Why Women Have Big Breasts

0

July 10, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Writer Carole Jahme shines the cold light of evolutionary psychology on readers’ problems.

From John, a student

I’m an animal science student and during our mammogenesis lecture a professor brought up the obvious, but seemingly overlooked notion of the size of the female human breast. Other species do have obvious teats and great apes have breasts, but humans are at the extreme end — obviously not all — but it does make one wonder on a selection and genetic level, why?

Ask Carole: Chimpanzee wearing spectacles

Carole replies:

The full, plump bosom seen in the human ape is an anomaly. No other primate has a permanent breast. During lactation all the ape species develop a full breast to store milk. In non-human primates (and other mammal species) a full breast is a clear indication the female is suckling young. Not so in humans. In addition, females in early adolescence can start developing a breast before menarche and females maintain breasts post menopause, so the full breast is not a reliable indicator of fertility. Neither is size an indicator of milk production — bigger breasts don’t necessarily produce more milk. It is the symmetry of the breasts that indicates the phenotypic quality and fitness of the individual female, not the size.

The sex appeal of rounded female buttocks and plump breasts is both universal and unique to the human primate 1. Fertile women tend not to store fat around the abdomen, so the waist of a fertile female is usually slimmer than her hips. Other female primates do not have fat deposited on the rump. For example, the female gorilla has a skinny posterior and stores fat on her abdomen, as do human males. So it has been widely theorised that the plump buttock and bosom of modern women are sexual ornaments, selected for by ancestral males 2. Seen from a distance the adult female form, either from behind or from the front, can be recognised as distinct from the male of the species. An hourglass figure, plus youthfulness, would have attracted male hominids looking for mating opportunity 3. The hourglass figure remains attractive to modern males. Over the centuries females attempting to increase their mate choice have dressed to exploit this shape (corsets, bustles and wonder bras). If ancestral males had not shown a preference for the mutation producing symmetrical, plump bosoms, modern women’s chests would resemble the flat thoraxes of the other apes.

Today, plastic surgery is used by some women, particularly those working in the sex industry, to enhance bust size and exploit ancient male programming. But the ultimate function of the human breast becomes clear only when an infant is born and lactation begins.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

11 Big Myths About the Economy That Are Destroying America

0

July 10, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

In the Middle Ages, people looked to the Church for certainty. In today’s complex, market-based economies, they look to the field of economics, at least for answers to questions concerning the economy. And unlike some disciplines, which acknowledge that there’s a huge gap between the scholarly knowledge and policy advice, economists have been anything but shy about asserting their authority.

As we can see from the current dismal state of economic affairs, economies are incredibly complex systems, and policymakers who are forced to act in the face of this uncertainty and complexity want guidance. And over the last half century, neoclassical economists have not only been more than happy to offer it, but largely been able to marginalize any other disciplines or approaches, giving them a virtual monopoly on economic policy advice.

But there are two big problems with this. First, despite economists’ calming assurances, we still know little about how economies actually work and the effect of policies. If we did, then economists should have sounded the alarm bells to head off the financial collapse and Great Recession. But even more problematic, even though most economists know better, they present to the public, the media and politicians a simplified, vulgar version of neoclassical economics – what can be called Econ 101 – that leads policymakers astray. Economists fear that if they really expose policymakers to all the contradictions, uncertainties and complications of “Advanced Econ,” the latter will go off track – embracing protectionism, heavy-handed “industrial policy” or even socialism. In fact, the myths of Econ 101 already lead policymakers dangerously off track, with tragic results for the economy and everyday Americans.

Myth 1: Economics is a science.

The way economists maintain stature in public policy circles is to present their discipline as a science, akin to physics. In Econ 101, there is no uncertainty, only the obvious truths embedded in supply and demand curves. As noted economist Lionel Robbins wrote, “Economics is the science which studies human behavior as a relationship between given ends and scarce means, which have alternative uses.” If economics is actually a science, then policymakers can feel more comfortable following the advice of economists. But if economics is really a science — which implies only one answer to a particular question – why do 40 percent of surveyed economists agree that raising the minimum wage would make it harder for people to get jobs while 40 percent disagree? It’s because as Larry Lindsey, former head of President Bush’s National Economic Council, admitted, “the continuing argument [among economists] is a product of philosophical disagreements about human nature and the role of government and cannot be fully resolved by economists no matter how sound their data.”

Myth 2: The goal of economic policy is maximizing efficiency.

Economists have one overarching principle that shapes their advice: maximize “efficiency.” As economist and venture investor William Janeway notes, “Efficiency is the virtue of economics.” But the goal of economic policy should not be to maximize static efficiency (the “right” allocation of widgets), but to create inefficiency – in the sense of disruptive innovation that makes widgets worthless. For it is the development of new widgets and better ways to make them (e.g., innovation), rather than efficiently allocating existing widgets, that drives prosperity. As noted “innovation” economist Joseph Schumpeter pointed out: “A system which is efficient in the static sense at every point in time can be inferior to a system which is never efficient in this sense, because the reason for its static inefficiency can be the driver for its long-term performance.”

Myth 3: The economy is a market.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Can You Rewire Your Brain to Change Bad Habits, Thoughts, and Feelings?

0

Throughout its history, many in the field of psychotherapy have been similarly pessimistic about people’s ability to liberate themselves from the past. It can even be argued that most modern cognitive-behavioral approaches are based on the assumption that, at best, therapists can only incrementally create new emotional and behavioral habits that work around–but don’t actually transform–the deep-seated emotional programming that causes clients’ most visceral distress. This way of thinking, however, doesn’t reflect our current understanding of how memory functions, nor do the therapeutic approaches that aim simply to manage or circumvent entrenched emotions, beliefs, and behaviors rooted in painful past experiences.

While most neuroscientists once believed that implicit memories, avoidance reactions, and rigid schemas were locked permanently in the brain’s synaptic pathways, recent brain research shows that, under certain conditions and within a brief timeframe, we can not only unlock these neural pathways, but actually erase them and substitute new learning. What psychotherapy has added to the discoveries of the research lab is a range of experiential methods that make it possible for therapists to help clients move on from the past, allowing it to release its terrible grip on the present.

This type of swift, deep, enduring change–popularly known as the clinical breakthrough–has occurred in a wide range of relatively new “deep change” approaches, all of which have a strong experiential component: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, Somatic Experiencing, Emotion-Focused Couples Therapy, Coherence Therapy, Internal Family Systems Therapy, Hakomi, and Neuro-Linguistic Programming, to name just a few. Of course, therapists have used all sorts of metaphors and theoretical concepts to describe breakthroughs since the emergence of our field. The difference today is that through understanding what’s happening in the brain, we can unshroud the mystery of what’s happening in the consulting room and make such breakthroughs happen far more regularly in our offices.

Locked and Unlocked Emotional Learnings

Therapeutic breakthroughs don’t come easily for good reason. As relatively puny, hairless, vulnerable creatures in a world of stronger, more aggressive predators, we’ve evolved to favor false positives–reacting to learned signs of danger even in the absence of actual danger–over false negatives–ignoring potential threats. Since before our oldest hominid ancestors walked the earth, our nervous systems were biologically wired to keep fully alive the memory circuits of learned threat and danger for the duration of our lives, guaranteeing that we won’t ignore cues to potentially perilous situations that could threaten our survival. From this perspective, the staying power of intense, distressing emotional arousal isn’t a sign of dysfunction–quite the opposite. The fact that raw feelings of fear and rage can be retriggered by implicit cues learned in the past for alerting us to threats, even if the threat is no longer present, indicates that the emotional brain is functioning properly.

The hidden workings of emotional memory are greatly clarified by recognizing that memories of events are different from the learnings based on those events. Each of these memory types is stored in its own separate network in the brain. Consider perfectionism as an example of an emotional learning that therapists frequently encounter. Some clients describe clear memories of original experiences in which being imperfect on their part incurred intense shaming or rejection, but they have no awareness of the resulting implicit learning that has since ruled their responses in life–that it’s urgent to be perfect to avoid such suffering. In contrast, other clients are aware of their learned expectation that imperfection is too dangerous to risk, but even when that expectation is triggered, they have no memory of the original life experiences in which that learning formed.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Senate Set to Confirm New FBI Head Who OK’d Waterboarding, Defends Mass Spying, Indefinite Detention

0

July 10, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The following transcript originally appeared on Democracy Now!:

At his confirmation hearing to head the FBI, former Bush administration Deputy Attorney General James Comey refused to criticize the broad, ongoing collection of the phone records of Americans and defended the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens deemed to be enemy combatants. Comey also explained why he signed off on a memo authorizing waterboarding while serving under Attorney General John Ashcroft. We get reaction from former special FBI agent Coleen Rowley, who served with the Bureau from 1981 to 2004. The New York Times just published her op-ed titled “Questions for the FBI Nominee.” In 2002, Time magazine named her and two other female whistleblowers as Time’s “Person of the Year,” for warning about the FBI’s failure to help prevent the 9/11 attacks.

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: In our next segment, we’ll be looking at the trial of Bradley Manning. I’m Amy Goodman, with Nermeen Shaikh.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: We turn now to the confirmation hearing of James Comey, President Obama’s nominee to run the FBI for the next 10 years, replacing Robert Mueller. Comey served as deputy attorney general under John Ashcroft in the Bush administration. In this role, Comey signed off on a controversial legal memo authorizing waterboarding of prisoners and approved of the indefinite detention of José Padilla, a U.S. citizen who was held on a military brig for three years without charge. During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Comey was questioned about these issues as well as his views on domestic surveillance. This is committee chair Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: I’ll ask you the same question I asked Attorney General Mukasey when he was before this committee for confirmation. I found–actually, I found his answer unsatisfactory, but I’ll ask you the same question. Do you agree that waterboarding is torture and is illegal?

JAMES COMEY: Yes.

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: Thank you. And would you agree to answer this question the same way no matter who is president?

JAMES COMEY: Oh, certainly.

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: Thank you. Now, the surveillance powers of the FBI have grown. Americans are becoming increasingly concerned theFBI is becoming more of a domestic surveillance agency than a crime-fighting, intelligence-gathering organization. The PATRIOT Act, other authorities, they can get vast amounts of information, including the data of law-abiding Americans, something that creates concerns, I know, among my fellow Vermonters. So, do you believe the bulk collection of metadata for domestic telephone calls or emails is appropriate, even when the majority of individuals with whom the calls or emails are associated are law-abiding Americans?

JAMES COMEY: Senator, I am not familiar with the details of the current programs. Obviously, I haven’t been cleared for anything like that, and I’ve been out of government for eight years. I do know, as a general matter, that the collection of metadata and analysis of metadata is a valuable tool in counterterrorism.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: That was FBI nominee James Comey. While Comey described waterboarding as torture and illegal, he acknowledged signing a memo authorizing its use when he was in the Bush Justice Department. Comey did not say why his view on waterboarding had changed since 2005.

During the hearing, senators repeatedly praised Comey for refusing to reauthorize the Bush administration’s warrantless spy program while serving as acting attorney general in the place of John Ashcroft, who was recovering from surgery. Comey alerted Ashcroft after top White House aides rushed to Ashcroft’s hospital bed in a failed bid to win his approval for the spying. According to news reports, the surveillance program later resumed under a similar legal framework, and senior Bush administration officials have said Comey raised few objections to other surveillance programs.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Climate Chaos ‘Needn’t Happen — IF…’

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/climate_chaos_neednt_happen_if_20130711/

Posted on Jul 11, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Medicine ban on Iran cruel: Rafsanjani

0

Chairman of Iranâ„¢s Expediency Council Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has described as Å“very cruel” the US-led sanctions against the Islamic Republic that have resulted in the shortage of medicine and health risks to patients in the country.

Å“The situation of patients and their families is worrisome and upsetting, [especially] when we hear that, in addition to the miseries of the illness, they have difficulty finding medication as well,” said Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani a Wednesday meeting with members of the Board of Directors of the Iranian Association of Pharmacists.

The top Iranian official said, Å“Under false pretexts and sometimes by relying on the words and deeds of extremists, the [so-called] advocates of human rights cause suffering to the [Iranian] people, in particular the patients, which does not conform to any human principles.”

Although the US-led sanctions imposed on Iran do not directly ban selling medicine and medical supplies to Iran, the sanctions on Iranâ„¢s banking sector have effectively hindered the import of medicine to the country through obligating the importers of medicine to Iran to apply for special licenses. The cumbersome process has dissuaded many of the importing companies. As a result, the lives of many Iranian patients suffering from special diseases such as thalassemia, hemophilia, hepatitis, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, etc., have been put at stake.

In an October report to the UN General Assembly, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon warned that the Western embargoes against Iran have mainly targeted the livelihood of the ordinary Iranian population, including patients.

Å“The sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic of Iran have had significant effects on the general population, including an escalation in inflation, a rise in commodities and energy costs, an increase in the rate of unemployment and a shortage of necessary items, including medicine,” the UN chief said on October 6.

The United States and the European Union have imposed sanctions on Iranâ„¢s oil and financial sectors aimed at preventing other countries from purchasing Iranian oil and conducting transactions with the Central Bank of Iran.

The illegal US-engineered sanctions have been imposed based on the accusation that Iran is pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

Iran rejects the allegation, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

AR/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Vilifying Alice Walker Irresponsibly

0

Vilifying Alice Walker Irresponsibly
by Stephen Lendman
Walker’s a Georgia sharecropper family daughter. She’s the youngest of eight children. At Atlanta’s Spellman College, she was one of Howard Zinn’s students.
He taught her and others:
“You can’t be neutral on a moving train.” 
“(E)vents are already moving in certain deadly directions, and to be neutral means to accept that.”
In school during the 1960s, Walker became active in civil rights issues. She addressed others. She’s best known for her Pulizer Prize-winning novel, “The Color Purple.”
She’s written other novels, short stories, children’s books, poetry and nonfiction. She taught Gender Studies at Wellesley College. Her classes were America’s first.
She’s critical of Israeli apartheid. She’s forthright saying so. On June 9, 2012, she wrote Yediot Books publisher. She declined its request to publish “The Color of Purple.”
“It isn’t possible for me to permit this at this time for the following reason:  As you may know, last Fall in South Africa the Russell Tribunal on Palestine met and determined that Israel is guilty of apartheid and persecution of the Palestinian people, both inside Israel and also in the Occupied Territories.”  
“The testimony we heard, both from Israelis and Palestinians (I was a jurist), was devastating.  I grew up under American apartheid and this was far worse.”  
“Indeed, many South Africans who attended, including Desmond Tutu, felt the Israeli version of these crimes is worse even than what they suffered under the white supremacist regimes that dominated South Africa for so long.”
“It is my hope that the non-violent BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement, of which I am part, will have enough of an impact on Israeli civilian society to change the situation.”
It hasn’t so far. Things go from bad to worse. “We must continue to work on the issue, and to wait,” said Walker.
“In faith that a just future can be fashioned from small acts, Alice Walker.”
On June 18, 2012, JTA (The Global Jewish News Source) headlined “Walker refuses to authorize Hebrew version of ‘The Color Purple.’ “
She “cite(d) what she called Israel’s ‘apartheid.’ “
“Walker has intensified her anti-Israel activism in recent years, traveling to the Gaza Strip to advocate on behalf of the Palestinians.”
JTA implied doing so is anti-Semitic. It claimed Walker prohibits a Hebrew translation. Haaretz published JTA’s distortions. It did so to its discredit. Setting the record straight is long overdue. So far, it’s not forthcoming.
Walker’s objection was clear. It remains so. Hebrew isn’t the issue. She’s against publishing her book in Israel.
She has every right to forbid it. She’s against publication until Israel changes. She wants no part of colonialism, occupation and apartheid.
JTA was caught red-handed. It changed its original text. It now says Walker won’t “allow an Israeli house to publish the book because ‘Israel is guilty of apartheid and persecution of the Palestinian people, both inside Israel and also in the Occupied Territories.’ “
Too little, too late doesn’t wash. Walker expressed her objection clearly. JTA willfully distorted her. Haaretz published its lies without checking.
Israeli policy is longstanding. It’s deplorable. It lawlessly occupies Palestine. It spurns core international law principles. It operates extrajudicially. 
It persecutes Palestinians ruthlessly. It mocks democratic rights. Colonialism and apartheid are serious international law breaches. They violate fundamental standards and values.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) calls self-determination “one of the essential principles of contemporary international law.” 
All states are obligated to respect it. Colonialism’s in clear violation. 
The 1960 Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (the Declaration on Colonialism), condemns “colonialism in all its forms and manifestations.”
Israeli settlements are lawless. They’re on stolen Palestinian land.
According to the 1973 International Convention for the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (the Apartheid Convention): 
Apartheid is state-sanctioned discriminatory “inhuman” racism. It’s “committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.” 
Apartheid’s an international crime. The above definition builds on the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD). 
The 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court calls apartheid a crime under the Court’s jurisdiction. Israel’s flagrantly guilty. It remains accountable. 
It’s ruthlessly out-of-control. It’s been so since 1948. It’s occupied Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem lawlessly since 1967. It spurns core international law principles. It shows no signs of change.
Its current government is its worst ever. It reflect fascist harshness, not democracy. It literally gets away with murder and much more. Palestinian self-determination’s denied. 
Ruthless occupation substitutes. Longstanding grievances remain unresolved. Israel’s unapologetic. Rogue states never admit wrongdoing. They never accept responsibility. They never say they’re sorry. 
Israel and America are by far the worst. They menace humanity. They do so ruthlessly.
Alan Dershowitz supports Israel’s worst crimes. He does so irresponsibly. Francis Boyle accused him and other Harvard Law professors or endorsing lawlessness.
They’re “(un)fit to educate (aspiring) lawyers,” he said. They’re “a sick joke and a demented fraud.”
“Harvard is to Law School as Torture is to Law,” he stressed. Its faculty and deans “torture the law.”
“Harvard Law School is a Neo-Con cesspool. (F)or the most part, its Faculty and Deans have always been viscerally bigoted and racist against Muslins/Arabs/Asians, and other People of Color.” They’ve been that way since at least 1971 when Boyle attended.
Dershowitz is a notorious bigot. He’s a longstanding Islamophobe. He believes in unique Jewish suffering. He’s mindless of all others.
He’s a committed Zionist/Israeli apologist. He’s a self-incriminating war criminal. He supports Israeli crimes of war, against humanity and genocide. 
He’s comfortable with torture. He reflects neo-con extremism. He claims only Jewish rights matter. He believes war is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is Strength. He’s a menace in his own time. He’s a disgrace to his profession and position.
On June 24, he attacked Alice Walker irresponsibly. He did so maliciously. He accused her of “crass bigotry.” Haaretz published his viciousness. It demands condemnation.
He denigrated Walker’s new book maliciously. It’s titled “The Cushion in the Road: Meditation and Wandering as the Whole World Awakens to Being in Harm’s Way.” 
The New York Times calls Walker “a lavishly gifted writer.” Her book revisits past themes. They include racism, Africa, Palestinian solidarity, and other social justice issues.
Dershowitz maligned her. He wrongfully accused her of “tell(ing) half-truths, omit(ting) salient facts, and find(ing) fault with everything Israel does.”
She “paints a cartoonishly absurd picture of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”
“Worst of all, she opposes peace talks, the two-state solution, and any rational approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”
Dershowitz is a serial liar. Distortion, exaggeration, misrepresentation, and willful fabrications adulterate his commentaries. They turn truth on its head.
Walker supports justice. So do other people of conscience. Palestinians are systematically denied. Israel deplores peace and stability. It prioritizes conflict and violence. It denies Palestinians self-determination. 
Don’t expect Dershowitz to explain. He disgracefully supports the worst of Israeli lawlessness. He does so shamelessly and unapologetically.
He lied saying Walker “adamantly refused to allow ‘The Color of Purple’ to be translated into Hebrew” and published. She did no such thing.
He accused her of multiple “half-truths and outright lies.” He maliciously lied saying so. Why Haaretz editors published him, they’ll have to explain.
He claims Israel’s “most strident critics….do not believe many of the bizarre and counter-factual assertions made by Walker.”
Millions do worldwide. They say so forthrightly. They document Israeli crimes. They’re easily verifiable.
Dershowitz maligned Walker for saying Israel tortures Palestinian children. Evidence proves it incontrovertibly. 
He mocked her saying Israel murdered Rachel Corrie. He misspelled her name “Cory.” 
On March 16, 2003, an Israeli bulldozer driver murdered her in cold blood. She tried stopping a Rafah refugee camp home demolition.
Eye witnesses saw her climb atop a giant Caterpillar tractor. They’re designed to destroy homes. They’re weapons of mass destruction. Rachel spoke to the driver. She climbed down. She knelt 10 – 20 meters in front. She blocked its path with her body. She was in clear view.
The tractor lurched forward. Activists screamed for it to stop. The soldier-operator pressed on. He crushed Rachel to death. He did so maliciously. 
He ran over her twice to be sure she was dead. He remains unaccountable. Rachel’s family wants justice. So should everyone.
Dershowitz mocked her death. He vilified Walker for discussing a horrendous crime. It symbolizes Israeli ruthlessness.
He attacked Walker for denouncing Israel’s apartheid wall. It’s on stolen Palestinian land. It isolates their communities. It separates farmers from their fields. 
It has nothing to do with security. It’s land theft writ large. When complete, it’ll include over 10% of occupied land. It belongs to Palestine, not Israel.
Dershowitz denigrated Walker for discussing Mavi Mamara assassins. Israeli commandos murdered human rights activists in cold blood. They wounded many more. They remain unaccountable.
He mocked her denunciation of premeditated Gaza attacks. “According to Walker, there has never been a more brutal occupation in the history of the world.”
It’s by far the worst in modern memory. It reflect police state harshness. It prioritizes state terror. It’s like Hitler treated Jews. He mistreated them for 12 years. 
Israeli viciousness exceeds 46 years. The human toll is appalling. Don’t expect Dershowitz to explain. His diatribe included more lies. It infests his entire commentary.
He accused Walker of “ignorant rants.” He called her “part of the problem, not part of the solution.” 
He’s mindless of hard truths he spurns. He unapologetically supports the worst of Israeli lawlessness. He vilifies openly discussing it. He’s a notorious racist. 
Hopefully wise Harvard Law students avoid his classes. He’s a menace in his own time. He teaches law avoidance. He spurns enforcing it responsibly. He threatens freedom in the process.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. 
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour 

Republished with permission from: Stephen Lendman

Junta-Style Transition in Egypt

0

Junta-Style Transition in Egypt
by Stephen Lendman
Events remain fluid. They’re fast-moving. Interim President Adly Mansour appointed Hazem Beblawi prime minister. He’s a technocrat. He’s an economics PhD. He and Mansour are pro-Western stooges.
From 1965 – 1980, Beblawi held academic positions at the University of Alexandria and elsewhere. From 1980 – 1983, he was an Industrial Bank of Kuwait manager.
From 1983 – 1995, he was Export Development Bank in Egypt chairman and CEO. From 1995 – 2000, he was UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) executive secretary.
From 2001 – 2011, he served as an Abu Dhabi-based Arab Monetary Fund advisor. After Mubarak’s ouster, he was an Egyptian Social Democratic Party founding member. Democracy in Egypt is verboten.
In July 2011, Beblawi was appointed deputy prime minister for economic affairs and finance minister. He succeeded Samir Radwan. After four months he resigned. He did so after security forces killed Coptic Christians.
SCAF pressured him to stay. He did so until December. Momtaz Saeed suceeded him. On July 6, state media announced Mohamed ElBaradei as new prime minister. 
On July 7, transition hit a speed bump. Egypt’s Salafist Nour party rejected his appointment. Two days later, Beblawi’s was announced. ElBaradei was appointed vice president for foreign relations. 
A previous article profiled him. He’s safe. He’s pro-Western, anti-populist, business as usual neoliberal. He and Beblawi assure continuity.
SCAF General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi warned against disrupting Egypt’s “difficult and complex” transition.
“The future of the nation is too important and sacred for maneuvers or hindrance, whatever the justifications,” he added.
Discussions are underway to select new ministers and complicit apparachiks. Subservient pro-Western ones alone are considered.
Mansour said he stands by his constitutional decree. It was prepared secretly. It represents junta power. It reflects despotism writ large, It has 33 articles. 
It usurps unchecked power. It does so irresponsibly. It does by diktat. It includes a sharia law provision strongly opposed when Islamists proposed it last year. 
It dictates constitutional amendment procedures and what’s proposed. It gives regime leaders virtual total authority. SCAF has final say. Mansour serves at its pleasure. So do Beblawi, ElBaradei, appointed ministers, and complicit apparachiks.
Mansour and Beblawi will announce what generals decree. They take orders from Washington. 
A state of emergency exists. On expiration, it’ll be extended three months. It’s renewable. It’s potentially indefinite. 
SCAF’s word is final. It’s beholden to Washington. Strings are pulled there. Democracy’s a convenient fiction. It’s nowhere in sight.
Mansour’s declaration decrees a constitutional referendum in about four and a half months. Parliamentary elections are supposed to follow around six weeks later. Presidential elections will be about six months from now.
Schedules are fluid. SCAF has final say. So-called transition can be interminable. Rogue states operate that way. 
Mansour heads a separate National Defense Council. He’ll oversee security, Egypt’s military budget, and laws relating to its armed forces. Doing so assures junta power rule. It bears repeating. Democracy’s a convenient fiction.
Al-Ahram is Egypt’s leading broadsheet. It’s state controlled. It quoted White House spokesman Jay Carney saying:
“We are cautiously encouraged by the announcement by the interim government that it (has) a potential plan for moving forward with a democratic process and elections, both parliamentary and presidential.”
“We call on all parties to engage in a dialogue about that process and not to, you know, refuse to participate.”
Al-Ahram said Obama “reached out to several key leaders in the region, calling Qatar’s new emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani and Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahayan.”
“(H)e urged (them) to use their influence in Egypt to press each side in the political standoff to avoid violence and to hasten the return of a democratic government.”
Muslim Brotherhood officials reject constitutional changes. They’re against SCAF’s timetable. They call Morsi’s ouster illegitimate. New elections bring Egypt “back to zero,” they said.
MB denounced Beblawi’s selection. Spokesman Gehad el-Haddad said he represents traditional elitist rule. MB officials call Tuesday’s appointments and others to follow illegitimate actions of unelected leaders.
Freedom and Justice party member Hamza Zawbaa said what happened is “not our business. We have nothing to do with that.”
“It’s a military coup, and we don’t negotiate with military leaders.”
Beblawi’s selection shows SCAF’s true agenda. It’s “anti-revolution enshrined by a military coup.”
MB member Bassem Ouda was ousted as supply and internal trade  minister. He was surprised about Beblawi’s appointment. In 2011, he resigned from Egypt’s rocky transition. He rejected Morsi’s premier offer.
Nour party hardliners approved Beblawi. They rejected ElBaradei for premier. They’re considering his vice presidential appointment. They’ll say when ready whether or not they approve.
On Tuesday, Saudi Arabia and the UAE pledged billions of dollars in emergency aid. Washington’s aid will continue. It comes with strings. So does Saudi and UAE money. 
Beblawi’s first order of business requires pain. Most Egyptians reject it.
Bread and butter issues matter most. Protests reflect what’s ignored. Widespread poverty, unemployment and extreme deprivation enrage people. They want long neglected issues addressed. 
Beblawi assures greater neoliberal harshness. Convincing people won’t be easy. He’s got “sour medicine” in mind. Morsi didn’t have “guts” enough to go as far as he wants.
Doing so assures no honeymoon. Egyptians oppose business as usual. They’re tired of sacrifices they alone make. Beblawi’s dismissive.
“The thing is we have a situation whereby we have to tighten the belt,” he said. “And this means we have to pay a price.”
“And it is difficult to ask people to sacrifice, particularly after the ‘revolution,’ where everyone was expecting to get rewards for past experiences.”
Beblawi’s notion of “sacrifice” matches Obama’s. Ordinary people alone are burdened. Robbing poor Peter to benefit rich Paul is policy. Western diktats demand it.
Beblawi and ElBaradei appointments reflect business as usual. Inflicting more pain when help’s badly needed assures greater public outrage. 
Most anti-Morsi National Salvation Front (NSF) members reject what’s proposed. So do Tamarod campaign supporters. Their leaders weren’t consulted. 
A twitter comment said it’s “impossible to accept (Mansour’s decree) because it founds a new dictatorship. We will hand over to the (military-installed interim) president our amendments to the declaration.”
MB officials remain undaunted. They’ll challenge what they call illegitimate. They urged “an uprising against those who want to steal the revolution with tanks.”
Senior advisor Jihad Haddad said they’ll put their lives on the line. “If our blood is the price that is needed for this country’s conscience to wake up or for the rest of the world’s conscience to wake up, we would be gladly giving it,” he said.
No one wants another Syria. Avoiding it remains to be seen. More blood on the streets looks certain. At issue is how much for how long.
A Final Comment
Broken clocks are right twice daily. Give credit when deserved. Media scoundrels rarely merit it. Washington Post editors are no exceptions.
On July 9, they headlined “Egypt’s generals, President Obama double down on failed policies.”
Long-suffering Egyptians deserve much better. Worse ahead is planned. Democracy’s a convenient fiction. Generals have final say.
They’re “repeating the same abuses and authoritarian practices that preceded the rise to power of the Islamist government they ousted.”
“(B)rute force” shows it. A “little-known judge (was) appointed president.” Doing so was illegitimate.
Mansour “issued a constitutional decree.” It was “prepared in secret….without the agreement of (other) political forces.”
“The governing document contains the worst elements of the constitution the military suspended, and adds more.”
It usurps “unchecked power.”
“Egypt desperately needs a political compromise to avoid further violence, not another diktat.”
Morsi and other Freedom and Justice party members are under house arrest. Secret deals are arranged. People have no say.
“This crude and counterproductive behavior should come as no surprise to Egyptians.” It’s been de rigueur for decades.
“The Obama administration is doubling down on its own failures.” 
“During 2011 and 2012, it refused to respond to the military’s abuses by reducing or suspending aid.” 
“For the past year, it remained publicly silent and passive while the Morsi government abused its powers.” 
“Now it is contending that a cutoff of US aid – required by law following any ouster of an elected government in which the military plays a decisive role – would not be in the US interest.”
“By refusing to follow the law even after the military’s brutal and autocratic actions, the administration is sending the message that nothing – short of war with Israel – will lead to a rupture with the Egyptian armed forces.” 
“That will merely encourage the generals to continue their reckless and counterproductive behavior.”
Too bad all WaPo editorials, commentaries and articles aren’t this candid. Rare ones deserve credit. Maybe they’ll encourage more.
Doing the right thing is its own reward. So is good journalism. An open letter to New York Times editors urged trying it sometime and see.
It said try publishing “All the News That’s Fit to Print” for real. Doing so may encourage never another way. That’s how things are supposed to be.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. 
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour 
http://www.dailycensored.com/junta-style-transition-in-egypt/

Republished with permission from: Stephen Lendman

Saudi princess charged with trafficking

0

A Saudi princess has been charged with human trafficking for allegedly forcing a Kenyan woman to work at her house against her will.

On Wednesday, Meshael Alayban, 42, identified as a Saudi princess, was reportedly arrested and charged for keeping a 30-year-old Kenyan woman at her house in the US state of California.

According to Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, Alayban was charged with one count of human trafficking. She could face up to 12 years in prison if convicted.

Alayban was arrested after the Kenyan woman told a passenger on a bus she was traveling on that she was a victim of human trafficking. The passenger then helped the woman contact the police.

According to the domestic worker, she was hired in Kenya in 2012. She added that her passport was taken from her after she arrived in Saudi Arabia.

The Kenyan woman was forced to work long hours, while being paid less than agreed upon. She was also not allowed to leave the house.

Å“This is not a contract dispute,” said Rackauckas. Å“This is holding someone captive against their will.”

A $5-million bail has been set for Alayban. She has also been required to submit to GPS monitoring.

The Saudi princess has also been banned from leaving the country without prior authorization.

SZH/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Venezuelans urged to boycott Facebook

Venezuela’s prisons minister has called on Venezuelans to cancel their accounts on the social networking website Facebook in a move to refrain from being targeted by US spying.

Maria Iris Varela said in a message posted on Twitter, Å“Fellow Venezuelans: cancel your Facebook accounts, since you unwittingly have worked as CIA informants! Look at the Snowden case!” referring to US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden.

Varela added that the victims of US Å“espionage” should file lawsuits in order to demand Å“fair compensation” from Washington and bankrupt the US government.

Snowden, a former CIA employee, has leaked two top secret US government spying programs under which the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are eavesdropping on millions of American and European phone records and the Internet data from major Internet companies such as Facebook, Yahoo, Google, Apple, and Microsoft.

On June 9, he admitted his role in the leaks in a 12-minute video recorded interview published by British daily the Guardian.

In the interview, Snowden denounced what he described as systematic surveillance of innocent US citizens, saying his Å“sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them.”

He has sought political asylum in 27 countries, including several in Latin America.

On July 8, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro said his government has received an asylum application from the NSA leaker.

Å“He (Snowden) will have to decide when he flies, if he finally wants to fly here,” Maduro noted, adding, Å“We told this young man, Ëœyou are being persecuted by the empire, come here,â„¢”, referring to the United States.

Snowden has been holed up at Russiaâ„¢s Sheremetyevo Airport since June 23, when he travelled from Hong Kong to avoid US extradition.

MR/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Brotherhood role in gov't not ‘ruled out’

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt’s Prime Minister Hazem al-Beblawi says he will not rule out the participation of Muslim Brotherhood in the country’s new government.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

‘Canada crash tied to technical failure’

0

The photo shows a major fire which broke out after an oil-laden freight train derailed and exploded in Canadaâ„¢s Quebec province on July 6, 2013.

Officials in Canada say a recent deadly train disaster in Quebec possibly happened due to an engineerâ„¢s failure to set a series of hand brakes.

Quebec provincial police inspector Michel Forget said Wednesday that the July 6 explosive train crash killed 20 people and left 30 people unaccounted for with small hope of being found alive.

He added all the 30 people were Å“missing and most probably dead in this tragedy,” nothing that authorities had met with their families.

The freight train that was carrying oil crashed on July 6 after it began to roll downhill without a conductor towards the town of Lac-Megantic, around 250 kilometers (155 miles) east of Montreal, near the US border and the state of Maine.

It caused a huge blaze that tore through part of Lac-Megantic and forced around 2,000 people to flee their homes.

On Wednesday, chairman of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Edward Burkhardt said an engineer had failed to set brakes properly on the train.

Å“Adequate hand brakes were not set on this train and it was the engineer’s responsibility to set them,” Burkhardt said during his visit to the scene, adding, Å“We wouldnâ„¢t have had this incident,” if the hand brakes been properly applied.

Burkhardt had previously put the blame on firefighters in the town of Nantes, where train had been stopped for a crew change, saying they unwittingly released the trainâ„¢s brakes when they turned off the main locomotiveâ„¢s engines to extinguish a small fire several hours before the disastrous incident.

However, he said on Wednesday that Å“The fact that when the air brakes released on the locomotive the train ran away would indicate that the hand brakes were not properly applied.”

He also revealed that the trainâ„¢s engineer has been suspended without pay. Å“I donâ„¢t think heâ„¢ll be back working for us. That is my personal opinion,” Burkhardt said.

Å“Itâ„¢s hard to explain why someone didnâ„¢t do something. We think he applied some hand brakes but the question is: did he apply enough of them?” he added.

MR/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Turkey summons 30 envoys for meeting

0

Turkeyâ„¢s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has summoned a group of 30 Turkish ambassadors serving in the Middle East to hold talks.

The Turkish envoys are to meet at the Turkish Foreign Ministry headquarters in the capital, Ankara, on Thursday to discuss current events in Egypt and Syria.

In the meeting chaired by Davutoglu, the ouster Egyptâ„¢s President Mohamed Morsi will be discussed.

On July 3, General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, the head of Egyptâ„¢s army, announced that President Morsi was no longer in office. Sisi also dissolved the Egyptian constitution.

The chief justice of Egyptâ„¢s Supreme Constitutional Court, Adli Mansour, was sworn in as interim president on July 4.

Since last week, Egypt has been witnessing mass protests and deadly clashes involving supporters and opponents of Morsi and security forces. Many people have been killed over the past few days, with more than 80 deaths reported on July 8 alone.

The Turkish officials are also to discuss the crisis in Syria, where Russia has recently presented evidence showing that foreign-backed Takfiri militants have used chemical weapons.

Ankara has been supporting the militants fighting the Syrian government.

The meeting in Ankara will also review the general outlook of Turkeyâ„¢s policies.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry meeting is scheduled despite ongoing anti-government demonstrations in Turkey.

Unrest in Turkey erupted on May 31 after police broke up a sit-in held at the iconic Taksim Square in the city of Istanbul to protest against a government redevelopment plan for Gezi Park.

A number of people have been killed in clashes between protesters and security forces.

SZH/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Iran entitled to N-tech: EU official

0

Chairman of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee Elmar Brok says the Islamic Republic of Iran has the right to use peaceful nuclear technology.

Brok made the remarks in a Wednesday meeting with Iranâ„¢s Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi on the sidelines of an international conference in the German city of Frankfurt, IRNA reported.

He said that the fatwa of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei on the prohibition of using nuclear technology for non-peaceful purposes could constitute a good basis for the West to reach an agreement in its dispute with Iran over the countryâ„¢s nuclear energy program.

On February 22, 2012, Ayatollah Khamenei said the Islamic Republic considered the pursuit and possession of nuclear weapons Å“a grave sin” from every logical, religious and theoretical standpoint.

The Leader described the proliferation of nuclear weapons as Å“senseless, destructive and dangerous,” adding that the Iranian nation had never sought and would never seek atomic bombs as the country already had the conventional capacity to challenge nuclear-backed powers.

Referring to Iranâ„¢s recent presidential election and the viewpoints expressed by Iranian President-elect Hassan Rohani, Brok voiced hope that the ground would be prepared for positive steps in the negotiations between Iran and the West over Tehranâ„¢s nuclear program.

Qasemi, for his part, said the Islamic Republic of Iran was always ready for engagement with all countries based on mutual respect and interests.

Å“We welcome negotiations within a logical and fruitful framework given the atmosphere created after the election of the new president who is a politician, a religious scholar and is familiar with international relations,” he added.

Iran has never been after and will never seek non-civilian nuclear energy, Qasemi said, adding that reciprocal trust can yield favorable results in the upcoming talks for both sides.

He also expressed hope that Iran-Europe relations would further develop in the future based on mutual respect.

The US, Israel, and some of their allies have repeatedly accused Iran of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

Tehran has categorically rejected the accusation, arguing that as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it is entitled to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

AR/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Trial of killer of Trayvon Martin nears conclusion

0

 

By
John Burton

11 July 2013

Wednesday afternoon, after two-and-a-half weeks of trial featuring 38 prosecution witnesses and 18 more called by the defense, George Zimmerman’s attorneys rested without calling the gunman to testify about shooting 17-year-old Trayvon Martin as the youth was walking to his father’s girlfriend’s home in Sanford, Florida.

After Seminole County Judge Debra Nelson denied a defense motion to acquit Zimmerman, the prosecution began its rebuttal case. The attorneys are expected to argue within the next few days and a verdict is likely sometime next week.

Martin’s February 26, 2012 death sparked national outrage after his parents, Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton, campaigned publicly to expose the refusal of local police and prosecutors to charge Zimmerman, a 28-year-old “neighborhood watch” volunteer. Zimmerman, who was wearing a pistol on his belt, as permitted by Florida’s permissive gun laws, initially claimed he was protected by Florida’s reactionary “stand your ground” law, which allows people to kill supposed aggressors rather than retreat to safety.

Yielding to intense national pressure, the Florida attorney general appointed a special prosecutor, who charged second degree murder, which means killing a person with “a depraved mind without regard for human life.” The jury will also consider the “lesser included offense” of manslaughter, an unlawful killing without malice.

Zimmerman shot and killed Martin after the young man had walked to a convenience store to purchase candy and a beverage. The gunman, who chased down Martin and then got into a fight, claims he shot in self-defense, which requires a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent his death or great bodily harm.

One cannot assess the impact of the evidence on the six-person jury. The talking heads who dominate coverage in the bourgeois media have tended to portray the prosecution as lackluster compared to Zimmerman’s legal team, which appears better prepared and more focused.

The prosecution’s opening statement, where the jury first hears the outline of evidence in the case–a crucial stage in any trial–was perfunctory, only a half-hour long. In contrast, defense attorney Don West spent two-and-a-half hours methodically setting out Zimmerman’s defense, complete with maps and diagrams, claiming that he had to fire because Martin attacked him, pounding the back of his head into a cement walkway.

The evidence began with Zimmerman’s call to 911 about a “real suspicious guy.” Without any basis other than Martin’s age and race, Zimmerman told the dispatcher, “This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.”

After telling the dispatcher that “he’s coming towards me” with “his hand in his waistband, and he’s a black male,” Zimmerman abruptly flip-flopped, claiming the youth was fleeing and bemoaning that “These a_______ always get away.”

Moments later, Zimmerman said Martin was running away and called the youth a “f______ punk.” After confirming that Zimmerman was following Martin, the dispatcher said, “Ok, we don’t need you to do that.”

Within minutes, Martin lay face down with his arms spread out, dead from a single gunshot wound to the heart from Zimmerman’s nine-millimeter Kal-Tac pistol.

Most of the evidence has concerned the fight between Martin and Zimmerman. A young woman with whom Martin was chatting by cell phone, Rachel Jeantel, confirmed that Martin felt he was being stalked by a hostile white man. There were three neighbors who either saw or heard portions of the altercation. None was able to give a full description of what happened.

Experts on both sides described the physical evidence, which was inconclusive. There was none of Zimmerman’s DNA on Martin’s hands, and none of Martin’s DNA on Zimmerman’s pistol. On the other hand, Martin’s fingers had abrasions consistent with having punched Zimmerman in the face, and Zimmerman had a bloody nose and abrasions on the back of his head. Both sides’ experts called Zimmerman’s wounds superficial and minor, not in any way life-threatening.

Taken as a whole, the eyewitness and physical evidence demonstrates that Zimmerman’s aggressive pursuit of Martin culminated in a physical fight, during which Martin punched Zimmerman in the face, causing the back of his head to hit a hard surface.

Over a dozen witnesses, including all four parents, were called solely to identify the voice calling for help heard in the background of a 911 call placed by one of the neighbors.

That issue could turn out to be insignificant. Zimmerman had no cause to get out of his car in the first place and pursue Martin while wearing a firearm–especially after being told not to do so. The young man had every right to use force to defend himself against such a provocation, and the fact that Zimmerman may have been getting the worse in a fight he picked does not excuse lethal force.

The rest of the evidence related to Zimmerman’s recorded statements and the police investigation.

Zimmerman described events to the Sanford police as if he were a police officer, calling Martin “the suspect”–there was no crime reported or underway–and employing the familiar clichés police often use to defend their unjustified shootings of workers and youth. The prosecution’s extensive use of Zimmerman’s statements, including a self-serving interview on the right-wing Hannity Fox News television hour, allowed Zimmerman to present his version of events to the jury on multiple occasions without having to take the witness stand, where he would have been cross-examined.

Nevertheless, Zimmerman’s own words expose the implausibility of his self-defense claim. Of particular interest is the glaring contradiction between Zimmerman’s initial statement that Martin surprised him by attacking from behind a bush, and the reenactment video Zimmerman and the police investigators made the next day, where Zimmerman points to the location of the fight in the middle of a lawn, far from any foliage that could have conceal a human being.

If Martin was fleeing, as Zimmerman told the dispatcher, and the fight began out in the open, then it must have been initiated by Zimmerman. Any use of force by Martin was therefore provoked, making Zimmerman’s shooting in response a criminal act.

While to a certain extent the prosecution’s weakness on key issues can be attributed to gaps and other problems in the evidence itself, it is also apparent that the police apparatus as a whole–within which prosecuting attorneys play a crucial role–tends to sympathize with Zimmerman, a “wannabe” police officer whose only offense, in the eyes of the state, was perhaps excessive zeal in the defense of property.

The real lineup of class forces was revealed most clearly during the testimony of Sanford police officer Chris Serino, who testified that he believed Zimmerman was telling the truth when claiming the shooting was in self-defense. Credibility determinations are reserved for the jury, and the testimony was clearly objectionable, yet the prosecutors said nothing until the next day, far too late to remedy their blunder effectively. Normally, police officers go out of their way to shape their courtroom testimony to convict the defendant.

The list of witnesses who have testified, with links to their video testimony, can be found here: http://trayvon.axiomamnesia.com/people/witnesses/ .



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Secret Intelligence Court a Precursor to Tyranny

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/secret_intelligence_court_a_precursor_to_tyranny_20130710/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Strikes and protests against mass layoffs in Greece

0

 

By
Christoph Dreier

11 July 2013

Greek municipal workers went on strike Monday in response to government plans to carry out further redundancies in the public services, as demanded by the European Union. Municipal police officers and community workers occupied public offices in Athens, Thessaloniki, Attica and other cities.

On Monday and Tuesday, thousands of people marched to the Interior Ministry on Klathmonos Square in Athens to protest against the government’s dismissal program. On Wednesday, workers reportedly decided to continue their walkout for the entire week. A one-day general strike has been announced for July 16.

The workers are protesting against the plan of the government (a coalition of the conservative New Democracy and the social democratic PASOK) to shift 4,200 state employees to a so-called “transfer company” by the end of the month. The transfer company guarantees the workers 75 percent of their salary for eight months, after which they will loose their jobs. A total of 12,500 workers are to be outsourced and condemned to unemployment via the transfer company by the end of September.

Those loosing their posts include 2,200 school security guards and 3,500 municipal police officers. The government has announced that at least some of the police officers will be reintegrated into the central security forces as part of the racist “Xenios Zeus” campaign to hunt down refugees without papers. Some 1,500 teachers will also lose their jobs despite the fact that the Greek educational system is already facing catastrophic conditions.

The government also intends to sack 4,000 workers directly by the end of the year. Some 2,000 jobs were shed last month following the closure of the ERT public broadcasting channel and its replacement by a slimmed-down successor station.

All of these measures have been dictated to the Greek government by the “troika”–the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Commission. On Tuesday, the troika published its report on the country’s progress in the implementation of austerity measures. The report was the basis for the decision by EU finance ministers Tuesday evening to release a fresh tranche of loans.

The troika report showed that the Greek government has surpassed the targets drawn up by the EU for the implementation of its austerity measures. In the first five months of this year, the country’s budget deficit totaled 3.8 billion euros, despite the country’s growing burden of interest and loan repayments. A deficit of 7.1 billion euros had been anticipated. This means Greece has already generated a primary budget surplus and would no longer require fresh loans were it not for its high burden of interest payments.

In order to pay off its creditors, the country still needs emergency loans from the EU and the IMF. To tighten the screws on the Greek government even further, EU finance ministers decided to divide the scheduled tranche of eight billion euros into smaller amounts and make payment dependent on the precise implementation of the redundancy plans.

The first tranche of 2.5 billion euros, which is needed to pay loans due in August, will be paid only if the Greek parliament passes appropriate laws by July 19. “By mid-July the necessary legislative steps need to be done,” German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said on Tuesday in Brussels.

The Greek government has only a wafer-thin majority following the departure in June of the Democratic Left (DIMAR) from the coalition.

Further tranches are to be paid in August (1.8 billion euros) and October (2.5 billion euros) on condition that the government has actually carried out the layoffs. The troika has already sent representatives to all major ministries to monitor these measures.

The EU has also demanded that the Greek government privatize state enterprises worth 1.6 billion euros. In light of the country’s appalling economic situation, the privatization amounts to a fire-sale. Following the failed takeover of the Greek supplier Depa by Russia’s Gazprom, the total sum to be raised was reduced by one billion euros.

The government program will serve only to deepen the social disaster already afflicting the country. The recession has now lasted 19 consecutive quarters and economic output has fallen by a third since 2009. This represents an economic collapse unprecedented in Western Europe since the end of World War II. Analysts expect a further decline in economic output of up to five percent this year, with unemployment rising to 27.8 percent. Unemployment already stands at 27 percent.

The government is resorting to increasingly aggressive methods to impose the latest round of social attacks and has placed striking workers under martial law on three separate occasions this year.

On Monday, police attacked a peaceful demonstration of students at the University of Athens. The students were opposing the closure of four universities. Police used tear gas and arrested 31 students after the protesters disrupted a meeting of the University Board and occupied a room.

The police attack on the students is highly symbolic. Prior to 2011, police were banned from entering university campuses. In August 2011, the government, then headed by PASOK, overturned the law and allowed the police to carry out the type of raid they staged on Monday. In order to carry out its social attacks, the government is resorting to the methods of the military junta that ruled Greece from 1967 to 1974.

The most important instruments of the ruling elite to keep workers under control, however, remain the trade unions. They have collaborated with the government to prohibit strikes and repeatedly worked to steer working class opposition into harmless channels.

The general strike called for July 16 by the country’s two major public and private union federations, ADEDY (Civil Servants’ Confederation) and GSEE (General Confederation of Greek Workers), is intended to serve just this purpose. The unions have organized dozens of such token actions in recent years. In every case, the strikes are coordinated with businesses and the government and organized merely to permit workers to let off steam.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

IMF update highlights global economic slide

0

 

11 July 2013

As the fifth anniversary of the eruption of the global financial crisis approaches, the world economy is moving still further away from what were once considered “normal” conditions.

This week, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) again downgraded its forecast for world economic growth–the fifth such downward revision since the beginning of last year. Significantly, the statement accompanying the update pointed to processes that indicate the overestimation of growth prospects in the past two years has been the result of a failure to take into account structural changes in the world economy.

The IMF cut its forecast for global growth to 3.1 percent for 2013, after projecting a 3.3 percent expansion in April, and lowered its forecast for 2014 to 3.8 percent, after previously predicting a 4 percent expansion.

It pointed to three major factors as being responsible for the slowdown: disappointing growth in emerging market economies, a deeper than expected recession in the euro area as a result of low demand and depressed confidence, and slower than expected growth in the US economy, due to cuts in government spending.

The update noted that while “old risks” to global growth remain “new risks have emerged, including the possibility of a longer growth slowdown in emerging market economies.” In other words, there is no prospect of growth in these economies compensating for the low growth in the United States and the continued recession in Europe. The euro area is expected to contract by 0.6 percent in 2013 and grow by just 1 percent in 2013.

The contraction in Europe is not only the product of the slump in the so-called periphery countries. IMF chief economist Olivier Blanchard said that even in the core economies of France and Germany “there seems to be a general lack of confidence in the future”–a remark that was borne out the next day when German industrial output fell by 1 percent in May, twice the expected drop.

Blanchard noted that while there were specific reasons for lower growth in China, Brazil and India, there was an underlying slowdown in the overall trend, not just in the cyclical component. “It is clear that these countries are not going to grow as fast as they did before the crisis,” he said.

Immediately following the update, data on China’s trade showed that exports in June fell 3.1 percent compared with a year earlier, after increasing by 10.4 percent on average for the first part of 2013.

The notion that somehow China and other so-called “emerging markets” were going to provide a new foundation for the expansion of the world economy was always a fiction, given their dependence on the US and Europe as their major export markets. But it was able to be maintained for a period due to extraordinary financial and fiscal measures undertaken in the aftermath of the financial crisis, especially by the Chinese government.

Authorities launched a stimulus package of some $500 billion and unleashed an expansion of credit in order to fuel the financing of investment projects, especially by local government authorities. As a result, the ratio of total credit to gross domestic product in the Chinese economy rose from around 115 percent in 2008 to an estimated 173 percent. At the same time, the share of investment rose from 42 percent of GDP in 2007 to 47 percent in 2013.

The stimulus measures were predicated on the assumption that eventually Europe and the US would recover, bringing a renewed expansion of exports. But the stagnation in the US economy and the contraction in Europe have meant that the expansionary credit policies in China can no longer be sustained. They have now been replaced by the imposition of a clampdown.

The overall significance of the IMF update is that it makes clear there is no area of the world economy that can provide the basis for a general expansion and no prospect of such a development in the future.

Moreover, there are clear and growing risks of the onset of a new financial crisis as the US Federal Reserve Board moves to cut back on its program of quantitative easing, through which it has been pumping $85 billion per month into financial markets.

The provision of this ultra-cheap cash has played a central role in lifting the US stock market to new highs in the face of stagnation or very low growth rates in the underlying economy. Insofar as higher share prices have been sustained by higher profits, these have resulted from savage cost-cutting rather than the growth of revenue as a consequence of expanding markets.

But according to a recent report in the Wall Street Journal, this process may be coming to an end, with companies needing a boost in revenue in order to sustain profits. However, the revenue of companies in the S&P 500 index is expected to rise by just 1 percent in the second quarter compared with a year earlier.

While markets have continued to rise, following a plunge last month when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke indicated the Fed was looking to cut back on quantitative easing, the actual implementation of the policy could set off renewed turbulence.

Even a limited winding back of the monetary stimulus could have a major impact on the so-called emerging market and developing economies, as cash is withdrawn and returned to the US. Using somewhat guarded language, the IMF warned that “weaker growth prospects” and “potential legacy problems” arising from a “prolonged period of rapid credit growth” could lead to increased “financial stability risks.”

If the Fed’s tapering down of quantitative easing triggers currency depreciations and rapid capital outflows from emerging markets, this could well blow back into US markets and spark a financial crisis.

Whatever the immediate turns in the economic conjuncture, the IMF’s latest report has a far-reaching political significance. It underscores the fact that, under conditions where there is no prospect of economic recovery in any meaningful sense, rising unemployment, wage cuts and cuts in social services have become permanent.

Against this program of social counter-revolution being implemented by the ruling elites, the working class must fight for its own independent interests and a political program aimed at the establishment of a workers’ government and the implementation of a socialist program, starting with the establishment of public ownership and democratic control of the banks and major corporations.

Nick Beams



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev arraigned in federal court

0

 

By
Thomas Gaist

11 July 2013

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing attack of April 15, was arraigned before a federal court in Boston Wednesday. He has been charged with 45 separate counts and could face the death penalty.

Three people were killed and more than 260 were wounded when two bombs detonated near the finish line of the marathon in a central commercial and tourist area of Boston. Tsarnaev is also charged in connection with the subsequent murder of Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer Sean Collier, as well as the kidnapping and robbery of a motorist whom the Tsarnaev brothers allegedly carjacked in an effort to escape the Boston area.

At his arraignment, the 19-year-old suspect pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.

Nearly three months after the bombing, the arraignment takes place amidst an ongoing cover-up by government officials and the media of extensive contacts between the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the second alleged bomber, Dzhokhar’s older brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev, as well as other members of the Tsarnaev family.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in a police shootout on April 19, during which Dzhokhar was wounded. The younger brother was arrested the following day and soon after transferred to a prison hospital in Massachusetts.

The US government seized on the bombings to impose a police-military lockdown on Boston and surrounding communities. Under the cover of a manhunt for the Tsarnaev brothers, thousands of National Guard troops and state and local police were mobilized to shut down a major urban area, utilizing heavily armed police backed by machine gun mounted armored vehicles and military helicopters to conduct warrantless house-to-house searches.

Residents were “advised” to remain indoors and virtually all public transit and surface and air traffic closed down.

This exercise in de facto martial law–a dress rehearsal for mass repression and the imposition of military rule–was overwhelmingly applauded within the political and media establishment as a model of coordination between police, intelligence and national security agencies.

In the weeks since the bombings and the police lockdown of Boston, the media has all but dropped mention of the events, evading any discussion of the murky circumstances surrounding the bombings themselves and the sinister political implications of the government response.

Simultaneously with Wednesday’s arraignment, a hearing was held at which Boston Police Commissioner Ed Davis told a Senate panel that in the run-up to the Boston Marathon, the FBI failed to share information about Tamerlan Tsarnaev with Boston police officers sitting on the regional Joint Terrorism Task Force with FBI, Homeland Security and other federal and state officials.

Neither Davis nor FBI Director Robert Mueller, who admitted to a congressional panel in May that his organization failed to inform local and state officials about Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s suspicious activities, has offered any credible explanation for this staggering breach of security.

In 2012, Tamerlan Tsarnaev traveled to the volatile North Caucasus in Russia and remained for six months, staying in Dagestan with his father and visiting other family members. There are multiple reports that while in Russia, the elder Tsarnaev brother made contact with Islamist separatists involved in terrorist attacks on Russian authorities.

The Tsarnaev family hails from Chechnya, which borders Dagestan. The Tsarnaevs left Chechnya in the mid-1990s, during the years of heavy fighting between Russian forces and Chechen rebels, who received covert support from the CIA.

In 2011, Russian and Saudi Arabian security services contacted the FBI and CIA with warnings about Tamerlan Tsarnaev. A Saudi official told the British Daily Mail that the information they gave the US was “very specific,” warning that “something was going to happen in a major US city.” The Mail cited a Department of Homeland Security official confirming the existence of this letter.

The FBI has said it investigated Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011, including interviews with Tamerlan and other family members, but found nothing suspicious and closed the case. Nevertheless, Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s name was placed on two US antiterrorism watch lists.

Despite this, Tamerlan Tsarnaev was allowed to fly out of the US to Dagestan and return without even being questioned by US border security. Subsequently, he allegedly purchased high-explosive fireworks, weapons and detonators without interference.

These circumstances, along with the failure of the FBI, CIA and Department of Homeland Security to inform local and state police of their contacts with Tamerlan in advance of the Marathon–a major international event–defy an innocent explanation.

The indictment against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, handed down at the end of June, maintains the official cover story that the Tsarnaev brothers were “self-radicalized” and inspired by Al Qaeda materials downloaded from the Internet. They allegedly acted entirely on their own. This story has been promoted by the government and uncritically echoed by the media in an evident attempt to preempt questions about the extensive contacts between the Tsarnaevs and US police and intelligence agencies.

The mainstream media has refused to report new facts documenting longstanding, high-level connections between US government agencies and members of the Tsarnaev family, including ties of blood and marriage.

Ruslan Tsarni, uncle of the Tsarnaev brothers, reportedly incorporated the Congress of Chechen International Organizations (CCIO), which was involved in the transfer of military supplies to Islamist militants fighting in Chechnya. The CCIO was registered to the home address of Graham Fuller, chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA during the Reagan administration. Fuller’s extensive CIA career included postings to Germany, Turkey, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, North Yemen, Afghanistan (where he served as station chief in Kabul) and Hong Kong.

Fuller was a key player in the 1986-87 Iran-Contra scandal, having first proposed the policy of secret arms sales to Iran to finance right-wing militias in Nicaragua, and was working at RAND Corporation, a think tank with close ties to the CIA and Pentagon, when Tsarni registered the CCIO to his address. Additionally, Tsarni married Fuller’s daughter in the mid-1990s.

The state killing of Ibragim Todashev, an acquaintance of the Tsarnaev brothers and subject of the government’s investigation, provides further damning evidence of systematic efforts by the government to conceal the roots and nature of the bombings. On May 22, five weeks after the bombings, Todashev was killed by an FBI interrogator in his Florida home. Todashev was shot as many as seven times, once in the head.

The government offered no less than four contradictory accounts of the killing in the week that followed, including initial claims that Todashev wielded a knife, which were later acknowledged to be false. Days after the knife claim was released and retracted, the New York Times reported that Todashev grabbed a “metal pole” that “might have been a broomstick.”

What is known for certain is that at least four federal agents occupied Todashev’s home for eight hours prior to his death and that before the interrogation began, Todashev informed his roommate that he feared for his life. At a press conference in Moscow, Todashev’s father stated that morgue photos proved the shots were fired into Todashev while he was on the ground, with a “control shot” delivered point-blank to his head.

There has been no attempt by the US media to pursue the issue of the state murder of Todashev.

The Boston bombing is the latest in a series of terrorist incidents involving individuals known to and monitored by US intelligence agencies, beginning with the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington DC. The abortive attempt to blow up a passenger jet as it approached Detroit on Christmas Day 2009 was likewise carried out by an individual about whom multiple warnings had been made to US intelligence agencies.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

North Korea slams US hostile policy

0

North Korea says it will not relinquish its nuclear deterrence until the United States ends its hostile policy toward Pyongyang and dissolves the US-led UN command in South Korea.

Å“The DPRK (North Korea) will never give up its nuclear deterrence unless the US fundamentally and irreversibly abandons its hostile policy and nuclear threat towards my country… and dissolves the UN command, a mechanism which is an aggressive military tool against the DPRK,” said North Koreaâ„¢s Ambassador to the UN So Se Pyong in Geneva on Wednesday.

Å“The UN command in South Korea is one of the notorious structures that causes danger of war in the Korean Peninsula,” So said.

Established in 1953 at the end of the Korean War, the United Nations Command Military Armistice Commission (UNCMAC) supervises the implementation of Korean Armistice Agreement.

The envoy, however, said that North Korea is open to resume the nuclear talks, which was halted since 2008.

Å“For six-party talks, we are now ready to have any kind of talks to ease the tension on the Korean Peninsula and to solve any kind of issues, mostly the security issues, because all the problems are security concerned (related),” he said.

The envoy also warned that an upcoming joint military exercise between the US and South Korea would raise tensions on the Korean Peninsula.

Å“The US will stage another joint military exercise in August with South Korea. In this case, the whole Korean Peninsula will fall into the same critical wartime situation.”

The Korean Peninsula has been locked in a cycle of military rhetoric over the past few months.

DB/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

US detains witness in FBI killing of Ibragim Todashev

0

 

By
Andrea Peters

11 July 2013

Amid a continuing cover-up of the FBI killing of Ibragim Todashev, US immigration officials are detaining Tatiana Gruzdeva, Todashev’s roommate, and preparing to deport her from the country on charges of overstaying her visa. Civil liberties groups believe Gruzdeva has valuable information about Todashev’s interactions with the FBI.

Todashev, an acquaintance of suspected Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was allegedly a key witness in the bombing. He was shot and killed by an FBI agent on May 22, after being interrogated in his apartment for many hours by investigators. He had been been repeatedly questioned in the days and weeks before his death.

There has been no official investigation into Todashev’s murder, though government officials and media sources gave wildly conflicting accounts. Initially, officials cited in the press claimed that the 27-year-old “went crazy,” lunging at officers with a knife. This then became a “samurai sword,” a “metal pole,” and even a “broomstick.” Other sources have since reported that Todashev was unarmed when he was killed.

It also remains unclear as to who was even in the room at the time of his death, with Washington Post and New York Times accounts citing conflicting official reports.

Press reports are now circulating that just prior to his death, Todashev was preparing to sign a statement implicating himself and Tamerlan Tsarnaev in a multiple homicide in Waltham, Massachusetts in 2011. The murder evidently involved bodies found with their throats cut and covered in marijuana. Todashev’s ex-wife and father firmly deny that he could have been involved in the murders, insisting that he stayed away from drugs.

Washington continues to work to silence others who might have information about Todashev’s death and his relationship with the FBI. In mid-May, the young man’s roommate, Tatiana Gruzdeva, a Russian national born in Moldova who was studying in the US, was detained by immigration officials.

Gruzdeva was imprisoned and slated for deportation on July 1, based on claims that she overstayed her visa. Her “voluntary departure” has now inexplicably been pushed back by 30 days, with Gruzdeva remaining in custody.

She was picked up by authorities a few days before Todashev’s arrest, shortly after civil liberties groups contacted her, believing that she could provide information about the FBI’s dealings with Todashev before his murder. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which has called for an independent investigation into Todashev’s death, believes that her detention and deportation are intended to prevent Gruzdeva from speaking publicly about the case.

Executive Director of CAIR’s Tampa, Florida office Hassan Shibly told the World Socialist Web Site, “There is a lot of mystery around the detention. There appears to be some sort of cover-up going on.”

Shibly pointed out that the onus is on the government to explain its actions. Immigration court officials working under the direction of the Department of Justice, which also oversees the FBI, have refused to comment on Gruzdeva’s case, citing privacy laws.

According to Shibly, there are reports that the FBI was harassing Todashev’s friends in the weeks leading up to his murder, threatening them with the loss of their green cards if they did not spy on Islamic establishments in the area and provide other information. CAIR believes that Gruzdeva can “shed light on these issues.”

Shibly also stated that CAIR’s investigation into Todashev’s killing and an independent analysis of forensic evidence established that Todashev was unarmed at the time of his death, lying on the ground. “This in and of itself is disturbing,” Shibly noted.

“ At best ,” he stated, “the FBI did an incompetent job.”

The refusal of officials to provide a credible explanation of Todashev’s killing or a justification for Gruzdeva’s detention reeks of a cover-up. Rather than make critical testimony publicly available, the state is killing and locking up witnesses in a murder case bound up with a major terror bombing that led to an extraordinary lockdown of a major US city.

This makes all the more troubling the evidence of numerous connections between US intelligence officials and the alleged perpetrators of the Boston bombings.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was a known quantity to the US intelligence community years before the Boston Marathon bombing. In 2011, the Kremlin alerted US officials to concerns about Tsarnaev’s links to Chechen jihadists. Nonetheless, he was able to move freely across the US border, visiting Russia, including regions in the country with active Islamic separatist movements.

According to his family, Tamerlan was repeatedly visited by the FBI for several years. His mother said that Tamerlan was “controlled by the FBI for three to five years” before the bombing.

The Tsarnaev brothers’ uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, founded a group called the Congress of Chechen International Organizations, which helped supply Islamic insurgents in Chechnya with mine resistant boots. Tsarni was married to the daughter of Graham Fuller, the one-time vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA. Tsarni registered his pro-Islamist organization at Fuller’s home address.

Questions also remain about Todashev himself. A May 22 NBC article reported that US officials had stated that Todashev “had some connections with radical Chechen rebels.”

He received asylum from the US in 2008, on the grounds that he feared for his life in his native Russia. Mark Kramer, director of the Cold War Studies program at Harvard, told the Boston Globe on July 5 that he “didn’t see any justification for granting asylum” to Todashev. He added that he was “baffled” because he had “known of others who applied and been turned down in cases far more deserving.”

Apparently, however, Todashev was in the process of moving back to Russia–the country that he supposedly fled fearing for his life in 2013–when he was questioned and murdered by the FBI. Todashev’s friend, Kushen Taramov, has stated that Todashev postponed his travel plans in response to FBI demands that he stay for questioning.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Tighter Chinese credit policy threatens financial instability

0

 

By
John Chan

11 July 2013

China’s State Council announced a series of policies last Friday aimed at reducing the country’s vast credit bubble created by the stimulus measures introduced in the midst of the 2008-09 global financial crisis. A credit crunch, however, threatens to trigger a wave of bankruptcies and destabilise the banking and financial system, which is burdened with high levels of bad debt.

Although the State Council statement insisted the state-owned banking system would keep the credit supply at a “reasonable level”, it is widely understood in financial circles that the new policy will end the massive injections of credit seen in the past four years. The guidelines indicated support for advanced manufacturing and promising new industries, rather than traditional sectors such as steel and shipbuilding that have huge overcapacities. This will inevitably lead to widespread restructuring, factory closures and mass lay-offs.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime faces a monumental dilemma. Credit ballooned to 200 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2012, or $23 trillion, up from 75 percent of GDP before the global financial crisis in 2008. Local governments, as well as the corporate sector, have stacked up massive debts, which, if uncontrolled, will lead to a financial meltdown.

However, the very measures undertaken by China’s central bank to reduce credit last month produced a credit crunch that pushed short-term inter-bank lending rates to record highs (see: “Credit crunch hits China”). The central bank was forced to intervene in the market to prevent the banking system grinding to a halt.

Nevertheless, the new policy announced last Friday will significantly restrict credit. According to a survey of economists by US Bloomberg News this week, the cash supply this year will be reduced by $122 billion–a sum equivalent to the size of Vietnamese economy.

Some economists have expressed concerns about the impact on the already slowing Chinese economy. Louis Kuijs, chief China economist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group, told Bloomberg that “the liquidity crunch has increased downside risks”. He warned that heavily indebted local governments and small enterprises “are going to be the hardest hit by a clampdown on financial activity”.

Estimates of local government debt range from 15 to 36 percent of the GDP. Much of the credit was used to finance unprofitable infrastructure projects or to speculate in the property market, Vice Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao said last Friday that Beijing has not released new figures since a 2010 audit put local government debt at 10.7 trillion yuan ($1.74 trillion). However, he acknowledged: “I think this number will rise.”

Beijing is particularly concerned about so-called “wealth products” issued by commercial banks, estimated at around $2 trillion, mainly in property speculation. Along with these risky financial assets, a vast “shadow banking” market has also developed. Smaller banks and financial institutions take out loans from major state banks and re-lend to companies and property developers unable to borrow through regular channels.

Last week’s State Council statement called on banks to isolate “wealth products” from other types of assets, in the hope of preventing any crisis in this sector spreading to the entire banking system.

The explosion of speculation and risky investments in China over the past four years is connected to a sharp downturn in its export markets in the US and Europe. In 2008, Beijing announced a 4 trillion yuan stimulus package in the hope that the developed economies would recover quickly. But that did not happen.

With the US and Europe going deeper into slump, net exports have not contributed to China’s GDP growth since 2008. The latest export figures show a 3.1 percent decline in June from a year earlier, well below the expected rise of 4 percent. Exports to the US fell sharply, by 5.4 percent, and to the EU by 8.3 percent. China’s overall foreign trade growth has plunged from 13.5 percent in the first quarter year on year, to 4.3 percent in the second quarter. In May, it was just 0.3 percent, followed by a 2 percent fall in June.

China’s economic expansion has overwhelmingly depended on fixed capital investment, which rose from the already high figure of 42 percent of GDP in 2007 to 48 percent in 2010. With little profit to be made in production, increased capital spending did not go into manufacturing and related infrastructure, but mainly into real estate speculation.

The Financial Times reported last month on the huge overcapacities across Chinese industries, all of which heavily depend on government subsidies. The article cited a study by US academics Usha Haley and George Haley, who found that steel, glass, paper and auto parts are actually highly fragmented industries, the “vast majority of companies enjoyed no economies of scope or scale.” They explained: “There is enormous overcapacity and no gauging of supply and demand and we found that subsidies account for about 30 percent of the industrial output. Most of the companies we looked at would probably be bankrupt without subsidies.”

The State Council statement came just as China’s largest private shipbuilding company, Rongsheng Heavy Industries Group, appealed to the government and large shareholders for a rescue package. Despite receiving state subsidies since 2010, Rongsheng has suffered from the global shipping downturn. New orders for Chinese shipbuilders halved in 2012. Rongsheng’s orders were $US55.6 million–well short of its target of $1.8 billion–and it now has debts of $4.1 billion.

The Wall Street Journal reported that this flagship company cut 8,000 jobs recently. Last week, 2,000 workers at its Nantong shipyard in Jiangsu province protested over unpaid wages and clashed with police. This situation is a harbinger of the social and political upheavals that will be triggered by a wave of job losses, potentially in the millions.

The new CCP leadership under President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang is exploiting the credit crisis as the means for enforcing pro-market restructuring. State bank credit will be replaced, according to the State Council, by encouraging private capital to set up financial institutions, including banks, financing leasing companies and consumer financing companies. The aim of promoting market-driven credit is to boost “productivity”–that is, to intensify the exploitation of the working class through speedups, layoffs and consolidation.

Just two days before the State Council released its guidelines, it approved the establishment of a new free trade zone in Shanghai as a testing ground for new financial and monetary policies. This includes convertibility of the now highly regulated Chinese yuan with international currencies and liberalising tightly controlled capital accounts, with the aim of establishing Shanghai as a competitive global financial centre.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

The background to the Lac-Mégantic disaster: Deregulation, profit and the Canadian rail industry

0

 

By
Carl Bronski

11 July 2013

Last weekend’s train derailment in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec and the subsequent explosion of oil-filled tanker cars that demolished much of the town’s central core and killed more than 50 people have exposed alarming trends in the shipment of dangerous substances on Canada’s rail network.

In particular, the immense boom in the transport of crude oil by rail over the past several years combined with the continued decay of rail infrastructure, reduction of railroad staffing levels and the deregulation of the industry have left many observers warning that the horrific tragedy at Lac-Mégantic could very well be repeated in other towns and cities across the country.

Oil production in North America has steadily increased in the last decade due to the massive development of the northern Alberta tar sands and increasing shale oil production from the Bakken deposits in North Dakota, Montana, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.

Today about 10 percent of all North American oil is moved by rail, up from two percent only five years ago. Much of this rail traffic is shuttled through major urban centres and is carried in tanker cars that are known to be susceptible to puncture in the event of a derailment. The ill-fated Lac-Mégantic train passed through Toronto only a day prior to the Quebec explosion.

According to the Canadian Railway Association, shipments of oil by railcar tanker in Canada have increased from 500 carloads in 2009 to about 140,000 for 2013–an increase of 28,000 percent. Even if the proposed Keystone XL pipeline from Western Canada to the American Gulf Coast and the Northern Gateway pipeline from Alberta to the British Columbia coast are eventually built, it is projected that oil production in Canada and the US will exceed pipeline capacity by one million barrels a day by 2025. Should the US government not approve the currently stalled extension of the Keystone XL pipeline project to Alberta, it is estimated that by 2017 oil shipments by rail in Canada will increase a further 42 percent.

Canadian rail companies have boosted profit margins on the heels of this transport boom. Canadian Pacific Railways increased its average revenue per car by 12 percent this year as a result of increased oil transport contracts. Canadian National Railways has so far gained 14 percent on the Toronto Stock Exchange this year. Montreal Maine and Atlantic (MMA), the railway company involved in the Quebec explosion, has buttressed its profits by using oil shipments to make up for a decline in lumber transport contracts.

Even as pipeline spills are becoming a more frequent occurrence in North America–due to aging installations, reduced maintenance and dubious risk analyses based not on environmental safety concerns but rather the voracious profit requirements of oil, construction and financial industry shareholders–the danger of an oil spill from a rail tanker is still deemed to be three and to six times greater than from a pipeline. Railcar accidents are more likely to cause immediate injury and death. Pipeline accidents, however, are often larger with broader and longer-term environmental and health impacts.

Proponents of quick development of the Keystone XL and Gateway pipelines–a group that includes Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservative government, substantial elements in the US Congress and Obama administration, Big Oil and much of the corporate elite in both countries–have cynically latched on to the Lac-Mégantic disaster to extol pipelines as a safe alternative to ever-increasing shipments of crude by rail.

In their cruel use of the Quebec tragedy, however, none of these proponents make mention of the fact that the oil on the train at Lac-Mégantic was shale oil from North Dakota–oil that will never be serviced by a pipeline due to the Bakken field’s untenably short “life span” of about twelve years. Indeed, with or without new pipeline infrastructure, railcar transport of oil will continue to increase.

In reality, the burgeoning risks associated with pipeline or railcar transportation of oil are a product of an economic system that places profit before the well-being of the general population.

Railroad safety in Canada has been deregulated under successive Liberal and Conservative governments since the 1990s. Today, railway companies largely carry out their own inspections of processes, equipment and infrastructure. This so-called self-regulation is simply a carte blanche for corporations to continue to cut safety corners to burnish their bottom lines. Similar practices have been instituted in Canada’s food safety system, resulting in repeated outbreaks of food-borne illnesses and deaths over the past decade.

Despite the dramatic increase in the shipment of hazardous materials, funding to Transport Canada for spot inspections has been slashed. The overall budget allocated by the Harper Conservatives to the Transportation Department has been reduced by 30 percent in the last year alone. In 2011 an auditor-general’s report concluded, “Transport Canada has not designed and implemented the management practices needed to effectively monitor regulatory compliance” of dangerous goods transport.

Recommendations by Safety Boards to rail companies to update rail safety technologies are not implemented. Technological advances, for instance, allow for the installation of automatic switching devices that would allow for the redirection of unauthorized trains–like the runaway Lac-Mégantic train–to safe-port sidings.

Replacement of the prone-to-puncture DOT-111 tanker car–the most heavily used vehicle type in the industry (and that used by MMA on its ill-fated Lac Mégantic train)–has proceeded at a snail’s pace. With companies complaining of the expense involved in eliminating the DOT-111s, the government has stipulated that they only need be replaced with safer, thicker-walled tanker cars when they are retired from service.

Profitability pressures meanwhile cause the railways to press for “lean” operations with reduced staffing and more onerous work schedules and to skimp on the upkeep of physical infrastructure. The runaway train at Lac-Mégantic, for instance, was overseen by a lone engineer in charge of 72 cars and five locomotives. He had parked the train for the night on aging tracks after a grueling 12-hour shift and, in accordance with policy, apparently left the train unattended with a locomotive engine still partially operational to maintain air-brake pressure. The loss of air-brake pressure, perhaps due to a reported fire on the unattended running locomotive, is a possible cause for the train eventually breaking away and careening into Lac-Mégantic.

Ed Burkhardt, MMA’s CEO, has pushed for one-man train “crews,” in which an engineer is responsible for both driving the train (whether manually or by remote control) and doing work on the ground. On Wednesday, Transport Canada revealed that in 2012 it had given the green light to a request by MMA officials to be one of only two companies allowed to operate one-man trains in Canada. Transport Canada also said that, although a rare occurrence, there are no regulations to prevent a company from leaving a running train unattended.

Burkhardt has made a fortune overseeing the privatization and rationalization of railway operations in New Zealand, Britain and continental Europe.

Over the past decade, several small derailments at low speed on poorly maintained MMA tracks have caused chemical leaks. According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, since 2000, MMA trains have spilled hazardous chemicals seven times, including a 13,000-litre diesel oil spill in Frontenac, just east of Lac-Mégantic, last month. Overall, the Transportation Safety Board reports 129 accidents both major and minor and 77 derailments of MMA trains since 2003.

The railway bosses’ overriding concern for corporate profitability was perhaps best exemplified by Canadian Pacific management during the recent Bow River Bridge collapse near Calgary, Alberta. When that century-old, poorly maintained bridge fell into the river after a heavy flood, threatening to drop precariously perched CP cars full of poisonous petroleum distillate into the gorge, CP’s chairman, Hunter Harrison, rejected suggestions that the bridge should have been inspected as the flood waters began to rise. Shutting the bridge down, he insisted, would have “jeopardized commerce.”

Over the past several days, network television anchors and their camera crews have descended on Lac-Mégantic to record in solemn tones the aftermath of the event. Police updates are broadcast in their entirety, railway experts are interviewed, eyewitnesses brought forward and grieving parents, sons and daughters featured. Scant attention, however, is given to the underlying systemic causes for the Lac-Mégantic tragedy and the growing list of public health disasters that have shaken Canada in the past 15 years–including the poisoning of Walkerton, Ontario’s water supply in 2000, the 2003 SARS epidemic, and the 2008 listeriosis outbreak.

Since last Saturday’s derailment explosion MMA’s Ed Burkhardt has repeatedly sought to shift blame away from his company and its practices by successively attributing the disaster to “sabotage,” errors by a local fire department, and malfeasance on the part of the train’s engineer. It was left to a shell-shocked citizen of the small Quebec town to say what no one else from the television networks would. When asked to explain the cause of the tragedy, she turned to the bank of cameras and screamed, “Money! Money! Money!”



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

The NSA given a free hand to operate in Germany

0

 

By
Peter Schwarz

11 July 2013

An interview with historian Josef Foschepoth published in the online edition of the Süddeutsche Zeitung makes clear that US intelligence agencies have a free hand to do what they like in Germany, with the knowledge and blessing of the federal government.

Foschepoth is professor of history at the University of Freiburg, and an expert on the role of Allied intelligence in postwar Germany. In 2012, he published a book on the subject entitled, “Germany Surveilled”.

The historian regards the indignant response of the German government regarding the spying activities of American and British intelligence services unmasked by Edward Snowden as pure hypocrisy. For a Western intelligence agency, such as the National Security Agency (NSA), there are in principle no limits in Germany.

“The NSA can do everything in Germany,” explains Foschepoth. “Not only because of the legal situation, but above all because of the intensive collaboration between the services, which was always desired and always politically acceptable.”

According to Foschepoth, the legal basis for the activity of Western intelligence services in Germany goes back to 1963. At that time, Germany and the Allied nations committed to close collaboration in the collection, exchange and protection of intelligence in a supplementary agreement to the NATO Status of Forces Agreement. The agreement came about through secret negotiations and was strictly confidential.

In 1968, the Western Allies returned responsibility for surveillance officially to Germany, but through an international, legally binding secret supplementary accord maintained the right to continue to conduct their own monitoring measures to protect their forces. At the same time, Article 10 of the German constitution was restricted so profoundly that “there is no longer a fundamental right to the inviolability of postal and telecommunications secrecy.”

“It was the biggest bluff of 1968,” said Foschepoth. “The Status of Forces Agreement, Management Agreements and secret accords survived [German] reunification, and are in force to this day.”

Chancellor Konrad Adenauer (Christian Democratic Union, CDU) and Willy Brandt (Social Democratic Party, SPD) accepted the special rights of the Western intelligence agencies because they aspired to German sovereignty. Likewise with Helmut Kohl (CDU), who did not want to endanger German reunification. Both the Schröder-Fischer (SPD-Green) and Merkel (CDU) governments have not touched the existing regulations. “They are all sitting in the same boat, because they benefit from US information.”

