Muslims roundly condemn London attack

0

British Muslims have joined other authorities including Prime Minister David Cameron in condemning the Å“sickening” Woolwich murder, local media reported.

David Cameron described the shocking bloody slaughter of a soldier in Woolwich as Å“the most appalling crime” as he abandoned a trip to Paris to fly back to London to chair a meeting of the Governmentâ„¢s COBRA emergency committee this morning.

Å“People in every community will utterly condemn this attack”, he said.

Meanwhile, the Muslim Council of Britain said its thoughts were with the victimâ„¢s family following the Å“truly barbaric act”.

Å“Muslims have long proudly served in this countryâ„¢s Armed Forces. This attack is dishonourable and no cause justifies it”, a spokesman said.

Suhra Ahmed, of the Islamic Society of Britain, said: Å“This is a horrific, unforgivable attack, the kind that should be purged from our society.”

A Muslim baker who lives near the scene of the killing was first to lay flowers there.

Ahmed Jama, 26, said: œScreaming ˜Allah-hu-Akbar™ and killing innocent people is nothing to do with Islam.

Home Secretary Theresa May also called the killing Å“sickening and barbaric”, describing it as Å“an attack on everyone in the United Kingdom”.

And Londonâ„¢s Mayor Boris Johnson said it was a Å“sickening, deluded and unforgivable act of violence”.

Britain is witnessing an increase in hate crimes against Muslims following an attack in London, in which the soldier was reportedly beheaded by two assailants.

One of the attackers went on video to explain the crime – shouting political statements, gesturing with bloodied hands and waving a meat cleaver.

Police shot and wounded the unidentified assailants and took them into custody.

MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

UK’s colonial past a possible factor in brutal Woolwich killing

0

The Woolwich attack in the UK has already been branded as the latest manifestation of global Islamist terrorism. However, it has also been suggested the attack was backlash for the UK’s history of colonialism and intervention in the Middle East.

The UK government has branded the brutal attack on a soldier in
Woolwich, East London, as a “sickening and barbaric” act of
terrorism, although the terror allegation has not been officially
confirmed. In video footage of the incident, the two assailants
yell “God is greatest” in Arabic as they attempt to
decapitate their victim.

When police arrived on the scene they reportedly opened fire and
injured the two suspects, who subsequently spent the night under
arrest in hospital. Speculation over the motivation behind the
unprecedented attack is rife in UK media, with the press drawing
parallels to a foiled 2007 plot to kidnap and decapitate a soldier
in Birmingham.

Citing police sources, Reuters reported on Thursday morning that
officers were examining possible links to Nigeria in the attack.
Nigeria was a British colony for over a century before gaining
independence in 1960. The UK now has a large Nigerian immigrant
population numbering 174,000, according to the Office for National
Statistics.

The colonial factor

Brian Becker from anti-war coalition ANSWER told RT that the
UK’s neo-colonial approach to the Middle East, along with its NATO
and US alliance, was leading to an “escalating cycle of
violence.”

“The British colonial past and its current legacy of
intervention and war is undoubtedly a factor,”
Becker said.

“The British government joined George W. Bush in the invasion
of Iraq and supported the war in Afghanistan.”
UK politician
George Galloway also intimated that the attack could have been a
consequence of British actions abroad, drawing a parallel with
Syria:

“This sickening atrocity in London is exactly what we are
paying the same kind of people to do in Syria.”
But Defense
Consultant Moeen Raoof told RT that the nature of the attack was
“bizarre,” and did not bear the hallmarks of Al-Qaeda.

“If this were an Al-Qaeda act they would have attacked many
more targets,”
Raoof said, describing the attack as more
“opportunistic” than premeditated. Raoof added that UK
soldiers were guilty of similar “appalling acts of murder,”
and are “returning to the UK without any
consequences.”

The UK government has stepped up security around the capital in
the aftermath of the attack, and Prime Minister David Cameron has
called an emergency meeting with top politicians and security
officials to discuss the atrocity.

Terror stereotypes

In 2008, the Guardian obtained a copy of an MI5 internal
research document on terror suspects that, based on numerous
studies, concluded it was difficult to identify those who might be
involved in terrorism in the UK.

The study’s results “challenge many of the stereotypes that
are held about who becomes a terrorist and why,”
the Guardian
said.

According to the assessment, terror suspects are “a diverse
collection of individuals, fitting no single demographic profile,
nor do they all follow a typical pathway to violent extremism.”

These include individuals from Pakistani, Middle Eastern and
Caucasian backgrounds.

The research revealed that roughly half of terror suspects were
born in the UK, and a majority of the other half is in the country
legally. Most of those involved in terrorism were males, with the
majority becoming radicalized in their early- to mid-20s. A large
number of those involved in terrorism did not practice Islam on
regular basis. Cases have also revealed supects being involved in
drug and alcohol consumption, and soliciting prostitutes.

MI5 added that there is evidence that a well-established
religious identity makes individuals less inclined towards violent
extremism.

Hundreds of UK men continue to travel abroad to places like
Syria and Somalia to join anti-government and terrorist-linked
organizations. Britons are allegedly involved with the Al-Nusra
Front in Syria, as well as Al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Shabaab in
Somalia.

Police officers man a cordoned off area in Woolwich, east London, on May 22, 2013, following an incident in which a man was killed and two others seriously injured (AFP Photo / Leon Neal)

This article originally appeared on : RT

Obama to justify terror drone hits

0

US President Barack Obama plans to justify assassination drone strikes as ‘necessary, legal and just’ in a major speech on Thursday, May 23, 2013.

US President Barack Obama plans to firmly defend the use of terror drones and targeted killing policy as Å“legal and just” and announce a new bid to transfer long-held Guantanamo captives back to their native lands.

In a much anticipated speech later on Thursday at a military college in Washington DC, Obama will further discuss plans to Å“restrict” the use of assassination drones and shifting their control from the CIA spy agency to the US military, The New York Times reports Thursday, citing Ëœa White House officialâ„¢ with knowledge about his upcoming speech.

Å“[He] will discuss why the use of [assassination] drone strikes is necessary, legal and just, while addressing the various issues raised by our use of targeted [killing] action,” the official was quoted in the report as saying.

While Obama will try to Å“reject” the notion of an endless US war with Å“terrorists,” the report says, he does not appear to think the end is anywhere near since Å“he is also institutionalizing procedures for [terror] drone strikes.”

This is while a top Pentagon official testified before a US congressional panel last week that the American so-called Å“war on terror” will likely continue for the next Å“10 to 20 years.”

The development comes as US Attorney General Eric Holder admitted for the first time on Wednesday that four American citizens were killed by US assassination drone strikes, defending the move as consistent with American law.

Critics of the secret policy, which has widely been condemned as a violation of international law, were not convinced.

Å“The Obama administration continues to claim authority to kill virtually anyone anywhere in the world under the Ëœglobal battlefieldâ„¢ legal theory and a radical redefinition of the concept of imminence,” said Amnesty Internationalâ„¢s Zeke Johnson as quoted in the report.

Å“President Obama should reject these concepts in his speech tomorrow and commit to upholding human rights, not just in word but in deed,” Johnson added.

According to the report, Obama will also use his Thursday speech to renew efforts Å“to close the [military] prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba” with a fresh push Å“to transfer detainees to home countries and lift the ban on sending some back to Yemen.”

The daily further notes that Obama will Å“reappoint a high-level State Department official to oversee the effort to reduce the prison population.”

Nearly 130 of the 166 captives held at the notorious Guantanamo detention and torture facility are currently on hunger strike, protesting abusive treatment by prison guards and their indefinite detention without charges or legal trials.

Most of the Guantanamo inmates have been picked up by American military forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the aftermath of the US-led occupation of Afghanistan under the pretext of removing the Saudi- and Pakistani-backed Taliban regime and bringing stability to the country.

MFB/MFB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Bombs hit French-run plant in Niger

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Two bomb attacks have hit a French-run nuclear plant and a military barracks in northern Niger, with immediate reports indicating that several people have been wounded in the attacks.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

British Muslims decry London attack

0

Britain is witnessing an increase in hate crimes against Muslims following an attack in London, in which a soldier was reportedly beheaded by two assailants.

Two men have been arrested after separate attacks on mosques following the terrorist incident in Woolwich, southeast London, police and local media reported.

According to police a 43-year-old man is in custody on suspicion of attempted arson after walking into a mosque with a knife in Braintree, Essex.

“Local mosque in Braintree attacked by man with knives and incendiary device. Man arrested. No one injured”, tweeted local MP Brooks Newmark.

A spokesman for Essex Police confirmed a 43-year-old from Braintree had been arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon and attempted arson after the incident in Silks Way at 7.15pm on Wednesday.

The spokesman added that police were investigating the “full circumstances” and said “it would not be appropriate to speculate at this time”.

Meanwhile, police in Kent were called to reports of criminal damage at a mosque in Canterbury Street, Gillingham, at 8.40pm local time.

A spokesman said a man is in custody on suspicion of racially-aggravated criminal damage. The force has stepped up the police presence after a man was butchered in broad daylight on the streets of London.

Supporters of the extremist English Defence League (EDL) gathered at Woolwich Arsenal train station near the scene and threw bottles at police.

EDL leader Tommy Robinson, who was among a group of around 250 men, said: “They’re chopping our soldiers’ heads off. This is Islam. That’s what we’ve seen today.”

The secretary of the mosque in Braintree, Sikander Saleemy, told Channel 4 News that he felt like it was a “revenge attack”.

“The police said it’s too early to try and link it to what happened in Woolwich, but those of us who were here feel that it was some sort of revenge attack. It was clear from the man’s behaviour”, said Saleemy.

“We absolutely condemn what happened in Woolwich, but it had nothing to do with us. It was an appalling act of terror – but it wasn’t “Islamic” in any way. I wish it wasn’t described like that, because sadly people will now start to blame Muslims”, he added.

Britainâ„¢s Muslim Council also condemned the soldier’s killing, calling it a barbaric act which has no basis in Islam.

According to a security source, the delay in the armed police response was “particularly surprising” because there is a heavily armed police presence at Woolwich Crown Court, which is just two and a half miles away.

MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Tripoli clashes death toll hits 14

0

Lebanese soldiers are deployed in the city of Tripoli, where there have been clashes between supporters and opponents of the Syrian government, May 21, 2013.

The death toll from recent clashes between supporters and opponents of the Syrian government in the Lebanese city of Tripoli has risen to 14.

A Lebanese security source said Å“very violent fighting took place last night” that killed six people. The number brought the death toll to 14.

The source stated that 40 people were also injured. Å“The clashes and shelling affected several areas of the city, including the centre.”

The clashes erupted between the two groups in two major districts of Bab al-Tibbaneh and Jabal Mohsen in Lebanonâ„¢s second largest city on May 19. More than 100 others have also been wounded.

Reports say two Lebanese soldiers were among the dead.

The Lebanese army intervened to break up the clashes on May 21.

Many homes have been damaged due to the unrest in the two neighborhoods.

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati issued a statement on Wednesday saying that the army had full authority to take the necessary measures to put an end to the clashes.

The violence escalated after ceasefire talks between the two sides failed.

Lebanese President Michel Suleiman also held a high-level meeting on May 21 to discuss the security situation in Tripoli, which has been the scene of fierce clashes between the two groups since the beginning of the turmoil in Syria in March 2011.

MSH/HSN

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘World welcomes Syria confab in Tehran’

0

Officials and representatives from over 30 countries pose for a photo during a day-long international consultative meeting on Syria, Tehran, August, 2012.

Iranâ„¢s Permanent Mission to the UN says the international community welcomes the upcoming Friends of Syria meeting due in the Iranian capital Tehran, which shows the global willingness to peacefully resolve the crisis in Syria.

Å“The interest shown by a considerable number of countries and international organizations to attend the meeting shows the growing international resolve to peacefully settle the crisis [in Syria] and the Islamic Republic of Iranâ„¢s increasing role in the peaceful approach,” the mission said in a statement on Thursday.

Tehran plans to host the Friends of Syria Conference under the banner of Å“Political Solution, Regional Stability” on May 29.

Å“The Islamic Republic of Iran believes that the upcoming meeting in Tehran can boost consultations and coordination among the real friends of Syria in order to help the [Arab] country overcome the ongoing crisis, and we hope that the conference will succeed in finding a practical solution to the Syrian issue,” the mission said.

The mission added that Iran has always made efforts to play a leading role in settling the crisis in Syria through peaceful means, and as an influential country in the region, the Islamic Republic has so far presented viable plans in this regard.

Syria has been experiencing unrest since March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security forces, have been killed in the turmoil.

Tehran held two meetings on Syria and has been an active member of a contact group, proposed by Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in 2012, comprising Iran, Egypt, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, it noted.

Iran hosted a two-day meeting attended by the representatives of the Syrian government and opposition groups in November 2012, with the participants unanimously opposing foreign interference and calling for a peaceful settlement of the conflict in the Arab country.

High-ranking officials from different countries including Russia, China, Iraq, Egypt, etc. participated in the meeting with the main theme of Å“No to Violence, Yes to Democracy.”

A day-long international consultative meeting on Syria was also held in Tehran, where the participants underlined the need for the resolution of the unrest in the Arab country based on international regulations, non-interference and respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of countries.

The statement by the Iranian mission further said that Iran has criticized measures by the countries that interfere in Syriaâ„¢s internal affairs, and support the extremists in Syria.

It noted that instead of transferring weapons to Syria, Iran dispatches food, medicine and fuel to the Arab country to improve living conditions in the crisis-stricken country.

Iran has repeatedly voiced its opposition to any foreign interference in Syria’s internal affairs, calling for inclusive dialog and national reconciliation as well as free elections as the keys to the settlement of the crisis in the country.

The Syrian government says that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

Damascus says the West and its regional allies, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, are supporting the militants.

SF/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Qatari princess slams Doha over Syria

0

The daughter of Qatari ruler Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani has censured Dohaâ„¢s support for the militants in Syria.

In a message she posted on Twitter, Sheikha Hind bint Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani stated that the backing of the militants was a Ëœscandal in the history of Qatar.â„¢

She also denounced the atrocities committed by the militants and said the armed groups had committed crimes against the Syrian people – an apparent reference to a gruesome video recently published on the Internet.

The video shows a cannibal militant in Syria cutting out the heart of a Syrian soldier and biting into it.

The Qatari princess also slammed the intervention of militants from Saudi Arabia in Syria and their Ëœexecution of Syrian citizens.â„¢

Turmoil has gripped Syria since March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian security forces, have been killed in the unrest.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said on May 18 that militants from 29 different countries were fighting against the government in different parts of the country.

In January, Prince Turki al-Faisal, former Saudi spy chief, called for sending heavy weaponry to the militants in Syria.

MR/HSN

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Market Buzz: Stocks down on Fed news, China’s flash PMI indicates contraction

0

Russian stocks started Thursday in the red following news yesterday from the US that the Fed has not yet come to a consensus on ending its stimulus program. Weak Chinese PMI data also contributed to the decline.

On Wednesday, Russian stocks ended the trading session with
significant gains after Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke’s
testimony. By the end of the day on May 22, Russia’s MICEX had
added 1.79 percent to close at 1448.42 and the RTS advanced 2.02
percent to 1461.93.

Wednesday’s main financial news was Bernank’s indication during
a Q&A that the US central bank could begin phasing out its $85
billion-per-month bond-buying program at one of its “next few
meetings.”

However, later in the session the Fed released minutes from the
May FOMC meeting that were less optimistic: There is not yet a firm
consensus on when to begin drawing down the stimulus program. The
decision will likely be significantly influenced by the trajectory
of the economy in the coming months.

The news spooked US investors, with major indices reacting
immediately and posting steep losses throughout the day. The Dow
Jones Industrial Average fell 0.52 percent to 15,307, the S&P
500 slipped 0.83 percent to 1,655 and the tech-centric Nasdaq
dropped by 1.11 percent to 3,463.

US home sales saw a moderate uptick in April, but failed to meet
the forecasted 4.98 million. On Thursday, the US will publish its
weekly report on initial jobless claims and official data on new
home sales.

European stocks closed higher on Wednesday after Bernanke spoke
of the Fed’s intention to “maintain highly accommodative
monetary policy as long as needed.” The UK’s FTSE 100 rose
0.53 percent to 6,840.27 — a 13-year high — while in Germany the
DAX 30 set a new record, climbing 0.69 percent to 8,530.89 points.
In Paris, the CAC 40 rose 0.37 percent to 4,051.11, a two-year
high.

On Thursday, European Central Bank President Mario Draghi will
make a hotly anticipated speech in London. Draghi is expected to
comment on further ECB cuts and potential negative deposit
rates.

Also on Thursday, the Eurozone, Germany and France will each
release preliminary data on manufacturing and service sector
activity, and Spain will hold 10-year government bonds auction. The
UK will release official data on retail sales, revised data on Q1
economic growth and a report on business investment.

Stocks in Asia have mostly declined on Thursday after China
released weak flash PMI data. The flash HSBC Purchasing Managers’
Index for May fell to 49.6, sliding below the 50-point mark
demarcating expansion and contraction for the first since October.
Investors fear that the economic recovery in the world’s
second-biggest economy may have stalled.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 index has fallen 2.4 percent to 15,256.56,
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng is down 1.6 percent to 22,879.74, South
Korea’s Kospi lost 0.7 percent to 1,980.42 and Australia’s
S&P/ASX 200 dropped 1.7 percent to 5,081.40. Benchmarks in
Singapore, Thailand and Taiwan also fell.

Oil is continuing its downward slide, with Brent losing 0.9
percent to trade at $101.6 and WTI down 1.1 percent to $93.4.

This article originally appeared on : RT

US House cmte. adopts new anti-Iran act

0

A US congressional panel has adopted a new measure to tighten the countryâ„¢s illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran over its nuclear energy program.

The US House Committee on Foreign Affairs on Wednesday passed an anti-Iran act that targets the countryâ„¢s auto and mining industries as well as its foreign currency reserves.

The act allows the US president to subject other Iranian industries, such as engineering, to similar restrictions.

The new US measure focuses on Iran’s finance and energy sectors, in particular its oil exports.

The sanctions would also punish any foreign institution that serves as an intermediary in facilitating currency conversions for Iran.

The bill needs to be approved by the full House and then the Senate and should be signed by US President Barack Obama in order to become law.

The United States, Israel and some of their allies have repeatedly accused Iran of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program. Over the false allegation, Washington and the European Union have imposed a series of illegal unilateral sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Iran refutes the allegation over its nuclear energy program and argues that as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it is entitled to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

In addition, the IAEA has conducted numerous inspections of Iran’s nuclear facilities but has never found any evidence showing that Iran’s civilian nuclear program has been diverted to nuclear weapons production.

AR/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Why Has Humanity Always Fantasized About the Capture and Rape of Women?

0

Photo Credit: Peter Paul Rubens, “Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus”

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

If you think about it, a woman carried off against her will is one of the most popular stories in human history. Whether she’s forced to marry, sexually violated, or otherwise tormented, the female captive pops up in Persian tales, Arthurian legends, and the great epics of India. She’s a staple of every art form and cultural product, from the paintings of great masters to true crime stories, from sonnets to soap operas. She’s woven into explanations of imperial origins: the Romans became the Romans because they snatched women from a neighboring tribe in a celebrated event known as the Rape of the Sabines. Biblical stories of captured women are so commonplace that the Lord issues helpful instructions on how to do the thing correctly, which include shaving the captive’s head, and if she fails to please you, properly disposing of her after she has been “dishonored.” ( Deuteronomy 21:10-14).

Myths overflow with women abducted and raped (the two terms have an ancient linkage): Persephone is carried off by Hades, Europa by Zeus, and Helen by Paris, which sets off the Trojan War. The romance would not be the romance, nor the novel the novel, without the long tradition of captive women in everything from the legendary medieval romance Apollonius of Tyre, to the grotesqueries of the Marquis de Sade, right on down to Stieg Larsson’s pop culture sensation, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (original title: Men Who Hate Women).

How do we explain this persistence? First, there’s the ancient notion of a maiden taken for the purpose of bringing “new blood” to the tribe — what anthropologists call “ exogamy.” This idea, usually expressed in a rape or a violent raid, gets sanitized and elevated in originary cultural narratives like the story of the Virgin Mary, whose divine impregnation (which she didn’t appear to choose), transforms her into the mother of the Christian religion.

Sometimes the captive woman expresses dramatic tensions, and even attractions, between men, as in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, where the capture and violation of a female creates a fraught male triangle. Other times captive women express economic and political conflicts between large groups. In Europe, popular stories of women abducted into Oriental harems (often featured in erotica) were brought over by settlers to America, where they gave way to tales of white people — often young women — taken captive by Indians (Western movies like The Searchers carried on this tradition). The visual titillation provided by captive women, a favorite theme of great European painters like Rubens and Titian, became a cinematic staple of schlocky slasher films, where young girls are abducted and terrorized until a “rescue” releases the audience from any collective feelings of guilt about watching women chopped into confetti.

The horror doesn’t end with the story. Captivity tales have a disturbing way of floating between fantasy and enactment. The key modern captivity novel, John Fowles’ The Collector, centers on a lonely clerk who collects butterflies until he kidnaps the object of his romantic obsession and locks her in the cellar. The novel inspired countless imitations in literature and film. It was also cited as the real-life inspiration for not one but three different American serial killers, one of whom, Leonard Lake, actually named his kidnapping and killing spree “Operation Miranda” after the victim in Fowles’ book.

In the porn industry, the capture, degradation and torture of females constitutes an entire subgenre. Women are hogtied, gang-banged, and locked away in dungeons. The captured and raped schoolgirl is a favorite theme of Japanese erotic hentai cartoons and video games. Monster porn adds the spectacle of tentacled aliens and horned devils delivering the torture.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

10 Common Ideas About Sex — That May Be Totally Wrong

0

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

We all think we know things we don’t, but when it comes to sex being fuzzy can be sticky. It’s harmless enough to think, say, that green M&Ms make you horny, but if you didn’t realize you had to take the birth control pill every day, misconceptions could lead to conceptions. So, are you ready for a sexual pop quiz? Here are 10 ideas about sex and the reasons they are true or false. Because you don’t always know what you think you know. Ya know?

1. True or false: Women lose interest in sex as they age.

There are myths we project onto others and myths we project onto ourselves. I assumed that my interest in sex would wane over the years whether I wanted it to or not, but during an evening of girl talk about the weird effects of perimenopause, this phrase came up: “Nobody ever told me about the horniness.”

I remember, because I was the one who said it.

I thought for a while that my hormones were ready to go off to an assisted living facility in Fort Lauderdale, but no: they go in and out of retirement like Michael Jordan (and they, too, want to take up new sports). Which just goes to show you that while it’s true that sex drives change periodically throughout our lives, it’s not true that interest in sex has some absolute cut-off point.

Sexuality and U, the website for the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, says that after menopause arousal does take longer, lubrication is not as easy and hormonal fluctuations may alter desire, but that doesn’t mean it will vamoose altogether. Some women have an increased interest because they’re unburdened by fear of pregnancy or having young kids to take care of. Our Bodies, Ourselves says the quality of relationships also plays a part in our later-life interest in sex as do some medications. So the bottom line is, it depends on the woman and her situation.

I know…you were looking forward to letting yourself go. Me too. Now I think I’ll still be flirting and asking “How’s my hair?” when I have more wrinkles than an Agatha Christie plot.

2. True or false: If you have heart trouble you should stop having sex.

Well, as luck would have it giving up sex isn’t necessary if you’ve had heart trouble. From ThirdAge.com: “Dr. Dawn Harper explains, “People with heart disease should be able to lead a completely normal sex life. Even people who’ve had a heart attack can normally resume their sex lives within two or three weeks unless there are complications. However, if you suffer from chest pain during sex, you should stop immediately and see your doctor.”

The American Heart Association has a list of tips, most of which involve checking with your doctor and some of which include specifics on erectile dysfunction, estrogen and recovery from heart failure. Of course, you want the green light from your own doctor, but you also don’t necessarily have to give up something that helps make life worth living.

Also that fabulous plot device of guys having heart attacks in the arms of their mistresses turns out not to be not-so-likely in real life. From the AHA: “Cardiovascular events – such as heart attacks or chest pain caused by heart disease – rarely occur during sexual activity, because sexual activity is usually for a short time.”

Dang it. That’s how I was planning to go.

3. True or false: You can orgasm, no direct stimulation required.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

How Our Massive Homeland Security Apparatus Does the Bidding of the Big Banks

0

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com/shalunts

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The following is the first in a series of articles extracted from a new report by CMD and DBA Press entitled “Dissent or Terror: How the Nation’s Counter Terrorism Apparatus, In Partnership With
 Corporate America, Turned on Occupy Wall Street.”

Following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, a nationwide “counter terrorism” apparatus emerged. Components of this apparatus include the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (U.S. DHS), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), ODNI’s “National Counterterrorism Center” (NCTC), and state/regional “fusion centers.”

“Fusion centers,” by and large, are staffed with personnel working in “counter terrorism”/ “homeland security” units of municipal, county, state, tribal and federal law enforcement/”public safety”/”counter terrorism” agencies. To a large degree, the “counter terrorism” operations of municipal, county, state and tribal agencies engaged in “fusion centers” are financed through a number of U.S. DHS grant programs.

Initially, “fusion centers” were intended to be intelligence sharing partnerships between municipal, county, state, tribal and federal law enforcement/”counter terrorism” agencies, dedicated solely to the dissemination/sharing of “terrorism”-related intelligence. However, shortly following the creation of “fusion centers,” their focus shifted from this exclusive interest in “terrorism,” to one of “all hazards” — an umbrella term used to describe virtually anything (including “terrorism”) that may be deemed a “hazard” to the public, or to certain private sector interests. And, as has been mandated through a series of federal legislative actions and presidential executive orders, “fusion centers” (and the “counter terrorism” entities that they are comprised of) work — in ever closer proximity — with private corporations, with the stated aim of protecting items deemed to be “critical infrastructure/key resources” (CI/KR, typically thought of as items such as power plants, dams or weapons manufacturing plants).

As detailed in a report from DBA Press and the Center for Media and Democracy (DBA/CMD), ” Dissent or Terror: How the Nation’s Counter Terrorism Apparatus, in Partnership with Corporate America, Turned on Occupy Wall Street,” through 2011 and 2012, “fusion centers” and other “counter terrorism” agencies engaged in widespread monitoring of Occupy Wall Street activists.

Records obtained by DBA/CMD indicate that, in some instances, these “counter terrorism” agencies worked in partnership with corporate interests to gather and disseminate intelligence relating to the activities of citizens engaged in the Occupy Wall Street movement. Ironically, records indicate that corporate entities engaged in such public-private intelligence sharing partnerships were often the very same corporate entities criticized, and protested against, by the Occupy Wall Street movement as having undue influence in the functions of public government.

This article examines the effects of such public-private intelligence sharing partnerships in Arizona, and how such partnerships benefited corporate interests that were subjects of Occupy Phoenix protest actions through 2011 and 2012.

Arizona Fusion Center Work on Behalf of Banks

In October of 2011, Jamie Dimon, president and CEO of J.P. Morgan Chase, had plans to travel to Phoenix for a “town hall” event with 2,000 of his employees at Chase Field (home of the Arizona Diamondbacks, located in downtown Phoenix). As Dimon is one of the most powerful men on Wall Street and the head of the largest bank in the country — a bank that played a key role in the collapse of the U.S. economy in 2008 — JP Morgan Chase Regional Security Manager Dan Grady contacted Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center personnel on October 17 (the day before Dimon’s scheduled visit), to ensure a smooth landing for Dimon in Phoenix.

The Arizona Counter Terrorism Information Center (ACTIC), commonly known as the “Arizona Fusion Center,” is comprised of personnel from such entities as the Arizona Department of Public Safety Intelligence Bureau, the Phoenix Police Department Homeland Defense Bureau, the Tempe Police Department Homeland Defense Unit, the Mesa Police Department Intelligence and Counter Terrorism Unit, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, the FBI Phoenix Joint Terrorism Task Force, the Transportation Security Administration, and the U.S. DHS offices of Infrastructure Protection and Intelligence and Analysis.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

The Secret Donors Behind the Center for American Progress and Other Think Tanks

0

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

This article first appeared in the Nation. For more great content, subscribe to the Nation here. 

The Center for American Progress, Washington’s leading liberal think tank, has been a big backer of the Energy Department’s $25 billion loan guarantee program for renewable energy projects. CAP has specifically praised First Solar, a firm that received $3.73 billion under the program, and its Antelope Valley project in California.

Last year, when First Solar was taking a beating from congressional Republicans and in the press over job layoffs and alleged political cronyism, CAP’s Richard Caperton praised Antelope Valley in his testimony to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, saying it headed up his list of “innovative projects” receiving loan guarantees. Earlier, Caperton and Steve Spinner–
a top Obama fundraiser who left his job at the Energy Department monitoring the issuance of loan guarantees and became a CAP senior fellow–had written an article cross-posted on CAP’s website and its Think Progress blog, stating that Antelope Valley represented “the cutting edge of the clean energy economy.”

Though the think tank didn’t disclose it, First Solar belonged to CAP’s Business Alliance, a secret group of corporate donors, according to internal lists obtained by The Nation. Meanwhile, José Villarreal–a consultant at the power-
house law and lobbying firm Akin Gump, who “provides strategic counseling on a range of legal and policy issues” for 
corporations–was on First Solar’s board until April 2012 while also sitting on the board of CAP, where he remains a member, according to the group’s latest tax filing.

CAP is a strong proponent of alternative energy, so there’s no reason to doubt the sincerity of its advocacy. But the fact that CAP has received financial support from First Solar while touting its virtues to Washington policy-makers points to a conflict of interest that, critics argue, ought to be disclosed to the public. CAP’s promotion of the company’s interests has supplemented First Solar’s aggressive Washington lobbying efforts, on which it spent more than $800,000 during 2011 and 2012.

“The only thing more damaging than disclosing your donors and having questions raised about the independence of your work is not disclosing them and have the information come to light and undermine your work,” says Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics. “The best practice, whether required by the IRS or not, is to disclose contributions.”

Nowadays, many Washington think tanks effectively serve as unregistered lobbyists for corporate donors, and companies strategically contribute to them just as they hire a PR or lobby shop or make campaign donations. And unlike lobbyists and elected officials, think tanks are not subject to financial disclosure requirements, so they reveal their donors only if they choose to. That makes it impossible for the public and lawmakers to know if a think tank is putting out an impartial study or one that’s been shaped by a donor’s political agenda. “If you’re a lobbyist, whatever you say is heavily discounted,” says Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University and an expert on political ethics. “If a think tank is saying it, it obviously sounds a lot better. Maybe think tanks aren’t aware of how useful that makes them to private interests. On the other hand, maybe it’s part of their revenue model.”

* * *

When Newt Gingrich was running for president, The Washington Post ran a story about the Center for Health Transformation, which it described as his “hybrid” single-issue think tank. The center, which subsequently went bankrupt and was bought by WellStar, published reports and advocated on behalf of donors–including lobbyists and industry groups that donated millions to support its work–in addition to offering perks like “direct Newt interaction.” While the center did disclose some of its donors, it didn’t reveal how much money they had contributed.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

America’s Newest Public Enemy No1: The Humble Pressure Cooker

0
When I went to the United States for the first time, long before 9/11, I wondered if immigration officials would harass me, a single young man from a turbulent part of the world. I didn’t have to worry. Customs officials and their formidable sniffing dogs were much more interested in middle-aged Indian women. They rifled through the contents of the bursting-at-the-seams suitcase of a lady who could have been my aunt. In those days the “illegal immigrant” America was most nervous about a forbidden mango or a sneaky parwal.

September 11 changed everything. Soon shoes were suspect. Cosmetic bags were viewed as booby traps. Even the clearest liquids and gels signalled danger in an America that was permanently colour-coded threat level orange. And men with beards and brown complexions and Muslim names found themselves regularly pulled aside for questioning.

Now after the Boston bombings we enter confront the newest marker of the dangerous other — beware the pressure cooker.

Talal al Rouki, a Saudi student in Michigan found the FBI suddenly surrounding his house. Officers said a woman had called them because she had seen him carrying a “bullet coloured” pressure cooker out of his apartment.

The young man told the FBI he was cooking a traditional rice dish called the kabsah which he was taking to a friend’s house.

“You need to be more careful moving around with such things, sir,” an FBI agent told al Rouki.

Indian mothers need to be more careful too in a jittery America. A Hawkins or Prestige pressure cooker has long been part of the must-have go-to-America-kit for any self-respecting desi student. The only question was how many liters — 2, 3, 5? I never took one with me when I went there, not because my mother was extraordinarily foresighted but because she was sure I’d make an absent-minded mess of it without her on-the-spot supervision.

However the hiss and whistle of a pressure cooker has always been the signature sound of apartment complexes filled with H1B families as much a marker of desi-dom as Subbulakshmi singing Suprabhatam. “The whistle is not working” is a domestic crisis on par with a lost green card. In Kolkata, my abiding memory of Sunday morning, is the pressure cooker whistling in kitchens around the neighbourhood — promising a Sunday lunch of goat curry and rice. In a country where it is hard for grown children to tell their mothers “I love you” and vice versa, we make do by asking “How many whistles?” the sharing of that pressure cooker wisdom as sure a sign of love as any Hallmark card.

The South Asian love affair with the pressure cooker is legendary though it was invented by a Frenchman. The blog TiffinCarrierAntiques hails the stainless steel workhorse of the Indian kitchen for being mother’s little helper in managing the “patriarchal expectations of a ‘complete Indian meal’” — a fairly impossible task which “would have been Herculean without the humble pressure cooker.”

Now thanks to the brothers Tsarnaev, the workhorse of the Indian kitchen is being viewed as the Trojan horse of America, its hiss more ominous than comforting. Swati on the blog WhistlingPressureCooker.com remembers how the pressure cooker saved her during Hurricane Irene in 2011.

(W)hen the electricity failed and the shiny, contemporary convection stove and oven beneath it at my in-laws’ house in Rhode Island were rendered useless, I cooked chicken tikka masala and rice in my pressure cooker over our tiny gas camping stove. Instead of ripening deli meat sandwiches made with stale bread, my in-laws and I ate a fresh, piping hot curry.

Now she writes of her dismay at the end of innocence as she sets her caramel custard in her trusty pressure cooker.

“(T)hat a pressure cooker could be used for anything other than cooking tasty food fast had never crossed my mind. I now feel nervous professing my love for my pressure cookers, and pressure cookers in general, openly.”

Swati might be well-advised to change the name of her blog before the FBI comes knocking at her door. But one could also argue the Swatis of the world have been in blissful denial. As Praveen Swami points out in Firstpost, the pressure cooker has been cooking terror for a long time:

“In India, the Indian Mujahideen’s urban terror networks have used pressure cookers on several occasions–starting with the attack on Delhi’s Sarojini Nagar market in 2005. Pressure cookers were also used in the 2006 attacks on a temple in Varanasi and the Mumbai’s train system; again, they were used to in the recent Dilsukh Nagar bombing in Hyderabad. On other occasions, though, the group has used steel milk cans and flour-boxes.”

But Indians take the pressure cooker’s dark side in their stride. You can still get onto a bus or a train with your pressure cooker without everyone clearing the compartment.

In America it’s a different story. But it should not come as a surprise. Soon after 9/11, the Shaikh family of Pennsylvania found secret agents in moon suits and gas masks going through the spice cabinets in their kitchen after neighbours spotted them carrying a large pot of biryani into their friend’s home.

At that time I had written:

Multiculturalism was supposed to take care of this fear of the other. But despite Diwali greetings to Hindus from the White House and International Day at school, in the end, multiculturalism has proven to be just a cute, fancy dress party. If it has really made a dent on how we conceive what it means to be American, it hasn’t trickled down to the Shaikh family’s biryani… Multiculturalism might have made the foreign a little more familiar. It certainly did not make it any more American.

Now we find the pressure cooker has remained resolutely un-American as well — the shining symbol of diversity that needs to be hidden at home, not carried out into the yard. Perhaps some enterprising pressure cooking enthusiast will embark on a Take Back the Pressure Cooker whistlestop tour of America to restore its lost shine.

Until then you have to careful moving around pressure cookers in America these days. Guns, not so much.

Sandip Roy (sandip@pacificnews.org) is host of “Upfront,” the Pacific News Service weekly radio program on KALW-FM, San Francisco.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

How Policy Nihilists in the Senate Doomed LGBT Immigrants

0

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The immigration bill crafted by the Senate “Gang of Eight” passed the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday evening, with a 13-5 vote. Every senator involved in the markup session leading up to the vote was very proud of him- or herself for how great the markup session was going. Especially after the senators bravely shot down a proposal to recognize the marriages of LGBT immigrants.

It was a very self-congratulatory affair, as each senator congratulated every other senator for their great legislative skill, their deeply held principles and their impressive civility. The markup deliberations were “courageous,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said, in reference to a bunch of people, mostly old dudes, carefully deciding exactly how awful they had to make an immigration bill before it could pass a Congress full of bigots, cynical fake-bigots and wingnuts. Even Ted Cruz was sort of civil as he hectored the committee for not passing his amendments, most of which were designed to ruin the bill. Everyone who opposes the bill, and those proposed amendments designed to sink it, had to say that they deeply wanted immigration reform to happen, it’s just that they defined reform as “no citizenship plus a bigger fence.” (Also everyone referred to the bill’s authors as the “group of eight” and not a “gang.”)

The most dispiriting moment came late in the amendment process, when Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy was forced to withdraw his own amendment, which would have treated same-sex couples equally under the proposed law. And senator after senator announced why they couldn’t support it. Not necessarily because they didn’t think gay couples deserved the same protection of the law, but because, you know, their colleaguesdon’t support it. Not because their colleagues are unkind! Just because, you know, their constituents are still a bit squicked out by gay people.

Sen. Lindsey Graham went first, saying he opposed the inclusion of gay couples’ protections in the bill.

“If you redefine marriage for immigration purposes [by the amendment], the bill would fall apart because the coalition would fall apart,” he said. “It would be a bridge too far.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein cited Graham’s comments, then, saying, “I think this sounds like the fairest approach, but here’s the problem … we know this is going to blow the agreement apart. I don’t want to blow this bill apart.”

One Democrat after another caved, entirely because they knew that if they supported LGBT rights, pathological deal-destroyer Lindsey Graham would destroy the deal. (He basically promised as much.) This is the micro form of the problem Democrats have been having since Obama took office: They want their legislation to pass, because they support the goals of their legislation. Republicans are indifferent, usually, to the goals of legislation and more concerned with how supporting or opposing bills makes them appear.

Democrats want immigration reform to pass because they want immigrants to have a chance to become citizens. Senate Republicans want to be seen as in favor of reform but they also wouldn’t mind (and in many cases would prefer) being seen as having been forced to regretfully withdraw their support from the reform proposal, because Democrats “overreached.”

So yesterday was a game where Republicans try to see how bad they can get away with making the bill, in order to try to get Democrats to jump ship, while Democrats tried to see how bad they had to allow the bill to be in order to retain Republican support. It’s healthcare all over again! In that fight, Republicans knew they had a strategic advantage, because Democrats desperately wanted to extend healthcare coverage to all Americans, and Republicans did not give a shit about that goal. So Republicans (and Lieberman) could just screw with the bill as much as they wanted and then not support it at all, confident that Democrats were too attached to the broader goal to give up on the bill just because there was no public option or Medicare buy-in.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Cops Go Undercover at High School to Bust Special-Needs Kid for Pot: Why Are Police So Desperate to Throw Kids in Jail?

0

Photo Credit: shutterstock.com

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Californians Doug and Catherine Snodgrass are suing their son’s high school for allowing undercover police officers to set up the 17-year-old special-needs student for a drug arrest.

In a video segment on ABC News, they say they were “thrilled” when their son — who has Asperger’s and other disabilities and struggled to make friends — appeared to have instantly made a friend named Daniel.

“He suddenly had this friend who was texting him around the clock,” Doug Snodgrass told ABC News. His son had just recently enrolled at Chaparral High School.

“Daniel,” however, was an undercover cop with the Temecula Police Department who ” hounded” the teenager to sell him his prescription medication. When he refused, the undercover cop gave him $20 to buy him weed, and he complied — not realizing the guy he wanted to befriend wanted him behind bars.

In December, the unnamed senior was arrested along with 21 other students from three schools, all charged with crimes related to the two officers’ undercover drug operation at two public schools in Temecula, California (Chaparral and Temecula Valley High School). This March, Judge Marian H. Tully ruled that Temecula Valley Unified School District could not expel the student, and had in fact failed to provide him with proper services.

 “Within three days of the officer’s requests, [the] student burned himself due to his anxiety,” Tully said. “Ultimately, the student was persuaded to buy marijuana for someone he thought was a friend who desperately needed this drug and brought it to school for him.”

In January, a juvenile court judge decided that extenuating circumstances applied to the student’s case, and ruled that he serve informal probation and 20 hours of community service, which would translate into “no finding of guilt.”

Since being allowed back to school, Snodgrass says his son has been “bullied” via suspensions and threat of expulsion. “Our son was cleared of the criminal charge, but the school continued to try and expel him,” Snodgrass said.

The Snodgrasses are now suing the school for unspecified damages. District administrators, they told ABC, should have protected their son, but instead “participated with local authorities in an undercover drug sting that intentionally targeted and discriminated against [him].”

“Sending police and informants to entrap high-school students is sick,” says Tony Newman, director of media relations at the Drug Policy Alliance. “We see cops seducing 18-year-olds to fall in love with them or befriending lonely kids and then tricking them into getting them small amounts of marijuana so they can stick them with felonies. We often hear that we need to fight the drug war to protect the kids. As these despicable examples show, more often the drug war is ruining young people’s lives and doing way more harm than good.”

Stephen Downing, a retired law enforcement veteran and former captain of detectives in the LAPD, said the behavior of the police in this case points to troubling trends in policy. “It is evidence of just how far we have gone, and how callous we have become, in treating our children with the care and dignity they should be entitled.”

“The fact that the police officer chose to prey upon the most vulnerable” is “egregious” but not surprising, he said. He pointed toward policing tactics and policies — like quotas, the increasing criminalization of America’s schools, and the war on drugs —  that put pressure on police to treat normal teen behavior as criminal.

Downing, who is a member of the group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, also pointed out, “The less fortunate are always targeted.”

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Average CEO Salary Reached A New Record High Of $9.7 Million In 2012

0

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The average CEO salary broke records in 2011 at $9.6 million – and now, that record high has been topped by 2012 salaries, which averaged out to $9.7 million. Health care and media CEOs enjoyed the highest pay, while utility CEOs had the lowest at $7.5 million. Sixty percent of CEOs got a raise last year.

Though CEO pay dropped slightly after the financial crisis, it quickly rebounded to reach new heights in 2010, 2011, and now 2012. Simultaneously, the pay gap between CEOs and workers has also broken records, as the average CEO in 2012 earned 354 times more than the average worker.

During the recession, some companies changed their compensation formulas to incorporate more stock as a way to tie executives’ salaries to the company’s performance. As the stock market enjoys all-time highs, CEO pay has also soared. Yet the stock market’s rally has not been felt by most middle and low income families, as the housing market recovers in fits and starts. As a result, income inequality has been exacerbated in the first two years of the recovery.

Skyrocketing executive salaries since deregulation in the 1980s helped the top 1 percent of Americans expand their share of income, even as worker pay has stagnated.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law tried to address this phenomenon by ordering public companies to reveal the exact disparity between their CEO and worker pay. Three years later, many big businesses are lobbying to kill the requirement in the rule-making process. Transparent payrolls can help keep executive compensation within the stratosphere and help investors get a sense of employee morale and company reputation. Even so, JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon compared efforts to tamp down executive pay to Communist Cuba. Whole Foods, which tracks pay to ensure that no employee makes more than 19 times the median company salary, has dismissed claims that the rule burdens businesses, noting it only takes a few days to track.

Skewed executive compensation levels made some CEOs iconic villains after the financial crisis. Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit got a $6.7 million pay-out after driving the bank to near ruin, while a Duke Energy CEO received $44 million for one day of work.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

In the Age of Social Media, People Say They Want More Real Friends

0

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Have you ever felt like your friendship is suffering from a prolonged period of stagnation? You’re not alone. According to Lifeboat co-founder Tim Walker, most Americans say they would prefer to have deeper friendships than more friends.

“People are feeling more insecure and unconfident about the quality of their friendships than ever before. That’s the experience of most adults across the country,” Walker told AlterNet.

Walker and co-founder Alia McKee, launched the very first ” State of Friendship in America Report 2013,” in response to their own independent, mid-life friendship slumps, with a view to discovering what friendship in adulthood really meant.

“We wanted to see if the friendship crisis in our own lives and in academic studies was taking a toll on the real lives of American people,” McKee told AlterNet.

Drawing upon academia, expert advice, philosophy and the assistance of two research teams on the quest to unlock the social science of friendship, McKee and Walker surveyed over 10,000 Americans across the country in search of finding answers.

Among the key findings in the study was that gen-Xers and baby boomers are hit hardest by the friendship crisis, exhibiting lower levels of satisfaction then millennials and seniors.

“Today’s generation is extremely busy and heavily invested in juggling a career and family and as a result these friendships have been sacrificed,” McKee explained.

The report also found that while women said they had access to more intimate friendships than men, they were not any happier than men with the state of their friendships. What’s more, the use of social media did not factor in the quality of one’s friendships or one’s overall friendship satisfaction.

“We have broader connections than ever before. However, social media isn’t helping us connect in terms of creating better friendships. The real gauge on whether people will be satisfied depends on the depth of the relationship you have created,” Walker said.

The good news for those of us who are suffering from “friendship inertia” is that there are a number of easy techniques we can use to spice up our old friendships or recreate deeper bonds. According to McKee, those seeking greater fulfillment from their friendships should invest more time and energy into the relationships they consider “close” — with one of the primary predictors of friendship being “proximity.”

“We’re not purposeful about who we choose as friends. Friendships happen to us through work, our daily lives and where we live. One of the joys of life is being introduced to new ideas, new professions and new ways of thinking. By purposefully seeking out people who are different from us, we can become more satisfied in relationships,” McKee told Alternet.

In addition to providing insight into the art of making and having friends, the study also revealed some quirky facts about friendships across various demographic groups in the United States:

  • Those who attend religious ceremonies once a week or more are twice as satisfied with their friendships then those who do not.
  • Conservatives are more satisfied in friendships than liberals.
  • Urban residents are happier with their friendships than those living in rural areas.
  • Most Americans don’t believe their close friends would bail them out of jail, lend them $500 or donate a kidney.

If you’re interested in how to become a better friend, Lifeboat has developed a list of Ten Simple And Powerful Practices of Amazing Friends to give people practical solutions on how to become an excellent friend. As Walker explained, “deep friendships give people greater meaning in life, higher levels of longevity, clear direction and a higher degree of empathy toward others.”

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Benghazi: Dissecting Congressional Follies, Media Coverage and ‘Cover-Up’ Charges

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/benghazi_dissecting_congressional_follies_media_coverage_and_cover-up_charg/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Israel preparing for war on Syria

0

An Israeli military commander says Tel Aviv is prepared to carry out an attack on Syria as soon as the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad collapses.

On Wednesday, Israeli Major General Amir Eshel said the Tel Aviv regime might launch a sudden war on Syria Ëœthe moment Damascus falls.â„¢

Å“We have to be ready for any scenario, at a few hoursâ„¢ notice,” Eshel stated.

He also said that the Israeli regime would even prepare for a Å“protracted” war with a Å“post-Assad Syria.”

The recent Israeli threat is seen as part of the Western-backed efforts to set up the scene for a military intervention in Syria.

The Tel Aviv regime has already carried out three air strikes on Syria.

On May 5, Syria said the Israeli regime had carried out an airstrike targeting a research center in a suburb of Damascus, following heavy losses inflicted upon al-Qaeda-affiliated groups by the Syrian army. According to Syrian media reports, the strike hit the Jamraya Research Center. The Jamraya facility had been targeted in another Israeli airstrike in January.

The May 5 Israeli aggression was Tel Avivâ„¢s second strike on Syria in three days.

Turmoil has gripped Syria for over two years, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the foreign-sponsored militancy.

Western powers and their regional allies including the Israeli regime, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are partners in supporting the militant groups in Syria.

SZH/HSN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Tories defy UK PM again on EU vote

0

Tory MPs have defied the UK Prime Minister again by demanding to put forward the EU vote.

Conservative MPs have defied British Prime Minister David Cameron again by urging that a referendum on Europe should be held on the same day as the next general election.

The defiance in Cameronâ„¢s political party comes after the UK Premier stated that he would not change his mind about holding an in/out vote on Britainâ„¢s membership with Europe by the end of 2017.

But despite his efforts to be firm with his colleaguesâ„¢ split opinions on the European Union (EU), his Eurosceptic MPs are already preparing their next motion to force Cameron to pre-pone the referendum to May 7, 2015, the same time as Britainâ„¢s next election.

The Tory MPs claim that such a measure would increase the Toriesâ„¢ hope at the election because it would look like they are the only party offering a vote on Europe.

Cameronâ„¢s allies are concerned that altering the course on the EU referendum date would fuel opposition Labour party opinions of him being Å“weak” and allowing his backbenchers to push him around.

Meanwhile, Cameron remains stubborn on the issue, claiming that Å“the date by which we hold this referendum isnâ„¢t going to change.”

BGH/MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Foreign forces behind Afghan insecurity’

0

A senior Iranian lawmaker has blamed the US-led foreign forces in Afghanistan for the growing insecurity in the war-torn country and in the region.

Å“The pretext of the US and its allies for their presence in Afghanistan was to establish security in the region, but as we are witnessing today, not only was security not established, but [the foreign presence] also led to insecurity in the region,” Alaeddin Boroujerdi, the chairman of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of Iranâ„¢s Majlis, made the remarks in a Wednesday meeting with UN envoy to Afghanistan Jan Kubis.

The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 under the pretext of combating terrorism. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to grow across the country despite the presence of many US-led soldiers.

Boroujerdi added that the restoration of peace and stability in Afghanistan is of paramount importance to regional countries, adding, Å“The establishment of stability and tranquility in Afghanistan will contribute to [the creation of] lasting security in the region, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is ready for cooperation to help restore security, peace and development in this country.”

He pointed to the issue of ethnicity in Afghanistan, highlighting the need to strike a Å“logical balance” in the political structure of Afghanistan to restore security in the country.

Kubis, for his part, thanked Iran for its full support for the Afghan people and praised the Islamic Republic for delivering humanitarian aid to Afghanistan as well as hosting Afghan refugees.

He also underlined the need for cooperation among Afghanistanâ„¢s neighbors to see peace take hold in the country.

AR/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

A Call to Support Guantanamo Detainees

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/a_call_to_support_guantanamo_detainees_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Oklahoma Needs Help, Not Ideology

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/oklahoma_needs_help_not_ideology_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

A Call to Support Guantanamo Detainees

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/a_call_to_support_guantanamo_detainees_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Oklahoma Needs Help, Not Ideology

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/oklahoma_needs_help_not_ideology_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

‘US, UK to blame for killing of Syrians’

0

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Arab and African Affairs Hossein Amir-Abdollahian

A senior Iranian official says the United States and Britain are to blame for the killing of the people in Syria, adding that the two Western governments have committed many strategic mistakes in the Arab country.

Å“The United States and Britain have made numerous strategic mistakes in the region, including in Syria, and are considered responsible for the killing of the Syrian people,” Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Arab and African Affairs Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said on Wednesday.

The top official termed a mistake the USâ„¢s call for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down, adding, Å“Mr. Obama (the US president) cannot decide for the wise Syrian people on the future of the country.”

The Iranian official stated that the Syrian people would, in the due time, decide on their countryâ„¢s future through a democratic process and elections.

Å“We have repeatedly warned the US that the tactic of supporting terrorism in Syria and sending weapons to the country will make the region insecure for all,” Amir-Abdollahian said.

He urged the US to give up its Å“contradictory stances” on regional developments, including events in Syria and Bahrain, adding Washington should confess to its mistake about supporting terrorism, which has resulted in the killing of Syrians and the destruction of the countryâ„¢s infrastructure, and apologize to the Syrian people for that.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

Damascus says the West and its regional allies, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, are supporting the militants.

In an interview recently broadcast on Turkish television, Assad said that if the militants take power in Syria, they could destabilize the entire Middle East region for decades.

Å“If the unrest in Syria leads to the partitioning of the country, or if the terrorist forces take control… the situation will inevitably spill over into neighboring countries and create a domino effect throughout the Middle East and beyond,” the Syrian president stated.

SF/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Bomb attack kills 12 in SW Pakistan

0

People carry an injured man after a bomb attack in Peshawar, northwestern Pakistan. (File photo)

A bomb attack targeting security forces in southwestern Pakistan has left at least 12 people dead and nearly two dozen others wounded, police officials say.

A Pakistani police source said on Thursday the bomb, which was planted in a car parked along a road, tore through a vehicle transporting security forces on the outskirts of the city of Quetta, the capital of Balochistan Province.

There has been no claim of responsibility for the bombing. However, pro-Taliban militant groups are often blamed for bomb attacks in Pakistan.

Pakistan has experienced unrelenting violence since the country joined an alliance with the United States in Washingtonâ„¢s so-called war on terror.

Thousands of people have subsequently lost their lives in bombings and other attacks. The violence has seen a sharp rise since late 2009.

MSH/HSN

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

UK soldier beheaded in a London street

0

A soldier has been killed in a machete attack in a street in London during broad daylight.

British police have been investigating a murderous attack near a London barracks on Wednesday as a possible act of terror, local media reported.

Police said three men were involved in the attack, of whom one was dead and two others were injured, one of them seriously.

The attack took place in Woolwich, southeast London near a military barracks and the dead man was a British soldier, who was beheaded by the knife-wielding attackers, British media reported.

One of the men involved in the attack, was filmed at the scene by local ITV News with a bloodied meat cleaver in his hand.

The man, who was dressed in a grey hooded jacket and black woolly hat then apologised for the fact that Å“women had to witness this today. But in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your government, they don’t care about you.”

The attacker, who spoke clear English with a London accent, is then seen walking towards his victim, lying in the street.

The violent scene was far from over as moments later, the two attackers were faced with intervening armed officers, who gunned down the suspects.

The incident occurred some 200 yards from the Royal Artillery Barracks, neighbouring to Woolwich Common, the historical home of the Royal Artillery.

BGH/MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Sweden protests enter fourth day

0

This photo shows a burning car during a protest in a suburb of Stockholm, Sweden, May 21, 2013.

Angry youths have once again taken to the streets in the suburbs of Swedenâ„¢s capital, causing damage to property and clashing with police in protest against youth unemployment and the police shooting of a 69-year-old man.

Hundreds of demonstrators on Wednesday broke windows and torched cars in the fourth night of protests in the suburbs of Stockholm, which are mainly populated by immigrants and asylum seekers.

Local media reports said that a police station office was set alight in the southern suburb of Ragsved. Several people were arrested in connection with the incidents.

Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt called for calm on May 21, when a police station in the northwest of Stockholm was attacked, two schools were damaged and a local arts center was set alight.

Meanwhile, police said two cars were also torched in the southern city of Malmo on Wednesday.

The protests in Sweden began on May 19, six days after police shot dead a 69-year-old man who had locked himself in an apartment in Husby, west of Stockholm.

A local source speaking to state-owned Radio Sweden said residents had been protesting since the shooting incident, demanding an investigation. However, they felt their actions had been left unanswered by authorities, the source added.

Police said they responded to calls saying the 69-year-old man was walking around carrying a machete.

When police came to the scene, the man had gone inside and stood on his balcony threatening them. Officers later decided to break into his apartment and as they were trying to overpower him, they fired shots that killed the elderly man.

The riots in one of Europeâ„¢s richest capitals have raised serious doubts about the country that prides itself on a reputation for Å“social justice.”

The protests have also fuelled a debate about how Sweden is coping with youth unemployment and an influx of immigrants.

MR/HSN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Support the WSWS 15th Anniversary Fund! An appeal from Nick Beams

0

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘,
‘

‘,
‘‘,
‘

The WSWS needs your support!

‘,
‘

Your donations go directly to financing, improving, and expanding the web site.

‘,
‘

‘,
”,
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Argentina’s ex-dictator Videla dead at 87

0

 

By
Henry Allan

23 May 2013

General Jorge Rafael Videla, who headed the bloody military junta that seized power in Argentina in 1976, died last Friday in a Marcos Paz prison cell. The coup that toppled the government of President Isabel Peron unleashed both economic devastation as well as mass repression against the working class for seven years (the “dirty war”) until it fell following the defeat of Argentina’s armed forces in the Malvinas War against Great Britain.

It is estimated that over 30,000 Argentines were murdered by the military government.

At his 1985 trial, General Videla and his codefendant, Admiral Emilio Massera, were found guilty of torture, murder and kidnapping. Videla was sentenced to life imprisonment, but served only five years before President Carlos Menem pardoned him and 30 other junta leaders. He was briefly returned to prison in 1998 after being convicted for kidnapping children, but then was released to house arrest for alleged health issues. In 2009, he was again sent to prison after a court cancelled the 1990 pardons, declaring them unconstitutional.

Videla never expressed remorse for the deaths of political prisoners and declared he was responsible for all military actions committed in fighting what he called “an internal war.” Videla also referred to today’s Peronist government of Cristina Fernandez Kirchner and that of her late husband Nestor Kirchner as “yesterday’s enemies [who] are in power and from there … trying to establish a Marxist regime.”

In 2010, judges in the central Argentine city of Cordoba declared that Videla was “criminally responsible” for the torture and deaths of prisoners there and sentenced him to life in prison for crimes against humanity.

The military coup in Argentina followed a pattern that had begun in South America with the US-backed military overthrow of the democratically-elected government of Joao Goulart in Brazil in 1964. Nine years later, Salvador Allende was overthrown by the military in Chile. These dictatorships, evoking an ideology of anti-communism and “national security” promoted by Washington ruled by decree, violently suppressing all opposition, murdering, torturing and “disappearing” perceived enemies, freezing and cutting wages, arresting and killing trade unionists, reducing welfare assistance and raising food prices.

In Argentina, as in Chile, the military regimes carried out wholesale privatizations of the public sector, while attempting to develop the agrarian export sector and deregulating the banking industry to the benefit of the wealthy elites.

Opponents of these policies were branded as “terrorists” by Videla who declared in 1977, “One becomes a terrorist, not only by killing with a weapon or setting a bomb, but also by encouraging others through ideas that go against our Western and Christian civilization.” The hierarchy of the Catholic Church, including the current Pope, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, supported the repression against “communists” and “subversives”, offering consolation and forgiveness instead to the regime’s torturers and murderers who dumped their victims naked and bound into the sea from airplanes.

The political and military relationship between the United States and the military junta has been well-established and documented in recent years, especially through the release of secret archives by the US State Department in 2002. (See “US documents implicate Kissinger in Argentine atrocities”) These documents make clear the three administrations that dealt with the junta–those of Ford, Carter, and Reagan–were well-informed of the death squads, torture centers and atrocities being committed. Washington clearly understood that the repression was part and parcel of the defense of both its economic interests in Argentina as well as those of the native ruling class. What is equally illuminating are the ties demonstrated between the civilian leadership in the Argentine junta and the US financial elite.

Jose Alfredo Martìnez de Hoz, lobbyist and later CEO of Acindar, one of Argentina’s largest steel manufacturers, was appointed Minister of the Economy under President Videla in 1976. He had long-standing ties to the armed forces and used their services in bloodily suppressing workers at his steel plants in 1975, about three hundred of whom were abducted and most of them murdered for allegedly electing a “socialist” shop steward.

As Minister of the Economy, Martìnez de Hoz announced a plan to make the country more efficient and competitive internationally by opening the economy to more foreign investment by lowering trade barriers, slashing workers’ wages, and rescinding the inheritance tax. He was a personal friend of David Rockefeller who moved to get IMF [International Monetary Fund] and Chase Manhattan Bank to approve loans of almost $1 billion (US) to Argentina’s military junta. Banks were deregulated as well as financial markets and all bad loans in the private sector were transferred to the state which was charged with paying them off. Cheap imports into the country soared, resulting in local businesses failing and declaring bankruptcy. In addition, real wages for workers lost almost 40 percent of their purchasing power and resulted in a decline of consumer spending power.

In addition to de Hoz, the Central Bank of Argentina, was handed over to the control of Adolfo Diz, one of the so-called Chicago Boys of the Milton Friedman school of free market economics. Diz acted to limit domestic credit, enacted the Monetary Regulation Account Law of 1977 (this raised reserve requirements to 45 percent of deposits) and led to an inflation level of 175 percent.

Fearing social upheaval despite the repression, Martinez de Hoz implemented a currency devaluation of the official exchange rate between the Argentine peso and the US dollar. While this temporarily eased inflation, foreign credit and imported goods became cheaper, and by 1981, Argentina had a record $4 billion annual trade deficit. Flooded with imports, many domestic industries collapsed and the state, once again, absorbed private sector debts, including, those of Martinez de Hoz’s own businesses.

At the same time, speculation on the Argentine peso and banking Ponzi schemes damaged the economy in the long run. Martinez De Hoz even participated himself in the short-selling by insiders of the peso. By 1983, the public debt coupled with capital flight amounted to $43 billion (US). Under the free market, thousands of businesses collapsed and hundreds of thousands of workers faced unemployment. But all was not lost.

In 1988, Martinez de Hoz was arrested and indicted for his involvement in human rights abuses. He spent a total of 77 days in jail. Freed by President Carlos Menem in 1990, he returned to the corporate banking world. In 1992 he was convicted of operating a brokerage with a revoked license but became a member of the board of directors of the General Business Bank. This bank helped clients illegally wire almost $30 billion (US) out of the country before the outbreak of the 2001 financial crisis. When the Argentine courts revoked Menem’s pardons in 2007, de Hoz was rearrested for new murder, kidnapping and extortion charges. He remained under house arrest until his death in March 2013.

On a final note, the Argentine military junta was advised by its American friends to enlist the services of the New York headquartered marketing agency, Burson-Marsteller, to counteract the “bad publicity” over its murder, disappearance and torture of tens of thousands of Argentines. Burson-Marsteller is one of the largest public relations firms in the world and known for handling damage control.

In a telling statement, Burson-Marsteller CEO, Victor Emmanuel, stated that “violence was necessary to open up Argentina’s economy.” Investment securement would be impossible if a state of civil war existed, it was lamented. Admitting that “a lot of innocent people were probably killed,” he went on to declare that “given the situation, immense force was required.” Burson-Marsteller also carried out public relations campaigns for Facebook’s Google smear campaign, Philip Morris’ support of supposed anti-smoking laws, Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol disaster, Union Carbide and the Bhopal mass industrial homicide case in India, to name a few.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

A fraudulent campaign for “climate justice”

0

 

The “Ecosocialist” conference in New York

By
Sandy English and Jerry White

23 May 2013

The recent announcement by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration that carbon dioxide levels as measured from Hawaii’s Mauna Loa volcano have exceeded 400 parts per million, most likely the highest level in three million years, is the latest and most dramatic proof of global warming that is being propelled by human activity.

Despite the disastrous toll caused by extreme weather events, capitalist governments around the world have been incapable of addressing, let alone reversing, the growth of greenhouse gases. In the US, Obama–hailed as the “environmental president” by various Democratic Party aligned groups–has proven to be nothing but a shill for the energy conglomerates, protecting BP during the worst ecological disaster in US history and blocking any environmental regulations on big corporations.

Along with the eruption of militarism, the explosive growth of social inequality and ever-greater attacks on the social and democratic rights of the masses of working people, the failure by world governments to halt the destruction of the environment is an indictment of capitalism.

The “Ecosocialist Conference” held at Barnard College in New York City–chiefly sponsored by the International Socialist Organization and the Green Party–was an attempt to block any independent movement of the working class against a potential environmental catastrophe.

Anyone not familiar with the politics of these organizations would get the impression from the “anti-capitalist” rhetoric in the promotional material that the conference would propose a radical or even socialist program to oppose global warming. This could not be further from the case.

The term “ecosocialism” has been utilized by various pseudo-left groups in Europe to align themselves with social democratic, ex-Stalinist, Green and other bourgeois parties. Its proponents not only reject the Marxist conception of the revolutionary role of the working class, they blame workers’ supposed obsession with consumerism for ecological problems and advocate a program of austerity.

At the open plenary session, Richard Smith, a writer described as an “independent socialist,” declared, “If Obama really wanted to cut CO2 emissions, he could simply ask Americans to stop consuming so much oil, crush their SUVs, shut off their air conditioners, stop taking cruise ship vacations and jetting off to Cancun.”

Chris Williams, a leading member of the ISO, complained that “capitalist alienation” means, “basic human fulfillment can be achieved if I can get more things. This has distorted our lives–we have no idea of what it means to be fully human…What do we mean by a good standard of living–the accumulation of more things, more stuff.”

Like so many anti-Marxists before him, Williams deliberately distorts the meaning of the concept “alienation,” which Marx, the founder of scientific socialism, developed in his early writings to express the separation of the worker from the products of his labor and the loss of any control of his life under capitalism, a social relation that could only be overcome if workers seized the means of production.

Instead, according to Williams, it is a psychological state that can be overcome by convincing workers that they will become “more human” if only they accept a drastic reduction in their conditions of life. Such an argument dovetails with the program of austerity being imposed by every capitalist government in the world, from Greece and Spain to the United States.

In a pointed display of the anti-working class character of the conference, union bureaucrats who are experts in reducing the consumption of the working class were invited to speak on one panel discussion entitled, “Natural Allies: Labor and Climate Justice Movements.”

The panel included Bruce Hamilton, an international vice-president of the Amalgamated Transit Union, which earlier this year carried out the betrayal of the month-long strike of nearly 9,000 New York City school bus drivers and escorts against the attack on job security and wages. Hamilton bragged about certain “green” policies of the ATU, making sure to explain, “the leadership took the lead and brought the membership along.”

This, the first “ecosocialism” conference held in the US, according to its organizers, served to reestablish the close relations between the Greens and the ISO, which have been courting one another for a decade and half. Each in their own way, the Greens and ISO both function as auxiliary organizations of the Democratic Party.

The Greens are a party of the upper-middle class seeking to gain some level of influence within the corporate and political establishment, chiefly to defend their own lifestyle concerns, though with a traditional focus on environmental reform. They base themselves on acceptance of the capitalist system. As one of the speakers, Gloria Mattera, a former Green candidate in New York State, declared, “I would be the first to admit that the Green Party is not an anti-capitalist party.”

Once in power, the Greens have proven loyal defenders of capitalist property and imperialism. In Germany, for example, where the Greens joined a coalition government with the Social Democrats, they defended the interests of big business, dropped their pacifist claims and supported the launching of wars against Yugoslavia and Afghanistan on behalf of German imperialism. In France, they allied themselves with the Socialist Party supporting austerity demands and bowing to the nuclear energy lobby.

In the US, the Green Party’s political perspective has been to pressure the Democratic Party from the outside, a position shared by the ISO. The ISO supported Green Party presidential candidate Ralph Nader in 2000. They supported Nader again in 2004 when he ran as an independent, even as he joined right-wing politician Pat Buchanan in denouncing “illegal aliens” from Mexico and offered himself as a semi-official advisor to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry. In 2006, the ISO supported so-called “left Greens,” such as California gubernatorial candidate Peter Camejo and US Senate candidate Howie Hawkins in New York, and ran its own member Todd Chretien as a Green in the race for US Senate in California.

In 2008, however, the ISO effectively threw itself behind the Obama campaign, utilizing its own stock-in-trade identity politics to help the Democratic Party promote the lie that the election of the first African American president would lead to a fundamental change. Under conditions of the increasing discrediting of Obama–after four years of Wall Street bank bailouts, attacks on workers and escalation of criminal wars and attacks on democratic rights–the ISO gave tepid support to Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein in 2012, while insisting that protests “from below” could shift Obama to the left in his second term.

ISO leader Chris Williams reasserted this lie at the conference, insisting the Obama administration could be pressured to “slow down the capitalist death train that is leading us over the carbon cliff.”

The New York City event was apparently conceived after the February 17 “Forward on Climate” protest in Washington, DC, with the ISO and Greens joining together to urge Obama to oppose Keystone XL pipeline project.

In her remarks to the conference, Stein said of the ISO, “We discovered that we had so much in common as political organizations.” This is true.

Like the Greens in Europe, the ISO is also deeply involved in the intrigues of US imperialism, promoting the US State Department’s line against Syria–by claiming the Islamic fundamentalist-led sectarian war backed by the US and its Gulf allies is really a popular “revolution”–and preparing the way for another neo-colonial “human rights” war by the Obama administration.

Under conditions of growing opposition to the Obama administration from the working class, the ISO is seeking to unite with the Greens with the aim of blocking any break with the Democratic Party, while hoping to attain the beloved “political space” in the capitalist state that their European counterparts already enjoy.

In either case, the ISO functions as nothing more than the “left” flank of the American capitalist political establishment.

A genuine fight against the destruction of the environment–and against war, social inequality and the attack on democratic rights–requires the building of a politically independent movement of the working class, based on an international and socialist program. Such a fight requires a systematic exposure of the hostile class interests represented by the ISO, the Greens and other pseudo-left organizations.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

AI slams US surging use of terror drones

0

Major human rights group Amnesty International (AI) has blasted the US for its growing use of assassination drones as part of the Obama administrationâ„¢s targeted-killing bid in Muslim nations abroad, saying the measure violates international laws.

In a Wednesday report titled Global Review of Human Rights Issues, the UK-based rights group questioned the legitimacy of American terror drone operations overseas, saying they are shrouded in secrecy and amount to extrajudicial executions, AP reported.

“Available information, limited by secrecy, indicated that US policy permitted extrajudicial executions in violation of international human rights law under the USA’s theory of a ‘global war’ against al-Qaeda and associated groups,” said the AI report.

Further challenging the legitimacy of the Obama administrationâ„¢s official targeted-killing policy, AIâ„¢s Secretary General Salil Shetty said, “We have issues with how the United States defines the ‘theater of war,’ which is a very broad definition which allows them a free reign to use drones and other weapons under a very wide set of circumstances.”

Shetty also censured the secrecy around the assassination drone strikes remotely carried out by the US military and its spy agency CIA, adding, “Our researchers, when talking to people in Pakistan, find that the people are living in constant fear in very remote areas. You really cannot figure out, at the end of the day, who has been injured or killed in a [terror] drone attack.”

The development comes as top administration officials have been cited in press report as revealing US plans to further expand its use of assassination drones and other Å“counterterrorism” measures in Muslim countries as the US-led war in Afghanistan winds down at the end of 2014, when most US troops are due to withdraw.

In its Wednesday report, AI further slammed American authorities for the growing reliance of its police forces on Taser stun guns, emphasizing that “tasers have been listed as a cause or contributory factor in more than 60 deaths” in the US since 2001.

“Most of those who died after being struck with a Taser were not armed and did not appear to pose a serious threat when the Taser was deployed,” the report noted.

AI also underlined that in May 2012, “the American Heart Association published a report which presented the first scientific, peer-reviewed evidence concluding that Tasers can cause cardiac arrest and death.”

Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama is due to address his administrationâ„¢s growing reliance on assassination drone attacks in a Thursday speech at the National Defense University, a Pentagon-financed military institution based in the US capital.

MFB/MFB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

'Most in US oppose Syria intervention'

0

This file photo shows a militant operating in Syria.

A new opinion poll shows that an overwhelming majority of Americans are opposed to a potential military intervention by the United States in Syria.

According to a Fox News poll surveying 1,013 people by telephone from May 18 to May 20 about their opinion on Washington’s possible military involvement in Syria, about 68 percent of the people opposed the US military intervention and said Washington should not get more involved in the internal affairs of Syria.

The respondents said Washington could be supporting anti-American extremist groups in the long run by helping the foreign-backed militants in Syria.

About 70 percent of those who were against intervention in Syria were Republicans, 69 percent Democrats, and 65 percent independents.

The poll also showed that only 23 percent of people in the US support military intervention in Syria.

Syriaâ„¢s government says the chaos that has gripped the country for over two years is being orchestrated from outside.

On May 21, the US Foreign Relations Committee voted 15-3 for a bill that would provide lethal assistance and military training to the militants in Syria. The bill is, however, not binding.

Many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers, have been killed in the turmoil.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said on May 18 that militants from 29 different countries were fighting against the government in different parts of the country.

SZH/HSN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Bomb attack kills 12 in SW Pakistan

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]A bomb targeting security forces in southwestern Pakistan has left at least 12 people dead, police officials say.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

The social disaster in Tornado Alley

0

 

23 May 2013

The immediate cause of the disaster wrought on Moore, Oklahoma this week was natural in character: a massive tornado with winds that surpassed 200 miles per hour. Yet, as with so many similar events in America, the consequences were immensely compounded by social and economic conditions.

At least 24 people have been killed, and 240 more were injured. Among the dead were ten children. These deaths were entirely preventable–the direct product of the lack of adequate infrastructure and safety protection in what is known as “Tornado Alley.”

If there is any city in the United States where emergency measures should have been taken to ensure protection from tornadoes, it is Moore. Indeed, the city is perhaps best known for its repeated encounters with tornadoes. In 1999, the strongest tornado ever recorded near the earth’s surface tore a strip through the same area that was struck Monday, killing 42.

The fact that, some fourteen years later, almost nothing has been done to protect residents from tornadoes is a crime for which the entire political establishment stands condemned.

The technology already exists to construct tornado-proof structures and “safe houses,” as well as to build houses that are more resistant to the elements. For example, more than twenty people were saved from disaster in Moore after taking refuge in a bank vault, which was left standing Monday after the entire building surrounding it was swept away.

A residential safe room can be installed for $8,000. A safe room in a public place like a school can be built for $1.4 million. Yet only a small minority of houses have these structures, and only 100 of Oklahoma’s schools. As a result, two-dozen people are dead, including the seven children sheltering after school in Plaza Towers Elementary.

As always, the reason cited by the political establishment, Democrat and Republican, and accepted by the mass media–to the extent these issues are even raised–is that there are no resources, that these are “difficult times.” What obscenities!

A single one of Oklahoma’s six billionaires could pay for the installation of a safe room with his pocket change. Harold Hamm (net worth $11.3 billion), who lives 20 minutes from Moore, donated $1 million to the presidential campaign of Mitt Romney last year. Tulsa’s George Kaiser (net worth $10 billion) was a top fundraising “bundler” for the Obama campaign.

The US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan carry an estimated cost of up to $6 trillion. At $4 million, the price of a single Predator drone like the ones raining down terror on the Afghan border could have provided for the safety of every student that was buried in rubble.

Five years into the economic crisis triggered by the speculative activity of the financial sector, the Obama administration continues to hand over $85 billion per month to the gambling class. A single day’s payout to the banks would more than cover Oklahoma’s $2 billion in damages.

After Obama’s perfunctory remarks, the administration is quickly moving on to more pressing matters–like implementing massive cuts in social programs. Federal assistance will turn out to be much less than pledged, with the burden of recovery operations placed on local officials. FEMA’s already threadbare budget has been cut by $1 billion under the federal sequestration order signed by Obama in March.

While the White House leapt at the chance to mobilize a militarized police force in response to the bombing of the Boston Marathon last month, shutting down the entire city in an unprecedented attack on democratic rights, it is unable and unwilling to organize a meaningful relief effort in disaster-stricken areas.

As for the media, its coverage has studiously avoided any mention of the inequality that has fostered the dire social conditions on display. After a sufficient number of “human interest” stories are compiled, the story will drift to the back pages until it can be safely dropped altogether.

A review of Obama’s record makes clear that the tornado victims will be abandoned the moment the doors on the news vans slam shut.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday that six months after the East Coast was battered by Hurricane Sandy, three quarters of small businesses that were impacted are still waiting for federal aid. Only 15 percent of the funding approved for loans has been disbursed.

In 2011, a massive tornado in Joplin, Missouri killed 162, including many whose mobile homes were completely destroyed by the winds. Volunteers bore the brunt of rebuilding. For damage estimated at $3 billion, the city received only $500 million, much of it in the form of loans. Joplin officials applied to the state for safe room grants, but the paltry FEMA aid had already been spent on flood relief. Thousands of uninsured families and renters lost everything.

Just last month, West, Texas was obliterated by a massive explosion at a fertilizer plant that killed 15. Obama trotted out the usual promises of support for the town. Yet FEMA only opened a Disaster Recovery Center to accept claims of residents on May 4. By May 18, the agency had closed up shop.

New Orleans, devastated by Hurricane Katrina nearly eight years ago, has 20 percent fewer residents than before the storm. The political and corporate elite used the disaster to gentrify swathes of the city previously occupied by the poor and to privatize the public school system and other social infrastructure.

The financial oligarchy’s stranglehold on social life ensures that tragedies such as the one still unfolding in Moore will be repeated.

What is required is a socialist response. The Socialist Equality Party calls for an emergency public works program in Oklahoma City and all the other areas impacted by recent disasters. Such a program would include the immediate infusion of aid to make survivors whole, rebuild infrastructure, homes and businesses.

Social infrastructure, including scientific monitoring and warning systems, must be vastly improved and expanded. Electrical grids would be rebuilt below ground in tornado-prone areas. Central planning would ensure safe and decent homes for everyone, with safe rooms and shelters in all structures in tornado-prone areas.

This program would be financed directly through a sharp increase in taxation on the rich. The major banks and corporations must be nationalized and run as publicly owned utilities. Public resources that have been hoarded by the financial elite must be reallocated to meet urgent social needs.

Naomi Spencer



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Poverty skyrockets in US suburbs

0

 

By
Marcus Day

23 May 2013

According to a new book published by the Brookings Institution, poverty in American suburbs soared more than 64 percent from 2000 to 2011. The report, titled Confronting Suburban Poverty in America, revealed that nearly 16.4 million suburban residents are now living below the federal poverty line, up from roughly 10 million in 2000.

The study reveals that the biggest surge in suburban poverty occurred in the centers of the housing collapse throughout the South and Southwest. Poverty in the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona rose by 134.2 percent; Las Vegas, Nevada by 139.3 percent; Austin, Texas by 142.5 percent; and Atlanta, Georgia by 158.9 percent. However, there were a number of other cities spread throughout the country, many in former industrial areas, which also saw increases in poverty of 100 percent or more, including Detroit, Michigan (114.7 percent), Minneapolis, Minnesota (127.9 percent), Boise, Idaho (129.7 percent), Denver, Colorado (138.2 percent), and Salt Lake City, Utah (141.7 percent).

Although inner cities still have a greater proportion of their population living in poverty–22 percent, versus 12 percent in the suburbs–the latter’s increase in poverty over the last 10 years was more than twice that of US cities–64 percent, versus 29 percent in the cities. The suburbs now hold the largest overall number of people living below the poverty limit, with 3 million more poor people than in the big cities and 9 million more than in rural areas.

As bleak as this portrait is, it nevertheless falls short of a truly accurate picture of the desperate situation facing millions more families. The federal poverty limit–defined as a yearly income at or below $22,314 for a family of four–is a grossly inadequate measure of real social misery. Indeed, shortly after last year’s presidential elections a change in the poverty measure worked out by the Census Bureau produced an upward revision of the overall US poverty rate from 15 percent to 16.1 percent–the highest rate since 1965 and comprising nearly 50 million people. Forty-eight percent of the population is now categorized as at or “near poor,” meaning they make less than twice the federal poverty limit (see: “The social crisis in America”).

The authors of the study pointed out that the suburbs are in many ways even less capable of providing an adequate safety net for the poor than urban areas. Much of what little social assistance the federal government provides is directed towards larger cities, and high fuel costs and the almost-total lack of public transportation in many suburbs pose significant obstacles to commuting to a job or traveling to social service agencies.

The study partly ascribes the explosive growth of suburban poverty to changing demographic trends. Many impoverished workers and youth from the inner cities have been chased out by gentrification and the destruction of public housing over the preceding decades and were able to find relatively more affordable housing in the suburbs–for a time. In addition, the destruction of manufacturing jobs around Midwestern cities has driven many to seek unskilled, low-wage work in the service industry.

Although suburban poverty has been growing steadily over the last decade, it was given a sharp impetus by the housing market plunge and subsequent economic crisis. According to the authors of the study, nearly 75 percent of home foreclosures have occurred in the suburbs. The steep fall in property values has had devastating effects for working and even middle class families: last year, a Federal Reserve report revealed that the median net worth of US families had plunged nearly 40 percent between 2007 and 2010 (see: “Crisis has thrown US families back 20 years”). By the Brookings Institution’s own estimates, the number of those living in poverty in the suburbs increased by 1 million between 2010 and 2011 alone, from 15.4 million to 16.4 million.

As Jennifer Clary, research associate for the Chicago-based non-profit Heartland Alliance, told the Chicago Tribune, “It’s really clear that lower incomes combined with the rising cost of pretty much everything in life are really crushing people in the suburbs.” Along with skyrocketing costs for education and health care, workers’ wages, which stagnated throughout 1980s and 1990s, have been under concerted attack since the onset of the financial crisis, even as the stock market has recovered and reached new heights.

Despite the alarming character of the study’s revelations, its authors reach more or less conservative conclusions, stating that their findings “underscore the need to think differently”–as if the financial elite and their political representatives were merely unaware of the devastating impact of their anti-social policies. Reflecting the lie of the political establishment that there is simply not enough money to meet the needs of the population, Elizabeth Kneebone, one of the study’s authors, stated, “There are promising models emerging on how to use limited resources.” Among the book’s proposals is a “competitive” federal grant, in which states or municipalities would apparently be compelled to fight over funds for anti-poverty programs.

Regardless of the ineffectual proposals, the growth of social misery revealed in the report explodes the myth, widely peddled over previous decades that the population living in US suburbs is uniformly complacent and economically secure. As Kneebone admitted, “When people think of poverty in America, they tend to think of inner city neighborhoods or isolated rural communities. But today, suburbs are home to the largest and fastest growing poor population in the country.”

Whether it is in the suburbs or cities, in the US or throughout the world, the impact of the capitalist crisis and the growth of staggering inequality is creating enormous social tensions which will inevitably erupt into open class conflict.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Iran blocks presidential campaign of pro-US candidate Rafsanjani

0

 

By
Keith Jones

23 May 2013

Iranian authorities announced Tuesday that the Islamic Republic’s Guardian Council has approved eight candidates to contest the June 14 presidential elections. Akhbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a pro-US pillar of Iran’s clerical-nationalist establishment and the country’s president from 1989 to 1997, and Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, the political protégé of current President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, were excluded from the list.

Rafsanjani accepts the Guardian Council’s ruling, according to his campaign staff.

Yesterday, Ahmadinejad said that he would petition Ayatollah Khamenei, the Islamic Republic’s Supreme Leader, to place Mashaei on the ballot, however.

This decision may not be final: Khamenei did order two candidates restored to the 2005 presidential ballot. However, it is almost certain that the Council would not have excluded either Rafsanjani or Mashaei without Khamenei’s approval.

The exclusion of two such well-connected figures reflects deep divisions in the Iranian ruling class and state apparatus. These divisions ultimately reflect the competition between bourgeois factions that emerged in control of various portions of the state apparatus, after the suppression of the working class struggles that launched the 1979 Iranian Revolution. Over the last decade in particular, US imperialism and its allies inflamed these divisions with their unrelenting campaign to effect “regime change” in Tehran.

Washington is in effect waging an undeclared war against Iran, whose pretext–the claim that Iran is developing nuclear weapons–is no more credible than the lies about Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction” that the US promoted before the illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq. In fact, Iran has been targeted because of its vast oil reserves and its geostrategic position at the heart of the Middle East.

The US and EU have imposed crippling economic sanctions on Iran, aiming to choke off its oil exports and access to credit. This has resulted in a 50 percent depreciation of the Iranian rial over the past year, inflation of over 35 percent and widespread unemployment.

Washington and its Middle Eastern junior partner, Israel, have repeatedly threatened to attack Iran, and the US is providing Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States with advanced weapons in anticipation that such an attack would provoke a regional war. Through Turkey, Qatar and other allies, Washington is financing and arming the Islamist-led insurgency in Syria, so as to overthrow the only government in the region allied with Teheran. The US is also sponsoring terrorism within Iran, including attacks by Baluchi ethnic separatists.

In line with a foreign policy shift initiated by Obama on assuming the presidency in 2009, the US is seeking to exploit the divisions within the Iranian bourgeoisie to promote elements seeking a quick surrender to US threats. Not coincidentally, this faction also champions privatization and massive social welfare cuts, denouncing “statist” policies of the current regime.

In 2009, the US, France, Britain, Germany and other European powers–repeating the scenario of “color revolutions” in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere–threw their weight behind the so-called Green Movement, championing its false claims that Ahmadinejad had stolen the election.

The Greens were touted by Obama, then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy and the western media as a “democratizing” force. In fact, their support came almost exclusively from the most privileged and reactionary sections of Iranian society; much of their animus toward Ahmadinejad was on account of his spending Iranian oil revenues on public services and food and energy subsidies.

The regime apparently decided to block Rafsanjani’s candidacy out of fear that his candidacy would become the focal point for a new Western intervention to destabilize the regime, amid what Washington is promoting as “last chance” talks on Iran’s nuclear program before full-scale military action.

Rafsanjani has long been identified with rapprochement with Washington and IMF-style austerity measures. The Speaker of the Iranian parliament for much of the 1980s, he became Iran’s first president in 1988, a position he held until 1997. During his two terms as president, he spearheaded pro-market reforms, through which many social gains made by the working class and poor in the revolution’s immediate aftermath were liquidated and, with Khamenei’s support, made repeated unsuccessful overtures to Washington.

In 2009 Rafsanjani, who has amassed a business fortune said to be among Iran’s largest, helped bankroll Green candidate Mirhossein Mousavi’s election campaign. Several of his children played prominent roles in postelection Green protests.

His candidacy for the 2013 presidential elections was publicly backed by his successor as president, the so-called “reformist” Mohammad Khatami, and by spokesmen for the Greens in Iran and abroad. After Rafsanjani filed his nomination papers, Mohammed Karroubi, whose father is one of the best-known Green leaders, told the Guardian that “the majority of the Green movement feel they now have a voice in this election.”

The western press took notice. Last week, the New York Times, which worked closely with the Obama administration in 2009 in promoting the Green movement’s challenge to Ahmadinejad’s reelection, ran a flattering portrait of Rafsanjani.

The Guardian Council has provided no public explanation for rejecting the 78-year-old former president’s candidacy. Several of his regime critics claimed that he was too old. In an editorial urging that Rafsanjani’s candidacy be rejected, Kayhan, a newspaper under Khamenei’s direction, declared, “A divine and serious responsibility rests on the shoulders of the Guardian Council. It is to rescue Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani from a dangerous bait that has been set for him by foreign enemies and their domestic associates.”

While the Guardian Council has excluded Rafsanjani from the presidential election, hoping thereby to prevent a fresh attempt on the part of the US and its allies to foment opposition to the government, the Supreme Leader, conscious of Rafsanjani’s strong connections to sections of Iranian business and the clerical establishment, has refrained from severing all ties with him.

Most of the eight Guardian Council-approved candidates are clearly identified with the dominant Principlist faction. But the Council did authorize the candidacy of a longtime, albeit not publicly prominent, Rafsanjani ally. According to the Guardian ’s Teheran Bureau, Hassan Rowhani, a member of the Supreme National Security Council since 1989, shares Rafsanjani’s “belief that dialogue with the U.S. can benefit Iran.”

The rift between Ahmadinejad and the dominant faction in the Islamic Republic’s government, which has resulted in his deputy Mashaei being barred from standing for the presidency, has long been public. In recent years Khamenei has repeatedly intervened to urge the Principlists and President to work together, warning that their disputes were aiding Iran’s enemies.

Ahmadinejad, whose original power base was in the militias formed to support the post-revolution regime, has at times angered the clerical elites by challenging their constitutionally underwritten domination of political power.

Another and greater source of controversy has been Ahmadinejad’s economic policies. During his first term, when world oil prices reached record levels, he increased social spending. Subsequently, he carried through a policy shift long urged by the IMF and Iranian big business, scrapping food and energy price subsidies in favor of “targeted” cash payments. But he was soon denounced–by the Principlists, Rafsanjani and the Greens alike–for insufficient ruthlessness, i.e. for not having using this shift to even more sharply slash social spending.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Far-right Japan Restoration Party defends wartime abuse of “comfort women”

0

 

By
John Chan

23 May 2013

Osaka Mayor Toru Hashimoto, a leader of the far-right Japan Restoration Party (JRP), set off a firestorm in Asia and within Japan last week, by declaring that the Japanese army’s policy of keeping thousands of women as sex slaves throughout Asia during World War II was necessary.

At a May 13 press conference, Hashimoto declared: “If you want them [troops fighting a war] to have a rest in such a situation, a comfort women system is necessary.” Hashimoto was defending one of Japanese imperialism’s most horrific wartime crimes. Up to 200,000 women were conscripted by the Imperial Japanese army in occupied China, South Korea, Taiwan, Philippines and Indonesia, supposedly to maintain discipline among Japanese troops.

Hashimoto’s comments also enraged the population of Okinawa, a Japanese island which houses 32 US military bases. Echoing the arguments he used to justify the abuse of “comfort women,” he told reporters that earlier this month he had told a US commander in Okinawa that base-related crimes, especially sex assaults, could be reduced if US troops were encouraged to use the local sex industry. He said this would control “the sexual energy of those tough guys.”

There is substantial opposition in Japan, especially in Okinawa, to the stationing of US forces under US-Japan Security Treaty, under which US troops are not subject to Japanese law.

Hashimoto’s provocative comments reflect a broader climate created by the encouragement of far-right Japanese chauvinism by the entire political establishment, including the bourgeois opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and its pseudo-left allies. In 2010, after the removal of Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama, the DPJ committed itself to the Obama administration’s aggressive “pivot to Asia,” turning Japan into the premier bastion of US-led intrigue against China.

Encouraged by the US to make Japan a strong military power, DPJ Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda moved to purchase the Senkakus/Diaoyu islands in the East China Sea from its private owners. This exacerbated the confrontation between China and Japan over the islands.

The JRP was established last September, as pseudo-left forces such as the Stalinist Japanese Communist Party (JCP), openly supported Noda’s claim that “Japan’s possession of the Senkaku Islands is legitimate based on history and international law.”

Hashimoto’s Osaka Ishi no Kai was initially a right-wing party focusing on slashing the state work force and carrying out free-market restructuring. His party merged with former Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara’s Sunrise Party, after he resigned from the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) ahead of last December’s Lower House. The formation includes a dozen former lawmakers from both the LDP and the DPJ.

Proclaiming to be a “third” alternative to the two discredited main parties, the JRP won 54 seats, becoming the third-largest party in Japan in the Lower House elections. This reflected the political confusion and the rightward shift in official Japanese politics amid mass public disillusionment with the DPJ–which had broken every promise it made when elected in 2009, ousting the LDP from a half-century of nearly unbroken rule.

Far from implementing promised social spending and a pledge to remove US bases out of Okinawa, the DPJ increased the regressive consumption tax and endorsed Obama’s “pivot to Asia.” Amid mass hostility to the DPJ, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe led the LDP back into office in December elections, wining approximately 40 percent of the total vote.

Building on the chauvinist climate created by Japan’s bourgeois “left,” Abe has moved to rehabilitate Japanese imperialism’s bloody record in Asia during World War II. Earlier this year, he suggested he would review a 1993 official apology by then-chief cabinet secretary Yohei Kono on the issue of “comfort women.” Moreover, in a parliamentary discussion last month over another major official statement in 1995 apologising for Japanese colonial rule in Asia, he said that the definition of “aggression” is not internationally established.

At the same time, several ministers of Abe’s cabinet visited the Yasukuni Shrine, where Japan’s war dead, including war criminals, are honoured.

Both the South Korean and Chinese governments issued strong protests against Hashimoto’s comments. US State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki attacked Hashimoto’s comments as “outrageous and offensive,” as the Japanese “comfort women” policy was “clearly a grave human rights violation of enormous proportions.”

