Dear Members of the US Senate and House of Representatives,
On July 1, Mexicans will go to the polls to elect a new president, both houses of Congress, and thousands of local and state officials. As scholars and representatives of civil society organizations that focus on Mexico, we are concerned about the serious challenges surrounding these elections. We are also concerned about the potentially negative role that the US government may play in light of recent comments from this administration and a mixed track record when it comes to supporting democracy in Mexico and other countries in the hemisphere.
It is important that Mexico, one of the US’s closest allies and trading partners, has a vibrant democracy, one in which citizens can freely and fairly exercise their right to vote, without restrictions or outside interference. We therefore respectfully call on you and your congressional colleagues to do everything in your power to ensure that US government policy with regard to Mexico’s elections remains neutral and supportive of basic democratic norms.
Mexico has a troubling, checkered record when it comes to elections, with frequent reports of major irregularities, vote buying, and the manipulation of results. The 1988 and 2006 presidential elections were strongly denounced as fraudulent by both the political opposition and independent civil society groups. The legitimacy of the most recent presidential elections, in 2012, has also been called into question due to revelations of illegal funding, vast vote-buying schemes, and the lack of independence of official electoral institutions and much of the broadcast media.
The recent 2017 regional elections in Mexico State and Coahuila demonstrated that unfair and fraudulent electoral practices remain a major problem today. In both these elections, there were credible allegations regarding the illegal use of public and private funds in the campaigns of the winning candidates (both belonging to the party of the sitting national government), numerous serious reports of vote buying, reports of attacks and intimidation targeting opposition campaigns, and widespread doubts about the fairness of the vote counting itself.
We are also concerned by recent developments that undermine basic civil liberties, such as freedom of association, freedom of speech, and the right to peaceful protest, all of which are a prerequisite to a healthy electoral climate. Among other things, reports have emerged indicating that the Mexican government has been involved in spying on opposition activists through the use of “Pegasus” software, and has engaged in covering up the role of security forces in the 2014 mass disappearance of 43 students from Ayotzinapa, Guerrero. The government also has recently approved a new Internal Security Law that gives the armed forces a greater role in policing, causing many to fear that these forces could be used to suppress legitimate political opposition and social protest.
At the same time, there is growing discontent in Mexico with increasing levels of corruption and violence. Last year, four former state governors were arrested on charges of corruption. Mexico scored at the bottom of Transparency International’s index of perceived public sector corruption, with 61 percent of those polled affirming that the level of corruption had increased. Violent crimes have also risen, with 2017 being the worst year on record in terms of the number of homicides that Mexico has experienced. As in the case of the 43 disappeared of Ayotzinapa, frequent and credible allegations of state security agents’ involvement in disappearances and homicides are rarely investigated.
These and other serious problems currently plaguing Mexico can only be resolved by Mexicans. But for Mexicans to be able to effectively and collectively tackle these issues, they need to have institutions and public officials that they can rely on and believe in. Clean and fair elections are essential to achieving this.
In this context, it is imperative for the US government to support a fair and democratic electoral process in Mexico, and avoid premature statements or actions that could lend legitimacy to elections that are strongly contested on the basis of credible reports of fraud.
Unfortunately, US administrations have at times adopted unhelpful positions with regard to elections in Mexico and other countries in the region.
In last year’s elections in Honduras, the US government was quick to recognize and support elections that raised serious doubts, both within Honduras and internationally. The same occurred after the Mexican presidential elections of 1988 and 2006. Such positions embolden entrenched political actors to carry out further fraudulent and unfair electoral practices. Such a scenario should not repeat itself in the upcoming elections in Mexico.
We urge you and your colleagues to make every effort to ensure that the US supports Mexican democracy by insisting on the strict adherence to fair electoral practices and compliance with laws by supporting the peaceful transition of power, and by publicly condemning any electoral irregularities or human rights violations. The US government should maintain the utmost respect for Mexican national sovereignty and the popular vote and express its commitment to building a strong relationship with any new Mexican administration.
We also encourage you to closely monitor the selection of the next United States ambassador to Mexico, subsequent to the departure of current ambassador Roberta Jacobson on May 1st, so as to ensure that he or she is equipped with the necessary experience and diplomatic skills to effectively navigate the complex and critical bilateral relationship.
Many Mexican and international electoral monitors, including many signers of this letter, will be on the ground in Mexico providing independent reports and evaluation of the elections. We will keep you posted on these monitoring efforts, and look forward to sharing key observations with you before, during, and following the July 1 electoral process.