According to research by the Süddeutsche Zeitung, the NSA currently has at least three facilities in Germany–in Darmstadt, Wiesbaden and Stuttgart. What the NSA does there is top secret. But it is to be assumed “that the NSA people working in Germany are involved in spy programs like Prism.”

“US intelligence agents go in and out in Berlin, Cologne and Pullach, where the German domestic and foreign intelligence agencies reside,” writes the Süddeutsche. The newspaper supposes that the reverse is also the case, indicating that there is a lively exchange between the country’s intelligence agencies.

In the government, it has mainly been Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, who has long-served as a liberal fig leaf for the Free Democratic Party’s (FDP) right-wing policies, who expressed public outrage over the NSA bugging. However, as Minister of Justice she must have known about the public and secret agreements that allow the NSA to spy unmolested in Germany.

In a guest contribution for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, SPD chair Sigmar Gabriel expressed outrage over the “betrayal of our core values” and called for a struggle against “data capitalism”. In fact, it was his party colleague, Otto Schily, who as Interior Minister in the Schröder government, massively strengthened the intelligence and security apparatus, and proclaimed that a “basic right to security” does not exist in the constitution.

While Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger pretends to know nothing and Gabriel spouts radical phrases, others are trying to steer indignation about the NSA’s espionage along nationalist lines. The most open in this regard is Jakob Augstein’s regular column in Spiegel Online, which is cynically titled “When in doubt, [turn] left”.

“Do the Germans want to submit to the yoke of this power with quiet pleasure like Heinrich Mann’s ‘Man of Straw’? Or do they want to oppose this power with a counter-power?” Augstein asks, pointing to an essay in Spiegel titled, “Why this country must finally accept its role as one of the most powerful nations in the world.”

The response to excessive intelligence snooping is: strengthen the power of the German state! Given the traditions of the Prussian authoritarian state, Nazi dictatorship and the subsequent integration of its staff into the West German judiciary and intelligence service, only a narrow-minded journalist with historical amnesia such as Augstein could come up with such an idea.

In fact, the target of the NSA wiretaps and the German secret services, which work together very closely, are their own people. The only “counter-power” that can oppose them is the working class on both sides of the Atlantic.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

People living in caves as UK homelessness reaches five-year high

0

 

By
Dennis Moore

11 July 2013

Homeless men and women are living in a network of disused sandstone caves near the town centre of Stockport, Greater Manchester. There have been up to four people a night sleeping rough in the cave system perched on a 20-foot precipice overhanging a river, only a short distance from public view.

A report in the Manchester Evening News noted that Stockport in the north of England has seen a 42 percent increase in homelessness in just one year. Jonathan Billings, a project manager with the local homeless charity Wellsprings, said, “The number of people turning up each day for support has soared from around 60 to 70 to around 140 in the last three years.”

His organization has witnessed a particular surge in demand among more middle class, affluent people. After having worked for years, they lost everything in the downturn, he said. Billings emphasised the risk these people face when sleeping without shelter:

“Unfortunately when people are sleeping rough they will come to very dangerous places. I know of people who have fallen into the river.”

Official statistics published by the government show a five-year high in homelessness across the UK. This includes 54,540 households declared homeless, with some 4,500 households now living in bed and breakfast accommodation (B&B).

This figure includes a year on year increase for a growing number of families who have been left stuck in B&B accommodation beyond the six-week legal limit. Many of these families are being forced to live in a single room with no cooking facilities, having to share a bathroom with many other families in the same building.

The number of people being housed outside the area where they initially are from has risen by 14 percent, with 9,000 of the households as of March 31, 2013 having to live in another local authority. This leaves many a long distance away from work, family and support networks.

Campbell Robb, chief executive of the homeless charity Shelter, said that many families were at the “breaking point”.

“Behind these numbers are thousands of families up and down the country who have lost the battle to stay in their homes,” he explained.

In the last two years the numbers of people defined as sleeping rough across the UK has risen by 31 percent.

Families face increasing pressure trying to make ends meet. Shelter reported that 4 out of 10 families with children have had to cut down on what they spend on food in the last year. A YouGov poll of 4,000 people carried out for Shelter showed that 27 percent of those polled had to cut back on gas and electricity bills to be able to pay for rent or mortgage costs. A total of 57 percent of adults, and 64 percent of families with children were struggling to pay their rent or mortgage last year.

Shelter have gone on to report that one in three people would not be able to pay their rent or mortgage for a month if they lost their job, with 35 percent of those polled–equivalent to 8.6 million people–saying they could not pay the rent or mortgage from their savings for a month. Some 18 percent of people polled–4.4 million people–would not be able to pay the rent or mortgage at all if they didn’t secure a new job immediately.

The financial precipice facing an increasing number of people each month is clear, with 3.9 million British families just one pay cheque away from the threat of losing their homes.

The enormous pressure this is placing on local authorities in trying to meet housing demand from ever greater numbers of people has brought things to breaking point. There has been a sharp rise in the numbers of people who have lost their homes who were tenants with Assured Short-hold tenancies (AST).

These tenancies are predominantly in the private rented sector, whereby the tenant has far less housing rights. It is estimated that over a fifth (21 percent) of people showing up at local authorities requesting assistance for rehousing were tenants who had lost their AST homes. This is compared to 14 percent of statutory homelessness cases two years ago who had lost an AST. The increase is being attributed to the recession, unemployment, stagnant wages and an increase in private rents.

Rising private rents are pushing up the numbers of working people having to claim top up housing benefit to be able to cover the payment. But housing benefit payments are also being cut. Renting a property is now considered more expensive than paying a mortgage across all regions of England, with the average renter paying an extra £75 more a month than people with a mortgage. Rents rose in 83 percent of areas across the country last year, with the average rent rising by £300.

A shortage of affordable homes, however, has left ever more people with no choice but to rent, leading to greater pressure of demand on the rental market and driving up costs.

The introduction of the bedroom tax–a penalty on unoccupied rooms for those on benefits in local authority and housing association accommodation–and the resulting debts incurred is threatening a further rise in homelessness. Housing benefit has been cut by 14 percent for people deemed to have one extra bedroom and by 25 percent for those with two extra bedrooms.

A survey by Scotland’s council umbrella body Cosla conducted 100 days after the introduction of the tax found social housing ren arrears increased to £2 million during April alone–covering just 8.4 percent of the UK population. Three-quarters of the councils reported rises in rent arrears, with four out of five councils collecting 50 percent or less in rent due from tenants affected by the cut and three in five collecting 40 percent or less. Requests for discretionary housing payments for those struggling to pay rent stood at over 22,000 by the end of May–over four times the number received in the same two-month period last year.

Further cuts to the welfare budget are to be implemented following the government’s spending review. Campbell Robb from Shelter commented, “Millions are living on the edge of a crisis, only secure in their homes for a matter of weeks. At the same time, support for people who have lost their homes is being stripped away. It’s easy to see why every fifteen minutes, another family in England finds themselves homeless.”



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

NSA casts massive surveillance net over Latin America

0

 

By
Bill Van Auken

11 July 2013

Secret National Security Agency documents provided by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden have exposed a massive spying operation covering all of Latin America.

The NSA’s interception of billions of telephone conversations, emails, Internet searches and other forms of communication made by Latin American individuals, companies and government agencies has provoked a wave of protests and demands for explanations by the Obama administration.

Snowden, the source of the secret documents, remained confined to the transit zone of Moscow’s international airport Wednesday, with conflicting reports about the prospect of his finding asylum in Venezuela or elsewhere.

According to the documents reported in the Rio de Janeiro-based daily O Globo, the most intensive surveillance has been conducted against both US allies–including Brazil, Colombia and Mexico–and against Venezuela, whose bourgeois nationalist regime has in the past come into conflict with US aims in the region.

Also subjected to the NSA surveillance net have been Argentina, Ecuador, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Paraguay, Chile, Peru and El Salvador, according to the O Globo report.

The spying has involved two programs: PRISM, which collates email, Internet chats, searches and other material directly from the servers of IT companies such as Microsoft, Google, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Skype; and “Boundless Informant,” which collects telephone calls, faxes and other communications.

Also in use has been a program code-named Silverzephyr, which an NSA power-point slide explains is aimed at “accessing lines for information transmission through a partner,” referring to an unnamed private corporation with access to satellites, telephone networks and data transmission systems.

The revelation that telephone and Internet communications in numerous Latin American countries have been exposed to constant surveillance by the NSA has given the lie to US officials who have defended the agency’s wholesale spying on the populations of both the US itself and other countries as a necessary weapon in the so-called war on terror.

There is no evidence that the countries subjected to this spying were the source of terrorist threats against the US. Moreover, as the documents made public by Snowden make clear, much of the US surveillance has been directed at uncovering “commercial secrets,” arms purchases and other matters designed to further the interests of US-based banks and corporations in their struggle to dominate the region’s economies.

“One aspect that stands out in the documents is that…the United States doesn’t appear interested in military affairs alone, but also in trade secrets–‘oil’ in Venezuela, and ‘energy’ in Mexico, according to a list produced by the NSA in the first quarter of this year,” O Globo reported.

In its surveillance of Venezuelan communications, for example, the NSA has focused both on military procurements and the oil sector, while conducting intense spying operations following the death of President Hugo Chavez, who headed the country’s government for 14 years.

In Mexico, in addition to a focus on drug trafficking, the surveillance has been directed at securing information on energy policy and deals.

Significantly, among those protesting the spying operation was the Federation of Industries of the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil’s most powerful business lobby. Paulo Skaf, the president of the federation, said that “any espionage is condemnable and an abuse, whether it is against individuals or against companies, no matter what government commits it.” He added that the US government should be compelled to “make some kind of reparation.”

The NSA documents make clear that Colombia, which is Washington’s closest ally in the region, receiving more military aid than any other countries save Israel and Egypt, has trailed only Brazil and Mexico as a target for US espionage. Even the right-wing government of President Juan Manuel Santos found itself compelled to issue a formal protest.

Mexico’s government demanded that Washington provide “ample information” on its spying operation and affirmed that “relations between countries must be conducted with respect and observance of legal frameworks,” while “energetically condemning any deviation from this practice.”

Argentina’s president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, declared that she “felt a shiver going down my spine when we learned that they are spying on us all through their services in Brazil.”

Certainly all of these bourgeois governments have carried out their own spying programs, several of them in collaboration with US intelligence.

Colombia’s secret police agency, the Department of Administrative Services, was revealed to be involved in a wide-ranging wire-tapping operation two years ago, targeting members of parliament and Supreme Court justices.

Fernandez de Kirchner was compelled to dismiss a close political ally as minister of security following revelations that the agency was overseeing “Project X,” in which the national police were spying on social activists and dissident trade unionists.

Until a recent decision by Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto, CIA personnel worked directly alongside their Mexican counterparts in “intelligence fusion centers” set up inside Mexico.

And among the reports based on the leaked NSA documents published in O Globo was the revelation that so-called “Special Collection Service” centers were set up by the CIA and the NSA in Brasilia, Bogota, Caracas, Panama City and Mexico City to monitor information from foreign satellites.

Nonetheless, the exposure of the wholesale espionage by US intelligence has escalated tensions between the various Latin American governments and Washington, fueled in no small part by conflicting economic interests under conditions where the historic hegemony of US imperialism in the region has been eroded by increased trade and investment from China and Europe, as well as the growing role of Brazilian capital.

It is expected that the NSA spying operation as well as the recent incident in which the plane of Bolivian President Evo Morales was forced down in Europe over alleged suspicions that it was carrying Edward Snowden from Moscow to asylum in Bolivia will figure prominently in the deliberations of a summit meeting of the Latin American trade bloc, Mercosur, which convenes in Montevideo Friday.

The Organization of American States, a body traditionally dominated by Washington, passed a resolution Tuesday condemning the act of state air piracy conducted by European governments at the behest of the CIA against Morales. Only the US and Canada failed to join in backing the statement, which demanded apologies from the governments of France, Spain, Italy and Portugal and explanations for their actions.

Spain, which initially refused such an apology, changed course Tuesday, with Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Garcia-Margallo declaring, “If any misunderstanding has taken place, I don’t have any objection to saying sorry to President Morales.”

Under questioning by reporters. Garcia-Margallo confirmed that the false information that Snowden had been aboard Morales’s plane had come from the US.

The Bolivian government has charged that Washington knew its allegations to be false, but spread them as a means of retaliating against Morales for saying he was prepared to offer Snowden asylum and using the incident to intimidate him and anyone else contemplating aid to the ex-NSA contractor.

Despite relentless government and media vilification of Snowden, the latest opinion poll conducted by Quinnipiac University found a clear majority, 55 percent, identifying him as a “whistle-blower,” i.e., someone who exposed government crimes, while barely one third agreed with the Obama administration in classifying him as a “traitor.”

While it is far from clear whether the offers of asylum made by the governments of Venezuela, Bolivia and Nicaragua will amount to more than left-nationalist rhetoric, it is clear that Snowden enjoys massive popular support both in the US and among working people all across the globe. It is only in the political mobilization of this support that his real defense lies.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Australian coroner’s report points to Labor’s responsibility for insulation deaths

0

 

By
Terry Cook

11 July 2013

In a bid at damage control, newly reinstalled Prime Minister Kevin Rudd belatedly apologised last week to the families of four young men killed in 2009 and 2010 when working for contractors under his Labor government’s $2.5 billion Home Insulation Program.

The hurriedly rolled out program provided rebates to insulate the ceilings of 2.7 million houses across the country. It was part of the first Rudd government’s $42 billion economic stimulus package, launched after the 2008 global financial crisis as a means of propping up business. Overall, the stimulus package allocated billions of dollars to underwrite the activities of major corporations, especially in the construction and retail industries, and also guaranteed the loans secured by the big banks.

Rudd’s cynical apology, more than three years after the fatalities, followed the release on July 4 of a Queensland Coroner’s findings into the deaths of Matthew James Fuller, 25, Reuben Kelly Barnes, 16, and Mitchell Scott Sweeney, 22. The coroner’s report pointed to the Labor government’s culpability for the fatalities.

Two of the young men were killed when firing steel staples to lay electrically conductive insulation material. A third was electrocuted when a steel pole he was using to push insulation into place touched a screw that had pierced a live cable. The fourth victim, Marcus Wilson, 19, died of heat exhaustion while working in a ceiling in over 40 degree Celsius temperatures in Sydney. His death was not part of the inquiry.

In each of the three cases, it was found that the men had not received adequate training or supervision. Two company directors and a supervisor were referred for possible health and safety violations, but Coroner Michael Barnes highlighted the underlying lack of safety regulation. He stated: “The only training stipulation required of persons employed or subcontracted by an installer to install insulation was that they were to have completed the relevant one day Occupational Health and Safety induction course.”

Beside the four deaths, the insulation program led to over 220 house fires, more than 1,000 roofs being electrified and 240,000 dangerous or sub-standard insulation jobs, all with the potential to have caused serious injury or death.

Coroner Barnes found that a major contributor to the deaths was the speed with which the program “was conceived, designed and implemented”. He stated: “Because a major focus of this was the stimulation of the economy to counter the effects of the global financial crisis, it needed to proceed far more quickly than [the two-year timeframe recommended by experts], but not at the cost of human life.” Put more plainly, young workers’ lives were put on the line to meet the urgent needs of big business.

Although Barnes noted that workplace safety was primarily the responsibility of the then state Labor government, he declared it was “reasonable to expect” that having injected billions of dollars into a program to stimulate the economy, the federal government “would have regard to the possible safety implications”. He added it was “reasonable to conclude the dangers should have been foreseen before three people died in Queensland and one in New South Wales.”

Known dangers were ignored. “While the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage had recommended mandatory specific training for all new entrants into the industry in the planning stages of the program, this did not occur due to the tight timeframe in which the program was to be rolled out.”

The haste driving the program had nothing to do with providing decent jobs or alleviating the dire social position of millions of ordinary people hit by the crisis. The scheme was a component of the Rudd government’s pro-market agenda to meet the cash needs of the financial and corporate elite amid the immediate fallout from the 2008-09 crash.

Underlining this is the fact that the insulation program was suddenly terminated in February 2010, just one year after its inception, followed by the government’s Green Loans and solar hot water installation stimulus schemes, in the face of intense media agitation.

The media campaign did not start until after the fourth fatality on February 4 that year. Far from being concerned for the lives and safety of the workers employed under the program, the media seized on the deaths to push for a wider shift from stimulus to austerity measures. With its immediate crisis averted, finance capital internationally insisted that the burden of the bailouts be imposed on the working class by slashing public spending, including on housing, health care, education and child care.

Rudd’s winding up of the insulation program and other parts of Labor’s stimulus package was meant to signal that he that was prepared to implement the required shift. He did not do so quickly enough to satisfy the corporate establishment, however, and that became a key factor in his ouster and replacement as prime minister by Julia Gillard in a backroom coup, orchestrated by Labor and trade union factional bosses in mid-2010. Gillard quickly pledged to cut spending to wipe out the budget deficit.

There is no doubt that the trade unions, as well as the Rudd government, were fully aware that the outsourcing of the home insulation program would see a flood of contractors into the industry, looking for quick profits, and the recruitment of inexperienced young people desperate for work.

From the outset, the unions fully backed the insulation program, claiming that it supported “tens of thousands of jobs” and covered up for the Rudd government. After the first three deaths in 2009, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) initially proposed the program’s suspension, but withdrew its call in November 2009, following a government promise to “boost safety and training standards”.

Little more than three months later, Michael Sweeny was electrocuted. The ACTU issued no subsequent statement on the insulation program, and has not commented on the coroner’s findings.

The unsafe and oppressive conditions that led to the deaths of the four young men are not an aberration. On the contrary, due to decades of deregulation, privatisation and outsourcing under both Labor and Liberal governments, enforced by the unions, unsafe and unhealthy conditions are endemic in many industries, from construction to hospitality and fast-food outlets.

This situation will continue to escalate regardless of which party takes office after the federal election, with both Labor and Liberal pledged to back the ongoing corporate restructuring that will further undermine safety in the drive to boost profits.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

30,000 inmates take part in California’s largest hunger strike

0

 

By
Richard Vargas and Jake Dean

11 July 2013

Nearly 30,000 inmates across two-thirds of California’s 33 prisons are entering into their fourth day of what has become the largest hunger strike in California history.

Almost a quarter of the approximately 150,000 inmates throughout California’s vast prison system, including those housed in privately-owned out-of-state facilities contracted by the state, are protesting deteriorating prison conditions and the use of indefinite solitary confinement, a form of state-sanctioned torture.

In addition to the inmates taking part in the hunger strike, 2,300 inmates did not attend work or class by either refusing to do so, or claiming that they were sick.

The recent opposition to the deteriorating living conditions in California prisons started at Pelican Bay State Prison in 2011, when a smaller number of inmates launched a hunger strike and protested against the indiscriminate use of indefinite solitary confinement against individuals suspected of having gang ties.

There are currently over 10,000 inmates in California that are held in some form of solitary confinement. One of the five “core demands” of the current hunger strike is that solitary confinement be limited to a maximum of five years–an extraordinary length of time for an individual to spend 23 hours a day in a small cell, with no interaction.

The other four demands are that “adequate and nutritious food” be provided; “group punishments [for individual actions] and administrative abuse” be eliminated; “constructive programming” be created and expanded for those in solitary confinement; and a program used to identify gang members–which rewards individuals who provide information on other inmates–be abolished.

On July 1, one week before the hunger strike began, ten inmates from the maximum security High Desert State Prison (HDSP), located in Susanville, California, issued an open letter demanding more humane living conditions. They announced plans to move forward with a hunger strike, which they described as a form of “peaceful protest” until their demands were met. On Tuesday, after over a week of refusing food, the ten inmates from HDSP were placed on medical watch just as the statewide hunger strike entered its second day of action.

One form of solitary confinement used in California is the Secure Housing Unit (SHU) program, which houses 4,527 prisoners–1,180 of which are held at Pelican Bay.

On average, inmates living in SHU will serve seven and a half years in solitary confinement–two and a half years longer than the five year limit demanded by the prisoners. There are currently 89 individuals who have been held in solitary confinement for over 20 years.

Inmates in solitary confinement are allowed only one hour of exercise in a 16 by 25 foot room, infamously known as the “dog run.”

Of California’s more than 10,000 inmates held in some form of solitary confinement, approximately 3,000 of those are being held in extreme isolation for life. The cells that house these inmates have no windows, no access to fresh air or sunlight. The United Nations officially identifies holding prisoners in solitary confinement for more than 15 days as torture.

Shane Bauer, one of the American hikers who was held hostage in Iran for twenty-six months, recently toured Pelican Bay State Prison. “My guide asks me how it compares to Iran, where I was held for twenty-six months. I want to tell him that no part of my experience–not the uncertainty of when I would be free again, not the tortured screams of other prisoners–was worse than the four months I spent in solitary. But that’s not what comes out. All I can say is, ‘I had a window.’”

California’s state prisons were recently at the center of a legal debate surrounding overcrowding and the Eighth Amendment. In 2011–in the 5-4, United States Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. Plata–the court ordered the state to reduce its prison population by 30,000 inmates from the level of 144,000. As of April, however, the prison population in California had grown to almost 150,000 inmates. The result has no doubt been a worsening of living conditions that inmates face, violating their Eighth Amendment right, which prohibits the government from cruel and unusual punishment.

Justice Kennedy had noted in the ruling that the state prisoner suicide rates are 80 percent above the national average, creating conditions that result in “needless suffering and death.”

Rather than reducing prison populations or address the demands raised by inmates, California has more and more relied on exporting prisoners to out-of-state facilities run by private firms with little or no public accountability. These for-profit facilities house nearly 10,000 California inmates, creating further hardship as some family members are unable to travel across country. Currently California utilizes facilities in Arizona, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Michigan.

The resumption of inmate opposition and the launching of the mass statewide hunger strike on Monday are an indication that conditions have only gotten worse since 2011



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

<em>Dirty Wars</em>: Revealing material, but missing the most important questions

0

 

By
Joanne Laurier

11 July 2013

Directed by Richard Rowley; with Jeremy Scahill as producer, writer and narrator

Dirty Wars, directed by Richard Rowley, is a documentary that follows investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill into the murderous, covert world of American Special Forces as the latter prosecute the US government’s so-called global war on terror.

Scahill is also responsible for a book, Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, covering some of the same material, which was published in April. He is the National Security Correspondent for the Nation magazine and author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army (Nation Books, 2007).

The documentary treats a wide range of material. The filmmakers speak with survivors of night raids and drone strikes in Afghanistan and Yemen and other victims of US aggression: they also interview US Special Forces members, generals and American-backed warlords. Filming took place in Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia and the US from 2010 to 2012. Dirty Wars opens with Scahill in Afghanistan talking with survivors of a February 2010 US night raid in Gardez. The brutal attack was launched on a family celebrating the birth of a child. As part of a cover-up, US Special Operations Forces–who killed two men and three women, two of whom were pregnant–spun the story of a family “honor killing.”

In the course of looking into the incident, Scahill begins to investigate the clandestine JSOC (Joint Special Operations Command), made up of units such as the Navy Seals and the Army’s Green Berets, which carry out armed missions abroad. “JSOC came to dominate the killing fields in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere,” asserts the journalist. He takes note of the emerging role of Admiral William McRaven, who assumed control of JSOC from General Stanley McChrystal in July 2008.

Scahill goes to Yemen, where a few months prior to the Gardez attack, cruise missiles struck the Bedouin village of al-Majalah in December 2009. More than forty people were killed, including 14 women and 21 children. About the massacre, a tribal leader angrily tells the camera: “If they kill innocent children and call them al Qaeda, then we are all al Qaeda. If children are terrorists, then we are all terrorists.”

The documentary points to the plight of Yemeni journalist Abdulelah Haider Shaye, who was imprisoned soon after he exposed the US role in al-Majalah. After the Yemeni president decided to pardon him, President Barack Obama personally intervened and the pardon was rescinded.

In Yemen, Scahill also visits Nasser al-Awlaki, the father of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American citizen assassinated by the Obama administration. Anwar was placed on the White House’s “kill list” in January 2010. He was the first US citizen known to have been placed on the list.

Anwar and Samir Khan, another US citizen, were killed in a US drone strike in Yemen on September 30, 2011. Two weeks later, Anwar’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, an American citizen, was killed by a US drone. Some of the film’s most moving footage involves Nasser and his grief-stricken wife, Saleha, showing family photographs of their son and grandson.

In his accompanying book, Scahill writes that in “October 2009, the CIA reportedly concluded that ‘the agency lacked specific evidence that [Anwar] threatened the lives of Americans–which is the threshold for any capture-or-kill operation’ against an American citizen. Obama disagreed.” Dirty Wars contends that following the assassination of Osama bin Laden in May 2011 JSOC came out of the shadows and became celebrated in the media, including in Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty. A still photo of the White House situation room shows Obama, Vice President Joseph Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and other top US officials as they witness the killing of bin Laden. It is a ghoulish scene. While not comfortable with every aspect of the sordid affair, Scahill comments that the assassination provided some closure for the American people.

“The world has become America’s battlefield,” and the global war on terror has “spun out of control,” conclude Scahill and the makers of the movie. A score by Kronos Quartet–made up of pieces called “drones,” which also refer to the harmonic variation of a musical tone–augments the film’s general eeriness.

It is disturbing to encounter a few of the US military’s many victims. Their stories are horrific and give flesh and blood to human beings only known from the headlines. Moreover, even a partial accounting of American imperialism’s crimes in the past decade and a half underscores how thoroughly the US media has concealed the reality from the American public.

However, taken as a whole, Dirty Wars easily raises as many questions as it answers.

First, although there are new facts and faces in Dirty Wars, it remains an issue how much of the film’s revelations will come as a shock to its likely audience, especially in the light of the revelations by WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden.

The film’s creators are not political naifs. Besides writing for the Nation, Scahill is a regular at such Democratic Party haunts as the Rachel Maddow Show, Real Time with Bill Maher and Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now! radio program. Dirty Wars was co-produced by Anthony Arnove, a member of the pseudo-left International Socialist Organization and an editor at the group’s International Socialist Review and Haymarket Books.

In other words, a distinct, if not clearly spelled out political perspective is at work here.

Numerous establishment publications, including the New York Times and the Washington Post, are still able on occasion of identifying misdeeds, even atrocities, committed by the US military and intelligence.

This media, however, is unable and unwilling to trace the various crimes to their source in the state of American society. These commentators treat the crimes as aberrations performed either by overzealous defenders of the homeland or mere “bad apples.” The objective inevitability of such illegal, unconstitutional behavior, given the decay and decline of US capitalism, much less the revolutionary political conclusions to be drawn, is entirely rejected.

Rowley, Scahill, Arnove, Goodman and company follow in the wake of the liberal media, as its somewhat more abrasive alter-ego. It is a serious question whether Dirty Wars is primarily an example of honest, but limited journalism … or an exercise in damage control on behalf of the American political establishment and the Democratic Party.

How is it possible that Dirty Wars offers no explanation whatsoever for the events it covers, no historical perspective? The long history of US machinations in the Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa is apparently a closed book for the filmmakers. The words “oil” and “neo-colonialism” never find utterance. The film never once considers the geopolitical exigencies that flow from the crisis of US and world imperialism–or the vast social inequality in America that fuels the anti-democratic flames. After all, what does its increasing reliance on global death squads tell us about the American ruling elite?

The illegal, unbridled violence against the populations of Afghanistan, Yemen and much of the planet and the assault on democratic rights in the US are two sides of the same process. Extra-judicial, state-sanctioned killing is not, as Scahill et al see it, a semi-legitimate response to 9/11 that has somehow run amok, but a new metastatic condition involving the entire system.

Refusing to analyze the roots of the political crimes it uncovers, the film instead implicitly exhorts the population to get rid of “neo-con” maniacs such as McRaven and turn the war on terror–which is never in dispute–from a dirty war into a “clean” one. Dirty Wars points to a series of terrible crimes, but rejects drawing any serious conclusions from them, leaving its audience suspended in mid-air. In fact, by default, it encourages the illusion that applying pressure to Obama and the Democratic Party can improve the situation, a fatal illusion.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Obama: Forcing Christians to Eat the Pork

0

While Barack Obama has often been compared to leaders of the past, it’s unlikely anyone has yet associated him with Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Ruler of the Seleucid Empire between 175 and 164 B.C., King Antiochus is best known for the persecution of Jews, and one story from the second book of Maccabees is particularly relevant here. As the passage tells us, the king was bent on forcing a Jewish woman and her seven sons to, of all things, eat pork. The boys resisted and were tortured and killed one by one as their mother, who ultimately was also murdered, looked on. What’s interesting, though, is that while the victims were being faithful to what they believed was divine dietary injunction, there was no Seleucid commandment stating “Thou shalt compel others to dine on swine.” The act of eating such meat was but a trivial matter to Antiochus, yet he nonetheless insisted on imposing his will.

Why would a person do this? It would be for one – or, more likely, a combination – of the following reasons:

– He hates the people in question and simply wants to torment them. Or, perhaps more precisely, he hates what they are and wants to destroy what makes them what they are.

– His ego cannot tolerate being defied.

– He views the beliefs at issue as stupid and takes pleasure in punishing those who dare be so “wrong.” This is a common human motivation.

– He wants to break the cohesiveness – and therefore the resistance – of the target people by forcing them to relinquish the beliefs binding them together.

Of course, while a different factor may be dominant in different situations, and while there is tremendous overlap among them, what’s obvious is that an Antiochan desire is one of hostility.

This brings us to a similar situation in our time: King Obama’s contraception mandate. The issue was ginned up during the 2012 campaign to rally Democrat support, but that battle has been won and is water under the bridge. Nonetheless and quite bizarrely, Obama insists on trying to force religious employers to fund contraception for their employees, despite the fact that offering such individuals an exemption would cost him nothing politically and would accord with the American tradition of respecting deeply held religious convictions.

And I’m going to relate a story illustrating just how deeply held they can be. I know of a man who, through some fairly unique connections, could make a healthy and relatively labor-free five-figure income selling contraception. He could really, really use the money, too. Yet he has declined the offer in obedience to his religious beliefs. Now, if a person wouldn’t even violate such a principle to win himself a treasure, how would he feel about violating it save someone else a trifle?

Yet as with King Antiochus, there is no corresponding principle on the other side. Sure, most everyone likes free stuff, but there is no divine injunction stating that anyone must compel others to pay for his contraception. So who should bend here and where does the onus belong?

I’ll answer that with one more story. A while back a neighbor approached me and requested I modify one of my activities in deference to a desire of his. Now, I considered his concerns trivial and, frankly, somewhat silly. And I certainly didn’t have to worry about fracturing any relationship – he was a liberal and devout atheist, and no dinner invitations would be in the offing regardless. Yet I accommodated him. After all, the concession I’d have to make would be a minor sacrifice, and the issue in question was important to him. It was just a matter of being neighborly.

This brings us to a comment made by “Reverend” Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. After spending the last 25 years defending efforts to purge longstanding Christian symbols, sentiments and prayers from our society by saying that religion is stronger when church and state are separate, Lynn now believes that forcing religious employers to provide contraception coverage is just peachy keen, no doubt because secularism has become stronger. And when supporting his newfound state-over-church principles he said that the contraception issue should not be a “justification for exemption from the laws that apply to the rest of us,” as it was “trivial.”

Ah, trivial.

Just as eating pork was to Antiochus or my neighbor’s concerns were to me.

And this raises an obvious question: since Lynn considers the matter so trivial but knows the other side does not, why does he react less as I did and more as did Antiochus?

(Mind you, this isn’t to say the matter actually is trivial, only that if the left considers it a molehill, why do they make a mountain out of it?)

Of course, Lynn certainly seems to believe in religious freedom – as long as he defines its boundaries. And they wouldn’t encompass what he considers “bull****,” which was how he excrementitiously described the contraception “religious-liberty claim”; moreover, many on his side point out that religious freedom isn’t absolute, as certain religious practices are illegal. But this attitude – and Obama’s mandate – represent a complete departure from our American understanding of religious freedom. Some churches engage in snake-handling, and there are Amish who will only drive tractors with metal wheels (and who are allowed to do so even though they damage roads). Additionally, the pacifistic Amish (and others) aren’t required to fight for the country even though defending one’s civilization is among the most important civic duties. The point is that as long as you’re not engaging in Aztec-like human sacrifice or crippling female genital mutilation, your deeply held beliefs will be respected, as a government that doesn’t even know what marriage should be is hardly capable of separating silly, superstitious trivialities from sublime insights into subtle truths. At least, that’s how it always had been in America.

And Lynn’s comments betray his heart. This is because, you see, you don’t go to the mat over trivial matters. But you might use a trivial matter as a convenient vehicle through which you can take a hated group to the mat. And with respect to Christians, the Lynn-heads obviously think they can get a pin.

The truth here is that no one is asking the left to make concessions; concessions aren’t at issue. If a situation existed wherein you could force a neighbor to donate $10 a month to your cause, but you knew he objected deeply and it would create bad blood, you’d no doubt pay the relative pittance yourself. It’s not only the neighborly thing to do, but also simply a matter of not engaging in salt-the-the-wound stealing. But the left is beneath even this. They have served notice that not only won’t they try to get along with Christians, they’ll do everything they can to not get along with them. Obama and his minions have become King Antiochus.

And we have to wonder what the future holds when they gain more power. If these purveyors of porcine government will feed on American freedom over something so “trivial,” what will they do over something they think really matters?

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com

Republished with permission from: The New American

OIC urges UN to help Myanmar Muslims

0

This file photo shows the burnt houses of Rohingya Muslims in central Myanmar.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has called on the UN to make more efforts to end the tyranny that Muslims are facing in Myanmar.

During a Wednesday meeting with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, OIC envoys said that the UN should put pressure on Myanmarâ„¢s government to resolve problems the Rohingya Muslim community is facing in the country.

Å“Myanmar is having a honeymoon with the world. The only problem is that that honeymoon is being built on the bodies of the Muslim victims in that country,” said Saudi ambassador to the UN Abdullah al-Mouallemi.

Hundreds of Rohingyas have been killed and thousands displaced in attacks by extremist Buddhists in Myanmar over the past year.

Roble Olhaye, Djiboutiâ„¢s UN ambassador and head of the OIC group at the UN, described the anti-Muslim attacks in the country as Å“ethnic cleansing.”

Å“The Myanmar authorities are failing to take the necessary measures to stem the violence,” he added at a press conference with Mouallemi.

Å“What we need from the UN is to have its voice heard loud and clear, being the conscience of the world,” Olhaye said.

The Saudi envoy to the UN also stated that the UN chief had pledged to do more in defending the rights of Rohingya Muslims. Å“There is a lot more that the UN can and should do,” Mouallemi said.

Å“We called on the secretary general to interfere to make his voice heard more loudly.”

Å“The most basic human rights and human values are being stepped upon by the current government and by the radical elements within Myanmar,” Mouallemi added.

Å“There has to be an end to the killing, that is much more basic, there has to be an end to the persecution, to the tyranny that this population is facing,” he said.

The Rohingya Muslim community in Myanmar accounts for about five percent of the countryâ„¢s population of nearly 60 million. The persecuted minority has faced torture, neglect, and repression since Myanmarâ„¢s independence in 1948.

Thousands of Rohingyas in the western state of Rakhine are deprived of citizenship rights, becoming vulnerable to acts of violence, expulsion, and displacement.

DB/HSN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Small Utah ISP firm stands up to ‘surveillance state’ as corporations cower

0



Published time: July 11, 2013 04:29

Despite having fewer resources and a fraction of the customers that broadband giants like Verizon and AT&T boast, one small internet service provider has resisted pressure from the NSA and refused to turn over customer data without a warrant.

Xmission, an independent company based out of one office in Salt
Lake City, Utah, has spent nearly two decades protecting its
customers’ privacy as the National Security Agency, Department of
Justice, and prosecutors have ramped up pressure on internet
service providers (ISPs). 

Owner Pete Ashdown told RT that every data collection request
stops at his desk, since he is the sole proprietor of Xmission.
At a larger company, a panel of stockholders would bow to
government pressure, he added.

“It’s pretty basic for me. Most of their requests are not
constitutional. They’re not proper warrants so I turn them
back
,” he said.

The government began sending data requests to Ashdown 15 years
ago but the entrepreneur, who launched his business in 1993,
acquiesced just once – at the advice of his lawyer. He agreed to
hand over the data only after receiving an FBI request
accompanied by a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court in 2010. Local governments and police in Utah
were behind most of the other formal inquiries that he received.

“There was actually a bill passed about four years ago that
allowed local law enforcements to request information out of ISPs
without a warrant and I fought that bill
,” Ashdown said.
“After it passed, I decided I was going to make a conscious
effort to refuse those requests because it’s very easy for law
enforcement to get a warrant and go through a court and do it
properly – but these are not passed through a court, so there’s
no check and balance. There’s no accountability with
it
.” 

Pete Ashdown

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), one of the internet’s
biggest privacy advocate organizations, has consistently ranked
Xmission’s transparency report among the most
desirable for subscribers concerned about privacy. But that
respect has not come without insinuations from state lawmakers –
although there has been no official retaliation against Xmission.

“We have had situations where people inside the Attorney
General’s office have slandered my business and said that we’re
supporting criminals
,” Ashdown said. “We absolutely do not
support criminals. We just ask for a proper warrant and that
seems to be too much to ask most of the time, unfortunately
.”

Ashdown has pledged his willingness to go to jail to protect his
customers’ privacy – a cause which he says is all too rare in the
current profit-first climate exposed by NSA whistleblower Edward
Snowden. 

“The other issue that we saw with the NSA exposure is that
companies like Google, Microsoft and Apple were supposedly
cooperating
,” he said. “They’re probably charging for that
privilege, so they’re making a financial decision to open their
networks for inspection by the NSA and it’s not worth it to me to
do that. I don’t want to live in a surveillance society and I’d
rather stick with what our Constitution says we’re protected
by
.” 

“I’ve got more to lose. I couldn’t fight a protracted court
battle but I’m willing to do it. I’m willing to go to jail to
protect my customers from being monitored. I find it surprising
that a company with the resources of Google isn’t more
circumspect about the information they’re giving away and what
they’re selling
.”

Ashdown made clear that he is a Snowden supporter, encouraging
the informed public to act in order to reverse the post-September
11 paranoia that has seeped into the national consciousness.
Whistleblowers like Snowden, along with others who disclose
information, could be the best hope for those worried about the
future, according to Ashdown.

“I think it’s shameful that he’s being treated like a criminal
for standing up and reporting what I believe are illegal acts by
our government…otherwise we have no recourse to turn our
government around
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Merkel defends cooperation with NSA

0

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has defended Germanyâ„¢s cooperation with the US National Security Agency (NSA) amid growing concerns over Washingtonâ„¢s secret surveillance on Europe.

The German weekly Der Spiegel recently reported that the NSA worked closely with German spies in a move which prompted the German opposition to press Merkel on how much she knew about US surveillance tactics.

Å“For decades, intelligence services have been working together under certain conditions that are tightly regulated in our country, and this serves our security,” Merkel said Wednesday in an interview with the weekly Die Zeit, adding that a certain level of cooperation was required to guarantee the security of German citizens.

She further told the German weekly that although the balance between privacy and security must be discussed, it is impossible to provide protection against terrorism without the option of electronic surveillance.

German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich is due to meet US President Barack Obamaâ„¢s adviser on homeland security and the US justice minister on Thursday to discuss the issue of US spying.

Å“I would like to make clear to our American partners how important it is to ensure things are proportionate in terms of the personal rights of our citizens,” Friedrich stated.

Berlin has also asked for explanations about revelations by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden of extensive spying by the NSA and by the UK on several countries including Germany and other EU nations.

Merkelâ„¢s office coordinates intelligence agencies in Germany that are also supervised by a parliamentary committee whose discussions are secret.

Germanyâ„¢s domestic spy agency has said it was unaware of Washington and Londonâ„¢s widespread eavesdropping.

However, the opposition maintains that the German chancellor or her chief of staff Ronald Pofalla, who coordinates the secret services, must have known more about their large-scale spying.

Snowden has revealed to the news media details of secret surveillance programs under which US spy agencies collect massive amounts of data on peopleâ„¢s communications via telephone and the Internet.

The fugitive leaker has also revealed that the NSA spies on European Union offices in New York, Washington and Brussels.

MR/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

UN accepts Syria invitation

0

The United Nations has accepted an invitation by the Syrian government for two senior UN officials to discuss allegations of using chemical weapons.

On July 8, Syrian Ambassador to the UN Bashar Jaâ„¢afari said Swedish scientist Ake Sellstrom and UN High Representative for Disarmament Angela Kane were invited to visit Syria over the issue of chemical weapons.

Martin Nesirky, spokesman for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, confirmed the invitation on Wednesday.

Nesirky said that the two had accepted the invitation Å“with a view to completing the consultations on the modalities of cooperation required for the proper, safe and efficient conduct of the UN mission to investigate allegations of the use of chemical weapons in Syria.”

On July 10, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that evidence shows that foreign-backed Takfiri militants in Syria have used chemical weapons containing shell and sarin.

Å“According to our additional information, these shells and the substance were made last February in the Syrian territory which at that time was under the control of the Free Syrian Army and made by one of the affiliated armed groups,” Lavrov stated.

The remarks by the Russian foreign minister came a day after Russian Ambassador to the UN Vitaly Churkin said that firsthand evidence suggests that the militants, not the Syrian government, had manufactured sarin nerve gas and used it during an attack near the northwestern city of Aleppo in March.

The UK, France, and the United States claim the Syrian government has used chemical weapons.

However, Syria says the militants have used chemical weapons on several occasions, including an attack in the region of Khan al-Assal in Aleppo Province on March 19, where over two dozen people died.

Foreign-sponsored militancy has taken its toll on the lives of many people, including large numbers of Syrian soldiers and security personnel, since March 2011.

SZH/HSN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Transatlantic Danger: U.S.-EU Merger Talks Underway in D.C.

0

The first round of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations has been proceeding this week (July 8 through 12) in Washington, D.C. largely under the radar. Although there has been relatively little coverage of the confab thus far, European and American officials and privileged “stakeholders” are busily negotiating agreements on a host of issues that would, if adopted, radically transform America. 

The TTIP is being billed as a trade agreement and marketed by the Obama administration and corporate sponsors as an initiative that will almost magically create millions of jobs and usher in wave after wave of innovation and prosperity. But as we have reported in our in-depth look at TTIP, “Secretly Trading Away Our Independence,” there is a stealth agenda behind this “trade” agreement; the ultimate aim of the TTIP promoters is the economic and political merger of the United States with the European Union. They say so in their own words, though usually not in forums for the general public.

“In TTIP, we have the opportunity to accomplish something very significant for our economies, for our relationship, and for the global trading system as a whole,” said U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman at the opening plenary session on July 8. Froman continued: 

We have an opportunity to spur growth and to generate significant increases in the already substantial number of jobs supported by transatlantic trade and investment.

We have the opportunity to complement one of the greatest alliances of all time with an equally compelling economic relationship.

And we have the opportunity to work together to establish and enforce international norms and standards that will help inform and strengthen the multilateral, rules-based trading system.

In the last sentence above, we catch a glimpse of the real purpose of the current negotiations: “to establish and enforce international norms and standards” and “strengthen the multilateral, rules-based trading system.” International rules, with international enforcement.

As we have reported previously, the clear goal of the architects of the TTIP is to ensnare the United States in the same ever-tightening process of economic and political integration and convergence that has transformed Europe from a continent of independent nation-states into a supranational federation ruled by unelected and unaccountable oligarchs in Brussels, unrestrained by any constitutional impediments. When this process began in Europe decades ago, following World War II, wise observers warned that the promised trade benefits were a ruse to hide the real fact that every step forward along this path was a step for centralizing and concentrating power, while simultaneously stripping away local autonomy and national sovereignty. (See “United States of Europe.”)

Now the nations of the European Union are trapped, and many of its citizens are trying desperately to extricate their countries from the tightening EU noose. They are being forced to pay for bailouts for the big banks, corporations, unions, and government boondoggles. They are being forced to accept regulations dictated by Brussels bureaucrats over all areas of their lives.

The same kind of micro-managing-by-bureaucracy is being planned for the EU-U.S. “partnership.” Here is a list of the areas that are being negotiated in the current round of TTIP talks, as listed by the U.S. Trade Representative’s website: 

Agricultural Market Access

Competition

Cross-Border Services

Customs and Trade Facilitation

Electronic Commerce and Telecommunications

Energy and Raw Materials

Environment Financial Services

Government Procurement

Intellectual Property Rights

Investment

Labor

Legal/Institutional Issues

Localization Barriers

Market Access and Industrial Goods Tariffs

Regulatory Coherence and Transparency

Rules of Origin

Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures

Sectoral Annexes/Regulatory Cooperation

Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

State-Owned Enterprises

Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)

Textiles

Trade Remedies 

As sweepingly broad as this list may seem, we can be sure that it is merely a start, as the EU experience has plainly shown; if allowed to be established, it would soon mushroom to cover virtually every aspect of life. 

Privileged “Stakeholders”: Phony “Transparency” and “Consensus”

Who are the folks crafting this new transatlantic “relationship”? In addition to government officials (led, for the United , by the U.S. Trade Representative and the State, Treasury and Commerce Departments), an assortment of corporate, industry, trade association, and NGO activist “stakeholders” have been assigned special rights at the negotiating table. These include: 

Sierra Club

Friends of the Earth

Humane Society of the U.S./ Humane Society International

Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch

AFL-CIO

Consumer Federation of America

Public Citizen’s Global Access to Medicines Program

Center for Science in the Public Interest 

These and other left-tilting groups are supposedly balanced by the following stakeholder organizations, which are usually described as “pro-market”: 

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

National Manufacturing Association

American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers

Grocery Manufacturers Association

Computer & Communications Industry Association

American Association of Exporters & Importers 

While many of the players in this supposedly diverse cast will hold clashing opinions on a multitude of issues, they tend to agree on one fundamental issue: global governance, which is merely a euphemism for global government. The one side wants to see a global regime that would enforce global environmental and social policy, while the other seeks the alleged benefits of a global regime that would make regulations uniform and easier for businesses to navigate. Both are willing to sacrifice national sovereignty and all that goes with it – the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution, checks and balances, states’ rights –to obtain their Holy Grails. It does not appear that there is a single organization among the assembled TTIP stakeholders to represent the interests of national sovereignty and independence as bonafide goods worthy of contending for.

Some of the stakeholder organizations give the appearance of championing national sovereignty while actually pushing for even greater global controls. Regular readers of The New American will not be surprised to find Lori Wallach among the TTIP’s controlled opposition. As we pointed out more than a decade ago (“Organized Anarchy”), when Wallach was put forward as the leading opponent of the World Trade Organization, her main problem with the WTO is that she wants it to have more power over more areas of our lives! Wallach represents Global Trade Watch, a subsidiary of Ralph Nader’s Public Citizen. The Ford Foundation, a primary source of funding for numerous radical groups, has been one of the principal funders for Global Trade Watch.

Interdependence vs. Independence

On June 19, just two weeks before America’s Independence Day this year, and three weeks before the start of the current TTIP round, The National Interest, a neoconservative journal appealing to a wide array of Beltway policy elites, published an article entitled “A New Declaration of Interdependence” arguing for quick passage of TTIP. The article was co-authored by Aart De Geus, chairman and CEO of the Bertelsmann Foundation, and Frederick Kempe, president and CEO of the Atlantic Council. Both organizations are major boosters of the EU, TTIP, and most other globalist projects. Kempe is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which has been the principal brain trust in the United States pushing for world government for most of the past century.

The highly influential CFR journal Foreign Affairs has likewise been busy lobbying for TTIP support among public policy and business elites. A July 10 Foreign Affairs article, “Getting to Yes on Transatlantic Trade,” and earlier articles such as “For Transatlantic Trade, This Time Is Different” and “Reviving the West: For an Atlantic Union”, are an integral part of the massive CFR lobbying offensive now underway to marshal support for TTIP, building toward votes in Congress on the matter next year.

Related articles:

Secretly Trading Away Our Independence

United States of Europe (A prophetic warning from nearly a quarter century ago)

Obama Administration Warns U.K. of Economic Loss if it Exits EU

Obama, Cameron, Barroso Push EU-U.S. Merger at G8 Ireland Summit

CFR Applauds European Union’s “Real Subversion of Sovereignty”

Organized Anarchy

Republished with permission from: The New American

Raising the Stakes on Immigration

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/raising_the_stakes_on_immigration_20130710/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

UK prince letters publication blocked

3

British high court has blocked attempts to force the publication of the content of controversial letters to ministers in which heir to the British throne tried to alter government policies.

Prince Charles is required to be politically neutral but cabinet minister have conceded that his letters to them contained Å“most deeply held personal views and beliefs” on matters he should avoid.

Attorney general Dominic Grieve had earlier vetoed the publication of the letters and on Tuesday England and Walesâ„¢s top judge Lord Judge ruled that Grieveâ„¢s move has been appropriate.

The attorney general had vetoed the publication of the 27 letters under the pretence that it would damage the public trust in his political neutrality, especially in his capacity as the future ruler of Britain.

“This risk will arise if, through these letters, the Prince of Wales was viewed by others as disagreeing with government policy. Any such perception would be seriously damaging to his role as future monarch because if he forfeits his position of political neutrality as heir to the throne he cannot easily recover it when he is king,” Grieve had said.

Charles has been repeatedly accused of meddling in the governmentâ„¢s decision-making.

The letters were apparently sent to call ministers to Charlesâ„¢ residence Clarence House before 2005 to discuss his pet subjects.

According to Alistair Campbell, the spin-doctor of the then British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Charles’ interference reached a point that Blair complained he wants to Å“scr**” the Labour government and raised the issue with the Queen.

AMR/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

27 Facts That Prove That The Family In America Is In The Worst Shape Ever

0

Family - Photo by Eric WardThe family is one of the fundamental building blocks of society. If you do not have strong families, you are not going to have a strong society. Unfortunately, the state of the family in America continues to deteriorate. The marriage rate has fallen to an all-time low, we lead the world in divorce, and about a third of all children live in a home without a father. Our young people have been taught that getting married and having a family is not a priority, and many of those that would like to get married and have children are not able to get the kinds of jobs that they need to support a family. The statistics that you are about to see should absolutely shock you. American families have never been this weak, and this is an incredibly troubling sign for the future of our nation. What will future generations of Americans be like if they do not have stable homes to grow up in? Will they be even more messed up than we are right now? That is a frightening thought.  The following are 27 facts that prove that the family in America is in the worst shape ever…

#1 The marriage rate in the United States has fallen to an all-time low. Right now it is sitting at a yearly rate of 6.8 marriages per 1000 people.

#2 Today, an all-time low 44.2 percent of Americans in the 25 to 34 year old age bracket are married.

#3 According to the Pew Research Center, only 51 percent of all adults in the United States are currently married. Back in 1960, 72 percent of all adults in the United States were married.

#4 Back in 1950, 78 percent of all households in the United States contained a married couple. Today, that number has declined to 48 percent.

#5 100 years ago, 4.52 were living in the average U.S. household, but now the average U.S. household only consists of 2.59 people.

#6 The United States has the highest percentage of one person households on the entire planet.

#7 In the United States today, more than half of all couples “move in together” before they get married.

#8 The divorce rate for couples that live together first is significantly higher than for those that do not.

#9 For women under the age of 30 in the United States, more than half of all babies are being born out of wedlock.

#10 In 1970, the average woman had her first child when she was 21.4 years old. Now the average woman has her first child when she is 25.6 years old.

#11 According to the Centers for Disease Control, there were 69.3 births per 1,000 women in the 15 to 44 year old age bracket in 2007. Now the rate has fallen to 63.2 births per 1,000 women.

#12 The birth rate for American women in the 20 to 24 year old age bracket has fallen to 85.3 births per 1,000 women. That is a new all-time record low.

#13 The United States has the highest divorce rate in the entire world.

#14 At this point, approximately one out of every three children in the United States lives in a home without a father.

#15 Without a father around, many single mothers in this country are really struggling to survive. Sadly, approximately 42 percent of all single mothers in the United States are on food stamps.

#16 It is being projected that approximately 50 percent of all U.S. children will be on food stamps at some point before they reach the age of 18.

#17 Today, more than a million public school students in the United States are homeless. This is the first time that has ever happened in our history.

#18 The United States has the highest teen pregnancy rate in the entire world. In fact, the United States has a teen pregnancy rate that is more than twice as high as Canada, more than three times as high as France and more than seven times as high as Japan.

#19 In the United States today, approximately 47 percent of all high school students have had sex.

#20 Approximately one out of every four teen girls in the United States has at least one sexually transmitted disease.

#21 According to one survey, 24 percent of all U.S. teens that have at least one sexually transmitted disease say that they still have unprotected sex.

#22 Instead of being raised by parents, an increasing number of children in America are being raised by movies, television and video games. For example, the average young American will spend 10,000 hours playing video games before the age of 21.

#23 Americans are tied with the British for the highest average number of hours spent watching television each week.

#24 There are more than 3 million reports of child abuse in the United States every single year.

#25 The United States actually has the highest child abuse death rate in the developed world.

#26 Approximately 20 percent of all child sexual abuse victims in the United States are under the age of 8.

#27 It is estimated that one out of every four girls will be sexually abused before they become adults.

Unfortunately, this is a problem that is not going to be fixed overnight. Getting the “right politicians” into office will not solve our problems and neither will spending a bunch of money.

The change that we need is a change of the heart. We need to change how we treat one another and we need to get our priorities straight.

Our families are really messed up, and this is hurting our kids the most. There is no way that this country is going to have any hope for a bright future unless our families start getting stronger.

Or could it be possible that I am overreacting?

What do you think?

Please feel free to share your thoughts about the state of the family in America by posting a comment below…

Republished with permission from: The Economic Collapse

'Europe birth rates fall amid recession'

0

A study shows the economic crisis that hit Europe in 2008 has meaningfully reduced birth rates across the continent. (file photo)

A new study shows fewer babies have been born in many European countries due to the economic crisis that started in the region in 2008.

The Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Germany has found that fewer babies were born in 28 European countries as unemployment rose.

According to the research published in the journal Demographic Research, Europeans under the age of 25 have especially refrained from having children in the face of the rising unemployment.

The fall in birth rates has hit southern European countries the hardest, especially in Spain, where the total fertility rate — the number of births per woman — fell nearly eight percent between 2008 and 2011 as unemployment rose from 8.3 percent to 11.3 percent.

Meanwhile, significant drops hit Hungary, Ireland, Croatia and Latvia, the study said, and the economic recession also interrupted the upswing in birth rates in the Czech Republic, Poland, Great Britain and Italy.

Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, whose labor markets weathered the crisis comparatively well, did not face much change in the birth rates.

According to co-author Michaela Kreyenfeld, the study proves that if unemployment rises one percentage point, the fertility rate for 20 to 24-year-olds drops by 0.1 across Europe, and 0.3 in southern Europe.

MRS/MHB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

UK has a CCTV for every 11 people

2

Britain has a CCTV camera for every 11 people, a security industry report disclosed, as privacy campaigners criticized the growth of the Å“surveillance state”.

Britain has a CCTV camera for every 11 people including 750,000 in Å“sensitive locations” such as schools and hospitals, British Security Industry Authority (BSIA) says.

The BSIA said there are up to 5.9 million closed-circuit cameras across Britain dramatically raising the previous estimates that put the number of cameras somewhere between 1.5 million and four million.

Å“Because there is no single reliable source of data no number can ever be held as truly accurate however the middle of our range suggests that there are around five million cameras,” Simon Adcock, of the BSIA, said.

The revelations drew angry criticism from privacy campaigners Big Brother Watch who described the CCTV culture as a sign of an ailing democracy in Britain.

Å“This report is another stark reminder of how out of control our surveillance culture has become,” Big Brother Watch director Nick Pickles said.

Å“With potentially more than five million CCTV cameras across country, including more than 300,000 cameras in schools, we are being monitored in a way that few people would recognize as a part of a healthy democratic society,” he added.

Pickles also compared the situation to the dystopia represented in George Orwellâ„¢s 1984 novel.

Å“This report should be a wakeup call that in modern Britain there are people in positions of responsibility who seem to think Ëœ1984â„¢ was an instruction manual,” he said.

The novel pictures a society where every single private move of the citizens in the then future Britain of 1984 is monitored by the eye of the state.

AMR/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

This Year’s Best-Kept Secret: The Next Generation of Community Radio

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/this_years_best-kept_secret_the_next_generation_of_community_radio_20130710/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Millions in US tax dollars go to Big Data for wiretap capabilities

0

The US government uses American tax dollars to pay major Internet companies and telecommunications giants like Verizon and AT&T for unprecedented access into millions of phone records and the ability to scour vast online databases.

AT&T charges the government a $325 “activation fee”
for each individual wiretap and a daily fee of $10 to maintain
it. Verizon, on the other hand, charges government eavesdroppers
$775 for the first month of monitoring an individual then $500 in
each month that follows, Representative Edward Markey (D-MA) told
the Associated Press. 

While Big Data executives claim they do not profit from the
government requests, civil liberties groups including the
American Civil Liberties Union encourage Microsoft, Google and
the like to charge because it could, theoretically, discourage
lawmakers from buying the warrantless access. 

“What we don’t want is surveillance to become a profit
center
,” Christopher Soghoian, the ACLU’s principal
technologist, told the AP. Because financial records create a
paper trail “it’s always better to charge one dollar. It
creates friction, and it creates transparency
.” 

Yahoo, Google and Microsoft did not disclose their fees, but the
ACLU determined that some email transcripts can cost the federal
government $25. Facebook said it grants the government access for
free. 

The extra scrutiny on the fledgling surveillance business comes
as US law enforcement continues its pursuit of former National
Security Agency Edward Snowden. Snowden admitted leaking secret
documents outlining the NSA’s policy of going before the secret
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to request access to
phone and Internet records. 

The average wiretap is estimated to cost American taxpayers
$50,000, although one narcotics case in 2011 cost New York
investigators $2.9 million in wiretapping alone. 

Companies rarely, if ever, charge in emergency cases – such as
police tracking an abducted child – and are not permitted to
charge for publicly accessible documentation, according to the
AP. 

“Government doesn’t have the manpower to wade through
irrelevant material any more than providers have the bandwidth to
bury them in records
,” said Al Gidari, a lawyer who
represents telecommunication companies in matters related to
privacy and civil liberty. “In reality, there is a pretty good
equilibrium and balance, with the exception of phone
records
.” 

Still, some in the government have complained that the fees
remain too high. Former New York criminal prosecutor John Prather
filed suit against several major telecommunication companies in
2009, claiming the fees they charge the government are
exorbitant. 

“They were monstrously more than what the telecoms could ever
hope to charge for similar services in an open, competitive
market, and the costs charged to the governments by telecoms did
not represent reasonable prices as defined in the code of federal
regulations
,” the suit alleged, as quoted by the AP. 

While the government has long been granted access to
communication methods, surveillance techniques — in recent years
— have struggled to adapt with constantly changing technology.
The FBI has pressured companies, most notably Google and the
Microsoft-owned Skype, to provide so-called backdoor methods that
would allow investigators to watch conversations in real
time. 

“A growing gap exists between the statutory authority of law
enforcement to intercept electronic communications pursuant to
court order and our practical ability to intercept those
communications
,” an anonymous FBI source told CNet in 2012.
“The FBI believes that if this gap continues to grow there is
a very real risk of the government ‘going dark,’ resulting in an
increased risk to national security and public safety
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

FBI Promotes Ultra Spy State

0

Everyone is a threat except for the elite funding terrorism.

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

As explained today on the Alex Jones Show, the FBI publishes bulletins intended to create a compliant public which spies on their neighbors at will for the witch hunt state.

Source: Creative Commons

Source: Creative Commons

Each of these Communities Against Terrorism: Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities bulletins are written specifically for a particular type of business such as tattoo shops, hotels, storage sheds, military surplus stores, etc. to highlight behavior by customers that the FBI says should be considered suspicious and a potential terrorist activity.

Yet the activities listed are so over-reaching that no doubt all Americans at one point in their lives have done more than one of these activities at the same time.

Let’s take a look at some of the items listed as suspicious on the bulletin sent to Internet cafes:

Activities on computer indicate evidence of a residential based internet provider (signs on to Comcast, AOL, etc.)

Perhaps you need to get some work done on the computer, but don’t want to be cooped up in your home.

Maybe you’d like a cup of organic java and the presence of people around you as you work, or you’d just like some background noise that an Internet cafe could provide.

According to the FBI, that’s suspicious! That indicates that you could be a terrorist!

Activities on computer indicate encryption or use of software to hide encrypted data in digital photos, etc.

Edward Snowden’s revelations on the massive, invasive extent of the NSA show more than ever the importance of using software encryption.

As Infowars reported via the Atlantic Wire, the anti-virus company McAfee “regularly cooperates” with the U.S. government and intelligence agencies are using Microsoft software bug vulnerabilities for cyber spying.

We recently reported how the NSA can exploit such zero-day vulnerabilities to wage cyber warfare.

Also, in a Heise online article, a researcher found that the NSA has a backdoor built into every version of Microsoft Windows going back as far as Windows 95.

All of these articles showcase how critical it is for Americans to take the initiative in securing their digital data.

Software encryption is a great tool towards this goal, but the FBI believes it’s suspicious if you encrypt your files.

If you don’t protect your privacy, you lose it.

The FBI wants you to lose it, implying that your belief in the Fourth Amendment is a sign of a potential terrorist.

People who are overly concerned about privacy, attempts to shield the screen from view of others

Who hasn’t been discrete with their computer in public?

What if you’re filling out an on-line form with personal information?

That’s a good reason why you would shield the screen from potential onlookers, but the instinct to protect your privacy is listed by the FBI as being suspicious.

People who always pay cash

So if you believe the government doesn’t need to track every single place you go (via credit or debit card records) in your day-to-day activities which harm no one, that is definitely an indicator of potential terrorist activity.

Of course no where in this bulletin does it state that cafe owners should notify law enforcement when they see a FBI agent personally driving a would-be terrorist to an intended blast site.

Amusingly, the footnote on the bottom of these bulletins states:

Each indicator listed above, is by itself, lawful conduct or behavior and may also constitute the exercise of rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. In addition, there may be a wholly innocent explanation for conduct or behavior that appears suspicious in nature. For this reason, no single indicator should be the sole basis for law enforcement action.

So if you engage in multiple types of listed behaviors that in total are still lawful and still an exercise of inalienable rights, the FBI suggests that the cafe owner should “be part of the solution” by gathering information on you discretely.

Write down your name, what you’re driving and your license plate.

All of this profiling is in the name of making “a positive contribution in the fight against terrorism.”

Doesn’t that sound a little creepy? Yet the FBI believes it’s all for your safety.

Safety that can only be provided if every American is locked in a prison cell.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 6:38 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

French farmers clash with police in Paris

0

French riot police clash with farmers protesting against the planned removal of subsidies to the agricultural sector in Paris on July 10, 2013.

French farmers have clashed with riot police during a protest in Paris against the governmentâ„¢s plan to remove subsidies for the agricultural sector.

The clash occurred on Wednesday after dozens of angry protesters blocked the Alexandre III bridge over the Seine river.

The farmers were demanding the resignation of French Agricultural Minister Stephane Le Foll for defending the plan, which they say would damage the countryâ„¢s agricultural industry.

The planned subsidy removal is in line with the European Unionâ„¢s broad agricultural reforms to the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) that is hoped to provide more funds to environmental schemes.

On June 26, EU negotiators agreed in Luxembourg on far-reaching reforms to CAP, fixing the rules governing 50 billion euros ($65.37 billion) in annual farm subsidies for 2014-2020.

The reforms, however, received a chilly welcome in Europe, where critics have raised questions over the lack of transparency in using the extra environmental money.

MRS/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

600 Reasons Turmeric May Be The World's Most Important Herb

0

600 Reasons Why Turmeric Is The World's Most Important Herb

There is a medicinal spice so timelessly interwoven with the origins of human culture and metabolism, so thoroughly supported by modern scientific inquiry, as to be unparalleled in its proven value to human health and well-being.

Indeed, turmeric turns the entire drug-based medical model on its head. Instead of causing far more side effects than therapeutic ones, as is the case for most patented pharmaceutical medications, turmeric possesses hundreds of potential side benefits, having been empirically demonstrated to positively modulate over 160 different physiological pathways in the mammalian body.

While no food or herb is right for everyone, and everything has the potential for unintended, adverse side effects, turmeric is truly unique in its exceptionally high margin of safety vis-à-vis the drugs it has been compared with, e.g. hydrocortisone, ibuprofen, chemotherapy agents. Furthermore, nothing within the modern-day pharmaceutical armamentarium comes even remotely close to turmeric’s 6,000 year track record of safe use in Ayurvedic medicine.[1]

Despite its vast potential for alleviating human suffering, turmeric will likely never receive the FDA stamp of approval, due to its lack of exclusivity, patentability and therefore profitability. Truth be told, the FDA’s “gold standard” for proving the value of a prospective medicinal substance betrays the age old aphorism: “he who owns the gold makes the rules,” and unless an investor is willing to risk losing the 800+ million dollars that must be spent upfront, the FDA-required multi-phased double-blind, randomized clinical trials will not occur. For additional details on this rather seedy arrangement read our article on the topic: Why The Law Forbids The Medicinal Use of Natural Substances.

Here at GreenMedInfo.com, we have reviewed over 5,000 study abstracts from the National Library of Medicine’s bibliographic database known as MEDLINE and have discovered over 600 potential health benefits of turmeric, and/or its primary polyphenol known as curcumin. These can be viewed on our turmeric research page which is dedicated to disseminating the research on the topic to a larger audience.

Some of the most amazing demonstrated properties include:

Again, what is so amazing is not that turmeric may have value in dozens of health conditions simultaneously, or that it may improve conditions that are completely resistant to conventional treatment, but that there are over six hundred additional health conditions it may also be valuable in preventing and/or treating. Consider also the fact that turmeric grows freely on the Earth, and you will understand why its very existence threatens billions of dollars in pharmaceutical industry revenue.  

Learn more about this research in the video below (keeping in mind that it is several years old and needing some updating), and please spread the information to others who may benefit from learning more on the topic


[1] The Genus Curcuma (Medicinal and Aromatic Plants – Industrial Profiles); CRC; March 2007

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Republished with permission from: Green Med Info

Anger growing over US spying reports

1

Anger is mounting in Latin America over the US intelligence gathering disclosed by controversial American whistleblower, Edward Snowden.

Colombia, the closest US military ally in Latin America, expressed concern on Wednesday about reports that it was the target of US electronic surveillance, saying it would demand an explanation from Washington.

In a statement, the Colombian Foreign Ministry rejected “acts of espionage that violate people’s right to privacy and international conventions on telecommunications.”

Snowden disclosed classified information about Washingtonâ„¢s electronic surveillance programs on a global scale last month.

The former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor disclosed that the agency’s so-called PRISM Internet surveillance program gathered phone logs and Internet data on a massive scale.

The NSA can present secret court orders to Internet firms like Google and Facebook to gain access to emails, online chats, pictures, files and videos uploaded by foreign users.

Documents leaked by Snowden reveal that the program targeted most Latin American countries with spying programs and lifted massive amounts of data on a wide range of developments in the region.

The revelation has prompted other regional countries including Chile, Mexico and Brazil to condemn the spying practices and ask Washington to provide explanations.

Snowden is still on the run and stranded at a Moscow airport.

MRS/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Why Did The Obama Administration “Organize And Manage” Protests Against George Zimmerman?

0

Million Hoodies Union Square protest against Trayvon Martin's shooting death in Sanford, Florida - Photo by David ShankboneIs the Obama administration at least partially responsible for turning the George Zimmerman trial into such a huge national spectacle? Judicial Watch has obtained documents which prove that the Community Relations Service, a division of the Department of Justice, was sent to Sanford, Florida in late March 2012 “to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman“. This included spending quite a bit of money, arranging meetings between the NAACP and local leaders, and providing police escorts for protesters. Someone needs to ask Obama why the federal government was doing this. A story that should have never made national headlines now threatens to unleash a firestorm of racial fury unlike anything we have seen since the Rodney King verdict. One young man, a neighborhood watch captain, shot and killed another young man. This kind of thing happens in American cities every single night. George Zimmerman says that he did it in self-defense. He should be allowed to have his day in court and that should be the end of the matter. But instead, this thing has been hyped into a massive national spectacle and it is being used to divide us along racial lines. And it appears that we have clear evidence that the Obama administration was involved in doing the hyping.

The documents that Judicial Watch was able to obtain contain some absolutely startling information. Apparently the role of the Obama administration in these protests was quite substantial…

*****

JW filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the DOJ on April 24, 2012; 125 pages were received on May 30, 2012. JW administratively appealed the request on June 5, 2012, and received 222 pages more on March 6, 2013. According to the documents:

  • March 25 — 27, 2012, CRS spent $674.14 upon being “deployed to Sanford, FL, to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.”
  • March 25 — 28, 2012, CRS spent $1,142.84 “in Sanford, FL to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.
  • March 30 — April 1, 2012, CRS spent $892.55 in Sanford, FL “to provide support for protest deployment in Florida.”
  • March 30 — April 1, 2012, CRS spent an additional $751.60 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance to the City of Sanford, event organizers, and law enforcement agencies for the march and rally on March 31.”
  • April 3 — 12, 2012, CRS spent $1,307.40 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance, conciliation, and onsite mediation during demonstrations planned in Sanford.”
  • April 11 — 12, 2012, CRS spent $552.35 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance for the preparation of possible marches and rallies related to the fatal shooting of a 17 year old African American male.”

*****

But the involvement of the Department of Justice went far beyond just spending money and helping to organize and manage the protests.

Apparently, the Department of Justice was involved in setting up meetings between the NAACP and local officials, and the Department of Justice even arranged police escorts for protesters…

On April 15, 2012, during the height of the protests, the Orlando Sentinel reported, “They [the CRS] helped set up a meeting between the local NAACP and elected officials that led to the temporary resignation of police Chief Bill Lee according to Turner Clayton, Seminole County chapter president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.” The paper quoted the Rev. Valarie Houston, pastor of Allen Chapel AME Church, a focal point for protestors, as saying “They were there for us,” after a March 20 meeting with CRS agents.

Separately, in response to a Florida Sunshine Law request to the City of Sanford, Judicial Watch also obtained an audio recording of a “community meeting” held at Second Shiloh Missionary Baptist Church in Sanford on April 19, 2012. The meeting, which led to the ouster of Sanford’s Police Chief Bill Lee, was scheduled after a group of college students calling themselves the “Dream Defenders” barricaded the entrance to the police department demanding Lee be fired. According to the Orlando Sentinel, DOJ employees with the CRS had arranged a 40-mile police escort for the students from Daytona Beach to Sanford.

Under what conditions is it ever acceptable for the federal government to arrange police escorts for protesters?

And why did the Obama administration want to help them?

What was the goal?

As a result of all of the hype that this case has been given, we now have more racial tension in the United States than we have had in a very, very long time.

And it is becoming apparent to everyone what could potentially happen if George Zimmerman is acquitted. In fact, law enforcement officials are so concerned about violence in the aftermath of the verdict that they have released a video encouraging young people not to commit violent acts…

On Monday, the Broward County Sheriff’s Office released a video calling on the public not to riot in the wake of the George Zimmerman verdict, expected this week or next in Florida. The Sheriff’s Office released a statement explaining that it was “working closely with the Sanford Police Department and other local law enforcement agencies” to coordinate “a response plan in anticipation of the verdict.”

The video, titled “Raise Your Voice, Not Your Hands,” focuses on attempting to channel reaction into non-violent response. It depicts two youngsters, one black teenage boy, one Hispanic teenage girl. “Raise your voice!” says the girl. “And not your hands!” says the boy. “We need to stand together as one, no cuffs, no guns,” says the girl. “Let’s give violence a rest, because we can easily end up arrested,” says the boy. “I know your patience will be tested,” says the girl, and then both conclude, “but law enforcement has your back!”

This never should have happened.

This case should never have been hyped like this.

Instead of being encouraged to look at each other as individuals and fellow American citizens, our politicians and the media continue to hype racial division and strife.

Are we ever going to learn how to love one another?

Trayvon Martin Protest March - Photo by David Shankbone

Republished with permission from: The American Dream

Morsi supporters hold demo in Cairo

0

Supporters of Mohamed Morsi demand the reinstatement of the ousted president during a mass rally in Cairo’s Nasr City on July 9, 2013.

Supporters of the Mohamed Morsi have held a demonstration in the Egyptian capital Cairo to demand the reinstatement of the deposed president.

Tens of thousands of Morsi supporters on Wednesday joined a rally called by the Muslim Brotherhood in Cairoâ„¢s Nasr City to denounce what they call a military coup against democracy.

The rallies once again gained momentum after Egyptâ„¢s prosecutor general ordered the arrest of Muslim Brotherhood leaders, including the supreme leader of the group, Mohammed Badie, on charges of inciting violence.

The Brotherhood members face arrest in connection with the July 8 violence outside the Republican Guard headquarters in Cairo, which led to 84 deaths.

Badie’s deputy, Mahmoud Ezzat, and party leaders, Essam El-Erian and Mohamed el-Beltagy, are also among the suspects.

Egyptâ„¢s judicial sources say that 200 people have been indicted for the bloodshed on July 8. They will be held for 15 days pending investigations into accusations of murder, incitement to violence, and carrying unlicensed weapons.

Meanwhile, Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party rejected offers by the countryâ„¢s new Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi to join the interim government.

Å“We reject all that comes from this coup,” spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, Tareq al-Morsi, said in a statement on Wednesday.

The group said that it will not hold talks with the interim government until Morsi is reinstated as the president.

On July 3, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that Morsi was no longer in office and declared that the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Adly Mansour, had been appointed as the new interim president.

Since then, Egypt has been the scene of rival rallies and clashes between thousands of the supporters and opponents of the ousted president.

Morsi is reportedly being held Å“preventively” by the military. Senior army officials say he might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

MN/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Defense rests in Bradley Manning case

0

Attorneys for Army Private first class Bradley Manning rested their case Wednesday afternoon after the prosecution cross-examined the defense’s tenth and final witness.

The soldier’s court-martial is now recessed until next week, at
which point government prosecutors plan to offer a rebuttal. Col.
Denise Lind, the presiding military judge in the case, also is
expected to weigh in next week on the defense’s recent request
that the government acquit Pfc. Manning on four of the more than
20 counts he has been charged with, including aiding the enemy.

Manning’s trial is expected to conclude next month and could end
with Col. Lind sentencing the soldier to life in prison if she
convicts him of aiding the enemy, a charge the government has
accused the defendant of because Manning willingly sent
classified documents to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks while
deployed as an Army intelligence analyst in Iraq. He was arrested
in April 2010 and admitted earlier this year to what is largely
regarded as the largest intel leak in United States history.

During Wednesday’s hearing, however, Harvard Law professor Yochai
Benkler testified that WikiLeaks was at first never regarded as
an organization that could be assisting terrorists, as the
prosecution alleges. Only after Manning’s relationship with the
site was already established in 2010, he said, did the government
begin developing that argument.

Benkler previously taught Internet law and policy at New York
University and later Yale before his tenure with Harvard began in
2007, and was called on by the defense as an expert witness on
“the network Fourth Estate,” which he described as “the set of
practices [and] organizing models technologies that together come
to fill the role that in the twentieth century we associated with
the free press
.”

“The network Fourth Estate is essentially the cluster of
practices and technologies and organizations that fill that role
in the twenty-first century model of network information
production
,” he said. “Mostly it refers to
journalism when we’re talking about its role in the construction
of democracy, more on the watchdog function specifically around
the more broadly journalism.
”

David Coombs, Manning’s civilian defense attorney, relied on
questioning Benkler into the afternoon “to specifically
testify about how WikiLeaks fits within the network Fourth
Estate
.” Additionally, Coombs tried to persuade Col. Lind
that the government’s accusation that Manning aided the enemy is
invalid since former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden did not
request material published by WikiLeaks until after the US
government and the media began demonizing the whistleblower
website.

“The Defense’s position is that rebuts the idea that the enemy
would use WikiLeaks as a source of intelligence initially prior
to these leaks because what happens is, essentially after these
leaks start to happen, the government rhetoric against WikiLeaks
makes them appear to be an enemy
,” Coombs told the court.
“And that, that rhetoric is what drives the enemy to actually
go look at WikiLeaks, not the actual publication of the
information
.”

“That type of argument has only been advanced after the March
2010 time period
,” Coombs said, roughly four months after
Pfc. Manning began sharing documents with WikiLeaks and only
weeks before his arrest.

“That whole train of thought is created really after March of
2010. It’s created by big government and how they reacted to the
releases in this case and how they reacted and Professor Benkler
will testify how they reacted in a very uneven-handed manner
where you have other organizations like the New York Times, like
The Guardian, like Der Spiegel, publishing the same information
and yet the diatribe coming from the government was not aimed at
them, it was aimed at WikiLeaks
.”

“The government’s whole argument seems to be premised on
creating WikiLeaks as a bad organization
,” Coombs said.

Previously, the prosecution admitted that they would have charged
The Times with aiding the enemy had Manning went to them first.
Prof. Benkler all but equated WikiLeaks as the same time of
entity, though, calling the website “an organization that
fulfilled a discrete role in network journalism of providing a
network solution to leak-based investigative journalism that in
the past was done only by relatively large and unified
organizations and now could be done in a network mode
.”

When Coombs asked his witness if WikiLeaks fits in with the idea
of a journalist organization, Bankler replied, “Yes,
absolutely
,” and acknowledged that government-affiliated
newspapers and even then-Sen. Joe Lieberman celebrated the site.

“They created what was essentially a safe platform for people
who were close to the materials, who had knowledge on the inside
to leak materials for public revelation and the platform was
intended both to provide secrecy and security for the person
leaking and to provide a mechanism for some level of
authentication of the voracity of the documents before they were
placed online and in the ideal model also a place for people to
comment on the materials after they were made online
,”
Bernkler said of WikiLeaks.

Bernkler added that nothing prior to April of 2010 connected the
website with a terrorist organization, but things shifted later
that year after they began publishing field reports from the Iraq
War that were leaked by Manning.

“The Defense’s position on this is that anyone looking at
WikiLeaks,”
prior to April 2010, said Coombs, “would have
viewed WikiLeaks as a legitimate news organization. Additionally,
the Defense’s position is that the enemy went to get this
information only after the government’s responses to the leaks
and that’s what prompted them
.” 

“So from the Defense’s position this not only rebuts the idea
that Pfc. Manning would have had any actual knowledge
” that
he’d be aiding al-Qaeda by leaking documents, but also “rebuts
the idea of any wanting conduct by PFC Manning by choosing to
release information to a legitimate news organization
.”

“The actual release of that information was wrongful and he’s
accepted responsibility for that
,” said Coombs. “But it
was not wanton
.”

Coombs concluded the defense’s case Wednesday afternoon after
calling his tenth and final witness. Previously, the prosecution
relied on testimonies from over 80 individuals to help get their
point across to the court.

Quotes attributed to Coombs and Benkler used in this article come
courtesy of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, which has so far
raised over $90,000 to hire the courtroom stenographers who’ve
created the only verbatim record of the case that’s publically
available.

Republished with permission from: RT

UK police reopen royal prank case

0

The British police say they have asked Australian authorities to consider possible charges against two radio hosts over a prank call involving the British royal family, which led to the death of a nurse.

Jacintha Saldanha, a nurse at the London hospital where the pregnant wife of British Queenâ„¢s grandson Prince William was being treated, killed herself after taking the call from the Sydney-based radio hosts, who introduced themselves as royal family members.

British prosecutors decided not to bring charges against Mel Greig and Michael Christian, but London Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has now passed details of its investigation to the Australian police to consider possible court action against them.

“On July 9 the MPS passed a file to the Australian Federal Police and New South Wales police in relation to a hoax call made to the King Edward VII Hospital on December 4, 2012,” the force said in a statement.

“The MPS has requested that consideration is given as to whether any offences were committed under Australian legislation,” the statement added.

The radio hosts had posed as Queen Elizabeth II and William’s father Prince Charles, and the nurse had belived them putting them through to the ward where Williamâ„¢s wife was being treated.

AMR/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Muslim Mobs Kill Egyptian Christians in Wake of Morsi Ouster

0

Several Christians have been killed in Egypt in the last week, in the wake of the military overthrow of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi July 2. On July 6 a Coptic Christian priest identified as Father Mina Aboud Sharween was gunned down in the Sinai town of El Arish, near the Gaza border. CBN News reported that Islamic gunmen in an SUV pulled up beside a vehicle driven by the 39-year-old Coptic priest, who was out shopping, and opened fire. Witnesses said that after killing the priest the gunmen dragged him from his vehicle and fled in it.

While it is unclear who exactly was responsible for the assassination, the Muslim Brotherhood, which had backed Morsi’s presidency, had harshly criticized Pope Tawadros, spiritual head of Egypt’s eight million Coptic Christians, after he expressed his support for the military’s removal of Morsi and for the suspension of Egypt’s constitution. Morning Star News, which monitors Christian persecution around the world, reported that “in the weeks leading up to the demonstrations against Morsi by millions, Islamists had issued threats against Christians, whom they held responsible for the movement.”