Underlying Washington’s protests is unease over the visible connection between US pressure on Japan to re-arm and aggressively pursue a pro-US military policy, and the explosion of the most noxious, fascistic sentiments in the Japanese ruling class. In the short term, Washington is concerned that this might harm South Korean-Japanese relations and cut across US efforts to build a trilateral US-Japanese-South Korean alliance against China.

More broadly, however, the imperialist bourgeoisies on both sides of the Pacific are concerned that such open endorsement of imperialist crimes as Hashimoto’s might provoke opposition in the working class.

Amid the public fury in Japan, the LDP is seeking to distance itself from Hashimoto. Abe insisted that his government “has a different position” than Hashimoto’s, adding: “I feel both great sadness and the deepest regret for the pain and suffering experienced at that time by the comfort women.”

LDP secretary-general Shigeru Ishiba declared that if politicians “are not careful about what they say, they will undermine Japan’s interests.”

Hashimoto was forced to back off last Thursday, calling the enslavement of “comfort women” a “disgraceful act” that should not be repeated. However, he added that Japan was not alone in exploiting women or committing other crimes during the war.

The JRP was further hit by the comment by a lawmaker Shingo Nishimura, who declared last Friday that because there are “many South Korean prostitutes roaming around in Japan,” “We should say, ‘You must be a South Korean comfort woman’ in Osaka.”

The JRP cynically expelled Nishimura to save appearances, and Hashimoto said he was “extremely sorry.”

The JRP is now divided. One JRP lawmaker told Asahi Shimbun that “the uproar has truly harmed Japan’s national interest,” while another proposed that Hashimoto submit his resignation.

The reaction by the JRP’s top leadership made clear, however, that they are calculating that the increasingly chauvinist atmosphere created by the “pivot to Asia” and the Japanese bourgeoisie’s moves to re-militarise its policies will ultimately play in their favour.

JRP co-leader Shintaro Ishihara, who supported Hashimoto’s position on “comfort women,” attacked him from the right, for not defending Japan’s wartime policies. Ishihara publicly criticised Hashimoto for falsely referring to Japan’s war as one of “aggression.” He said that the “correct perspective” on the war is the official position of Japan’s wartime regime, which claimed it was “liberating” Asia from the Western colonial powers.

“It is wrong if Japanese define their own history in accordance with the set of values determined by the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal,” he said.

The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was set up by the US after the war to prosecute the leaders of Imperial Japan for waging a war of aggression.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Chicago officials release final list of 49 school closures

0

 

By
Kristina Betinis

23 May 2013

In the face of mass opposition, the Chicago Board of Education released its final list of school closings Tuesday, announcing the closure of 49 elementary schools and one high school program this year. The city has shuttered public schools every year since 2001, but the latest round is the largest yet, and one of the biggest mass shutdown of schools in US history.

Democratic Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s plan to close a record number of schools was a major point of contention during the strike of 26,000 Chicago teachers last September. Since February, more than 20,000 parents, teachers, and students attended official hearings on the closures to express their angry opposition.

How, then, is it possible that city leaders are moving ahead with the school closing plan? Nearly a year ago, teachers voted by 90 percent to strike and won popular support for the fight against the attack on public education. How was this determined opposition squandered?

In short, the struggle by teachers, parents and students was sabotaged by the Chicago Teachers Union, which betrayed last year’s strike and has worked might and main to prevent a political break by the working class from Emanuel and Obama’s Democratic Party. Providing critical assistance to the CTU has been the pseudo-left group, the International Socialist Organization, whose leading member, Jesse Sharkey, is vice-president of the union.

Sharkey and CTU President Karen Lewis are the leaders of the Caucus of Rank and File Educators (CORE), the leading faction of the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU), which postures as opponents of the corporate-driven attack on public education, the closure of schools and expansion of charter schools.

Tapping into the deep discontent with the CTU leadership, in June 2010, CORE overwhelmingly defeated the United Progressive Caucus, which had openly collaborated with the reactionary school “reform” agenda spearheaded by former CPS CEO and now Obama’s education secretary Arne Duncan. Subjected to mass layoffs, school closures, expansion of charter schools and victimization through standardized testing and other arbitrary evaluation measures–and without a strike in more than 20 years–teachers were looking for a way to fight.

CORE presented itself as more militant than the previous leadership, willing to use “social justice unionism” to fight against school privatization. Within a matter of months, however, CORE proved to have no major political differences with the faction it deposed, and would take measures even more right-wing than its predecessors.

From the summer of 2010 through 2011, more than 1,750 teachers were laid off, in violation of their tenure and seniority rights. During the same period, CORE leaders worked with Illinois Democratic and Republican legislators to draft Senate Bill 7, which severely limited teachers’ right to strike, expanded the use of standardized tests to fire teachers, and allowed for school districts to extend the length of school days and years without additional compensation.

Throughout its tenure, the CORE leadership has promoted impotent discrimination lawsuits as a means to dissipate opposition to mass layoffs and school closures, while the suits themselves languish in the courts. Recently, CORE has filed two more lawsuits that allege the school closures are racist, concealing the class character of the attack on the public education and aiding the Democratic Party in dividing the working class along racial lines.

Confronted with teachers’ opposition to Obama’s reactionary education agenda, CTU launched a seven-day long strike on September 10, 2012. The planned school closures were a central issue raised by teachers during the strike. Despite this, CTU officials insisted it was illegal to strike over school closings. This was in part due to restrictions they had worked to impose through Senate Bill 7, which prevents teachers from striking on issues they cannot collectively bargain on–namely, working conditions.

During the strike Karen Lewis made clear that the union was not opposed in principle to mass school closings, telling the Chicago Tribune on September 12, “We understand that whole movement of closing schools and doing it aggressively. The problem is–I guess that’s why we’re all here–we either do this together in some reasonable way or we will always be fighting, and I think the key is that the people that are making these decisions want to make them unilaterally.”

Against the will of teachers, and the interests of students, teachers and parents, CTU pursued its goal of settling the strike on terms friendly to Emanuel, and integrating itself into the process of closing schools. Behind the scenes, the union was given access to organize low-paid and highly exploited charter school teachers, guaranteeing the continued flow of dues into the CTU apparatus as dozens of schools were closed, hundreds of teachers laid off and public education privatized.

The contract CTU leaders negotiated with the city thoroughly exposed the class character of the CORE faction. It containing all of Emanuel’s demands, including the right of principals to hire and fire teachers, expanding the use of tests in teacher evaluations, and severely weakening job security. Each of these provisions facilitated the school closures and consolidations now being implemented.

CTU, as well as its pseudo-left and liberal supporters in the ISO and at The Nation magazine, declared the contract a historic victory and the strike a rebirth of militant trade unionism. With far more justification, Emanuel too declared the contract a victory, to the consternation of CORE leaders, who called for a truce with the city.

From the very start, the CTU was preoccupied with preventing the strike from developing into an open political confrontation with Emanuel and the Obama administration and a counter-offensive against the war on teachers and public education throughout the US. The CTU even delayed the start of the strike until after the Democratic Party convention nominated Obama for re-election. In justifying the shutdown of the strike and the sellout agreement the CTU leaders repeated Emanuel’s lie that there was not enough money to pay for decent schools and teachers, with Lewis telling her members they had no choice but to accept an “austerity contract” because of the “hard times” in the US. After its first attempt to ram through the sellout was defeated by a delegates meeting, Lewis and Sharkey pushed the deal through on a second vote after telling members this was Emanuel’s last offer and they would not go back to negotiate anything better.

Having demobilized the teachers and prevented a showdown with Emanuel, and Obama behind him, the path was cleared for the mayor to press ahead with his school closing plan. After this was announced, the CTU encouraged complacency during the months-long series of CPS hearings on school closures, encouraging teachers and parents to take part in the sham hearings, while warning teachers–many who would soon be laid off–to support the union as it facilitated the closures.

Despite phony rhetoric from Karen Lewis about “shutting down the city” during protests called by the CTU against the closures earlier this spring, these were nothing but stunts aimed at promoting local Democratic politicians, including Jesse Jackson, as supposed friends of public education. A similar series of small protests were held last weekend, to provide a further cover for the CTU’s collaboration in the school closings.

Teachers’ discontent with these betrayals was manifest in last week’s CTU election. While CORE again defeated the despised former ruling faction, United Progressive Caucus–receiving 80 percent of the votes cast–an estimated 10,500 out of 26,000 CTU members refused to vote. Despite the claims by the ISO and the Nation that it won a sweeping mandate for its policies, CORE was supported by only 49 percent of the total membership.

At last weekend’s protests against the school closures, WSWS reporters spoke with parents and teachers on the city’s south and west sides. One teacher stated, “It’s about the haves and have-nots and that’s why I’m here at the march. I never trusted Obama just because he was black. When he became president his entire agenda was about promoting charter schools.”

Sherize, a parent opposed to the school closings, said, “I’m outraged at the school closings. My children’s school is not closing, but this is happening on the backs of all working people. The Democrats, Obama, Rahm, Duncan, they’re all out for themselves. When Obama nominated (Chicago billionaire) Penny Pritzker to his cabinet, this was the biggest slap in the face. It shows who’s in charge in politics today.”

Sherize noted, “I’ve talked to a lot of teachers and they feel like they’ve been sold out by Karen Lewis.”



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Australian budget reports pave way for deeper austerity offensive

0

 

By
Patrick O’Connor

23 May 2013

The Australian corporate elite seized on two reports issued yesterday, by the Australian Treasury department and the Parliamentary Budget Office, to advance its campaign for sweeping European-style austerity measures directed against the working class.

Both reports examined the country’s so-called structural deficit, that is, a hypothetical calculation of what the federal government’s budget would look like if mineral exports were priced at their historical average instead of their current, near record, value.

Unsurprisingly, on this basis, the Parliamentary Budget Office economists concluded that the structural deficit was far higher than the actual deficit. It estimated a structural deficit of around $38 billion this year, remaining as high as $16 billion in four years’ time. By contrast, the Labor government’s May 14 budget forecast an $18 billion deficit this year, with a surplus due in four years. The Treasury report claimed that structural deficits could last until 2021—22.

The “structural deficit” concept has been used by corporate lobby groups, right-wing think tanks and the Murdoch and financial press throughout the year to agitate for massive budget cuts. (See “Australian business, media step up campaign for austerity cuts”)

This reflects real fears within ruling circles over the precarious position of Australian capitalism. The assault unleashed against the wages and conditions of the European and American working class has established new benchmarks for advanced economies seeking to maintain their “international competitiveness.”

Moreover, the Australian economy remains heavily dependent on continued high Chinese economic growth. Already, the China-fuelled mining boom is coming to a rapid end, with declining commodity prices triggering cancellations of energy and mining projects across the country. According to official figures released today, these cancellations are valued at $150 billion. A crisis in China would quickly spark a wider restructuring of the resources sector–prompting mass layoffs in the mining, energy, construction and related industries–and plunge the Australian economy into a deep slump.

At the same time, the Australian bourgeoisie is deliberately utilising the “structural deficit” to whip up a crisis atmosphere that is aimed at creating the political conditions for sweeping spending cuts to welfare, social infrastructure, public health and education and other basic services. All these cutbacks are overwhelming opposed by ordinary people. There are parallels with the US budget. The Obama administration and the Republican Party set in place artificial triggers for spending cuts–the “fiscal cliff” and sequestration measures–to ram through historic attacks on bedrock public spending programs.

Chris Richardson of Deloitte Access Economics declared that the Treasury and Parliamentary Budget Office reports showed that the government taking office after the September federal election would inherit “big problems.” He added that the “electorate” did not “understand that this means difficult decisions lie ahead.”

In fact, the two reports demonstrate that the current budget deficits have directly emerged out of repeated tax cuts, implemented by the Labor government and its Liberal-National predecessor under John Howard, which heavily favoured big business and upper middle class layers. Even a minor increase in taxes on the multi-billion dollar profits of the major mining companies and banks would eliminate the deficit.

In addition, neither the official budget reports nor the media attempt any estimate of the budget impact of the record spending allocated by successive Liberal and Labor governments on the country’s vast military-intelligence apparatus.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard and her colleagues responded to the latest budget reports by rejecting out of hand any suggestion that taxes should be raised to return revenue collection to previous levels.

Treasurer Wayne Swan used the Parliamentary Budget Office report to denounce the Howard government for spending “like drunken sailors” in its final years in office. He boasted that the Labor government had implemented $300 billion of cuts and structural savings measures. “We’re proud of that, we’ve done the right thing in terms of fiscal responsibility for the long-term,” he declared.

Labor’s “fiscal responsibility” involves vicious attacks on the most vulnerable layers of the working class. Gillard and Swan plunged thousands of single parents into poverty by eliminating parenting payments and forcing them onto unemployment benefits. The government has kept unemployment benefits at sub-poverty rates, openly stating that this is necessary to ensure that enough workers fill the low-wage, insecure jobs offered by corporate Australia. Labor is similarly preparing to strip the disability support pension from hundreds of thousands of people, forcing them into the workforce to boost the labour supply.

The Labor government is seeking to secure the backing of key sections of the corporate elite for another term in office by demonstrating its willingness to impose austerity and pro-business economic restructuring measures.

Labor’s budget, unveiled on May 14, set in place the framework for permanent austerity. Swan mentioned shadow treasurer Joe Hockey’s demand for an end to the “age of entitlement”–that is, for the abolition of the welfare state and the elimination of public funding for basic services–only to deride the opposition for failing to deliver. The coalition still faced a choice, Swan insisted, “between making motherhood statements about ending the age of entitlement and putting those empty words into action.”

Hockey yesterday addressed the National Press Club to reply to the budget. He notably refused to commit the opposition to any additional spending cuts beyond what it previously announced. Most of the Liberal-National Coalition’s announced cuts comprise Labor’s austerity initiatives, which they have given bipartisan support. Just four months ahead of the scheduled September 14 election, Hockey and opposition leader Tony Abbott are acutely sensitive to the popular opposition to the agenda demanded by the financial elite. Speaking yesterday, Hockey sought to distance himself from his “age of entitlement” calls, dishonestly insisting that he was talking about the need for austerity in Europe, not Australia.

The shadow treasurer emphasised that a Coalition government’s real budget situation could not be determined until after the election. A “commission of audit” would review every spending measure and make proposals for cuts.

The official election campaign is nothing more than a conspiracy. Behind the backs of the people, both the Labor and Liberal parties are preparing to implement an historic assault on the social position of the working class. Whichever major party ends up forming government after September 14, this is the agenda that will be immediately pursued.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

‘You may want to consider relocating’ – Oregon police too broke to fight crime

0

There are only six deputies in the Josephine County, Oregon Sherriff’s Office, and resources are so sparse that a woman was raped last year after an emergency dispatcher told her four times over the phone there was no one to help her.

It was last August, and a woman was brutally raped and sodomized
by her abusive ex-boyfriend after unsuccessfully pleading with a
911 dispatcher for over 10 minutes.

“I’m not letting him in, but he’s, like, tried to break down
the door, and he’s trying to break into one of the windows
,”
the woman is heard telling the operator in the calls.

“He put me in the hospital a few weeks ago, and I’ve been
trying to keep him away
,” she said.

Four times during that call, the operator told the woman that
she wasn’t able to provide assistance.

“I don’t have anybody to send out there,” she kept
saying. “Once again, it’s unfortunate you guys don’t have any
law enforcement up there
.”

At the county jail, staffing cuts caused by a lack of funding
has formed a revolving door system where inmates are released
sometimes right after being arrested because there’s seldom enough
money to keep facilities functioning at even the bare minimum.
There are only six deputies in the Josephine Sherriff’s Office, and
recently the department’s canine unit was cut to a single dog.

“You may want to consider relocating to an area with adequate
law enforcement services
,” the department cautioned the
county’s 80,000 or so residents last year.

Although a Wild West-like scenario has spiraled out of control
in the Pacific Northwest, residents voted against a measure Tuesday
that would have funded much-needed law enforcement operations at
the cost of only a 3 percent tax levy.

The measure would have bumped the county government tax rate –
currently the lowest in the state – to $1.48 per $1,000, in turn
costing the average homeowner in Josephine around $85 a year
extra.

But even after news of last year’s rape went viral, residents
narrowly decided this week to halt any attempt to milk mere pennies
on the dollar for an added sense of security. On Tuesday evening
the decision was too close to call in Josephine, but by Wednesday
afternoon the county clerk acknowledged to RT that the public
safety levy was voted down by a margin of 51 to 49 percent, with
barely 500 ballots deciding the fate of a county where calling 911
is no longer the way to handle an emergency.

“There isn’t a day go by that we don’t have another
victim
,” Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilberson told Oregon
Public Broadcasting last week. Speaking to OPB, Gilberson directly
blamed the ongoing inability to fight crime on budget
restraints.

“If you don’t pay the bill, you don’t get the service,”
he said.

Policing Josephine County wasn’t always a problem. In 2000,
Congress passed the Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act and as a result began sharing revenue made
off of timber grown on public land.

“Federal forests make up 60 percent of the land in many rural
Oregon counties. Because federal land isn’t subject to property
taxes, the federal government for decades shared timber sale
revenue with the counties
,” the Oregonian recently noted.

Those funds were until recently divvied up among rural counties
to help line the pockets where sparsely inhabited towns were losing
out on taxes brought in by more densely populated regions. The act
has expired, however, and the result has been the rapid defunding
of public programs in some areas, including the Josephine
Sherriff’s Office. Since the expiration of the bill, the county has
lost millions of dollars in revenue that for more than a decade was
a routine handout.

In the case of last August’s rape, a 911 dispatcher stayed on
the phone with the soon-to-be victim for over 10 minutes,
instructing her to hide in her house while emergency options were
considered.

“None of the sheriff’s deputies in Josephine County were on
duty
,” explained Amelia Templeton of OPB. “So dispatch
transferred the call to the Oregon State Police, but they also
didn’t have anyone available
.”

“And four times in total, she says there isn’t anyone who can
help
,” she said.

The expiration of the act that provided the city with timber
revenue forced the Sheriff’s Office to cut its budget in half and
most law enforcement operations have ended. Had voters agreed to a
tax hike on Tuesday, the county expected to raise $9.5 million
during the next year and slightly more annually through 2016. Those
funds, the voters were told, would be used to increase inmate
capacity at the county jail, provide the resources for the District
Attorney’s office to prosecute more criminals and, generally, bring
the force back up to snuff.

“I’m not going to vote for it,” Josephine County
convenience store owner Les Monk told Templeton. “Things are no
worse or better now than they were when they were fully
funded
.”

For Monk – and presumably the 13,365 other “nay” ballots casted
on Tuesday – things are just fine in Josephine. Monk told Templeton
that he carried a knife for his own protection and suggested that
paying money for an inefficient police force wasn’t worth his tax
dollars. “People have to understand you will, and are able, to
defend your property,”
he said.

According to Templeton, an attorney for the rape victim said the
woman felt hopeless, alone and very scared when she waited,
unsuccessfully, for police assistance last year. Sheriff Gilbertson
admitted that it’s a very real problem.

“It’s devastated law enforcement,” Sheriff Gilbertson
told The Oregonian. “The criminals now act with impunity and a
sense of entitlement
.”

“It’s been a deteriorating situation for a long time,”
added Greg Wolf, intergovernmental affairs director for Gov. John
Kitzhaber, “and we can see that we’re going to hit a wall unless
we come up with some dramatic solutions
.”

Nearby on Tuesday, voters in Curry County voters rejected a $4.5
million effort that aimed to reverse the dastardly trend there. And
in Lane County, a five-year, $80 million property tax levy was
approved amid similar circumstances – but only after eight previous
attempts stretching all the way back to 1998 were rejected by
voters.

“We’ve essentially eviscerated law enforcement staffing over
the last 45 years
,” Lane County District Attorney Alex Gardner
told a legislative committee earlier this year. With this week’s
vote, Lane County can start to pick up the pieces. In Josephine,
however, residents have a long ways to go.

Speaking to OPB late Tuesday, reporter April Baer said Gov.
Kitzhaber is now expected to declare a public safety emergency and
likely and impose a temporary tax to keep at least some law
enforcement operations functioning through the end of 2014.

This article originally appeared on : RT

US government admits to killing four American citizens with drones

0

United States Attorney General Eric Holder has informed Congress that four American citizens have been killed in Yemen and Pakistan by US drones since 2009.

It has been widely reported but rarely acknowledged in
Washington that three US citizens – Samir Khan, Anwar al-Awlaki and
his teenage son, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki – were executed in Yemen by
missile-equipped drones in 2011. With Holder’s latest admission,
however, a fourth American – Jude Kenan Mohammed – has also been
officially named as another casualty in America’s continuing drone
war.

“Since 2009, the United States, in the conduct of US
counterterrorism operations against al-Qaeda and its associated
forces outside of areas of active hostilities, has specifically
targeted and killed one US citizen, Anwar al-Awlaki
,” the
letter reads in part. “The United States is
further aware of three other US citizens who have been killed in
such US counterterrorism operations over that same time
period
,” Holder said before naming the other victims.

“These individuals were not specifically targeted by the
United States
,” the attorney general wrote.

The news of the admission broke Wednesday afternoon when New
York Times reporter Charlie Savage published the letter sent from
Holder to congressional leaders in a clear attempt to counter
critics who have challenged the White House for falling short of US
President Barack Obama’s campaign plans of utmost transparency.
Upon a growing number of executive branch scandals worsened by the
Department of Justice’s recently disclosed investigation of
Associated Press journalists, Holder wrote that coming clean is an
effort to include the American public in a discussion all too often
conducted in the shadows cast by the US intelligence community.

MQ-1 Predator unmanned aircraft (Reuters / Lt Col Leslie Pratt)

“The administration is determined to continue these extensive
outreach efforts to communicate with the American people
,”
continued Holder. “To this end, the president has directed me to
disclose certain information that until now has been properly
classified. You and other members of your committee have on
numerous occasions expressed a particular interest in the
administration’s use of lethal force against US citizens. In light
of this face, I am writing to disclose to you certain information
about the number of US citizens who have been killed by US
counterterrorism operations outside of areas of active
hostilities
.”

The letter, dated Wednesday, May 22, was addressed to Sen.
Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Drone strikes have become a signature counterterrorism tool used
by the Obama administration and his predecessor, President George
W. Bush, and have been attributed with killing roughly 5,000 persons abroad, according
to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina). But under the covert and
protective umbrella of the Central Intelligence Agency, little has
been formally acknowledged from Washington as to the details of
these strikes.

As part of the vaguely defined ‘War on Terror,’ the US has
reportedly waged drone strikes outside of Afghanistan where the
Taliban once harbored al-Qaeda. In recent years, those strikes have
targeted towns in neighboring Pakistan, as well as Yemen, Somalia
and perhaps elsewhere.

But despite growing criticism over escalating use of drones, the
president and his office has remained adamant about defending the
operations.

“It’s important for everybody to understand that this thing
is kept on a very tight leash
,” Obama said last January, adding
that his administration does not conduct “a whole bunch of
strikes willy-nilly
.”

Others have argued quite the opposite, though, and have opposed
these drone strikes over the lack of due process involved and the
habit of accidently executing civilians in the strikes. When
researchers at Stanford University and New York University
published their ‘Living Under Drones’ report last September, they
found that roughly 2 percent of drone casualties are of top
militant leaders. The Pakistani Interior Minister has said that
around 80 percent of drone deaths in his country were suffered by
civilians.

Earlier this year, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) led a marathon
filibuster on the floor of Congress to oppose
the CIA’s drone program and demand the administration explain to
elected lawmakers why the use of unmanned aerial vehicles is
warranted in executing suspects, often killing innocent civilians
as a result.

U.S. Senator Rand Paul (Reuters / Jason Reed)

Of particular concern, Paul said, was whether or not the Obama
administration would use the 2011 Yemen strike as justification to
kill American citizens within the US. For 13 hours, he demanded the
White House respond.

“I rise today to begin to filibuster John Brennan’s
nomination for the CIA
,” Sen. Paul said. “I will speak until
I can no longer speak. I will speak as long as it takes, until the
alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is
important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no
American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first
being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty
by a court
.”

One day after the filibuster, both Attorney General Holder and
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney reached out to Sen. Paul to
say the president lacks the authority to issue such a strike within
the US. With this week’s letter, however, Holder admits that at
least four Americans have met their demise due to US drones. He
also explains why the administration felt justified in using UAVs
to execute its own people.

“Al-Awlaki repeatedly made clear his intent to attack US
persons and his hope that these attacks would take American
lives
,” wrote Holder. “Based on this information, high-level
US government officials appropriately concluded that al-Awlaki
posed a continuing and imminent threat of violent attack against
the United States
.”

Later, Holder says the decision to strike al-Awlaki was “not
taken lightly
” and was first put into plan in early 2010.
Additionally, Holder said the plan was “subjected to
exceptionally rigorous interagency legal review
” and that
Justice Department lawyers and attorneys for other agencies agreed
that it was the appropriate action to take.

According to Holder, the senior al-Awlaki and Mr. Khan were
killed in the same September 2011 drone strike in Yemen. The
following month, 16-year-old Abdulrahman Anwar Al-Awlaki was killed
in a strike in the same country. Mohammed, a North Carolina
resident born in 1988, was killed by a drone likely in November
2011 within a tribal area of Pakistan. Mohammed was indicted by a
federal grand jury in 2009 for conspiracy to provide material
support to terrorists and conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and
injure persons in a foreign country, and was considered armed and
dangerous by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Both Khan and the
older al-Awlaki were suspected members of al-Qaeda and were
affiliated with the group’s magazine, Inspire.

Last February, friends of Mohammad told a North Carolina
newspaper that they believed he was dead.

“Farhan Mohammed says he heard in November that his friend
was killed in a drone strike
,” Raleigh’s WRAL News reported in
2012. “Jude Mohammad’s pregnant wife was hysterical about her
husband’s death and called her mother-in-law in the Triangle to
break the news, according to Sabra. The US government hasn’t
confirmed Mohammad’s death, but the people who knew him in North
Carolina say it’s probably true
.”

Holder declined to explain why either Mohammad or the teenage
al-Awlaki were killed. President Obama is expected to discuss
America’s drone program at an address in Washington on
Thursday.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Never in his life would he attack anyone unprovoked’ — Todashev’s father

0



Published time: May 22, 2013 21:02
Edited time: May 22, 2013 23:42

Embed

Code

An FBI agent shot Tamerlan Tsarnaev-linked triple murder suspect Ibragim Todashev in Florida, allegedly after the suspect attacked him with a knife. But Todashev’s father Abdulbaki told RT he strongly doubted his son could attack the agent first.

Following reports that a Chechen man Ibragim Todashev, suspected
in a 2011 triple murder in Massachusetts alongside the elder
Tsarnaev and questioned about the Boston bombings previously, was
shot by an FBI agent during interrogation in
Orlando, Florida, RT had a phone conversation with the suspect’s
father.

The elder Todashev described his son as “a very calm”
man, who wouldn’t become aggressive for no reason.

“Never in his life would he attack anyone unprovoked,”
Abdulbaki Todashev stressed.

Abdulbaki, who lives in Grozny, Chechnya, said he was not
contacted by anyone from the US, and his only sources about
Ibragim’s fate were neighbors citing media agencies.

Ibragim Todashev is pictured in this undated booking photo courtesy of the Orange County Corrections Department (Reuters)Having heard the reports that
Ibragim was questioned by a group of people, including several
policemen, Abdulbaki also said he does not believe he would rush to
engage in a one-sided fight.

He explained that his 27-year-old son studied in the Russian
city of Saratov, and later in Grozny, but decided to give up his
education and move to the US after going on a student internship
there.

Ibragim decided to leave for Florida because he “liked
America,”
Abdulbaki explained, adding he never got to know what
occupation, if any, his son had in the US, other than practicing
sports.

Abdulbaki said they were not acquainted with the Tsarnaev family
at home in Chechnya. Ibragim knew Tamerlan Tsarnaev only because
they went to the same gym when he stayed in Boston, he added.

Ibragim “couldn’t take part” in the Boston Marathon
bombings as he was undergoing a surgical operation on his tendons
in Florida days before the bombings and “had to learn how to
walk again,”
the father said.

Todashev’s friend Kushen Taramov said he and Ibragim had been
interrogated about the bombings earlier this week.

But reports said that on Wednesday the investigators were
questioning Todashev over his alleged role in an unsolved 2011
triple homicide in Waltham, Massachusetts, which the bombing
suspects Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have been implicated in,
and that he was ready to sign a confession.

Todashev allegedly took out a knife and attacked the FBI agent
questioning him, but was shot to death.

Taramov said Ibragim was going to fly back home to Chechnya, but
the FBI insisted that he postpone his trip for “one last”
interview. Abdulbaki also knew that his son was flying to Grozny on
May 24.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Julian Assange sues US military over secrecy of Bradley Manning trial

0

Julian Assange and a coalition of activists and journalists filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against the military judge overseeing Army Pfc. Bradley Manning’s trial in a bid to open access to the secretive proceedings.

During the trial both access to transcripts and prosecution and
defense motions have been virtually inaccessible.

Bradley, who faces a life sentence over the leaking of more than
700,000 sensitive military documents published by Wikileaks, is
currently being tried by a military tribunal. The trial is expected
to begin on June 3, 2013.

The judge overseeing Manning’s court-martial announced this week
that she will close portions of the trial to the public in order to
protect classified material. Prosecutors are expected to call 150
witnesses to testify against Manning, while two dozen witnesses may
be able to provide their testimony in closed sessions.

Shayana Kadidal, an attorney with the Center for Constitutional
Rights which is part of the legal challenge, described the effort
as a last ditch attempt.

“If this lawsuit fails, Manning’s
trial will take place under conditions where journalists and the
public will be unable as a practical matter to follow what is going
on in the courtroom,”
says Kadidal.

“The federal civilian courts are
now our last option,”
she added.

Assange’s co-plaintiffs in the legal injunction include Guardian
columnist Glenn Greenwald, Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman, and The
Nation magazine. The coalition seeks to force the release of files
currently being kept out of the public’s access.

Bradley Manning (Reuters / Jose Luis Magana)

The same group previously filed a similar lawsuit in military
courts that was shot down in a 3-2 decision by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces last month. Now, they are
hoping that the same legal request will fare better in a civilian
court.

The group’s preliminary injunction is expected to be presented
in front of a Maryland US District Court shortly after Manning’s
trial begins in June.

Though the pretrial process has been opaque, prosecutors did say
this week that they had agreed not to pursue a charge that Manning
had violated the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which could
potentially reduce any prison sentence by eight years. According to
the Washington Post, prosecutors did not provide a reason for the
recent shift.

Regardless, convictions for the more serious charges faced by
Manning could still carry a sentence of life in prison.

Manning’s defense team attempted to block testimony from
witnesses linked to alleged damage caused by the release of the
leaked documents. Army Col. Denise Lind, overseeing the trial,
disagreed, and ruled that the prosecution will have the option to
call witnesses to provide both evidence and context of any
collateral damage caused by the document leaks.

Lind did say, however, that the testimony would be limited so as
to not have the trial “devolve into many trials regarding
international politics in many regions of the world.”

Both activists and journalists that have been following
Manning’s pretrial proceedings have accused the US military of
undermining the legal process by preventing access.

“The culture of extreme secrecy that has defined both the
Bush and Obama presidencies does a disservice to our democratic
society. By unnecessarily cloaking these proceedings from public
view or scrutiny, the government is undermining the most basic
principles of transparency and freedom of the press, both of which
are vital components of the democratic and judicial process,”

said journalist Jeremy Scahill, national security correspondent for
The Nation.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Was the machete supplied by William Hague?’

0
<!–Afshin Rattansi–>

Afshin Rattansi is a journalist, author of “The Dream of the Decade — the London Novels” and an RT Contributor. He can be reached at afshinrattansi@hotmail.com.



Published time: May 23, 2013 00:04

A police forensics officer investigates a crime scene where one man was killed in Woolwich, southeast London May 22, 2013 (Reuters / Stefan Wermuth)

Embed

Code

The horrible massacre events at Woolwich could be repeated if the UK continues similar practices in its military campaigns abroad, such as arming the Syrian rebels, RT contributor Afshin Rattansi has told the channel.

Arming the opposition who kill civilians on the ground in Syria
and pursuing an inadequate domestic immigration policy, Rattansi
argues will lead to “new MI 5 operations to infiltrate Muslim
communities and create more antagonism and inspire more events”

similar in grotesque to Woolwich murder.

“Foreign Secretary William Hague is completely out of his depth
when it comes to Syria. The idea that he is backing the kind of
people that hacked the soldier to death,”
Rattansi told RT.

RT: The man with blood on his hands in the video says
‘the women in our country have to see this every day’. What do you
think he meant?

Afshin Rattansi: If indeed that is a complete video. It is
very interesting that the corporate broadcasters were afraid of
broadcasting it, Whitehall sources already spreading the
information as far as I understand, the British Broadcasting
cooperation not to broadcast that video.

I have the full statement actually from that video, so it is not
just about warning women not to see it. So for instance, ‘Do you
think David Cameron is going to get caught in the street? Do you
think it is your politicians that are going to die? No, it is going
to be the average guy and your children, so get rid of them. Tell
them to bring our troops back so we can all live in peace.’

What a grotesque thing for this man, if indeed it is this suspect
responsible for this killing. What a grotesque thing to say
because, it is William Hague and David Cameron that are supporting
these type of attack theory, people who hack people to death in
Syria. So what a confusion, if these two suspects are indeed the
men who hacked this British soldier, if he is a British soldier, to
death. How confused are these people?

RT: To what extent has Britain been prepared for an
attack like this to occur? (There have been threats against British
soldiers in the UK before.)

AR: The problem we have here is that we have a country; the
problem as far as the government is concerned is that the entire
country does not support the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq.
It is not being consulted about the tax payer backing the sort of
people hacking people to death in Syria. There is no way that the
law enforcement officials can protect the country from some an
event like this from happening.

Police forensics officers investigate a car at a crime scene where one man was killed in Woolwich, southeast London May 22, 2013 (Reuters / Stefan Wermuth)

The way it can do is to forge community relations to not have
foreign policy bent on murder and so forth, which has been talked
about time and time again. We got to see that in communities like
Woolwich, a very poor, although again, this has nothing to do with
this action and what is always problematic about outlier incidents
as the one in London is that some kind of policy will be made and
the absurdity of Cobra, this meeting that the Prime Minister has to
coordinate some kind of national terrorism strategy on the basis of
this very, very rare event that we have seen on the Streets of
Woolwich is in itself very absurd. The real questions were asked
around the time of the beginning of the Iraq war.

RT: The dead man was reportedly wearing a shirt branded
‘Help for Heroes’ which is a military charity. Does this mean
military personnel will be forced to take greater security measures
in their own country?

AR: Britain is one of the few countries in the world whose
soldiers cannot walk freely on the streets of Britain. Many people
from abroad when they visit Britain are surprised that British
soldiers when they leave their barracks have to change to civvies
to walk around. That is the legacy of anti-militarism that is
widespread in the society.

Although in recent years you began to see soldiers walking around
in uniform, but all this man was wearing ‘Help for Heroes’ t-shirt.
This channel has been covering in detail the appalling nature of
aftercare for ex-servicemen and women by the British government and
it is up to private charities and begging bowls to help the
aftercare of British soldiers that is what that t-shirt meant. I’m
sure people who help the heroes will be planning marches of
thousands of people wearing those t-shirts in days to come to show
solidarity with those charities that help the servicemen and
women.

RT: Britain’s PM Cameron is cutting short his trip to
Paris to hold an emergency security Cobra session. Is it that
serious?

AR: I think what is serious about it is that David Cameron
and his opposite number Ed Miliband have deliberately tried to put
the immigration debate up on political and editorial ladder. 
They’ve received opposition from UKIP and other parties; even
without UKIP, they are looking for a middle swing vote in 2015
election and both Ed Miliband and David Cameron have deliberately
been targeting immigration, consequences of which is to make
immigrant minorities and the children of immigrants and the
grandchildren of immigrants more uneasy.

It is simple addition sum. You create austerity, you create
austerity Britain, then you create hatred between working class
communities of all faiths, all creeds, all colors and you have that
type of recipe. And what Cameron and Miliband are trying to do is
to get those swing votes of those who want the far right in power.
And I’m not going to give publicity to the far right but apparently
they had plans for Woolwich, they were tweeting about it within
hours after hacking to death of this British soldier.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague (Reuters / Muhammad Hamed)

RT: As for Britain’s involvement in supporting Syria’s
rebels, as well as military support in the Libyan revolution and
campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. Will there be any consideration
about how dangerous Britain is being made because of this military
action?

AR: I think it is clear to most analysts, even those on the
conservative benches who fought in wars that the Foreign Secretary
William Hague is completely out of his depth when it comes to
Syria. The idea that he is backing the kind of people that hack the
soldier to death, just being able to say that sentence seems
plainly absurd. But it is true that David Cameron and Hague are at
the forefront, along with Francois Hollande in Paris, trying to
support the rebels that are hacking to death Christians, Muslims,
people of no faith at all in Syria. Perhaps it is time for Barack
Obama to give them some advice, because certainly the conservative
government and the Labor opposition in this country seem to
understand in no way how their foreign policy affects things here
and affects British interests.

RT: Last week, shocking footage emerged of a Syrian
rebel reportedly eating the flesh of a murdered army soldier. What
are your thoughts about whether such brutal, random, attacks will
increase?

AR: If those reports that you have put on your channel
were as widely broadcast on corporate media channels here and
terrestrial channels here in Britain, perhaps the people would have
seen how alike the events in Woolwich were to the hacking we saw in
the streets, I think it was Homs, but of course this kind of attack
has been occurring all over Syria. Except the British government
has been supporting people with the machetes. I have to say when I
first heard about it and that it was a machete and it was involving
knives, and then there was of course the inevitable — they were
Islamists, or some connection to Islam, one had to think – 
was the machete supplied by William Hague? One good thing that I
should add is that it leads the identity driven corporate media,
terrestrial media are attempting to reinforce in the minds of the
British people that 2 billion Muslims, that you can’t judge them by
actions of these two people.

RT: Do you think the UK government be looking at
revising their foreign policy?

AR: In no way will they change their foreign policy. They
will react completely wrongly just as they did after 07/07, invent
new MI 5 operations to infiltrate Muslim communities and create
more antagonism and inspire more events, if the past is anything to
go by, more tragic terrible violent events like the ones we saw
today in Woolwich.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Jealous NYPD officer hacked fellow cops' email

0

A New York City Police Department detective was arrested Tuesday and charged with hacking the email information of at least 43 people, among them 20 current and former police officers, along with other violations.

Federal officials said Edwin Vargas, 42, paid over $4,000 to a
nefarious “email hacking service” that gave him access to
dozens of accounts. His motivation for the alleged crimes was not
disclosed in court papers, according to the New York Times, but
Vargas is thought to have fathered a child with a fellow officer
and may have been snooping out of jealousy.

Vargas is also accused of accessing the federal National Crime
Information Center to gain intelligence on at least two of the
officers whose email accounts he infiltrated. 

Vargas, formerly tasked with policing the 40th Precinct in the
Bronx, has been suspended with pay, which is standard NYPD practice
when an officer has been charged with a crime.

“Of all places, the Police Department is not a workplace
where one should have to be concerned about an unscrupulous fellow
employee
,” said George Venizelos, the head of the FBI’s New
York office. 

The complaint states that Vargas kept the information he
obtained in the hack on a work computer. 

Vargas has been charged with one count of conspiracy to commit
computer hacking and one count of computer hacking, each of which
carries a maximum one-year sentence.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Obama mulls resuming Guantanamo prison transfers – reports

0

Ahead of a major speech by President Obama involving US counterterrorism operations, the White House has indicated that it will include a plan to renew prisoner transfers out of Guantanamo Bay, with the ultimate goal of shuttering the prison.

Just as the Pentagon is requesting an additional $450 million in
funding to keep the detention center running, the administration
seems ready to push for the transfer of prisoners to their home
country.

“The president is considering
a range of options for ways that we can reduce the population there
and move towards ultimate closure – some of which we can take on
our own, but some of which will require working with the
Congress,”
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said
Wednesday.

Obama, who has long placed blame on Congress for the continued
presence of detainees at Guantanamo, made the closure of the
military facility a campaign pledge during his 2008 run.

“That’s an excuse,”
said Andrea Prasow, senior counterterrorism counsel at Human Rights
Watch.

“We’re at the point now where
I think the president realizes he has to take what action he can
before he works with Congress. They’ll be more amenable once
they’ve seen he’s actually done something,”
added
Prasow.

Lifting the ban on Gitmo-Yemen transfers?

Currently, of the 166 detainees still held at Guantanamo 86 have
already been cleared for transfer, including 56 Yemenis, who
constitute the largest single group. The Pentagon has thus far
transferred only a handful of detainees whose release has been
ordered by courts.

The administration had specifically halted transfers to Yemen
following the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner by
members of a Yemen branch of Al-Qaeda in December 2009.

In a letter addressed to national security adviser Tom Donilon
in late April Senator Feinstein had requested resumption of
transfers of detainees to Yemen, citing continued support by that
country’s president, Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, in continued
operations against Al-Qaeda. In the last few years, Yemen has
become a primary theater of operations by the US in drone strikes
against terrorist targets.

Although Al Qaeda “still has a
strong presence in Yemen, I believe it would be prudent to revisit
the decision to halt transfers to Yemen and assess whether
President Hadi’s government, with appropriate assistance, would be
able to securely hold detainees in Sana,”
wrote
Feinstein.

According to the Wall Street Journal, resumption of transfers
out of Guantanamo is likely to begin with non-Yemeni detainees,
citing current and former officials. That would give Yemen’s
government time to build up a rehabilitation and oversight
program.

Widespread hunger strike adds urgency

Perhaps placing an even greater impetus on new policy for
Guantanamo Bay is the ongoing hunger strike by 103 detainees, of
which 31 are being forcibly fed through tubes.

The hunger strike has resulted in a number of detainees being
hospitalized within the base, and human rights groups have been
increasingly vocal regarding the force feeding practice, which
includes painful nasal tube inserts and restraints.

Follow RT’s
day-by-day timeline of the Gitmo hunger strike.

A view of a common area at the medium security prison inside Camp IV at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base (Reuters)

Human rights advocates believe that detainees from Afghanistan
could be among the first transferred out of Guantanamo. The WSJ
reported that the US government has already been in talks with that
country’s government regarding prisoner transfers.

Supporters for the closure of the detention facility seem thus
far cautious ahead of Obama’s Thursday speech.

“He needs to make it clear he
is serious this time. He promised the same thing four years ago.
What makes this different? The transfers are what make this
different,”
said Prasow.

Moreover, the announcement for a renewed push to wind down the
prison is not likely to be received well by some lawmakers, such as
Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte, who has spearheaded efforts to
block transfers out of Guantanamo Bay.

“We know there is significant
Al-Qaeda activity in Yemen,”
she said. “I obviously have some serious questions
about Yemen.”

Transfers out of Guantanamo slowed considerably in 2011 after
Congress imposed tough requirements. As a result, there was a
single transfer in 2011, four transfers in 2012 and none so far in
2013.

Administration officials have said the president will finally
fill a vacant State Department position tasked with overseeing the
transfer of detainees, as well as recommend a review board to
resume transferal cases.

In January, the U.S. State Department re-assigned Daniel Fried,
the special envoy who had been in charge of persuading countries to
take Guantanamo inmates approved for transfer.

That vacancy was viewed by both Guantanamo inmates and human
rights group as a flagrant sign that the administration did not
consider shuttering Guantanamo a priority.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Error of judgment’: English town rules non-offensive, reinstates flag of St George

0

A British town has faced fiery protest and even death threats over none other than the national flag of England after the local council has decided not to display it, with one of the councilors saying its links with the Crusades could offend Muslims.

St George’s flags have been proudly flying in Radstock, Somerset
after the town council members unanimously voted on Tuesday to buy
the national flag of England and to display it on “appropriate
occasions,”
the local newspaper ‘The Bath Chronicle’
reports.

The Radstock town council stated on Tuesday that the original
decision not to display the flag was ‘an error of judgment.’

Radstock was stormed by protests on the weekend, prompted by the
decision not to purchase the flag of St George to fly atop the
town’s repaired civic flagpole.

This came after concerns of one of the town’s councilors Eleanor
Jackson who said that the red and white symbol could offend Muslims
living in the English town, because it was used during the Crusades
in the 11th, 12th and 13th centuries.

“My big problem is that it is offensive to some Muslims, but
even more so that it has been hijacked by the far right…My thoughts
are we ought to drop it for 20 years,”
Jackson said as quoted
be ‘The Telegraph’.

Peter Sas with a flag of St George flying from the flagpole at the Memorial Garden, Radstock (Image from thisisbristol.co.uk)

According to Jackson the Union flag was a more suitable way of
displaying national pride.

Though the council has insisted that its decision was
unconnected with Jackson’s comments, and had been prompted by
practical concerns about staffing and funding.

“The general comment made by councilor Jackson, as we moved
to the vote, had no impact on the decision we took,”
said
council chair Lesley Mansell on Tuesday.

John Clements, vice-president of national patriotic group the
Royal Society of St George, said that the censoring of the national
flag is “nonsense”.

In addition, the Muslim Council of Britain encouraged the flying
of the St George’s flag.

“St George needs to take his rightful place as a national
symbol of inclusivity rather than a symbol of hatred. St George
actually lived before the birth of Islam and should not be
associated with any hatred of Muslims,”
said a spokeswoman for
the council Nasima Begum.

Jackson has apologized for her comments, councilor Peter Sas
said on Tuesday.

“Councilor Jackson issued a public apology and made special
tribute to our Armed Forces and the local police who offered her
protection following the death threats she received. She
acknowledged that her comments were inappropriate and confirmed it
had never been her intention to offend anyone,”
local media
reported.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Same copyright boat’: Dotcom vows not to sue Google, Facebook in exchange for legal support

0

Megaupload founder and Internet tycoon Kim Dotcom claimed via Twitter Wednesday that he invented Two Step Authentication, a method of online security that adds a layer of log-in protection, and called on major Internet players to respect his copyright.

Dotcom is currently home in New Zealand on bail as US
authorities pursue an extradition request in order to prosecute him
on charges related to copyright infringement. But the mogul, whose
birth name is Kim Schmitz, implied that he would take legal action
against the powerful social networks and banking sites that have
implemented Two Step Authentication if they refuse to contribute to
his defense fund. 

The security feature springs into action when a user tries
logging into a service from a device foreign to their usual method
of access, at which point Two Step Authentication sends a one-time
log-in password to a predetermined proxy device, such as that
user’s cell phone.

Twitter is the most recent Internet behemoth to institute Two
Step Authentication after hackers victimized the Associated Press,
Financial Times, and other high profile news agencies.  

WordPress, Facebook, Microsoft, and Google are just a few of the
major networks that employ the advanced but not foolproof log-in
method. 

As proof of his ownership, Dotcom pointed his Twitter followers
to a patent, requested in 1998 and published in 2000, that lists
Kim Schmitz as the sole assignee. The document references 14
separate patents and itself has been referenced by 79 others,
including Sony, HP, and Research in Motion (the precursor to
Blackberry). 

The US Department of Justice is seeking to prosecute Dotcom on
racketeering, fraud, money-laundering and copyright theft, charges
that could land him a 20-year prison sentence if he were convicted
in a US court. He has long denied the charges, citing an
overzealous legal effort that was later found to have employed
illegal surveillance methods.

This article originally appeared on : RT

NYC stop-and-frisk data: Whites more likely to carry weapons and drugs

0

Data compiled by the New York Police Department as a result of the city’s controversial focus on stop-and-frisk measures has shown that those suspects who were white were more often to be found in possession of weapons and drugs.

The analysis of 2012 statistics provided by the Public
Advocate’s office shows that the likelihood that an African
American detained for search would be found in possession of a
weapon was half that of a white person.

Specifically, the New York Police Department uncovered a weapon in
one out of every 49 stops of white New Yorkers, while for Latinos a
weapon was found for every 71 stops, and for African Americans that
number was 93 stops.

Meanwhile, the likelihood that a stop of an African American New
Yorker would yield contraband was one-third less than that of white
New Yorkers stopped.

The NYPD uncovered contraband in one out every 43 stops of white
New Yorkers. By contrast, it took the Department 57 stops of
Latinos and 61 stops of African Americans to uncover
contraband.

Recent testimony by several New York police officers in connection
to a lawsuit allege that the department regularly targets young
black men and other minorities, which are judged by an arbitrary
notion of “reasonable suspicion.”

Further, the stop-and-frisk practice is allegedly tied to quotas by
which superiors measure success rates over the city’s police
precincts.

In March, following evidence provided by a leaked recording,
Officer Pedro Serrano, an 8-year veteran of the New York Police
Department testified that during a meeting with Deputy Inspector
Christopher McCormick he was told in no uncertain terms what
individuals to focus his duties on.

“I don’t have any trouble telling you this: male blacks 14 to
20, 21,”
said McCormick.  

Serrano’s testimony was presented as part of Floyd v. City of New
York, in which four plaintiffs claim they were racially profiled by
the NYPD. Four other police officers presented evidence for the
prosecution.

Reuters / Lucas Jackson

That trial concluded this week following two months of
testimony, while Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, who will provide a
ruling within a few months, seemed to indicate heavy skepticism
over the high error rate of New York police stops.

“A lot of people are being frisked or searched on suspicion
of having a gun and nobody has a gun,”
said Judge Scheindlin on
Monday during closing arguments in the trial.

“So the point is: the suspicion turns out to be wrong in most
of the cases,”
she added.

This most recent analysis of the NYPD’s statistics may well add
more fuel to the fire over the stop-and-frisk controversy. The
report by the Public Advocate’s Office leaves little room to
interpret its findings after surveying the 2012 data.

“Despite the overall reduction in stops, the proportion
involving black and Latino New Yorkers has remained unchanged. They
continue to constitute 84 percent of all stops, despite comprising
only 54 percent of the general population. And the innocence rates
remain at the same level as 2011 — at nearly 89 percent.”

Meanwhile, in a separate analysis by the New York Civil
Liberties Union of these same statistics, the group revealed that
out of 532,911 stop-and-frisk searches in 2012, just 729 guns were
found.

On Monday, Judge Scheindlin referred to the “high error
rate”
correlated with the stop-and-frisk practice, in which 88
per cent of stops yielded no evidence of criminality.

“You reasonably suspect something and you’re wrong 90 percent
of the time,”
said Scheindlin to a lawyer representing the
city.  

For his part, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has taken an
unbending stance on city police’s stop-and-frisk policy.

“If you end street stops looking for guns, there will be more
guns on the streets, and more people will be killed. It’s that
simple,”
said Bloomberg during an April speech.

Mayor Bloomberg has often aimed his defense of the policy at the
media, in particular the New York Times, for allegedly turning a
blind eye to the victims of the city’s gun violence,

This article originally appeared on : RT

Witness tied to Boston bombing suspect killed by FBI

0

 

By
Barry Grey and Nick Barrickman

23 May 2013

Twenty-seven-year-old Ibragim Todashev was shot and killed early Wednesday morning while being interrogated by police and intelligence officials in an Orlando, Florida, apartment. Todashev, a friend of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev and, like Tsarnaev, an ethnic Chechen, was reportedly being questioned by a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent from the FBI’s Boston field office, along with Massachusetts state troopers and counterterrorism officials.

The FBI claims that Todashev had implicated both himself and Tsarnaev in the grisly murder of three men in Waltham, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb, on September 11, 2011. They said he then suddenly pulled a knife and tried to attack the FBI agent questioning him. The attack, according to the FBI, prompted the lethal shooting.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in a shootout with police four days after two bombs detonated near the finish line of the April 15 marathon in downtown Boston killed three people and wounded 264 others. His younger brother, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, alleged to have participated with Tamerlan in the bombings, is being held in a Massachusetts prison hospital, charged with the capital crime of using a weapon of mass destruction.

One of the three men killed in Waltham in 2011 was a close friend of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, a boxer and martial arts fighter. Brendan Mess, who, like the other two victims of the attack, had his throat slit, was also a boxer and trained at the same gym as Tsarnaev.

Todashev had lived in the Boston area before moving to Florida. A martial arts fighter, like Tamerlan Tsarnaev, he had become friendly with his fellow Chechen. He reportedly last spoke to Tamerlan in April.

There is no reason to accept, as the media has uncritically done, the FBI’s version of Todashev’s death. The elimination of a witness renders even less credible the official line on the Boston bombings and the role of the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and other police and intelligence agencies. It adds to the miasma of cover-up surrounding the Boston attack.

Khusen Taramov, 22, a friend of Todashev who was also questioned by the FBI, told several Orlando television outlets Wednesday morning that Todashev feared for his life. “He felt inside he was going to get shot,” Taramov said of his friend. “I told him, ‘Everything is going to be fine, don’t worry about it.’ He said, ‘I have a really bad feeling.’”

The events in Orlando also undermine the official story that Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were “lone wolf” and “self-radicalized” individuals, with no connections to other groups. As the Orlando Sentinel reported Wednesday, “FBI sources also told [Orlando television channel] WESH that Todashev has extremist friends overseas.”

From the outset, the government has been eager to portray the Tsarnaevs as lone actors in an apparent effort to limit public information about the multiple contacts between federal police and intelligences agencies and the Tsarnaev family in the months leading up to the bombings, and advance warnings of Tamerlan’s Chechen separatist and Islamic fundamentalist sympathies and connections.

Once again, as in the September 11, 2001 attacks, the alleged perpetrators were well known to US police and intelligence and were being tracked, and the authorities ignored multiple warnings of an impending terror attack. Now, as then, in lieu of any explanation or accountability for, at the very least, a staggering intelligence failure, and, more plausibly, something more sinister, the resort is to the threadbare and all-purpose mantra of a “failure to connect the dots.”

Meanwhile, the Marathon bombings were used as a pretext to carry out a day-long lockdown of Boston and its suburbs, in which civil liberties were effectively suspended and state security forces tested out techniques for imposing a military dictatorship. The supposed security “lapses” are being cited as justification for giving the police and intelligence agencies even greater powers to spy on and repress the American people.

It has been acknowledged that in 2011 the FBI and CIA received multiple alerts from Russian authorities about Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and that the elder Tsarnaev brother was placed on a number of terror watch lists. There are also reports of warnings from Saudi Arabian officials.

The FBI claims it conducted an investigation into Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011 in which it questioned both Tamerlan and his parents but found nothing suspicious and closed the case. The FBI and the Department of Homeland Security allowed Tamerlan to travel to the volatile North Caucasus region that includes Chechnya in January of 2012 and remain for six months, then return home without being stopped for questioning by customs or security officials on either leg of the trip.

There are multiple reports that while in Russia, Tamerlan sought out and made contact with known Islamist separatists who are waging a terror campaign against Russian authorities.

And yet, according to both Boston police and FBI Director Robert Mueller, Boston authorities were never informed of any of this information regarding the Tsarnaevs in advance of the Marathon, a mass event that attracts tens of thousands of people from all over the world. Instead, the Boston Joint Terrorism Task Force was reportedly tracking Occupy Wall Street activists.

The FBI’s current charge that Tamerlan, and possibly Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, were involved in the triple slaying in Waltham, Massachusetts, in 2011 underscores the unbelievable character of its claim that it could find nothing suspicious about Tamerlan when it carried out its probe that year, and had no reason to reopen its investigation thereafter.

The FBI could not have failed to discover the close connection between Tamerlan and one of the victims of the triple homicide, making absurd its supposed finding of “no derogatory” information regarding him.

Far more plausible than the official story is the likelihood that US intelligence agencies, including the FBI, were using, or planned to use, Tamerlan Tsarnaev to further their operations with Islamist separatist forces in the North Caucasus, with whom they have been working for many years. These operations include Washington’s machinations in Russia and the former Soviet republics, as well as its use of Chechen Islamist terrorists in its neo-colonial wars in the Middle East, including the current US proxy war in Syria.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

The SPD celebrates its 150th anniversary

0

 

By
Peter Schwarz

23 May 2013

Four months before the federal election, the Social Democratic Party is celebrating its 150th anniversary. The ceremony in Leipzig is completely directed towards the ruling elite, with the SPD eager to confirm that it will faithfully represent its interests at a time of crisis.

As party leader, Sigmar Gabriel proudly proclaimed on his website that the 1,600 invited guests include no less than ten heads of state, as well as many deputy and former heads of government, foreign ministers and European Commissioners. The German chancellor and chair of the Christian Democratic Union, Angela Merkel, will also attend the ceremony, together with the German President Joachim Gauck and the French President François Hollande.

Also in attendance are “around 30 party leaders and many senior party representatives, including the US Democrats, the South African ANC, the Indian Congress Party, the Chinese governing party and the Brazilian PT.”

Most of these parties have a long tradition of oppressing the working class. Obama’s Democrats are responsible for criminal imperialist wars, targeted assassinations with drones, and the abolition of basic democratic rights. The South African ANC massacred dozens striking miners at Marikana last year. And the Chinese government uses dictatorial measures to enforce inhumane conditions of exploitation, while CCP members enrich themselves in princely fashion.

An appropriate audience for the birthday party of the SPD!

SPD leader Sigmar Gabriel recently gave his own interpretation of the SPD’s history in preparation for the ceremony. It was no coincidence that he chose to give a long interview to Germany’s leading business newspaper Handelsblatt .

The date of the anniversary celebration selected by the SPD is also significant. The founding of the General German Workers’ Association (ADAV) in Leipzig by Ferdinand Lassalle on May 23, 1863 is not generally regarded as the date of origin of the SPD. Lasalle was a contentious figure who dominated his Association, met secretly with the German chancellor Otto von Bismarck and was killed in a senseless duel only a year after the founding of the ADAV. Much more serious political work was carried out by August Bebel and Wilhelm Liebknecht.

Bebel and Liebknecht were in close contact with Marx and Engels and in 1869 founded the Social Democratic Workers Party (SDAP) in Eisenach. The year 1875 saw the merger of the SPAD and ADAV, and the Lassalleans rapidly lost influence. Bebel and Liebknecht led the organization and built it into a powerful mass party, educating hundreds of thousands of workers in Marxism. 1869 or 1875 are therefore much more likely to be cited as the founding date of the SPD than 1863.

Gabriel told the Handelsblatt, why he preferred Lassalle. From the latter one could learn that “attitude has nothing to do with social status. Lassalle was well off and more of a bon vivant. Nevertheless, he agitated on behalf of rachitic children in coal mines and the working class.”

According to this view, the SPD was never a workers’ party, but rather a party that took care of workers. It “was never a purely workers’ party, but always a mixture of dedicated workers, enlightened and liberal middle class and left-wing intellectuals”, Gabriel declares.

When Handelsblatt then notes that Bebel regarded the SPD as an “exclusively workers party,” Gabriel fiercely attacks the long-standing party chairman. The “materialists” around Bebel believed that “historical necessity demanded the collapse of capitalism. … The most extreme form of materialism then ended up in Leninism, in which the path to socialism was to be accelerated by a dictatorship of the proletariat.”

The “idealists” around Bernstein, on the other hand, relied “on the ability of people to achieve democratic and social emancipation”.

In reality, Eduard Bernstein’s concept of a peaceful reform of capitalism ended in the bloody trenches of World War I. The war proved that capitalism was destined to collapse on the basis of its own contradictions. It was Bernstein’s attack on Marxism that prepared the betrayal of the SPD in 1914, which would then shape the entire century. The SPD supported a war that sacrificed the lives of millions of young men for imperialist interests.

The support for the First World War in 1914 marked the complete transition of the SPD into the camp of bourgeois reaction. When the November Revolution of 1918 swept away the regime of Wilhelm II, it was the SPD which assembled demobilized soldiers into far right militias and repressed the workers’ uprisings. The SPD then went on to construct a bourgeois state behind whose flimsy democratic façade the forces of reaction–the state, the army, big business and the Junkers–were able to reorganize and bring Hitler to power 15 years later.

Gabriel’s profound cynicism is most clearly revealed when he refers to the vote against Hitler’s Enabling Act by the Social Democratic parliamentary group in March 1933 as “probably the proudest moment in the history of the SPD”.

In the years previously the SPD bore the main responsibility for hamstringing workers seeking to fight Hitler. It had effectively abolished democracy long before Hitler seized power by supporting the anti-working-class emergency decrees of Chancellor Brüning at the height of the economic crisis. In 1932 the SPD supported the election of Paul von Hindenburg as Reich President, who then appointed Hitler as chancellor. And when the right wing staged a coup and wrested power in Prussia in the same year, the party capitulated without a fight.

The fact that the SPD in 1933 was not prepared to support the Enabling Act, which amounted to signing its own death warrant, can hardly be counted as an event to be proud of.

After the Second World War, the SPD once again played a key role in consolidating the bourgeois state in which numerous former Nazis continued their careers and the very same industrialists who had financed Hitler and enriched themselves with forced labor were permitted to retain their property and power.

Asked by Handelsblatt about the concrete legacy of the three post war SPD chancellors Willy Brandt, Helmut Schmidt and Gerhard Schröder, Gabriel replied, “Assuming responsibility in difficult times.”

He made clear that all three had defended the bourgeois order against pressure from the population and from inside the party itself: “That was the case in the first major economic crisis with Brandt, at the time of terrorism and a major oil crisis with Schmidt–and the Agenda 2010, and war against Iraq with Schröder. When in doubt the Social Democratic chancellors Brandt, Schmidt and Schröder put the country’s interests above the good of the party.”

Gabriel then bitterly complains that the current ruling coalition of the CDU and Free Democratic Party refer to themselves as a “bourgeois coalition”, and seek to portray the SPD as a party standing outside of bourgeois society, although the SPD had always defended the bourgeois order.

Finally, Gabriel expressed his pride in the Agenda 2010 introduced by the Schröder government. “I am proud of the courage shown by the SPD in finally ending the crazy system of unemployment assistance and social assistance,” he says. “But the expansion of the low-wage sector was wrong and is destroying the work ethic of our society.”

Gabriel is desperately trying to cover up the party’s tracks with this last, thoroughly disingenuous remark. In reality the whole aim of the Agenda program was to create a huge low-wage sector which in turn puts pressure on the wages of all other sections of workers. An unemployed person today loses any entitlement to unemployment benefits after just one year. He then has to expend all his savings before being eligible for pitiful Hartz IV payments and is forced to take the most poorly paid forms of work if he does not want to lose benefits altogether.

Gabriel does not limit himself to expressing pride in the Agenda 2010. He also announces a “new Agenda” for the SPD should it assume government in the fall. He refers to a “program for the working middle”, a synonym for the wealthy middle classes who earn many times the income of a single worker, but are unable to pocket the millions paid out to those at the very top of the income pyramid. Gabriel promises “a new social balance”.

The SPD has lost all interest, however, for the vast majority of the population. Like all of the other leading parties it courts the favor of, and offers its services to the richest ten percent.

During the economic boom of the postwar period, the SPD was able to combine its bourgeois policy with concessions to the working class, thereby winning some support among workers and youth, especially in the 1960s and 1970s. Today, in the midst of the biggest crisis of capitalism since the 1930s, it is a bulwark for imperialism and social reaction.



This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

The European Commission, French President Hollande accelerate austerity

0

 

By
Anthony Torres

23 May 2013

In recent days, French President François Hollande has been under pressure from the European Union (EU) and also from his own Socialist Party (PS) to accelerate austerity measures, amid a slowdown of the French and world economy.

On Wednesday May 15, François Hollande went to Brussels to meet the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, and twenty EU commissioners. The EU Commission considered that austerity measures implemented by the French government do not go far enough. It gave France two more years to reduce its deficits by enforcing more social cuts.

On his return to France, Hollande held a televised press conference attended by several hundred journalists, to lay out his government’s policy for his second year in office, whilst doing everything to camouflage the consequences this will have on working class living standards.

France went into recession during the first quarter, with a downturn of 0.2 percent of GDP, according to the Finance Ministry. Forecasts project 0.1 percent economic growth in 2013. According to the government statistics department, household consumption fell by 0.1 percent at the beginning of 2013, and a fall in exports of 0.5 percent was registered for the same period.

Faced with recession in France, the Hollande government and the EU Commission are echoing the demands of the international financial markets, speeding up attacks on the social gains of workers to make the economy more profitable. During his press conference, François Hollande said his second year in office would go more on the offensive. He repeatedly referred to competitiveness, presenting several measures which he claimed would help research and development, as well as the digital technology industry.

France is competing with developing countries that provide global capitalism with a super-exploited work force, which has grown since 2000. The EU Commissioner for Foreign Affairs stressed that “the [world] market share of French exports in goods and services has fallen by 27 percent since 2000, far more than for other exporting countries in the euro zone.”

France’s economic model was founded on its internal market. After the 2008 crisis and the resulting collapse of consumption, the French bourgeoisie is reviewing its economic strategy. From its point of view, France lags behind Germany, which, during the bubble-induced boom in the early 2000s slashed the labour market with austerity measures under the SPD social democratic government, thus encouraging the rapid expansion of German exports.

The measures presented by Hollande will not kick-start the French economy, however, which is hit by the current, systemic crisis of world capitalism. Austerity imposed by the EU and the PS government will only deepen the impoverishment of workers caused by the crisis.

The depressing statistics for the French economy are the result of the worsening world crisis. The rate of growth in GDP for China and the US is slowing down. Germany, Europe’s main economic power, experienced a fall of 0.7 percent for the fourth quarter of 2012 and for the first quarter of 2013 it registered near zero growth.

A Médiapart article entitled, “The EU Commission and its obsession for ‘structural reforms’” reports on the written proposals last year by EU Monetary Affairs Commissioner Olli Rehn’s department: “A credible budget strategy, in the medium term, must be completed by substantial structural reforms of the labour market, retirement pensions, and liberalisation of trade practices.”

France is being driven onto the austerity course followed by Greece’s PASOK and the Spanish social democrats, which have devastated those countries’ economies, in order to satisfy the demands of the financial markets. As Hollande pointed out in his speech, the two years the EU gave to France “aren’t a respite but a jump forward for a more rapid economic upturn in Europe.”

The wing of the Socialist Party (PS) represented by Ségolène Royal, the former PS presidential candidate and former partner of Hollande, criticized the government’s slowness in implementing the cuts. She wrote in Le Monde that “time has been lost, it was necessary to reform by decree from the start. Let us succeed in the first hundred days of the second year [of office].”

Other sections of the PS are calling for a less hasty implementation of austerity, for fear of a popular revolt against the PS government, which is deeply unpopular. Emmanuel Maurel declared: “We have reached a very worrying stage. The EU Commission is proposing nothing less than the dismantling of our social model, and preferably at high speed. Three pillars of the French model are being attacked: the state pension system, the labour protection code, and public services…. All that risks being explosive.”

The Hollande government has contacted the employers and the “working class” unions to start implementing the austerity measures. The government will be able to count on the CGT (General Confederation of Labour) which, although it did not sign the agreement on the reform of the labour market, has not mobilized workers against the government and supports its general austerity course.

There are objective reasons why the CGT opposes a struggle of the working class. The unions are empty shells that are financially dependent on the state and employers, and which share common interests with the state. The role of the unions is to isolate and demoralize workers to block opposition to the layoffs, as is the case of workers at the PSA Peugeot-Citroën car manufacturer.

The author also recommends:

French unions back closure of PSA Aulnay auto factory
[7 May 2013]



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Low turnout in Sri Lankan strike reflects no confidence in the unions and opposition

0

 

By
W.A. Sunil

23 May 2013

Despite growing opposition among workers to President Mahinda Rajapakse’s assault on living standards and democratic rights, there was only limited participation in a one-day general strike on Tuesday. The low turnout expressed the deep distrust among broad layers of workers in the trade unions and official opposition parties, which called the strike action.

The stoppage was limited to a token protest against the government’s decision to increase electricity prices by up to 60 percent. This massive price hike–a direct attack on working-class families–is only part of the government’s austerity measures, dictated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The government clearly fears a social eruption. It unleashed an intimidation campaign against the strike, illegally cancelled leave for state employees and, in an unprecedented move, the defence ministry ordered every public sector institution chief to hand over the names of strikers. Police commandos were deployed at electricity board offices and soldiers mobilised to several workplaces, including the railways.

Cabinet minister Maithripala Sirisena, the general secretary of the ruling Sri Lanka Freedom Party, branded the strike “unpatriotic”, just as the government denounced all opposition during its brutal war against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). Sirisena declared that the strike was a bid to “destabilise the country.”

In reality, the organisers called the stoppage to head off rising social unrest and divert it into harmless protest channels. Their aim was not the organisation of a working-class struggle against the Rajapakse government. On the contrary, in order to avoid any confrontation with the government, they urged strikers to remain at home. In some places, like Colombo Port and the Water Board, they cancelled the strike and called a lunchtime picket.

The stoppage was organised by the Coordinating Committee for Trade Union Alliance (CCTUA), led by the Sinhala communalist and pro-capitalist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP). Other opposition parties, including the right-wing Democratic Party, Tamil National Alliance and pseudo-left Nava Sama Samaja Party (NSSP) and United Socialist Party (USP), joined the strike call. The big business United National Party (UNP) supported the call, but did not ask its affiliated trade union to join the strike.

In the government sector, including electricity, water, railway and bus services and hospitals, only a few thousand workers participated. Several thousand public school teachers, mainly in rural areas, joined the strike. University teachers at Jayawardanapura and Kelaniya in Colombo’s suburbs, Ruhunu University in Matara, Peradeniya University and Jaffna abstained from lectures.

Trade unions claimed employees from 200 private sector factories stopped work. However, there was no significant participation in the plantations and free trade zones, where about one million workers are employed. Police dispersed a march of about 500 workers in the Ratmalana industrial area.

On Tuesday evening, JVP leader and CCTUA convenor Lal Kantha claimed the strike was a complete success. This was not the last struggle, he stated, but he and other union leaders who addressed the media failed to say what their next action would be.

Workers who spoke with Socialist Equality Party members and World Socialist Web Site reporters blamed trade union officials for the poor turnout. A worker at the Kandy railway station said: “No one came here and convinced us of today’s action.” A Chilaw hospital worker said his colleagues opposed the government’s measures but had no “confidence in trade union leaders.” A Water Board worker said there was no strike at his workplace because of “the government’s threats and trade union leaders backsliding.”

The unions are thoroughly discredited among workers, following one betrayal after another. During the civil war against the LTTE, when the government used that war to suppress workers’ struggles, the JVP backed the government, proclaiming that the “motherland is first.”

Since the war ended in 2009, the opposition-aligned unions have called limited protests to defuse the anger among working people, as the government has ruthlessly implemented the demands of the IMF to cut the budget deficit to 5.2 percent of gross domestic product by next year. This austerity program is part of a global drive to impose the burden of the global economic crisis on the back of the working class.

In order to enforce its measures, the Rajapakse government is increasingly utilising the police-state powers that it built up during the war against the LTTE. But the unions and opposition parties are seeking to tie workers to the UNP, which has just as a repressive record as the Rajapakse government, and other equally reactionary parties.

At a separate electricity price protest last week, another trade union front, led by the Public Health Officers Union and Ceylon Teachers Union, invited the UNP and the Democratic Party to participate. The Democratic Party is led by former army commander Sarath Fonseka, who executed the Rajapakse government’s slaughter of thousands of Tamil civilians in the final stages of the civil war.

The pseudo-left groups, the NSSP and the USP, are in the forefront of promoting the UNP as a defender of democratic rights and living conditions. NSSP leader Wickramabahu Karunaratne praised the unity with the UNP unions in the electricity price protests. The USP newspaper Red Star wrote: “It is a welcome sign that the divided trade union movement is getting united for class actions.”

The working class needs to draw key political lessons from the strike. No trust can be placed in any of the ruling class parties, including the UNP, Democratic Party and JVP. The government’s attacks and repression can be fought only in a conscious struggle against the entire political establishment and the bankrupt capitalist profit system itself.

Workers must take matters into own hands, first by establishing rank and file committees, independent of, and opposed to, the trade unions. This requires a socialist program, based on the fight for a workers’ and peasants’ government. This is part of the struggle for socialism in South Asia and internationally. It means joining and building the Socialist Equality Party as the new mass revolutionary leadership of the working class.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Emergency manager to decide on Detroit bankruptcy within six weeks

0

 

By
Bryan Dyne

23 May 2013

Detroit emergency manager Kevyn Orr has set a six-week deadline–until the end of the current fiscal year–to decide whether to file Chapter 9 bankruptcy. Detroit would be the largest city in US history to file for bankruptcy.

Orr is using the threat of imminent bankruptcy–much like the Democrats and Republicans used the manufactured “fiscal cliff”–to force through sweeping concessions on city employees, privatize city services and sell or lease city assets.

Orr has been given virtual dictatorial powers to restructure the city on behalf of the banks and big business. In a recent interview he scoffed at the popular opposition to his actions, telling the media, “Opinions matter to politicians because it translates into votes. I’m not running for anything.”

Indeed, Orr was appointed as emergency manager by Republican Governor Rick Snyder and Democratic Treasurer Andy Dillon and is answerable to no one but Wall Street. His task is to make Detroit profitable for big investors and bankruptcy is seen as one of the best avenues to do just that.

Similar blackmail methods were used by the Obama administration to force auto workers to accept historic rollbacks during the forced bankruptcy of General Motors and Chrysler in 2009. As a lead attorney for Chrysler, Orr argued before the bankruptcy court, clearing the way for the closure of hundreds of car dealerships and the destruction of thousands of jobs.

The urgency for Detroit, according to Orr, is that it is facing an immediate cash flow shortage of $162 million. Moreover, the city has exhausted its borrowing power and cannot sustain itself by accruing more debt as it has in the past. Meanwhile, some $250 million a year of public resources are squandered to service debt and financial derivatives to the big banks, consuming nearly 20 percent of the general budget.

According to Orr, the city is capable of running through December. Past that, by March 2014, the city will not have the revenue to perform the most basic services, from trash pick up to firefighting. “In my opinion, we are already insolvent,” said Orr. “In March 2014, we go off the cliff, underneath the line, never to come back. We are in mission critical right now. It just gets worse. March is free-fall.”

Bankruptcy is being used to force maximum cooperation from pension boards and unions, who in turn use the threat to force their members to accept concessions on the grounds that the losses from bankruptcy court would be even worse.

Orr’s baseline for givebacks is being drawn from last July’s consent agreement between the city and the state of Michigan. To stave off bankruptcy then, the Mayor and City Council imposed what are known as City Employment Terms (CETs). These allowed the imposition of concessions on virtually all sections of city workers–both those under the auspices of the city’s 48 unions and those that aren’t. Only transportation workers were not targeted and because the city wished to keep federal transportation subsidies, which under federal law would be stopped if collective bargaining were halted.

The CETs included a 10 percent wage cut, 20 percent health care cut, eliminated sick leave accrual, halted sick time cash payouts, stopped annual bonus vacation days and reduced vacation accrual from 320 hours to 160 hours. All these and more are being planned.

The primary targets for privatization that will be considered in the next six weeks are the sanitation, water and sewerage and lighting departments; their annual running costs are $15 million, $50-$70 million and $30 million respectively. Other departments, such as tax collection, will possibly be consolidated to make them more “efficient,” or eliminated all together.

In an interview given to the Detroit Free Press, Orr explicitly stated that he is looking to lease Belle Isle, the largest island city park in the US. It has been the subject of repeated proposals for state ownership, leasing or even sale to private investors. It is now being seen as a haven for the rich in Detroit, a place to oversee the blight they are inflicting on the city.

Orr has also said that even after his tenure is over, whether in eighteen months or beyond, the city will most likely still be under the auspices of a financial board or state-appointed comptroller, which could be around for decades, similar to what happened to New York City after its near bankruptcy in 1975.

He then explicitly ruled out higher taxes, saying that this would discourage private-sector investment in the area. “We don’t want to run people out of the city.”

“People” in this instance are billionaires like Quicken Loans founder Dan Gilbert who are going to make a mint of the gentrification of areas like downtown and midtown. Every section of the political establishment rules out even modest tax increases on the extremely wealthy who have largely dodged paying any taxes, even thought this would do a great deal to ease Detroit’s burden considerably. Instead, they all support the slash and burn policies Orr is planning to slash city services and privatization to raise revenue.

Though bankruptcy is being presented as an “equal sacrifice” between bondholders and Detroit’s residents, this is a fallacy. Already, insurance companies for the bondholders, such as MBIA, Inc., National Public Finance Guarantee Corp, and Assured Guaranty, have stated that they will be sure to reimburse the bondholders if Detroit does go bankrupt.

“Should the city of Detroit fail to make a required debt service payment for any reason, including a bankruptcy filing,” wrote Adam Bergonzi, chief risk officer of National in March. “National’s insured bondholders are guaranteed their scheduled interest and principal payments on time and in full.”

Together, these three companies insure at least $4.3 billion of the long-term bonds held by Detroit’s creditors. Assured also insures $321 million of Detroit’s general obligation and general fund debt. There will be no insurance for the tens of thousands of workers and retirees in the city who will find themselves incapable of meeting even basic needs.

This state of affairs will be the “new normal” for Detroit.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

DC mayor to offer closed schools to charter operators

0

 

By
Nick Barrickman

23 May 2013

A new announcement by Vincent C. Gray, Democratic mayor of Washington, DC would see 12 former public facilities opened up for long-term leasing to charter schools in the District of Columbia, with an additional four receiving short-term rights. The announcement comes days after the rejection of an injunction in Federal court which was intended to halt the planned closures of 15 public schools this year and next.

The facilities are planned to be released for public bidding in phases, starting in July, as city representatives seek to gain a sense of the most valuable properties.

The District of Columbia possesses the highest concentration of charter schools of any city in the United States save for New Orleans. Over 43 percent of the city’s student population is currently enrolled in one of the many facilities which dot the DC landscape. “This process reflects my commitment to helping more public charter schools gain access to appropriate space for their programs,” stated Gray to the press. Due to a clause, charter operators must be given first dibs on any newly-available public space in the city over their traditional counterparts.

In January, Education Chancellor Kaya Henderson, who was appointed by Gray, announced the elimination of 15 public facilities, many of which will close in as little as two weeks from now, at the end of the school year for DC public schools (DCPS). “As a city, we are committed to increasing the number of high-quality seats we offer to families, especially in our high-poverty neighborhoods,” stated Henderson. In a particularly provocative move, several of the buildings which are currently slated for closure are already being offered to charter operators.

At the time of Henderson’s initial school closure announcement one of the excuses deployed in order to justify doing so was the existence of supposed under-enrollment in the city. This pretext has been exploded by the recent estimate that as many as 22,000 students are currently awaiting to be admitted into one of the remaining charter schools in the District, an increase from 15,000 applicants last year.

Rather than being committed to improving the education of youth, public officials have been carrying out a wrecking operation in DCPS, with Henderson and her predecessor, Michelle Rhee, who closed 23 schools in 2008, seeking to transfer blighted schools into the hands of private operators.

A recent decision by Henderson to broaden the classification of what constitutes a “small school” in the city, in order to reduce the required funding to the latter, typifies this agenda. Under the scheme schools with as many as 400 children will now be classified as “small schools,” up from 300 originally. The average school size in the District of Columbia is regarded as being 400 students. (See, “Washington, DC schools chancellor unveils new scheme to defund public schools”)

The decision comes days after a Federal judge released an opinion rejecting an injunction which was intended to halt the slated school closures. The judge, James E. Boasberg, echoing views of DC officials, said that in his opinion the closures were “actually transferring children out of weaker… under-enrolled schools.” The judge’s opinion was widely seen as being influenced in part by the connections of his brother, Tom Boasberg, who received grants for the proliferation of charter schools while acting as the superintendent of Denver Public Schools (DPS). (See, “Federal judge rejects lawsuit opposing Washington DC school closures”)

Though publicly funded, charter schools are privately operated, and are able to skirt strictures placed upon traditional public facilities. One such allowance is the ability to remove students from the rolls, or outright refuse the applicant from being enrolled if they have special needs. A report released in 2011 by Western Michigan University found that the Knowledge is Power Program, otherwise known as KIPP, enrolled less than half the percentage of disabled and English as a Second Language (ESL) students as do traditional public schools. (See, “Washington, DC charter school wins Race to the Top grant”)

Similarly, another DC charter known as College Prep was found to have suspended more than 50 percent of its total student body in the period of a single year. Both charters operate in DC.

As is the case with the closures, all of the newly-offered buildings are to be opened east of Rock Creek Park, a historic dividing line in the District of Columbia between those in the blighted southeast and those in the higher-income northwest section of the city.

Representatives of the District’s charter operations have responded eagerly to the announcement, having long-desired increased access to public space. “We’re pleased…. This is a large number of buildings we’re talking about here,” said Robert Cane of Friends of Choice in Urban Schools (FOCUS), a pro-charter non-profit that cites the Washington, DC government as one of its “partners” in school reform. FOCUS is heavily involved in the helping of charters seeking to receive licensing permits in the District of Columbia.

Behind the closures and the continuing proliferation of privately-owned charters in the District of Columbia lies the Obama administration and the Democratic party as a whole, who seek to force cash-strapped school districts to introduce standardized testing and performance-based pay for teachers through the implementation of the Race to the Top (RTTT) program–or else be punished by the closing and transformation of traditional schools into privately-owned charters.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Behind Syria peace talks proposal, US prepares regional war

0

 

By
Bill Van Auken

23 May 2013

While ostensibly touring the Middle East to discuss a joint US-Russian proposal for peace talks between the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad and Western-backed “rebels,” Secretary of State John Kerry met with US allies to prepare for region-wide war.

Stopping first in Oman, Kerry held talks with the ruling Sultan, one of the string of monarchical dictators that constitute, together with Israel, the foundation of US influence in the Middle East. The secretary of state’s visit coincided with the signing of a $2.1 billion deal between the absolute monarchy and Raytheon Corp. for the sale of advanced weapons systems, including Avenger fire units, Stinger missiles, and Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles, part of a ring of steel that Washington has sought to erect around Iran.

From there, he flew to Amman, Jordan for a meeting Wednesday of the “Friends of Syria,” a US-led “coalition of the willing” that is fomenting the war for regime change in Syria. It consists of Washington, its European NATO allies, led by Britain, Turkey, Egypt and the various sheikhdoms and sultanates of the Persian Gulf, including the major arms suppliers to the anti-Assad militias: Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

As the conference was convening Wednesday, Syria’s ambassador to Jordan held a press conference to denounce it as “a meeting of Syria’s enemies”

“Those who want to end the tragedy in Syria need to stop arming and training terrorist gangs in Syria. The war on Syria is unprecedented,” said the ambassador, Bahjat Suleiman.

Representatives of the Syrian National Coalition, the anti-Assad front cobbled together by the US State Department, were invited to the meeting only at the last minute. It appears there was some doubt if an agreement could be reached on whom the “rebels” would accept as their representative.

The US has promoted Ghassan Hitto, a Texas-based businessman linked to the Muslim Brotherhood who has lived in the US for over 30 years, as the “premier” of a transitional government. There have been increasing reports, however, that his role is strongly opposed by the Sunni sectarian militias that are fighting in Syria. It was reported that the coalition’s “acting chief,” George Sabra, a former member of the Stalinist Syrian Communist Party, would stand in for the “rebels.”

While the State Department claims that Kerry’s role in this gathering is to prepare for Syrian peace talks–dubbed Geneva 2–which Washington and Moscow have publicly agreed to support, it is evident that the real agenda occupying the US and its allies is how to salvage the war for regime change, under conditions in which the Syrian government is inflicting strategic reverses on the Western-backed forces.

This has emerged most clearly in the Syrian army’s overrunning of the city of Qusayr in western Syria, just eight miles from the Lebanese border. The town, which had fallen under control of the Western-backed militias, has served as a key pipeline for arms and foreign fighters crossing the Lebanese border. “Rebel” control of the surrounding region also threatened to separate the Syrian capital of Damascus from the city of Aleppo as well as the Syrian coast.

Speaking at a news conference in Amman at the opening of the “Friends of Syria” meeting, Kerry warned that if the Assad regime failed to negotiate a political solution, Washington would consider “growing support for the opposition in order to continue to fight for the freedom of their country.” With US officials demanding Assad’s ouster as a condition for any settlement, it appears that the proposed talks will be turned into a pretext for escalating the US intervention.

Kerry’s remark came just one day after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved by a 15-to-3 vote a proposal for Washington to directly arm the opposition militias. The CIA is already coordinating the arms flows from the Gulf states and has reportedly organized large shipments from Eastern Europe through third parties.

Kerry blamed the reversals suffered by Washington’s proxy forces in the battle for Qusayr on the role played by fighters of Hezbollah, the Lebanese-based party and militia that is aligned with the Assad government, as well as on alleged Iranian backing for the regime.

“Just last week, obviously, Hezbollah intervened very, very significantly,” said Kerry. “There are several thousands of Hezbollah militia forces on the ground in Syria who are contributing to this violence and we condemn that.”

Hezbollah has acknowledged that its fighters are in Syria, but has denied reports that they are playing any decisive role in the fighting, insisting rather that they are training Lebanese in Syrian border towns to defend themselves.

The Western media has also focused on Hezbollah’s role, while ignoring the fact that large numbers of Sunni Islamist fighters have also come across the Lebanese border to fight against the Assad regime.

The threat that this conflict will spill over the region’s borders into a full-scale regional war grows daily. In the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli, at least 11 people have died, including at least two Lebanese army soldiers, in clashes between Sunni militias and Lebanese Alawite supporters of Assad. The clashes have seen exchanges of mortar fire and rocket-propelled grenades, bringing schools, businesses and other activities to a standstill.

The State Department issued a statement denouncing Hezbollah’s role in Syria, charging that it serves to “exacerbate and inflame regional sectarian tensions.” No such denunciations were forthcoming when the Islamist forces overran Qusayr, decapitating and shooting members of the substantial Alawite and Christian minority populations in the area and forcing thousands to flee their homes.

In one measure of the opposition’s desperation, acting National Coalition chief Sabra issued a statement on the eve of the Amman conference calling for the US and its allies to “open a humanitarian corridor” to Qusayr–in other words, to launch a direct Western military intervention on Syrian soil.

In a conference call on Tuesday, a senior State Department official acknowledged, “One of the things we’ll be talking about here in Amman tomorrow is what else needs to be done with respect to the military balance on the ground.”

In advancing its militarist agenda, Washington has stepped up a propaganda campaign charging that Iran is likewise responsible for the reverses suffered by the anti-Assad forces in Syria. A senior State Department official told the Washington Post that Iranian forces are fighting in Syria, repeating totally unsubstantiated allegations by the “rebels” as fact.

As the Post pointed out, “The US official’s allegation was a tacit acknowledgment that the two-year Syrian conflict has become a regional war and a de facto US proxy fight with Iran.”

The Post ’s columnist David Ignatius noted that while there is public talk of a peace conference in Geneva by next month, “the battling on the ground is so intense, and the demand for additional weapons [from the opposition] so vocal, that a skeptical person should ask whether the Geneva talks will take place at all.”

Washington’s ostensible agreement with Moscow on peace talks is merely another tactic to advance its strategic aims in the region, which have been prosecuted through the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now Syria. Behind the crocodile tears about Syrian civilian casualties, its objective remains the same as that which underlay the eruption of American militarism 12 years ago: the assertion by military means of hegemonic control over strategic energy reserves coveted by its rivals, particularly in China and Russia.

As the evolution of the proxy war in Syria demonstrates, this predatory US intervention points directly toward a far wider and catastrophic conflagration that threatens not only war against Iran, but confrontation with Russia and China as well.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

‘Same copyright boat’: Dotcom vows not to sue Google, Facebook in exchange for legal support

0

Megaupload founder and Internet tycoon Kim Dotcom claimed via Twitter Wednesday that he invented Two Step Authentication, a method of online security that adds a layer of log-in protection, and called on major Internet players to respect his copyright.

Dotcom is currently home in New Zealand on bail as US
authorities pursue an extradition request in order to prosecute him
on charges related to copyright infringement. But the mogul, whose
birth name is Kim Schmitz, implied that he would take legal action
against the powerful social networks and banking sites that have
implemented Two Step Authentication if they refuse to contribute to
his defense fund. 

The security feature springs into action when a user tries
logging into a service from a device foreign to their usual method
of access, at which point Two Step Authentication sends a one-time
log-in password to a predetermined proxy device, such as that
user’s cell phone.

Twitter is the most recent Internet behemoth to institute Two
Step Authentication after hackers victimized the Associated Press,
Financial Times, and other high profile news agencies.  

WordPress, Facebook, Microsoft, and Google are just a few of the
major networks that employ the advanced but not foolproof log-in
method. 

As proof of his ownership, Dotcom pointed his Twitter followers
to a patent, requested in 1998 and published in 2000, that lists
Kim Schmitz as the sole assignee. The document references 14
separate patents and itself has been referenced by 79 others,
including Sony, HP, and Research in Motion (the precursor to
Blackberry). 

The US Department of Justice is seeking to prosecute Dotcom on
racketeering, fraud, money-laundering and copyright theft, charges
that could land him a 20-year prison sentence if he were convicted
in a US court. He has long denied the charges, citing an
overzealous legal effort that was later found to have employed
illegal surveillance methods.

This article originally appeared on : RT

NYC stop-and-frisk data: Whites more likely to carry weapons and drugs

0

Data compiled by the New York Police Department as a result of the city’s controversial focus on stop-and-frisk measures has shown that those suspects who were white were more often to be found in possession of weapons and drugs.

The analysis of 2012 statistics provided by the Public
Advocate’s office shows that the likelihood that an African
American detained for search would be found in possession of a
weapon was half that of a white person.

Specifically, the New York Police Department uncovered a weapon in
one out of every 49 stops of white New Yorkers, while for Latinos a
weapon was found for every 71 stops, and for African Americans that
number was 93 stops.

Meanwhile, the likelihood that a stop of an African American New
Yorker would yield contraband was one-third less than that of white
New Yorkers stopped.

The NYPD uncovered contraband in one out every 43 stops of white
New Yorkers. By contrast, it took the Department 57 stops of
Latinos and 61 stops of African Americans to uncover
contraband.

Recent testimony by several New York police officers in connection
to a lawsuit allege that the department regularly targets young
black men and other minorities, which are judged by an arbitrary
notion of “reasonable suspicion.”

Further, the stop-and-frisk practice is allegedly tied to quotas by
which superiors measure success rates over the city’s police
precincts.

In March, following evidence provided by a leaked recording,
Officer Pedro Serrano, an 8-year veteran of the New York Police
Department testified that during a meeting with Deputy Inspector
Christopher McCormick he was told in no uncertain terms what
individuals to focus his duties on.

“I don’t have any trouble telling you this: male blacks 14 to
20, 21,”
said McCormick.  

Serrano’s testimony was presented as part of Floyd v. City of New
York, in which four plaintiffs claim they were racially profiled by
the NYPD. Four other police officers presented evidence for the
prosecution.

Reuters / Lucas Jackson

That trial concluded this week following two months of
testimony, while Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, who will provide a
ruling within a few months, seemed to indicate heavy skepticism
over the high error rate of New York police stops.

“A lot of people are being frisked or searched on suspicion
of having a gun and nobody has a gun,”
said Judge Scheindlin on
Monday during closing arguments in the trial.

“So the point is: the suspicion turns out to be wrong in most
of the cases,”
she added.

This most recent analysis of the NYPD’s statistics may well add
more fuel to the fire over the stop-and-frisk controversy. The
report by the Public Advocate’s Office leaves little room to
interpret its findings after surveying the 2012 data.

“Despite the overall reduction in stops, the proportion
involving black and Latino New Yorkers has remained unchanged. They
continue to constitute 84 percent of all stops, despite comprising
only 54 percent of the general population. And the innocence rates
remain at the same level as 2011 — at nearly 89 percent.”

Meanwhile, in a separate analysis by the New York Civil
Liberties Union of these same statistics, the group revealed that
out of 532,911 stop-and-frisk searches in 2012, just 729 guns were
found.