Sincerely,
*Affiliation for identity purposes only
Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera, Associate Professor, Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University
Laura Carlsen, Director, Americas Program, Center for International Policy
Christy Thornton, Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins University
Tony Payan, Fellow and Director, Baker Institute Mexico Center, Rice University
Gilbert Joseph, Farnam Professor of History and International Studies, Yale University
Mary Kay Vaughan, Professor Emerita, University of Maryland, College Park
Horacio Larreguy Arbesu, Associate Professor of Government, Harvard University
Jonathan Fox, Professor, American University
Robert A. Blecker, Professor of Economics, American University
Maureen Meyer, Director for Mexico and Migrant Rights, Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA)
Vanessa Freije, Assistant Professor, University of Washington
Ted Lewis, Human Rights Director, Global Exchange
Manuel Pérez-Rocha, Associate Fellow, Institute for Policy Studies
Karin Alejandra Rosemblatt, Associate Professor of History, University of Maryland
Alexander Aviña, Associate Professor of History, School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Arizona State University
David Shirk, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of San Diego
Lisa VeneKlasen, Executive Director, JASS (Just Associates)
Salih Booker, Executive Director, Center for International Policy (CIP)
Margaret Chowning, Professor of History, University of California Berkeley
José Antonio Lucero, Associate Professor of International Studies, University of Washington
Christopher Boyer, Professor, University of Illinois – Chicago
Renata Keller, Assistant Professor, University of Nevada, Reno
John Lindsay-Poland, Coordinator, Project to Stop US Arms to Mexico
Vicki Gass, Senior Policy Advisor for Central America & Mexico, Oxfam
Stephen Morris, Professor, Dept of Political Science and International Relations, Middle Tennessee State University
Paul Gillingham, Director of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Associate Professor of History, Northwestern University
Kevin P. Gallagher, Director, Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, USA
Louise Walker, Associate Professor of History, Northeastern University
John M. Ackerman, Law Professor, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)
James Cohen, Professor, North American Studies, University of Paris 3-Sorbonne Nouvelle
Alexander Main, Senior Associate for International Policy, Center for Economic and Policy
Research
Jocelyn Olcott, Associate Professor of History, Duke University
Tanalís Padilla, Associate Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Daniella Burgi-Palomino, Senior Associate, Latin America Working Group
William I. Robinson, Professor of Sociology and Global and International Studies, University of California-Santa Barbara
Greg Grandin, Professor of History, New York University
Yolanda Zorayda Avila Toledo, Leadership and Capacity Building Manager, Alianza Americas
Mark Weisbrot, Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research
Geoff Thale, Vice President for Programs, Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA)
David Montejano, Professor Emeritus of Comparative Ethnic Studies, University of California at Berkeley
Carla Garcia Zendejas, Director People, Land and Resources Program, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
Dan La Botz, Murphy Institute, City University of New York
Casey Marina Lurtz, Assistant Professor of History, Johns Hopkins University
Ericka Beckman, Associate Professor of Romance Languages, University of Pennsylvania
James E. Sanders, Professor of History, Utah State University
Barbara Weinstein, Professor of History, New York University
Raymond Craib, Professor of History and Director, Latin American Studies Program, Cornell University
Amy Offner, Assistant Professor of History, University of Pennsylvania
Luis Herran Avila, Visiting Assistant Professor of History, Carleton College
Laura G. Gutiérrez, Associate Professor of Mexican American and Latina/o Studies, The
University of Texas at Austin
Ginapaolo Baiocchi, Associate Professor and Director, Urban Democracy Lab, New York University
Pamela Voekel, Associate Professor of History, Dartmouth College
Sinclair Thomson, Associate Professor of History, New York University
Matthew Vitz, Assistant Professor of History, University of California, San Diego
Susan Gauss, Associate Professor, Latin American and Iberian Studies, University of Massachusetts, Boston
Alejandro Velasco, Associate Professor, Gallatin School, New York University
Robert A. Karl, Assistant Professor of History, Princeton University
María Josefina Saldaña-Portillo, Professor of Social & Cultural Analysis, New York University
Gerardo Renique, Associate Professor, City College of New York
Adam Goodman, Assistant Professor of History, University of Illinois at Chicago
Aurelia Gómez Unamuno, Assistant Professor of Spanish, Haverford College
George Ciccariello-Maher, Visiting Scholar, Hemispheric Institute of Performance and Politics
Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University
Judith Aissen, Professor Emerita of Linguistics, UC Santa Cruz
Miguel Tinker Salas, Professor, Pomona College
Benjamin H. Johnson, Associate Professor, Loyola University Chicago
Susan Rose-Ackerman, Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale University
Gareth Williams, Professor, University of Michigan
Victor Silverman, Professor, Pomona College
Guadalupe Bacio, Assistant Professor, Pomona College
Gilda Ochoa, Professor of Chicana/o-Latina/o Studies, Pomona College
Guillermo Delgado-P., Anthropologist, Univ of California Santa Cruz
James M. Cypher, Professor of Economics, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas and California State University (Emeritus)
Ivonne del Valle, Associate Professor, U.C. Berkeley
Bradley Levinson, Professor of Education, Indiana University
Domenico Romero, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Queens College, City University of New York
Kirsten Weld, John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Social Sciences, Harvard University
Rodrigo Aguilar Benignos, CEO, Wiljan Consulting LLC
Susanne Jonas, Retired, University of California, Santa Cruz
Noam Chomsky, Professor (emeritus) MIT, Laureate Professor U. of Arizona, U. of Arizona
Veronica Montes, Assistant Professor, Bryn Mawr College
Lorrin Thomas, Professor, Rutgers University
Alexander Dawson, Associate Professor of History, SUNY Albany
Patricia Escamilla Hamm, Associate Professor, Independent Scholar/formerly at William J Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies, National Defense University
Valentina Melgar Bermúdez, Project Coordinator, University and Citizen Network for Democracy (“RUCD”), Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Francisco de Vitoria OP. A.C.