While Sharween was the first Christian leader killed since Morsi’s ouster, several other Christians have been killed in upper Egypt since July 2. “A country contact for the Voice for the Martyrs (VOM) reports nine Christians died in violence in the Upper Egyptian village of Al Dabaa, near Luxor,” related CBN News July 8. “Christian homes and shops were looted and burned and at least one church building was destroyed.”

The VOM contact said that Christians had been assaulted in Dalga and Der Mawas villages in Menia city, and at least three churches had been attacked and burned. “The army and the police forces are working so hard to protect Egyptians everywhere in Egypt, especially in the Upper Egypt area,” the VOM contact said.

Morning Star News related the killings of four Coptic Christians July 5 in a village near Luxor. The trouble began when a Muslim mob attacked a Coptic Christian identified as 42-year-old Emil Naseem Saroufeem, “known to be a supporter of the Tamard or ‘Rebel’ movement that began gathering in cities across Egypt on June 30 to demonstrate against Morsi,” reported Morning Star.

The mob began beating Saroufeem, “who escaped briefly when two relatives, Mouhareb Noushy Habib, 38, and Romany Noushy, 33, hid him,” the Morning Star account continued. The mob “caught up with the three Christians in the apartment of Rasem Tawadrous Aqladios, 56. Saroufeem and Aqladios were bludgeoned to death. The other two, Habib and Noushy, died when they were beaten and repeatedly stabbed.”

The account was related by Safwat Samaan, a spokesman for the human rights group Nation Without Limits. Samaan said that after the killings, the mob turned its wrath on other Coptics in the village, beating them and looting and burning their homes. Samaan said that in all, some 20 homes were destroyed, and Christians in the area have been too fearful to return to the area.

“The situation is calm there now,” Samaan told Morning Star News, “but there are about 95 Christian families that are staying at the church of Mar Youhana because they are too scared to go back. Also, a lot of these people had their homes burned down, and if not that, a lot of them had their houses torn apart and looted. The church is trying to get them to return home, but a lot of them are refusing.”

Samaan predicted that Morsi’s overthrow and the continuing military rule will spark more attacks on Christians in the country. “People from the Muslim Brotherhood are taking it upon themselves to wage jihad to defend Morsi and their religion,” he said. 

Ishak Ibrahim, an official with the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, said that Coptic Christians in the country “know very well there is a price that has to be paid, and what the Muslim Brotherhood people are saying is stirring people up against the Copts, even though the Copts were just participating in democracy just like everyone else.”

Photo of mourners at a funeral for two Coptic Christians killed in Egypt: AP Images

Republished with permission from: The New American

California Unveils Health Plans to Mixed Reactions

0

Kathleen Doheny
WebMD
July 10, 2013

California, the first state to set up a health insurance Marketplace under the Affordable Care Act, has chosen the state’s health plans and announced proposed rates.

Both the insurance plan selection and rates are subject to final approval by state regulators.

Since the plans were picked in late May, some experts have praised the progress in California while others have predicted ”rate shock.” On a swing through the state to promote the sweeping health care reform law, President Barack Obama lauded California’s efforts at creating a state-operated Marketplace (also called an Exchange) and urged the uninsured to sign up for the new insurance options starting Oct. 1.

About 5.3 million of the state’s 38 million residents are expected to be eligible for coverage through the Marketplace, known as Covered California. Of those, 2.6 million are expected to be eligible for subsidies to help cover the cost.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:39 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Shopping Mall Workers Spying Under Obama Spy Grid

0

“Insider threat” program part of an immense indoctrination campaign

Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Even before the government called for federal workers to ferret out “inside threats” by observing the mannerisms of their fellow employees in order to identify “suspicious activity,” the FBI had issued bulletins to various businesses and vendors, including shopping mall workers, telling them to be on the lookout for potential terrorist activity, in effect enlisting mall employees to be whistleblowers for the state.

By Jeff Karpala (originally posted to Flickr as IMG_2001), via Wikimedia Commons

By Jeff Karpala (originally posted to Flickr as IMG_2001), via Wikimedia Commons

In 2007, the FBI, in conjunction with the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Assistance, began its Communities Against Terrorism campaign in which they released flyers to different locations outlining what should be considered “Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities.”

Included in that document were suggestions on what nuances mall vendors may witness mall goers exhibit if said mall goer were to be in the middle of planning or executing a terrorist plot.

A few its more insane terrorist identifiers included being on the lookout for: anyone who “significantly alters appearance from visit to visit (shaving beard, changing hair color, style of dress, etc.),” people who are missing hands or fingers, or have “chemical burns, strange odors or bright colored stains on clothing,” or people seen discreetly using cameras, video recorders or “note taking… over an extended period.”

That’s right, if you’re guilty of having done any of these things, it’s possible you may have unknowingly been flagged as a potential terrorist by a Great American Cookie Company, Orange Julius or JC Penny employee.

Truth be told, the real goal behind the Communities Against Terrorism initiative is not to thwart terrorism. If so, the FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. might be the first place one may want to start looking according to the New York Times, who last year wrote that the FBI hatches a majority of its own terror plots.

As PrisonPlanet.com editor Paul Joseph Watson wrote in his book “Order Out of Chaos,” governments routinely promote the fear of an outside terror threat as it is a tried and true method of manipulating a population into waiving its rights for the sake of security.

“The constant (government) threat of terror has turned people into willing informants,” Watson wrote in his 2003 book. “The new definition of patriotism is helping the state in any way you can to stop the terrorists, even if it fundamentally violates the rights of the individual. Even a high-tech dictatorship cannot keep track of all its slaves short of putting them in camps and so the citizens need to be encouraged to spy on each other.”

The fact that shopping malls have, as of late, been so frequently designated as potential terrorist targets has led some to suspect that an American mall may be the staging ground for the next big government false flag attack.

Last year, we reported on how the DHS had partnered up with a few Simon-owned malls to begin promoting its See Something, Say Something snitch campaign.

And just yesterday, we featured a video sent in by a San Antonio mall-goer who said he was weirded out when he saw a TSA agent handling a canine inside of the Ingram Park Mall.

Given that the FBI has expended significant effort in attempting to enlist citizen spies at malls, Internet cafes, hotels and motels, rental properties, storage facilities and various other public locations, it’s not surprising to see the federal government begin telling its own workers to report suspicious actions and be on the lookout for “high-risk persons or behaviors.”

The program’s overall effectiveness in identifying an actual terror threat is also in doubt. According to McClatchy Newspapers, a 2008 National Research Council report on detecting terrorists concluded, “There is no consensus in the relevant scientific community nor on the committee regarding whether any behavioral surveillance or physiological monitoring techniques are ready for use at all.”

In addition to intimidating those who wish to speak out against inter-governmental corruptness, Obama’s federal worker spy grid is part of an immense indoctrination campaign that’s been long in the works.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Police Fear Flash Mob Violence If Zimmerman Acquitted

0

Cops plan to flood Twitter with anti-riot messages

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Police in Broward County fear that Twitter could be used to organize flash mob violence if George Zimmerman is acquitted, with authorities planning to flood the social network with anti-riot messages.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

During a meeting last night attended by Broward Sheriff Scott Israel, numerous other law enforcement officials and dozens of local pastors, Sheriff’s Sgt. Eddie Grant pointed to a recent incident where a Twitter message about two girls planning to fight outside the Lauderhill Mall on June 26 prompted over 100 teenagers to arrive on the scene within minutes.

Authorities are concerned that flash mobs angry at the verdict could use Twitter to organize similar unrest. As we reported last week, a plethora of individuals have promised to stage riots and looting if George Zimmerman is found not guilty. The latest round of controversy focused on popular clothing brand ‘Illuminati’ — which yesterday tweeted to over a million followers, “The Only Justice for Trayvon Martin is to take the Life of George Zimmerman.”

The case already sparked looting by Trayvon Martin supporters last year when gangs of teenagers ransacked a Walgreens in north Miami in reaction to the fact that Zimmerman had not yet been arrested.

Detective Munib Ahmed outlined a plan to calm irate Trayvon supporters via Twitter during last night’s meeting, remarking, “What we’re concerned about is all the people starting rumors or instigating fights [through social media]. So we’re trying to get ahead of the game [and] quell the fight before it starts.”

Pastor Michael K. Anderson, of New Jerusalem First Baptist Church in Hollywood also called for Twitter to be used to quell disorder. “They’ll hear a lot of [rumors] but they’ll know the truth if they’re following us [on social media],” he stated.

Numerous prominent voices, including former Chicago cop Paul Huebl have warned that the outcome of the trial will lead to riots that could surpass those seen in the aftermath of the Rodney King beating.

Sheriffs in several Florida counties have been preparing for the potential that the outcome of the trial could spark riots for weeks. Sanford Police Chief Cecil Smith and other city officials are worried that a Zimmerman acquittal could spark “violence” and have crafted a “secret law enforcement” plan to deal with potential social disorder.

Broward County’s latest outreach was a video entitled Raise Your Voice, Not Your Hands, which encourages residents to express their anger peacefully through free speech rather than resorting to violence.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:28 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Has the break-up of the eurozone already started?

0

Andrew Higgins
economictimes.indiatimes.com
July 10, 2013

On a visit to Athens this year, Marios Loucaides, a Cypriot businessman, saw an apartment he liked in the heart of the Greek capital and decided to buy it. He told the owner he would seal the deal with a bank transfer — the price was 170,000 euros, about $220,000 — once he got back to Cyprus.

After returning home, however, Loucaides discovered that the euros he had on deposit here in Nicosia, the capital, could not be moved to Greece, even though the two countries share the same currency and, in theory at least, the same commitment to the free movement of capital.

The apartment deal collapsed. And so, too, did Loucaides’ belief that Europe has a common currency. Tangled in restrictions imposed in March as part of a bailout for the country’s ailing banks, a euro in Cyprus is no longer the same as one in France, Germany or Greece.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:23 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Generic drug companies granted immunity against lawsuits from patients harmed by side effects

0

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
July 10, 2013

You may want to think twice before taking any more generic copies of brand-name pharmaceutical drugs, thanks to a recent Supreme Court ruling that effectively eliminates manufacturer liability in injury cases resulting from negative side effects. In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court recently overturned a $21 million judgment awarded to a New Hampshire woman injured by a generic pain drug, declaring in the process that generic drug manufacturers cannot be sued when the drugs they produce injure patients.

Since generic drugs are mere replicas of brand-name drugs that, at one time, were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as “safe,” generic drug manufacturers are exempt from being held liable in the event of injuries caused by harmful side effects. This is the opinion of the majority of the Supreme Court anyway, which has now made it that much harder for members of the public to seek remedy for injuries caused by pharmaceutical drugs.

Photo Caption: Erich Ferdinand

Photo Caption: Erich Ferdinand

According to Reuters, the ruling affects lawsuits filed under state law, which allegedly conflict with federal regulatory guidelines as they pertain to safety approval for brand-name drugs. When it comes to federal versus state law, federal always tends to win these days, which means the big boys in the drug industry basically get to call all the shots. And if you are injured by a drug, in this case a generic drug, well then tough luck for you.

“The court has left a seriously injured consumer without any remedy,” wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor, along with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Elena Kagan, in a dissent to the ruling.

It all started when Karen L. Bartlett of New Hampshire was prescribed a generic version of Merck & Co.’s anti-inflammatory drug Clinoril by her doctor for shoulder pain. Bartlett quickly developed a condition known as toxic epidermal necrolysis, which left her with burn-like lesions on two-thirds of her body. Bartlett had to be put into a medically-induced coma and be fed out of a tube for over a year while she underwent dozens of eye surgeries.

With the help of her lawyer, Bartlett filed a lawsuit against Mutual Pharmaceutical, the manufacturer of sulindac, the generic version of Clinoril that led to her injuries. The Supreme Court issued a ruling against Bartlett, which was eventually overturned by a Boston-based appeals court, according to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). But the Supreme Court later overturned the ruling of the appeals court, claiming that federal law prohibits such lawsuits.

Shielding drug companies from liability will only further erode public confidence in Big Pharma

On the surface, the Supreme Court’s ruling on this matter appears as though it is just another win for Big Pharma, which as we all know takes every opportunity to leverage control over the federal regulatory scheme for drugs. But in the long run, the decision will end up hurting the drug industry, as the general public will put even less faith in the safety and integrity of drugs.

“Today’s court decision provides a disincentive for generic makers of drugs to monitor the safety of their products and to make sure that they have a surveillance system in place to detect adverse events that pose a threat to patients,” says Michael Carome, Director of the Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, as quoted by Reuters.

In other words, why perform routine and costly safety tests when there are no longer any consequences if patients are harmed by tainted drugs? Official FDA approval of the “parent” drugs is apparently all that is now needed to shield the generic drug industry from future liability for injuries, which means patients are basically being forced to take drugs at their own risk.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.reuters.com

http://online.wsj.com

http://www.newsmax.com

ECB Coeure: Euro Zone Still in “Severe Crisis”

0

Todd Buell
online.wsj.com
July 10, 2013

The euro zone remains in a deep crisis, posing challenges for those tasked with setting policy on the continent, European Central Bank Executive Board member Benoit Coeure said in a speech Wednesday.

In his remarks, prepared for delivery in Paris and published on the ECB’s website, Mr. Coeure did not discuss the central bank’s introduction of forward guidance on interest rates at its policy meeting last week. He said, however, that the ECB “will keep an open mind and stand ready to react flexibly to new developments, abiding by the same principles and staying within the boundary of our mandate.”

The central bank aims to keep consumer-price inflation just below 2% over the medium term.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:26 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Privatization's the Name of the Game for Accident-Prone Train Company Behind Lac-Mégantic Oil Disaster

0

Scene from the runaway train disaster that hit the Quebec town of Lac-Mégantic. (Photo: The Canadian Press)As the head of the company behind the runaway oil train that derailed and caused a fireball explosion  in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec faced furious residents on Wednesday, he continued to defend the shoddy safety record of his company, whose goal is all about privatization.

Edward Burkhardt, chairman of Maine, Montreal and Atlantic Railways (MM&A) and President and CEO of Rail World, Inc., its parent company, headed to the tragedy-stricken town where he hoped he was “not going to get shot,” though he faced heckling by residents and dodged a handful of reporters.

One resident, Richard Lefebvre, carried a sign with a simple message likely felt throughout the town: “No more killer train.”

Burkhardt has been deflecting blame for the disaster, denying he had first blamed local firefighters and later saying it was the fault of an employee for not setting the brakes.

Burkhardt didn’t mention MM&A’s safety track record.A sign on the tracks in Lac Megantic reads: You, the train of hell, don’t come back here. You are not welcome. –the population(Photo: Twitter via @ArmstrongGN)

The Canadian Press, citing information from the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, reports that the MM&A has had 8 derailments and four collisions since 2010, and it has an average of 34.7 accidents per million miles traveled, well above the national average of 2.3 accidents per million miles. The Wall Street Journal adds that the company had “23 accidents, injuries or reportable mishaps from 2010 to 2012.”

As for the parent company itself Rail World Inc., its goals are laid bare on its own website:

A railway management, consulting and investment corporation specializing in privatizations and restructurings. Its purpose is to promote rail industry privatization by bringing together government bodies wishing to sell their stakes with investment capital and management skills.

The Chicago Tribune adds information on how Burkhardt’s rail privatization push extends beyond North America:

Besides working with railroads, Burkhardt is New Zealand’s honorary consul for the Midwest, a position he picked up after helping to privatize railways on the Pacific Ocean island.

Rail World Inc. also states that Burkhardt led the privatization of Estonian railways.

The official death toll from the disaster is at 15 with 60 still missing.

_______________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Military cmdr. attacked in Egypt's Sinai

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt’s army says gunmen have opened fire on the car of a senior military commander in the volatile Sinai Peninsula.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Republicans: War on terror is not over

0

Jake Miller
cbsnews.com
July 10, 2013

Global terrorist networks continue to pose a grave threat to the security of the United States, and any attempt by the United States to revert to a pre-9/11 security posture would be “very dangerous,” Republicans warned Thursday, seemingly criticizing the Obama administration’s stated desire to end the global war on terror and pull America back from its “perpetual wartime footing.”

Despite the recent spate of attacks planned by individuals and small groups, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said, large terrorist syndicates like al Qaeda remain a deadly force. “The thought that we’ve conquered them would be exceedingly unrealistic and very, very dangerous,” he said. “We have by no means conquered well organized Islamic terrorist groups.”

“Whether we recognize that we are at war with them is almost completely irrelevant, because they are at war with us,” Giuliani continued, saying we should not “fool ourselves into a very, very dangerous state of denial.”

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:17 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

GOP bill would defund schools with rules against playing with imaginary guns

0

Pete Kasperowicz
The Hill
July 10, 2013

Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas) introduced legislation this week to block federal funding for schools that enforce rules that punish students for playing with imaginary weapons.

The Student Protection Act, H.R. 2625, is a reaction to what Stockman says is the zero tolerance policy at some schools that has led to several suspensions of very young children who engage in these activities, including cases where students pretended their thumb and index finger is a gun.

The bill finds that these school policies are being used to outlaw “harmless expressions of childhood play,” and are only teaching students to “be afraid of inanimate objects that are shaped like guns.”

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:17 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Lawmaker demands the National Guard patrol the streets of Chicago to stop gun violence

0

The military could soon be patrolling the streets of Chicago, Illinois if a local lawmaker has her way. State Rep. Monique Davis has asked the governor to deploy the National Guard among an epidemic of violent crime.

Davis, a 76-year-old Democrat who represents Chicago in the
Illinois House of Representatives, said Tuesday that Gov. Pat
Quinn should order both the Illinois State Police and the
Illinois National Guard to assist with law enforcement efforts in
her city aimed at curbing crime.

More than 100 people have been shot in only the first 10 days of
July. Twenty people were shot during a single evening last month,
and at least 72 victims were either injured or killed by guns
during the Fourth of July weekend. Last year, a homicide tally
that surpassed the 500-person mark set a new record for the city
of Chicago. In a Tuesday news conference in Springfield,
Illinois, Rep. Davis asked the governor to consider exploring new
options.

“I am requesting with this press conference that Gov. Patrick
Quinn order the Illinois National Guard (and) the Illinois State
Police (to) come to Chicago and work with our mayor Ron (sic)
Emanuel to provide safety for the children, especially
,” she
said at the event, a local CBS station reported.

Gov. Quinn did not immediately respond to the state senator’s
request, but in recent days has rallied for efforts that he hoped
would have brought violence down in the Windy City. Last week
Gov. Quinn said he was using his “constitutional authority to
address serious public safety issues
” when he made a handful
of amendatory changes to a House bill that he hoped would
decrease violent crime. Those alterations were rejected, however,
and this week Illinois became the last state in the US to lift a
prohibition against carrying concealed firearms.

Rep. Brandon Phelps, another Democratic state lawmaker, said
residents “finally get to exercise their Second Amendment
rights
” with gun owners now legally able to carry a concealed
weapon.

“If the governor wants to get serious about crime, let’s find
out about all the shootings going on in Chicago
,” Phelps told
the city’s Sun-Times newspaper. “They’ve got the strictest gun
laws in the nation, but they still lead in shootings and
murders
.”

Speaking against the legislation, Gov. Quinn said, “It has
shortcomings that will lead to tragedies
.” State Police
spokeswoman Monique Bond told the Associated Press that law
enforcement expects 300,000 applicants will request
concealed-carry permits in the first year.

Meanwhile, Rep. Davis says the state must step-in to do something
to help keep shootings from climbing as high as last year, when
the number of gunfire victims surged to more than 20 percent of
what the city saw in 2011.

“It’s almost as if there’s a war going on,” Davis told the
Chicago Sun-Times. “It seems like it is genocide, and those
officials who can do something about it have chosen not to do
anything about it. I’m calling for the National Guard to come to
Chicago and ride up and down these streets
.”

Rep. Mary Flowers, another Chicago Democrat, added to the
Sun-Times that she disagrees with her colleague’s plan but hopes
that the governor will respond with some sort of action.

“I happen to disagree with calling in the state police and the
National Guard
,” Flowers said, “but what I do agree with
is that the governor needs to do something. We must be respected
in our community. We must have jobs in our community
.”

According to Jens Ludwig, the director of the University of
Chicago Crime Lab, shootings in Chicago cost the city around $2.5
billion annually.

Republished with permission from: RT

Egypt: Staging a “Democratic” Military Coup

0

During the 2011 Egyptian uprisings, the military was jeered for cracking down on protestors and for the infamous virginity tests they conducted on detained female protestors. In June 2012, when Mohamed Morsi won the presidential race with 51% of the votes, crowds gathered in Tahrir Square to celebrate his victory, chanting : “God is great” and “down with military rule.“   Barely a year passed before the crowds were cheering the U.S.-backed military for ousting their first democratically elected president in a coup dubbed by various media outlets as a democratic coup.  What transpired?

Mr. Morsi alienated both Egyptians and foreign states in his short term in office. No doubt many Egyptians were alarmed and opposed to what they perceived as his ‘power-grab’, as well as the new constitution which passed in a referendum with 64% of a measly 33% turnout; but inarguably, the economy was a huge factor in sending protestors to the streets. The lack of progress in dealing with the economy, the fuel shortages,  and the IMF loan delay also contributed to the continuous unrest in Egypt .

It is worthwhile mentioning here that a significant percentage of Egypt ’s economy is run by the military.    Robert Springborg, an expert on Egypt ’s military told The New York Times: “Protecting its businesses from scrutiny and accountability is a red line the [Egyptian] military will draw”.   Also of note is the fact that long lines formed at gasoline stations in Cairo amid an apparent fuel shortage, disappeared quickly after the coup.  This led to speculation that the fuel crisis had “been deliberately engineered to feed unrest and dissatisfaction with the Morsi government in the days before its overthrow.”

Gripped in social and economic crisis, it came as no surprise that on May 1st, a group opposed to Mr. Morsi which called itself “Rebel” organized a 1 million people march to be held on June 30th.   The group also planned on delivering a signed petition to the Prosecutor General at the same time with the aim of collecting 15 million signatures by that date. “In one month, movement promoters travelled the length and breadth of the country, collecting signatures door to door, on buses, in restaurants and offices as well as on the internet.” They claimed that they had secured just over 7 million signatures, and four weeks later, on June 28th, the Washington Post reported that the group had secured 22 millions signatures.   (Given the timeframe and the challenges, surely this number has a place in the Guinness Book of World Records — if only it could be verifiable).

This number cited by “Rebel” became an accepted reality and was promoted by media outlets without verification.  As anti-protestors marched on Tahrir as planned, military  tanks and personnel blocked the pro-Morsi crowd from the onset;  enabling the media lens to capture the sea of anti-Morsi demonstrators and marginalizing his supporters. These actions together with the unverified 22 million signatures claim played an essential role in calling a military coup a “democratic” coup. Washington was off the hook and funds could to secure the Egyptian army’s cooperation and loyalty to Washington .

But one should ask why was it that Washington which has a long standing relationship with the Moslem Brotherhood[1] rejected Morsi?

There are many answers to this question — with the most basic being that he was not part of the plan. As early as 2007 speculation about Hosni Mubarak’s  replacement appeared in the American mainstream media. Discussing his ailing health, in October 2007, Michael Stackman’s opinion piece in The New York Times addressed the importance of a Mubark’s replacement to be someone who would continue the same policies towards Israel and Washington . 

With this in mind, in 2008, young, ‘civil society’ Egyptians met with former Secretary of State Condeleeza Rice who called the young Egyptian activists the “hope for the future of Egypt “. The “hope of Egypt ” also met the US National Security Advisor and prominent Congressional member. These meetings were organized by The Freedom House (see link here). The Freedom House, an outfit which calls itself “independent” but receives 80% of its funding from the US government, including the National Endowment for Democracy – a CIA front – claimed to provide “advanced training on civic mobilization, strategic thinking, new media, advocacy and outreach“. 

In 2010, Freedom House boasted of teaching new media tools to Egypt ‘s “hope”.

Freedom House had reason to boast. 2010 was a crucial year to decide and settle on Mubarak’s successor as time was of the essence given Mubarak’s health and terminal illness. In April 2010, the pro-Israeli Jerusalem Post ventured that former IAEA Chief, Egyptian-born Mohammad El baradei would “add excitement to Egyptian politics.” He did.  Mr. El-Baradei served on the Board of Trustees of the International Crisis Group funded by Carnegie, Soros, and Ford (Ford Foundation was a conduit for CIA funds during the Cold War — Saunders 2000[i]) where he rubbed shoulders with colleagues Shimon Peres, Saudi Arabia’s Prince Turki al-Faisal,  Richard Armitage,  Zbigniew Brzezinski, etc.

Morsi’s election not only interrupted Washington ’s efforts to replace Mubarak in spite of his close cooperation with Washington (specifically in cutting ties with Syria ).  Morsi presented Washington with many challenges. Not only was he reported to have called “Jews descendants of pigs and apes”, but his election into office was warmly welcomed not only by HAMAS, but also by the U.S.-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who called Morsi “the choice of the great people of Egypt” while one of his senior aides, Saeb Erekat, said the democratic vote for Morsi “meant the Palestinian cause was the Number One priority for all Egyptians“.   Washington was not in the business of making Palestinians jubilant, or contradicting Israel ’s demands. .

Regardless,  Morsi dug in deeper.   Soon after taking office, Morsi forced NGO’s out of Egypt, raising the ire of Freedom House (NGOs were referred to as force-multipliers by Colin Powell, and have been instrumental in executing US policies around the globe).  Additionally, Morsi forced out powerful military figures in order to reclaim the military power the army had seized.  As Juan Cole put it, ‘a coup against the generals’. Israel called the move “Instability in Egypt to threaten Israel ,” and “Muslim Brotherhood on our doorstep.”  However,  Morsi made the mistake of appointing Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi as military chief — a man with close ties to the U.S. and Saudi Arabia .

Perhaps his most serious offense was his opposition to a dam which both Israel and Saudi Arabia favored as they had plans to divert water from the Nile . In 2012, it was reported that Saudi Arabia had claimed a stake in the Nile . Israel ’s ambitions went much further back.

First initiated by Theodore Herzl in 1903, the diversion plan was dropped due to British and Egyptian opposition to it only to be picked up again in the 1970s.  At that time, Israeli’s idea was to convince Egypt to divert Nile water to Israel . In 1978, President Anwar Sadat “declared in Haifa to the Israeli public that he would transfer Nile water to the Negev . Shortly afterward, in a letter to Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Sadat promised that Nile water would go to Jerusalem . During Mubarak’s presidency, published reports indicated that Israeli experts were helping Ethiopia to plan 40 dams along the Blue Nile .”[ii]

On May 30, 2013, The Times of Israel reported that the construction on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (on the Blue Nile) had sparked a major diplomatic crisis with Egypt .  The article also reported (citing Al-Arabiya) that Major General Mohammed Ali Bilal, the deputy chief of staff of the Egyptian Armed Forces, had said Egypt was not in a position to confront the project (countries). “The only solution lies in the US intervening to convince Ethiopia to alleviate the impact of the dam on Egypt .” No such solutions from the U.S.

On June 3rd, Morsi met with his cabinet to discuss the dam and its implications. Cabinet members were surprised to learn that the meeting was aired live.  During the meeting, a cabinet member said: “Imagine what 80 million of us would do to Israel and America if our water was turned off”. Morsi contended that “We have very serious measures to protect every drop of Nile water.” The day prior to Morsi’s ouster, on July 2nd, Fox News reported that work on the dam was “proceeding apace”, with plans to finish the project in 2017.

It seems the only “serious measure” undertaken was the ouster of Morsi. With him gone, the military engaged, and the poring in of Saudi money, the dam project will proceed unhindered; blood-diluted Nile water will flow to the enemies of the Egyptian in sink with a current of jubilation by the crowds who ‘can’t see the forest for the trees’.

Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich is an independent researcher with a focus on U.S. foreign policy and the influence of lobby groups. 

Notes

During the early years of the Cold War, American spies in Cairo “engaged in an operation to show Soviet ungodliness”  by circulating anti-Islamic literature and attributing it to the Soviets.  When the nationalist Gamal Abdel Nasser refused to become America ’s man in Egypt , CIA looked for a “religious spellbinder” who could tip the scales of Arab opinion and “divert the growing stream of anti-American hostility.” The intent was to “groom a messiah who would start out in Egypt, and then spread his word to Africans and perhaps other Third World peoples” in order to “immunize them against false prophets,” namely Nasser[1]. Although no ‘messiah’ was groomed, the CIA did co-opt leaders of the Islamic revival movement known as the Ikhwan, or Muslim Brotherhood and “the seeds of a furtive relationship between the CIA and the Ikhwan were planted.” In the years ahead, the agency would become a de facto accomplice of the Muslim Brotherhood and its “terrorist” activities[1]. 

[i] Frances Stonor Saunders. The Cultural Cold War: the CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York : New Press 2000

[ii] “Will Nile water go to Israel ? North Sinai pipelines and the politics of scarcity”, Middle East Policy (Sep 1997): 113-124.

 

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Obama’s Insider Threat Program Resembles Nazi Gestapo

0

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 10, 2012

SS propaganda poster of the Day of the German police (1941). Wikimedia Commons

SS propaganda poster of the Day of the German police (1941). Wikimedia Commons

The techniques employed by Obama’s Insider Threat Program are reminiscent of those used by the Gestapo in Nazi Germany. Unlike the Nazis, however, Obama’s effort — the result of an unconstitutional executive order issued in October, 2011 — is limited, for now, to federal government employees.

From McClatchy:

The techniques are a key pillar of the Insider Threat Program, an unprecedented government-wide crackdown under which millions of federal bureaucrats and contractors must watch out for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers. Those who fail to report them could face penalties, including criminal charges.

(…)

Under the program, which is being implemented with little public attention, security investigations can be launched when government employees showing “indicators of insider threat behavior” are reported by co-workers, according to previously undisclosed administration documents obtained by McClatchy. Investigations also can be triggered when “suspicious user behavior” is detected by computer network monitoring and reported to “insider threat personnel.”

Federal employees and contractors are asked to pay particular attention to the lifestyles, attitudes and behaviors — like financial troubles, odd working hours or unexplained travel — of co-workers as a way to predict whether they might do “harm to the United States.” Managers of special insider threat offices will have “regular, timely, and, if possible, electronic, access” to employees’ personnel, payroll, disciplinary and “personal contact” files, as well as records of their use of classified and unclassified computer networks, polygraph results, travel reports and financial disclosure forms.

The effort is not limited to preventing whistleblowers like Edward Snowden. “The initiative goes beyond classified information leaks,” McClatchy explains. “It includes as insider threats ‘damage to the United States through espionage, terrorism, unauthorized disclosure of national security information or through the loss or degradation of departmental resources or capabilities,’ according to a document setting ‘Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs.’”

In his book, The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evans describes a similar pattern in Nazi Germany. The Gestapo, the official secret police of Germany in the 1930s and all of occupied Europe during the Second World War, relied on a large network of informers comprised largely of average citizens. The end result of the Gestapo’s panopticism — as described by Canadian historian Robert Gellately — was the creation of widespread fear and the belief that the state was all-seeing, an attribute fictionalized by George Orwell in his seminal novel, Nineteen Eighty Four.

Critics will argue that Obama’s effort is limited to the federal workforce and it does not threaten society at large. Developments since September 11, 2001, however, reveal that a Gestapo-like panopticism — a social theory originally developed by French philosopher Michel Foucault in his book, Discipline and Punish — is already at work in American society.

Because of the Department of Homeland Security’s “see something, say something” program and the TSA’s intrusive and humiliating search techniques and revelations of the NSA’s overarching electronic surveillance grid — a high-tech electronic panopticon – it can be categorically stated that America is now a Stasi police state.

Mission creep under the rubric of the so-called war on terror is now commonplace. The Department of Homeland security was established in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks to address the supposed threat Americans face from foreign terrorists.

“Over the last decade, the feds have established a number of efforts to nationalize law enforcement and create a number of organizations designed to supposedly ‘protect the homeland’ from not only terrorists — most handled by the FBI and the CIA — but all sorts of domestic criminals, including those who engage in victimless crimes such as drug use and prostitution,” we reported last March.

There are now dozens of organizations feeding off tax dollars dispensed by the feds — from FEMA’s Citizen Corps to Volunteers in Police Service and Infragard and beyond. In many ways, these federally-funded and organized groups rival the police state apparatus active in Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union.

For example, the DHS now “protects victims” from “domestic violence and other violent crimes” that have nothing to do with the late CIA asset Osama bin Laden or the would-be nineteen hijackers who trained on U.S. military bases. The mega-bureaucracy now doles out money to everything from “Juvenile Accountability” to anti-counterfeiting, border security, and computer incident response.

But it really shines when it comes to acting as a political surveillance tool for the establishment. It has successfully exploited the global jihad terror myth to spy on antiwar and patriot groups and recently the Occupy movement. So-called fusion centers — centralized high-tech Orwellian snoop hubs — now dot the landscape and feed data into the DHS leviathan.

Obama’s Insider Threat Program sets a precedent for similar action outside government. In fact, Infragard — a public-private partnership between business and government (the very essence of fascism) — serves as an apparatus that shares data with the government’s intelligence network.

The ACLU put it mildly when it said there “is evidence that InfraGard may be closer to a corporate TIPS program, turning private-sector corporations – some of which may be in a position to observe the activities of millions of individual customers – into surrogate eyes and ears for the FBI.”

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 4:02 pm

Tags: , , , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

'Historic' Drone Landing Paves Way for 'Killer Robots'

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

The landing of the X-47B pilotless drone is just the ‘precursor’ to the future of warfare. (Photo: Timothy Waller/ USNavy/ AP)In an event sure to make “history”—if not for its technical prowess, than for its long-term impact on international warfare—the US Navy Wednesday successfully completed the landing of a fully automated aerial drone on an aircraft carrier at sea.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Manning's Defense Rests After Final Blows to 'Aiding the Enemy' Charges

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Bradley Manning defense team. Image by Clark Stoeckley.The defense for Pfc. Bradley Manning rested Wednesday afternoon after hearing testimony from Harvard Professor Yochai Benkler, a “fourth estate” scholar who argued that WikiLeaks is “a legitimate journalistic organization” rather than an organization which aids “terrorist organizations,” as has been portrayed by the U.S. government.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

‘Syria militants used chemical weapons’

0

Russia has confirmed the use of chemical weapons by foreign-backed militants fighting against the Syrian government.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made the remarks at a press conference in Moscow on Wednesday.

“Our experts took samples on the spot and studied them in the very lab which is certified by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and came to the conclusion that both the shell and the sarin it contained were home-made,” the Russian foreign minister said.

Å“According to our additional information, these shells and the substance were made last February in the Syrian territory which at that time was under the control of the Free Syrian Army and made by one of the affiliated armed groups,” Lavrov added.

On Tuesday, the Russian ambassador to the United Nations said firsthand evidence showed that militants, and not the Syrian army, manufactured sarin nerve gas and used it during an attack near the city of Aleppo in March.

Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said that Russian experts collected samples at the site of the attack in the region of Khan al-Assal, where over two dozen people, including 16 Syrian troops, died on March 19.

The Syria crisis began in March 2011, and many people, including large numbers of soldiers and security personnel, have been killed in the violence.

The Syrian government says that the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

Damascus says the West and its regional allies, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, are supporting the militants.

In an interview broadcast on Turkish television in April, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said that if the militants take power in Syria, they could destabilize the entire Middle East region for decades.

Å“If the unrest in Syria leads to the partitioning of the country, or if the terrorist forces take control… the situation will inevitably spill over into neighboring countries and create a domino effect throughout the Middle East and beyond,” he stated.

NT/MHB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Expanded Mental Health Recording Raises Privacy, Gun Control Issues

0

As more of President Obama’s “Now is the Time” agenda announced in January is implemented, more and more concerns are being expressed over the impact on privacy and the right to own firearms. Said the president on January 16 following the horrific shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School: “We must strengthen efforts to keep guns from falling into the wrong hands … to make sure those who would commit acts of violence cannot get access to guns.”

There are at least two major concerns about the president’s statement: Who defines “wrong hands” and how effective are predictions about persons “who would commit acts of violence” in advance of such acts? 

There are privacy concerns as well, as noted by Roberta Rampton, writing for Reuters: “Mental health advocates are worried that the privacy of people who have received treatment for their illnesses would be jeopardized.” They are also concerned that persons seeking treatment would be discouraged from disclosing their problems to professionals because such information could wind up in a government database. And further, such a listing might reasonably jeopardize their freedom to own firearms. As Daniel Fisher, who was treated for schizophrenia decades ago and is now a mental health advocate, noted:

I think it’s a bad idea. It would really put a chill on people getting services. They find it very scary – the idea of a national database that the government will keep [on them].

As Obama explained:

The background check system is the most efficient and effective way to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous individuals, but we need to make sure it has access to complete information about these individuals. For example, although the number of mental health records available to the system has increased by 800 percent since 2004, a recent report by the Government Accountability Office found that there are still 17 states that have made fewer than 10 mental health records available.

We need to make sure reliable data on prohibited purchasers is available to the background check system….

We need to make sure our laws are effective at identifying the dangerous or untrustworthy individuals [who] should not have access to guns.

Some have tried to minimize the impact of such expansion of mental health information into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), saying the data sought is limited in scope. Privacy concerns are “unfounded” according to Lindsay Nichols, an attorney with the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, because only those with “a severe mental illness” would be included in the database. This was an echo of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius when she promised in April, “Our actions will be carefully tailored to ensure patient confidentiality as well as public health and safety.”

Drawbacks to such inclusion of sensitive mental health information are numerous and would actually work against those individuals who need treatment. Writing for The American Prospect, Abby Rapoport said the basic assumption underlying such data gathering is that the mentally ill, however defined, are a threat to public safety, that “there’s a widespread belief that mental health monitoring and treatment is key to decreasing gun violence.” But that assumption turns the mentally ill into scapegoats in the ongoing gun violence debate:

Rather than offering solutions to the existing problems that patients and providers face, policymakers instead promise to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill. The trouble is, that often means presenting policies that are actually detrimental to mental-health treatment – threatening doctor-patient confidentiality, expanding forced treatment rather than successful voluntary programs, and further stigmatizing people with databases that track who’s been committed to hospitals or mental institutions.

It’s clear from the president’s comments that he means to confiscate firearms from the mentally ill – a defacto declaration that the mentally ill present a threat to public safety, and a sufficient excuse to invade their privacy and seize their weapons. As Rapoport explains:

The new rules and proposals perpetuate the assumption that people with mental illness are dangerous; instead of making people safer, the requirements may hurt efforts to get the mentally ill treatment.

For instance, the expanded reporting requirements mean mental-health providers must alert officials if a patient may harm herself or others. Law-enforcement officials can then show up and confiscate any guns the patient owns.

Ron Honberg, national director at the National Alliance on Mental Illness, put it bluntly: “If they’re aware that by seeking help they’re going to lose their right to have a gun, we’re concerned it’s going to have a chilling effect.”

Another false assumption is that violence can somehow be predicted and lessened by taking guns away from those on a list (who are there because some mental health “professional” put them there). Exactly the opposite is true. According to Debbie Plotnick, senior director at Mental Health America, “People with mental illness are so much more likely to be victims of crimes than perpetrators that it’s almost immeasurable,” with one study showing that the mentally ill are 11 times more likely to be victims of gun violence compared to the general population.

In 2010 more than six million background checks were run using the NICS and just 72,659 gun purchases were denied by the FBI. Half were due to felony indictments or convictions, while one in five persons who were checked were fugitives with outstanding warrants, and 11 percent were those who had violated state laws. But if the definitions were expanded to allow the “mentally defective” to be included, the potential for denial would rise enormously. Mallory Sauer at The New American magazine cited sources that state that “there is more than a 50-percent chance that an American will develop a mental disorder in his or her lifetime” and that one in four “already suffer from mental illness.”

This clearly illustrates the danger to law-abiding Americans enjoying their Second Amendment rights: If the definition of mental illness is broad enough, and states are mandated to enter into the database every person whom someone has diagnosed with some form of mental illness, what is to keep the government from essentially labeling every living soul as mentally defective, thus denying them essential rights under the Constitution?

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Republished with permission from: The New American

Kuwait pledges $4bn aid to Egypt

0

Supporters of Egyptâ„¢s ousted president, Mohamed Morsi, hold a demonstration in Cairo on July 8, 2013.

Kuwait’s cabinet has approved an urgent aid package to Egypt apparently as a show of support for the military coup against ousted President Mohamed Morsi.

On Wednesday, the official Kuwait News Agency quoted the minister of cabinet affairs, Mohammad Al Sabah, as saying that Egypt will receive a $2 billion loan, a $1 billion grant and $1 billion worth of oil and petroleum products.

The decision for the aid package was announced only a day after Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates pledged $8 billion in financial assistance to Egypt.

The aid from the three Persian Gulf Arab oil producers is expected to help Egypt avoid a balance of payments crisis and overcome severe fuel shortages.

On July 3, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that Morsi was no longer in office and declared that the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Adly Mansour, had been appointed as the new interim president.

Since then, Egypt has been the scene of rival rallies and clashes between thousands of the supporters and opponents of the ousted president.

On July 8, Egyptian officials said that 84 people were killed in clashes between the supporters of Morsi and security forces in Cairo.

Morsi is reportedly being held Å“preventively” by the military. Senior army officials say he might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

MN/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

US Bankrolled Anti-Morsi Activists: US Money Trail to Egyptian Groups that Pressed for President’s Removal.

0

President Barack Obama recently stated the United States was not taking sides as Egypt’s crisis came to a head with the military overthrow of the democratically elected president.

But a review of dozens of US federal government documents shows Washington has quietly funded senior Egyptian opposition figures who called for toppling of the country’s now-deposed president Mohamed Morsi.

Documents obtained by the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley show the US channeled funding through a State Department programme to promote democracy in the Middle East region. This programme vigorously supported activists and politicians who have fomented unrest in Egypt, after autocratic president Hosni Mubarak was ousted in a popular uprising in February 2011.

The State Department’s programme, dubbed by US officials as a “democracy assistance” initiative, is part of a wider Obama administration effort to try to stop the retreat of pro-Washington secularists, and to win back influence in Arab Spring countries that saw the rise of Islamists, who largely oppose US interests in the Middle East.

Activists bankrolled by the programme include an exiled Egyptian police officer who plotted the violent overthrow of the Morsi government, an anti-Islamist politician who advocated closing mosques and dragging preachers out by force, as well as a coterie of opposition politicians who pushed for the ouster of the country’s first democratically elected leader, government documents show

Information obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, interviews, and public records reveal Washington’s “democracy assistance” may have violated Egyptian law, which prohibits foreign political funding.

It may also have broken US government regulations that ban the use of taxpayers’ money to fund foreign politicians, or finance subversive activities that target democratically elected governments.

‘Bureau for Democracy’

Washington’s democracy assistance programme for the Middle East is filtered through a pyramid of agencies within the State Department. Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars is channeled through the Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL), The Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI), USAID, as well as the Washington-based, quasi-governmental organisation the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

In turn, those groups re-route money to other organisations such as the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute (NDI), and Freedom House, among others. Federal documents show these groups have sent funds to certain organisations in Egypt, mostly run by senior members of anti-Morsi political parties who double as NGO activists.

The Middle East Partnership Initiative — launched by the George W Bush administration in 2002 in a bid to influence politics in the Middle East in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks — has spent close to $900m on democracy projects across the region, a federal grants database shows.

USAID manages about $1.4bn annually in the Middle East, with nearly $390m designated for democracy promotion, according to the Washington-based Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED).

The US government doesn’t issue figures on democracy spending per country, but Stephen McInerney, POMED’s executive director, estimated that Washington spent some $65m in 2011 and $25m in 2012. He said he expects a similar amount paid out this year.

A main conduit for channeling the State Department’s democracy funds to Egypt has been the National Endowment for Democracy. Federal documents show NED, which in 2011 was authorised an annual budget of $118m by Congress, funneled at least $120,000 over several years to an exiled Egyptian police officer who has for years incited violence in his native country.

This appears to be in direct contradiction to its Congressional mandate, which clearly states NED is to engage only in “peaceful” political change overseas.

Exiled policeman

Colonel Omar Afifi Soliman — who served in Egypt’s elite investigative police unit, notorious for human rights abuses — began receiving NED funds in 2008 for at least four years.

During that time he and his followers targeted Mubarak’s government, and Soliman later followed the same tactics against the military rulers who briefly replaced him. Most recently Soliman set his sights on Morsi’s government.

Soliman, who has refugee status in the US, was sentenced in absentia last year for five years imprisonment by a Cairo court for his role in inciting violence in 2011 against the embassies of Israel and Saudi Arabia, two US allies.

He also used social media to encourage violent attacks against Egyptian officials, according to court documents and a review of his social media posts.

US Internal Revenue Service documents reveal thatNED paid tens of thousands of dollars to Soliman through an organisation he created called Hukuk Al-Nas (People’s Rights), based in Falls Church, Virginia. Federal forms show he is the only employee.

After he was awarded a 2008 human rights fellowship at NED and moved to the US, Soliman received a second $50,000 NED grant in 2009 for Hukuk Al-Nas. In 2010, he received $60,000 and another $10,000 in 2011.

In an interview with the Investigative Reporting Program at UC Berkeley, Soliman reluctantly admitted he received US government funding from the National Endowment for Democracy, but complained it wasn’t enough. “It is like $2000 or $2,500 a month,” he said. “Do you think this is too much? Obama wants to give us peanuts. We will not accept that.”

NED has removed public access to its Egyptian grant recipients in 2011 and 2012 from its website. NED officials didn’t respond to repeated interview requests.

‘Pro bono advice’

NED’s website says Soliman spreads only nonviolent literature, and his group was set up to provide “immediate, pro bono legal advice through a telephone hotline, instant messaging, and other social networking tools”.

However, in Egyptian media interviews, social media posts and YouTube videos, Soliman encouraged the violent overthrow of Egypt’s government, then led by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party.

“Incapacitate them by smashing their knee bones first,” he instructed followers on Facebook in late June, as Morsi’s opponents prepared massive street rallies against the government. Egypt’s US-funded and trainedmilitary later used those demonstrations to justify its coup on July 3.

“Make a road bump with a broken palm tree to stop the buses going into Cairo, and drench the road around it with gas and diesel. When the bus slows down for the bump, set it all ablaze so it will burn down with all the passengers inside … God bless,” Soliman’s post read.

In late May he instructed, “Behead those who control power, water and gas utilities.”

Soliman removed several older social media posts after authorities in Egypt took notice of his subversive instructions, court documents show.

More recent Facebook instructions to his 83,000 followers range from guidelines on spraying roads with a mix of auto oil and gas — “20 liters of oil to 4 liters of gas”- to how to thwart cars giving chase.

On a YouTube video, Soliman took credit for a failed attempt in December to storm the Egyptian presidential palace with handguns and Molotov cocktails to oust Morsi.

“We know he gets support from some groups in the US, but we do not know he is getting support from the US government. This would be news to us,” said an Egyptian embassy official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak to the media.

Funding other Morsi opponents

Other beneficiaries of US government funding are also opponents of the now-deposed president, some who had called for Morsi’s removal by force.

The Salvation Front main opposition bloc, of which some members received US funding, has backed street protest campaigns that turned violent against the elected government, in contradiction of many of the State Department’s own guidelines.

A longtime grantee of the National Endowment for Democracy and other US democracy groups is a 34-year old Egyptian woman, Esraa Abdel-Fatah, who sprang to notoriety during the country’s pitched battle over the new constitution in December 2012.

She exhorted activists to lay siege to mosques and drag from pulpits all Muslim preachers and religious figures who supported the country’s the proposed constitution, just before it went to a public referendum.

The act of besieging mosques has continued ever since, and several people have died in clashes defending them.

Federal records show Abdel-Fatah’s NGO, the Egyptian Democratic Academy, received support from NED, MEPI and NDI, among other State Department-funded groups “assisting democracy”. Records show NED gave her organisation a one-year $75,000 grant in 2011.

Abdel-Fatah is politically active, crisscrossing Egypt to rally support for her Al-Dostor Party, which is led by former UN nuclear chief Mohamed El-Baradei, the most prominent figure in the Salvation Front. She lent full support to the military takeover, and urged the West not call it a “coup”.

“June 30 will be the last day of Morsi’s term,” she told the press a few weeks before the coup took place.

US taxpayer money has also been sent to groups set up by some of Egypt’s richest people, raising questions about waste in the democracy programme.

Michael Meunier is a frequent guest on TV channels that opposed Morsi. Head of the Al-Haya Party, Meunier — a dual US-Egyptian citizen — has quietly collected US funding through his NGO, Hand In Hand for Egypt Association.

Meunier’s organisation was founded by some of the most vehement opposition figures, including Egypt’s richest man and well-known Coptic Christian billionaire Naguib Sawiris, Tarek Heggy, an oil industry executive, Salah Diab, Halliburton’s partner in Egypt, and Usama Ghazali Harb, a politician with roots in the Mubarak regime and a frequent US embassy contact.

Meunier has denied receiving US assistance, but government documents show USAID in 2011 granted his Cairo-based organisation $873,355. Since 2009, it has taken in $1.3 million from the US agency.

Meunier helped rally the country’s five million Christian Orthodox Coptic minority, who oppose Morsi’s Islamist agenda, to take to the streets against the president on June 30.

Reform and Development Party member Mohammed Essmat al-Sadat received US financial support through his Sadat Association for Social Development, a grantee of The Middle East Partnership Initiative.

The federal grants records and database show in 2011 Sadat collected $84,445 from MEPI “to work with youth in the post-revolutionary Egypt”.

Sadat was a member of the coordination committee, the main organising body for the June 30 anti-Morsi protest. Since 2008, he has collected $265,176 in US funding. Sadat announced he will be running for office again in upcoming parliamentary elections.

After soldiers and police killed more than 50 Morsi supporters on Monday, Sadat defended the use of force and blamed the Muslim Brotherhood, saying it used women and children as shields.

Some US-backed politicians have said Washington tacitly encouraged them to incite protests.

“We were told by the Americans that if we see big street protests that sustain themselves for a week, they will reconsider all current US policies towards the Muslim Brotherhood regime,” said Saaddin Ibrahim, an Egyptian-American politician opposed Morsi.

Ibrahim’s Ibn Khaldoun Center in Cairo receives US funding, one of the largest recipients of democracy promotion money in fact.

His comments followed statements by other Egyptian opposition politicians claiming they had been prodded by US officials to whip up public sentiment against Morsi before Washington could publicly weigh in.

Democracy programme defence

The practice of funding politicians and anti-government activists through NGOs was vehemently defended by the State Department and by a group of Washington-based Middle East experts close to the programme.

“The line between politics and activism is very blurred in this country,” said David Linfield, spokesman for the US Embassy in Cairo.

Others said the United States cannot be held responsible for activities by groups it doesn’t control.

“It’s a very hot and dynamic political scene,” said Michelle Dunne, an expert at the Atlantic Council think-tank. Her husband, Michael Dunne, was given a five-year jail sentence in absentia by a Cairo court for his role in political funding in Egypt.

“Just because you give someone some money, you cannot take away their freedom or the position they want to take,” said Dunne.

Elliot Abrams, a former official in the administration of George W. Bush and a member of the Working Group on Egypt that includes Dunne, denied in an email message that the US has paid politicians in Egypt, or elsewhere in the Middle East.

“The US does not provide funding for parties or ‘local politicians’ in Egypt or anywhere else,” said Abrams. “That is prohibited by law and the law is scrupulously obeyed by all US agencies, under careful Congressional oversight.”

But a State Department official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the issue’s sensitivity, said American support for foreign political activists was in line with American principles.

“The US government provides support to civil society, democracy and human rights activists around the world, in line with our long-held values, such as respecting the fundamental human rights of free speech, peaceful assembly, and human dignity,” the official wrote in an email. “US outreach in Egypt is consistent with these principles.”

A Cairo court convicted 43 local and foreign NGO workers last month on charges of illegally using foreign funds to stir unrest in Egypt. The US and UN expressed concern over the move.

Out of line

Some Middle East observers suggested the US’ democracy push in Egypt may be more about buying influence than spreading human rights and good governance.

“Funding of politicians is a problem,” said Robert Springborg, who evaluated democracy programmes for the State Department in Egypt, and is now a professor at the National Security Department of the Naval Postgraduate School at Monterey, California.

“If you run a programme for electoral observation, or for developing media capacity for political parties, I am not against that. But providing lots of money to politicians — I think that raises lots of questions,” Springborg said.

Some Egyptians, meanwhile, said the US was out of line by sending cash through its democracy programme in the Middle East to organisations run by political operators.

“Instead of being sincere about backing democracy and reaching out to the Egyptian people, the US has chosen an unethical path,” said Esam Neizamy, an independent researcher into foreign funding in Egypt, and a member of the country’s Revolutionary Trustees, a group set up to protect the 2011 revolution.

“The Americans think they can outsmart lots of people in the Middle East. They are being very hostile against the Egyptian people who have nothing but goodwill for them — so far,” Neizamy said.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Iran satellite channels on new frequency

0

Iranian satellite channels Press TV and iFilm are airing on a new frequency on the Express AM44 satellite. (file photo)

Iranâ„¢s entertainment and movie channel iFilm as well as the 24-hour English-language news channel Press TV are airing with new parameters on the Express AM44 satellite.

Viewers can watch Press TV and the English version of iFilm on the following frequency:

Satellite: Express AM44 at 11.0 W

Transponder: B5

Frequency: 11109

Polarization: Horizontal

Symbol Rate: 9479

FEC: ¾

The Arabic version of iFilm and the Spanish-language Hispan TV have also been uplinked with the same parameters on the Express AM44 at 11.0 W.

Press TV and other Iranian channels have come under an unprecedented wave of attacks by European governments and satellite companies since January 2012.

They have been taken off the air in several Western countries, including Britain, France, Germany and Spain.

European companies say they are abiding by anti-Iran sanctions. However, Michael Mann, the EU foreign policy chief’s spokesman, has told Press TV that sanctions do not apply to media.

The latest move against Iranian alternative channels came in June when Intelsat told Iran’s national broadcasting corporation, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), that it will no longer provide services to Iranian channels, including Press TV, as of July 1.

Intelsat made the move under the pretext of the US sanctions against the head of the IRIB, Ezzatollah Zarghami.

Press TV later learned that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) — an agency of the US Treasury Department headed by an Ashkenazi Jew called Adam Szubin — was behind the pressure on Intelsat.

Media activists call the attacks on Iranian channels a campaign against free speech launched by the same European governments that preach freedom of expression.

MRS/MHB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

1,900 more UK troops leave Afghanistan

0

Britain will withdraw 1,900 of its total 7,900 forces from Afghanistan by the autumn, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond says.

The pull-out follows the British governmentâ„¢s stated plans for cutting its troops in Afghanistan to around 5,200 by the end of 2013.

London also said earlier this month that it is pulling its fleet of Merlin choppers from Afghanistan as part of its phased withdrawal plan.

The Merlins were planned to be sent back as part of a shipment of 3,500 armored vehicles and 12,000 containers of military equipment estimated to cost some £300 million to be flown back to the country.

The British government has vowed to withdraw all its troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014 in line with the NATO planning.

Britain has already reduced the number of its forces in the Asian country from a peak of 9,500 last year to 7,900 currently.

AMR/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Taxes On Recreational Pot Sales Could Top 35 Percent

0

CBS Denver
July 10, 2013

The taxes on recreational marijuana might go a lot higher than first thought. Smokers buying at shops in Denver may pay up to 35 percent in taxes.

Colorado voters will be asked to approve two state taxes totaling 25 percent on all retail marijuana sales in the November election. They may be asked to approve an additional city tax for Denver.

Denver Mayor Michael Hancock wants to add an additional five to 10 percent city tax on top of that.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 3:22 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

'Israel to up military presence in Golan'

0

Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen Benny Gantz (with binoculars) and other military officers overlook parts of Syria from the occupied Golan Heights. (file photo)

The Israeli military is set to deploy a new regional unit along the Syrian border in the occupied Golan Heights, a military source says.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the Israeli military source told Xinhua on Wednesday that the new unit would be the Israeli regimeâ„¢s fifth regional division to operate in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

The Israeli daily Haaretz also reported that the decision had been finalized by Israeli Chief of Staff Lt. Gen Benny Gantz earlier this week.

The regime in Tel Aviv has recently increased its military activities in the occupied Syrian territory of Golan Heights.

On June 26, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that military maneuvers may be carried out in the occupied Golan Heights in the near future, the Times of Israel reported.

The Israeli military has also been behind a number of aerial assaults on the Syrian soil over the past months.

On May 5, the Israeli military launched an airstrike on the Jamraya Research Center in a suburb of the Syrian capital Damascus.

The regime in Tel Aviv, along with the West and its other regional allies, are supporting over two years of deadly crisis plaguing Syria.

MKA/NT/MHB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

UK to privatize Royal Mail

0

Britain is to privatize its national mail service the Royal Mail by offering part of the service on the London Stock Exchange this year.

Business Secretary Vince Cable said in an announcement in the House of Commons that the privatization will take place in the autumn

Å“The government’s decision on the sale is practical, it is logical, it is a commercial decision designed to put Royal Mail’s future on a long-term sustainable business. It is consistent with developments elsewhere in Europe,” he told MPs.

The Royal Mail employs 150,000 staff and delivers mail and parcels to all parts of the country.

The announcement was challenged by the Communication Workers Union (CWU), which represents 100,000 Royal Mail workers, and has been holding a wave of strike actions to halt the Royal Mailâ„¢s sale.

“Royal Mail is thriving in public ownership, increasing its profits, providing good quality services and decent jobs. We want it to remain that way,” CWU general secretary Billy Hayes said.

AMR/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Lost Lightning: The Missing Secrets Of Nikola Tesla

0

A mystery surrounds Tesla. His contributions, which were great and many, have descended into obscurity. Why?

Nikola Tesla, a Serbian scientist born in Croatia, was a humanitarian, a US patriot, and yes, an unbridled genius, though he has often been personified as the quintessential mad scientist. Perhaps his only real misdeed was being born ahead of his time.

Tesla’s idea was to be able to provide power equally to all people on Earth. At this time there are 2 to 3 billion people on this planet that can’t go home at night and turn on the lights. The people that can’t are living in poverty.

Tesla saw that there was a division between the haves and the have-nots. And he was determined to make electrical power equally available to all people on this planet… as a gift.

This is the story of the man that time forgot and the US government which did no justice to him.

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the
copyright owner.

For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev pleads not guilty to marathon blasts

0

John Zaremba, Antonio Planas and Laurel J. Sweet
Boston Herald
July 10, 2013

Accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev pleaded not guilty today in federal court, making a quick but dramatic first appearance under the stares of victims, the adoring gaze of his sisters and the watchful eyes of dozens of global media organizations.

Judge Marianne Bowler’s courtroom was packed for the 19-year-old’s arraignment on 30 charges including use of a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death.

He pleaded “not guilty” in a thick accent seven times.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 3:11 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

ALEC Agenda Tips the Scales of Justice to Help Corporations Win

0

At least 71 bills introduced in 2013 that make it harder for average Americans to access the civil justice system resemble “models” from the American Legislative Exchange Council, or “ALEC,” according to an analysis by the Center for Media and Democracy, publishers of ALECexposed.org.

ALEC Agenda Tips the Scales of Justice to Help Corporations Win

For decades, ALEC has been a conduit for the oil, tobacco, and pharmaceutical industries to push legislation that changes the rules to limit accountability when a corporation’s products or actions cause injury or death — such as when a Koch Industries pipeline explodes and kills teenagers, or when the tobacco or pharmaceutical industries withhold evidence that their products are dangerous. In just the first six months of 2013, seventy-one ALEC bills that advance these “tort reform” goals have been introduced in thirty states.

“Each of these bills would weaken the legal rights of everyday people who are wrongfully harmed by a corporation or health care provider,” says Joanne Doroshow, Executive Director of the Center for Justice & Democracy, a group that works to protect the civil justice system and fight tort reform. “[The bills] are carefully crafted to provide relief and protections for the industries who wrote them.”

A long-standing principle of American law gives a person injured (or whose family member is killed) by the fault of another the right to pursue justice and seek fair compensation in front of a judge and jury. An injury for which a person can sue is known as a “tort.” Tort lawsuits are one of the few instances where an average American can stand on equal footing with a global corporation, make their case in front of a citizen jury, and demand justice. On a level playing field, consumers often win — which is why corporate interests want to rig this centuries-old system to their benefit.

Tort cases are relatively rare — they make up only six percent of the entire civil court caseload, and are declining — but they are effective. Tort liability is why U.S. companies have stopped selling dangerous cribs that strangle infants and children’s pajamas that catch fire.

The ALEC “tort reform” bills fundamentally alter the tort liability system by making it harder to bring a lawsuit or by limiting a jury’s ability to award damages. The bills provide a way for ALEC corporations to escape responsibility for wrongdoing, help ALEC insurance companies limit payouts (and increase profits), and prevent Americans wrongfully injured or killed from receiving just compensation.(Photo: Center for Media and Democracy)

ALEC Bills Limit Corporate Accountability, Change Liability Rules

Some ALEC bills limit how much a corporation might have to pay for causing injury.

  • The ALEC “Noneconomic Damage Awards Act” (versions of which were introduced in five states in 2013) limits the amount a jury can award to compensate a person for their diminished quality of life as the result of an injury. 
  • The misleadingly-named “Full and Fair Noneconomic Damages Act” (introduced in two states) limits the amount a corporation might have to pay to compensate a person for their pain and suffering.
  • The “Phantom Damages Elimination Act” (introduced in two states) changes the rules so a person who paid health insurance premiums for years would recover less for their medical bills than a person who had no insurance: rather than placing the full cost of paying for medical bills on the wrongdoer, the bill would reduce the amount they must pay if a person’s insurance company negotiated a discount. 

Other ALEC bills change how liability is apportioned when more than one individual or corporation is at fault.

  • Three states introduced versions of the “Comparative Fault Act,” which changes the rules so that “if a company is 49% responsible, they are completely off the hook,” Doroshow says. 
  • Two states introduced the misleadingly-named “Joint and Several Liability Act,” which actually eliminates the Joint and Several rule that has worked for many years and protects victims in situations where it is difficult to pinpoint which defendant is at fault — such as when multiple companies may have manufactured lead paint — or where one of the defendants is insolvent. The bill eliminates the rule that had established that after a jury finds a defendant substantially responsible, they can be required to fully reimburse a person for their injury. 

Other ALEC “model legislation” would provide immunity for certain forms of lawsuits. 

  • Five states introduced the “Emergency Care Immunity Act,” which provides immunity to emergency personnel who provide assistance, without compensation, at the scene of an emergency. Providing some legal protections for volunteers in emergency situations may be important, but Doroshow suspects the bill is primarily advanced “for PR purposes” to promote the notion that the tort system is broken. 
  • Ten states introduced the “Trespasser Responsibility Act,” which would largely absolve landowners from a responsibility to maintain safe premises, and tends to benefit large landowners like railroads, utility companies, and big agriculture. These large corporations would be absolved from their duty to act responsibly, and would be immune if a person accidentally wanders onto their property and are injured by poorly-maintained electrical boxes, dangerous chemicals or farm implements.

ALEC Corporations Reap the Rewards

The Trespasser Responsibility Act was brought to ALEC by Matt Fullenbaum of the American Tort Reform Association and Mark Behrens of Shook Hardy & Bacon, a law firm that has long represented tobacco companies and other industries seeking to avoid tort liability. Behrens is an “advisor” to the ALEC Civil Justice Task Force, as are other Shook Hardy & Bacon attorneys. The head of Shook Hardy & Bacon is Victor Schwartz, the so-called “undisputed king of tort reform” who for many years has chaired the ALEC Civil Justice Task Force.

Others involved with the Civil Justice Task Force include a variety of corporate trade groups that have worked closely with Schwartz and his law firm, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business, as well as the American Insurance Industry and others.

“Industries like the tobacco, insurance, oil and chemical industries are pretty detested,” Doroshow says, “and trade groups provide a way for these corporations to hide behind a more neutral-sounding entity that will push their agenda. This makes it harder for the public to learn how these detested industries would benefit from tort reform.”

ALEC’s corporate members are a who’s-who of companies that face tort liability. Its corporate board, recently renamed by ALEC as the “Private Enterprise Advisory Board,” includes representatives of fossil fuel interests (Koch Industries, Peabody Energy, Exxon Mobil, Energy Future Holdings), the pharmaceutical industry (PhRMA, Pfizer), and big tobacco (Altria, formally known as Phillip Morris). It also includes insurance companies like State Farm, which profits from a rigged tort liability system by paying out less in claims (even while raising premiums).  

Average Americans Pay the Price

An increasingly major player in advancing the ALEC tort reform agenda is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its Institute for Legal Reform, both of which are members of the ALEC Civil Justice Task Force.

A big priority for the Chamber this year has been legislation narrowing access to the courts for asbestos victims. The ALEC “Asbestos Claims Transparency Act” was first adopted by members of the ALEC Civil Justice Task Force in 2007 and was introduced in four states in 2013, in many cases supported by testimony from Shook Hardy & Bacon attorney Mark Behrens on behalf of the Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform. The effort would benefit corporations like Crown Holdings, a Fortune 500 company with over $8 billion in annual sales that has worked with ALEC for years to legislate its way out of compensating asbestos victims, as well as ALEC member Honeywell International, which has faced significant asbestos liability in recent years.

Asbestos-related diseases kill at least 10,000 Americans every year, in many cases from mesothelioma, an incurable and painful cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. For decades, asbestos was used for insulation and industrial purposes, and the diseases particularly affect veterans, firefighters, construction workers, and individuals who worked in factories with high-heat machinery.

Asbestos company executives knew from at least the 1940s that asbestos was deadly but covered it up for half of a century. For example, an internal memo from a subsidiary of ALEC member Honeywell in 1966 stated, “if you have enjoyed a good life while working with asbestos products why not die from it?” The disease can take between 20 and 50 years to manifest, so individuals exposed decades earlier are only discovering the illness now. 

Like the ALEC-supported voter ID laws that spread across the country in recent years, supporters of the Asbestos Claims Transparency Act claim the law is necessary to stop fraud — despite no persuasive evidence of significant fraud or abuse. The law is couched in terms of “transparency,” but is actually designed to save corporations money by delaying justice for asbestos victims and enacting unnecessary procedural hurdles for getting their day in court.

The bill could allow corporations like Crown Holdings or Honeywell to delay a lawsuit until a victim files claims with any other asbestos or personal injury “trust funds,” which are accounts set up after a company goes bankrupt to pay claims to injured parties. This requirement, advocates say, is intended to drag out a case until after a sick victim dies — an especially pointed concern given that asbestos cancer victims usually die within a year after being diagnosed.

In December of 2012, Ohio became the first state to pass the ALEC asbestos bill, which the Chamber publicly applauded: “‘As Ohio goes, so goes the nation,’ and we hope this will result in a domino effect,” said Lisa Rickard, president of the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform. The Wall Street Journal editorial board — which includes Stephen Moore, an ALEC “advisor” — published an editorial in support of the legislation.

Consumer and worker advocates expect more states to introduce versions of the Asbestos Claims Transparency Act in 2014. A parallel bill has been introduced on the federal level and recently passed the House Judiciary Committee (prompting a response from the New York Times Editorial Board). Testimony presented to Congress from attorneys at Caplin & Drysdale has identified the ALEC connection.

“Tort Reform” Bills Contradict ALEC’s Alleged Free Market Principles

A robust tort liability system advances “free market” goals — a principle ALEC claims to support — by providing market pressures that provide a check on corporate misbehavior. The possibility of a lawsuit, and the associated financial liability, provides an economic incentive for manufacturers, hospitals, utility companies, and other corporations to be more safe and responsible, and it advances these goals without government regulation and enforcement.

By pushing these “tort reform” bills, ALEC is not advocating for “free markets” and “limited government,” but instead protecting corporate interests from any form of accountability to consumers or the public.

“[The ALEC tort reform bills] offer nothing for consumers and in fact, would do them great harm,” Doroshow says. “And they create frameworks, easily amended by future lawmakers, that could result in even worse damage to the public.”

Copyright 2013 Center for Media and Democracy

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Accession to the EU: Serbia should ‘’Icelandize’’ its European policy

0

 IBNA INTERVIEW — Živadin Jovanović, former Yugoslav Foreign Minister

By Miloš Mitrovi㠗 Belgrade

“After the European Union Council had announced the start of the accession negotiations with Serbia, the statements by the EU representatives in this regard were mainly general. They said that the talks will start at the latest in January 2014, but it is not clear what the EU Council will discuss in December. However, we can assume that the issue will be complete and continual implementation of the Brussels agreement about the normalization of the relations between Belgrade and PriÅ¡tina. I think this is for certain, especially given the fact that the implementation of the Brussels agreement was the main demand of the German Parliament in the first place”, Živadin Jovanović, former Yugoslav Foreign Minister (1998 — 2000) said in the interview for IBNA. Jovanović is President of Belgrade Forum of the world of equals, since 2005.

The officials of the Serbian Government are claiming that there will be no further preconditions for the start of the talks. Are they right?

„These comments are directed to Serbian public. The officials want to send the message to the people that Serbian policy concerning the EU thus far was adequate and that it was fruitful. Nevertheless, I believe that situation is not so simple at all. There are no reasons to be satisfied with the EU decision, not to mention celebrations. Serbia is going to face new tough demands. Serbian Government accepted EU policy that had tied the accession talks with Serbia with the issue of Kosovo which is wrong. Such an approach is unprecedented in the history of the EU enlargement process. And now we can see — according to German Bundestag decision — that even the new negotiation chapter on relations between Belgrade and PriÅ¡tina will be introduced.“

Do you think that EU will accept the German position?

“I am sure that the EU will follow German position. This is usual practice in Bruxels. Any unbiased observer would say that by this approach EU requests from Serbia to recognize the independence of Kosovo. Bundestag declaration means that the EU will demand from Serbia to accept the entering of Kosovo into international organizations, including UN, to sign an “agreement on good neighbourly relations and status of national minorities”, to establish diplomatic relations etc. I even think that certain other EU member states, not only Germany, sooner or later, will make their own preconditions for Serbia. They will not support Serbian progress towards the EU without fulfilling these preconditions.”

You consider the Brussels agreement as a dictate. Do you find that Serbia had a different choice?

„The Icelandization of Serbian policy regarding the EU was an alternative. This approach implies cooling-down the whole process of endless unilateral concessions to EU, USA and Prishtina, intensify economic and other ties with Russia, China, India and all countries supporting Serbia`s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to start activating own economic, natural, humane and geostrategic capacities which are not negligible. Serbian officials, to my opinion, made serious mistake by trading Serbian legitimate rights in Kosovo and Metohija for the accession talks date. We will see what will be the final price of the Serbian EU membership. For instance, Serbian public is not aware that Germany, Austria, may be even Hungary, may request compensations for Volksdeutsche (Germans which were expelled from Serbia in the end of the Second World War as collaborators of occupying fascist’s forces).

What could be the consequences for the current Serbian government in case that it had been refused the EU demands regarding Kosovo?

„I think that this government went too far, too rapidly. Why they have decided to rush into negotiations at the highest level? If the highest ranking officials make a wrong decision, nobody can correct it. The alternative solution was to conduct constructive policy towards the EU, but without rushing and without surrendering vital state and national long term interests. This approach could imply openness for membership but not for dictate and blackmail. By intensifying the economical and other relations with BRICS countries, as well as with the Arab and Latin American countries, Serbia could strengthen its position towards the EU. Accepting the Brussels agreement under the conditions imposed by the EU will be remembered as historical step, but unfortunately, wrong one.“

Do you think that current EU „sticks and carrots“ policy towards Serbia is similar to Western policy in Yugoslavia during the 90s?

„There are many similarities. Generally, EU practices a racist policy toward Serbia. During the 90s sticks were isolation, sanctions and even, direct military aggression in alliance with the terrorist UCK. At this moment, circumstances are different — there are no sanctions, isolations threat of aggression. Neither EU, nor NATO have monopoly in European or world relations, be they economic, political or strategic. Serbia is member of most important international organizations, has many friends. Her interests and rights in Kosovo and Metohija are guaranteed by UN SC resolution 1244. Thus, Serbia has more opportunities to demand and reach just compromise. Yet, somehow, Serbia is more opened and more subjected to dictate. I am not sure whether the Brussels agreement will provide stability in the region or create the foundation for the new strives in the future. “

What will the Croatian entry into EU bring to Serbia?

„Croatia is our neighbour country and we should build good relations together. The basic principle in this cooperation should be the reciprocity. Nevertheless, Serbia has allowed Croatia unilateral concessions thus far. Croatian companies have purchased both Serbian factories and the agricultural resources’ of the highest quality. Croatian businessman Ivica Todoric controls more than a third chain market`s in Serbia. On the other hand, Serbian companies are not allowed to invest in Croatia. Serbs in Croatia are discriminated; barriers for the return of Serbian refugees forced out in 90-ies are still there. The part of the border between Serbia and Croatia is still undefined, because Croatia has pretensions that are contrary to international law. All this is certainly not in compliance with the standards of EU.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

America and the Generals in Egypt moved against Morsi to prevent a Popular Revolution

0

The Egyptian military’s removal of the Muslim Brotherhood government is seen as a military coup, or an acknowledgment of the people’s demands to remove Morsi, but it also could have been a move to pre-empt a civil war from taking place.

What should be emphasized about the Egyptian military is that its leadership is Egypt’s top economic actor, no friend of democracy, and the most reliable partner of the US and Israel inside Egypt.

There is another factor that is to be considered. If not delayed until 2014, the coup came a few months before delayed parliamentary elections that could have taken place in October or November 2013. If the protests in the streets amounted to a majority at the ballot box, the opposition could have had Morsi constitutionally and legally removed from power through a parliamentary vote leading to a general plebiscite.

For both the Muslim Brotherhood’s supporters and opponents, at least at the grassroots level, America is the common denominator in their struggle. Morsi’s supporters and opponents alike are both accusing one another of complying with US plots against Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood’s supporters say that the US had Morsi removed from power whereas Morsi’s opponents say he was a US puppet that Washington was trying to keep in power. Both are actually right.

There is one important angle that is being missed when the events in Egypt are being debated. The Egyptian military removed Morsi to pre-empt a popular revolution from taking place. The Obama administration gave the green light to remove Morsi as a means of preventing the Egyptian people from taking things into their own hands.

AFP Photo / Mahmud Khaled

The Muslim Brotherhood-Obama alliance

Many have accused the Muslim Brotherhood of being an American asset. Asset could mean many things and depends on what is specifically being implied by the use of the word. If asset means an actor that has no agency and is unable to make independent decisions, the Muslim Brotherhood is not categorically a US asset. Yet, the Muslim Brotherhood is not the pristine organization with clean hands that many of its supporters think it is. It is definitely a US asset, if by asset it is being implied that the Muslim Brotherhood has served US interests.

What is important to note is that the United States and Muslim Brotherhood have both tried to manipulate one another on the basis of their own converging agendas. Collaboration between the US government and Muslim Brotherhood goes back to the time of Gamal Abdel Nasser when they both worked against Nasser’s government. The particular arrangement between the Muslim Brotherhood and the US over the Arab Spring, which has seen the Muslim Brotherhood riding the 2011 wave of Arab upheavals into power, goes back to President Obama’s 2009 “A New Beginning” speech that was supposed to reset America’s damaged relations with the world’s Muslims. The Obama administration specifically asked that representatives of the Muslim Brotherhood be present when President Obama delivered the widely anticipated speech in Cairo.

As a regional player, the Muslim Brotherhood tried to use the Obama administration as much as it could in its ascent to power in Egypt and the broader Middle East and North Africa. In fact, the Muslim Brotherhood in many circumstances would have found it nearly impossible to act on its own if it were not for the support of the Obama administration and its regional allies, like Qatar and Turkey. On the other hand, the Obama administration has used the Muslim Brotherhood in its regional strategy against Iran and all the other regional players opposing the US and Israel. In this regard, the Muslim Brotherhood has served Washington in its war against the Syrians and Libyans and as a means to slowly nudge the Hamas government in Gaza away from the orbit of Iran and the Iranian-led Resistance Bloc that includes Syria and Hezbollah. The Muslim Brotherhood has also continued to support Israel by blockading Gaza and collaborating against the Palestinians in the military and security sectors.

The military coup pre-empted a real revolution

Swept away with romanticized notions, many people have been slow to realize that the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt was a neo-liberal regime. To put it candidly, the Muslim Brotherhood has represented a democratized continuation of the old regime of Hosni Mubarak in its policies and actions. Most Egyptian state institutions maintained old regime figures and even Morsi’s cabinet included more members of the old regime of Mubarak than Muslim Brotherhood politicians from the Freedom and Justice Party.

Despite the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood and the Egyptian military formed an uneasy US-brokered alliance, the one snag in America’s plans has been that inside Egypt there has been a power struggle. Be it members of the old regime or authentic democrats, there has been a reluctance by a large segment of the population to accept the Muslim Brotherhood’s rule that has polarized Egyptian society. At the same time, the Obama administration has capitalized on these cleavages as a means of trying to position itself as the arbitrator of power in Egypt.

The Obama administration supported the Morsi administration, but it betrayed him by quietly supporting the military coup. Washington did this to prevent what it feared could have led to a popular uprising and revolution in Egypt that would have overthrown Morsi. Because an authentic people’s revolution would have unpredictable results that would not safeguard their interests, both the US government and Egyptian military feared this. Specifically, Washington and the Egyptian military’s leadership could both face the potential risk of seeing the empowerment of a revolutionary government in Cairo that would be outside of their control or influence. The Egyptian military’s leaders could have lost their wealth and businesses, while America would have lost control of the largest Arab country and the Suez Canal. This is why the military acted against the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Obama administration has made a huge mistake in Egypt. Maybe it will engineer a civil war to prevent the inevitable. America, however, will eventually lose Egypt.

This article was originally published by RT Op-Edge.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Latin American Nations Upset Over NSA Spying, U.S. Interference

0

The Rio de Janeiro, Brazil-based newspaper O Globo reported on July 9 that former NSA contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden had provided it with documents showing that the United States has been accumulating data on telephone calls and e-mails from several countries in Latin America, including Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.

Citing the report in O Globo, the Washington Post reported that the NSA had collected military and security data “on countries such as Venezuela, an American adversary that has been accused of aiding Colombia’s Marxist rebels and maintaining close ties with Iran.”

While spying on a leftist regime such as Venezuela’s might be understandable, the documents show that the NSA carried out surveillance operations to discover inside information related to the oil and energy industries not only in Venezuela, but also in Mexico.

The Post quoted a statement from U.S. officials in Bogota, Colombia, whose statement on the assertions printed in O Globo was: “We have been clear that the United States does gather foreign intelligence of the type gathered by all nations.”

Brazil’s Communications Minister Paulo Bernardo told reporters in Brasilia that Thomas Shannon, the U.S. ambassador to Brazil, denied in a meeting that the United States carries out surveillance operations on Brazilian communications and told him that the United States is not working with Brazilian telecommunications operators, reported the Post.

The Guardian (U.K.) also cited Bernardo’s opinion that the NSA data gathering was likely to have been done by satellite or by tapping undersea cables, but he also wanted to determine whether domestic international providers were involved.

“If that has happened, these companies broke Brazilian law and acted against our constitution, which safeguards the right to privacy,” said Bernardo.

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff told reporters on Monday that her government would raise the issues with the UN Commission on Human Rights, asserting, “Brazil’s position on this issue is very clear and very firm. We do not agree at all with interference of this kind, not just in Brazil but in any other country.”

O Globo reported that the most intense NSA surveillance was directed at Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, and Mexico.

Other Latin American nations spied on by the NSA were Argentina, Ecuador, Panama, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Honduras, Paraguay, Chile, Peru, and El Salvador, noted the report.

Peru’s President Ollanta Humala said in a televised interview on Tuesday that the alleged spying was worrisome, reported Reuters.

“We are against these kinds of espionage activities,” declared Humala. “It would be good for [Peru’s] Congress to look with concern at privacy issues related to personal information.”

Retuers noted that the O Globo article was written by Glenn Greenwald, Roberto Kaz, and José Casado. If Greenwald’s name sounds familiar, it is because he is the reporter for The Guardian who worked extensively with Edward Snowden. The Guardian published a series of exposés based on Snowden’s disclosures in June 2013. 

When Greenwald asked Snowden in an interview what the leaked documents reveal, the whistleblower replied:

That the NSA routinely lies in response to congressional inquiries about the scope of surveillance in America. I believe that when [Senator Ron] Wyden and [Senator Mark] Udall asked about the scale of this, they [the NSA] said it did not have the tools to provide an answer. We do have the tools and I have maps showing where people have been scrutinized.

When Greenwald asked Snowden why he decided to become a whistleblower, he replied: 

The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.

I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things.… I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under. 

Greenwald, who is a U.S. citizen, lives in Rio de Janeiro.