On Monday, Judge Scheindlin referred to the “high error
rate”
correlated with the stop-and-frisk practice, in which 88
per cent of stops yielded no evidence of criminality.

“You reasonably suspect something and you’re wrong 90 percent
of the time,”
said Scheindlin to a lawyer representing the
city.  

For his part, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has taken an
unbending stance on city police’s stop-and-frisk policy.

“If you end street stops looking for guns, there will be more
guns on the streets, and more people will be killed. It’s that
simple,”
said Bloomberg during an April speech.

Mayor Bloomberg has often aimed his defense of the policy at the
media, in particular the New York Times, for allegedly turning a
blind eye to the victims of the city’s gun violence,

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Error of judgment’: English town rules non-offensive, reinstates flag of St George

0

A British town has faced fiery protest and even death threats over none other than the national flag of England after the local council has decided not to display it, with one of the councilors saying its links with the Crusades could offend Muslims.

St George’s flags have been proudly flying in Radstock, Somerset
after the town council members unanimously voted on Tuesday to buy
the national flag of England and to display it on “appropriate
occasions,”
the local newspaper ‘The Bath Chronicle’
reports.

The Radstock town council stated on Tuesday that the original
decision not to display the flag was ‘an error of judgment.’

Radstock was stormed by protests on the weekend, prompted by the
decision not to purchase the flag of St George to fly atop the
town’s repaired civic flagpole.

This came after concerns of one of the town’s councilors Eleanor
Jackson who said that the red and white symbol could offend Muslims
living in the English town, because it was used during the Crusades
in the 11th, 12th and 13th centuries.

“My big problem is that it is offensive to some Muslims, but
even more so that it has been hijacked by the far right…My thoughts
are we ought to drop it for 20 years,”
Jackson said as quoted
be ‘The Telegraph’.

Peter Sas with a flag of St George flying from the flagpole at the Memorial Garden, Radstock (Image from thisisbristol.co.uk)

According to Jackson the Union flag was a more suitable way of
displaying national pride.

Though the council has insisted that its decision was
unconnected with Jackson’s comments, and had been prompted by
practical concerns about staffing and funding.

“The general comment made by councilor Jackson, as we moved
to the vote, had no impact on the decision we took,”
said
council chair Lesley Mansell on Tuesday.

John Clements, vice-president of national patriotic group the
Royal Society of St George, said that the censoring of the national
flag is “nonsense”.

In addition, the Muslim Council of Britain encouraged the flying
of the St George’s flag.

“St George needs to take his rightful place as a national
symbol of inclusivity rather than a symbol of hatred. St George
actually lived before the birth of Islam and should not be
associated with any hatred of Muslims,”
said a spokeswoman for
the council Nasima Begum.

Jackson has apologized for her comments, councilor Peter Sas
said on Tuesday.

“Councilor Jackson issued a public apology and made special
tribute to our Armed Forces and the local police who offered her
protection following the death threats she received. She
acknowledged that her comments were inappropriate and confirmed it
had never been her intention to offend anyone,”
local media
reported.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Study: Fukushima Radiation Has Already Killed 14,000 Americans

0

washingtonsblog.com
May 22, 2013

Already 14,000 U.S. Deaths From Fukushima?

International Journal of Health Services alleges that 14,000 people have already died in the United States due to Fukushima.

Specifically, the authors of the study claim:

An estimated 14,000 excess deaths in the United States are linked to the radioactive fallout from the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear reactors in Japan, according to a major new article in the December 2011 edition of the International Journal of Health Services. This is the first peer-reviewed study published in a medical journal documenting the health hazards of Fukushima.[The authors] note that their estimate of 14,000 excess U.S. deaths in the 14 weeks after the Fukushima meltdowns is comparable to the 16,500 excess deaths in the 17 weeks after the Chernobyl meltdown in 1986. The rise in reported deaths after Fukushima was largest among U.S. infants under age one. The 2010-2011 increase for infant deaths in the spring was 1.8 percent, compared to a decrease of 8.37 percent in the preceding 14 weeks.

The authors seem — at first glance — to have pretty solid credentials. Janette Sherman, M.D. worked for the Atomic Energy Commission (forerunner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission) at the University of California in Berkeley, and for the U.S. Navy Radiation Defense Laboratory in San Francisco. She served on the EPA’s advisory board for 6 years, and has been an advisor to the National Cancer Institute on breast cancer. Dr. Sherman specializes in internal medicine and toxicology with an emphasis on chemicals and nuclear radiation.

Joseph J. Mangano is a public health administrator and researcher who has studied the connection between low-dose radiation exposure and subsequent risk of diseases such as cancer and damage to newborns. He has published numerous articles and letters in medical and other journals in addition to books, including Low Level Radiation and Immune System Disorders: An Atomic Era Legacy.

Sherman also claims that a study in British Columbia of infants under 1 year of age allegedly corroborates the increased deaths due to Fukushima:

But a Scientific American blog post and Med Page Today slam the study as being voodoo science. However, Scientific American does admit:

Certainly radiation from Fukushima is dangerous, and could very well lead to negative health effects–even across the Pacific.

What Do Other Experts Say?

Pediatrician Helen Caldicott said recently:

May I say that North America has received quite a large fallout itself.

***

We’re going to see an incredible increase in cancer, leukemia, and – down the time track – genetic disease. Not just in Japan but in the Northern Hemisphere, particularly North America.

Caldicott also wrote in a New York Times Op-Ed:

Children are innately sensitive to the carcinogenic effects of radiation, fetuses even more so. Like Chernobyl, the accident at Fukushima is of global proportions. Unusual levels of radiation have been discovered in British Columbia, along the West Coast and East Coast of the United States and in Europe, and heavy contamination has been found in oceanic waters.

Nuclear engineer Gunderson says that the Japanese will suffer one million cancer deaths from Fukushima, and that we’ll see a statistically meaningful increase in cancer on the West Coast of America and Canada from Fukushima. Gundersen says that — after Japan — the most radioactive areas are the Cascades and Portland.

There is certainly evidence that West Coast residents — especially in Seattle, Portland and other areas near the Cascades — have been hit with some radiation. And there is certainly evidence that radioactive contamination has spread in the United States, and will continue to spread for some time to come.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Why Is The Science So Hotly Debated?

Why is there so much dispute about the number of deaths which Fukushima could cause on the West Coast?

Because radiation safety standards are set based on the assumption that everyone exposed is a healthy man in his 20s — and that radioactive particles ingested into the body cause no more damage than radiation hitting the outside of the body.

However — in the real world — radiation affects small children much more than full-grown adults. And small particles of radiation — called “internal emitters” — which get inside the body are much more dangerous than general exposures to radiation. See this and this.

In addition, American and Canadian authorities have virtually stopped monitoring airborn radiation, and are not testing fish for radiation. (Indeed, the EPA reacted to Fukushima by raising “acceptable” radiation levels.)

So — as in Japan — radiation is usually discovered by citizens and the handful of research scientists with funding to check, and not the government. See this, this, this, this, this and this.

The Japanese government’s entire strategy from day one has been to cover up the severity of the Fukushima accident. This has likely led to unnecessary, additional deaths.

Indeed, the core problem is that all of the world’s nuclear agencies are wholly captured by the nuclear industry … as are virtually all of the supposedly independent health agencies.

So the failure of the American, Canadian and other governments to test for and share results is making it difficult to hold an open scientific debate about what is happening.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 9:29 pm






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Another Memorial Day in This Endless War

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/another_memorial_day_in_this_endless_war_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Obama mulls resuming Guantanamo prison transfers – reports

0

Ahead of a major speech by President Obama involving US counterterrorism operations, the White House has indicated that it will include a plan to renew prisoner transfers out of Guantanamo Bay, with the ultimate goal of shuttering the prison.

Just as the Pentagon is requesting an additional $450 million in
funding to keep the detention center running, the administration
seems ready to push for the transfer of prisoners to their home
country.

“The president is considering
a range of options for ways that we can reduce the population there
and move towards ultimate closure – some of which we can take on
our own, but some of which will require working with the
Congress,”
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said
Wednesday.

Obama, who has long placed blame on Congress for the continued
presence of detainees at Guantanamo, made the closure of the
military facility a campaign pledge during his 2008 run.

“That’s an excuse,”
said Andrea Prasow, senior counterterrorism counsel at Human Rights
Watch.

“We’re at the point now where
I think the president realizes he has to take what action he can
before he works with Congress. They’ll be more amenable once
they’ve seen he’s actually done something,”
added
Prasow.

Lifting the ban on Gitmo-Yemen transfers?

Currently, of the 166 detainees still held at Guantanamo 86 have
already been cleared for transfer, including 56 Yemenis, who
constitute the largest single group. The Pentagon has thus far
transferred only a handful of detainees whose release has been
ordered by courts.

The administration had specifically halted transfers to Yemen
following the attempted bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner by
members of a Yemen branch of Al-Qaeda in December 2009.

In a letter addressed to national security adviser Tom Donilon
in late April Senator Feinstein had requested resumption of
transfers of detainees to Yemen, citing continued support by that
country’s president, Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, in continued
operations against Al-Qaeda. In the last few years, Yemen has
become a primary theater of operations by the US in drone strikes
against terrorist targets.

Although Al Qaeda “still has a
strong presence in Yemen, I believe it would be prudent to revisit
the decision to halt transfers to Yemen and assess whether
President Hadi’s government, with appropriate assistance, would be
able to securely hold detainees in Sana,”
wrote
Feinstein.

According to the Wall Street Journal, resumption of transfers
out of Guantanamo is likely to begin with non-Yemeni detainees,
citing current and former officials. That would give Yemen’s
government time to build up a rehabilitation and oversight
program.

A view of a common area at the medium security prison inside Camp IV at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base (Reuters)

Widespread hunger strike adds urgency

Perhaps placing an even greater impetus on new policy for
Guantanamo Bay is the ongoing hunger strike by 103 detainees, of
which 31 are being forcibly fed through tubes.

The hunger strike has resulted in a number of detainees being
hospitalized within the base, and human rights groups have been
increasingly vocal regarding the force feeding practice, which
includes painful nasal tube inserts and restraints.

Human rights advocates believe that detainees from Afghanistan
could be among the first transferred out of Guantanamo. Per the
WSJ, the US government has already been in talks with that
country’s government regarding prisoner transfers.

Supporters for the closure of the detention facility seem thus
far cautious ahead of Obama’s Thursday speech.

“He needs to make it clear he
is serious this time. He promised the same thing four years ago.
What makes this different? The transfers are what make this
different,”
said Prasow.

Moreover, the announcement for a renewed push to wind down the
prison is not likely to be received well by some lawmakers, such as
Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte, who has spearheaded efforts to
block transfers out of Guantanamo Bay.

“We know there is significant
Al-Qaeda activity in Yemen,”
she said. “I obviously have some serious questions
about Yemen.”

Transfers out of Guantanamo slowed considerably in 2011 after
Congress imposed tough requirements. As a result, there was a
single transfer in 2011, four transfers in 2012 and none so far in
2013.

Administration officials have said the president will finally
fill a vacant State Department position tasked with overseeing the
transfer of detainees, as well as recommend a review board to
resume transferal cases.

In January, the U.S. State Department re-assigned Daniel Fried,
the special envoy who had been in charge of persuading countries to
take Guantanamo inmates approved for transfer.

That vacancy was viewed by both Guantanamo inmates and human
rights group as a flagrant sign that the administration did not
consider shuttering Guantanamo a priority.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Ivory trade menaces peace in C Africa’

0

A file photo taken on July 20, 2011 shows a Kenya Wildlife Services ranger standing guard in front of an illegal ivory stockpile at Tsavo National Park, southeast of the capital Nairobi.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has warned that illegal trade of elephant ivory is threatening peace and security in central Africa.

In a report to the United Nations Security Council, Ban said that the illegal trade has become a major source of funding for armed groups in the volatile region, The Associated Press reported on Wednesday.

“Poaching and its potential linkages to other criminal, even terrorist, activities constitute a grave menace to sustainable peace and security in central Africa,” the secretary general was quoted as saying in the report.

He said that certain African governments are already using armed forces to hunt down poachers due to the sensitive situation in the countries.

According to the report, more than 11,000 elephants were killed in northeastern Gabon between 2004 and 2013, over 300 elephants were slaughtered in Cameroon in the last two months of 2012, and 86 elephants were slain in a week in March 2013.

Ban said the hunters are using more sophisticated and powerful weapons that Å“might be originating from the fallout in Libya.”

He called on the Security Council to consider sanctions against those who have committed “gross human rights violations” in central Africa.

Both African and Asian elephants are listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which strictly controls the trade in ivory and ivory products.

DB/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Amnesty raps abuses in PG Arab states

0

Saudi protesters hold a demonstration in Eastern Province. (file photo)

Amnesty International has condemned the Persian Gulf Arab states for widespread human rights violations.

The Human rights group published a report on Wednesday regarding human rights violations in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Oman.

In Saudi Arabia, “government critics and political activists were detained without trial or sentenced after grossly unfair trials,” Amnesty said.

It added that many are prosecuted in the country based on vague charges such as “disobeying the ruler.”

Anti-government protests have intensified in Saudi Arabia since November 2011, when security forces opened fire on protestors in Qatif in Eastern Province, killing five people and leaving scores more injured.

Activists say there are over 30,000 political prisoners in Saudi Arabia.

Amnesty also referred to discrimination against Shia Muslims in Bahrain where Saudi-backed troops have killed dozens of people since 2011.

The Bahraini uprising began in mid-February 2011, when the people, inspired by the popular revolutions that toppled the dictators of Tunisia and Egypt, started holding massive demonstrations.

The Bahraini government promptly launched a brutal crackdown on the peaceful protests and called in Saudi-led Arab forces from neighboring states.

Dozens of people have been killed in the crackdown, and the security forces have arrested hundreds, including doctors and nurses accused of treating injured revolutionaries.

NT/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

The Growing Global Challenge to Monsanto’s Monopolistic Greed

0

Monsanto.(Photo: Monsanto via The New York Times)

The common problem we face is the power of concentrated wealth and monopolistic corporate interests. This has created a crony capitalist economy that uses government to further enrich the wealthy at the expense of the people, often threatening our basic necessities for life.A clear example of this is found in the behavior of the chemical and seed corporation, Monsanto.

Monsanto threatens the world’s food supply; this is a major challenge of our era. This struggle is central to the global ecosystem, economy and energy crises. Monsanto also pushes poisonous chemicals into the environment and promotes agricultural practices that exacerbate climate change.

Monsanto’s actions truly affect each of us. They put their profits over the need for healthy foods, diverse seed supplies and the stability of the agricultural economy. They employ a variety of tools to control access to seeds and aggressively push genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and toxic chemicals despite serious safety concerns about them. And they accomplish this with great help from the US government.

When President Obama appointed a Monsanto lobbyist, Michael Taylor, as the “food czar” (officially the deputy commissioner for foods) — avoiding the Senate confirmation process, which would have brought public attention to the appointment — it was one more example of how corrupted both parties have become by corporate influence.

A global grassroots movement is building to challenge Monsanto as more people realize that we are in a struggle for our survival. May 25 is a global day of action against Monsanto taking place in hundreds of cities and 41 countries. Monsanto must be stopped before its unfettered greed destroys our health and environment. We urge you to join the effort to stop Monsanto.

Monsanto: A Threat to Public Health and the Environment

Monsanto’s products increase the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, water and energy. At a time when the world needs to be making a transition away from the destructive impacts of energy and chemical-intensive agriculture toward local and organic food and farming, Monsanto is pulling the world in the opposite direction.

Monsanto began as a chemical company in 1901. In the 1930s, it was responsible for some of the most damaging chemicals in our history – polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCB’s, and dioxin. According to a Food & Water Watch corporate profile, a single Monsanto plant in Sauget, Illinois, produced 99 percent of PCB’s until they were banned in 1976. PCBs are carcinogenic and harmful to multiple organs and systems. They are still illegally dumped into waterways, where they accumulate in plants and food crops, as well as fish and other aquatic organisms, which enter the human food supply. The Sauget plant is now the home of two Superfund sites.

Dioxin is the defoliant used in Vietnam known as Agent Orange. It is one of the most dangerous chemicals known, a highly toxic carcinogen linked to 50 illnesses and 20 birth defects. Between 1962 and 1971, 19 million gallons of Agent Orange were sprayed in Vietnam. A class action lawsuit filed by Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange was settled for $180 million. And a Monsanto plant that made dioxin in Times Beach, Missouri, poisoned the area so greatly that the town has been wiped from the map. Thousands of people had to be relocated and it is now also a superfund site. Consistent with their method of operation, Monsanto has denied responsibility for the harm these chemicals have caused.

Their biggest selling chemical worldwide is the herbicide glyphosate, sold under the name RoundUp. Monsanto markets it as a safe herbicide and has made a fortune from it. Sales of Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicides accounted for 27 percent of Monsanto’s total 2011 net sales. Monsanto engineers genetically modified seeds, branded as “Roundup Ready,” to resist Roundup so that the herbicide is absolutely necessary for those who buy these seeds. Roundup Ready seeds have been Monsanto’s most successful genetically modified product line and have made Roundup the most widely used herbicide in the history of the world.

Roundup is toxic, known to cause cancer, Parkinson’s Disease, birth defects and infertility. A 2012 European Report found that the, “Industry has known from its own studies since the 1980s that glyphosate causes malformations in experimental animals at high doses” and that industry has known “since 1993 that these effects also occur at lower and mid doses.” This information was not made public, and both Monsanto and the European government misled people by telling them glyphosate was safe — as did the US government.

In response to Monsanto’s denial of this toxicity, Earth Open Source explicitly pointed to studies, including some funded by Monsanto, that showed “glyphosate causes birth defects in experimental animals” and also causes “cancer, genetic damage, endocrine disruption and other serious health effects. Many of these effects are found at very low, physiologically relevant doses.”

Before the use of glyphosate-resistant seeds, farmers used lower quantities of Roundup for fear of killing their own plants (since the herbicide kills anything green). But, a 2012 report found that with resistant seeds, “the herbicide can be sprayed in massive amounts, often from planes, near homes, schools and villages, resulting in massive increases in cancer and birth defects.”

In addition, farmers are discovering Roundup resistant “super weeds” that are not killed by the herbicide. An Arkansas farmer tells US News “This is not a science fiction thing, this is happening right now. We’re creating super weeds.” Indeed, there are now 24 Roundup resistant weeds that have been reported. In response to the appearance of these weeds, a report found: “farmers … use progressively more glyphosate as well as mixtures of other even more toxic herbicides.” In fact, farmers who grow genetically modified crops use about 25 percent more herbicides than farmers who use traditional seeds.

Monsanto produces a variety of pesticides that are less well known. Author Jill Richardson reports that these include “a number of chemicals named as Bad Actors by Pesticide Action Network.” They include known carcinogens, endocrine disruptors and other toxins such as Alachlor, Acetochlor, Atrazine, Clopyralid, Dicamba and Thiodicarb.

Not only does Monsanto never take responsibility for the impact of its poisonous chemicals, but they do their best to prevent research showing toxic effects. For example, in 2011, Monsanto acquired Beeologics, a company dedicated to restoring the health of the bee population, amid scientific and media speculation that an overuse of pesticides was to blame for dwindling bee populations.

Monsanto also threatens the sustainability of agriculture because its products require the use of larger quantities of water and fossil fuels in farming. While genetically engineered crops are supposed to be more drought resistant, the opposite turns out to be true. Don Huber, a science expert, notes “It takes twice as much water to produce a pound of a Roundup-ready crop soybean plant treated with glyphosate, as it does with soybean plant that’s not treated with glyphosate.”

Monsanto is a major threat to climate change due to its energy-intensive agricultural model and promotion of ethanol as a fuel source. The Organic Consumers Association adds it all up: “All told, the production and processing of Monsanto’s GMO crops, from deforestation to fossil-fuel-based pesticides and fertilizers, polluting factory farms, and fuel-intensive food processing and distribution, is estimated to produce up to 51% of global greenhouse gas emissions.”

As a result of Monsanto’s marketing, there are a lot of myths about GMOs. The truth is that GMO foods are different from traditional foods and are neither more nutritious — nor have they been proven to be safe to eat. Limited studies so far indicate that GMO foods may cause kidney and liver damage. GMO crops do not produce larger crop yields or make farmers’ lives easier, nor are they a key to feeding the world. The use of GMO seeds does environmental damage by increasing the use of pesticides, fossil fuels and water. And they make the world’s biggest environmental problem, climate change, worse.

Monsanto: A Threat to Biodiversity and Independent Agriculture

One of the keys to sustainability and durability in times of environmental stress is biodiversity. This means the existence of many varieties of plants and the insects, fungi and bacteria they require for survival so that food can be produced under different conditions. With climate change upon us, the environment is in a state of great stress: more extreme weather, new varieties of insects moving from south to north and new weeds are becoming common. This is a time when biodiversity is more important than ever.

Yet years of chemical-based agriculture have poisoned the air, water, soil and food supplies, which has killed many living things and decreased biodiversity. In addition to causing disease in humans, the use of herbicides and pesticides is contributing to a rapid species extinction of beneficial plants, insects and animals.

Monsanto is pushing agriculture toward less biodiversity by concentrating the world’s seed supply under its control. Through promotion of their genetically altered crops, contamination of traditional seeds and the practice of monopolization, Monsanto is rapidly dominating our global food system.

Monsanto’s genes are currently found in 40 percent of the crops grown in the United States. A March 2013 report found 86 percent of corn, 88 percent of cotton and 93 percent of soybeans farmed in the US are now genetically engineered (GE) varieties, making the option of farming non-GE crops increasingly difficult. As GE crops spread and infect or mix with traditional crops, it is becoming harder to preserve traditional seeds. This creates a great problem because, as we discussed above, GE crops are unsustainable for a variety of reasons.

Monsanto’s efforts to dominate the market began with buying up the competition as early as 1982. In the decade after the mid-90s, Monsanto spent more than $12 billion to buy at least 30 businesses contributing to the decline of independent seed companies. One of the big purchases that consolidated the market was a 1997 purchase of Holden Foundation Seeds and two Holden seed distributors for $1.02 billion. Holden was the country’s last big independent producer of foundation seed. The company was in the Holden family for three generations. They produced seed that was planted on about 35 percent of the acreage set aside for corn and were the biggest American producer of foundation corn, the parent seed from which hybrids are made.

Jill Richardson describes how aggressively Monsanto uses their market power “to get seed dealers to not stock many of their competitors’ products … they restrict the seed companies’ ability to combine Monsanto’s traits with those of their competitors. And, famously, farmers who plant Monsanto’s patented seeds sign contracts prohibiting them from saving and replanting their seeds.” They promised rebates to farmers who ensured that Monsanto products made up at least 70 percent of their inventory to keep competitors out of the market. As a result of this, through either purchases or forcing competitors into bankruptcy, the number of independent seed producers has dropped from 300 to under 100 since the mid-90s. Monsanto also required that their Roundup Ready seeds be used only with Roundup, thereby keeping generic, less expensive competitors out of the market.

The result has been increased prices for farmers and consumers. Since 2001, Monsanto has more than doubled the price of soybean and corn seeds and farmers have been told to expect prices to keep increasing. According to a March 2013 report, from 1995 to 2011, the average cost to plant one acre of soybeans has risen 325 percent; cotton prices spiked 516 percent and corn seed prices are up by 259 percent. The rising cost has had a deadly effect in India, where more than 270,000 farmers who grew Monsanto’s Bt Cotton committed suicide, many by drinking pesticides, because of endless growing debt. Nonetheless, the greatest threat from the loss of biodiversity in the seed markets is the ability to adapt to increasingly unpredictable climate changes. As Salon reports: “Many of the seed breeders and retailers Monsanto purchased were regional experts, familiar with the soil and adept at breeding crops suited to the vagaries of local pests and climate. That sprawling network of local knowledge and experimentation has been severely thinned.” Richardson adds, when crops are “too genetically homogenous, then they are vulnerable to a single disease or pest that can wipe them out.”

A March 2013 report, Seed Giants vs. US Farmers, found that Monsanto’s seed dominance is also shrinking the number of independent farmers. According to the report, as of January 2013, Monsanto, alleging seed patent infringement, had filed 144 lawsuits involving 410 farmers and 56 small farm businesses in at least 27 different states. Some of these farmers are sued because pollen brings Monsanto products onto their farms. There are so many cases it is impossible to summarize them in this article, but the Organic Consumers Association has an excellent web site for more information on this and other Monsanto controversies.

Monsanto: Leading Example of Corrupted Government Unable to Operate in the Public Interest

You would think this concentration of industry would lead to antitrust litigation. In fact, shortly after taking office, the Obama administration began an antitrust investigation, taking over from several states that were looking into the market practices of Monsanto. The investigation was announced with much fanfare, but last November, without even a press release, the Department of Justice closed the investigation, leaving us to conclude that it may have been a tactic to thwart state efforts.

At the beginning of the antitrust investigation, there was hope that a marketplace with more diverse seed sources and competition could exist in the future, but with the Obama administration’s decision to drop the investigation, Monsanto domination of the market has been given the imprimatur of legality and the abusive practices Monsanto uses to buy or destroy competition have been ratified.

Monsanto exemplifies political connections, the revolving door, bought-and-paid-for corporatist governance and so much that is wrong with the way the US government operates. Open Secrets reports Monsanto is one of the biggest spenders in Washington. It spent $6 million lobbying in DC in 2012, the biggest agribusiness spender. The next was Archer Daniel Midlands, spending just over $1 million.

Monsanto epitomizes the revolving door between industry and government. At least seven Monsanto officials have served in government positions. Michael Taylor left the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1984 to join King & Spalding, a law firm that lobbies for Monsanto. He returned to the FDA in 1991 and then left again to return to Monsanto in 1994 as their vice president for public policy, only to return to the FDA again as the current “food czar,” where he has led major advances for genetically modified foods. Taylor played the lead role in introducing rBGH (bovine growth hormone), which was used to increase cows’ milk production, into the US market in the early 90s along with two other Monsanto-FDA door revolvers, Dr. Margaret Miller and Susan Sechen, both from the Office of New Animal Drugs.

Other door revolvers include high level officials: Arthur Hayes, commissioner of the FDA from 1981 to 1983 and consultant to Searle’s public relations firm, which later merged with Monsanto; Michael A. Friedman, former acting commissioner of the FDA, who later went on to become senior vice president for clinical affairs at Searle; and Virginia Weldon, a member of the FDA’s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee, after retiring as vice president for public policy at Monsanto.

It is not only the FDA where the Monsanto revolving door has influence. On the Supreme Court, Justice Clarence Thomas used to be a lawyer for Monsanto. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled against a farmer who was sued by Monsanto, ordering the farmer to pay $84,000 in damages.

But it is not only the revolving door that is the problem. It is also that some top government officials “work” for Monsanto while they are in office. One example took place during the Clinton administration when the French government was reluctant to allow Monsanto’s seeds on French soil. First the US Trade Representative Charlene Barschefsky urged the French government to allow the seeds. When that did not work, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright lobbied for Monsanto in France. When that failed, President Clinton himself took up the task of giving Prime Minister Lionel Jospin “an earful” about Monsanto. Even that did not work. Finally, Vice President Gore pushed Jospin — who finally gave in.

This is just one example of many in which the US government foreign policy apparatus operated on behalf of Monsanto. Five years of WikiLeaks diplomatic cables during the Bush and Obama administrations reveal that the State Department lobbied for Monsanto products worldwide and pushed genetically modified foods wherever it could. It is almost like the US government is a marketing arm for Monsanto and genetically modified foods. Indeed, in August 2011, WikiLeaks exposed that American diplomats requested funding to send lobbyists for the biotech industry to hold talks with politicians and agricultural officials in “target countries” in areas like Africa and Latin America.

There is no doubt that in the new massive trade agreements, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the trade agreement being negotiated with Europe, the United States will seek to include protections for Monsanto and GMOs. Europeans involved in every aspect of agriculture or food safety are very concerned that lowered trade barriers will allow GMOs into Europe. In Europe, GMOs are currently grown on less than 1 percent of farmland.

When people try to use democratic tools to change Monsanto’s behavior, Monsanto and its allies spend millions to confuse voters and create fear. That was clear in the California initiative in November 2012 in which tens of millions were spent to prevent the requirement that foods be labeled so consumers would know whether they contained GMOs or not. Consumer groups continue to push for labeling. Another vote will be held in 2013 in Washington State, and Vermont may become the first state to pass a law requiring labeling.

Although labeling of foods that contain GMOs is required in Europe and US corporations such as Walmart and McDonald’s comply with these rules in Europe, Monsanto and its allies are taking the fight to prevent labeling in the United States to new levels. As more state-level battles and an energized grass roots develop, Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association reports Monsanto and allies are trying to subvert these efforts by getting the corrupt federal government to pass a law forbidding states to pass labeling laws.

Impossible, you think? Well, Monsanto has done the seemingly impossible before. Most recently, one legislative victory that enraged people was the Monsanto Protection Act (actually misleadingly named the Farmer Assurance Provision) which was buried in a spending bill earlier this year and which protects Monsanto from the courts. For example, under the new law, federal courts are not allowed to stop the sale or planting of controversial genetically modified seeds, no matter what health issues may arise concerning GMOs in the future. There are now efforts to add a rider to the farm bill to repeal this measure.

Stopping Monsanto and Moving to Sensible Agricultural Policy

The first step to stopping the entrenchment of genetically modified foods in our food supply is labeling. As noted above, states are moving forward on that front, despite the efforts of Monsanto to stop them. This is the big battle because when foods are labeled, consumers have the power of knowledge and can choose not to buy them. Cummins reports that in Europe, the labeling of foods was the key to stopping the development of genetically modified foods.

One of the tools we must use is the boycott. Large food and beverage corporations that sell billions of dollars of organic and natural foods bankrolled the industry opposition to GMO labeling in California. Brand names like Kashi, Cascadian Farms, Bear Naked, Honest Tea, Odwalla, Naked Juice and others need to be told that we will not buy their products if they continue to fund ignorance by blocking GMO labeling.

To protect our food and health, the United States needs to adopt the precautionary principle, which means products must be proven to be safe before they are allowed on the market. The US applies a sham standard of “substantial equivalence” which avoids the need to test for safety. Applying the precautionary principle to Monsanto’s products would mean a moratorium on them until their safety can be demonstrated by independent (non-corporate-funded), long-term tests for food safety as well as safety for agriculture. Our health should come before Monsanto’s profits.

People need to be empowered not just with credible information about genetically modified foods and how to avoid them — that is, buy organic and non-processed foods — but also with access to courts to sue if agriculture, the environment or their health is damaged by GMOs. The repeal of the “Monsanto Protection Act” is a first step in that direction, but people also need to have a greater ability to sue corporations that harm them.

We advocate a two-path approach — protest what you do not like and build what you want. That means that while we encourage community-supported agriculture, organic and local gardening, preparing your own non-processed foods and working to change laws, we also urge protest. This May 25, nearly 300 protests are being held all over the world against Monsanto in the March Against Monsanto organized by Occupy Monsanto. Join these protests.

As it is with many other issues, the future of the world’s food supply boils down to the people vs. concentrated wealth and corporate power. It highlights the corruption of government and the need for a real democracy in which people are allowed to make choices for themselves on basic issues like what kind of food they eat and what kind of plants they want to grow. Popular resistance to concentrated wealth is growing as more people demand the right to control their own lives.

You can learn more and hear our interview with Ronnie Cummins, Patty Lovera and Adam Eidinger, “Reasons to Protest Monsanto” at Clearing The FOG. 

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Canadians renew calls for independence

0

Many Canadians have renewed their call for full separation from Britain on Victoria Day — a federal public holiday in honor of British Queen Victoria’s birthday, Press TV reports.

Hundreds of people marched through the streets of Montreal on Victoria Day, which is celebrated on the last Monday before May 25, to demand that Canada sever ties with the British monarchy.

Å“I think that the British monarchy has no more place in Canada… I think the world is in the right state of mind to abolish all those statues and limitations to common people,” said one Montreal resident.

Canadians celebrate Victoria Day in honor of Queen Victoria who granted Canada Independence. But many Quebecers do not feel Canada is independent.

Quebec celebrates National Patriots’ Day on the same day, to honor the rebellion against the British in 1837.

Å“It seems that the British monarchy is such a mild expression here; it is really just like people have tea and they drink it out of china cups and they have a few things like Victoria Day and Victoria Hospital,” a Quebec citizen said.

Others, however, decided to take the fight to an online petition asking Prime Minister Stephen Harper to change the name of the holiday.

A group of prominent Canadians such as Margaret Atwood, Gordon Pinsent and Elizabeth May have called upon the prime minister to change the name of Victoria Day to “Victoria and First Peoples Day.”

MN/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

North Korean leader sends envoy to China

0

Wang Jiarui (R), the head of the Chinese leadership’s international affairs office, meets with North Korea’s Vice Marshal Choe Ryong Hae, a senior Workers Party official and the militaryâ„¢s top political officer, in Beijing, on May 22, 2013.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un has sent a high-level envoy to China in a bid to boost ties with the country’s most important ally.

The Wednesday trip by Vice Marshal Choe Ryong Hae, a senior Workers’ Party official and the military’s top political officer, to Beijing came amid escalating tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

Chinese media say Choe met Wang Jiarui, a top foreign affairs official during his first day of visit.

This is the first visit by a top North Korean official to China, which is North Korea’s biggest trading partner and closest ally, this year.

China, the United States and other nations are trying to persuade North Korea to return to stalled multilateral negotiations on ending Pyongyang’s nuclear weapons program.

The Korean Peninsula also has been locked in a cycle of escalating military rhetoric since March 1, when the US and South Korea began two months of joint military maneuvers, which included nuclear-capable B-52 and B-2 bombers.

The move prompted the North Korean government to step up its war rhetoric and authorize its army to launch Å“preemptive nuclear strikes” on the United States.

Pyongyang has also said its military should be prepared to attack “all US military bases in the Asia-Pacific region, including the US mainland, Hawaii, and Guam.”

DB/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘US continues backing Syria militants’

0

The United States has reiterated its Å“continued” and Å“growing” support for militants fighting against the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

At a joint press conference with Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh in Jordanâ„¢s capital Amman on Thursday, US Secretary of State John Kerry said that Washington would continue backing the militants Å“to permit them to continue to fight.”

Also on Thursday, in a communiqué issued after a meeting of the so-called Friends of Syria in Amman, the alliance said it would Å“further increase their support for the opposition and take all other steps as necessary.”

The Syria crisis began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

Damascus says the West and its regional allies, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, are supporting the militants.

In an interview recently broadcast on Turkish television, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said that if the militants take power in Syria, they could destabilize the entire Middle East region for decades.

Å“If the unrest in Syria leads to the partitioning of the country, or if the terrorist forces take control… the situation will inevitably spill over into neighboring countries and create a domino effect throughout the Middle East and beyond,” he stated.

NT/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Syria militants not committed to peace’

0

Russia says militants fighting against the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad are not committed to peace.

“We expect various opposition groups would react in a constructive way. So far, however, the news is discouraging,” Lavrov said during a meeting with Syrian First Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Miqdad in Moscow on Wednesday.

“The situation urges for an immediate stop of fighting and the start of a political dialogue,” Lavrov said, adding that the future of Syria must be decided by Syrians themselves.

Meanwhile, in a communiqué issued after a meeting of the so-called Friends of Syria in the Jordanian capital Amman, the alliance said it would Å“further increase their support for the opposition and take all other steps as necessary.”

The Syria crisis began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

Damascus says the West and its regional allies, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, are supporting the militants.

In an interview recently broadcast on Turkish television, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said that if the militants take power in Syria, they could destabilize the entire Middle East region for decades.

Å“If the unrest in Syria leads to the partitioning of the country, or if the terrorist forces take control… the situation will inevitably spill over into neighboring countries and create a domino effect throughout the Middle East and beyond,” he stated.

NT/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Jealous NYPD officer hacked fellow cops' email

0

A New York City Police Department detective was arrested Tuesday and charged with hacking the email information of at least 43 people, among them 20 current and former police officers, along with other violations.

Federal officials said Edwin Vargas, 42, paid over $4,000 to a
nefarious “email hacking service” that gave him access to
dozens of accounts. His motivation for the alleged crimes was not
disclosed in court papers, according to the New York Times, but
Vargas is thought to have fathered a child with a fellow officer
and may have been snooping out of jealousy.

Vargas is also accused of accessing the federal National Crime
Information Center to gain intelligence on at least two of the
officers whose email accounts he infiltrated. 

Vargas, formerly tasked with policing the 40th Precinct in the
Bronx, has been suspended with pay, which is standard NYPD practice
when an officer has been charged with a crime.

“Of all places, the Police Department is not a workplace
where one should have to be concerned about an unscrupulous fellow
employee
,” said George Venizelos, the head of the FBI’s New
York office. 

The complaint states that Vargas kept the information he
obtained in the hack on a work computer. 

Vargas has been charged with one count of conspiracy to commit
computer hacking and one count of computer hacking, each of which
carries a maximum one-year sentence.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Iran says US does not need Afghan bases

0

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi (R) meets in Tehran with UN Special Envoy to Afghanistan Jan Kubis on May 22, 2013.

Iran has reiterated its opposition to US plans to establish permanent military bases in Afghanistan after the planned withdrawal of US-led foreign forces from the country in 2014.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said on Wednesday that the United States does not need to establish military bases in Afghanistan and stressed that Afghan forces should take full responsibility for the country’s security.

Salehi made the remarks during a meeting in Tehran meeting with Jan Kubis, the UN special envoy to Afghanistan and head of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA).

Kubis underlined Iranâ„¢s key role in the region and called for more cooperation from Afghanistanâ„¢s neighboring countries to reconstruct the war-torn country. The UNAMA chief also demanded that Iran help Afghanistan advance its political transition and hold elections.

The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 under the pretext of combating terrorism. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across the country despite the presence of thousands of US-led soldiers.

In 2011, Afghan President Hamid Karzai confirmed for the first time that the administration of US President Barack Obama had demanded the establishment of a system of permanent US military bases across Afghanistan.

In May 2012, Washington and Kabul signed an agreement that authorized the presence of US troops for a period of 10 years after 2014, which was the original date agreed earlier for the departure of all foreign combat troopers from Afghanistan.

Afghan officials now say Washington picked some cities for its military bases during its recent talks with Kabul.

MRS/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Was the machete supplied by William Hague?’

0
<!–Afshin Rattansi–>

Afshin Rattansi is a journalist, author of “The Dream of the Decade — the London Novels” and an RT Contributor. He can be reached at afshinrattansi@hotmail.com.



Published time: May 23, 2013 00:04

A police forensics officer investigates a crime scene where one man was killed in Woolwich, southeast London May 22, 2013 (Reuters / Stefan Wermuth)

Embed

Code

The horrible massacre events at Woolwich could be repeated if the UK continues similar practices in its military campaigns abroad, such as arming the Syrian rebels, RT contributor Afshin Rattansi has told the channel.

Arming the opposition who kill civilians on the ground in Syria
and pursuing an inadequate domestic immigration policy, Rattansi
argues will lead to “new MI 5 operations to infiltrate Muslim
communities and create more antagonism and inspire more events”

similar in grotesque to Woolwich murder.

“Foreign Secretary William Hague is completely out of his depth
when it comes to Syria. The idea that he is backing the kind of
people that hacked the soldier to death,”
Rattansi told RT.

RT: The man with blood on his hands in the video says
‘the women in our country have to see this every day’. What do you
think he meant?

Afshin Rattansi: If indeed that is a complete video. It is
very interesting that the corporate broadcasters were afraid of
broadcasting it, Whitehall sources already spreading the
information as far as I understand, the British Broadcasting
cooperation not to broadcast that video.

I have the full statement actually from that video, so it is not
just about warning women not to see it. So for instance, ‘Do you
think David Cameron is going to get caught in the street? Do you
think it is your politicians that are going to die? No, it is going
to be the average guy and your children, so get rid of them. Tell
them to bring our troops back so we can all live in peace.’

What a grotesque thing for this man, if indeed it is this suspect
responsible for this killing. What a grotesque thing to say
because, it is William Hague and David Cameron that are supporting
these type of attack theory, people who hack people to death in
Syria. So what a confusion, if these two suspects are indeed the
men who hacked this British soldier, if he is a British soldier, to
death. How confused are these people?

RT: To what extent has Britain been prepared for an
attack like this to occur? (There have been threats against British
soldiers in the UK before.)

AR: The problem we have here is that we have a country; the
problem as far as the government is concerned is that the entire
country does not support the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq.
It is not being consulted about the tax payer backing the sort of
people hacking people to death in Syria. There is no way that the
law enforcement officials can protect the country from some an
event like this from happening.

Police forensics officers investigate a car at a crime scene where one man was killed in Woolwich, southeast London May 22, 2013 (Reuters / Stefan Wermuth)

The way it can do is to forge community relations to not have
foreign policy bent on murder and so forth, which has been talked
about time and time again. We got to see that in communities like
Woolwich, a very poor, although again, this has nothing to do with
this action and what is always problematic about outlier incidents
as the one in London is that some kind of policy will be made and
the absurdity of Cobra, this meeting that the Prime Minister has to
coordinate some kind of national terrorism strategy on the basis of
this very, very rare event that we have seen on the Streets of
Woolwich is in itself very absurd. The real questions were asked
around the time of the beginning of the Iraq war.

RT: The dead man was reportedly wearing a shirt branded
‘Help for Heroes’ which is a military charity. Does this mean
military personnel will be forced to take greater security measures
in their own country?

AR: Britain is one of the few countries in the world whose
soldiers cannot walk freely on the streets of Britain. Many people
from abroad when they visit Britain are surprised that British
soldiers when they leave their barracks have to change to civvies
to walk around. That is the legacy of anti-militarism that is
widespread in the society.

Although in recent years you began to see soldiers walking around
in uniform, but all this man was wearing ‘Help for Heroes’ t-shirt.
This channel has been covering in detail the appalling nature of
aftercare for ex-servicemen and women by the British government and
it is up to private charities and begging bowls to help the
aftercare of British soldiers that is what that t-shirt meant. I’m
sure people who help the heroes will be planning marches of
thousands of people wearing those t-shirts in days to come to show
solidarity with those charities that help the servicemen and
women.

RT: Britain’s PM Cameron is cutting short his trip to
Paris to hold an emergency security Cobra session. Is it that
serious?

AR: I think what is serious about it is that David Cameron
and his opposite number Ed Miliband have deliberately tried to put
the immigration debate up on political and editorial ladder. 
They’ve received opposition from UKIP and other parties; even
without UKIP, they are looking for a middle swing vote in 2015
election and both Ed Miliband and David Cameron have deliberately
been targeting immigration, consequences of which is to make
immigrant minorities and the children of immigrants and the
grandchildren of immigrants more uneasy.

It is simple addition sum. You create austerity, you create
austerity Britain, then you create hatred between working class
communities of all faiths, all creeds, all colors and you have that
type of recipe. And what Cameron and Miliband are trying to do is
to get those swing votes of those who want the far right in power.
And I’m not going to give publicity to the far right but apparently
they had plans for Woolwich, they were tweeting about it within
hours after hacking to death of this British soldier.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague (Reuters / Muhammad Hamed)

RT: As for Britain’s involvement in supporting Syria’s
rebels, as well as military support in the Libyan revolution and
campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan. Will there be any consideration
about how dangerous Britain is being made because of this military
action?

AR: I think it is clear to most analysts, even those on the
conservative benches who fought in wars that the Foreign Secretary
William Hague is completely out of his depth when it comes to
Syria. The idea that he is backing the kind of people that hack the
soldier to death, just being able to say that sentence seems
plainly absurd. But it is true that David Cameron and Hague are at
the forefront, along with Francois Hollande in Paris, trying to
support the rebels that are hacking to death Christians, Muslims,
people of no faith at all in Syria. Perhaps it is time for Barack
Obama to give them some advice, because certainly the conservative
government and the Labor opposition in this country seem to
understand in no way how their foreign policy affects things here
and affects British interests.

RT: Last week, shocking footage emerged of a Syrian
rebel reportedly eating the flesh of a murdered army soldier. What
are your thoughts about whether such brutal, random, attacks will
increase?

AR: If those reports that you have put on your channel
were as widely broadcast on corporate media channels here and
terrestrial channels here in Britain, perhaps the people would have
seen how alike the events in Woolwich were to the hacking we saw in
the streets, I think it was Homs, but of course this kind of attack
has been occurring all over Syria. Except the British government
has been supporting people with the machetes. I have to say when I
first heard about it and that it was a machete and it was involving
knives, and then there was of course the inevitable — they were
Islamists, or some connection to Islam, one had to think – 
was the machete supplied by William Hague? One good thing that I
should add is that it leads the identity driven corporate media,
terrestrial media are attempting to reinforce in the minds of the
British people that 2 billion Muslims, that you can’t judge them by
actions of these two people.

RT: Do you think the UK government be looking at
revising their foreign policy?

AR: In no way will they change their foreign policy. They
will react completely wrongly just as they did after 07/07, invent
new MI 5 operations to infiltrate Muslim communities and create
more antagonism and inspire more events, if the past is anything to
go by, more tragic terrible violent events like the ones we saw
today in Woolwich.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Iran committed to cooperation with IAEA’

0

The Iranian ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has reiterated the peaceful nature of the countryâ„¢s nuclear energy program, saying that Tehran is determined to continue its cooperation with the IAEA, Press TV reports.

Å“After 10 years of the most robust inspection in the history of the IAEA, no evidence of diversion of nuclear material or nuclear activities to the prohibited purposes have been found and everything remains peaceful,” Ambassador Ali Asghar Soltanieh told Press TV in an exclusive interview on Wednesday.

The Iranian official made the remarks in response to a new IAEA quarterly report that reflects accusations made by the United States, Israel and some of their allies against the Islamic Republic of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

Though strongly rejected by Tehran, the allegations have been used as a pretext by the US and the European Union to imposed illegal sanctions against Iran.

Soltanieh stressed that IAEA inspectors’ failure to find any diversion in Iran’s nuclear activities “is in fact a very clear document to prove that all those allegations against Iran are forged and fabricated.”

He reemphasized Iranâ„¢s Å“political determination to work with the IAEA in order to remove any ambiguities” regarding its nuclear energy program, noting that Tehranâ„¢s participation in negotiations on the so-called Ëœpossible military dimensionâ„¢ is beyond its obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Iran and the IAEA have so far held 10 rounds of negotiations over the Islamic Republicâ„¢s nuclear energy program since early 2012.

Tehran maintains that as a committed NPT signatory and a member of the IAEA, it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

MRS/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Man Linked to Boston Bombing Suspect Confesses to Murder, Gets Shot by FBI

0

Dead men tell no tales

Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

The man supposedly linked to deceased Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev allegedly confessed to being involved in the murder of three people just before he was shot to death today by the FBI, sources told NBC News.

“Sources say that what began as a drug ripoff ended in a triple homicide when Tsarnaev and friend Ibragim Todashev realized their victims would later be able to identify them,” reports NBC.

According to law enforcement, after confessing to the three unsolved 2011 murders, Todashev used a knife to attack an FBI agent in an apartment complex in Orlando, Florida, prompting the agent to shoot and kill him. He reportedly “became violent as he was about to sign a written statement based on his confession.”

Coincidentally, Todashev had told his friend, prior to being interrogated, he had a feeling he would be shot by the FBI.

“He felt inside he was going to get shot,” Todashev’s friend, Khusn Taramiv, said. “I told him, ‘Everything is going to be fine, don’t worry about it.’ He said, ‘I have a really bad feeling.’”

Last Thursday, it was reported Tamerlan’s brother Dzhokhar had also penned a confession to the Boston Marathon bombing on a note which was found in his hideout boat.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 5:52 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

US admits drones killed 4 Americans

0

The White House has for the first time admitted that four US citizens were killed in CIA assassination drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan in 2011.

In a letter to Congressional leaders on Wednesday, Attorney General Eric Holder acknowledged that the US government had deliberately killed Anwar al-Awlaki in a drone strike in September 2011 in Yemen, The New York Times reported.

Å“The decision to target Anwar al-Awlaki was lawful, it was considered, and it was just,” Holder wrote, claiming that Anwar al-Awlaki was the inspiration for several plots against the United States.

The letter also said that the US had killed three other US citizens: Samir Khan, who was killed in the same strike; Awlakiâ„¢s son Abdulrahman, who was also killed in Yemen in October 2011; and Jude Kenan Mohammad, who was reportedly killed in November of the same year in a strike in Pakistan.

Holder said the letter, directed by US President Barack Obama, comes in response to congressional inquiries about the “administrationâ„¢s use of lethal force against US citizens.”

The disclosure to Congress comes a day before the US president is scheduled to deliver an address on the use of drones.

The Obama administration refuses to publicly discuss any details of the covert program and the death toll from drone strikes remains a mystery.

In February, a number of US lawmakers expressed concern about Obama’s use of assassination drones to kill US citizens overseas and the secrecy in legal justifications for the targeted killings.

“The same president who opposes the detention of foreign terrorists, who opposes the use of enhanced interrogation techniques on foreign terrorists, and who attempted to bring foreign terrorists to trial in New York City is now personally approving the killing of Americans,” House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte said.

The lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee also criticized Obama’s secrecy in laying out legal justifications for the attacks.

“To date, the administration has not even acknowledged that this program exists, let alone provided this committee with the information it requires to examine the legality of the program,” said Representative John Conyers, a Democrat from Michigan.

Washington uses assassination drones in several countries, claiming that they target Å“terrorists”. According to witnesses, however, the attacks have mostly led to massive civilian casualties.

MN/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Nine soldiers killed in Colombia attack

0

A Colombian soldier looks at the remains of a car bomb that exploded in Popayan, Cauca department, Colombia, on June 18, 2011.

Nine soldiers have been killed and six others injured in an attack carried out by a leftist guerrilla group in northeastern Colombia near the border with Venezuela.

Officials blamed the late Tuesday attack on the National Liberation Army (ELN).

“Six heroes of our army (died) in an ELN attack in Norte de Santander. Our hearts are with their families,” Columbian President Juan Manuel Santos said in a message on Twitter on Wednesday.

The army, however, later raised the death toll to nine, saying they died late Tuesday when “home-made explosives” detonated in the municipality of Chitaga, in the department of Norte de Santander.

On April 14, ELN guerrillas killed three soldiers in the nearby department of Arauca.

Colombia has been experiencing violent conflict since the 1960s, when peasant guerrilla groups such as the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the ELN took up arms against the government.

The FARC has been hammering out peace terms with government negotiators since November to end five decades of war that has killed more than 100,000 people. The government wants a peace agreement signed by the end of this year.

DB/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Julian Assange sues US military over secrecy of Bradley Manning trial

0

Julian Assange and a coalition of activists and journalists filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against the military judge overseeing Army Pfc. Bradley Manning’s trial in a bid to open access to the secretive proceedings.

During the trial both access to transcripts and prosecution and
defense motions have been virtually inaccessible.

Bradley, who faces a life sentence over the leaking of more than
700,000 sensitive military documents published by Wikileaks, is
currently being tried by a military tribunal. The trial is expected
to begin on June 3, 2013.

The judge overseeing Manning’s court-martial announced this week
that she will close portions of the trial to the public in order to
protect classified material. Prosecutors are expected to call 150
witnesses to testify against Manning, while two dozen witnesses may
be able to provide their testimony in closed sessions.

Shayana Kadidal, an attorney with the Center for Constitutional
Rights which is part of the legal challenge, described the effort
as a last ditch attempt.

“If this lawsuit fails, Manning’s
trial will take place under conditions where journalists and the
public will be unable as a practical matter to follow what is going
on in the courtroom,”
says Kadidal.

“The federal civilian courts are
now our last option,”
she added.

Assange’s co-plaintiffs in the legal injunction include Guardian
columnist Glenn Greenwald, Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman, and The
Nation magazine. The coalition seeks to force the release of files
currently being kept out of the public’s access.

The same group previously filed a similar lawsuit in military
courts that was shot down in a 3-2 decision by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces last month. Now, they are
hoping that the same legal request will fare better in a civilian
court.

The group’s preliminary injunction is expected to be presented in
front of a Maryland US District Court shortly after Manning’s trial
begins in June.

Though the pretrial process has been opaque, prosecutors did say
this week that they had agreed not to pursue a charge that Manning
had violated the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which could
potentially reduce any prison sentence by eight years. According to
the Washington Post, prosecutors did not provide a reason for the
recent shift.

Regardless, convictions for the more serious charges faced by
Manning could still carry a sentence of life in prison.

Manning’s defense team attempted to block testimony from witnesses
linked to alleged damage caused by the release of the leaked
documents. Army Col. Denise Lind, overseeing the trial, disagreed,
and ruled that the prosecution will have the option to call
witnesses to provide both evidence and context of any collateral
damage caused by the document leaks.

Lind did say, however, that the testimony would be limited so as to
not have the trial “devolve into
many trials regarding international politics in many regions of the
world.”

Both activists and journalists that have been following Manning’s
pretrial proceedings have accused the US military of undermining
the legal process by preventing access.

“The culture of extreme secrecy
that has defined both the Bush and Obama presidencies does a
disservice to our democratic society. By unnecessarily cloaking
these proceedings from public view or scrutiny, the government is
undermining the most basic principles of transparency and freedom
of the press, both of which are vital components of the democratic
and judicial process,”
said journalist Jeremy Scahill,
national security correspondent for The Nation.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Fighting continues in Congo for 3rd day

0

March 23 movement (M23) rebels have fired two rockets into the eastern Congolese city of Goma killing one person and wounding four, officials say.

The two rockets exploded in Goma’s Ndosho neighborhood on Wednesday, said Col. Premanku Ghosh, a UN peacekeeping officer in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), The Associated Press reported.

He said civilians were among the casualties.

The M23 rebels, however, accuse the government forces of launching the attack first.

“The FARDC (Congolese army) has been attacking us since 6 a.m. (2400 GMT) with mortars, tanks and rocket launchers in the Mutaho area,” M23 military spokesman Vianney Kazarama told AFP.

Wednesday marked the third straight day of fighting between the rebels and government forces near the strategic city of Goma, after a nearly six-month lull in fighting in the troubled east.

The new round of clashes between government forces and the rebels began on Monday. Residents of nearby refugee camps have been fleeing in their hundreds since then.

Meanwhile, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon arrived in Congo’s capital Kinshasa for a two-day visit expected to take him to the flashpoint city of Goma.

The mandate of the United Nations peacekeeping mission in Congo, known as MONUSCO, was recently renewed by the UN Security Council. The new mandate allows the creation of a special unit, called the Force Intervention Brigade, to carry out targeted offensive operations against armed groups rather than merely protecting civilians. The forces of the special unit are expected to arrive in the country before July 1.

The UN has nearly 20,000 peacekeepers in eastern Congo.

The M23 rebels seized Goma on November 20, 2012 after UN peacekeepers gave up the battle for the frontier city of one million people. M23 fighters withdrew from the city on December 1 under a ceasefire accord.

The M23 rebels defected from the Congolese army in April 2012 in protest over alleged mistreatment in the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC). They had previously been integrated into the Congolese army under a peace deal signed in 2009.

Since early May 2012, nearly 3 million people have fled their homes in the eastern Congo. About 2.5 million have resettled in Congo, but more than 460,000 have crossed into neighboring Rwanda and Uganda.

Congo has faced numerous problems over the past few decades, such as grinding poverty, crumbling infrastructure, and a war in the east of the country that has dragged on since 1998 and left over 5.5 million people dead.

MN/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

The Next Gun Debate? Armed Drones Could Be Protected By the Second Amendment

0

Jason Koebler
US News & World Report
May 22, 2013

Several YouTube videos show hobbyists who have allegedly created rudimentary armed drones.

But those who most often challenge anti-gun laws aren’t ready to get behind citizens’ armed drone rights — either real or perceived.

“It’s nothing I’ve ever heard of anyone wanting to do,” Dave Workman, a representative for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. “It certainly is an interesting idea, but if you’re launching an armed, remote controlled aircraft, I’d imagine you’d run into some serious safety issues. What if it crashes and you have a loaded gun on it?”

Though the FAA expressly forbids people from arming their private planes, it doesn’t forbid the shooting of guns out of the windows of planes or helicopters. While it is illegal in most states, in some places, it’s specifically permitted. In 2011, Texas passed a law that allows licensed hunters to shoot feral hogs from helicopters.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 4:13 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Al-Wefaq halts talks with Bahrain regime

0

The Bahraini opposition bloc al-Wefaq has suspended talks with the regime due to the Persian Gulf kingdomâ„¢s deliberate “delay and absence of positive response.”

The al-Wefaq National Islamic Society said in a statement on Wednesday that it has boycotted the negotiations for two weeks.

“Al-Wefaq National Islamic Society, and in coordination with the national democratic opposition parties, declares it will temporarily stop attending the dialogue’s preparation sessions for two weeks,” the statement read.

The statement also cited a recent raid on the house of prominent Shia cleric Ayatollah Sheikh Issa Ahmed Qassim as a reason for the halt.

On May 17, the countryâ„¢s Saudi-backed security forces attacked the sheikhâ„¢s house in the village of Diraz near capital Manama.

Born in 1937, Sheikh Issa Qassem is often referred to as the spiritual leader of Bahrainâ„¢s main opposition party.

Six opposition groups have been holding talks with regime officials since February.

The Bahraini uprising began in mid-February 2011, when the people, inspired by the popular revolutions that toppled the dictators of Tunisia and Egypt, started holding massive demonstrations.

The Bahraini government promptly launched a brutal crackdown on the peaceful protests and called in Saudi-led Arab forces from neighboring states.

Dozens of people have been killed in the crackdown, and the security forces have arrested hundreds, including doctors and nurses accused of treating injured revolutionaries.

A report published by the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry in November 2011 found that the Al Khalifa regime had used excessive force in the crackdown and accused Manama of torturing political activists, politicians, and protesters.

Bahrainis say they will continue holding demonstrations until their demand for the establishment of a democratically elected government is met.

NT/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

The Next Gun Debate? Armed Drones Could Be Protected By the Second Amendment

0

Jason Koebler
US News & World Report
May 22, 2013

Several YouTube videos show hobbyists who have allegedly created rudimentary armed drones.

But those who most often challenge anti-gun laws aren’t ready to get behind citizens’ armed drone rights — either real or perceived.

“It’s nothing I’ve ever heard of anyone wanting to do,” Dave Workman, a representative for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. “It certainly is an interesting idea, but if you’re launching an armed, remote controlled aircraft, I’d imagine you’d run into some serious safety issues. What if it crashes and you have a loaded gun on it?”

Though the FAA expressly forbids people from arming their private planes, it doesn’t forbid the shooting of guns out of the windows of planes or helicopters. While it is illegal in most states, in some places, it’s specifically permitted. In 2011, Texas passed a law that allows licensed hunters to shoot feral hogs from helicopters.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 4:13 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Al-Wefaq halts talks with Bahrain regime

0

The Bahraini opposition bloc al-Wefaq has suspended talks with the regime due to the Persian Gulf kingdomâ„¢s deliberate “delay and absence of positive response.”

The al-Wefaq National Islamic Society said in a statement on Wednesday that it has boycotted the negotiations for two weeks.

“Al-Wefaq National Islamic Society, and in coordination with the national democratic opposition parties, declares it will temporarily stop attending the dialogue’s preparation sessions for two weeks,” the statement read.

The statement also cited a recent raid on the house of prominent Shia cleric Ayatollah Sheikh Issa Ahmed Qassim as a reason for the halt.

On May 17, the countryâ„¢s Saudi-backed security forces attacked the sheikhâ„¢s house in the village of Diraz near capital Manama.

Born in 1937, Sheikh Issa Qassem is often referred to as the spiritual leader of Bahrainâ„¢s main opposition party.

Six opposition groups have been holding talks with regime officials since February.

The Bahraini uprising began in mid-February 2011, when the people, inspired by the popular revolutions that toppled the dictators of Tunisia and Egypt, started holding massive demonstrations.

The Bahraini government promptly launched a brutal crackdown on the peaceful protests and called in Saudi-led Arab forces from neighboring states.

Dozens of people have been killed in the crackdown, and the security forces have arrested hundreds, including doctors and nurses accused of treating injured revolutionaries.

A report published by the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry in November 2011 found that the Al Khalifa regime had used excessive force in the crackdown and accused Manama of torturing political activists, politicians, and protesters.

Bahrainis say they will continue holding demonstrations until their demand for the establishment of a democratically elected government is met.

NT/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Iran slams US over election remarks

0

Iran has strongly criticized the United States for making Å“baseless remarks” about the countryâ„¢s electoral process and interfering in its domestic affairs.

Å“Flawed judgment on the basis of poor knowledge and misinformation about the electoral process in Iran, is not only interference in the Iranian nationâ„¢s [domestic] affairs and in contradiction with basic international laws, but offends the political maturity and awareness of Iranâ„¢s discerning people,” Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Seyyed Abbas Araqchi said on Wednesday.

Araqchi said the US lacks adequate knowledge and is incapable of a sound analysis of politics in the Middle East.

Å“The Iranian nation and the [worldâ„¢s] public opinion have witnessed over half a century of US support for dictatorial and despotic regimes in the region, and do not care for their obsolete claims in support of democracy,” he stated.

The comments come after US State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell criticized Iranâ„¢s Guardian Council over the vetting process that has disapproved hundreds of presidential hopefuls.

US officials must learn more about the electoral process in Iran before making comments about the presidential election, Araqchi urged.

A total of 686 individuals registered from May 7 to 11 for the Islamic Republicâ„¢s 11th presidential election, which will be held on June 14.

Late on Tuesday, Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry issued the list of hopefuls approved by the Guardian Council to run in the presidential election.

The council approved MP Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili, Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei, Hassan Rohani, the director of the Strategic Research Center of the Expediency Council, former First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref, Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, and former Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Velayati.

The council did not approve, among others, former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei, a top aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and former Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki.

MRS/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

On the Road to Damascus: An Eyewitness Report

0

I participated, May 1-11, 2013 in the Mussalaha International Peace Delegation to Lebanon-Syria alongside fellow TRANSCEND member Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Maguire, from Ireland, and 15 others from eight countries. Keenly aware of my responsibility, especially to my newly made Syrian and Lebanese friends left behind, I shall try to report, describe, make sense of what I saw, heard and experienced; also offer views and insights based on interviews. However, this report will take more than one article.

First impressions first: the people, the civil society, women, men, the youth, elderly, children, workers, the Arab street, as it is called. It was disconcerting coming into the country for the first time knowing what I thought I knew and seeing a calm, positive demeanor in people, which could well be misconstrued as apathy, yet exhibiting expectant, concerned, awaiting eyes and facial expressions. After some time I noticed a striking absence of anger or negative excitement in the air; people going about their daily business as if nothing was happening, as if life were normal. No cries for revenge against their many external aggressors, no fists in the air, no demonstrations against a dictator, no pleading or denouncing slips of paper passed to me surreptitiously by nervous, fearful hands. Eye contacts revealed seriousness, curiosity, kindness, hope, hospitality, happiness in seeing strangers. No public laughs or smiles though. Heavy hearts do not allow for such frivolities. Syrian people are suffering, they are sad, stuck, against the wall, being victimized for which they bear no responsibility. They just don’t know why they are being threatened, attacked, killed, tortured, and humiliated so viciously from so many fronts. The concept of proxy war is alien to them even though they are at its core. Fear of violence can be more psychologically and emotionally damaging than the real thing. Understandably, they are afraid of talking in public and being later identified and targeted by jihadists.

But then again, that is always the case, isn’t? Who cares about unimportant people when so many more pressing factors are in play? Like the obscene profits made by the oil multinationals, the 7 sisters cartel, and the preservation of wasteful lifestyles of peoples from richer, more powerful nations that need —and will take by any means necessary— the oil that Syrians at this juncture unfortunately have underneath their feet?

Disconcerting as well was to find a country bursting with activity and life, children in playgrounds or walking to school in their uniforms, open air markets filled with people, heavy traffic, buses running, life happening in and around Damascus. Disconcerting because I had psyched myself to find a country in ruins, people fleeing for their lives from bombs, tanks on the streets, a police state massacring its own citizens, large scale suffering, buildings demolished, people resisting the government by force, and so on. Yet, I saw none of the above; quite the opposite. But you will forgive my ignorance, for I am a Westerner and that is what we hear, watch and read in our corporate media, which without a pinch of shame, honesty or humanity tell us half truths, innuendoes, straight lies, and party-line talking-points uttered by talking heads about what is happening on this part of the world. And I stand guilty of believing them like a fool. Nonetheless, the country has been as if divided by checkpoints in every strategic entrance and exit. To give an idea, our Damascus hotel was surrounded by six different checkpoints strategically located around it. Armed personnel and soldiers on the streets is a common sight that adds to a sense of security.

Mairead and Mother Agnès-Maryam Soeur (our leaders) met privately with Syrian armed fighters and we were introduced to some persons victimized by their atrocities. Audiences included: Syrian Prime Minister Mr. Wael Al Halki, Deputy PM and Minister of Economic Affairs Mr. Qadri Jameel (opposition), Minister of Health Dr. Saed Anayef, Minister of Social Affairs Ms. Kinda Al-Shammat (a pleasant and intelligent young lady), Minister of Justice Dr. Najem Hamad Al-Ahmad, Minister of Information Mr. Omran Ahed Al-Zouabi, Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Walid Muallem, the Syrian Ambassador to Lebanon Mr. Ali Abd Karim Ali, the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon, and General Michael Aoun, an influential Lebanese party leader (who is rumored to discriminate against Palestinian refugees).

We visited the People’s Council of Syria (parliament), hospitals, refugee camps, were briefed by senior field coordinator Maeve Murphy at the UNHCR intake center in Zahleh-Lebanon, and met with a representative of the Syrian Arab Red Crescent, and with ambulance drivers and health workers. We were also welcomed by some ten leaders from various religions, sects and faiths, were greeted in churches and mosques, and I talked with common folks every time an opportunity presented in shops and in the streets. I talked with an active member of the political opposition to the present regime. He was in prison for 24 years, released 11 years ago, and wants changes–but without outside interference as he told to me textually. The 71 year-old kind and intelligent gentleman who declined to give his name also told me he did not marry and have children because he was in prison, and he was ashamed of that.

ACTORS AND PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT

A deeper contextual assessment and analysis within a peace studies/conflict resolution paradigm would require more time and research into the complexities of the conflicts (in the plural) vis-à-vis the newest perceptions, facts and evidences acquired herein; the majority of actors are not evident whereas the main, deadliest ones are shielded by ‘deniability.’ However, they are all known–and very active. Of one thing you may rest assured: Bashar al-Assad is not the sole culprit, THE bad guy in this saga. He is a well liked leader all over, which is evident in different cities, in talks with differing kinds of persons, and by their attitudes and actions. Body languages, eye contacts, non-verbal messages work wonders in bringing hidden messages to the surface. Billboards with his picture are spread throughout the land and they are clean, well preserved. One does not see graffiti over them, obscenities or anything like that. Syrians in general show pride in having a handsome leader, an eye doctor who is not a sanguinary dictator like Saddam Hussein was. I would assume that in the present context even those who oppose him are on his side to defend Syria’s integrity as a functioning society.

Quoting Johan Galtung [i]: “An image of the goals of some outside parties:

  • Israel: wants Syria divided in smaller parts, detached from Iran, status quo for Golan Heights, and a new map for the Middle East;
  • USA: wants what Israel wants and control over oil, gas, pipelines;
  • UK: wants what USA wants;
  • France: co-responsible with the UK for post-Ottoman colonization in the area, wants confirmed friendship France-Syria;
  • Russia: wants a naval base in the Mediterranean, and an “ally”;
  • China: wants what Russia wants;
  • EU: wants both what Israel-USA want and what France wants;
  • Iran: wants Shia power;
  • Iraq: majority Shia, wants what Iran wants;
  • Lebanon: wants to know what it wants;
  • Saudi-Arabia: wants Sunni power;
  • Egypt: wants to emerge as the conflict-manager;
  • Qatar: wants the same as Saudi Arabia and Egypt;
  • Gulf States: want what USA-UK want;
  • The Arab League: wants no repetition of Libya, tries human rights;
  • Turkey: wants to assert itself relative to the (Israel-USA) successors to the (France-UK-Italy) successors to the Ottoman Empire, and a buffer zone in Syria.
  • UN: wants to emerge as the conflict manager.

Every single statement here can be challenged and challenged again. But let us for the sake of the mental experiment assume that this image, with 16 outside and five inside parties, is more right than wrong.”

The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economic Affairs, Mr. Kadri Jameel, is a Communist Kurd elected on the opposition party platform. He came to talk to the delegation at the 5-star hotel where we stayed in Damascus. He affirmed that his electoral victory represented a foot on the door for further changes, which envisioned a multiparty political system. I talked with four members of his security detail. One of them, 26, showed me his wound: a bullet entered through his backside and exited through his neck, which had been broken as he was attacked by foreign fighters coming from Turkey at a Palestinian refugee camp in Latakia on Aug, 2011 when he was still in the army. Although army officers, they guard the leader of the opposition. I was told by them that these armed gangs of trouble makers target especially the minorities (Druze, Christians, Shia) in hopes that they turn against the government.

“As the government moves to a multi-party system, a non-territorial federation with two chambers, one for provinces and the other for nations, with vetoes in matters of vital concern might be useful.” [ii]

In addition, as much as I tried, no one leader could or would answer my two basic questions: What is the source of this conflict? What are the solutions? Perhaps it was so because all our audiences, meetings, visits, and so forth were made in groups: our delegation, composed of 16 invitees from seven countries, our hosts, the press (which at times stole the whole show all for themselves), plus the heavily armed security around us everywhere around the clock, sometimes annoyingly so. Thus no conversations or even follow-up questions were ever entertained. But I got a generalized reply based and around a single theme: “The violence must stop!” Moreover, few of the leaders spoke English. Thus a lot of our ‘conversations’ was lost or truncated in the interpreting process. What stands out is that almost all of the various leaders and people in general seem to agree that the major, perhaps only problem facing the country is the (contained) violence and threat thereof. Not could be farther from the truth, though. So I will stay more at the surface in this overview of our visit.

Galtung’s bird’s eye view of the situation (in Syria, TMS 29 Apr 2013): “Over this looms a dark cloud: Syria is in the zone between Israel-USA-NATO and Shanghai Cooperation Organization-SCO [Russia-China], both expanding.

“Then, an image of the goals of some inside parties:

  • Alawis (15%): want to remain in power, “for the best of all” (Assad’s power base);
  • Shias in general: want the same;
  • Sunnis: want majority rule, their rule, democracy;
  • Jews, Christians, minorities: want security, fearing Sunni rule;
  • Kurds: want high level autonomy, some community with other Kurds.”

However, Susan Dirgham, a delegate from Australia, offers a qualification:

“Much of the propaganda in Australia that leads to young Sunni Lebanese Australians to go to Syria for jihad relies on claims that in Syria you have an Alawi minority suppressing a Sunni majority. My understanding is that most of the ministers are in fact Sunni and the business elite with the economic power in Syria is also mostly Sunni. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Ministers_(Syria):

“The Information Minister, Dr Al-Zouabi, is Sunni (not Alawi, as claimed).

“The Foreign Minister, Walid Muallem, is Sunni (not Greek Orthodox, as claimed).

“The Deputy PM and Minister for Economic Affairs Qadri Jamil is Kurdish, as stated, and Communist (not Alawi as claimed).

“It is interesting that the religion of the Minister for Social Affairs Ms. Kinda Al-Shammat is not listed though one would assume she is Sunni because of her white hijab and the way she wears it.”

REFUGEES

The Syrian state and its population are being indirectly attacked by US/EU/NATO/UN; and directly by Israel, HERE and also HERE, by the autocratic dictatorships of the GCC-Gulf Cooperation Council: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, UAE (mostly Sunni Muslims) in partnership with Turkey (secular), and by Al Qaeda plus a diversity of mercenary jihadists (by definition terrorist groups), each with its own agenda, recruited from 29 countries and paid by GCC/CIA. Syrians are also assailed by UN sanctions and an embargo, and by a foreign press bent on demonizing, lying, destabilizing the country (not merely the regime). The mercenaries fight among themselves to grab the moneys channeled from the CIA and other American institutions via GCC and/or Turkey. Weapons enter Syria hidden in Turkish ambulances posing as such. US cash provides weapons and logistics, fund mercenaries, pay for jihadists. Bands of jihadists armed to the teeth invade Syria through Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon (Tripoli). Turkey opened its Syrian borders to them and, through terror, they displace the populations forcing them to take refuge back in Turkey in an effort to destabilize Syria. Turkey, in fact, invites Syrian refugees into the country. It is documented that Syrian refugees in Turkey are mistreated, have their organs removed (stolen), children sold for forced marriage or else. There are an estimated 50,000 foreign jihadist fighters terrorizing Syria’s countryside: snipers, bombers, agitators. They torture and kill men who refuse to join them. In their religious fundamentalism they believe that any Muslim they kill will automatically and immediately achieve paradise; they are actually doing them a favor (!). There is a score of young Europeans on their ranks as well (Germans, Dutch, British, Australians).

We visited and talked with a chief of family, refugee in Lebanon and saw twenty people living in a space roughly 6×6 without ventilation, a room inside a warehouse, for which they pay the equivalent of 400 dollar/month. One filthy kitchen, one bathroom. And that is that. They are on their own to find work and everything else. Some resort to stealing and committing petty crimes to survive.  This is typical, not an exception. And he explained that in his native Homs jihadists take over their houses, rape their women, and kill young males who refuse to join their ranks. Chechens, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Lebanese, Jordanians, Turkish, Europeans compose these gangs armed, fed and maintained by the above mentioned foreign governments. He said they attach suicide vests around peoples’ bodies and threaten to explode them if they don’t do what they are told. Underneath a rather dignified posture, he was scared, terrorized. Yet we kept hearing the same mantra over and over: “I want to go back home, I don’t belong here.” It was truly heartbreaking, and I felt helpless in the face of it. Bearing witness we were.

In one of the refugee camps we visited in Lebanon (more aptly called a concentration camp) we talked with a couple from Homs—he being a pharmacist and engineer—who had their house and business blown up due to terrorist activities. Now they live by charity in the Bekaa Valley-Lebanon, under a tent and with nothing but the clothes over their bodies. They are not allowed to work, own property, have a dignified life. There is no sanitation and there are check points with armed soldiers at the gates. Multiply this by about 1.5 million and you will have an approximate dimension of the human tragedy. We visited the Sabra Palestinian refugee camp as well, of the infamous Sabra-Shatila massacre by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in September 1982, on the outskirts of Beirut. In addition we toured the UN High Commission for Refugees intake center in Zahleh, Lebanon, next to Bekaa valley and were briefed by Maeve Murphy, UNHCR senior field coordinator. She said that there is a staff of 50 workers to deal with an influx of 1,500 refugees a day.

This is how it works, according to Prime Minister Wael Al Halki himself, with whom we spent 2.5 hours and with him doing most of the talk to explain in detail and with statistics and evidences what is really happening for the last two years. Jihadists take a village by assault, kill public officials, take over private houses in which to hide, burn plantations, spread terror and devastation. Their aim is simple: to render the country as ungovernable as they possibly can, disrupt normal life, destroy institutions, livestock, people. They occupy hospitals forcing medical personnel to look only after foreign fighters, not allowing wounded locals or government soldiers to be treated. This has created a wave of refugees from a total population of 21.9 million. Internal displacement is calculated at 1.5 million people. And 600,000 external refugees according to the Minister of Social Affairs, Ms Kinda Al-Shammat (estimate). But the UNHCR provides an official estimate of 1.5 million refugees spread over the different neighboring countries as follows:

– Jordan: 471.677;

– Lebanon: 469.217;

– Turkey: 347.157;

– Iraq: 146.951;

– Egypt: 66.922.

GOVERNMENT RETALIATION

Syrian authorities on the other hand reacted to the rampant and aggressive terrorism through a policy they call ‘iron hand.’ Tanks, artillery and infantry descend in force on the places that foreign fighters keep under siege and blow up the buildings where they hide, keep armaments and snipers. However, before striking the buildings fliers are thrown from helicopters advising residents to leave the area, what is not always possible because the terrorists use them as human shields, keeping them under captivity inside their own residences. Collateral damage is high, it is a policy many consider unacceptable. But given the odds he said it is the best alternative. And this method, as brutal as it is, is bearing fruits as the terrorists are being decimated or otherwise driven farther and farther from populated areas. The minister of justice said textually: “Those who invade us to kill and destroy our country will not leave Syria alive.” But the jihadists still occupy and keep under siege many localities. If compared to the US retaliation to the 9/11/2001 terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center, killing millions, invading other countries, and lingering still 12 years later through drone attacks and selective assassinations, such ‘iron hand’ policies are mild (without condoning the violence, that is). Those are, therefore, the demolished buildings shown ad nauseam and out of context, over and over on CNN, BBC, FOX and the rest of them.

According to Paul Larudee, a delegate from the USA:

“Most of the men and some of the women do not want to be photographed, but the children don’t mind. Several people from Qusayr, a town on the Lebanese border said that when the demonstrations first began two years ago, they were nonviolent and the local officials would even clear the roads for them. However, as they became more violent, the central government failed to act and the town was eventually overrun by armed local elements and foreign fighters from Chechnya, Azerbaijan and other places. It was only after the population fled that Syrian troops finally came to quell the rebellion, which has apparently not yet been fully accomplished. I have no way to assess the accuracy of these stories, nor to generalize them, but at least my modest Arabic skills allow me to strike up conversations with whomever I want, and there are no government minders in Lebanon. Nevertheless, we all want to meet with groups that have a very different story to tell, and Mother Agnès-Maryam has included such opportunities in our schedule, even Jabhat al-Nusrah, the al-Qaeda affiliate, with whom none of us expected to be able to speak.”

There is also the case of a boy shot by snipers in a street and whose body was whisked away by photographers who then made a video of his death; of his dying actually, fleeing afterwards and leaving the corpse behind. Medical personnel said afterwards that he could have been saved if taken to a hospital instead of to the killing fields’ improvised TV studio. The result of such filth is sold to TV networks for your and my robotized consumption. Yet as the PM asserted, the workers are being paid on time, schools, universities, public offices continue operating, and the government is able to maintain a somewhat normal life under such extenuating circumstances. As we toured the city or participated in meetings, we would hear loud booms at a distance, sometimes seeing clouds of black smoke rising from the bombed sites, or else, sounds of gun fights. We taped some of these with our cell phones. ‘Necessary evil,’ I was told, as I asked a gentleman in a restaurant, what he thought about such retaliatory bombings. People in fact don’t pay much attention to them. The UN says nearly 70,000 people have been killed since the foreign fighters entered the country and started the armed conflict in March 2011.

Another important point made by delegate Susan Dirgham:

“I don’t remember anyone we met supporting an arms embargo against the state. We were reminded by the Melkite Patriarch that the selling of arms to the state is legal. If it were stopped, the enemies of Syria would surely win. I think what united everyone I met in Damascus was support for the state + dialogue. This view was shared by people from different backgrounds and by those who supported the president and the current government and those who didn’t, such as the members of the “Third Current” I spoke with. They may not have supported some of the tactics of the army or security etc, but they supported the right for Syria to defend itself from outside aggression and to remain in a position where it can defend its people and territory. It seems as though we are being balanced and peace-loving when we support an arms embargo on both sides, but actually to support an embargo against Syria without also supporting the same for all countries in the region, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, etc. would not be helpful. Syria would collapse and be destroyed by its enemies if its army didn’t have the military hardware to defend the people and country, firstly against the 50,000 foreign jihadists/mercenaries, etc. and then against the states that work to destroy and dismember it.”

On one occasion an IED-Improvised Explosive Device exploded about 10 minutes after our delegation had left the Patriarchate of the Melkite Greek Catholic Church (our hosts throughout), where we had attended an ecumenical prayer for peace. I was shown photos immediately after, sent by cell phone, of blood on the floor from people killed and injured from the attack. Such is life in Damascus to which, after a short 10-day visit, we were getting somewhat used to. Understanding drives away outrage and harsh judgmental assumptions and conclusions. Mairead Maguire, who talked in private with four Syrian armed combatants, said they told her they took up arms against the government because they were unemployed; one of them with five children. Al Qaida offered them money. They took the offer and started killing fellow Syrians. Moreover, three shots were fired against the car of the leader/organizer of the peace mission, Mother Agnès-Mariam Soeur, a Melkite nun, on Sat. May 11, 2013 as she traveled to her native Homs, the hotspot city where her monastery was destroyed by terrorist activities.

Delegate Paul Larudee reports:

“There was the celebrated case of a nine-year-old Christian boy named Sari Saoud, killed by rebels in Homs. His body was taken by the rebels, but his mother, Georgina al-Jammal caught up with them, and her embrace of her dead son was captured on video by the rebels, who then falsified the account to make it appear that the boy had been killed by government forces.

I talked with Georgina, who supports the government, but blames it for leaving the area without protection. She told me that she recognized some of the rebels from the neighborhood, but that others were strangers.”

CONCLUSION

A positive note: we were gifted with a VIP visit to the famous Umayyad Mosque in the old city of Damascus, fourth-holiest place after Mecca, where is located the tomb and shrine of St John the Baptist right at the center of the huge 4,000 year-old construction that had previously been a temple of Jupiter in Roman times and the Basilica of Saint John the Baptist. This mosque is at the end of the famous Road to Damascus, of St Paul’s conversion, which we walked by foot seeing the exact spot of the event. Upon exiting the mosque complex one could see another building erected by Saladin (1174—1193), also buried in Umayyad. This was just one of many fascinating experiences afforded us by our hosts being demonized and targeted for invasion and occupation by the West. They are understandably worried that invading marines wouldn’t have what it takes to appreciate such a wealth of history, art, religious traditions, faiths, civilization, and would most probably raze it to the ground as they have done elsewhere in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan. Right they are. We were hosted by the head of Umayyad, the Grand Mufti of the Syrian Arab republic, Dr. Ahmad Badr Al-Din Hassoun and by the Greek Catholic Patriarch Gregory III Laham, who organized and hosted our whole trip along with Mussalaha.

We arrived in Lebanon during the holy week of the Eastern Orthodox Churches and spent their Easter Sunday (5 May) as guests of one of the many Christianities of the Middle East, where it all began. An added treat.

The Mussalaha International Peace Delegation to Syria issued a Concluding Declaration. Being from varying backgrounds, delegates did not agree on everything and one of them did not sign it. Therefore: no groupthink and no possibility of collective brainwashing of our group by Syrian authorities. And Mairead Maguire’s messages to the media, as the Nobel Peace laureate head of the delegation, remained impeccable and on point. She started all interviews with affirmations to the effect that,

“It is for the Syrian people to decide about their own problems, their own destiny, their own politics, their own leadership and form of government. No one has de right to interfere in their internal affairs and all foreign forces must withdraw and stay away. The flow of arms and armed fighters must be stopped, sanctions must be lifted, and if the arms embargo should remain in place, it ought to all parties involved, not just to the Syrian government that has a right to defend itself from foreign aggression. Are the foreign bands of invaders that are killing and terrorizing the population. All parties must follow the rules of international law.”

I find it disgraceful that our Western governments, led by US-EU-Israel and their client states, be full and willing partners in such atrocities perpetrated in name of ‘human rights,” “democracy,” “rule of law,” “freedom,” “liberty,” and other such meaningless, trivialized euphemisms. The present political and economic structures, embedded in the machinery of predatory militarism and capitalism, present us with only one choice, the lesser evil; but that is an artificial construct. Gandhi, Mandela, Luther King, Lula and many others are proof that changes and transformation are envisioned, given form and arise from below, from the ranks of the oppressed and minorities, from a non co-opted periphery, and not from within the belly of an empire of banks and bases seeking unlimited profits and hegemonic powers–for their own sake. Policies must again be made to endeavor the wellbeing of human beings, of life, not the perpetuation of structures and cultures that by necessity have to go. At other times in history piracy, slavery and absolute monarchy, for instance, also represented the status quo, the law; but they are no more. Nonviolent resistance and actions throughout the cultural-structural apparatus are the means to turn this tide, which is taking our planet and all its life to the abyss. We must choose life and peace by peaceful means, resist we must; and we will!

The formula is given by Galtung: Equity, Harmony, Trauma Reconciliation, Conflict Resolution:

                          + Positive Peace             Equity X Harmony

     Peace =  ________________ = _________________

                  — Negative Peace   Trauma X Conflict

 “For Syria, what comes to mind is a Swiss solution. One Syria, federal, with local autonomy, even down to the village level, with Sunnis, Shias and Kurds having relations to their own across the borders. International peacekeeping, also for the protection of minorities. And non-aligned, which rules out foreign bases and flows of arms, but does not rule out compulsory arbitration for the Golan Heights (and June 1967 in general), with Israeli UN membership at stake. The search could be for solutions, not for the solution. Let 1,000 dialogues blossom, in each quarter, each village, enriching the gross national idea product, GNIP. UN-supported facilitators, with knowledge of mediation, rather than with guns and binoculars.” [iii]

Like Paul meeting the angel Ananias on his way to Damascus experienced a change of heart and became St Paul, so have I met many angels on my own Road to Damascus and, although not gone into sainthood, I have reinterpreted and upgraded my own vision of reality–which I now share with you.


[i] Johan Galtung, Syria, TRANSCEND Media Service, 29 April, 2013.

[iii] Galtung, Syria, TRANSCEND Media Service, 29 April, 2013.

____________________________

Antonio Carlos Silva Rosa is the editor of the Peace Journalism website, TRANSCEND Media Service, and the Eurolatina Convener for the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment. He has a Masters (Ph.D. incomplete) in Political Science-Peace Studies from the University of Hawaii, is originally from Brazil, and presently lives in Porto, Portugal. He was educated in the USA, where he lived for 20 years, and lives in Europe for the last 20.

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Iran, India in talks on barter trade deal

0

Iran and India have reached a basic agreement to exchange crude oil for textile products. (file photo)

Iran and India have reached a basic barter trade deal, enabling New Delhi to purchase the Iranian oil in exchange for the Indian textile products.

Reza Tofiqi, the vice president for marketing and relations adjustment at Iranâ„¢s Trade Promotion Organization, told Mehr news agency on Wednesday that Tehran and New Delhi have held negotiations over the exchange of the Islamic Republicâ„¢s crude oil and gas condensates for Indiaâ„¢s textile machinery and raw materials.

Å“It was agreed that a preliminary agreement be signed between the private sectors of the two countries for imports of textile machinery and raw materials, and then general agreements will be struck between the two administrations over the exchange of oil for goods,” Tofiqi said.

Tofiqi further added that Iran is the major oil supplier to India, while the South Asian country is experienced in the field of textile industry. The Islamic Republic might increase imports from India up to $400 million if the two sides reach a final agreement, he said.

In this regard, India’s Textiles Secretary Zohra Chatterji also said the two sides have started to hold talks over the barter trade deals, expressing hope that the agreements would be established between Tehran and New Delhi.

At the beginning of 2012, the United States and the European Union imposed new sanctions on Iranâ„¢s oil and financial sectors with the goal of preventing other countries from purchasing Iranian oil and conducting transactions with the Central Bank of Iran.

The illegal US-engineered sanctions have been imposed based on the unfounded accusation that Iran is pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

Iran rejects the allegation, maintaining that as a committed signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

MKA/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Never in his life would he attack anyone unprovoked’ — Todashev’s father

0

An FBI agent shot Tamerlan Tsarnaev-linked triple murder suspect Ibragim Todashev in Florida, allegedly after the suspect attacked him with a knife. But Todashev’s father Abdulbaki told RT he strongly doubted his son could attack the agent first.

Following reports that a Chechen man Ibragim Todashev, suspected
in a 2011 triple murder in Massachusetts alongside the elder
Tsarnaev and questioned about the Boston bombings previously, was
shot by an FBI agent during interrogation in
Orlando, Florida, RT had a phone conversation with the suspect’s
father.

The elder Todashev described his son as “a very calm”
man, who wouldn’t become aggressive for no reason.

“Never in his life would he attack anyone unprovoked,”
Abdulbaki Todashev stressed.

Abdulbaki, who lives in Grozny, Chechnya, said he was not
contacted by anyone from the US, and his only sources about
Ibragim’s fate were neighbors citing media agencies.

Ibragim Todashev is pictured in this undated booking photo courtesy of the Orange County Corrections Department (Reuters)Having heard the reports that
Ibragim was questioned by a group of people, including several
policemen, Abdulbaki also said he does not believe he would rush to
engage in a one-sided fight.

He explained that his 27-year-old son studied in the Russian
city of Saratov, and later in Grozny, but decided to give up his
education and move to the US after going on a student internship
there.

Ibragim decided to leave for Florida because he “liked
America,”
Abdulbaki explained, adding he never got to know what
occupation, if any, his son had in the US, other than practicing
sports.

Abdulbaki said they were not acquainted with the Tsarnaev family
at home in Chechnya. Ibragim knew Tamerlan Tsarnaev only because
they went to the same gym when he stayed in Boston, he added.

Ibragim “couldn’t take part” in the Boston Marathon
bombings as he was undergoing a surgical operation on his tendons
in Florida days before the bombings and “had to learn how to
walk again,”
the father said.

Todashev’s friend Kushen Taramov said he and Ibragim had been
interrogated about the bombings earlier this week.

But reports said that on Wednesday the investigators were
questioning Todashev over his alleged role in an unsolved 2011
triple homicide in Waltham, Massachusetts, which the bombing
suspects Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have been implicated in,
and that he was ready to sign a confession.

Todashev allegedly took out a knife and attacked the FBI agent
questioning him, but was shot to death.

Taramov said Ibragim was going to fly back home to Chechnya, but
the FBI insisted that he postpone his trip for “one last”
interview. Abdulbaki also knew that his son was flying to Grozny on
May 24.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Violence displaces Palestinians in Syria’

0

Palestinians fleeing from the Yarmouk refugee camp in Damascus are seen at a Lebanese border crossing with Syria on December 19, 2012.

The UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) says violence in Syria has displaced over two-thirds of Palestinian refugees living in the Arab country.

Å“We have registered approximately 530,000 Palestinian refugees. We believe that almost all of them, certainly maybe 70-80 percent, are displaced from their normal homes,” UNRWA Commissioner General Filippo Grandi said in a statement on Wednesday.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

Grandi’s statement said that 12-15 percent of Palestinian refugees in Syria escaped their camps and went to another country.

Å“You can say that 12-15 percent of the refugee population in Syria is now (made) refugee again in another country,” the statement said.

MAM/AS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Washington admits drones killed 4 US citizens

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]The US government has for the first time admitted that four US citizens have been killed in CIA assassination drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Riots grip Stockholm suburbs after police shooting

0

bbc.co.uk
May 22, 2013

Rioters have lit fires and stoned emergency services in the suburbs of Stockholm for the third night in a row after a man was shot dead by police.

Incidents were reported in at least nine suburbs of the Swedish capital and police made eight arrests.

On Sunday night, more than 100 cars were set alight, Swedish media report.

Police in the deprived, largely immigrant suburb of Husby shot a man dead last week after he reportedly threatened to kill them with a machete.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 3:40 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Does Anything Change in Los Angeles With Election of New Mayor?

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/does_anything_change_in_los_angeles_with_election_of_new_mayor_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Nevada Governor Candidate Warns Boy Scout Jamboree May be Next False Flag

0

Says it may come in the form of a biological attack

Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Last week, Nevada’s 2014 gubernatorial candidate David Lory VanDerBeek announced he has reason to believe the next false flag event may occur at the 2013 National Scout Jamboree, and may come in the form of a biological attack.

“Let me be clear,” Mr. VanDerBeek stated on his official site, “my objective in sharing prior knowledge of a mass casualty terror drill is to prevent criminal elements in the government from taking this drill live at the jamboree. I want the good people in government to feel confident in maintaining accountability over one another. As an Eagle scout myself, I want the scouts to have a great jamboree.”