Carolyn Gallaher, Associate Professor, American University
Yann P. Kerevel, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Louisiana State University
Xóchitl Bada, Associate Professor of Latin American and Latino Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago
Neil Harvey, Professor, New Mexico State University
Dana Frank, Professor of History, University of California, Santa Cruz
Norma Klahn, Professor of Latin American Literary and Cultural Studies, U of CA, Santa Cruz
Armando Navarro, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Riverside
Nora Haenn, Associate Professor, North Carolina State University
Maria Anna Gonzales, Retired Public Policy Researcher, University of California, Riverside
Enrique C. Ochoa, Professor of Latin American Studies and History, California State University, Los Angeles
Estelle Tarica, Associate Professor, University of California, Berkeley
Suyapa Portillo, Assistant Professor, Pitzer College
Fernando Herrera Calderón, Associate Professor of History, University of Northern Iowa
Janice Gallagher, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Rutgers University-Newark
Karen Hansen-Kuhn, Director of Trade and Global Governance, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
Francisco Lara-Valencia, Associate Professor, Arizona State University
Corinna Zeltsman. Assistant Professor of History, Georgia Southern University
Heather Vrana, Assistant Professor of History, University of Florida
Ana Claudia Zubieta, Program Director, The Ohio State University
Chris Tilly, Professor of Urban Planning and Sociology, UCLA
Gladys McCormick, Associate Professor, History, Syracuse University
María L. Olin Muñoz, Associate Professor of History, Susquehanna University
Maria Rosa Garcia, Professor, CSUN
Rachel Nolan, Doctoral Candidate, New York University
Claudia Lucero, Executive Director, Chicago Religious Leadership Network on Latin America – CRLN
James Chaney, Professor, Middle Tennessee State University
Diana Schwartz Francisco, Andrew W. Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in Latin American Studies, Wesleyan University
María José Zubieta, Professor, New York University
Stephen Allen, Assistant Professor, California State University, Bakersfield
Rebecca Watts, Program Associate, Center for Economic and Policy Research
Rebellions from below challenged both capitalism and Soviet bureaucracy – and these revolts combined with crises in the institutions of domination to produce competing visions and strategies for ‘modernisation: ‘Democracy-driven change’ versus ‘market-led politics.’
Importantly, the rebellions of ’68 and the following decade were about more than protesting the established order and or even building counter-power. The goal was to transform and even eliminate power inequalities altogether.
In general, the ‘new’ left influenced by social movements moved away from the Cold War’s market-state binaries, in which the central strategic goal was to ‘seize’ or ‘win’ power, towards direct and immediate work to create feasible alternatives.
The cultural breaks of ‘68 rarely found institutional expression, let alone the ability to drive institutional change. Exceptions prove the rule: Tony Benn’s support for workers’ control, or at least effective participation in public industries, in the UK, and the experience of Ken Livingstone’s Greater London Council (sometimes described as ‘68ers in office’).
Decentralised initiative combined with networked coordination could also describe the social relations enabled by new digital technologies. The counterculture of ’68, in fact, played an interesting role in preparing the way for the cyberculture of the 21st century.
50 years since the Free Speech Movement in Berkeley, an iconic direct action of ’68, they are acting on the belief of one of its activists, the late Mario Savo, who stressed individual responsibility in the context of a social movement for freedom.
Countering the messaging emanating from the National Rifle Association’s convention across the street, a student-organized protest took place in Dallas on Saturday to denounce the powerful lobbying group’s “