O Globo reported on Sunday that not only the NSA but also the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had gathered telephone and e-mail data in Brazil, basing its allegations on documents Snowden provided to Greenwald. The two agencies jointly ran monitoring stations to gather information from foreign satellites in 65 countries, including five in Latin America, said the report.

The Guardian reported that Brazilian Foreign Minister Antonio Patriota expressed “deep concern” about the report appearing in O Globo, stating, “The Brazilian government has asked for clarifications through the U.S. embassy in Brasília and the Brazilian embassy in Washington.” Patriota said that Brazil would ask the UN to work on an international regulation “to impede abuses and protect the privacy” of Internet users.

Greenwald, writing in his blog, noted that Brazil was merely one example of the NSA’s global practice. He observed,

There are many more populations of non-adversarial countries which have been subjected to the same type of mass surveillance net by the NSA: indeed, the list of those which haven’t been are [sic] shorter than those which have.

Snowden has revealed that the NSA and CIA used programs called “PRISM” and “Boundless Informant” in Latin America.

As we noted in our recent article “South American Leaders Protest Rerouting of Bolivian Plane,” many in Latin America are already disenchanted by what they see as heavy-handed interference in their affairs by their neighbor to the north. 

Photo of protesters in Mexico condemning the rerouting of Morales’ plane: AP Images

 

Related articles:

South American Leaders Protest Rerouting of Bolivian Plane

Snowden Headed to Ecuador for Asylum?

Fox News Focuses on Snowden, Ignores Gov’t Assault on Bill of Rights

The Predictable Response to Edward Snowden’s Disclosure of PRISM

Republished with permission from: The New American

NSA Spying: the 'Insult Felt Across Latin America'

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

<img alt="" border="0" class="image-full" src="/sites/commondreams.org/files/imce-images/dilma-rousseff-009.jpg" style="width: 540px; height: 324px;" title="Brazil's president, Dilma Rousseff, who called in cabinet ministers to discuss the issue of NSA spying on Brazilians.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Did Israel Attack Syria?

0

In a recent report from investigative journalist Richard Silverstein at the Tikun Olam blog, confidential sources within the Israeli military establishment revealed to him that the alleged bombing of a weapons depot in the Syrian town of Latakia, — which sits beside the Russian controlled seaport at Tartous — was an Israeli operation, targeting advanced Russian-supplied defensive missile systems (S-300 or Yakhont), an operation that included the direct assistance of opposition militants inside Syria.

Silverstein’s Israeli source specifically states that members of the FSA coordinated with the IDF and engaged in a diversionary rocket attack at the time of the Israeli airstrike. The previous Israeli attack in Damascus; when rebels were on hand to film the event, bears similar hallmarks to the attack in Latakia, yet, contrary to the previous strike, there has been no footage to date of the explosion, and Syrian journalists I have contacted have confirmed that there are no Syrian media reports on recent large-scale explosions in Latakia. The anti-Assad activist the “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” has reported briefly on the incident and claimed Syrian soldiers were killed, and the blast could be heard kilometres from the alleged strike-zone.

In this Reuters report, titled “Syrian Naval Base Blast Points to Israel”, Qassem Saadeddine, spokesman for the Free Syrian Army’s “Supreme Military Council”, states: (my emphasis)

“rebel forces’ intelligence network had identified newly supplied Yakhont missiles being stored there.It was not the FSA that targeted this,… It is not an attack that was carried out by rebels.”

Saadeddine goes on to state that the attack on the base “was either by air raid or long-range missiles fired from boats in the Mediterranean.” Why would a “FSA” spokesmen disavow attacks on Syrian military installations? It seems anathema to what the various incarnations of “spokesmen” have been trying to achieve for two years; namely, fabricating attacks on military installations to bolster morale within the ranks of the rebels, and deplete the morale of the Syrian Army. These accounts seem to tally with Silverstein’s Israeli source — yet the specific weapons that were the target seem to differ.

It is hard to believe that Israel would take such a risk for the Yakhonts alone, unless they have developed a superior stand-off missile system that radically reduces the risks involved; which may have been the reason in using “rebels” to gleefully advertise the “success” of Israel’s earlier airstrikes on Damascus. The S-300 system is a clear advantage for Syria, enabling superior mobile air-defense; the Yakhonts are built to target war-ships and while they offer deterrent for Syria’s Mediterranean coast, they are no use to Assad if a No-Fly Zone is enforced.

Furthermore, it must be noted that it has become widespread knowledge that Israel is, at the very least, liaising directly with “opposition” forces inside Syria. Silverstein also confirmed this to be the case, and in particular referenced the Golan Heights; this cooperation has also been reported in some avenues of mainstream media, although the reportage is usually set to a “humanitarian” tone.

In a Times of Israel report from the 1st July titled: “We Have No Beef With Israel, Syrian Islamist Group Says”, a spokesman for the rebel group “the Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade” — a Salafist “rebel” group based in the Golan Heights/Quneitra/Daraa region with close links to Jabhat al Nusra, and the group responsible for several kidnappings of UN peacekeepers — goes as far as to thank Israel for its assistance along the border saying: “The medical help that the refugees got from Israel is a very good thing,”, and attempted to reassure Israelis that their fight is directed at the Assad regime and not them; not even in “ten years time”. The report goes on to state: (my emphasis)

To date, Israel has admitted over two dozen Syrians into its hospitals for treatment, and the IDF has set up a field hospital on the border for treating relatively minor cases. During June 6 clashes between Syrian rebels and Assad forces at the Quneitra border crossing, the IDF treated 20 Syrian rebel combatants for injuries suffered during the gunfight, according to a recently published UN secretary-general’s report.

Moreover, Israel has also made overtures to the Druze community in and around the Quneitra/Golan Heights region, in attempts to shore-up its borders. This highlights the moral expediency and great lengths the Israeli military will go to uphold the status quo and its military dominance. The Israeli government has no concern for Syria or its people, it will happily pour fuel on the fire and enable warring factions to shed further needless blood to achieve its desired strategic objectives. As Jonathon Cook noted recently, the “optimal scenario” for the Israel military would be for the Syrian war to totally divide the state, resulting in a de-facto “balkanization”. It makes perfect sense that to achieve this, Israel are in the same position as the United States, they are looking to “level the playing field”.

Red Lines and Ambiguity.

When Reuters questioned Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon regarding the explosions in Latakia, his reply was reminiscent of official ambiguous statements regarding previous Israeli strikes in Syria. (and other various Muslim nations around the world): (my emphasis)

“We have set red lines in regards to our own interests, and we keep them. There is an attack here, an explosion there, various versions — in any event, in the Middle East it is usually we who are blamed for most.”

Following recent statements from Russian diplomats vowing to honour advanced weapons contracts, along with claims from Assad that the shipments had begun to arrive in response to the previous Israeli airstrike upon Syria, — which targeted elite Syrian military divisions stationed in the Qassioun Mountains in Damascus — it appears Israel may have acted upon the threat of attacking Russian weapons that “tip the balance” in the region. In reality, the result of Syria acquiring such advanced systems will diminish Israel’s ability to violate its neighbours sovereign airspace at will, and in turn, commit acts of war unhindered.

The media silence surrounding this alleged attack is disconcerting on several levels. Firstly, if indeed Russian supplied advanced weapons (either the Yakhont Surface to Sea, or the S-300 Surface to Air systems) — that will undoubtedly be accompanied by Russian military personnel — have been attacked, why is Russia silent on the issue? Have Russia given the Israeli’s guarantees that retaliation will not be forthcoming? Aside from this theory, there is the distinct possibility that an emboldened Israeli military now feels it can strike targets within Syrian territory with impunity; particularly considering the half-hearted response from Russia (and the “International Community”) to Israel’s last act of war upon Syria.

Furthermore, if Israel has indeed carried out this strike and knowingly hit targets that Russian troops may be alongside, are Russia even willing or able to retaliate? Lets not forget, a war with Israel is almost a guaranteed war with the United States. Of course, to these powers this is a game of chess, and Israel like to play in the dark. Could Russia and Israel both be engaging in covert strikes against each other? Mysteriously, an Israeli F-16 “crashed during routine training” over the Mediterranean on Sunday, a mere two days after the alleged strike in Latakia; it is no secret Russia has been building a huge Naval presence in the Med.

In summary, if it is true that Israel has targeted Russian advanced systems, and all the implications that follow, Russia and Syria could be remaining silent for three reasons: firstly, out of embarrassment and an unwillingness to appear weak through lack of ability to retaliate; secondly, one of the parties is complicit; thirdly, they plan to retaliate in kind, ie: a covert operation. The only other explanation is that the strike in Latakia simply did not occur.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Hip-Hop Legend Reveals The Most Powerful Force In The World

0

Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Chuck D is an American rapper and producer best known as the leader of the rap group Public Enemy, inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame last December. Public Enemy is only the fourth rap group to be inducted.

Professor Griff, also a well-known member of Public Enemy, called out the NWO on the Alex Jones Show and the Infowars Nightly News.

Infowars interviewed Public Enemy during the Kings of the Mic Tour at Stubb’s BBQ in Austin, Texas. They are touring with LL Cool J, Ice Cube, De La Soul, and DJ Chuck Chillout.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 2:15 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

The Backlash Begins: Indiana Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Felony Punishable by Prison

0

On July 1 of next year, same-sex couples applying for a marriage license in Indiana will have committed a felony punishable by 18 months in prison an a $10,000 fine. The new crime stems from the revival  of a1997 law forbidding false information on a marriage license as a Class D felony. It will also make it a Class B misdemeanor — punishable by up to 180 days in a jail and a maximum fine of $1,000 —  for clergy, judges, and others to perform a same-sex marriage.

The New Civil Rights Movement explains how the new rule works:

Because Indiana marriage license forms have a space for “male applicant” and “female applicant”, any same-sex couple filling out the form would automatically violate the law. The harsh penalties Indiana lawmakers have approved make it difficult for protest movements like the Campaign for Southern Equality’s “ We Do” Campaign, which encourages same-sex couples to apply for marriage licenses as a protest in states that prohibit same-sex marriages.

Same-sex marriage is already illegal in Indiana, but legislators are contemplating adding a ban in an amendment the state’s Constitution. The vote will be held in the January-March 2014 legislative session.

Kristen Gwynne is an associate editor and drug policy reporter at AlterNet.  Follow her on Twitter: @KristenGwynne

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Where Are the Voices of GOP Senators Who Still Care About Democratic Institutions?

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/where_are_the_voices_of_gop_senators_who_still_care_about_democratic_instit/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Obama's DOJ Moves to Keep Secret Spy Court in the Shadows

0

Obama’s Department of Justice argues FISA court’s interpretation of law must remain a secret. (Photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)The rulings and rationale behind the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s (FISC) decisions must remain a secret because… that’s just how it works, reasoned the Department of Justice in a court filing Friday.

In the motion, which was issued in response to a recent ACLU suit, the DOJ makes the “circular” argument that, because “FISC has always conducted activities in secret, it must continue in secret,” as ACLU attorney Patrick Toomey explained to Common Dreams.

The civil liberties group is asking FISC, also known as the FISA court, to release their ‘secret opinions’ in regards to the “meaning, scope, and constitutionality of Section 215 of the Patriot Act.” In the suit they challenge that the court has a First Amendment obligation to reveal what surveillance powers it is granting to America’s spy agencies.

Section 215 was the legal basis for the FISA court order requiring Verizon to turn over months’ worth of phone metadata, information which was revealed by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and published by the Guardian newspaper.

“The substance of a law is how a court interprets that law. Without knowing how the courts interpret it, we don’t actually know what the law is,” Toomey points out. The ACLU charges that it is possible to reveal such information without compromising classified intelligence operations.

In the motion–which largely cites a 2007 ruling in response to a similar ACLU request–the DOJ further argues that, because of the classified nature of the court’s dealings, that laws such as the First Amendment are not relevant:

Indeed, proceedings before the FISC involve highly sensitive and classified matters involving national security, relating, for example, to efforts by the United States to foil acts of international terrorism. By their very nature, such proceedings need to be conducted in secrecy.

{…] The FISC has in fact issued other legally significant decisions that remain classified and have not been released to the public.

This Court has also observed that “the detrimental consequences of broad public access to FISC proceedings or records would greatly outweigh any such benefits resulting from a finding of a First Amendment right of access to FISC records and proceedings. […] In this vein, the Court found that the possible harms from a finding of a First Amendment-based right of access “are real and significant, and, quite frankly, beyond debate.”

“The DOJ is being incredibly dishonest and disingenuous in conflating the two issues, arguing that because the FISC deals with intelligence operations, that its rulings on the interpretation of the law must also be secret,” writes Techdirt’s Mike Masnick. “The only reason to keep the interpretation of the law a secret is because it’ll be a huge embarrassment and show widespread abuse.”

The DOJ motion comes amidst growing criticisms against the secret court and their issuance of broad rulings in total secrecy.

On Tuesday, James Robertson, a retired FISA court judge, criticized recent legal changes–made public by Snowden’s recent disclosure–which now authorize more sweeping collections of US phone records.

“What FISA does is not adjudication, but approval. This works just fine when it deals with individual applications for warrants, but the 2008 amendment has turned the Fisa court into administrative agency making rules for others to follow,” he said, testifying in the first public hearings before the Obama-appointed Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB).

“It is not the bailiwick of judges to make policy,” he added.

The entire Department of Justice court motion can be viewed below:

US Opposes ACLU at FISA Court

_____________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Obama Lobbies Reluctant Congress to Support Arming Syrian Rebels

0

Despite the White House’s mistaken impression that Obama can arm jihadist Syrian rebels without permission from Congress, media reports indicate that the administration is lobbying lawmakers for a green light after key congressional committees rebuked the president’s deeply unpopular plan to send military aid to opposition forces in Syria. While members of Congress on both sides of the aisle fret about the potential for U.S. weapons to end up in the hands of al Qaeda and other terrorist groups currently fighting the Assad regime, the administration appears determined to go forward with its scheme.

Without any semblance of congressional approval, the Obama administration vowed last month to intensify its support and start overtly shipping military assistance to rebel forces – a coalition of mostly Sunni jihadists and designated terror groups backed by Western governments, Arab dictators, and the global establishment. U.S. officials claimed – implausibly, according to analysts and investigators – that the Syrian regime had deployed chemical weapons, which Obama had previously called a “red line.”

As The New American reported in late June, Republican and Democrat lawmakers are seeking to restrain Obama, citing the U.S. Constitution and national security concerns about arming dubious rebel groups with well-documented links to al-Qaeda. Bi-partisan legislation has already been introduced in Congress aimed at stopping the administration from arming Syrian rebels. So far, however, the president has largely ignored lawmakers anyway, especially when it comes to foreign policy and unconstitutional wars.

According to a July 8 Reuters report citing “five U.S. national security sources,” Congress might finally be putting its foot down. Both the Senate and House intelligence committees have apparently “expressed reservations behind closed doors,” the news agency reported, saying Obama’s controversial plot to deepen U.S. government involvement with weapons shipments to the opposition had been “delayed” by congressional reluctance. Now, top administration officials such as Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry, and CIA boss John Brennan are reportedly lobbying hard to sway lawmakers.

Still, Obama does not seem to believe that he needs Congress to sign off on his scheming. “Technically, the administration does not need specific congressional approval either through public legislation or some kind of legislative sanction process to move ahead with the weapons plan,” Reuters claimed, citing “sources” rather than the source of Obama’s authority – the U.S. Constitution. “The president already has legal authority to order such shipments, several sources said.”

Despite falsely claiming that congressional approval is not required to deepen U.S. government involvement in the bloody Syrian war, the administration is trying to at least create the impression that lawmakers are being kept in the loop. “As noted at the time we announced the expansion of our assistance to the [rebel] Supreme Military Council, we will continue to consult closely with Congress on these matters,” claimed a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council on Monday.

The next day, discredited White House spokesperson Jay Carney echoed those remarks. “We have consistently stepped up on our assistance to the Syrian opposition, and we are engaged with Congress in discussions about that policy and why we believe it’s the correct policy,” he was quoted as saying in media reports. No mention was made of the fact that Obama has already deployed U.S. troops and trainers all along Syria’s borders without congressional authorization. “We were not bluffing,” Carney continued. “The president was very serious, as I think he made clear.”

Congress, though, does not appear to be playing along. Intelligence Committee “insiders” cited by The Hill said the panels had voted to block Obama’s lawless plan by placing “severe restrictions” on funding. Because the committees are dealing with “classified information,” few details are known publicly about the vote or the measures adopted by lawmakers. However, The Hill reported that the restrictions should be enough to stop the planned arms shipments – at least for now.

“Whatever we do, we have to make sure we do it right,” ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.) was quoted as saying Tuesday without elaborating on the funding restrictions. “If we are going to arm, we have to make sure we have control of what arms are out there and how people are trained to use those arms so they don’t fall into the hands of our enemy al-Qaeda.” Of course, one of the most prominent and effective rebel factions fighting Assad, the al Nusra front, announced a merger with al-Qaeda in April.

Meanwhile, multiple senators also publicly expressed skepticism about Obama’s plan to arm jihadists in Syria, The Hill reported. Intelligence Committee member Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), for example, said, “It’s not clear to me that the administration has a workable policy.” Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and an “ex-officio member” of the Intelligence panel, said lawmakers did not even have a “clear picture” of the administration’s decision.

Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) even accused the administration of trying to get the scheme to arm rebels approved in secret by going to the Intelligence Committee. “They should come and talk about this openly,” he was quoted as saying about the self-styled “most transparent” administration. “It puts the Intelligence Committee in a very awkward place. All of a sudden, they own it.”

According to news reports citing officials, no U.S. weapons have reached the Syrian rebels yet. However, as The New American and publications around the world have documented for months, the Obama administration and the CIA have played a key role in funneling weapons provided by Sunni despots to jihadist forces on the ground in Syria. American troops have also been training the rebel fighters. Of course, as officials documents released by WikiLeaks revealed, U.S. taxpayers have been financing the Syrian opposition since long before open warfare broke out, too. 

The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, which is at the center of the Islamist rebellion against Assad’s secular regime, has been loudly complaining about being “abandoned and disappointed” because Obama has not been even more supportive. However, at least one Syrian rebel commander, who gained international notoriety after eating a dead soldier’s body organs on video, threatened to unleash a wave of even more horrifying atrocities if Obama did not immediately comply with his demands. “If we don’t get help, a no-fly zone, heavy weapons, we will do worse [than I did],” cannibal commander Abu Sakkar told BBC. “You’ve seen nothing yet.”

Aside from cannibalism, the jihadist rebels have also been criticized for a wide array of other reasons. Among the most serious: well-documented links to terrorist organizations, seeking to impose Sharia law in a nation with a significant non-Muslim population, using chemical weapons, massacring civilians, firing on protesters, ethnic cleansing of minorities like Christians and Shia Muslims, threatening to attack the West, beheading a Catholic priest, and more. The list of atrocities perpetrated by rebels continues to grow every day.

Of course, the Assad dictatorship, a former ally of the U.S. government, has been responsible for more than its fair share of atrocities as well – horrors stretching back decades, in fact. It now has the support of the Russian government and the Iranian regime, along with the Lebanese Hezbollah militia. However, despite the existing despot’s long track record of abuses and brutality, few analysts expect Syria to improve under the leadership of establishment-backed Islamist rebels, so it is not clear why Obama and his neoconservative allies are so determined to support the “revolution.” More than a few experts say Iran is the real target.  

Already, an estimated 100,000 people have died in the fighting in Syria, with another million or more having fled the country. News reports indicate that the regime is still holding strong, though at this point, that is impossible to determine with certainty. As foreign powers continue feeding the fire by pouring weapons and money into Syria, however, innocent civilians – especially Christians – will keep paying the price.

Photo of President Barack Obama: AP Images

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is currently based in Europe. He can be reached at
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
.

Related articles:

House and Senate Bills Would Block Military Aid to Syria

Lawmakers Seek to Stop Obama Arming Terrorists in Syria

President Obama OKs Shipment of Arms to Al-Qaeda in Syria

Without Asking Congress, Obama Puts U.S. Troops on Syria Border

Catholic Priest Beheaded by Islamic Terrorists in Syria

Western-backed Syrian Rebels Massacre Shia Villagers

Clinton: Obama Will Ignore Congress on Libya War

Syrian Rebel Alliance Openly Threatens Ethnic Cleansing

Syrian Rebels Massacre Christian Village

Russia to Arm Syria, EU Lifts Embargo on Rebels

Oops! Sen. McCain Met Syrian Rebels Accused of Kidnapping

Obama-backed Syrian Rebels “Ethnic Cleansing” Christians

Syrian Christians Fear Genocide if al-Assad Falls to Muslim Extremists

Christian Massacres: A Result of U.S. Foreign Policy

Libyan Rebels Accused of “Ethnic Cleansing,” Black Genocide

Rand Paul: Senate Is Arming Al-Qaeda and Rushing to War in Syria

Syrian Rebels Fire on Civilian Protesters

Syrian Rebel Leader Filmed Eating Soldier’s Body Organs

Obama Plots Openly Arming Jihadist Rebels in Syria

Obama Unsure Who’s Behind Syrian Chemical Attacks – or Is He?

Top Syrian Rebel Group Merges With Al-Qaeda in Iraq

Obama Paves Way to Arm Muslim Brotherhood-linked Regime in Somalia

Obama-backed War Making Syria a Jihad Haven; Europe Threatened

Al-Qaeda & the West Back Syrian Rebels Against Assad

Obama-backed Egypt Forging “One Nation” With Sudan Terror Regime

U.S. Involvement in Syrian War Becoming More Apparent

Chemical Weapons Charge May Be Pretext to Put U.S. Troops in Syria

Reports: U.S. Personnel Arming and Training Syrian Rebels

Without Congress, Obama Deepens Overt U.S. Support for Syrian War

Most Arms Shipments to Syria Go to Jihadists

Should Pres. Obama be Detained for Violating the NDAA?

Republished with permission from: The New American

Democratic Lawmakers Propose National Park on the Moon

0

In an effort to “protect” the Apollo landing sites for “posterity,” two House Democrats on Monday pitched a bill that would establish a national historical park on the lunar surface to shelter the landing sites of the 1969-1972 Apollo missions. The legislation, proposed by Reps. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) and Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), would create the Apollo Lunar Landing Sites National Historical Park, which would safeguard artifacts left on the moon’s surface – such as flags and the bottom halves of lunar landers – from the Apollo 11 through 17 landings.

According to the bill’s sponsors, the legislation was drafted to preserve the sites for posterity, as the legislators anticipate a boost in commercial moon landings in the future. “As commercial enterprises and foreign nations acquire the ability to land on the Moon, it is necessary to protect the Apollo lunar landing sites for posterity,” the legislation reads. “Establishing the Historical Park under this Act will expand and enhance the protection and preservation of the Apollo lunar landing sites and provide for greater recognition and public understanding of this singular achievement in American history.”

“In 1969, led by the late Apollo Astronaut Neil Armstrong, American ingenuity changed history as humanity took a giant leap forward on the surface of the moon,” Rep. Edwards asserted Tuesday on the House floor. “That history, as preserved on the lunar surface, is now in danger, as spacefaring commercial entities and foreign nations begin to achieve the technical capabilities necessary to land spacecraft on the surface of the moon.”

In some capacity, space tourism has already made flight, with companies like Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, now making preparations to lift customers into low orbit. Meanwhile, some NASA proponents and lawmakers, such as like those who authored this bill, fear that when adventurous vacationers make landing on the moon, they will flock to the Apollo sites, potentially tampering with artifacts and the site itself.

Under the Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act, H.R. 2617, the national park would be established within a year of the bill’s passage, and would be operated jointly by the Department of Interior and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The effort would grant the federal government authority to harvest donations from businesses and foreign governments to assist in managing the landing sites and “provid[ing] visitor services and administrative facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical Park.”

Addressing donations and cooperative agreements, the bill explains:

(1) AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES. – The Secretary may enter into one or more agreements with the head of a Federal agency to provide public access to, and management, interpretation, and historic preservation of, historically significant Apollo lunar landing site resources under the jurisdiction or control of the Federal agency.

(2) DONATIONS; COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS. – The Secretary may accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements with, foreign governments and international bodies, organizations, or individuals to further the purpose of an interagency agreement entered into under paragraph (1) or to provide visitor services and administrative facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical Park.

(3) DONATIONS TO NASA.– For the purposes of this Act, the Administrator may accept, hold, administer, and use gifts, bequests, and devises (including labor and services).

After one year, NASA and the Interior Department would have to produce a blueprint on how to manage and administer the site, including proper monitoring of the sites, establishing access to the sites – in collaboration with other spacefaring countries and entities – and recording an accurate cataloguing of items in the park. Furthermore, the U.S. government would have to submit the lunar landing park to the United Nations for designation as a World Heritage location.

According to Harold Maass of The Week, an effort to preserve aspects of the Apollo missions is not entirely new. As far back as 1984, the National Air and Space Museum requested that NASA transfer control of the Apollo mission’s artifacts.

“Although there are, at present, no plans for return visits to the moon, it is certain as anything that someday man will return,” Walter J. Boyne, the museum’s director at the time, affirmed. “When he does, it is imperative that the historic and scientific significance of all remnants of earlier, pioneering exploration efforts be fully appreciated and respected.”

Some experts, however, note that the bill may conflict with various provisions of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which the United States and Soviet Union signed off on during the peak of the space race. While the treaty maintains that all space artifacts remain property of the country that launched them, it also bars any petition for national sovereignty on lunar territory.

In the bill, Edwards and Bernice Johnson claim they are limiting the park’s provisions to the equipment itself, but they also defined the landing sites as “all areas of the Moon where astronauts and instruments connected to the Apollo program between 1969 and 1972 touched the lunar surface.” This invokes astronauts’ lunar footprints, which observers claim would be difficult to defend under the 1967 treaty.

As veteran space attorney James Dunstan noted, the last three Apollo excursions positioned lunar rovers that covered “significant amounts of real estate.” Consequently, Dunstan suggests that legislation simply declaring American ownership of its equipment “would receive a much warmer international reception.”

In addition to H.R. 2617, Edwards proposed a bill on Monday to reauthorize NASA for three years, with a new budget of $18.1 billion in 2014, rising to $18.9 billion in 2016. The legislation also proposes a human mission to Mars and a guarantee to fund International Space Station operations through 2020. 

All constitutional issues of the bill aside, the legislation highlights some of the problems with signing UN treaties that give up U.S. sovereignty. Because the Outer Space treaty forbids “states from claiming territorial sovereignty” in outer space, the United States cannot even claim small parts of the moon, even though Americans are the only humans who have ever trod there. Since we cannot claim land there, we can’t even protect our legacy, let alone anything else. If a private company were to discover important minerals in space and a way to mine them profitably, it has almost no incentive to actually mine these minerals because space has been deemed “the common heritage of mankind,” not open to property claims by explorers and risk-takers – people willing to invest money in a venture. If such a treaty is allowed to remain, it will undoubtedly stifle efforts to make use of space, perhaps permanently.

Republished with permission from: The New American

Coincidence? KKK Leaves ‘Neighborhood Watch’ Letters in CT, Just as Zimmerman Defense Wraps Up

0

The United Klans of America (UKA) are apparently active in Milford, Connecticut, leaving notes on residents’ driveways advising them, “NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH: You can sleep well tonight knowing the UKA is awake!”

In light of the ongoing George Zimmerman trial (the defense could finish today), the report from CBS affiliate WFSB almost seems like a parody, but officials appear to be taking it seriously.  According to WFSB, Milford police are looking into finding out who delivered the notes, but cannot classify the letter-leaving as a hate crime because it promotes a neighborhood watch program, rather than targeting a specific group of people.

One can only hope that the Zimmerman trial is not inspiring more racially-coded neighborhood-watching among sympathetic, racist supporters. The death of Trayvon Martin is a tragedy, and the notion that Zimmerman was bravely defending himself and his neighborhood holds some disturbing potential for repetition. Earlier this year, for example, a “White Student Union” group announced plans to lead armed patrols of Towson University.

The Zimmerman defense hinges on the idea that an unarmed, dead teenager was a criminal who asked for it. If this rhetoric gives fuel to the armed-white-power-patrolleres, we can only expect more racist killings in the name of ‘safety.’

Kristen Gwynne is an associate editor and drug policy reporter at AlterNet.  Follow her on Twitter: @KristenGwynne

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

'Daylight Robbery': UK Announces Privatization of State-Run Mail Service

0

(Getty Images)The official plan for the privatization of the UK’s centuries old mail service, Royal Mail, was announced by business secretary Vince Cable on Wednesday to the ire of trade unions and others who have slammed the biggest privatization since the railways in the 1990s as “daylight robbery.”

Cable said a majority of the shares would be sold in the private sector, although it was unclear as to exactly how much. The majority stake in Royal Mail will be posted on the London Stock Exchange within the next nine months, or by March at the latest, for prospective buyers including “foreign postal services, hedge funds, and city speculators,” said consumer watchdog group Sum of Us.

Additionally, in “a bid to weaken support for trade unions which have helped to scupper past attempts to sell off Royal Mail,” the government announced plans to give away 10 percent of shares in Royal Mail to the 150,000 UK postal workers, Reuters reports.

Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU), which represents two-thirds of the Royal Mail’s 150,000 workforce, said they wouldn’t “sell their soul” for the 10 percent stake.

30-year Royal Mail employee Malcolm Curry told the Guardian, “The government are the winners, not the Royal Mail workers. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer … I don’t think there’s any benefits for us and none for the customers. I can’t see that in 12 months’ time we’ll be delivering to every household every day. Privatization is all about making profits. There will be cut-backs, and shareholders will have profits instead.”

Journalist and author John Harris adds sarcastically that the privatization is happening “with the aid of a syndicate of banks headed by those well-known guarantors of the public interest, Goldman Sachs and UBS. The financiers will take home around £30m; over time, the rest of us will likely end up with a threadbare postal service, and the feeling that we were robbed, in broad daylight.”

Cable also made promises that Royal Mail would be obligated to continue providing six-day mail service across Britain despite its new private ownership. However, many people, including unions representing Royal Mail workers, remain opposed to the privatization and say it could lead to a decline in working conditions.

Unions representing the Royal Mail staff rejected a pay offer and are now threatening strike action including the CWU.

Dave Ward, the CWU deputy general secretary, stated Wednesday:

The flotation announcement has ignored the views of the workforce and the British public. The workforce agreed a modernization program with Royal Mail three years ago and it didn’t include privatization.

They have worked hard to modernize the company and deliver the profitable organization Royal Mail is today. They have recently voted in big numbers against the sale and they will be angered by the announcement.

CWU will continue to fight the sale and without worthwhile and legally binding assurances on terms and conditions, strike action is inevitable.

_______________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Wal-Mart to DC: We’ll Skip Town Before We Pay a Living Wage

3

Wal-Mart threatens to abandon Washington DC if living wage bill passes. Communities say ‘good riddance!’

 

Wal-Mart executives claim they will slam the brakes on plans to open six mega-stores in Washington DC if the city council passes a living-wage bill that would force billion dollar retailers to pay workers at least $12.50 an hour.

 

Wal-Mart officials spread the ‘threat’ in a massive Tuesday public relations blitz, reaching out to city council members and publishing an op-ed in the Washington Post.

 

The PR maneuvers appear to be timed to influence a Washington DC city council final decision Wednesday on a ‘living-wage’ bill that would mandate that city retailers–with buildings greater than 75,000 square feet and with corporate sales over one billion dollars–pay an elevated minimum wage.

 

Wal-Mart general manager Alex Barren charged that the local bill is “discriminatory” and “discourages investment in Washington.”

 

Community groups scoff at the large multinational’s public tantrum at the elevated minimum wage, in a city beset with severe unemployment, poverty and wage inequality. Parisa Norouzi, Executive Director of community organization Empower DC, told Common Dreams:

 

We know that the cost of housing in this city has become so high that someone working at minimum wage would have to work 150 hours a week to afford the average market rate unit. They would have to earn $29 an hour to afford average rate at 40 hours. Pay of $12.50 is very little to ask, in context of how much [Wal-Mart] would earn and draw out of our city to send to their corporate headquarters.

 

Many Washington DC community members and workers–who deride the company’s discriminatory employment and development practices and atrocious human rights record–would be happy to see the retailer go.

 

“We have opposed Wal-Mart from beginning because of their poverty wages, horrible healthcare, efforts to prevent workers from organizing and unionizing, and because of the Walden family’s dedication to using money and power to influence other kinds of harmful policies like promoting privatization of public education,” Norouzi declared.

 

“Furthermore, the building of six Wal-Mart stores would spell out the end of black-owned businesses in our city.”

 

A large coalition of unions and community organizations along with Washington DC Jobs with Justice have been mobilizing for months to win a boosted minimum wage. Some local organizers suspect Wal-Mart is bluffing and worry that local city officials with close ties to the multinational corporation will undermine the living wage bill.

 

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Obama's DOJ Moves to Keep Secret Court in Shadows

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Obama’s Department of Justice argues FISA court’s interpretation of law must remain a secret. (Photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA)The rulings and rational behind the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's (FISC) decisions must remain a secret because… that's just how it works, reasoned the Department of Justice in a court filing Friday.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Obama administration urges federal employees to spy on each other to avoid leaks

0

President Barack Obama has asked that federal agencies launch an unprecedented campaign requiring government workers to monitor the behavior of their colleagues and report potential leakers under the threat of prosecution.

McClatchy reporters Jonathan Landay and Marisa Taylor wrote
Tuesday that the “Insider Threat” program mandated by Pres. Obama
utilizes methods that, while meant to identify security threats
from within, actually provoke co-workers to spy on one another.

The program is unprecedented in scope and hopes to prevent future
instances where government secrets are spilled. According to a
new report, however, the Insider Threat initiative and the
techniques utilized by the agencies involved are not proven to
work.

Insider Threat was authorized in October 2011 after Army Private
first class Bradley Manning sent classified intelligence to the
website WikiLeaks, an action that government prosecutors argued
in court this week aided al-Qaeda by indirectly providing them
with secret documents.

Through the program, employees are asked to monitor the behavior
of their peers, and could face hefty penalties if they fail to
alert higher-ups of a potential breach.

Specifically, the Insider Threat program asks that officials
within the ranks of federal agencies spanning all sectors of the
government adopt behavioral profiling techniques that ideally
would alert higher-ups of a subordinate interested in leaking
intelligence. The White House, the Justice Department, the Peace
Corps and the departments of Health and Human Services, Homeland
Security and Education have all been asked to watch out for
“high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers under the
program, and If “indicators of insider threat behavior” are
brought to attention, officials within those agencies are
expected to investigate in order to curb the likelihood of
another Pfc. Manning.

Research conducted by McClatchy reporters combined with expert
interviews suggest those efforts are futile, though, and aren’t
proven to work.

Gene Barlow, a spokesman for the Office of the National
Counterintelligence Executive, told McClatchy that “the
awareness effort of the program is to teach people not only what
types of activity to report, but how to report it and why it is
so important to report
it.” So far, though, that
method hasn’t been proven to actually put potential leakers out
of work.

According to McClatchy, the “indicators” that federal employees
are told to monitor include stress, relationship issues,
financial problems, odd work hours and random traveling.

“It simply educates employees about basic activities or
behavior that might suggest a person is up to improper
activity
,” Barlow told reporters. On the website for his
agency’s Insider Threat program, the Office claims that employees
may be lured to “betray their nation for ideological reasons,
a lust for money or sex, or through blackmail
,” and cites
threats from within as “the top counterintelligence challenge
to our community
.”

Barlow also stressed that the policy “does not mandate”
employees to report behavior indicators, but McClatchy reporters
noted that failing to act could land an eyewitness with harsh
penalties, including criminal charges.

According to a 2008 National Research Council study, however,
analyzing these indicators do not necessarily signal that one
agent may be up to no good.

“There is no consensus in the relevant scientific community
nor on the committee regarding whether any behavioral
surveillance or physiological monitoring techniques are ready for
use at all
,” the study concluded.

“We have not found any silver bullets,” added Deana
Caputo, a behavioral scientist at MITRE Corp., which assists
several US agencies with their insider threat efforts. “We
don’t have actually any really good profiles or pictures of a bad
guy, a good guy gone bad or even the bad guy walking in to do bad
things from the very beginning
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Wal-Mart says it will pull out of D.C. plans should city mandate ‘living wage’

0

Mike DeBonis
The Washington Post
July 10, 2013

The world’s largest retailer delivered an ultimatum to District lawmakers Tuesday, telling them less than 24 hours before a decisive vote that at least three planned Wal-Marts will not open in the city if a super-minimum-wage proposal becomes law.

A team of Wal-Mart officials and lobbyists, including a high-level executive from the mega-
retailer’s Arkansas headquarters, walked the halls of the John A. Wilson Building on Tuesday afternoon, delivering the news to D.C. Council members.

The company’s hardball tactics come out of a well-worn playbook that involves successfully using Wal-Mart’s leverage in the form of jobs and low-priced goods to fend off legislation and regulation that could cut into its profits and set precedent in other potential markets. In the Wilson Building, elected officials have found their reliable liberal, pro-union political sentiments in conflict with their desire to bring amenities to underserved neighborhoods.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 1:11 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Pesticide Use Spikes as GMO Failure Cripples Corn Belt

0

Pesticides Poured on Illinois Cornfield (Photo: Fig and Sage)

Pesticide use is skyrocketing across the Midwestern U.S. corn belt, as biotech companies like Syngenta and AMVAC Chemical watch their pesticide sales spike 50 to 100 percent over the past two years, NPR reported Tuesday.

The culprit? Bt corn–a type of genetically engineered corn with insecticide built into its genes.

Variations of this corn strain–peddled across the world by large multinationals including Monstanto and Syngenta–are giving rise to Bt resistant insects and worms, studies show.

NPR reports that resistant ‘pests’ are decimating entire cornfields across Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota and Nebraska.

Yet, now that the targeted insect killings are not working, big agribusiness is simply throwing pesticides at the problem instead of moving away from GMOs.

This is despite warnings last year from the Environmental Protection Agency that unrestrained use of Bt corn will off-set the balance of the ecosystem.

Monsanto denies the severity of the damage wrought by Bt corn, assuring customers that many farmers ‘have great success.’

Environmental groups have long warned that Bt corn is a danger to non-‘pest’ insects. In a 2004 briefing, Greenpeace showed that the effects of non-targeted insect killings ripple throughout the ecosystem.

Critics charge that the modified corn–which is spread by big agribusiness, pushed to small farmers, and crossbred with non GMO strains–undermines food diversity and security and devastates small-scale, sustainable farmers and peasants.

The revelation comes after scientists recently warned that pollution runoff from Midwestern farms, carried to the ocean by the Mississippi, is slated to create the largest ocean dead zone recorded in the Gulf of Mexico, choking marine life that crosses its path.

(Photo: Digital Journal)

_____________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Pipeline vs. Rail? Neither, say Campaigners, Just Leave It in the Ground

0

Wagons of the train wreck are seen in Lac Megantic, July 9, 2013. The crude oil freight train that derailed and blew up in the small town of Lac-Megantic early on Saturday morning was traveling far too fast when it went off the rails, investigators told reporters on Tuesday. (Photo: Reuters/Mathieu Belanger)As the death toll rises and the search for the missing in Lac-Megantic continues, the oil pipeline industry and its supporters are receiving wide condemnation for exploiting the deadly disaster in Quebec to argue that moving crude oil through pipelines is a “more safe” alternative to moving it by rail.

Kevin Grandia, writing for DeSmogBlog, points to a piece by oil industry flack Diana Furchtgott-Roth that appeared in the Globe and Mail on Sunday–just one day after the deadly explosion–and called her attempt to use the tragedy to call for more pipelines “shameful” and a “a new low.” Subsequently, Oil Change International’s Andy Rowell compared the behavior to the Big Oil equivalent of “ambulance-chasing.”

“There is no use talking about the best way to transport a product which climate science tells us shouldn’t even be being produced.” —Stephen Kretzmann, Oil Change International

In her piece, Furchtgott-Roth says that the fire which engulfed the town of Lac-Megantic in the early hours of Saturday morning–leaving 13 confirmed dead and many more still missing–was proof that pipelines were better for moving crude oil from one end of the continent to the other.

“If this oil shipment had been carried through pipelines, instead of rail, families in Lac-Mégantic would not be grieving for lost loved ones today, and oil would not be polluting Lac Mégantic and the Chaudière River,” she wrote.

Grandia’s retort was fierce:

No kidding, Furchgott-Roth wants no more delay in the Keystone XL pipeline, since she has been advocating on behalf of the oil industry in one form or another for more than 25 years, with stints as an economist at the American Petroleum Institute and the oil industry-backed American Enterprise Institute.

Working for oil company front groups is one thing, but using the tragedy still unfolding in Quebec to argue for more oil pipelines is a whole new level of low. 

By late Monday, however, the debate had already taken hold throughout the mainstream press. Headlines appeared in The New York Times, The Montreal Gazette, and Bloomberg (among other places) saying that the Quebec train disaster was, to use Bloomberg’s phrasing, “[Spurring] Rail-Versus-Pipelines Debate on Oil.”

“Pipeline companies will use this to point out the advantages and safety records of pipelines,” Bob Schulz, a professor at the University of Calgary’s Haskayne School of Business, told Bloomberg in an interview. “It gives those companies an additional point to support their argument.”

Environmentalists, however, were quick to call the debate a false dichotomy and a distraction from the larger issues that underlie the destructive nature of all fossil fuel extraction, including the unsustainable levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases generated by the industry.

“The answer is there’s no safe way to move this oil around,” argued Eddie Scher of the Sierra Club. “What we need to do is to get the hell off oil.”

Responding to questions about the nature of the debate between rail transport and pipelines, Oil Change International’s executive director Stephen Kretzmann was dismissive of the comparison’s made by industry-backers on either side.

“Of course, it’s a false dichotomy,” Kretzmann told Common Dreams in an email exchange. “It’s like debating whether or not menthol or regular cigarettes are worse for you. They both kill, and that’s the point.” 

As Keith Stewart of Greenpeace Canada wrote on Monday:

Whether its pipelines or rail, we have a growing safety problem in this country as the Federal government continues to put oil profits ahead of public safety.

The Lac Megantic tragedy shows the dangers of transporting hydrocarbons by rail but we know, all too well, that the answer isn’t more pipelines. The history of pipeline spills from Arkansas and Kalamazoo to Little Buffalo and Zama City shows that pipelines create their own disasters. Alberta averages more than 2 oil spills a day.

The real solution to reducing the risk to the public from oil disasters is in transitioning away from oil; not building new, unneeded infrastructure; and in ensuring that the fossil fuel transportation system we do have is as safe as possible. The federal government is not doing that now, and their inaction is putting all our communities at risk.

Arguing about how we move the stuff, said Kretzmann, betrays the deeper argument that we shouldn’t be digging–or in many cases ‘squeezing’–it out of the ground in the first place.

This is what climate activists have been saying for years, arguing that the only defensible strategy–to borrow a series of popular slogans–is to leave the ‘Coal in the Hole,’ the ‘Oil in the Soil,’ and the ‘Tar Sand in the Land’. (They’re still working on a natural gas slogan, it seems.)

Citing data from the International Energy Agency and climate scientists, Kretzmann points out that the untapped oil reserves held by the industry giants should be left untouched if humanity hopes to prevent the worst impacts of climate change. “Building more pipelines and rail only facilitates the extraction of more oil that we cannot afford to burn, if we want to limit global temp rise to two degrees Celsius, which all nations of the world–even Canada and the US–have agreed is our goal.”

And Grist’s John Upton agrees, saying the debate between rail and pipelines obfuscates the real lesson, which is that “oil can’t be moved safely at all.”

Citing the numerous and devastating accidents from both rail and pipelines in recent years, he writes:

It’s clear that letting the energy industry move incendiary bulk fluids around the continent is like tossing a book of matches into the crib to keep little Johnny happy while his folks stare at the television. And that’s without even considering the climate impacts of the fossil-fuel mining binge, or the many hazards of fracking.

The weekend tragedy is a reminder that the energy industry can’t be trusted to do anything safely, let alone transport oil.

As Kretzmann concludes, environmentalists and climate campaigners should not be caught up in the false arguments pushed by industry.

Instead, he suggests, they should remain clear–especially when discussing unconventional fuels like tar sands oil and the “fracked” Bakken crude now contaminating the area around Lac-Megantic in Quebec–that “the product is the problem. Period.”

“There is no use talking about the best way to transport a product which climate science tells us shouldn’t even be being produced,” he said.

_________________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

'Significant' Destruction of Canadian Wildlife Serves 'Public Interest,' says Govt Panel

0

Elk cross the Athabasa River in northern Alberta. A regulatory panel assumes that a tar sands expansion in the region will ‘significantly’ endanger wildlife living there, but make a bizarre decision as they determine profits trump those realities. (Photo: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation)A panel of government regulators in Canada has determined that a proposed multi-billion dollar expansion of Royal Dutch Shell’s tar sands project in Alberta would cause ‘significant’ damage to the ecosystems of the region and that the oil giant’s proposed cleanup plans are likely to be ineffective.

So they blocked the project, right?

No. Instead they have called the expansion vital to the “public interest” and said the nearly forty percent expansion of Shell’s Athabasca tar sands project can now proceed to its next phase.

According to its official review, the panel found “that the project would likely have significant adverse environmental effects on wetlands, traditional plant potential areas, wetland-reliant species at risk, migratory birds that are wetland-reliant or species at risk, and biodiversity.”

In addition, they continued, “there is also a lack of proposed mitigation measures that have been proven to be effective.”

Environmental groups in Canada were outraged, though not necessarily surprised, by the decision.

Simon Dyer, policy director of the Pembina Institute in Canada, said the decision strikes a blow to “aboriginal rights and values, wildlife populations, wetlands, migratory birds and old-growth forests.”

“The joint review panel heard from Shell’s own analysis that this project will exceed science-based environmental limits for impacts to air quality, wildlife habitat and the Athabasca River,” Dyer said, “yet the panel recommended approval of the project anyway.”

Dyer said “responsible tar sands” extraction was just a slogan, but told the Globe and Mail he wasn’t surprised by the decision by the pro-industry government. “It’s the same old stuff,” he said.The existing Shell Jackpine tar sands mine north of Fort McMurray, Alberta. (North American Construction Group)

Conservationists, climate activists, and First Nations have led the fight to curb the pollution caused by Alberta’s tar sands mining in recent years.

In June, Eriel Deranger, an activist and spokesperson for the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, described the ongoing tar sands expansions on native lands throughout the province as a form of ‘cultural genocide.’

“It’s a genocide. It’s happening slowly, but we are dying off. We’re still drinking the water, and we’re eating the fish, but it’s getting poisoned,” Deranger said, speaking at the Hollyhock Social Change Institute in British Columbia.

And in related news, local people along the Athabasca River in Alberta have complained of an “oily sheen” spreading over the surface of the water.”There is obviously a petrochemical of some kind in the Athabasca River system in such great quantities from upstream that it is now residing on the shores of Lake Athabasca,” said Deranger, who was interviewed by the Canadian Press.

“There are numerous reports of dead fish being found along the delta, within the lake and the river system,” she said. “None of the land users have ever heard of or seen anything like this on the Athabasca.”

Unfortunately, with expansion of the region’s tar sands on the march and according to the very regulators charged with protecting such pollution, such episodes are “likely” to be much more frequent in the future.

________________________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

UK Announces Privatization of State-Run Mail Service

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

(Getty Images)The official plan for the privatization of the UK's centuries old mail service, Royal Mail, was announced by business secretary Vince Cable on Wednesday to the ire of trade unions and others concerned over the future of mail delivery and the working conditions of Ro

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

‘BBC spies on own staff’: revealed

0

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been accused of spying on the emails of staff it suspected of leaking information, it is revealed.

According to figures revealed under Freedom of Information legislation, the BBCâ„¢s Investigations Service monitored emails sent and received by 30 members of staff last year.

Four of these were staff suspected of having leaked information to people outside the organisation and three of what it described as taking part in Å“malicious communications”, the Daily Telegraph reported.

That raises the prospect that BBC management is targeting whistle-blowers, and that those staff in question would not have been made aware their emails were being read.

The emails were monitored to allow the investigation team to gather evidence against members of staff, with a view to mounting disciplinary procedures against them.

Monitoring of emails was also used during investigations which could have led to criminal proceedings, the report said.

As well as those suspected of leaking information, investigators also monitored the email correspondence of one BBC worker suspected of bribery, one of harassment, two of theft, six of fraud, eight of computer misuse and four in relation to disciplinary matters.

Meanwhile, it was revealed last month that the BBC used licence fee payersâ„¢ money to buy the silence of more than 500 staff, with payouts of up to £500,000 each.

According to figures released under Freedom of Information, in the past eight years 539 staff have signed gagging orders at a total cost of £28 million.

The scale of the payouts led to accusations that the BBC was using the agreements to silence potential whistle blowers and victims of bullying or sexual harassment.

Gavin MacFadyen, spokesman for Whistleblowers UK, said: œIt is clear that in a large number of cases the BBC appears to be targeting whistle-blowers and we are very concerned about this.

Å“It signals that the BBC is more interested in shooting the messenger than in dealing with the grievances that have led them to speak out in the first place. But it also runs counter to public opinion, which is increasingly supportive of whistle-blowers”.

MOL/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Italy parliament blocked over Berlusconi

0

The Italian political party led by Silvio Berlusconi has blocked parliamentary activity in protest against a decision by the Supreme Court to speed up a ruling that could ban former prime minister from public office.

On Wednesday, almost all activity in parliament was suspended due to the rally by Berlusconiâ„¢s People of Freedom party, one of the two main partners in Prime Minister Enrico Lettaâ„¢s left-right coalition government.

Letta responded to the protest by saying Italyâ„¢s government would survive whatever happened.

The protest came a day after the Supreme Court announced that Berlusconiâ„¢s final appeal against a tax fraud conviction is set for July 30, months earlier than expected by his lawyers.

The Supreme Court is to decide whether to uphold a four-year jail term against Berlusconi and five-year ban on him from holding public office for complicity in tax fraud.

The latest appeal is one of many legal cases Berlusconi has faced in his two decades in politics. Most of the time, he has either been acquitted or the charges have been dismissed when statues of limitations expired.

In June, Berlusconi was sentenced to seven years and a lifetime ban from holding public positions for inappropriate relations with an under-age girl and then using his influence in an attempt to cover it up.

Previous charges against Berlusconi included Mafia collusion, false accounting, tax fraud, corruption and bribing police officers and judges.

Berlusconi, who served as the country’s prime minister from 1994 to 2011, resigned last November after coming under immense pressure to step down for mishandling the Italian economy.

CAH/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV

'Rohani favors constructive interaction'

0

Rohani seeks constructive interaction with world: Iran oil min.

Iranian Oil Minister Rostam Qasemi says president-elect Hassan Rohani seeks constructive interaction with the world.

Qasemi said on Wednesday that Iranâ„¢s newly-elected president Å“is familiar and well-versed in international affairs and is an expert on international relations and … his slogan has always been cooperation and constructive interaction with the world.”

He made the remarks during an international conference, which was hosted by the Munich Security Conference Foundation (MSC) and the F.A.Z. Forum in the German city of Frankfurt to discuss Å“energy security.”

The event was participated by leading politicians, business executives and scientists to discuss the economic, environmental and security policy issues surrounding energy security in the 21st century.

The Iranian minister further described Iranâ„¢s June 14 presidential election as an Å“amazing” event which shows the existence of Å“complete democracy” in the Islamic Republic.

Qasemi also criticized US-engineered sanctions against Iran, stressing that anti-Iran bans Å“disrupt the cycle of energy security.”

Last year, the Islamic Republic invested more than USD 30 billion in the energy sector despite the anti-Iran bans, the Iranian oil minister noted.

Å“We are strongly against politicizing the energy issue and [we] are critical of the performance of main consumer countries which use the energy issue as a tool to achieve their political ends,” the Iranian minister said.

The United States, the Israeli regime and some of their allies have repeatedly accused Iran of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program.

Over the false allegation, Washington and the European Union have imposed a series of illegal unilateral sanctions on the Islamic Republicâ„¢s oil and financial sectors.

Iran rejects the allegation over its nuclear energy program and argues that as a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency, it is entitled to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

MKA/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Iran-Kurdistan trade volume hits $4 bn

0

A view of Parviz Khan border crossing in the western Iranian city of Qasr-e Shirin (file photo)

The volume of annual trade between Iran and Iraqâ„¢s semi-autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has reached USD 4 billion, and is expected to increase in the wake of a recently-signed trade agreement.

KRG Minister for Construction and Housing Kamran Ahmad made the remarks on Wednesday, adding that Tehran is eager to further increase such relations.

He went on to say that Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan region reached an agreement on Sunday to further expand mutual trade in various areas, including the transit of commodities, construction of a border industrial park and establishment of joint transit, tourism and air travel firms.

Yavar Mohammadi, acting governor of the western Iranian city of Qasr-e Shirin, said on June 25 that enhancement of border transactions with Iraqâ„¢s Kurdistan region through Parviz Khan border crossing is among Iranâ„¢s top economic priorities.

He added that half of non-oil exports from Iran to Iraq pass through this border crossing. Therefore, Iranians would like to witness a rise in the volume of exports to the Iraqi side through Parviz Khan.

Parviz Khan border crossing has been named the most active trade checkpoint out of 86 crossings between Iran and Iraq.

MP/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Majority of Americans think Snowden did the right thing

0

Fifty-five percent of registered American voters consider former NSA contractor Edward Snowden to be a whistleblower, and only 34 percent call him a traitor – despite US lawmakers labeling him as such.

A poll conducted by Quinnipiac University found that the majority
of Americans perceive Snowden as a man who exposed the
inappropriate surveillance tactics of the US government – not as
a man who betrayed his duty. 

“The verdict that Snowden is not a traitor goes against almost
the unified view of the nation’s political establishment,”

Peter Brown, assistant director of Quinnipiac’s polling
institute, said in a press release.

Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, including House Speaker
John Boehner (R-Ohio), have vilified Snowden, calling him a
traitor for revealing classified national security information.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) called his actions “treason,”
and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) argued that Snowden is dangerous.

“He’s no hero. He put people’s lives at risk,” King told
reporters in June. 

But according to the Quinnipiac poll, lawmakers’ views are out of
line with those of the American public. In light of recent
revelations regarding the National Security Agency’s domestic
surveillance tactics, more voters have expressed their discontent
with the US government. Fifty-five percent of poll respondents
consider Snowden to be a whistleblower, while only 34 percent
consider him a traitor.

Favorability toward Snowden was highest among Independents, with
58 percent of them calling him a whistleblower. Fifty-five
percent of Republicans and 49 percent of Democrats referred to
him as such. 

Poll results also show that 45 percent of voters believe the
government has gone too far in restricting civil liberties as
part of its anti-terrorism initiatives. A similar survey from
January 2010 found that only 25 percent of Americans believed
that the government’s anti-terrorism initiatives went far enough
or too far.

“The massive swing in public opinion about civil liberties and
governmental anti-terrorism efforts, and the public view that
Edward Snowden is more whistle-blower than traitor, are the
public reaction and apparent shock at the extent to which the
government has gone in trying to prevent future terrorist
incidents,”
Brown said, emphasizing that both Democrats and
Republicans are evenly divided on whether US counter-terrorism
measures have gone too far.

“The fact that there is little difference now along party
lines about the overall anti-terrorism effort and civil liberties
and about Snowden is in itself unusual in a country sharply
divided along political lines about almost everything,”
he
added.

Other polls have shown that more Americans disapprove than
approve of Snowden’s actions, but the Quinnipiac poll suggests
that public opinion may be shifting as more information on the
NSA’s surveillance tactics becomes available. The university
surveyed 2,014 registered voters and has a margin of error of
plus or minus 2.2 percent. 

“The change in public attitudes has been extraordinary, almost
across the board and obviously not just related to the revelation
of the phone-scanning program, given all that has transpired
since 2010,”
Brown said. “Yet it would be naïve to see
these numbers as anything but evidence of a rethinking by the
public about the tradeoffs between security and freedom.”

The US is trying to extradite Snowden, who has reportedly been
staying in the international transit zone of Moscow’s
Sheremetyevo airport. Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who broke
the NSA story, said on Tuesday that Venezuela is the
“most likely” asylum choice for the former US intelligence
contractor.

Republished with permission from: RT

Iran examines two cases of illegal bans

0

File photo shows a cargo ship belonging to the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL)

The Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) says it is following up on two cases of illegal sanctions imposed against the firm through international channels.

IRISL Managing Director Mohammad Hossein Dajmar said on Wednesday that there were two cases currently under investigation which are against international law.

Dajmar added that the IRISL is pursuing the files in the European Union (EU) and the United States.

Å“Most of these sanctions have a political aspect and are far from [having] technical and economic ones,” the official added.

Dajmar also stressed that the IRISL is a private company with private shareholders; therefore what the imposers of sanctions are doing is in effect inflicting damages on innocent people.

According to the IRISL head, the first round of sanctions against the Iranian shipping firm was imposed by the United Nations under the baseless pretext that the company had been involved in transferring missiles and nuclear equipment.

However, the parties who imposed the bans have gone beyond the UN sanctions and included the transit of all kinds of goods in the list, Dajmar added.

Dajmar went on to say that, Å“International shipping lines, in response to the Iranian private sectorâ„¢s request for the transit of goods, either offer astronomical prices or avoid transiting the goods.”

The United States, Israel and some of their allies have repeatedly accused Iran of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program, with the US and European Union using the claim as an excuse to impose illegal sanctions against Tehran.

Iran has categorically rejected the allegation, stressing that as a committed member of the International Atomic Energy Agency and a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty it is entitled to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

MKA/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

NYSE to supervise Britain’s Libor rate

0

Britain has said it will hand over supervision of Libor interest rate-setting to stock exchange operator NYSE Euronext, after last year’s interbank rate-rigging scandal.

The decision was made after industry body the British Bankers’ Association was forced to relinquish its role following the Libor crisis.

“NYSE Euronext is to be the new Libor administrator,” the Treasury said in a statement.

The announcement followed a tendering process that was launched in late February to find a new administrator for the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) in a process run by an independent committee.

“After overseeing an open and competitive tendering process, the committee is pleased to announce that NYSE Euronext Rate Administration Limited has been accepted by the BBA as the new administrator of Libor,” added committee chair Baroness Hogg in the statement.

“This change will play a vital role in restoring the international credibility of Libor,” she said.

Britain’s banking sector was rocked last year by revelations that Barclays bank tried to manipulate the rate, which is used as a benchmark for global financial contracts worth about $300 trillion.

Libor is calculated daily, using estimates from banks of their own interbank rates. However, the system has been found to be open to abuse, with some traders lying about borrowing costs to boost trading positions or make their bank seem more secure.

MOL/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Rebuking Political Establishment, Americans Say Snowden Is a Whistleblower, Not a Traitor

1

A majority of Americans believe that Edward Snowden is a whistleblower, not a traitor, according to results of a Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday.

Image: Steve Rhodes/cc/flickr 55% of respondents said Snowden was more of a whistleblower, compared to 34% who said he was more of a traitor. 

The view of him more as a whistleblower also crossed party and gender lines–this despite a chorus of bipartisan voices within Congress and the corporate media labeling the NSA leaker a traitor.

Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, pointed out that “the verdict that Snowden is not a traitor goes against almost the unified view of the nation’s political establishment.”

The poll also revealed a notable trend in Americans’ views on anti-terrorism policies affecting civil liberties.

A 2010 poll showed that 25% of Americans said that the government’s anti-terrorism policies have gone too far in restricting civil liberties. But that figure jumped to 45% in the current poll.

While a majority (51%) said they support the NSA’s collection of all phone calls, 53% also stated that the program is too intrusive into their privacy.

“The massive swing in public opinion about civil liberties and governmental anti- terrorism efforts, and the public view that Edward Snowden is more whistleblower than traitor are the public reaction and apparent shock at the extent to which the government has gone in trying to prevent future terrorist incidents,” added Brown.

_________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

US Navy to attempt first drone landing on aircraft carrier

0

The US navy will attempt to land the experimental X-47B drone on an aircraft carrier for the first time since its May launch. A successful landing would mean the US can launch drones overseas without needing to use bases in other countries.

The unmanned X-47B aircraft, which is a prototype drone the
size of a fighter jet developed by the American defense
technology company Northrop Grumman, is due to take off from a
naval air station in Maryland on Wednesday. The drone will then
try to land on the USS George H.W. Bush off the coast of
Virginia.

The drone will attempt a maneuver known as “arrested landing,”
which involves catching a wire on board the ship with a deployed
tail hook, bringing the aircraft to a quick stop.

The task is considered to be one of the most challenging for a
human pilot, due to constant movement of the ship and the
turbulent air around it. The procedure will be performed
exclusively by the drone’s built-in computer program. 

This May 13, 2013 US Navy handout image shows an X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS) demonstrator being towed into the hangar bay of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) during operations in the Atlantic Ocean. (AFP Photo/US Navy)

If the drone fails to catch the wire, it is said to be able to
perform a touch-and-go stunt to try to land again. The X-47B made
nine such maneuvers in May, when it was successfully catapulted
from an aircraft carrier for the first time.

The US navy saluted the drone’s test, with Rear Admiral Mat
Winter calling it “historic event” worth mentioning in
“history books.” However, the drone’s capabilities have
raised concerns over possible expansion of Washington’s
controversial overseas drone program.

A successful launch of the drone prototype would prompt the Navy
to go ahead with its plans to order a fleet of carrier-based
drones. According to Winter — the US Navy’s program executive
officer for unmanned aviation and strike weapons — such drones
could begin operating by 2020.

It would also mean the US would soon be capable of launching
drone missions overseas without the need to obtain permission to
use other countries’ ground bases. Such missions could vary from
around-the-clock surveillance to targeted strikes, as the $1.4
billion X-47B is said to be able to carry missiles.

This May 14, 2013 US Navy handout image shows an X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS) demonstrator flying over the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) during operations in the Atlantic Ocean. (AFP Photo/US Navy)

According to the Navy, new generation drones would be at least
three times the range of the notorious Predators, while having
the capability to carry out programmed missions without human
intervention. They would rely on advanced flight control software
and precision GPS navigation, but retain the option of a remote
control by a human operator when needed.

The prototype X-47B can already boast reaching an altitude of
12km, and is said to be able to travel in a range of about
4000km. The US Navy plans to demonstrate that the drone can be
refueled in flight, which would increase its range even further.

The new drone and the research around it have already come under
criticism amid concerns that deadly attacks could get out of hand
without a pilot to control the aircraft.

Human Rights Watch has particularly protested the development of
drones that carry weapons and are fully autonomous.

“We’re saying you need to draw the line when you have a fully
autonomous system that is weaponized. We’re saying you must have
meaningful human control over key battlefield decisions of who
lives and who dies. That should not be left up to the weapons
system itself,”
Steve Goose, director of the arms division at
Human Rights Watch, said in a statement.

Maintenence personel check a Predator drone operated by U.S. Office of Air and Marine (OAM), before its surveillance flight near the Mexican border on March 7, 2013 from Fort Huachuca in Sierra Vista, Arizona. (John Moore/Getty Images/AFP)

The UN Human Rights Commission has published a report calling for
a worldwide moratorium on the “testing, production, assembly,
transfer, acquisition, deployment and use”
of autonomous
weapons systems until an international conference can develop
rules for their use. The systems, which are referred to as
“lethal autonomous robotics” (LARs) in the report,
“should not have the power of life and death over human
beings,”
said Christof Heyns, the UN’s Special Rapporteur on
Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions.

Washington’s use of Reaper and Predator drones in targeted
strikes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen has been a
subject of international criticism amid reports of widespread
civilian casualties. Both US and foreign critics have said that
the controversial drone program is conducted with inadequate
oversight.

In May, President Obama announced plans to scale back drone
strikes in foreign lands, only deploying the unmanned aircraft
when a threat was “continuing and imminent.”

But UN special rapporteur on counterterrorism and human rights,
Ben Emmerson, said that any justification cited in international
law by US officials for the use of lethal drone strikes is not
accepted outside the United States. Emmerson, who has been
investigating the US drone program since January, also said that
the American monopoly on unmanned aircraft technology is
“over,” and the US should engage in “a dialogue” on
the international legal framework surrounding the use of drones.

Republished with permission from: RT

UK ‘made matters worse’ in Afghanistan

0

A new report says that early military misjudgements by British commanders in Afghanistan made the insurgency worse and actually won over recruits to the enemy.

The study published by leading think tank Chatham House is based on 53 interviews with Taliban commanders and fighters in Helmand province, as well as local elders.

It claims to be the first in-depth study of the situation in Afghanistan from the perspective of the Taliban.

Researchers concluded the insurgents are likely to try and retake Helmand Province after U.S.-led foreign troops withdraw from the area at the end of next year.

They say the British military antagonised the local population and was Ëœblindingly ignorantâ„¢ of local politics.

A high level of casualties has produced widespread support among field commanders for ceasefire talks, but the resilience of the insurgency and the growing influence of Taliban military commissions in the Pakistani cities of Quetta and Peshawar means they are “unlikely to give ground easily in negotiations”, says Theo Farrell, one of the study’s authors.

Farrell, head of the war studies department at King’s College London, and Antonio Giustozzi, visiting professor at the department, have published the study in the Chatham House thinktank’s journal.

“What we find is an insurgency that is driven both by a strong unifying strategic narrative and purpose – jihad against foreign invaders – and by local conflict dynamics: rivalry between kinship groups and competition over land, water and drugs”, they warned.

“The manner of the Taliban return to Helmand shows clear intent to retake the province,” the authors say.

Farrell and Giustozzi add: “By arriving with insufficient force, aligning themselves with local corrupt power-holders, relying on firepower to keep insurgents at bay and targeting the poppy crop, the British made matters worse.

“Far from securing Helmand, British forces alienated the population, mobilised local armed resistance and drew in foreign fighters seeking jihad.”

They describe British troops as “blindly ignorant of the local politics underpinning [the insurgency]”.

“Indiscriminate use of fire by British forces alienated locals who were driven from their homes or lost family members,” they write. “The pressure on what remained an undermanned force meant that the British lacked the presence and tactical patience to develop ties in most communities, and still had to rely on artillery and air power to get out of trouble.”

MOL/HE

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Egyptian Photographer captures his own death on camera

0

Jill Riley
Mail Online
July 10, 2013

Shocking footage has captured the moment an Egyptian photographer filmed his own death through his lenses.

The grainy footage shows an Egyptian solider aiming and shooting at Ahmed Samir Assem, before the film goes black.

The 26-year-old photojournalist was shot dead on Monday as he took photos outside the Republican Guard building in Cairo, where some believe the ousted president Mohamed Morsi is being held.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 11:43 am

Tags: , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Iran slams civilian killings in Egypt

0

A supporter of deposed Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi attends a protest outside the Rabaa Adawiya Mosque in Cairo on July 8, 2013.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi has strongly condemned the recent killing of a number of civilians in Egypt, urging Egyptian political figures and factions to help stop divisions in the North African country.

Salehi on Wednesday told reporters following a cabinet meeting in Tehran that ultimately it is the Egyptians who must determine their future.

Å“We hope Egyptian political pundits, tribes and various parties stop the division created in Egypt through cooperation, compassion and consultation so that the ill-wishers of Egypt will not [find the opportunity to]enter its [political] arena and complicate the situation by sowing discord,” Salehi said on Wednesday.

Salehi said Egypt plays an effective role in the region, and Iran hopes that stability can be restored to the country as soon as possible.

On Wednesday, Egyptian prosecutors charged 200 people for their alleged involvement in clashes outside a military barracks in the capital Cairo that left 80 people – mostly supporter of ousted president Mohamed Morsi – dead on July 8.

They will reportedly be held for 15 days pending investigation into accusations of murder, incitement of violence, carrying unlicensed weapons and disrupting public order and security.

The Muslim Brotherhood accuses the Egyptian army of committing a “massacre” outside the Republican Guard headquarters. However, the military says it was responding to an attack by “armed terrorists.”

On July 3, General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, the head of Egyptâ„¢s army, announced that Morsi was no longer in office. Sisi also suspended the Egyptian constitution.

The chief justice of Egyptâ„¢s Supreme Constitutional Court, Adly Mansour, was sworn in as interim president on July 4.

Morsi is reportedly being held Å“preventively” by the military. Senior army officials say he might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

MP/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Iran urges strong ties with Philippines

0

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Ramin Mehmanparast has called for the further expansion of diplomatic relations and cooperation between Iran and the Philippines.

In a meeting with Filipino Foreign Ministry Spokesman Raul Hernandez in Manila on Wednesday, Mehmanparast lauded Tehran-Manila relations and expressed hope that bilateral ties between the two Asian countries would continue to grow during the next Iranian administration.

Hernandez, for his part, congratulated Iran’s president-elect Hassan Rohani over his victory in Iranâ„¢s June 14 president election, and praised his stance on the expansion of relations with other countries.

Mehmanparast also referred to Iranâ„¢s great potentials in the economic, trade, industrial and agricultural sectors in a separate meeting with Filipino Deputy Foreign Minister Laura del Rosario.

He voiced the Islamic Republicâ„¢s readiness to share its expertise with the Philippines through a joint economic commission, and chambers of commerce set up between the two countries.

Rosario expressed hope that Manila-Tehran relations would further expand under the next Iranian administration.

Diplomatic relations between Iran and the Philippines were established in 1974. Hydrocarbons remain the main avenue of economic interaction between Iran and the Philippines.

In June 2008, Philippine Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Rafael Seguis voiced Manilaâ„¢s support for Tehran’s right to use peaceful nuclear energy.

MP/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

UN questions Vatican over abuse cases

0

UN has called on the Vatican to give details in cases of sexual abuse by the clergy.

The United Nations has requested the Vatican to hand over details of tens of thousands of children alleged to have been sexually abused by members of the clergy.

The Geneva-based Committee on the Rights of the Child published recently a Å“list of issues”, calling on the Vatican to give Å“detailed information” about the alleged abuses.

The list is to be discussed when the Vatican appears before the committee next January to report on the Church’s performance under the 1990 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Among the items on the list, the committee wants to know what measures the Church has imposed to ensure that abuser priests have no contact with children.

The committee also asked what support has been given to the victims of sexual abuse by clergy members.

In addition to sexual abuse, the committee also asked about physical abuse, forced labor and degrading treatment suffered by girls in the Magdalene’s laundries run by Catholic Sisters in Ireland from 1922 to 1996.

The Vatican has until November 1 to reply to the list of issues, ahead of the January questioning.

It will be the first time the Holy See is publicly questioned by an international panel over the child abuse scandal.

The Roman Catholic Church has been hit by numerous scandals in the US and Europe in the past few years, involving allegations of covering up the sexual abuse of children by priests to protect pedophiles and its own reputation.

CAH/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Pro-gun activist Adam Kokesh arrested after posting YouTube video

0

Second Amendment activist Adam Kokesh was arrested Tuesday evening following an armed raid on his Washington, DC-area home.

Police have charged Kokesh, 31, with possession of Schedule I
drug while also in possession of a firearm. According to the
Washington Post, charging documents filed in court Wednesday
morning said the raid turned up hallucinogenic mushrooms, a
Schedule I narcotic.

The United States Park Police confirmed that a search warrant was
executed on the Herndon, Virginia residence leased by Kokesh late
Wednesday in the wake of a YouTube video posted by the activist
on July 4 showing him reportedly loading a shotgun in a DC park
only two blocks from the White House. Kokesh uploaded the video
after a planned “Open Carry March” into DC scheduled for
Independence Day was cancelled amid warnings from police. He had
hoped to have hundreds of people march from Virginia into DC
carrying firearms in defiance of the city’s ban on carrying
loaded guns.

Although the July 4 march was ultimately nixed, Kokesh
nonetheless loaded a firearm at DC’s Freedom Plaza on film, then
told the photographer, “We will not be silent. We will not
obey. We will not allow our government to destroy our humanity.
We are the final American Revolution. See you next Independence
Day
.”

DC laws prohibit people within the city from carrying loaded
weapons.

“It was very specifically a call to overthrow the United
States federal government
,” Kokesh told radio host Alex Jones
after the video surfaced online. “I think that we have come to
the point where we can get a critical mass of Americans to
realize that we’d be better off without it then with it
.”

After the video was posted, the Washington Metropolitan Police
and the US Park Police said issued a joint statement saying they
had launched an investigation.

“The Metropolitan Police Department and US Park Police are
aware that today Adam Kokesh posted a video that appears to have
been taken in Freedom Plaza in Northwest, DC. We are in the
process of determining the authenticity of the video
,” the
authorities announced.

In an interview earlier this week with a local NBC affiliate,
Kokesh confirmed that he legitimately loaded the firearm.

“I was here, and I loaded a shotgun on Independence Day, but I
didn’t kill anybody. I didn’t drone any children
,” he said.
“I didn’t steal any children’s future. I didn’t sell this
country into debt. I didn’t do any of the crimes that the man two
blocks over at the White House is responsible for
.”

Law enforcement confirmed on Wednesday that the investigation led
them to execute a search warrant at the Kokesh residence,
culminating in his arrest.

“We were expecting this,” roommate Darrell Young told a
local NBC affiliate. “We were expecting the government to raid
our house
.”

Lucas Jewell, a producer for Kokesh’s Internet television
program, issued a statement early Wednesday saying the search
lasted for five hours, during which police “searched every
corner of the house with canine units and blueprints to the
house
.”

“Throughout the ordeal, the police repeatedly showed a
volatile desire to initiate aggressive, forceful conduct with
detainees
,” Jewell wrote, adding that a personal safe within
the home was forced open by police and all items were
confiscated. He equates the behavior caught on the July 4 video
as an act of civil disobedience.

Additionally, police reportedly hovered over the home with no
fewer than two helicopters during the raid and detonated
flash-bang grenades upon entering the premises. A battering ram
was utilized to enter the home, and the door to the house was
rendered inoperable as a result.

Kokesh was scheduled to be arraigned early Wednesday, but a
report from a local NBC affiliate updated at 10:19 that morning
claimed that Kokesh refused to leave his cell, opening the
possibility that he’ll be held in contempt of court. He’s
currently being held at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center
in northern Virginia.

The possession of Schedule I or II drugs is a felony in Virginia
that’s punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a maximum
$2,500 fine. If Kokesh is found guilty of possession of Schedule
I drugs while also in possession of a firearm, then he would also
face an additional minimum of two years in prison.

Republished with permission from: RT

'Neighborly alliances necessary for ME'

0

An Iranian lawmaker says economic and military alliances with the Islamic Republicâ„¢s neighboring states guarantee regional stability.

Member of the Majlis National Security and Foreign Policy Committee Mohammad Saleh Jokar said on Wednesday that the unity of neighboring countries improves regional defense abilities and prevents transregional powers from exerting their influence on the region.

The Iranian legislator further described as Å“positive” a joint military drill by Iran and Russia, which is expected to be held in the Caspian Sea within the next few months.

Pointing to the recent unveiling of new military achievements by the Iranian Defense Ministry, Jokar said, Å“Fortunately, Iranâ„¢s Armed Forces, through innovation and creativity and relying on its capabilities, have made good progress in manufacturing military equipment.”

On July 1, Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi unveiled the countryâ„¢s first sophisticated flight simulator of the Iran-140 passenger plane.

Å“By relying on indigenous knowledge and information, the countryâ„¢s researchers and experts have managed to improve the position of Iranâ„¢s Armed Forces to a considerable extent,” the Iranian lawmaker added.

In recent years, Iran has made great achievements in its defense sector and attained self-sufficiency in producing essential military equipment and systems.

Tehran has repeatedly assured other nations that its military might poses no threat to other countries, insisting that the Islamic Republicâ„¢s defense doctrine is entirely based on deterrence.

MKA/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Bill Moyers Discusses New American Economy and His New Film 'Two American Families'

0

<!–

MailChimp RSS-Email Widget

–>

Watch Moyers and two experts break down the policies turning the American dream into a nightmare.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com

July 10, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Bill Moyers spent more than twenty years documenting the lives of two American families, one black and one white, for the new Frontline special ” Two American Families.” After decades chronicling their struggles to achieve the American dream, Moyers sat down this week with author/activist/playwright Barbara Garson, as well as public education advocate and author Barbara Miner, to discuss the changing lives of Americans struggling it to make it in the new American economy. Watch it:

Liked this article? Join our email list
Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email

Like Alternet on Facebook

‘;
jQuery(‘#root_subfooter’).before( html );

var slide_top_offset = calculate_slide_div_top_offset();
var slide_left_offset = calculate_slide_div_left_offset();

jQuery(‘#like_alternet_on_fb’)
.css(‘position’,’fixed’)
.css(‘top’,’-150px’)
.css(‘width’,’450px’)
.css(‘height’,’105px’)
.css(‘background’,’#E8E8FB’)
.css(‘border’,’10px solid #223BBE’)
.css(‘border-right’,’0px’);

toggle();

}

function resize_slide_div(){

var slide_top_offset = calculate_slide_div_top_offset();
var slide_left_offset = calculate_slide_div_left_offset();

jQuery(‘#like_alternet_on_fb’)
.css(‘top’,slide_top_offset)
.css(‘left’,slide_left_offset);

}

/* HOOK SCRIPT INTO EVENTS */

var paging = String( getUrlVars()[“page”] );

if( paging == ‘off’ ){
var is_paging_off = true;
} else {
var is_paging_off = false;
}

//console.log( ‘Is paging off ? [‘ + is_paging_off + ‘] ‘ + getUrlVars()[“paging”] );

var page = String( getUrlVars()[“page”] );

if( page == ‘undefined’ ){
var is_first_page = true;
} else {
var is_first_page = false;
}

//console.log( ‘Is first page ? [‘ + is_first_page + ‘] ‘ + page );

jQuery(window).scroll(function() {

var scrollYpos = jQuery(document).scrollTop();

if( scrollYpos >= pop_in_yPos && on_off_toggle == ‘off’ ){
toggle();
}

if( scrollYpos

‘;
jQuery(‘div.media-image’).each( function(index){
src = String(jQuery(this).children(‘img.media-image’).attr(‘src’));
if( src != ” && src != ‘undefined’ ){
parts = src.split(‘/’);
if( parts[parts.length-2] == ‘slideshow’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/slideshow/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else if( parts[parts.length-2] == ‘AFP’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/images/AFP/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else if( parts[parts.length-2] == ‘public’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else if( parts[parts.length-3] == ‘public’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/’+parts[parts.length-2]+’/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else { new_src = false; }
if( new_src ){ jQuery(this).html(‘‘+jQuery(this).html()+enlarge_html+’‘); }
}
});

var slideshowdiv; var new_html; var img_obj; var sourcediv; var titlediv; var captiondiv; var title; var caption;

jQuery(‘div.slideshow-body div.slideshow div.field-item’).each( function(index){

slideshowdiv = jQuery(this).find(‘div.altslideshow-embedded-gallery’);
img_obj = slideshowdiv.find(‘img’);
src = img_obj.attr(‘src’);

title = slideshowdiv.children(‘div.altslideshow-title’).html();
if( title == null ){ title = ”; }

caption = slideshowdiv.children(‘div.altslideshow-caption’).html();
if( caption == null ){ caption = ”; }

if( src != ” && src != ‘undefined’ ){
// alert( ‘SRC: ‘+src );
parts = src.split(‘/’);
if( parts[parts.length-2] == ‘slideshow’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/slideshow/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else if( parts[parts.length-2] == ‘AFP’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/images/AFP/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else if( parts[parts.length-2] == ‘public’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else if( parts[parts.length-3] == ‘public’ ){ new_src = ‘/files/’+parts[parts.length-2]+’/’+parts[parts.length-1]; }
else { new_src = false; }
// alert( ‘New SRC: ‘+new_src );
if( new_src ){
img_obj.parent().attr(‘href’,new_src).attr(‘rel’,’lightbox[slides]’).attr(‘title’,title+’
‘+caption).append(‘

Click to enlarge.

‘);
}
}

//sourcediv = jQuery(this).find(‘div.altslideshow-source’);
//titlediv = jQuery(this).find(‘div.altslideshow-title’);
//captiondiv = jQuery(this).find(‘div.altslideshow-caption’);
//sourcediv.after( titlediv ).after( captiondiv );

});


Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Pentagon spends $34 million on unused military base in Afghanistan

4

The US military has raised a $34 million building in southwestern Afghanistan, which it initially planned to use as its headquarters. But as the US scales back its troops, the brand new 64,000 square foot building may soon be demolished.

“What the hell were they thinking? There was never any
justification to build something this fancy,”
a two-star Army
general based in Afghanistan told the Washington Post on
condition of anonymity.

In 2009, military officials based in South Carolina and the
Pentagon issued contracts for the construction of the two-story
building, which they planned to use as headquarters for the
Marine forces at Camp Leatherneck in southern Afghanistan.

Military commanders protested its construction, arguing that
there was no use for the extravagant structure. Former Maj. Gen.
Richard P. Mills argued that his modest headquarters were
sufficient for the job. Other Marine officers also objected to
the plans, but their concerns were disregarded.

The Pentagon awarded a private British firm, AMEC Earth and
Environment, a contract to build the headquarters. Construction
began in November 2011, even though President Obama had already
announced the end of the surge and the impending withdrawal.