The National Scout Jamboree is a gathering of around 50 thousand members of the Boy Scouts of America, and, this year, is set to take place at The Summit Bechtel Family National Scout Reserve outside of Mount Hope, West Virginia from July 17 to July 23.

Referencing the FBI’s undeniable involvement in helping stage the Boston Marathon bombings, Mr. VanDerBeek said insider sources notified him of a “FEMA mass casualty terror drill” planned for the month of July. He also cautioned that information regarding the drill has been kept secret from the public.

“…FEMA is preparing an unannounced disease outbreak drill caused by conventional and unconventional terrorism in July with 4:1 ratio of mental and ‘sick’” VanDerBeek wrote from notes provided him from unnamed government sources. According to those sources, “this drill could be held at the Jamboree.”

Mr. VanDerBeek also found it suspicious that the location of the Jamboree was altered.

For nearly 30 years, the Jamboree has been held at Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia, an active duty army base VanDerBeek says was an ideal spot due to its ease of access, military defense capabilities and communications availability.

On the other hand, the Jamboree’s new location does not offer the same level of security.

Google map of The Summit Bechtel National Scout Reserve

Here’s Mr. VanDerBeek’s analysis:

National Scout Jamboree 2013 disaster threat analysis of new location. The main body will be at the villages that you can see in the center of the picture as two clearings. There are towns to the northwest with the highway. The events are spread across the reserve of mountainous terrain. If there is an emergency near the summit, how are you going to see the people? Look at the tree cover of the new location. Notice they had to draw the road on the map because you cannot see the road from the sky due to tree cover. There is one road up to the summit and down. However, there are supposed to be numerous helicopter pads. The road is a likely narrow and as you can see curving. It will not be highway quality as in the case of Fort A.P. Hill base. You could not cover that with many emergency vehicles easily even if you had them on hand as you would be able to on a military base. Also if you are the one stuck up on the summit needing help, how do you know you’ll have a cell phone signal to call for help?

“It’s clear that you will not have the resources you would at the Fort A.P. Hill base. It’s much less secure and unguarded if someone wanted to enter the camp from any direction. The trees would hide them on their way in and out,” Mr. VanDerBeek said of the various security flaws that leave scouts vulnerable to a possible attack.

“Being at this reserve,” VanDerBeek warns, “the scouts would be in the perfect location to rationalize a quarantine.”

The potential governor also highlighted the fact that West Virginia’s Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management has been appointed to provide support for the event.

West Virginia Governor Earl Ray Tomblin signed an executive order last year “giving DHS, FEMA, and the national guard martial law police power over the event,” VanDerBeek commented.

In 2011, The Register-Herald reported, “The order designates the West Virginia Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management as the principal coordinator for federal, state and local agencies providing support for the Summit Bechtel National Scout Reserve before and during the Jamboree.”

According to the Register-Herald, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Director Jimmy Gianato said a joint inter-agency task force of key federal, state and local agencies have been “building communications infrastructure, increasing capacity for cell coverage, and working with hospitals to ensure they are prepared for a major event.” (emphasis ours)

Mr. VanDerBeek also laid out the Bechtel Corporation’s sordid history and their involvement with several nefarious activities, including providing poisonous mobile homes to relief victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. “In sum, if you were evil and you wanted to sponsor a terrorist event on your property because that is who you are? Think Bechtel,” remarked VanDerBeek.

Previously, Mr. VanDerBeek had railed against the spending of tax dollars on recent FEMA zombie and UFO drills, asking, “Do the leaders of our nation believe in UFOs and zombies really? If so, what is their proof? They must have proof in order to spend money on drills? If they have proof, they must provide it to the general public? What is the threat? How imminent is it?”

Shortly after VanDerBeek called out FEMA’s excess spending, they scrubbed details of the exercise from their website, although Paul Joseph Watson was able to save screenshots that can be viewed here.

As Mr. VanDerBeek correctly noted, if enough light is shed on a false flag event prior to it taking place, the less likely it is to happen.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 3:28 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Facebook falling out of favor with teens

0

upi.com
May 22, 2013

Teens are sharing more about themselves on social media but many favor Twitter to avoid parents and “oversharing” they see on Facebook, a U.S. poll indicates.

While social media use is skyrocketing among teenagers, they aren’t happy with a Facebook community that involves “drama,” stress and their parents, the Pew Research Center said in a report released Tuesday.

Teens “dislike the increasing number of adults on the site, get annoyed when their Facebook friends share inane details, and are drained by the ‘drama’ that they described as happening frequently on the site,” the report said.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 3:21 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

US government admits to killing four American citizens with drones

0


United States Attorney General Eric Holder has told Congress that four American citizens have been killed in Yemen and Pakistan by US drones since 2009.

It has been widely reported but rarely acknowledged in
Washington that three US citizens – Samir Khan, Anwar al-Awlaki and
his teenage son – were executed in a September 2011 strike in
Yemen. With Holder’s latest admission, however, a fourth American –
Jude Mohammed–has also been named a casualty of America’s
continuing drone war.

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘You may want to consider relocating’ – Oregon police too broke to fight crime

0

There are only six deputies in the Josephine County, Oregon Sherriff’s Office, and resources are so sparse that a woman was raped last year after an emergency dispatcher told her four times over the phone there was no one to help her.

It was last August, and a woman was brutally raped and sodomized
by her abusive ex-boyfriend after unsuccessfully pleading with a
911 dispatcher for over 10 minutes.

“I’m not letting him in, but he’s, like, tried to break down
the door, and he’s trying to break into one of the windows
,”
the woman is heard telling the operator in the calls.

“He put me in the hospital a few weeks ago, and I’ve been
trying to keep him away
,” she said.

Four times during that call, the operator told the woman that
she wasn’t able to provide assistance.

“I don’t have anybody to send out there,” she kept
saying. “Once again, it’s unfortunate you guys don’t have any
law enforcement up there
.”

At the county jail, staffing cuts caused by a lack of funding
has formed a revolving door system where inmates are released
sometimes right after being arrested because there’s seldom enough
money to keep facilities functioning at even the bare minimum.
There are only six deputies in the Josephine Sherriff’s Office, and
recently the department’s canine unit was cut to a single dog.

“You may want to consider relocating to an area with adequate
law enforcement services
,” the department cautioned the
county’s 80,000 or so residents last year.

Although a Wild West-like scenario has spiraled out of control
in the Pacific Northwest, residents voted against a measure Tuesday
that would have funded much-needed law enforcement operations at
the cost of only a 3 percent tax levy.

The measure would have bumped the county government tax rate –
currently the lowest in the state – to $1.48 per $1,000, in turn
costing the average homeowner in Josephine around $85 a year
extra.

But even after news of last year’s rape went viral, residents
narrowly decided this week to halt any attempt to milk mere pennies
on the dollar for an added sense of security. On Tuesday evening
the decision was too close to call in Josephine, but by Wednesday
afternoon the county clerk acknowledged to RT that the public
safety levy was voted down by a margin of 51 to 49 percent, with
barely 500 ballots deciding the fate of a county where calling 911
is no longer the way to handle an emergency.

“There isn’t a day go by that we don’t have another
victim
,” Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilberson told Oregon
Public Broadcasting last week. Speaking to OPB, Gilberson directly
blamed the ongoing inability to fight crime on budget
restraints.

“If you don’t pay the bill, you don’t get the service,”
he said.

Policing Josephine County wasn’t always a problem. In 2000,
Congress passed the Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act and as a result began sharing revenue made
off of timber grown on public land.

“Federal forests make up 60 percent of the land in many rural
Oregon counties. Because federal land isn’t subject to property
taxes, the federal government for decades shared timber sale
revenue with the counties
,” the Oregonian recently noted.

Those funds were until recently divvied up among rural counties
to help line the pockets where sparsely inhabited towns were losing
out on taxes brought in by more densely populated regions. The act
has expired, however, and the result has been the rapid defunding
of public programs in some areas, including the Josephine
Sherriff’s Office. Since the expiration of the bill, the county has
lost millions of dollars in revenue that for more than a decade was
a routine handout.

In the case of last August’s rape, a 911 dispatcher stayed on
the phone with the soon-to-be victim for over 10 minutes,
instructing her to hide in her house while emergency options were
considered.

“None of the sheriff’s deputies in Josephine County were on
duty
,” explained Amelia Templeton of OPB. “So dispatch
transferred the call to the Oregon State Police, but they also
didn’t have anyone available
.”

“And four times in total, she says there isn’t anyone who can
help
,” she said.

The expiration of the act that provided the city with timber
revenue forced the Sheriff’s Office to cut its budget in half and
most law enforcement operations have ended. Had voters agreed to a
tax hike on Tuesday, the county expected to raise $9.5 million
during the next year and slightly more annually through 2016. Those
funds, the voters were told, would be used to increase inmate
capacity at the county jail, provide the resources for the District
Attorney’s office to prosecute more criminals and, generally, bring
the force back up to snuff.

“I’m not going to vote for it,” Josephine County
convenience store owner Les Monk told Templeton. “Things are no
worse or better now than they were when they were fully
funded
.”

For Monk – and presumably the 13,365 other “nay” ballots casted
on Tuesday – things are just fine in Josephine. Monk told Templeton
that he carried a knife for his own protection and suggested that
paying money for an inefficient police force wasn’t worth his tax
dollars. “People have to understand you will, and are able, to
defend your property,”
he said.

According to Templeton, an attorney for the rape victim said the
woman felt hopeless, alone and very scared when she waited,
unsuccessfully, for police assistance last year. Sheriff Gilbertson
admitted that it’s a very real problem.

“It’s devastated law enforcement,” Sheriff Gilbertson
told The Oregonian. “The criminals now act with impunity and a
sense of entitlement
.”

“It’s been a deteriorating situation for a long time,”
added Greg Wolf, intergovernmental affairs director for Gov. John
Kitzhaber, “and we can see that we’re going to hit a wall unless
we come up with some dramatic solutions
.”

Nearby on Tuesday, voters in Curry County voters rejected a $4.5
million effort that aimed to reverse the dastardly trend there. And
in Lane County, a five-year, $80 million property tax levy was
approved amid similar circumstances – but only after eight previous
attempts stretching all the way back to 1998 were rejected by
voters.

“We’ve essentially eviscerated law enforcement staffing over
the last 45 years
,” Lane County District Attorney Alex Gardner
told a legislative committee earlier this year. With this week’s
vote, Lane County can start to pick up the pieces. In Josephine,
however, residents have a long ways to go.

Speaking to OPB late Tuesday, reporter April Baer said Gov.
Kitzhaber is now expected to declare a public safety emergency and
likely and impose a temporary tax to keep at least some law
enforcement operations functioning through the end of 2014.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Gharazi vows to subdue inflation

0

Iranian presidential candidate Mohammad Gharazi says he will form a cabinet to subdue inflation in order to improve the countryâ„¢s economy if he wins the June 14 vote.

On Wednesday, Gharazi stated that the Iranian economy has been in ruins since the last two years.

He went on to say that his administration will not spend more than its allocated annual budget, because higher liquidity will increase the inflation rate.

Gharazi also blamed the administration of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for the high rate of inflation and the widening gap between the rich and the poor in Iran.

Late on Tuesday night, Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry issued the list of hopefuls approved by the Guardian Council to run in the countryâ„¢s 11th presidential election.

The Guardian Council approved MP Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili, Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei, Hassan Rohani, the director of the Strategic Research Center of the Expediency Council, former First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref, Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, and former Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Velayati. The eight candidates were approved after a 10-day vetting process.

The council did not approve, among others, former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei, a top aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and former Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki.

MP/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

London “Terror Attack” Blamed on Anti-Government Sentiment

0

Media hyperventilates over murder of British soldier

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

The murder of a serving British soldier in London is being treated as a major “terror attack,” with Prime Minister David Cameron set to attend an emergency Cobra meeting as the UK media hyperventilates over an incident that will be used to demonize anti-government rhetoric while serving as a poster child for more military intervention in the middle east.

“A dramatic video tonight emerged of a man with bloodied hands, carrying knives and ranting ‘We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you’, after a serving soldier was hacked to death by two men just 200 yards from an Army barracks,” reports the Daily Mail.

After running over and attempting to behead and disembowel the soldier with a machete, the two men responsible for the attack paraded up and down the street making political statements, “as if they wanted to be on TV or something,” before they were shot by police.

“We must fight them as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” stated the man on camera, adding, “I apologise that women have had to witness this today, but in our land our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your government, they don’t care about you.”

The suspect was a black man who appeared to have a London accent and was not a foreigner. The other suspect was also a black man.

“Basically two men carried out an axe attack on a young army cadet walking along the street, by the looks of things the police responded and then shot them in front of the public,” said one eyewitness.

The reaction to what at the moment remains a tragic murder has been completely over the top, with Prime Minister David Cameron canceling a trip to France to fly back and attend a Cobra emergency response meeting, while even the Queen is being kept informed of developments.

The political statements made by the suspect before he was shot will provide the state and the media all the cannon fodder it needs to link anti-government rhetoric with violent terrorism.

It remains to be seen how this will be exploited by the state, but immediate thoughts will turn to a re-introduction of the defeated “stop and search” powers under the pretext of preventing terrorism, as well as further driving a wedge between Muslims and the rest of the British population, greasing the skids for future military intervention in the middle east.

Indeed, the suspect was also heard to say that the motive for the murder was “because David Cameron, (the) British government sent troops in Arabic country”.

It’s ironic that the men responsible for the brutal murder supposedly chanted “Allahu Akbar” after trying to behead the soldier given that this is the refrain used by rebels in Syria, whom the UK government is desperately trying to arm, whenever they carry out similar atrocities — including numerous beheadings.

The two suspects are wounded and in critical condition.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Pentagon wants more than $450 mn for Gitmo amidst swelling hunger strike

0

The Pentagon is requesting more than $450 from lawmakers for maintaining and upgrading the Guantanamo Bay camp. The request comes as an intensifying hunger strike is ratcheting up pressure on President Barack Obama to push for the prison’s closure.

The budget request for the fiscal year beginning October 1 has
called for $79 million for detention operations, the same as the
current year. An additional $20.5 million has been requested for
the office of military commissions, the military tribunals set up
in 2006 for prosecuting detainees. The current price tag on the
Guantanamo military commission is $12.6 million. A further $40
million is needed for a fiber optic cable and $99 million for
operation and maintenance of the facilities.

The Pentagon is also mulling over a request from the Southern
Command to spend about $200 million for renovating the camp, which
will include the construction of a new prison building for “high
value” detainees, as well as a new dining hall, barracks for prison
guards, a hospital, a “legal meeting complex” and a “communications
network facility” to store data.

The increased budget request comes in stark contrast to
President Obama’s recent push to shutter the facility, where 103
out of the camp’s 166 detainees have been carrying out an
unprecedented hunger strike for more than 100 days. Human rights
advocates have placed the number of hunger strikers as high as
130.

Thirty of the hunger strikers are being force-fed through a
nasal tube — a practice which the UN human rights office condemned
as “torture” and a breach of international law. Three have been
sent to the detainee hospital for observation. Lawyers for
Guantanamo inmates have also claimed that prisoners who wish to
talk to their legal representatives are being subjected to
humiliating new cavity searches.

The 166 prisoners have been detained for eleven and a half
years, the vast majority of them have not been charged with a
crime, and 86 of them have been cleared for release.

The detention facility already ranks as one of the most
expensive in the world, costing over $900,000 annually per
prisoner. With 166 detainees, Gitmo consumes over $150
million each year.

Obama is expected to make a major speech on Thursday at National
Defense University, where he will outline his latest plan to close
the detention facility, as well as his administration’s drone
policy, targeted killing and the war against al Qaeda.

The president’s new push to shut down Guantanamo comes after
Congress blocked attempts to close Guantanamo during his first term
in office, when Obama signed a 2009 executive order calling for the
camp’s closure.

“Guantanamo is not necessary to keep America safe,” the
president said at a White House news conference last month. “It
is expensive. It is inefficient. It hurts us in terms of our
international standing. It lessens cooperation with our allies on
counterterrorism efforts. It is a recruitment tool for extremists.
It needs to be closed.”

However, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations
Act, 2013, the law that Congress passed and Obama signed in March
to stem the possibility of a federal government shutdown, prohibits
any additional funds for the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to
the United States or its territories. It further blocks any
expenditures on the renovation of any US facility on American soil
to house detainees, effectively making it illegal for the
government to transfer the men it plans to continue holding.

It also remains unclear how Obama will win over both Republicans
and members of his own party who remain staunchly opposed to
transferring terror suspects to the US.

While lawmakers have cited recidivism of released terror
suspects as a reason to keep the camp open, in 2009 the Pentagon
was only able to “confirm” that 18 former detainees — 4 percent of
the camp’s population — had participated in attacks. A spokesman at
the time said evidence of someone being “confirmed” could
have included fingerprints, a conclusive photograph or
“well-corroborated intelligence reporting.”

Another issue involves the camp’s 86 detainees who have never
been charged with a crime and have already been cleared for
release.

Earlier this month, Democratic Senator Carl Levin wrote a letter
to the White House requesting that the White House appoint an
official who will be tasked with relocating the dozens of detainees
who were being held without charge.

Levin, the Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman, said that
although the defense authorization bill has restricted the
administration’s ability to transfer detainees, a national security
waiver provided a “clear route” to moving detainees to some
third countries. Levin further urged Obama to find a way to close
the camp without Congress’ blessing.

“Congress has blocked it, so he’s going to have to find a way
to remove the blockages of Congress, and hopefully he’ll let us
know how he’ll do that,” 
Levin told reporters
Tuesday.

Levin told The Hill on Tuesday that he has yet to receive a
response to his letter.

Democratic representative Adam Smith (D-Wash.) questioned in an
interview if the growing international outcry surrounding the
hunger strike was enough to persuade resistant lawmakers to change
their position on keeping the camp open.

“It’s getting uglier and uglier at Gitmo…The level of
embarrassment is growing and the cost is growing, so is that enough
to persuade them that it’s time to change positions?”
Smith
asked.

“We’re going to have that debate.”

This article originally appeared on : RT

Qalibaf to focus on economy, job creation

0

Iranâ„¢s principlist presidential candidate and Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf

Iranâ„¢s principlist presidential contender Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf says focusing on economy and job creation to rectify the countryâ„¢s economic situation will top his agenda.

On his first day of official campaigning on Wednesday, the mayor of Tehran blamed mismanagement for the dire fiscal situation in the country.

He noted that his cabinet will include people with proven managerial skills in order to improve the economy.

Qalibaf also pointed to his experience as the mayor of Tehran and his successful record of job creation.

The presidential candidate stated that he will focus on a plan to grow the economy through investments and providing aid to small businesses.

He said the only solution to the current economic situation in Iran is weaning the economy off petrodollars.

Late on Tuesday night, Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry issued the list of hopefuls approved by the Guardian Council to run in the countryâ„¢s 11th presidential election, which will be held on June 14.

The Guardian Council approved MP Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili, Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei, Hassan Rohani, the director of the Strategic Research Center of the Expediency Council, former First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref, Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, and former Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Velayati. The eight candidates were approved by the Guardian Council after a 10-day vetting process.

The council did not approve, among others, former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei, a top aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and former Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki.

MP/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Western Mercenaries Have Integrated the Ranks of Al Qaeda Rebels in Syria

0

Germany’s interior minister says Germans teamed up with Syria militants

On April 24, EU’s anti-terror chief Gilles de Kerchove told the British media that some 500 Europeans were in Syria to fight against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich has said that a number of German nationals have teamed up with the foreign-backed militants in Syria.

A recently published study reveals that between 2,000 and 5,500 foreign nationals are active in Syria. Senior counter-terrorism officials within the European Union have stated that at least 500 of those nationals come from the EU countries.

Pan-European police force Europol said in its annual EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report released on April 25 that Syria was the “destination of choice for foreign fighters in 2012.”

The report cited the risk that the foreign fighters pose on Europe — after their return — through using new training and knowledge that they acquired in Syria for conducting terrorist activities.“The threat from terrorism… remains strong in Europe. It also continues to evolve from structured groups and networks to smaller EU-based groups and solo terrorists or lone actors,” the report said.Europe has seen a rise in the number of its citizens entering Syria as ‘jihadists.’

On April 24, EU’s anti-terror chief Gilles de Kerchove told the British media that some 500 Europeans were in Syria to fight against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.Kerchove said Britain, Ireland and France were among the EU countries to have the highest numbers of militants in Syria.Unrest has gripped Syria for over two years and the Syrian government maintains that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the
copyright owner.

For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

French, British, German Mercenaries Fighting in Al Qaeda Ranks in Syria

0

According to a report of Fars News Agency quoting Assim Qansou, a member of Lebanon’s parliament, that during the battle in Al-Qusseir city, which until recently was an Al Nusra stronghold, the Syrian army arrested tens of French, British, Belgian, Dutch and Qatari officers, fighting in the ranks of the Al Qaeda affiliated force.

In April, German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich confirmed in an interview that a number of German nationals had integrated rebel forces in Syria. How they were recruited is not mentioned.

In an exclusive interview with Germany’s Der Spiegel weekly magazine, Friedrich officially confirmed for the first time that there were German-born gunmen inside Syria fighting against the government.

Friedrich particularly expressed concern about calls for those Europeans who have been trained in battle inside Syria.

German officials say that 20 German nationals are currently fighting in Syria. Some have reportedly even taken their wives there and live directly on the frontlines of battle.

A recently published study reveals that between 2,000 and 5,500 foreign nationals are active in Syria. Senior counter-terrorism officials within the European Union have stated that at least 500 of those nationals come from the EU countries. (Press Tv,

On April 24, EU’s anti-terror chief Gilles de Kerchove told the British media that some 500 Europeans were in Syria to fight against the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Kerchove said Britain, Ireland and France were among the EU countries to have the highest numbers of militants in Syria.

Unrest has gripped Syria for over two years and the Syrian government maintains that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country.

The EU’s anti-terror chief said in April that hundreds of Europeans are now fighting with rebel forces in Syria against Bashar al-Assad’s government. 

Gilles de Kerchove estimated the number in Syria at about 500. 

Intelligence agencies are concerned some could join groups linked to al-Qaeda and later return to Europe to launch terrorist attacks. 

The UK, Ireland and France are among the EU countries estimated to have the highest numbers of fighters in Syria. 

“Not all of them are radical when they leave, but most likely many of them will be radicalized there, will be trained,” de Kerchove said. 

“And as we’ve seen this might lead to a serious threat when they get back.” 

Across Europe, intelligence agencies have stepped up investigations, says the BBC’s Europe correspondent Duncan Crawford. 

In Britain and Belgium they have increased efforts to track how people are recruited. 

In the Netherlands, officials have raised the terror threat level there to “substantial” — partly over concerns about radicalized citizens returning from Syria. 

The Syrian army announced on Tuesday that it found an Israeli military vehicle during its wide-scale attack in the central city of al-Qusseir. 

According to the report, the vehicle was found along with tapping and jamming devices in al-Qusseir where the Syrian army has taken full control over the entire Eastern part of the strategic city near the borders with Lebanon.

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Deadly unknown respiratory disease kills two in Alabama

0

A mysterious respiratory illness has claimed the lives of two people in southeast Alabama, and caused five other hospitalizations. The illness has left health officials baffled, who have no idea what this disease is or where it originated.

The mysterious illness has sickened its victims with flu-like
symptoms, including a shortness of breath, fever, and coughing. Of
the seven people who were hospitalized with the new disease, two
have died, Alabama Department of Public Health spokeswoman Mary
McIntyre told AP.

Scientists are currently studying lab specimens from the seven
victims, and health officials are urging hospital staff to wear
masks and gloves when coming in contact with the infected
patients.

All seven patients were from Houston County, and McIntyre says
there have been no out-of-state reports of this illness. The
victims are all adults ranging in age from early 20s to late 80s,
and have all been hospitalized in the Southeast Alabama Medical
Center starting last Thursday.

“We’re only aware of the Southeast, but we don’t know — we
haven’t received reports from anywhere else,”
McIntyre said.
“That’s why we’re trying to get the information out.”

There is currently no evidence that the victims traveled out of
the country or picked up the illness outside of the US. Researchers
do not currently believe that this illness is related to a deadly
new coronavirus, coined the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, which
has infected 40 people and killed 20 who all traveled to or lived
in the Middle East. The novel coronavirus has recently surfaced in
France, the UK and Saudi Arabia.

Health officials also do not believe that the victims acquired
the H7H9 virus, which has caused 17 deaths and 82 illnesses in
China. This virus is a strain of the bird flu and spreads through
person-to-person contact.

But although health officials doubt that the Alabama patients
acquired either of the two foreign pathogens, McIntyre told NBC
that nothing is being ruled out, since laboratory test results are
not yet complete.

“At this point it’s too early to tell,” she said.
“That’s why we called it a respiratory illness of unknown
origin.”

One of the infected patients tested positive for H1N1 influenza
A, but researchers believe this victim may have fallen ill with the
unknown disease simultaneously. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention appear to have no
knowledge about the illness. The agency has so far directed media
questions to Alabama health officials.

State health officials are urging Alabama residents to take
precautionary steps to avoid getting sick.

“Be sure to cover your cough, wash your hands frequently,
don’t cough on your hands and then shake somebody else’s hands, to
try to prevent from spreading stuff,”
McIntyre said during a
Tuesday morning press conference, while trying to
encourage Alabama residents not to panic.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Fed Pours Huge Sums Into Foreign Bank Coffers: Why Is the Fed Bailing Out the World … On Our Dime?

0

We noted even before the TARP bailout law was signed into law that bailout moneys could flow to foreign banks.

We were right. A large percentage of the bailouts went to foreign banks (and see this). And so did a huge portion of the money from quantitative easing. More here and here.

Ron Paul noted in 2011 that essentially 100% of New York Federal Reserve Bank loans went to foreign banks.

A former high-level Federal Reserve official said that the Fed is secretly bailing out Europe.

The Fed has bailed out Gaddafi’s Libyan bank, the Arab Banking Corporation of Bahrain, and the banks of Bavaria, Korea and Mexico … but has shafted normal Americans.

The Financial Times reported in February:

Foreign banks also have a striking amount of cash at the Fed, potentially aggravating the Fed’s PR problem. Analysts at Stone & McCarthy noted recently that there had been a steep increase in foreign banks placing reserves at the Fed and suggested that “US banks may have distaste for the opportunistic arbitrage”, between lower market rates and the interest on reserves, whereas overseas institutions “might not feel encumbered in the same fashion”.

Canada’s TD Bank, Germany’s Deutsche Bank and Switzerland’s UBS each have more than $12bn at the Fed.

Yesterday, Zero Hedge provided an update to this story. ZH reports that the Fed’s quantitative easing program has injected huge sums into foreign banks:

The latest H.8 report demonstrates, as of the most recently weekly data, the Fed’s policies have led to foreign banks operating in the US holding an all time high amount of reserves, surpassing $1 trillion for the first time, or $1,033 billion to be precise.

This means that, as we expected several months ago, the only recipient of ongoing Fed money printing are not US banks, but foreign banks operating in the US. For those confused about the big picture, here is a chart showing the breakdown of cash held by big and small US banks as well as foreign banks, superimposed to total reserves created by the Fed since the start of the Great Financial Crisis. The correlation is 100%.

And just to prove that ALL the unsterilized cash from both QE2 and QEternity has essentially gone to support offshore banks, here is the conclusive chart showing the change in Fed reserves and cash held by foreign banks:

Finally, tying it all together, here is chart showing cash at US banks vs cash at foreign banks operating in the US. At $1.03 trillion in foreign cash, the Fed’s policies have once again led to more cash being held by foreign banks than all cash held by domestic banks.

We are confident that we speak for all when we say: “Thank you Ben — insolvent foreign banks appreciate your ongoing QE2 and QEternity-funded generosity“

In a separate report, ZH notes that Bank of Korea Governor Kim Choong-soo said:

World may face rate risk if U.S. exits from QE

Too bad that quantitative easing doesn’t help Main Street or the average American. It only helps big banks, giant corporations, and big investors. And by causing food and gas prices skyrocket, it takes a bigger bite out of the little guy’s paycheck, and thus makes the poor even poorer.

And it’s a shame that a study of 124 banking crises by the International Monetary Fund found that bailing out banks which are only pretending to be solvent — like most of the big banks — harms the economy.

And what a farce that:

The bailout money is just going to line the pockets of the wealthy, instead of helping to stabilize the economy or even the companies receiving the bailouts:

  • A lot of the bailout money is going to the failing companies’ shareholders
  • Indeed, a leading progressive economist says that the true purpose of the bank rescue plans is “a massive redistribution of wealth to the bank shareholders and their top executives”
  • The Treasury Department encouraged banks to use the bailout money to buy their competitors, and pushed through an amendment to the tax laws which rewards mergers in the banking industry (this has caused a lot of companies to bite off more than they can chew, destabilizing the acquiring companies)

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

IRS Official Invokes The Fifth, Angering Tea Party Patriots Group

0

Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Lois Lerner told House investigators she didn’t do anything wrong and she didn’t break any laws, and then she invoked her Fifth Amendment Right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination. But then, she’s already told so many lies, what difference does it really make? Nobody’s believe her, anyway.

Following the advice of her attorney, Lois Lerner, the IRS official responsible for granting tax exemptions, decided to plead the Fifth rather than risk entangling and probably incriminating herself in the tangled web of lies surrounding the IRS controversy.

Before clamming up, Lerner said, “I know some people will assume I have done something wrong. I have not,” she said. “I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules and regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

Represtative Trey Gowdy, (R-S.C.) protested Lerner’s action. “You don’t get to tell your side of the story and then not stand for cross examination,” he said. “She waived her right against self-incrimination, she ought to sit here and answer our questions.”

Chairman Darrell Issa, (R-Calif.) said not to worry. Lerner could be recalled if committee lawyers determine whe waived her rights by delivering an opening statement.

However, Jenny Beth Martin, Tea Party Patriots Co-Founder and National Coordinator, was none too happy that Lerner was allowed to plead the Fifth. She says her group was one of those targeted and harassed by the IRS.

“While we respect Ms. Lerner’s use of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment, we are disturbed she saw fit to trample over our First Amendment rights by harassing us and many other groups for our views.”

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 1:59 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

The Path of Hubris and War

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_path_of_hubris_and_war_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

The Path of Hubris and War

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_path_of_hubris_and_war_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Amnesty Bill Swiftly Gains Senate Approval While America Focuses On “Scandals”

0

Donna Anderson
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Photo: Wikipedia

In what has to be the quickest, quietest approval process in history, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act got the go-ahead yesterday from the Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill now moves to the Senate floor where it may pass again, just as quickly, if Americans remain distracted by the current “scandals” inside the White House.

The bipartisan “Gang of Eight” immigration reform bill passed in the Democratic-controlled committee by a vote of 13-5. All 10 Democrats on the panel voted in favor of the bill and they were joined by three Republicans — Jeff Flake of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, and Orrin Hatch of Utah.

Given it’s size and complexity, the 844-page bill, consisting of approximately 300 amendments passed with amazing speed in less than three weeks. But maybe it’s really not so amazing when you consider what’s on the line for both parties.

Republicans who’ve been accused of pandering to gun lobbyists and using the IRS, AP and Benghazi controversies to “make hay” don’t want to make more waves by fighting the immigration bill. Allowing the bill to pass without argument also gives the impression that the Republicans party cares about their constituents. And during the last election, Latinos voted overwhelmingly for Obama, so both parties, especially Republicans, want their share of the Latino vote next time around.

Senator Hatch’s swing vote is of particular importance and highlights one of the key reasons Americans need to avoid the “scandalous” distractions in Washington and pay closer attention to this bill. In order to get Hatch’s support, Gang of Eight negotiator Democrat Chuck Schumer of New York, raised the cap on the number of H1-B visas from 65,000 to 110, 000, and added provision to increase the number even higher to 180,000.

The H1-B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows U.S. employers to temporarily employ foreign workers in high-tech occupations.

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio was also appreciative of Hatch’s support:

“The Senate Judiciary Committee’s approval of Senator Hatch’s proposal to improve the H-1B visa provisions in the immigration legislation address key concerns shared by many conservatives,” he said in a statement. “We must modernize our broken legal immigration system to meet the needs of America’s 21st century economy and create jobs. Senator Hatch’s amendment provides important protections for American workers while also ensuring that fast-growing and high-tech firms can continue to create jobs here in America.”

But the AFL-CIO disagrees. “Hatch’s amendments would change the bill so high-tech companies can hire new immigrant employees without first making the jobs available to American workers,” wrote Ana Avendaño, assistant to the president for immigration at the AFL-CIO, in the email. “Hatch’s amendments would mean American corporations could fire American workers in order to bring in new immigrant workers at lower wages.”

The Congressional Budget Office will assess the fiscal cost of the bill over the next two weeks, and then it moves on to the full Senate. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is urging Republicans not to block the bill from a floor vote. The bill is expected to be enacted on or before October 1, 2013, which is the date set for funding the initial $6.6 billion Trust Fund.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 1:44 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Goal Reached: Time to Restart the Economy

0

Finally — it’s over. The goal of Simpson and Bowles has been met, the deficit is shrinking rapidly. And the intellectual underpinning for deficit reduction, based on the study by Rogoff and Reinhart, has been destroyed.

Phew! Glad that is behind us. Now, can we actually try to fix the economy?

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report that shows a rapid decline in the deficit, $203 billion has been cut from the deficit making it the smallest since 2008. And they project that by 2015, the deficit will be under $400 billion, less than one-third of the $1.4 trillion deficit Bush left when Obama took office and only 2.1% of the GDP. We agree with political economy writer Doug Henwood’s conclusion: “there’s no way any honest analyst could read them [the CBO report] as anything but the official end to any rational concern about red ink.”

Dave Johnson writes that since now we’ve reached the Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction goal of 2.3% ratio of deficit to GDP, we can focus on the real problems — the job gap, the wage gap and the trade gap. Unlike the deficit problem, which was always more imagined than real, these are very real problems that DC should address as it restarts its economic planning. Johnson summarizes that the real economic problem we face is, at its roots, due to jobs lost to the trade deficit, writing:

“The economy can’t recover until housing recovers. Housing can’t recover until people can afford to buy houses. People can’t afford to buy houses until they can get jobs, and those with jobs can’t afford to buy houses until wages go up. Wages can’t go up until the trade problem is fixed. And the trade problem is killing jobs.”

Let’s look at Johnson’s statement more closely. With jobs at the center of the problem, one thing that must be rethought is the sequestration. The CBO estimates sequestration will cost around 750,000 jobs in total, and forecasters think it could reduce economic growth by half a percentage point this year. In fact, the economy is adding very few jobs, floundering with just enough to keep with the growth of the workforce. The federal government has shed 8,000 jobs.

Let’s look at housing. There has been a lot of excitement in news reports about housing in the last two weeks because prices are going up, but in reality the housing market “recovery” is a complete hoax. What is really happening is that the Federal Reserve’s very low interest rates are allowing investors to borrow money cheaply and invest in buying low-priced houses. In addition, banks have kept 7 million houses in foreclosure off the market in order to create housing scarcity, resulting in a rise in prices. Of course, actual families who have lost wealth and income and cannot borrow easily are unable to buy. The fake housing recovery is another way the wealthy are stealing wealth from the rest of us.

Much is the same with the stock market — the Fed’s cheap money is very likely letting the wealthy borrow money to invest.  When we look at the underlying realities of the economy — unemployment, lower income and less wealth for most Americans, high trade deficits and a government going in the wrong direction — there are no reasons for investors to be confident. But because the Fed is pumping $85 billion of newly created money into the big banks each month, there is money to invest. For some elites, the money is being used to buy up company stock in order to pump up its value. The game of chicken is — how long can they stay in this bubble before it bursts?

When it comes to trade, rather than learning the lessons from the last 20 years of corporate trade agreements — agreements that have resulted in a massive trade deficit and are a key factor in loss of jobs — President Obama is aggressively pushing more of the same,  indeed, even bigger versions of NAFTA-like agreements. The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) promise to give more power to transnational corporations. Actually, they will make corporations more powerful than governments. The only way the agreements will pass is if Fast Track, now called Trade Promotion Authority, is brought back from the dead. Why? Because these trade agreements are very unpopular. People know these agreements threaten our sovereignty, empower Wall Street, pharmaceuticals and insurance companies at the expense of people, threaten a free and open Internet, and will undermine the environment, labor and consumer rights. For more on all of this see FlushTheTPP.org.

Related to trade is the State Department becoming a marketer of genetically modified seeds. Food and Water Watch reports that: “The U.S. State Department has launched a concerted strategy to promote agricultural biotechnology, often over the opposition of the public and governments, to the near exclusion of other more sustainable, more appropriate agricultural policy alternatives.” Our weekly Wednesday column in TruthOut goes into greater depth on Monsanto and related issues. The good news is there is a growing revolt by people all over the world. Demonstrations are planned for May 25 in 41 countries and nearly 300 cities by Occupy Monsanto.

How is the real economy looking? Well, in China it is looking good. A recent economic survey found that China was the “world’s most financially secure country.” Their people are faring much better because “only 3 percent of Chinese households are financially vulnerable, whereas the same figure for Germany is 22 percent and 26 percent for France.” In the United States, two-thirds of Americans cannot handle a $1,000 surprise expenditure and most live paycheck to paycheck.

Another snapshot of spreading poverty in the U.S. came out this week in a report that found more of the poor in the United States now live in suburbs than in urban areas. The number of poor people living in suburbs surged 67% between 2000 and 2011. Why? The housing collapse destroyed their wealth, the job collapse resulted in lost jobs or lower incomes, and urban gentrification pushed poor people toward cheaper housing. Suburban wealth is a myth, now the reality is growing suburban poverty.

And, a college job is no guarantee of economic success. A survey of recent college graduates found that 42% currently have jobs that do not require a four-year degree. A majority of those with jobs are underemployed working in retail or restaurant employment. This is part of the “Gradocracy” Sam Smith describes — too many degrees and not enough jobs.  The students, who are leaving school with record tuition debt, are in sharp contrast with a report this week on the pay of public university presidents. There are now several presidents making over $1 million a year, a big increase in those making over $600,000 and the mean is $441,392. All this while tuition rises and puts students who will go into a lousy job market deep in debt.

Smith ends his discussion of the Gradocracy pointing out that “We must not only condemn the worst, but offer witness for the better. And create places in which to live it.” That is similar to what we recommend – proceed on two tracks: protest what we do not like and build what we want. We continue to see evidence of people building the new economy they want.

You might remember several years ago when 250 workers were laid off by a company called Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago; they arranged a sit-in to protest violations against their union agreements. The second time it happened, they decided to purchase the now-bankrupt company and operate it themselves. The new company has now opened for business as a worker-owned co-operative called New Era Windows, which opens for business today. They stopped the machine and created a new world.

In order to help solve our energy, environmental and health crises, the United States needs to shift to walkable, bike-able communities. Continued reliance on automobiles with their extreme use of oil and gas, as well as pollution of the air and water, will ensure the wasteful and unhealthy American Way Of Life (AWOL). In September 2010, Washington, DC began the first large bike sharing program in the U.S. (Tulsa was first with a small program of two dozen bikes in 2007.) The twin cities in Minnesota and Denver also began in 2010.  This year 22 cities have bike-share programs, and next year that number is likely to double. Lots of experimentation is happening around the country.

Studies are finding that bike-shares create an economic boost, “Each ride in the Twin Cities’ Nice Ride system was found to bring $7—14 to the local economy. Forty-four percent of Capital Bikeshare riders surveyed used bike share to make a trip they otherwise would have skipped, largely for entertainment, socializing, and dining out.” The U.S. Conference of Mayors, representing more than 1,300 cities across the country, noted at its 2012 meeting that “communities that have invested in pedestrian and bicycle projects have benefited from improved quality of life, a healthier population, greater local real estate values, more local travel choices, and reduced air pollution.”

We’re also starting to see states and countries standing up to big oil as communities begin to understand how they may become a “sacrifice zone” in the interests of big oil and gas. In the United States, Texas joined with other Gulf States to sue BP oil and Halliburton over the oil spill that did so much damage to the Gulf of Mexico and the economies of those states. They claim the companies engaged in “wanton and willful misconduct” and violated state regulations. And, the Europe Commission carried out unannounced raids on Shell, BP and other big oil companies as part of an investigation into price-rigging that could have been going on for a decade.

Maybe there is enough going on through protest, creating the economy we want and getting government to wake up and change course, that the nation can avoid the scenario described in this article of the U.S. becoming an impoverished country. Now there is no need to cut essential services with extreme austerity, instead there is an opportunity to invest in a new, sustainable economy based on clean energy and to correct so much of the misdirection of the nation.

The people have awakened and are protesting what they do not like and building what they want. In DC this week, homeowners who have had their homes foreclosed upon through fraudulent practices, are occupying the Department of Justice and demanding that the banks be held accountable. Fast food workers have been striking all over the country, including a large surprise strike today in DC. And unemployed families are walking from Philadelphia to DC to demand green jobs.  Students and teachers in Philadelphia and Chicago are demanding their community schools stay open.  A popular resistance is brewing and we can expect it to build throughout the summer.

 This article is based on a weekly newsletter for ItsOurEconomy.us. To sign up for the free newsletter, click here.

Kevin Zeese JD and Margaret Flowers MD co-direct It’s Our Economy and are organizers of the Occupation of Washington, DC. They co-host Clearing the FOG on We Act Radio 1480 AM Washington, DC and on Economic Democracy Media. Their twitters are @KBZeese and @MFlowers8.

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Woolwich killings: LIVE UPDATES

0


British police have shot and wounded two men after a man believed to be soldier was beheaded in an attack on a street outside Woolwich barracks in South East London. Prime Minister David Cameron called the attack “truly shocking.”

18:15 GMT: A British government official speaking on
condition of anonymity said that the details which had emerged so
far pointed towards a “terrorist motivated attack.”

This article originally appeared on : RT

China backs Iran presence in Syria talks

0

China has voiced support for the participation of Iran in the upcoming international conference to discuss the crisis plaguing Syria, Press TV reports.

Å“China thinks the Syrian issue cannot be solved without certain important countries in the region and especially not without the participation and support of the countries that have an important influence on the current Syrian situation,” Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Hong Lei said.

Å“China is receptive to the participation of Iran and Saudi Arabia,” Lei added in his press conference in Beijing.

On May 7, Russia and the United States agreed in Moscow to hold an international conference on Syria, which will serve as a follow-up to an earlier Geneva meeting, which was held in June 2012. The new event is reportedly expected to take place in early June.

Chinese analysts also agree that the Islamic Republic is too influential in the region to be left out of the Geneva 2 meeting on Syria.

Former Chinese Ambassador to Syria Shi Yanchun told Press TV that, Å“Iran is a major power in the Middle East. When I was ambassador to Syria, the closeness of relations between Iran and Syria left a deep impression on me.”

Å“Everyone knows about Iranâ„¢s influence in Syria and the history of close cooperation between the two countries, but now we have some Western countries trying to dictate who can take part in any settlement for Syria and who cannot,” he added.

On May 20, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also underlined the need for the presence of Iran in the upcoming talks.

Syria crisis started over two years ago, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the foreign-sponsored militancy.

MKA/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Velayati to renovate Iran aviation industry

0

Presidential candidate Ali Akbar Velayati addresses a group of pilots and civil aviation engineers in Tehran on May 21, 2013.

Iranian principlist presidential candidate Ali Akbar Velayati says he will modernize the national aviation industry if he receives enough votes to win the June 14 election.

Addressing a group of Iranian passenger plane pilots in Tehran on Wednesday, Velayati described highly developed civil aviation industry as one of the main features of a sophisticated administration.

Å“In order to compensate for current shortcomings and realize growth, we need a number of factors: the most outstanding of which is [the presence of] qualified and intelligent people,” he said.

Velayati went on to say, Å“The second factor is the use of advanced aircraft.”

The former foreign minister also criticized past administrations for their failure to upgrade Iran civil aviation industry.

Velayati noted that if proper policies had been adopted, “something which is still possible,” Iran could purchase the best airliners and make use of them.

Å“The government must make sure everything is up to the standards … that the plane purchased is of a distinguished make, documents are valid, the contract is compelling, and repair, maintenance, and [supply of] spare parts are guaranteed. This must be supervised by the administration, and [the rest] must be done by the people,” he added.

The Iranian presidential candidate said, Å“The next point is more training. Aviation education, pilot training, aviation engineering education and navigation education must be updated with the passage of time. In other words, we should have retraining for our pilots.”

Velayati stressed that to achieve civil aviation industry’s goals domestic resources should be taken advantage of.

Å“Another point that can greatly help us as a resource to cover our expenses is the use of the Iranian air space. Pundits tell us that many airliners flying from west to east or vice versa would substantially save on jet fuel, the price of which is always going up, if they fly over Iran,” Velayati stated.

MP/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Army commander suspended over sexual misconduct charges

0

The Army’s top general at Fort Jackson has been suspended over allegations of assault and adultery. The news strikes another blow against the US military, which has come under immense scrutiny for its frequent sex scandals involving senior officers.

Brig. Gen. Bryan Roberts is facing accusations of adultery and
engaging in a physical altercation with a woman that is not his
wife. The 29-year veteran was the top general at Fort Jackson,
S.C., where he took command in April 2012. He previously served as
head of a unit training Iraqi soldiers. Roberts has been suspended
pending an investigation into the allegations against him.

The Army made the announcement of Roberts’ suspension on
Tuesday
, but did not provide further details regarding the
assault and adultery allegations.

“It was not clear whom Brig. Gen Bryan Roberts struck,”
USA TODAY reported, indicating that the general may have physically
harmed the woman with whom he had an altercation. NBC News
reports that the altercation involved Roberts and the woman he
allegedly cheated on his wife with, and that the two were involved
in a violent argument. After making up, Roberts allegedly bit the
woman’s lip, which caused her to seek medical help, a US military
official told the news agency.

Brig. Gen. Peggy Combs, Commandant of the US Army Chemical,
Biological, Radiological and Nuclear School at Fort Leonard Wood,
Missouri, will take over as interim commander while the
investigation is ongoing.

The U.S. Army’s Command and Staff page on Tuesday
showed a vacant spot under the position of “Commanding
General”.

The suspension is the latest sex scandal involving a senior
military officer. In recent months, the Pentagon has come under
enormous pressure to address the number of military sexual assault
allegations.

Earlier this month, Air Force Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski, was
arrested for drunkenly groping a woman. Krusinski was in charge of
sexual abuse prevention, which made the case more disgraceful than
most.

Sgt. 1st Class Gregory McQueen, the US military
soldier responsible for overseeing sexual assault prevention at
Ford Hood is also under investigation
for sexual assault. The man is facing allegations including the
maltreatment of subordinates and running a prostitution ring.

Meanwhile, Lt. Col. Darin Haas, the manager of Fort Campbell’s
sexual harassment prevention office, was fired from his post and
arrested on charges of violating an order of protection, and
stalking his ex-wife.

Although the details of Roberts’ allegations remain unclear and
it is not known whether the ‘assault’ was a sexual assault, his
misconduct serves as further embarrassment to the Pentagon during a
month filled with news of sex scandals and shocking statistics.

Pentagon officials recently announced that sexual assault
incidents have increased by 35 percent from 2010 to 2012, bringing
the annual total to 26,000 last year. The Department of Veteran
Affairs also found that 85,000 US veterans received
medical treatment for sex abuse trauma last year, which indicates
that the effects of assault have far-reaching consequences, both
financially and emotionally.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Top IRS official takes the Fifth: what it means

0

Jon Rappoport
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Now it’s getting interesting.

Lois Lerner, head of the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt filings.

Lois Lerner, head of the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt filings, will take the Fifth in front of Congress tomorrow.

She won’t answer questions. She won’t say, for example, why she never informed Congress that she knew there was criminal fiddling going on at the IRS, where employees “gave extra scrutiny” to tea party, conservative, patriot, and other groups during the application process.

Instead, as the DOJ launches a criminal investigation, Lerner will tell the House Oversight Committee, “I decline to answer. I invoke my Fifth Amendment right.” Multiple times she will say this.

Meaning: “If I answer, I could incriminate myself.”

Her lawyer, William Taylor, has asked the Committee to excuse Lerner from testifying tomorrow, Wednesday, since she won’t be answering questions. Taylor wrote to the House Committee, “[Forcing her to testify would] have no other purpose other than to embarrass or burden her.”

Tsk, tsk. Mustn’t embarrass a person who has committed crimes. Be nice. Be kind. Yes, Lois Lerner failed to tell the Committee anything about IRS crimes, when she testified four times last year, but so what? Give her a break. Goodness gracious, don’t put her through an ordeal.

Somehow, Lerner’s lawyer’s logic doesn’t stand up. But he’s a lawyer, so that’s no surprise.

Then there was this: a presidential election last year. 2012? Obama? Remember?

If Lois Lerner had blown the whistle then, and the full-blown scandal that’s erupting now had occurred before the election, who knows who would have won the presidency.

Lois was obviously protecting a president running to win a second term. She’s “pre-taking” the Fifth now and hoping she won’t have to appear before the Committee tomorrow, so the Obama administration won’t have to risk hearing a Congressman ask, WERE YOU PROTECTING THE PRESIDENT FROM SCANDAL IN AN ELECTION YEAR?

WERE YOU LYING SO OBAMA COULD WIN REELECTION?

Ahem…the Fifth Amendment wasn’t designed for that purpose. It was designed so a person wouldn’t have to incriminate himself/herself. The Fifth doesn’t exist to protect someone else from scandal.

We get it, Lois. We get what you’re up to.

If you do stand before the Committee tomorrow, why don’t you just say, “I refuse to answer on the grounds that I would cast doubt on the 2012 presidential election and the president.” Come out with it.

One question, though. Are you sure the president you’re protecting isn’t named George Bush? Because this sounds a lot like what Bush’s people were doing all those years.

Am I dreaming here? This is the Obama administration, right? The presidency that was supposed to be transparent and good and different and transcendent, and prophetic of a New Age?

Gee, you mean it’s just biz as usual? It’s every presidency and every administration that pulls dirty tricks? It’s one continuous, unbroken line of diabolical scum at work?

What a shock. Let me hold on to my chair, because the room might start spinning.

Lois, what if there is no Clark? What if he’s not in some phone booth taking off his suit and turning into Superman, so he can rescue you? What if the president and his henchmen are just throwing you to the wolves?

Consider that. Then consider what would happen if you changed your mind at the 11th hour, and instead of taking the Fifth, you checked into the Committee room tomorrow and told everything, and I mean everything, you know.

You could rock the vote, retrospectively. You could make the kind of splash we rarely see. You could upset so many apple carts it would be wondrous to behold.

Wasn’t this administration supposed to be about a massive healing and cleansing? You could make it so, Lois. You could engage with the people, for once, and tell the truth.

I know you’re sweating bullets right now, but think about it.

Imagine the looks on the faces of Steven Miller, Eric Holder, Barack Obama.

The truth and the whole truth.

Priceless.

Lois, your lawyer, Taylor, has written to the House Committee, “[Lois] has not committed any crime or made any misrepresentation, but under the circumstances, she has no choice but to take this course [and invoke the Fifth].”

Wow, Lois, do you see how crazy it’s getting? Your own attorney is basically saying you have no reason to take the Fifth…except for the fact that you have to protect other people. Isn’t that right? Isn’t that what he really means? So who is he really working for?

You’re out there alone. You’re exposed. Why not give them all the shaft and tell the whole sordid story?

Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 11:57 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Man beheaded in suspected terrorist attack outside army barracks in London

0


A man believed to be soldier has been beheaded in an attack on a street outside Woolwich barracks in South East London. Armed police who responded to incident have also reportedly shot and injured two people, one of them seriously.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Fox Pulls Story On Arrest of Italian Gun Manufacturer

0

Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Perazzi SPA, the Italian gun manufacturer, has issued a press release claiming the story about the alleged arrest of Daniele Perazzi, reported as the founder of the gun manufacturing company, is a hoax.

In response, Fox News pulled the story, which Infowars.com used as source.

630 KHOW in Denver posted the following video on the incident:

In addition to sourcing Fox News, we sourced the Gun Rights Examiner. That website has posted the Perazzi statement, as follows (translated from the Italian):

OFFICIAL PRESS RELEASE by Perazzi SPA

With regard to reports in the American press, in relation to an alleged arrest for “terrorism” by Daniele Perazzi (founder of Perazzi Armi SpA), we point out that the news is completely devoid of any foundation. Daniele Perazzi is however, unfortunately, failed to live for about a year. Even his son, Mauro, was last Saturday in the USA. As reported in the press is absolutely false. The company Perazzi, however, contrary to what is written, is familiar with the American legislation on weapons because of his extensive and well-known activities of marketing its products in the USA. Since it is difficult to think of simple error, it is believed that someone who has interests contrary to those of the Perazzi SpA, may have spread false and misleading information purposes only defamatory. The company has already instructed his lawyers to take the most appropriate actions, civil and criminal, in order to protect the brand represented and its activity, carried on the American market. Perazzi Armi SpA

PRESS RELEASE From Perazzi SpA With reference to press reports Concerning Daniele Perazzi’s alleged unlawful arrest for terrorism last Saturday in Denver (Colorado), That we were the incident is devoid of any foundation and the news is completely fabricated. Daniele Perazzi (founder of Perazzi SpA) died last year, and his son Mauro was not in the United States last Saturday. The Perazzis are not involved in. any wrongdoing in any way, shape or form and, to our best knowledge, are not under investigation or scrutiny nor are targets of criminal proceedings. The Perazzi Company, contrarily to what Has Been Reported, is very familiar with the U.S. legislation on two weapons to its extensive presence in the American market. Perazzi is considering to take legal action to protect the brand and the Company’s reputation in the USA. Perazzi SpA

David Codrea, who writes for the Gun Rights Examiner, explained on May 19 that he also used the Fox News story as a source, as well as the comments of “a very well-known Second Amendment attorney.”

“I also called the Adams County Sheriff’s Office and left a voice mail with the Public Information Officer. As it was Sunday, no one answered and no call has been returned,” Codrea explains.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 12:13 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

‘Syria reaction to talks constructive’

0

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R) welcomes Syria’s Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad during a meeting in Moscow, on May 22, 2013.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says the Syrian government’s response to proposed peace talks is constructive.

Å“We value the constructive reaction of the Syrian leadership to this proposal,” Lavrov said on Wednesday in a meeting with Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad in Moscow.

For his part, Mekdad said that Damascus will soon decide on whether to take part in the upcoming international peace conference due to be held in Geneva in June.

Å“We are still discussing this question. A final decision will be taken after our return to Damascus,” Mekdad stated.

UN-Arab League Special Envoy to Syria Lakhdar Brahimi said on Tuesday that the Syrian government and the opposition are preparing to take part in the peace conference.

Brahimi said both the Damascus government and the opposition will take part in the talks in a bid to help resolve the conflict in Syria.

The first Geneva talks, which were presided over by former mediator Kofi Annan last June, called for a political process to end the crisis in Syria.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

MAM/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Egypt reopens Rafah border crossing

0

The Egyptian authorities have reopened the Rafah crossing with the Gaza Strip following the release of seven Egyptian security forces kidnapped in the volatile Sinai Peninsula last week.

The border crossing between Egypt and the besieged Gaza Strip was reopened on Wednesday after Egyptian guards ended their five-day strike.

The striking guards had been protesting the kidnapping of their colleagues.

Å“This is all we wanted. We have ended our strike and reopened the border,” Al-Ahram Arabic news website quoted one of the striking officers as saying.

The crossing was closed on Friday after security forces were abducted by suspected militants in northern Sinai.

The freed soldiers were received by President Mohamed Morsi and government ministers at a military base in a Cairo suburb on Wednesday.

Morsi had earlier ruled out any negotiations with the kidnappers and called on the people of Sinai to lay down their arms.

Their release followed a massive show of force by Egyptâ„¢s military in the peninsula.

The Sinai Peninsula is awash with guns and has become increasingly lawless since the fall of former dictator Hosni Mubarak in 2011.

Hundreds of Palestinians have been stranded on the Egyptian side of the border since Saturday morning.

Some 800 people normally leave for Egypt and beyond through the Rafah crossing, the only passageway leading to the rest of the world for most Gazans.

Israel imposed an all-out land, aerial, and naval blockade of the Gaza in June 2007 after the democratically-elected Palestinian resistance movement of Hamas took over the administration of the territory.

The siege has had a disastrous impact on the humanitarian and economic situation in the impoverished enclave, having turned the territory into the worldâ„¢s largest open-air prison.

Impoverished Palestinians are forced to use underground tunnels to bring in essential supplies including food, fuel and medicine.

The Rafah crossing is the Palestinian territory’s only crossing outside Israeli control.

JR/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Rand Paul On IRS Scandal: “Someone Needs To Go To Jail”

0

“Outraged” Obama has “transferred people around in the State Department… nobody lost their job”

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Senator Rand Paul says that appropriate punishments need to be handed out to officials involved in the IRS’ unfair treatment of Tea Party groups and conservative “patriot” groups applying for tax exemption.

“Someone needs to be fired,” Paul said on Fox News’s Neil Cavuto Tuesday. “And it seems to be impossible to fire a government employee. Still no one has been fired over Benghazi. They were transferred. We called them up today. They still all have phone numbers and offices. That’s the problem.”

“People want government to be responsive. And if someone uses and abuses the power of government, they want that person kicked out of office.” Paul asserted.

Paul also stated that should a proper investigation find criminal activity at the heart of the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, then “someone needs to go to jail.”

The Senator repeated his call for an independent investigation into the scandal,

Taking aim at the president’s attempted detachment from the issue, Paul said that if Obama truly is “outraged”, as he has claimed, then “…we want to see him do something. He needs to say, in a short period of time, that someone is going to be leaving.”

“He sort of says he is outraged, but like with Benghazi, his response was to transfer people around in the State Department and nobody lost their job.” Paul added.

“So, really, someone has to be fired. Someone should be prosecuted if this is a criminal occurrence. But I don’t think the president – he has been kind of passive in all of this. He seems to be detached and he kind of wants to show outrage, but say, hey, I had nothing to do with it, I’m just the president.” The Senator urged.

“I’m not sure that’s going to fly with the public.” Paul added.

Watch the interview:

Paul’s demands come in the wake of IRS official Lois Lerner pleading the Fifth Amendment and refusing to testify at today’s congressional hearing.

Before invoking that right, Lerner claimed she had done nothing wrong, adding “I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations, and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

Commentators have reveled in the irony of an IRS official invoking constitutional protections after specifically targeting non-profits that were teaching the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

As we noted yesterday, most Americans believe that the White House is engaging in a cover up over the IRS tactics. In a Washington Post/ABC News poll, 45 percent suggested that the White House has not disclosed all the facts, compared to 42 percent who say they trust the government on the matter.

In addition, a majority of Americans said they believe increased IRS scrutiny on conservative groups was deliberate, with only 31 percent saying they believed it was an “administrative mistake.” A whopping 74 percent, described the tactics as inappropriate, with 51 percent saying they feel the actions are criminal.

A CNN poll reveals that the Tea Party has received a favorability bump in response to the scandal.

“Politically, the group that may have benefitted the most from last week’s news is the tea party movement, which may be getting something akin to a ‘sympathy vote’ for being targeted by the highly unpopular IRS,” CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said on Monday.

–––––––––––––––––––––-

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 11:58 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Kerry Complains About Hezbollah Fighters in Syria

0

Secretary of State says nothing about CIA’s foreign mercenaries, including al-Qaeda

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

During a meeting with Jordan’s King Abdullah II in Amman, Secretary of State John Kerry said Hezbollah is fighting alongside al-Assad’s soldiers in Syria with Iranian support, according to Reuters.

On Tuesday, ahead of Kerry ‘s visit, a senior State Department official said the “Syrian Government is welcoming Iranian help and Hezbollah help.”

The unnamed official also said the U.S. knows Iran and Hezbollah cooperate in a number of countries, “not just in Syria. And so it is not a surprise that Iran would be there with Hezbollah on the ground. We do have consistent reports of Hezbollah fighters on the ground.”

The official also said the United States government has reports “from several of the commanders that Hezbollah fighters are directly engaged in fighting literally on the streets.”

The State Department declarations about Hezbollah fighters and Iranian assistance ignores the fact that the CIA is arming and supporting foreign mercenaries in Syria. In addition to CIA sponsored mercenaries, the presence of British and Qatari troops have been reported in Syria. “There is ample evidence that this armed insurgency is directly supported by the US and NATO. There is also evidence that these armed groups are responsible for killing civilians and carrying out terrorist acts,” Michel Chossudovsky noted last February.

In April, Russia’s Federal Drug Control Service Director Viktor Ivanov said around 20,000 foreign mercenaries financed by Afghan drug trafficking are attempting to overthrow the al-Assad regime in Syria.

“Transnational organized crime groups can ensure an inflow of a huge number of criminals and mercenaries from certain countries to any part of the world with proceeds from heroin sales,” Ivanov told the Ria Novosti news service.

Afghanistan’s drug trade “is funding insurgency, international terrorism and wider destabilization,” United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said in 2011. In 2009, we reported that the brother of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, a suspected kingpin of the country’s booming opium trade, had been on the CIA payroll for years prior to his assassination.

During the CIA’s successful effort to defeat the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, the agency institutionalized drug production. “In order to augment their funds, rebel chieftains began to grow poppies, refine opium into heroin, and sell the drug in the U.S. and Europe,” Robert Friedman wrote in the early 1990s.

Ivanov’s statement coincided with remarks by Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich. “Syria’s transformation into a center of attraction for international terrorists is becoming an alarming reality,” he told the Interfax news agency.

“Field reports from the ground inside Syria point towards a difficult and complex situation, with the country teeming with foreign mercenaries, including westerners, with outside forces using Saudi, Turkey and Qatar as proxies to support minority groups and destabilize the status quo,” Russia’s Pravda reported on Tuesday.

Since the beginning of the effort to overthrow al-Assad and install a more complaisant government in Syria, the United States, the UK, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, and Turkey have “sent billions of dollars and thousands of tons of weapons into Syria along side known-terrorists from Libya, Chechnya, neighboring Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq,” writes Tony Cartalucci.

Finally, al-Qaeda in Iraq has taken over the foreign financed and CIA-supported effort to depose al-Assad. “The most feared and effective rebel group battling President Bashar al-Assad, the Islamist Nusra Front, is being eclipsed by a more radical jihadi force whose aims go far beyond overthrowing the Syrian leader,” Reuters reported last week. “Many Syrians turned a blind eye to the growing presence of foreign and Arab jihadi fighters in its ranks.”

The foreign presence within the ranks of mercenaries in Syria is epitomized by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the head of the Islamic State of Iraq, an al-Qaeda affiliated group. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has relocated to northern Syria to take control of al-Qaeda forces inside the country.

Secretary of State John Kerry and the U.S. government support al-Qaeda in Syria, although they continue to decry the presence of the terrorist group and its offshoots, including al-Nusra. Kerry knows that Hezbollah, with Iranian support, will make the task of overthrowing al-Assad and moving the globalist “Arab Spring” destabilization plan forward more difficult.

The complaint about Hezbollah is a crucial component of a pretext required to argue for more direct military support of al-Qaeda in Syria and the ouster of al-Assad.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 11:40 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

The Inside Story of a Harvard Dissertation Too Racist for the Heritage Foundation

0

The idea that some racial groups are, on average, smarter than others is without a doubt among the most discussed (and debunked) “taboos” in American intellectual history. It is an argument that has been advanced since the days of slavery, one that helped push through the draconian Immigration Act of 1924, and one that set off a scientific firestorm in the late 60s that’s hardly flagged since.

Yet every time the race and IQ hypothesis reclaims the public spotlight, we are caught slackjaw, always returning to the same basic debates on the same basic concepts.

The recent fracas sparked by Dr. Jason Richwine’s doctoral dissertation is a case in point. The paper is a dry thing, written for an academic audience, yet its core claim, that Latino immigrants to the United States are and will likely remain less intelligent than “native whites,” has proved proper tinder for a public firestorm. The Heritage Foundation’s Senior Policy Analyst in Empirical Studies is now a former Senior Policy Analyst – Heritage could not risk further tainting an immigration report it hoped would be influential by outright defending its scholar’s meditations on the possibly genetic intellectual inferiority of immigrants from Latin America.

It might seem like the book is closed on l’affaire Richwine: he’s left his job, Heritage is left with a black eye, and not a single mind has been changed about the value of research into race and IQ. But there’s still one major unanswered question.

If the dissertation was bad enough to get him fired from the Heritage Foundation, how did it earn him a degree from Harvard?

A popular answer among Richwine’s defenders is that, quite simply, it was exemplary work. Richwine’s dissertation committee was made up, by all accounts, of three eminent scholars, each widely respected in their respective fields. And it is Harvard.

But dozens of interviews with subject matter experts, Harvard graduates in Richwine’s program who overlapped with him, and members of the committee itself paint a somewhat more textured picture. Richwine’s dissertation was sloppy scholarship, relying on statistical sophistication to hide some serious conceptual errors. Yet internal accounts of Richwine’s time at Harvard suggests the august university, for the most part, let serious problems in Richwine’s research  fall through the cracks.

Richwine Goes To Harvard

By his own account, Jason Richwine came to the Harvard Kennedy School deeply fascinated with the link between race and IQ. Richwine told The Washington Examiner’s Byron York that, as an undergraduate at American University, he fell in love with Charles Murray’s work on the topic. Murray, who will became an important player in Richwine’s story later on, is one of the authors of the infamous The Bell Curve, the 1994 book whose claims about the genetic roots of the black/white IQ gap set off the most famous public food fight over race and IQ. Richwine describes Murray as “ my childhood hero.”

People that knew Richwine at Harvard describe him as an introverted, but kind, man. “He was a quiet and thoughtful person,” said Anh Ngoc Tran, a contemporary of Richwine’s at Harvard who now teaches at Indiana University. “[Richwine] was friendlier to international students,” Tran said. Another contemporary of Richwine’s echoed Tran, saying Richwine was “not really all that outgoing. Always a really nice guy.”

Tran took pain to distance Richwine from accusations of racism. “I don’t think he is racist,” Tran told me. “His wife is an immigrant.”

After the first two years of coursework, PhD candidates in Public Policy at the Kennedy School move away from group classes toward individual research. That means taking comprehensive exams (“comps,” in grad student lingo) to show you’ve mastered the course material. After comps, you start work on a dissertation, a piece of original scholarship that’s supposed to demonstrate the candidate’s ability to produce research at the level expected of an expert in the field. Dissertation topics are determined in conjunction with a primary advisor, who goes on to become the “chair” of a three-person committee that determines the candidate’s fate. The topic is finalized in a formal “prospectus” outlining the research agenda.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

How Racism Turned an Interracial Family’s Trip to Walmart into a Kidnapping Investigation

0

A Virginia father’s trip to Walmart last week took an unexpected turn when he was accused of kidnapping his three young daughters because their skin color did not match his. Joseph, a white father in an interracial marriage who does not want his family name revealed, has three daughters, a 4-year-old and 2-year-old twins. According to Fox News in DC, Joseph took them to Walmart in Potomac Mills in Woolbridge to cash a check, then was “shocked” to find a Prince William County police officer waiting for them at home.

“He asks us very sincerely, ‘Hey, I was sent here by Walmart security. I just need to make sure that the children that you have are your own,’” Joseph told Fox.

“I was dumbfounded,” his wife, Keana, told Fox, “I sat there for a minute and I thought, ‘Did he just ask us if these were our kids knowing what we went through to have our children?’

“He took my ID and asked my 4-year-old to point out who her mother and father were.”

Joseph told Fox an officer explained that a Walmart security guard  “reported seeing him in the parking lot with the girls and thought it was strange.” After the cop left, Keana called Walmart and was transferred to a Walmart security officer who blamed a customer for the incredibly false alarm.

Keana says the security oficer told her, “Well, the customer was concerned because they saw the children with your husband and he didn’t think that they fit. And I said, ‘What do you mean by they don’t fit?’ And I was trying to get her to say it. And she says, ‘Well, they just don’t match up.’”

Walmart issued a statement claiming, “There’s still a lot of unknowns at this time and we’re currently looking into the situation.” Joseph and Keana will never shop at Walmart again, and are hoping they can make good of the incident by raising awareness about racism and love’s ability to transcend skin color.

PSA: Multiracial families do not imply kidnapping.

Kristen Gwynne is an associate editor and drug policy reporter at AlterNet.  Follow her on Twitter: @KristenGwynne

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

US federal workers strike over low pay

0

Low-wage workers strike against low wages in Washington DC on May 22, 2013.

US federal workers have walked off their jobs in protest to low wages and benefits in Washington DC.

A group called the Good Jobs Nation called the strike on Tuesday, as federal contract employees protested against the lowly federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour, the Washington Post reported.

Police made two arrests, as protesters blocked traffic, passed out flyers and gathered at Union Station.

The protest came amid a Demos report showing that the US federal government remained the largest creator of low-wage jobs – more than Wal-Mart and McDonaldâ„¢s put together.

According to the organization, hundreds of billions of dollars in federal contracts, grants, loans, concession agreements and property leases go to private companies to create about 2 million jobs at a rate of USD 12 an hour or less, the report said.

This is while the chief executives of these contracting firms earn millions in salaries and bonuses, it notes.

In the last three years, about 50 percent of jobs created in the United States have been low-paying jobs, according to economists at the Royal Bank of Scotland.

A Congressional hearing is due to be held in upcoming weeks in a bid to address the problem low wage jobs that are funded by American tax payers.

GMA/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Spain spent $680 million on submarine that ‘can’t resurface’

1

Spanish engineers, who already spent some $680 million on designing the new generation S-80 class submarine, say it is a major “technical innovation.” There is just one problem the calculations show — if submerged into water, it may never come up again.

The Spanish media has been furiously discussing the errors made
by the state-owned Navantia construction company, which has spent
about a third of the huge $2.2 billion budget only to produce an
‘overweight’ submarine that is not able to float.

Spain’s Ministry of Defense has confirmed that Navantia detected
“deviations” in the new submarine’s design, thus delaying
its March 2015 scheduled launch for one or two years.

Navantia said an excess weight of up to 100 tons has been added
to the sub during construction, and the company may have to
redesign the whole craft.

The excess weight may result in significant problem in the
craft’s buoyancy and severely affect its ability to submerge and
resurface from depth, the local media explained.

To ensure the submarine does not sink, Navantia considers
lengthening its hull in order to re-balance the weight,
infodefensa.com said, citing sources.

A computer-generation image of the S-80 class submarine (Image: navantia.es)

But each extra meter of the sub will reportedly cost the
austerity-stricken state more than €7.5 million ($9.7
million).

Spain’s opposition party United Left has mocked the submarine
development in parliament and demanded explanations.

The Ministry of Defense downplayed the clamor, saying
adjustments and delays in such complex technological projects are
“within normality.” The ministry is now “studying the
scope of the problem to determine its impact in terms of time and
money”
and is considering “various
alternatives.”

A delegation from the local College of Industrial Engineers in
Murcia region on Tuesday visited the Navantia facilities and spoke
in support of the company’s engineers “facing unprecedented
technological solutions,”
La Verdad said. Navantia’s
“technical innovation” is an even more challenging task,
given that the plant has to build “four submarines
simultaneously,”
said the Dean of the College Andres
Ortuno.

While the Spanish state is waiting for the four S-80 class
submarines to be modified and completed, it will only have two
submarines in service — and may have to spend €30 million ($38.8
million) to repair the aging S-74 Tramontana.

The unexpected costs come at a time when Spain’s Ministry of
Defense has seen its budget cut by some 30 per cent as part of
austerity measures.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Atheists Rising: Wolf Blitzer Learns a Lesson and Arizona Lawmaker Says "Don't Bow Your Heads"

0

Photo Credit: James Steidi/Shutterstock.com

May 22, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

You’d think by now CNN would have learned to stop treating their assumptions and as truths. But when Wolf Blitzer made a casual comment Tuesday, it turned out to be a teachable moment both for the newsman and television viewers.

Speaking live to a survivor of the deadly tornado in Moore, Okla., Blitzer declared the woman “blessed,” her husband “blessed,” and her son “blessed.” He then asked, “You’ve gotta thank the Lord, right? Do you thank the Lord for that split-second decision?”

But as she held her 18-month-old son, Rebecca Vitsmun politely replied, “I’m actually an atheist.” A flummoxed Blitzer quickly lobbed back, “You are. All right. But you made the right call,” and Vitsmun graciously offered him a lifeline. “We are here,” she said, “and I don’t blame anyone for thanking the Lord.” Nicely done, Rebecca Vitsmun.

One in five American adults — and a third of Americans under age 30 – now declare no religious affiliation. We are less religious now than at any other point in our history, and our secularism is rising at a rapid pace. Get used to it, Lord thankers.

As Vitsmun pointed out, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with a statement of gratitude or even an acknowledgment of spirituality. I recently had someone tell me that she felt very “blessed” — right before adding that she was agnostic. Where Blitzer was insensitive – and just plain unthinking – was in his no-doubt well-intentioned demand that his interviewee cough up a Praise the Lord moment for edification of CNN viewers.

And Blitzer was not the only person this week who got his expectations rocked. When Tempe, Ariz., State Rep. Juan Mendez was asked Tuesday to deliver the opening prayer for the afternoon’s session of the House of Representatives, he delivered something different. 

“Most prayers in this room begin with a request to bow your heads,” the Democratic official said. “I would like to ask that you not bow your heads. I would like to ask that you take a moment to look around the room at all of the men and women here, in this moment, sharing together this extraordinary experience of being alive and of dedicating ourselves to working toward improving the lives of the people in our state.”

He went on to say, “This is a room in which there are many challenging debates, many moments of tension, of ideological division, of frustration. But this is also a room where, as my secular humanist tradition stresses, by the very fact of being human, we have much more in common than we have differences.”

It was a call to love and empathy that stands right up there next to any prayer in the book, and one that offered bonus inclusion and humanity. Afterward, he said, “I hope today marks the beginning of a new era in which Arizona’s non-believers can feel as welcome and valued here as believers.” And if the conservative state of Arizona can make it happen, there’s hope yet for the other 49, people.

In a nation in which the divide between believers and non-believers can be great and truly ugly — one of “militant atheism” on one side and unbearably ignorant religious conservatismon the other, with just a few words, Rebecca Vitsmun and Juan Mendez showed that the ideals of being respectful and compassionate belong to all of us. Whatever our personal views, we can give others space to have theirs and to express them with dignity. We can challenge assumptions, but we can conduct ourselves with kindness. Because what matters most in life isn’t what we believe in our hearts, it’s how we practice those beliefs with each other.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Britain accuses Iran of boosting Syria

0

British Foreign Secretary accuses Iran, Hezbollah of shoring up Syrian Pres. Assad

British Foreign Secretary William Hague speaks at a joint news conference with his Jordanian counterpart Nasser Judeh in Amman.

The British Foreign Secretary has accused Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah and Iran of Å“propping up” Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The allegations made by Hague in Jordanian capital of Amman are yet another sign of the Westâ„¢s frustration with the advances the Syrian government forces are making against foreign-backed terrorists in the country.

Speaking at a news conference with his Jordanian counterpart Nasser Judeh, William Hague failed to control his anger over the Syrian Armyâ„¢s progresses in al-Qusayr.

“It is very clear that Syrian regime is receiving a great deal of support … from outside Syria from Hizbollah and Iran”, he alleged.

“This is a regime that is increasingly dependent on external support,” Hague claimed.

Ahead of a meeting of the so-called ËœFriends of Syriaâ„¢ grouping, he said: “The regime is being propped up by others outside, further undermining its legitimacy”.

Britain and its allies in the so-called ËœFriends of Syriaâ„¢ grouping have revealed their real intention behind convening meetings and discussions, which is to oust President Bashar al-Assad.

The fact was exposed before the meeting of the grouping in Jordan, where Hague moaned that Å“Syrian President Bashar al-Assad cannot be part of a solution to the Syrian crisis”.

“We want a solution without Assad. We do not accept the stay of Assad,” Hague said ahead of the meeting in Amman.

William Hague also said the UK government will renew its attempts to seek to lift an embargo against foreign-backed terrorists in Syria in a fresh bid to provide them heavy weapons.

The developments come as the Syrian Army continues to advance deeper into the strategic town of Qusayr, an area which has been the focal point of clashes between government forces and terrorists for weeks.

The army forces have managed to restore security and stability to Al-Akari and Tal Sar villages and hunted down rebels in the town of al-Hamidieh on the outskirts of al-Qusayr, state-run SANA news agency said Wednesday.

The army pushed its way into al-Qusayr city early Sunday after taking control of its surburb after 46 days of battling.

MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Syria reaction to talks constructive’

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says the Syrian government’s response to proposed peace talks is constructive and Damascus will soon decide on whether to take part in the upcoming international peace conference.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘600,000 Greek children in poverty’

0

A woman holds her child as she begs outside shops displaying Christmas offers in central Athens . (file photo)

Almost 600,000 children in Greece are living below the poverty line, a UNICEF official says.

Å“The situation is very worrying. The problems of poverty and social exclusion are increasing,” President of UNICEF in Greece, Lambros Kanellopoulos, said on Wednesday.

Kanellopoulos added that the situation has a negative effect both on the welfare of children and issues concerning their health and development.

He noted that approximately 597,000 children are currently living in poverty, up from 439,000 a year ago. Out of that number, 322,000 lack the basic daily nutritional needs.

Greece has been at the epicenter of the eurozone debt crisis and is experiencing its sixth year of recession, while harsh austerity measures have left tens of thousands of people without jobs.

Many Greek workers are currently unemployed, banks are in a shaky position, and pensions and salaries have been slashed.

Greek youths have also been badly affected, and more than half of them are unemployed.

EKA/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

UK taxpayers pay for the rich’s greed

0

British people are struggling with their biggest squeeze on living standards at a time of austerity while many high-profile individuals, including the Royal family and giant corporations, are earning billions of pounds through the so-called legal tax avoidance.

Tax avoidance by definition is generally the legal exploitation of the tax regime to one’s own advantage, attempting to reduce the amount of tax that is payable by means that are within the law.

Tax offenders exploit loopholes in the law to remove income or assets from taxable situations into ones with lower taxes or none at all.

Similarly, Britainâ„¢s highly abusive tax loopholes allow wealthy individuals & organisations to evade their tax burden, making the most vulnerable people in the society bear the brunt of spending cuts and pay for the richâ„¢s greed.

But who are the UKâ„¢s biggest tax evaders, depriving British people of millions of pounds that could be spent on public services?

In December 2012, Britain’s HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) were called on to probe suspected tax avoidance by the heir to the throne Prince Charlesâ„¢s £728 million hereditary estate, the Duchy of Cornwall.

The unclaimed property, which Prince Charles owns, thanks to his royal status under an ancient law, comprises around 53,408 hectares of land in 24 counties, mostly in the south west of England and including the whole of the Isles of Scilly.

Charles receives the “revenue surplus” from the estate, and the Duchy’s accounts show it grew by 2.8 percent to £18.3 million in the last financial year. The estateâ„¢s total worth also grew by £32 million to £728 million due to “buoyant agricultural property values” and accordingly, the British princeâ„¢s tax bill rose marginally from £4,398,000 to £4,496,000, an increase of £98,000.

The duchy, however, insisted that the state “is not subject to corporation tax as it is not a separate legal entity for tax purposes”. But principal judge at the information rights tribunal John Angel ruled last December the property was a separate legal body to the prince.

Earning money through tax evasion by the Royal Family is just part of the story. Business giants Starbucks, Google and Amazon were also found guilty of dodging millions of pounds in tax in Britain.

It is estimated that the corporate tax evasion is costing the UK economy something between 45 to 90 billion pounds a year, meaning that it is practically undoing all austerity measures as well as widening the gap between the rich and the poor in the British society.

Moreover, the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been accused of complicity in tax avoidance for more than 25,000 of its employees. The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said discovering the scale of fraud at the BBC was quite shocking.

In attempts to identify the deliberate tax defaulters in Britain, the HMRC has published two lists so far.

The lists, published in February and May, contained the names of individual tax evaders, including a hairdresser, a coach operator, a knitwear manufacturer, and a tandoori takeaway.

Not surprisingly, the British government was stringently criticized for pursuing individual tax dodgers instead of large corporations, which had largely avoided tax and harmed the most vulnerable people in the society.

MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

UK retail sales fall unexpectedly in April

0

Britain’s retail sales volume has unexpectedly dropped in April, indicating continued weakness in consumer spending.

Britain’s retail sales volume has unexpectedly dropped in April, indicating continued weakness in consumer spending.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the retail sales, including automotive fuel, fell by 1.3 percent in April compared to last month.

This comes as economists had expected little or no monthly decline in retail sales volume.

According to the ONS, total food sales plunged 4.1 percent in April; the weakest showing since 2011. The ONS report revealed the restricted demand on food sales is mainly due to falling wages, increasing cost of living in the country, and the unusually bleak weather.

High street shops also suffered a 0.2 percent contraction in the amount of money spent on the same month last year, the biggest year-on-year fall in retail spending since the turn of the century.

“This rise in prices will have squeezed consumers’ disposable income, possibly resulting in them buying less or substituting cheaper goods for their normal purchases,” the ONS said.

MOS/MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Mayor Weiner? Sexting congressman enters race to lead New York City

0

Anthony Weiner, the former United States congressman who resigned two years ago amid a media-catching sexting scandal, is officially running for mayor of New York City.

Weiner, 48, announced in a YouTube video late Tuesday that he’ll
be running in the New York mayoral race this November.

The long-time member of the US House of Representatives was
rumored in recent weeks to be weighing a bid for the Democratic
Party’s nod in this fall’s race, which will mark the first time
since 2001 that incumbent Michael Bloomberg will be ineligible to
run for the office of mayor due to term restraints.

Weiner previously served as a congressional Democrat in the
House for the ninth district of New York, a region composed
entirely of his native Brooklyn. After a 12-year run in the House,
however, Weiner walked away from office in June 2011 after
admitting to sending inappropriate images to young women while
married to his wife, Huma Abedin.

After conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart published lewd
photos the lawmaker was alleged to have sent from cell phone, a
sexting scandal dubbed “Weinergate” by the mainstream media
propelled the congressman into the national spotlight. Weiner
initially declined the accusations that he sent the images, only to
eventually come clean and walk away from office shortly after.

Photo from twitter.com user @anthonyweiner

In a YouTube video released this week, Weiner apologized for his
past conduct and asked for another opportunity at elected office
from his longtime constituents.

“I made some big mistakes, and I know I let a lot of people
down, but I also learned some tough lessons
,” Weiner said.
“I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle
class and those struggling to make it my entire life. And I hope I
get a second chance
.”

“We love this city,” adds his wife Abedin. “And no one
will work harder to make it better than Anthony
.”

With the tossing of Weiner’s hat into the ring, the once-popular
liberal lawmaker will have to compete with Comptroller John Liu,
City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, 2009 mayoral hopeful Bill
Thompson and others for the Democratic Party’s nomination. The
former chairman of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority
and the one-time director of the White House Office of Urban
Affairs are among a handful of candidates who have confirmed
they’ll seek the Republican Party’s nod. The last time a Democratic
served as mayor of New York was 1993.

Rumors of Weiner’s return to politics have amounted in recent
weeks following a profile in the New York Times last month. But
even after appealing to New Yorkers through pleas in that paper and
elsewhere, Weiner faces an uphill battle in seeking the city’s top
position two years after he left the House with his tail between
his legs.

The results of a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday
found Weiner grabbing only 15 percent of New York democrats to
frontrunner Quinn’s 25 percent. One month earlier, a NBC New
York/Marist poll determined that less than half of the city’s
Democrats would even consider voting for Weiner in a mayoral
race.

“I think that is going to be up to the people of the city of
New York as they judge all of us
,” Thompson, the 2009
Democratic nominee who previously served as Comptroller, told
WNYC.

“I agree with Billy,” added Quinn. “That’s not
a question for any of us to answer, it’s a question for the voters
to answer. But what I think the voters are really concerned about
is making sure that the next mayor isn’t someone who’s just going
to make promises, is somebody who’s got a record during their
career in government or the private sector of actually delivering
for New Yorkers
.”

According to Weiner, he’s already done as much. Despite his
career being put on pause due to 2011’s scandal, he stands by his
accomplishments in the House and as New York City council member
from 1992 through 1998. In his campaign video, Weiner said he
secured one billion dollars as congressman to hire more New York
City police officers and also worked to help 9/11 first responders
receive adequate health benefits.

“Anybody who underestimates Anthony Weiner’s ambition is a
fool. And anybody who underestimates his ability as a candidate is
a fool
,” retired Hunter College political science professor
Kenneth Sherrill told the Associated Press. But “we’re going to
see, basically, if Weiner can take hits as well as he can dish them
out
.”

In kick-starting his campaign, Weiner published on Wednesday his
“64 Ideas to Keep New York the Capital of the Middle Class,” a
blueprint that calls for, among other items, bringing more jobs to
the city, reversing the trend of surging housing prices and
bringing affordable health care to 1.2 million New Yorkers who are
currently without insurance.

And if that doesn’t work, there’s another thing that might help
Weiner win the votes of New Yorkers: he currently has over $5.1
million cash in the bank that could be used towards his campaign,
second only to Quinn’s $7 million.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Federalized Local Police Helped Arrest Adam Kokesh

0

US adopting RAND Corp Stability Police Force model

Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
May 21, 2013

Last Saturday’s marijuana legalization rally in Philadelphia, where radio host and political activist Adam Kokesh gave a keynote speech and was arrested, was possibly designated a potential terror event beforehand and attended by police specially trained to deal with terrorism.

Judging by a red patch spotted on police jackets visible in footage of Kokesh’s arrest, members of the city’s federalized Homeland Security Bureau, trained to deal with “civil affairs” and “counter-terrorism operations,” appear to have been patrolling the event.

In at least two separate videos of the protest, numerous officers are seen wearing their normal blue and white uniforms outfitted with standard Philadelphia police patches. Other officers can also be seen, however, dressed in black jackets festooned with mysterious red patches that surround the traditional Philadelphia police emblem.

This small, but important, detail may indicate Philadelphia’s Smoke Down Prohibition event was to be treated as a terror threat. Evidently marijuana legalization assemblies and other concentrated acts of civil disobedience and protest are now disturbingly being equated with terrorist activities.

Since even before the events of 9/11, the globalist think tank known as the Rand Corporation had made its intent to federalize and militarize local and state police known.

Calling for “the creation of a high-end police force,” known as a Stability Police Force, the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security, has been busy inserting special cadres of federal police officers in both state and city police departments, creating designated squads tasked to deal with, among other things, “a range of threats from insurgents to criminal organizations” and counter-terrorism operations. Alex Jones, an expert on the militarization and federalization of local and state police, has researched the subject for years and believes this to be the case.

Furthermore, a flow chart illustrating the organization of the Philadelphia Police Department lists their Homeland Security Deputy Commissioner, Thomas Wright, as overseeing specialized units trained in dealing with domestic preparedness and response, such as counter-terrorism operations, and, ambiguously, “civil affairs.”

Screen capture taken from phillypolice.com

While no information regarding what the red patch signifies can be located, the City of Pittsburgh’s Police Department does mention they have a specialty unit titled the “RED Team” prepared to deal with “certain critical incidents.”

Pittsburgh’s Bureau of Police website describes the RED team, short for Rapid Emergency Deployment, as a “highly skilled and highly trained specialized unit that can provide a quick and appropriate response to certain critical incidents, such as WMDs, terrorists events, major HAZMAT incidents and Acts of Civil Disobedience.” (emphasis added)

Earlier this month, we also reported on Massachusetts state police who have adopted COIN (an acronym for counterinsurgency) operations cloned from Iraq and Afghanistan to address drugs and gangs.

The fact that “insurgent” is a term usually used to describe armed rebellions in occupied nations, and not your common street drug dealer or gang member, should serve as a red flag signifying local law enforcement is already beginning to take on military police characteristics.

Of course, that fact that Kokesh announced an armed, but peaceful, march on Washington DC earlier this month in defiance of the capitol’s firearms laws, set to take place on July 4 doesn’t help.

However, if federalized police are attending a peaceful marijuana protest event and labeling it “terrorism,” it sets a startling precedent.

Infowars reached out to the Philadelphia Police Department for comment on what the red patch represents, but have not heard back from them.

View one of the videos of Kokesh’s arrest below in which the red patch is visible:

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 11:15 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

More deaths reported in Leb. clashes

0

Lebanese troops in armored personnel carriers patrol the area along the demarcation line between Tripoli’s Bab al-Tabbneh district and Jabal Mohsen neighborhood on May 21, 2013.

Violent clashes rage on for a fourth consecutive day in Lebanonâ„¢s flashpoint city of Tripoli, causing more deaths.

The violence has claimed at least thirteen lives since the weekend. More than 100 people have been also injured as supporters and opponents of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad clashed in the city.

Two Lebanese soldiers were reportedly among the dead.

The soldiers were killed after the Lebanese Army entered the flashpoint area to break up the clashes between residents of rival neighborhoods of Bab al-Tabbaneh and Jabal Mohsen on Tuesday.

Many homes have been destroyed since the breakout of violence on Sunday.

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati issued a statement on Wednesday saying that the Army has Å“full authority” to take the necessary measures to put an end to the clashes.

While Bab al-Tebbaneh residents support militants fighting against the Syrian government, the inhabitants of neighboring Jabal Mohsen are loyal to Assad.

Tripoli has been the scene of fierce clashes between the supporters and opponents of the Syrian government since the beginning of the unrest in Syria more than two years ago.

In February, at least three people were injured in clashes between supporters and opponents of the Syrian government in the area.

MAM/KA/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Iran rejects false KSA spy allegations

0

Iran Foreign Ministry spokesman has dismissed Saudi Arabiaâ„¢s false allegations that the Islamic Republic has links to a spy cell recently arrested in the Kingdom.

“We expect the Saudi government to pursue the issue through correct channels instead of creating media hype,” the Iranian Foreign Ministryâ„¢s newly-appointed spokesman, Abbas Araqchi said on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Saudi Arabiaâ„¢s state media reported that the country had arrested 10 more suspects in what it claimed was a spy ring linked to Iran. The kingdom had arrested 18 others people in the same case in March 2012.

According to Saudi state media those detained include 24 Saudi nationals, one Turk, two Lebanese citizen, and allegedly one Iranian.

Å“It was alleged [by the Saudi Arabia] that a network of spies, who were arrested in late March last year, were connected to Iran. At the time, we stressed the fallacy of this claim,” Araqchi added.

The spokesman noted that the Foreign Ministry summoned the Saudi Arabian chargé d’affaires in Tehran and protested the allegations in March 2012, requesting a formal explanation from the Saudi side.

Araqchi said Iran had requested consular access to the Iranian national two months ago but Å“unfortunately there has been no response from Saudi officials.”

Saudi activists say there are more than 30,000 political prisoners, mostly prisoners of conscience, in jails across the Kingdom.

According to the activists, most of the detained political thinkers are being held by the government without trial or legitimate charges and have been arrested for merely looking suspicious. Some of the detainees have reportedly been held without trial for more than 16 years.

PG/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Britain says wants Syria without Assad

0

Britain and its allies in the so-called ËœFriends of Syriaâ„¢ grouping have revealed their real intention behind convening meetings and discussions, which is to oust President Bashar al-Assad.

The fact was exposed before a meeting of the grouping in Jordan, where British Foreign Secretary William Hague moaned that Å“Syrian President Bashar al-Assad cannot be part of a solution to the Syrian crisis”.

“We want a solution without Assad. We do not accept the stay of Assad,” Hague said ahead of the meeting in Amman.

William Hague said the UK government will renew its attempts to seek to lift an embargo against foreign-backed terrorists in Syria in a fresh bid to provide them heavy weapons.

Hague made the threatening remarks at a joint press conference with Jordan’s Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh.

“The UK and France seek to end the ban on arming Syrian rebels. Any decision to be taken will be discussed with the Syrian National Coalition and in cooperation with other entities”, he said.

The grouping includes Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Egypt, the United States, Britain, France, Turkey, Germany and Italy.