The extravagant project was completed this year, costing the US
government $34 million — even though the military now has no
plans to use it. The two-story structure, which is larger than a
football field, features a briefing theater, large offices,
110-volt outlets for US appliances, luxurious chairs and
furniture, equipment to wage modern war, and powerful air
conditioning and heating systems that require costly amounts of
electricity.

John F. Sopko, the special inspector general for Afghanistan’s
reconstruction, told Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel in a letter that the structure is “the best
constructed building I have seen in my travels to
Afghanistan.”

RC-SW Command and Control Facility

But the construction of this building represents a common problem
that can be seen throughout Afghanistan: the US has wasted
millions of dollars on buildings that stand empty or incomplete
as the military scales back its troops. 

“Unfortunately, it is unused, unoccupied, and presumably will
never be used for its intended purpose,”
Sopko wrote.
“This is an example of what is wrong with military
construction in general – once a project is started, it is very
difficult to stop.”

The US must now decide whether to hand over the facility to the
Afghan army or demolish it. Since the huge windowless building is
equipped for US appliances and requires expensive fuel purchases
for its generators, it may be difficult for Afghans to sustain.

“The building will probably be demolished,” the two-star
Army general told the Post.

But the military headquarters, which have the capacity to hold
1,500 personnel, is just one of many expensive structures that
will never serve their intended purpose. The US military recently
spent $45 million on a facility to repair armored vehicles in
Kandahar province, which is now being used as a location to sort
through equipment being shipped out of the country, the Post
reports. The State Department last year also abandoned plans to
turn a large building into a consulate, after spending more than
$80 million on a 10-year lease.

The wasteful spending on extravagant structures in Afghanistan
closely mirrors US spending in Iraq. The US spent $60 billion to
rebuild Iraq, but a final report from Special Inspector General for Iraq
Reconstruction Stuart Bowen concluded that more than $9 billion
was wasted.

After US troops withdrew from Iraq, they left behind a plethora
of abandoned projects, including a 3,600-bed prison that cost $40
million, a $165 million children’s hospital that remains unused,
and a $108 million wastewater treatment center that remains
unfinished. Building materials worth $1.2 million were abandoned
when fears of violence prompted the US to abandon construction of
the prison.

In Afghanistan, the US is now facing many of the same problems.
And with a $34 million base standing unused and equipped for
modern warfare, the US must decide whether to destroy or hand
over the structure.  

“Both alternatives for how to resolve this issue are troubling
— destroying a never-occupied and never-used building or turning
over what may be a “white elephant” to the Afghan government that
it may not have the capacity to sustain,”
Sopko writes,
relaying his concerns to the defense secretary that he is
“deeply troubled that the military may have spent taxpayer
funds on a construction project that should have been
stopped.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Poll shows “Massive Swing” In Public View Of Terror/Liberty Trade Off

0

Majority of Americans see Snowden as hero, despite relentless government and media attacks

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

A new scientific poll out this week finds that former NSA leaker Edward Snowden is viewed by the majority of Americans in a positive light as a whistleblower, and not a “traitor”, as the mainstream media and government officials would have it.

The poll from Quinnipiac, also reveals that a plurality of registered voters believe that government anti-terrorism programs have gone too far in stripping away liberties.

When given the two options, 55% of poll respondents said that they believed Snowden to be a “whistleblower”, while only 34% see him as a “traitor.”

The terms were used as an acknowledgement of the media talking point that has been repeated again and again since Snowden fled the US to Moscow, from where he is still seeking political asylum.

The poll found that the description of Snowden as a whistle-blower and not a traitor was the majority opinion in practically every demographic of voter, regardless of party, gender, income, education or age.

Only amongst black voters did more people say they thought Snowden to be a traitor, with the margin at 43% to 42%.

“The verdict that Snowden is not a traitor goes against almost the unified view of the nation’s political establishment,” commented Peter Brown, assistant director of Quinnipiac’s polling institute.

Several elected officials, including House Speaker John Boehner, have referred to Snowden as a traitor, and have called for him to be given the harshest possible punishment.

The findings have bolstered the results of similar polls undertaken when the news first broke last month in early June, and underscore the fact that people no longer believe the idea that exposing government surveillance of Americans makes the country less safe.

Perhaps the more telling revelation from the poll is the fact that by a 45-40% margin, voters now believe that the government goes too far in restricting civil liberties in the name of anti-terrorism efforts.

Those figures represent a monumental reversal from just over three years ago when the public told Quinnipiac by a 63-25 margin that the government didn’t go far enough.

“The massive swing in public opinion about civil liberties and governmental anti-terrorism efforts, and the public view that Edward Snowden is more whistle-blower than traitor are the public reaction and apparent shock at the extent to which the government has gone in trying to prevent future terrorist incidents,” said Peter Brown.

Put simply, Americans are no longer buying the idea that the threat of terrorism warrants their own government spying on them en mass. Neither do they believe that it is right to punish and demonise anyone who speaks out about it, just as an authoritarian regime would.

The poll also revealed that both Democrats and Republicans were evenly divided on whether government counter-terrorism measures have become excessive. By a margin of 49 percent to 36 percent, independent voters said the government has taken things too far.

“The fact that there is little difference now along party lines about the overall anti-terrorism effort and civil liberties and about Snowden is in itself unusual in a country sharply divided along political lines about almost everything,” Brown said.

“It would be naive to see these numbers as anything but evidence of a rethinking by the public about the tradeoffs between security and freedom,” Brown added.

In related news, Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who broke the Snowden leaks has revealed that Snowden has this week “vehemently denied media claims that he gave classified information to the governments of China or Russia.”

” He also denied assertions that one or both governments had succeeded in ‘draining the contents of his laptops’. ‘I never gave any information to either government, and they never took anything from my laptops,’ he said.”

Greenwald explains how the claim was generated in the media without a shred of evidence, and subsequently spread everywhere as “truth”, being repeatedly cited in an effort to to demonize Snowden.

–––––––––––––––––––––-

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 11:04 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

First Google Glass-Recorded Arrest: ‘Little Brother’ Filling In The Gaps

0

Donna Anderson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

While it’s difficult to go about your day without being tracked by Big Brother’s security cameras, it’s not yet impossible. There are still little nooks and crannies that aren’t under 24-hour video surveillance. And even Big Sis can’t cover all the bases with her “See something, say something” propaganda. Never fear, though, because we have Little Brother, Google’s Glass, to help fill in the gaps and plenty of citizens willing to record your every move.

During the 4th of July celebration on a New Jersey boardwalk, Chris Barrett was in the right place at the right time and managed to capture the first video of an arrest with his brand new Google Glass.

“I picked up my Google Glass explorer edition last week,” Chris Barrett told Venture Beat. “I wanted to test Glass out, so I filmed some fireworks, getting a very cool first-person perspective. About 10 minutes after the fireworks, we were walking back to our car, and I just decided to try it out on the boardwalk.”

As he was walking to his car, Barrett happens upon a small crowd of people chanting “USA!” and a small scuffle broke out, “followed by a shirtless young man being handcuffed, arrested, and led away.”

“I walked right up, saw a crowd forming, and people were saying a fight was going on,” Barrett told me. “With Glass I went closer to the action than I probably should have and saw a couple fights going on. I think I got the first arrest with Google Glass … kinda cool!”

As Venture Beat points out, Barrett probably never would have been able to get that close to the action if he’d been using a traditional camera or waving around a cellphone. But the fact that Google Glass looks so much like a regular pair of sunglasses — especially when viewed in dim light or from a distance or in the middle of a distracting crowd — makes it possible for anyone to surreptitiously record anything anytime they want.

Yes, Big Brother is watching, but like any super-villain he now has a side-kick and you’ll never know his identity.

Google Glass isn’t available to everyone yet but it soon will be. Prices may be a little out of reach for the average citizen when it’s first introduced but eventually they’ll drop, just like any other new technology. When that happens, we’ll be seeing a lot more videos. Some will be similar to Barrett’s, but many more will be videos of average citizens doing average things, like walking down the street with a pressure cooker. And that’s what Big Brother is counting on.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Bonuses Given to Bank of America Employees for Home Foreclosures

0

Bank of American employees were told to disappear records, falsify documents and blatantly lie to its’ customers

Julie Wilson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Homeowners have filed a multi-state class action lawsuit against Bank of America (BOA) for scamming them into foreclosure.

Last week, six former BOA employees revealed in a sworn statement to a federal court in Massachusetts that they were given financial incentives for deliberately foreclosing on people’s homes.

According to Salon.com, BOA employees in the mortgage servicing unit “systematically lied to homeowners, fraudulently denied loan modifications, and paid staff bonuses” for foreclosing on people’s homes.

On June 1, 2012 Obama expanded the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to help struggling homeowners.

HAMP was supposed to lower homeowner’s monthly payments so that they could afford their payments and sustain their home for the long-term. Instead of providing homeowner’s with the modifications to their loans, former employees say BOA used it as a tool, attempting to squeeze out as much money as possible from the struggling borrowers before eventually foreclosing on them.

Under the program’s guidelines, borrowers were supposed make “three trial payments before the loan modification became permanent.” Instead, the borrowers were left making trial payments for up to one year and were then rejected for “permanent modification.” Homeowners were left owing the difference between the trial modification and the original payment.

The BOA employees were told to lie to customers telling them their files were incomplete or missing, when they weren’t. Or, customers were told their file was “under review,” but would then be thrown out for being more than 30 days old.

Former case management supervisor William Wilson said “I personally reviewed hundreds of files in which the computer system showed the homeowner had fulfilled a Trial Period Plan and was entitled to a permanent loan modification, but was nevertheless declined for permanent modification.”

Some employees even went as far as falsifying electronic records and also blatantly removed documents from the homeowners file to make it look like the borrower had failed to submit the required information.

Simone Gordon, a former BOA employee, said managers created quotas for lower-level employees, and a bonus system for reaching those quotas. Employees “who placed ten or more accounts into foreclosure in a given month received a $500 bonus,” said Gordon.

BOA employees even received gift cards to places like Target and Bed Bath & Beyond for their “good work.”

Reportedly, employees who refused to lie to customers, didn’t meet the quotas, or questioned the bank’s ethics, were fired.

The Department of Treasury, the entity in charge of overseeing HAMP, failed to discipline a single bank for their blatant misconduct and refusal to follow the program’s guidelines.

Ex-employees listed specific names of top BOA executives that were involved in directly authorizing these fraudulent transactions.

“The delay and rejection programs were methodically carried out under the overall direction of Patrick Kerry, a Vice President who oversaw the entire eastern region’s loan modification process,” wrote William Wilson.

Other executives included John Berens, Patricia Feltch and Rebecca Mairone, who is now working for JP Morgan Chase, and happens to be under investigation for a separate financial fraud case.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Feds Expose Subway Riders to Chemical Gas and Admits Ignorance to Health Effects

1

We’re not sure about the health risks, but we’re going to gas you anyway.

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

The New York City Metropolitan Transportation Authority released a notice to subway passengers not only thanking them for being gassed lab rats and also admitting that they weren’t fully aware what the health effects could be.

Subway riders won't be supplied masks as shown in photo. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Subway riders won’t be supplied masks as shown in photo.
Source: Wikimedia Commons

They did admit, however, that the gas exposure could lead to early menopause for women.

As we reported previously via RT
, the New York Police Department announced in April that they would release “harmless” gases into the city’s subway station this summer as a terrorist readiness drill.

The department explained that the drill would test first-responder readiness to a chemical terrorist attack and track the path of the released chemicals.

The full text of the notice follows:

Thank you for riding the MTA.

At this time we would like to thank you for participating in a joint study conducted by the NYPD and Brookhaven National Laboratory, sponsored by the Department of Defense.

During the month of July riders will be randomly exposed to Per-fluorocarbon gas in five boroughs and on 21 subway lines in an effort to study airflow throughout the MTA subway system.

Per-fluorocarbons are colorless, odorless, and powerful man-made greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. They are emitted as a by-product during aluminum production, are used as solvents in the electronics industry, and as refrigerants in many cooling systems.

We still do not fully understand the health effects of Per-fluorocarbon gas exposure, though exposure to Per-fluorocarbons are linked to the early onset of menopause. Studies in animals have found these gases significantly alter liver and thyroid function, increase the risk for tumors, and cause failure in reproductive organs.

These gases are being dispersed as a test for your protection against an unwanted chemical attack.

Thank you for riding with the MTA and have a safe day.

This notice exposes that the PFC gas is not “harmless” and the program is actually a partnership between the NYPD and the Department of Defense.

A 2011 study by the West Virginia University School of Medicine concluded “PFC are associated with endocrine disruption in women and that further research on mechanisms is warranted.”

This medical study, which surveyed over 25,000 women, says that “the survey was the result of a class action suit.”

In short, women who take the New York subway may find their childbearing days prematurely cut short. This terrorist drill may even leave some women childless for the rest of their lives.

It will be extremely difficult for women subway riders to avoid PFC gas exposure because the drill was scheduled for dozens of stations on the majority of the subway lines.

This isn’t the first time the U.S. government has treated NYC subway riders as unwilling lab rats. In the 1950s and 60s, Fort Detrick scientists exposed bacteria to subway riders to determine the feasibility of a biological attack.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Detained Turkish protesters go on strike

0

Turkish riot police detain a demonstrator during protests at Kizilay Square in central Ankara, June 16, 2013.

Turkish demonstrators, arrested at Istanbulâ„¢s Gezi Park, start a hunger strike to protest against the extension of their detention period.

Almost 50 detainees went on hunger strike on Wednesday after prosecutors prolonged their detention.

The detainees identified as representatives and leaders of workers’ groups had been rounded up on Monday.

The Taksim Solidarity Platform said they were taken into custody without any legal basis.

Turkish police have arrested thousands of demonstrators since a renovation plan at Gezi Park sparked massive anti-government rallies in May.

The Turkish protesters said Gezi Park, which is a traditional gathering point for rallies and demonstrations as well as a popular tourist destination, is one of Istanbulâ„¢s last public green spaces.

The protests soon spread to other cities across the country and turned into calls for the resignation of the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Erdogan opponents say he has become increasingly authoritarian since coming to power a decade ago.

Several people have been killed in the violent crackdown on peaceful protesters, who Erdogan has described as foreign-backed extremists and terrorists.

On June 24, Erdogan praised the Å“legendary heroism” of police forces in quelling anti-government protests.

The Turkish prime minister has faced international condemnation for his handling of the crisis. Turkish police have been also strongly criticized for using excessive force against the peaceful protests.

MAM/KA/

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Homophobia in Nigeria

0

According to Nigeria’s Ministry of Information, its web portal was attacked on July 4th by a “group” of gay rights activists, who were ostensibly hoping to successfully fight Nigeria’s anti homosexual rights laws by ambushing its governmental portals. As the special assistant to the minister of Information, Joseph Mutah, puts it, the attacks were attempts to not only “promote” homosexuality in the country but also to “blackmail” Nigerians into abandoning their commitment to a “highly cultured and religious society.” Admonishing the group to lawfully campaign for queer rights through the institutions of Nigeria’s “robust” democracy, Mutah warned the gay rights villains that Nigeria’s government would not succumb to their immoral whims since the majority of its people’s remain “overwhelmingly opposed to the imposition of gay rights and marriages as practiced in other countries.”

Now one might be tempted to laugh out loud at the preceding press release, as there are certainly reasons to find it amusing. For instance, there is the issue of Mutah’s assertion that Nigeria is a “robust” democracy despite a deeply entrenched culture of vote rigging, gross human rights violations, corrupt and ineffective legislature and judiciary. One would have to suspend disbelief in order to embrace the idea that although Nigeria remains a country where most citizens lack access to electricity and the internet, gay rights activists could electronically subvert deeply entrenched homophobic attitudes to “promote” queer rights by compromising its web sites, if only for a few hours.

Yes indeed! For Mr. Mutah and his ministry there are big bad gay bandits lurking around menacingly on the Internet hoping to change Nigeria’s anti gay culture instantaneously and compromise the country’s high moral standards.

But perhaps the biggest reason why one might find all this satirical is that it signals the first time the Nigerian government appears very much committed and invested in representing the will of the people. Yes, Mr. Mutah is right! Although the majority of Nigerians are in dire need of three square meals a day, electricity, drinking water, security from domestic terrorists and a more rigorous guarantee of their human rights, they are also “overwhelmingly” homophobic. And to this end, its ever-prudent government has chosen to disregard the people’s more urgent material needs to prioritize its human rights denying will. It has in an unprecedented display of bowing to the presumed desire of the people passed a repressive legislation that could imprison homosexuals for up to 14 years.

More scarily, they have given moral licence to the continuation of the type of jungle justice that was recently practiced in Imo state where a number of individuals accused of being gay were stripped naked, tied up with rope and paraded around the community. Indeed Mr. Mutah and like-minded officials are continuing Nigeria’s noble tradition of maintaining an exemplary commitment to the principles of democracy and human rights!

Yet this author urges all to hold their laughter. If only because Mutah’s deployment of democratic rhetoric while simultaneously justifying the denial of democratic rights to a segment of the population is worrying and should be for every Nigerian committed to the principles of human rights.  Indeed despite signing on to the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the continued violation of the human rights of homosexuals means that Nigeria’s government cannot be relied upon to protect the inalienable rights of all its citizens.

What is more, the attack on queer rights ought to be seen by Nigerians of good conscience as part and parcel of the human rights violations that characterize the daily lives of most Nigerian citizens. The culture of impunity enjoyed by the titans at the top of the Nigerian food chain against ordinary people is the same one that legitimizes the attack on the human rights of LGBT members of the national community. My fellow—Nigerians, the oppression of queer people is bound up with your human rights and should not be seen as alien and different! Martin Luther King was right on with his bold declaration that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”

But if one needs further reasons to hold their mirth, another look at Mutah’s pronouncements is also helpful. What does Mutah mean when he asserts that Nigerians will not accept the “imposition of gay rights from abroad”? Why, one may ask, is a presumably educated Nigerian official with access to boywivesenormous resources and the world wide web, reproducing the now debunked fable that homosexuality is a western and an un-African import? Should we at best, view Mutah’s pronouncements as a commitment to ignorance; or at worst an attempt to  miseducate the people, a state of affairs already facilitated by his government’s neoliberal policy of disinvestment in public education? Whatever the case may be it behoves me at this juncture to recommend the book Boy-wives and Female Husbands: Studies in African Homosexualities, edited by Stephen O. Murray and Will Roscoe, on the matter of homosexuality and Africa. It should help dispel the seemingly stubborn idea that homosexuality was brought to Africa by the Europeans much like Christianity, elaborate “white” weddings, and the white wigs worn by our esteemed judges.

And what about the oft deployed argument, explicit in Mutah’s pronouncements, that guaranteeing basic human rights to homosexuals is a threat to moral order in Nigeria? Although, we have all come to expect irrational statements from Nigerian politicians dressed in grandiose language, one must still wonder as to the basis for such declarations? Since homosexuality has been demonstrated to be as African as Mutah himself is and has always existed in Africa, to what extent does the notion that it threatens Nigeria’s “highly cultured and religious society” rational? One could only believe this assertion if one is partial to the false premise that homosexuality is un-African.   If one does not pander to the “out-of-Africa” thesis, how can the decriminalisation of homosexuality now threaten Africa if it has always been on the continent?  And where homosexuality has been legalised, in what ways has it threatened the society’s moral order? Perhaps Mutah, the Ministry of Information, the federal government and like-minded people in Nigeria should enlighten us as to this special rubric that they use to measure morality in which Nigeria apparently ranks higher than the rest of the world?

To conclude, the bottom line must be that Mutah’s rhetoric and the current climate of extreme homophobia in Nigeria is far from humorous. Indeed if the federal government’s recent rejection of the United Nation’s recommendations on the human rights of LGBT people is anything to go by, the only people that might be laughing are those Nigerians that erroneously view the guarantee of basic human rights to homosexuals as distinct from their own human rights.

Congratulations to the morally upstanding and virtuous national legislature for successfully distracting the people from the manifold social, political and economic issues that undermine their quality of life and actually threaten the country’s moral order.

Ijeoma Ekoh is adoctoral student at York University (Canada) and Director at We Are From Ihe.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Global Corruption: Economies and Political Systems Worldwide Are Being Destroyed By Corruption

2

We’ve extensively documented that institutional corruption in the United States has led to a collapse in trust … which is hurting the economy.

And that the same thing is happening worldwide:

And that .

CBS News reports today:

According to a survey released Tuesday [by the international anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International], a majority of people across the globe feel that corruption has worsened in their countries, and that their governments are ineffective in combating it.

According to the survey, more than one in four people reported paying a bribe in the past year.

***

The survey asked respondents to rate the corruption level of their countries’ institutions on a one-to-five scale, in which five meant “extremely corrupt.”

Political parties were considered to be the most corrupt globally, with an average score of 3.8 out of 5.

“As political parties require money in order to run their campaigns, one of the big corruption risks for political parties is how they are funded,” Transparency International wrote in its report. “The interests of the people and organizations that fund political parties can have a large influence on the actions of those parties.”

Transparency International’s “Global Corruption Barometer” asked respondents to rate institutions on a corruption scale./ Transparency International

Political parties fared worse in the United States, where the 1,000 respondents surveyed gave them a corruption score of 4.1.

Globally, police came in a close second, with a corruption score of 3.7. Nearly a third of respondents who came into contact with police reported having paid a bribe.

***

And while 53 percent of respondents felt corruption had increased in the last two years, a majority also believed that their governments couldn’t fix the problem. According to the report, 54 percent of respondents view government as ineffective in combating corruption, up from the 47 percent recorded in Transparency International’s 2010-2011 survey.

“When there is widespread belief that corruption prevails and that the powerful in particular are able to get away with it, people lose faith in those entrusted with power,” Transparency International said.

In the survey, 54 percent of respondents felt that governments largely run for the benefit of self-interested groups. In the U.S., 64 percent said the government is run by a few big interests, compared with 5 percent who felt the same in Norway, and 83 percent in Greece.

CNN Money notes:

“The majority of people around the world believe that their government is ineffective at fighting corruption and corruption in their country is getting worse,” Transparency International said in the report, which was based on a survey of 114,000 people in 107 countries.

***

The surveys suggest that corruption cuts across societies and demographics.

***

“Impunity is anathema to the fight against corruption and, especially in the judiciary and law enforcement sectors, is a direct challenge to the rule of law,” the group said.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Cinnamon's Infection and Diabetes-Fighting Properties Revealed

0

 

Cinnamon's Infection and Diabetes-Fighting Properties Revealed

Cinnamon is a familiar spice, but few are aware of just how diverse are its medicinal properties. The US National Library of Medicine houses well over 1300 abstracts on the subject of the various forms of cinnamon’s potential health benefits.

GreenMedInfo.com has gathered together research on no less than 60 potential health benefits of this highly valued spice on our research page dedicated to the topic: Cinnamon Medicinal Properties.

First, it must be clarified that there are a wide range of plants whose bark are sold as cinnamon. The first though less used form is known as Cinnamomum verum (literally “true cinnamon”) and is sometimes called Ceylon (the ancient name of Sri Lanka) cinnamon, as it is named after the geographic region where it was first commonly cultivated. Due to its rarity, it is more expensive and harder to find on the market.

Other forms include:

  •  C. cassia (Cassia or Chinese cinnamon)
  •  C. burmannii ( Indonesian cinnamon)
  •  C. loureiroi (Vietnamese cinnamon)

One of the major differences between C. verum and varieties such as C. burmannii and C. cassia is that the latter types contain much higher levels of coumarin, a naturally occurring phytochemical with blood-thinning properties.  This has prompted European health agencies to warn against consuming large amounts of cinnamon varieties such as cassia.[i] Natural blood-thinning activity, of course, within the proper context can be life-saving, but when mixed with already dangerous blood-thinning drugs such as aspirin, can be a recipe for disaster – all the more reason why folks using spices and herbs in ‘pharmacological’ or heroic doses should consult a medical herbalist, or physician with a nuanced understanding of the benefits and potential harms of using high-dose herbal therapies.

Another issue that the US buyer of spices must be fully aware of is the likelihood that unless explicitly labeled USDA certified organic the cinnamon they are purchasing was exposed to toxic levels of gamma irradiation in a controversial process known as “electronic” or “cold” pasteurization. To learn more about this serious threat to our food supply read: The Invisible Nuclear Threat in Non-Organic Food.

Lastly, be mindful of the differences between the powdered whole herb, various water or alcohol extracts, and the oil itself. Some of the studies below focus on solely the oil component (90% of the oil is the therapeutic substance known as cinnamaldehyde) whereas others use water soluble components. The information listed below is not provided as medical advice but to illustrate the vast potential natural substances have to be used in a therapeutic manner. 

Probably the most well-known health benefit of cinnamon is for blood sugar disorders. And this is for good reason. There is now a rather substantial body of clinical and preclinical research showing that it may help to improve the condition of both type 2 and type 1 diabetics in the following ways:

  •  Type 2 diabetics: Improve fasting blood sugar,[ii] reduce glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and blood pressure,[iii] increase glucose optimization in a manner similar to metformin,[iv] [v]improve insulin signaling and sensitivity,[vi] [vii] and improve blood lipid profiles.[viii]
  •  Type 1 diabetics: Protect against hypertension,[ix] protect against diabetes-associated kidney damage,[x] suppress post-meal blood sugar elevations,[xi] and contribute to ongoing reduction in blood sugar.[xii]

Infections

While there is extant folk medical lore indicating that honey mixed with cinnamon can help relieve a sore throat, or fight off infection, few realize it has been confirmed to have extensive anti-infective properties against a wide range of bacteria, viruses and fungi.

It makes sense that cinnamon bark would protect against infection, as one of the major biological functions of plant bark is defense against predation (i.e. infection).  

What follows is an impressive range of pathogens that appear to succumb to cinnamon:

  •   Aspergillus niger[xiii]
  • Campylobacter Infections[xiv]
  • Candida Infection[xv]
  •   Coronaviridae (SARS-associated) Infections[xvi]
  • Escherichia coli Infections[xvii]
  • H1N1 Infection[xviii]
  • Head Lice[xix]
  • HIV Infections[xx]
  • Insect Bites: Repellent[xxi]
  • Klebsiella Infections[xxii]
  • Legionnaires’ disease[xxiii]
  • MRSA[xxiv]
  •   Pseudomonas aeruginosa[xxv]
  • Staphylococcal Infections[xxvi]

Like many natural spices that have been used for thousands of years, we are only now just beginning to comprehend through scientific research how important they are in not simply flavoring our foods but helping keep us free of disease. For an impressive list of traditional spices and herbs that have now been confirmed to have medicinal properties by empirical science, view our article on the topic: When Science Confirms Tradition.


[xvi] Min Zhuang, Hong Jiang, Yasuhiro Suzuki, Xiaoguang Li, Peng Xiao, Takashi Tanaka, Hong Ling, Baofeng Yang, Hiroki Saitoh, Lianfeng Zhang, Chuan Qin, Kazuo Sugamura, Toshio Hattori.Procyanidins and butanol extract of Cinnamomi Cortex inhibit SARS-CoV infection. Antiviral Res. 2009 Apr;82(1):73-81. Epub 2009 Feb 11. PMID: 19428598

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Republished with permission from: Green Med Info

Obama orders government workers to spy on one another

0

Nick Sorrentino
againstcronycapitalism.org
July 10, 2013

Federal employees and contractors are asked to pay particular attention to the lifestyles, attitudes and behaviors.

Federal employees and contractors are asked to pay particular attention to the lifestyles, attitudes and behaviors.

And this is where the bureaucratic snake starts to eat itself. Actually it began in 2011 after Bradley Manning did his thing, but it’s being reported now by McClatchy in the wake of Snowden’s revelations.

Obama began the “Insider Threats Initiative” 2 years ago.

Basically it works like this. Watch your co-workers and if they’re acting the slightest bit strange one had better report them, or face disciplinary or even legal action.

Is Bill working late? Better report him. Coming in late? Better report him. Did he say the wrong thing? Better report him, or else you are on the hook too and you don’t want that do you?

We give government workers a hard time all the time on this site, but living under the “Insider Threats Initiative” sounds pretty hellish. Even they shouldn’t have to look out over their shoulders every time they fill out a TPS report and toss it into the black hole which rotates in the center of DC.

(From McClatchydc.com)

Federal employees and contractors are asked to pay particular attention to the lifestyles, attitudes and behaviors — like financial troubles, odd working hours or unexplained travel — of co-workers as a way to predict whether they might do “harm to the United States.” Managers of special insider threat offices will have “regular, timely, and, if possible, electronic, access” to employees’ personnel, payroll, disciplinary and “personal contact” files, as well as records of their use of classified and unclassified computer networks, polygraph results, travel reports and financial disclosure forms.

Click here for the article.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 10:28 am

Tags: , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

The Tragic New Normal in American Cities

1

What is the plan for our nation’s cities? Are they simply to simmer with a growing divide between the affluent financial district and the impoverished slums? Will another generation be lost while we wait for the inevitable explosions? The gulf between the realities of our cities and the foolishness of our politics has seldom been wider.

Consider gun violence. Over the Fourth of July weekend, Chicago surpassed 200 homicide deaths for the year. On that weekend alone, 10 people were killed and several dozen wounded in gun violence, including 5- and 7-year-old boys. The only grim salvation in the savage toll is that the city’s year-to-date homicide rate is rising at a somewhat slower rate than last year.

While this goes on, the Illinois state Legislature is gearing up to overturn the state’s ban on carrying concealed weapons. The last of its kind, the concealed-weapons ban was ruled unconstitutional by a federal appeals court. Somehow, the conservative justices concluded that the Second Amendment, which provided constitutional protection for state militias, now prohibits citizens from deciding to ban concealed weapons as part of cracking down on gun violence. The gulf between the reality on the ground and the crackpot ideology of the right-wing activist judges could not be greater.

Consider the economy. The youth unemployment rate in the U.S. is the highest it’s been since World War II. The Center for Labor Market Studies reports that 72 percent of Illinois teenagers –ages 16-19 – are unemployed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics finds that less than 16 percent of black teenagers are employed. The official unemployment rate for African-American teenagers – which doesn’t count those forced to take part-time jobs or who have given up – stood at 43.6 percent in June, according to the BLS.

This is a human and national calamity. An entire generation of young people is coming out of school and ending up on the streets or on a couch in their parents’ home.

Yet at the national level, Washington and Wall Street are telling us that this calamity – a deep and enduring depression in our urban areas – is the “new normal.” The Congress is cutting jobs, not taking action to create them. In Illinois, those on unemployment are suffering a 16.8 percent cut in benefits. The gulf between the elite politics in Washington and the realities facing young people in our urban areas could not be greater.

None of this is inevitable. None of it is an act of God. These realities are the result of policy choices, of values and power expressed in policy. This cannot continue without a reckoning. If we choose not to invest in the young, we will pay dearly as they grow older. If we choose to starve the schools of poor children of color, we will suffer when they become adults without skills. If we choose to let companies stash profits abroad without taxes, we will lack the resources we need to build a strong economy at home.

What is clear is that Wall Street, Washington and the conservative judges feel that they can embrace this new normal without paying any price. These policies will not be changed by those who profit from them. They will only be changed if those who are victimized by them make it clear that they will not “adjust and accept.” The young, the unemployed, the poor, the abandoned urban communities must make their voices heard. Change will come only if they force the elites to face reality, not ignore it.

Jesse Jackson is the founder of Rainbow PUSH.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Sarah Palin considering 2014 Senate bid

0

James Hohmann
Politico
July 10, 2013

Sarah Palin opened the door Tuesday to running for Senate next year in Alaska.

“I’ve considered it because people have requested me considering it, but I’m still waiting to see what the lineup will be and hoping that … there will be some new blood, some new energy,” the former governor told Sean Hannity during an appearance on his radio show.

Two Republicans have already announced challenges to Democratic freshman Sen. Mark Begich: Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell and 2010 GOP nominee Joe Miller.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:57 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Russia Says Syrian Mercenaries Behind Chemical Attacks

0

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

According to Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, the Syrian mercenaries supported by the CIA and funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar are behind chemical attacks in Syria. The Russians claim the weapons used include the poison gas sarin.

Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said a Russian scientific team accessed the site of an attack in Khan al-Assal where 26 people were killed and 86 injured during a chemical attack on March 19. The weapon used in the attack, an unguided Basha’ir-3 rocket, was produced by the Free Syrian Army, according to the Russian team.

“Therefore, there is every reason to believe that it was the armed opposition fighters who used the chemical weapons in Khan al-Assal,” Churkin said.

Following Churkin’s remarks, the United States expressed doubt the mercenaries had used chemical weapons.

According to White House spokesman Jay Carney, the United States has yet to see any evidence suggesting anyone other than the Syrian government “had the ability to use chemical weapons, or has used chemical weapons.”

On Wednesday, the British parliament’s intelligence committee warned in its annual report about the consequences of al-Qaeda and other Salafist mercenaries in Syria obtaining chemical weapons.

“Al-Qaeda elements and individual jihadists in Syria currently represent the most worrying emerging terrorist threat to the U.K. and the West,” the report states.

“There has to be a significant risk that some of the country’s chemical weapons stockpile could fall into the hands of those with links to terrorism, in Syria or elsewhere in the region” if the Bashar al-Assad regime falls, the report concludes. “If this happens, the consequences could be catastrophic.”

The United States and Israel continue to insist the al-Assad regime is behind chemical attacks inside Syria.

“Following a deliberative review, our intelligence community assesses that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year,” Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes said in a written statement last month. “The use of chemical weapons violates international norms and crosses clear red lines that have existed within the international community for decades.”

In June, Obama said that the deployment of chemical weapons by the Syrian government had crossed a “red line” and prompted him to provide direct military aid to the CIA’s mercenaries operating in the country.

Russia has dismissed a report produced by the United States and used by Obama to declare a “red line” in Syria as a fabrication. “Information about the usage of chemical weapons by [Syrian President Bashar] Assad is fabricated in the same way as the lie about [Saddam] Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction [in Iraq],” Alexei Pushkov, head of the Russian lower house of parliament’s international affairs committee, said on Twitter in June, according to RIA Novosti.

In April, Israel’s senior military intelligence analyst said that his country found evidence that the Syrian government used chemical weapons repeatedly, although it did not provide conclusive evidence.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 10:04 am

Tags: , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Arrests show mob running Long Island Teamsters: N.Y. district attorney

0

Francesca Trianni
Reuters
July 10, 2013

The Manhattan District attorney unveiled indictments on Tuesday of nine reputed Mafia gangsters, saying that a two-year investigation had cracked a $10 million scheme run an organized criminal enterprise that had infiltrated a labor union.

The attorney, Cyrus Vance, said the criminal gangs had been engaged in mob staples such as extortion, loan sharking, and gambling around the New York City region, but also new ventures such as trading in prescription drugs dealing from Oxycodone to Viagra.

“While in the last few decades we have seen a decline, organized crime is by no means extinct,” Vance told reporters at a news conference.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 10:07 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Almost 30K CA. inmates enter day two of hunger strike

0

Abby Ohlheiser
Atlantic Wire
July 10, 2013

Over 30,000 California prisoners started refusing meals on Monday morning in what might become the biggest hunger strike in California prison history, according to California’s corrections department.

So far, corrections officials have acknowledged that prisoners in two-thirds of the 33 prisons across the state, along with all of the out-of-state private prisons in the system, have missed at least breakfast and lunch on Monday. Corrections officials don’t start calling such a protest a hunger strike until prisoners have missed nine consecutive meals. 2,300 prisoners also refused to go to work or to their classes, they added.

While the California prison system has a less than stellar reputation on a handful of issues – many of which trace back to its astonishing overcrowding – the striking prisoners are focusing their message on improving conditions for those locked in solitary confinement. Last October, Mother Jones published a must-read on solitary in California, written by Shane Bauer, one of the three hikers kept in an Iranian solitary confinement cell for 26 months. Spoiler: Bauer thought California’s conditions were worse.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:55 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

The British Labour / Israel Dinner Date

0

As the British Labour party leadership desperately tried to contain the fallout from the Falkirk fixing scandals last week, with allegations flying around that both candidates had broken party rules, every politician, journalist and Labour activist was offering their views on who was at fault and what should be done. Next, allegations were made first by Labour Uncut, then by The Sun, that Unite activists had tried to deselect Blairite shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander. It was in the shrill noise and raucous denunciations of ‘uber-Blairites’ trying to wreck the party and ‘militant lefties’ trying to make it unelectable that Douglas Alexander’s alarming speech to the Labour Friends of Israel’s annual lunch went completely unnoticed.

The annual meeting of the Labourite branch of the UK’s Israel lobby was well-attended as ever. Senior shadow cabinet members present included Ed Balls, Stephen Twigg, Liam Byrne, Jim Murphy and Douglas Alexander himself, who was delivering the keynote address, a role that Ed Miliband has performed in previous years, when he addressed a room that also included Alan Johnson, Yvette Cooper and Tessa Jowell.

Whilst Miliband had been hesitant in the past on announcing full-throttle support for all Israel is and does, Douglas Alexander wooed supporters in Labour’s latest desperate scramble with the Tories to impress the Israel lobby. In his speech Alexander said, ‘I do not want Israel’s existence to be tolerated or simply accepted, but recognised and celebrated.’ He made no mention of the illegal occupation, nor the Palestinian citizens of Israel, who are presumably supposed to celebrate the fact that, according to Human Rights Watch, Israel has reserved over 90% of its land for Jewish use only, and pursues ‘discriminatory policies’ that include forced evictions and home demolitions of indigenous Bedouin.

Douglas Alexander made no mention in his ‘celebrations’ of a state which has detained 40% of Palestinian men in its jails since the military occupation began in 1967 and regularly tortures and abuses prisoners, whilst reserving 40% of the occupied West Bank for its illegal settlements, which now contain over half a million Israeli Jews. No mention of Israel’s crimes was made.

Not only was Douglas Alexander prepared to sing the praises of the only state in the Middle East in possession of illegal nuclear weapons, but then proceeded to threaten Iran if it were to consider doing the same. Alexander’s comments that, ‘all options remain on the table’ were meant to soothe the tempers of Israel’s supporters, who demand a constant fortress mentality regarding any external threat, real or perceived, as a mask against their own gross violations of international law against the Palestinians.

Alexander has attempted to present himself as a foreign policy progressive in the past, writing in The Guardian to call for tighter regulations for British arms exports, hilariously claiming that elements of the US arms export criteria should be adopted by the UK, and not mentioning Israel once in the article. This is unusual, given that the US funnels $3bn a year in military aid to Israel, although Alexander is right that Britain needs some tightening in its regulations. His Labour predecessor David Miliband had to admit that British weapons were used in the slaughter of 1,400 Palestinians during Operation Cast Lead in 2008-9, an attack Amnesty International and the UN condemned for war crimes.

There is in fact a very long history of collusion between Zionists and the Labour party, and one that shames the working-class origins and socialist sentiments of the latter, whilst making a mockery of the humane pretensions and ‘Jewish democracy’ of the former. For many years Zionist mythology held that Britain, and foreign secretary Ernie Bevin in particular had conspired to destroy Israel during its war of independence. Oxford-based Israeli professor of international relations, Avi Shlaim has demonstrated otherwise, writing, ‘Bevin indirectly helped to ensure that the Palestinian state envisaged in the U.N. partition plan would be stillborn.’ Bevin and Labour actually achieved this by allowing the Arab Legion to consume the Palestinian portion of the West Bank, but discouraged it from attacking Israel. Shlaim continues, ‘Bevin felt that if Palestine had to be partitioned, the Arab area could not be left to stand on its own but should be united with Transjordan.’ Thus, Labour’s imperial policy was instrumental in forming Israel and obliterating the newly-formed Arab Palestine in 1948.

In his highly-acclaimed The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, the Israeli professor Ilan Pappe has documented how Hugh Stockwell, a British army officer, actually allowed the ethnic cleansing of Haifa by removing the buffer zone of British troops between the Jewish paramilitaries and the 75,000 Palestinians in the city, who Stockwell then encouraged to leave.

The complicity of Labour governments in that initial injustice is a damning mark against Clement Attlee’s halo that makes him the most mythologised of all Labour prime ministers. The actions of men like Bevin and Stockwell helped Jewish paramilitaries ethnically cleanse 700,000 Palestinians from the country between 1947-9, a cruel and barbaric operation well-documented in David Ben-Gurion’s diaries as a deliberate attempt to create an ethnically pure Jewish state. The conspiracy by a Labour foreign secretary to prevent a Palestinian state coming into being was completely lost on Douglas Alexander. His speech noted how, ‘as a student of 20th century history, I recognise the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 as a moral necessity.’

As Alexander said in his own speech, ‘It is customary for politicians at events like this to affirm their belief in Israel’s right to exist.’ He went on to do so, ‘unequivocally’, but made no mention of Labour’s complicity in Israel’s brutal crimes in the past. Prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were both members of the Labour Friends of Israel, and as journalist David Cronin notes, “With Tony Blair at the helm, Britain’s position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict became virtually indistinguishable from that of the United States.” Labour actually allowed arms exports to increase during the brutal repression of the Second Intifada, whilst failing to criticise Israel’s wars in Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-9.

This unscrupulousness amongst Blairites like Alexander, Murphy, both Milibands and the many Progress-aligned MPs such as Twigg, Flint and Byrne is what has helped drive so many trade unionists and political activists away from Labour recently, in a time when the Trade Union Congress has endorsed the boycott of Israeli settlements. There is a sense that change may be coming, with reports that as many as 80 Labour MPs are now members of Labour Friends of Palestine, who endorse some limited sanctions.

My father often tells me about his days campaigning against apartheid in South Africa, and how he was successful in pressuring Lancaster University to award Nelson Mandela an honorary degree in the 1980s, enduring the taunts of the Federation of Conservative Students and their ‘Hang Mandela’ badges. Today, the regressive supporters of apartheid policies are not only to be found in the Conservative party, with 80% of its MPs ‘Friends of Israel’, but also in Labour.

In spite of the UN Human Rights Council accusing Israel of apartheid and even ethnic cleansing, much of the Labour movement are resistant to the kind of direct action, in the form of boycotts, divestment and sanctions, that were used to such great effect in South Africa. It is not for the soul or the moral cleanliness of the Labour party that we should seek justice for the Palestinians by opposing Israeli oppression. It is for the dignity of the Palestinians themselves that we should press forward on the great moral issue of our time. This is the injustice they have suffered under for half a century, and it’s time we recognised it, as Douglas Alexander might say, ‘unequivocally.’

James Elliott is a British journalist.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Mexico asks US clarification on spying

1

Mexico has demanded Washington to provide Å“broad information” about a leaked report that it was among Latin American nations monitored by US spy agencies.

The request by the countryâ„¢s Foreign Ministry on Tuesday came a day after Brazilian newspaper O Globo reported that US National Security Agency (NSA) had lifted data related to energy and drugs in Mexico.

The newspaper cited documents leaked by former US intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

“Following the information published today, the Mexican government reiterated to the US government, through diplomatic channels, its demand for broad information on this matter,” said a Foreign Ministry spokesman.

Another US ally Colombia has also reacted to the O Globo revelations by requesting Washington to explain why it had targeted its citizens.

A Colombian Foreign Ministry spokesman said the South American country rejects “acts of espionage that violate the rights and privacy of persons and international conventions.”

Meanwhile, other Latin American countries, including Venezuela, Nicaragua and Bolivia, have all offered asylum to Snowden, who is currently holed up the transit area of Moscowâ„¢s Sheremetyevo International Airport since arriving on a flight from Hong Kong on June 23 to avoid extradition to the United States.

Snowden admitted on June 9 his role in leaking two top-secret US government spying programs, under which the NSA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have been eavesdropping on millions of phone records and the Internet data.

CAH/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Obama’s FBI choice James Comey defends phone-log collection

0

Joseph Straw
New York Daily News
July 10, 2013

President Obama’s pick to head the FBI – who fought broad phone snooping in the Bush administration – on Tuesday defended the collection of some private communication data to fight terror.

James Comey, a former Manhattan U.S. attorney who served as second-in-command at the Justice Department from 2003 to 2005, testified at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked if Comey backs bulk collection of U.S. phone call logs, called “metadata” – an Obama administration practice revealed in June by leaker Edward Snowden.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:40 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

New oversight board hears testimony on NSA surveillance

0

David G. Savage
L.A. Times
July 10, 2013

As Americans were learning that the National Security Agency has been secretly collecting their phone records, a privacy board intended to monitor government surveillance finally came into existence last month – years after the Sept. 11 Commission recommended its creation.

The nonpartisan Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board held its first public hearing Tuesday, taking comments from former government lawyers who support expanded surveillance and from privacy advocates who oppose it.

“We are looking for solutions,” not just commentary, said board member Elisebeth Collins Cook. She said the board wanted “recommendations on how these programs may be done differently.”

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:43 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Drone Rehearses for Aircraft Carrier Landings

0

Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
Breaking Defense
July 10, 2013

Ninety years ago, in the fall of 1922, US Navy pilots made the first landings on America’s first-ever aircraft carrier. (Okay, the British did it first). Just a few weeks from now, a Navy aircraft will make history again – except this time there won’t be a pilot. Meet the Navy’s new robotic Top Gun, the X-47B:

The Northrop Grumman-built X-47B, aka the UCAS (unmanned combat air system), is getting ready to be the first robotic aircraft, aka UAV (unmanned air vehicle) to take off and land on an aircraft carrier.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:36 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Jay Z’s App and Obama’s Criminal Enterprise

0

To gauge the real impact of a historic development like “the Snowden revelations”, it’s sometimes useful to examine how wide it’s being felt. An illustration: Jay-Z’s “Magna Carta Holy Grail” Samsung cellphone app. I’ve a feeling some may not know what I’m talking about because, up until this past Friday, neither did I. But my May First/People Link colleague and office buddy Hilary Goldstein (who has often been the source of ideas for my writings here) sent me an email with a link to a story about the controversy and it got me thinking about how our society has succumbed to a massive crime and how this might be a kind of “critical mass”.

The story starts with a Tweet by a respected Hip Hop artist named Michael “Killer Mike” Render. The Atlanta, Georgia resident issued a tweet this week displaying a graphic of the registration screen for the Magna Carta Holy Grail App with the cryptic but powerful message: “Naw…I’m cool.” The app (a term used to describe small applications often used on hand-held devices) lets the user download a new album (called “Magna Carta Holy Grail”) by Hip Hop super-star Jay-Z.

The meaning of the message (a bit more dismissive than “Thanks but no thanks”) is significant because over a half million people had already said “yes” to that App and had downloaded it to their phones. In the process, they gave Samsung their names, specific GPS location, approximate network location and the phone’s precies id and status as well as permission to “modify or delete contents” from their USB storage, stop the phone from sleeping and get full access to their network communications.

In other words, you give them a treasure trove of information about you in exchange for downloading a “pre-release” version of this album.

Why give in to such an intrusion? The most obvious answer is to get an advanced copy of the already critically acclaimed album by one of the greatest musical artists of all time.

Shawn Corey Carter, known as Jay-Z, grew up on tough streets in Brooklyn, New York (where he led what he himself terms a “gangsta life-style”) and has risen to world-wide reknown as a musical genius. His evocative and innovative lyrics, run over brilliant instrumental mixes, touch on themes and topics touched on in “conceptual albums”: tracks that are hung together under one theme. His legendary discipline and the shere quantify of quality music he puts out make him singular in his industry. He’s also a successful businessman (already reportedly worth over a half billion dollars) with a diverse array of businesses. Because of what he’s done with his life and what he does with his music, it’s hard not to admire Jay-Z.

Carter is, above all, an innovator and so it’s probable that he saw the value in pre-releasing his album as a Samsung app to address a mostly young audience that uses that technology while departing from the competitive and even hostile attitude the recording industry has had towards the Internet. He probably hardly noticed that Samsung was gathering critical information on people for marketing and (given what we know) turning it over to the government. Not that he would necessarily care but Killer Mike does and so, apparently, do a striking number of other “fans”.

Killer Mike Render has 69,000 followers on his Twitter account and when he dropped this little diss it was noticed enough to be the subject of a long litany of tweet responses about surveillance and several trade articles noting the protest. The album also caught the attention of hacktivists who took quick and brilliant action. As a result, some of the people trying to download the real app were actually downloading a hack app, a piece of “malware”, software that mimics real software but does “malicious” things. Of course, one person’s “malicious” is sometimes another’s act of protest.

“On the surface, the malware app functions identically to the legit app,” writes Irfan Asrar on MacAfee’s Blog Central. “But in in the background, the malware sends info about the infected device to an external server every time the phone restarts.” The malware then tries to install additional software and, on July 4, it replaced wallpaper on the infected device with an image of President Obama and commentary on the recent spying scandals. In short, a political message hack.

Asrar, a worthy commentator on things technological, issued his blog as a warning to all who download such apps – be careful what you download, it could be malware. But that admonition misses the point: the malware itself is a warning. It is reminding people that the information Samsung is demanding in exchange for this album is, effectively, surveillance and part of a gross violation by our government of the Constitution of the United States. Know it or not, Jay-Z is facilitating the criminal behavior of corporations and the government.

Those who think “criminal” might be too strong a word might start by looking at the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution because many people, perhaps most, don’t really know what it says. In fact, top Security officials like former NSA chief Michael Hayden (who’s been making the pundit rounds recently representing the Obama Administration) seem to have no idea.

Here then is the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, part of what is called The Bill of Rights, proposed by the Congress in 1789 and made law in 1791 after all State legislatures approved it.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

This is the “privacy” amendment. In case after case for more than two centuries, it has been relied on to support the First Amendment’s clause establishing “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. It’s the legal basis for our rights as a movement for progressive change.

Virtually every word of the amendment completely contradicts the surveillance the U.S. government is routinely conducting. So the question is pertinent: Is our government engaging in criminal behavior?

Are the searches and seizures in these programs “reasonable”? Were there warrants issued for them based on “probable cause”? Did they specifically describe the search place and what was to be seized? Absolutely not. The aggressive and blanket seizure of information can’t be considered reasonable unless there is a “reasonable suspicion” that everyone in this country is violating the law. There is certainly no probable cause here; in fact, for much of the seized data (collected from storage devices in other countries), there are no warrants and when warrants are involved they are issued by a secret court which only hears one side of any argument: the government’s side. As for “particularly describing” the place to be searched and what’s to be seized, the answer “all phone records and the entire Internet” doesn’t qualify.

That this issue of criminal behavior isn’t being publicly debated is the outcome of decades of social conditioning: an Orwellian soup that blends programmed ignorance about our real history with a groundless fear of people from other countries and spices the mix with exploitation of the human tendency to deny the unthinkable. Meanwhile, our government spins at top speed when it can’t hide information and frantically covers up and lies about that information that has not yet been revealed.

This is political bankruptcy at its worst and these past three weeks have been an ode to that bankruptcy.

It was revealed that our President has spied on us and lied to us, completely violating the letter and spirit of the Constitution written to protect us and put checks on his office. His Administration continues wars and attacks world-wide that are not legally sanctioned or popularly supported and that are, for the most part, based on lies and distortions. There’s little question that the Obama Administration was behind the shocking treatment of Bolivian President Juan Evo Morales whose plane was denied airspace access by several European allies under the suspicion that Snowden was aboard (he wasn’t, though if he had been, Morales would have had every right to be flying him home to Bolivia)

The Congress, with an approval rating of about 9 percent for over two years now, has stopped functioning productively. It makes no laws. It approves no programs. All it does is destroy what we have built and turn over much of its functional power to the Executive Branch or to the States in a retrenchment to pre-Civil War governance that should at a minimum lead to a wholesale ousting of the entire membership of both houses and would lead to a complete “government organization” in most democracies.

That’s not happening, though, because we have become a society of cynics. Nobody expects the Congress to do anything about a country that has unemployed its people, wasted most of their money on useless war and eroded the rights of all citizens. Nobody was surprised when Congressional leaders, rather than express the outrage at the government blanket surveillance Edward Snowden revealed, called for that hero’s head.

This fortnight of outrageous malfeasance saw the Supreme Court (the supposed “protector” of the Constitution) trash the rights of voters and spit at the entire history of the Civil Rights movement (and its achievements) by calling sections of the Voter Rights law unconstitutional, using the brazenly disdainful argument that racial discrimination is no longer a major factor in voter rights denial. As if on cue (because it probably was), several state legislatures moved on measures to make it harder for people of color to vote.

Finally, it was revealed that the Post Office (the one government agency everyone seemed to trust) was taking and storing a snapshot of the intended and return address of every single piece of mail it handles as part of the government’s surveillance program. Those who eschew email, claiming that “snail mail” is slower but more secure, can’t even make that argument anymore.

This three week spurt of repressive action is the destructive icing on a cake of years of neglect and sadistic myopia that has ignored the country’s joblessness, alienation of its youth, continuing erosion of women’s rights, escalating violence, increasingly blatant racism and demonization of its working people and their right to self-protection and the militarization of the police. The Congress, with the acquiesence of the Administration, refuses to launch a major public works program that might at least stem our social collapse if not reverse it and then actually attacks the rights of elders and seniors to retrieve the social security we have paid into. In a vicious version of a comedy skit, the Congress has tried 37 times to repeal the only health coverage program all citizens have ever had – before it comes into effect. They cite the need to cut spending while they continue waste 50 cents of every tax dollar on the military, a tax-funded “social works program” that lacks the social productivity and usefulness of most other works programs and actually makes killing easier and more alluring.

All the while, the government’s cozy relationship with the mainstream media means that we can’t expect any decent information from that institution.

Our government isn’t representing us. The Constitution is effectively being ignored. We are in big trouble and the criminal behavior of our “leaders” isn’t going to save us.

All of this has gone on with very little popular resistance. So when Jay-Z “dropped” his album using a phone App that actually enhanced the intrusiveness cell phone companies have become infamous for, it’s not surprising that many didn’t care. But it’s noteworthy that many did. Polls are showing that, contrary to what pols and pundits protest, citizens in this country are very concerned about this surveillance. It may be that these latest surveillance revelations, painting a picture of a society that makes “Big Brother” look like a younger sibling, have brought us to some kind of critical mass.

That’s not happening, though, because we have become a society of cynics. Nobody expects the Congress to do anything about a country that has unemployed its people, wasted most of their money on useless war and eroded the rights of all citizens. Nobody was surprised when Congressional leaders, rather than express the outrage at the government blanket surveillance Edward Snowden revealed, called for that hero’s head.

This fortnight of outrageous malfeasance saw the Supreme Court (the supposed “protector” of the Constitution) trash the rights of voters and spit at the entire history of the Civil Rights movement (and its achievements) by calling sections of the Voter Rights law unconstitutional, using the brazenly disdainful argument that racial discrimination is no longer a major factor in voter rights denial. As if on cue (because it probably was), several state legislatures moved on measures to make it harder for people of color to vote.

Finally, it was revealed that the Post Office (the one government agency everyone seemed to trust) was taking and storing a snapshot of the intended and return address of every single piece of mail it handles as part of the government’s surveillance program. Those who eschew email, claiming that “snail mail” is slower but more secure, can’t even make that argument anymore.

This three week spurt of repressive action is the destructive icing on a cake of years of neglect and sadistic myopia that has ignored the country’s joblessness, alienation of its youth, continuing erosion of women’s rights, escalating violence, increasingly blatant racism and demonization of its working people and their right to self-protection and the militarization of the police. The Congress, with the acquiesence of the Administration, refuses to launch a major public works program that might at least stem our social collapse if not reverse it and then actually attacks the rights of elders and seniors to retrieve the social security we have paid into. In a vicious version of a comedy skit, the Congress has tried 37 times to repeal the only health coverage program all citizens have ever had – before it comes into effect. They cite the need to cut spending while they continue waste 50 cents of every tax dollar on the military, a tax-funded “social works program” that lacks the social productivity and usefulness of most other works programs and actually makes killing easier and more alluring.

All the while, the government’s cozy relationship with the mainstream media means that we can’t expect any decent information from that institution.

Our government isn’t representing us. The Constitution is effectively being ignored. We are in big trouble and the criminal behavior of our “leaders” isn’t going to save us.

All of this has gone on with very little popular resistance. So when Jay-Z “dropped” his album using a phone App that actually enhanced the intrusiveness cell phone companies have become infamous for, it’s not surprising that many didn’t care. But it’s noteworthy that many did. Polls are showing that, contrary to what pols and pundits protest, citizens in this country are very concerned about this surveillance. It may be that these latest surveillance revelations, painting a picture of a society that makes “Big Brother” look like a younger sibling, have brought us to some kind of critical mass.

Alfredo Lopez is a member of ThisCantBeHappening!, the new independent three-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Political Violence and Privilege

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/political_violence_and_privilege_20130710/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Syria militants open fire at protesters

0

Syrian militants fighting government forces in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo (file photo)

Syrian militants have used gunfire to disperse a protest by angry residents of the flashpoint city of Aleppo against militant’s measure for preventing food, medicine and oil from reaching civilians in the western part of the city.

The protest took place on Wednesday in the city including in the Bustan al-Qasr District where foreign-backed Takfiris fired into the air to disperse the protesters chanting Å“the people want an end to the blockade.”

At least two million people live in the area which is controlled by the militants.

The civilians were demonstrating at a checkpoint that prevents supplies from entering the western part of the city which is controlled by the Syrian armed forces.

There are conflicting reports about possible casualties with some saying one person was killed

Residents in Aleppo’s west say food prices have drastically soared as a result of the blockade.

The Syria crisis began in mid-March 2011. Many people, including large numbers of security personnel, have been killed in the violence, and several international human rights organizations say the foreign-sponsored militants have committed war crimes.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

MAM/KA/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Drone Rehearses for Aircraft Carrier Landings

0

Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
Breaking Defense
July 10, 2013

Ninety years ago, in the fall of 1922, US Navy pilots made the first landings on America’s first-ever aircraft carrier. (Okay, the British did it first). Just a few weeks from now, a Navy aircraft will make history again – except this time there won’t be a pilot. Meet the Navy’s new robotic Top Gun, the X-47B:

The Northrop Grumman-built X-47B, aka the UCAS (unmanned combat air system), is getting ready to be the first robotic aircraft, aka UAV (unmanned air vehicle) to take off and land on an aircraft carrier.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:36 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev faces charges in attacks today

0

David Abel
Boston Globe
July 10, 2013

For the first time since he emerged covered in blood from a boat in a Watertown backyard, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev will appear in federal court Wednesday in Boston to face charges that he used weapons of mass destruction to kill three people and wound more than 260 others at the Boston Marathon.

Tsarnaev, who is also accused of killing an MIT police officer, faces 30 federal criminal charges, including use of a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death and bombing of a place of public use resulting in death. Authorities allege that the 19-year-old was inspired by Al Qaeda publications and that he left a confession in the boat justifying the bombings as payback for US military action in Muslim countries.

Seventeen of the charges carry the possibility of the death penalty, which hasn’t been applied in Massachusetts in 66 years and has been banned here for state cases since 1984. But because Tsarnaev is charged under federal law, he could face death for his alleged crimes.

Read full article

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 9:29 am

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Jay Z’s App and Obama’s Criminal Enterprise

0

To gauge the real impact of a historic development like “the Snowden revelations”, it’s sometimes useful to examine how wide it’s being felt. An illustration: Jay-Z’s “Magna Carta Holy Grail” Samsung cellphone app. I’ve a feeling some may not know what I’m talking about because, up until this past Friday, neither did I. But my May First/People Link colleague and office buddy Hilary Goldstein (who has often been the source of ideas for my writings here) sent me an email with a link to a story about the controversy and it got me thinking about how our society has succumbed to a massive crime and how this might be a kind of “critical mass”.

The story starts with a Tweet by a respected Hip Hop artist named Michael “Killer Mike” Render. The Atlanta, Georgia resident issued a tweet this week displaying a graphic of the registration screen for the Magna Carta Holy Grail App with the cryptic but powerful message: “Naw…I’m cool.” The app (a term used to describe small applications often used on hand-held devices) lets the user download a new album (called “Magna Carta Holy Grail”) by Hip Hop super-star Jay-Z.

The meaning of the message (a bit more dismissive than “Thanks but no thanks”) is significant because over a half million people had already said “yes” to that App and had downloaded it to their phones. In the process, they gave Samsung their names, specific GPS location, approximate network location and the phone’s precies id and status as well as permission to “modify or delete contents” from their USB storage, stop the phone from sleeping and get full access to their network communications.

In other words, you give them a treasure trove of information about you in exchange for downloading a “pre-release” version of this album.

Why give in to such an intrusion? The most obvious answer is to get an advanced copy of the already critically acclaimed album by one of the greatest musical artists of all time.

Shawn Corey Carter, known as Jay-Z, grew up on tough streets in Brooklyn, New York (where he led what he himself terms a “gangsta life-style”) and has risen to world-wide reknown as a musical genius. His evocative and innovative lyrics, run over brilliant instrumental mixes, touch on themes and topics touched on in “conceptual albums”: tracks that are hung together under one theme. His legendary discipline and the shere quantify of quality music he puts out make him singular in his industry. He’s also a successful businessman (already reportedly worth over a half billion dollars) with a diverse array of businesses. Because of what he’s done with his life and what he does with his music, it’s hard not to admire Jay-Z.

Carter is, above all, an innovator and so it’s probable that he saw the value in pre-releasing his album as a Samsung app to address a mostly young audience that uses that technology while departing from the competitive and even hostile attitude the recording industry has had towards the Internet. He probably hardly noticed that Samsung was gathering critical information on people for marketing and (given what we know) turning it over to the government. Not that he would necessarily care but Killer Mike does and so, apparently, do a striking number of other “fans”.

Killer Mike Render has 69,000 followers on his Twitter account and when he dropped this little diss it was noticed enough to be the subject of a long litany of tweet responses about surveillance and several trade articles noting the protest. The album also caught the attention of hacktivists who took quick and brilliant action. As a result, some of the people trying to download the real app were actually downloading a hack app, a piece of “malware”, software that mimics real software but does “malicious” things. Of course, one person’s “malicious” is sometimes another’s act of protest.

“On the surface, the malware app functions identically to the legit app,” writes Irfan Asrar on MacAfee’s Blog Central. “But in in the background, the malware sends info about the infected device to an external server every time the phone restarts.” The malware then tries to install additional software and, on July 4, it replaced wallpaper on the infected device with an image of President Obama and commentary on the recent spying scandals. In short, a political message hack.

Asrar, a worthy commentator on things technological, issued his blog as a warning to all who download such apps – be careful what you download, it could be malware. But that admonition misses the point: the malware itself is a warning. It is reminding people that the information Samsung is demanding in exchange for this album is, effectively, surveillance and part of a gross violation by our government of the Constitution of the United States. Know it or not, Jay-Z is facilitating the criminal behavior of corporations and the government.

Those who think “criminal” might be too strong a word might start by looking at the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution because many people, perhaps most, don’t really know what it says. In fact, top Security officials like former NSA chief Michael Hayden (who’s been making the pundit rounds recently representing the Obama Administration) seem to have no idea.

Here then is the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, part of what is called The Bill of Rights, proposed by the Congress in 1789 and made law in 1791 after all State legislatures approved it.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

This is the “privacy” amendment. In case after case for more than two centuries, it has been relied on to support the First Amendment’s clause establishing “the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. It’s the legal basis for our rights as a movement for progressive change.

Virtually every word of the amendment completely contradicts the surveillance the U.S. government is routinely conducting. So the question is pertinent: Is our government engaging in criminal behavior?

Are the searches and seizures in these programs “reasonable”? Were there warrants issued for them based on “probable cause”? Did they specifically describe the search place and what was to be seized? Absolutely not. The aggressive and blanket seizure of information can’t be considered reasonable unless there is a “reasonable suspicion” that everyone in this country is violating the law. There is certainly no probable cause here; in fact, for much of the seized data (collected from storage devices in other countries), there are no warrants and when warrants are involved they are issued by a secret court which only hears one side of any argument: the government’s side. As for “particularly describing” the place to be searched and what’s to be seized, the answer “all phone records and the entire Internet” doesn’t qualify.

That this issue of criminal behavior isn’t being publicly debated is the outcome of decades of social conditioning: an Orwellian soup that blends programmed ignorance about our real history with a groundless fear of people from other countries and spices the mix with exploitation of the human tendency to deny the unthinkable. Meanwhile, our government spins at top speed when it can’t hide information and frantically covers up and lies about that information that has not yet been revealed.

This is political bankruptcy at its worst and these past three weeks have been an ode to that bankruptcy.

It was revealed that our President has spied on us and lied to us, completely violating the letter and spirit of the Constitution written to protect us and put checks on his office. His Administration continues wars and attacks world-wide that are not legally sanctioned or popularly supported and that are, for the most part, based on lies and distortions. There’s little question that the Obama Administration was behind the shocking treatment of Bolivian President Juan Evo Morales whose plane was denied airspace access by several European allies under the suspicion that Snowden was aboard (he wasn’t, though if he had been, Morales would have had every right to be flying him home to Bolivia)

The Congress, with an approval rating of about 9 percent for over two years now, has stopped functioning productively. It makes no laws. It approves no programs. All it does is destroy what we have built and turn over much of its functional power to the Executive Branch or to the States in a retrenchment to pre-Civil War governance that should at a minimum lead to a wholesale ousting of the entire membership of both houses and would lead to a complete “government organization” in most democracies.

That’s not happening, though, because we have become a society of cynics. Nobody expects the Congress to do anything about a country that has unemployed its people, wasted most of their money on useless war and eroded the rights of all citizens. Nobody was surprised when Congressional leaders, rather than express the outrage at the government blanket surveillance Edward Snowden revealed, called for that hero’s head.

This fortnight of outrageous malfeasance saw the Supreme Court (the supposed “protector” of the Constitution) trash the rights of voters and spit at the entire history of the Civil Rights movement (and its achievements) by calling sections of the Voter Rights law unconstitutional, using the brazenly disdainful argument that racial discrimination is no longer a major factor in voter rights denial. As if on cue (because it probably was), several state legislatures moved on measures to make it harder for people of color to vote.

Finally, it was revealed that the Post Office (the one government agency everyone seemed to trust) was taking and storing a snapshot of the intended and return address of every single piece of mail it handles as part of the government’s surveillance program. Those who eschew email, claiming that “snail mail” is slower but more secure, can’t even make that argument anymore.

This three week spurt of repressive action is the destructive icing on a cake of years of neglect and sadistic myopia that has ignored the country’s joblessness, alienation of its youth, continuing erosion of women’s rights, escalating violence, increasingly blatant racism and demonization of its working people and their right to self-protection and the militarization of the police. The Congress, with the acquiesence of the Administration, refuses to launch a major public works program that might at least stem our social collapse if not reverse it and then actually attacks the rights of elders and seniors to retrieve the social security we have paid into. In a vicious version of a comedy skit, the Congress has tried 37 times to repeal the only health coverage program all citizens have ever had – before it comes into effect. They cite the need to cut spending while they continue waste 50 cents of every tax dollar on the military, a tax-funded “social works program” that lacks the social productivity and usefulness of most other works programs and actually makes killing easier and more alluring.

All the while, the government’s cozy relationship with the mainstream media means that we can’t expect any decent information from that institution.

Our government isn’t representing us. The Constitution is effectively being ignored. We are in big trouble and the criminal behavior of our “leaders” isn’t going to save us.

All of this has gone on with very little popular resistance. So when Jay-Z “dropped” his album using a phone App that actually enhanced the intrusiveness cell phone companies have become infamous for, it’s not surprising that many didn’t care. But it’s noteworthy that many did. Polls are showing that, contrary to what pols and pundits protest, citizens in this country are very concerned about this surveillance. It may be that these latest surveillance revelations, painting a picture of a society that makes “Big Brother” look like a younger sibling, have brought us to some kind of critical mass.

That’s not happening, though, because we have become a society of cynics. Nobody expects the Congress to do anything about a country that has unemployed its people, wasted most of their money on useless war and eroded the rights of all citizens. Nobody was surprised when Congressional leaders, rather than express the outrage at the government blanket surveillance Edward Snowden revealed, called for that hero’s head.

This fortnight of outrageous malfeasance saw the Supreme Court (the supposed “protector” of the Constitution) trash the rights of voters and spit at the entire history of the Civil Rights movement (and its achievements) by calling sections of the Voter Rights law unconstitutional, using the brazenly disdainful argument that racial discrimination is no longer a major factor in voter rights denial. As if on cue (because it probably was), several state legislatures moved on measures to make it harder for people of color to vote.

Finally, it was revealed that the Post Office (the one government agency everyone seemed to trust) was taking and storing a snapshot of the intended and return address of every single piece of mail it handles as part of the government’s surveillance program. Those who eschew email, claiming that “snail mail” is slower but more secure, can’t even make that argument anymore.

This three week spurt of repressive action is the destructive icing on a cake of years of neglect and sadistic myopia that has ignored the country’s joblessness, alienation of its youth, continuing erosion of women’s rights, escalating violence, increasingly blatant racism and demonization of its working people and their right to self-protection and the militarization of the police. The Congress, with the acquiesence of the Administration, refuses to launch a major public works program that might at least stem our social collapse if not reverse it and then actually attacks the rights of elders and seniors to retrieve the social security we have paid into. In a vicious version of a comedy skit, the Congress has tried 37 times to repeal the only health coverage program all citizens have ever had – before it comes into effect. They cite the need to cut spending while they continue waste 50 cents of every tax dollar on the military, a tax-funded “social works program” that lacks the social productivity and usefulness of most other works programs and actually makes killing easier and more alluring.

All the while, the government’s cozy relationship with the mainstream media means that we can’t expect any decent information from that institution.

Our government isn’t representing us. The Constitution is effectively being ignored. We are in big trouble and the criminal behavior of our “leaders” isn’t going to save us.

All of this has gone on with very little popular resistance. So when Jay-Z “dropped” his album using a phone App that actually enhanced the intrusiveness cell phone companies have become infamous for, it’s not surprising that many didn’t care. But it’s noteworthy that many did. Polls are showing that, contrary to what pols and pundits protest, citizens in this country are very concerned about this surveillance. It may be that these latest surveillance revelations, painting a picture of a society that makes “Big Brother” look like a younger sibling, have brought us to some kind of critical mass.

Alfredo Lopez is a member of ThisCantBeHappening!, the new independent three-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Political Violence and Privilege

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/political_violence_and_privilege_20130710/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

'US-Israel created Stuxnet to hurt Iran’

0

Political commentator Gordon Duff says Israel and the US created the Stuxnet computer virus in an attempt to sabotage Iranâ„¢s nuclear energy program, Press TV reports.

In an exclusive interview with Press TV on Wednesday, the senior Veterans Today editor from Ohio, said Tel Aviv and Washington “co-wrote” the malware to infiltrate Iranâ„¢s nuclear facility networks despite the CIA realizing Tehran was not after atomic weapons.

Å“…There is a real story here, the real story is that this virus was released against Iran in 2010, yet in 2007, the CIA had discovered that Iran had no weapons program at all,” duff continued.

Duff went on to say that a virus was released against Iran should not be the main focus of attention, as Å“the issue should be, not that Israel and the CIA were working together but both were working together as terrorists against a peaceful nuclear program.”

In an interview with the German weekly Der Spiegel published on Monday, US surveillance whistleblower, Edward Snowden, said the US National Security Agency and Israel created Stuxnet to target Iranâ„¢s nuclear installations, adding that the virus was used to change the speed of thousands of gas-spinning centrifuges at the Iranian nuclear sites.

Iranian experts detected and neutralized the malware in time, averting any extensive damage to the country’s nuclear facilities.

In June 2012, The New York Times revealed that US President Barack Obama had secretly ordered the cyber attack with the Stuxnet computer virus.

In addition, a report published by The Washington Post in the same month said the US and Israel had jointly created the computer virus Flame — a Stuxnet-like espionage malware — to spy on Iran.

MP/HGH/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Israel’s Ethnic Cleansing Zones

0

Were it not for the razor wire, giant concrete blocks, steel gates, watchtower and standard-issue surly teenage soldier, it would be impossible to tell at what point the barren uplands of Israel’s eastern Negev give way to the South Hebron Hills of the West Bank.

The military checkpoint of Shani vaguely marks the formal demarcation between Israel and occupied Palestinian territory, but in practical terms the distinction is meaningless. On either side of the Green Line, Israel is in charge.

In recent weeks it has been intensifying a campaign to summarily evict Palestinian farming communities from their ancestral lands to replace them with Jewish newcomers.

Israeli human rights lawyers, tired of the international community’s formulaic criticisms, say it is time to be more forthright. They call these “ethnic cleansing” zones — intended to drive off Palestinians irrespective of the provisions of international law and whether or not the Palestinians in question hold Israeli citizenship.

In the occupied South Hebron Hills, a dozen traditional communities — long ago denied by Israel the right to enjoy modern amenities such as electricity and running water — are struggling to remain in the cave-homes that sheltered them for centuries.

Israel has reclassified much of their land as a military firing range and demands that they leave for their own safety. An appeal to the Israeli courts, the latest instalment in a 14-year saga to avoid eviction, is due in the next few days.

Israel’s concern for the villagers’ welfare might sound more convincing were it not encouraging Jews to live close by in illegal settlements.

Palestinians in other parts of the occupied territories coveted by Israel — such as villages next to Jerusalem and those in the fertile Jordan Valley, the territorial backbone of any future Palestinian state — are being squeezed too. Firing ranges, closed military zones and national parks are the pretexts for Israel to seize the farmland these rural communities need to survive.

As a result, Palestinian life is withering in the nearly two-thirds of the West Bank Israel was temporarily entrusted with — the so-called Area C — under the Oslo Accords.

Endlessly harassed Palestinians have sought sanctuary in West Bank cities under Palestinian Authority control. Today the remnants in Area C, a population of about 100,000, are outnumbered three to one by
Jewish settlers.

A discomfited European Union, normally mealy-mouthed on Israel’s occupation, has started to describe this as “forced transfer”. The term may sound ominous and reproving, but human rights groups say that, from a legal perspective, the terminology obscures rather than illuminates what is taking place.

“Forced transfer”, observes Suhad Bishara, a lawyer with Adalah, a legal centre for Israel’s minority of 1.5 million Palestinian citizens, usually describes uncoordinated and unofficial incidents of population displacement, often as an outcome of war.

Bishara and others argue that Israel is carrying out a systematic and intentional policy to drive Palestinians off their land to replace them with Jewish communities. This, they say, should be identified as “ethnic cleansing”, a term first given legal and moral weight in the Balkans conflict in the early 1990s.

As evidence, the lawyers point to recent developments inside Israel. The treatment of tens of thousands of Bedouin in the Negev, all of them Israeli citizens, is virtually identical to that of Palestinians in the South Hebron Hills.

The Bedouin too have faced a prolonged campaign to push them off their ancestral lands, where most live as pastoral farmers, and into a series of “townships”, forcibly urbanising them in the most deprived communities in Israel. In the disconcerting language of Israeli bureaucracy, the Bedouin need to be “concentrated”.

Israel has increased the pressure — as in the West Bank — by denying these Bedouin all public services, and demolishing any concrete homes they build. As with Palestinians under occupation, the Bedouin have found their communities reclassified as firing ranges, military zones or national forests.

The village of al-Araqib, near Beersheva, for example, has been demolished more than 50 times in recent years as Israel plants on its land — with a suitably sinister irony — the Ambassadors’ Forest, commemorating the help provided to Israel by the international community’s diplomatic corps.

Waiting in the wings are developers ready to build on the Bedouin’s land 10 towns for Jews only. The rest of the territory is being eaten up by Jewish ranches, given swathes of land to create new tourism opportunities, such as vineyards with wine-tasting services, camel and horse riding centres and, in one case, a pet cemetery.

But, as in the West Bank, the Bedouin are refusing to budge, and pressing their historic land claims in the Israeli courts. Rather than wait for a verdict it may not like, the government of Benjamin Netanyahu is rewriting the Bedouin’s citizenship rights.

The Prawer plan, which passed its first reading in parliament last month, will force 40,000 Bedouin off their land — the largest expulsions inside Israel for decades. Unlike Jewish citizens, they will have no say over where they live; they will be forcibly assigned to a township.

For the first time, Israeli citizens — the Bedouin — are to be deprived of any recourse to the courts as they are harried from their homes. Instead Israel will resort to administrative procedures more familiar from the occupied territories.

The policy is clear: Palestinians on both sides of the Green Line are to be treated like sheep, penned into ever-smaller areas, while Jews will have unrestrained access to a Greater Israel envisioned by Netanyahu.

The international community has long criticised Israel for the “discrimination” its Palestinian citizens face and for the “oppression” of Palestinians under occupation. This terminology needs overhauling too, say the human rights lawyers.

A political system that treats one ethnic group as less human than another already has a legal name: it is called apartheid.

Jonathan Cook won the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. His latest books are “Israel and the Clash of Civilisations: Iraq, Iran and the Plan to Remake the Middle East” (Pluto Press) and “Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair” (Zed Books).  His new website is www.jonathan-cook.net.

A version of this article first appeared in The National, Abu Dhabi.

 

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Greenland Faces ‘Modest’ but Risky Melt

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/greenland_faces_modest_but_risky_melt_20130710/

Posted on Jul 10, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Haiti: US to Re-Write Haiti Constitution to Better Service the One Percent

0

When the U.S. overthrew Haiti’s government in 2004, Washington proclaimed the invasion a “humanitarian” enterprise. Now it turns out that Haiti’s earth and waters are filled with gold and oil. The U.S.-controlled World Bank has volunteered to help rewrite the Haitian constitution, to allow easier access for foreign extraction corporations. Haitians must, as always, “look out for themselves.”

The leech says, “I cling to you because without your blood, I have no life.”

As long as white supremacy paints Haiti as a failed state because of weak public services, when Haiti is prevented by US unfair trade and World Bank/IMF structural adjustments from investing in its own local economy and paints the Clintons, Paul Farmers, UN, World Bank, the NGOs and their three-piece suited Eurocentric-Haiti collaborators with the mark of international distinction and service to humanity, Haiti’s pains will continue to be their cash cow.

“The holocaust in Ayiti continues. The insane imperial narrative and custom of honoring rapists, murderers, torturers, degenerate pedophile maniacs, pillagers, plunderers, enslavers and poverty pimps, starting with Christopher Columbus, who set forth the most prolonged genocides and horrific terrors in recorded human history, continues today. Officialdom honors the UN and UN envoys to Haiti as ‘humanitarians’ or ‘God’ bringing security, stability, peace, law, Christian ethos and ‘Western civilization.’ Too many have jobs, egos, power and prestige invested in the profit-over-people system to see that the current saviors of Haiti extend mostly the same narcissistic, cultural blindness and denials as the initial ‘missionaries/humanitarians’ brought to Haiti in 1492.“—Ezili Dantò of HLLN, Oct. 10, 2011 , Bill Clinton has more power in Haiti than Haiti’s president: The Holocaust Continues.

There’s a new move by the discredited Haiti rescuers, led today by Obama/the Clintons/USAID/UN, the Paul Farmer-led NGOS and their International Financing Institutions to refocus their fundraising scam away from “earthquake reconstruction relief” now to “cholera relief,” or to “local agriculture relief,” and “mining protection relief for Haitians!” It’s a slightly repackaged imperial economic pillage but the same old arsonist/fireman modus operandi. Same failures intended to enrich the global North, impoverish Haiti (UN Capitalizing on Cholera: playing arsonist and fireman and The Pain Rush in Haiti : Clorox Hunger lives in the same space that billions of dollars in “aid” are supposed to have being poured.)

The NGOs carry out US imperial policies in Haiti in exchange for “charity funding” — which means, they money launder US tax payer and donor dollars and put it in their pockets. US imperial policies is about destroying Haiti manufacturing and local economy, expropriating Haiti natural resources and making a larger Haiti market for their subsidized Wall Street monopolies.

Se mèt ki veye kò — The Haiti Population Must Look Out for Itself 

Racism continually allows the Haiti perspective and non-colonial narrative to be marginalized. But Ezili’s HLLN has been the voice ahead of all to sound the alarm, to consistently and almost daily provide the tools for Haiti defense for nearly ten years now. We cover all things Desalin, Dantò and about Haiti riches, Haiti epistemology.

Back in 2004, when Ezili’s HLLN noted that the US occupation of Haiti wasn’t because the US wanted to protect Haiti civil rights and stop a supposedly abusive Haiti elected government under Aristide. It was about stopping that popularly elected government from nationalizing Haiti resources. When we pointed this out, not one of the charitable industrial complex organizations today purporting to be helping Haiti protect itself with “good mining” laws would quote our work, not then and not now.

We were called the apologists for Lavalas and most of the foreign Haiti experts announced that Haiti had no resources the US could want. Today, the US occupiers are freely announcing their intent to change Haiti’s mining laws with little public dissent of their nefarious occupation and resource pillages in Haiti. Ezili’s HLLN is still the only voice out here exposing Oxfam, World Bank and the other fake philanthropic folks involved in protecting the interests of the one percenters, re-writing Haiti mining laws.

The invaders in Haiti finally admit Haiti has gold, iridium, uranium. It seems Haiti’s $20 billion in gold exist only when the “discoverers” are ready to proclaim Haiti has riches. They’ve still strategically refuse to acknowledge that the US has built its fifth largest embassy — after Iraq, Afghanistan, China, Germany — in Haiti because Haiti oil is an Olympic pool to Venezuela’s glass of water. (See, Haiti Riches and Haiti rich in unexplored hydrocarbons (with potential oil reserves larger than those of Venezuela) , gold, copper, uranium 238 and 235 and strategic metals and Did mining and oil drilling trigger the Haiti earthquake?)

If you want to be ahead of the corporate lies, there’s a Kreyòl, Lakou New York Interview where HLLN’s Ezili Dantò talks about environmental degradation concerns, Haiti resources and the foreign mining of Haiti resources. It was broadcasted in 2009 before the earthquake, before foreign cholera, before the public pillage of earthquake donor dollars. The English parallel (the text is here) to the 2009 Kreyòl interview may be listened to at Ezili Dantò with Chris Scott- CKUT on Haiti Riches.

At the point we did the interviews, it had just been announced that Haiti was no longer the “poorest” country in the Western Hemisphere, Nicaragua was. This was because of all the billions the foreigners had made in Haiti from 2004 to 2009 during the US occupation of Haiti. The economic elites made billions upon billions before the $9-billion the US “big-hearted humanitarians” would add to their coffers from laundering earthquake relief dollars largely back to US groups.

These interviews on Haiti Riches were done before the UN poisoned the Artibonite river with cholera. Haitians wondered then, in terms of US mining, what happens if mining chemicals poison the Artibonite river? Very uncanny this foreshadowing. For the invaders found another way to poison Haiti waters with greater market effectiveness.

We point to these unheralded Haitianist efforts to defend Haiti because of the current multinational and NGO efforts in Haiti to link mining to Haiti development! (See, Haiti must avoid the resource curse ; Haiti gets $35.5M grant to improve water services and World Bank says its helping Haiti draft mining legislation.)

Our “rescuers’” benevolence is the decoy used for manufacturing consent to the US occupation in Haiti. Period, no comma. OXFAM, the IDB, the UN and the World Bank are simply howling a wolf’s care for the sheep they’re tearing apart.

Neither Oxfam, nor the World Bank are questioning that US Newmont mining, VCS Mining and Canada’s Majescor et al, have managed to get the puppet Haiti president to WAIVE Haiti environmental and mining laws — its Constitutional laws — in order for US mining do open pit mining in areas close to earthquake fault lines in the North, in a country devastated by the last earthquake and with its water already poisoned by UN cholera. But the corporate media — liberal and conservative — are blithely writing PR articles about the World Bank “helping” Haiti draft mining laws. There’s no outrage or concern that mining and oil drilling trigger are known to cause earthquakes.

HLLN on the cholera case

Infecting over 650,000 and killing 8,200 Haitians with cholera in less than 2-years provides the NGO and multinational companies commercializing poverty and their Paul Farmer/Jim Yong Kim ilks with 1) more opportunity to raise funds that will be laundered back to this corporatocracy but called “Haiti aid” 2) the more Haitians die, the better to bring demand down and balance the elites’ capital markets and 3) our deaths provide the multinational companies with the opportunity to privatize all sources of Haiti water under the pretext of cleaning Haiti water for the public’s good health.

In October 2010, the very month that the UN imported cholera to Haiti, before the charitable industrial complex saviors entered the fray as big-hearted humanitarians to delay and defer Haiti justice, HLLN wrote:

“The accused cannot investigate itself. The United Nations being the prosecutor, the judge, the jury and the executioner, all in one, in the Haiti cholera case, is contrary to established traditions as well as established national and international laws. (Listen to Oct 30, 2010 interview with Yves Point Du Jour “HLLN has never subscribed to the callous and profiting-on-misery notion of letting the UN independently investigate itself while Haiti’s people die unmercifully. ” – Excerpt from HLLN complaint against the US occupational forces for bringing cholera to Haiti.

“The Alien Tort Statute (28 U.S.C. § 1350) of the United States Code reads: ‘The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.’ This statute is notable for allowing United States courts to hear human rights cases brought by foreign citizens for conduct committed outside the United States.” – Excerpt from HLLN complaint against the US occupational forces for bringing cholera to Haiti.

Do not be shocked if the UN/PAHO/WHO stealthily concludes and garners public consensus for the proposition that justice for Haiti cholera victims shall be served if a law is passed that makes all sources of Haiti water property of a foreign company like Bechtel and it shall clean Haiti’s water and sell it back to Haitians.

The Bolivian water wars is a good parallel to study in order to understand why Brian Concannon’s Institute for Justice for Democracy (IDJH), a Dr. Paul Farmer affiliate, is “legally representing(?)” the Haiti cholera victims. IDJH like Paul Farmer have glaring ethical conflicts of interests issues that makes it impossible for them to vigorously defend the cholera victims by naming their own funders, employers, business associates and the primary funder of the US occupation — the US government that occupies Haiti, their consulting firms and NGO cohorts as the Respondiat Superior for the destruction of Haiti government and water systems.

A first-year law student readily understands that Haiti needs immediate injunctive relief, restitution and damages. Injunctive relief is not subject to immunity laws. Neither the US government nor the UN are too big to be prosecuted for human rights crimes, tort or gross negligence. As the largest funder and the main orchestrator of the UN presence in Haiti, the US government, is legally, the Respondiat Superior for the cholera wrongdoings in Haiti along with the UN.

But the NGOs and their Hollywood, media and academic cohorts play firemen to the US government’s arsonist role in Haiti and the global south. The professional posers — the white industrial charitable complex — play an underhanded game. For instance “The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) analyzed the $1.15 billion pledged after the January 2010 quake to Haiti and found that the “vast majority” of the money it could follow went straight to U.S. companies or organizations, more than half in the Washington area alone.” (See also US military company DynCorp gets $48.6 million contract in Haiti to staff officers for UN mission ; Capitalizing on Cholera: playing arsonist and fireman and Haiti’s earthquake generated a $9bn response — where did the money go?)

Yet, CEPR and such foreign “policy researchers” on Haiti also claim IDJH/Paul Farmer and their fake cholera “lawsuit” against the UN along with the US/UN non-funded $2 billion proposal for privatizing clean water in 10-years in Haiti is a DIFFERENT, more positive paternal step for Haiti. That this sort of bait and switch, fraudulent Haiti aid and NGO funding always further weakens Haiti’s ability to handle its own affairs is of no consequence.

US to re-write Haiti Constitution, Again
(with change in mining laws)

ARTICLE 36-5 of the Haitian Constitution, states:

“The right to own property does not extend to the coasts, springs, rivers, water courses, mines and quarries. They are part of the State’s public domain.”

So, how is it legally possible for the US to re-write Haiti mining laws? To legally change the Haiti constitution on ownership of Haiti resources at mines, coasts, springs, rivers, water courses and quarries? Who will stop this US occupation forces’ re-writing of the Haiti Constitution to benefit US resource extraction companies and for privatization of Haiti’s water? Ayisyen kote nou ye? — Where are the Haitians? (See World Bank says its helping Haiti draft mining legislation.)

Haiti’s current law doesn’t allow drilling without a signed mining convention. But US Newmont mining got a “waiver” to the current Haiti law without the approval of even the puppet Haiti legislature. Martelly signed it in violation of the Haiti Constitution. (Gold Rush in Haiti: Mining Investment Good for Whom?)

The US companies were offered a friendly, public-private partnership by the Aristide government to exploit Haiti oil, gold, iridium, uranium and other strategic resources. That idea of equitable revenue sharing with Haiti peoples insulted the northern US-Euro monopolies so much, they hired and trained death squads in the Dominican Republic from former Haiti army officials to take down Haiti’s duly elected government. And when the hired jackals and US mercenaries, including Guy Philippe/Louis Jodel Chamblain paramilitaries, could not do the US regime change themselves, US Special Forces along with Canada and French troops landed in Haiti on February 29, 2004, and through extraordinary rendition put President Aristide and the first lady on a plane to Africa. This merciless and shocking malevolence was followed by a brutal 3-months US Marines sweep of Site Solèy, Bel Air, Solino and other dissenting areas and then covered up with US MINUSTAH’s permanent war in Haiti behind NGO imperialism.

Between 2004 to 2006 the US occupation behind UN guns slaughtered 14 to 20 thousand Haitians. If it wasn’t for organizations like Ezili’s HLLN the Wall Street assassination squads in Haiti might have slaughtered more in the same manner the CIA orchestrated paramilitary death squads in Guatemala killed 200,000 Guatemalans on behalf of US United Fruit companies. In Haiti, with former UN employee Gerald Latortue illegally imposed as Prime Minister, the oligarchs urged Brazil commanders to kill more poor Haitians so that Haiti oil and gold can now freely be carted off to service the Northern vampires as Haiti majority die of Clorox hunger, UN cholera, unfair trade, endless debts and World Bank neoliberal death plans. (The Pain Rush in Haiti : Clorox Hunger lives in the same space that billions of dollars in “aid” are supposed to have being poured.)
Today, the US is re-writing Haiti mining laws for its corporations.

“Now that these ghouls think we indigenous Haiti are all infected with vampire blood and dead, it’s no surprise that the NGO OXFAM/World Bank is howling out a wolf’s care for the sheep they’re tearing their fangs into — funding conferences, issuing action alerts with the other wolves guarding Haiti from the mining companies? I would laugh out loud at these media missives if the depravity these hidden war criminal collaborators bring forth wasn’t as evil to the Haiti majority as a Hitler’s holocaust was.” (Excerpt from [ezilidanto] NGO false benevolence manufactures consent for the US occupation in Haiti: OXFAM & World Bank howling a wolf’s care for the sheep they’re tearing apart; or here.)

The global North’s insane sense of entitlement knows no bounds, no law, no morality, no ethics. The US government destroys Haiti farmers, Haiti manufacturing, Haiti water system, Haiti politics, Haiti spirituality in order to reshape, privatize and call Haiti resources their own. (Se mèt ki pou veye kò.)

With respect to this sudden US public effort via coup d’etat NGO, Oxfam USA, purported to be about securing protection for occupied Haiti from US mining giants. This false benevolence is a way to do the mode soufle.

In Haiti, mode soufle (bite and blow) is where the cunning rural rat takes a bite while you’re sleeping, then blows on the injury in order to lessen the pain, keeping you asleep longer so the rat increases its chances for getting a second bite before the peasant awakes from the piercing pain. While the US is destroying the provisions in the Haiti Constitution protecting Haiti from foreign mining companies, Oxfam and its other international cohorts are sent forth to do PR for America’s commitment to protect Haiti’s poor from the giant mining companies!

But keep your eye on the ball Haitians and true friends of Haiti. For they must especially eradicate these protective local Haiti laws that give the local Haiti inhabitants the right to exploit the mines or to participate in mining exploitationbefore the government may legally offer that opportunity to outsiders. To wit:

ARTICLE 39 of the Haitian Constitution, states that the “inhabitants of the Communal Sections have the right of preemption for the exploitation of the State’s land in the private domain located in their locality.”

ARTICLE 36-6 of the Haitian Constitution, states that “law shall establish regulations governing freedom to prospect for and work mines, or bearing earths, and quarries, ensuring an equal share of the profits of such exploitation to the owner of the land and to the Haitian State or its concessionnaires.”

ARTICLE 36-5 of the Haitian Constitution, states: ”The right to own property does not extend to the coasts, springs, rivers, water courses, mines and quarries. They are part of the State’s public domain. ”

US occupiers mining on fault lines, stealthily privatizing Haiti water

Peruvian peasants have been struggling against US mining company Newmont’s $5billion Conga gold project which is effectively privatizing certain public lakes:

“Lake Perol is one of several lakes that would eventually be displaced to mine ore from the Conga project. Water from the lakes would be transferred to four reservoirs that the U.S. company (Newmont) and its Peruvian partner, Buenaventura, are building or planning to build. The companies say the reservoirs would end seasonal shortages and guarantee year-round water supplies to towns and farmers in the area, but many residents fear they would lose control of the water or that the mine would cause pollution…’Why would we want a reservoir controlled by the company when we already have lakes that naturally provide us water?’ asked…a peasant patrol group…”— Peru protesters push to stop $5 billion Newmont mine, June 17, 2013.

Where are the Haitians — Ayisyen kote nou ye — concerned with the taking of Haiti water to mine $20 billion in gold for foreigners with open pit mining chemicals known to kill, pollute and cause earthquakes?

Where’s the public outrage when one notes media missives such as, World Bank says its helping Haiti draft mining legislation. Shouldn’t the international community — these self-defined “big-hearted humnitarians” — be shouting that defenseless “Haiti can’t take anymore Made-in-the-USA devastations. That human life and environmental health is more important than Northern profit?”

If Peru’s $5 billion Newmont mine project requires displacing huge amounts of Peruvian water sources, how much more is Haiti’s $20 billion gold mine project going to take of Haiti water sources which are already in grave shortage because of UN cholera poisoning? (Peru protesters push to stop $5 billion Newmont mine.)

It is only possible for the US to re-write Haiti mining laws because Haiti is under US tutelage and might makes right. Who will stand for justice, stop this US occupation force, its rampage and re-writing of the Haiti Constitution to benefit US-Euro resource extraction companies and for privatization of Haiti’s water?Ayisyen kote nou ye? Haiti must look out for itself – Se mèt ki veye kò.

For those foreign charity workers reconciling with injustice like Farmer’s Partnerand Death, for the Haitian technocrats and diaspora collaborators pretending amnesia, proclaiming ignorance or innocence, occupied Haiti runs thus: “Recently, there was a government press conference. There was nothing ‘government’ about it; we organized it and told them what to say, explains the spokesman for one of the largest UN organizations in the Haiti.” (Full article atThe NGO Republic of Haiti).

The hidden US occupation of Haiti

On December 31, 2003 this author was in Haiti to honor the bicentennial of Haiti’s independence. It was very late, I’d already gone up to my room for the night. But my good friend Jafrikayiti (Jean St-Vil) had come to the Montana Hotel in Petion-Ville to meet up. He called from the front desk. I took the elevator down and found a heated conversation in progress with US career diplomat and current member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Luigi R. Einaudi, who was then the Assistant Secretary General at the Organization of American States. Journalist Kevin Pina was arguing with him. What Einaudi said as he exited towards the elevator up to his room was so astonishing, I took out pen and paper and wrote it down. On the eve of Haiti’s 200-year independence, the OAS’s Luigi Einaudi said, “the international community is so screwed up they’re letting Haitians run Haiti.”

One month later, in February 2004, the international community got itself together and started ruling Haiti. The US occupation of Haiti has been going on for nearly ten years now. Its colonial, bipartisan violence is hidden behind a UN and NGO humanitarian cover. (See, 30 U.S. Humanitarian and Advocacy NGOs Encourage Support for Royce-Engel Amendment to Farm Bill to Reform Food Aid to Feed More People, More Quickly, at a Lower Cost.)

The US occupation of Haiti is hidden by the white saviors, their educational and professional institutions and media outlets. These operatives hide the re-enslavement of Haiti by centering the uninformed persons’ attention on the UN or, on their own “good works” in Haiti. Empire’s various celebrity front-men are constantly awarded and elevated with the highest international distinction for their “service to humanity.” When one lifts up the white supremacy visor, the stark reality is that the fake US progressives control the conversation on Haiti to improve the rabid elites’ global feudal system, not to take it down.

Haitians require an end to the US occupation of Haiti, a stop to the mining companies and the NGO republic. If the Haiti government was sovereign and free from US bullying neoliberal World Bank/IFIs policies; if Haiti oil, gold, iridium, marble and uranium resources were not privatized but used for Haiti’s public welfare, there would be no need for food-aid in Haiti.

“These operatives hide the re-enslavement of Haiti by centering the uninformed persons’ attention on the UN or, on their own ‘good works’ in Haiti.”

If the Haitian government would be allowed by Paul Farmer’s partner at the World Bank, President Jim Yong Kim, to invest in its own health care, its own people’s education, water management and to protect its own local economy from unbalanced US trade with protective Haiti tariffs, there would be no need for NGOs in Haiti. There would be no need for a Paul Farmer hospital in Mirebalais, Haiti, not accountable to the Haitian public; no need for food-aid, no need for the NGO pèpè schools and “orphanages.”

USAID just launched its newest money laundering scam — Feed the Future North— to capitalize on the media brainwashing of US tax payers and carry forth its usual extortions in Haiti. Media misinformation on Haitiallows death squad-maker USAID to freely use tax payer dollars and “aid” monies for creating new markets in Haiti for their biotech, pharmaceutical, shipping and big-agribusiness companies.

How much sense does it make to empower NGOs to provide local agricultural aid in Haiti while keeping the Haiti government weak and unable to respond to its farmer constituents. When will the human rights community stop getting funds from the imperialist, divest from the system killing the poor and commercializing poverty. Use their platform to act as real humanitarians to confront subsidized big agribusiness destructions, Monsanto genetic poisons and World Bank/IFS priorities inhibiting local agricultural and manufacturing growth? The current NGO push to “help” Haiti local agriculture is nothing more than another means to further increase NGO capacity and to create more unwilling markets for the US biotech and big agri-business industries instead of increasing Haiti governmental capacity and supporting autonomous Haiti community-based organizations that are the real engines of progress and Haiti’s only hope for sustainable development. (Feeding Dependency, Starving Democracy: USAID Policies in Haiti Grassroots International and Ezili Dantò’ at Foreign Investment means Death and Repression: A Historical Perspective.)

Haiti misery and the general American public’s cluelessness is their cash cow. US false benevolences in Haiti, its fairly uninterrupted corruption, has been going on for over two centuries. But as recently as in 1997 when a similar USAID initiative was analyzed, Grassroots International noted :

“CARE has been ‘helping’ people in the Northwest for decades. But each year, the misery of the people of the Northwest increases. What is the real impact of this aid? To make people more dependent, more vulnerable, more on the margins?…The aid is not given in such a way as to give the people responsibility, to make them less dependent….This is what you call ‘commercializing’ poverty….The people’s misery should not be marketed — Samuel Madisten, Haitian Senator.” (Feeding Dependency, Starving Democracy: USAID Policies in Haiti Grassroots International 6 March 1997.)

Unless Haitians start protesting like the Peruvians, the World Bank, NGOs and US mining companies will gather together as one and with depraved indifference to Black life and environmental health in Haiti successfully amend the Haiti constitution as the US marines did during the first occupation (1915-1934), to destroy more Haiti life than UN cholera, privatize all sources of Haiti water.

Ezili Dantò is an award winning playwright, a performance poet, author and human rights attorney. She was born in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, and raised in the USA. She holds a BA from Boston College, a JD from the University of Connecticut School of law. She is a human rights lawyer, cultural and political activist and the founder and president of the Ezili’s Haitian Lawyers Leadership Network (HLLN). She runs the Haitian Perspectives on-line journal and the Ezili Dantò Newsletter.

She can be contacted at http://www.ezilidanto.com/zili/contact-us/.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

The End of the “Leaderless” Revolution

0

More than 10 million people in Egypt mobilized against a clumsy autocrat. Yet, their mobilization ultimately led to a military-judiciary seizure of power, with the support of centrist politicians and clerics. Call this what you like: coup d’état, elegant coup, or people’s power. None of these labels change the nature of the intervention and its aftermath: popularly supported military rule, by more or less the same military-police-judicial-business elements who were in power during Mubarak’s reign and who had struck a (shaky and incomplete) coalition deal with the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Tunisian and Egyptian revolts of the recent years sparked the imagination of many activists around the globe as “leaderless revolution”s. Yet, the strange amalgam of revolution, restoration, coup, democratization, and authoritarianism that persisted throughout the Egyptian process hints that different lessons need to be drawn from the Egyptian situation.

From a people’s campaign to the reassertion of elite rule

Tamarod, an unprecedented people’s campaign, collected millions of signatures and called for the downfall of president Morsi. Huge crowds gathered all around Egypt on June 30, 2013 in order to enforce the campaign’s call. According to estimates, around 15 million people took to the streets, making this the biggest rebellion in Egyptian history.

Ironically, the main mood among the protesters seemed to be pro-military. There were even groups that openly called for a military intervention. Among the protesters were not only pro-Mubarak civilians, but also thugs and Mubarak era security personnel who came to the square in their uniforms. Actually, during the month of June, it had become increasingly clear that the military intended to use the rebellion as an opportunity to intervene (and some politicians, who had previously made fierce statements against military rule, now welcomed the possibility in roundabout ways).

There were also other hegemonic forces bent on capitalizing on the protests and reinforcing their domination. For instance, Gulf intellectuals rejoiced in the troubles of the Brotherhood. They wanted a real ErdoÄŸan as Egypt’s leader, not a “Taiwanese” version. They chose to ignore that their criticisms of Morsi (power-grabbing, centralization, authoritarianism, etc.) applied equally to their favorite Muslim leader. Regional hegemons thus suggested that the only way out of the Egyptian crisis could be another established path, rather than a truly revolutionary one.

There were calls for a general strike during the protests of June 30, alongside the louder calls for military involvement. In fact, the national situation that set the scene for Tamarod had a class dimension, though this was not articulated firmly as a part of its platform. Moreover, some groups in Tahrir (April 6, Strong Egypt Party, Revolutionary Socialists) openly protested against the military, not just the Brotherhood.
cihanNone of this, however, culminated in a roadmap that delineated the way out of the Brotherhood-military coalition (leaving the military and its new allies as the only actors capable of dictating the famous roadmap).

The uprising’s immediate result was the resignation of six ministers. Had a revolutionary political will crystallized in Egypt during the last two and a half years, it could have capitalized on this opening and declared an early victory; that is, it would have intervened before the Kornilovs of Egypt transformed it into their own victory.

When the military intervened, a few anti-coup speeches and slogans were drowned by the overall pro-military atmosphere in Tahrir. The unfounded optimism that anti-militarist forces would remain in the square until the military left did not change the main dynamics. Nobody mobilized Tahrir to fight their erstwhile torturers. Millions came back only in order to prevent the square from the Brothers.

Ultimately, July 2013 witnessed not only the removal of an unpopular president, but the making of a full-fledged dictatorial regime: A hasty crackdown rounded up hundreds of MB and non-MB Islamists. Many television channels were closed down. And most important of all, the military appointed an old regime judiciary figure to replace the president. The massacres that followed were the necessary ingredients that accompanied any military takeover.

Misinterpretations

Most of the initial responses to the military intervention missed the crucial point: Under the Brotherhood-military coalition, Egypt was quickly moving from popularly supported authoritarian rule to popularly supported totalitarian rule; Tahrir activists had the radicalism and the will to slow down this transformation, but did not have the tools to stop it without the military’s pernicious “aid.” Procedure-focused liberal critics of the military intervention completely ignored that under certain conditions, an elected president can help build a totalitarian regime that will render all future elections simple plebiscites. The street needed to act to defend the Egyptian revolution and perhaps even to recall the president. Liberal accounts, with their pronounced fear of the mob, ruled out not only such risky moves, but all other forms of participatory democracy.

As dangerous were the (perhaps well-intentioned) accounts that listed the abuses of the Brotherhood-military regime, but stopped short of discussing the calamities a non-Brotherhood military regime could produce. Those who called the military coup a “second revolution” quickly pointed out all the autocratic moves of the Muslim Brotherhood regime. But they did not explain in what sense the regime that would replace it had the potential of becoming a democracy. (A broader circle of pro-Tamarod intellectuals focused on the illegitimate moves of the toppled president, without going into whether and how these legitimized the moves of the military and judiciary after he was deposed).

The assertion, frequently seen in both English and Arabic, that “all the factors that render January 25 a revolution also legitimize calling June 30 the second revolution” ignored one blatant fact (along many others): 2013 is not 2011. In other words, two years have passed that have led to different social and political possibilities. During these two years, the priority could have been organizing popular power, alternative institutions, and revolutionary leadership in order to prevent (or at least slow down) the increasing authoritarianism of elected powerholders, rather than toppling them to open the way for the old enemies of the revolution.

Some commentators still insist that neither the military nor the National Salvation Front (the coalition of anti-Brotherhood centrist politicians) represents the masses in Tahrir, whose real demand is democracy and early elections. This disclaimer on behalf of the apparently pro-military millions does not alter one of the rules of thumb of politics: Those who cannot represent themselves will be represented.

The fruits of the ideology-less “revolution”

This old statement regarding the French peasantry warns us against the beautification of non-organized masses, a romanticization now in high fashion. Multiple anti-representation theses from rival ideological corners (anarchist, liberal, autonomist, postmodernist, etc.) all boil down to the following assumption: when there is no meta-discourse and no leadership, plurality will win. This might be true in the short-run. Indeed, in the case of Egypt, the anonymity of Tamarod’s spokespersons initially helped: the spokespersons (who are not leaders, it is held) could not be vilified, demonized as partisan populists. Moreover, thanks to uniting people only through their negative identity (being anti-Brotherhood), as well as to its innovative tactics, Tamarod mobilized people of all kinds. Still, the mobilized people fell prey to the only existing option: the old regime!

When the revolutionaries do not produce ideology, demands and leaders, this does not mean that the revolt will have no ideology, demands and leaders. In fact, Tamarod’s spontaneous ideology turned out to be militarist nationalism, its demand a postmodern coup, its leader the feloul (remnants of the old regime). This is the danger that awaits any allegedly leaderless revolt: Appropriation by the main institutional alternatives of the institutions they are fighting against.

It is time to globalize the lessons from the global wave of 2011-2013. Let’s start with the US and Egypt. What we learn from this case is that when movements don’t have (or claim not to have) ideologies, agendas, demands and leaders, they can go in two directions: they can dissipate (as did Occupy), or serve the agendas of others.

We are living in interesting times. Unlike the depressing three decades that stretched from 1980 to 2010, “the people want the system to fall,” as the Arab slogan goes. And the system is very likely to fall, not just in Egypt but in many other places throughout the world (if we keep in mind how reactionary and reform-averse the current leaders and elites, all the way from the White House to the colonies, are: they simply do not want, or are incapable of imagining, New Deal-type frameworks, which could in fact absorb the revolt).

Yet, it is not sufficient for the system to fall. What will replace it? We have been avoiding an answer (for meta-narratives are allegedly dead; well, all meta-narratives but liberalism). We now have to wake up and realize that if we do not develop solid alternatives (and organizations and institutions that will implement them), the downfall of the system will not mean the making of a better world.

Leaderful revolutions

What will happen now? The Egyptian military is very likely to perpetrate neoliberalism, a pro-American foreign policy, and its time-tested authoritarianism. Many sectors of the left already expect nothing from the military; they need no conversion on this issue. But just like the Muslim Brotherhood quickly alienated millions of people in one year of rule, the “new” military regime (which has refurbished itself through appropriating a revolutionary uprising) will show its real face to those who have supported the coup with naïvely democratic expectations. The democratically backed authoritarian “new” regime the military is about to build is very likely to pave the road for a third revolutionary uprising. The left (including not only socialists, anarchists, communists and feminists, but also the left-liberals and left-wing Islamists) needs to use the intervening time to organize the inescapable dissatisfaction with military rule. It has to construct solid alternatives to military democracy and conservative-totalitarian democracy. Based on its experiences throughout the last three years, it should build the leadership, the institutions, and organs of popular power that can implement its alternative vision. In short, this time around, the left needs to be ready.

***

The end of the leaderless revolution does not mean the end of the Egyptian revolutionary process. But it spells the end of the fallacy that the people can take power without an agenda, an alternative platform, an ideology, and leaders.

The leaderless revolution has turned out to be the wrong substitute for the status quo and revolutions that end up in a cult of the leader. What we need is perhaps leaderful rather than leaderless revolutions.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Zardari security chief killed in Karachi

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]A powerful explosion has rocked an area of the southern Pakistani port city of Karachi, killing at least three people including the chief security guard of President Asif Ali Zardari, security sources say.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

High Speed Rail, Infrastructure and Job Creation

0

In our present world of religiously held economic beliefs, agnosticism might be prudent.  On the one side, advocates just want to cut taxes and reduce spending; on the other we have seen a stimulus package of dole-outs and “shovel-ready” projects that has done little to move the unemployment rate.  It remains stubbornly high.

In the meantime, the Fed has been busy pumping money at a rate that has the dollar hitting new lows in the currency markets and gold reaching new highs until very recently – the latter aided by near-zero T-Bill rates thereby negating the opportunity cost of owning it.

It all works to some extent – we are not in a tail-spin – but like Japan for a quarter-century, we can also imagine decades of life in the doldrums. The Keynesian answer to lack of aggregate demand has always been a stimulus package of monetary and fiscal measures.  On the monetary front, the near-zero interest rates are about as far as the Fed can go. And since the $787 billion stimulus package wound down (late 2010), the economy has not yet picked up fast enough (quarterly growth rate last quarter now revised down to 1.8 percent) for necessary job growth although the Fed is unconvincingly hopeful.

Keynes, however, was particularly keen on investment in infrastructure.  In difficult times with stubborn unemployment, the government becomes an employer of last resort. Government hiring injects income which starts a chain of events where the total effect is multiples of the original investment. The process is akin to seeding.  Spending by the newly hired injects life into businesses, small and large, and over time propagates hiring in the private sector; all this activity in turn generates additional government revenue. GDP is over two-thirds consumer expenditures, and we need extensive seeding to create enough jobs and spending to move a stagnant economy.

It so happens, we have before us the possibility of a marriage between vast numbers of unemployed and a disintegrating infrastructure.  The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has now again issued its quadrennial report card on infrastructure. Almost everything (aviation, dams, drinking water, roads, schools, transit, waterways, waste water) received a grade of D-, D or D+.  Slightly better were bridges (C+) and rail (C-).  Nothing received a grade of A or even B.

ASCE calls for “bold leadership and a compelling national vision”, reminding us that our greatest infrastructure projects stem from Federal programs like the New Deal, the Interstate Highway System and the Clean Water Act.  It calls for the Federal government to take the lead in developing a strategic vision that can be supported by other levels of government and the private sector.

Looking to the future, modernizing our obsolete passenger railroad system is a unique development opportunity.  High speed rail makes journey times, city center to city center, competitive with airplanes up to a 1000 mile trip. The railroads are quicker for journeys less than 500 miles.  This is a project that can transform the economic landscape creating a giant suburb of the Eastern Seaboard with expanded job, education and business opportunities. For the rust belt, connecting to Chicago and New York would take the pressure off urban centers and spur regional development.

Rail travel also has a smaller carbon footprint.  According to the International Energy Agency, transport pumps 6.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  Road traffic is among the highest contributors, electric rail substantially less.  Reputable sources like Greengauge 21 seeking to advance high speed rail, claim its carbon emissions are roughly one-third of automobile and one-quarter of air travel.

High speed rail has also been an unqualified commercial success.  Japan’s Shinkansen is one example, the French TGV another.  According to Michel Leboef, the head of major projects at SNCF the French national railroad,  TGV is a victim of its own success with capacity problems on nearly all its routes. He advises setting aside spare space alongside the tracks for future expansion because, in his experience, usage has always overwhelmed forecasts.

China’s current high speed rail network is already the world’s largest. But it plans to invest a further $500 billion in present valuation.  The goal is to have four north-south and four east-west lines comprising a 1200 km network by 2015.  There is little reason for the U.S. to continue to lag far behind Europe, China and Japan, and suffer the consequences, other than a lack of will and leadership.

 A joint study by Siemens and the U.S. Conference of Mayors highlighted some of the benefits.  The small links planned in California, Illinois, New York and Florida are expected to generate another 150,000 jobs, take 5000 commuters off California roads, and pluck 12.3 million passengers out of the skies by 2035.

Chinese trains have already topped 300 mph though regular running speeds are closer to 200 mph.  But the next generation technology being planned and installed now are maglev trains.  These float on cushions of air, are quieter, quicker, accelerate and decelerate much faster – so can reach optimum speed even on frequent-stop routes – and require much less maintenance.

About 200 years ago George Stephenson’s Rocket pulled the world’s first trains from Manchester to the port of Liverpool. The purpose? To speed up the transport of manufactured goods heretofore, carried on barges drawn by draft horses along canals. The age of steam had begun. The factories could now run at full speed, and the eventual returns of industry and a new infrastructure transformed the British economy into a world leader. George Stephenson became the first president of the world’s oldest engineering professional association, The Institution of Mechanical Engineers.

The Manchester-Liverpool line was the brainchild of business leaders who foresaw its economic potential. This time it will require visionary leadership from the public and private sectors to plan a true high-speed rail network of the latest trains, but it can transform and galvanize the United States much like the age of steam did in the 19th century.

Arshad Khan is a former engineering Professor and a Fellow of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Black Education Tragedy

0

Walter E. Williams

As if more evidence were needed about the tragedy of black education, Rachel Jeantel, a witness for the prosecution in the George Zimmerman murder trial, put a face on it for the nation to see. Some of that evidence unfolded when Zimmerman’s defense attorney asked 19-year-old Jeantel to read a letter that she allegedly had written to Trayvon Martin’s mother. She responded that she doesn’t read cursive, and that’s in addition to her poor grammar, syntax and communication skills.

Jeantel is a senior at Miami Norland Senior High School. How in the world did she manage to become a 12th-grader without being able to read cursive writing? That’s a skill one would expect from a fourth-grader. Jeantel is by no means an exception at her school. Here are a few achievement scores from her school: Thirty-nine percent of the students score basic for reading, and 38 percent score below basic. In math, 37 percent score basic, and 50 percent score below basic. Below basic is the score when a student is unable to demonstrate even partial mastery of knowledge and skills fundamental for proficient work at his grade level. Basic indicates only partial mastery.

Few Americans, particularly black Americans, have any idea of the true magnitude of the black education tragedy. The education establishment might claim that it’s not their fault. They’re not responsible for the devastation caused by female-headed families, drugs, violence and the culture of dependency. But they are totally responsible for committing gross educational fraud. It’s educators who graduated Jeantel from elementary and middle school and continued to pass her along in high school. It’s educators who will, in June 2014, confer upon her a high-school diploma.

It’s not just Florida’s schools. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, nationally most black 12th-graders test either basic or below basic in reading, writing, math and science. Drs. Abigail and Stephan Thernstrom wrote in their 2004 book, No Excuses: Closing the Racial Gap in Learning, “Blacks nearing the end of their high school education perform a little worse than white eighth-graders in both reading and U.S. history, and a lot worse in math and geography.” Little has changed since the book’s publication.

Drexel University history and political science professor George Ciccariello-Maher disapprovingly says that the reaction to Jeantel’s court performance “has been in terms of aesthetics, of disregarding a witness on the basis of how she talks, how good she is at reading and writing.” Harking back to Jim Crow days, he adds: “These are subtle things that echo literacy testing at the polls, echo the question of whether black Americans can testify against white people, of being always suspect in their testimony. It’s the same old dynamics emerging in a very different guise.” Then there’s Morgan Polikoff, assistant professor of education at the University of Southern California, who says: “Cursive should be allowed to die. In fact, it’s already dying, despite having been taught for decades.” That’s the kind of educational philosophy that accounts for much of our nation’s educational decline.

The educational system and black family structure and culture have combined to make increasing numbers of young black people virtually useless in the increasingly high-tech world of the 21st century. Too many people believe that pouring more money into schools will help. That’s whistlin’ “Dixie.” Whether a student is black or white, poor or rich, there are some minimum requirements that must be met in order to do well in school. Someone must make the student do his homework, see to it that he gets a good night’s sleep, fix a breakfast, make sure he gets to school on time and make sure he respects and obeys his teachers. Here are my questions: Which one of those requirements can be achieved through a higher school budget? Which can be achieved by politicians? If those minimal requirements aren’t met, whatever else is done is mostly for naught.

I hope Rachel Jeantel’s court performance is a wake-up call for black Americans about the devastation wrought by our educational system.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM

Republished with permission from: The New American

Nevada Man Sues Police for Commandeering His Home to Surveil Neighbor

0

Just when it seemed the liberties protected by the Bill of Rights couldn’t possibly be in any greater peril of extinction, now the Third Amendment seems to be a candidate for inclusion on the endangered list.

A man and his family from suburban Las Vegas have sued local police for violation of their rights as guaranteed by the Third Amendment to the Constitution.

The Third Amendment reads: “No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.”

The tale told by Anthony Mitchell of how he and his family were robbed of these rights is compelling and cautionary.

Mitchell was sitting at home in Henderson, Nevada, on the morning of July 10, 2011, when the phone rang. Officer Christopher Worley of the Henderson Police Department was calling Mitchell to tell him that the police were going to take over his house. In order to gain “tactical advantage” over Mitchell’s next door neighbor, Officer Worley reportedly explained, police were going to set up shop in Mitchell’s house.

There was no asking if Mitchell would mind such a surrender of his home. The officer was informing Mitchell that they would be commandeering his house. In his legal complaint against the Henderson Police Department, Mitchell claims that he didn’t want to get involved with the police department’s operation against his neighbor and accordingly refused to let police occupy his home.

Not surprisingly, Mitchell’s refusal didn’t sit well with law enforcement. Again, according to Mitchell’s complaint, Officer David Cawthorn of the Henderson Police Department, one of the members of the force who were named as defendants in Mitchell’s lawsuit, “outlined the defendants’ plan in his official report: ‘It was determined to move to 367 Evening Side and attempt to contact Mitchell. If Mitchell answered the door he would be asked to leave. If he refused to leave he would be arrested for Obstructing a Police Officer. If Mitchell refused to answer the door, force entry would be made and Mitchell would be arrested.’”

It isn’t hard in the these times of police militarization to predict what happened next.

Just before noon, five (or more) officers of the Henderson Police Department “arrayed themselves in front of plaintiff Anthony Mitchell’s house and prepared to execute their plan,” according to the narrative laid out in Mitchell’s lawsuit.

After showing up at Mitchell’s door, the officers allegedly “banged forcefully” on his door and demanded that Mitchell and his family open up.

Seconds later, Mitchell claims, “officers … smashed open his front door using a metal ram.”

Standing in his living room in shock, Mitchell says that the officers “aimed their weapons” at him and ordered him “to lie down on the floor.” Fearing for his life, Mitchell complied.

Mitchell says that while he was prostrate on his front room floor, Henderson Police Department officers shouted “conflicting orders” at him, some commanding him to “crawl” toward the officers, with others demanding that he stay put.

Mitchell’s complaint continues the account of this incredible afternoon:

Confused and terrified, plaintiff Anthony Mitchell remained curled on the floor of his living room, with his hands over his face, and made no movement. 
Although plaintiff Anthony Mitchell was lying motionless on the ground and posed no threat, officers, including Officer David Cawthorn, then fired multiple “pepperball” rounds at plaintiff as he lay defenseless on the floor of his living room. Anthony Mitchell was struck at least three times by shots fired from close range, injuring him and causing him severe pain.

Police then took Mitchell in custody and, as they reportedly planned to do, arrested him for obstructing a police officer. After arresting Mitchell, officers searched his home, then proceeded to rearrange furniture and establish the tactical lookout they wanted all along.

Remarkably, Mitchell’s complaint claims that police played out a similar scenario at his parents’ home just down the street. Mitchell alleges:

Meanwhile, starting at approximately 10:45 a.m., police officers entered the back yard of plaintiffs Michael Mitchell and Linda Mitchell’s [Anthony Mitchell’s parents] residence at 362 Eveningside Avenue. The officers asked plaintiff Michael Mitchell if he would be willing to vacate his residence and accompany them to their “command center” under the guise that the officers wanted Michael Mitchell’s assistance in negotiating the surrender of the neighboring suspect at 363 Eveningside Avenue. Plaintiff Michael Mitchell reluctantly agreed to follow the officers from his back yard to the HPD command center, which was approximately one quarter mile away,” the complaint states. When plaintiff Michael Mitchell arrived at the HPD command center, he was informed that the suspect was “not taking any calls” and that plaintiff Michael Mitchell would not be permitted to call the suspect neighbor from his own phone. At that time, Mr. Mitchell realized that the request to accompany officers to the HPD command center was a tactic to remove him from his house. He waited approximately ten minutes at the HPD command center and was told he could not return to his home. Plaintiff Michael Mitchell then left HPD command center and walked down Mauve Street toward the exit of the neighborhood. After walking for less than five minutes, an HPD car pulled up next to him. He was told that his wife, Linda Mitchell, had “left the house” and would meet him at the HPD command center. Michael Mitchell then walked back up Mauve Street to the HPD command center. He called his son, James Mitchell, to pick him up at the HPD command center. When plaintiff Michael Mitchell attempted to leave the HPD command center to meet James, he was arrested, handcuffed and placed in the back of a marked police car.

Then, just before 2 p.m., several officers entered the backyard of the home of Michael Mitchell (Anthony Mitchell’s father) and “banged on the backdoor” ordering Linda Mitchell (Anthony Mitchell’s mother) to open up.

Mrs. Mitchell obeyed police orders and opened the back door. She then informed officers they couldn’t come into her home without a warrant. Upon being so informed, officers “seized her by the arm” and “entered her home without permission.”

The Mitchells’ complaint alleges that one of the officers then “forcibly pulled plaintiff Linda Mitchell out of her house,” while another took her purse and “began rummaging through it, without permission, consent, or a warrant.”

Seems that police weren’t content to deny the Mitchells the rights protected by the Third Amendment, but set their sights on the Fourth Amendment, as well.

As one officer forced Mrs. Mitchell back to the “command post,” other officers “searched and occupied” her home. When she was permitted to return home, Mrs. Mitchell reportedly found the cabinets and closets in her house were open and that the contents had been rifled through.

Finally, police took Anthony Mitchell and his father into custody, booked them into jail, and charged the pair with obstructing an officer. After spending nine hours incarcerated, they posted bail and were released.

Ultimately, the police dismissed the criminal charges against both Mitchell men.

In another unbelievable twist to the story told by the Mitchells, not one of the officers identified in their complaint ever faced any disciplinary actions and not one of them was ever the subject of a formal inquiry into his behavior on that hot July day in 2011.

The lawsuit filed by the Mitchell family seeks punitive damages for violations of the Third, Fourth, and 14th Amendments, among other complaints.

While there are few cases on point, one Georgetown law professor quoted in a Wall Street Journal story describes the Third Amendment as the “Rosetta Stone of the Bill of Rights.

“[The] Third Amendment can reveal the structure of the Bill of Rights, and its objects,” Professor Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz wrote as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

A quote by Joseph Story from his Commentaries on the Constitution confirms Rosenkranz’s view.

“This provision speaks for itself. Its plain object is to secure the perfect enjoyment of that great right of the common law, that a man’s house shall be his own castle, privileged against all civil and military intrusion,” Story wrote.

The New American will continue following this story.

Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. is a correspondent for The New American and travels frequently nationwide speaking on topics of nullification, the NDAA, and the surveillance state. He can be reached at:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Republished with permission from: The New American

Japan Set to Join TPP as Secret Negotiations Continue in Malaysia

0

The 18th round of secretive negotiations on the formation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) – a massive so-called free trade treaty – is about to begin in Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. In advance of that confab, one group has announced the creation of a campaign to stop the TPP from becoming the law in the United States.

The campaign, called Flush the TPP, is being sponsored by PopularResistance.org. According to the web page promoting the effort, “a movement to stop the TPP is expanding rapidly. Every Tuesday, people across North America are holding actions against the TPP, from education events to civil disobedience.”

Part of the latter prong of the program involves handing out pre-printed cards opposing the TPP and “holding a sign in a public place on #TPPTuesday, or a more complicated and creative action such as light projection or highway bannering.”

PopularResistance.org’s Flush the TPP website rightly reports that “this massive trade agreement is a high priority for transnational corporations, and they are working fast to make it law.”

As The New American reported just after the start of President Obama’s second term:

In an article published by World Politics Review, for example, Edward Alden writes that the Obama administration’s acceptance and acceleration of the TPP is the “biggest swerve” away from a global Great Depression.

Alden writes:

The global financial crisis of 2008 and the recession that followed produced the first steep decline in world trade since the Great Depression. Yet rather than falling down, the United States and other countries have managed to swerve and keep going.

The biggest swerve was the embrace of regional trade liberalization, starting with Asia.

Identifying the TPP as the president’s “top trade priority,” Alden suggests that the “embrace of regional trade liberalization” will keep the United States from falling down the steep decline toward economic devastation.

Next, the Flush the TPP website informs readers, “The TPP affects many issues, including worker’s rights and wages, environmental collapse and climate change, sovereignty of nations and democratic rule of law, Internet freedom and online creativity, food safety and agriculture, healthcare and financial regulation (including controls over the flow of capital), and much more.”

With the exception of some overt socialist and green gobbledygook, the group’s take on the tragic toll the TPP would exact from American sovereignty and individual liberty is accurate, as well.

The ultimate aim of the TPP is the creation of a Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP). Members of the proposed “free trade” bloc include Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam. The regional trading partnership is intended to establish “a comprehensive free trade agreement across the region.”

An article in the Georgetown Journal of International Law says that the TPP negotiations “are designed to culminate in a ‘gold standard’ free trade agreement (FTA).” The article continues:

The TPP negotiations are among the more recent of a large number of FTAs and Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) that have been or are being negotiated between the member economies of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum. Since the APEC Leaders’ Bogor Declaration in November 1994, the member economies have been committed on some level to the objective of achieving an environment for “free and open” trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific region.

In the argot of globalism, “free and open trade” translates as “economic and political integration.” Later in the Georgetown piece, former United States Trade Representative (USTR) Ron Kirk is quoted as calling for the TPP to be “more than a broad concept.” 

Additional evidence of the “ambitious” goal of the TPP discussions is found in a press release issued by representatives of the member nations attending an APEC meeting in Honolulu in 2011:

We are delighted to have achieved this milestone in our common vision to establish a comprehensive, next-generation regional agreement that liberalizes trade and investment and addresses new and traditional trade issues and 21st-century challenges. We are confident that this agreement will be a model for ambition for other free trade agreements in the future.

In fact, the authors of the Georgetown review state that the ultimate goal of the TPP isn’t just the creation of an FTAAP. They insist that the TPP is a “trade agreement designed to achieve broad liberalization and a high degree of economic integration among the parties.” There’s that word “integration” again.

At the G20 Leading Economies Summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, former USTR Kirk announced that Mexico would soon join the TPP. At a press conference after that announcement, former Mexican President Felipe Calderón described the the TPP as “one of the free trade initiatives that’s most ambitious in the world” and one that would “foster integration of the Asia Pacific region, one of the regions with the greatest dynamism in the world.”

Integration is a word that is painful to the ears of constitutionalists and those unwilling to surrender U.S. sovereignty to a committee of globalists who are unelected by the American people and unaccountable to them. Integration is an internationalist tool for subordinating American law to the globalist bureaucracy at the United Nations. Economic and political integration will push the once independent United States of America into yet another collectivist bloc that will facilitate the complete dissolution of our nation and our states into no more than impotent members of a one-world government.

Although 11 countries are currently included within the coterie of TPP participants, in April, President Obama notified Congress of his plan to bring Japan into the TPP area and include it in all upcoming negotiations. This notification follows an announcement on April 12, 2013 that the United States and Japan had completed bilateral TPP consultations, as well as an announcement by TPP countries on April 21, 2013 that they welcome Japan as a new participant in the TPP negotiations, pending the successful completion of domestic procedures by each TPP country.

On July 24, the 90-day consultation period with Congress and the public on U.S. negotiating objectives with respect to Japan is set to expire. That gives Americans only two weeks to contact their congressmen and senators and demand that U.S. control of trade not be surrendered to an unelected body of globalist bureaucrats.

Existing U.S. law would also be supplanted by the TPP if the agreement is adopted.

All “partners” to the pact, including foreign corporations, would be exempted from abiding by American laws governing trade disputes. Moreover, the sovereignty of the United States and the Constitution’s enumeration of powers would once again be sacrificed on the altar of global government by subordinating U.S. laws passed by duly elected representatives of the people to a code of regulations created by a team of trans-national bureaucrats.



If you’re as fond of NAFTA and what it did for our economy and our sovereignty as Mexico and Canada are, then you’ll love what the TPP has in store.



Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
JA
X-NONE

In June, recently sworn-in USTR Michael Froman met with NAFTA and TPP partner, Canadian Trade Minister Ed Fast, and the pair reaffirmed their commitment to concluding the TPP this year and mapped out plans for doing so.

In June 2012, portions of the TPP draft agreement that were leaked to the Internet contained sketches of President Obama’s plans to surrender American sovereignty to international tribunals. This is just one of many frightening provisions of the TPP that are being negotiated in secret by American and international trade representatives.

U.S. copyright laws, Internet freedom, and web-based publishing would all be obliterated by the TPP and the global government would be granted sweeping surveillance powers, as well.

Americans who study the subject realize that the redrawing of national boundaries and domestic legal processes being carried out in secret by the globalists sitting around the TPP negotiating table is an attack on American laws, American courts, American freedom of expression, American sovereignty, and the American Constitution.

Nonetheless, the TPP cannot have these bad effects on America unless Congress approves a final TPP agreement. However, if the American people do not rise up in firm opposition to the TPP and convince Congress to tear down the wall of secrecy built by globalists seeking to shield their attack on our law and liberty from congressional oversight, and ultimately to reject any TPP agreement, then an approved TPP might finish the integration – economic and political – begun by NAFTA and it may be the last straw in the already weakened broom of American sovereignty.

Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. is a correspondent for The New American and travels frequently nationwide speaking on topics of nullification, the NDAA, and the surveillance state. He can be reached at
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Republished with permission from: The New American

NSA Spying on Venezuela: Post-Chavez Elections and Petroleum Industry Were Priorities

0

Brazilian daily O Globo, reporting jointly with Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald informed today that according to the leaked National Security Agency (NSA) documents, the United States has also been spying on Venezuela’s petroleum industry. The information comes as governments confirm that whistleblower Edward Snowden has applied for asylum in Venezuela.

According to the leaked documents, the NSA also spied on other Latin American countries such as Mexico, Argentina, Colombia, and Ecuador.

O Globo reports that, “The United States doesn’t seem to be only interested in military affairs, but also in commercial secrets, such as Venezuela’s petroleum”.

According to the documents, NSA spied on Latin America through at least two programs, the Prism program from 2-8 of February this year, and the “Informant Without Limits” program from January to March.

One document describes Operation Silverzephyr, which accessed information through partnerships with private satellite and phone operators, focusing on Latin American countries. The document shows that the NSA agency collected information through telephone calls, faxes and emails, possibly using the program Fairview.

According to O Globo and the leaked NSA documents, Venezuela was also observed in 2008 through the X-Keyscore program, which identifies the presence of foreigners according to the language they use in emails. Further, in March this year it appears that Venezuela was a priority for the NSA’s spying. President Hugo Chavez died on 5 March, and presidential elections were called for 14 April.

U.S. reacts to Venezuela’s asylum offer

On Sunday U.S. legislators suggested sanctioning countries which grant asylum to Edward Snowden, who leaked the NSA documents to The Guardian. The chair of the U.S. House of Representative’s intelligence committee, Mike Rogers, said Latin American countries are “using Snowden as a public relations tool… we shouldn’t allow this… it’s a serious issue…some Latin American companies enjoy trade benefits from the United States and we’re going to have to revise that”.

Legislator Robert Menendez also said that any “acceptance of Snowden” would put that country “directly against the United States”. The Venezuelan government formally offered Snowden asylum on 5 July. Nicaragua and Bolivia have also done so.

“We’ve made very clear that he [Snowden] has been charged with felonies and as such, he should not be allowed to proceed in any further international travel other than travel that would result in him returning to the United States,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters yesterday at his daily news conference.

Yesterday Maduro said that Venezuela has also formally received an asylum request from Snowden, who agencies report to have been in the Moscow airport since 23 June.

Russian legislator Alexei Pushkov also confirmed yesterday (via a Tweet that he later deleted) that Snowden had accepted Venezuela’s offer of political asylum. “It seems that that is the option he feels is safest,” Pushkov wrote. However, later today Wikileaks also tweeted that Snowden had not formally accepted asylum in Venezuela, but also deleted the tweets a few minutes later.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

‘Israel jails Mossad agent Prisoner X2’

0

Ayalon Prison situated near Tel-Aviv, Israel (file photo).

Israel has imprisoned a Mossad agent in the same prison where the intelligence agent Ben Zygier known as Prisoner X was jailed and later found hanged, a newspaper report says.

The Israeli daily Ha’aretz published a report on Tuesday revealing that the Mossad agent aka Prisoner X2 was being held at Ayalon prison in Ramle, situated in central Israel.

The report did not disclose why the unnamed man was jailed in the maximum security prison near Tel Aviv.

On February 12, reporter Trevor Bormann revealed on Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) that the 34-year-old Zygier who had worked for Mossad for ten years was Å“found hanged in a cell with state-of-the-art surveillance systems” near Tel Aviv in December 2010.

Following the revelation, the Tel Aviv regime was forced to admit that Zygier had been jailed under a false identity Å“for security reasons” despite nearly two years of great efforts to cover up the secret.

A report by the New York Times quoting the Kuwaiti daily Al Jarida on February 14, said Zygier was among the 26 suspects in a murder plot in which Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, a Hamas official, was tracked and killed in his hotel room hours after his arrival in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates, in January 2010.

The assassins had reportedly used fake passports from Australia, Britain, Ireland, Germany and France, among other countries.

The report added that Prisoner X had provided the officials in Dubai with Å“names and pictures and accurate details” in exchange for protection.

However, the Israeli regime kidnapped him from his hideout and jailed him over treason nearly a month after the operation over the speculation that he had been on the verge of exposing Tel Avivâ„¢s secrets about the passports.

MAM/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Criminal probe into Quebec train crash

0

Rescue workers dig through the rubble for victims of the train disaster in Lac-Megantic, Quebec on July 8, 2013.

Canadian police say they are examining criminal negligence as the cause of the recent deadly train disaster near Montreal.

Quebec police inspector Michel Forget said Tuesday that they are looking for Å“evidence that might allow the filing of criminal charges” into the derailment of the oil-carrying train.

The July 6 train disaster left 15 people dead and around 40 others missing. It also leveled 30 buildings in the city of Lac-Megantic.

About 2,000 of the 6,000 residents, who were forced to flee the explosions sparked by the derailment, were allowed to return to their homes on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, the chairman of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, Edward Burkhardt, accused firefighters in Nantes of releasing the train’s brakes after they had extinguished a small fire in one of the trainâ„¢s five locomotives.

Nantes firefighters Å“showed up and put out the fire with a fire extinguisher. To do that they also shut down the first locomotive’s engines. This is what led to the disaster,” said Burkhardt.

But, Nantes Fire Chief Patrick Lambert dismissed Burkhardtâ„¢s accusations, saying the 12 firefighters who responded to the initial fire had followed all of the proper procedures.

Investigators from Canadaâ„¢s Transportation Safety Board (TSB) said their inquiry will focus on the trainâ„¢s brakes, the rail companyâ„¢s policies for securing stopped trains as well as what caused the original locomotive fire in Nantes.

TSB lead investigator Donald Ross reported that the train began to roll moments after firefighters and a company official left the locomotive unattended on the tracks in Nantes, after the fire was extinguished.

CAH/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Obama-Backed Rebels Starve Syrians, Kill Protesters

0

Extremists threaten one year in jail for food during Ramadan

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Obama administration-backed FSA rebels are starving Syrians by imposing food blockades and shooting at protesters in the city of Aleppo.

Even opposition activists who support the Syrian rebels have condemned the action, noting that it has caused food prices to spike to more than ten times normal levels.

“This is a crime … Some of our rebel forces, God reform them, are participating in this blockade. Prices are soaring at an unimaginable rate. There is now horrible scarcity,” one of the activists told Reuters.

Rebel fighters dubiously blamed government forces for the blockade, despite the fact that it is being imposed by FSA militants, who are blocking roads and preventing both food and medical provisions from reaching the city, which is split between FSA and Syrian Army control.

In addition, Aleppo residents who attended protests against the food blockade were shot at and killed by FSA rebels. Activist Edward Dark, who works to help displaced families in Aleppo, tweeted out the following photo of two victims killed by FSA militants.

Despite allegations that the Egyptian military shot at Muslim Brotherhood protesters following last week’s coup receiving widespread media attention, reports that FSA rebels are now doing the same thing to Syrian citizens have attracted virtually no press coverage.

According to a letter printed in Arabic, rebel fighters are also threatening anyone caught with food during Ramadan with one month in prison.

The Obama administration last month signaled its intention to arm FSA rebels despite a plethora of evidence confirming they have joined forces with Al-Qaeda terrorists and are committing atrocities on a routine basis. Some fighters have even threatened to commit more war crimes if heavy weaponry is not immediately sent by western powers, while others have vowed to attack the US and Europe once they are finished in Syria.

Watch an interview below with an Aleppo resident in addition to a separate clip which shows Syrians protesting against food blockades being intimidated and shot at by FSA militants.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

Snowden's Primary Challenge: Avoiding Reach of US Empire

0

What does a “flight of liberty” look like?Though a rush of speculation mounted on Tuesday, the ongoing saga surrounding NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden’s attempts to find political asylum continued Wednesday.

Venezuela, whose President Nicholas Maduro has offered asyslum, now seems the most likely destination for the man, whose intelligence disclosures have given the world an unprecedented look into the massive global surveillance machine run by the US spy agency. But the real challenge, according to many, is how Snowden will make his way from Moscow to any of the possible countries willing to take him in, which also include Bolivian and Nicaragua.

Wikileaks, which has been offering guidance and legal assistance to Snowden since he left Hong Kong over two weeks ago, has indicated that plans are underway for some kind of effort. On Tuesday night, the group tweeted:

Other supporters of Snowden’s have suggested raising funds for a private aircraft that could deliver Snowden using a flight path free from US interference.

As USA Today reports:

For Snowden to leave for South America, he would need for Venezuela to issue him travel documents and he would need to find a way to get there. The only direct commercial flight from Moscow stops in Havana, Cuba.

The Moscow-Havana flight goes over Europe and the U.S., which could cause complications. Some European countries refused to allow Bolivian President Evo Morales to fly through their airspace on his way home from Moscow last week because of suspicions that Snowden was on his plane.

Despite that, no other details have become available at this point to indicate whether or not Snowden has, in fact, officially accepted Venezuela’s asylum offer.

The bigger question, however, is how Snowden would possibly get to South America if and when the decision is made.

Glenn Greenwald, the Guardian journalist who broke the NSA story after being contacted by Snowden and given access to the NSA documents, said in a video interview that Snowden’s acceptance of Maduro’s offer for aslym was the “most plausible” now available to him.

The bigger issue, said Greenwald, is getting there.

“Figuring out how to get to the country that has offered him asylum without the rogue, lawless empire–that has proven itself willing to engage in rogue behavior–being able to stop him. That’s the challenge,” said Greenwald referring to the episode with Morales’ plane that followed pressure from US amid rumors that Snowden was possibly on board.

Amnesty International and others have called the US attempts to thwart Snowden’s asylum attempts as an affront to international law and a person’s right to seek protection from undue persecution.

_______________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

The Mubarak (Re)turn

0

More deaths in Egypt yesterday — 50 and counting. Some call it a massacre. Is there another word for it?

This prompted Essam el-Erian of the Muslim Brotherhood to demand the reversal of the ‘fascist coup government.’

Meanwhile there was a spirited debate on yesterday’s Democracy Now — when is a coup a coup and what kind of coup means what kind of future.

Everyone is spinning everything. Can the spinning be controlled if the streets become uncontrollable?

Everybody in Egypt is under tremendous strain, including the pundits on all sides. Meanwhile the New York Times reports the election roadmap: there will be amendments to the constitution, then parliamentary elections will be held in February, which will set the stage for Presidential elections in the future. When the Presidential elections will be held is unknown. The Guardian reports the same scenario.

That is, if the country doesn’t slip into civil war.

How likely is civil war? We know that there is no going back. President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood will not be returning to power. What’s up ahead is unknown. Is it possible that the Egyptian army will lose control?

Right now the Presidential election seems a long way off. One can only imagine what might happen during the interim, especially after the coup and the violence yesterday.

Of course, American aid and coordination with Israel is unaffected. The crackdown on the press continues. How are issues to be debated for the upcoming elections if the press is muzzled and dissenters of all stripes are monitored, beaten and jailed? How can Egypt hold together if the press is unmuzzled and dissenters on all sides are allowed to roam free?

Deutsche Welle, Reuter AlertNet and LinkTV report that women are being assaulted and gang raped — as a political tool? For some this might seem ancillary to the debate about the future of Egypt. Perhaps. Or is assault and rape being used as a political weapon of choice to help shape the future?

The Egyptian police are revising their history. They now contend that the Muslim Brotherhood was responsible for the killings in the days before Mubarak’s ouster. The police were innocent. Their point of view: Doesn’t the now deposed traitorous government and the violence of the Muslim Brotherhood prove their innocence?

Egypt is spiraling out of control and only an ever expanding martial law can contain the violence that the army, too, is partaking in and in some case may be instigating. Is there an alternative to ever expanding military control?

Will Egyptian progressives and their supporters continue to justify the army’s expanding powers? Having initially sided with the military, they may have little choice.

A deal will be struck. That deal will be with the Mubarak holdovers in the army, judiciary, moneyed elites and elsewhere that never went away and have now reasserted their power. How future oriented does that sound?

Revolutions hide continuities in tradition, culture and power — for a while. They appear in different guises — for a while. Sometimes they reappear — and remain.

The reality is that the post-Mubarak era is looking more like the pre-Mubarak era that crystallized in the Mubarak era. Whether in the post-Mubarak Mubarak-like era there will be less repression and more freedom is yet to be seen. So far — not so good.

Under martial law, on the brink of civil war, the Presidential elections are a horizon that seems suspended in the distance. How much blood will be shed in the interim and what that bloodshed will mean for the future of Egypt is the great unknown.

Marc H. Ellis is an author, liberation theologian, and Distinguished Visiting Professor, University for Peace, Costa Rica.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Egypt reopens Rafah crossing

0

Egyptian authorities say they have reopened the Rafah crossing on the border with the Gaza Strip for several hours per day.

They said on Tuesday that the decision was made to allow stranded Palestinians return to their homes.

The vital crossing was closed last Friday after armed men fired rocket-propelled grenades at army stations guarding El Arish International Airport and six other police stations including a security checkpoint near the military intelligence station in the border town of Rafah, killing at least one Egyptian soldier and wounding two others.

Some 800 Palestinian people normally leave for Egypt and beyond through the Rafah crossing, the only passageway leading to the rest of the world for most Gazans.

Israel imposed an all-out land, aerial, and naval blockade of the Gaza in June 2007 after the democratically-elected Palestinian resistance movement Hamas took over the administration of the territory.

The Rafah crossing is the Palestinian territory’s only crossing outside Israeli control.

Since last week, Egypt has been the scene of rival rallies and clashes between thousands of the supporters and opponents of the ousted president, Mohamed Morsi.

MAM/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Accused Boston Marathon bomber first court appearance

0

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, alleged Boston Marathon bomber, is about to make his first public appearance in court to have his 30 criminal charges read out to him. More than half of them potentially imply the death penalty for the 19-year-old.

Tsarnaev’s first public appearance in a courtroom comes two weeks
after a Massachusetts federal grand jury returned a 30-count indictment against him. The charges include
using weapons of massive destruction, killing three Boston
Marathon spectators, and also shooting a police officer to death.

The first public court hearing are for the judge to explain
Tsarnaev what penalties exactly he may face. Seventeen of the 30
charges brought against him are capital offences.

Sparing Tsarnaev this worst scenario is believed to be the
biggest challenge faced by his attorney, public defender Miriam
Conrad.

The death penalty was banned in Massachusetts in 1984, but only
for state cases, while Tsarnaev is being charged under federal
law, which means he could still face capital punishment if found
guilty.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, an ethnic Chechen and a US citizen, is accused
of setting off homemade pressure-cooker bombs on April 15 in the
middle of the crowd watching the Boston Marathon, killing three
people and injuring more than 260, with many of the injured
eventually losing their legs. Dzhokhar was allegedly acting
together with his elder brother Tamerlan, 26, who supposedly
masterminded the attack.

Later, while being on the run from police, the brothers allegedly
shot dead an MIT police officer.

After several days of manhunt, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was detained,
following a gun battle with police, in which Tamerlan was killed.
The younger brother, severely wounded was found in a boat in the
suburb of Watertown, Massachusetts.  

The alleged bomber reportedly scribbled his statement on the
inside wall of the boat.

“The US government is killing our innocent civilians,” it
read, as cited by prosecutors. “We Muslims are one body, you
hurt one you hurt us all. Now I don’t like killing innocent
people it is forbidden in Islam but due to said it is allowed.
Stop killing our innocent people and we will stop
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Important Agreements Negotiated in Secret: Help Roll back Corporate Power over EU Trade Policy

0

It is an affront to democracy that the European Union is negotiating international free trade treaties in secret.

While the public are kept in the dark, big corporations are being given privileged access to influence the negotiations in their own interests.

These trade agreements are threatening people’s basic rights to safe food, affordable medicines, a healthy environment and decent work — no wonder the European Commission doesn’t want you to know about them.

Corporate Europe Observatory needs your help to shine a light on these important agreements being negotiated in secret, with big business in the driving seat. Please help us create a more just and transparent EU trade policy.

We have just appealed a court ruling which could deepen the secrecy and corporate influence over the EU’s trade negotiations, at the expense of the wider public interest. But we need your help to raise €5000 to cover our legal costs for the appeal.

We are sueing the European Commission in the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg for withholding information over the ongoing EU-India free trade talks from the public, even though the same information had already been shared with corporate lobby groups. In a ruling delivered in June, the court concluded that the Commission neither violated EU transparency rules nor discriminated against us.

Why are corporate lobby groups allowed access to information that the general public are denied?

We need your donations, however big or small, to be able to successfully appeal this ruling and put an end to the corporate capture of EU trade policy. This is not just about the EU-India free trade talks but the democratic accountability of future EU trade deals in general.

Thank you in advance for your support!

The CEO team

Here’s what others say about our legal action against the Commission

“The EU-India Free Trade Agreement could have adverse consequences for farmers, street vendors, fishers and others who have to survive on meagre income with no or little social security. The unabated power which free trade deals grant giant corporations over agriculture, industry and services needs to be reined in. CEO’s legal action for democratizing the trade policy processes is a significant move in this direction.”

Dharmendra Kumar, Director of India FDI Watch

 “Free Trade Agreements like the proposed EU-US trade pact have a direct impact on the lives of millions of people. It is unacceptable that they are negotiated in the interest of big corporations and in secret. I support CEO’s fight for more openness around EU trade negotiations and against big business being put in the driving seat.”

José Bové, Member of the European Parliament

 “The case brought to court by CEO challenges which documents can be kept away from the public according to EU access rules. It also highlights the power the EU institutions have to discriminate between different actors. This makes the case important not only for understanding ongoing trade talks, but for the fundamental question of democratic accountability as well.”

Republished with permission from: Global Research

The Great EU-India Corporate Heist: Uncovering the Free Trade Agenda

0

The current far-reaching free trade talks between the EU and India are being carried out behind closed doors. People and groups are therefore rightly concerned that proper accountability and effective public scrutiny are being sidelined in favour of a business-led agenda (1) Demands for transparency were however dealt a blow by a recent ruling.

It was discovered a while back that the European Commission (EC) withheld information about the EU-India talks from the public, even though it had already shared the information with corporate lobby groups. These documents include meeting reports, emails and a letter, all of which the EC had sent to large corporate lobby groups. Lobby watchdog Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) had argued that information could not suddenly become confidential, which it did, when a public interest group asked for it (2).

Although the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg recently concluded that the EC did not violate EU rules by doing this (3), CEO has now appealed to the European Court of Justice on the ruling.

In a press release, CEO trade campaigner Pia Eberhardt says:

“The real issue at stake is whether the European Commission can continue negotiating backroom trade deals, together with, and for, a tiny elite of corporate lobby groups. At a time when more and more people fear that trade agreements threaten their basic rights to safe food, affordable medicines, a healthy environment and decent work, we cannot sit by and fail to challenge a ruling that risks legitimising the privileged access that the Commission grants big business over its policies.”

In its appeal, CEO argues that the EU’s General Court made errors in law, including in assessing the role of the Commission’s internal rules on access to documents (4).

The appeal comes as the EU and India are reportedly trying to ink the proposed trade agreement before elections in both regions in 2014. Trade unions, farmers, patients’ organisations and other public interest groups have repeatedly sounded the alarm at the potentially devastating impacts of the deal, particularly on access to medicines, investment and procurement decisions and the livelihoods of Indian farmers and street traders. In effect, the deal could have detrimental implications for hundreds of millions of people in India by leading to the restructuring of much of Indian society for the benefit of foreign corporate interests (5).

This week, the EU and the US are also engaged in their first round of negotiations in Washington for a major trade deal between the two blocks, which bears a the same hallmark of secrecy and a similar template for corporate plunder (6).

Underlining the relevance of the lawsuit for the EU-US trade negotiations, Pia Eberhardt stated:

“For too long, the Commission has negotiated trade agreements in secret and catered for the needs of transnational companies. Corporate Europe Observatory is challenging this complicity, trying to redress the balance in favour of transparency and a trade policy in the interest of the many rather than the few.”

CEO’s appeal will now be reviewed by the European Court of Justice. The European Commission and Germany, which intervened in the case, will then respond in writing. Once the written procedure is declared closed, the European Court of Justice will either set a date for an oral hearing or forego a hearing and issue a ruling.

The EU-India (and EU-US) free trade talks raise two key questions.

Is it right that the EU is negotiating free trade treaties in secret, while the public is kept n the dark?

Is it right that big corporations are being given privileged access to negotiations?

Little wonder that the EC does not want us to know about the negotiations.

Notes

Corporate Europe Observatory has launched a donation call to cover the legal costs of the appeal at: http://corporateeurope.org/civicrm/contribute/transact?reset=1&id=4

1) http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-eu-india-free-trade-agreement-corporate-driven-neocolonial-plunder/5338049

2) In the General Court of the European Union. Application for Annulment of Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory against the European Commission, 15 February 2011. A background article on the case can be downloaded at: http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/files/article/lawsuit_backgrounder.pdf

A report about the hearing, which took place in January 2013 can be found at:http://corporateeurope.org/blog/commission-defends-privileged-access-big-business-court

3) Judgement of the General Court in case T-93/11, 7 June 2013,http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=138132&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=665977

4) Corporate Europe Observatory argues that the General Court made three errors in law: a) in holding that the Commission’s internal rules on handling access-to-documents requests did not produce any external effects — because the rules were transmitted to Corporate Europe Observatory by the Commission and because the rules do have an automatic effect on third parties, as they determine how to deal with requests from third parties; b) in disregarding the presumption that the documents from the Commission were intended to be seen by a large number of people, which is why it was not necessary for Corporate Europe Observatory to demonstrate that the documents had actually be seen by persons other than the initial recipient; c) in holding that there was no implicit waiver of confidentiality when the Commission did not mark documents as confidential — because it would be unworkable for the Commission to protect confidentiality without prior care, once documents had already been sent out without a confidentiality marker.

5) http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-eu-india-free-trade-agreement-india-up-for-sale-to-western-corporate-capital/5332214

6) http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-eu-free-trade-agreement-a-corporate-stitch-up-by-any-other-name/5339789

 

Republished with permission from: Global Research

‘Egypt charges 200 over bloodshed’

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt has charged 200 people over bloodshed on July 8 outside the Republican Guard headquarters in the capital, Cairo, judicial sources say.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

The Great EU-India Corporate Heist: Uncovering the Free Trade Agenda

Global Research and Countercurrents 10/7/2013 and Deccan Herald 13/7/2013

Help fight the secrecy by donating HERE

The current far-reaching free trade talks between the EU and India are being carried out behind closed doors. People and groups are therefore rightly concerned that proper accountability and effective public scrutiny are being sidelined in favour of a business-led agenda (1) Demands for transparency were however dealt a blow by a recent ruling.

It was discovered a while back that the European Commission (EC) withheld information about the EU-India talks from the public, even though it had already shared the information with corporate lobby groups. These documents include meeting reports, emails and a letter, all of which the EC had sent to large corporate lobby groups. Lobby watchdog Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) had argued that information could not suddenly become confidential, which it did, when a public interest group asked for it (2).

Although the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg recently concluded that the EC did not violate EU rules by doing this (3), CEO has now appealed to the European Court of Justice on the ruling.

In a press release, CEO trade campaigner Pia Eberhardt says:

“The real issue at stake is whether the European Commission can continue negotiating backroom trade deals, together with, and for, a tiny elite of corporate lobby groups. At a time when more and more people fear that trade agreements threaten their basic rights to safe food, affordable medicines, a healthy environment and decent work, we cannot sit by and fail to challenge a ruling that risks legitimising the privileged access that the Commission grants big business over its policies.” 

In its appeal, CEO argues that the EU’s General Court made errors in law, including in assessing the role of the Commission’s internal rules on access to documents (4).

The appeal comes as the EU and India are reportedly trying to ink the proposed trade agreement before elections in both regions in 2014. Trade unions, farmers, patients’ organisations and other public interest groups have repeatedly sounded the alarm at the potentially devastating impacts of the deal, particularly on access to medicines, investment and procurement decisions and the livelihoods of Indian farmers and street traders. In effect, the deal could have detrimental implications for hundreds of millions of people in India by leading to the restructuring of much of Indian society for the benefit of foreign corporate interests (5).

This week, the EU and the US are also engaged in their first round of negotiations in Washington for a major trade deal between the two blocks, which bears a the same hallmark of secrecy and a similar template for corporate plunder (6).

Underlining the relevance of the lawsuit for the EU-US trade negotiations, Pia Eberhardt stated:

“For too long, the Commission has negotiated trade agreements in secret and catered for the needs of transnational companies. Corporate Europe Observatory is challenging this complicity, trying to redress the balance in favour of transparency and a trade policy in the interest of the many rather than the few.” 

CEO’s appeal will now be reviewed by the European Court of Justice. The European Commission and Germany, which intervened in the case, will then respond in writing. Once the written procedure is declared closed, the European Court of Justice will either set a date for an oral hearing or forego a hearing and issue a ruling.

The EU-India (and EU-US) free trade talks raise two key questions.

Is it right that the EU is negotiating free trade treaties in secret, while the public is kept n the dark?

Is it right that big corporations are being given privileged access to negotiations?

Little wonder that the EC does not want us to know about the negotiations.

Notes 

Corporate Europe Observatory has launched a donation call to cover the legal costs of the appeal at: http://corporateeurope.org/civicrm/contribute/transact?reset=1&id=4

1) http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-eu-india-free-trade-agreement-corporate-driven-neocolonial-plunder/5338049

2) In the General Court of the European Union. Application for Annulment of Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory against the European Commission, 15 February 2011.

A background article on the case can be downloaded at: http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/files/article/lawsuit_backgrounder.pdf

A report about the hearing, which took place in January 2013 can be found at: :http://corporateeurope.org/blog/commission-defends-privileged-access-big-business-court

3) Judgement of the General Court in case T-93/11, 7 June 2013, http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf text=&docid=138132&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=665977

4) Corporate Europe Observatory argues that the General Court made three errors in law: a) in holding that the Commission’s internal rules on handling access-to-documents requests did not produce any external effects — because the rules were transmitted to Corporate Europe Observatory by the Commission and because the rules do have an automatic effect on third parties, as they determine how to deal with requests from third parties; b) in disregarding the presumption that the documents from the Commission were intended to be seen by a large number of people, which is why it was not necessary for Corporate Europe Observatory to demonstrate that the documents had actually be seen by persons other than the initial recipient; c) in holding that there was no implicit waiver of confidentiality when the Commission did not mark documents as confidential — because it would be unworkable for the Commission to protect confidentiality without prior care, once documents had already been sent out without a confidentiality marker.

5) http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-eu-india-free-trade-agreement-india-up-for-sale-to-western-corporate-capital/5332214

6) http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-eu-free-trade-agreement-a-corporate-stitch-up-by-any-other-name/5339789

"Stasi-Like": Obama's Program to Thwart Unwanted Leaks Not Only Creepy, It Won't Work

0

(Image: Danny Dougherty/McClatchy Washington Bureau)What’s worse than a government program that “creates a culture of intimidation,” “represses creative thinking,” and acts to subvert the protections offered by the First and Fourth Amendments of the constitution?

Well, according to the growing number of critics of a White House program that asks government workers to spy on their colleagues, one that does all those things while also damaging the instituitions the program is deisgned to protect. Namely, the government itself and the democratic principles which uphold it.

Following on their groundbreaking report that exposed an internal Obama administration program designed to thwart would-be leakers by having goverment employees keep tabs on their co-workers, McClatchy reporters have now published a follow-up which shows the plan, codenamed Insider Threat, is not only “creepy” and misguided but not “even likely to work.”

The existence of the Insider Threat program was first revealed by the news outlet last month and came amid the growing controversy caused by the revelations generated by leaked NSA documents that gave a detailed look at the mass surveillance being conducted on US citizens and people all over the world by the US intelligence agency.

In the debate that followed, many critics of the Obama administration pointed out that their pursuit of whistleblowers who leak, or discuss with reporters, information that reflects poorly on the US government’s intelligence apparatus has been the most aggressive in modern history.

In addition to its ongiong determination to bring recent NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden back to the US for prosecution for his disclosures, the Insider Threat program is seen as the icing on the cake of this trend.

As McClatchy reports:

In an initiative aimed at rooting out future leakers and other security violators, President Barack Obama has ordered federal employees to report suspicious actions of their colleagues based on behavioral profiling techniques that are not scientifically proven to work, according to experts and government documents.

The techniques are a key pillar of the Insider Threat Program, an unprecedented government-wide crackdown under which millions of federal bureaucrats and contractors must watch out for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers. Those who fail to report them could face penalties, including criminal charges.

Obama mandated the program in an October 2011 executive order after Army Pfc. Bradley Manning downloaded hundreds of thousands of documents from a classified computer network and gave them to WikiLeaks, the anti-government secrecy group. The order covers virtually every federal department and agency, including the Peace Corps, the Department of Education and others not directly involved in national security.

Critics of the program immediately condemned it, saying Obama’s reaction to the existence of whistleblowers has done more harm to liberty than any of the revelations made public by the government whistleblowers.

As Digby, a commentor on national affairs, wrote on her blog following McClatchy’s original story on Insider Threat:

This government paranoia and informant culture is about as corrosive to the idea of freedom as it gets. The workplace is already rife with petty jealousies, and singular ambition— it’s a human organization after all. Adding in this sort of incentive structure is pretty much setting up a system for intimidation and abuse.

And, as with all informant systems, especially ones that “profile” for certain behaviors deemed to be a threat to the state, only the most conformist will thrive. It’s a recipe for disaster if one is looking for any kind of dynamic, creative thinking. Clearly, that is the last these creepy bureaucrats want.

This is the direct result of a culture of secrecy that seems to be pervading the federal government under president Obama. He is not the first president to expand the national security state , nor is he responsible for the bipartisan consensus on national security or the ongoing influence of the Military Industrial Complex.This, however, is different. And he should be individually held to account for this policy.

Beyond the widely shared criticism of the Obama program on these grounds, what McClatchy’s latest reporting reveals is that Insider Threat, according to experts, won’t even give the government its desired results. They report:

…current and former U.S. officials and experts worry that Obama’s Insider Threat Program could lead to false or retaliatory accusations across the entire government, in part because security officials are granted access to information outside their usual purview.

These current and former U.S. officials and experts also ridiculed as overly zealous and simplistic the idea of using reports of suspicious behavior to predict potential insider threats. It takes years for professional spy-hunters to learn their craft, and relying on the observations of inexperienced people could lead to baseless and discriminatory investigations, they said.

“Anyone is an amateur looking at behavior here,” said Thomas Fingar, a former State Department intelligence chief who chaired the National Intelligence Council, which prepares top-secret intelligence analyses for the president, from 2005 to 2008.

Co-workers, Fingar said, should “be attentive” to colleagues’ personal problems in order to refer them to counseling, not to report them as potential security violators. “It’s simply because they are colleagues, fellow human beings,” he said.

Eric Feldman, a former inspector general of the National Reconnaissance Office, the super-secret agency that oversees U.S. spy satellites, expressed concern that relying on workers to report colleagues’ suspicious behaviors to security officials could create “a repressive kind of culture.”

“The answer to it is not to have a Stasi-like response,” said Feldman, referring to the feared secret police of communist East Germany. “You’ve removed that firewall between employees seeking help and the threat that any employee who seeks help could be immediately retaliated against by this insider threat office.”

__________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Egypt orders arrest of MB leaders

0

Egypt prosecutor has ordered the arrest of Muslim Brotherhood leaders including the supreme leader of the group, Mohammed Badie, on charges of inciting violence on July 8 outside the Republican Guard headquarters in the capital, Cairo, where 55 people were killed and many more were injured.

MAM/SS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Giant Banks Take Over Real Economy As Well As Financial System. Manipulation On a Vast Scale

0

Big Banks Move Into Uranium Mining, Petroleum Products, Aluminum, Ownership and Operation Of Airports, Toll Roads, and Ports, and Electricity

Top economists, financial experts and bankers say that the big banks are too large … and their very size is threatening the economy.