This comes as a U.S. Senate panel has already endorsed plans to give Syrian terrorists lethal arms.

The developments come as the Syrian Army continues to advance deeper into the strategic town of Qusayr, an area which has been the focal point of clashes between government forces and terrorists for weeks.

The army forces have managed to restore security and stability to Al-Akari and Tal Sar villages and hunted down rebels in the town of al-Hamidieh on the outskirts of al-Qusayr, state-run SANA news agency said Wednesday.

The army pushed its way into al-Qusayr city early Sunday after taking control of its surburb after 46 days of battling.

MOL/MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Obama Shows He's Serious About Fixing Our Screwed-Up Election System

0

May 21, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

President Obama’s newly appointed election reform commission is filled with election officials who have a record of supporting progressive election reforms–even though some of them are known for working in red states under conservative Republicans.

Whether Congress listens to this panel’s suggestions is another matter. Half of the 10-member panel are election state and local officials who have participated in numerous retreats sponsored by the Pew Center on the States where they have endorsed voter registration modernization that would be a vast improvement over what’s widely in practice in election administration today. Regardless of political party, they generally agreed that voter registration–which is the gateway to the process–could be made more accurate, cost-effective and efficient. As important, they all don’t think very highly of politicizing the voting process. Their fundamental commitment is making sure eligible voters can cast ballots.

The backbone of their recommendations at Pew in 2010 was creating a system where states use a mix of government databases to draw up lists of eligible voters. Then states are left to decide how they will contact those voters and what people must do to activate their registrations before casting a ballot. This centrist compromise doesn’t entirely please progressives, who want states to universally register everyone. And it doesn’t please conservatives either, who want to make voter registration and the process of voting more difficult, in order to maintain GOP political power in states with increasingly diverse populations.

But, if Obama’s blue ribbon committee draws on the thinking that’s been done by these same people, what’s likely to emerge is a system where the government draws up eligible voter lists, attempts to contact new voters and people who move, and has better voter information databases and tracking ability on Election Day to ensure that anyone who wants to vote has an easier time crossing the finish line and casting a ballot. One impact of this more modernized approach–which would appeal to Republicans–is that a larger state role in enrolling voters would lessen the need for registration drives that have been attacked as unprofessional, such as by ACORN in 2008. However, the fact that states might rely on government data to identify people as eligible voters also would put GOP “voter integrity groups” out of business, because the government would be using data gathered under penalty of perjury.

Obama’s panel is headed by two of the country’s top election lawyers–Democrat Bob Bauer and Republican Benjamin Ginsberg–who are known for using any tactic to win and then saying there’s nothing wrong with the process because their side won. The panel also has people whose professional lives are in corporate America and not in running elections. Both these lawyers and executives are likely to defer to the real experts–people who have run elections for years.

In that latter category is former Tennessee Republican Secretary of State Trey Grayson; Clark County, Nevada (Las Vegas), Registrar Larry Lomax; former Texas Director of Elections Ann McGeehan; Maricopa County, Arizona, (Phoenix) longtime election official Tammy Patrick, and Michigan Director of Elections Christopher Thomas. These officials know exactly what does and doesn’t work in elections. They may get mixed reveiws from some progressive groups, but many of them have improved voting in their state, though that hasn’t gotten press attention.

For example, in Michigan, under a Republican Secretary of State, Christopher Thomas instituted an Election Day affidavit that a person who said she had registered–but wasn’t on the polling place list–could sign, under penalty of perjury, to get a ballot and vote. A handful of states have this option, which gives the benefit of the doubt to voters.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Russians name Brezhnev best 20th-century leader, Gorbachev worst

0

Over half of Russians believe Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev was the best head of state in the past century, followed by Bolshevik Revolution mastermind Vladimir Lenin and dictator Joseph Stalin, a poll by Levada Center has revealed.

Sociologists asked Russians about their attitude towards
20th-century leaders. Some 56 percent of respondents have positive
feelings about Brezhnev, who led the USSR from 1964 till 1982. A
target of countless Soviet jokes and anecdotes, he is now disliked
by 29 percent of people, Levada revealed.

The first ruler of the Soviet Union, Lenin, is seen in a good
light by 55 percent of Russians, while exactly one-half of Russians
favor Stalin. However, over one-third of respondents do not approve
of the leader, who is often described as “bloody
tyrant.” 

Nikita Khruschev — who was Soviet premier during the Cuban
missile crisis — is liked by 45 percent of Russians. That figure is
slightly less than modern-day supporters of Tsar Nicholas II, who
was overthrown in 1917; he got kind reviews from 48 percent of
respondents. 

Josef Stalin.(RIA Novosti / Shagin)

And at the bottom of the list, two-thirds of respondents gave
negative evaluations to the first and only Soviet President,
Mikhail Gorbachev, and the first Russian President Boris,
Yeltsin.

The late Yeltsin is viewed positively by only 22 percent of
Russians, while his predecessor Gorbachev is seen as Russia’s worst
leader ever, according to the poll. The architect of perestroika is
now disliked by 66 percent of Russians, and only one-fifth of the
population has warm feelings about the Soviet president.

Experts link Brezhnev’s popularity among the population to
financial well-being during his epoch, which was the “peak of
Soviet socialism.” Stalin is associated with victory in World
War II, which explains why he is favored by modern
Russians.

First Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party Central Committee and Chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers Nikita Khrushchev.(RIA Novosti)

“No one would want to live in Stalin’s era, but he
personifies what now is in shortage: Justice and equality in
fear
,” Professor Valery Solovei told Kommersant daily.
Gorbachev and Yeltsin’s time brought “only defeats” and no material
prosperity, political analyst Sergey Chernyakhovsky explained.

“Gorbachev’s rule ended up with the dissolution of the USSR,
which is still considered by Russians as the 20th-century
catastrophe,
” said Aleksey Grazhdankin, deputy head of the
Levada Center. Attitudes towards Yeltsin worsened following his
1992 reforms, which lead to inflation and the closure of many
businesses, he added.

Harsh politicians are always perceived better than liberal ones,
Grazhdankin said: “Freedom brings uncertainty, while people
prefer certainty and clear perspectives… Rights and freedoms are
too abstract, and the majority of people don’t need them. First of
all, people appreciate the right to social guarantees and
labor
.”

Soviet Ex-President Mikhail Gorbachev.(RIA Novosti / Aleksey Nikolskyi)

This article originally appeared on : RT

$156bn lost to tax havens enough to end extreme poverty twice over — report

0

The estimated $156 billion in revenues lost to tax havens worldwide would be enough to end extreme global poverty twice over, according to new figures published by UK-based charity Oxfam on Wednesday.

Tax lost in tax havens is enough to end global extreme poverty
twice over according to new figures published by Oxfam,
Wednesday.

Although a deal was done earlier this month to get some of these
tax havens to be more transparent and share tax information, there
is still no tax deal on the table that will benefit poor countries
who are struggling to reclaim billions of dollars.

In the agreement British tax havens in the Caribbean have said
they will provide information on offshore bank accounts.

Tax havens take desperately needed cash from poor countries as
well as from citizens at home who are being hit by austerity
measures, the international agency said.

Some of the major world, EU and British tax havens are the
Bahamas, Luxembourg, the British Virgin Islands and the Isle of
Mann, which is located under 50miles away from the UK mainland.

“These figures put the UK at the center of a global tax
system that is a colossal betrayal of people here and in the
poorest countries who are struggling to get by, and put the
government on the side of the privileged few,”
said Emma Seery,
Oxfam’s head of Development Finance and Public Services, in a
statement.

The $156 billion in lost tax revenue is estimated by Oxfam to be
just a fraction of the total tax lost, as it only reflects the
amount of tax individuals are neglecting to pay and doesn’t include
tax dodged by companies that costs poor countries a further $160
billion a year.

Reuters / Desmond Boylan

Oxfam is part of the Enough Food for Everyone IF campaign, which
is calling on the G8 to make all tax havens join a multinational
agreement to share tax information.

The campaign includes more than 200 UK anti-poverty
organizations and calls on the British government use its
presidency of the G8 to launch a Convention on Tax Transparency,
where countries would commit to preventing individuals and
companies from making their wealth untraceable.

“The crucial thing at G8 is that any tax deal is
multilateral, which means the developing world would be able to
recoup the money owed to them,”
Emma Seery told RT.

The UK Prime Minister David Cameron is attending an EU summit
Wednesday where European heads of state and government will be
addressing the unfair global tax system. Two thirds of the world’s
offshore wealth, some $12.29 trillion is sitting in European linked
tax havens, including the British ones.

“Britain’s credibility is on the line; talking tough on tax,
whilst continuing to usher a third of the world’s wealth into UK
tax havens, risks making a mockery of David Cameron’s leadership at
the G8 summit in June,”
Seery said.

Oxfam says the EU is set to fail on imposing countermeasure
sanctions against tax havens and those using them and that they
won’t come out of Brussels with a deal.

In fact the EU meeting will be about harmonizing tax across the
trading bloc. Attempts for a better exchange of information on what
tax multinationals are paying, which were meant to be global rather
than European in scope, have been taken over by various attempts to
create a consolidated EU corporate tax base.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Schools devastated by Oklahoma tornado had no safe rooms

0

Two Oklahoma schools destroyed by the devastating May 20 tornado lacked “safe room” shelters that cost up to $1 million, but could have potentially saved the lives of children who died in the wreckage.

Two elementary schools were destroyed in the EF-5 twister that
killed at least 24 people on Monday and injured
hundreds of others. Seven children were found dead in the debris of
the Plaza Towers Elementary School in Moore, Okla.

Authorities believe that everyone who was at Briarwood
Elementary School survived the deadly tornado, which ravaged the
building with 200 mph winds.

“You could just feel the pressure just building like you were
in an airplane, just the pressurization of the cabin and your ears
popping and the debris starts flying and the roof falling in,”

Briarwood’s first-grade teacher Sheri Bittle told ABC. “And
everything in your classroom falling in on you.”

Both of the destroyed schools lacked tornado shelters, which
would have potentially prevented many of the casualties and
fatalities that occurred on May 20. More than 100 Oklahoma schools
currently have metal safe rooms, which can be built above ground or
underground and sustain winds up to 250 mph.

These rooms may be the difference between life and death in
states where the tornado risk is high, but lack of funding to build
them has prevented elementary schools like Plaza Towers and
Briarwood from constructing shelters of their own.

Retrofitting a school with a safe room shelter costs an
estimated $600,000 to $1 million per building, Bloomberg News
reports. Albert Ashwood, director of the Oklahoma Department of
Emergency, told the news agency that his department can’t afford to
provide every school with a shelter, but that he is looking into
whether the two schools had ever even applied for federal funding
to build safe rooms.

A U.S. flag from the Plaza Towers elementary school is erected on poles in front of the school in Moore, Oklahoma May 22, 2013.(Reuters / Rick Wilking)

“You have a limited amount of funds,” he said. “You
set priorities. It’s not a matter of they were being left
out.”

But Oklahoma residents refer to Moore as “Tornado Alley”, since
the area has been struck by devastating twisters more than any
other region in the US. In May 1999, a tornado took a similar path,
ravaging Moore, killing 41 people, and costing the US $1 billion in
damages.

Some residents believe that safe rooms should be a priority in
Oklahoma — particularly in Moore, since it has a history of falling
victim to tornadoes.

“If they can afford a $5 million football stadium, they can
afford a safe room,”
67-year-old John Lemmon, a Moore resident
who lives near Plaza Towers Elementary School, told Bloomberg.
“They should have done it right after they had the last big
one.”

While both elementary schools were reduced to rubble, students
at Plaza Towers Elementary School were worse off. This traditional
school building was constructed with a long line of classrooms that
were all under a single roof. When the tornado caused the building
to crumble, students were trapped in the wreckage of the structure,
and at least seven of them died. 

Briarwood Elementary School was divided into four sections, with
several classrooms in each pod. Between these pods were openings
that led students outside, which allowed students to escape the
collapsing walls and ceilings.

No children died at Briarwood as they escaped the falling debris
with backpacks over their heads. But both schools could have
ensured the safety of their students if they had metal safe rooms
to retreat into during natural disasters.

Now that children have died in the May 20 twister that ravaged
Moore, Okla., the Federal Emergency Management Agency may
reconsider providing the funding for safe rooms. The city of Moore
has long been trying to acquire funds to buy them, and the city in
February wrote on its website that FEMA requirements have held them
back.

“If you don’t have disasters, you don’t have additional money
for mitigation for safe rooms, but without disasters there’s not a
set funding source just for safe rooms,”
FEMA director Craig
Fugate told ABC, indicating that changes may only occur when it’s
too late to reverse the damage.

This article originally appeared on : RT

EU agrees to end ‘dangerous’ tax evasion and bank secrecy

0

In a period of record recession and unemployment, the EU has decided to recover a reported €1 trillion in tax revenue lost in loopholes and fraud, and has set a one year deadline to end banking secrecy.

Parliament Officials meet in Brussels to address the burden the
€1 trillion tax evasion is having on the EU economy, and have again
called to end fraud and ‘offshore’ zones. 

The European Parliament agreed to halve the 1 trillion figure by
2020 through an aggressive dismantling of tax loopholes and
havens. The MEP’s also approved state resources to go
after and prosecute tax evaders, in hopes of recovering lost
assets.

“At a time when finances are tight and taxpayers are
squeezed, it’s only right that we crack down on those who pursue
illegal means to avoid making any contribution to public coffers,
and who put smaller competitors at a disadvantage,”
said
Conservative MEP Martin Callanan, in a direct challenge to British
PM David Cameron to make tax evasion a priority in the UK

Austria, notorious for its banking secrecy, has joined
its EU partners in the quest against tax fraud, and supports the
one year banking secrecy deadline. According to Tax Research UK, a
blog maintained by an “anti-poverty campaigner and tax expert”
according to the Guardian.

The blog’s owner also is involved with Tax Justice Network and
is the director of Tax Research LLP.

The poverty charity Oxfam said on Tuesday that the EU has missed
out on £100 billion from individual tax scammers.

Oxfam has called for a blacklist of tax havens and believes EU
member states should impose sanctions on members who provide
platforms for such activity.

Ireland has vehemently denied it is a tax haven and on Wednesday
called for an international clampdown on multinationals, yet sits
at the center of the controversy. On Monday, it became known that
Apple Inc. paid just 2 percent on $74 billion
overseas income, which was mostly facilitated by a loophole in
Ireland’s tax code.

The ‘Irish double dip’ allows a company to file two subsidiaries
in Ireland with a corporate tax rate of 12.5 percent, which is far
less than the 35 percent rate in the US, for example.

This ‘legitimate tax abuse’ by high-profile corporates such as
Amazon, Google, and Apple hijacked the EU summit agenda.

Martin Callanan has called for an end to tax-havens and doesn’t
blame the companies, but the governing bodies which allow such a
framework.

“Nobody can blame companies for wanting to look after
share-holders’ capital by minimizing their tax bill in a legal
manner,”
he said.

Getting all member states to abide by one tax code, seems near
impossible.

“While companies may be using loopholes to pay as little tax
as possible, the truth is it’s a national issue. It’s up to the
relevant member states to change their tax codes and tighten the
net.”

The EU has already agreed to strengthen savings tax agreements
with European countries widely regarded as tax havens –
Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Andorra and San Marino.

Luxembourg has taken a lead and has agreed to an automatic
information exchange with the United States.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Israel war rhetoric against Syria ‘empty’

0

A senior Iranian lawmaker has downplayed recent Israeli warmongering rhetoric against Syria as an empty threat aimed at keeping up the morale of the foreign-backed militants in the Arab country.

Chairman of Iran Majlis National Security and Foreign Policy Committee Alaeddin Boroujerdi said on Wednesday that the “Leaders of the fake Zionist regime (of Israel) only issue such empty threats to boost the morale of terrorists.”

Pointing to the recent advancements made by the Syrian army against militants in the western city of al-Qusayr in the central province of Homs near the Lebanese border, Boroujerdi said Tel Aviv threats are aimed at preventing the blockade of al-Qusayr, which is the main channel of arms supply to militants.

The Iranian lawmaker stated that the Syrian army has maintained its powerful position against foreign threats throughout the two-year unrest and has defeated militants in various fronts.

On Tuesday, Israeli Defense Forces Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz reiterated threats to launch more attacks against Syria, saying Israel is prepared to Å“to take a stronger hand in the conflict” against Syria.

The warning came after the Syrian army said in a statement that it had destroyed an Israeli military vehicle which had crossed the ceasefire line in the occupied Golan Heights.

The Israeli regime has recently boosted its military activities in the Golan Heights, where clashes between the Syrian army and the militant groups continue.

Syria has been gripped by unrest for over two years, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the foreign-sponsored militancy.

PG/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Iran candidates urged to respect law

0

Iran Judiciary Chief Ayatollah Sadeq Amoli Larijani has called on unsuccessful presidential hopefuls and those approved to stand in the race to respect the law and the Constitution in the wake of next monthâ„¢s vote.

He said on Wednesday that the decisions by the Guardian Council – a 12-member body consisting of six jurists and six theologians – were made in the right direction to create yet another epic election on June 14.

Amoli Larijani further noted that the top constitutional supervisory body has the final say in vetting candidates and those who were not approved should abide by the law.

The senior Iranian official also asked the candidates to refrain from character assassination during presidential debates.

Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry on Wednesday published the list of hopefuls approved to run in the countryâ„¢s 11th presidential election.

The candidates are Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, President of the Center for Strategic Research of the Expediency Council Hassan Rohani, former Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati, former First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref, Secretary of the Expediency Council Mohsen Rezaei, Iranian lawmaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel and Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf.

The eight candidates were approved by the Guardian Council after a 10-day vetting process.

The Council has not approved, among others, former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, former Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, and a close aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Esfandiyar Rahim Mashaei.

MP/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Syria Rebels Threaten to Wipe Out Shiite, Alawite Towns

0

Dana El Baltaji
Bloomberg
May 22, 2013

Communities inhabited by Shiite Muslims and President Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite minority will be “wiped off the map” if the strategic city of Al-Qusair in central Syria falls to government troops, rebel forces said.

“We don’t want this to happen, but it will be a reality imposed on everyone,” Colonel Abdel-Hamid Zakaria, a spokesman for the Free Syrian Army in Turkey, told Al-Arabiya television yesterday. “It’s going to be an open, sectarian, bloody war to the end.”

Fighter planes and heavy artillery pounded the city today, the U.K.-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said in an e-mail. It said two people were killed during clashes between rebels and government troops backed by Hezbollah fighters, bringing the death toll from clashes at Al-Qusair in the last three days to more than 90.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 9:58 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

'5 killed in E Afghanistan bombing'

0

A wounded Afghan receives treatment at a hospital in Ghazni Province, east Afghanistan, on May 22, 2013.

At least five people have been killed and 20 others wounded in a bomb attack in Afghanistanâ„¢s troubled eastern province of Ghazni, local media say.

An improvised explosive device (IED) went off in Ghazni city, the provincial capital of eastern Ghazni Province on Wednesday.

The death toll is expected to rise as some of the injured are said to be in critical condition.

Afghan police officials said the main target of the attack in the city, which is located 125 km south of Kabul, remained unknown.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the bomb attack. But Taliban militants frequently use roadside bombs against foreign troops and Afghan armed forces.

Separately, the US-led forces opened fire on a group of seminary students in western Afghanistan, killing at least two and injuring several others.

Security sources in the Herat province said the students were attending a ceremony at the Aziz-Abad village when the shooting happened.

Following the incident, a group of protesters, including local elders, gathered outside the governorâ„¢s office, demanding the arrest of the culprits.

The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 under the pretext of combating terrorism. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across the country despite the presence of thousands of US-led soldiers.

JR/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Glaciers are Melting Slowly But Surely

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/glaciers_are_melting_slowly_but_surely_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Millions of poverty-stricken Italians unable to afford heat, meat amid economic crisis

0

As a severe recession and unprecedented unemployment sweeps Italy, millions of people are struggling to make ends meet. The number of those receiving food assistance has doubled in the past two years, according to a government report.

The data comes from national
statistics institute ISTAT, which published an annual report
demonstrating, among other issues, that Italy is witnessing youth
unemployment of nearly 40 percent — the highest in
Europe.

A reported 23.9 percent of
young Italians are neither in the job market nor receiving
education, the report stressed. In southern Italy, one in three
young people aged 15-29 fell into this category.

Just over half (57.2 percent)
of youths who graduated were currently employed, with the
Europe-wide average standing at 77.2 per cent.

Fourteen percent of Italy’s
population — 8.6 million people — is living on food assistance, a
number that has doubled over the past two years, according to the
report.

Nine poverty indicators were
taken into account while carrying out the study; if a family meets
more than four, it is considered to be seriously deprived. Some 15
million people — 25 percent of Italy’s population — are living in
families that meet three or more of the poverty indicators, the
research found.

Reuters / Javier Barbancho

For instance, one poverty
indicator is being unable to heat one’s home, something one in five
Italians cannot afford. Also, 16.6 percent of the Italians cannot
afford a protein-based meal such as meat every two days, from just
6.7 percent in 2010.

Over half of the Italian
population is unable to afford a one-week vacation, including a
staggering 69 percent of southern Italians, according to
ISTAT.

The recession, which has now
lasted almost two years, has taken a heavy toll on Italians, who
are increasingly digging into their savings, ISTAT stressed. The
savings rate, traditionally high in Italy, is currently far below
that of France and Germany, Reuters reported.

Italians’ purchasing power
also fell by 4.8 percent last year, an “exceptionally steep”
decline caused largely by aggressive tax hikes aimed at battling
the economic crisis gripping the country. 

The study results come just a
few days after thousands gathered in Rome to protest austerity
measures and high unemployment. Demonstrators urged Prime Minister
Enrico Letta to create jobs to pull the country out of recession.
Protesters held banners reading, “We can’t wait anymore” and “We
need money to live.”

According to a Friday poll
conducted by the SWG institute, the government’s approval rating
has dropped to 34 percent, down from 43 percent at the start of
May.

AFP Photo / Alberto Pizzoli

This article originally appeared on : RT

Australian Preschools may get Right to Bar Unvaccinated Children

0

New Zealand Herald
May 22, 2013

Preschools and childcare centres in New South Wales may be given the legal right to refuse to enrol children who have not been vaccinated.

The state Opposition will present legislation to Parliament allowing the right of refusal following declining rates of vaccination that in some parts of NSW are now lower than in Rwanda.

Health authorities have warned that unless checked, the decline will threaten the measles-free status Australia achieved in 2005 and new epidemics would become inevitable.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 9:53 am

Tags: , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Iran unveils new military garb, gear

0

The Islamic Republic of Iran has officially unveiled newly-developed sophisticated weapons, ammunition and military camouflage outfit.

During a Wednesday ceremony held in Tehran, Defense Minister Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi unveiled Sarbaz (Soldier) individual rifle, Mersad sniper rifle, Sa’ed pistol, piercing ammunition and military outfit designed to remain undetectable by night vision goggles.

The Sarbaz individual rifle has been manufactured in order to take advantage of the maximum capabilities of the Kalashnikov rifle and increase its efficiency in different combat missions.

In addition, the new rifle is compatible with telescoping stock, aiming aids and stands to increase shooting accuracy.

The Mersad sniper rifle is designed to provide the sniper units’ with a light, precise and small-caliber weapon and is capable of fulfilling sniper missions.

The Saâ„¢ed pistol is a light weapon with a high-capacity magazine, which can be used with different accessories.

The ammunition unveiled at the ceremony is capable of piercing hard armor, including helicopters and armored personnel carriers.

On May 20, Iran also unveiled Herz-9, a passive, short-range air defense shield, developed by Iranian Defense Ministry and the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps Aerospace Force.

Over the past year, Iran has made important breakthroughs in its defense sector and attained self-sufficiency in producing important military equipment and systems.

The Islamic Republic has repeatedly assured other nations, especially its neighbors, that its military might poses no threat to other countries, insisting that its defense doctrine is based on deterrence.

MKA/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Tweeting for freedom: Gitmo inmate starts online campaign

0

An inmate at Guantanamo Bay prison has embarked on a Twitter campaign through his lawyer for the closure of the facility where he has been kept for 11 years, despite being cleared for release.

The tweeting inmate is Shaker Aamer, a Saudi citizen and a legal
resident of the UK. Unable to go online himself, he is delivering
his message to Twitter through his lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith,
who is also founder of legal group Reprieve.

The May 20 tweet urging people to call the US Embassy in the UK and
demand the closure of Gitmo has already been retweeted more than
300 times.

Smith said that although he is doing the tweeting, it was
Aamer’s idea, despite the fact that he was imprisoned four years
before Twitter even existed. “

He really does know about Twitter and all the social media,
as I have sent him copies of what people have said and done for him
to keep his spirits up
,” Wired quoted Smith as saying.

Twitter users who called the embassy shared their experience
online:

Aamer is one of 86 Guantanamo detainees cleared
for release. He is also one of the inmates on hunger strike for the
facility’s closure. The number of those on strike is 103 according
to prison officials, and more than 130 according to the prisoners’
lawyers.

One-third of the striking inmates are being force-fed, including
Aamer. The practice has been deemed torture and a breach of
international law by the UN human rights office.

“There’s only one way to end this strike fairly, and that’s
to take prisoners who’ve been cleared for release and set them
free. And Shaker Aamer, the last British resident, he could come
back to London tomorrow if only President Obama would show him
redemption and use the National Defense Authorization Act to let
people go free. That’s the only way to solve this problem
,”
Smith told RT.

Aamer has been held without charge since 2002, despite having
been cleared for release six years ago along with the other 85
detainees. The Reprieve website said he “has been repeatedly abused
and subjected to extended isolation in Guantánamo Bay.” Aamer
joined the hunger strike on February 15. His lawyer is concerned
with his deteriorating health, saying his client has long passed
the point where he risks “irreversible cognitive
impairment
.”

AFP Photo / John Moore

This article originally appeared on : RT

FBI kills man related to Boston bombings

0

An FBI agent has shot dead a man during interrogations connected with the Boston Marathon bombings in April.

NBC News reported that the suspect was initially cooperative during early morning investigations at a condominium in Orlando, Florida on Wednesday, but later became hostile toward the FBI agent who then shot and killed him.

Å“The agent encountered the suspect while conducting official duties. The suspect is deceased. We do not have any further details at this time,” said FBI spokesman Dave Couvertier.

The deceased man has been identified as 27-year-old Ibragim Todashev, who was being questioned in connection to the Boston Marathon attack and knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the Orlando Sentinel quoted his friend Khusn Taramiv as saying.

Taramiv said Todashev was a close friend of Tsarnaev who died in a hospital in Boston on April 19 after sustaining critical injuries in a car-chase and shootout with the police.

Å“Back when [Todashev] used to live in Boston, they used to hang out — not hang out — he knew him. They met a few times because [Todashev] was a MMA fighter and [Tsarnaev] was a boxer. They just knew each other. Thatâ„¢s it,” said Taramiv.

Taramiv also said FBI agents were following him and Todashev over the past few days.

The April 15 bombings near the finish line of the Boston Marathon killed three people and injured more than 260 others.

US authorities have yet to provide information on the motive behind the attacks that some say was an inside job.

GMA/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

NHS chief quits over Stafford scandal

0

NHS chief Sir David Nicholson decides to step down in March 2014.

Britainâ„¢s National Health Service (NHS) chief Sir David Nicholson has finally caved in to mounting pressure over his role in the Stafford Hospital scandal and announced resignation.

Nicholson, who has been widely criticized over his failure in 1,200 preventable deaths at Stafford Hospital, said he will quit his £211,000-a-year post in March next year.

Nicholsonâ„¢s resignation, however, sparked fury among campaigners as it emerged he will pocket a huge pension pot worth £1.9 million.

Julie Bailey, whose mother died at Stafford Hospital in 2007 and has campaigned for improvements to care ever since, welcomed Nicholsonâ„¢s retirement but said the pension he will receive Å“is an obscene amount of money for failure.”

Å“He will be able to enjoy the rest of his life, unlike us – we are left with memories of our loved ones suffering under his watch,” she added.

The news of Nicholsonâ„¢s resignation came right after leading health figures issued grave warnings about the safety of accident and emergency (A&E) units.

Earlier this week, the president of the College of Emergency Medicine Mike Clancy expressed concerns over overcrowding in the departments at hospitals in England, saying it could lead to more deaths.

Clancy warned the overcrowding in A&E units was Å“dangerous” and associated Å“mortality and morbidity”.

MOS/MOL/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Watford Police Fear “Possible Crime and Disorder” At Bilderberg

0

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

The Grove resort in Watford, UK. Photo: Golf World Resorts

According to an article in the Watford Observer, the Herts constabulary fears the coming Bilderberg conference may attract “possible crime and disorder linked to a nearby conference at The Grove.”

After a local Green Party candidate announced she was planning to organize a “green event” around the Grove, Herts police apparently expressed their fears in a document cited by Watford Observer senior reporter Ben Endley.

“Documents show Herts police objected to the application due to “concerns over possible crime and disorder linked to a nearby conference at The Grove”.”, Endley reported.

In response to the request of Green Party candidate Su Murray to organize an event in a field across from The Grove Hotel from June 8 to June 12, the Watford Borough Council will not issue a permit for the event, consisting mostly of picknick-style pleasantries such as folk music, children’s entertainers, face painting, and other innocent activities.

The Council’s refusal to permit the event was apparantly preceded by Su Murray’s own decision to withdraw her application altogether “ fearing it would become too disruptive to the public and could be over-run by anti-Bilderberg protestors”.

The police’s fears might be fed by the Watford mayor Dorothy Thornhill, who expressed her fear of violence and anarchy, telling the local newspaper a week back that she fears violent protests at the upcoming Bilderberg conference.

“I have my concerns about it because it does attract people who can and do cause violence and disturbance.”, Thornhill told the Watford Observer. Although she added she is “confident the police will be able to minimize that”.

Past Bilderberg protests cannot give the mayor and Herts police any reason to think the coming conference will be violent. On the contrary, compared to other global summits the Bilderberg summit is usually being met with restrained protests of the most peace-loving people imaginable. On the rare occasions of incidents occurring during the protests, there is usually a provocateur present hoping to stir things up to the point of violent conflict.

There is a certain irony in the words of fear expressed by local authorities. By stating that crime and disorder are to be expected come June, the local Hertfordshire police inadvertently have a point: the only possible criminal activity going on- albeit in a most orderly way- will be the fact that elected officials will be mingling with the world’s financial en economic elites without any detailed record or outside observers to democratically check the proceedings.

Jurriaan Maessen’s websigte is Explosive Reports.

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Investigative journalists threatened with felony for exposing security flaw

0

RT
May 22, 2013

Investigative journalists with Scripps News Service have discovered a major security lapse, in turn accessing the private data of tens of thousands of cell phone customers in the United States.

Scripps isn’t being hailed for exposing the error, though, and has been accused by telecom attorneys of hacking into computers to gain access to the records – a claim the reporters dispute.

According to the journalists, they uncovered the files using nothing more than a simple Google search.

Reporters with Scripps were investigating Lifeline, a government benefit-program that provides low-income Americans with discounted phone service, when they came across the sensitive data.

“While looking into companies participating in the program, the Scripps News investigative team discovered more than 170,000 records posted online listing sensitive information such as Social Security numbers, home addresses and financial accounts of customers and applicants of Lifeline,” the news service wrote this week.

According to Scripps, Oklahoma-based TerraCom Inc. and an affiliate, YourTel America Inc., were up until recently hosting around 170,000 files just like these on the Internet, unencrypted and easy to find for anyone looking in the right spot. In fact, the journalists say they discovered the records by keying in a basic search query into Google.com.

“A simple online search into TerraCom yielded a Lifeline application that had been filled out and was posted on a site operated by Call Centers India Inc., under contract for TerraCom and YourTel,” Scripps reported.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

When another journalist conducted a follow-up Google search of the website, Scripps was presented with a trove of documents that were all hosted online without any security system in place to restrict access. From there, they used a computer code to download the publically available records and eventually possessed the entire trove without ever hacking any passwords or posing as an unauthorized party.

The reporters put the number of Lifeline applicants whose privacy was breached at around 44,000, spanning 18 states in the US.

San Antonio, Texas resident Linda Mendez, 51, was among the thousands of customers whose personal info was compromised due to the lack of security. When Scripps presented her with a completed TerraCom application she was shocked.

“How can they make it so easy like this for people to steal somebody’s identity?” Mendez asked.

Scripps asked similarly of TerraCom but was met with a shocker as well. Shortly after they presented their findings to the telecom, the files disappeared off the website. Then came a warning from TerraCom’s attorney.

“The person or persons using the Scripps IP address have engaged in numerous violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,” insisted TerraCom’s lawyer, Jonathan Lee, “by gaining unauthorized access into confidential computer files maintained for the Companies by Vcare, and by digitally transferring the information in these folders to Scripps. I request that you take immediate steps to identify the Scripps Hackers, cause them to cease their activities described in this letter and assist the companies in mitigating the damage from the Scripps Hackers’ activities.”

“Shoot the messenger,” wrote a blogger for NetworkWorld. “Reporters found a gaping security hole exposing 170,000 Lifeline phone customer records online, but were labeled Scripps Hackers and accused of violating [the] CFAA.”

Lee continued:

“If the purpose of the hacking was journalistic and the Scripps Hackers have not made and do not intend to make any further disclosure of the hacked data, then any financial or other risk for those applicants would be minimal and notification of the breach may not be necessary under the law of about half of the states involved. However, the downloading of more than 120,000 files over a period of several weeks may not be consistent with solely journalistic intent.”

New York-based attorney Tor Ekeland represented security researcher Andrew Auernheimer during a CFAA case that ended earlier this year with a federal judge sentencing the so-called hacker to 41 months in prison. In Auernheimer’s case, he was convicted of gaining unauthorized access to the personal details of thousands of AT&T customers after he discovered – and disclosed – a major security flaw that exposed the data of Apple iPad users in a major breach.

“I don’t see much difference between what happened in that case and what happened here,” Ekeland wrote on his website this week, “[e]xcept maybe that the DOJ might be a bit sensitive about going after reporters given their current track record on that front.”

“By not defining its key operative phrase ‘unauthorized access’ as requiring bypassing a password or some other type of technological access barrier, it allows corporations to be negligent regarding their infosec,” or informational security, wrote Ekeland. “The corporations know that someone else, and not themselves, will suffer the consequences for discovering their confidential data that the corporation has displayed for all to see on the open Web. Why should anyone disclose any computer security flaw in that type of set up? Why risk a felony conviction? Better to keep your mouth shut and let all sorts of criminal organizations and foreign governments harvest the information than to incur the wrath of the Department of Justice and a vexatious and costly civil suit.”

Before being sentenced, Auernheimer himself wrote that “in an age of rampant cyber espionage and crackdowns on dissidents,” the only ethical way to disclose security exploits was to avoid going to the company involved or the government that might prosecute you. “In a few cases, that individual might be a journalist who can facilitate the public shaming of a web application operator. However, in many cases the harm of disclosure to the un-patched masses . . . greatly outweighs any benefit that comes from shaming vendors.”

Scripps’ attorney, David Giles, responded much akin to Ekeland that TerraCom was misinterpreting the CFAA. “Regardless of the flowery moniker you have used to characterize the bureau’s newsgathering activities, the bureau’s reporters have not violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or any other law or regulation,” Giles wrote. “Rather, in the process of gathering newsworthy information, the bureau accessed — via a basic Internet search — personal and confidential information that apparently is available to anyone with a computer, an outlet and access to electricity.”

Scripps requested an on-camera interview with TerraCom before and after making their disclosure in order to show the company face-to-face how they “hacked” into their network. TerraCom acknowledged the breach on their website and told customers that “names, addresses, Social Security numbers, tax information and other government forms used by our company to determine applicant eligibility for the federal Lifeline program” were all compromised.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 9:25 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Cops Being Trained That Cell Phones Could Be Guns

0

New tactic attempts to limit YouTube clips of police brutality

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

A recent case where a police officer attempted to seize a cell phone by claiming it could be a weapon underscores how cops are now being trained to treat phones as potential guns in an underhanded effort to prevent people from recording police activity.

As a result of the numerous legal cases that have proven recording police officers is not a crime, authorities are getting more creative in attempting to stop abuse by law enforcement offices ending up as a viral video on YouTube.

In the clip above, Detective Shannon Todd of the Newark Police Gang Unit approaches a man who is recording a police stop on his cell phone, ordering him to, “put your phone down, put it in your pocket.”

Despite acknowledging that the device is a phone, when the man refuses to follow the unlawful order, Todd remarks, “I need to hold on to it,” before stating, “May I look at it and inspect it to ensure it’s not a firearm.”

“The truth is, she feared being the victim of a viral Youtube video instead of a fatal bullet, which is why she ordered the citizen to place his hands behind his back,” writes Carlos Miller.

Miller cites three other separate cases where police have attempted to stop an incident being recorded by claiming that a flip camera or a cell phone could be a lethal weapon, one where a Sony Bloggie camera was confiscated by Hialeah police officer Antonio Sentmanat in South Florida, another where San Diego police officer Martin Reinhold slapped a cell phone out of a man’s hands and arrested him for recording while the officer was writing a citation for smoking in an unauthorized area, and a third where a cop in Arkansas seized a Adam Pringle’s phone while he was recording the Exxon oil spill outside Little Rock.

“Reinhold told Pringle that he had specifically been trained to assume cell phones could be guns, which is apparently a training lesson being taught at police departments throughout the country,” writes Miller, adding that this is, “obviously a tactic meant to dissuade video recording rather than ensure officer safety.”

The rest of the incident in Newark consists of police attempting to intimidate the man against recording proceedings, as you can see in the clip below.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 9:24 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

‘5 killed in E Afghanistan bombing’

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]At least five people have been killed and 20 others wounded in a bomb attack in Afghanistan’s eastern province of Ghazni, local media say.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘UK deeply involved in CIA renditions’

0

A new study has shed more lights on the UK government’s involvement in the U.S. spying agency CIA’s rendition flights.

The study, entitled “the Rendition Project”, found that Britain provided much more support for the CIA’s global rendition program than what was previously recognized, with aircraft associated with secret detention operations landing at British airports 1,622 times.

According to the research project thousands of CIAâ„¢s secret kidnap and detention programs have been accomplished by the UK governmentâ„¢s direct involvement as stressed by evidence.

The researchers behind the project have drawn on testimony from detainees, Red Cross reports, courtroom evidence, flight records and invoices to show that at least 144 were entering the UK while engaged in rendition operations.

They have linked some 51 different UK airports, which were used by 84 different aircraft to the rendition programme. The most used UK airport was Luton, followed by Glasgow Prestwick and Stansted. There were also flights in and out of RAF Northolt and RAF Brize Norton, according to the study.

In September 2005, The Guardian newspaper for the first time exposed the CIAâ„¢s use of UK airports. Jack Straw, the then Foreign Secretary, dismissed the evidence. He told MPs in December that year that “unless we all start to believe in conspiracy theories and that the officials are lying, that I am lying, that behind this there is some kind of secret state which is in league with some dark forces in the United States … there simply is no truth in the claims that the United Kingdom has been involved in rendition.”

Straw told the same MPs that media reports of UK involvement in the mistreatment of detainees were “in the realms of the fantastic”.

However, documentation subsequently disclosed in the high court in London showed that Straw had consigned British citizens to U.S.-run detention camp at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba after they were detained in Afghanistan in 2001.

MOL/MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Syria envoy raps Jordan meeting on Syria

0

Syrian Ambassador to Jordan Bahjat Suleiman speaks to reporters in Amman on May 22, 2013.

Syria’s ambassador to Jordan has slammed a meeting of the so-called Å“Friends of Syria” group in Amman, describing it as a gathering of Å“friends of Israel.”

Å“It is a meeting of Syria’s enemies, or friends of Israel,” Bahjat Suleiman said on Wednesday in Jordan’s capital ahead of the meeting.

Officials from a number of countries including Britain, Egypt, France, Germany, Italy, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and the United States are participating in the meeting.

Suleiman said those who intend to put an end to the crisis in Syria must stop supplying arms to militants fighting against Damascus.

Å“Those who want to end the tragedy in Syria need to stop arming and training terrorist gangs in Syria. The war on Syria is unprecedented,” the Syrian envoy said, adding that Syria is Å“defending itself and will continue to fight Israel’s tools in the region.”

He also warned that Jordan should not involve itself in the war on Syria.

Å“We understand the pressures that Jordan is facing, but the kingdom should not involve itself in the war on Syria. Amman’s security is linked to Damascus’s security,” Suleiman said.

Meanwhile, a US Senate panel voted in favor of a bill authorizing the government to provide foreign-sponsored militants in Syria with lethal weapons and military training.

The bill, which also authorizes a USD 250-million fund to help transition of the Syrian government, was supported by both Democrats and Republicans.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

On May 18, President Bashar al-Assad said militants from 29 different countries are fighting against the government in Syria. He stated that foreign intervention is the most important factor aggravating the situation in his country.

MAM/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Astounding Gold News From India and China

0

 

 Standard Podcast Hide Player | Play in Popup | Download

Jim Rogers tells Lew Rockwell about his Adventures on the Road and in the Markets.

FBI Kills Tamerlan Tsarnaev Acquaintance

0

Ibragim Todashev told friend he thought the FBI would kill him

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Ibragim Todashev, said to be an acquaintance of deceased Boston bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was killed by the FBI on Tuesday after agents interrogated him on his political views. The Chechen-born Muslim was shot by agents after midnight at an apartment complex in Orlando, Florida, about ten miles from Disney World.

WESH-TV in Orlando reports that Todashev was originally cooperative, but he was shot after attacking an FBI agent. “During the confrontation, the individual was killed and the agent sustained non-life threatening injuries,” the FBI told ABC News.

Khusn Taramiv, a friend of Todashev, said they were interrogated about the Boston bombing. “(The FBI) took me and my friend, (Ibragim Todashev). They were talking to us, both of us, right? And they said they need him for a little more, for a couple more hours, and I left, and they told me they’re going to bring him back. They never brought him back,” Taramiv told WESH-TV.

See Taramiv’s interview.

Todashev told his friend he felt he would be shot by the FBI. “He felt inside he was going to get shot,” Taramiv said. “I told him, ‘Everything is going to be fine, don’t worry about it.’ He said, ‘I have a really bad feeling.”

Todashev was a professional MMA fighter. In May, according to WESH-TV, he was arrested after an altercation over a parking space.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 9:12 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/how_america_became_a_third_world_country_2013-2023_20130522/

Posted on May 22, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

Morsi receives released security forces

0

Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi (C) along with senior officials arrive at Almaza military Airbase in Cairo on May 22, 2013 .

Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi has received seven security forces whom suspected militants released in the troubled Sinai Peninsula after nearly a week.

The six policemen and a border guard – kidnapped last week by suspected militants – were received by Morsi and several government ministers at Almaza military Airbase in the capital, Cairo, on Wednesday.

The president congratulated Egyptian officials involved in the liberation operation and vowed that the Å“perpetrators will be held accountable.”

Å“This event will be a departure point for all of us to solve the problems of Sinai, its people and to develop Sinai,” said Morsi.

On Monday, Morsi had ruled out any negotiations with the kidnappers.

Egyptâ„¢s military sources said the men were freed due to cooperation of tribal leaders and the people of Sinai. The kidnappers reportedly freed the men in the middle of the desert.

Militant groups and criminals have exploited a security vacuum that developed in the Sinai since the 2011 uprising against former dictator Hosni Mubarak.

Occasionally, tribal Bedouins in the increasingly lawless peninsula briefly kidnap foreigners to use them as bargaining chips with authorities to secure the release of imprisoned relatives.

In August 2012, at least 15 Egyptian policemen were killed in an assault on a police station at the border between Egypt and Israel. It was the deadliest incident in Egypt’s Sinai in decades.

In response, Cairo launched an offensive against terrorists in Sinai, sending thousands of troops backed by tanks and heavy equipment into the region.

JR/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Court rules bin Laden death photos can stay secret

0

David Ingram
Reuters
May 22, 2013

A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that the U.S. government had properly classified top secret more than 50 images of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden taken after his death, and that the government did not need to release them.

The unanimous ruling by three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a request for the images by a conservative nonprofit watchdog group.

Judicial Watch sued for photographs and video from the May 2011 raid in which U.S. special forces killed bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, after more than a decade of searching.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 8:50 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Courtroom ordered closed for Manning trial session to ‘protect classified information’

0

A US judge has ruled that some testimony in the Bradley Manning trial will be heard behind closed doors to ensure that classified information is safeguarded.

The order comes after judges dropped one count against Manning,
but are still pushing for serious charges: Disclosing classified
data to WikiLeaks and aiding Al-Qaeda. Manning has pleaded guilty
to 10 of the 22 charges set against him, standing accused of
leaking over 700,000 documents to Wikileaks.

Twenty-four witnesses, including several US ambassadors, will
testify behind closed doors during the trial of Pfc. Bradley
Manning, which begins on June 3.

The decision was made by US Military judge Col. Denise Lind, who
heads the case. She indicated that otherwise, some sensitive
information could be revealed. A censored transcript of the hearing
will be published at a later date, the judge explained.

There has already been too much secrecy in the Manning case,
Jesselyn Radack, national security and human rights director of the
Washington-based Government Accountability Project told AP two
weeks ago.

“The more they do behind closed doors and the more they do
through secret codes or anything else that shields the public from
information, like not providing transcripts, those things are all
antithetical to the democratic idea of having a free and open
trial,”
Radack stressed.

Last year, the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a petition
to order the court to grant the public and press wider access to
the trial, a request an appeals court later denied.

In April, prosecutors urged journalists to “police” each other
and inform judges if they notice other reporters taking notes or
recordings the proceedings. The move followed the leak of a snippet
of audio from the courtroom featuring Manning’s testimony about his
motives in leaking the documents.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) released the audio,
marking the first time the public has heard Manning’s voice since
his 2010 arrest. Manning justified his actions by calling for the
exposure of what he saw as US government wrongdoings in order to
“spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our
foreign policy in general as it related to Iraq and
Afghanistan.”

In the recording, he goes on to accuse the US Army of “not valu[ing] human
life,”
and compared other soldiers to “a child torturing
ants with a magnifying glass.”

Pfc. Bradley Manning admitted to disclosing classified
government documents and diplomatic cables to whistleblowing
website WikiLeaks, and now faces charges of aiding the enemy for
those leaks. Part of the government’s case against Manning asserts
that late Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden asked one of his deputies
to download documents leaked by Manning.

Among the witnesses set to testify was one of the Navy SEALs
that raided Osama bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan in May 2011.
Prosecutors said the “DoD operator,” whose identity was not
disclosed, would testify that terrorists had received access to
some of the WikiLeaks material through an associate.

Prosecutors said Tuesday that they had agreed not to pursue a
charge that Manning had violated the federal Computer Fraud and
Abuse Act, reducing his potential 162-year prison sentence by eight
years.

Just over a month ago, the judge ordered the prosecution to
prove that Manning intended to harm the US by leaking the
cables.

On Tuesday, judges accepted Manning’s guilty plea to one of the
charges. The offense was related to a State Department cable from
the US embassy in Reykjavik, Iceland, which Manning has admitted to
leaking.

Manning has offered to plead guilty to 10 of the less serious
charges against him, which could see him sentenced to up to 20
years. If convicted of all charges against him, he could be
imprisoned for up to 150 years.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Sweden PM urges calm amid violence

0

Firefighters extinguish a burning car in Kista after youths rioted in few different suburbs around Stockholm on May 21, 2013.

Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt has called for calm after Stockholm experienced its third night of violent protests in several suburbs.

Å“Everyone must pitch in to restore calm – parents, adults,” Reinfeldt told reporters on Tuesday.

The premierâ„¢s appeal for calm came after youths continued setting fire to cars and fighting with the staff of the emergency services.

Å“Weâ„¢ve had around 30 cars set on fire last night, fires that we connect to youth gangs and criminals,” Kjell Lindgren, spokesman for Stockholm police, said on Wednesday.

He added that eight people were arrested Tuesday night, but there were no reports of injuries.

A police station in the northwest of Stockholm was attacked, two schools were damaged and a local arts center was set alight during the unrest.

The unrest began Sunday night in response to the May 13 shooting, in which police killed a 69-year-old man who had locked himself in an apartment in Husby, west of Stockholm.

The riots in one of Europeâ„¢s richest capitals have shocked a country that prides itself on a reputation for social justice, and fuelled a debate about how Sweden is coping with both youth unemployment and an influx of immigrants.

EKA/KA/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Man with ties to Boston bombing suspect shot during FBI questioning

0

Richard Esposito, Pete Williams and Matthew DeLuca
NBC
May 22, 2013

A man with ties to the Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev was shot and killed by an FBI agent while being questioned in Florida, law enforcement officials said on Wednesday.

The man who was shot, Ibragim Todashev, 27, was not suspected of having played any role in the bombing that killed three people and injured scores more in April, they said.

Instead, law enforcement officials said Todashev was being questioned as part of the FBI’s effort to find and talk to anyone who had any contact with Tsarnaev, the older bombing suspect.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 8:36 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Pussy Riot’s Alekhina announces hunger strike

0

Maria Alekhina, an imprisoned member of punk band Pussy Riot, has declared a hunger strike in protest against a court’s decision not to allow her to personally attend a hearing on her possible parole release.

Following the announcement, the court ruled to postpone the
parole hearing till May 23. “I’m declaring a hunger strike and
order my defense lawyers not to take part in this court trial
,”
Alekhina stated.

She participated in the hearing via videoconference from the
penal colony in the Perm region in Russia’s Urals, where she is
serving her two-year sentence for hooliganism over the Pussy Riot’s
‘punk-prayer’ in Moscow’s main Russian Orthodox
cathedral. 

“Given that the Bereznikovsky city court [considering
Alekhina’s parole release] is just across the road from the colony,
the decision to deny her to attend the hearing can only be
explained as humiliation,
” tweeted Pavel Chikov, head of Agora,
an association of human rights organizations.

Prosecutor Lev Tashnikov said there was no need for Alekhina’s
presence in the courtroom. The judge also said that there were no
grounds for her to attend the hearing, as she could talk with her
defense lawyer via the video link, Rossiyskaya Gazeta reported.

During the Wednesday hearing, Alekhina also demanded that the
judge — who refused to let her personally participate in the
hearing — and the prosecutor recuse themselves from the trial.
Prosecutor Tashkinov has personal enmity towards her, she argued.
The court rejected both requests.

Alekhina, 24, appealed for parole in April, seven months after
the court sentenced her and two other Pussy Riot members
to jail. Her fellow band member Nadezhda Tolokonnikova — who is
also serving a two-year sentence — was denied parole last month.
The third convicted activist, Ekaterina Samutsevich, was released
on probation in October last year.

It is yet unclear whether Alekhina will participate in
tomorrow’s court hearing.

This article originally appeared on : RT

FBI kills man connected to Boston bombings

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]An FBI agent has shot dead a man during interrogations connected with the Boston Marathon bombings.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Russia luxury car tax seen as another step towards social justice

0

Russia’s luxury tax — a campaign pledge by President Vladimir Putin — is taking shape. Though attaining social equality through taxing the rich has proven tough, the Russian parliament has outlined legislation to sharply raise taxes on luxury cars.

Driving quick as the wind on a car worth over $160,000 on Moscow
streets, which sees its fair share of expensive German cars, will
soon cost owners much more following the Russian Parliament’s vote
for a new tax on luxury vehicles.

The new legislation would double the tax on cars worth more than
5 million rubles ($160,000), and a triple the tax on those worth
over 10 million rubles ($320,000).

For example, the annual payment for a BMW 760Li (544 h/p, 6.6
million rubles or about $213,000) in Moscow is now about $2,600;
soon it will be around $5,250. For cars worth over $320,000 — like
the Ferrari California V8 (10.4 million rubles or $335,000) — it
will rise from current $2,600 to $6,600.

“Not so many people use such cars. And such restrictions lie
rather in the moral than in the fiscal realm,”
Putin said
during an annual call-in Q&A in April.

A main plank of President Putin’s election campaign 1.5 years
ago was taxing hyper-consumption by Russia’s richest citizens, for
land and real estate, yachts, business jets, luxury property and
expensive cars.

Though rich Russian citizens are famous for their conspicuous
consumption, the outcome of such a taxation scheme was not expected
to be a decisive contribution to the state budget — but that was
never the point. “It is the right thing to do, there should be
such a [luxury] tax. And the question of social equity, the gap in
incomes is a sharp and a very important question,”
Putin said
during the Q&A.

However, the legislation has been drastically softened compared
to its original objectives.

The new amendments are not the same as a previously proposed
luxury tax, as Russian owners of super-yachts and business jets
prefer to register and use this kind of property abroad, so they do
not pay Russian taxes on the aircrafts and vessels in Russia.
Owners of vast land and real estate in Russia have similarly
complicated schemes that make it difficult to prove ownership.

Still, there are several kinds of property subject to obligatory
official registration. The rich prefer to sleep in remote villas at
nighttime and drive in expensive cars in broad daylight, making
luxury cars a prime target for the tax. So, it was therefore
decided not to create the luxury tax from a scratch, but rather to
increase annual payments for owning personal “objects of
luxury.”

RIA Novosti / Anton Denisov

The number of expensive cars falling under the new legislation
is around 20,000 to 25,000; while not contribute hugely to the
budget, the sums of the new tax could amount to billions of rubles.
“We’d like to stress that the new legislation rather has social
than fiscal character,”
Deputy Minister of Finance Sergey
Shatalov stated.

Proposals for additional annual real estate and land taxes have
been postponed. The Ministry for Economic Development has said that
much private property has previously been estimated too low, and in
some regions a reevaluation of such property is needed to estimate
their real market value.

The opposition supported the new legislation, though calling it
a “profanation” of the original proposed luxury tax.

“This increase [in annual payments] is a profanation of the
original idea of a tax on excessive consumption,”
Fair Russia
deputy Oksana Dmitrieva stressed. The MP believes that the tax
legislation amendments will only affect a limited number of the
richest taxpayers, for whom such payments are insignificant.

A traffic jam on the Garden Ring near Smolenskaya Square.(RIA Novosti / Konstantin Chalabov)

This article originally appeared on : RT

Pussy Riot’s Alekhina announces hunger strike

0

Maria Alekhina, an imprisoned member of punk band Pussy Riot, has declared a hunger strike in protest against a court’s decision not to allow her to personally attend a hearing on her possible parole release.

Following the announcement, the court ruled to postpone the
parole hearing till May 23. “I’m declaring a hunger strike and
order my defense lawyers not to take part in this court trial
,”
Alekhina stated.

She participated in the hearing via videoconference from the
penal colony in the Perm region in Russia’s Urals, where she is
serving her two-year sentence for hooliganism over the Pussy Riot’s
‘punk-prayer’ in Moscow’s main Russian Orthodox
cathedral. 

“Given that the Bereznikovsky city court [considering
Alekhina’s parole release] is just across the road from the colony,
the decision to deny her to attend the hearing can only be
explained as humiliation,
” tweeted Pavel Chikov, head of Agora,
an association of human rights organizations.

Prosecutor Lev Tashnikov said there was no need for Alekhina’s
presence in the courtroom. The judge also said that there were no
grounds for her to attend the hearing, as she could talk with her
defense lawyer via the video link, Rossiyskaya Gazeta reported.

During the Wednesday hearing, Alekhina also demanded that the
judge — who refused to let her personally participate in the
hearing — and the prosecutor recuse themselves from the trial.
Prosecutor Tashkinov has personal enmity towards her, she argued.
The court rejected both requests.

Alekhina, 24, appealed for parole in April, seven months after
the court sentenced her and two other Pussy Riot members
to jail. Her fellow band member Nadezhda Tolokonnikova — who is
also serving a two-year sentence — was denied parole last month.
The third convicted activist, Ekaterina Samutsevich, was released
on probation in October last year.

It is yet unclear whether Alekhina will participate in
tomorrow’s court hearing.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Amnesty Bill Start Up Costs: Blackmailers Start At $6.6 Billion For 2013

0

Donna Anderson
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Photo: Casey Renner

Section 6 of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act provides that $6.6 billion be placed in a separate Treasury account on or before October 1, 2013. The bulk of the money, earmarked for “one-time and start-up costs necessary to implement this Act,” is to be transferred from the general fund, which means it’s coming directly out of taxpayer’s pockets.

The proposed bill provides for the establishment of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Trust Fund. The Trust Fund will hold money transferred from the general fund of the Treasury and proceeds from various application and registration fees collected from immigrants and employers.

More than 75 percent of the U.S. Treasury’s general fund consists of money collected from sales and income taxes, to be used for law enforcement, health and human services, public safety, the administration of justice and general government services — all departments and services that are already severely affected by sequestration.

Nevertheless, the amnesty bill calls for $6.5 billion to be transferred “On the later of the date of the enactment of this Act or October 1, 2013.”

Additionally, another $100 million is to be appropriated at the same time, “to remain available until September 30, 2015, to the Department to pay for one-time and startup costs necessary to implement this Act.”

On top of that, all fees and penalties collected from immigrants and employers applying for visas or a change in status will also be added to the Trust Fund.

Initially, $3 billion over the next five years will be made available to the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security for use in implementing the Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy. Another $2 billion will be made available over the next 10 years for the Secretary to achieve and maintain border security, and another $1.5 bill will be made available to the Secretary over the next five years to actually fence in our borders.

An additional $100 million dollars is to be made available from 2014 through 2018, $50 million for “ increas(ing) the number of border crossing prosecutions in the Tucson Sector of the Southwest Border region to up to 210 prosecutions per day” and $50 million for “reimburs(ing) State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies for any detention costs related to the border crossing prosecutions.”

The Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy, which is included in the bill, deserves much more than a paragraph of explanation, but suffice to say it includes additional border patrol stations, mobile, video, manned and un-manned surveillance equipment, single-, double- and triple-layered fencing, increased man-power and training, helicopters, tanks and aircraft. In short, everything we’ve been asking for to protect our borders from illegal aliens.

And all for the low, low price of just $6.6 billion — to start. Oh, and amnesty for a few million illegal aliens.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 8:21 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

S Korea increases Iranian oil imports

0

South Koreaâ„¢s crude imports from Iran have increased 7.5 percent in April compared to a month ago despite the US-led unilateral embargoes against the Islamic Republic’s oil and financial sectors.

South Korea imported 4.18 million barrels of Iranian crude oil in April, equivalent to 139,400 barrels per day (bpd), Reuters reported citing the latest official data on Wednesday.

Earlier in January, statistics by Korea Customs Service indicated that Seoul bought 793,361 metric tons, or 188,000 bpd, of crude oil from Iran in December 2012 which showed a 24-percent rise compared with the 639,281 tons in the corresponding period a year earlier.

South Korea halted crude imports from Iran in August and September 2012 after its refiners lost insurance coverage on ships because of the illegal sanctions imposed by the US and the European Union against Iran.

However, Iran responded by using state-owned tankers to carry cargoes, a move that would allow South Korea to receive crude shipments without concerns over insurance guarantees.

At the beginning of 2012, the US and the European Union imposed new sanctions on Iranâ„¢s oil and financial sectors with the goal of preventing other countries from purchasing Iranian oil, extending insurance coverage for tankers carrying Iranian crude, and conducting transactions with the Central Bank of Iran.

The illegal US-engineered sanctions were imposed based on the unfounded accusation that Iran is pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

Iran strongly rejects the allegation, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

YH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Medical workers stage strike in US

0

Thousands of medical workers have staged a strike in the US state of California, delaying emergency care, surgeries and other medical treatment, Press TV reports.

An estimated 13,000 healthcare workers from five University of California (UC) medical centers around the state began a strike on Tuesday, demanding better care for patients and increased staffing.

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), representing vocational nurses, respiratory therapists and radiology technicians called the two-day strike to highlight poor patient care at UC hospitals in San Francisco, Davis, Los Angeles, San Diego and Irvine.

Å“Thatâ„¢s why weâ„¢re so upset and moved because this is about patient care. If you discharge a patient and the room is not clean, and you put another patient in there, of course theyâ„¢re going to get sick. Theyâ„¢re going to come down with whatever that last patient had,” said Todd Perez, a medical technician.

Moreover, UCâ„¢s Human Resources Vice President Dwaine Duckett said the strike had forced the postponement of hundreds of surgeries, including five pediatric heart surgeries and specialized procedures such as chemotherapy infusions for children with cancer.

The demonstrators also demanded an increase in pay and benefits.

This is while UC hospital leaders continue to receive bonuses worth millions of dollars.

Å“If theyâ„¢d come to the table in good faith, we wouldnâ„¢t have to be out here protecting our patients and protecting our livelihood. Iâ„¢ve been here 46 years. This is the worst Iâ„¢ve seen the discrepancy between management level, administrators and the workers in the system,” said Cliff Fried, a healthcare worker.

The strike, which came after 11 months of failed negotiations between the union and the hospital, is estimated to cost the hospital USD 20 million in lost revenue.

Meanwhile, California’s labor board has resorted to a state judge to intervene and order the health workers back to work.

GMA/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Papers Please: TSA-Style Checkpoints at UK Bus & Train Stations

0

‘Airport-style’ security checkpoints being rolled out in public

Steve Jolly
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

Travel by train, tram or bus to destinations in central England and you are increasingly likely to be greeted by Britain’s ‘yellowjackets’: the high-visibility uniforms of Britain’s police force.

Image: Sandwell Police

‘Airport-style’ security checkpoints are being rolled out at local bus and train stations up and down the UK after local pilot schemes conducted over the last two years were deemed a success by police.

The checkpoints comprise metal detector arches, drug-sniffing dogs , police pat-downs and bag searches. The reason? To “help people who use public transport feel safer.”

Over the last couple of years more and more of these ‘security’ checkpoints have been quietly introduced at local bus and train stations across the UK under a number of pretexts that simply don’t bear up to scrutiny.

One such stop-and-search operation last week (May 15th) at West Bromwich bus station in the West Midlands, was captured in this short video clip showing a police officer rifling through a man’s pockets [1] while he holds up his wallet for potential inspection. The other photographs here were tweeted by Sandwell Police on the day.

According to the police this operation and others like it are not related to the ongoing mission creep that police so often attempt to justify with their trump card of ‘terrorism’; instead they represent an increasing shift towards ‘pro-active’ policies which threaten to become a part of everyday policing in Britain today. This Youtube clip shows a ‘Day of Action’ by Sandwell Police, who took to Twitter to explain that,”the aim of this operation is to reduce crime and anti social behaviour and offer community reasurance (sic) and assist in any prosecutions,” [specifically to] “focus on drugs and anti-social behaviour.”

Quite how emptying people’s pockets can reduce ‘anti-social behaviour’ is not clear, but by the end of the day the police were busy tweeting the day’s results:

Image: Sandwell Police

“Drugs dog [2] at West Bromwich bus station. Lots of people stopped but no drugs found.”

The tweets continued, “We’ve had some nice feedback regarding our ‘day of action’. Thanks for your support. No crime has been reported in West Bromwich town today!”

So, with no drugs found and no crime of any kind reported, what possible value could there be in stopping and searching hundreds of law-abiding citizens? Perhaps the following tweet provides one of several possible answers: “20 people have been checked on the police national computer (PNC). Some have previous convictions for robbery so intelligence has [been] submitted.”

Leaving aside the obvious injustice of stopping and searching everybody ‘just in case’ one or two people turn out to be guilty of some wrongdoing, these indiscriminate fishing expeditions are neither an effective way to ‘catch criminals’ nor to ‘keep us safe’.

Last week’s ‘day of action’ at West Bromwich bus station is by no means a one-off, and this apparently crime-free bus station is no stranger to such police operations. In 2010 Sandwell Police launched a ‘Safer Travel’ scheme called Safer Six, a pilot scheme carried out in six towns across the region over a six week period spanning October and November. It too was branded as a “community reassurance” exercise designed “to help people who use public transport feel safer,” as one local Sergeant put it. More specifically the police explained, “Our aim is to detect people who are carrying weapons.” This video [3] shows the travelling public being herded through a metal detector arch (often described by police in Orwellian terms, as “safety arches”) before being stopped, searched and sniffed up by a police drugs dog. The operation was repeated in the autumn of 2011 and again in 2012 and was considered so successful that it is now being rolled out across the entire West Midlands region on a permanent basis. A press release [4] by West Midlands Police in January 2013 states that:

“Airport-style metal detectors popped-up at West Bromwich bus station yesterday as a police blitz on knife crime continued. Around 500 commuters of all ages passed through the portable devices — known by police as knife arches — in just four hours.”

Image: Sandwell Police

Just how successful was the operation then? Well, about as ‘successful’ as last week’s ‘day of action’:

“No knives or other illegal items were recovered in the operation. No arrests were made,” the press release reveals.

Perhaps all the knife-wielding criminals managed to avoid detection by not using buses and trains for the full six weeks? Well no, it seems that knife-wielding criminals are a bit thin on the ground in West Bromwich, as the police acknowledged:

“The decision to set up the knife arches in West Bromwich wasn’t based on there being large instances of knife crime in the town, but part of an ongoing and broader safety programme which will be replicated at bus, tram and train stations across the entire West Midlands in the coming days.”

Once again we are told that we must sacrifice our rights and freedoms in the name of ‘safety’, even though police admit that the supposed risk of harm is somewhat negligible and not the real focus of the operation anyway.

If the success of the operation is not judged by the number of arrests made, or the quantity of drugs and weapons seized, or the number of dangerous criminals taken off the streets, then what is the purpose of these exercises? Perhaps the phrase “public reassurance” could be more accurately expressed another way. How about “conditioning the public to accept the ever-growing police state by normalising such unnecesssary and demeaning security theatre.” Or “exploiting dubious safety fears to deprive citizens of their fundamental rights and freedoms.” Or how about “inverting the centuries-old fundamental legal principle that we are all ‘innocent until proven guilty’ by treating us all as suspects, demanding that we prove our innocence.” I could go on…

The following line from a well known novel accurately describes policing in Britain today:

         “For distances of less than 100 kilometres it was not necessary to get your passport endorsed, but sometimes there were patrols hanging about the railway stations, who examined the papers of any Party member they found there and asked awkward questions.”

                                                                  (George Orwell — Nineteen Eighty-Four).

The truth is that these police operations aim to condition the public to accept, submit and grow accustomed to what is essentially an unlawful stop and search.

Section 1 of PACE (Police and Criminal Evidence Act) [5] does allow ‘Stop and Search’, but only if the police have ‘reasonable grounds’ to suspect that someone has committed a crime, as explained in PACE Code of Practice ‘Code A’ (.pdf) [6]. The Code says, “There must be an objective basis for that suspicion based on facts, information, and/or intelligence which are relevant to the likelihood of finding an article of a certain kind” and “Reasonable suspicion cannot be based on generalisations or stereotypical images of certain groups or categories of people” [such as ‘users of public transport’] “as more likely to be involved in criminal activity.”

A police officer needs ‘reasonable grounds’ to suspect you are carrying a weapon, drugs or stolen goods, or that you are a terrorist. Can any of these justifications be applied to an entire arrivals terminal at a transport hub? No, of course not.

Since checkpoints like these are being applied en masse to people whom the police have absolutely no “reasonable grounds” to suspect of criminality, the police cannot lawfully compel people to submit to such searches. Therefore the public must be doing so “voluntarily,” although somehow I suspect that they are not told this.

In the upside-down Orwellian world that we now inhabit, the only real criminals identified at West Bromwich bus station during their ‘day of action’ are the police themselves. Substitute the term ‘brownshirts’ for ‘yellowjackets’ and you get the picture.

To quote the Russian novelist who provided the original inspiration for George Orwell’s dystopian classic, ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’:

“When a man’s freedom is reduced to zero, he commits no crimes. That’s clear. The only means to rid man of crime is to rid him of freedom.”

– Yevgeny Zamyatin, ‘We’.

Steve Jolly is a campaigner, journalist and spokesman for the campaign group No CCTV. He has written for the London Guardian, Big Brother Watch and Infowars. His successful campaign against ‘Project Champion’ — a police surveillance operation in Birmingham UK — forced the Chief constable to publicly apologise, scrap the scheme and remove 216 surveillance cameras from parts of the city. He was nominated for a Human Rights Award in 2010 and appeared before the UK parliament to give evidence on the Protection of Freedoms Bill about new CCTV laws. Steve writes and gives media interviews about camera surveillance and related issues.

––––––––––––––––––––––-

[1] Youtube video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1UX7QXzJf8&feature=youtu.be

[2] Photo on Sandwell Police Twitter feed: pic.twitter.com/Wa1zuw08Tf

[3] Youtube video fof Safer Six operation by Sandwell Police: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB7y1SloHyM

[4] Press release by Sandwell Police: http://www.west-midlands.police.uk/np/sandwell/news/newsitem.asp?id=11884

[5] http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/section/1

[6] http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/police/operational-policing/pace-codes/pace-code-a-2011?view=Binary

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 7:50 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Body of tortured Afghan unearthed near former US Special Forces base – report

0

Afghan officials have reportedly found the footless body of a local man who went missing a half-year ago. The corpse was unearthed near the former A-Team US Special Forces base — where detainees were tortured and killed, locals claim.

Authorities alleged that the grisly discovery is directly
connected to Zakaria Kandahari, a notorious wartime collaborator
who Afghan officials believe has US citizenship.

Kandahari reportedly led a death squad that terrorized locals in
Wardak Province, using the A-Team base in Nerkh District, a
one-hour drive from Kabul, as a permanent residence.

The mutilated body was discovered by ditch diggers about 200
yards from the perimeter of Nerkh base in Wardak Province, the New
York Times reported. The base was previously occupied by the A-Team
US Special Forces unit, which withdrew in March. Rhe Nerkh base
compound is currently occupied by Afghan Special Forces.

According to district governor Mohammad Hanif Hanafi, the corpse
was found packed in a military-style black body bag. The victim was
identified as Sayid Mohammad, a local resident who was allegedly
seen being taken to an US base in November 2012.

This is not the first time that the partial remains and clothing
of a missing person have been found near Nerkh base, Afghan
officials said. A dismembered body was previously found in a
garbage container just outside the US base.

An anonymous Afghan investigator for the Defense Ministry told
the NYT that he has a list of names of 17 people who went missing
in Nerkh District in Wardak Province between November and December
2012, when Kandahari’s squad conducted operations such as detaining
suspects and bringing them to the US Special Forces base.

The seized persons were reportedly never seen alive again. Nine
of their bodies, including that of Sayid Mohammad, were found; the
other eight remain missing.

The torture squad

The recently unearthed victim was the same man previously seen
in a classified video recording made last year. US officials
familiar with the matter said it depicts Mohammad being repeatedly
kicked by the chief interpreter at the Nerkh base — Kandahari.

Kandahari is on Afghanistan’s most-wanted list for prisoner
abuse, torture and murder. Kabul claimed the US sheltered
Kandahari; the US Army has denied the accusations.

The US Army has not denied that Kandahari was previously on
their payroll, but maintains that the torture video was made after
he parted with the A-Team to operate a rogue Afghan unit, and that
he is not a US citizen. The US Military described Kandahari as a
“freelance interpreter” who joined the American Special Forces
voluntarily and lived at their base out of gratitude.

Over the past year, Kandahari and his henchmen have been seen
throughout Wardak Province wearing NATO uniforms while riding on
quad bikes in search of alleged insurgents.

Precious hangman

Last March, hundreds of Afghans — watched by a considerable
number of armed riot police — marched to parliament in Kabul, demanding the
withdrawal of US Special Forces from Wardak Province. The
demonstrators were infuriated by reports of civilians being
tortured and killed; Kandahari’s name first went public amid these
demonstrations.

APTN video still

Following the protests, Afghan authorities demanded the US
deliver the alleged criminal to Kabul. The US refused to turn over Kandahari to Afghan
authorities.

US Military authorities claimed that Kandahari had escaped, and
that they knew nothing about his whereabouts. In response, an
infuriated President Hamid Karzai demanded that the US Special
Operations forces leave Wardak. A compromise was later reached, and
only the infamous A-Team base was removed.

An unidentified Afghan investigator told the New York Times that
“there is no question” that Kandahari was directly involved in
torture and murder, but asks, “Who recruited him, gave him his
salary, his weapons? Who kept him under their protection?”

The official also expressed doubts that Kandahari could have
left the base on his own, since “He was such a criminal that he
could not stay one hour outside the base by himself.”

US Military officials reported that they conducted thorough
investigations into the disappearances and murders “of at least
15 people”
in Wardak Province, none of which revealed evidence
that American soldiers were involved in such crimes. However, the
results of these investigations have not been made public.

The treatment of Afghans by US troops and their collaborators has been a perpetual
stumbling block for US-Afghan relations; the ‘steal and kill’ case
of Kandahari could well be the final straw in the 11-plus years of
the Afghan War.

This article originally appeared on : RT

'Poverty strikes millions in Italy'

0

File photo shows a mendicant in Italy.

Millions of Italians cannot afford to heat their homes properly or eat meat as their country is racked by recession and soaring unemployment, an official report has revealed.

The report released on Wednesday by Italyâ„¢s National Statistics Institute, ISTAT, said the number of people considered seriously deprived has doubled in the past two years.

The findings underlined the scale of the challenge faced by Prime Minister Enrico Lettaâ„¢s new coalition government which has vowed to stimulate growth and tackle a youth jobless rate of almost 40 percent.

A recession that has lasted almost two years has taken a heavy toll on ordinary Italians who are increasingly digging into their savings, ISTAT said in its annual report.

Italy has the highest level in Europe of young people who are neither in education, nor in employment, at 23.9 percent, the study showed. In Italy’s impoverished south, one in three people aged 15-29 fell into this group.

The number of people living in families considered to be seriously deprived has doubled in the past two years to 8.6 million, or about 14 percent of the population, ISTAT said.

According to the report, about 14.9 million people, or a quarter of Italy’s population of 61 million, are living in families that meet three or more of ISTAT’s poverty indicators.

Italy started to experience recession after its economy contracted by 0.2 percent in the third quarter of 2011, and by 0.7 percent in the fourth quarter of the same year.

Over the past decade, Italy has been also the slowest growing economy in the eurozone.

EKA/KA/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Argentina’s General Videla and the “War on Terror”

0

Gen. Jorge Rafael Videla died May 17 at the age of 87 as the result of injuries suffered from a fall in a prison shower. He was remembered as the head of a savage military dictatorship that between 1976 and 1983 murdered and “disappeared” some 30,000 Argentine workers, socialist militants, teachers, students and others perceived as “subversives,” while torturing at least 100,000 others. In his own country, newspapers that once backed his rule condemned him as a dictator and practitioner of state terror.

Yet one cannot help but suspect that within the military and intelligence apparatus in the US and Latin America–not to mention among the ruling financial interests that he served–the aged general’s passing has been mourned.

Three days before his death, the ex-dictator appeared as the principal defendant before an Argentine court hearing charges relating to Operation Condor, a joint endeavor by Latin America’s ruling dictatorships of the 1970s to hunt down and murder one another’s opponents, wherever they might be found.

As in previous trials, Videla claimed a loss of memory about the events of that period, while unconditionally defending the actions taken by his regime and the military as necessary in an “anti-terrorist war.”

Operation Condor involved the combined efforts of military regimes in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay, with indispensable logistical support and military aid from the Pentagon and the CIA.

It resulted in the abduction and murder of a number of individuals seen as opponents of the dictatorial regimes. This included the Washington, DC car bomb killing of Orlando Letelier, the former Chilean foreign minister in the Allende government, the assassinations of former Bolivian president Juan José Torres and former Uruguayan deputies Héctor Gutiérrez and Zelmar Michelini in Buenos Aires, and the assassinations of former Brazilian presidents Joao Goulart and Juscelino Kubitschek, whose deaths were made to appear, respectively, as a heart attack and a car accident.

In official US parlance, the methods employed under Condor are known as “rendition” and “targeted assassinations.” They would be well understood by today’s CIA and special operations personnel.

All of the Condor regimes were staffed by senior military personnel who had been trained at the Army’s School of the Americas in Panama and other US military facilities, and all of them had US military advisers, received substantial US military aid, and hosted well-staffed CIA stations.

Previously secret State Department documents make it clear that Washington understood Videla’s intentions from the beginning and fully supported them. One of these documents records an exchange between then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and his assistant secretary of state for Latin America, William Rogers, two days after Videla seized power.

Rogers told Kissinger that Washington must “expect a fair amount of repression, probably a good deal of blood, in Argentina before too long. I think they’re going to have to come down not only on the terrorists but on the dissidents of trade unions and their parties.”

While Rogers suggested delaying official recognition of the junta out of public relations concerns, Kissinger ordered full US support. “Whatever chance they have,” he stressed, “they will need a little encouragement from us.”

Among those involved in implementing this policy in 1976 were Richard Cheney, then the White House chief of staff, and Donald Rumsfeld, who was defense secretary. Twenty five years later, both would reemerge as principal architects of the US “global war on terror.”

With Washington’s blessing, Videla and his fellow officers set about what they dubbed the “process of national reorganization,” or el proceso.

Among its first steps was the suspension of basic democratic rights, including habeas corpus guarantees against imprisonment without charges or trials. The dictatorship outlawed unions and political parties and disbanded the legislature. Strikes and protests were turned into grave crimes against “national security.”

A network of clandestine prisons was set up, including the notorious dungeons of ESMA (the Navy School of Mechanics), the army’s Campo de Mayo, and scores of others scattered across the country. There, detainees were subjected to vicious forms of torture, including beatings, electric shocks, prolonged submersion in foul water, forced denial of sleep, extreme temperature and noise, attacks by trained dogs, simulated executions and sexual torture and humiliation.

Virtually all of these methods came into common usage at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and CIA “black sites” across the globe a quarter of a century later.

After being subjected to torture, the great majority of the victims were murdered, many of them drugged, loaded onto military aircraft and dropped naked to drown in the Rio de la Plata or the Atlantic Ocean.

The positive attitude of the US military toward the junta was reflected in an article appearing in the June 1978 edition of Parameters, the journal of the US Army War College, which noted approvingly that “General Jorge Rafael Videla, who heads Argentina’s military junta, has permitted the authorities to adopt more rigorous measures” against “terrorism.” It praised Videla as a “moderate committed to returning the country to democracy once the foundations have been established for stability.”

By this time, as one of the declassified State Department documents revealed, the official estimate of the number of Argentines murdered in this crusade for “stability” stood at 22,000.

Fully 40 percent of the junta’s victims were militant workers and union members. Torture centers were set up inside some of the country’s major factories, including a Ford auto plant. The Peronist union bureaucracy collaborated in this extermination campaign, helping to form death squads even before the military took power.

The repression had definite class and economic aims. The dictatorship managed to cut wages in half within its first year, reducing workers’ share of the national income from 48.5 percent to only 29 percent. Universal health care was abolished in favor of for-profit insurance companies, and other forms of social assistance were eliminated or drastically curtailed. In essence, the junta oversaw a vast transfer of social wealth from Argentine working people to the country’s ruling class, the transnational corporations and international finance capital.

This is not merely a matter of historical interest. Faced with the deepest economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, the ruling establishments in the US and internationally are attempting to effect a similar transfer of social wealth today. And, under the mantle of a “war on terror”–the same justification given by Videla–the US government, beginning with the Bush administration and accelerating under Obama, has already put in place the legal and institutional framework for Argentine-style repression.

The Obama administration has arrogated to itself the power to subject US citizens to indefinite military detention without charges or trials, i.e., to conduct “disappearances.” A White House that regularly draws up “kill lists” for assassinations and massacres abroad has specified that it can order such killings of American citizens residing within the US itself if it deems them “terrorist” enemies of the state.

Those who look at the horrors of Argentina under Videla’s junta and think, “It can’t happen here,” are only fooling themselves.

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Turkey seals border crossing with Syria

0

The site of one of the blasts in the in the Turkish border town of Reyhanli in the southern Province of Hatay where over 50 people were killed on May 11, 2013.

Turkey has closed a border gate with Syria following two deadly bomb attacks in Turkeyâ„¢s southern province of Hatay.

Å“We are closely observing and controlling the border gates between Syria and Turkey. We have closed the Yayladagi border gate after the sad event in [the border town of] Reyhanli to prevent suspects from fleeing,” a statement from Turkish Customs Minister Hayat Yazici said on Tuesday.

The Yayladagi gate, which is situated some 90 kilometers (55 miles) from Reyhanli, remains closed for at least one month to prevent those involved in the May 11 deadly twin bombings from fleeing, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

Ankara has accused Damascus of being behind the bombings which killed more than 50 people.

But Damascus held Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan responsible for the attacks, noting that Ankara has facilitated the flow of arms, explosives, vehicles, militants and money across the border into the Arab country.

Damascus also stated that Turkey has planned the attacks to use them as a pretext to justify foreign intervention in Syria.

In February, at least 14 people lost their lives in a bombing at the Cilvegozu border gate near Reyhanli.

MAM/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Lawyers protest over UK legal aid cuts

0

Hundreds of lawyers protest outside parliament to oppose British governmentâ„¢s plans to slash legal aid spending.

Hundreds of lawyers have protested outside the Houses of Parliament to oppose British governmentâ„¢s plans to cut another £220 million from the criminal legal aid budget.

The mass protest was organized by the London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA), through which demonstrators condemned the Justice Secretary Chris Graylingâ„¢s plans to slash legal aid spending.

Barristers and solicitors branded Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals as unfair, warning that the plans could damage the quality of representation in courts and police stations.

A former solicitor and Labour’s justice spokesman Sadiq Khan condemned Grayling for destroying legal aid and said, “[his] obsession with throwing red meat to Tory backbenchers and appearing on the front page of the Mail on Sunday” would lead to more miscarriages of British justice.

The UK government is seeking to save about £350 million from its £2.2 billion annual bill for legal aid by removing public funding in many areas of civil law, including family disputes, advice on some employment and education law as well as some debt and housing issues.

MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘High turnout to foil US, Israel plots’

0

Iranian Majlis (parliament) Speaker Ali Larijani says massive voter turnout in the forthcoming presidential election will foil plots hatched by the United States and Israel against the Islamic Republic.

Speaking at the open session of the Majlis on Wednesday, Larijani said Israeli officials have left no stone unturned in their efforts to compel Western governments to impose more economic sanctions on Iran.

He added that elections in Iran are actually for the sake of promoting unity and democracy rather than division.

The high-ranking Iranian official also called on all candidates to take international developments into consideration during their presidential campaigns, and also respect the law in order to encourage a high voter turnout in the June 14 vote.

Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry on Wednesday published the list of hopefuls approved to run in the countryâ„¢s 11th presidential election.

The candidates are Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, President of the Center for Strategic Research of the Expediency Council Hassan Rohani, former Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati, former First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref, Secretary of the Expediency Council Mohsen Rezaei, Iranian lawmaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel and Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf.

The eight candidates were approved by Iranâ„¢s top constitutional supervisory body, the Guardian Council, after a 10-day vetting process.

The Council has not approved, among others, former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, former Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, and a close aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Esfandiyar Rahim Mashaei.

MP/HGH/SS

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Israel, US Threatens War with Syria as Sectarian Fighting Spreads across Region

0

Israeli and Syrian forces exchanged fire across the cease-fire line in the Golan Heights yesterday, amid rising US and Israeli threats of intervention in the US-led sectarian proxy war in Syria, which is rapidly spreading throughout the region.

Fighting in the Golan Heights started overnight when Syrian forces fired at an Israeli vehicle that allegedly crossed into Syrian territory. Israeli forces fired rockets into Syrian territory and claimed to have destroyed the source of Syrian fire.

The border fighting came only two days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to act “with determination” to prevent the transfer of arms from Syria to the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah. Hezbollah has now intervened in the Syrian war to support the regime of President Bashar al-Assad against the US-backed Sunni Islamist opposition.

Netanyahu’s statement was widely interpreted as an Israeli threat to mount further unprovoked air strikes on Syria.

Since Obama’s reelection last November and twice this month, Israeli forces have bombed targets in Syria. This month’s bombings, hitting Syrian army targets in the capital, Damascus, were timed to coincide with an offensive by the Sunni opposition on the city. This offensive has been thrown back and forced into retreat, however, due, in part, to the intervention of Hezbollah forces in areas of southern Syria adjacent to Lebanon.

The reversals suffered by the opposition point to the minimal support it has in the Syrian population.

There are now intensifying threats of war coming from Israel as well as calls in Washington and in European capitals for stepping up the flow of arms to opposition forces or directly intervening with air strikes or a ground invasion. Speaking yesterday at the University of Haifa, Israel Defense Forces head Lt. General Benny Gantz said: “We will not allow the Golan to become a comfortable space for Assad to operate from. If he escalates the situation on the Golan Heights, he will have to bear the consequences.”

He implied that war could break out at any time, noting that “a day doesn’t go by” without the risk of a “sudden uncontrollable deterioration.”

In Washington, senators Robert Menendez (Democrat of New Jersey) and Bob Corker (Republican of Tennessee) have submitted a bill titled “Syrian Transition Support Act.” It would authorize the Obama administration to “provide defense articles, defense services, and military training” to Syrian opposition forces.

The bill bluntly spells out broader strategic calculations underlying the proxy war in Syria. It notes, “A change of government in Syria could be a significant blow to the Government of Iran and Hizballah [Hezbollah], which would lose a strong ally.”

That is, the Syrian war is in line with US imperialism’s strategic interests: isolating Hezbollah, the main threat to Israeli military hegemony in the Near East, and Iran, the main obstacle to US hegemony in the entire Middle East and to US control of the region’s oil.

In its presentation of the war, the bill advances lies and evasions similar to those with which pseudo-left forces such as the International Socialist Organization in the US, France’s New Anti-capitalist Party and Germany’s Left Party have promoted the US-backed opposition. It proposes to support opposition forces that are “protecting human rights” and “protecting the Syrian population against sectarian violence and reprisals.”

In fact, Sunni opposition militias armed under CIA supervision with funds from Washington’s Middle East allies are waging a bloody sectarian war with terror bombings and massacres. This was even recognized partially by Washington, which declared one of the main opposition forces, the Al Nusra Front, a terrorist organization responsible for nearly 600 terror bombings in the period up to December 2012.

On Monday, a spokesman for the US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) threatened a sectarian genocide of Shia Muslims–including the Alawite minority from which Assad’s family is drawn–in territory still held by the opposition, as it retreats in southern Syria.

He threatened that Shia communities would be “wiped off the map,” adding: “It’s going to be an open, sectarian, bloody war to the end.”

This comes a week after an opposition commander of the so-called “moderate” Farouq Brigade filmed himself desecrating the corpse of a Syrian soldier, cutting out his organs and biting into one of them. He also called for the killing of Alawites.

Washington, its allies, and its Sunni Islamist proxies fear, in particular, the loss of the town of Qusayr. This would cut supply lines connecting opposition fighters around Homs from the majority-Sunni port of Tripoli, in Lebanon, from which they receive weapons supplies. It would also open direct land routes connecting the Assad regime in Damascus to the Alawite heartland on Syria’s Mediterranean coast.

According to AFP, Hezbollah sources confirmed that they had sent “new elite troops to Qusayr.” The Syrian state daily Al Watan reported yesterday that Syrian regime forces had retaken Qusayr’s official buildings and “raised the Syrian flag” over them.

Washington has denounced Hezbollah’s intervention, with US President Barack Obama calling Lebanese President Michel Sleiman to criticize Hezbollah’s “active and growing role” in Syria. The US State Department said Hezbollah’s actions “exacerbate and inflame regional sectarian tensions and perpetuate the [Syrian] regime’s campaign of terror.”

In fact, it is Washington and its allies that are backing forces advocating and carrying out sectarian massacres and terror attacks. By giving Turkey and the Persian Gulf monarchies carte blanche for an international campaign to arm rabid Sunni sectarian forces, overseen by the CIA, they are spreading sectarian bloodshed across the entire region.

Fighting continued in Iraq yesterday, with 19 people killed and one hundred wounded in bombings, as the sectarian tensions unleashed by US support for Sunni Islamist militias in Syria spilled over into Sunni fighting against the Shia-led Iraqi regime. Opposition Free Syrian Army (FSA) fighters also fired into Lebanon yesterday, targeting Hezbollah positions with Grad rockets from the Qusayr area in Syria. According to Iran’s Press TV, they targeted the villages of Hawsh al-Sayyed Ali and al-Qasr. The rockets targeting al-Qasr exploded close to the Zainul Abideen orphanage but caused no casualties, according to the orphanage’s director, Mohammad al-Saeed.

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Israel Heads Closer to War on Syria

0

Syria is Washington’s war. Israel’s very much involved. It abhors peace and stability. Its history reflects belligerence. It’s a direct threat. It borders Syria.

Both countries are longstanding imperial partners. The Israeli Lobby plays a key role.

Orwell once said “(w)ho controls the past, controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

Saving the future requires understanding both past and present. Preventing imperial annihilation depends on it.

So-called “rebel” forces are no match against Syria’s military superiority. Al-Qusayr is a strategic western Syrian city. It’s about 18 miles southwest of Homs.

It’s located on Lebanon’s border. It links Damascus with government controlled Mediterranean coastal areas.

It’s a key smuggling route. Insurgents, weapons, munitions and supplies pass cross-border into Syria. Stopping them is strategically important.

Fighting for control continues. On May 21, Press TV said Syrian forces control over 70% of the city. According to a Syrian source:

“We managed to enter the city from several directions. We encountered heavy resistance but we overpowered them and seized control of these places and we will pursue them and eliminate them wherever they go.”

According to Voice of Russia, Syria captured the city. Russia’s Rossia-24 TV reported it. Insurgents controlled the city throughout the conflict. No longer.

Capturing Al-Qusayr prevents supplying insurgents from key parts of Lebanon.

Voice of Russia and Rossia-24 reported “mopping-up operations” around Aleppo.

According to the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA), “Army units restored stability and security to the full eastern area of (Al-Qusayr) in Homs Countryside after killing big numbers of terrorists and destroying their hideouts.”

“A military source added that army units dismantled a number of explosive devices, planted by terrorists in al-Souk area in the middle of the city.”

“The source added that army units are continuing hunting the remnants of terrorists in some hideouts in the northern and southern areas of the city.”

Insurgents suffered heavy losses. Leadership elements were killed or captured. “Tens of terrorist” surrendered. Others were arrested.

SANA said insurgents were routed in several provinces.

Local journalist Abdallah Mawazini told Russia Today that Syria’s army “managed to make a full circle around the city, fighting the opposition fighters. The main achievement is to stop the line of supply chain between Lebanon and Syria.”

“They started from the western side of the city, in the rural areas. They control this zone with some fighters from Lebanon.”

“Some extremist groups were preparing to go into Syria to fight with the rebels, they were going to go make a bigger front in order to fight and expand the fighting line between the government and the opposition.”

America’s war of words continues. Assad’s wrongfully blamed for US-backed insurgent crimes. They’re death squads. They’re US proxy foot soldiers. They’re foreign invaders. They’re recruited from many countries.

They’re funded, armed, trained and directed. Don’t expect US government sources to explain. Nor will media scoundrels.

On May 20, State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell said Washington “strongly condemns the Assad regime’s intense air and artillery strikes this weekend on the Syrian town of (Al-Qusayr), along the Lebanese border, where more than 90 people were reportedly killed.”

“The Assad regime deliberately provoked sectarian tensions through its assaults, which we saw recently in Sunni massacres in the towns of Bayada and Banias.”

“We reject the regime’s use of sectarian-driver war to divide the Syrian people. The Assad regime and its supporters who continue to commit crimes against the Syrian people should know that the world is watching and they will be identified and held accountable.”

Insurgents bear direct responsibility for numerous massacres wrongfully blamed on Assad. Hezbollah elements are aiding their Syrian ally. They’re doing so responsibly. They’re confronting US imperialism. Not according to Ventrell.

He “condemn(ed) Hezbollah’s direct intervention in the assault on (Al-Qusayr) where its fighters are playing a significant role in the regime’s offensive.”

“Hezbollah’s occupation of villages along the Lebanese-Syrian border and its support for the regime and pro-Assad militias exacerbate and inflame regional sectarian tensions and perpetuate the regime’s campaign of terror against the Syrian people.”

“We reject Hezbollah’s efforts to escalate violence inside Syria and incite instability in Lebanon.”

Hezbollah and Syrian forces are trying to end conflict. They want peace. They want stability restored. They want Washington’s imperial intentions defeated. Much rides on their success.

On May 20, Lebanon’s Daily Star headlined “Situation in Syria against US, Israel: Hezbollah.”

According to Hezbollah MP Nawaf Musawi, Syria’s conflict hasn’t gone according to US and Israeli plans. He warned both countries against toppling Assad, saying:

“If some were betting on weakening our ally in Syria and toppling him, he should keep in mind that two years into the (conflict) have passed while betting on delusions.”

“Those who were banking on US power and Israeli threats of war and victory of the US-Israeli attack on Syria are mistaken.”

He added that Hezbollah won’t hesitate to plunge “Israel into the abyss. If the enemy — through its aggression — is practicing brinkmanship with the resistance and its allies in this region, the resistance is not afraid to push the enemy itself into the abyss.”

“Hezbollah has enough potential to make any Israeli official aware that the threat of war applies to him, and that he will be the first to lose as a result of his behavior.”

Syria’s military displayed a captured Israeli army vehicle. It did so in Al-Qusayr. Lebanon’s Al-Mayadeen television aired video proof.

Military uniforms, wiretapping and jamming equipment were found in the vehicle. Damascus called it evidence of Israel’s involvement.

Last June, insurgents were captured with Israeli weapons. Israel’s very much involved.

On May 21, SANA said

“the seizure of an Israeli military vehicle….refutes the allegations made by Israel to justify its aggression on Syria and proves the scale of Israel’s military and intelligence involvements in the events in Syria.”

“(T)he Israeli military support for the armed terrorist groups proves the involvement of Qatar, Turkey and Israel in the aggression on Syria which is waged through a single central operations room.”

“(T)he Israeli military support for terrorism in Syria proves once more that Israel was and still is adopting the policy of organized state terrorism, stressing that the world must act to confront this terrorism.”

“(T)he questions raised by the seizure of the Israeli military vehicle and the surveillance and jamming equipment….show that the armed terrorist groups with all their different names are merely headlines for a single structure led by Israel, Qatar and Turkey.”

Syria understands Washington’s key role. Partnered with Israel, other NATO countries, and rogue Arab states, they’re waging imperial war against a non-belligerent country. Doing so is lawless aggression. It’s the supreme crime against peace.

Israel escalated things further. In response to alleged cross-border gunfire, it “returned precise fire,” according to IDF officials.

Tammuz missiles were used. Twice before they targeted Syrian sites.

Incidents are easy to manufacture. Doing so provide pretexts to respond. On May 4 and 5, Israel bombed Syria. It did so preemptively. It was a joint US-Israeli provocation. It suggests further aggression ahead.

On May 21, Mossad-connected DEBKAfile (DF) claimed a “Syrian-Israeli confrontation loomed closer…”

DF alleges Damascus admitted responsibility for Monday night’s cross-border gunfire. No source was cited. Syria’s gone out of its way to avoid challenging other countries.

It hasn’t retaliated against previous Israeli and Turkish provocations. It’s unlikely to change tactics now. Doing so would be self-defeating. Assad has no death wish. DF’s allegations don’t wash.

It cites unnamed Israeli military sources claiming his “readiness for a war of attrition on Israel from the Golan….”

It says Hezbollah will be involved. On Sunday, Netanyahu sent mixed messages. On the one hand, he said Israel won’t intervene in Syria’s conflict.

On the other, he stressed it will act if its own interests are affected. He said he’ll topple Assad if he responds to Israeli attacks. He suggested further bombings may follow. Allegedly they’ll target weapons transfers to Hezbollah.

Bombings and other belligerence are willful provocations. At issue is goading Syria to respond. Doing so would provide pretext for direct US/Israeli intervention.

Assad’s not about to give them reason to attack. He’s gone out of his way to avoid it. His ability to do so depends on US/NATO/Israeli plans. Direct intervention appears likely. How and when remains to be seen.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

http://www.dailycensored.com/israel-heads-closer-to-war-on-syria/

This article originally appeared on : Global Research

Russia to become 'next Greece’ with slowing economic growth – Renaissance Capital

0

The Russian economy will not be able to grow faster than 2 percent per year in the coming decade and might become another Greece, says one of Russia’s leading investment banking firms Renaissance Capital.

This would mean the government increasing national debt just
like it was in Greece.

The slowing economic growth in Russia to 1.6 percent in the
first quarter of 2013 has been connected to various factors
including falling investment, private consumption and weak exterior
demand, Vedomosti daily reports.

However according to Ivan Chakarov, an analyst with Renaissance
Capital quoted by the newspaper, the slowing pace of economic
growth in Russia is mainly due to the so-called middle-income
trap. 

It is common for developing economies, when a country, which
attains a certain income, gets stuck at that level as it begins
losing its main advantage — low costs.

The analyst claims the middle-income trap strikes a country when
annual per capita GDP reaches $16,000. In Russia this figure is
slightly above that at $16,016. The analysts added that Russia is
the first BRICS state to enter the middle-income trap. Similar
economic situations were seen in the Western Europe’s economy in
the 1970s, in South Korea in 1995 and in Singapore and Hong Kong at
the beginning of the 1980s.

In his comments Chakarov refers to the study by the US National
Bureau of Economic Research, which has come to a conclusion that
countries falling into the trap lose two thirds of their growth
speed. This means that Russian economic growth will slow to 1.6
percent of GDP against 4.3 percent in 2010-2011. 

The analyst says that in the upcoming decade the Russian economy
won’t be able to expand faster than 2 percent per year. In his
opinion this may force the Russian government to increase the
national debt and make Russia “the next Greece”.

Greece has reached the annual per capita GDP mark of $16,000 in
the 1980s. Over the next decade unemployment jumped two and a half
times, while inflation increased one and a half times. While in the
beginning of 1980s the national debt of Greece totaled 20 percent
of GDP, by 2012 it has made 170 percent of GDP.

Renaissance Capital forecast the middle-income trap for Russia
in November last year. Back then the company estimated the state’s
chances to avoid this scenario at 60 percent, noting however that
the government would have to take a series of economic
reforms. 

Russia has entered the phase of economic slowdown since the
beginning of last year. By the end of 2012 GDP added 3.4 percent
against 4.3 percent in 2011. In the first quarter of 2013 Russian
economy grew by just 1.6 percent. The slowing pace of economic
growth forced the Russian Ministry of Economic Development and
international organizations including the World Bank to revise
their forecasts for Russia economic development in the coming
years. 

In April the Russian Ministry of Economic Development said that
if no urgent measures are taken by the government Russia might fall
into recession by the fall. 

Russian national debt currently accounts for 10 percent of
GDP.

This article originally appeared on : RT

FBI shoot Chechen dead in Florida, suspect questioned in Boston bombings – report

0

An FBI special agent has shot dead a Chechen man in Orlando, Florida who had previously been questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings. The suspect had reportedly known Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the slain assailant in last month’s attack.

The shooting transpired just after midnight in an apartment
complex after a special agent was reportedly attacked after
encountering the suspect. The FBI has not released the name of the
suspect, though friends identified the man who was shot and killed
as Ibragim Todashev, 27.

Kushen Taramov, a friend of the suspect, said he and Todashev
were interviewed by FBI agents for nearly three hours on Tuesday in
connection with the Boston Marathon bombings.

“(The FBI) took me and my friend, the suspect that got
killed. They were talking to us, both of us, right? And they said
they need him for a little more, for a couple more hours, and I
left, and they told me they’re going to bring him back. They never
brought him back,”
WESH Orlando cites Taramov as saying.

Taramov said after he concluded the interview, he came back to
the apartments to discover that there had been a shooting.

The FBI has not confirmed any link between Todashev and the
Boston bombings, but Taramov told WKMG Local that the suspect had
known Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died from injuries sustained in a
shootout with police days after the Boston marathon
bombing.

This article originally appeared on : RT

UK to offer visa to Afghan interpreters

0

An ex-interpreter presented a petition in May calling for Afghan interpreters to be given asylum in Britain.

About half of Afghan interpreters, who worked for British forces in southern Afghanistan, are to be given the right to live in Britain after NATO pullout in 2014, the British government has claimed.

A source from British Prime Minister David Cameron’s office in Downing Street said on Wednesday that Britain is now preparing to offer five-year visas to those interpreters who have regularly served on the front line.

According to the reports, the visas will be granted to about half of the 1,200 interpreters who are currently employed by Britainâ„¢s Foreign Office and Armed Forces.

Under the new proposals, those who remain in Afghanistan after British forcesâ„¢ withdrawal will receive generous packages, including fully-funded training and education for five years, or instead be paid at their current rate for a further 18 months.

Earlier in May, the British PM urged Afghan interpreters not to seek asylum in the UK and to remain in Afghanistan after British forcesâ„¢ withdrawal from the war-torn country.

“When we think of all that we have spent and all the cost in money and human lives we have put into Afghanistan, we should do everything we can to encourage talented Afghans to stay in their country and contribute to it,” Cameron said.

The PM, however, backed down the decision after the interpreters began a legal bid to win the right to live in Britain.

Afghan interpreters, who have worked with British forces in Afghanistan since 2001, now fear retaliation from Taliban militants as foreign forces prepare to withdraw from the Asian country.

According to the reports, 20 interpreters working with British troops in Afghanistan were killed in action and dozens have been injured. Another five were said to have been killed while off duty.

MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Haddad-Adel, Gholam-Ali

0

Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel was born in 1945 in Tehran. After finishing high school in 1963, he started studying physics at University of Tehran. He got his MSc in physics from Shiraz University and taught physics at university before continuing to study philosophy at Tehran University. He has been teaching western philosophy at Tehran University since 1985.

He was elected to parliament from Tehran for four consecutive terms. He served as the speaker of Majlis for four years from 2004 to 2008. He has since then been senior aide to Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, he was arrested and jailed for 66 days for his struggles against the Shah regime.

Haddad-Adel has so far held the following posts:

– Deputy Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance

– Advisor to the Minister of Education

– Head of Education Research and Planning Organization

– Faculty Member of Philosophy at Tehran University

– Managing-Director of Islamic Encyclopedia Foundation

– Head of Academy of Persian Language and Literature

– Tehran MP

– Speaker of Majlis

– Aide to Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei

– Head of Cultural Committee of Majlis

Books:

– Farhang-e Berahnegi va Berahnegi-e Farhangi (Culture of Nudity and Nudity of Culture)

– Haj: Namaaz-e Bozorg (Hajj: The Grand Prayer)

– Daaneshnaame-ye Jahaan-e Eslam (The Encyclopedia of the Islamic World)

– Textbooks on sociology, social science, civil studies and Qur’an, for high school and guidance schools

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Jalili, Saeed

0

Saeed Jalili was born in September 1965 in the holy of Mashhad in northeastern Iran.

He holds a PhD in political science from Imam Sadeq University.

Jalili has been with the Iranian Foreign Ministry for 18 years.

His PhD thesis was titled Å“The Foreign Policy of the Prophet Muhammad”. He currently teaches “the Prophet’s Diplomacy” at Imam Sadeq University.

During the 1980-1988 Iraqi imposed war, Jalili fought as a Basiji volunteer force and lost a leg due to severe injuries.

Jalili was named director of Iranian Foreign Ministry Inspection Office at the age of 30. He remained in the post up to 1996. When Mohammad Khatami was elected president, Jalili was appointed as deputy foreign minister for Americas’ affairs.

He went on to become a senior director in the office of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

When Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took office in 2005, Jalili returned to Foreign Ministry to serve as deputy minister for Europe and Americas. He was accompanying then chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani in the talks with European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana.

When Ali Larijani resigned from his post as secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Jalili was appointed to the post.

Jalili is also member of the Islamic Engineers Society.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Big Brother sees you off: Foreigners in US to be fingerprinted upon leaving country

0

Travelers visiting the US may have to prepare for more hassles at customs: All foreign nationals leaving the country at 30 airports must have their fingerprints taken, according to a new amendment to a planned immigration reform bill.

The amendment, which was approved by the Senate Judiciary
Committee in a 13-5 vote, will see departure terminals at major US
airports — including JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Liberty — equipped
with high-tech systems for fingerprinting foreign nationals and
scanning their passports and visas.

Introducing the new law will take time, as 10 of the biggest US
airports — accounting for 70 percent of international travel — will
have the immigration tracking system installed within two years;
the 20 other airports will have six years to refurbish their
departure areas.

Currently, foreigners are only required to submit their
fingerprints when entering the United States.

Not tracking exits is “a hole in the system,” said Senator
Orrin Hatch (R-UT), one of the amendment’s proponents. 
“Biometric data provides the government with certainty that
travelers (and not just their travel documents) have or have not
left the country
,” the Senator’s office said in a statement,
according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

The new departure procedure is being introduced in order to prevent
foreigners from overstaying their visas. Overstays have become a
pressing issue in the US — 40 percent of an estimated 11 million
undocumented immigrants arrived through now-expired visas.

Defendants Dias Kadyrbayev (L) and Azamat Tazhayakov are pictured in a courtroom sketch, appearing in front of Federal Magistrate Marianne Bowler at the John Joseph Moakley United States Federal Courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts May 1, 2013.(Reuters / Jane Flavell Collins)

Advocates for the provision cite the recent high-profile case of
Azamat Tazhayakov. A Kazakhstani, Tazhayakov was a friend of
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a Boston Marathon bombing suspect, and was
charged with obstruction of justice after he allegedly attempted to
dispose of possessions belonging to Tsarnaev. Tazhayakov reportedly
entered the United States in January on an invalid visa.

However, human rights activists have voiced concerns about
“the effect it will have on peoples’ privacy rights as well as
concerns about selective enforcement
,” Jacqueline Esposito of
the New York Immigration Coalition said in an interview with news
channel NY1.

“We don’t want to see a situation where only people from
particular countries may be fingerprinted or other racial profiling
taking place
,” Esposito added.

An earlier proposal by House Republicans suggested that all of
the country’s air, sea and land ports should use biometric tracking
for foreigners leaving the country. Apart from fingerprinting, the
proposed tracking would have included facial recognition and iris
scans. The plan, with an estimated cost of $25 billion, was
eventually rejected as too expensive.

The immigration reform bill was approved on Tuesday by the
Senate Judiciary Committee, much to the satisfaction of President
Obama, who had declared the bill a second-term priority. Apart from
tightening border controls, it also contains a new program for
low-skilled foreign labor, and makes it easier for US firms to hire
programmers and engineers from abroad, raising the annual limit of
visas for these professions from 65,000 to 180,000. The full Senate
will vote on the sweeping legislation next month.

This article originally appeared on : RT

India pledges aid to Afghanistan

0

New Delhi has vowed to increase its reconstruction aid to Kabul as Afghan President Hamid Karzai wraps up a three-day visit to India.

Å“India is prepared to increase bilateral contribution to institution building, training and equipment to the extent India can,” a statement by Indian President Pranab Mukherjeeâ„¢s office said on Wednesday.

The statement came on the third and final day of Karzaiâ„¢s visit to India aimed at seeking more aid, including military assistance, to Afghanistan.

The Indian leaderâ„¢s office did not provide further details about the talks held between the two sides.

India has invested more than USD 2 billion in Afghan infrastructure, including freeways, medical centers, and rural electricity projects.

The visit is Karzaiâ„¢s second trip to India over the past six months.

In October 2011, Afghanistan and India signed a Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) to expand relations in a variety of sectors, including security and defense.

The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 under the pretext of combating terrorism. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across the country despite the presence of thousands of US-led soldiers.

SZH/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Syria Army foils car bomb attacks

0

Syrians stand near damaged cars at the site after a car bomb attack in Bab Touma neighborhood in Damascus. (File Photo)

The Syrian Army has destroyed two cars loaded with a total of 1,300 kilograms of explosives in a suburb of the capital Damascus.

The Army destroyed a Mercedes loaded with 700 kilograms of explosives and another car loaded with 600 kilograms of explosives near car showrooms in Harasta neighborhood, the Syrian news agency SANA reported on Wednesday.

The achievements were made within the framework of an operation to flush out militants carrying out terrorist attacks in the area.

A day earlier, the Army destroyed a car loaded with 1,000 kilograms of explosives in the same area.

Meanwhile, a US Senate panel voted in favor of a bill authorizing the government to provide foreign-sponsored militants in Syria with lethal weapons and military training.

The bill, which also authorizes a USD 250-million fund to help transition of the Syrian government, was supported by both Democrats and Republicans.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

On May 18, President Bashar al-Assad said militants from 29 different countries are fighting against the government in Syria. He stated that foreign intervention is the most important factor aggravating the situation in his country.

MAM/KA

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

YOU ARE CRAZY: New Psychiatric Guidelines Target Hoarding, Child Temper Tantrums, and a Host of Other “Illnesses”

0

It’s not a stretch to suggest that Americans are over medicated. In 2011 doctors across the nation wrote an astounding four billion medical prescriptions, amounting to an average of 13 prescriptions for every  man, woman and child in the United States.

In the next few weeks the American Psychiatric Associations is releasing their updated fifth version their Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); the so-called ‘bible’ of psychiatric diagnoses. The new manual promises to take mental illness and the use of prescription drugs to a whole new level.

You may not be considered “crazy” or “mentally ill” today, but under the new guidelines experts say half of us will be diagnosed with a psychiatric condition in the future.

The odds will probably be greater than 50 percent, according to the new manual, that you’ll have a mental disorder in your lifetime.

…

The increasing number of disorders comes about because some “problems” that were not previously considered to be mental illness were reclassified as such by their inclusion in the DSM–and it is the DSM that functionally defines mental illness in the United States.

You see, in the DSM-5 the definitions for mental illness have been expanded to include a whole host of new symptoms and conditions.

For example, under the new guidelines if your 6 to 18 year-old child throws a temper tantrum from time to time or has a mood swing, a psychiatrist could diagnose the condition as a “Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder” requiring professional treatment. Keep in mind that in psychiatry “professional treatment” almost always means prescription drugs.

Are you over the age of 55 and have “senior moments” like forgetting where you put your keys? If so, then in all likelihood you have a neurocognitive disorder.

Do you stockpile food, supplies or other items in anticipation of a disaster? If so, you may have what’s called an obsessive compulsive hoarding disorder.

“The reality shows have raised awareness, but they tend to sensationalize the patients, and they rarely talk about treatment.”

“The big change,” Dr. Saxena said, “will be an official recognition of hoarding as an important neuropsychic disorder that will increase screening, increase detection and diagnosis, and refer patients in for treatment.”

While the new hoarding guidelines don’t specifically target “preparedness,” the fact is that some ‘professionals’ have already suggested that if you have any level of anxiety about the possibility of a major catastrophe, or your motivation for preparing for unforeseen events includes a distrust of the government, then you’ve got psychological problems.

Now, with the DSM-5, they can officially diagnose you as crazy.

Dr. Allen Frances, the author of Saving Normal, says that the new requirements will, ”turn everyday anxiety, eccentricity, forgetting and bad eating habits into mental disorders.”

The changes being introduced by the DSM-5 are nothing short of a sweeping overhaul of our mental health care system, and they will have effects that many experts can’t even fathom. But those behind the DSM, who work very closely with government experts, know exactly what they’re doing.

Let’s connect the dots a little bit to get an idea of how this is going to have a direct impact on your life in the very near future.

Under the new regulations set forth by the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, certain groups of Americans like school children, seniors, those on government health plans, active-duty military personnel, and veterans will be required to submit to mental health screenings.

Page 1137 of the The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act provides grants for the operation of school-based health centers required to include “mental health and substance abuse disorder assessments” for children and adolescents.

On page 1191 is found a section on Mental Health Screening that refers to a program called “Healthy Aging, Living Well”. Persons ages 55-64 are being targeted for screening activities that can include “mental health/behavioral health and substance use disorders.”

Obamacare requires mental health services for many other groups.

These include Medicaid recipients, addicts, mothers with postpartum depression, the elderly, and soldiers. There’s even has a section called “Mental Health in Small Businesses” which awards grants to small businesses willing to provide workplace wellness programs that encourage “healthy lifestyles, healthy eating, increased physical activity and improved mental health.”

Are you starting to see where this is going?

You’ll be forced by your child’s school, by the government, and even your private employer to be  involuntarily screened. And the psychiatrists who’ll be performing the diagnoses will be utilizing the criteria outlined in the DSM-5.

According to the afforementioned statistics, there’s a 50% chance that those being screened will be found to have some type of mental health condition.

But that’s just the beginning.

As we know, once diagnosed, failure to take the treatment (e.g. medication) prescribed could then be deemed unlawful behavior, especially in the case of children.

Not possible in America? Think again:

Earlier this year, administrators from the Berne-Knox-Westerlo school district called Albany County Child Protective Services, alleging child abuse when the Carrolls said they wanted to take Kyle off the drug.

As a result, the Carrolls are now on a statewide list of alleged child abusers, and they have been thrust into an Orwellian family court battle to clear their name and to ensure their child isn’t removed from their home. “It’s beyond the point of whether he should be on it. Now it’s the point of them telling us what we’re going to do,” said Michael Carroll. “They’re telling me how to raise my child.”

…

“The schools are now using child protective services to enforce their own desires and their own policies,” said David Lansner, a New York City lawyer who has seen cases similar to the Carrolls’. “The parents’ authority is being undermined when people have to do what some public official wants,” Lansner added. “This thing is so scary,”

It’s already happening, and with nearly 4 million children every year being (mis)diagnosed with ADHD, we can expect the numbers to rise significantly under the new DSM guidelines.

It’s important to understand, however, that they’re not just targeting our children. They’re coming after all of us.

The DSM-5, coupled with Obama Care legislation, will allow the government unprecedented control over lives.

One such example is the targeting of America’s gun owners. Legislation is in the works in many states, as well as the U.S. Congress, that would require mental health screenings for firearms ownership. Should these bills pass, then about half of America’s gun owners would immediately lose their right to bear arms for any manner of “disorders” that could include stress, anxiety, depressed mood or even poor eating habits!

And while gun control proponents would applaud the victory, what they fail to understand is that by green-lighting such a government intrusion, they are setting themselves up for future legislation that may restrict their own rights for activities that may include maintaining employment or caring for their children.

Once a diagnoses is made the government will then have the ability to enforce it at the barrel of a gun.

If your child is diagnosed with ADHD or separation anxiety disorder, and you refuse to feed them their prescription cocktail, then the government will step in and take your children under the guise of protecting them… from you!

Likewise, you may one day be forced to be screened by your employer and found to be mentally ill (remember, 50/50 shot!). If you refuse the professional treatment that’s recommended, you could lose your job as a result. And because the Department of Homeland Security has been busy creating a Domestic No-Work List all prospective employers will know of your condition and your refusal to seek professional treatment.

The possibilities, now that the door has been opened, are endless.

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Is America’s Economy Being Sovietized?

0

Brandon Smith
Alt Market
May 22, 2013

The foundation of the Soviet model of trade and investment was centralization under the guise of “universal public ownership”. The entire goal of communism in general was not to give more social and political power to the people, but to extinguish alternative options and focus power into the hands of a select few. The process used to reach this end result can vary, but the goal always remains the same. In most cases, such centralization begins with economic hegemony, and it is in our fiscal structure that we have the means to see the future. Sovietization in our financial life will inevitably lead to sovietization in our political life.

Does the U.S. economy’s path resemble the Soviet template exactly? No. And I’m sure the very suggestion will make the average unaware free market evangelical froth at the mouth. However, as I plan to show, the parallels in our fundamentals are disturbing; the reality is that true free markets in America died a long time ago.

The Tyranny Of Planned Economy

The characteristics of a free market society defy the use of centralized planning. Adam Smith’s original concept of free market trade stood as an antithesis to what was then referred to as “mercantilism,” a select few “joint stock companies” (corporations) monopolizing production while using government ties to destroy any new competition. Unfortunately, there are to this day economists and politicians who believe that corporate centralization is a “natural” function of a free market. In reality, corporate monopolies are an unnatural creation of collusion between governments and big-money interests designed to suffocate any entrepreneurship outside of their sphere of influence. Over time, as we now see in the United States today, government power and corporate power begin to hybridize, until one can barely be distinguished from the other.

The bottom line is that you cannot have planned structures, monopolized production or controlled capital flow within an economy and still claim it to be a “free market. There are no exceptions to this rule.

The Soviet system was the ultimate in centralization. Every aspect of financial life was dictated by the communist government, from industrial input and output to investment to food production and rationing to wages and retail prices. Some people might argue that this structure is a far cry from what we now have in the United States, but let’s look at the fundamentals.

Controlled Money Creation

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

One of the primary tenets of The Communist Manifesto was the creation of a central bank meant to keep tight controls over currency issuance. The existence of a central bank immediately disrupts any chance of a true free market. Central banking without competition allows an oligarchy, whether corporate or political or a meshing of the two, to manipulate interest rates as well as adjust prices through inflation. Lending standards (which the central bank determines arbitrarily) built on fractional reserve banking opens the door to murky debt instruments and toxic financial products that are further used to either fabricate a “high” standard of living (as we saw in the U.S. in the 90s and early 2000s) or execute a bubble implosion causing a lower standard of living (as the U.S. is experiencing today).

Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve through subversive collusion between banking interests and corrupt politicians in 1913, America has not had a free market system. From that point forward, every boom and bust, every interest rate disaster, every inflationary increase in prices has been scientifically engineered.

Dominance Of Industry

Soviet controls on industrial output are legendary. Every part of the resource allocation process became subject to bureaucracy, and this led to stunted manufacturing growth as well as a culture of misrepresented economic data. In the United States, the establishment has taken a slightly different approach but with the same end result.

Heavy taxation on business ventures within the U.S. against entrepreneurs not lucky enough to run in elitists circles has erased incentives for manufacturing experiments within our borders. In the meantime, members of the corporate glee club receive government subsidization while they simultaneously outsource industrial projects to Third World nations. Controlled industry within communist Russia was meant to force the population to depend upon the government for every means of survival. In the United States, dependency on government has been replaced by interdependency on the globalized model in general. Necessities are now compartmentalized, and only select international businesses with cooperation from government have the ability to bring all the pieces together to keep our domestic economy running smoothly. Our society has been so distanced from self-sufficiency that many people now consider the globalist dynamic indispensable.

The next step in this degradation of free market industry is the introduction of “public works projects” by the federal government, which gives the illusion that job creation through centralization is possible. This is the same strategy used in the Soviet Union and to this day, socialists still argue that the communist design for industrial expansion was “effective”. In truth, the soviet public works plan with all its trains and transits and bridges and buildings was an absolute failure, as the collapse of the country made clear. Tax funded infrastructure is no replacement for free market invention, and at bottom, no public works enterprise can be undertaken without the government first stealing capital from one area in order to fund another. Governments can never and will never create wealth or jobs. They can only present the semblance of economic progress while siphoning wealth away from private citizens.

Bureaucracy And Food Production

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations, based on dubious junk science and often instituted on high without congressional oversight, further erode business possibilities, especially for young companies as well as private agriculture, while giving free reign to elitist entities like Monsanto, an organization the government actually PROTECTS through specialized legislation making it nearly immune to civil litigation.

While farms in the United States are not exactly “controlled” by the Federal government in the Soviet sense, many of them are subsidized through welfare on the condition that they grow only particular kinds of crops, raise particular animals or grow nothing at all. This subsidization is an indirect form of price control, creating engineered scarcity or abundance. At the same time, agricultural empires like Monsanto make private farm ownership increasingly difficult by using their government protection to harass and squeeze out independent food producers.

This destabilization of private resource management by common citizens has culminated in the passage of President Barack Obama’s executive order National Defense Resource Preparedness, which allows under a “national emergency” (which the President can declare for any reason) the confiscation of any and all private resources, including farms and businesses, to be redistributed by the government to ensure security conditions. This is the Stalinist model, pure and simple.

Centralized Control Of Investment

We now know that since at least 2008, the U.S. stock market, often presented by the mainstream as a paragon of free market prowess, has actually been propped up and inflated by Federal Reserve fiat. Both former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and current branch head Richard Fisher have openly admitted in separate news interviews that the central bank spends considerable energy in “artificially sustaining” equity markets. This has been done, I suspect, with full knowledge of the U.S. Treasury and the Obama Administration.

The Soviet model for investment was to remove all uncertainties from their domestic markets, often in the name of preventing manipulation by “speculators.” The speculator rationale was generally a distraction away from the attempt to dictate the natural forces of supply and demand. The idea was that if the government could dismiss legitimate demand or lack of demand or hide excess supply or lack of supply, the perception of a balanced economy could be conjured for the population. This led to strict redirection of capital to areas where manipulation was needed to artificially pump up (or deflate) a particular part of the economy. The government became the sole investor of the Soviet system and, thus, the sole determinant of the success or failure of any particular market.

This is EXACTLY what is going on in America today, in what mainstream economists now call “the new normal”. Federal Reserve fiat is being printed and dumped into every financial mechanism that supposedly maintains our country’s fiscal health, including stocks, Treasuries and municipals, while trade volume remains low and private investment disappears. The Federal government now owes its very existence to the continued support of central bank dollars, and the Dow Jones does as well. If this is not the Soviet ideal, then I don’t know what is.

Labor Oppression, Dismal Living Standards And Government Dependency

Poverty levels within the United States are at record highs. Nearly 50 million Americans are now dependent on government-subsidized food stamps for their survival. Nearly 100 million Americans receive welfare (or Social Security) in one form or another from the establishment. That is almost one-third of our entire population that relies on the system for at least a part of their sustainment. If Obamacare is fully realized, millions more Americans will also be conditioned to become dependent on government-designated healthcare providers. The point is not to pass judgment on those people who get money or services from the government, only to make clear our progression away from freedom and into centralized servitude.

For a Soviet structure to thrive, poverty among common citizens has to be institutionalized. Dependency requires a constant state of desperation. In America, this has been accomplished through a combination of inflated prices and reduced wages in conjunction with the destruction of labor options.

At the height of the communist machine in Russia, employment was ample; but the kind of employment one could apply for was dependent on bureaucratic red tape and availability based on a worker’s record. Only the academic “elite” within the government-run cesspools of Soviet universities and military schools had their choice of employment; even then, they were often pressured into particular specialized fields, depending on the kind of labor the state needed done at that particular time.

In the United States anyone can certainly aspire to do whatever job he hopes to do. But again, options have been removed economically; and the same academic elitism pervasive in Soviet Union labor markets exists in America today. In a recent installment of his weekly radio show,New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said it was better for “so-so” high school students to pursue a career in plumbing rather than go to college.

Though I rarely agree with Bloomberg on anything, my initial reaction was surprise at his willingness to steer American youth away from university indoctrination centers. However, upon further examination, it became clear that Bloomberg was not trying to save the next generation time and money. Instead, he is promoting a shift in the labor dynamic of the U.S. economy toward a Soviet-style foundation. Bloomberg knows well that the U.S. labor market will never return to its former glory, partly because he is a supporter of the globalist policies that ruined our economy in the first place. Instead of suggesting ways to reverse the trend of progressive poverty and the lack of high-end jobs that engender ingenuity and invention, elitists like Bloomberg are saying “forget your dreams and get used to being a drone.”

In a 70% service and retail economy, where job availability is increasingly degraded and independent business is discouraged, Americans will have two choices: Excel in the world of federally funded and propagandized education and sell your soul just for a chance at obtaining a professional career in a field of influence, or, settle for the leftovers. Modern socialists often sing the praises of the soviet educational model for raising the literacy rates of once agricultural and isolated people to 98%, but what they fail to mention is that this literacy was only encouraged in order to create a more efficient servant class that was easier to propagandize. The U.S. is moving into a similar paradigm. For some people, being a plumber is a fine thing; but it should not be the only thing. In a true free market, a smart man can make his own way, even if he does not conform to the ideologies of the educational racket. In a Sovietized market, a smart man is prohibited from accomplishing anything unless he conforms to the ideologies of the educational racket.

Some people may respond that the centralization conspiracy within the American economy is an obvious thing today, and that there is little need to expose it any further. I would point out that centralization is not the only issue here; the guidebook by which that centralization is being implemented is also important. This has all been done before on the other side of the world only decades ago, and the end result was a horrifying cascade of social enslavement and mechanically inclined death.

In the end, the Soviet economy was so utterly fraudulent that the final breakdown of the system came as a complete surprise to many in political and economic fields of the era. This is what happens when governments control all source data for financial statistics; transparency dies and collapse creeps in. Centralization is an absolute affront to the natural laws of supply and demand and an oppressive hindrance to the innovation that humanity thrives on. Such systems require constant theft from the populace in the form of reduced employment, reduced wages, reduced resources, increased taxes, increased price controls and a highly ignorant citizenry in order to function even for a short time. Sadly, the United States is well on its way in all of these areas, emulating a poisonous fiscal system and lending itself to a global economic tyranny in which all of us work much harder, for much less, and all for a government that seeks to use our very labor against us.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 5:47 am

Tags: , , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere

0

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
May 22, 2013

Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA’s Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence.

As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth’s upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth’s lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA’s own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth’s upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.

“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”

Almost all ‘heating’ radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2

According to the data, up to 95 percent of solar radiation is literally bounced back into space by both CO2 and NO in the upper atmosphere. Without these necessary elements, in other words, the earth would be capable of absorbing potentially devastating amounts of solar energy that would truly melt the polar ice caps and destroy the planet.

“The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet,” write H. Schreuder and J. O’Sullivan for PSI. “[T]his compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA’s chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his team over at NASA’s GISS.”

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Dr. Hansen, of course, is an outspoken global warming activist who helped spark man-made climate change hysteria in the U.S. back in 1988. Just after the release of the new SABER study, however, Dr. Hansen conveniently retired from his career as a climatologist at NASA, and reportedly now plans to spend his time “on science,” and on “drawing attention to [its] implications for young people.”

You can read more details of the new NASA SABER study by visiting:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

You can also check out a informative, four-minute video report on the solar storm here:
http://youtu.be/EEFQHDSYP1I

Sources for this article include:

http://principia-scientific.org

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

http://youtu.be/EEFQHDSYP1I

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 5:43 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Armed DHS Guards Protect IRS From Tea Party Protesters

0

Agency created to protect against terror attacks now policing free speech

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
May 22, 2013

The DHS appears to have finally found a use for all those bullets it’s been buying. At a Tea Party protest outside an IRS building in St. Louis yesterday there were no regular police — only armed Homeland Security guards.

Video footage from the demonstration at which protesters, including Infowars,com readers, chanted “no more harassment,” shows numerous DHS Federal Protective Service vehicles along with several armed DHS guards. There is not a regular police officer in sight.

The St. Louis demonstration was just one of numerous similar protests against the IRS’s punitive targeting of conservative groups that took place across the country yesterday.

The DHS was supposedly founded to protect against and respond to terrorist attacks, man-made accidents, and natural disasters. It was not created to protect the IRS from peaceful protesters, but in the decade since its inception, Big Sis has morphed into an entity that polices and monitors political free speech as one of its primary functions.

Homeland Security has routinely been caught spying on protesters from both ends of the political spectrum via its nationwide network of “threat fusion centers”.

Government documents unearthed in April revealed that the DHS, “conducts daily monitoring of peaceful, lawful protests as a matter of policy” and functions as a “secret political police force against people participating in lawful, peaceful free speech activity,” such as ‘Occupy’ demonstrations.

In 2011, the DHS asserted that it had every right to spy on peaceful protest groups and had been using Federal Protective Service (FPS) agents to do so since at least 2006.

In March, Arkansas State Fusion Center Director Richard Davis admitted that the federal agency spies on Americans deemed to be “anti-government,” noting that the DHS concentrates on, “domestic terrorism and certain groups that are anti-government. We want to kind of take a look at that and receive that information,” so-called threats which included people, “putting political stickers in public bathrooms or participating in movements against the death penalty.”

A 2012 Senate subcommittee investigation of DHS data fusion centers found that millions of dollars had been spent not on gathering important anti-terrorism information but on collating “a bunch of crap,” which was “unrelated to terrorism” and in fact targeted Americans peacefully exercising their First Amendment rights.

In its promotional material for the ‘See Something, Say Something’ snitch program, the DHS has routinely portrayed white, middle class Americans as the most likely terrorists. Mock news reports and security drills run by the DHS have also depicted gun owners and homeschoolers as violent terrorists.

It’s no surprise that the DHS is now deploying its agents to defend the IRS against the ire of the American people given that both federal agencies have gone to extreme lengths to target law-abiding, conservative, or God forbid “anti-government” Americans as domestic extremists and even terrorists.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 5:47 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Are We Entering The Worst Period For Natural Disasters In U.S. History?

0

Michael Snyder
American Dream
May 22, 2013

Weather patterns are becoming increasingly erratic and the ground under our feet is becoming extremely unstable. So precisely what in the world is going on here? Is this the beginning of a trend? Could it be possible that we are entering the worst period for natural disasters in U.S. history? The tornado that just hit the town of Moore, Oklahoma is already being called one of the most destructive tornadoes that America has ever seen. That tornado came almost two years to the day after the deadliest tornado in U.S. history hit Joplin, Missouri. But of course it is not just tornadoes that seem to be getting more powerful. Giant sinkholes are appearing at an unprecedented rate, earthquakes are becoming more frequent and more powerful, 6 of the 10 worst years for wildfires ever recorded in the United States have all come since the year 2000, and the western part of the country is experiencing the worst stretch of drought since the days of the Great Depression. Is all of this just some sort of a giant coincidence? If not, what is causing these changes?

The giant F4 tornado that absolutely devastated Moore, Oklahoma had winds of up to 200 mph. It was estimated to be at least two miles wide at one point, and what made it especially destructive was the fact that it sat on the ground for40 minutes. Most tornadoes only reach the ground for a couple of minutes. According to the latest reports, the tornado resulted in 24 deaths and hundreds of others were seriously injured.

It was far more powerful than the atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima, and it is being called “the worst tornado damage-wise in the history of the world” by a meteorologist at KFOR-TV.

You can see video of the tornado right here. Oklahoma Lt. Gov. Todd Lamb compared the tornado to a “two-mile-wide lawnmower blade going over a community.”

Meanwhile, other parts of Oklahoma experienced very unusual weather as well. In fact, hail the size of grapefruits was falling in one area near Oklahoma City.

Personally, I sure am glad that I don’t live in tornado alley. I don’t know if I could handle hail the size of grapefruits and tornadoes that are two miles wide.

But despite the fact that we have seen such destructive tornadoes in recent years, constructing storm shelters has very much gone out of style. This is very unfortunate, because as Mike Adams of Natural News has pointed out, even a very small storm shelter can save your life…

Storm shelters offer almost 100% survivability against tornados. Tornados cannot penetrate underground, after all. If YOU are underground, even in a small, cramped storm shelter that’s just two meters wide and two meters tall, you have an almost 100% chance of emerging from the storm completely unhurt.

Most fatalities in tornados happen because people are killed from flying debris. You might even call it “wind shrapnel.” Take a bunch of lumber, aluminum siding, bricks and roof trusses and accelerate them to 200 mph and you have a deadly weapon that will kill almost anyone it touches. But put your body just three feet underground – in a tornado shelter – and all that debris flies right past you, harmlessly above your shelter.

Another huge concern is the epidemic of sinkholes that we have seen all over the United States over the past few years.

Some cities are actually being eaten alive by these things. For example, just check out what is happening to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania…

Pennsylvania’s state capital is suffering from a rash of monster sinkholes, but city officials are too broke to do anything about it.

Loose soil and leaky, century-old underground water pipes are to blame for the municipal nightmare, which came to a head on the New Year’s Eve when a 50-foot sinkhole yawned open along Fourth Street, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The eight-foot deep crater – one of at least 41 in the city – is so large, locals made it a “check-in” site on the social media site Four Square.

Some cheeky residents and the media nicknamed the hole “Super Sinkhole Walter.”

And check out what is happening in one housing division out in California…

Scott and Robin Spivey had a sinking feeling that something was wrong with their home when cracks began snaking across their walls in March.

The cracks soon turned into gaping fractures, and within two weeks their 600-square-foot garage broke from the house and the entire property – manicured lawn and all – dropped 10 feet below the street.

It wasn’t long before the houses on both sides collapsed as the ground gave way in the Spivey’s neighborhood in Lake County, about 100 miles north of San Francisco.

For much more on this phenomenon, please see my previous article entitled “Why Are Giant Sinkholes Appearing All Over America? Is Something Happening To The Earth’s Crust?”

At the same time, we have seen the number and intensity of earthquakesincrease all over the planet in recent years.

Thankfully, the U.S. has not seen “the big one” strike yet.

But everyone knows that it is going to happen at some point.

One of the areas that I am most concerned about is the New Madrid fault zone. A massive earthquake along that fault zone would deeply affect millions of lives. The following is from a recent article by Michael Fitzgerald of the CNHI News Service…

It’s a bleak scenario. A massive earthquake along the New Madrid fault kills or injures 60,000 people in Tennessee. A quarter of a million people are homeless. The Memphis airport — the country’s biggest air terminal for packages — goes off-line. Major oil and gas pipelines across Tennessee rupture, causing shortages in the Northeast. In Missouri, another 15,000 people are hurt or dead. Cities and towns throughout the central U.S. lose power and water for months. Losses stack up to hundreds of billions of dollars.

Fortunately, this magnitude 7.7 temblor is not real but rather a scenario imagined by the Mid-America Earthquake Center and the Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management at George Washington University. The goal of their 2008 analysis was to plan for a modern recurrence of quakes that happened along the New Madrid fault more than 200 years ago, in 1811 and 1812.

And remember, the scenario discussed above is just for a 7.7 earthquake. Much more powerful earthquakes have happened in the New Madrid fault zone in the past, and that is exactly what many are expecting to happen in the years ahead.

Meanwhile, the “Ring of Fire” continues to heat up. Over the past few years, there have been major earthquakes in almost every area along the Pacific rim except for the west coast of the United States. We should be very thankful for that, but that good fortune will not last indefinitely.

Personally, I would not want to be living anywhere along the Pacific coast in the coming years.

And it is not just earthquakes that we need to be concerned about along the Ring of Fire. We are also seeing a significant increase in volcanic activity.

Most Americans don’t realize it, but a major volcanic eruption is going on up in Alaska right now. The following is from Yahoo News…

One of Alaska’s most active volcanoes, which has been belching ash and spewing lava since last week, has forced regional flight cancellations and dusted some nearby communities with ash, scientists and local officials said on Monday.

Pavlof Volcano has sent up ash as high as 22,000 feet, with the cloud blowing eastward and the eruption showing no signs of abating, according to the federal-state Alaska Volcano Observatory.

The lava from its 8,261-foot (2,518-metre) peak has also created huge steam clouds on meeting the mountain’s snow.

And there are several volcanoes along the west coast of the United States that people should be keeping their eyes on as well. One of them is Mt. Saint Helens. The following is what one scientist recently said about Mt. Saint Helens…

We know magma is forming, we see little earthquakes, and we know it is reloading. We know it will erupt again and we know we may have as little as a week’s notice.

Personally, I am even more concerned about Mt. Rainier. That is one of the reasons why I included an eruption of Mt. Rainier in my new novel. Mt. Rainier has started to become unstable, and a full-blown eruption would be absolutely catastrophic.

In addition to everything else that I have discussed above, we have also been witnessing an increase in the intensity of hurricanes, wildfires, drought and dust storms over the past decade.

So what is causing all of this?

Do you have any idea?

Please feel free to post a comment with your opinion below…

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 5:46 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

America’s Bubble Economy Is Going To Become An Economic Black Hole

0

Michael Snyder
Economic Collapse
May 22, 2013

What is going to happen when the greatest economic bubble in the history of the world pops? The mainstream media never talks about that. They are much too busy covering the latest dogfights in Washington and what Justin Bieber has been up to. And most Americans seem to think that if the Dow keeps setting new all-time highs that everything must be okay. Sadly, that is not the case at all. Right now, the U.S. economy is exhibiting all of the classic symptoms of a bubble economy. You can see this when you step back and take a longer-term view of things. Over the past decade, we have added more than 10 trillion dollars to the national debt. But most Americans have shown very little concern as the balance on our national credit card has soared from 6 trillion dollars to nearly 17 trillion dollars. Meanwhile, Wall Street has been transformed into the biggest casino on the planet, and much of the new money that the Federal Reserve has been recklessly printing up has gone into stocks. But the Dow does not keep setting new records because the underlying economic fundamentals are good. Rather, the reckless euphoria that we are seeing in the financial markets right now reminds me very much of 1929. Margin debt is absolutely soaring, and every time that happens a crash rapidly follows. But this time when a crash happens it could very well be unlike anything that we have ever seen before. The top 25 U.S. banks have more than 212 trillion dollars of exposure to derivatives combined, and when that house of cards comes crashing down there is no way that anyone will be able to prop it back up. After all, U.S. GDP for an entire year is only a bit more than 15 trillion dollars.

But most Americans are only focused on the short-term because the mainstream media is only focused on the short-term. Things are good this week and things were good last week, so there is nothing to worry about, right?

Unfortunately, economic reality is not going to change even if all of us try to ignore it. Those that are willing to take an honest look at what is coming down the road are very troubled. For example, Bill Gross of PIMCO says that his firm sees “bubbles everywhere”…

We see bubbles everywhere, and that is not to be dramatic and not to suggest they will pop immediately. I just suggested in the bond market with a bubble in treasuries and bubble in narrow credit spreads and high-yield prices, that perhaps there is a significant distortion there. Having said that, it suggests that as long as the FED and Bank of Japan and other Central Banks keep writing checks and do not withdraw, then the bubble can be supported as in blowing bubbles. They are blowing bubbles. When that stops there will be repercussions.

And unfortunately, it is not just the United States that has a bubble economy. In fact, the gigantic financial bubble over in Japan may burst before our own financial bubble does. The following is from a recent article by Graham Summers…

First and foremost, Japan is the second largest bond market in the world. If Japan’s sovereign bonds continue to fall, pushing rates higher, then there has been a tectonic shift in the global financial system. Remember the impact that Greece had on asset prices? Greece’s bond market is less than 3% of Japan’s in size.

For multiple decades, Japanese bonds have been considered “risk free.” As a result of this, investors have been willing to lend money to Japan at extremely low rates. This has allowed Japan’s economy, the second largest in the world, to putter along marginally.

So if Japanese bonds begin to implode, this means that:

1)  The second largest bond market in the world is entering a bear market (along with commensurate liquidations and redemptions by institutional investors around the globe).

2)  The second largest economy in the world will collapse (along with the impact on global exports).

Both of these are truly epic problems for the financial system.

And of course the entire global financial system is a giant bundle of debt, risk and leverage at this point. We have never seen anything like this in world history. When you step back and take a good, hard look at the numbers, they truly are staggering. The following statistics are from one of my previous articles entitled “Why Is The World Economy Doomed? The Global Financial Pyramid Scheme By The Numbers“…

–$70,000,000,000,000 — The approximate size of total world GDP.

–$190,000,000,000,000 — The approximate size of the total amount of debt in the entire world. It has nearly doubled in size over the past decade.

–$212,525,587,000,000 — According to the U.S. government, this is the notional value of the derivatives that are being held by the top 25 banks in the United States. But those banks only have total assets of about 8.9 trillion dollars combined. In other words, the exposure of our largest banks to derivatives outweighs their total assets by a ratio of about 24 to 1.

–$600,000,000,000,000 to $1,500,000,000,000,000 — The estimates of the total notional value of all global derivatives generally fall within this range. At the high end of the range, the ratio of derivatives to global GDP is more than 21 to 1.

The financial meltdown that happened back in 2008 should have been a wake up call for the nations of the world. They should have corrected the mistakes that happened so that nothing like that would ever happen again. Unfortunately, nothing was fixed. Instead, our politicians and the central bankers became obsessed with reinflating the system. They piled up even more debt, recklessly printed tons of money and kicked the can down the road for a few years. In the process, they made our long-term problems even worse. The following is a recent quote from John Williams of shadowstats.com…

The economic and systemic solvency crises of the last eight years continue. There never was an actual recovery following the economic downturn that began in 2006 and collapsed into 2008 and 2009. What followed was a protracted period of business stagnation that began to turn down anew in second- and third-quarter 2012. The official recovery seen in GDP has been a statistical illusion generated by the use of understated inflation in calculating key economic series (see Public Comment on Inflation). Nonetheless, given the nature of official reporting, the renewed downturn likely will gain recognition as the second-dip in a double- or multiple-dip recession.

What continues to unfold in the systemic and economic crises is just an ongoing part of the 2008 turmoil. All the extraordinary actions and interventions bought a little time, but they did not resolve the various crises. That the crises continue can be seen in deteriorating economic activity and in the panicked actions by the Federal Reserve, where it proactively is monetizing U.S. Treasury debt at a pace suggestive of a Treasury that is unable to borrow otherwise.

And there are already lots of signs that the next economic downturn is rapidly approaching.

For example, corporate revenues are falling at Wal-Mart, Proctor and Gamble, Starbucks, AT&T, Safeway, American Express and IBM.

Would revenues at Wal-Mart be falling if the economy was getting better?

U.S. jobless claims hit a six week high last week. We aren’t in the danger zone yet, but once they hit 400,000 that will be a major red flag.

And even though we are still in the “good times” relatively speaking, the federal government is already talking about tightening welfare programs. In fact, there are proposals in Congress right now to make significant cuts to the food stamp program.

If food stamps and other welfare programs get cut, that is going to make a lot of people very, very angry. And that anger and frustration will get even worse when the next economic downturn strikes and millions of people start losing their jobs and their homes.

What we are witnessing right now is the calm before the storm. Let us hope that it lasts for as long as possible so that we can have more time to prepare.

Unfortunately, this bubble of false hope will not last forever. At some point it will end, and then the pain will begin.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 at 5:47 am

Tags: , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Russian Central Bank to increase controls over bankers' bonuses and salaries

0

The Russian government is poised to amend 2 banking laws which will authorize the Central Bank to limit banker’s salaries and supervise both domestic and international branches.

The State Duma Committee on Financial Markets will meet on
Friday, and is expected to approve the bill, as they already have
support from both government and bank deputies.

If approved by deputies, the Central Bank will increase control
over banks, their owners, executives, and executive bonuses.
Starting in 2014 banks will be required to prepare a consolidated
report in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards

The Central Bank will be able to influence banking systems,
including bonuses, said Mikhail Sukhov, the Bank’s Deputy Chairman.
If it sees fit the bank can set individual standards for banking
groups.

“Specific restrictions and sanctions will be outlined later
in a separate piece of legislation,”
said Sukhov.

Starting on July 1, all banks will be required to submit their
payroll documents to the Central Bank.

“In general, we support the amendments. It is important for
the Central Bank to understand the concentration risks in banks and
to regulate controls abroad,”
Anatoly Aksakov, the deputy
president of the Association of Regional Banks, said in support of
the amendments.

The Central Bank will also be able to check on international
subsidiaries, within the parameters of local
jurisdiction. 

“If there are any violations to ‘daughter’ companies, we have
no right to use these sanctions, but the [Russian] ‘parent’ company
will be able to impose fines and sanctions on the ‘daughter’
company in order to correct violations,”
said Sukhov

Alexander Levkovsky, first deputy chairman of SMP Bank, agrees
that the new controls will mostly affect banking groups with
foreign subsidiary branches.

For low-quality risk management or corporate governance the
Central Bank will be able to set individual standards for
banks.

This article originally appeared on : RT

US suspends top general for adultery

0

The US Army has suspended the commander of a major training camp for adultery and physical abuse allegations in yet another case of persisting sexual misconduct charges filed against senior American military officers.

Military authorities said on Tuesday that Brigadier General Bryan Roberts, who is a 29-year Army veteran, was suspended from his post at Ft. Jackson Army base in South Carolina, while the Pentagon probes allegations of “adultery and a physical altercation,” The Los Angeles Times reports on Wednesday.

Roberts, who is reportedly married with three children, previously led American Army units during the US-led invasion of Iraq as well as in city of New Orleans after a major flooding caused by Hurricane Katrina.

Ft. Jackson is a huge military training facility near the city of Columbia and serves as the main base for conducting boot camps for nearly half of the Armyâ„¢s annual recruits – about 36,000 soldiers – including 60 percent of female recruits, according to the report.

The latest allegations against the senior commander deal another embarrassing blow to the newly installed US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who is evidently struggling to show he takes sexual misconduct seriously.

This is while official statistics point to a staggering rise in sexual assault cases throughout the US armed forces.

Earlier this month, the Pentagon released figures estimating that 26,000 service members were sexually assaulted in unreported incidents last year, a 35% increase from 2010.

The development comes as the head of the US Air Force sexual assault prevention branch was arrested by the local police earlier in May on charges of sexually assaulting a woman outside a restaurant near the Pentagon.

Just a few days later, the report adds, the Army relieved from duty its chief of the sexual harassment prevention unit for the 101st Airborne Division at Ft. Campbell base in Kentucky after his arrest in a domestic dispute. The Army further suspended a sergeant first class who coordinated a sexual assault prevention program at its Ft. Hood military base in Texas on allegations of running a prostitution ring and abusing other service members.

Another top Army commander, Brigadier General Jeffrey Sinclair is also due to face a military court-martial in June on charges of sexual misconduct, including allegations that he forcibly raped a female captain and then threatened to kill her and her family if she told anyone.

Sinclair, who was a deputy commander of the 82nd Airborne Division in Afghanistan at the time, faces life imprisonment if convicted of the charges.

MFB/MFB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Russia ‘outraged’ over Azerbaijan Eurovision vote blunder

0

Russia is outraged over how Eurovision votes for its entrant, Dina Garipova, disappeared during a voting mishap in Azerbaijan, the Foreign Minister said. Azerbaijan gave Russia no points, despite the fact its song came second in a phone poll.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov slammed the “outrageous”
incident at a press conference in Moscow with his Azerbaijani
counterpart, Elmar Mammadyarov.

“When 10 points are stolen from our participant, there is
cause for concern,”
Lavrov said, adding that it reflected badly
on how the event was organized.

“This outrageous action will not remain without a
response,”
he stressed, stating that he would decide on a
proper course of action after receiving the results of an
investigation into the matter.

Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister described the voting blunder as a
mystery, and called it a “detective story.”
“Where did the votes go? How did they disappear? This is an
issue that our state television should resolve,”
he said. Three
of Azerbaijan’s largest phone operators registered Russia as
receiving the most votes after Ukraine.

The telephone poll comprised 50 percent of the total vote, and
the remainder was decided by a panel of judges.
Russia’s entry in this year’s Eurovision — ‘Change the World,’ sung
by Garipova — came in fifth place in Saturday’s annual Eurovision
Song Contest held in Malmo, Sweden. 

Despite the complaints, the extra 10 points that Russia may have
lost would have made a difference in the final results, as Russia
finished 17 points behind Norway.

Official Eurovision representative Jarmo Siim said that the
results would not be changed, and that the vote had been
watertight.

“Any attempt to politically pressure the Jury that may lead
to results not connected to the artists’ individual merits is
considered a violation of Eurovision Song Contest rules,”
Siim
told reporters.

Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko also criticized the
contest, describing it as politicized and highlighting how the
Belarusian contestant received no votes from Russia.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Washington’s love affair with Myanmar: It’s the resources, stupid!

0
<!–Nile Bowie–>

Nile Bowie is a political analyst and photographer currently residing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

The ramshackle streets of Myanmar’s capital Yangon, with its ancient Buddhist pagodas and dilapidated colonial-era buildings, are one of the last places in the world where you’d expect to find Colonel Sanders.

If the democratic reforms recently undertaken by Myanmar, a once
dysfunctional and paranoid socialist state turned hardcore military
pariah, could be attributed to a smell, it would probably resemble
a bucket of KFC chicken. Since the dramatic thawing of US-Myanmar
relations following the political ascent of President Thein Sein
and his quasi-civilian regime in 2010, diplomatic figures such as
Hillary Clinton, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague, and even
President Obama have dropped by — and corporate America came along
for the ride too. Multinational players from Ford and Hilton, to
Coca-Cola and Google are now trying to find their place in what the
IMF calls the “next economic frontier in Asia”.

Many have questioned Washington’s fast embrace of this
long-isolated Southeast Asian state, which is still accused of
overseeing vast human rights violations and employing
discriminatory policies toward ethnic minorities. Are we to believe
that after decades of crippling US-EU sanctions and trade
embargoes, which nearly collapsed Myanmar’s manufacturing base and
made anti-retroviral drugs and other medicines unaffordable, the
West is now enthusiastically emboldened to extend a hand in genuine
support for peace and the rights of the population and minorities?
Sure, that narrative is warm and fuzzy, but one should review all
sides of the equation, especially when billions upon billions in
profit remain up for grabs. Myanmar is pristine and extremely
underdeveloped, and it holds abundant natural resources, from gold,
gas, and oil, to uranium, precious gems, zinc, and copper.

It’s not just about the resources though; Myanmar is a huge
potential energy exporter whose transformation promises to have a
major impact on the regional economy. Most importantly, Myanmar
sits on China’s southern border, making the country a vital trade
and energy crossroads for Beijing, which is keen to keep Myanmar in
its economic orbit as the Obama administration ‘pivots’ to the
Asia-Pacific. As the country continues on the trajectory of reform,
it may find itself in a contentious wedge between rival superpowers
sooner than later, especially since the US has shown interest in
expanding military ties with Myanmar as part of its foreign policy
strategy, much to the discontent of China, who has practically been
Myanmar’s sole investor for the past two decades. Observers from
Myanmar took part in annual US-led military exercises in Thailand
known as Cobra Gold for the first time in February 2013, and on a
recent visit to the White House, President Sein boldly called for
direct military-to-military training.

US President Barack Obama and President Thein Sein of Myanmar (L) hold meetings in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, May 20, 2013.(AFP Photo / Saul Loeb)

IMF to the rescue

Nobody doubts the fact that far-reaching economic and currency
reforms were long overdue for Myanmar, where it was once common to
receive loose cigarettes or packs of gum in the absence of small
change; shopkeepers would also receive payment in euros and offer
US dollars and other foreign currencies in change, and the currency
exchange system was in absolute disarray. The immediate question
is, what the kind of economic model Myanmar will adopt, and what
will be the ramifications? It can gradually develop its domestic
industries with capital controls, trade protection and subsidies
until they mature enough to compete internationally, while focusing
on steering investment into manufacturing and services sectors to
train the workforce in skills and technology. Or, it can swallow
the pill of the Washington consensus and the International Monetary
Fund (IMF).

In that scenario, Myanmar would see reduced public investment in
rural development, health and social services, and a reliance on
private international banks that favor multinational corporations
rather than domestic industries by keeping affordable credit out of
the reach of many local companies and start-ups. In other words, it
can place priority on foreign corporations and investors by rapidly
integrating itself into the global economy at the expensive of the
human infrastructure upon which future productivity depends. For
all intents and purposes, it looks like Myanmar has already sided
with the IMF. According to IMF chief Christine Lagarde, her
institution had a direct hand in designing the recent
currency overhaul that ended in the moves to float the national
currency, the kyat.

IMF mission chief Meral Karasulu was quoted saying how Myanmar
could see strong growth if it is willing to “take advantage of its
rich natural resources” and “young labour force”. To the ears of a
cynic, that may translate into ‘sell us your resources on the cheap
by exploiting your unskilled labor base’. It shouldn’t surprise
anyone that the kyat has depreciated and hit record lows against the US dollar, making
that cheap labour all the more cheaper. History tells us that
Western development strategies place much more interest on
extracting raw materials and turning poor countries into markets
for Western goods, rather than advocating policy that fosters
strong national industries that allow countries to take off and
break free of the low-income trap. Myanmar would be wise to avoid
those pitfalls as best it can, if it is allowed the space to do so.
 

An unidentified official (L) of French oil campany Total briefs visiting media at the metering junction of a gas pipeline in Nat-En-Tong, border town of Myanmar.(AFP Photo / Pascale Trouillaud)

The tight-lipped Lady

Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi is the subject of big-budget
blockbuster films and global praise, but inside Myanmar, she’s
garnered a surprising amount of criticism from her rank and file
following her ascension into parliament after more than a decade
under house arrest at the behest of the former military junta. In
June 2012, outbreaks of violence in western Myanmar left nearly 200
dead and hundreds of thousands of the ethnic minority Muslim
Rohingyas displaced following sectarian clashes with Buddhists.
President Thein Sein was criticized internationally for referring
to the Rohingya, who resemble Bangladeshis, as “illegal
immigrants”, although Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy party
maintained a near-identical stance on the issue.
Washington, as well as Suu Kyi, remained questionably silent on the
plight of the Rohingya, which the UN classifies as one of the
world’s most discriminated ethnic minorities. Suu Kyi’s silence can
be attributed to the complex chauvinistic and xenophobic nature of
the Theravada Buddhist culture practised in Myanmar.

The pervasive climate of Buddhist nationalism in the country
ensures that she would face a backlash from her future voter base
if she takes the side of the Rohingya Muslims. Suu Kyi is widely
expected to run as a presidential candidate in the 2015 elections,
and she has already disenchanted many activists by praising the
military, despite previously accusing them of heinous human rights
abuses. Since she entered politics, she has curbed her criticisms
of the regime and hasn’t offered comment on the countries ongoing
conflicts with various ethnic minority militias throughout the
country. It should be remembered that Suu Kyi was a hardline
advocate in favor of Western economic sanctions on
Myanmar, which created enormous suffering for the population. It’s
difficult not to see Suu Kyi has disingenuous, as she now frequents
the World Economic Forum calling for foreign investment that could
have benefited her people years ago. It appears she’s had a change
of heart since she now has the prospect of standing for
elections.

Nobel laureate and Myanmar opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi (L) and Japanese Crown Prince Naruhito posing for photographers during their meeting at the latter's residence Togu Palace in Tokyo. Suu Kyi is on a week-long visit to Japan.(AFP Photo / Imperial Household Agency)

From Beijing’s sphere to
Washington’s Orbit

It’s difficult to ascertain what prompted Myanmar’s flight
toward the West. While the inept and unsustainable nature of the
former political and economic system was clear to everyone, some
say that Myanmar resented China’s stranglehold over their economy,
likening it to a colonial relationship. There is no doubt that
Beijing will look at expanding US-Myanmar military ties as a threat
and a provocation, especially if Myanmar continues morphing into a
US ally. As once anti-imperialist generals become US-friendly
strongmen, and principled activists begin to look more like
calculative politicians, Myanmar’s transformation is key to US
strategies of containing China and resuscitating its economic
muscle through trade with Southeast Asia. As institutional
repression is dismantled, there is a real danger of movements and
leaders that once championed civil liberties and human rights
becoming enablers of neoliberal capitalism, indiscriminate
privatization and deregulation. The fact that nearly all-Western
leaders still refer to the country under its colonial title, Burma,
may be a cynical reflection of prevailing economic attitudes toward
this dirt-poor, resource-rich, and geo-strategically crucial Asian
state.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Syria army foils car bomb attacks

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]The Syrian army has destroyed two cars, loaded with 1,300 kilograms of explosives, in the Harasta neighborhood in the Syrian capital, Damascus, during an operation to flush out militants carrying out terrorist attacks in the area.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Ahmadinejad to pursue decision on aide

0

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (L) accompanies his aide Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei to the Interior Ministry for registration in the upcoming presidential election, May 11, 2013.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has pledged to pursue the Guardian Council (GC)’s decision not to approve his top aide, Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei, as a candidate to run in next monthâ„¢s presidential election.

On Tuesday night, the Interior Ministry issued a statement saying that the Guardian Council, which vets presidential hopefuls for official candidacy, had approved eight individuals who had signed up for the race.

Rahim-Mashaei and former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani were not among the individuals approved by the Council.

Voicing his tacit dissatisfaction with the Councilâ„¢s decision on Mashaei, Ahmadinejad said, Å“I ask those who support me and Mr. Mashaei to be patient, because there will be no problem because of the presence of the Leader [of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei],” Ahmadinejad told reporters on Wednesday.

The Iranian president said he would vigorously pursue the matter by seeking help from the Leader, so that the issue will – God willing – be resolved.

Ahmadinejad noted that he lent support to Mashaei because he believes his aide has what it takes to run the country for the next four years.

In a statement issued late on Tuesday, the election campaign office of Rahim-Mashaei announced it will pursue the matter through legal channels and use Å“the full legal capacity of the country.”

Meanwhile, Eshaq Jahangiri, the head of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjaniâ„¢s election campaign office, has said the former president, who has not been approved either, will not object to the Guardian Council’s decision.

A total of 686 individuals had registered from May 7 to 11 for the Islamic Republicâ„¢s 11th presidential election, which will be held on June 14.

The president of Iran is elected for a four-year term in a national election.

ASH/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Train accident spills 91k liters of oil

0

A Canadian train derailed and spilled 91,000 liters of oil in the province of Saskatchewan on May 21, 2013.

A Canadian freight train has derailed in the Saskatchewan province spilling more than 91,000 liters of oil.

The accident happened on Tuesday as the 64-unit eastbound train operated by the Canadian Pacific Rail was traveling through an area southeast of the city Saskatoon.

According to Ed Greenberg a spokesman for the company, of the five derailed cars only one leaked a total of 575 barrels onto the ground.

The leaking car was the only one, which remained upright; the rest were on their sides intact.

Excavation equipment was sent to the accident site to build a wall of dirt to further control the spill.

The rising number of oil spills from train accidents comes as the countryâ„¢s train operators have increased its crude shipments in an attempt to meet oil companiesâ„¢ demand.

The incident was the fourth such accident in 2013. In April, around 20 freight cars went off tracks near White River in the province of Ontario causing a 63,000-liter oil spill.

A month earlier, in March, a Canadian Pacific train derailed in the American state of Minnesota. The stateâ„¢s Pollution Control Agency said 76,000 liters leaked onto the still-frozen ground.

At the beginning of the year, a train operated by the Canadian National collided with a road grader near the city of Paynton in the province of Saskatchewan. Police said about 1,000 liters of oil leaked from two tankers.

The Canadian government has been condemned for how the oil is transported in the country as well as its proposed plans to construct oil pipelines such as the Keystone XL.

Critics say Ottawa lacks concern for rights of its indigenous groups and instead side with big oil corporations.

CAH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Royal Mail profits slap UK gov’t in face

0

Britainâ„¢s Royal Mail has posted a massive £403 million profit amid claims by the government that it should be privatized to survive.

The government is pushing with closures and privatizations plans at the 497-year-old service, earmarking 76 of its biggest branches for transfer to the private sector.

The Communication Workers Union (CWU) has staged four strike actions against the plans that will slash 20 percent of the Crown Post Offices.

CWU is now saying that the 2012 profits are more than double the £152 million gains in 2011, providing Å“compelling evidence that the service will be better off in the hands of the public sector.

“Today’s positive results are more compelling evidence of why Royal Mail should be kept in the public sector,” CWU deputy general secretary Dave Ward said.

Å“Privatization isn’t necessary and it would destabilize the workforce and the good progress being made. The support of the workforce is crucial to the success of the company,” he added.

The CWU deputy leader also said the profits figure justifies a pay rise Å“reward” for the commitment of the Royal Mail staff.

The Royal Mail workers have had their pays frozen since 2011.

CWU had earlier expressed outrage over the issue especially after the Crown Post Office personnel were offered lump sum Å“bribes” to sign up to the privatization plans.

Crown Post Offices constitute only three percent of the mail network of 11,800 branches across Britain, but handle 20 percent of all transactions and 40 percent of financial services sales.

AMR/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

4 killed in Lebanon clashes

0

Lebanese army soldiers deploy at the entrance of Tripoli’s Bab al-Tebbaneh neighbourhood (file photo)

At least four people have been killed and thirty-five others wounded in clashes in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli.

The fatalities of the incident that occurred on Tuesday were in the wake of clashes between the supporters and opponents of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Two of the victims were from the Bab el-Tebbaneh district, one from somewhere in Tripoli and one was an Alawite resident of the Jabal Mohsen neighborhood.

On Sunday, at least two people were killed and many others injured in a gun battle in the same area. Two Lebanese soldiers were also killed on the next day when the army entered the flashpoint area to break up the clashes.

Tripoli has been the scene of fierce clashes between the supporters and opponents of the Syrian government since the beginning of the unrest in Syria more than two years ago.

While Bab al-Tebbaneh residents support militants fighting against the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the inhabitants of neighboring Jabal Mohsen are loyal to Assad.

IA/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Italian MP slams attacks against Kyenge

0

An Italian member of parliament has urged the center-right politicians to step away from a far-right party and condemn its racist acts against the new black Integration Minister Cecile Kyenge.

The push from Nico Stumpo from the Democratic Party comes as the New Force (Forza Muova) has lately been racially attacking the minister.

Å“The New Force has exceeded all limits,” said Stumpo, adding Å“We are faced with yet another act of intimidation against the Democratic Party and against Minister Cecile Kyenge.”

In its latest attack on May 18, some New Force members went to the Democratic Party office in the city of Bari and left a pickaxe painted in red, referring to a recent killing of an Italian man by an immigrant.

The group also left posters saying Å“Kyenge Resign” and Å“No to birthright citizenship law.”

This comes while the minister plans to push for legislation that would allow children born in Italy to immigrant parents to get automatic citizenship instead of waiting until 18 to apply.

Stumpo said that the attacks Å“are uncivilized and shameful” acts inspired by Å“vulgar racism.”

The parliamentarian, who is against terming the incident as a pure provocation, said, Å“Let’s call a spade a spade,” stressing that the party will not be intimidated by such acts of violence.

On May 27, Kyenge, an eye doctor, was sworn in as the new Italian minister of integration, making her the first black cabinet minister.

CAH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

China PM vows stronger ties with Pakistan

0

Pakistani commuters ride past a welcome billboard showing portraits of visiting Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (C), Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari (L), and caretaker Prime Minister Mir Hazar Khan Khoso in Islamabad on May 21, 2013.

Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang has pledged to strengthen partnership with Pakistan, as he arrived in the country for a two-day visit.

Li arrived in Pakistan on Wednesday on the second leg of his first overseas trip as premier.

The Chinese premier was met by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari at Nur Khan air base in Rawalpindi near Islamabad. Li is scheduled to hold talks with Zardari and caretaker Prime Minister Mir Hazar Khan Khoso on Wednesday.

The premier will also meet Prime Minister-elect Nawaz Sharif, who has not yet sworn in.

“The purpose of the visit is to devise a strategy to bolster future cooperation and friendship,” the Chinese premier was quoted as saying by state broadcaster PTV.

“We will strengthen a strategic partnership with Pakistan in whatever the international scenario and circumstances are,” he added.

Trade between the two countries hit an annual USD 12 billion for the first time in 2012, according to Pakistan Foreign Ministry. The two sides have planned to increase the figure to USD 15 billion in the next two to three years.

Li arrived in Pakistan after a visit to India, where he said he will work to build up mutual trust and better ties between China and India.

The Chinese premier will then go to Switzerland and Germany as part of his tour.

SAB/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Syria calls on UN to end Israeli violations

0

UN peace envoy Lakhdar Brahimi meets with Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem ( file phote)

The Syrian Foreign and Expatriates Ministry has called on the UN Security Council to terminate the violations made by Israel, restating Syriaâ„¢s right to respond to any breach of its sovereignty.

Referring to the identical letters sent to the Security Council and the UN Secretary General, the ministry said on Tuesday that Syria “expects the Security Council to put an end to the Israeli violations that breach the UN Charter and the Disengagement Agreement.”

The mentioned letters were on the Israeli vehicle which crossed the cease-fire line and two rockets fired by the Israel from the occupied site of Tal al-Faras toward one of the Syrian sites in al-Zubaydiah village.

“While Syria places these facts before the Security Council, it once again reaffirms its right to immediately respond to any violation of its sovereignty and the sanctity of its land, and that lies within the framework of practicing its right to self-defense,” the Ministry said.

The Israeli regime has recently boosted its military activities in the Golan Heights, where clashes between the Syrian army and the militant groups continue.

Syria has been gripped by unrest for over two years, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the foreign-sponsored militancy.

IA/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

China going green? World’s no. 1 polluter to cap emissions by 2016

0

China has agreed to cap greenhouse emissions by 2016, after previously refusing to commit to global guidelines. Beijing’s regime change signaled a move to a greener policy, as rising levels of toxic pollution in China are suffocating industrial centers.

China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) — the
government organ responsible for socio-economic growth planning —
announced the initiative, which must now be approved by the Cabinet
before it is enacted.

Previously, the Chinese government had sought to cut carbon
dioxide emissions by meeting intensity targets linked to their rate
of economic growth — the amount of the greenhouse gas produced per
dollar of economic output. However, this measure still left
significant room for emissions to increase, and the NDRC has
predicted that on its current path Chinese emissions will peak in
2025.

China’s rampant economic growth in recent years has made it the
world’s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, surpassing the US.
Currently, the Asian country is responsible for a quarter of all
greenhouse gas produced, followed by North America, which produces
17.6 percent of the global total.

Severe pollution clouds the Beijing skyline on January 12, 2013 (AFP Photo / Ed Jones)

Beijing slammed the EU last week for threatening China with a
series of fines for not complying with greenhouse gas regulations.
An official from the Civil Aviation Administration told state press
that China disapproved, and “will not accept any unilateral and
compulsory market measures.”

At present, eight Chinese airlines are facing fines under the
terms of the Emissions Trading Systems for shirking emissions
payments during flights in the EU.

The recent increase in air pollution in China due to the
country’s burning of fossil fuels has begun to ring alarm bells. At
the beginning of this year, Beijing authorities warned residents to
stay indoors because air pollution levels in the Chinese capital
had reached dangerous levels.

The local government blamed the conditions on unfavorable
weather, maintaining that a lack of wind and foggy conditions were
the source of the air contamination.

The toxic cloud of pollution then blew over Japan, causing the
government to issue health warnings. In some regions of Japan,
pollution exceeded government air cleanliness standards by 42
percent.

People walk during a heavily hazy winter day in central Beijing, January 12, 2013 (Reuters / Jason Lee)

China’s recent regime change has contributed to a new, greener
policy, with leaders resolving to clean up toxic pollution. Thus
far, the central government has issued emissions targets for every
province in China for 2011 through 2015, but it is unclear how
these quotas are regulated.

China’s industrial development has had huge environmental
consequences for the country. The largest source of China’s
emissions is the burning of coal, which accounts for over 60
percent of the nation’s electricity supply. In an investigation
carried out at the beginning of 2013, the US Energy Information
Administration has calculated that China burns almost as much coal
as the rest of the world combined.

Vehicles drive on the Third Ring Road on a very hazy winter day in Beijing January 12, 2013 (Reuters / Jason Lee)

This article originally appeared on : RT

Pentagon wants $450mn Gitmo upgrade

0

The US military has asked the nationâ„¢s Congress for over 450 million dollars to upgrade and maintain its notorious prison and torture camp at Guantanamo Bay despite renewed claims by President Barack Obama to shut down the facility.

New details about the Obama administration’s budget request for making improvements at the US military prison surfaced on Tuesday, marking yet another contradiction in Obamaâ„¢s supposed political push to close the infamous detention center while the Pentagon calculates the budget it needs to keep the camp operating.

The US military budget request for the next fiscal year, which begins on October 1, calls for USD79 million for Å“detention operations,” USD20.5 million for the office of military commissions, USD99 million for operation and maintenance and USD 40 million for a fiber optic cable, according to an AP report.

Additionally, the Pentagon is asking for USD 200 million for Å“military construction to upgrade temporary facilities,” which the report says may take eight to 10 years to complete, since Å“the military has to transport workers to the [Guantanamo Bay] island [in Cuba], rely on limited housing and fly in building material.”

The controversial military prison camp at the US naval base in Cuba currently holds 166 captives, over 130 of whom are reportedly on hunger strike to protest abusive treatment by prison guards and their indefinite detention with charges or legal trials.

Moreover, more than 30 of the hunger strikers are being forced fed in a severely painful procedure, involving the injection of a tube through the inmatesâ„¢ nose and into their stomach, which the United Nations has condemned as torture.

The growing protests and objections over the abusive treatment of Guantanamo captives have also prompted Obama to renew his pledge to shut down the military facility.

“Guantanamo is not necessary to keep America safe,” Obama said at a White House news conference last month. “It is expensive. It is inefficient. It hurts us in terms of our international standing. It lessens cooperation with our allies on counterterrorism efforts. It is a recruitment tool for extremists. It needs to be closed.”

Meanwhile, Obama reportedly plans to further elaborate on the future of the prison camp in a scheduled Thursday address on Å“counterterrorism” at National Defense University.

Although some members of the US Congress have strongly resisted the closure of Guantanamo, others have expressed support for the move.

Democratic Congressman Adam Smith of Washington State, who is the senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, offered his assistance to shut down the military prison camp in a Tuesday letter to Obama.

Until it is, Smith reportedly wrote, “it will continue to symbolize an unjust attempt to avoid the rule of law and to undermine the United States’ moral standing in defending its values and protecting human rights.”

Most of the Guantanamo inmates have been picked up by American military forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the aftermath of the US-led occupation of Afghanistan under the pretext of removing the Saudi- and Pakistani-backed Taliban regime and bringing stability to the country.

MFB/MFB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Bomb explosions hit Afghanistan

0

US-led foreign forces and Afghan security personnel inspect the site of a car bombing attack in Kandahar on February 20, 2012.

Two powerful bomb explosions in war-torn Afghanistan have killed at least one civilian and injured several others, Press TV reports.

On Wednesday, a roadside blast went off in eastern Afghanistanâ„¢s Ghazni city, the provincial capital of Ghazni Province, killing at least one and injuring five others.

Also on Wednesday, a second explosion hit the southern city of Kandahar, leaving an Afghan police officer wounded.

A similar attack in Kandahar on Tuesday killed two police forces and injured another five. The Taliban later claimed responsibility for the attack.

The Wednesday attacks also come a day after five policemen were killed in the province of Helmand.

Civilian casualties are expected to rise in Afghanistan after Washington announced plans to set up permanent bases in the country.

This is while Taliban militants recently announced the start of their annual “spring offensive” against US-led and Afghan forces, vowing a new wave of attacks across Afghanistan.

The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 under the pretext of combating terrorism. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across the country despite the presence of thousands of US-led soldiers.

AZA/SZH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

No econ. Plan B in UK despite IMF call

0

No econ. Plan B in UK despite IMF call

The British government says it will not switch to a Plan B for economy despite the calls from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to rein in austerity to boost growth.

IMF has warned Britain that the austerity should be curbed to avoid stifling growth unless economic figures show significant positive change.

However, the government is insisting on its current austerity policy with a Prime Ministerâ„¢s spokesperson saying “we are on the right road, but we have to stick to it”.

The fund had initially supported the governmentâ„¢s package of massive spending cuts but its managing director Christine Lagarde warned that the cuts are taking too long to trigger growth and called for a change of approach.

The British economy narrowly missed a triple-dip recession in the first quarter of 2013.

The government says its £50 billion austerity program will help decrease the £1 trillion national debt by 2015 but economists are not that optimist about the claim.

AMR/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Xbox One: Constantly Listening To Conversations

Mick Meaney
RINF Alternative News

With the announcement of Microsoft’s next generation gaming console, the Xbox One, it has emerged that the new system carries a device that will be ‘constantly listening’ to gamer’s conversations.

During a PR move designed to make the Xbox One appear more attractive, Microsoft’s hardware program manager, John Link, let slip that a component bundled with the console, the Kinect, will contain a microphone that never turns off.

The current version of the Kinect also contains a microphone but that can be switched off.

Speaking last night, Link said:

“The Kinect has a variety of settings. You know, it’s always available to the system, so … you can count, as an application developer or a game developer, [that] everyone’s going to have a Kinect. You always have that stream available. And then, you know, there are settings, obviously, in the console to be able to change the settings of how your Kinect is used, if you’re interested.

“It will be just listening enough to know that, ‘Hey, I heard something interesting. Somebody’s probably trying to wake me up.’ It sends it to the console for confirmation, and then it can really power up to that high-power state.”

The new system can automatically detect and identify users through their body shape and voice. The system can also monitor heart rates.

Microsoft were quick to defend the technology, releasing a statement:

“The new Kinect is listening for a specific cue, like ‘Xbox on,'” the spokesperson said. “We know our customers want and expect strong privacy protections to be built into our products, devices and services, and for companies to be responsible stewards of their data. Microsoft has more than 10 years of experience making privacy a top priority. Kinect for Xbox 360 was designed and built with strong privacy protections in place and the new Kinect will continue this commitment.”

They also added:

“We aren’t using Kinect to snoop on anybody at all. We listen for the word ‘Xbox on’ and then switch on the machine, but we don’t transmit personal data in any way, shape or form that could be personally identifiable to you, unless you explicitly opt into that.”

However, the company aren’t exactly known for their commitment to privacy.

We recently revealed how the company were involved with ‘Legal intercept’ technology that provides governments with an easy way to monitor VoIP communication, and how the Kinect could be potentially used to restrict activity in the home.

Not to mention that last year they helped police to build a surveillance system across New York which connects a wide variety of technologies together for the NYPD. They hope to sell the big brother system to other cities around the world.

Also in 2012 Microsoft came under fire for its privacy policy and in 2010 Windows Live exposed users names and other data.

Its not just Microsoft that Xbox One users should be concerned about, it’s also malicious hackers who could eavesdrop on conversations in the living room via the Internet.

The software giant doesn’t exactly have a solid track record for producing secure systems. Earlier this year hackers accessed the Xbox Live accounts of employees.

Nonetheless, millions of children, including my own, will now be begging their parents for the latest must-have tech. We have to hand it to corporations like Microsoft and Google… they have managed to turn Big brother into the unthinkable; an object of desire.

Final list of presidential candidates out

0

Iran’s Interior Ministry releases official list of approved presidential hopefuls

Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry has published the list of the hopefuls approved to run as official candidates for president in the countryâ„¢s eleventh presidential election slated for June 14, Press TV reports.

The Ministry on Wednesday released the names of the approved hopefuls, which include Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili; former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi; President of the Center for Strategic Research of the Expediency Council Hassan Rohani; former Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Velayati; former First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref; Secretary of the Expediency Council Mohsen Rezaei; Iranian lawmaker Gholam Ali Haddad-Adel; and Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf.

The eight individuals were approved by Iranâ„¢s top constitutional supervisory body, the Guardian Council, after a 10-day vetting process.

The Council has not approved two-term former President Ali Akbar Heshemi Rafsanjani, former Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki and Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, a close aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iranian reformist candidate Aref, who is also an academic, says Å“Livelihood, Dignity and Rationality” is his campaignâ„¢s slogan.

Independent candidate Gharazi says he is running on a platform of Å“Administration against Inflation.”

Haddad-Adel, a principlist candidate, says he will form his cabinet based on Å“Piety and Good Judgment” if he is elected president.

Jalili, another Iranian principlist candidate, believes in the discourse of the Islamic Revolution as a means to promote national progress.

Principlist candidate Qalibaf, a former military and police commander, says Å“Better Economy and Life for People” is his battle cry.

Rezaei, an independent candidate, says he is campaigning on a platform of Å“Political Ethics and Economic Efficiency.”

Å“Moderation, Rationality and Acumen” is the slogan of reformist candidate Rohani, who is currently a member of Iranâ„¢s Assembly of Experts.

Principlist candidate Velayati says his election campaign centers on Å“Moralism and Management Stability.”

The approved candidates have now three weeks to run their electoral campaigns, according to Iran’s Interior Ministry.

YH/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Europe faces decade of stagnation’

0

Governor of Bank of Canada has warned Europe that it faces a Å“decade of stagnation” if it does not apply sustained and significant reforms to put its fiscal house in order.

Mark Carney issued the warning on Tuesday while making a speech to the Montreal board of trade.

“Europe remains in recession, with economic activity constrained by fiscal austerity, low confidence and tight credit conditions,” said Carney.

He added, “Deep challenges persist in its financial system. Without sustained and significant reforms, a decade of stagnation threatens.”

Carney was vague on details however he pointed out that there are currently few institutional mechanisms within the Economic and Monetary Union (EMI) that could create shocks like the one Spain was hit by when its economy collapsed after the banking system and real estate market crashed.

This was Carneyâ„¢s final speech as Canadaâ„¢s central bank governor before taking the role of the head of Bank of England on July 1.

On April 16, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) urged the eurozone to avoid a long stagnation by calling on the European Central Bank to lower its key interest rate and to consider other stimulus measures, adding that efforts to cut budget deficits should be slowed.

Europe plunged into a financial crisis in early 2008. The worsening debt crisis has forced the EU governments to adopt harsh austerity measures and tough economic reforms.

CAH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Rafsanjani advises against political libel

0

Chairman of Iranâ„¢s Expediency Council Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani (shown) has not been approved to run for president in Iranâ„¢s July 14th election. (File photo)

Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has, in a statement released prior to the official announcement of the approved presidential candidates for Iran’s June 14 election, called on his supporters to refrain from engaging in any smear campaigns against others.

The top Iranian official, a two-time former president and the incumbent chairman of the Expediency Council, said he did not wish to distress the nation in the run-up to the election and noted, Å“I would like to urge friends not to allow the dust of smear [campaigns] by certain individuals, which has unfortunately turned into a nasty habit in elections, to blind them to justice and morality and lead them, too, to donning a cloak of insult and slander.”

Rafsanjani made the comments in a statement posted on his official website on Monday – a day before the Interior Ministry officially announced the list of the approved candidates – in response to speculations about the likelihood of his presence in the presidential race.

He pointed to his decades-long close relationship with the founder of the Islamic Republic, late Imam Khomeini, and highlighted Iranâ„¢s economic, cultural and social achievements under his presidency, and criticized the status quo.

Å“I believe that the presence of all tendencies in the election is necessary to create a political epic,” Rafsanjani said.

Å“What made me enter the field was concerns over the [idle] insinuation of the idea that religion is ineffective in running the affairs of the society, [as well as concerns over] a decline in production, the unemployment of the youth, an ailing economy, Iranophobia among [Iranâ„¢s] neighbors, moral and cultural contradictions, and the international sanctions, all of which have resulted in livelihood problems in the society,” the former Iranian president pointed out.

Å“The main rival of all candidates is the problems facing society,” he stated.

Rafsanjani said the existing problems can only be resolved through continued efforts by Iranian officials in cooperation with the public.

Later, on Tuesday night, the Interior Ministry issued a statement saying that the Guardian Council, which vets presidential hopefuls for official candidacy, had approved eight individuals who had signed up for the race.

The council approved Member of Majlis Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel; Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili; Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei; Hassan Rohani, the director of the Strategic Research Center of the Expediency Council; former First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref; Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf; former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi; and former Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Velayati.

A total of 686 individuals had registered from May 7 to 11 for the Islamic Republicâ„¢s 11th presidential election, which will be held on June 14.

The president of Iran is elected for a four-year term in a national election.

ASH/NN/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Market Buzz: World waiting to see if US Fed will end stimulus

0

Russian floors started off Wednesday’s session in the black following positive performance on Wall Street. Investors expect upward momentum to prevail during the day, though falling oil prices may cause a correction.

Despite declining oil
prices on Tuesday, Russian markets ended the day’s session in
positive territory: The MICEX advanced 1.15 percent to close at
1422.99, and the RTS added 1.13 percent to
1433.02. 

Asian stocks traded mostly higher on Wednesday due to the
positive sentiment on Wall Street. Tokyo’s Nikkei added 1.6 percent
to reach 15,500 for the first time in over five years, after the
Bank of Japan kept its monetary policy unchanged as
expected. 

Investors will also be eying testimony from Federal Reserve
Chair Ben Bernanke due later in the day. European stocks may see a
boost amid speculation over whether the Fed will continue its
economic stimulus program until next year.  Hints emerged that
the US may not be ready yet to end its bond-buying program when St.
Louis Fed President James Bullard and New York Fed President
William Dudley said that low inflation and mixed signals for growth
prospects meant an end to stimulus was unlikely.

The US will also publish data on existing home sales, a
leading indicator of economic health, and the Fed will publish the
minutes of its most recent policy-setting meeting. In addition to
the anticipated statement from the Fed chief, more news will follow
from other international markets: Japan will release official data
on its trade balance, the difference in value between imports and
exports.

In the eurozone, Italy and Germany will hold government bond
auctions, and EU leaders will gather to hold an economic summit in
Brussels. The Bank of England is expected to publish the minutes of
its most recent policy-setting meeting, and the UK is also set to
release official data on public sector net borrowing and a report
on industrial order expectations.

European stocks posted gains on Tuesday: The benchmark Stoxx
600 index ended the session up 0.1 percent at 309.99, Germany’s DAX
advanced 0.2 percent to 8472.20, France’s CAC rose 0.3 percent to
4036.18 and London’s FTSE 100 was up 0.7 percent to close at
6803.87.

US stocks closed in the black on Tuesday. The Dow Jones
Industrial Average climbed 0.34 percent to 15,387.58, the S&P
500 added 0.17 percent to close at 1,669.16, and the tech-heavy
Nasdaq Composite Index rose 0.16 percent to 3,502.12.

Oil quotations are falling, with both Brent and WTI losing 0.3
percent each; Brent is currently trading at $103.50 and Light is
trading at $95.80.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Israeli soldier killed in Golan Heights

0

Israeli soldiers stand on a tank near the northern border with Syria ( file photo)

An Israeli Defense Forces soldier has been killed while participating in an operation to clear a minefield in the southern Golan Heights.

The 19-year-old soldier, Roey Yisrael Alfi, was a member of the Engineering Corps. He was participating in an advanced training course near Moshav Yonatan when an old mine went off.

A senior army source said that the mine exploded for unknown reasons.

Ground Forces Commander Major General Guy Tzur appointed a committee of inquiry to investigate the incident.

The occupied Golan Heights is an area surrounded by the Yarmouk River in the south, the Sea of Galilee and Hula Valley in the west, Mount Hermon in the north, and the Raqqad Wadi in the east.

Israel has occupied the western two thirds of this region. Syria controls the eastern third.

Tel Aviv has recently boosted military activities in the area, where clashes between Syrian forces and foreign-sponsored militants have spiked dramatically.

The Israeli military has set up a Å“military field hospital” at military outpost 105 in the occupied Golan Heights to treat wounded militants fighting against the government in neighboring Syria.

IA/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

US-led forces kill 2 Afghan students

0

File photo shows a US-led soldier in Afghanistan.

US-led foreign soldiers stationed in Afghanistan have shot and killed at least two seminary students in the war-torn country, Press TV reports.

According to security officials in the western province of Herat, the US-led soldiers opened fire on a group of students on Tuesday.

The officials say the students were attending a ceremony in Shindandâ„¢s Azizabad village when the shooting took place.

A group of protesters reportedly gathered outside the governorâ„¢s office, demanding the arrest of the soldiers responsible for the killings.

Meanwhile, Herat officials say a fact-finding team has already been sent to the area to investigate the killings.

The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in October 2001 as part of Washingtonâ„¢s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across the country, despite the presence of thousands of US-led troops.

The increasing number of military casualties in Afghanistan has caused widespread anger in the US and other NATO member states, undermining public support for the Afghan war.

In the first six months of 2012, over 1,140 Afghan civilians were killed and around 2,000 were wounded, mostly by roadside bombs, according to the statistics released by the United Nations. Thirty percent of the casualties were women and children.

FKO/SZH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Tunisia man dies of coronavirus

0

Picture shows the coronavirus seen under an electron microscope.

A 66-year-old man in Tunisia has died of the new coronavirus, in what is believed to be the first recorded case of the disease in the African nation.

The Tunisia Health Ministry said on Tuesday that the victim had visited Saudi Arabia, and been suffering from breathing problem since his return.

He later died in a hospital in the city of Monastir, the Health Ministry spokesman Ibrahim Labassi said.

“Tests showed that his two sons were infected by the same virus and they are under medical observation,” Labassi added.

The novel coronavirus virus, also known as NCoV, is from the same family of viruses that caused the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003, when some 770 people were killed.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported about 20 deaths and 41 cases of the disease in some countries, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Germany, Britain, France and the United Arab Emirates.