They say we need to break up the big banks to stabilize the economy.

They say that too much interconnectedness leads to financial instability.

They also say that the big financial players are able to manipulate virtually every market in the world.

But the big banks have only gotten bigger — and more interconnected — than before the phony financial “reform” legislation was passed a couple of years ago.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, four congressmen point out that the big banks are not taking over the tangible economy as well … which allows them to control and manipulate the markets.

Specifically, Congressman Grayson wrote — and Congressmen Conyers, Ellison and Grijalva co-signed — a letter to the Federal Reserve which, in the words of a congressional aide:

Ask[ed] why large banks are engaged in a host of commercial activities, including power production, management of ports, oil drilling and distribution, and uranium mining. These activities have nothing to do with the business of banking and it’s unclear how the Fed or other bank regulators can actually regulate them. There’s useful and somewhat crazy information in the 10Ks of the banks about what they are currently doing. You can find that in the footnotes of the letter.

Here is their letter:

June 27, 2013

The Honorable Ben Bernanke
Chairman
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
20th Street and Constitution Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20551

Dear Chairman Bernanke,

We write in regards to the expansion of large banks into what had traditionally been non-financial commercial spheres. Specifically, we are concerned about how large banks have recently expanded their businesses into such fields as electric power production, oil refining and distribution, owning and operating of public assets such as ports and airports, and even uranium mining. [Isn’t that a national security issue?]

Here are a few examples. Morgan Stanley imported 4 million barrels of oil and petroleum products into the United States in June, 2012.[i] Goldman Sachs stores aluminum in vast warehouses in Detroit as well as serving as a commodities derivatives dealer.[ii] This “bank” is also expanding into the ownership and operation of airports, toll roads, and ports.[iii] JP Morgan markets electricity in California.

In other words, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and Morgan Stanley are no longer just banks — they have effectively become oil companies, port and airport operators, commodities dealers, and electric utilities as well. This is causing unforeseen problems for the industrial sector of the economy. For example, Coca Cola has filed a complaint with the London Metal Exchange that Goldman Sachs was hoarding aluminum. JP Morgan is currently being probed by regulators for manipulating power prices in California, where the “bank” was marketing electricity from power plants it controlled. We don’t know what other price manipulation could be occurring due to potential informational advantages accruing to derivatives dealers who also market and sell commodities. The long shadow of Enron could loom in these activities.

According to legal scholar Saule Omarova, over the past five years, there has been a “quiet transformation of U.S. financial holding companies.” These financial services companies have become global merchants that seek to extract rent from any commercial or financial business activity within their reach.[iv] They have used legal authority in Graham-Leach-Bliley to subvert the “foundational principle of separation of banking from commerce”. This shift has many consequences for our economy, and for bank regulators. We wonder how the Federal Reserve is responding to this shift.

It seems like there is a significant macro-economic risk in having a massive entity like, say JP Morgan, both issuing credit cards and mortgages, managing municipal bond offerings, selling gasoline and electric power, running large oil tankers, trading derivatives, and owning and operating airports, in multiple countries. Such a dramatic intertwining of the industrial economy and supply chain with the financial system creates systemic risk, since there is effectively no regulatory entity that can oversee what is happening within these sprawling global entities.

Our questions are as follows:

1)     What is the Federal Reserve’s current position with respect to allowing Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to continue trading in physical commodities and holding commodity-related assets after the expiration of the statutory grace period during which they, as newly registered bank holding companies, must conform all of their activities to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956? What is the legal justification for this position?

2)     Has the Federal Reserve been investigating the full range of risks, costs, and benefits — to the national economy and broader society — of allowing these institutions (and, possibly, other large financial holding companies) to engage in trade intermediation and commercial activities that go far beyond pure financial services? If so, please share the results of your investigation. If not, why not?

3)     What types of data do you collect about the regulated financial holding companies’ non-financial activities? How does the Federal Reserve interact with non-bank regulators who are in charge of overseeing the areas and markets in which banking institutions conduct their non-financial activities?

4)     How do your examiners review, monitor, and evaluate banking organizations’ management of potential conflicts of interest between their physical commodity businesses and their derivatives trading?

5)     If such an entity were to become insolvent, what complications are likely to arise in resolving a company with such a range of activities? Please share your analysis on the implications of resolution authority on the commercial activities of systemically important financial institutions. Please describe how these banks approach this issue in their resolution plans (or “living wills”).

6)     When your examiners work within these large institutions, what framework do they use to, say, consider the possibility that a bank run could ensue from a massive public oil spill by a Goldman Sachs-owned oil tanker or a nuclear accident at a plant owned by a bank?

7)     Does this relatively new corporate structure contribute to the likelihood of industrial supply shocks?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Alan Grayson

Raul Grijalva

John Conyers

Keith Ellison

Notes

[i] http://www.morganstanley.com/about/ir/shareholder/10k2012/10k2012.pdf

Morgan Stanley, according to its investment documents, is engaged “in the production, storage, transportation, marketing and trading of several commodities, including metals (base a nd precious), agricultural products, crude oil, oil products, natural gas, electric power, emission credits, coal, freight, liquefied natural gas and related products and indices. In addition, we are an electricity power marketer in the U.S. and own electricity generating facilities in the U.S. and Europe; we own TransMontaigne Inc. and its subsidiaries, a group of companies operating in the refined petroleum products marketing and distribution business; and we own a minority interest in Heidmar Holdings LLC, which owns a group of companies that provide international marine transportation and U.S. marine logistics services.”

[ii] http://www.goldmansachs.com/investor-relations/financials/current/10k/2012-10-K.pdf

Goldman Sachs, according to its own recent investment reports, is engaged in “the production, storage, transportation, marketing and trading of numerous commodities, including crude oil, oil products, natural gas, electric power, agricultural products, metals (base and precious), minerals (including uranium), emission credits, coal, freight, liquefied natural gas and related products and indices.”

[iii] ibid

[iv] “The Merchants of Wall Street: Banking, Commerce, and Commodities” Omarova, Saule, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2180647&download=yes

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Egypt: A Pendulum of Chaos

0

What is happening in Egypt? Is the overthrow of the country’s Islamist president a symbol of American failure? Will the military’s rise to power, followed by a new, perhaps secular government, help to normalize the situation?

When Mubarak was toppled, the military made no move to intervene. And this was despite the fact that as a result of his ouster the army’s top brass lost power, and a large number of senior officers were later dismissed by President Morsi. But the army did not defend Mubarak. He was “surrendered” in exchange for the military elite’s peace of mind: there were several forced resignations, but no trials or reprisals. In the coup that forced out Mubarak, the Islamists “stifled” the secular element of society and became the main force behind this political “change of course.”

But the goal of the global elites is to see Chaos in Egypt, as well as throughout the Middle East. Thus, society’s secular element is now supposed to “bring down” the Islamists. But secular, “European” Egyptians are less passionate than the Islamist radicals. They need support. The support for the Islamists who unseated Mubarak came from the West (money, weapons, instructions and information). But 18 months later the West cannot refuse to support other forces in Egypt, because in a year or two it will again be necessary to throw out the secular “European” Egyptians.

This means that the army was needed to support the secular element of society against the Islamists. And this support was not long in coming. Ultimatums were issued to the president, weapons were used to attack the demonstrators supporting President Morsi, and in general the conduct of the West was in keeping with the best traditions of the 19th and early 20th centuries, when no one gave any thought to human rights, and only sober, undisguised realpolitik held sway.

In other words, the army was afraid to defend one legitimate president, but now has shown it is not afraid to depose another legitimate president. Where did such courage come from? Or has the Egyptian military heard nothing about the court in The Hague? Have they not seen the videos of Saddam’s hanging?

And what is the reaction of the West to this military coup d’état? None at all. Bashar al-Assad’s rule was declared illegitimate, although no one had stripped him of power. But the Egyptian military has arrested a president whom the whole world viewed as legitimate, and no reaction is seen from the West.

Why? What’s going on?

This is the Pendulum of Chaos. Secular forces will take power in order to lose it after a period of time in favor of the even-more-radicalized Islamists. And so this pendulum will swing in order to further the wild oscillation of the forces of Chaos. Like a seesaw.

egypt-flagAnd now a few words about economics and “the price of freedom.”Revolutions never solve any economic problems, they only aggravate them. During this “time of change” in Egypt, the country’s foreign-exchange reserves have been practically wiped out and its grain reserves are once again getting dangerously low. But this time there is no hard currency to buy more abroad.

In May 2011, there was a remark in Russian press: “The victory of democracy in this Arab country is already demonstrating its first fruits. Egypt is running out of food. Along with “freedom,” the bankruptcy of the nation is knocking at the door of the Egyptian government. War will be the next to knock.”

The result of Egypt’s “democratization” is its rapidly expanding debt.

The Russian news agency Novosti wrote earlier this week: “What prevented the Egyptian military from appointing competent people to the government during those 16 months when they were in power before Morsi was elected? And now, when the Egyptian president has accepted billions of dollars from his Arab neighbors (and spurned loans from the IMF), no meritocracy will be able to repay them.” (link in Russian)

Egypt has borrowed money from its Arab neighbors. Now there has been a change in power and the “new Egypt” will accept loans from the IMF. Tomorrow power will change hands again, and the latest “new Egypt” will once again accept loans from its Arab neighbors. The Pendulum of Chaos.

Ultimately, the chaos magnifies with each political takeover. The situation is only deteriorating — Egypt is in debt and no one is truly in power.

The Egyptian military became the agent of outside forces that wanted to destabilize the country. Because this situation is being deliberately rockedto make the Pendulum of Chaos swing ever wider, Egypt will cease to exist as player on the political stage of the Middle East. I doubt anyone needs me to specify who will benefit from these developments.

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Adam Kokesh Raided By “Storm Trooper” Cops

0

Police smash into residence of gun activist, deploy flash bang grenade

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
July 10, 2013

Days after Adam Kokesh staged an open carry protest by loading a shotgun in Washington DC, “storm trooper” police raided the former Marine’s home last night, smashing in his door and deploying a flash bang grenade before arresting Kokesh.

According to a press release issued by Kokesh’s Adam vs the Man media team, “Numerous police vehicles, including a light armored vehicle and two low-flying helicopters barricaded Adam’s street. More than 20 armored SWAT team members surrounded the house, as well as a number of detectives, and plainclothes officers. Assault rifles were aimed on all members of the team as they were handcuffed without being told why they were detained. Masked and armored police in full “Storm Trooper” gear flooded in and ransacked the residence. The team was cordoned in a front room, while Adam was pulled aside for questioning.”

Roads around Kokesh’s home, which also contains his broadcast studio, were blocked off and other residents were told to stay indoors. The raid was conducted by Herndon police as well as US Parks Police, an arm of Homeland Security.

Kokesh’s team alleges that police also assaulted Kokesh by kicking him to the floor when he politely asked to use the bathroom. Throughout the ordeal “police repeatedly showed a volatile desire to initiate aggressive, forceful conduct with detainees,” according to the press release.

Cops searched every corner of the residence while confiscating cellphones and personal items “with force”. A safe inside the residence was also forced open and the contents seized.

At around midnight, over four hours after the raid began, police left the premises and Kokesh was taken to Fairfax County Adult Detention Center.

“The ADAM VS THE MAN Team will be continuing production on the podcast and the Youtube channel as long as Adam remains imprisoned for an act of civil disobedience. We will continue to spread the message of liberty, self ownership, and the non-aggression principle regardless of the government’s relentless attacks on our operation. We will continue to combat its desperate attempts to crush a worldwide, revolutionary shift in the people’s understanding of the state’s illegitimacy–after all, good ideas don’t require force,” states the press release.

The incident took place just hours after Kokesh had recorded an interview with Alex Jones for Infowars Nightly News.

The image above shows where police smashed in the door to Kokesh’s residence and deployed a flash bang grenade. According to Kokesh’s team, “The officers used a battering ram to knock in the door after two knocks, and did not announce that they had a warrant.”

The raid followed the publishing of a YouTube video on July 4 in which Kokesh is seen to load a 12 gauge shotgun before announcing “We are the final American revolution. See you next Independence Day.”

The video was filmed at Freedom Plaza, just down the street from the White House. Under DC law, it is illegal to carry firearms in public and Kokesh could face up to five years in a federal prison.

Kokesh’s roommate Darryl Young pointed out that whereas Virginia allows open carry, in DC only politicians are allowed to protect themselves with guns.

“The point is we have the right to bear arms in all states,” he said. “We shouldn’t set standards of laws by imaginary lines called borders. In the state of Virginia, it’s an open carry state where you can legally open carry, but in the District [of Columbia], the only people allowed to walk with firearms are the criminals themselves.”

In June 2008, the Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Heller v. District of Columbia, ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms and that the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 is unconstitutional. However, authorities in DC have largely ignored the ruling and still impose draconian measures on anyone who wants to own a firearm.

The image above shows that media trucks were in place to broadcast news of the raid almost instantly. “How nice of the police to tell the media before we got raided,” states Kokesh’s Facebook page.

Kokesh’s open carry protest stemmed out of his call for a “new American revolution” that would have involved a march on all 50 state capitols. The former Iraq vet had previously planned to lead an armed march on Washington DC on Independence Day.

Kokesh later revised the plan after he was arrested in May for little more than exercising his First Amendment at a pro-marijuana legalization rally in Philadelphia. “When it comes to this event being executed properly,” Kokesh told the Alex Jones Show, “when the government has already escalated the violent tactics against me personally as an organizer, I can’t in good conscience go forward with a plan that is so centrally dependent and not open source.”

Kokesh’s supporters are urging people call the US Parks Police non-emergency number at (202) 619 7105 to demand Adam’s release “and that charges be placed on the individuals that committed a B&E, vandalism, destruction of property, theft, and kidnapped Adam at our home.”

The YouTube video that pre-empted the raid can be viewed below.

Kokesh also appeared as a guest on Infowars Nightly News with Alex Jones just hours before the raid.

Kokesh also appeared on the Alex Jones Show on Monday to discuss his DC open carry protest.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 5:45 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Denouncing NSA Surveillance Isn’t Enough – We Need the Power to Stop It

0

For more than a month, outrage has been profuse in response to news about NSA surveillance and other evidence that all three branches of the U.S. government are turning Uncle Sam into Big Brother.

Now what?Continuing to expose and denounce the assaults on civil liberties is essential. So is supporting Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and other whistleblowers – past, present and future. But those vital efforts are far from sufficient.

For a moment, walk a mile in the iron-heeled shoes of the military-industrial-digital complex. Its leaders don’t like clarity about what they’re doing, and they certainly don’t like being exposed or denounced – but right now the surveillance state is in no danger of losing what it needs to keep going: power.

The huge digi-tech firms and the government have become mutual tools for gaining humungous profits and tightening political control. The partnerships are deeply enmeshed in military and surveillance realms, whether cruise missiles and drones or vast metadata records and capacities to squirrel away trillions of emails.

At the core of the surveillance state is the hollowness of its democratic pretenses. Only with authentic democracy can we save ourselves from devastating evisceration of the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

The enormous corporate leverage over government policies doesn’t change the fact that the nexus of the surveillance state – and the only organization with enough potential torque to reverse its anti-democratic trajectory – is government itself.

The necessity is to subdue the corporate-military forces that have so extensively hijacked the government. To do that, we’ll need to accomplish what progressives are currently ill-positioned for: democratic mobilization to challenge the surveillance state’s hold on power.

These days, progressives are way too deferential and nice to elected Democrats who should be confronted for their active or passive complicity with abysmal policies of the Obama White House. An example is Al Franken, senator from Minnesota, who declared his support for the NSA surveillance program last month: “I can assure you, this is not about spying on the American people.”

 The right-wing Tea Party types realized years ago what progressive activists and groups are much less likely to face – that namby-pamby “lobbying” gets much weaker results than identifying crucial issues and making clear a willingness to mount primary challenges.

Progressives should be turning up the heat and building electoral capacities. But right now, many Democrats in Congress are cakewalking toward re-election in progressive districts where they should be on the defensive for their anemic “opposition” to – or outright support for – NSA surveillance.

Meanwhile, such officials with national profiles should encounter progressive pushback wherever they go. A step in that direction will happen just north of the Golden Gate Bridge this weekend, when House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi appears as guest of honor to raise money for the party (up to $32,400 per couple) at a Marin County reception. There will also be a different kind of reception that Pelosi hadn’t been counting on — a picket line challenging her steadfast support for NSA surveillance.

In the first days of this week, upwards of 20,000 people responded to a RootsAction.org action alert by sending their senators and representative an email urging an end to the Insider Threat Program – the creepily Orwellian concoction that, as McClatchy news service revealed last month, “requires federal employees to keep closer tabs on their co-workers and exhorts managers to punish those who fail to report their suspicions.”

Messages to Congress members, vocal protests and many other forms of public outcry are important – but they should lay the groundwork for much stronger actions to wrest control of the government away from the military-industrial-digital complex. That may seem impossible, but it’s certainly imperative: if we’re going to prevent the destruction of civil liberties. In the long run, denunciations of the surveillance state will mean little unless we can build the political capacity to end it.

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.”

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Ecuador censures the British on Assange

0

Ecuadorian Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino has criticized British authorities for not allowing WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

Patino said in an interview that British officials were Å“making a big mistake” by not letting the founder of the whistleblowing website out of his nationâ„¢s embassy in the UKâ„¢s capital, RIA Novosti reports Wednesday.

Å“Possibly some day Britain will realize that it is making a big mistake and violates human rights in regard to someone, who deserves freedom,” the Ecuadorian foreign minister is cited as adding in an interview with Democracynow news portal.

The 41-year-old Assange has sought refuge at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since June to avoid his extradition to Sweden, where he faces alleged criminal charges that he rejects as politically motivated.

Patino further said that in a recent conversation with his British counterpart William Hague he asked him about what Britain was waiting for regarding Assange. Å“Are you waiting for Assange to get old and die in our embassy?”

Although Assange was granted asylum in Ecuador in August, he faces arrest if he steps out of Ecuadorâ„¢s embassy building in London.

Assanges whistleblowing site leaked hundreds of thousands of American diplomatic cables in 2010, thereby making an enemy of the US government.

US authorities, meanwhile, have never ruled out an effort to seek his extradition from Sweden.

MFB/MFB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

The NSA Has Inserted Its Code Into Android OS, Or Three Quarters Of All Smartphones

0

Zero Hedge
July 10, 2013

Over a decade ago, it was discovered that the NSA embedded backdoor access into Windows 95, and likely into virtually all other subsequent internet connected, desktop-based operating systems. However, with the passage of time, more and more people went “mobile”, and as a result the NSA had to adapt. And adapt they have: as Bloomberg reports, “The NSA is quietly writing code for Google’s Android OS.”

Is it ironic that the same “don’t be evil” Google which went to such great lengths in the aftermath of the Snowden scandal to wash its hands of snooping on its customers and even filed a request with the secretive FISA court asking permission to disclose more information about the government’s data requests, is embedding NSA code into its mobile operating system, which according to IDC runs on three-quarters of all smartphones shipped in the first quarter? Yes, yes it is.

Google spokeswoman Gina Scigliano confirms that the company has already inserted some of the NSA’s programming in Android OS. “All Android code and contributors are publicly available for review at source.android.com.” Scigliano says, declining to comment further.

From Bloomberg:

Through its open-source Android project, Google has agreed to incorporate code, first developed by the agency in 2011, into future versions of its mobile operating system, which according to market researcher IDC runs on three-quarters of the smartphones shipped globally in the first quarter. NSA officials say their code, known as Security Enhancements for Android, isolates apps to prevent hackers and marketers from gaining access to personal or corporate data stored on a device.Eventually all new phones, tablets, televisions, cars, and other devices that rely on Android will include NSA code, agency spokeswoman Vanee’ Vines said in an e-mailed statement. NSA researcher Stephen Smalley, who works on the program, says, “Our goal is to raise the bar in the security of commodity mobile devices.”

See, there’s no need to worry: the reason the NSA is generously providing the source code for every Google-based smartphone is for your own security. Oh but it’s open-sourced, so someone else will intercept any and all attempts at malice. We forgot.

The story continues:

In a 2011 presentation obtained by Bloomberg Businessweek, Smalley listed among the benefits of the program that it’s “normally invisible to users.” The program’s top goal, according to that presentation: “Improve our understanding of Android security.”

Well one wouldn’t want their bug to be visible to users now, would one…

Vines wouldn’t say whether the agency’s work on Android and other software is part of or helps with Prism. “The source code is publicly available for anyone to use, and that includes the ability to review the code line by line,” she said in her statement. Most of the NSA’s suggested additions to the operating system can already be found buried in Google’s latest release–on newer devices including Sony’s Xperia Z, HTC’s One, and Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy S4. Although the features are not turned on by default, according to agency documentation, future versions will be. In May the Pentagon approved the use of smartphones and tablets that run Samsung’s mobile enterprise software, Knox, which also includes NSA programming, the company wrote in a June white paper. Sony, HTC, and Samsung declined to comment.

Apple appears to be immune from this unprecedented breach of customer loyalty, if only for now, although open-sourced Linux may not be as lucky:

“Apple (AAPL) does not accept source code from any government agencies for any of our operating systems or other products,” says Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for the company. It’s not known if any other proprietary operating systems are using NSA code.SE for Android is an offshoot of a long-running NSA project called Security-Enhanced Linux. That code was integrated a decade ago into the main version of the open-source operating system, the server platform of choice for Internet leaders including Google, Facebook (FB), and Yahoo! (YHOO). Jeff Zemlin, the executive director of the Linux Foundation, says the NSA didn’t add any obvious means of eavesdropping. “This code was peer-reviewed by a lot of people,” he says.

But that’s not all:

The NSA developed a separate Android project because Google’s mobile OS required markedly different programming, according to Smalley’s 2011 presentation. Brian Honan, an information technology consultant in Dublin, says his clients in European governments and multinational corporations are worried about how vulnerable their data are when dealing with U.S. companies. The information security world had been preoccupied with Chinese hacking until recently, Honan says. “With Prism, the same accusations can be laid against the U.S. government.”

In short: the (big brother supervised) fun never stops in Stasi 2.0 world. Just buy your 100 P/E stocks, eat your burgers, watch your Dancing With The Stars, pay your taxes, and engage in as much internet contact with other internet-addicted organisms as possible and all shall be well.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 5:25 am

Tags: , , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

The Core Problem: Corruption Skyrockets Globally

1

Washington’s Blog
July 10, 2013

We’ve extensively documented that institutional corruption in the United States has led to a collapse in trust … which is hurting the economy.

And that the same thing is happening worldwide:

And that .

CBS News reports today:

According to a survey released Tuesday [by the international anti-corruption watchdog Transparency International], a majority of people across the globe feel that corruption has worsened in their countries, and that their governments are ineffective in combating it.

According to the survey, more than one in four people reported paying a bribe in the past year.

***

The survey asked respondents to rate the corruption level of their countries’ institutions on a one-to-five scale, in which five meant “extremely corrupt.”

Political parties were considered to be the most corrupt globally, with an average score of 3.8 out of 5.

“As political parties require money in order to run their campaigns, one of the big corruption risks for political parties is how they are funded,” Transparency International wrote in its report. “The interests of the people and organizations that fund political parties can have a large influence on the actions of those parties.”

Transparency International’s “Global Corruption Barometer” asked respondents to rate institutions on a corruption scale./ Transparency International

Political parties fared worse in the United States, where the 1,000 respondents surveyed gave them a corruption score of 4.1.

Globally, police came in a close second, with a corruption score of 3.7. Nearly a third of respondents who came into contact with police reported having paid a bribe.

***

And while 53 percent of respondents felt corruption had increased in the last two years, a majority also believed that their governments couldn’t fix the problem. According to the report, 54 percent of respondents view government as ineffective in combating corruption, up from the 47 percent recorded in Transparency International’s 2010-2011 survey.

“When there is widespread belief that corruption prevails and that the powerful in particular are able to get away with it, people lose faith in those entrusted with power,” Transparency International said.

In the survey, 54 percent of respondents felt that governments largely run for the benefit of self-interested groups. In the U.S., 64 percent said the government is run by a few big interests, compared with 5 percent who felt the same in Norway, and 83 percent in Greece.

CNN Money notes:

“The majority of people around the world believe that their government is ineffective at fighting corruption and corruption in their country is getting worse,” Transparency International said in the report, which was based on a survey of 114,000 people in 107 countries.

***

The surveys suggest that corruption cuts across societies and demographics.

***

“Impunity is anathema to the fight against corruption and, especially in the judiciary and law enforcement sectors, is a direct challenge to the rule of law,” the group said.

 

Obama Orders Fed Workers to Spy on Each Other

0

Jonathan S. Landay and Marisa Taylor
McClatchy
July 10, 2013

In an initiative aimed at rooting out future leakers and other security violators, President Barack Obama has ordered federal employees to report suspicious actions of their colleagues based on behavioral profiling techniques that are not scientifically proven to work, according to experts and government documents.

The techniques are a key pillar of the Insider Threat Program, an unprecedented government-wide crackdown under which millions of federal bureaucrats and contractors must watch out for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers. Those who fail to report them could face penalties, including criminal charges.

[…]

Under the program, which is being implemented with little public attention, security investigations can be launched when government employees showing “indicators of insider threat behavior” are reported by co-workers, according to previously undisclosed administration documents obtained by McClatchy. Investigations also can be triggered when “suspicious user behavior” is detected by computer network monitoring and reported to “insider threat personnel.”

Federal employees and contractors are asked to pay particular attention to the lifestyles, attitudes and behaviors — like financial troubles, odd working hours or unexplained travel — of co-workers as a way to predict whether they might do “harm to the United States.”

Managers of special insider threat offices will have “regular, timely, and, if possible, electronic, access” to employees’ personnel, payroll, disciplinary and “personal contact” files, as well as records of their use of classified and unclassified computer networks, polygraph results, travel reports and financial disclosure forms.

Full article here

Exclusive: San Francisco jetliner crash caused by airlines turning pilots into ‘computer geeks who can’t fly’ says commercial pilot

0

Mike Adams
Natural News
July 10, 2013

When flight 214 crashed last week at the San Francisco airport, killing two people and injuring dozens, many people were in a state of disbelief. How could a Boeing 777 – the “Titanic” of commercial airliners – be piloted so carelessly that the pilot seemingly flew it into the seawall and caused the accident?

But that’s the problem, you see: There are no more pilots flying these planes. The real pilots have nearly all retired, leaving a bunch of “computer geeks” who have almost no flying skills and only know how to operate the computerized, automated flight equipment which is subject to catastrophic failure.

That’s what “Pilot X” told me in a phone interview. His identity is being secret for his own protection, but he recently retired from over two decades of flying Boeing’s largest aircraft for major U.S. airlines. He has received more actual flight time than 99% of today’s active commercial pilots, and he’s an expert in Boeing flight automation equipment. His testimony, below, reveals insider details that only a real commercial pilot would know.

Airlines are trying to dumb down the pilots

“The bigger the plane, the worse the pilot,” he told me. “The airlines are trying to dumb down most of the entire fleet, and the pilots are losing all their flying skills. They don’t want pilots; they want computer geeks instead of someone who can actually fly. The stick-and-rudder skills go to hell in a hand basket when you don’t actually fly the plane.”

The SFO flight 214 accident was likely caused by the pilot relying on the auto-throttle, Pilot X explained to me. “There’s too much reliance on the auto-throttle. If you’re a real pilot, you can do much better than the auto-throttle by running the power yourself to stay in line with whatever approach you’re making.”

The other pilot on the flight deck was also partially responsible for failing to do his job, I was told:

“The non-flying pilot was not using CRM (crew resources management) where you call out the controls and altitude all the way down. They also had the glide slope switched off, and those two runways are too close together to be doing real close approaches.”

“The pilot was probably being trained to use the auto pilot and auto throttle instead of developing his pilot skills. Probably within 5 or 10 hours [with the plane] he should have been able to hand fly the airplane, but they don’t teach that anymore; they teach people to be button pushers instead of pilots.”

Accident was made worse by an air traffic control scheme called a “slam dunk”

“The air traffic controllers do what they call a slam dunk,” Pilot X continued. “They make you go fast [during the approach], they are trying to move numbers instead of safety. They are trying to slam dunk everybody and push airplanes through as quickly as they can to get the next one on the ground instead of worrying about spacing, which should be increased. Sometimes it causes you to exceed your flap speed and limitations on the airplane for their convenience instead of what you should be doing as a pilot.”

Expect to see huge increases in the number of air travel accidents

“I see a big increase in the number of aviation accidents in the future,” Pilot X told me. “The FAA is just as corrupt as airline management. They’re all pushing numbers instead of developing pilot skills.”

“As far as air traffic control goes, they’re one of the biggest threats to aviation right now. Most of the senior controllers have retired. These guys are pushing numbers, so coming into different airports, sometimes you’ll have 3 different STAR approaches (standard terminal arrival routes) switched around for their convenience, and they switch runways when you’re close in. And you’re busy running the checklist, and then you suddenly have to switch everything in the FMC (flight management computer), so it’s all heads down trying to change everything for their convenience, and it results in all kinds of safety parameters being violated, especially looking out for other planes.”

Air traffic control treats pilots like they were a “yo yo,” he explained. “I view air traffic control and the FAA as a big threat to aviation… giving up safety for convenience and statistics, and moving numbers. The speeds are too high, they make you fly high speed, 180 knots to the marker. That’s too fast, no matter what kind of airplane you’re in, you don’t have time to slow it down, you’re trying to get the gear out and everything else, so instead of worrying about landing the plane in front of you, you have to worry about the guy behind you, they’re trying to rush you to move numbers.”

Experienced pilots being forced out of the industry

All the really good pilots are retiring, quitting or being forced out of the industry, Pilot X explained to me. “Most of the best guys have quit, and some of these airlines are expected to file bankruptcy next year and steal their retirement funds.”

A pilot shortage is on the horizon, causing even more inexperienced pilots to be put in charge of airliners carrying hundreds of passengers. “There’s gonna be a massive pilot shortage over the next 2-3 years. They need 60,000 pilots and there are only 10,000 qualified to draw from. Everybody is pissed off and stressed out.”

Airlines also have a reputation for stealing the pensions of pilots. “Most of the pilots want to get out; they know [management] is going to steal the pension money to give themselves bonuses.”

Conclusion: Air travel is going to become increasingly dangerous

Here are the key trends happening in the air travel industry right now according to Pilot X:

– Real piloting skills are being abandoned by airlines.

– Pilots are being trained to be button pushers instead of real pilots.

– Air traffic control is “slam dunking” airplanes into runways at dangerous speeds in order to increase traffic throughput at the cost of sacrificing safety.

– Airplane automation is actually becoming a danger to the safety of airline passengers because pilots rely on it too much and lose piloting skills.

– The most experienced pilots are rapidly leaving the industry and taking decades of experience with them. There are not enough younger pilots to replace them, so airline companies will increasingly have to hire inexperienced pilots to fly the largest planes.

But who cares about safety when you can get extra miles by shopping with your “rewards” credit card!

Democratic aide brings gun into courthouse, receives ticket

0

Robby Soave
Daily Caller
July 10, 2013

An aide to Michigan Democratic Rep. John Conyers got off with a warning after illegally bringing a gun into a public building.

Security officers at a federal building in downtown Detroit found a gun in the purse of Betty Petrenz, Conyers’ office manager. Bringing weapons into government buildings is strictly forbidden, but Petrenz received no sentence or formal punishment. Just a ticket, which will be stricken from her record if she demonstrates good behavior.

Conyers is a strong advocate of stronger gun control laws who has received an “F” grade from the National Rifle Association.

Full article here

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 at 5:26 am

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

‘You have to be a good liar to join NSA’

0



Published time: July 10, 2013 10:34



A worker at the National Security Agency (NSA) sits at her computer terminal in the Threat Operations Center (Reuters/Jason Reed)

The NSA surveillance agency is living in a complete bubble, researcher Madiha Tahir told RT. She engaged in controversy with a couple of NSA recruitment agents who showed up at the University of Wisconsin in early July.

The grad students and members of a local high school class
debated the National Security Agency (NSA) representatives on the
meaning of the word “adversary” in regard to NSA surveillance
targeting the US allies in Europe – in particular Germany – the
legality of the NSA’s global data collection programs and
misinformation about the NSA activities presented by the agency’s
bosses to the American and international communities.

The agents that came to the University of Wisconsin seemed to be
“entirely unprepared” to answer “basic questions”
posed by potential employees, said Madiha Tahir, a PhD candidate
at Columbia University currently attending a language program at
the University of Wisconsin.

Madiha Tahir

“It is fixed to the bubble the intelligence community lives
in. They are so disengaged that they think that they don’t
actually have to answer any questions when they go out
recruiting,”
Tahir said. “They have never had to actually
justify or even critically think about the work they are engaged
in. They simply did not know how to answer the basic questions
about the nature of their work,”
she said.

The claim of the NSA recruiters that their agency is an
“apolitical organization that fulfills requests sent to it by
other departments”
appeared as if they were trying to hide
behind “I’m only doing my job” excuse “which is not a
defense at all,”
Tahir shared with RT.

Working for the NSA is tough job, agrees Tahir, but as an
American citizen she felt she was doing her job when asking the
agents about the controversies NSA has been doing towards the
American citizens and internationally.

“This surveillance establishment lives in a complete
bubble,”
Tahir said, recalling that one of the recruiters, a
female agent, told the students that after work they go down to a
karaoke bar and get drunk, simply because “they are not even
able to talk to their families about the kind of work they are
engaged in.”

Tahir acknowledged that she has no idea whether the NSA managed
to recruit any of her fellow students that day, but shared her
understanding of what it takes to become a successful NSA
recruit.

“You have to be a good liar and you probably have to be quite
skillful — which those guys [NSA recruiters] unfortunately were
not at dealing with these kinds of questions, be engaged in
double-speak,”
Tahir said.

The people trying to persuade students to join the NSA ranks made
no effort whatsoever to somehow down play the scandal around the
agency being discussed so widely around the globe over the last
weeks.

The NSA’s unsuccessful recruitment drive was audio recorded by
Madiha Tahir on her iPhone. Later she posted the recording of the
NSA agents’ and students’ dispute, together with a transcript on
her blog called The Mob and the Multitude.

Bascom Hall atop Bascom Hill at the heart of the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus. (Photo from Wikipedia)

Republished with permission from: RT

Greek unions call strike to protest cuts

0

Major unions in Greece have announced plans to wage a general strike on July 16 to protest a new government scheme to slash civil service jobs in an effort to secure EU-IMF loans.

“An emergency meeting of the executive committee has decided to call a 24-hour general strike on July 16” in response to a government bill to maintain the layoffs, leading union GSEE announced in a Wednesday statement.

The development came after the Greek government submitted a draft bill to the parliament on Tuesday, detailing the redeployment of civil servants, a move that has incited widespread protests.

This is while Greek Finance Minister Yannis Stournaras has reportedly stated that the parliament must pass the bill by July 19 so that the deeply indebted country can receive the first installment of rescue funds from its EU-IMF bailout.

The latest cuts would have a major impact on thousands of teachers, school administrators and municipal staff and have caused new outrage in Greece, which is undergoing a fourth year of austerity and record unemployment.

The conservative-led Greek government has committed to enforcing the reforms in exchange for nearly 6.8 billion euros (USDA9.54 billion) in new bailout funds from the troika of international creditors – the European Union, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

Athens was granted a 110-billion-euro (USD 145-billion) bailout by the so-called troika in May 2010.

Another 130-billion euro (USD 170-billion) rescue package was approved in February 2012.

MFB/MFB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Rohani urges closer ties with countries

0

Iranian President-elect Hassan Rohani has called for the further enhancement of all-out relations with Lebanon, Ghana and North Korea.

In response to a congratulatory message from Lebanese President Michel Sleiman, Rohani said he was confident that Tehran and Beirut would witness growing cooperation based on mutual trust and respect.

Rohani thanked Sleiman for having sent him a congratulatory message over his victory in Iranâ„¢s presidential election, and said the age-old amicable ties between Tehran and Beirut have been rooted in cultural bonds.

Also, in response to the congratulatory message by Ghanaâ„¢s President John Dramani Mahama, Rohani expressed hope that constructive and friendly relations between Tehran and Accra would further develop.

Iran has always paid due regard to the expansion of all-out ties with African countries, he added.

Also in response to the congratulatory message from Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme People’s Assembly of North Korea Kim Yong-nam, Rohani expressed satisfaction over the growing trend of relations between Tehran and Pyongyang.

Rohani won Iranâ„¢s June 14 presidential election, garnering 50.7 percent of a total of 36,704,156 ballots. The voter turnout in the election was 72.7 percent, according to Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry.

The Iranian president-elect currently represents Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei in the Supreme National Security Council. He is also a member of the Assembly of Experts, the Expediency Council and the president of the councilâ„¢s Center for Strategic Research.

YH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Death toll from Turkey crackdown hits 5

0

The death toll from the Turkish crackdown on the anti-government protests that have rocked Turkey since early June have increased to five.

The fatalities grew when a 19-year-old student died of the injuries he sustained during police crackdown on a June 2 demonstration in the Turkish city of Eskisehir.

SAB/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Amnesty raps Egypt army’s use of force

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Amnesty International has slammed the Egyptian army’s “disproportionate” use of lethal force against protesters, mostly the supporters of ousted President Mohamed Morsi.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Greek workers occupy Athens building

0

Protesters attend a demonstration in Athens, Greece, July 8, 2013.

Athens city police officers have occupied a municipal building in the Greek capital to protest their inclusion in a Athens city police officers have occupied a municipal building in the Greek capital to protest their inclusion in a government plan to slash the number of civil servants.

Angered by their inclusion in a government scheme to further reduce the workforce of civil servants as part of the international bailout requirements, municipal police officers in Athens occupied a city building in downtown Athens on Wednesday.

The main union for Greek municipal workers, who have been on strike for the last two days, has also called on its members to engage in occupying government buildings on Wednesday and Thursday.

The union, according to local reports, has further extended rolling 24-hour strikes for the remainder of this week.

The development comes as Greece’s international creditors approved releasing 6.8 billion euros (USD8.7 billion) in rescue loans on Monday, despite a missed deadline by the government to place 12,500 workers in an involuntary transfer program.

Meanwhile, the government announced on Tuesday that it was placing 4,200 workers, including school guards and teachers, on an eight-month suspension with reduced pay this month.

Athens agreed last week to transfer some 4,000 municipal officers to the police force, a cost-cutting move which unionists fear will lead to massive layoffs.

By the end of this year, some 25,000 civil servants overall must be redeployed and an additional 4,000 fired in order for the country to receive access to further payout of approximately 8.1 billion euros (USD 10.4 billion) in bailout rescue loans.

Athens was granted a 110-billion-euro (USD 145-billion) bailout by the so-called troika in May 2010.

Another 130-billion euro (USD 170-billion) rescue package was approved in February 2012.

MFB/MFB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Egypt MB rejects offer to join gov't

0

Egyptâ„¢s interim Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi (shown) earlier announced that some cabinet posts would be offered to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptâ„¢s Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party has rejected offers by the countryâ„¢s new Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi to join the interim government.

The Muslim Brotherhood announced the decision in a statement on Wednesday, after presidential spokesman Ahmed al-Muslimani said that Beblawi had announced that some cabinet posts would be offered to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Å“We reject all that comes from this coup,” spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, Tareq al-Morsi, said in response.

The group said that it will not hold talks with the interim government until ousted President Mohamed Morsi is reinstated.

Also on Wednesday, Egyptâ„¢s main liberal coalition, the National Salvation Front (NSF), retracted an earlier statement that rejected a constitutional decree issued by the interim government.

The decree, issued by interim President Adli Mansour, lays out a timetable for the transition, the period of which is to last around six months until a presidential election is held.

Meanwhile, the interim prime minister said the new cabinet is unlikely to have unanimous support.

On July 3, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that Morsi was no longer in office and declared that the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Adli Mahmoud Mansour, had been appointed as the new interim president of Egypt.

On July 9, interim President Mansour appointed 76-year-old former Finance Minister Beblawi as the country’s interim prime minister and 71-year-old opposition politician Mohamed ElBaradei as deputy to the president.

Since last week, Egypt has been the scene of rival rallies and clashes between thousands of the supporters and opponents of ousted Morsi.

Egyptian officials say that on July 8, 84 people were killed in clashes between the supporters of Morsi and security forces in Cairo.

Morsi is reportedly being held Å“preventively” by the military. Senior army officials say he might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

SZH/PR/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Greek unions call general strike

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Greek unions announce a July 16 general strike to protest further government job cuts.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

‘US hands visible in Egypt crisis’

0

The US is likely to be behind the ongoing crisis in Egypt as Washington constantly seeks to destabilize regional countries in an attempt to fulfill its own interests, a political analyst tells Press TV.

Å“Washington prefers violence and instability; it wants Egypt like other countries in the region and elsewhere subservient to the USâ„¢ interests. Washingtonâ„¢s dirty hands are all over what is going on,” said Stephen Lendman in a Wednesday interview.

Egypt plunged into a fresh wave of unrest after General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, the head of the Egyptian Army, declared on June 3 that Mohamed Morsi was no longer in office as president and announced the suspension of the countryâ„¢s Constitution after days of massive anti-government protests across Egypt.

A day later, Chief Justice of Egyptâ„¢s Supreme Constitutional Court Adli Mansour, was sworn in as the interim president of the country. The Egyptian military said Morsi was being held Å“preventively.”

Lendman pointed to the ongoing crisis orchestrated by foreign elements in Syria and noted, Å“What is going on in Syria in a different way is going on in Egypt now. It is not a war, but it is a war low level against the Egyptian people to ensure that the same power interests run the country and the people are denied basic rights they deserved.”

Å“That is a plan from Egyptâ„¢s Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, SCAF, it is a plan from Washington, it is a plan from Israel unless Egyptians do something nonviolently to change this, theyâ„¢re stuck with this and things will only get worse,” he pointed out.

ASH/NN

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Brazil demands response on US spying

0

As Brazil awaits Washingtonâ„¢s response on reports that US spy agencies also conducted surveillance on Brazilian companies and citizens, its lawmakers are urging the nationâ„¢s president to cancel her October visit to the White House.

Brazilian politicians have called on President Dilma Rousseff to adopt a tough position against Washington and cancel her official meeting with US President Barack Obama next October following allegations that the Americans monitored billions of Brazilian emails and other electronic communications as part of their global surveillance bids, local media reported Tuesday.

Recent press reports cite documents leaked by former NSA contract worker Edward Snowden, who is wanted in the US for revealing top-secret electronic spying operations by its intelligence agencies.

Brazil has further stated that it will submit a proposal to the United Nations to look into the worldwide American surveillance activities in order to guarantee privacy rights.

Citing a leaked report by Snowden, Brazilian newspaper O Globo published a report on Sunday, revealing that Brazil may have been subjected to the highest level of surveillance by the US National Security Agency (NSA) of any South American nation.

Following the report, President Rousseff reacted immediately and condemned the US effort.

Å“Brazil’s position on this issue is very clear and very firm,” she said in a Monday press conference. Å“We do not agree with interference of this kind in Brazil and in any other country.”

The new revelations further triggered a fierce debate on Monday in the Federal Senate in Brasilia as lawmakers representing both the ruling parties and the opposition insisted that Brazil should demand an apology from Washington if allegations of spying on Brazilian territory are proven to be accurate.

Å“These allegations of eavesdropping are very serious and affect the sovereignty of our country,” said Senator Alvero Dias of the opposition Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB). Å“President Rousseff should discuss the matter directly with President Obama and if the answer is not satisfactory, she should cancel her visit to Washington in October.”

The development comes following a diplomatic fiasco last week in which the aircraft carrying Bolivian President Evo Morales was denied access to European airspace due to suspicions that Snowden was on board.

After the incident, South American leaders expressed solidarity with President Morales.

This is while Brazilian Politicians on all sides have voiced support for Snowden, arguing that Brazil should have also followed the lead of Venezuela and publically offered him political asylum.

The Brazilian government has already demanded official clarification on the report from the US government.

Moreover, State Communications Minister Paulo Bernardo further launched an inquiry on Monday led by the federal, saying the probe could lead to criminal proceedings.

Meanwhile, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey cautioned in a Sunday televised interview that Snowden’s disclosures have undermined American relationships with other nations and affected what he described as “the importance of trust.”

According to local analysts, the developing situation may generate a damaging impact on diplomatic ties between America and Brazil.

MFB/MFB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Trans Pacific Partnership is a Threat To National Sovereignty

0

The proponents of the Trans Pacific Partnership argue that the TPP would bring huge benefits to Malaysia “with as much as US $ 40 billion (RM 128.4 billion) in annual export gains and US $ 25 billion in annual income gains by 2025.” Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in particular will reap a bonanza. The TPP, it is said, will also “give Malaysia preferential access to a US $ 15 trillion economy, which means access to the US $ 500 billion in US government tenders.” As against these projections, there are issues of tremendous significance pertaining to the TPP that have been raised by a variety of citizen groups in almost all the 12 countries (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, United States and Vietnam) that are currently part of the negotiation process. These issues have emerged as a result of leaks since no officially sanctioned draft has been placed before the public.

The negotiations – the 18th round of which will commence in Kota Kinabalu (Malaysia) on the 15th of July 2013 – are shrouded in secrecy though representatives of major corporations such as Monsanto, Walmart, Bank of America, JP Morgan, Cargill, Exxon-Mobil, and Chevron, among others, it is alleged, have had full access to the draft and have been “suggesting amendments.” One of the issues that has caused grave concern is a set of rules in the TPP which apparently would empower foreign corporations to bypass domestic laws and courts and challenge government policies and regulations aimed at protecting the public interest via tribunals linked to the World Bank and the UN. If this is true, it would be an affront to national sovereignty.

The TPP also prohibits governments and central banks from imposing capital controls or banning risky financial products. Central banks would have diminished capacity to regulate the entry and exit of speculative capital. Countries that are part of the TPP would be compelled to create an even more conducive environment for casino capitalism. Given Malaysia’s relative success in developing regulatory mechanisms during and after the 1998 Asian financial crisis, this aspect of the TPP would be particularly galling.

The adverse impact of this trade pact upon national sovereignty and the economic wellbeing of countries such as Malaysia is underscored by yet another provision which questions our procurement policies. Apart from seeking to rectify economic imbalances, government procurement policies have also attempted to expedite technology transfers to local industries, enhance export capabilities and curb foreign exchange outflows. These are goals that do not conform to TPP objectives.

The TPP also allows pharmaceutical corporations to increase the price of medicines and to limit consumer access to cheaper generic drugs. Monopoly patents would be better protected and the purchase of generic drugs would be made more difficult. At the same time, by designating a whole spectrum of policies, regulations and practices as “trade barriers” the proposed agreement undermines some of the people oriented measures associated with different TPP countries. For instance, the TPP, it is alleged, upbraids the Malaysian government for “requiring that slaughter plants maintain dedicated halal facilities and ensure segregated transportation for halal and non-halal products.”

While some of the provisions of the TPP may be set aside at the behest of individual countries, it is obvious that the US which is the driving force behind the pact is determined to use it as its vehicle to strengthen its economic position in the Pacific region in the face of the rise of China. It explains why China itself – economically the most dynamic nation in the region – has not been invited to join the TPP. This is why it would be naïve to view the TPP as a mere economic and trade arrangement. Its underlying motive is clearly political. It is a critical weapon in the US arsenal for curbing and containing the emergence of a power which has the potential of shaping the future of the entire Pacific in the decades to come.

The US will not allow this to happen. It knows that in order to remain as the world’s sole superpower it has to ensure that it is at the helm of that one region with the greatest economic viability and vitality. The US already has 320,000 troops in the Pacific region. That is the military arm of Pacific Power. The TPP is designed to secure the economic dimension of Pacific Power. As a nation committed to harmonious relations among states, Malaysia should be extra cautious about participating in any venture by any power, be it the United States or China, to enhance its hegemony over the Pacific – a region whose very name signifies peace.

Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is the President of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST)

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Iran decries terrorist attack in Lebanon

0

Iranâ„¢s Foreign Minister Akbar Salehi has condemned the recent terrorist bombing in the southern suburbs of the Lebanese capital, Beirut, which left dozens of people wounded.

At least 53 people were injured in a powerful explosion that rocked the southern Bir al-Abed suburb of Beirut on Tuesday, causing heavy damage to the nearby buildings. Several cars also caught fire in the wake of the blast.

In a telephone conversation with his Lebanese counterpart Adnan Mansour on Tuesday, Salehi denounced the terrorist attack and sympathized with the families of the victims.

The top Iranian diplomat said the attack had targeted Lebanonâ„¢s security, stability and national unity, expressing hope that the Lebanese authorities would take the necessary precautions in the face of the plots hatched by the country’s enemies.

In January, two people were injured after a bomb went off in the suburb of al-Selloum, south of Beirut.

In December 2012, a car bomb attack in the capital claimed the life of the intelligence chief of Lebanon’s Internal Security Forces, General Wissam al-Hassan.

YH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Political Asylum Ain’t What It’s Cracked Up To Be

0

As Edward Snowden, the young American accused of blowing the whistle on NSA surveillance tactics, continues his search for a fresh start in a new country in order to avoid extradition and perhaps a lengthy prison term in a U.S. prison, he needs to ask himself a couple of things.

First, can he speak Spanish? According to the latest reports, the two countries most likely to offer him asylum (after the Russians more or less made it clear they didn’t want him) are Venezuela and Bolivia, both of which speak Spanish. Granted, if Snowden has the faculty for picking up a foreign language, he’ll eventually get the hang of it, but until he does, it’s going to be real drag walking around sounding like–and being treated as–a Yankee tourist.

Also, he needs to bear in mind that, as an acknowledged fink (even one motivated by highly defensible ethical reasons), he will never be trusted again, not by anyone. He needs to know that. Because he’s an acknowledged fink, he will never be entirely trusted by friends, casual acquaintances, future girlfriends, or future employers. He also needs to know that the reason Venezuela or Bolivia offered him asylum wasn’t because they coveted him. They largely did it to thumb their nose at the U.S.

Which raises another question. What sort of job does Snowden expect to get, once he relocates? While it’s very likely the country providing asylum will, for the time being at least, provide him with a monthly stipend on which to live, they will eventually expect him to get off his duff and find work.

What kind of career does he plan to have? There is no way in hell anyone’s going to give him a job where he has access to computers or sensitive information. (“Here, Ed, take this stack of documents and file them under Confidential.”) As an American, not only will he always be considered an “outsider,” he has, unfortunately, established a track record as someone who’s willing to take matters into his own hands if he feels there’s a moral or legal justification for doing so. It’s going to be a tough road for this young man.

It was different for actual “defectors,” which Snowden clearly is not. Cold War defectors were a breed unto themselves. Take men like the legendary British spy Kim Philby, who, after years of feeding classified information to the KGB, fled England to live in the USSR where he was treated almost as a national hero. His defection was tantamount to a religious conversion. So enamored was Philby with Soviet-style socialism, he was willing to risk arrest, pack it all in, and betray his own country for it.

But that’s not Snowden. He didn’t blow the whistle on his fellow Americans because he admired Venezuela’s political ideology. Young Snowden just desperately wanted to do the “right thing,” which, in my opinion, he did. Alas, he’s going to be paying for that decision the rest of his life. Que lastima (as they say in Venezuela).

David Macaray, an LA playwright and author (“It’s Never Been Easy: Essays on Modern Labor” 2nd edition), was a former union rep.  Dmacaray@earthlink.net

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Police protesters occupy Athens building

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Athens city police officers have occupied a municipal building in the Greek capital to protest their inclusion in a government plan to slash the number of civil servants.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Bahrain nabs 30 anti-regime protesters

0

A Bahraini protester holding a noose around his neck reading “The government’s policies” marches with fellow demonstrators during an anti-government in the village of Karrana on July 5, 2013.

Bahraini regime forces have raided the houses of anti-regime demonstrators in several villages, arresting more than 30 people.

The Bahraini opposition group al-Wefaq said the regime forces raided dozens of houses in the country over the past 48 hours.

A child is reportedly among those arrested by the Saudi-backed security forces.

Bahraini forces frequently raid the houses of anti-regime protesters in the country.

Bahrain has been hit by political turmoil since mid-February 2011, with protesters calling on the Al Khalifa royal family to relinquish power.

On July 5, thousands of protesters marched on the Budaiya Highway, west of the capital Manama, demanding the release of political prisoners.

The demonstration, called by al-Wefaq, came a day after the partyâ„¢s Secretary General Ali Salman said that Bahrainâ„¢s Interior Ministry had arrested more than 640 individuals on various charges during the last three months.

At least 13 opposition leaders are held in prison for being involved in protests against the Bahraini regime.

The regimeâ„¢s courts have handed down life sentences to seven of the activists, including prominent activist Abdulhadi al-Khawaja. Others have received jail terms ranging from five to 15 years.

Following the eruption of the protests, the Bahraini regime launched a brutal crackdown on the peaceful protests and called in Saudi-led Arab forces from neighboring states to assist the suppression.

Dozens of Bahraini people have been killed in the crackdown, and the security forces have arrested hundreds, including doctors and nurses.

SAB/PR/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Australian PM to hold vote on aborigines

0

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says if the Labor Party is reelected, he will hold a referendum on the recognition of the countryâ„¢s Aborigines in the constitution.

On Wednesday, during the 50th anniversary of the indigenous land rights movement, Rudd said the recognition of the Aboriginal people as Australiaâ„¢s first inhabitants was a key priority.

“I therefore, as prime minister, want to see this matter brought to the people of Australia by referendum within two years of the election of the next parliament,” he added.

This is while national elections are scheduled later this year.

“No more delays, no more excuses, no more buck-passing. It’s time the nation got on with this business. That is my commitment to you,” said Rudd, calling on the conservative Tony Abbott-led opposition to make more efforts to work with the government.

The statement by Rudd came ahead of an event planned in the Aboriginal community of Yirrkala in northern Australia.

Over the past years, human rights groups have pointed out that the Aborigines have been suffering from the violation of their basic human rights by the Australian government.

The United Nations has also criticized the governmentâ„¢s policies toward the countryâ„¢s indigenous people.

Last month, Rudd defeated former Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard in a Labor Party leadership vote.

SZH/PR

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Egypt NSF retracts rejection of decree

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt’s main liberal coalition, the National Salvation Front (NSF), has withdrawn an earlier statement in which it rejected a constitutional decree issued by the interim President Adli Mansour.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Iran stresses Afghan role in region

0

Tehran says Kabul plays a key role in promoting bilateral and regional trade. Above, trucks are seen waiting to cross the Afghanistan-Iran border in Zaranj, Afghanistan, May 10, 2011.

Iran has stressed the importance of peace and stability in Afghanistan, stating that Kabul plays a key role in promoting bilateral and regional trade.

Å“A peaceful and stable Afghanistan can play an efficient role in the promotion of trade and the transit (of goods) between the two countries and in the region,” said Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for Asia-Pacific Affairs Abbas Araqchi in a joint statement issued following a meeting with Afghan Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs Ershad Ahmadi on Tuesday.

Araqchi said Iran backs the Afghan peace process led by the Kabul government and based on the Afghan constitution.

The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001 as part of Washingtonâ„¢s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but the country is still grappling with insecurity.

In the joint statement, the Iranian and Afghan sides emphasized that Iran and Afghanistan would not allow their territories to be used for any possible threats against one another.

They also urged closer cooperation in fighting terrorism, extremism and narcotics.

Iran, which has a 900-kilometer common border with Afghanistan, has been used as the main conduit for smuggling Afghan drugs to narcotics kingpins in Europe.

Despite high economic and human costs, the Islamic Republic has been actively fighting the drug smuggling over the past three decades. Iran has spent more than USD 700 million to seal the borders and prevent the transit of narcotics destined for European, Arab and Central Asian countries.

YH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Three Cheers For Coup Democracy

0

It was a typical US government response to favorable facts-on-the-ground rooted in violence. Once the military coup in Egypt had been accomplished and the first democratically-elected president of Egypt and many of his allies had been arrested and all sympathetic radio stations had been shut down, the US State Department released a statement expressing US condemnation of any future violence.

While the dirty deal was going down President Obama played golf and Secretary of State John Kerry went sailing off Nantucket. It was a bit like the The Godfather when Don Corleone is shown in church and the sequence is inter-cut with scenes of men being shot dead in bed and sputtering as they are being garroted.

This is not a particularly novel turn of events – just especially dishonest and dishonorable. It seems to be the way the US does coups in the 21st century. The days of crude coups like Iran (’53), Guatemala (’54) and Chile (’73) are long gone. Today, it’s done with great coordinated finesse thanks to a sophisticated international secrecy network vis-à-vis American taxpayers and the rest of the civilian world. As citizens, all we get is public relations that expresses great concern for the control of violence … once the favorable facts-on-the-ground have been established.

Currently, members of the Freedom and Justice Party, the name of the Muslim Brotherhood’s and ousted President Morsi’s political party, are furious. They should be. The New York Times reports that the party is planning to organize escalated demonstrations across Egypt. Many fear where this coup will lead. A 23-year-old female law student told The Times that her Islamist neighbors had started shaving their heads, which sounded ominous. “Everyone’s worried about a civil war,” she said. The body count [1] is now rising.

According to the official US position, anyone who foments violent acts after the coup that established favorable facts-on-the-ground can be treated as a threat to the stability of Egypt by the same military that undertook the coup. (The US, of course, is not calling it a “coup,” since to do so it would have to cut off the $1.5 billion in military aid it sends to Egypt, which would make no sense when the coup may foment civil war.)

Back in 2009, the Obama administration sent out the same sort of boilerplate garbage statement about stability and condemning violence when the democratically-elected, left-leaning president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya [2], was awoken at dawn by a gun to his head and flown out of the country in his pajamas. The same earnest US statement condemned future violence, defended democracy and expressed concern about stability. The dirt-poor, basket-case nation then devolved from its already lowly state into the homicide capital of the western hemisphere. And, in what is surely the most significant post-coup fact-on-the-ground, since Zelaya was ousted, a host of US military bases have sprouted like mushrooms out of the more fertile soil.

It’s true that the United States has lost a lot of its imperial mojo of late in the Middle East, but the important thing is it has not lost that mojo vis-à-vis the incredibly corrupt institution of the Egyptian military. Years of US tax-payer largesse has helped feather the nests of corrupt Egyptian officers in a military that’s deeply invested in business and finance. Washington’s excellent public relations skills help in these 21st Century coups by working the Sunday news talk-show circuit and other venues of meaning to get the right story out. Elliot Abrams [3] of Iran-Contra fame was one of them cranked up for the Egyptian coup. What’s important is that the American people be re-assured that stability is the most important thing and that the White House condemns any future violence. Everything is OK. It was not a coup.

You can all go back to sleep now.

The same sort of stability-focused public relations occurred in the notorious 2000 US presidential election. I know we’re not supposed to talk about that episode in American democratic history any more, since Al Gore patriotically ate the roadkill raw for the sake of stability and in the name of discouraging anger and maybe violence. It also turned out to be good for his future as a middle-brow environmental hero and money-maker.

As you may recall, the declared winner of that absurd episode, George W. Bush, assured voters that he was going to rule for all Americans. Better than anyone, he knew he’d lost the popular vote by 500,000 souls and would have lost the Electoral College if there had been a fair vote in the state ruled by his brother. So he too sucked it up and said what he had to say.

Then, of course, he got behind the wheel and drove the nation into a ditch off the right side of the road. He mounted a completely unnecessary war that wasted trillions of dollars and cost the lives of thousands of US service men and women. Then, he exploited the disastrous program of his Democratic predecessor to provide every American a house and nurtured an unaccountable Wall Street greed machine that hauled the battered car out of the Iraq ditch and, by 2008, sent it careening over a cliff.

This record makes Mohamed Morsi’s year-long run look like child’s play.

Consider it a modest proposal in retrospect. But think what might have been if we had been able to use the Egyptian military model of democracy. Think how comforting it would have been to have the Joint Chiefs step up and declare they were ready to throw the unduly-elected George W. Bush and his far-right cronies out of office in the name of “the people.” The Generals might have appointed an esteemed character like George Mitchell to be interim president until a truly fair election could be arranged. The Supreme Court could have used the same sophistry they used in Bush v. Gore to make it at least sound legal. Sure, it would have been a mess. But it could not have been a worse mess than the one that was the illegitimate reign of George W. Bush. The republic would have survived. In fact it might have been a worthwhile reality check. And we’d all now be much better off.

But, of course, I must be smoking something. This is not how things work. The analogy is completely wrong; it’s silly to imagine the US military would do something like that. Our joint chiefs were delighted by the far-right swerve George W. Bush had taken; it boosted their powers like never before. It didn’t matter one iota that he’d stolen the election. If George W. Bush had been a Muslim, of course, it would be different.

The story in Egypt is certainly not over. The coup has opened room for another very large shoe to be dropped. Another civil war in the region is now a good possibility. It’s disappointing that so many young Egyptian demonstrators in Tahrir Square apparently became so frustrated with political life in Egypt they crawled into bed with the corrupt Egyptian military they’d recently opposed. In a New York Times op-ed, Khaled M. Abouk El Fadl [4] points out that tyrants like Gamal Abdel Nasser and Saddam Hussein all “pointed to their supporters in the streets as the source of their legitimacy.”

“This time, the military agreed with the protesters,” he writes. “But next time, when protesters call for something that isn’t in the military’s interest, they will meet a very different fate.”

It’s tragically logical that if the first democratically-elected president can be so easily removed by the military and the dirty deed so neatly finessed by Washington, the future of real democracy in Egypt seems doomed. We’ll have to wait to find out what the cost of such a devil’s bargain will be for ordinary Egyptians. A US-excused coup was disastrous for Hondurans.

It’s clear the Egyptian coup benefited militarists in the United States and Israeli governments. Ironically, it apparently also benefited President Bashar al-Assad in Syria, who said he was delighted by the coup that removed one of his more worrisome opponents.

The question for Americans – at least for those still awake – remains how do we put a check on our own massively corrupt military institution? And how do we create real democracy and save the mess we have from the vise grip of militarism and rapacious, unaccountable wealth?

JOHN GRANT is a founding member of ThisCantBeHappening!, a new independent, collectively-owned, journalist-run, reader-supported online alternative newspaper.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Toward a Living Legacy for Nelson Mandela

0

Nelson Mandela’s exceptional and exemplary life has and will produce worldwide celebrations of his extremely unique blend of character, personality and resolve for broad-gauged justice. To truly memorialize his contributions, however, requires grand actions.

Taking immediate recognition of the deep wellsprings of respect, affection and sorrow over the loss of his leadership to the people of South Africa and the world, leaders from various nations can come together to establish the Nelson Mandela Institute for Global Human Rights with an endowment of one billion dollars. The founders must be possessed of a vision that includes posterity’s rights to peace and justice, to freedom and opportunity compatible with the survival of the Planet.

To be perceived as impeccable for this specific noble mission, the founders must select themselves so as to define a unanimity of purpose, a resolve and expeditiousness. To turn the powerful spirit of Nelson Mandela into a powerful vision and proliferate his ideals and actions, his courage and humanity, his uncanny sense of what it takes to move the immovable and inspire the shameless to higher levels of human possibilities, a combination of seasoned knowledge and material resources will be required.

The founders need not be angels, need not be pure in background or without “baggage.” They need only to be lawful and capable in creating a well-funded Institute and engaging with substantive experienced and innovative people in human rights, research, communication and advocacy to carry forward Mandela’s work. Most immediately, the founders need to come together with all deliberate speed. At the outset they need not be representative of the world. That will come later. The immediate need is for a critical mass of individuals with foresight who can create the Mandela Institute.

By way of non-exclusive suggestion, suppose a quartet of Bishop Desmond Tutu, Congressman John Lewis, Warren Buffett and former President Bill Clinton initiated a conversation between themselves. Here is what could happen forthwith:

Bishop Tutu brings his friendship and alliance with Nelson Mandela, together with the respect of his country’s people and human rights advocates around the world with whom he has worked tirelessly.

Congressman John Lewis brings his ground-level valor in the U.S. civil rights movement of the sixties and the widespread, non-partisan high regard for his undeterred principles and moral values.

Warren Buffett brings a core of multi-billionaires who have pledged to give at least half their estate to good works (See The Giving Pledge). They are looking for good, collaborative ideas.

Bill Clinton brings his unrivalled rolodex of establishment achievers and leaders, who come to his annual conference, to discuss commercial and charitable ways to improve the world.

Beside the memorial vision, nothing gathers attentive support more than the availability of material resources. Mr. Buffett (who modestly tells friends that at least he gets his calls returned) can draw on over 100 (and growing) pledgers from the U.S. and other countries. Their combined reported net worth is $504 billion. An average of $10 million from each pledger for this grand institution would take the fundraising over the one billion dollar level. This can occur before major foundations decide on significant founding contributions. As the proposal moves into organization and substantive phases, the organizers of the Institute do have to be impeccable, pure of heart and results oriented, without the conflicting or distracting personal ambition that self-censors their worthiest traits and ideals.

The fine details of the Institute’s leadership and activities, so as to maximize its great potential, are, of course, important. But they are not immediate. For now it is the guiding light, work and principles of Nelson Mandela that can assure that he lives through the coming generations in both deeds and grassroots leaders who reflect his courage and humanity.

Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer and author of Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us! He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press. Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition.

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

Meet the Elites Inside the $4 Trillion Global Powerhouse Bank of JP Morgan Chase

0

July 4, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

In May, JPMorgan Chase was listed as the largest bank in the world with assets at roughly $4 trillion — some $1.53 trillion of it in derivatives. This was reported a month after the announcement that the bank had posted a record first-quarter profit of $6.5 billion.

Jamie Dimon, the bank’s CEO and Chairman, has faced a host of scandals in relation to his management of the megabank, including the loss of roughly $6 billion through the London branch of the bank — losses that Dimon was accused of hiding. A 300-page report by the U.S. Senate, investigating the “creative accounting” of JPMorgan, noted that the bank “hid losses, did not share information with its regulators, and misled the public” in what one banking regulator referred to as “make believe voodoo magic.” Stated bluntly in The New York Times, JPMorgan Chase, the largest derivatives dealer in the world, “is too big to regulate.”

In the midst of the scandal, the bank faced a potential “revolt” of its shareholders in a bid to strip Dimon of his dual role as CEO and Chairman. In confidential government reports which were leaked to The New York Times, the bank was accused of “manipulative schemes” which transformed “money-losing power plants into powerful profit centers” while executives made “ false and misleading statements” under oath.

Yet even in the midst of scandal, Jamie Dimon was praised in a storm of support by billionaires, corporate kingpins and media barons. Calling JPMorgan Chase “as good a bank as there is,” New York City mayor and billionaire media baron Michael Bloomberg went on to call Dimon “a very smart, honest, great executive.” News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch praised Dimon as “one of the smartest, toughest guys around,” while Jack Welch, former chairman and CEO of General Electric, referred to him as a “great leader” and said he had earned the “right to hold both Chairman and CEO titles.” To top it off, billionaire investor and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffet, dubbed Dimon “a fabulous banker.”

And the adoration goes all the way to the top rung. In 2009, The New York Times referred to Jamie Dimon as “President Obama’s favorite banker.” In 2010, Obama told Bloomberg BusinessWeek that he didn’t “begrudge” bank CEOs like Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs for their massive bonuses of $17 and $9 million, respectively. Obama explained: “I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That is part of the free-market system.” The president added, “I know both those guys; they are very savvy businessmen.”

In May of 2012, Obama rushed to Jamie Dimon’s defense in light of the financial scandals, stating that Dimon was “one of the smartest bankers we got.” The Financial Times referred to Dimon as “the last king of Wall Street.” And when finally faced with the decision to strip Dimon of his dual role as chairman and CEO, Obama’s “favorite banker” ended up winning “a decisive victory” by maintaining both his roles.

But this is just the surface of JPMorgan Chase’s financial manipulations. The bank, in fact, was at the forefront of creating Credit Default Swaps (CDS), a key aspect of the derivatives market that led to the inflation and subsequent blowout of the housing bubble. JPMorgan developed these “financial instruments” as a type of insurance policy in 1994, allowing the bank to trade its debt (in the form of loans to corporations and governments) to third parties, thus handing off the risk and removing the debts from its accounts, which allowed it to make further loans. JPMorgan opened up the first CDS desk in New York in 1997, “a division that would eventually earn the name the Morgan Mafia for the number of former members who went on to senior positions at global banks and hedge funds.” Back in 2003, the same Warren Buffet who would later praise Dimon referred to credit default swaps as “financial weapons of mass destruction.”

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

If You Love Nature and Defend It Against Human Destruction, Be Prepared to Be Called a Fascist

0

July 8, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Two months ago, American canvas weevil was found in the archives of the National Gallery. After ravaging the Metropolitan and Guggenheim collections in the US, it is now working its way through the gallery’s storage rooms. Hundreds of old masters have been destroyed. The curators fear that much of the collection will go the same way.

The media has greeted this devastation with near-silence. A front-page article in the Guardian’s review section dismissed expressions of love for the paintings being destroyed as “bourgeois escapism”. Those seeking to arrest the spread of canvas weevil were compared to “anti-immigration demagogues [who] claim that foreigners will destroy a unique and distinctive British culture”.

Inconceivable? You would hope so — and this story is, happily, fictitious. But the responses I’ve mentioned are real, when you swap art for nature.

Earlier this year, the former energy minister John Hayes described concerns about the rainforests of Malaysia and Indonesia — which, with their tigers, orangutans and thousands of unique species, are being destroyed to grow biofuels — as ” bourgeois views“. (Coming from a Tory MP, this was magnificent.) In the Guardian Review on Saturday, Steven Poole took up his call ( Comfort of the wild, 6 July). Echoing Mao’s denunciations of pre-revolutionary Chinese culture, he castigated those of us who write about our love of nature as bourgeois and snobbish, and suggested that our concerns about the spread of exotic invasive animals and plants are a form of crypto-fascism — “the green version of the English Defence League”.

Exotic invasive species are a straightforward ecological problem, wearily familiar to anyone trying to protect biodiversity. Some introduced creatures — such as brown hare, little owl, field poppy, corncockle and pheasant’s eye in Britain — do no harm to their new homes, and are cherished and defended by nature lovers. Others, such as cane toads, mink, rats, rhododendron, kudzu vine or tree-killing fungi, can quickly simplify a complex ecosystem, wiping out many of its endemic animals and plants. They have characteristics (for example, being omnivorous, light-excluding, toxic or inedible to any native carnivore or herbivore) that allow them to tear an ecosystem to shreds. These aren’t cultural constructions. They are biological facts.

Comparing those who describe this process to racists is the intellectual equivalent of stating that evolution through natural selection is a coded attack on the welfare state, or that the first law of thermodynamics was hatched by green campaigners intent on conserving energy. It is to see the words but not to understand the science they describe. This fallacy — mistaking scientific findings for cultural concepts — was deliciously ripped apart by Alan Sokal’s satirical paper Transgressing the Boundaries: towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity.

I see a love for the diversity and richness of nature as an aesthetic and cultural impulse identical to the love of art. It is a form of culture as refined and intense as any other, yet those who profess it tend to be regarded as nerds, not connoisseurs (that’s true snobbery for you). Poole and people like him position themselves among the philistines — those who see no value in the wonders with which others are enchanted.

Consider the issue of dry rot in historic buildings. It’s a major problem. Anyone who dismissed the concern of conservators as a form of neofascism would be considered insane. Dry rot is an exotic invasive species, a fungus that, until we introduced it in shipments of timber, lived quietly on pine and yew trees in the Himalayas. Unchecked, it could destroy much of our cultural heritage. What’s the difference?

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

5 Ways to Make It Easier for Men to Channel Empathy and Compassion

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The men are gone.

That’s what I realize on the last class of the Cultivating Compassion Training (CCT) course at Stanford University. We’ve spent nine weeks strengthening our attention, building awareness of our bodies, and learning to confront pain in ourselves and in others–and throughout the course, male students were dropping out like 12th-seeded teams in the NCAA basketball tournament.

This gender imbalance was not unique to Stanford’s CCT. Two-thirds of students at the Insight Meditation Center in Redwood City, California, are female, according to teacher Gil Fronsdal, an ordained Soto Zen priest who was also a Theravada monk in Burma. Elad Levinson, the director of programs at Spirit Rock Mediation Center, says, “The sociodemographic of Spirit Rock consists of primarily women.”

All of these programs integrate mindfulness meditation–the practice of focusing attention on our thoughts and feelings without judging them. That might not sound like much, but study after study finds that practicing mindfulness can bring a host of physical, psychological, and social benefits. More recently, evaluations of programs like CCT are finding that mindfulness is a very effective way to cultivate compassionate intentions and behaviors.

Is that something that boys and men need? “Men tell you what is on their minds, but not what is in their heart,” says Levinson, who has 40 years of psychotherapy and 20 years of leading men’s groups under his belt. Perhaps not coincidentally, boys and men commit the vast majority of violent acts, from domestic violence to murder. Many struggle with expressing empathy and compassion.

The problem does not seem to center on mindfulness. Men practice high levels of mindfulness in a variety of arenas in our society. At military boot camps and police academies, men learn to control their breathing and focus on a target before firing a weapon. Sports are a great training ground for mindfulness: Basketball players are taught to clear their mind by going through a routine when shooting a free throw. Being in “the zone” is active meditation in its highest form.

Notice, however, that in all of these mindfulness practices, compassion is removed from the equation. These boys and men are being trained for win-or-lose competition. “It has been historically dangerous for a man to be vulnerable,” says Elad Levinson, who suggests that men’s resistance to explore interior emotions like compassion is the result of hundreds of years of conditioning.

While some argue that this is the result of a biological predisposition, contemporary research in neuroplasticity, by scientists like Richard Davidson at the University of Wisconsin, Madison’s Center for Investigating Healthy Minds, finds that even short-term compassion meditation training (30 minutes a day for eight weeks) alters the brain activity in regions associated with positive emotional skills like empathy. That is true for both men and women. As Davidson says, “Compassion is indeed an emotional skill that can be trained.”

We understand the benefits. The need is there. But how do we get men to participate in mindfulness and compassion training? Here are five ways to plant the seeds of compassion in boys–and cultivate its growth in men.

1. Use pop culture to teach mindfulness to boys

When my wife and I tried to teach our sons how to meditate, they immediately sat down “crisscrossed apple-sauce” and closed their eyes. “What are you thinking about?” I asked my five year old. “Inner peace,” he replied.

It turns out that he learned this technique from Po in the movie Kung Fu Panda. I wasn’t surprised: One of the reasons I was attracted to meditation at an early age stems from my love of the Japanese anime Ikkyu-san, based on the historical Zen Buddhist monk.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

How American Weapons Are Crushing Dissent in Egypt

0

A joint American-Egyptian military demonstration in 2005.
Photo Credit: US Navy/Wikimedia Commons

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

When the dust settles from the ongoing deadly confrontations between the Egyptian armed forces and thousands of Islamist protesters in the streets of Cairo and Alexandria, the eventual winner will be the United States — specifically U.S.-made weapons systems in the hands of the country’s 440,000-strong military.

At last count, over 50 demonstrators were killed and more than 400 wounded in the military rampage Monday as the political crisis in Egypt spun out of control.

With massive firepower at its command, the Egyptian security forces are armed with a wide range of mostly U.S-supplied weapons, ranging from fighter planes, combat helicopters, warships and missiles to riot-controlled equipment such as armoured personnel carriers, recoilless rifles, sub-machine guns, rubber bullets, handguns and tear gas grenades.

Virtually all of these weapons have been provided under non-repayable, outright U.S. military grants ever since Egypt signed the U.S.-brokered Camp David Peace Treaty with Israel back in September 1978.

As the second largest recipient of U.S. aid after Israel, Egypt receives about 1.5 billion dollars in both military and economic aid annually, of which 1.3 billion dollars is earmarked for the armed forces.

Nicole Auger, a military analyst covering the Middle East and Africa at Forecast International, a leader in defence market intelligence and industry forecasting, told IPS the United States is “the overwhelming (arms) supplier to Egypt”.

She said about 35 percent of the 1.3 billion dollars in annual U.S. Foreign Military Financing (FMF) grants is utilised each year for the purchase of new U.S. weapons systems.

Of the balance, about 30 percent is earmarked for the purchase and maintenance of U.S. equipment (including the procurement of ammunition for that equipment), with 20 percent covering the ongoing costs of programmes being implemented, and 15 percent being used to supplement and upgrade equipment currently in service.

Egypt is also eligible to receive surplus U.S. equipment under the Excess Defense Articles (EDA) programme, mostly on a cost-free basis, she pointed out.

Additionally, Egypt receives grants under the International Military Education and Training (IMET) programme, amounting to about 1.3 million to about 1.9 million dollars annually, plus about 250 million dollars annually in economic aid.

According to figures released by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), Egypt received about 11.8 billion dollars worth of weapons from the United States during 2004-2011, followed by 900 million dollars each in arms from China and Russia, and 700 million dollars in arms from Europe.

Although for all intents and purposes, the upheaval in Egypt has been described as a military coup, the administration of President Barack Obama has shied away from that categorisation, arguing the military takeover was triggered by civilian demands.

In an op-ed published in the New York Times Monday, Khaled M. Abou El Fadl, a law professor at the University of California, wrote: “By stepping in to remove an unpopular president, the Egyptian army re-affirmed a despotic tradition in the Middle East: army officers decide what the country needs, and they always know best.”

Under current U.S. legislation, it is mandatory for the United States to cut off aid to any country where the military takes power and ousts a democratically elected government — as happened in previous years in Fiji, Cote d’Ivoire and the Central African Republic, among others.

After country-wide elections, Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood was sworn in as the country’s first democratically-elected president in June 2012.

But so far, the White House has refused to cut off aid to Egypt, hoping to use it as leverage to restore civilian rule.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

How Unchecked Capitalism Has Brought the World to the Brink of Apocalypse — and What We Must Do Now

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The following is an excerpt from We Are All Apocalyptic Now: On the Responsibilities of Teaching, Preaching, Reporting, Writing, and Speaking Out , in print at Amazon.com and on Kindle (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013):

The first step in dealing with a difficult situation is to muster the courage to face it honestly, to assess the actual depth and severity of a problem and identify the systems from which the problem emerges. The existing social, economic, and political systems produce a distribution of wealth and well-being that is inconsistent with moral principles, as the ecological capital of the planet is drawn down faster than it can regenerate. The systems that structure almost all human societies produce profoundly unjust and fundamentally unsustainable results. We have both a moral obligation and practical reasons to work for justice and sustainability.

We need first to imagine, and then begin to create, alternative systems that will reduce inequality and slow, and we hope eventually reverse, the human assault on the ecosphere. To work toward those goals, individuals can (and should) make changes in their personal lives to consume less; corporations can (and should) be subject to greater regulation; and the most corrupt political leaders can (and should) be turned out of office. But those limited efforts, while noble and important in the short term, are inadequate to address the problems if no systemic and structural changes are made.

That sounds difficult because it will be, and glib slogans can’t change that fact. A longstanding cliché of progressive politics — organizers’ task is to “make it easy for people to do the right thing” — is inadequate in these circumstances. Given the depth of the dysfunction, it will not be easy to do the right thing. It will, in fact, be very hard, and there’s no sense pretending otherwise. At this point in history, anything that is easy and can be achieved quickly is almost certainly insufficient and likely irrelevant in the long run. Attempting to persuade people that large-scale social change will come easily is not only insulting to their intelligence but is guaranteed to fail. If organizers can persuade people to join a movement based on promises of victories that won’t disrupt privileged lives — victories that cannot be achieved — the backlash is likely worse than the status quo.

There’s one simple reason that serious change cannot be easy: We are the first species in the history of the planet that is going to have to will itself to practice restraint across the board, especially in our use of energy. Like other carbon-based creatures, we evolved to pursue energy-rich carbon, not constrain ourselves. Going against that basic fact of nature will not be easy.

Modern humans — animals like us, with our brain capacity — have been on the planet about 200,000 years, which means that we’ve lived within the hierarchical systems launched by agriculture for only about 5 percent of human history. We are living today in a world defined by systems in which we did not evolve as a species and to which we are still struggling to adapt. What today we take to be normal ways of organizing human societies — nation-states with capitalist economies — are recent developments, radically different than how we lived for 95 percent of our evolutionary history. We evolved in small gatherer-hunter groups, band-level societies that were basically egalitarian. Research on human social networks suggest that there is a limit on the “natural” size of a human social group of about 150 members, which is determined by our cognitive capacity. This has been called “Dunbar’s number” (after anthropologist Robin Dunbar) — the number of individuals with whom any one of us can maintain stable relationships. In that world, we pursed that energy-rich carbon without the knowledge or technology that makes that same pursuit so dangerous today.

So we are, as Wes Jackson puts it, “a species out of context.” We are living in a world that is in many ways dramatically out of sync with the kind of animals we are. If we are to create systems and structures that will make possible an ongoing human presence on the planet, we have to understand our evolutionary history and adapt our institutions to reflect our essentially local existence — people live, after all, not on “the planet” but in a specific place, as part of an ecosystem — on a scale and with a scope that we are capable of managing. But we also have to acknowledge that we are inextricably connected to others around the world because of more recent history. As a result of the centuries of imperialism that have advantaged some and disadvantaged others, we are all morally connected, as well as literally connected by modern transportation and communication technology. The task is not to go backward to some imagined Eden, but to understand our history to create a more just and sustainable future.