“These Tunisia cases haven’t changed our risk assessment, but they do show the virus is still spreading,” said Gregory Hartl, WHO spokesman.

On Monday, the Saudi Arabian Health Ministry reported that another Saudi citizen had died of the respiratory virus, raising the death toll in the kingdom from the virus to 16.

Health authorities are trying to find out the mechanism through which humans contract and spread the virus as well as the best remedy to treat it.

According to the reports, most patients diagnosed with the virus are elderly men.

SAB/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Feds' Bogus Threat of Terrorism to Hunt Down Black Liberation Activist

0

Mugshot taken of Assata Shakur.
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

May 13, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Just 17 days after the Boston Marathon bombings, the largest spectacle of terrorism on US soil since 9/11, the FBI added the first woman to its list of “ Most Wanted Terrorists” for a crime she is accused of committing more than 40 years ago. This is just the latest attempt by the federal government to rewrite the history of radical activists from the ’60s and ’70s and cover up the government’s illegal actions aimed at stopping them.

Assata Shakur, known in court documents and wanted posters as Joanne Chesimard, was added to the list of Most Wanted Terrorists on May 2. Nearly eight years earlier, she was reclassified from fugitive to domestic terrorist under the Patriot Act in 2005. Shakur is only the second so-called domestic terrorist ever to be placed on the list; she joins Daniel Andreas San Diego, an animal rights activist, who was added in 2009. The state of New Jersey also announced that it would be contributing $1 million to her bounty, bringing the total for Assata Shakur’s capture to $2 million.

Since 1984, Shakur, a fugitive and political prisoner, has been living as a refugee, exiled in Cuba. She was a member of the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Today she might be just as famous for being Tupac Shakur’s godmother if she wasn’t being called a “ top priority” by the FBI. But Assata Shakur belonged to one of the most important movements for democracy and racial justice in the 20th century, and for many people who dream of a better world, she is the apogee of hope. For the US government, though, she is the one who got away. Now, at the age of 66, Shakur may still be agitating with her words, but she cannot seriously beconsidered a national security threat.

It is an outrage and a shock to some, but for anyone who has been paying attention, it is par for the course. Since 9/11, the US government has operated with impunity, trampling civil rights, due process, and the legal claims of other sovereign nations. These two new escalations by the FBI and the state of New Jersey, repainting Shakur and other members of the black liberation movement as terrorists, is also nothing new. In fact, it is a logical extension of the repression these groups faced under COINTELPRO when they were active. Only now, it is being translated from the anachronistic language of containment into the present-day language of fear and securitization, in order to merge the narratives of older movements and newer ones, and to justify the repression against both.

Two Narratives of a Traffic Stop

There are two 40-year-old narratives underpinning this case: an official US government narrative that is open-and-shut, and another narrative that recognizes the history of repression faced by black radicals and the oppression of black communities.

Officially, Shakur’s status as a domestic terrorist stems from a shootout with police that took place on May 2, 1973. The shootout resulted in the deaths of a New Jersey state trooper and one of Shakur’s companions, Zayd Malik Shakur.

But according to the National Lawyers Guild (NLG), Assata Shakur had been pursued by state and federal authorities for several years before the incident in New Jersey because of her political affiliations and because she was a woman. “Prior to the shootout, Ms. Shakur was the subject of a nationwide hunt as part of an FBI campaign to tie her to every suspected Black Liberation Army action involving a woman. After her capture, Ms. Shakur was not charged with any of the crimes that prompted the dragnet,” the NLG states.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Shocker: Republicans Fight Obama Plan to Privatize the Hugely Popular, Cheap Energy Source of the TVA

0

Photo Credit: Jean Lee/ Shutterstock.com

May 19, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Buried within the fine print of the 2014 Obama budget is a startling bit of history-changing policy. The government, the administration says, should consider selling off the Tennessee Valley Authority, one of the nation’s largest publicly operated–that is, “socialist”–institutions, and the largest public power provider in the country.

The TVA is a non-profi, free-standing public authority established by the Roosevelt administration during the Depression–a very large utility, if you like. It provides 165 billion kilowatt hours of power to 9 million Americans, has $11.2 billion in sales revenue, employs more than 12,500 people, and provides other educational, training and related services (such as navigation and land management, flood control, and economic development) to the people in the states and region around the Tennessee river basin.

Strikingly, it’s the free-market Republicans who object to this proposed privatization. Senator Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican who has vehemently opposed government tax credits and subsidies for renewable energy, calls the proposal “one more bad idea in a budget full of bad ideas,” and fears that privatization would lead to higher energy costs for his constituents.

Congressman John L. Duncan, Jr., another Tennessee Republican, says privatization is “something that has been proposed in the past and been determined to be a very bad idea.” Senator Richard Shelby, Republican of Alabama (a state also served by the TVA), says he will “carefully study any proposals to restructure TVA” in order to make sure that it won’t result in a price hike. And Tennessee’s other Republican Senator, Bob Corker, is clear: “I doubt this idea gains much traction.”

If we didn’t know better, we might think the administration has decided to call the Republicans’ bluff on the issue of “socialism”–a strategy that, however, seems to be beyond the clever quotient of the Obama political team.

The basic problem is that this “socialist” institution is immensely popular. It has given the people of the region good service for roughly eight decades, and its prices are lower than those of many private corporations. An analysis by the U.S. Energy Information Administration found that consumers in Alabama and Tennessee pay considerably less for power than the national average. The low rates, former TVA Chairman S. David Freeman suggests, have earned TVA “the ‘mother love’ of a politically conservative region.”

Even among environmental groups–which often criticize the TVA for, among other things, its continued use of coal and nuclear power plants–there is little appetite for privatization. The Tennessee chapter of the Sierra Club holds that privatization would be a mistake, potentially allowing new private corporate owners to “liquidate its assets by selling off TVA’s public lands along the Tennessee River and tributaries.”

So why is the Obama administration pursuing a sell-off? Mainly for short-sighted budget appearances. Privatizing public assets like the TVA will generate some near-term revenue and help pay down a (very) small fraction of the nation’s debt. The White House also claims the TVA will likely have to issue more debt securities in the future in order to raise money to modernize its aging infrastructure, which would–in a purely accounting sense–slightly increase the deficit. This is an odd worry, since the TVA is, and would continue to be, entirely self-funded at no cost to the taxpayer, and the new debt is simply to finance the kind of updating and modernizing any major corporation routinely does.

Most Americans do not realize that public ownership like that involved in the TVA, and a cornerstone of much decried “socialism,” can be found in communities in every state in the nation. For one thing, there are more than 2,000 public electric utilities–many in conservative rural areas–and, like the TVA, they are popular among local residents and politicians. Succesful public ownership of vital transportation facilities (such as roads, ports and airports) is also common. And, of course, roughly a third of the nation’s total land surface (and the minerals beneath and forests above) is owned and managed by the government.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Rooftop Revolution: How Solar Energy Is Putting Power Back in the Hands of the People

0

Photo Credit: Mana Photo/ Shutterstock.com

May 20, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Rarely do we switch on an appliance or flick on the lights and consider the source of energy. Yet, in the past few years, we have become more conscious about the mountains being blown up in Appalachia to extract coal or the massive onslaught of gas drilling and fracking on new shale formations. Danny Kennedy’s new book, Rooftop Revolution: How Solar Power Can Save Our Economy — and Our Planet, turns our endless search to keep looking down for future energy sources and simply asks us to look up for it. The sun, he argues, is waiting to be tapped for clean, cheap energy if we can get our heads out of the sand.

Danny Kennedy, Greenpeace activist, Project Underground founder and long-time campaigner, decided to apply his organizing skills to harness the sun’s energy. Choosing to do something about our energy crisis and climate change, he founded Sungevity with a small group of trusted friends in 2007. Now, Sungevity is one the world’s leading residential solar-energy companies and is the exclusive residential solar partner for Lowe’s.

I sat down with Kennedy to learn more about his vision and reasons for writing this book.

Heeten Kalan: Your book is titled Rooftop Revolution. Why do you think solar power is a revolution in the making?

Danny Kennedy: Solar power represents a change in electricity that has a potentially disruptive impact on power in both the literal sense (meaning how we get electricity) and in the figurative sense of how we distribute wealth and power in our society. Fossil fuels have led to the concentration of power whereas solar’s potential is really to give power over to the hands of people. This shift has huge community benefits while releasing our dependency on the centralized, monopolized capital of the fossil fuel industry. So it’s revolutionary in the technological and political sense.

Sungevity’s mission is to build power based on sunshine as well as build a great business. Each time a solar panel is installed we gain supporters and voters. A family or business that uses solar panels ends up lending their voice to demonstrate solar’s potential for new energy, new jobs and a healthier economy. This is a revolution — using our rooftops, we can make the difference.

HK: In your book you talk about solar power being local and decentralized. This is almost the antithesis of what we currently have. While that is an appealing concept, what do you think gets in the way of realizing solar’s potential?

DK: What gets in the way is all the wealth and politics that benefit from “King CONG.” I identify the collective interests of coal, oil, nukes, and gas as the major obstacles to alternative energy sources and have dubbed those interests King CONG. We have regulated monopolies in the U.S. that basically amount to the government saying to the fossil fuel industry/big energy that if you keep the lights on in Chicago and New York we’ll give you control over that market and let you grow your business by certain regulated standards.

Yet there’s been no innovation in that industry and no motivation to innovate. They’re using the same turbines for a century now. We’re suffering because the big energy companies are motivated by self-interests. Just like cell phones threatened landlines in the telephone business, solar power is seen as threatening big fossil fuel-derived energy. What we need is a social will and political pressure to break down that monopoly and we need entrepreneurs who will deliver a more modular, flexible and affordable solution.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

How Coca-Cola's Ruthless Business Tactics Created a Despicable Global Powerhouse

0

Photo Credit: ronstik/ Shutterstock.com

May 20, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

For God, Country, and Coca-Cola by Mark Pendergast is the definitive history of the product so many see as a symbol of America itself. This impressive tome — recently released as a third edition with added new material — is not a critique of Coca-Cola, nor is it a fan’s tribute, as Pendergast reveals things the Coca-Cola Company doesn’t want you to know. (Yes, it used to contain cocaine.) He even reveals the drink’s original secret formula (which is less exciting than you might think).

Coca-Cola is not fascinating for what it is — colored sugar water with bubbles — but for what it represents. And that’s a point long known by the company’s marketers, with the exception of when they forgot it during the New Coke fiasco in the 1980s. Today, marketing students in business schools everywhere study that famous gaff.

Despite the decades-old slogan, “Delicious and Refreshing,” people do not drink Coca-Cola for the taste. They drink it because they associate it with positive things like friendship, fun, patriotism, and athleticism. Careful to market the drink to all people, everywhere, without alienating anyone, the ads are often vague. “Coke is It!” What is “it”? It’s whatever you want it to be, just as long as it makes you want to buy more Coke!

The book guides readers through the decades of marketing campaigns that built this image, most significantly during World War II, when Coca-Cola was made available to U.S. soldiers everywhere in the world, often at the government’s expense. When sales slumped, the answer was never changing the flagship product; it was a new ad campaign. Remind consumers that Coke = fun (or simpler times, or hope, or whatever feeling they crave) and they will drink more of it.

Because constant, never-ending growth is seen as essential, the other necessity is finding new channels to facilitate more Coke-drinking than ever before. Today, you can be 50 miles from nowhere in any country except Cuba and North Korea and if you crave an ice-cold Coca-Cola, you can get one. Even in places where few have clean drinking water or electricity, both needed to produce ice-cold Coke, some enterprising entrepreneur will have electricity and a cooler and plenty of Coke. The same cannot be said of nearly any other product.

The New Coke failure punctuates this strange phenomenon — that the world loves and guzzles an unhealthy beverage, but not for its good taste. Pepsi showed that in blind taste tests, more people prefer Pepsi over Coke. New Coke was tastier than both Coke and Pepsi in blind taste tests. Surely consumers would love it. Except, they didn’t. They wanted fun, hope, patriotism, and everything else they associated with good, old-fashioned Coca-Cola, not some new, better-tasting concoction.

Readers seeking the dirt on Coca-Cola’s sordid past with Columbian paramilitaries and Guatemalan death squads will find these episodes covered briefly in this book. But the completeness of the company’s history in this book paints a bigger picture, and Coca-Cola’s tangles with death squads fit in as just one piece.

This is a company devoted to, above all else, making as much money as possible and selling as much Coca-Cola as possible. Period. Nazis get thirsty, too, you know. In almost every case, the company tried to please everyone and sell to everyone, without taking sides, unless it had no choice.

It’s no good that Coca-Cola did business with a Guatemalan bottler who allegedly hired death squads to murder employees trying to unionize. But that is all part of a larger pattern, a larger scandal — although there’s no conspiracy at all. The drive to increase profits and sales and market share at all cost is the company’s story, plain and simple. It took us from a 6.5-ounce drink only available at soda fountains to one available everywhere in sizes as large as 64 ounces.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

"As a Black Man Like You": Six Words That Enraged White Right-Wingers in Obama's Speech at Historic Black College

0

Photo Credit: White House

Barack Obama, the United States’ first black president, rarely talks about race or racism. Moreover, he is weak on policy prescriptions or targeted assistance for communities of color (and black folks in particular)–even though they are a key demographic in his electoral coalition.

Obama’s election may not have been the Mount Everest of black politics and the Black Freedom Struggle. But, President Obama did to go to Morehouse College, one of the country’s leading historically black institutions of higher learning, where he delivered the commencement speech on Sunday.

There he offered up a very conservative brand of life advice for the graduating class, suggestions that pivot on “personal responsibility” and not “excuse-making” for the lived realities of day-to-day and structural discrimination.

As reported by The Washington Post:

Obama said that too many young black men make “bad choices.”

“Growing up, I made quite a few myself,” Obama said. “Sometimes I wrote off my own failings as just another example of the world trying to keep a black man down. I had a tendency to make excuses for me not doing the right thing.”

But, the president implored, “we’ve got no time for excuses.”

“In today’s hyper-connected, hyper-competitive world, with millions of young people from China and India and Brazil, many of whom started with a whole lot less than all of you did, all of them entering the global workforce alongside you, nobody is going to give you anything you haven’t earned,” he said. “Nobody cares how tough your upbringing was. Nobody cares if you suffered some discrimination.”

“Moreover,” Obama continued, “you have to remember that whatever you’ve gone through, it pales in comparison to the hardships previous generations endured – and if they overcame them, you can overcome them, too.”

Republicans and the Tea Party Right should be very pleased by President Obama’s suggestions to the Morehouse graduating class. We know they will not be. Why? Because the White Right, as they have been since his election in 2008, cannot evolve past their herrenvolk bigotry and white supremacist habits. They are drugs in the American body politic to which conservatives are uniquely addicted.

President Obama uttered six little words at Morehouse on Sunday, words that will be twisted, lied about, spun, and processed by a pathologically reactionary conservative White Racial Frame. At Morehouse, Obama committed the ultimate move of poor taste in “post racial” colorblind America: he said, “as a black man like you.”

Ultimately, President Obama dared to remind the public that he too is a black man in America.

It would seem that to Drudge and The Weekly Standard this is poor taste, a point of controversy, and worth particular emphasis on their respective websites. To point. Drudge has as its lede following Obama’s Morehouse address “I am a Black Man” under the President’s photo. The Weekly Standard chose to place in bold for emphasis what they see as an impolitic and provocative phrase–“as a black man like you”–in their quoting of Obama’s speech at Morehouse.

The President apparently did not learn from the public whipping he suffered by the Right-wing media when he committed a similar misstep in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin shooting.

Let the complaints and predictable howls begin. The Tea Party GOP and their echo chamber will cry that “if a white president said ‘as a white man like you'” that there would be charges of racism. The most dim bloviators on the Right will assert that “historically black colleges” are bastions of “hate” that discriminate against white people.

Never mind the fact that historically black colleges actually offer scholarships and special funding for white students because of a belief in the merits of racial diversity.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

The Federal Govt. Wants the Nuclear Industry to Be One Big Secret

0

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com/ Sergey Kamshylin

May 20, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The city of Oak Ridge, Tennessee and its neighbor Knoxville, are government towns.  Oak Ridge has been called “the closed city,” reminiscent of government cities in the old Soviet Union that were closed to the public because of sensitive weapons production and other activities Soviets wanted to keep from prying eyes.  In the case of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, the U.S. government wants to keep the production of nuclear bombs and their components away from public scrutiny.

Oak Ridge is a tough place to challenge the biggest employer in the area, a southern town where dissent is abnormal and prejudices of all sorts run deep in the culture and heritage.

Nine months ago, on July 28, 2012, three persons,  with the snip of four fences found themselves in the Oak Ridge nuclear weapons complex beside the most sensitive and dangerous of all buildings in the nuclear weapons program of the United States–the Highly Enriched Uranium Materials Facility (HEUMF)

Sister Megan Rice, an 83 year old nun from in Washington, D.C, Michael Walli, a 63 year old veteran with two tours in Vietnam and now a “missionary” for the Dorothy Day Catholic Worker house in Washington, D.C and Greg Boertje-Obed, 57, a Vietnam era  Army medical officer and now a Minnesota house painter  were arrested and charged with harming the national defense and causing more than $1000 damage to a government facility.

The defendants had no thoughts of asking for a venue in any other place; this company town is where exposure to different ideas about nuclear weapons should happen, they believed.

There were 70 prospective jurors called for jury duty. Most had government backgrounds, family members or friends who had worked for the government. Only 3 had ever been to any type of protest, march or demonstration on any issue.

Despite nodding affirmatively that she/he would be able to vote not-guilty if the government did not present evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the elements of the charges had been met, one would hazard an opinion that each juror knew that crosses would be burned in their yards, children would be shunned at school and they would be stigmatized for the rest of their lives for voting not to convict the defendants, those challenging the nuclear weapons of their city and our country.

So, the three defendants went on trial for harming the United States national defense and causing physical damage to a defense facility in excess of $1000.  There was no charge of trespass.

In the early morning of July 28, 2012, the three defendants prayed in a church parking lot, walked a few hundred yards to a perimeter fence of the Y12 complex, carefully snipped the boundary fence to the Y-12 National Nuclear Security Complex at Oak Ridge, Tennessee.  No alarm sounded, not patrol arrived to check on possible intruders.

Finding no security to stop them, three decided to walk ahead and slowly climbed up a hill in switchbacks as the 82 year old nun had a heart condition and could not walk for long distances. After frequent stops, the group finally emerged at the top of the hill, along the Oak Ridge line and looked down on America’s most dangerous nuclear facility.  Since no patrol had come to stop them, they kept moving down the hill toward the complex in the valley, called by the “spirit,” they later said.

Soon they encountered three more fences and with the bolt cutters they carried, they cut through the first fence-no alarms, no sensors, sounded.  No patrols arrived, so they cut through the next fence and then the final fence.  They found themselves at the base of a fortress like building. Taking from their backpacks cans of spray paint, they sprayed some of the walls with biblical sayings “the fruit of justice is peace.”  They hung a banner on the last fence that read “Transform now”. They took their hammers and knocked a small chunk of concrete out of the wall and took out baby bottles filled with the blood of a priest who, before he died asked that some of his blood be poured on a nuclear facility to symbolize the blood of those killed by U.S. nuclear weapons during World War II and the testing of nuclear weapons afterwards.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

NYPD Stops of (Mostly) People of Color Wrong 90 Percent of the Time: 'High Error Rate,' Judge Says

0

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

May 21, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

On Monday, the major class-action lawsuit Floyd v. the City of New York challenging the NYPD’s “stop-and-frisk” policy wrapped up after more than two months of testimony.  Plaintiffs allege that the NYPD has routinely and systematically violated the 4th and 14th Amendment rights of New Yorkers stopped and sometimes frisked because of their race. “They laid siege to black and Latino neighborhoods over the last eight years … making people of color afraid to leave their homes,” Gretchen Hoff Varner, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said Monday.

Reasonable suspicion that a person is about to, or has committed a crime is the legal prerequisite for a stop. But nine-tenths of stops have not resulted in any further law enforcement enforcement activity, like an arrest or a summons. “What troubles me is the fact that the suspicion seems to be wrong 90 percent of the time,” presiding judge Shira Scheindlin said during closing arguments. “That’s a high error rate.”

In addition, 85% of people stopped are black or Latino, which plaintiffs say is further evidence of racial motivation. They also allege that quotas the NYPD has described as “performance standards” for “proactive policing” encourage officers to make unconstitutional stops based on race.

Earlier in the trial, NYPD officers Pedro Serrano and Adhyl Polanco testified that they were forced to meet numerical quotas for stops or face punishment. Their secretly recorded tapes reveal supervisors commanding officers to make “20-and 1” (20 summonses and 1 arrest), as well as “five 250s,” or street stops, per month.

Serrano also recorded 40th Precinct’s commanding officer, Deputy Inspector Christopher McCormack, telling him to stop “the right people at the right time, the right location” adding that the “problem” was “male blacks 14 to 20, 21.”

The description was echoed by others throughout the trial, who testified that those deemed suspects are young men of color. The defense categorically denies racial profiling. Rather, they said, they are simply going after the people responsible for committing crimes, who tend to be young men of color.

City attorney Heidi Grossman said during closing arguments that, “The right people are the right people about whom there is information directly connected to known crime conditions.” The problem with that logic, plaintiffs said, is that a suspect description for a black youth in a “high-crime” area (which could be as large as Queens) could make any black teen in that neighborhood susceptible to a stop.

While the plaintiffs argued in summation that race has become a “proxy” for reasonable suspicion, the city claimed the race of people stopped was highly correlated with suspect descriptions.

During closing arguments, Judge Scheindlin challenged what she called the city’s “circular argument.”  

“The fact that the stops reflect a similar percentage as the crime suspect data may show that the officers are influenced by the fact that they know in a certain area most crimes are committed by blacks,” Scheindlin said. “So you may worry that they’re adding race in as a reasonable suspicion factor.”

Quotas

The plaintiffs alleged that a top-down policy that included the implementation of quotas or “performance standards” put pressure on police officers to make unconstitutional stops. The city argued that those speaking out against quotas are just lazy.

The defense claimed during summations that allegations of punishable quotas, which are forbidden under New York State Labor Law are a “sideshow.” Heidi Grossman said that the plaintiffs presented not evidence of a city-wide quota policy, but “longstanding struggles” about “getting work done.” Throughout the trial, the defense has also repeatedly invoked the language of NYPD Operations Order 52, which says that, “Department managers can and must set performance goals.”

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

Austerity Kills: Crippling Economic Policies Causing Global Health Crisis

0

The following is reprinted from the Democracy Now!  interview, “Why Austerity Kills: From Greece to U.S., Crippling Economic Policies Causing Global Health Crisis. “

In their new book, “The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills,” economist David Stuckler and physician Sanjay Basu examine the health impacts of austerity across the globe. The authors estimate there have been more than 10,000 additional suicides and up to a million extra cases of depression across Europe and the United States since governments started introducing austerity programs in the aftermath of the economic crisis. For example, in Greece, where spending on public health has been slashed by 40 percent, HIV rates have jumped 200 percent, and the country has seen its first malaria outbreak since the 1970s. An economist and public health specialist, Stuckler is a senior research leader at Oxford University. Dr. Basu is a physician and epidemiologist who teaches at Stanford University. “Had austerity been organized like a clinical trial, it would’ve been discontinued given evidence of its deadly side effects,” Stuckler says. “There is an alternative choice that we found in the historical data and through the present recessions: When we place people and their health at the center of economic recovery, it can help get our economy back on track faster and yield lasting dividends to our society.”

Amy Goodman: “Early last month, a triple suicide was reported in the seaside town of Civitanova Marche, Italy. A married couple, Anna Maria Sopranzi, who was 68, and Romeo Dionisi, [who was] 62, had been struggling to live on her monthly pension of around 500 euros [around $650 a month], and had fallen behind on rent.

“Because the Italian government’s austerity budget had raised the retirement age, Mr. Dionisi, a former construction worker, became one of Italy’s esodati (exiled ones)–older workers plunged into poverty without a safety net. On April 5, he and his wife left a note on a neighbor’s car asking for forgiveness, then hanged themselves in a storage closet at home. When Ms. Sopranzi’s brother, Giuseppe [Sopranzi, who was] 73, heard the news, he drowned himself in the Adriatic.”

Those are the opening lines to a startling recent article in The New York Times headlined “How Austerity Kills.” The authors of the piece, David Stuckler and Dr. Sanjay Basu, have just published a new book looking at the health impacts of austerity across the globe. The authors estimate there have been more than 10,000 additional suicides and up to a million extra cases of depression across Europe and the United States since governments started introducing austerity programs in the aftermath of the economic crisis. In Greece, where spending on public health has been slashed by 40 percent, HIV rates have jumped 200 percent, and Greece has seen its first outbreak in malaria since the 1970s.

David Stuckler is an economist and public health specialist. He’s a senior research leader at Oxford University. Dr. Sanjay Basu is a physician and epidemiologist. He teaches at Stanford University. Together, they’ve written this new book, out today, called The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills–Recessions, Budget Battles, and the Politics of Life and Death.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! I’m glad you could both be together in one place, being at Stanford and being at Oxford. David, let’s begin with you. Lay out the thesis of this book.

David Stuckler: We’ve been studying how recessions affect people’s health over the past decade, looking at the Great Depression through the East Asian financial crisis, right through to the present Great Recession. And what we found is that recessions hurt. Unemployment, job loss, foreclosure, unpayable debt are risks to health. But what ultimately matters is how politicians respond. And when they make large cuts to social supports, social protections, they can turn recessions into severe epidemics.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

The Internet Is Slaying the Middle Class

0

May 21, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Jaron Lanier is a computer science pioneer who has grown gradually disenchanted with the online world since his early days popularizing the idea of virtual reality. “Lanier is often described as ‘visionary,’ ” Jennifer Kahn wrote in a 2011 New Yorker profile, “a word that manages to convey both a capacity for mercurial insight and a lack of practical job skills.”

Raised mostly in Texas and New Mexico by bohemian parents who’d escaped anti-Semitic violence in Europe, he’s been a young disciple of Richard Feynman, an employee at Atari, a scholar at Columbia, a visiting artist at New York University, and a columnist for Discover magazine. He’s also a longtime composer and musician, and a collector of antique and archaic instruments, many of them Asian.

His book continues his war on digital utopianism and his assertion of humanist and individualistic values in a hive-mind world. But Lanier still sees potential in digital technology: He just wants it reoriented away from its main role so far, which involves “spying” on citizens, creating a winner-take-all society, eroding professions and, in exchange, throwing bonbons to the crowd.

This week sees the publication of “Who Owns the Future?,” which digs into technology, economics and culture in unconventional ways. (How is a pirated music file like a 21st century mortgage?) Lanier argues that there is little essential difference between Facebook and a digital trading company, or Amazon and an enormous bank. (“Stanford sometimes seems like one of the Silicon Valley companies.”)

Much of the book looks at the way Internet technology threatens to destroy the middle class by first eroding employment and job security, along with various “levees” that give the economic middle stability.

“Here’s a current example of the challenge we face,” he writes in the book’s prelude: “At the height of its power, the photography company Kodak employed more than 140,000 people and was worth $28 billion. They even invented the first digital camera. But today Kodak is bankrupt, and the new face of digital photography has become Instagram. When Instagram was sold to Facebook for a billion dollars in 2012, it employed only 13 people. Where did all those jobs disappear? And what happened to the wealth that all those middle-class jobs created?”

“Future” also looks at the way the creative class — especially musicians, journalists and photographers – has borne the brunt of disruptive technology.

The new book — which has drawn a rave in the New York Times – has already received a serious challenge from Evgeny Morozov in the Washington Post. The Internet-skeptic author of “To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism” challenges Lanier’s proposed solution that regular people be rewarded in micropayments when their data enriches a digital network.

But more important than Lanier’s hopes for a cure is his diagnosis of the digital disease. Eccentric as it is, “Future” is one of the best skeptical books about the online world, alongside Nicholas Carr’s “The Shallows,” Robert Levine’s “Free Ride” and Lanier’s own “You Are Not a Gadget.”

We spoke to the dreadlocked, Berkeley-based author from the road, where he’s on a massive book tour.

You talk early in “Who Owns the Future?” about Kodak – about thousand of jobs being destroyed, and Instagram picking up the slack – but with almost no jobs produced. So give us a sense of how that happens and what the result is. It seems like the seed of your book in a way.

Right. Well, I think what’s been happening is a shift from the formal to the informal economy for most people. So that’s to say if you use Instagram to show pictures to your friends and relatives, or whatever service it is, there are a couple of things that are still the same as they were in the times of Kodak. One is that the number of people who are contributing to the system to make it viable is probably the same. Instagram wouldn’t work if there weren’t many millions of people using it. And furthermore, many people kind of have to use social networks for them to be functional besides being valuable. People have to, there’s a constant tending that’s done on a volunteer basis so that people can find each other and whatnot.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

UK taxing performance ‘extremely poor’

0

British parliamentâ„¢s expenses watchdog has hit out at the government for its failure to tackle fraud at HM Revenue and Customs leading to an estimated £5 billion budget loss.

The Commons public accounts committee said tax revenues will be less than half the expected amount because they could not trap tax frauds.

“HMRC’s performance in cutting the level of fraud and error in the tax credits system has been hugely disappointing and extremely poor. In these strained times, the government cannot afford these failures,” committee chairman Margaret Hodge said.

Tax credits paid to some six million families cost the public £30 billion annually.

The committee added that they expect the HMRC to miss the £8 billion savings target, set in the 2010 spending review, by £5 billion by 2015.

The HMRC says it has increased checks on individuals, claiming tax credits, from 123,000 to six million a year.

However, the committee dismissed it as inadequate, seeing that the HMRC lost £2.3 billion to error and fraud only in 2010-2011 that was £850 million more than expected.

AMR/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

US senate votes to arm militants in Syria

0

Sen. Robert Menendez, democratic chairman of the Senateâ„¢s Foreign Relations Committee announces the bill

A US Senate panel has voted in favor of a bill authorizing the government to provide foreign sponsored militants in Syria with lethal weapons and military training.

On Tuesday, democratic chairman of the Senateâ„¢s Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. Robert Menendez, introduced the bill which authorizes the US government to directly back foreign sponsored militant groups with arms.

The bill, which also authorizes a 250-million dollar fund to help the transition of the Syrian government, was supported by both the Democrats and Republicans with a 15-3 vote.

This is the first time Washington directly supports the foreign sponsored militants.

“Vital national interests are at stake and we cannot watch from the sidelines,” Menendez said.

This comes while Sen. Mark Udall (D., Colo.) warned his fellow senators of the dangers of arming rebel forces whose intentions are unknown, saying “I think we have to ask the question, who are we arming?”

Å“To tell you the truth, I don’t think we know who we’re arming. The truth is it changes every day,” he added.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

On Saturday, President Bashar al-Assad said militants from 29 different countries are fighting against the government in Syria. He stated that foreign intervention is the most important factor aggravating the situation in his country.

IA/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

7 abducted Egyptian officers released

0

An Egyptian watchtower near the border with Israel. (File photo)

Seven Egyptian security officers who had been abducted by suspected militants in Sinai have been released, the countryâ„¢s army says.

The security forces who were on their way to the Egyptian capital, Cairo, were abducted on May 16, near el-Arish, the capital of the North Sinai Governorate.

Officials said that four of those kidnapped worked at the Rafah crossing.

“The seven security personnel have been released by their kidnappers in Sinai,” Egyptian military spokesman Ahmed Aly said in a statement on Wednesday.

Following the abduction, Egyptian police closed the main crossing to the besieged Gaza Strip.

According to the countryâ„¢s Interior Minister Mohamed Ibrahim, the officers were kidnapped by men armed with machineguns and anti-aircraft missiles, who were demanding the release of imprisoned militants.

Ibrahim added that no talks were held with the gunmen.

In August 2012, 15 Egyptian policemen were killed in an attack against a police station at the border between Egypt and Israel. It was the deadliest incident in Egypt’s Sinai in decades.

In response, Cairo launched an offensive against terrorists in Sinai, sending thousands of troops backed by tanks and heavy equipment into the region.

SZH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

US Senate committee votes to arm Syrian rebels

0

A US Senate committee had passed a bill that would allow, if signed for the Obama administration to supply arms to Syrian opposition – a move that could threaten the entire region if these weapons end up in terrorist cells operating on the ground.

The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 15-3 vote showed
bipartisan support among US politicians for arming the
rebels.

It remains uncertain if the full Senate will vote on the
legislation that calls to “provide defense articles, defense
services, and military training”
directly to the opposition on
the ground Syria who “have been properly and fully vetted and
share common values and interests with the United States.”

“I don’t think that this resolution, this bill will gain
traction in the House of Representatives, and if it does we will
have to wait and see if Mr. Obama signs this bill,”
historian
Gerald Horne told RT.

Horne believes that the Israeli lobby in Washington might sway
US politicians including President Obama.

“The Israeli lobby in particular has been quite energetic and
quite active in regard of lobbying for aid to the rebels, which is
quite curious since if these rebels come to power, I dare say that
Israel will have many sleepless nights,”
Horne says.

The language of the proposed legislature is vague but it
suggests the sale of small arms but specifies that “no
anti-aircraft defensive systems”
would be provided.

Despite fear that sending arms to the rebels might backfire if
al-Qaeda linked cells get a hold of them, US lawmakers are adamant
that weapons will be supplied to those groups “committed to
rejecting terrorism and extremist ideologies.”

Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky has voted against the bill,
warning “You will be funding today the allies of al Qaeda,”
Paul said adding “It is an irony you cannot overcome,”
quotes the Washington Times.

New Jersey democrat and co-author of the bill, Senator Robert
Menenedez addressed such concerns and stressed that the proposed
bill has in place a “tough vetting mechanism” to prevent
terrorist from obtaining US arms. “Vital national
interests are at stake and we cannot watch from the sidelines,”

Menenedez concluded.

In the meantime, US Secretary of State John Kerry is on a
mission to Jordan to meet with representatives from 11 nations, as
part of a US-Russian roadmap to end Syria’s violence.

If the bill is to be adopted it Russia in the past has argued
that arming the rebels would contradict international law.

Russia has repeatedly said that its stance on Syria arises from
its concern for the Syrian people rather than the fate of Assad and
that his forced departure would make the situation worse. Moscow
insists that only direct talks between parties involved in the
conflict — the government and the opposition — can help to resolve
the ongoing crisis. It also criticized some players in the
international arena for providing support and arming Syrian
rebels.

“International law does not permit the supply of arms to
non-governmental actors and our point of view is that it is a
violation of international law,”
Lavrov said in March.

The latest vote Horne argues “will hamper diplomacy efforts
but I don’t think it will gut diplomacy efforts”
because the
Obama administration would like to reset with Moscow and then
“pivot towards China.”

At the Friends of Syria meeting in Amman,
which backs the Syrian opposition, Kerry will try to build
consensus for an international peace conference next month in
Geneva. The combined US-Russian effort want to bring together the
Syrian opposition and the government for talks on a new
transitional authority. 

Reuters / Ammar Abdullah

This article originally appeared on : RT

Canada: NDP suffers debacle in British Columbia election

0

 

By
Dylan Lubao

22 May 2013

Opinion polls and media pundits notwithstanding, the trade union-backed New Democratic Party (NDP) suffered a debacle in the May 14 British Columbia election, failing to unseat an unpopular twelve year-old Liberal government.

The Liberals, who have held office in Canada’s third-most populous province since 2001, will use their fourth successive majority government to intensify big business’ assault on the working class. Already Premier Christy Clark has said that she will renew her drive to impose a concessionary ten-year contract on the province’s teachers.

For several years opinion polls had shown the NDP poised to return to power in B.C. for the first time since 2001. This trend continued right through until May 14th, although pre-election polls did indicate that the Liberals had narrowed what at the launch of the campaign had been a 20 percentage-point NDP lead.

When the votes were counted, the NDP emerged with just a 39.5 percent share of the popular vote–a 2.65 percentage point drop from the 2009 election–and with only 33 seats, three less than when the election campaign began. With 44.4 percent of the votes cast, the Liberals won 50 of the provincial legislature’s 85 seats. The Green Party entered into the provincial parliament for the first time, winning a seat in an affluent south Vancouver constituency, and one seat was taken by an independent.

The most striking feature of the election results was the low voter turnout. Only 51 percent of eligible voters participated, with the total number of votes decreasing by 10,000 from 2009, when the turnout was also close to a record low. Until recently, it was common in B.C. elections for more than 70 percent of the electorate to vote.

The mass abstention in B.C.’s May 14 vote is an expression of popular disaffection with the entire political establishment, including the social-democratic NDP and the trade unions–a disaffection born of the recognition that the establishment parties are impervious to the needs of working people and when in office pursue essentially the same big business agenda. Significantly, young people were the least likely to vote, with an estimated election participation rate of just 27 percent.

While the corporate media has trumpeted the Liberals’ victory as “sweeping,” they in fact polled the votes of just 23 percent of registered voters, or less than one in every four. The NDP’s share was 20 percent and that of the Greens 4 percent.

The B.C. election results are a major blow to the NDP, which has responded to its surprise emergence as Canada’s Official Opposition in the 2011 federal election by stepping up its efforts to convince the ruling class that it can supplant the Liberals as its “left” party of government. Toward this end, the NDP has moved still further right, championing Canada’s participation in the NATO war on Libya, opposing the Quebec student strike, and sustaining in office an Ontario Liberal government that has cut billions from social spending and used anti-worker laws to impose wage cuts and other concessions on teachers.

Thomas Mulcair, the ex-Quebec Liberal cabinet minister who now heads the federal NDP, and the NDP leadership as a whole, viewed an NDP victory in the May 14 B.C. election as a vital first step for the party’s 2015 national election campaign. The NDP wanted to use B.C. to showcase to the ruling class that it could provide “effective”, “fiscally responsible” government–i.e. enforce austerity on the working class and swell business profits–in one of the country’s major provinces.

The NDP’s B.C. campaign was organized by three former top aides of the late NDP leader Jack Layton–Anne McGrath, Brian Topp, and Brad Lavigne. All three had been front in center in Layton’s drive to reposition the NDP as a “moderate, progressive” party akin to Obama’s Democrats and the campaign mounted by B.C. NDP leader Adrian Dix followed this prescription to the letter.

Last week’s election debacle initially left the party leadership flummoxed. But as the dust settled around the wreckage of the NDP campaign, party heads were quick to declare their agreement with the corporate media’s claim that the social democrats need to be even more pliant before big business. In an interview with the Toronto Star, Mulcair, who had joined Dix’s campaign tour for several days, lamented that Dix’s deference to big-business was insufficient in the case of the Kinder Morgan oil pipeline expansion, a development proposal that Dix rejected. “There’s a difference,” said Mulcair, “between not saying yes in advance, and saying no.”

The highlight of the NDP campaign was a set of anemic “reform” proposals. These included raising the corporate tax rate by a paltry 2 percent and a meager tax increase for the highest income bracket–which in both cases would have left the tax rates far lower than they were when the NDP last held office. By vowing not to repeat his NDP predecessors’ purported mistakes of “trying to do too much”, Dix emphasized that he would make only a handful of largely cosmetic changes to the socially destructive big business policies implemented by the Liberal governments of Gordon Campbell and Christy Clark.

Although B.C. has Canada’s highest poverty rate, the NDP proposed only minimal increases in income support programs, such as the inflation-indexing of social assistance (welfare) benefits. It proposed no reduction whatsoever in university tuition fees, which have more than doubled in the past decade.

Dix promised generous subsidies to the film industry and despite phony pretenses, he made it clear that his party would support the liquefied natural gas industry’s environmental destructive “fracking” operations.

Sections of the business elite responded favourably to these overtures. The Business Council of British Columbia proclaimed a “solid” relationship with “key figures” within the NDP, while former NDP Premier Glen Clark, now president of the multi-billion dollar Jim Pattison Group, worked the corporate corridors to emphasize that the social democrats were eager to partner with big business.

During the election campaign, the Liberals resorted to the traditional rhetoric of the political right in B.C., trying to paint the NDP as “radical,” if not “socialist,” and pointing to Dix’s decision to reject the Kinder Morgan pipeline as proof that the NDP is “anti-business.” Liberal Minister of Forests Mike de Jong, referring to a 2010 NDP report that proposed to nationalize power production, compared the NDP to the regime of the late Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez. This prompted a protest from Dix, who repudiated the party’s support for the power proposal, which in any case had never figured in the party’s platform.

In the aftermath of the elections, Clark publicly mused about renaming her party so as to better accommodate its constituent elements–Harper Conservatives, federal Liberals, and one-time supporters of the right-wing populist Social Credit Party. Clark has indicated that she plans to aggressively develop the liquefied natural gas industry and the Kinder Morgan oil pipeline. She has also made clear that she will be calling on the trade unions to work more closely with her government, i.e. to assist it in slashing jobs and wages. Union leaders were quick to reciprocate. B.C. Teachers’ Federation President Susan Lambert expressed the hope that the invigorated Liberals will “allow a mature relationship to develop–one that’s mutually respectful.”

The B.C. elections were a debacle for the trade union bureaucracy, which was hoping under an NDP government to strengthen its corporatist relations with big business.

Over the past twelve years workers in B.C. have repeatedly come forward to challenge the provincial Liberal government only to have their struggles isolated and suppressed by the unions and NDP. In recent years, in the face of mounting public sector worker anger over the Liberals “zero net mandate”–under which any wage increases are paid for through speed-up and job cuts–the unions have baldly opposed any job action, claiming that things would be better when the NDP was returned to office in May 2012.

Pseudo-left organizations such as the International Socialists (IS), the Canadian organization aligned with the British SWP and the U.S. International Socialist Organization, have worked assiduously to uphold the dwindling authority of the unions and the NDP. The IS hyped the right-wing NDP campaign, publishing an editorial late last month titled “BC NDP platform: really good, but not as good as it could be.” The editorial said not a word about the NDP’s role in enforcing austerity and wage cuts and supporting imperialist war. It concluded by urging working people to support this big business party because “we can force an NDP government to do the right thing.”



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

US-led forces kill 2 Afghan students

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]US-led foreign soldiers stationed in Afghanistan have shot and killed at least two seminary students in the war-torn country, reports say.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

IMF chief set to testify at fraud probe

0

The chief of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is set to testify before court in a corruption probe into her alleged role in a 400 million-euro scam while she was Franceâ„¢s finance minister.

Christine Lagarde will appear before the Court of Justice of the Republic (CJR) on Wednesday to explain her actions that resulted in the huge payout to disgrace former Minister of City Affairs Bernard Tapie, who has served two years in prison for corruption.

Prosecutors suspect that Tapie received favorable treatment in return for giving support to Nicolas Sarkozy in the 2007 and 2012 presidential elections.

The prosecution suggests Lagarde was somewhat responsible for “numerous anomalies and irregularities,” which could lead to charges for complicity in fraud and misappropriation of public funds.

The probe focuses on her decision to overrule objections from advisers in 2007 and instead go ahead with arbitration between Tapie and the collapsed bank Credit Lyonnais, over his sale of sports group Adidas in 1993.

Tapie claimed the bank had defrauded him after it resold his stake for a much higher sum and argued that the state, who at that time owned the bank, should compensate him.

Critics said the state should not have paid the 400-million euro compensation to the convicted Tapie, who at that time was bankrupt, since he would not have been able financially to take the case through the courts.

With the payout, Tapie was able to repay his huge debts and relaunch his business career.

Throughout the investigation, Lagarde has denied the accusations and rejected that she had acted under direct orders from Sarkozy.

Largarde is the second IMF chief to appear before court as her predecessor and compatriot Dominique Strauss-Kahn resigned as head in 2011 over an alleged sexual assault.

CAH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

French man kills self inside Notre Dame

0

French police barricade the entrance to Paris Notre Dame Cathedral after the suicide on May 21, 2013.

A French man has committed suicide inside Parisâ„¢ landmark Notre Dame Cathedral in protest at what he called the decay of the Western society.

Police confirmed that Dominique Venner, an award-winning essayist, shot himself in front of the alter of the church after leaving behind a letter denouncing gay marriage and saying new spectacular actions are needed to wake up the nation.

“I believe it is necessary to sacrifice myself to break with the lethargy that is overwhelming us,” Venner wrote in his letter and continued, “I am killing myself to awaken slumbering consciences.”

At the time of the shooting, the cathedral had about 1,500 visitors who were evacuated without incident.

Franceâ„¢s far-right Front National party leader Marine Le Pen says the suicide was a political gesture.

The Tuesday shooting came only four days after another unusual suicide in central Paris, when a 50-year-old man shot himself in front of a dozen schoolchildren at a private Catholic primary school.

On May 18, French President Francois Hollande signed into law a bill legalizing gay marriages and child adoption by same-sex couples. The law was approved despite a huge number of protests against the legalization.

CAH/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

IMF urges UK to sell RBS, Lloyds stakes

0

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is urging the British government to sell taxpayer-held shares in Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds following their bail-out in the financial crisis.

In its annual report on Britainâ„¢s economy set to be published on Wednesday, the IMF will call on British Chancellor George Osborne to dump its 39 percent stakes in Lloyds and 81 percent share in RBS, even if it leads to losses to the taxpayers, the Times reported.

The suggestion is reportedly meant to trigger growth in a bid to deal with the British economic woes.

The fund is also expected to repeat its call on the British government to curb its austerity measures.

This comes as Osborne vowed last week to push ahead its austerity drive, aimed at cutting national deficit.

The British government invested £45.5 billion of taxpayer money to bail RBS out during the financial crisis in 2008, in the worldâ„¢s biggest ever banking bailout.

RBS is now saying that it has carried out fundamental reforms to its operations and is planning to return to the private sector next year.

However, the bankâ„¢s share value has plunged to only 60 percent of its value back in 2008 that means a £20 billon loss to the taxpayer in case of a sell-off.

AMR/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Six million suffer fuel poverty in UK

0

 

By
Emily Wilson

22 May 2013

As more and more people suffer the consequences of another harsh winter, the number of families suffering fuel poverty is rising. Four million households in England alone were classified as being in fuel poverty in 2009. This is three times the number in 2003. Today, over 6 million are in fuel poverty, a figure that is expected to rise to 9 million by 2016.

The human cost of fuel poverty is appalling. Previously the government had claimed that fuel poverty-related deaths stood at 2,700 a year. However, official figures released in November 2012 reveal that during the winter of 2011, 24,000 additional deaths were recorded in England and Wales. The previous winter, 25,700 excess winter deaths in England and Wales were recorded. On the basis of World Health Organisation guidance that 30 percent of winter deaths in Europe can be attributable to people living in cold homes, around 7,200 (65 a day) of those who died in the winter of 2011 likely did so as a result of not living in warm homes.

A household is said to be in fuel poverty if it needs to spend more than 10 percent of its income on fuel to maintain a satisfactory heating regime. One of the biggest challenges for poor families is their being forced to have pre-paid meters installed. Pre-paid meters are the most expensive form of fuel supply. The poorest are usually put on this form of supply because they are already in fuel debt, and there is little or no opportunity to have meters removed. Once in debt, most households cannot pass credit checks that are carried out for other forms of fuel supply.

It is almost impossible to know how many households are without heat or power because of “self-disconnection” due to high costs and the inability of many to afford to feed meters. Before pre-paid meters were installed, records of disconnections were available and families with young children could not be disconnected. With pre-paid meters there are such no such records.

The Guardian reported April 20, “Millions of mostly poor UK households are paying up to £300 a year more than customers on the cheapest fuel tariffs, with thousands barred from switching to better deals.”

It adds, “Figures from uSwitch [a price comparison web site] show that more than five million households (20 percent) are in debt to their energy supplier, 6 percent more than last year. This is not surprising when you consider the average household energy bill is £1,353 a year, almost £100 more than a year ago and £831 more than at the start of 2004.”

Since 2010, 130,000 more children have been plunged into fuel poverty; a 9 percent increase in three years. There are now 1.6 million children living in fuel poverty in the UK, with 1.2 million in England alone.

A February article by the Energy Bill Revolution group explains that in a “Families and Fuel Poverty” study they carried out, it was estimated that since the “government came to power, funding to help fuel poor families with children has been cut by 27 percent. Fuel poverty can have a disastrous impact on the health and well being of children.”

A new film by the campaign Fuel poverty: Growing up cold shows a boy, Ryan, who is an asthma sufferer. Breathing problems such as asthma can be exacerbated by living in cold and damp rooms, with research proving that children living in cold homes are twice as likely to suffer from asthma and other respiratory problems, compared to those whose families can afford to keep the house warm. The “Families and Fuel Poverty” report lists the differences between the more affluent South and London regions and the Midlands and the North. A substantially higher number of children live in fuel poverty in the North West (236,000–13.9 percent), compared, for example, to the South East (125,000–6.6 percent).

In this climate of rising fuel poverty and hardship, British energy suppliers continue to report massive annual profit margins, extracting as much money as possible out of working people. Since 2010, there have been four cases of British energy providers being investigated and heavily fined by the energy watchdog OFGEM for various counts of malpractice and mis-selling.

This year British Gas announced an 11 percent increase in profits for last year. The profits of its energy supply division rose to £606 million. Parent company Centrica said colder weather resulted in customers using more gas. But the company also raised prices for consumers. Centrica made a pre-tax profit of £2.7 billion.

In 2012, a report by Professor John Hills from the London School of Economics stated, “In February 2012, official statistics showed that carbon emissions rose for the first time in seven years, driven primarily by increased usage of gas for heating homes during especially cold winter months. It is not known how many of the people who turned up the heating did so because they could afford to or had to make sacrifices elsewhere. Nor is it known how many actually stayed cold.”

Hills stated, “Tackling fuel poverty offers multiple pay off…. Better living standards and conditions for people on low incomes, an improved and more efficient housing stock, fewer winter deaths and reduced costs for the NHS. This was no doubt the intended goal when in 2000, parliament agreed that fuel poverty should be eradicated as reasonably practical within 15 years.”

Some 13 years later, more people than ever are in fuel poverty. Millions already struggling to provide basic needs for their families are being devastated by continuous brutal austerity cuts. This state of affairs is an indictment of capitalism and all the parties of the ruling elite, including the Labour Party. The 1997-2000, Labour Party government, while pledging to end fuel poverty, fully endorsed the previous Conservative government’s privatisation of the electricity, gas and water industries, and continued to give these parasitic firms carte blanche to do as they please.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Protest opposes London-wide National Health Service cuts

0

 

By
Paul Bond

22 May 2013

Around 7,000 people marched on Saturday at the first London-wide protest against cuts to the National Health Service (NHS). This is less than a third of the number that marched in defence of Lewisham Hospital in south London in January, and around the same number as marched against the sell-off of parts of the Whittington Hospital, north London, in March.

Called by Save our Hospitals –a front for the Labour Party and trade unions–the organisers tried to talk up the demonstration as a spontaneous expression of popular anger at the assault on the NHS. It stands, rather, as an indictment of the political perspective advanced in various local protests.

The Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government has already forced through a devastating assault on NHS provisions. It has pursued aggressively the £20 billion “efficiency savings” package of cuts launched by the previous Labour government. The coalition has also pushed further the privatisation programme begun by Labour with its building of Private Finance Initiative (PFI) hospitals. The Health and Social Care Act, which took effect last month, abolished hundreds of Primary Care Trusts and Strategic Health Authorities and handed them over to Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), which will control some £60 billion of health spending. Under the government’s statutory regulation, it will be virtually compulsory for the CCGs to outsource to the private sector.

Health care in London has been particularly targeted. Eight of the capital’s 32 Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments are slated for closure and downgrading. Other services, including maternity units, have been targeted for downgrading. Hospitals are pushing to sell off land in order to make the transition to Foundation Trust status.

These moves are far advanced. The downgrading of Lewisham’s A&E and maternity unit was accompanied by the dissolution of neighbouring South London Health Trust (SLHT). The decision has been taken to close four A&Es in northwest London. The outcome will be death and suffering for thousands of people.

That the onslaught has got so far despite overwhelming popular opposition is down to the Labour Party and trade unions, and their loyal apologists in the pseudo-left parties like the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) and Socialist Party (SP).

In south London, Labour councillors and Labour MPs agreed with the government’s proposals for the SLHT. They disagreed only on dragging Lewisham Hospital into those proposals. By dividing the two attacks, their campaign enabled the government to impose all the planned cuts across both areas. In northwest London, opposition to the A&E closures was divided into separate campaigns for each hospital.

These campaigns promoted illusions in phony consultation procedures, after which they moved to appeals to the government to act against the predetermined outcome of the consultations. The latest stage is to promote alliances with local councils, of every political persuasion, to force a legal review of the decision. The outcome can be seen most clearly over plans to downgrade Charing Cross Hospital’s A&E. Tory Hammersmith Council, promoted as a potential ally by the Save Our Hospitals campaign, took the opportunity to do a secret deal with NHS northwest London to force through the changes.

Speaking on Saturday, the SWP’s Candy Udwin said the Lewisham campaign was the model for showing “us how to organise.” She did not mention that that campaign resulted in the destruction of the SLHT and the downgrading of Lewisham’s services.

A public meeting of the London Keep Our NHS Public campaign in February, chaired by Udwin, would not even demand that Labour repudiate PFI for risk of offending a bureaucrat or two. Udwin deferred a discussion of aims and moved instead to discussing printing leaflets with “broad slogans” that “everyone agreed on”–and to securing the funding for this from Labour and the unions!

The National Health Action Party has been founded by Dr. Clive Peedell, who told the rally that “Clinical excellence and democratic process mean nothing to this government.” The party, however, pledges only to “insist the most damaging parts of the Government’s NHS legislation are repealed.”

The result of all this was the small attendance at the demonstration. Udwin, who chaired, stressed the need for “united action,” insisting the rally was “a coalition of campaigns, of unions, of parties.” Shirley Franklin (Defend the Whittington Hospital Coalition) called it a “coalition of parties and all trade unions.”

In practice, this means opening the platform to parties that have shown their willingness to implement cuts as soon as they come into local power. Darren Johnson, Green Party member of the Greater London Authority, echoed Udwin’s description of the failed Lewisham campaign as “an inspiration.” In Bristol, Green councillors have entered a “rainbow cabinet” set to make £35 million in cuts for 2013-2014. In Brighton and Hove, where the Green Party heads a minority administration, the council has implemented nearly £20 million in cuts resulting in 120 job losses, services being slashed and rents for council housing raised.

Above all, Udwin’s coalition means pushing workers back behind unions that are sabotaging and betraying their struggles. It means allowing Labour MPs, councillors and members of the GLA to pose as defenders of the NHS regardless of their party’s record. Before the march began, Dr. Onkar Sahota pledged the support of the Labour group on the GLA. At the closing rally, Jeremy Corbyn MP said, “When we’ve defeated the Health and Social Care Act, let’s end PFI … they are the leeches on our service”–something Labour, which introduced PFI, has no intention of doing.

Norma Dudley, a Unite rep, called for protesters to lobby their MPs and join a union “that’s standing up” in defence of the NHS. Unite’s record proves it is in cahoots with the government. Yorkshire Ambulance Service Trust deputy chief executive Stephen Moir commented recently that Unite (which represents 10 percent of ambulance crews there and has since been derecognised) had “advised its members to accept the Trust’s proposals on changes to the A&E workforce.” This, he noted, “is inconsistent with their stated public position to reject the Trust’s plans.”

Saturday’s rally was intended by the pseudo-left groups to provide a cover for the unions’ systematic sabotaging of any real struggle against government austerity. Had Unite or any union any genuine intention of organising a fight, they could easily have brought tens of thousands of health workers onto the streets.

Those workers present expressed their anger at the cuts and a determination to defend the NHS. But this will not come from the unions or Labour. The defence of health care and every other basic social right can only be taken forward through a break from these bankrupt organisations. Action committees must be formed by patients, hospital staff and the workers and youth whose lives and health are being jeopardised. The Socialist Equality Party calls on working people to join its FightBack campaign at nhsfightback.org .



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Israel, US threatens war with Syria as sectarian fighting spreads across region

0

 

By
Alex Lantier

22 May 2013

Israeli and Syrian forces exchanged fire across the cease-fire line in the Golan Heights yesterday, amid rising US and Israeli threats of intervention in the US-led sectarian proxy war in Syria, which is rapidly spreading throughout the region.

Fighting in the Golan Heights started overnight when Syrian forces fired at an Israeli vehicle that allegedly crossed into Syrian territory. Israeli forces fired rockets into Syrian territory and claimed to have destroyed the source of Syrian fire.

The border fighting came only two days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to act “with determination” to prevent the transfer of arms from Syria to the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah. Hezbollah has now intervened in the Syrian war to support the regime of President Bashar al-Assad against the US-backed Sunni Islamist opposition.

Netanyahu’s statement was widely interpreted as an Israeli threat to mount further unprovoked air strikes on Syria.

Since Obama’s reelection last November and twice this month, Israeli forces have bombed targets in Syria. This month’s bombings, hitting Syrian army targets in the capital, Damascus, were timed to coincide with an offensive by the Sunni opposition on the city. This offensive has been thrown back and forced into retreat, however, due, in part, to the intervention of Hezbollah forces in areas of southern Syria adjacent to Lebanon.

The reversals suffered by the opposition point to the minimal support it has in the Syrian population.

There are now intensifying threats of war coming from Israel as well as calls in Washington and in European capitals for stepping up the flow of arms to opposition forces or directly intervening with air strikes or a ground invasion. Speaking yesterday at the University of Haifa, Israel Defense Forces head Lt. General Benny Gantz said: “We will not allow the Golan to become a comfortable space for Assad to operate from. If he escalates the situation on the Golan Heights, he will have to bear the consequences.”

He implied that war could break out at any time, noting that “a day doesn’t go by” without the risk of a “sudden uncontrollable deterioration.”

In Washington, senators Robert Menendez (Democrat of New Jersey) and Bob Corker (Republican of Tennessee) have submitted a bill titled “Syrian Transition Support Act.” It would authorize the Obama administration to “provide defense articles, defense services, and military training” to Syrian opposition forces.

The bill bluntly spells out broader strategic calculations underlying the proxy war in Syria. It notes, “A change of government in Syria could be a significant blow to the Government of Iran and Hizballah [Hezbollah], which would lose a strong ally.”

That is, the Syrian war is in line with US imperialism’s strategic interests: isolating Hezbollah, the main threat to Israeli military hegemony in the Near East, and Iran, the main obstacle to US hegemony in the entire Middle East and to US control of the region’s oil.

In its presentation of the war, the bill advances lies and evasions similar to those with which pseudo-left forces such as the International Socialist Organization in the US, France’s New Anti-capitalist Party and Germany’s Left Party have promoted the US-backed opposition. It proposes to support opposition forces that are “protecting human rights” and “protecting the Syrian population against sectarian violence and reprisals.”

In fact, Sunni opposition militias armed under CIA supervision with funds from Washington’s Middle East allies are waging a bloody sectarian war with terror bombings and massacres. This was even recognized partially by Washington, which declared one of the main opposition forces, the Al Nusra Front, a terrorist organization responsible for nearly 600 terror bombings in the period up to December 2012.

On Monday, a spokesman for the US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) threatened a sectarian genocide of Shia Muslims–including the Alawite minority from which Assad’s family is drawn–in territory still held by the opposition, as it retreats in southern Syria.

He threatened that Shia communities would be “wiped off the map,” adding: “It’s going to be an open, sectarian, bloody war to the end.”

This comes a week after an opposition commander of the so-called “moderate” Farouq Brigade filmed himself desecrating the corpse of a Syrian soldier, cutting out his organs and biting into one of them. He also called for the killing of Alawites.

Washington, its allies, and its Sunni Islamist proxies fear, in particular, the loss of the town of Qusayr. This would cut supply lines connecting opposition fighters around Homs from the majority-Sunni port of Tripoli, in Lebanon, from which they receive weapons supplies. It would also open direct land routes connecting the Assad regime in Damascus to the Alawite heartland on Syria’s Mediterranean coast.

According to AFP, Hezbollah sources confirmed that they had sent “new elite troops to Qusayr.” The Syrian state daily Al Watan reported yesterday that Syrian regime forces had retaken Qusayr’s official buildings and “raised the Syrian flag” over them.

Washington has denounced Hezbollah’s intervention, with US President Barack Obama calling Lebanese President Michel Sleiman to criticize Hezbollah’s “active and growing role” in Syria. The US State Department said Hezbollah’s actions “exacerbate and inflame regional sectarian tensions and perpetuate the [Syrian] regime’s campaign of terror.”

In fact, it is Washington and its allies that are backing forces advocating and carrying out sectarian massacres and terror attacks. By giving Turkey and the Persian Gulf monarchies carte blanche for an international campaign to arm rabid Sunni sectarian forces, overseen by the CIA, they are spreading sectarian bloodshed across the entire region.

Fighting continued in Iraq yesterday, with 19 people killed and one hundred wounded in bombings, as the sectarian tensions unleashed by US support for Sunni Islamist militias in Syria spilled over into Sunni fighting against the Shia-led Iraqi regime. Opposition Free Syrian Army (FSA) fighters also fired into Lebanon yesterday, targeting Hezbollah positions with Grad rockets from the Qusayr area in Syria. According to Iran’s Press TV, they targeted the villages of Hawsh al-Sayyed Ali and al-Qasr. The rockets targeting al-Qasr exploded close to the Zainul Abideen orphanage but caused no casualties, according to the orphanage’s director, Mohammad al-Saeed.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Hundreds killed in upsurge of terror bombings, sectarian killings in Iraq

0

 

By
Jean Shaoul

22 May 2013

A wave of violence is shaking the neo-colonial Iraqi regime that emerged from the US war and occupation of Iraq, as sectarian tensions between Iraq’s bourgeois factions are inflamed by the savage US-led proxy war in neighbouring Syria.

In this past week, more than 200 people have been killed in car bomb attacks in a number of Iraqi cities. The worst violence was in Baghdad, where car bombs hit markets and bus stops in Shia neighbourhoods during the Monday morning rush hour.

Attacks also hit the Shia-majority city of Basra in southern Iraq, where two car bombs killed at least 13 and wounded 40. A car bomb in Balad, 80 km north of Baghdad, exploded near a bus carrying Iranian pilgrims, killing six Iranians and one Iraqi, and wounding nine.

Numerous Shia mosques have also been targeted. While no one claimed responsibility for the attacks, they were assumed to be the work of Sunni terrorist organizations, such as Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Sunni areas were also hit, including Samarra north of Baghdad, where a car bomb went off near a gathering of Sunni armed security men working for the government, killing three and wounding 13. In the western province of Anbar, armed men killed eight police officers in Haditha. A further 13 dead bodies were found, including eight police officers kidnapped at gunpoint last Friday.

Violence has risen following the attack by Iraq’s security forces on a protest in the northern town of Hawija last month, following a raid on an army position, killing about 53 people and injuring 150 more.

According to the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq, April was the bloodiest month in Iraq since June 2008. 712 people were killed and another 1,633 wounded in “acts of terrorism and violence.”

Most of those killed were civilians and non-military personnel, including 161 police officers, making a total of 595. Similarly, most of those wounded were civilians and non-military personnel, including 290 police officers. In addition, 290 members of the Iraqi security services were killed, and another 195 were wounded.

Baghdad, the capital bore the brunt of the violence: 211 were killed and another 486 wounded. Sunni-majority provinces of Diyala, Saladin, Kirkuk, Nineveh and Anbar also saw numerous attacks.

It is prompting people to flee their homes. Jordan has closed its border with Iraq, however, as it is struggling to cope with more than 550,000 Syrian refugees, so Iraqi refugees are becoming internally displaced inside their own country.

Some violence in Sunni areas is being carried out by Sunnis against Sunnis working with the Maliki government–24 policemen have been killed in Anbar alone–but some of it has also been carried out by Shia gangs in retaliation.

The US-led war in Syria and the related preparation by Washington and its European allies for war with Iran are tearing apart the various factions underlying the regime of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Washington and its allies are arming ultra-right Islamist fighters tied to Al Qaeda in Iraq, such as the Al Nusra Front, in a war broadly aimed at isolating the Shia regime in Iran and the Shia-led Syrian regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. This policy of confrontation with Iran brings Washington into conflict, however, with the Shia-majority Maliki government that it helped to set up in Iraq.

The Maliki government has refused to back demands for Assad’s ouster and has forged close ties with Iran. Washington has accused Iraq of tolerating Iranian shipments of weapons to Syria through Iraqi airspace; some Iraqi Shia militias are reportedly fighting on the side of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

The escalating tensions reflect the reactionary character of the regime US imperialism set up in Iraq, in a war that cost over a million lives and was fought based on US plans for a sectarian-based “partition” of Iraq. This allowed Washington and its allies to pursue a strategy of divide and rule inside Iraq, and oversee the looting of its oil.

The working masses, however, face rising unemployment, the lack of electricity, water and sanitation, and the failure to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by US war and sanctions. The deep tensions and social anger created by the legacy of US occupation are now being inflamed by reactionary sectarian conflicts that imperialism is again mobilizing to pursue its interests in the region.

Anbar and other mainly Sunni provinces of Diyala, Saladin, Kirkuk and Nineveh have seen weekly rallies against Maliki. Since last December, they have been protesting official discrimination, arbitrary arrests, detention, torture, and executions of Sunni oppositionists by Maliki’s Shia-led coalition. Hundreds of thousands have been locked up for years, many without charges.

Sunni forces are also denouncing a sweeping anti-terrorism law that targets members of Al Qaeda or the Ba’ath Party of former President Saddam Hussein. They have called for Maliki’s resignation.

Anbar leader Muhammed Khamis Abu Risha, a fugitive former member of the Sunni Awakening–fighters who were paid to switch sides and fight alongside the US during the US occupation of Iraq–have pledged further attacks on security forces.

He said that the government had not responded to their demands. He said, “We will not accept the army in Anbar. This is out of the question.” He added, “The protest is not peaceful anymore, and we are ready for them. The coming days will not pass peacefully. We don’t want democracy anymore.”

According to Al-Hayat, Sunni protest leaders have called for “armed confrontation or the declaration of an [autonomous] region.”

Prime Minister Maliki has responded by saying that while he would contemplate the establishment of an autonomous region in the Sunni-dominated western provinces, this had to come about “through the correct legal procedures.” He also said he would overhaul Iraq’s security strategy, without providing further details. He added, “I assure the Iraqi people that they [attackers] will not be able to return us to sectarian conflict” that killed tens of thousands in Iraq in past years.

Iraq’s Sunni parliamentary speaker Osama al-Nujaifi called for an emergency session to discuss the worsening security situation. He provocatively called for “a clear position from the international community on what is taking place in Iraq.”

Maliki, who urged politicians to stay away from the parliamentary session, hit back at al-Nujaifi, alleging that legislators were exploiting sectarian passions for their own political gain. He said, “The politicians bear the responsibility for the sectarian escalation because of their statements, calls for violence and sectarian positions. Ignorant people pick up on that and go out bearing weapons and calling for fighting.”

He accused some Sunni leaders of stoking unrest, saying: “The sectarian speeches at the demonstration sites are giving the insurgents a reason to kill.”

Maliki is also in dispute with the oil-rich autonomous Kurdish Regional Government (KRG). It has awarded oil contracts to international corporations, sold oil on the international markets, and shipped oil to Turkey via its pipeline, bypassing Baghdad. Kurdish ministers and legislators have refused to attend the central cabinet meetings and parliament in Baghdad over the state budget allocations.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Britain’s victims during Kenya’s Mau Mau uprising expect compensation

0

 

By
Jean Shaoul

22 May 2013

Thousands of Kenyans are expecting to receive reparations for the abuses they suffered at the hands of British imperialism, during the suppression of the Mau Mau resistance movement.

Negotiations with the British Foreign Office are reported to be near completion.

Gitu wa Kahengeri, the spokesman for the Mau Mau War Veterans Association, explained, “They have offered to negotiate out of court. We have agreed. Then it all depends what offer they are going to give.”

The talks are the product of a 14-year legal battle by the Mau Mau veterans seeking justice and recompense for war crimes committed against them in the 1950s during the closing days of Britain’s rule in Kenya.

Dan Leader, a partner with Leigh Day, represents three Kenyans seeking compensation, which will set a precedent for many others.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) declared in a statement of truly breath-taking cynicism, “We believe there should be a debate about the past. It is an enduring feature of our democracy that we are willing to learn from our history.”

If the British government does settle the case, it will be the first compensation settlement resulting from officially sanctioned crimes committed under colonial rule. It would have broad implications for thousands of people who suffered under the illegal and inhumane methods used by the authorities in Britain’s former colonies. More than 10,000 Kenyans are expected to file claims, likely to cost the government tens of millions of pounds. It will pave the way for many other claims from Malaya, Palestine, Aden, Cyprus, Uganda and Zimbabwe.

The announcement follows a landmark ruling last October when a judge granted three elderly survivors of the insurgency the right to a full High Court trial over allegations of British government complicity in torture, and thus the right to seek an apology and compensation. It was the first time the court had allowed colonial victims to sue the British state, and the decision rested upon the likelihood of a fair trial given the lapse of time, as opposed to the validity of the claims. As such, it was tantamount to the first official acknowledgement by the British government that torture had taken place during one of the bloodiest chapters in Britain’s retreat from empire in Africa.

The judge overruled the FCO’s objections to such a case, saying that a fair trial was possible. Justice McCoombe pointed out that there were the more than 8,000 documents in a secret Foreign Office archive and “ample evidence even in the few papers that I have seen suggesting that there may have been systematic torture of detainees during the Emergency.”

A vast archive of files from 37 former colonies, held at Hanslope Park in Buckinghamshire, has been kept secret for years. The files seen were only discovered after historians called as expert witnesses during the preliminary hearings into the case realised that the government’s disclosure of information was incomplete.

A damning memo from Kenya’s attorney general, Eric Griffith-Jones, described the mistreatment of the detainees as “distressingly reminiscent of conditions in Nazi Germany or Communist Russia.” Despite this, he agreed to draft new legislation that sanctioned beatings, as long as the abuse was kept secret. “If we are going to sin,” he wrote, “we must sin quietly.”

Both the colonial officials in Kenya and the government in London knew that their counter-insurgency strategy based on illegal collective punishment and consisting of interrogation and detention practices was causing widespread abuses. Rather than put an end to the practices, London covered it up, both at the time and for decades afterwards.

The Royal Air Force carried out bombing raids to crush the guerrilla insurgency of 1952 to 1956, resulting in the deaths of around 11,503 Mau Mau fighters, according to official British figures. However, Harvard professor of history Caroline Elkins, Pulitzer Prize winner for Britain’s Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya, estimated that more than 150,000 Kenyans were killed. By comparison, there was a loss of less than 200 British lives.

The colonial authorities’ attempts to suppress the rebellion involved show trials resulting in the public hangings of more than 1,000 Mau Mau fighters, collective punishments such as the large-scale confiscation of livestock, fines and forced labour, the torching of entire villages and the massacre of their civilian inhabitants.

They used 25,000 troops to purge the capital Nairobi of Kikuyu people, who were placed in barbed-wire enclosures. In a two-week period, 20,000 male detainees were sent to be interrogated, while 30,000 women and children were placed in the reserves, ultimately to be moved to militarised “protected villages” with 23-hour curfews. More than a million rural Kikuyu people were forcibly resettled into what were little more than concentration camps.

They ordered the “screening” of the entire population by violent interrogation to force confessions of Mau Mau oath-taking.

Thousands of people–estimates vary between 80,000 and 300,000–were detained in a network of prisons and forced labour camps, where atrocities were committed wholesale. Suspected rebels were transported with little food and water, and no sanitation. Malnutrition and disease were rife. A brutal regime of interrogation developed, including beatings, starvation, sexual abuse and forced labour. Among those who were tortured was Barack Obama’s grandfather.

Work camps were established whose conditions were described by a colonial officer as “short rations, overwork, brutality, humiliating and disgusting treatment and flogging–all in violation of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights”.

Emergency rule, which provided legal protection for the perpetrators of repression, was not lifted until January 1960, a few years before independence in 1963.

Last October, in a last-ditch attempt to sweep Britain’s crimes under the carpet, the FCO said it would appeal the judge’s decision. A chance of a settlement came only after considerable international political pressure. The United Nations special rapporteur on torture, Juan Méndez, had called publicly for the UK government to “provide full redress to the victims, including fair and adequate compensation”, and had written to Prime Minister David Cameron to warn him that Britain’s position was undermining its moral authority across the world.

He wrote, “In our view the response of the British government to vulnerable and elderly victims of (acknowledged) British torture is shameful.”

The recent election of Kenya’s new president, Uhuru Kenyatta, caused further embarrassment. His father Jomo Kenyatta, Kenya’s first president and head of the Kenyan African Union (KAU), was imprisoned by the British. Britain banned the KAU and arrested him on charges of running the Mau Mau rebellion, even though it is now widely believed that he was opposed to the Mau Mau. After a flawed trial, he was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment with hard labour and indefinite restriction afterwards, and only released in 1961.

Finally, the FCO wrote to Leigh Day last month, saying that it would adjourn its appeal against the High Court ruling and would like to negotiate a settlement.

The vast number of colonial-era documents discovered in an FCO archive meant that the government had little chance of winning an appeal, and they and everyone else knew it. Crucially, a full hearing would reveal to the public, not just in Britain but all over the world, the brutality of British colonialism and give rise to new investigations into its criminal record and bitter legacy in Africa and Asia.

This is all the more dangerous for Britain’s rulers, as they have again turned towards neo-colonial wars, mouthing humanitarian rhetoric while committing similar brutality in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and potentially Syria and Iran.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Argentina’s General Videla and the “war on terror”

0

 

22 May 2013

Gen. Jorge Rafael Videla died May 17 at the age of 87 as the result of injuries suffered from a fall in a prison shower. He was remembered as the head of a savage military dictatorship that between 1976 and 1983 murdered and “disappeared” some 30,000 Argentine workers, socialist militants, teachers, students and others perceived as “subversives,” while torturing at least 100,000 others. In his own country, newspapers that once backed his rule condemned him as a dictator and practitioner of state terror.

Yet one cannot help but suspect that within the military and intelligence apparatus in the US and Latin America–not to mention among the ruling financial interests that he served–the aged general’s passing has been mourned.

He was, after all, a pioneer in the “war on terrorism,” writing the textbook on methods of extra-constitutional rule, repression and state violence that have been largely embraced by ruling circles in Washington and elsewhere. Undoubtedly, there are those engaged in this line of work today who see him as something of a visionary.

Three days before his death, the ex-dictator appeared as the principal defendant before an Argentine court hearing charges relating to Operation Condor, a joint endeavor by Latin America’s ruling dictatorships of the 1970s to hunt down and murder one another’s opponents, wherever they might be found.

As in previous trials, Videla claimed a loss of memory about the events of that period, while unconditionally defending the actions taken by his regime and the military as necessary in an “anti-terrorist war.”

Operation Condor involved the combined efforts of military regimes in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay, with indispensable logistical support and military aid from the Pentagon and the CIA.

It resulted in the abduction and murder of a number of individuals seen as opponents of the dictatorial regimes. This included the Washington, DC car bomb killing of Orlando Letelier, the former Chilean foreign minister in the Allende government, the assassinations of former Bolivian president Juan José Torres and former Uruguayan deputies Héctor Gutiérrez and Zelmar Michelini in Buenos Aires, and the assassinations of former Brazilian presidents Joao Goulart and Juscelino Kubitschek, whose deaths were made to appear, respectively, as a heart attack and a car accident.

In official US parlance, the methods employed under Condor are known as “rendition” and “targeted assassinations.” They would be well understood by today’s CIA and special operations personnel.

All of the Condor regimes were staffed by senior military personnel who had been trained at the Army’s School of the Americas in Panama and other US military facilities, and all of them had US military advisers, received substantial US military aid, and hosted well-staffed CIA stations.

Previously secret State Department documents make it clear that Washington understood Videla’s intentions from the beginning and fully supported them. One of these documents records an exchange between then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and his assistant secretary of state for Latin America, William Rogers, two days after Videla seized power.

Rogers told Kissinger that Washington must “expect a fair amount of repression, probably a good deal of blood, in Argentina before too long. I think they’re going to have to come down not only on the terrorists but on the dissidents of trade unions and their parties.”

While Rogers suggested delaying official recognition of the junta out of public relations concerns, Kissinger ordered full US support. “Whatever chance they have,” he stressed, “they will need a little encouragement from us.”

Among those involved in implementing this policy in 1976 were Richard Cheney, then the White House chief of staff, and Donald Rumsfeld, who was defense secretary. Twenty five years later, both would reemerge as principal architects of the US “global war on terror.”

With Washington’s blessing, Videla and his fellow officers set about what they dubbed the “process of national reorganization,” or el proceso.

Among its first steps was the suspension of basic democratic rights, including habeas corpus guarantees against imprisonment without charges or trials. The dictatorship outlawed unions and political parties and disbanded the legislature. Strikes and protests were turned into grave crimes against “national security.”

A network of clandestine prisons was set up, including the notorious dungeons of ESMA (the Navy School of Mechanics), the army’s Campo de Mayo, and scores of others scattered across the country. There, detainees were subjected to vicious forms of torture, including beatings, electric shocks, prolonged submersion in foul water, forced denial of sleep, extreme temperature and noise, attacks by trained dogs, simulated executions and sexual torture and humiliation.

Virtually all of these methods came into common usage at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and CIA “black sites” across the globe a quarter of a century later.

After being subjected to torture, the great majority of the victims were murdered, many of them drugged, loaded onto military aircraft and dropped naked to drown in the Rio de la Plata or the Atlantic Ocean.

The positive attitude of the US military toward the junta was reflected in an article appearing in the June 1978 edition of Parameters, the journal of the US Army War College, which noted approvingly that “General Jorge Rafael Videla, who heads Argentina’s military junta, has permitted the authorities to adopt more rigorous measures” against “terrorism.” It praised Videla as a “moderate committed to returning the country to democracy once the foundations have been established for stability.”

By this time, as one of the declassified State Department documents revealed, the official estimate of the number of Argentines murdered in this crusade for “stability” stood at 22,000.

Fully 40 percent of the junta’s victims were militant workers and union members. Torture centers were set up inside some of the country’s major factories, including a Ford auto plant. The Peronist union bureaucracy collaborated in this extermination campaign, helping to form death squads even before the military took power.

The repression had definite class and economic aims. The dictatorship managed to cut wages in half within its first year, reducing workers’ share of the national income from 48.5 percent to only 29 percent. Universal health care was abolished in favor of for-profit insurance companies, and other forms of social assistance were eliminated or drastically curtailed. In essence, the junta oversaw a vast transfer of social wealth from Argentine working people to the country’s ruling class, the transnational corporations and international finance capital.

This is not merely a matter of historical interest. Faced with the deepest economic crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, the ruling establishments in the US and internationally are attempting to effect a similar transfer of social wealth today. And, under the mantle of a “war on terror”–the same justification given by Videla–the US government, beginning with the Bush administration and accelerating under Obama, has already put in place the legal and institutional framework for Argentine-style repression.

The Obama administration has arrogated to itself the power to subject US citizens to indefinite military detention without charges or trials, i.e., to conduct “disappearances.” A White House that regularly draws up “kill lists” for assassinations and massacres abroad has specified that it can order such killings of American citizens residing within the US itself if it deems them “terrorist” enemies of the state.

Those who look at the horrors of Argentina under Videla’s junta and think, “It can’t happen here,” are only fooling themselves.

Bill Van Auken



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Apple CEO defends multi-billion-dollar tax dodge

0

 

By
Andre Damon

22 May 2013

Apple CEO Tim Cook used his appearance Tuesday at a hearing of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations–called to investigate Apple’s evasion of billions of dollars in taxes–to call for a sharp reduction in the corporate tax rate. The senators on the committee, Democratic and Republican alike, agreed with Cook that the appropriate response to the systematic evasion of taxes carried out by Apple and other US corporations was to enact pro-corporate tax “reform.”

Cook’s appearance followed the publication Tuesday of a report by the committee showing that Apple, one of the world’s largest companies by market capitalization, pays almost no taxes on the bulk of its income. The report found that between 2009 and 2011, Apple paid only $21 million in taxes on all of its earnings outside the United States–an effective tax rate of 0.06 percent.

Apple managed to avoid paying taxes on its worldwide profits by funneling them through global subsidiaries, the main ones being based in Ireland, where the company pays a nominal corporate tax rate of 2 percent. The report found that in 2011, Apple posted 64 percent of its global pretax income in Ireland, a country that accounts for less than one percent of its global sales.

Since the United States bases a corporation’s tax nationality on the country where it is incorporated, and Ireland bases it on where a firm is managed, Apple’s subsidiaries were able to sidestep taxation in both countries by being incorporated in Ireland and managed in the US.

According to the Senate committee’s report, Apple used this gimmick to pay little or no taxes on at least $74 billion over the past four years. One of Apple’s Irish-based units, Apple Operations International, has not filed a tax return in any country for the past five years. The report said of this subsidiary: “Despite reporting net income of $30 billion over the four-year period 2009 to 2012… [it] paid no corporate income taxes to any national government during that period.”

By Apple’s own estimate, cited in the Senate report, the company avoided paying $9 billion in taxes in 2012. It paid only $6 billion in US taxes that year after reporting a record $41.7 billion in profit–an effective tax rate of less than 15 percent.

Apple CEO Cook was completely unapologetic at the hearing, saying, “We pay all the taxes we owe… Every single dollar. We not only comply with the laws, but we comply with the spirit of the laws.”

The Senate committee concluded as well that Apple had violated no laws by evading billions of dollars in taxes. To the extent that this is technically true, it only demonstrates the corrupt character of the entire tax structure, which is designed to allow major corporations to avoid paying taxes.

Cook went on to call for “comprehensive tax reform” that would slash the corporate tax rate while supposedly eliminating tax loopholes. He concluded his prepared remarks by saying, “Apple has recommended to the Obama administration and several members of Congress… to pass legislation that dramatically simplifies the US corporate tax system.”

Cook treated the senators with well-deserved contempt, knowing he had nothing to fear from them. They, in turn, treated Cook with cringing deference.

“Apple is a great company,” said the committee chairman, Carl Levin (Democrat of Michigan), at the beginning of his remarks. Other senators followed suit, heaping praise on the company. No one suggested that any sanctions, criminal or financial, be imposed, or that any action be taken to hold Cook and the company accountable for defrauding the American people.

Kentucky Republican Rand Paul openly defended Apple, presenting the firm as the victim of a federal tax structure that penalizes US corporations. “I’m offended by a $4 trillion government bullying, berating and badgering one of America’s greatest success stories,” he declared, and demanded that the committee “tell me what Apple’s done that is illegal.” He continued: “What we need to do is apologize to Apple and compliment them for the job-creation they’re doing.”

While major US corporations routinely move profits offshore to minimize their taxes, investigators told the committee that Apple was the first company they had seen that claimed a substantial portion of its profits was not taxable by any country.

Apple’s evasion of corporate taxes is not the exception for corporate America, it is the rule. In September, the same senate panel investigated tax avoidance by Apple’s competitors, Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard, which used similar methods to avoid paying billions of dollars in taxes.

General Electric paid an 11 percent effective tax rate in 2011, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, after paying negative taxes for the previous three years as a result of vast tax breaks given to US manufacturers.

The Senate report noted the correspondence between the expansion of the US federal debt and the decline in the effective corporate tax rate, noting, “At the same time the US federal debt has continued to grow–now surpassing $16 trillion–the US corporate tax base has continued to decline, placing a greater burden on individual taxpayers and future generations.”

The report quoted an earlier document from the Congressional Research Service that noted: “At its post-WWII peak in 1952, the corporate tax generated 32.1 percent of all federal tax revenue. In that same year, the individual tax accounted for 42.2 percent of federal revenue, and the payroll tax accounted for 9.7 percent of revenue. Today, the corporate tax accounts for 8.9 percent of federal tax revenue, whereas the individual and payroll taxes generate 41.5 percent and 40.0 percent, respectively, of federal revenue.”

As a result of this drastic reduction in corporate tax rates, individuals paid $1.1 trillion in federal taxes in 2011, while corporations paid only $181 billion.

The subcommittee report hinted at the vast scale of corporate offshore tax havens, noting that the “foreign profits of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) of US multinationals significantly outpace the total GDP of some tax havens. For example, profits of CFCs in Bermuda were 645 percent and in the Cayman Islands were 546 percent as a percentage of GDP, respectively.”

According to a report released this month by Audit Analytics, US corporations’ overseas earnings hit a record $1.9 trillion in 2012. The total stockpile of these profits, which are not taxable in the US, has swelled by 70 percent over the last five years. Apple itself is sitting on a vast cash hoard of $145 billion, of which $102 billion is outside of the US and not subject to US corporate taxes.

Under pressure from shareholders demanding higher returns, Apple issued $17 billion in bonds earlier this month to pay dividends to investors rather than repatriate some of its offshore cash hoard, on which it would have had to pay taxes.

The Senate report highlights the role of corporations in driving up the deficit, which is universally presented as the burning issue facing the country. Yet there are no demands from any section of the political or media establishment that corporate profits derived from withholding taxes be seized. Instead, both parties demand the gutting of social programs upon which millions of working people depend, as well as the lowering of wages and slashing of health care and pensions.

This demonstrates the fact that the economic policies of the Obama administration and both parties are determined not by the so-called “national interest,” but by the class interests of the corporate-financial elite.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations’ report on Apple is only the latest in a series of reports by the panel documenting rampant corporate fraud and criminality, none of which have led to any serious consequences for the malefactors.

In 2011, the subcommittee issued a voluminous report on the 2008 Wall Street crash that documented fraud and violations of securities laws by Goldman Sachs and Deutsche bank, as well as collusion on the part of the credit ratings firms and government regulators. Earlier this year, the panel issued a report establishing that the top management of JPMorgan Chase, including Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon, concealed from the government and the public billions of dollars in speculative losses.

Thousands of pages of reports notwithstanding, not a single leading banker has been prosecuted for the criminal actions that led to the crash of 2008. On the contrary, this social layer has been rewarded with trillions of dollars in bank bailouts and cash infusions from the Federal Reserve.

Tuesday’s hearing makes clear that there is no way to end this vast looting operation outside of the restructuring of society and transformation of corporations into public enterprises under the democratic control of the working population.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

7 abducted Egyptian officers released

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Seven Egyptian security officers, who had been abducted by suspected militants in Sinai, have been released, the country’s army says.

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

ThyssenKrupp to slash 3,000 jobs

0

 

By
Elizabeth Zimmermann

22 May 2013

Last week, ThyssenKrupp CEO Heinrich Hiesinger announced the axing of a further 3,000 jobs worldwide. In February, Hiesinger had already declared plans to axe 2,000 jobs in ThyssenKrupp’s steel sector and sell off parts of the company’s operations, thereby threatening a further 1,800 jobs (see “ThyssenKrupp to cut 3,800 jobs in the steel sector”).

The job cuts are part of a comprehensive programme aimed at saving ThyssenKrupp a total of €2 billion (US$2.5 billion) in operating costs by 2014. Some 4,600 jobs will be lost in total. Four hundred posts from the administrative divisions of ThyssenKrupp Steel were already included in the 2,000 job losses announced in February.

The company austerity programme will affect one fifth of the 15,000 jobs in ThyssenKrupp’s administration; 1,600 will go in Germany alone. The job cuts in administration are aimed at saving €250 million, with the measures announced in February saving €500 million.

Two hundred of the 800 jobs at the company’s administrative centre will be lost in a building erected in Essen just a few years ago. An additional 470 jobs are under threat in Essen. According to the WAZ newspaper, one third of the jobs in the subsidiaries ThyssenKrupp Business Services and ThyssenKrupp IT Services are to be cut, as well as 170 jobs in Corporate Services.

The company executive has argued that the massive job losses are necessary to compensate for losses suffered by its steel plants in Brazil and the US, as well as the dramatic decline in demand for steel due to the international economic crisis. Demand for steel has slumped in southern European countries heavily affected by the austerity measures dictated by the European Union.

The steel plants in Brazil and the United States, for which a buyer is being sought, were responsible for €683 million of the company’s total losses of €822 million in the first half of fiscal year 2012/2013.

Like many other companies, ThyssenKrupp is using the economic crisis to undertake a frontal assault on jobs and working conditions. The management is supported by the IG Metall trade union and its works council. ThyssenKrupp acknowledged that the job cuts had been drawn up in close consultation with the works council.

Company works council head William Segerath described the negotiations between the works council and management on the staff reductions as “tough, but fair and constructive at all times.” Both sides stressed that the reduction of 3,000 jobs should be “socially responsible” and undertaken without “compulsory redundancies”.

In practice, this means that in individual interviews, employees are placed under pressure to sign termination agreements to sacrifice their jobs or be forced into early retirement with a correspondingly smaller pension. At the same time, the pressure on those retaining their jobs is to be increased accordingly.

According to the latest figures, ThyssenKrupp employed a total of 151,000 people in its core business areas in late March of this year, 3,300 less than last year. No end to the cuts and cost savings is in sight.

Germany’s second largest steelmaker, Salzgitter, has also announced a drastic programme of job cuts, but without so far giving any details. The steel trading company Kloeckner & Co., based in Duisburg, has already begun to cut 1,600 jobs.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Lack of shelters a factor in Oklahoma tornado death toll

0

 

By
Naomi Spencer

22 May 2013

As Moore, Oklahoma residents grapple with the devastating destruction from Monday’s tornado, information is coming out about the way in which the lack of adequate infrastructure significantly increased the death toll.

At least 24 people were killed, including nine children, when a massive twister hit the Oklahoma City suburb Monday afternoon. Seven of the children were students at an elementary school in the direct path of the storm. At least 240 others were injured; of those, 60 are children.

The Oklahoma City Medical Examiner’s Office modified their early fatality estimate of 51 early on Tuesday, saying that the lack of phone communications had resulted in double reporting of casualties. However, the death toll will likely climb as search teams carry out their work.

The National Weather Service upgraded the Moore tornado to a category EF5, the highest rating, with winds more than 200 miles per hour. The storm cut a path up to two miles wide and 20 miles long, and was reportedly on the ground for more than 40 minutes. Flyover footage and first-hand video taken by residents reveal a vast scene of shredded neighborhoods, twisted vehicles and utility poles and four-feet-deep drifts of rubble.

The Plaza Towers Elementary School was destroyed as children and teachers sheltered in the hallways and bathrooms. “All you could hear were screams,” first responder Stuart Earnest Jr. said. “The people screaming for help. And the people trying to help were also screaming.”

At least three children remain unaccounted for.

With disturbing frequency, natural disasters like tornados expose the underlying social disaster of American life.

Once again the undeveloped state of infrastructure in the US is revealed: Masses of people are exposed to the elements, with no access to underground storm shelters. Public schools are built in the heart of “Tornado Alley” with no basements or storm safe rooms. Although tornado sirens sounded 16 minutes ahead of the twister and meteorologists warned of the approaching dangers for hours, many hundreds of people simply had nowhere to go. The tornado hit during the early rush hour just before school let out. Many people were on the roads during that time and simply could not find shelter.

Five public schools in the area were hit by the storm. None of them had shelter areas, such as reinforced “safe rooms” or basements. A report on NBC News Tuesday noted that the Federal Emergency Management Agency estimates that school safe rooms would cost $1.4 million.

“We have limited numbers of funds, so you set priorities,” Oklahoma’s Emergency Management Agency Director Albert Ashwood told a press conference. “It’s not a matter of they’re being left out for any reason. They hadn’t been brought forward yet.” Only 100 schools in the state have safe rooms.

The surrounding residential area was also bereft of safety rooms because of a months’ long delay in FEMA aid disbursement. A grant for safe rooms was promised in 2011, but the $2 million in federal aid had not been allocated nearly a year and a half later. Local officials explained that the county’s emergency initiatives were funded based on previous disaster declarations. “Oklahoma has had a few of these declarations in the past couple of years, so there is not a lot of grant money available.”

Residential safe rooms can be built for $8,000 to $10,000 each. Out of 16,000 applicants for financial assistance in constructing safe rooms statewide, only 500 were chosen, based on a lottery drawing.

Moore had not built a common tornado shelter, because, according to the city, it was not likely to be hit by a tornado. The city’s web site said it faced only a “1-2 percent” chance of a tornado hitting the town on any spring day. Tornado season in the US is typically 60 to 90 days long, and tornados are a daily occurrence in the nation’s midsection.

That public shelters do not exist in a city perhaps best known for its weather tragedies is a crime for which the entire political establishment bears responsibility.

Moore has been hit by four tornados in the last decade and a half: October 4, 1998; May 3, 1999; May 8, 2003; and three years ago, on May 10, 2010. The 1999 storm carried wind speeds of 318 miles per hour–the strongest ever recorded near the earth’s surface. The tornado killed 42 people and injured 800 others. Monday’s storm followed approximately the same path as the 1999 twister.

In 2002, engineer Timothy Marshall issued a report, published in the Journal of the American Meteorological Society, on housing construction in Moore following the 1999 tornado. Marshall found that many neighborhoods were rebuilt for a higher population density than before, using the same substandard methods that had failed under the impact of the tornado.

Of the subdivisions surveyed, only a single house was found to be rebuilt better than before. Houses in the region are generally unable to withstand winds of even 90 miles per hour, let alone the more than 200 mile per hour winds that came with Monday’s twister.

“Most newly built homes were attached to their concrete [slab] foundations with tapered cut nails or shot pins as had been noted in homes destroyed by the tornado,” he wrote. “None of the houses inspected had hurricane clips or other wind-resistant connections.” Marshall lamented that far from leading to more stringent building codes and enforcement, the tornado bolstered the claim that “no building could survive a tornado” and led to even weaker standards.

The decrepit and unplanned state of physical infrastructure compounded Monday’s disaster. As the storm hit, communications systems failed, the above-ground electrical grid was instantly destroyed, and the transportation system was thrown into chaos.

Local officials responded to such situations by erecting police checkpoints. Interstate ramps in and out of the city have been closed. A live report from KOCO-TV showed long lines of traffic in neighborhoods across the city, with residents stranded trying to check on their homes.

The disaster bears long-term consequences for thousands of residents, who lack insurance. Time after time, the response of the industry is to jack up rates even further in areas hit by storms.

The political establishment has responded predictably. President Barack Obama spoke for barely five minutes at a perfunctory address att the White House Tuesday morning.

While saying that the government would provide aid, Obama emphasized repeatedly that the responsibility for rebuilding would fall on the victims themselves. “If there is hope to hold on to, not just in Oklahoma but around the country,” he declared, “it’s the knowledge that the good people there and in Oklahoma are better prepared for this type of storm than most.”

Given that schools and many houses demolished in Moore were without basements or storm shelters, this statement amounts to little more than a declaration of indifference to the loss of life there.

What residents of Moore, Obama assured, “can be certain of is that Americans from every corner of this country will be right there with them, opening our homes, our hearts to those in need… We’ve seen that spirit in Joplin, in Tuscaloosa; we saw that spirit in Boston and Breezy Point,” Obama stated.

Indeed, the outpouring of charity by ordinary Americans in the aftermath of disasters is always enormous–and always utilized by the government to substitute for meaningful federal aid. The Obama administration left the tornado-ravaged cities of Joplin, Missouri and Tuscaloosa, Alabama, along with Sandy-stricken Breezy Point in New York to languish without aid for months. Many residents of these cities were left with little beyond blue tarps and unfilled insurance claims.

This is the time-worn script of the Obama administration. The president issues a disaster declaration and pledges his prayers and the support of “the country.” The National Guard is deployed for a brief stint. Corporations and wealthy figures are applauded for tossing out tax-deductible donations to the relief efforts. Then the cameras turn away from the disaster zone.

The weight of the work is placed on a patchwork of religious organizations, charities, and volunteers. Cash-starved states and municipalities scrape together paltry sums. FEMA, itself grossly underfunded, doles out a fraction of the aid needed, most of it to contractors and major corporations.

In concluding his remarks, Obama suggested that concerned citizens should send text-message donations to the American Red Cross, the only entity that had set up emergency response efforts in Moore. In other words, the government would organize no serious relief effort.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Australian Education Union pushes sell out through delegates’ meetings

0

 

By
our reporters

22 May 2013

The Australian Education Union (AEU) in Victoria yesterday announced that delegates’ meetings had voted by a 78-percent margin to ratify its sell out industrial agreement with the state Liberal government. The substantial 22 percent “no” vote gave some indication of the growing hostility among teachers to the union’s betrayals.

AEU officials secured the majority vote, despite determined opposition among a broad layer of teachers, through its time-tested tactics of keeping teachers in the dark about the agreement’s contents, suppressing discussion, fuelling scepticism and resignation, and utilising anti-democratically convened delegates’ meetings to isolate the opposition. The experience underscores the warning raised from the outset by the Socialist Equality Party–that within the political straitjacket of the AEU, teachers cannot defend their independent interests and fight the offensive against public education.

Teachers had waged a year-long industrial campaign that included three one-day strikes and mass meetings, as well as rolling stoppages and work bans. The AEU initially called for a 30 percent wage rise over three years, reduced class sizes, the reduced employment of teachers on insecure contracts, and improvements in conditions.

The final agreement with the government involved annual wage rises of just 2.75 to 3 percent, no improvements on class sizes or contract teaching, and regressive new measures. These included the elimination of employment protections for teachers deemed “excess” to schools’ requirements and a fast track mechanism for sacking “poor performers”.

Premier Denis Napthine’s state government made clear that the deal paves the way for enforcing a performance pay mechanism agreed to by the AEU in a previous industrial agreement, with near-automatic incremental salary rises now tied to certain classroom benchmarks.

The union bureaucracy hailed the agreement as a “historic achievement” and lied about various aspects of the deal. By incorporating incremental wage gains that most teachers would receive anyway, the AEU claimed to have won a 16-20 percent wage rise.

After this bogus figure was trumpeted in the media, the union withheld the text of the agreement from teachers for more than a week. Schools were encouraged to nominate delegates to approve the deal without teachers having an opportunity to examine the agreement. The delegates’ meetings were convened in an arbitrary manner. In many instances, branch meetings of union members were not held to discuss the agreement and vote for delegates, with incumbent branch leaders nominating themselves to vote in favour. In other cases, branches with a slight majority in favour of the deal bound the votes of all their delegates, disenfranchising the substantial minorities who wanted a “no” vote.

Wherever there was a wide discussion among teachers, substantial majorities voted against the agreement. This was most evident in the schools and AEU branches where members and supporters of the Socialist Equality Party (SEP) were able to expose the bureaucracy and its regressive agreement.

In two delegates’ meetings, a procedural motion by SEP supporters to limit the union secretary’s opening report to 15 minutes and allow adequate time for opponents of the deal to speak received a majority vote, despite the bureaucracy’s opposition. In other meetings, where this motion was narrowly defeated, AEU secretary Meredith Peace took up about 45 minutes of the meeting, repeating the union’s falsifications.

At all the meetings, many union leadership supporters dropped their ballots in the “yes” box and then left without bothering to participate in the discussion. The union reported majority “yes” votes at every meeting. Such was the nervousness of the bureaucracy, however, that it attempted to suppress an indicative vote by show of hands at the end of at least two meetings, where a majority opposed the agreement.

At the May 6 meeting in the inner Melbourne suburb of Abbotsford, union representatives began to count the vote, only to abruptly shut down the meeting when they realised they had lost the count. At a May 13 meeting in Eltham, Peace claimed the right to cast a delegates’ vote in favour of the agreement, in order to produce a deadlocked vote. The meeting chairperson, Marino D’Ortenzio, another senior union functionary, then declared that he would cast a deciding “yes” vote. The meeting was shut down amid uproar.

“The union’s objective is to get the deal through no matter what,” a primary school teacher with 12 years’ experience told the World Socialist Web Site during the delegates’ meeting. “They are strategising that the best way for them is through delegates’ meetings–it seems to me they are trying to manage a wildfire, keep people divided so they can conquer. This is how they run the meetings anyway, stifle discussion and stop people from speaking… The anger and opposition of teachers to the deal is different this time compared to [the last agreement in] 2008. It is like being hustled by the same person twice. The first time it happens you think– ‘wow’ what happened then? Like going to a restaurant and getting ripped off, you pay the bill and you are out on the street before you realise what happened. The second time around, you are far more careful, you watch out.”

A teacher from Middle Kinglake Primary School said: “I see the union less and less as representing us… The union leaders’ pay is at principal levels–$130,000 a year, plus a phone and car. They get an extraordinary amount of money and it’s our money. I find it offensive. It should be publicised what they get paid. If you wanted to get teachers angry with the union, just put out their pay scale. They are very good at looking after themselves but they are not as good at looking after the membership.”

The AEU bureaucrats, like their counterparts in other trade unions, comprise a privileged upper middle class stratum. Its material interests depend on implementing the bipartisan assault on public education, spearheaded by Julia Gillard’s Labor government, against public school teachers.

Teachers in Australia and around the world, especially in the US and Europe, are under attack as the ruling elite attempts to eliminate the right to public education. Resources are funnelled into private schools, while every aspect of education is subordinated to the demands of business for more productive workforces. Standardised testing regimes, such as Labor’s NAPLAN scheme, are designed to narrow the curriculum and discipline teachers while also providing the key mechanism for shutting down so-called underperforming schools and imposing mass layoffs of teachers.

This offensive is part of a broader social counter-revolution, in which the financial aristocracy is seeking a way out of the global economic crisis by eliminating spending on welfare, public health and education, social infrastructure and other basic services. The aim is to slash working class living standards to boost corporate profits and economic “competitiveness.”

The AEU sell out still has to be ratified in a general ballot of all teachers, under the government’s Fair Work Act, before it takes effect. Teachers must vote “no,” as the first step in a counter-offensive in defence of their interests and public education.

A successful struggle is only possible by developing new forms of organisation–rank and file committees in every school that unite teachers, students and local communities–independently of, and in opposition to, the AEU. These committees should turn out to other layers of the working class confronting similar attacks, including teachers throughout Australia, university and TAFE staff, and other public sector workers.

Above all, what is required is a socialist and internationalist perspective. Education is a fundamental social right. Every young person ought to have access to a properly-resourced, freely available, and high quality public school system that allows them to fully develop their talents, intellects and capacities. This, however, is not realisable within the framework of the crisis-stricken capitalist system. It requires the development of a revolutionary movement of the working class. This is the SEP’s perspective and we urge teachers and education workers to contact us to develop a discussion on these crucial issues.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

This article originally appeared on : World Socialist Web Site

Chileans hurl firebombs outside Cong.

0

Demonstrators clash with riot police in the surroundings of the Congress, while Chilean President Sebastian Pinera delivers his annual message to the nation on May 21, 2013.

Chilean students have hurled homemade firebombs during demonstrations as President Sebastian Pinera makes his final state of the nation speech to Congress.

Several thousands of people took part in protests outside the Congress in the port city of Valparaiso on Tuesday, demanding wide-range expansion of free education.

Police said more than 130 people were arrested and two police motorcycles were burned.

Protesters say the education system is deeply unfair, as middle-class students have access to the best schooling in the Latin American country, while the less privileged people have to be content with under-funded state schools.

During his speech to the Congress, Pinera called on the countryâ„¢s legislators not to give into the studentsâ„¢ demands. He said the state should not pay for those who can afford to pay for school.

Chilean families pay up to 900 dollars per month in tuition fees for their children to study at public universities where the average per capita GDP stands at around 20,000 dollars per year.

On May 8, tens of thousands of students staged nationwide demonstrations in Chileâ„¢s major cities, including Santiago, Valparaiso and Concepcion, in order to call for an end to for-profit education in the country.

Similar protests were also held on April 11, with authorities estimating the Chileans protesting across the country to demand improvements to the education system at 150,000.

The wave of student demonstrations started in 2011 and carried on throughout 2012.

EKA/SAB/PR

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Court rules 'gruesome' pictures of dead bin Laden to remain classified

0

A federal appeals court unanimously agreed that the US government was right to classify top secret more than 50 images of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden taken after he was killed, ruling against a watchdog group hoping to make the pictures public.

Judicial Watch, a conservative-leaning organization dedicated to
uncovering abuse and corruption in the legal system, petitioned
Defense Department and Central Intelligence Agency to publish 59
images of bin Laden’s corpse after the terrorist leader was killed
during a May 2011 raid in Pakistan. 

The US Court of Appeals in Washington DC found that releasing
the pictures could cause “exceptionally grave harm” to
American citizens. The three judges wrote, in a 14-page opinion,
that the portrayal of the bullet that killed bin Laden were
“quite graphic” and “gruesome,” but the real
motivation could have been to quell the possibility of
terrorism.

People react to the death of Osama bin Laden in Times Square in New York early May 2, 2011 (Reuters / Eric Thayer)

“It is undisputed that the government is withholding the
images not to shield wrongdoing or avoid embarrassment, but rather
to prevent the killing of Americans
,” read the opinion from
Judges Merrick Garland, Judith Rogers and Harry Edwards. 

The decision made references to violent outbursts from radical
Islamists after US media wrongfully reported that troops stationed
in the Middle East desecrated the Koran. Cartoon depictions of the
Muslim prophet Muhammad have prompted similar outrage. 

Lawyers from Judicial Watch, promising to file an appeal, told
the Washington Post that the judicial system “needs to stop
rubber-stamping this administration’s secrecy
.”

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘Don’t interact, don’t talk, they are not humans’ – Gitmo guard's basic orders

0



Published time: May 22, 2013 03:21

Reuters / Bob Strong

Embed

Code

One of the methods used to extract information from Muslim inmates in Guantanamo was to apply sexual interrogation techniques, Terry Holdbrooks, former guard at the camp has told RT.

Such a degradation methods, the former US soldier said, were
used on innocent men. Holdbrooks claims that it is the inmates’
religious perseverance in the face of pain and humiliation made him
convinced that US was not fighting for the right cause.

RT: What did you experience at the detention camp that
changed you?

Terry Holdbrooks: To be honest with you I would not even
know where to begin with that. Initially seeing religion practiced
the way that the detainees practice Islam is a really life changing
experience in itself. I have not really seen any kind of any
serious devotion, the faith like that growing up in the US.

The torture and information extraction methods that we used
certainly created a great deal of doubt and questions in my mind to
whether or not this was my America. But when I thought about what
we were doing there and how we go about doing it, it did not seem
like the America I signed up to defend. It did not seem like the
America I grew up in, I grew to believe in. And that in itself was
a very disillusioning experience. There was a great deal of
personal growth that took there as well.

RT: Could you describe the relationship between the
guards and detainees at Guantanamo back when you were serving (and
how has it changed since then)?

TH: I suppose that if we’re going to take a stroll down
the memory lane, Brandon Neely was there first. He was there when
it was camp x-ray. It was essentially dog cages, nothing more. It
was dog kennels, I suppose you can say. When I was there camp Delta
was in full swing. Delta housed about 612 men that would be the
general population of the camps.

RT: Were you given any orders as how to treat the
inmates?

TH: Our interaction with the detainees was such that we
were told not to talk to them, not to treat them as humans, to not
engage in conversation with them whatsoever. And the army sort of
made a mistake by allowing somebody who is inclined to sociology
and to studying people by leaving me with individuals from all over
the world unsupervised for eight hours. I was very low in rank so I
was delegated all the work, while those who were higher in rank
were sitting in the air-conditioned shacks, nurturing their
hangovers. So the instructions I was given were simple — don’t
interact, don’t talk, they are not humans.

RT: There have been reports of torture and other human
rights violations happening at the prison camp. Could you tell us
what you saw?

TH: We can begin with experiences I had the pleasure of
having. Myself, Eric Sarr and another Guantanamo guard were
involved in this. Eric was a linguist and he was working with an
interrogator.

We took the detainee into interrogation and throughout the
interrogation the interrogator took off her clothing. She
essentially gave the detainee a lap dance, tried to arouse him and
then let him believe that he had menstrual blood on him. We then
took the detainee back to his cell and were told that he was not
allowed to have shower privileges nor fresh water for days. The
idea behind this being that if he could not clean himself he would
not be able to pray, if he could not pray, he could not practice
Islam. Essentially it was an idea to break him down
spiritually.

Detainees participate in an early morning prayer session at Camp IV at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base (Reuters / Deborah Gembara)

Omar Khadr and a number of other detainees, I remember hearing
just few moments ago Shaker Aamer, they were privileged to
something we called the frequent flyer program, where we would
essentially move them every two hours. Whether we were moving them
from camp Delta to camp Echo or moving them from Bravo block to
Charlie block, be it a little move or a big move, the idea is that
every two hours they would be moved and they would not be able to
sleep. This was essentially to wear down their psyche and make them
more probable to give out their information during
interrogation. 

But what has questioned me ever since I first saw it, it seemed
that most of these men were innocent and as numbers are starting to
show, we’ve sent over 600 of them home, so they must have been
innocent; if we knew that we were purchasing men that were
innocent, why were we trying to interrogate innocent men? What were
we hoping to get from them?

Some of the tactics I saw practiced in Guantanamo, I just want
to never want to relive again and then a great deal of regret takes
place and then I did not take the most productive use of some years
after Guantanamo. I tried to drown away some of those memories and
that is something you cannot do. You have to confront it.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Maliki orders Iraqi security shakeup

0

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has ordered a shakeup in the security structure of the country following terrorist attacks that have killed hundreds of people across the Arab state since May 14.

Å“After consultation with security officials, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, today (Tuesday) issued orders… for changes in the operations commands and the leadership of the divisions,” a statement on the Iraqi prime ministerâ„¢s website said on Tuesday.

Å“We are about to make changes in the high and middle positions of those responsible for security, and the security strategy,” Maliki told journalists in Baghdad late on Monday.

Å“I assure the Iraqi people that they (terrorists) will not be able to return us to the sectarian conflict,” which killed tens of thousands of people in Iraq during the past years, the Iraqi prime minister stated.

On Tuesday, a total of 42 people were killed and dozens of others injured in several attacks across Iraq, according to Iraqi security and hospital sources.

A car bomb targeted a mosque in the west of Baghdad, killing 11 people and injuring 21 others.

Six more people were killed and 18 others were injured by a bomb that detonated outside a cafe in the Doura district of southern Baghdad.

Eight people, including two policemen, were killed in bombings and shootings in Diyala Province.

In the town of Kanaan, about 75 kilometers northeast of the capital, two roadside bombs went off in quick succession, claiming three lives.

In the city of Kirkuk, three roadside bombs killed six people, shredding their bodies.

Two car bombs killed three people in the town of Tuz Khurmato, which is located in Kirkuk Province.

A bomber killed three soldiers at a checkpoint in the town of Tarmiya, north of Baghdad.

And in the eastern town of Khalis, gunmen broke into a house and killed a couple.

The incidents are the latest in a string of attacks that have left more than 300 people dead this month.

GJH/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Israelis shoot Palestinian boy in chest

0

Israeli troops have shot and critically injured a Palestinian boy in the chest in the occupied West Bank, according to Palestinian security and hospital sources.

The troopers of the Israeli regime shot 12-year-old Atta Mohammed Sharadeh on Tuesday outside the Jelazoun refugee camp, near Ramallah, AFP reported.

Palestinian paramedics said Sharadeh was hit in the chest and the bullet exited through his back. The boy was transported to a Ramallah hospital, where he is in critical condition.

The Jelazoun refugee camp is close to the so-called Beit El Israeli settlement.

Earlier in the day, clashes had broken out between Palestinians and Israeli troops, The clashes erupted shortly after the occupying Israeli forces stormed the refugee camp.

Palestinian youths – angry over the presence of Israeli soldiers at the camp site – hurled stones and bottles at the Israeli troops, who fired live bullets in return.

Palestinian youth and children have been among the most vulnerable victims of the Israeli soldiers’ brutality in the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since Israelâ„¢s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

The UN and most countries regard the Israeli settlements as illegal because the territories were occupied by Israel in a war in 1967 and are hence subject to the Geneva Conventions, which forbids construction on occupied lands.

GJH/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Syrian premier says victory is nearing

0

Syrian Prime Minister Wael al-Halqi has lauded the army’s achievements in its fight against the militants operating in the country, saying that Å“victory is nearing.”

Halqi made the remarks on Tuesday in the capital, Damascus, during a regular cabinet meeting, the official Syrian news agency, SANA, reported.

The Syrian prime minister stated that the Å“army’s victories” against the militants can help the government further facilitate the welfare of Syrian citizens.

Halqi’s remarks come at a time when Syrian forces have been making progress in their battle to drive the militants out of the strategic town of Qusayr, located near the Lebanese border.

The army killed scores of militants, and destroyed their weaponry and equipment. Among those killed was the senior commander of the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front in Qusayr, identified as Abu Omar.

Meanwhile, the Syrian army killed a number of foreign-backed militants in clashes on the Wa’er farms of Homs on Tuesday.

On Saturday, President Bashar al-Assad said militants from 29 different countries are fighting against the government in Syria.

He stated that foreign intervention is the most important factor aggravating the situation in Syria.

The crisis in Syria began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

GJH/HJL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Zakani to tap enormous Iran capacities

0

Principlist presidential hopeful Ali-Reza Zakani says his priority will be exploring Iranâ„¢s enormous capacities and inviting intellectuals and thinkers to develop society if he wins the the June 14 election.

Å“We believe that we must use the societyâ„¢s remarkable capacities. We must [use] the countryâ„¢s elite and experts, [we must use] the seminary and university and intellectuals and thinkers to help society evolve,” he said.

He made the remarks at the the Faculty of Civil Engineering of Khajeh Nasir Tousi University of Technology in Tehran on Monday.

Å“We must purse a path that benefits from the presence of intellectuals …and can rectify the executive policies of the country.

Å“Correct models must be employed, and potential and their expert capacities can be tapped in the best possible way. And this system must be able to work as the driving force to bring the core of society to the scene in order for [us to see] developments in the near future,” he stated.

A total of 686 hopefuls registered from May 7 to 11 for the Islamic Republicâ„¢s 11th presidential election. The Guardian Council, which is tasked with vetting hopefuls for candidacy and confirming the election results, is expected to submit the list of the candidates to the Interior Ministry on Tuesday.

The president of Iran is elected for a four-year term in a national election.

MP/HGH/NN

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Hope for saving US tornado survivors dim

0

Moore police dig through the rubble of the Plaza Towers Elementary School following a tornado in Moore, Okla., on May 20, 2013

Nearly 24 hours after a monster tornado tore through a suburb of Oklahoma City, hopes for a rescue of trapped survivors are beginning to wane as more threatening weather moves into the region.

“As long as we are here… we are going to hold out hope that we will find survivors,” Trooper Betsy Randolph, a spokeswoman for the Oklahoma Highway Patrol said on Tuesday.

But officials believe more bodies are underneath the rubble.

“I truly expect that they’ll find more today,” Oklahoma City Medical Examiner Office Spokeswoman Amy Elliott said.

Elliott cautioned Tuesday that officials could see as many as 40 additional fatalities, and that bodies may have been taken to funeral homes instead of authorities.

Rescue crews are sifting through rubble in the search for survivors, painting X’s on buildings to make sure nothing is being overlooked.

“We will rebuild and we will regain our strength,” said Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin, who went on a flyover of the area and described it as a Å“heartbreaking experience” that is “hard to look at.”

The Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Oklahoma, forecast more stormy weather Tuesday in parts of Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, including the Moore, Oklahoma, area where the tornado hit.

The tornado, estimated to be up to two-mile wide, tore through Moore on Monday afternoon, a community of 41,000 people about ten miles south of Oklahoma City. The twister left at least 24 dead — including nine children.

Fallin said during a news conference on Tuesday that many houses and buildings have been reduced to “sticks and bricks.” Homes were seen crushed into piles of broken wood. Cars and trucks were left crumpled on the roadside. At least 38,000 in the area remain without power.

Many land lines to stricken areas were down after the tornado hit, and cellphone networks were congested. The storm was so massive that it will take time to establish communications between rescuers and state officials, Fallin said.

Monday’s powerful tornado loosely followed the path of a killer twister that slammed the region in May 1999; the storm then had winds clocked at 480 kilometers per hour.

EKA/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

FBI zeroes in on Benghazi attack suspects, lacks evidence for civilian prosecution

0

Five men have been identified by the US as linked to the September 2012 attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, though they remain at large as the FBI seeks to gather sufficient evidence for a civilian trial.

According to the Associated Press, the five individuals thought
to be responsible for the attack, in which four were killed
including US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, could be taken into
custody by the US military, though sufficient proof seems lacking
to try them in court.

The suspects are thought to be members of Ansar al-Shariah, a
Libyan militia group whose fighters were seen near the US
diplomatic facility in Benghazi just prior to the assault.

At least some of the suspects have been in contact with previously
identified regional Jihadists, including Al-Qaeda in the Islamic
Maghreb.

A senior Obama administration official has told the AP that the FBI
identified several individuals that may either have information, or
may have been directly involved in the attack. However, per that
official, a unilateral military mission to extract the suspects
without Libya’s cooperation is thought to be potentially damaging
to relations.

Photos for three of the five suspects have been released by the FBI
in the hopes that the public may provide information, images
evidently obtained by security cameras at the US diplomatic post at
the time of the attack. Delays due to the security situation meant
that the agency took three weeks to obtain the camera and their
data, and relay them to American officials in Tripoli.

These images released by the FBI on May 1, 2013, show three unknown suspects sought in the Benghazi, Libya, attack on the US Consulate on September 1, 2012. (AFP PHOTO / FBI)

Mounting criticism of the administration and the State
Department under former Secretary Hillary Clinton have added a deep
layer of scrutiny, both in the evident lack of security at Benghazi
prior to the attack, as well as accusations of a cover-up following
the killing of US staff.

Last week, the White House released 99 pages of emails pertaining
to talking points used by Susan Rice to describe the attack, which
initially pointed to a protest regarding an anti-Islamic film that
had spiraled out of control.

According to those emails, subsequent drafts made in conjunction
with the US intelligence community omitted any mention of
terrorism, including groups such as Ansar al-Shariah or Al-Qaeda,
purportedly because their involvement was still unclear.

Several GOP legislators have taken issue with delays in the
investigation, evidently caused by infighting between the FBI, and
the Departments of Justice and State.

In October Senator John McCain went so far as to allege that
President Obama had been dishonest in initial media appearances
referring to the attack in Benghazi as a spontaneous demonstration
that spun out of control, owing to the existence of recordings at
the consulate of the attack. A delay in the investigation would, as
CBS News previously reported, explain why the administration would
not have been aware of terrorist involvement at that point.

According to information provided by the AP, FBI investigators hope
to locate additional evidence, such as a smoking gun video
depicting the suspects in the act of setting the fires which killed
the ambassador, or firing at a CIA base where surviving US staff
took shelter.

But Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon, the Republican chairman of
the House Armed Services Committee, said he is concerned the Obama
administration is treating terrorism as criminal actions instead of
acts of war that would elicit a much harsher response from the
United States.

“Regardless of what happened previously, we have made very,
very, very substantial progress in that investigation,”
said
Attorney General Eric Holder to lawmakers last week.

That assertion seemed to coordinate with statements made by
Secretary of State John Kerry to congress last month. “They do
have people ID’d,”
Kerry said of the investigation. “They
have made some progress. They have a number of suspects who are
persons of interest that they are pursuing in this and building
cases on,”
he added.

This article originally appeared on : RT

'Close Gitmo' Twitter campaign launched

0

The front gate of the Camp Six detention facility of the Joint Detention Group at the US Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

A detainee in the Guantanamo prison has launched a twitter campaign through his lawyer with the goal of pressuring US President Barack Obama to close the infamous detention facility.

On Tuesday, the lawyer for Saudi citizen Shaker Aamer posted his demand on Twitter. His message calls on everyone to ask the US Embassy in London to demand action on the Guantanamo Bay prison. The message has gotten hundreds of retweets so far.

Aamer is one of the 130 detainees who have been on hunger strike for a hundred and seven days now. The inmates began their strike action in early February to protest the prison guards’ searching of their cells and personal belongings — as well as their indefinite detention.

EKA/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

2nd day of riots shakes Sweden

0

Police officers extinguish burning cars after youths rioted in the immigrant-heavy Stockholm suburb of Husby on May 20, 2013.

Some 200 youths have hurled rocks at police and set cars ablaze in the Swedish capital in the second day of rioting triggered by the fatal police shooting of a man wielding a knife.

Dozens of windows were smashed on in a largely immigrant suburb of Stockholm on Tuesday, ten cars and several containers were set on fire, and seven police officers were injured.

Cars and containers were also set ablaze in Fittja, another of suburb of the capital.

The unrest began Sunday night in response to the May 13 shooting, in which police killed a 69-year-old man who had locked himself in an apartment in Husby, west of Stockholm. Police refused to give the nationality of the victim.

Six youths were arrested early Tuesday, but two were released after questioning, said police spokesman Jorgen Karlsson.

The atmosphere was tense on Tuesday, with residents expressing both anger at police and sadness about the destruction. City workers were seen clearing the debris of a burnt-out container and documenting fire damage.

Many local residents see the shooting as an example of police brutality, and the violence has stirred debate in Sweden.

Prosecutors have launched an internal probe into the shooting. Police say they shot the man in self-defense because he attacked them with a knife when they broke down the door to an apartment where he had locked himself up with a woman.

EKA/MHB

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

G4S chief executive to step down

0

G4S chief executive is to resign over 2012 Olympics shambles.

Chief executive of private security group G4S is to step down over the companyâ„¢s failure to meet its commitment in terms of security guards for the 2012 London Olympic Games.

The company said Nick Buckles will be replaced by Ashley Almanza, a senior executive from the oil and gas company BG Group, at the end of May.

Buchkleâ„¢s resignation was welcomed by G4Sâ„¢s biggest shareholders after a series of embarrassments centered around the company.

“I think we feel that the time is right for Nick (Buckles) to move on,” a leading shareholder said.

Buckles, who has led the company for eight years, has been under fire recently after the group announced they cannot fulfill their promise to provide 10,400 security guards for the Olympics just two weeks before the Games.

The fiasco forced Olympic organizers to request the British army and the police to fill in the security gap.

G4S, however, has been hired to help secure the Group of Eight industrialized nations (G8) summit in Northern Ireland next month.

The company also faces criticism for its cooperation with the Israeli regime, including providing equipment and services to Israeli checkpoints, illegal settlements, the apartheid wall and jails where Palestinian political prisoners are subjected to mistreatment and torture.

SSM/MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Terror drones mostly kill civilians’

0

A new report shows that US assassination drones in Pakistan have killed Å“scores of innocent civilians” instead of targeting terrorists.

On Tuesday, the Brussels-based International Crisis Group (ICG) published a report entitled Å“Drones: Myths and Reality in Pakistan” that says the United Statesâ„¢ refuses to acknowledge that the CIA-led drone campaign Å“undermines efforts to assess the programâ„¢s legality.”

The ICG called on Washington to Å“demonstrate respect for the international humanitarian law principles of humanity, distinction, proportionality and military necessity.”

The report said the US must Å“establish clearer lines of authority and accountability, including greater congressional and judicial oversight.”

Å“The Obama administration should terminate any practice, such as the reported signature strikes, that does not comply with principles of international humanitarian and human rights law. It must also introduce transparency to the drone program, including its governing rules, how targets are selected and how civilian damage is weighed.”

Signature strikes target groups of men by using behavior patterns associated with terrorist activity rather than targeting terrorists with known identities.

Pakistanâ„¢s tribal regions are often attacked by US assassination drones.

According to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the United Statesâ„¢ drone strikes in Pakistan have killed up to 3,587 people since 2004.

Washington claims that its airstrikes target militants who cross the border into and out of Afghanistan.

Pakistanis have held many demonstrations to condemn the United Statesâ„¢ violations of their national sovereignty.

In September 2012, a report by the Stanford Law School and the New York University School of Law gave an alarming account of the effect that assassination drone strikes have on ordinary people in Pakistanâ„¢s tribal areas. The report noted, Å“The number of Ëœhigh-levelâ„¢ targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low — estimated at just 2%.”

The killing of Pakistani civilians, including women and children, has strained relations between Islamabad and Washington.

NT/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Mashaei to pursue presidential bid’

0

Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei (R), accompanied by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, attends a press conference after registering for the presidential election in Tehran on May 11, 2013.

The election campaign office of Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei, who was not approved by Iranâ„¢s Guardian Council to run in the upcoming presidential election, says it will pursue the matter through legal channels.

In a statement issued late on Tuesday, the campaign office said that it will use Å“the full legal capacity of the country to appeal to the Guardian Council to revise and eliminate possible ambiguities in its decision,” IRNA reported.

The statement also asked that Å“President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as the executor of the Constitution, take action to remove probable restrictions in this regard.”

In addition, it called on the supporters of Rahim-Mashaei, who is a top aide of President Ahmadinejad, to organize their activities based on legal methods in order to dishearten the enemies of the Islamic Revolution and the Iranian nation.

Earlier on Tuesday night, the Interior Ministry issued a statement saying that the Guardian Council had approved eight presidential candidates.

The council approved MP Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili, Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei, Hassan Rohani, the director of the Strategic Research Center of the Expediency Council, former First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref, Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, and former Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Velayati.

A total of 686 individuals registered from May 7 to 11 for the Islamic Republicâ„¢s 11th presidential election, which will be held on June 14.

The president of Iran is elected for a four-year term in a national election, and the Guardian Council vets the candidates.

MHB/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘US opened Pandora’s box in Iraq, regional sectarian violence almost impossible to stop now’

0

Sectarian violence unleashed after the US disintegration of Iraq is linked to the Syrian conflict and the death toll will only climb since extremist elements hijacked the sectarian instability in the region, political analyst Chris Bambery told RT.

“Everyone in Iraq must be terrified that the situation in
Syria is spilling over into Iraq”
Bambery said as Tuesday’s
attacks in the country kill over 40, a day after over 70 people
were murdered, escalating fears of all-out sectarian war between
minority Sunnis and majority Shiites.

In the biggest incident on Tuesday, a car bomb exploded near a
Sunni mosque in Baghdad killing 11 people and injuring 21.

In a separate incident, a bomb outside a cafe in southern Baghdad
killed six more and wounded 18.

A decade after the hanging of Saddam Hussein, Iraq is bitterly
divided between the Sunnis, Kurds and Shiites and with no
power-sharing deal insight, violence is again on the rise.

“It is based on the decision by the Americans when they occupied
Iraq to separate Iraq off into these three areas,”
Bambery told
the viewers.

It is also being fueled by the Syrian conflict where predominantly
Sunni insurgents are fighting President Assad. Another Syrian
neighbor, Lebanon is seeing Shiite Hezbollah forces fighting
alongside Assad’s troops, a minority Shiite-linked Alawite
sect.

Overall it is estimated by the UN that over 700 people died in Iraq
in April, a number Bambery warns will only rise as “we have now
seen an alliance of al-Qaeda elements in Syria and al-Qaeda
elements in Iraq, who are involved in sectarian violence in both
countries.”

RT: The Sunni demand for more independence, is it a
realistic goal?

Chris Bambery: I think it is realistic given the Kurds in
the North have effectively separated from the rest of Iraq. But I
think this is unfortunate decision. It is based on the decision by
the Americans when they occupied Iraq to separate Iraq off into
these three areas. Iraq has been a unified country for a long time.
And yet doing so based on the sectarian headcount by dividing the
country up, particularly be excluding the Sunni from having any
control of the oil fields was a recipe of the sectarian conflict.
And that’s what we’ve seen. But what is adding spice to that is the
question of what is happening across the border in Syria, because
we are seeing an alliance between al-Qaeda elements in Syria and
Sunni Salafists in Iraq — they’ve united — and have been involved
in these attacks. And I think everyone in Iraq must be terrified
that the situation in Syria is spilling over into Iraq. Indeed
across the region we are seeing a possibility of further tension, a
possibility of it spilling over in Lebanon. This sectarian violence
which is terrible in Iraq is becoming very intertwined with what is
going on in Syria with almost an open border between the two
countries there.

RT:  Would handing more self-rule do anything to
stop the violence?

CB: I don’t think it would stop the violence. I don’t think
the people carrying sectarian attacks particularly the targeting of
Shia are motivated by the issue of creating an autonomous region
for the essentially majority of Sunni population. They are
motivated by sectarianism, let’s be honest about this. Even if they
were granted the autonomy inside Iraq, they are going to use that
as continuation for that kind of sectarian killings. As I said they
are spurred on by what is happening in Syria, which is increasingly
a sectarian conflict, my answer is no- that would not stop
sectarian killings. I think, unfortunately they are only likely to
get worse.

RT:  Where would the line be in allowing more
freedom to self-govern and the country’s disintegration?

CB: Yes, the country is disintegrating. As I say, Americans
have to take the blame for that because of the system they imposed
in Iraq, giving independence to Kurds in the North, who of course
were allies with them against Saddam Hussein, and then they are
suggesting they would split the Shia alliance in the rest of Iraq
and that opened up a Pandora’s box, which really is almost
impossible to stop now. But this is not going to stop sectarian
violence. I think people across the world should be absolutely
clear the responsibility for that does lie on Americans and what
they did in 2003 and the subsequent occupation of that county.

Iraqi armed tribesmen pose for a picture on the back of a truck in a road north of Ramadi, on May 18, 2013 (AFP PHOTO/AZHAR SHALLAL)

RT: What about Syria – is it heading in the same
direction? 

CB: That must be the fear. Because I say there is almost
an open border between Syria and Iraq. There are many refugees from
Syria inside Iraq and we have now seen an alliance of al-Qaeda
elements in Syria and al-Qaeda elements in Iraq, who are involved
in sectarian violence in both countries. We have Iraqis fighting
along with Free Syrian Army and Islamists inside Syria. So the
possibly because of this, in fact I would say it is spreading –
and increasing the sectarian campaign in Iraq is becoming
deeply connected to that inside Syria. Geography of
instability is spreading and that threatens to destabilize
elsewhere in the Middle East, particularly Lebanon.

RT: With Lebanon’s Hezbollah now involved in Syria –
how much will this influx of military manpower going to shift
momentum in the fighting?

CB: I think the fighting has been in impasse for some
time. Neither side is capable of producing decisive victory.
Whether Hezbollah is battle-training fighters, battle training
against Israelis can shift the balance, let’s see. But let’s be
clear as well there is intervention from the other side. It is
clear, everyone and their dogs knows, the Saudis, the Qataris
pouring arms, the Americans are providing training and if Hezbollah
increases its intervention on the side of the Assad regime, I
think that it is likely that they are pushing for Western
intervention. Some of the governments in America and Britain seem
quite keen on increasing, arming the rebels inside Syria and
proving other means. So, I think we are seeing very dangerous time
and I think when the moment comes to the question about Syria, one
is very important, I think, the decision to exclude Iran from next
week’s conference in Geneva on the possibility of political
solution is profoundly mistaken, because there can be no agreement
between the various powers in the world over the question of Syria
with no Iran at the table.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Nigeria to free terror suspects, women

0

Nigeria to free Ëœterrorismâ„¢ suspects, all women in peace gesture to Boko Haram

The Nigerian government says it will release a number of suspects held for “terrorist activities” and all the women in its custody in a peace gesture to Boko Haram militants fighting in the north of the country.

The Nigerian Defense Headquarters issued a statement on Tuesday, saying Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan had instructed them to release a number of detainees and “all women under custody.”

“Consequent upon the directives of the president… the Defense Headquarters will be releasing from detention a number of persons being held in connection with terrorist activities,” the statement read.

“The measure, which is in line with presidential magnanimity to enhance peace efforts in the country, will result in freedom for suspects including all women under custody,” it added.

Meanwhile, late on Monday, Nigeria asked its northern neighbor Niger for help in the campaign against the militants.

“As you know, there are operations in progress in Nigeria in three states very affected by the problem of terrorism, and we are hoping to have support from the Republic of Niger in the battle to defeat these terrorists,” Nigerian Foreign Minister Nurudeen Muhammed said in Niger after talks with Nigerien President Mahamadou Issoufou on Tuesday.

Muhammed did not elaborate on what sort of help Nigeria is seeking.

Also on Tuesday, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross’ regional delegation for Niger and Mali said at least 2,400 people had fled violence in northern Nigeria and were being provided with emergency supplies in Diffa in the southeast of Niger.

“These people, most of whom are originally from Niger but settled in Nigeria some time back, in some cases decades ago, are completely destitute,” Jean-Nicolas Marti stated.

On May 16, the Nigerian army launched a large-scale military campaign against militants in border areas.

On May 14, Jonathan declared a state of emergency in the three northeastern states of Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa.

Boko Haram has claimed responsibility for a number of deadly gun and bomb attacks in various parts of Nigeria since 2009.

Over the past four years, violence in the north of Africaâ„¢s most populous country has claimed the lives of 3,600 people, including killings by the security forces.

NT/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

TUC: British workers suffer wage drop

0

British workers suffer real-term wage drop, TUC says.

British workers have seen the value of their real wages drop by 8.5 percent over the last three years, the UK’s largest unions body the Trades Unions Congress (TUC) warns.

According to the TUC, average salaries in March 2013 were £2,234 down compared to 2010 level, putting more pressure on family budgets in the country.

Å“Average pay packets have fallen by nearly 10 per cent over the last three years, eroding the spending power of households and eating away at the value of savings for those families still fortunate enough to have them,” said TUC general secretary Frances Oâ„¢Grady.

The TUC also warned that the prices are rising three times faster than real term wages, adding that the governmentâ„¢s austerity measures have squeezed the public purse.

An earlier study by the union showed that real wages dropped by 4.5 percent between 2007 and 2011, leaving workers with smaller incomes at a time of rising costs for basic necessities such as food, fuel, gas and electricity -not to mention housing costs.

MOS/SSM/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

US aims to boost combat manhunt precision

0

The US military is planning to launch a new, efficient method of sending small satellites into space which will dramatically boost soldiers’ ability to locate, track and eventually annihilate potential enemies.

The military has spent years quietly developing and implementing
radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags to track Taliban
leaders, suspected terrorists, and other perceived enemies.
Tribesmen in the Middle East are paid to “plant the electronic
devices
” on the intended targets or the targets’ home,
according to a 2009 report in The Guardian. 

The device can be tracked to within three feet of its location,
providing targeting co-ordinates that have become integral in
launching drone strikes. 

“Transmitters make a lot of sense to me,” former CIA case
officer Robert Baer told Wired in 2009. “It is simply not
possible to train a Pashtun from Waziristan to go to a targeted
site, case it, and come back to Peshawar or Islamabad with anything
like an accurate report. The best you can hope for it they’re
putting the transmitter right on the house
.” 

The United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM) will
advance that strategy with the September rocket launch from
Wallops, Virginia. Attached to the sides of the rocket will be
eight devices that will be dispersed 300 miles above Earth then act
as beacons for US intelligence. 

Wired noted that each of the eight satellites is roughly the
size of a “water jug.” 

This is not America’s first foray into using outer space for
gaining intelligence. A 2009 test program launched similar location
devices to great success, with special operations officials later
reporting that the technology was used to help locate Al Qaeda
leader Osama bin Laden. 

But the military’s reliance on less-than-trustworthy operatives
to carry out the most important part of such an expensive mission,
locating the original target, has some people very concerned.
Recruiting and paying poor people in hostile countries to carry out
dangerous tasks could have intended, but serious,
consequences. 

In a video released in April 2009, 19-year-old Habibur Rehman,
reading a script written by the Taliban, who then executed him on
film, claimed he was so desperate for money that he took advantage
of his US handlers. 

“I was given $122 to drop chips wrapped in cigarette paper at
Al Qaeda and Taliban houses
,” Rehman said, before being shot
for spying for the US. “If I was successful, I was told, I would
be given thousands of dollars
.” 

A US official told NBC News that the video was nothing more than
“extremist propaganda,” but it does raise moral questions
surrounding drone warfare and targeted killings in the modern
era. 

“I thought this was a very easy job,” Rehman went on.
“The money was good so I started throwing chips all over. I knew
people were dying because of what I was doing, but I needed the
money
.”

This article originally appeared on : RT

US aims to boost combat manhunt precision

0

The US military is planning to launch a new, efficient method of sending small satellites into space which will dramatically boost soldiers’ ability to locate, track and eventually annihilate potential enemies.

The military has spent years quietly developing and implementing
radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags to track Taliban
leaders, suspected terrorists, and other perceived enemies.
Tribesmen in the Middle East are paid to “plant the electronic
devices
” on the intended targets or the targets’ home,
according to a 2009 report in The Guardian. 

The device can be tracked to within three feet of its location,
providing targeting co-ordinates that have become integral in
launching drone strikes. 

“Transmitters make a lot of sense to me,” former CIA case
officer Robert Baer told Wired in 2009. “It is simply not
possible to train a Pashtun from Waziristan to go to a targeted
site, case it, and come back to Peshawar or Islamabad with anything
like an accurate report. The best you can hope for it they’re
putting the transmitter right on the house
.” 

The United States Special Operations Command (SOCOM) will
advance that strategy with the September rocket launch from
Wallops, Virginia. Attached to the sides of the rocket will be
eight devices that will be dispersed 300 miles above Earth then act
as beacons for US intelligence. 

Wired noted that each of the eight satellites is roughly the
size of a “water jug.” 

This is not America’s first foray into using outer space for
gaining intelligence. A 2009 test program launched similar location
devices to great success, with special operations officials later
reporting that the technology was used to help locate Al Qaeda
leader Osama bin Laden. 

But the military’s reliance on less-than-trustworthy operatives
to carry out the most important part of such an expensive mission,
locating the original target, has some people very concerned.
Recruiting and paying poor people in hostile countries to carry out
dangerous tasks could have intended, but serious,
consequences. 

In a video released in April 2009, 19-year-old Habibur Rehman,
reading a script written by the Taliban, who then executed him on
film, claimed he was so desperate for money that he took advantage
of his US handlers. 

“I was given $122 to drop chips wrapped in cigarette paper at
Al Qaeda and Taliban houses
,” Rehman said, before being shot
for spying for the US. “If I was successful, I was told, I would
be given thousands of dollars
.” 

A US official told NBC News that the video was nothing more than
“extremist propaganda,” but it does raise moral questions
surrounding drone warfare and targeted killings in the modern
era. 

“I thought this was a very easy job,” Rehman went on.
“The money was good so I started throwing chips all over. I knew
people were dying because of what I was doing, but I needed the
money
.”

This article originally appeared on : RT

‘UK must end recruiting minors to army’

0

Britainâ„¢s practice of recruiting minors to the army has to stop, a Labour MP warns.

Britainâ„¢s practice of recruiting 16 and 17-year-olds to its armed forces has to stop, a Labour MP has warned.

Stockton North MP Alex Cunningham said he wants the age of recruitment in the British army to rise to 18, arguing that minors are not mature enough to decide serving in the force.

“It strikes me as amazing that in the 21st century we have 16 year olds making a decision to sign up for the armed forces and in time, combat roles, on behalf of the UK when the vast majority of nations across the globe have ended recruiting children,” Cunningham wrote in an article for the Central Lobby.

Earlier in April, campaign groups Child Soldiers International and ForcesWatch revealed that Britainâ„¢s Ministry of Defence (MoD) wasted up to £94 million a year by recruiting minors, saying that it takes longer for them to develop their skills and have a higher drop-out rate.

The campaign groups also disclosed that young troops are more likely to suffer post-traumatic stress disorder, sexual harassment and bullying.

MOS/SSM/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Lock Up Washington

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/lock_up_washington_20130521/

Posted on May 21, 2013

This article originally appeared on : TruthDig

'Congo clashes kill 19, injure 27'

0

M23 rebels celebrate in the streets of Goma in the east of the Democratic Republic of the Congo on November 20, 2012.

Clashes between the March 23 movement (M23) rebel forces and the Congolese army have killed 19 people and injured 27 in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, the government says.

At a press conference on Tuesday, Congolese government spokesman Lambert Mende said 15 rebels were killed and 21 injured, while four soldiers died and six others were injured in Mondayâ„¢s clashes in North Kivu province, 12 kilometers (about seven miles) north of Goma.

“Heavy weaponry and several cases of ammunition from the exterior have been recovered in two enemy positions, which have fallen under the control of the Congolese army,” Mende added.

However, M23 military spokesman Vianney Kazarama rejected the figures, saying only two rebels and two soldiers were injured.

A new round of clashes between government forces and the rebels began on Monday and continued on Tuesday in North Kivu province.

Meanwhile, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said during a visit to Mozambique that the United Nations would speed up the deployment of a new intervention force in the country.

“Considering what has happened, I think we must expedite the deployment so they will be fully responsible as soon as possible,” Ban stated.

The mandate of the UN peacekeeping mission in Congo, known as MONUSCO, was recently renewed by the UN Security Council. The new mandate allows the creation of a special unit, called the Force Intervention Brigade, to carry out targeted offensive operations against armed groups rather than merely protecting civilians. The forces of the special unit are expected to arrive in the country before July 1.

The M23 rebels seized Goma on November 20, 2012 after UN peacekeepers gave up the battle for the frontier city of one million people. M23 fighters withdrew from the city on December 1 under a ceasefire accord.

The M23 rebels defected from the Congolese Army in April 2012 in protest over alleged mistreatment in the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC). They had previously been integrated into the Congolese army under a peace deal signed in 2009.

Since early May 2012, nearly 3 million people have fled their homes in the eastern Congo. About 2.5 million have resettled in Congo, but more than 460,000 have crossed into neighboring Rwanda and Uganda.

Congo has faced numerous problems over the past few decades, such as grinding poverty, crumbling infrastructure, and a war in the east of the country that has dragged on since 1998 and left over 5.5 million people dead.

NT/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

UK grants £4bn arms exports to Riyadh

0

The British government has approved arms export licenses to Saudi Arabia worth nearly £4 billion over the past four years despite concerns over the Arab countryâ„¢s poor human rights record.

According to an analysis by the watchdog Campaign Against the Arms Trade (CAAT), Britain approved licenses worth £112 million for 209 items to Saudi Arabia over the last year.

The items included components for military aircraft and combat vehicles, crowd control ammunition grenades and components for electronic warfare, The Guardian reported.

Saudi Arabia, which is accused of brutal crackdown on peaceful anti-regime protests, is considered as Britain’s largest trading partner in the Middle East, with bilateral trade worth more than £15 billion every year.

Since February 2011, protesters have held demonstrations on an almost regular basis in Saudi Arabia, calling for the release of all political prisoners, freedom of expression and assembly, and an end to widespread discrimination.

The demonstrations, however, have turned into protests against the repressive Al Saud regime.

According to Human Rights Watch, the Saudi regime Å“routinely represses expression critical of the government.”

SSM/MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Federal court strikes down Arizona abortion ban

0

A federal court has struck down an Arizona state ban on abortions beyond 20 weeks, signed into law last year. As is often the case with the contentious issue of abortion rights, at question was the legal definition of life.

In a major rebuff to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer and the
Republican-led legislature of Arizona the 9th US Circuit Court of
Appeals found that the ban — named the Mother’s Health and Safety
Act (HB 2036) — violated the constitutionally protected right to
terminate a pregnancy under Roe V. Wade.

Supporters of the Arizona statute had based their arguments both on
an interpretation of life as beginning earlier than the generally
accepted legal standard of 24 weeks, while the bill also included
the possibility of an abortion past 20 weeks in case of medical
emergency.

The decision of the 9th Circuit Court three-judge panel was
unanimous against Arizona’s abortion ban. Judge Marsha Berzon,
writing on behalf of the San Francisco-based court, said the
state’s ban violated US Supreme Court rulings since the Roe v. Wade
decision of 1973.

“A woman has a constitutional
right to choose to terminate her pregnancy before the fetus is
viable,”
said Berzon.

Cathi Herrod, the head of Christian social conservative group
Center for Arizona Policy which championed the 2012 ban, said the
ruling was not surprising and believed its ruling would be
overturned.

“This ruling is not surprising
nor am I discouraged at the prospects of this important law
ultimately being upheld,”
said Herrod via a statement on
Tuesday.

“The Ninth Circuit Court is
historically one of the most overturned appellate courts in the
nation. Based on the facts of this case, I am confident that this
Court will be overturned once again,”
she added.

According to the Associated Press, the 9th Circuit’s ruling is
binding only within the nine Western US states under its
jurisdiction, Idaho is the only additional state with a similar
abortion ban.

Janet Creppe, the lawyer who argued against the ban on behalf of
the Center for Reproductive Rights, said Tuesday’s decision
affirmed abortion law based on viability.

“These laws are all
unconstitutional,”
she said. “This is not a close legal question at all.
These laws are unconstitutional.”

Supporters of Arizona’s ban asserted that the law was meant to
protect a mother’s health, and prevent fetuses from feeling pain,
though that concept seemed to be in legal conflict with viability
of a fetus as defined by Roe v. Wade and subsequent rulings.

Supporters of abortion bans have been vocal regarding the
disputed claim that fetuses can feel pain at a gestational age of
20 weeks and older. The more conservative view held by other
pro-life groups supports the belief that life begins at
conception.

“We look forward to an appeal to
the United States Supreme Court,”
said Herrod.

Nine other US states have enacted similar bans starting at 20 weeks
or even earlier. Though several of those state bans had previously
been placed on hold, or struck down by other courts.

Historically, US public opinion has varied on the issue of
abortion. According to opinion data provided by Gallup, as of May
2013 just over 50 per cent of Americans believe abortion should be
provided “only under certain circumstances,” 26 per cent believe it
should be available without restriction, and 20 per cent believe it
should be illegal altogether.

This article originally appeared on : RT

UK warned on A&E overcrowding

0

UK MPS have been warned over emergency departments overcrowding.

A British medical expert has expressed concerns over overcrowding in accident and emergency (A&E) departments at hospitals in England, saying it could lead to more deaths.

Speaking at the Parliamentâ„¢s Health Select Committee on Tuesday, President of the College of Emergency Medicine Mike Clancy said the number of patients attending major A&E units had been increased by 17 percent in the last decade.

He warned that the overcrowding was Å“dangerous” and associated Å“mortality and morbidity”.

Clancy also said that many hospital emergency departments have dropped the British government’s four-hour waiting target.

It was revealed that in the last year the number of A&E patients who waited between four and 12 hours soared by 34,000.

“What is happening in emergency departments reflects the performance and difficulties of the whole National Health System [NHS] as well as within the emergency department,” Clancy said.

Meanwhile, in a leaked letter seen by the Independent, some 20 Accident and Emergency doctors warned that a combination of “toxic overcrowding” and Å“institutional exhaustion” is threatening patientsâ„¢ lives.

Earlier in February, the think tank The Kingâ„¢s Fund found that emergency queues at hospitals in England is at its highest in a decade.

According to the organizationâ„¢s report, from October to December 2012, over 232,000 patients waited more than four hours in A&E wards, showing a rise of 21 percent when compared with the same period in 2011 and the highest figure for those months since 2003.

SSM/MOS/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

42 die in another day of carnage in Iraq

0

An Iraqi woman passes by the scene of a car bomb attack in the Kamaliyah neighborhood, a predominantly Shia area of eastern Baghdad, on May 20, 2013.

Forty-two people have been killed and dozens others injured in several attacks across Iraq, according to Iraqi security and hospital sources.

All the 42 deaths occurred in attacks on Tuesday.

A car bomb targeted a Sunni mosque in the west of Baghdad, killing 11 people and injuring 21 others.

“I heard a powerful bang and a fireball near the main gate of the mosque,” said Uday Raheem, a policeman who was deployed near the mosque in the Abu Ghraib area.

“We held back a while fearing a second explosion and then rushed to the blast location. The bodies of worshippers were scattered and some were shouting for help, bleeding to death.”

Six more people were killed and 18 were injured by a bomb that detonated outside a cafe in the Doura district of southern Baghdad.

Eight people, including two policemen, were killed in bombings and shootings in Diyala province.

In the town of Kanaan, about 75 kilometers northeast of the capital, two roadside bombs went off in quick succession, claiming three lives.

In the city of Kirkuk, three roadside bombs killed six people, shredding their bodies and the bodies of several nearby animals.

“I heard the explosions, but never thought this place would be targeted since these animals have nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with sect, nothing to do with ethnicity or religion,” said Mahmoud Jumaa, whose cousin was killed in the bomb attack.

Two car bombs killed three people in the town of Tuz Khurmato, which is located in Kirkuk province.

A bomber killed three soldiers at a checkpoint in the town of Tarmiya, north of Baghdad.

And in the eastern town of Khalis, gunmen broke into a house and killed a couple.

The incidents are the latest in a string of attacks that have left more than 300 people dead this month.

On May 20, attacks across Iraq left 113 people dead in both Shia and Sunni areas.

On May 18, shootings and bombings killed 16 people, including an anti-terrorism police captain and his entire family.

On May 17, bombers targeted Sunni neighborhoods in Baghdad and surrounding areas, killing at least 76 people.

On May 16, car bombs hit Shia neighborhoods in Baghdad and attacks elsewhere in Iraq killed 21 people.

On May 15, a car bomb in the capital’s main Shia district and attacks in other areas of the country killed 33 people.

And on May 14, unidentified gunmen killed 11 people in eastern Baghdad.

Violence has increased in Iraq since December 2011, when an arrest warrant was issued for fugitive Vice President Tariq al-Hashemi, who has been charged with running a death squad targeting Iraqi officials and Shia Muslims.

GJH/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

UK gay marriage bill passes Commons

0

A bill to legalize gay marriage in Britain passes its final Commons hurdle despite fierce opposition from Tory MPs.

A bill to legalize gay marriage in Britain has passed its final Commons hurdle despite fierce opposition from majority of Conservative MPs.

The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill was given its third reading by 366 votes to 161 and will now go to the House of Lords for consideration.

Initial analysis of the vote suggested that 136 Tory MPs, including a number of senior ministers, were among the 161 MPs who voted for blocking the reform.

The chairman of the Conservative Christian Fellowship David Burrowes, who is also one of the leading opponents of the Bill said, Å“the state has become involved in refining aspects of marriage, but the essential definition of marriage, and therefore its meaning and purpose, its very foundation, have remained unchanged until now.”

British Prime Minister and Conservative leader David Cameron suffered a further blow after majority of his own party members refused to support the bill. Fierce opposition from Tory MPs forced Cameron to rely on the Labour Party to get the bill through the Commons.

Earlier this week, right-wing Tories proposed an amendment to allow heterosexual couples to form civil partnerships.

Downing Street, however, called the proposal a “wrecking amendment”, saying that it could cost 4 billion pounds in pension changes and delay the passing of the same-sex marriage bill by up to two years.

MOS/SSM/HE

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Hopefuls vetted based on Constitution’

0

Iranâ„¢s Guardian Council says the Constitution and the election law were the criteria for vetting presidential hopefuls.

Guardian Council Spokesman Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei made the remarks in a televised interview with IRIB late on Tuesday, shortly after the Interior Ministry issued a statement saying that the Guardian Council had approved eight candidates.

He added that the top electoral supervisory body held several sessions to discuss the capabilities, resumes, and even the past actions and remarks of the presidential hopefuls.

He went on to say that Å“being Iranian, management capabilities, and faithfulness to the principles of the Islamic Republic” are some of the criteria used for vetting hopefuls who want to run in the presidential election.

The Guardian Council approved MP Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili, Expediency Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei, Hassan Rohani, the director of the Strategic Research Center of the Expediency Council, former First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref, Tehran Mayor Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf, former Telecommunications Minister Mohammad Gharazi, and former Foreign Minister Ali-Akbar Velayati.

Former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Esfandiyar Rahim-Mashaei, a top aide to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and former Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki were not approved by the council.

A total of 686 individuals registered from May 7 to 11 for the presidential election, which will be held on June 14.

The president of Iran is elected for a four-year term in a national election, and the Guardian Council vets the candidates.

MHB/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

‘Multiculturalism failing’: Stockholm suburbs enflamed with riots for days, Swedish PM calls to get neighborhoods ‘back’

0

Hundreds youths hurling rocks, burning cars and smashing windows for the second day in a row in Stockholm say they are protesting against police brutality and inequality. In Sweden, critics of the multiculturalism policies lash out at immigration laws.

Seven policemen were injured, at least ten cars and countless
containers set on fire, and dozens of windows smashed in several
heavily immigrant-populated neighborhoods of the Swedish capital on
Tuesday.

The police said some 300 people are now taking part in riots,
which started in protest against the shooting of a man allegedly
armed with a knife in the Stockholm district of Husby. The
protesters also cited beatings and ‘discriminative’ derogatory
remarks of the officers.

The protester are mainly young, the police said. Of the seven
rioters arrested on Tuesday only four were detained, two of them
later released, and one turned out to be underage.

All of the men arrested on suspicion of violent rioting and
assaulting a public official were aged between 15 and 19, the
police said.

 A burned-out van is prepared for removal after youths rioted in Husby, northern Stockholm on May 21, 2013 (AFP Photo / Jonathan Nackstrand)

Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt on Tuesday commented on
the matter, urging a halt to the violence, but acknowledged in the
short term that may be unlikely.

“We have groups of young men who think that that they can and
should change society with violence. Let’s be clear: This is not
okay. We cannot be ruled by violence,”
Reinfeldt said as cited
by the Local.

He also urged “everyone, including parents and adults” to
help restore calm.

“Husby residents must get their neighborhood back,”
Reinfeldt stressed, speaking of the district, where around 80
percent of about 11,000 residents are first- or second-generation
immigrants. This particular district has seen employment increasing
and crime falling in the last seven years, Reinfeldt added,
speaking of the “right direction” it has been going.

Policemen extinguish burning cars after youths rioted in Husby, northern Stockholm on May 20, 2013 (AFP Photo / Fredrik Sandberg / Scanpix Sweden/ Sweden out)

But not everyone agreed with Reinfeldt’s assessment of
immigrant-populated Swedish districts development, with critics
saying the integration policies of the country — and that of the
whole of Western Europe — are “not working.”

“This is a clear consequence of this multiculturalism
politics that Sweden adopted around ‘80s and increased in the
‘90s… And this is not a unique one single occasion… we have had
these ethnic-based riots against Swedish authorities. We have seen
this in Western Europe, that is very sad, and I think we will see
more of this, if we don’t change the politics,”
the chairman of
the Sweden’s National Democrats Party Marc Abramsson told RT.

While not elaborating on the incident that caused the current
riots, Abramsson said all such incidents have a common “problem
beneath”
— that is, the immigrants not identifying themselves
with the country’s society, nor accepting the country’s
authorities, sticking only to their own ethnic group.

“Sweden has been trying harder than any of the countries in
Europe to try to push for integration. We have invested virtually
billions from taxpayers’ money into it, we have tried everything
that the scientists have presented — and still it’s not
working,”
the politician argued.

“They live in their area, and they feel the area is their
own. And when the police arrive, they feel they are you intruding
into their, sort of, ‘country.’ The police… who work in these
areas, there have to be in two cars, one protecting the other.
People are trying to maintain buildings, to have security guards,
the fire department can’t work, they get attacked by angry
immigrant youth that feel like they’re intruding into their own
area, even though they’re trying to help,”
Abramsson went on to
say.

Policemen extinguish burning cars after youths rioted in Husby, northern Stockholm on May 20, 2013 (AFP Photo / Fredrik Sandberg / Scanpix Sweden/ Sweden out)

This article originally appeared on : RT

Anarchy in the USA– Live at Zuccotti Park

0

In my last posting, I deplored the state of the US left, citing the rise of utopian and reformist alternatives to socialism. Deeply ingrained anti-Communism explains the ready acceptance of the shallow and muddy alternatives to capitalism served up by academic oracles like Professor Gar Alperovitz. These wishful options come at a time when more and more US citizens, especially young people, are showing a hunger to learn more about socialism. But the thin gruel of cooperatives and other small-scale and locally owned enterprises will not satisfy that hunger. Nor does monopoly capital seem too alarmed by the prescriptions of the good Professor. The threat of one, two, three… thousands of little “socialisms” has left big business singularly unmoved in spite of Alperovitz’s reach well beyond the left establishment.

Among those fans of Alperovitz who wish to slink away from Marxism and revolutionary politics it has become customary to cite Lenin’s essay “On Cooperation” from 1923. This shamefully dishonest tactic rips Lenin’s praise of agricultural cooperatives from its context. Writing at the time of the New Economic Policy, Lenin emphasizes that cooperatives are only viable because of Soviet power, the monopoly of “political power is in the hands of the working-class.” He is crystal clear on the cooperative movement under the capitalist state:

There is a lot of fantasy in the dreams of the old cooperators. Often they are ridiculously fantastic. But why are they fantastic? Because people do not understand the fundamental, the rock-bottom significance of the working-class political struggle for the overthrow of the rule of the exploiters. We have overthrown the rule of the exploiters, and much that was fantastic, even romantic, even banal in the dreams of the old cooperators is now becoming unvarnished reality.

“Fantastic, even romantic, even banal…”

Seasoned veterans of the left know that any strategy that promises to be non-threatening and enters through the front door of the monopoly media should be received with suspicion.

Occupy Revisited

For the above reason, I read a recent The New Yorker article with a jaundiced eye. While nearly everyone acknowledges that the Occupy Movement is –if not dead –splintered and marginalized, a New Yorker“critic at large” Kelefa Sanneh, picked this moment to revisit it. Moreover, the usually attuned-to-the-cutting-edge editors indulged five full pages of copy to the movement’s “godfather” and the allure of anarchism.

Just weeks ago, before the elections in Venezuela, the magazine published a long piece scathingly critical of the Bolivarian Revolution and its late leader, Hugo Chavez. No doubt with the approval of The New Yorker‘s dogmatic Cold War editor David Remnick, who still sees Stalin lurking under every bed, the author revived the tired canard of Chavez “preventing a coup like the one that put him in office.” [my italics] Of course Chavez didn’t come to office through a coup, a fact that The New Yorkerlater acknowledged with a small correction. Certainly joining with the mainstream media to trash Chavez and his socialism doesn’t dispose me to expect The New Yorkerto experience a sudden change of heart and promote any genuine alternative to capitalism. And they don’t disappoint.

Paint Bombs: David Graeber’s ‘The Democracy Project’ and the Anarchist Revival(5-13, 2013) is a stealth exercise in distraction and diversion. Where many of us saw the Occupy movement as an incipient anti-capitalist movement degraded through its failure to generate organization and focus, Sanneh sees a noble struggle against “verticals” and in defense of the procedures of the “horizontals.” Sanneh crows: “Occupy resisted those who wanted to stop it and those who wanted to organize it”.

Imagine wanting to organize the Occupy movement! The shame!

The self-styled and New Yorker-anointed guru of the “horizontal” movement is David Graeber, an anthropologist and author of an interesting, eccentric book on debt. Sanneh acclaims Graeber as “the most influential radical political thinker of the moment” (Take that, Gar Alperovitz!). The arch enemies of the “horizontal” movement are “verticals” represented by Marx, the Soviet Union, and parties, leaders, and demands. Sannah claims to see this through the prism of Occupy:

…instead of arguing about economics and ideology, the Occupiers could affirm, instead, their unanimous commitment to freedom of assembly. Occupy may have begun with a grievance against Wall Street, but the process of occupation transformed the movement , peopled by activists demanding the right to demand their rights…

Perhaps no one could say exactly what the Zuccotti Park occupation wanted, but lots of people knew how it worked.

At a critical moment in an economic crisis adversely affecting millions, the “horizontals” were able to transform a movement against Wall Street into a statement “demanding the right to demand… rights.” Thankfully, this does not characterize all Occupy experiences outside of Zuccotti Park. In many cases, Occupiers joined activists in their cities and neighborhoods fighting for health care, jobs, economic justice, and against US aggression. They found righteous demands and learned valuable lessons in organized struggle.

Sanneh concedes that the “rehabilitation of the anarchist movement in America has a lot to do with the fall of the Soviet Union, which lives in popular memory as a quaint and brutal place– an embarrassing precursor that modern, pro-democracy socialists must find ways to disavow.”

So it’s embarrassment and not ideology, disavowal and not commitment that drives the popularity of anarchism. Does this not reek of opportunism? An opportunism that prefers to swiftly and resolutely condemn and separate from the Soviet experience in the face of a “popular” inquisition rather than candidly address both the Soviet strengths and weaknesses?

However, embarrassment should be felt for the anarchist blueprint for forging a new society. Rather than the vision offered by “grim joyless revolutionaries,” Graeber wants “a kind of de-centralized socialism, with decisions made by a patchwork of local assemblies and cooperatives…” — in his own words – “something vaguely like jury duty, except non-compulsory.” Thus, the road to an other-than-capitalist future is paved with “open mics,” assemblies, cooperatives, and a fuzzy analogy.

Adding more to the anarchist strategy are the views of a fellow anthropologist and ally, Yale professor James C. Scott. Scott salutes anarchism for “its tolerance for confusion and improvisation.” He finds anarchism’s foot print in such acts of resistance as “foot-dragging, poaching, pilfering, dissimulation, sabotage, desertion, absenteeism, squatting, and flight.”

“Grim joyless revolutionaries” will be surprised to learn how easy is the road forward. Instead of tiresome organizing, demonstrations and marches, instead of demands and manifestos, instead of meetings and planning sessions, instead of party-building and coalition work, acts of individual and often covert defiance mark the way.

One suspects that despite the rhetoric of radical and participatory democracy advocated by Graeber, Scott, and other anarchist “influentials,” their ideas were not forged in the cauldron of struggle, their thinking was not the product of collective, “horizontal” decisions. The professors decry leadership, but contradictorily speak authoritatively for their movement with little hesitation. They are unsanctioned spokespersons for a leaderless movement. Strange.

To appropriate an old expression: Scratch an anarchist and find an angry, embittered liberal. Like all liberals, modern-day anarchists are obsessed with procedure. It’s not a program that defines their agenda, but the ritual of decision making. It’s no surprise that the liberals at The New Yorkerare fascinated. And it’s no surprise that they take us no further from a decadent, crisis-ridden capitalism.

Zoltan Zigedy

zoltanzigedy@gmail.com

Israel warns Syria to halt attacks after exchange of fire in the Golan Heights

0

William booth and Loveday Morris
Reuters
May 21, 2013

In blunt language marking a turn away from diplomatic caution, Israel warned the Syrian government Tuesday that it “would suffer the consequences” if it continued to press attacks, hours after Syrian and Israeli troops exchanged fire along the cease-fire line in the occupied Golan Heights.

After an Israel Defense Forces jeep was hit by machine-gun fire from a Syrian military post on the cease-fire line, a potential flash point for spillover from Syria’s civil war, Israel “returned pinpoint fire at the source,” an Israeli military spokesman said.

Israeli defense officials said the military responded with a short-range, antitank Spike missile.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 5:44 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell won’t block immigration bill

0

Tarini Parti
Politico
May 21, 2013

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday he wants the Gang of Eight’s immigration bill to proceed to the floor, despite requests from some conservatives to reject all procedural votes related to the bill.

“With regard to getting started on the bill – it’s my intention if there is a motion to proceed required, to vote for the motion to proceed so we can get on the bill and see if it we’re able to pass a bill that actually moves the ball in the right direction,” McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters

McConnell’s signal that he won’t block an initial motion to proceed should carry a fair amount of weight within the conference.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 5:07 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Here's What a Real Political Cover-up Looks Like — Orchestrated by the Right-Wingers Who Know It Best

0

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com/AR Images

May 21, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Exclusive: Republicans won’t let go of their conspiracy theory about some nefarious “cover-up” in “talking points” for Ambassador Susan Rice’s TV interviews on the Benghazi attack. But they should at least have better skills for detecting a real cover-up, since they’ve had direct experience, as Robert Parry documents.

There have been nine public hearings and countless hours of commentary about the so-called Benghazi “cover-up” — really some bureaucratic back-and-forth about “talking points” for a second-tier official’s appearance on TV. But none of the outraged members of Congress or the news media seems to have any idea what a real cover-up looks like.

In 2011, I gained access to files at the George H.W. Bush library in College Station, Texas, showing how Bush’s White House reacted to allegations in 1991 that he had joined in an operation in 1980 to sabotage President Jimmy Carter’s negotiations to free 52 American hostages then held in Iran.

What those files revealed was how to run a cover-up! Its framework was set on Nov. 6, 1991, by White House Counsel C. Boyden Gray, who explained to an inter-agency strategy session how to contain and frustrate a congressional investigation into the so-called October Surprise case. The explicit goal was to insure the scandal would not hurt President Bush’s reelection hopes in 1992.

Gray’s strategy session followed by two days the White House receiving evidence from the State Department that a key fact in the October Surprise allegations had been verified. Ronald Reagan’s 1980 campaign director, William Casey, indeed had traveled on a mysterious trip to Madrid, just as one of the central witnesses had claimed.

The confirmation was passed along by State Department legal adviser Edwin D. Williamson, who said that among the State Department “material potentially relevant to the October Surprise allegations [was] a cable from the Madrid embassy indicating that Bill Casey was in town, for purposes unknown.” Associate White House counsel Chester Paul Beach Jr. Beach noted Williamson’s information in a “ memorandum for record” dated Nov. 4, 1991.

Two days later, on Nov. 6, Gray summoned his subordinates to a meeting that laid out how to thwart the October Surprise inquiry, which was seen as a dangerous expansion of the Iran-Contra investigation. Up to that point, Iran-Contra had focused on illicit arms-for-hostage sales to Iran that President Reagan authorized in 1985-86.

As assistant White House counsel Ronald vonLembke, put it, the White House goal in 1991 was to “kill/spike this story.” To achieve that result, the Republicans coordinated the counter-offensive through Gray’s office under the supervision of associate counsel Janet Rehnquist, the daughter of the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist.

The Stakes

Gray explained the stakes at the White House strategy session. “Whatever form they ultimately take, the House and Senate ‘October Surprise’ investigations, like Iran-Contra, will involve interagency concerns — and be of special interest to the President,” Gray declared, according to minutes. [Emphasis in original.]

Among “touchstones” cited by Gray were “No Surprises to the White House, and Maintain Ability to Respond to Leaks in Real Time. This is Partisan.” White House “talking points” on the October Surprise investigation urged restricting the inquiry to 1979-80 and imposing strict time limits for issuing any findings.

“Alleged facts have to do with 1979-80 — no apparent reason for jurisdiction/subpoena power to extend beyond,” the document said. “There is no sunset provision — this could drag on like Walsh!” — a reference to Iran-Contra special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh.

However, the key to understanding the October Surprise case was that it appeared to be a prequel to the Iran-Contra scandal, part of the same narrative. The story started with the 1980 crisis over 52 American hostages held in Iran, continuing through their release immediately after Ronald Reagan’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 1981, then followed by mysterious U.S. government approval of secret arms shipments to Iran via Israel in 1981, and ultimately morphing into the Iran-Contra Affair of more arms-for-hostage deals with Iran until that scandal exploded in 1986.

This article originally appeared on : AlterNet

CAR rebels hold demo at 5-star hotel

0

A group of the rebels who have taken over the Central African Republic (CAR) have staged a demonstration outside the Hotel Ledger Plaza Bangui in the capital to demand an improvement in their living conditions.

On Tuesday, some members of the Seleka rebel coalition gathered outside the only five-star hotel in the country, where rebel leader Michel Djotodia is based.

Since they captured Bangui, the rebels have been camping outdoors or living in public buildings.

On January 11, former CAR President Francois Bozizé and representatives of the Seleka rebels signed an agreement in Libreville, Gabon, after three days of negotiations brokered by regional neighbors.

However, the deal fell through, and Djotodia, leading thousands of Seleka rebels, captured Bangui and proclaimed himself president after seizing power from Bozizé on March 24.

The Seleka fighters launched an offensive against the CAR government in December 2012.

There are many mineral resources, including gold and diamonds, in the Central African Republic. However, the country is extremely poor and has faced a series of rebellions and coups since it gained independence in 1960.

NT/HGL

This article originally appeared on : Press TV

Russian confidence growing in its vision for ending Syrian war

0

Fred Weir
csmonitor.com
May 21, 2013

Russia believes that its long-held vision of how to achieve peace in civil war-torn Syria has at last become possible due to a shifting balance of forces in the war and changing perceptions in the West, experts say.

In Russia’s view, peace would come through a negotiated settlement between the Bashar al-Assad regime and at least major elements of the anti-Assad rebels.

Newly assertive in advance of an upcoming peace conference to be jointly sponsored by the US and Russia, Moscow is insisting that rebel factions who come to the meeting must do so “without preconditions,” meaning no demands for Mr. Assad’s removal. It is also advocating that Syria’s main regional ally, Iran, should be included in the talks along with other players like Saudi Arabia.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:54 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Police chief: Looking at helicopters and drones

0

csindy.com
May 21, 2013

Last week, Police Chief Pete Carey said he was looking at reactivating the Police Department’s helicopter unit, as well as unmanned aircraft – drones, in other words.

His comments came during Mayor Steve Bach’s town hall meeting at Broadmoor Elementary, after a citizen asked what can be done to get aviation assets to respond to wildland fires quicker and whether drones are viable for early detection of fires.

“Unmanned aircraft is going to be the future,” Carey said. “There’s a lot of concerns about this, as far as restricted air space, especially around Colorado Springs, with the military bases.”

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:33 pm

Tags: , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

How a Computer Model Could Help ‘Fight Terrorism’

0

Jillian Scharr
TechNewsDaily
May 21, 2013

When Justin Bieber tweets, 39,361,876 people (and counting) immediately jump to attention. But when one of those nearly 40 million people tweet, does the Beebs see it? Does he react at all?

Communication among terrorist cells works much in the same way as Justin Bieber’s Twitter account, according to mathematicians from Ryerson University in Toronto who have built a mathematical model of the way information spreads through these hierarchical networks. Their approach may give counterterrorism agents insight into terrorism hierarchies and allow them to predict terrorist attacks and sabotage networks before the attack plans can be carried out.

Terrorist networks are often arranged hierarchically, meaning information flows in one direction: top down, from one leader to many followers. This model is called a “directed network without cycles,” or a “directed acyclic graph.” [See also: Google Search Algorithm Models Cancer Spread]

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:41 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Homeland Security monitors tea party at Florida IRS protest

0

bizpacreview.com
Mayt 21, 2013

In spite of confusing messages and midday rain showers, the tea party showed up in force at the local IRS office in Orlando on Tuesday to express its dissatisfaction with the agency.

On a warm, humid Central Florida day, dozens of protestors turned out in spite of an inconvenient location and a somewhat inexplicable call to suspend the event amid a series of inconsistent messages from various tea party factions.

The protest was held in Maitland, Florida, a short drive north of Orlando and not surprisingly, North Lake Tea Party, long the standard bearer of the Central Florida tea party movement, was on hand.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:46 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

City Defends Heavy Use of Stop-and-Frisk by Police Dept.

0

newyorklawjournal.com
May 21, 2013

A lawyer for New York City insisted yesterday that plaintiffs have thoroughly failed to prove that New York City police violate the U.S. Constitution on a massive scale by stopping, questioning and frisking young men of color without reasonable suspicion they have committed or are about to commit a crime.

Heidi Grossman, deputy chief of the city Law Department’s Special Federal Litigation Division, began closing arguments in the grinding, 10-week bench trial before Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin (See Profile) by questioning the plaintiffs’ claims with regard to each and every one of the 19 stops described from the witness stand by name plaintiffs or their witnesses.

Their testimony, Grossman said, was vague, inconsistent, unreliable and did nothing to advance the plaintiffs’ claim that the police are engaged in a top-down policy of violating the Fourth Amendment. Instead, she said the evidence showed that police practices comported with the Constitution, were in sync with the crime rate and demographics of individual neighborhoods, and are dedicated to keeping the city safe–”especially in minority neighborhoods.”

Read more

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

$25 Gun Created With Cheap 3D Printer Fires Nine Shots (Video)

0

Andy Greenberg
Forbes
May 21, 2013

When high tech gunsmith group Defense Distributed test-fired the world’s first fully 3D-printed firearm earlier this month, some critics dismissed the demonstration as expensive and impractical, arguing it could only be done with a high-end industrial 3D printer and that the plastic weapon wouldn’t last more than a single shot. Now a couple of hobbyists have proven them wrong on both counts.

One evening late last week, a Wisconsin engineer who calls himself “Joe” test-fired a new version of that handgun printed on a $1,725 Lulzbot A0-101 consumer-grade 3D printer, far cheaper than the one used by Defense Distributed. Joe, who asked that I not reveal his full name, loaded the weapon with .380 caliber rounds and fired it nine times, using a string to pull its trigger for safety.

The weapon survived all nine shots over the course of an evening, as you can see in the YouTube video below. (The clip was filmed by Michael Guslick, a fellow Wisconsin engineer who helped Joe with his tests and who is known for printing one of the first working lower receivers for AR-15 semi-automatic rifles.)

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:54 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

New York police defends itself on Muslim surveillance

0

zeenews.india.com
May 21, 2013

New York: The New York Police Department is defending itself in a federal civil rights lawsuit over its surveillance of Muslims.

It says in a new court filing that nothing it has done violated surveillance guidelines imposed by a federal judge in a previous case.

In the legal papers, a detective told the judge that he never asked an informant to get Muslims to make incriminating comments. But text messages obtained by The Associated Press show that the detective never told the informant to stop, either.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:30 pm






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Bowman v. Monsanto: The Price We All Pay for Roundup Ready Seeds

0

Eamon Murphy
Daily Finance
May 21, 2013

Last week, the Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision that was hailed by some as a major victory for intellectual property rights. Others worried about the implications for agriculture, the very foundation of civilization; and in the background – not raised by the nine justices, whom a recent study called “friendlier to corporate interests” than any court since 1946 – was the question of prices for farmers and consumers.

The case was Bowman v. Monsanto Co., in which the court held that an Indiana farmer infringed on the biotech giant’s patents when he planted genetically-modified soybean seeds not purchased from the company.

The seeds had been designed to withstand application of the herbicide glyphosate, which Monsanto markets as Roundup. Farmers who plant such “Roundup Ready” crops are required to sign an agreement with Monsanto stipulating that they will buy new seeds from the company each year, rather than using the products of the plants’ reproduction.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:31 pm

Tags: , , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

WTC Properties Loses Bid to Bar Act-of-War 9/11 Defense

0

bloomberg.com
May 21, 2013

World Trade Center Properties LLC lost its bid to prevent American Airlines and its parent AMR Corp. (AAMRQ) from raising “act of war” as a defense to its alleged negligence in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein in Manhattan denied the bid by the leaseholder of the twin 110-story towers in a May 17 ruling posted yesterday on the court’s docket. The buildings collapsed after hijackers flew an American Airlines jet into one and a United Airlines jet into the other.

The airlines promised Congress and the U.S. public they wouldn’t raise “act of war” to avoid paying claims, lawyers for the leaseholder, an affiliate of Silverstein Properties, argued in a February court filing.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:19 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Judge warns bin Laden’s son-in-law on lawyer choices

0

Bernard Vaughan
reuters.com
May 21, 2013

The son-in-law of Osama bin Laden and former spokesman for al Qaeda, who has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiring to kill Americans, was warned on Tuesday that his three chosen lawyers may not get clearance to review classified evidence in the case.

A federal judge in New York told Suleiman Abu Ghaith, one of the highest-ranking al Qaeda figures to face trial in the United States for crimes related to the September 11, 2001, attacks, that legal issues and, for one lawyer, a disability, could prevent them from getting the needed clearance.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan warned Abu Ghaith, 47, on Tuesday that proceeding with the lawyers with these potential conflicts “is a mistake, that it is against your interests.”

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:14 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

IAEA inspector backs pumping Fukushima groundwater into sea

0

Japan Times
May 21, 2013

A possible solution to the increasing amount of radioactive water inside the crisis-hit Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant could be to pump groundwater into the sea before it flows into the reactor buildings, as planned by the plant operator, the head of international inspectors has said.

“It will be very nice if they really get to bypass the main (buildings) through these systems – through this direct pumping of the water to the sea or whatever it is. Because it is clean water,” said Juan Carlos Lentijo, head of a 13-member team of the International Atomic Energy Agency that inspected the plant last month.

Tokyo Electric Power Co. has created a system to direct part of the groundwater into the sea before it flows and seeps into the reactor buildings and mixes with highly radioactive water accumulating inside, increasing the amount by 400 tons a day, but has yet to win approval from local fishermen to discharge the water.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:22 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Durham police constable threatens to beat up man and plant cocaine on him, video shows

0

Tony Van Alphen
The Star
May 21, 2013

Warning, the video contains graphic language.

A Durham Region police officer threatened to beat up a man and plant cocaine on him during a one-sided, expletive-filled confrontation, a graphic video shows.

“I hurt people . . . and then I make their cocaine f–ing appear,” the armed constable barks into the face of the burly, young man. “You see how I work. . . . See what I do.”

The 8½-minute video, which appeared recently on YouTube, also features the constable appearing to provoke the bald man into hitting him during the sometimes tense grilling beside a house in Oshawa in late 2011.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:11 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Congress rethinks 9/11 law on military force

0

washingtonexaminer.com
May 21, 2013

Congress is rethinking the broad authority it gave the president to wage a war on terror after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in light of how President Barack Obama has used the power to target suspected terrorists with lethal drone strikes.

Senior Pentagon officials insisted on Thursday that the law should remain unchanged as the nation remains locked in armed conflict with al-Qaida and its affiliates, a fight that will rage for another decade or two. But Republicans and Democrats fear that they have given the president a blank check for using military force worldwide.

“This authority … has grown way out of proportions and is no longer applicable to the conditions that prevailed, that motivated the United States Congress to pass the authorization for the use of military force that we did in 2001,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said during a Senate hearing. He told Pentagon officials that “basically you’ve got carte blanche as to what you are doing throughout the world.”

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 4:23 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Investigative journalists threatened with felony for exposing security flaw

0

Investigative journalists with Scripps News Service have discovered a major security lapse, in turn accessing the private data of tens of thousands of cell phone customers in the United States.

Scripps isn’t being hailed for exposing the error, though, and
has been accused by telecom attorneys of hacking into computers to
gain access to the records – a claim the reporters dispute.

According to the journalists, they uncovered the files using
nothing more than a simple Google search.

Reporters with Scripps were investigating Lifeline, a government
benefit-program that provides low-income Americans with discounted
phone service, when they came across the sensitive data.

“While looking into companies participating in the program,
the Scripps News investigative team discovered more than 170,000
records posted online listing sensitive information such as Social
Security numbers, home addresses and financial accounts of
customers and applicants of Lifeline
,” the news service wrote
this week.

According to Scripps, Oklahoma-based TerraCom Inc. and an
affiliate, YourTel America Inc., were up until recently hosting
around 170,000 files just like these on the Internet, unencrypted
and easy to find for anyone looking in the right spot. In fact, the
journalists say they discovered the records by keying in a basic
search query into Google.com.

“A simple online search into TerraCom yielded a Lifeline
application that had been filled out and was posted on a site
operated by Call Centers India Inc., under contract for TerraCom
and YourTel
,” Scripps reported.

When another journalist conducted a follow-up Google search of
the website, Scripps was presented with a trove of documents that
were all hosted online without any security system in place to
restrict access. From there, they used a computer code to download
the publically available records and eventually possessed the
entire trove without ever hacking any passwords or posing as an
unauthorized party.

The reporters put the number of Lifeline applicants whose
privacy was breached at around 44,000, spanning 18 states in the
US.

San Antonio, Texas resident Linda Mendez, 51, was among the
thousands of customers whose personal info was compromised due to
the lack of security. When Scripps presented her with a completed
TerraCom application she was shocked.

“How can they make it so easy like this for people to steal
somebody’s identity
?” Mendez asked.

Scripps asked similarly of TerraCom but was met with a shocker
as well. Shortly after they presented their findings to the
telecom, the files disappeared off the website. Then came a warning
from TerraCom’s attorney.

“The person or persons using the Scripps IP address have
engaged in numerous violations of the
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act,” insisted TerraCom’s
lawyer, Jonathan Lee, “by gaining unauthorized access into
confidential computer files maintained for the Companies by Vcare,
and by digitally transferring the information in these folders to
Scripps. I request that you take immediate steps to identify the
Scripps Hackers, cause them to cease their activities described in
this letter and assist the companies in mitigating the damage from
the Scripps Hackers’ activities
.”

“Shoot the messenger,” wrote a blogger for NetworkWorld.
“Reporters found a gaping security hole exposing 170,000
Lifeline phone customer records online, but were labeled Scripps
Hackers and accused of violating [the] CFAA
.”

Lee continued:

“If the purpose of the hacking was journalistic and the
Scripps Hackers have not made and do not intend to make any further
disclosure of the hacked data, then any financial or other risk for
those applicants would be minimal and notification of the breach
may not be necessary under the law of about half of the states
involved. However, the downloading of more than 120,000 files over
a period of several weeks may not be consistent with solely
journalistic intent
.”

New York-based attorney Tor Ekeland represented security
researcher Andrew Auernheimer during a CFAA case that ended earlier
this year with a federal judge sentencing the so-called hacker to 41 months in
prison. In Auernheimer’s case, he was convicted of gaining
unauthorized access to the personal details of thousands of
AT&T customers after he discovered – and disclosed – a major
security flaw that exposed the data of Apple iPad users in a major
breach.

“I don’t see much difference between what happened in that
case and what happened here
,” Ekeland wrote on his website this
week, “[e]xcept maybe that the DOJ might be a bit sensitive
about going after reporters given their current track record on
that front
.”

“By not defining its key operative phrase ‘unauthorized
access’ as requiring bypassing a password or some other type
of technological access barrier, it allows corporations to be
negligent regarding their infosec
,” or informational security,
wrote Ekeland. “The corporations know that someone else, and not
themselves, will suffer the consequences for discovering their
confidential data that the corporation has displayed for all to see
on the open Web. Why should anyone disclose any computer security
flaw in that type of set up? Why risk a felony conviction? Better
to keep your mouth shut and let all sorts of criminal organizations
and foreign governments harvest the information than to incur the
wrath of the Department of Justice and a vexatious and costly civil
suit
.”

Before being sentenced, Auernheimer himself wrote that “in an
age of rampant cyber espionage and crackdowns on dissidents
,”
the only ethical way to disclose security exploits was to avoid
going to the company involved or the government that might
prosecute you. “In a few cases, that individual might be a
journalist who can facilitate the public shaming of a web
application operator. However, in many cases the harm of disclosure
to the un-patched masses . . . greatly outweighs any benefit that
comes from shaming vendors
.”

Scripps’ attorney, David Giles, responded much akin to Ekeland
that TerraCom was misinterpreting the CFAA. “Regardless of the
flowery moniker you have used to characterize the bureau’s
newsgathering activities, the bureau’s reporters have not violated
the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act or any other law or
regulation
,” Giles wrote. “Rather, in the process of
gathering newsworthy information, the bureau accessed — via a basic
Internet search — personal and confidential information that
apparently is available to anyone with a computer, an outlet and
access to electricity
.”

Scripps requested an on-camera interview with TerraCom before
and after making their disclosure in order to show the company
face-to-face how they “hacked” into their network. TerraCom
acknowledged the breach on their website and told customers that
“names, addresses, Social Security numbers, tax information and
other government forms used by our company to determine applicant
eligibility for the federal Lifeline program
” were all
compromised.

This article originally appeared on : RT

Video: Control Freak Rentacop Goes Off on Trespassers

0

Infowars.com
May 21, 2013

All it takes is a blue uniform and an inflated sense of authority for a mall rentacop to go off on a few trespassing sightseers and end up in a brawl.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 3:53 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars

Top IRS official will invoke 5th Amendment

0

Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
latimes.com
May 21, 2013

A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the 5th Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups.

Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t disclose it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor III. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.

“She has not committed any crime or made any misrepresentation but under the circumstances she has no choice but to take this course,” said a letter by Taylor to committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Vista). The letter, sent Monday, was obtained Tuesday by the Los Angeles Times.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 at 3:33 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

This article originally appeared on : Infowars