This means we have to recognize that the biological processes that govern the larger living world, along with our own evolutionary history, impose limits on human societies. Either we start shaping our world to reflect those limits so that we can control to some degree the dramatic changes coming, or we will be reacting to changes that can’t be controlled. That isn’t an easy task; as James Howard Kunstler points out, “the only thing that complex societies have not been able to do is contract, to become smaller and less complex, and to do it in a programmatic way that reduces the pain of transition.” Though history suggests that “people do what they can until they can’t,” it’s still imperative that we face the challenge:

Our longer-term destination is a society run at much lower levels of available energy, with much lower populations, and a time-out from the kinds of progressive innovation that so many have taken for granted their whole lives. It was an illusory result of a certain sequencing in the exploitation of resources in the planet earth that we have now pretty much run through. We have an awful lot to contend with in this reset of human activities.

If there is to be a decent future, we have to give up on the imperial fantasy of endless power, the capitalist fantasy of endless growth, the technological fantasy of endless comfort. Those systems have long been celebrated as the engines of unprecedented wealth, albeit for a limited segment of the world’s population. Instead of celebrating, we should mourn the world that these systems have created and search for something better. Systems that celebrate domination are death cults, not the basis for societies striving for justice and sustainability.

Our task can be stated simply: We seek justice, the simple plea for decent lives for all, and sustainability, a balance in which human social systems can thrive within the larger living world. Justice and sustainability have a common economics, politics, ethics, and theology behind them — rooted in a rejection of concentrated power and hierarchy — but there is no cookbook we can pull off the shelf with a recipe for success. We can articulate principles, identify rough guidelines, and search for specific solutions to immediate problems.

On justice: Our philosophical and theological systems all acknowledge the inherent dignity of all human beings. We say that we believe that all people are equal, though we accept conditions in the world in which all people cannot live with dignity, where any claim of equality is a farce. In that case we understand the principles but do not live accordingly.

On sustainability: There is less consensus on the philosophy and theology on which we ground a concern for sustainability. Is it purely pragmatic? Do we need to conserve the world to sustain ourselves? Should we have some more expansive concern about the non-human living world? Do other living things have a claim on us? There are no simple or obvious answers. We may have some general reverence for all life, but most of us value the lives of our children, our friends, and other humans more than we value the lives of other animals. But even with a lack of clarity about how to value various forms of life, we have to understand that we are part of that larger living world and that we should be careful about how we carve it up into categories.

For example, we should be careful not to value the pristine and ignore the human-built. We should not value the part of a forest that is untouched by human hands more than the part that has been cleared for human shelter. It is seductive to label wilderness as sacred and development as profane. Instead we should learn to see all the world — the last stands of old-growth redwoods in northern California and the most burned-out block of the South Bronx — as sacred ground. Until we do that, we have little hope of saving the former from destruction or restoring the latter to health. At its core, sustainability is about the acknowledgment of interdependence: the interdependence of people on each other, of people and other animals, of all living species and the non-living earth. We must see the interdependence of the redwoods and the South Bronx.

Again, no one has a blueprint for creating a just and sustainable society, but here is a list of a few basic assumptions and assertions that make justice and sustainability imaginable: (1) nature is not something humans have a right, divine or natural, to subdue and exploit; (2) for most of human beings’ evolutionary history, our social systems encouraged the solidarity and cooperation required for survival, and our social systems today should foster those same values, (3) systems that place profit above other values inevitably cause problems they cannot solve; (4) solutions must be holistic, linking the always interdependent parts of a system, such as producers and consumers; (5) technology is not automatically beneficial and must be scrutinized before being used; and, perhaps most importantly, (6) humans have the moral and intellectual capacity to make choices that will preserve rather than destroy the larger living world.

That human capacity to choose wisely does not guarantee we always will. The ease with which intellectuals can be co-opted is a reminder of that.

Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin and board member of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center. His latest book is ‘All My Bones Shake: Radical Politics in the Prophetic Voice’ (Soft Skull Press). He is also the author of ‘Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity’ (South End Press).

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Heroin Track Marks Are the Scars of War in Afghanistan

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Under the bridge downtown
Is where I drew some blood
Under the bridge
I could not get enough
Under the bridge
Forgot about my love
Under the bridge
I gave my life away — Red Hot Chili Peppers

Drug users are drawn to bridges. They offer a modicum of privacy and camaraderie to go about the illegal business of staving off opiate withdrawal and tamping down painful feelings. On a recent trip to Kabul, Afghanistan, I stood among dozens of men injecting heroin and inhaling opium vapors huddled under scarves in small groups under the Pul-i-Sokhta bridge — the name means “burned bridge.”

Some corners were so dark I wondered how users found a vein to inject. The smog of combustible opium filled the air. The soggy mud under our feet was full of putrid human detritus. I saw caked blood on track-pocked arms, weeping sores, scars and necrotic tissue. All I could think of was this: It doesn’t have to be this way. The hell and human suffering under the Pul-i-Sokhta bridge is entirely man-made. Drug users in Kabul need a safe injection site ( like this one), but instead, many will die from bloodborne infections and preventable diseases like HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis C.

I was at the bridge with a group of outreach workers from the Organization for Harm Reduction in Afghanistan (OHRA), who deliver “kites” filled with condoms, syringes and alcohol pads. Amidst feces, discarded syringes, cigarette butts and crushed plastic bottles, men surrounded me and Ziauddin, a former heroin user and a peer educator for OHRA. They shouted loudly and angrily about the police. Drug users are routinely assaulted and injured by officers driving them away from the bridge. Some are arrested. One man was beaten to death; Ziauddin showed me a picture of the dead man taken with his cell phone camera.

There is a mosque next to the bridge, and Ziauddin said the Mullah has given permission for Muslims to attack drug users with heavy wooden sticks. Hospitals openly refuse to treat the drug addicted. “We have no rights,” the men said over and over again. Then came a series of desperate pleas to the outreach staff, for basic items like food, clothing, housing and money. The men believe it’s the government’s responsibility to help them, although they’re cynical enough to understand that their criminal status makes any assistance unlikely.

Ziauddin explained many of the men have lost family support due to their opiate addiction. In Afghanistan, drug use brings tremendous shame to families. But to be without family is emotionally devastating in a country where there are few social support programs. Drug users depend on each other for survival, and meeting in public places to use drugs creates alternative families and community.

Scars of War

Afghans use drugs for many reasons, but in a country that’s suffered 30 years of uninterrupted war and foreign occupation, it’s no suprise that many men, women and even children use opiates. Opiates are well known for their calming effect, as well as their ability to mediate unpleasant emotions and suppress traumatic memories. Heroin and opium are fast-acting, powerful pain relievers with effects that last a long time, from seven to eight hours depending on the purity, which in Afghanistan, outreach workers told me, is about 80 percent.

The trauma of war creates the conditions for, and increases the risks of drug addiction. The prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Afghanistan is among the highest in the world. Add that to the facts that more than 20 million Afghans live in poverty, the unemployment rate is 35 percent, and hundreds of thousands of internally displaced people live in squalid refugee camps. No one in Afghanistan talks about addiction as a brain disease; it seems obvious that addiction is a response to trauma and social and economic deprivation.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

11 Shocking Things Snowden Has Taught Us (So Far)

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

This article originally appeared on GlobalPost.

1) Can you hear me now?

The Guardian reported on June 6 that, according to documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the Obama administration enabled the National Security Agency to collect caller information from Verizon through a “business records” provision of the Patriot Act, established under President George W. Bush. The government ordered Verizon to hand over call information on a daily basis, including the time, location and duration of calls. The Bush administration began collecting such information in October 2001 from AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth, which USA Today reported in 2006.

The consequence:

While US officials sought to reassure the public that such surveillance was legal and part of an ongoing program vital to national security, many Americans called the domestic spying an unnecessary invasion of privacy and lamented that it was even legal in the first place. A national debate quickly erupted.

2) Yes we scan

Snowden also leaked a secret 41-slide PowerPoint presentation apparently used to train US intelligence personnel. The slides detail the NSA’s involvement in a then-clandestine program called PRISM.

PRISM is the NSA effort to collect massive amounts of data from internet companies such as email content, search histories and file transfers tied to potential terrorism or espionage suspects. The PowerPoint presentation confirmed that the NSA is able to directly access the servers of “major US service providers,” describing collaboration with tech companies like YouTube, Skype, Google and Apple. Google, Apple, and others in the tech industry, however, denied awareness of the program.

PRISM began in 2007 with Microsoft and expanded to include Apple in 2012. To be subject toPRISM surveillance, there need only be “reasonable suspicion” that one of the suspects is outside the United States. Unlike the Verizon court-ordered collaboration, the government can access live information, photos, video chats and data from social networks directly through the companies’ servers without required consent or individual court orders. One slide puts the cost of the program at $20 million per year.

The consequence:

Domestically, PRISM was criticized for its ability to collect data on US citizens unintentionally. Also, the revelations coincided with a meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Barack Obama, adding tension to an already heated dialogue over cyber-espionage between the two countries. The summit in California was focused on US accusations of Chinese cyberattacks; but the US had little credibility in the wake of the Snowden leaks. China was adamant that it too was the victim of US attacks. EU countries were also brought into the mix, and European citizens now worry they have been spied upon through the PRISM program.

3) Boundless Informant

Boundless Informant is a tool that allows the NSA to compile and track the “metadata” it collects around the world. In the month of March alone, nearly 3 billion pieces of information were collected from US networks and 97 billion pieces worldwide,  the Guardian reported on June 8.

A “global heat map” sorts the intelligence sources by country, type, and volume, allowing quick analysis of which countries are most targeted, as well as when the information was gathered. The program is reviewed periodically, according to the documents, with operators able to make recommendations for future improvement.

The consequence:

Boundless Informant proved that despite assurances to Congress to the contrary, the NSA does keep track of the surveillance it performs on US citizens. James Clapper, director of national intelligence, defended the government’s use of the PRISM program and condemned “reckless disclosures” of its details by media. It was the first time Clapper named the program publicly. The intelligence director now faces criticism that he misled Congress when he earlier said the NSA did not have the tools to assess the extent of information gathered on US citizens. Clapper remains adamant that any information gathered on US citizens is “unwitting,” rather than the result of targeted surveillance.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Teen Gets Jailed, Registered as Sex Offender for Having Sex with a Female While 'Pretending' to Be a Boy

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The young relationship started as so many do these days – online. Thirteen-year-old “Scott” and 12-year-old “M” developed a friendship that over the course of three years and many instant message conversations, bloomed into romance. M began calling Scott her boyfriend – they even talked about getting married and having kids. After M’s 16th birthday, Scott, then 17, traveled from his home in Scotland to visit her in England. They watched a movie, kissed and, before long, things went further.

It may sound like a sweet story of teenage love – but Scott was sentenced by a court in England to three years in prison and ordered to register as a sex offender for life as a result of the relationship. That’s because Scott was born Justine McNally and assigned at birth as female. In an appeal of McNally’s sentence, which was made public late last week, a U.K. court reduced McNally’s sentence but affirmed that the 18-year-old had violated M’s sexual consent by presenting as male. It was deemed a “deception” and “abuse of trust.”

I’ll be referring to McNally as female from here on out because that appears to be how she currently identifies. As the court ruling put it, though, she had a history of “self-harm” and “confusion surrounding her gender identity and sexuality.” McNally also told police that she took on the identity of Scott online – at the pivotal age of 13 – “because it made her more comfortable,” according to the ruling. Regardless of how McNally identifies, this case could be significant for those who identify as transgender – as well as those who are exploring their gender and sexuality. That’s because it sets a possible precedent in the U.K. for prosecuting people for failing to announce before a sexual encounter the gender they were assigned at birth.

Matt Kailey, author of “Just Add Hormones: An Insider’s Guide to the Transsexual Experience,” points out the potential challenges that could arise. He asks, “What happens if a person who does not identify as ‘trans’ in any way is accused of being so … because his penis is too small for his sexual partner’s tastes or her breasts are too small or not the right shape for her sexual partner’s tastes? What about a person whose genitals do not meet the ‘standard’ appearance that society expects for male and female genitalia?”

This case also brings up dystopian images of couples breaking out pre-coital legal contracts that map out their every sequence of DNA. Jennifer Finney Boylan, a director of GLAAD, tells me, “What else do people want before falling in love, a birth certificate and a set of fingerprints?”

Previous U.K. cases have found that concealing one’s marital status, wealth, age or HIV diagnosis from a sexual partner does not invalidate consent. “It is unclear why being trans would be singled out as an exception to this, other than blatant societal transphobia,” says  Julia Serano, author of “Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity” – or homophobia. As Jane Fae wrote in the NewStatesman: “The only thing that really seems to vex this bunch of middle-aged blokes is being misled over gender, which must raise questions as to why such fears,” she writes of the recent ruling. “Is this, as they remark, merely ‘a broad commonsense way’ to deal with ‘evidence relating to “choice” and the “freedom” to make any particular choice.’ Or is it delicately muffled – and bewigged – homophobia?” (She also wrote that “the law in relation to intimate consent” is “an unholy heteronormative, patriarchally-inspired man-protecting mess.”)

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

The Extreme Suffering of Solitary Confinement Has Propelled 30,000 Prisoners to Go on Hunger Strike

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Note: A prisoner hunger strike began on Monday, July 8, with the Los Angeles Times reporting that “ 30,000 inmates refused meals at the start of what could be the largest prison protest in state history,” with prisoners in “two-thirds of the state’s 33 prisons” taking part.

Prisoners in Pelican Bay State Prison’s Security Housing Unit (SHU) are isolated for at least 22.5 hours a day in cramped, concrete, windowless cells. They are denied telephone calls, contact visits, any kind of programming, adequate food and, often, medical care. Nearly 750 of these men have been held under these conditions for more than a decade, dozens for over 20 years. This treatment has inflicted profound psychological suffering and caused or exacerbated debilitating physical ailments.

Ostensibly, these men are in the SHU because they associate with gang members and isolating them is necessary to prevent gang activity and racially-motivated violence. But in the summer and fall of 2011, these men, joined by other SHU prisoners throughout California, showed this claim to be the lie that it is. Organizing across racial lines, more than 6,000 SHU prisoners went on hunger strike for several weeks to protest their conditions. That’s right – men who have been isolated for over a decade and deprived of basic human rights because they are allegedly connected to racially divided gangs worked together to demand basic rights and constitutional protections for themselves and one another. Now they have resumed their hunger strike, demanding that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation meet their demands.

Gabriel Reyes, a plaintiff in the Center for Constitutional Rights lawsuit, is challenging long-term solitary confinement.

For the past 16 years, I have spent at least 22.5 hours of every day completely isolated within a tiny, windowless cell in the Security Housing Unit at California’s Pelican Bay State Prison in Crescent City (Del Norte County).

Eighteen years ago, I committed the crime that brought me here: burgling an unoccupied dwelling. Under the state’s “three strikes” law, I was sentenced to between 25 years and life in prison. From that time, I have been forced into solitary confinement for alleged “gang affiliation.” I have made desperate and repeated appeals to rid myself of that label, to free myself from this prison within a prison, but to no avail.

The circumstances of my case are not unique. In fact, about a third of Pelican Bay’s 3,400 prisoners are in solitary confinement; more than 500 have been there for 10 years, including 78 who have been here for more than 20 years, according to a 2011 report by National Public Radio. Unless you have lived it, you cannot imagine what it feels like to be by yourself, between four cold walls, with little concept of time, no one to confide in, and only a pillow for comfort – for years on end. It is a living tomb. I eat alone and exercise alone in a small, dank, cement enclosure known as the “dog-pen.” I am not allowed telephone calls, nor can my family visit me very often; the prison is hundreds of miles from the nearest city. I have not been allowed physical contact with any of my loved ones since 1995. I have developed severe insomnia, I suffer frequent headaches, and I feel helpless and hopeless. In short, I am being psychologically tortured.

Claimed reforms or opportunities to be transferred out of the SHU are tokens at best.

Our other option to improve our lot is “debriefing,” which means informing on prisoner activities. The guards use this tactic as leverage in exchange for medical care, food, amenities and even, theoretically, removal from the SHU. Debrief sessions are held in complete secrecy. When another prisoner is the subject of a debrief, he is not informed of the content, so he is punished with no means to challenge the accusations.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Activists Sue Federal Agency for Illegally Withholding Affordable Housing Funds

0

Activists and members of Causa Justa, a social justice organization, take to the streets in San Francisco on Tuesday to demand affordable housing.
Photo Credit: Causa Justa

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

The Right to the City alliance filed an unprecedented lawsuit against the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and its acting director, Ed DeMarco, on Tuesday, for illegally withholding at least $382 million from the National Housing Trust Fund, an affordable housing federal fund established in 2008.

Right to the City is a national alliance of 50 grassroots organizations in 17 cities. Its major campaign, the Homes for All campaign, unites renters, public housing occupants, homeless families and underwater homeowners to fight for affordable housing.

The 2008 Housing and Economic Recovery Act required that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac contribute a portion of their revenue – 0.04 percent of every dollar in new mortgage purchases – to the National Housing Trust Fund. As a result of the 2008 financial crisis, however, the FHFA suspended its contributions. Now, the mortgage finance giants have reported $28 billion in record-setting profits in 2012, but have yet to contribute to the fund.

After two years of pressuring the Obama administration to fund affordable housing, the Right to the City alliance said it could not wait another day. The alliance has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to enforce the FHFA and DeMarco contribute what they owe to the fund. The $382 million would secure the largest new investment to low-income housing in more than 30 years.

Rachel Laforest, executive director of Right to the City, said during a press conference on Tuesday, “Unfortunately, an investment in public housing has not been a trend in this country.”

She said from 1995 to 2008, more than 200,000 units of publicly subsidized housing have been demolished, while hundreds of thousands more units are slated for demolition. Currently, 11 million Americans pay more than 50 percent of their income on housing. Meanwhile, more than 3 million Americans remain homeless, half of whom are children.

Danielle Stelluto is one of those homeless Americans. She is a member of Picture the Homeless, one of Right to the City’s member organizations, and a plaintiff in the lawsuit. Stelluto is a single mother of a 5-year-old son and a 3-year-old daughter, all currently living in a shelter in the Bronx, NY. Stelluto said after five months of living in a shelter, she was able to move into a three-bedroom house after receiving a housing voucher. After a year and a half, however, she lost the voucher after Mayor Bloomberg discontinued the program. She has since been living in a shelter, away from family and friends. Because of her long commute to work and her need to obey the shelter’s curfew, she had to leave her job and take a job as a home health aid, where she now makes less than $10,000 a year.

She added that Section 8 in NYC is closed, while the wait list for public housing in the city is 10 years.

Stelluto said:

I’ve been striving to pick myself up, but it seems almost impossible at times. I’ve never been more stressed out in my life, between my kids’ loss, the loss of the voucher and the loss of a roof over our heads. …I’ve dealt with depression, anxiety and feeling like I’m running on a hamster wheel.

Angela Samuels, another plaintiff in the case, is a member of Miami’s worker center, another Right to the City’s member organizations. Samuels said she grew up in Miami, went to college and became a nurse. However, she lost her job after 26 years, and was evicted from the house where she grew up after 43 years.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Washington Ousted Egypt's Morsi

0

Washington Ousted Egypt’s Morsi
by Stephen Lendman
Previous articles discussed it. So did The New York Times. More on that below.
Washington manipulates most regional events. It’s dirty hands orchestrate them. Geopolitical ones matter most. In 2011, Obama officials choreographed Mubarak’s ouster. They deposed Morsi in similar fashion.
Michel Chossudovsky said Egypt’s Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) “tows the line. (I)t takes orders from Washington, DC.”
Around $1.5 billion annually buys lots of influence. America’s long arm tolerates no outliers. Independent governments are targeted. Subservient ones are supported.
“US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel as well as the US Chief of Staff General Martin Dempsey were in permanent liaison with the architects of the coup in the two weeks preceding the military takeover,” said Chossudovsky.
Egypt’s the largest Arab country. It’s strategically important. It’s a vital US ally. SCAF generals don’t act without US approval.
They’re in close liaison with Israel. Controlling events on the ground is important. Washington manipulates them. SCAF’s ordered to prevent them from spinning out of control.
Given strong commitment on both sides, it won’t be easy. Civil war’s unlikely but possible. Events at times exceed what observers expect. Egypt’s a virtual tinder box. Nothing ahead will surprise.
On Monday, SCAF killed dozens of peaceful pro-Morsi protesters. Hundreds more were injured. They knelt to pray in front of Republican Guard headquarters. Morsi’s believed to be held there under house arrest.
One injured protester explained what happened, saying:
Soldiers opened fire “like pouring rain. They started shooting tear gas and then live ammunition. We were shouting ‘peaceful, peaceful,’ but the shooting continued.”
“There were dawn prayers and then I heard someone calling for help, so the imam finished the prayers quickly.”
“Just before we finished, the shooting started. The army units that were standing in front of the Republican Guard headquarters first started shooting teargas, then live ammunition above people’s heads.” 
“I was taking cover with another guy behind some rubble and I felt something hit my head. I held my prayer mat in my hand and I started to cover my head with it. But I couldn’t stop the bleeding because there was so much blood.”
Another injured man said “I swear to God no one was doing anything.”
A pro-Morsi doctor said:
“We were out on the street to defend legitimacy. But then the army shot us in broad daylight.”
A SCAF spokesman lied. He claimed Morsi supporters attacked the compound with stones and live fire. They’re “armed terrorists,” he said. He defended the indefensible. He called cold blooded murder self-defense.
“The army had no choice but to return fire,” he claimed.
Evidence showed otherwise. The New York Times headlined “Video of Army Shooting Islamists in Cairo Stokes Anger,” saying:
Images showed “shots being fired by army snipers.” Protesters were killed in cold blood.  Video clips were posted on Facebook and You Tube.
One was viewed about half a million times. It showed “close-up footage of a man in uniform firing down from a rooftop.”
Separately The Times said:
SCAF “provided little evidence to back its claim that the fighting had been instigated by the Islamists.”
Bullet casings proved soldiers used live fire. Independent munitions expert Nic Jensen Jones examined photos. He confirmed SCAF’s responsibility.
Senior Muslim Brotherhood leader Essam el-Erian called what happened “an outright massacre (by) a fascist coup government.”
He and other MB officials called for a national “uprising” against military dictatorship ruthlessness.
On July 8, NYT editors headlined “Bloodshed in Egypt,” saying:
It’s been “all downhill (since SCAF) ousted President Mohaned Morsi last week.”
Egypt’s “military claimed its soldiers fired in response to an attack by gunmen from an unnamed ‘terrorist group.’ ” 
“But other evidence – bullet casings with the army stamp, indications that the gunfire came from the top of a nearby building – suggest a military all too willing to use excessive force.”
Obama “refused to label the coup a coup because to do so (requires) “cut(ting) of $1.5 billion in (mostly) military…aid to a country” vital to America’s regional strategic interests.
Times editors stopped short of explaining Washington’s direct role. They said America “cannot control Egypt’s future.”
Orwell explained best, saying:
“Those who control the present, control the past, and those who control the past control the future.”
What’s ongoing won’t end easily or quickly. It’ll likely continue. Resolution’s nowhere in sight.
Conditions are deplorable. They’re worse now than ever. Decades of neoliberal harshness reflect socioeconomic terrorism. People take so much before exploding.
Conditions are deteriorating in real time. Public anger on both sides is real. Longstanding grievances remain unaddressed. 
Junta power runs Egypt. Politicians serve at its behest. Washington has final say. Longstanding neoliberal harshness is policy. Police state terror keeps things in check.
America benefits from instability. Egypt’s kept unable to function viably. Neocolonialism prevents it. It’s true throughout the region.
On July 6, New York Times writers David Kirkpatrick and Mayy El Sheikh explained what NYT editors omitted. They headlined “Morsi Spurned Deals, Seeing Military as Tamed.” 
Ahead of his ouster, he huddled with aides. “(H)e received a call from an Arab foreign minister with a final offer to end a standoff with the country’s top generals, senior advisors with the president said.”
The unnamed official was Washington’s emissary. He offered Morsi a deal he knew he’d reject. 
He asked if he’d “accept the appointment of a new prime minister and cabinet, one that would take over all legislative powers and replace his chosen provincial governors.”
Morsi rejected a similar proposal earlier. “This before that,” he said. He repeated a “vow to die before accepting what he considered a de facto coup….”
Essam el-Haddad was his key foreign policy advisor. He left the room. He phoned Anne Patterson. She’s Washington’s Egypt ambassador.
On return, he said he spoke to Susan Rice. She’s Obama’s national security advisor. She represents the worst of US imperial interests.
She told el-Haddad the coup was about to begin. An aide texted an associate saying:
“Mother America just told us that we will stop playing in one hour.” 
During Morsi’s final days, White House and State Department officials kept low profiles. According to The Times:
“The abrupt end of Egypt’s first Islamist government was the culmination of months of escalating tensions and ultimately futile American efforts to broker a solution that would keep Mr. Morsi in his elected office, at least in name, if not in power.”
“A new alliance of youthful activists and Mubarak-era elites was driving street protests.” Strings were pulled in Washington.
Last fall, Morsi knew he might be ousted. He told close advisers:
“Do you think this is the peak? (It’ll) be when you see my blood flowing on the floor.”
He erred thinking SCAF supported him. After Mubarak’s ouster, he was MB’s designated envoy for talks with ruling generals. He thought he developed close ties.
Close aides said he was the last to know his days were numbered. An old poker saying goes “If you can’t spot the sucker in 30 minutes or less, you’re it.”
Around mid-June, Morsi’s inner circle saw imminent trouble. SCAF head General Abdul Fatah al-Sisi warned of a growing “split in society.” 
Divisions between Morsi and opponents compels the military “to intervene,” he said.
Morsi didn’t expect a coup. Al-Sisi told him his statement “was to satisfy some of his men. It was nothing more than an attempt to absorb their anger.”
Steps to remove Morsi were underway. Opposition leaders were energized by the prospect. Large scale protests followed. Millions turned out nationwide.
Top Morsi advisers met with ambassador Patterson. They spoke to Susan Rice. They argued that ousting him would be “a long term disaster. Egyptians and others throughout the Arab world would “lose faith in democracy.”
An uncontrollable “explosion in the streets” would follow. They knew about Washington’s involvement.
“Nobody who knows Egypt is going to believe a coup could go forward without a green light from the Americans,” they said.
Mixed messages followed. Morsi advisers met with al-Sisi. They accepted earlier concessions he proposed.
The same evening Morsi spoke publicly. His defiant address called opponents “traitorous conspirators.”
It didn’t matter either way. The die was cast. Coup steps were underway. Obama officials ordered them.
Morsi took refuge inside Republican Guard headquarters. He chose the wrong place. After his final meeting with aides, al-Sisi ordered “Lock the gates.”
Morsi was seized. He remains under house arrest. Junta power rules. Police state repression terrorizes resisters. Expect lots more spilled blood.
Washington rules apply. America’s dirty hands run things. Obama has final say. Egyptians were again betrayed.
Longstanding grievances remain unaddressed. Bread and butter ones matter most. 
Neoliberal harshness remains policy. Brute force targets challengers. Nothing ahead looks promising. Coup authority spurns democratic rights.
Egyptians are on their own like always. Unity against state terror is vital. Real change won’t come any other way. It’s true throughout the region. It’s true everywhere.
Challenging entrenched power takes organized people. It takes unity. Divisions are self-defeating. 
It takes commitment for nothing less than what serves everyone equitably. It takes longterm struggle for justice. It’s never possible easily or quickly.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. 
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour 
http://www.dailycensored.com/washington-ousted-egypts-morsi/

Republished with permission from: Stephen Lendman

Frustrating Snowden’s Asylum Bid

0

In its struggle against whistleblowers, the United States has exerted a variegated form of power, one that focuses on documents and an anaemic reading of the law. The international relations canon searches desperately for what that might be. In the classically obtuse language pursued by the IR troupe, it might be deemed “soft power” — there is no military force, though there is a degree of coercion. Such a concept involves concepts of attraction and conviction. There has never been such a thing, however much that straw man is stuffed by the likes of Joseph Nye and his adherents.

Power, by definition, is not soft. It is turgid, tumescent and violent, be it physically, symbolically or psychologically. Nor is it even “smart” in the sense that some scholars would have it. (The national interest was always a fiction of the highest order.) What only matters is the type of violence and coercion the exerciser of that power intends to affect.

The pressing encirclement of Edward Snowden is the empire of paper in action, war by visa, by passport, by documentation. One exists only because of paper, an ontological crime if ever there was one. To borrow an expression from the French designation of irregular migrants, Snowden is as species of political sans papiers.

Since the triumph of inhumane bureaucracy forecast by Franz Kafka’s dystopian vision, the state has become the arbitrary mediator of human identity. Documents and records dictate who you are. Without them, you are invisible, and by definition, absent. In absence, there are no rights. One is not Aristotle’s zoon politikon, the human who is a political animal by inclination, but legalis homo, a creature only recognised by law as lawful.

Notorious examples of this behaviour abound in the register of muck that is history. The U.S. State Department, as did other administrations across the globe, adopted a notorious ‘go slow’ approach when it came to processing claims for asylum by Jewish refugees once Hitler’s regime began its cleansing operations. True, in 1936, it was not necessarily clear that the modern German state would eventually become the efficient killing machine that it did, but such were the times. The precedent was set.

Even in those cases, adequate documentation, whatever that might suggest, was not a guarantee of acceptance into another state. Naturally, having been deprived of German citizenship, many German Jews did not have a national leg to stand on. In the eyes of the cold bureaucrat processing the claims, they were but non-entities scrapping for recognition. Such difficulties dog cases such as Snowden’s, where legal substitutes have to be found. When a state turns on you, what is the recourse?

This is a struggle citizens have been waging for centuries in some form or rather, but after the creation of passports, documentation for travel, and a system of formalised asylum, the political dissident has had to face an array of legal quandaries. What to do if the state of which one is a citizen refuses you a passport, confiscates an existing one or refuses to grant one? Contemptibly, the state’s power to do that suggests the limited ambit of what citizens really mean in the context of state law. If the sovereign can be so fickle about citizenship, it is fitting that he should be abandoned.

Now, powers such as Venezuela, Nicaragua and Bolivia have thrown a spanner, or at the very least something of a shovel, at the system, though they will also have to find some way of facilitating Snowden’s exit from Moscow, assuming he is still there. The empire of paper is riddled with borders, and demands even the naughty to play by the rules. President Evo Morales claims that he is happy to accept Snowden “if he asks”; Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro has also offered “humanitarian asylum”, and Bolivia’s Daniel Ortega has added his name to the mix of those willing to offer a safe haven.

Such offers, as was shown by Ecuador, are contingent on circumstance and expediency. The initial reports of a refugee pass granted by the government were enthusiastic, but the document was subsequently revoked, leaving Snowden to linger amidst the sprawl of Sheremetyevo international airport.

For convenience, assuming he is still there, there is still the problem he faces of being on a flight that is grounded before leaving. As Sheremetyevo sticks to commercial flights, Snowden would either have to brave one or make it to another facility used by foreign dignitaries. So far, the latter option seems very unlikely.

The Russian response to his claims for asylum have been enthusiastic, largely because they don’t want him in their midst. Russian lawmakers will be insensible at the suggestion that this is because of the reach of U.S. power. Another theory that might be offered is that President Vladimir Putin is a man of secrecy, a former KGB man who specialised as a creature with no face. There is surely a strain in his body that finds sympathy with the NSA crowd, the shadowy war against political misfits and missionaries. The watched citizen, in that school of thought, is a better citizen.

All in all, the interest in Snowden as a politically engaged responsible citizen is less important than recognising him as a legal, or illegal creature. As it stands, he occupies a ghastly purgatory at this point, a literal “transit” zone which will determine what control he passes through next. Even those willing to offer him refuge demand their own set of paperwork to be done. Snowden knows that, as we all do. But it makes the empire of paper only slightly less pitiful or sinister.

Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

Republished with permission from: Counterpunch

The ‘B’ Word: Republicans Fan the Flames of Ageism

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_b_word_republicans_fan_the_flames_of_ageism_20130709/

Posted on Jul 9, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Spain court rejects Iranian’s appeal

0

This file photo shows Iranian engineer Alireza Valadkhani, who is under house arrest in Spain.

A Spanish appeals court has rejected a request by Iranian engineer Alireza Valadkhani to lift his house arrest and return his passport under a conditional release term.

Valadkhani, who was the managing director of private Iranian helicopter service company Heli Kish, was arrested in Spain in 2011. He had traveled to the European country to visit a company on the outskirts of Madrid, where three Bell 212 Helicopters were undergoing repair.

The 54-year-old Iranian national was arrested by Spanish police on the charge of attempting to violate UN sanctions against Iran.

Since he has been under house arrest for more than two years and no date has yet been set for a court hearing to review his case, the Iranian engineer submitted a request to the court through his lawyer, pointing out that even if he was found guilty of the alleged charge, his prison sentence would not be more than two years according to law.

Also considering the fact that he has posted a EUR 500,000 bail, and has been deprived of his basic citizenship rights because his passport has been taken away, he requested that the court return his passport to him so that he can return to Iran and visit his family until a court hearing is scheduled.

The officials of the Spanish company, who were also arrested along with Valadkhani, were released without posting bail a long time ago. Valadkhani was released from primary solitary confinement and was put under house arrest only after posting the 500,000-euro bail.

In a February interview, Valadkhani complained about his daily life restrictions in a country like Spain because he is not holding a passport or a residence permit, noting that he has been denied all social rights and services including health insurance coverage, a bank account, a work permit, the right to travel out of the capital and other basic human rights.

The Iranian businessman also said he was shouldering the heavy financial burden of the proceedings on his own.

ASH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Syrian Opposition in Disarray

0

Syrian Opposition in Disarray
by Stephen Lendman
After 28 months of conflict, Assad defeated Washington’s best laid plans. Its Syrian National Coalition (SNC) opposition lacks effective leadership. It lacks legitimacy. 
It’s an artificial construct. It operates extrajudicially. It resembles a gang that can’t shoot straight. On July 8, another leader resigned. 
After four months, self-styled prime minister Ghassan Hitto announced he won’t “continue in (his) capacity as prime minister tasked with leading the interim government, though (he) emphasize(s he’ll) ‘continue working for the interests of the revolution and towards achieving its objectives.”
Washington’s war on Syria’s no “revolution.” There’s nothing civil about it. It’s US proxy aggression. Foreign death squad invaders want Islamofacism replacing Syrian sovereignty.
Hitto’s resignation came two days after SNC members elected Ahmad Asi-al Jarba president.
The post’s been vacant since Mouaz al-Khatib resigned in April. He cited frustration over lack of enough international support, internal divisions, and disarray among “rebel” factions.
Washington hoped he’d become Syria’s Hamid Karzai. Maybe Obama has similar aspirations for al-Jarba.
Repeated changing of the guard shows SNC ranks in disarray. Al-Khatib and Hitto couldn’t resolve SNC divisions. Don’t expect al-Jarba to fare better.
Just causes close ranks effectively. Rogue operations feature self-aggrandizing, power-hungry opportunists. They face overwhelming Syrian opposition. 
Most Syrians support Assad. They do so for good reason. They alone want to decide who rule them. They deplore outside intervention. 
Disorganized “rebel” ranks are no match for Syria’s superior military. It continues making impressive gains.
Regular Syrian National News Agency (SANA) reports repeat what the July 9 one said. It headlined “Army eliminates Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists in several areas.” 
Army units inflicted heavy losses on “armed terrorist groups” in and around Homs, Hula and other areas. 
“Leader of an armed terrorist group, Obeid Hassan Obeid, nicknamed Abi Allaith, and terrorists Mossa al-Khaled, Mustafa Shamir and Osama Zabateh were identified among the dead.”
On July 8, FARS News Agency headlined “Syrian Army Continues Advance in Aleppo,” saying:
“Syrian Army units inflicted heavy losses on armed rebels in a series of concentrated military operations against their gatherings in Aleppo and took control of several parts of the city.”
Syrian forces continued mopping up operations. Areas have been totally cleared of foreign fighters.
Clashes continued around Aleppo’s central prison. Dozens of insurgents were killed. Many others were eliminated in other parts of the city.
On July 9, Press TV headlined “Syria invites UN officials to discuss claims of chemical weapons use,” saying:
Syria’s UN ambassador Bashar Jaafari said:
“The Syrian authorities have discovered yesterday in the city of Banias 281 barrels filled with dangerous, hazardous chemical materials.”
Amounts found are “capable of destroying a whole city, if not the whole country,” he added.
Toxic substances include 79 barrels of polyethylene glycol (PEG), 67 barrels of mono ethylene glycol, 25 barrels of mono ethanol (or ethanolamine), 68 barrels of diethanolamine (DEA), and 42 barrels of triethanolamine (TEA).
Jaafari said chemicals found were “in a secret storage (area) controlled and monitored by the armed terrorist groups.”
Washington falsely accused Syria of using sarin and other chemical weapons “on a small scale.”
Damascus dismissed US allegations, saying:
“The White House published a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria, based on fabricated information, through which it is trying to hold the Syrian government responsible for such use.”
In mid-June, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said so-called US evidence doesn’t meet longstanding Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) requirements.
Insurgents used chemical weapons multiple times. UN investigators confirmed sarin use. They did so before equivocating under heavy Western pressure.
In late May, Turkish police arrested 12 suspected Al Nusra fighters. They were seized in southern Turkey. 
They were caught red-handed with a two gm cylinder of sarin nerve gas. Initial Turkish media reports said four and a half pounds of sarin were seized. 
Other reports provided clear evidence. Insurgents used sarin and other chemical weapons multiple times. 
On July 9, Russia Today headlined “Russian inquiry to UN: “Rebels, not Army behind Syria Aleppo chemical attack,” saying:
Moscow’s UN ambassador Vladimir Churkin said analysis of samples taken indicate “rebels” bear responsibility.
“I have just passed the analysis of samples taken at the site of the chemical attack to the UN Secretary General,” Churkin said.
“Evidence studied by Russian scientists indicates that a projectile carrying the deadly nerve agent sarin was most likely fired at Khan al-Assal by the rebels.”
More than 30 people died. Damascus straightaway asked for a UN investigation. Insurgents lied. They denied responsibility. They falsely blamed Assad.
Western sources consistently point fingers the wrong way. So do media scoundrels. Assad’s falsely blamed for death squad crimes.
Syria’s conflict is far from resolved. Israeli involvement complicates things.
On July 6, Haaretz headlined “Report: Series of blasts heard near Assad arms depot in northern Syria,” saying:
Residents reported seeing “fighter jets near time of blasts.” A Syrian weapons depot was struck near Latakia. Lebanon’s Al Manar said rockets or missiles were fired. 
Haaretz called the source of the strike “unclear.” It was Israeli aggression. It was Israel’s third attack on Syria since January.
Richard Silverstein explained what Haaretz omitted, saying:
“A massive explosion last Thursday at a major Syrian weapons depot in Latakia, not far from the main port of Tartus, completely destroyed the facility and munitions stored there.”
The Free Syrian army (FSA) falsely took credit. “(I)t was not the responsible party,” said Silverstein. It was done to divert attention from Israel.
“A confidential Israeli source (told Silverstein) Israeli forces attacked the site.” SA-300 anti-aircraft missile components were targeted.
Russia shipped them to Tartus. They’re stored in Latakia. What Israel destroyed, Russia will replace. Other military help is provided.
Russia has longstanding contractual obligations. It supports its Syrian ally. It does so against Western aggression. It wants Assad supplied with enough firepower to prevail.
Silverstein’s source said “the FSA coordinated with the IDF and launched a rocket attack on nearby government military installations in order to distract loyalist forces from the real target.”
Insurgents had no involvement in attacking Syria’s weapons depot. Israel bore full responsibility. Assad knows it. So does Russia.
Israel’s a key US regional imperial partner. It’s heavily involved in Washington’s war on Syria. It’s allied with Al Qaeda and Al Nusra insurgents. 
It supplies arms and munitions. It treats wounded insurgents in Israeli hospitals. It remains to be seen what follows.
In late May, Syria warned Israel. Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem said Damascus won’t let “any (further) Israeli aggression go unanswered without retaliation.” 
“The retaliation will be the same size as the aggression, and the same type of weapons will be used.”
We’ll know before long if he means it.
On July 9, Voice of Russia headlined “Russian, US experts disagree over many aspects of Syrian problem – Morozov.”
Syria and its regional implications were addressed at a bilateral seminar.
The Public Projects Institute (INOP) and Center for the National Interest (CNI) organized it.
Former Senator Gary Hart, General Charles Boyd, and Dmitri Simes represented America.
Parliamentarians and foreign policy experts spoke for Russia.
Discussion focused on Syria. Polar opposite opinions were expressed. According to Morozov:
“Our US partners said that it was possible to discuss Syrian issues and methods of solving them only in the case of the unconditional resignation of Bashar al-Assad.” 
“They made themselves clear – ‘al-Assad must go’ before the formation of an interim government and elections of the new authorities are discussed.”
Russia believes otherwise. Syrians alone should decide who’ll rule them. “Counter-questions were asked”, said Morozov.
“We asked why al-Assad, a legitimate president, must go. He enjoys the support of many people in spite of the conflict.” 
“He is in command of over 300,000 servicemen. And only one year is left until the next election.”
Russia categorically refuses to buy unacceptable US demands. It defends Syrian sovereignty. It supports rule of law principles 
Washington’s ravaging Syria. It’s doing so ruthlessly. It’s doing it with impunity. Its imperial priorities matter most.
A Final Comment
US regional interests extend well beyond Syria and Egypt. Iran’s been unjustly targeted for decades.
On July 9, House Homeland Security’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency debated Iran’s alleged Western Hemisphere influence.
The 2012 Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act directs the Secretary of State to assess “threats posed to the United States by Iran’s growing presence and activity in the Western Hemisphere.”
Annual reports must be submitted to Congress. They’re classified. The latest dated June contains a two-page unclassified annex. It states in part:
“As a result of diplomatic outreach, strengthening of allies’ capacity, international nonproliferation efforts, a strong sanctions policy, and Iran’s poor management of its foreign relations, Iranian influence in Latin America and the Caribbean is waning.”
Rep. Jeff Duncan (R. SC) chairs the House Oversight, Investigations and Management Subcommittee. He questioned the State Department report, saying:
It didn’t “reach reach out to even one country in the Western Hemisphere in the crafting of the threat assessment and strategy.”  
“It makes no sense for the State Department to send (Congress an Iranian report on its alleged Western Hemisphere influence) without considering the views of our allies in the region.”
He cited Alberto Nisman’s May report. He’s an Argentinian prosecutor. The State Department debunked his findings. 
He falsely linked Iran to regional terror attacks. He did so duplicitously. He did with no credible evidence.
His so-called “irrefutable proof” was rubbish. He left unaddressed an Iranian motive or interest in Latin American terrorism. What possible purpose could it serve? 
Tehran’s got everything to lose and nothing to gain. Israel and America benefit hugely. Iran’s falsely linked to incidents bearing their fingerprints globally. 
Reinventing history doesn’t wash. Scoundrels like Nisman try anyway. Even the State Department dismissed his deception.
He was invited to testify before Duncan’s committee. Argentina’s Attorney General denied his travel request. 
She and President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner want no part of his bogus allegations. They know others about Iran’s nuclear program are false and misleading. 
Targeting Iran continues maliciously. Washington wants another independent government deposed. It wants pro-Western puppet regimes throughout the region. It wants them everywhere. Unchallenged imperial dominance matters most.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. 
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. 
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour 
http://www.dailycensored.com/syrian-opposition-in-disarray/

Republished with permission from: Stephen Lendman

Egypt MB rejects offer to join government

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party has rejected offers by the country’s new Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi to join the interim government.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

China, US talks on cyber security work

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]China and the United States have begun the annual dialogue on cyber security, with Chinese media saying the talks go well despite recent revelations by former American spy agency contractor Edward Snowden.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Spaniards protest fraud by ruling party

0

Spaniards rally against government corruption in February 2013 (file photo).

Angry protesters have staged a demonstration outside the headquarters of Spainâ„¢s ruling Popular Party to protest alleged corruption within the party amid the nationâ„¢s growing financial troubles.

The Tuesday protest rally came in response to a Sunday report in El Mundo newspaper, releasing spending records of the conservative party that showed it had made payments to its members from an illicit slush fund.

The protester further called for the resignation of the Spanish government.

The development comes as the Spaniards have been struggling with persisting recession, high unemployment and deep budget cuts over recent years.

This is while the Popular Party issued a statement rejecting the illegal financing allegations publish by prominent newspaper, which cited the political partyâ„¢s former treasurer Luis Barcenas as its source.

Barcenas revealed in his interview with the newspaper that the ruling Popular Party had been illegally financing itself for at least 20 yaars, receiving cash donations from construction firms and other businesses in exchange for contracts from administrations run by the party.

The fallout from the report further continued on Tuesday as one of Barcenasâ„¢s close confidants that the ex-treasurer of the ruling party has more documents in his possession, which Å“could being down the government.”

Back in January, however, another local daily El Pais also published photocopied extracts of the same ledger, stirring similar protest rallies.

MFB/MFB

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Koreas kick out talks on Kaesong

0

A view of the joint Kaesong industrial zone, which is run by North and South Korea (file photo)

South and North Korea have started talks on the reopening of the joint Kaesong industrial zone, where work has been on a hiatus since an escalation of tensions between Pyongyang and Seoul.

Delegates from Seoul and Pyongyang met on Wednesday to hold talks aimed at restarting activities at the siteâ„¢s factories, which have been suspended for three months.

Å“We’ll do our best to ensure this meeting will lead to restoration of mutual trust and larger cooperation,” South Koreaâ„¢s Unification Ministry chief delegate Suh Ho said on Wednesday.

The talks come days after Seoul and Pyongyang agreed to reopen the industrial zone.

Å“The weekend marked the first step, but the difficult part starts now,” said a South Korean Unification Ministry official.

On July 3, the representatives of dozens of firms in Kaesong called on Pyongyang and Seoul to resume talks.

Kaesong is located on the North Korean side of the fortified border with South. Over 120 South Korean companies, employing both South and North Korean workers, are located in the industrial zone.

Kaesong was launched in 2003 in an effort to boost ties between the two Koreas.

Pyongyang blocked access to the site and withdrew its 53,000 employees in May amid rising tensions with Seoul. South Korea pulled out the last of its workers on May 3.

The Korean Peninsula has been locked in a cycle of military rhetoric over the past few months.

The rhetoric escalated when the United States and South Korea held joint military exercises in April, with the participation of US nuclear-capable B-52 and B-2 stealth bombers. North Korea censured the drills and warned Washington and Seoul against a Å“preemptive attack,” which could develop into an Å“all-out war.”

SZH/PR/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

‘West should be moderate in Iran N-talks’

0

An Iranian lawmaker has called on Western powers to shift toward a moderate approach vis-à-vis Iran in the course of the negotiations over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear energy program.

Å“Parties to the talks with Iran suspended the negotiations long ago due to the elections in Iran; but now that they welcome the election of [Hassan] Rohani [as Iranâ„¢s new president], they should shift their approaches from extremism to moderation,” said Hossein Naqavi-Hosseini, the spokesman for the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of Iranâ„¢s Majlis on Tuesday.

Iran and the P5+1 – Russia, China, France, Britain, and the United States plus Germany – have held several rounds of talks, mainly over the Iranian nuclear energy program.

On whether a fresh round of talks is likely to be held between Iran and the P5+1 in mid-August, Naqavi-Hosseini said, Å“In the course of its nuclear talks with the Western sides, the Islamic Republic of Iran has built the necessary confidence, and (now) it is awaiting a change in approach on the part of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the P5+1.”

The legislator also alluded to Rohaniâ„¢s experience as Iranâ„¢s chief nuclear negotiator from October 2003 to August 2005, and noted that the president-elect was fully cognizant of the principles of Iranâ„¢s foreign policy and its red lines.

He said Western countries should not expect the change of the president in Iran to lead to a major shift in Tehranâ„¢s stance in the trend of the talks.

The US, Israel, and some of their allies have repeatedly accused Iran of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program and used the unfounded allegation as a pretext to impose illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Tehran has categorically rejected the accusation, arguing that as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the IAEA, it is entitled to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

Meanwhile, numerous inspections of Iran’s nuclear facilities by the IAEA have never found any evidence showing that the Iranian nuclear energy program has been diverted toward non-civilian purposes.

ASH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

‘Iran open to ties with Helsinki, Prague’

0

Iranian President-elect Hassan Rohani says Tehran welcomes the enhancement of relations with Finland and the Czech Republic.

In a Tuesday message to Finnish President Sauli Vainamo Niinisto, Rohani expressed hope that Tehran and Helsinki would forge closer ties in the future.

Rohani thanked Niinisto for having sent him a congratulatory message over his victory in Iranâ„¢s presidential election, and wished the Finnish nation prosperity and welfare.

Also, in response to Czech President Milos Zemanâ„¢s congratulatory message, Rohani expressed hope that the relations between Tehran and Prague would further expand based on mutual respect and interests.

Rohani won Iranâ„¢s June 14 presidential election, garnering 50.7 percent of a total of 36,704,156 ballots. The voter turnout in the election was 72.7 percent, according to Iranâ„¢s Interior Ministry.

The Iranian president-elect currently represents Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei in the Supreme National Security Council. He is also a member of the Assembly of Experts, the Expediency Council and the president of the councilâ„¢s Center for Strategic Research.

YH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Claim of Iran meddling in Egypt rejected

0

Egyptian supporters of ousted President Mohamed Morsi shout slogans as they rally outside Cairo’s Rabaa al-Adawiya Mosque, July 8, 2013.

A senior Iranian lawmaker has dismissed Egyptâ„¢s recent allegations about Tehranâ„¢s interference in the North African countryâ„¢s internal affairs as a blame game.

Å“Remarks by Egyptâ„¢s Foreign Ministry spokesman [Badr Abdelatty] about Iranâ„¢s meddling in Egyptâ„¢s domestic crises are aimed at shifting the blame for [Cairoâ„¢s] inability to manage the countryâ„¢s domestic affairs and diverting the public opinion from the realities in Egypt,” said Alaeddin Boroujerdi, the chairman of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of Iranâ„¢s Majlis.

Å“All countries, including Iran, comment on the Egypt issue; but based on international norms, that by no means equates interference,” he pointed out.

Egypt plunged into a fresh wave of unrest after General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, head of the Egyptian army, declared on June 3 that President Mohamed Morsi was no longer in office and announced the suspension of the countryâ„¢s Constitution after days of massive anti-government protests across Egypt.

A day later, Chief Justice of Egyptâ„¢s Supreme Constitutional Court Adli Mansour, was sworn in as the interim president of the country. The Egyptian military said Morsi was being held Å“preventively.”

Boroujerdi also argued that although most analyses attribute the recent crisis in Egypt to Morsiâ„¢s mistakes, he had gained power within the democratic framework recognized in the world today and through election, and that altering this framework through military force is not acceptable.

Å“Iran believes that the freedom and the votes of nations must be respected, and we hope the changes brought about in Egyptâ„¢s political structure will be in such a way that the US and Israel will not once again get the chance to capitalize [on the situation] in the country,” he added.

The Iranian lawmaker noted that the US and Israel seek to sow discord and stoke tension in Islamic nations, adding, Å“After the emergence of Islamic Awakening in the region, the two (the US and Israel) used everything in their power to deflect Islamic Awakening from its path and incite sectarian and religious disputes, the latest instance of which is the Egypt crisis.”

ASH/NN/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Turkish police attack demonstrators attempting to enter Gezi Park

0

 

By
Stefan Steinberg

10 July 2013

Turkish riot police fired tear gas and rubber bullets Monday to block protesters from entering Gezi Park, the scene of repeated conflicts between police and demonstrators last month. Two days earlier, police had also clashed violently with protesters attempting to gain access to the park.

In June, four protesters were killed and around 8,000 injured, while the police made hundreds of arrests when protests against the redevelopment of the small park in Istanbul rapidly developed into a series of nationwide demonstrations against the Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) government headed by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan.

The police action on Monday took place after the authorities in Istanbul reopened Gezi Park for the first time to the public since a massive police action cleared the park on June 15.

Following the clashes on Saturday, the Turkish authorities made clear that no further protests would be tolerated at the site of the park. Early Monday, Istanbul governor Huseyin Avni Mutlu warned on Twitter, “Gezi Park has been reopened to public but there are many calls for unauthorised protests aimed at turning the park into an occupation zone,”.

In anticipation of new protests, the police sealed off access to Taksim Square, which adjoins the park, and began expelling protesters from nearby streets. When protesters managed to enter the park, they were confronted by police who used their shields to forcibly expel them from the site.

According to Turkish press reports, a 17-year-old boy was severely injured in the head by a canister when police began firing tear gas and rubber bullets at protesters in nearby streets.

Police then arrested many of the demonstrators, including leaders of the Taksim Solidarity Platform and the Turkish Doctors Association. The Istanbul Medical Association reported that several people were injured.

As Turkish riot police once again resorted to brutal measures to suppress protests in Istanbul, the Turkish prime minister used a rally in Germany to condemn those taking part in the demonstrations.

A few weeks ago, 10,000 members of the Turkish community demonstrated in Cologne against the Erdogan government, and one central purpose of Sunday’s rally in the German city of Düsseldorf was to mobilise supporters of the Turkish regime in Germany. In a direct attack on his critics in Turkey and Germany, ErdoÄŸan used the rally to lash out at those who, he claimed, could not accept election results and sought instead to change things by “occupying the streets, plundering or insulting people.”

Since the start of the Gezi protests, it is ErdoÄŸan himself who has been in the forefront of denouncing and insulting those taking part in demonstrations. Prior to the clearing of the park in the middle of June, ErdoÄŸan claimed the protests were being organised by terrorists in the pay of foreign powers. All methods of repression were justified in order to suppress the protests, he warned: “We have not responded to punches with punches. From now on security forces will respond differently. This issue will be over in 24 hours.”

In fact, the extent of the protests last month made clear that discontent with the Turkish authorities is not limited to the fate of one of the capital’s central parks. What was evident in the demonstrations was growing anger in the country at soaring levels of inequality and the increasingly repressive nature of the ErdoÄŸan regime, as well as widespread discontent with its pro-American foreign policy.

In May, ErdoÄŸan had stood alongside US president Barack Obama, who praised his Turkish colleague for “being such a strong ally and partner in the region and around the world.” It is precisely the readiness of the Turkish government to deal forcefully with popular opposition, plus ErdoÄŸan’s subservience to US foreign policy that makes him such a favoured partner in Washington.

For the past year, ErdoÄŸan has been in the forefront of the campaign for Western military action to topple the government of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad. Now, following the military toppling of the regime of President Mohamed Morsi, he is banging the drum loudest for Western military intervention in Egypt.

At the rally in Düsseldorf, Erdoğan accused the European Union and Western countries of giving support to the military coup in Egypt by refusing to intervene themselves.

Once again, ErdoÄŸan is playing the role of chief warmonger in the region. In reality, the Turkish prime minister has few scruples about the actions undertaken by the Egyptian army–in May, his own government granted Egypt a US$250 million loan to finance Turkish-Egyptian joint defence projects. His main concern is that the protests in his own country could assume a similar mass character to those in Egypt that preceded the military coup against Morsi, drawing in broad layers of the Turkish working class. This is the fear that lies behind ErdoÄŸan’s vehement attacks on the Gezi Park protesters.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

The infrastructure of a police state emerges in Europe

0

 

10 July 2013

Former NSA employee Edward Snowden has exposed the infrastructure of a police state whose surveillance powers far exceed those of totalitarian dictatorships such as the German Nazi regime.

American and European intelligence agencies monitor and store the communications data of hundreds of millions of citizens. Based on the metadata of tapped connections, they can draw up a seamless profile of an individual’s movements and contacts. This in turn enables them to selectively filter out the content of conversations and emails.

The right to privacy–a basic human right enshrined in the American and every European Constitution–and the associated guarantee of the confidentiality of the post and telecommunications are being ripped to shreds. The wiretaps are so obviously illegal that intelligence agencies in one country often delegate their activities to foreign partners in order to avoid overly blatant violation of their own national laws.

Snowden’s revelations represent the tip of the iceberg. They concentrate on his former employer, the National Security Agency (NSA) and its partner organizations–such as the British Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND), the French Direction générale de la sécurité extérieure (DGSE)–which officially conduct foreign espionage. The activities of military and domestic intelligence agencies, which have access to collected data together with affiliated police departments, have not yet been revealed.

The extent of the monitoring apparatus is gigantic. The US intelligence services alone employ hundreds of thousands of employees. Exact figures are difficult to obtain because they remain secret, but an investigation by the Washington Post concluded that in 2010 approximately 854,000 Americans possessed top-secret security clearance. This means that the number of intelligence officials is approximately half the number of the 1.8 million teachers in American primary schools.

In Europe, the numbers of intelligence agency employees is likely to be just as high. Accurate estimates are hard to come by, given the large number of countries and intelligence agencies. In Germany alone, in addition to the BND, other agencies include the Military Counterintelligence Service, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) and its 16 separate state offices.

The claim that this Orwellian surveillance apparatus is devoted to the struggle against terrorism is absurd. There is no need to monitor hundreds of millions of citizens in order to track down a handful of terrorists, who in many cases have their own links to the intelligence services.

The real target of the intelligence surveillance is the vast majority of the people. This is the real enemy identified by the ruling class. This is confirmed by any brief look at social statistics and the social counterrevolution currently taking place.

In the US, the richest ten percent of the population control more than half of all income and about three quarters of all private assets. At the bottom, the poorest 15 percent of the population live below the official poverty line of $22,300 annually for a family of four.

In Europe, austerity measures dictated by the EU have resulted in mass unemployment and social decline on an unprecedented scale. After five austerity budgets in Greece, 40 percent of the population are no longer covered by health insurance and therefore not entitled to health care.

The ruling class senses that popular opposition is growing and is responding by placing the entire population under surveillance. Such surveillance is not limited to passive observation. In the event of an escalation of the class struggle, as is currently occurring in Egypt, the profiles and addresses stored in the vast databases of the intelligence agencies would be mined to draw up lists of dissidents and political leaders for arrest and prosecution.

The ruthlessness of the ruling class is most clearly shown in the case of Edward Snowden. The 30-year-old must fear for his life and is being hunted across the planet because he had the courage to expose the criminal activities of the NSA. The forced landing of Bolivian President Evo Morales in Vienna made clear that even the elected leader of a sovereign state is not safe from the machinations of the US Secret Service and their European accomplices.

The intelligence agencies are also quite prepared to use provocations and acts of terror to further their ends. The secret NATO Gladio organization in Italy was infamous for carrying out such acts of provocation in Italy in the 1970s and 1980s.

The Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker, is expected to resign today due to a similar case, the so-called “bomb-planting affair”. In Germany, meanwhile, new evidence is continually emerging on the involvement of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution in the racist murders conducted by the National Socialist Underground (NSU).

The case of Edward Snowden contains vital lessons. No confidence can be placed in any section of the ruling class to defend basic democratic rights. The ruling elites disregard the most basic rights and are developing police-state methods to defend their wealth and privileges. The defense of democratic rights, along with the struggle against social cuts, can only be carried out on the basis of a mass movement of the working class aimed at overturning the capitalist system.

Peter Schwarz



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

SEP campaigns in Adelaide, South Australia

0

 

By
our correspondents

10 July 2013

Over the past four days, James Cogan, the Socialist Equality Party (SEP) Senate candidate for South Australia, and party members and supporters have campaigned in Adelaide, the state capital, for a SEP public meeting on July 13.

On Monday, Cogan spoke with workers, students and young people outside the city’s central museum and art gallery in Rundle Street and at the University of Adelaide. Students, including overseas students from the United States, France, Hong Kong and China, expressed support for American intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden and purchased tickets for the meeting.

Yesterday, Cogan and SEP members campaigned in the working class suburb of Elizabeth, 30 kilometres north of the city centre. Elizabeth is the location of the main General Motors Holden (GMH) assembly plant. Wave after wave of layoffs and cuts to conditions, backed by the federal and state Labor governments and enforced by the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU), have resulted in the number of jobs being slashed from more than 3,000 in 2007 to just 1,600. Four hundred workers are currently being retrenched through union-organised redundancy packages.

Last month, GMH issued an ultimatum, demanding that workers accept a 20 percent wage cut, of more than $5.60 per hour, or face the plant’s imminent closure. The demand marks a new stage in the deepening assault on jobs and conditions under the Labor government, which will intensify after the federal election, regardless of which party wins. The AMWU is now in negotiations with the company. Workers will be forced to vote by August 9 on whether to accept the reduced wages and conditions.

An SEP campaign team distributed several hundred copies of an article on the wage and job cuts, written by Cogan, to workers coming off the day shift at the Elizabeth plant.

While a number of workers expressed a sense of resignation that the plant closure was inevitable, several indicated that the main reason for this attitude was that they had no confidence in the AMWU. One worker explained: “The union is owned by the company. You can’t trust them after what they’ve pulled on us the last few times. Like when they agreed [in 2009] to the one week on-one week off roster. I lost my house and one of my cars because of that. They don’t care. They’re only thinking about themselves.” He added: “It doesn’t matter what they offer in exchange for the wage cuts. Either way, I’m voting ‘no.’ I just can’t afford it.”

Another worker explained that the company was demanding the reduction of the enterprise bargaining agreement document from 130 pages to 40, tearing up previously-won conditions.

Cogan and SEP campaigners also spoke with workers and youth at the nearby Elizabeth shopping complex and train station. As a result of the destruction of manufacturing jobs, the suburbs of northern Adelaide have the second highest official level of youth unemployment in Australia–42.6 percent.

Troy and Jackie, 17 and 18 respectively, are both studying in order to finish high school before Jackie has their child in September. Troy is also trying to work as much as possible to save money.

Troy explained: “Jobs are hard to find. I went through the entire Elizabeth shops and handed out 50 applications and only got one call-back. It’s been nearly impossible because they judge you based on your appearance. I had a McDonald’s interview and I didn’t even get a trial because a manager said I didn’t have ‘customer service skills’… The only place I got a job was at a café. I’m paid $11.97 an hour and $14.37 per hour on weekends and I’m getting only five hours a week.”

After a discussion on the decade-long wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and now Syria, Troy said: “Most of it is just for oil. America is trying to control the land. They say that there are terrorists. But I know that Osama Bin Laden was taught by the CIA to start terrorist organisations to get the Russians out of Afghanistan. That’s basically why 9/11 happened. The reasons they give for the wars are lies.”

Angelina, a carer in a nursing home, told the campaign team: “The job and wage cuts at Holden are not fair. Already it’s hard to get work here. I’m a casual and we get just $19 per hour for the day shift. The rent is $500 a week! I get just enough work to keep me going.”

Angelina commented on the political turmoil wracking the Labor government in Canberra, with the sudden re-installation of Kevin Rudd as prime minister, replacing Julia Gillard. “We’ve got no say. How they got rid of Rudd [in 2010], and even the way they did it this time with Gillard is wrong. There should have been another election. We voted for them and they thought, ‘we’ll change because the Australian people won’t mind.’ Well, some of us do mind. We should decide.”

Milta, whose son has worked at the GMH plant for 18 years, told the team. “He’s waiting to see if they’re cutting the wages and then he’ll see what he can do. It’s terrible for a young family with two children. Luckily, his wife is also working. I think the plant is going to completely close. That’s what happened to Mitsubishi and Bridgestone, and now it’s happening to Holden. I have family members who worked in all of these companies.

“Things are getting worse and worse. Wages are going down and prices are going up. It’s not only Australia. It’s all over the world.”

Laura, a mother of four teenage boys, said: “I’ve been here for four years, and it’s gone from being OK to really bad. A lot of people are depressed because of the work situation. I lost my home. I had to walk away from it and rent. I bought a home in Elizabeth North, and you’d think that would be OK, because I was working full-time. Then they cut back my hours.

“I refuse to vote. I haven’t voted in 10 years because I haven’t found anyone that I think is worth voting for. They don’t care about the working class people. My eldest son is 19 and he won’t vote as well.”

Elle, a young retail worker who recently moved to Adelaide from the regional town of Whyalla, had a long discussion with Cogan about the situation facing young people and the SEP’s socialist program.

Elle explained: “I have two part-time jobs. I go back and forth but you just put up with it. It’s not only Holden. I used to get shifts at least three times a week. Now I’m lucky to get one. Retail is really struggling. I’m doing a TAFE [Technical and Further Education] course but I’m going to go to uni because all employers want are degrees, degrees. It doesn’t matter how good you are sometimes–all they want is a piece of paper. It is about $800 for my course, so lucky I have some work.”

Asked about the return of Rudd, Elle’s response reflected the way in which vague sympathies for Rudd, due to his backroom ousting in 2010, are being exploited to try to salvage the Labor government. “Thank god Gillard got removed because I love Kevin Rudd,” she said. “When he got thrown out I was really mad. I thought–and it’s not anything against women because I’m a girl–Gillard shouldn’t be running the country, because Rudd got elected.”

Elle added: “I am not sure what party I support, though. I’m undecided because they are all the same for me. I’m not a fan of what’s going on with the wars everywhere either. I don’t believe wars are right.” She said she would read the SEP election statement and think about the party’s socialist perspective.

Authorised by Nick Beams, 113/55 Flemington Rd, North Melbourne VIC 3051



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

More details emerge of the UK’s illegal mass spying

0

 

By
Robert Stevens

10 July 2013

UK charity Privacy International has begun a legal case calling for the British government to end the use of data collected by the US National Security Agency’s (NSA’s) mass surveillance system, Prism.

The papers also call for an injunction on the “Tempora” system, used by the UK’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) programme to systematically spy on the entire British population.

GCHQ monitors all outgoing and incoming communications via its access to the fibre-optic cables through which all UK Internet traffic passes. Some 600 million “telephone events” are monitored each day by tapping more than 200 fibre-optic cables, including those that connect the UK to the US.

According to the Guardian, the legal claim was submitted to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT).

The IPT is a tribunal, supposedly tasked with investigating claims regarding the UK’s spy agencies. It was created under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) 2000, meets in secret and is not required to make a determination on a complaint.

On this basis, it is not possible to have a complaint heard before an open public court. Carly Nyst, head of international advocacy at Privacy International, wrote in the Guardian Tuesday, “[W]hen Privacy International informed the foreign secretary that it intended to challenge such practices in the British courts, the government’s lawyers notified us that we could not bring such a claim in the administrative court, which would be the normal route. Rather, we have been forced to take our concerns to the IPT.”

Nyst described the IPT as a “quasi-judicial body that meets and deliberates in secret, the decisions of which are neither public nor appealable to any higher authority.”

Nyst noted that according to the IPT’s 2010 report, in its entire history it had only “ruled in favour of the complainant a total of 10 times, out of more than a thousand cases.” The document revealed that out of 180 cases, none found in favour of the complainant.

Privacy International’s international claim states, “Through their access to the US programme, UK authorities are able to obtain private information about UK citizens without having to comply with any requirements of RIPA.”

Under RIPA, there is legal requirement that intelligence officials acquire a warrant from a minister before performing a wiretap.

The claim adds, “If UK authorities are to be permitted to access such information in relation to those located in the UK in secret and without their knowledge or consent, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) requires there to be a legal regime in place which contains sufficient safeguards against abuse of power and arbitrary use. There is no such regime.”

The organisation again cites the convention in its attempt to force an injunction against the operation of Tempora, stating, “Bulk interception of communications and bulk inspection of such data is disproportionate interference with the rights guaranteed by article 8 of the ECHR, and it is not being undertaken pursuant to a legal regime containing sufficient safeguards to render it in accordance with the law.”

It adds that RIPA “does not provide sufficiently specific or clear authorisation for such wide-ranging and universal interception of communications, nor any sufficient or proper safeguards against misuse that are known and available to the public.”

Tempora was originally set up in autumn 2011 after being first trialled by GCHQ in 2008. It was part of a wider GCHQ programme, Mastering the Internet (MTI), set up under the last Labour government, and whose detailed operation was confirmed by former NSA subcontractor Edward Snowden.

From its 2011 launch, the gigantic amounts of data it amassed were shared with the NSA (see “Communications of millions subject to US-UK spying” ). Last year, according to documents seen by the Guardian, 550 analysts from GCHQ and the NSA were employed to filter the contents.

Tempora not only monitors and stores all electronic and phone call data of all British citizens, but those of billions of people internationally. These numbers are constantly increasing as the Internet expands. A June 21 report in the Guardian, based on Snowden’s documents, stated, “For the 2 billion users of the world wide web, Tempora represents a window on to their everyday lives, sucking up every form of communication from the fibre-optic cables that ring the world.”

This capability will be vastly expanded as GCHQ’s capacity is being upgraded to take in data from new super cables carrying data at 100 gigabits a second.

In May 2009, the Sunday Times first drew attention to MTI, noting that its existence only came to light through a GCHQ job advertisement carried in the computer trade press. The article reported MTI was being established at a cost of £1 billion over a three-year period. The Times reported it “will rely on thousands of ‘black box’ probes being covertly inserted across online infrastructure.”

At the time, Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith denied the government had any plans to establish an all-embracing computerised database that would be able to store all communications data in the UK. Making no mention of the already approved MTI, Smith said, “The government recognised the privacy implications of the move [and] therefore does not propose to pursue this move.”

The article revealed Lockheed Martin, the American defence firm, had been given a £200 million contract as part of MTI, and Detica, a British IT firm closely connected to the intelligence agencies, was also enlisted. Describing MTI, the Times explained, “A huge room of supercomputers will help the agency to monitor–and record’–data passing through black-box probes placed at critical traffic junctions with internet service providers and telephone companies, allowing GCHQ to spy at will.”

In an interview published Monday in news magazine Der Speigel, Snowden gave further details of Tempora. The interview was held via encrypted e-mail with encryption specialist Jacob Appelbaum and documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras before Snowden left the US for Hong Kong and began making public his revelations.

Asked what were some of the “big surveillance programs that are active today and how do international partners aid the NSA?” he stated, “Tempora is the signals intelligence community’s first ‘full-take’ Internet buffer that doesn’t care about content type and pays only marginal attention to the Human Rights Act. It snarfs everything, in a rolling buffer to allow retroactive investigation without missing a single bit. Right now the buffer can hold three days of traffic, but that’s being improved. Three days may not sound like much, but remember that that’s not metadata.

“ ‘Full-take’ means it doesn’t miss anything, and ingests the entirety of each circuits capacity.”

Every piece of data sent and received through the Internet by British Internet users was intercepted, explained Snowden. “If you download something and the CDN (Content Delivery Network) happens to serve from the UK, we get it. If your sick daughter’s medical records get processed at a London call centre…well, you get the idea.”

The British government is imposing unprecedented cuts in public spending, with more than £165 billion being cut from health, education and welfare. The one area where spending is being substantially increased is on the illegal spying network. In his recent Spending Review, Chancellor George Osborne announced a 3.4 percent funding increase to the intelligence services’ £1.9 billion budget. It equates to them receiving another £100 million in funding annually from 2015.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Protest in WB in support of prisoners

0

A demonstration has been held in the occupied West Bank city of al-Bireh in solidarity with Palestinian and Jordanian hunger strikers in Israeli jails, Press TV reports.

Families of the hunger strikers gathered outside the International Committee of the Red Cross office in the city to voice their concerns over the health condition of the prisoners.

The prisoners have been refusing food in protest at their treatment by the Israeli officials.

Å“We are here to raise our voices to tell the world that our prisoners are refusing food for their rights. We are here in solidarity with the prisoners,” said Um Osama Bargouthi, wife of a hunger striker.

Five of the hunger strikers have Jordanian citizenships, while the others hold identity card from the Palestinian Authority.

Helmi al-Aâ„¢raj, the director of the Center for Defense of Liberties, told Press TV that the prisoners demand freedom.

Å“They want their freedom. The Jordanian prisoners who are on hunger strike demand to be freed and to go back to Jordan. The Palestinian prisoners are refusing food in protest to the administrative detention policies. These policies are oppressive and contradictory to international law and international humanitarian law,” he said.

Human rights experts have expressed concerns over the deteriorating health condition of the hunger-striking prisoners. Observers also warned of deliberate medical negligence by the Israeli Prison Services against the hunger striking prisoners as a way to stop their acts of disobedience.

Å“Their health condition was declining at a quick pace, there is a real danger for their lives, a danger of death and this is the result of the Israeli policy of medical negligence,” al-Aâ„¢raj also said.

Administrative detention is a sort of imprisonment without trial or charge that allows Israel to incarcerate Palestinians for up to six months. The detention order can be renewed for indefinite periods of time.

SAB/PR

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Sri Lankan SEP campaigns for defence of Edward Snowden

0

 

By
our correspondent

10 July 2013

Workers and youth in Sri Lanka have responded with great interest to the campaign launched by the Socialist Equality Party (SEP) and its youth organisation, the International Youth and Students for Social Equality (IYSSE), in defence of the US intelligence whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor is being persecuted by the Obama administration for his exposure of the NSA’s massive electronic surveillance spy operation against the people of America and the world. Snowden remains trapped in a Moscow airport transit area, denied political asylum as a result of Washington’s bullying and intimidation of other countries.

The campaign in Sri Lanka is part of the initiative taken by the International Committee of the Fourth International and the World Socialist Web Site to defend Snowden. The SEP and the IYSSE have called a public meeting on July 12 in the Colombo Library Auditorium and launched a petition demanding an end to the Obama administration’s dragnet against him.

SEP and IYSSE members spoke to workers, youth and students at Colombo harbour, railway station, residential areas and universities this week. Hundreds signed the petition and several bought tickets for the meeting. Campaigners distributed a WSWS statement, “Defend Edward Snowden,” as a leaflet in Sinhala and Tamil languages.

The petition declared: “Edward Snowden is a direct target of a massive witch-hunt by the Obama administration, the US political establishment and the capitalist media. Snowden has become the target of this persecution because he took the courageous step of revealing the secret and illegal surveillance operations of the US National Security Agency directed at millions of people in the United States and around the world… we denounce the vicious actions of the Obama administration and the American imperialism it represents, and demand the witch-hunt be stopped immediately.”

Malsha, a Sri Jayawardenepura University student, commented: “Because Obama is black, I thought he would address the grievances of ordinary Americans. In fact, he mainly promised a ‘change of course’ during his first presidential campaign in 2008. In Sri Lanka, I expected that President Mahinda Rajapakse would address our issues after the end of the civil war [against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]. That did not happen. Obama has shattered our hopes. Rajapakse also did the same. Yes, Snowden should be defended, irrespective of his nationality.”

Reflecting the confusion created by misleading Sri Lankan media reports, Nivanthi, another Sri Jayawardenepura University student, believed that Russia was going to grant asylum to Snowden. Campaigners explained that the Russian President Vladimir Putin had asked Snowden to stop revealing US spying secrets if he were to be granted asylum.

“If Snowden did not reveal those secrets, he could well have remained in America,” Nivanthi responded sarcastically. “So what use is Russian political asylum?” A SEP member explained that far as democratic rights are concerned, the ruling classes around the world are unanimous in suppressing them.

Another student initially asked: “Why are you campaigning for Snowden? I think he has done his job incorrectly. Does he not deserve it [punishment]?”

WSWS correspondents explained why Snowden came out against the US establishment. At first, he genuinely believed that the so-called war on terror was aimed at defeating terrorism and establishing democracy, but later became disillusioned because of the American military’s conduct in Afghanistan and Iraq. The student then expressed sympathy for the defence campaign.

In front of the Colombo harbour gate, nearly a hundred workers and youth signed the petition and engaged in discussion. Many had not heard about Snowden. Even though they were hurrying to catch overcrowded busses and trains, they waited to sign the petition after being told that Snowden was threatened by the Obama government. One young man promised to attend the public meeting, noting that no one else was campaigning for Snowden’s defence in Sri Lanka.

A worker told the WSWS: “I know this person [Snowden] is being hunted by the American government. The airplane flying the Bolivian president was forced to land last week because of suspicion that Snowden was traveling inside. This is not good. America is trying to subjugate the whole world. That is why they are spying.”

One young man asked: “What is the significance of signing a petition for an American citizen in Sri Lanka?” SEP members explained that the events unfolding over Snowden’s revelations were of an international scope. His revelations showed the real nature of American capitalism and the Obama administration, and what they were doing against the US and international working class and oppressed masses. After the discussion, the young man signed the petition.

The Sri Lankan media has published extremely limited and distorted articles about Snowden and the Obama administration’s wrath toward him. As a result, most workers and youth know little or nothing about him. What is striking about the response to the SEP-IYSSE campaign, however, is the growing interest in international issues, particularly the increasingly repressive activities of US imperialism, among working people and students.

We urge workers, youth and intellectuals to attend the public meeting organised by the SEP and IYSSE this Friday July 12 at the Public Library Auditorium in central Colombo at 4 pm.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Russian government implements austerity as economy falters

0

 

By
Andrea Peters

10 July 2013

Russia’s minister of finance, Anton Sulianov, announced Thursday that the state budget is in a crisis. According to official estimates, there is a one trillion ruble ($33 billion) shortfall for 2013 alone, requiring a “budgetary maneuver” (i.e., cuts) in state expenditures over the next three years.

The government proposes to plug the “holes” by deep attacks on the working class, including cutting payments to the state pension fund, decreasing state procurements by five percent, and cutting spending on health care, education, and utilities.

In addition, the ministry may also drain 300 billion rubles from Russia’s Reserve Fund (a state-run sovereign wealth fund), and divert income normally used to build up the Reserve Fund to meet budgetary goals. The last time this occurred was during the 2008-2009 economic crisis, when the Kremlin used the money to bail out Russian oligarchs and big businesses.

Though Russia is home to 11 of the world’s top 100 billionaires, the government insists that austerity measures are the only solution to Russia’s faltering economy. Growth rates have never recovered from the 2008 economic crisis. This year they will hit a low of 2.4 percent, down from a projected 3.6 percent. Prior to the world financial meltdown in 2008-2009, Russia’s economy had grown by as much 8-9 percent in some years. Many economists now predict further weakening.

Despite repeated policy declarations that Russia is moving towards diversifying its economy, the country’s wealth and state budget remain overwhelmingly dependent on income earned from the energy sector. In the first quarter of 2013, oil provided nearly 50 percent of total budget revenues. The International Monetary Fund is demanding cuts, after warning that lower projected oil prices for 2014 put the Russian budget in jeopardy.

At the same time, Russia faces massive capital outflows, as investors offshore their profits. The Economist reports that in May 2013 alone, $9 billion left Russia.

Last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned of the coming austerity program, insisting in his annual presentation of the proposed budget for 2014-2016 that the country’s slowing growth meant that the state could no longer increase spending. In an interview with news agency RIA Novosti around this time, Putin attacked the remnants of Europe’s social welfare model, insisting that it created a “dependence mentality” and turned the continent into a pole of attraction for social loafers.

Putin has often used assurances of increasing state spending to shore up his popularity in the face of rising social discontent. Even as his minister of finance announced the government’s plans to slash expenditures by $33 billion, Putin is insisting that his “May decrees,” social promises issued to the electorate during last year’s presidential race, will be fulfilled. This position is entirely at odds with his government’s plans, however.

Notwithstanding the Kremlin’s claims that it is cracking down on corruption and tax evasion, the finance ministry’s latest announcement shows that it intends to place the burden of the country’s economic and fiscal decline on the backs of the working class.

The Putin regime is preparing for the latest in the many waves of attacks on Russian workers’ social conditions that have followed the restoration of capitalism in Russia and the former USSR in 1991.

In this case, the pension fund in particular is targeted. Proposed budget cuts from limiting transfers to the state pension fund are to be exacted by changing the basis upon which pensions are calculated and distributed.

The changes include: making pensions more dependent on individuals’ salary history and length of service; increasing the number of years a person must have worked to receive a pension from 5 to 15 years; increasing the percentage of a person’s pension to be financed by his/her own contribution; and providing financial incentives for those who chose to work beyond the official retirement age.

The reforms, going into effect January 1, 2014, will cut the number of people eligible for a pension in Russia, destabilize the pension fund by making it more dependent on individuals’ choice to contribute a portion of their salary, and raise the retirement age.

The latter is a particular goal of government officials. While women will be formally allowed to retire at age 55 and men at age 60, those who work additional years without drawing on their pensions could receive as much as 50 percent more once they retire. Given that the average pension in Russia is currently only $350 a month, many will make this choice. With male life expectancy in the country at just over 64 years, many men will die before ever drawing a pension–a fact that policy-makers doubtless welcome.

The pension reform will undermine the minimal benefits of the small increases in state pensions that are currently being implemented. By April of 2014, the average pension in Russia is expected to reach 11,144 rubles (less than $400) a month. In 2016, it is expected to rise to 13,200 rubles (about $440) a month. The current plan to end transfers to the state pension fund jeopardizes all of this.

Even if the promised increases were to be implemented, these are poverty sums, whose impact will be eroded through inflation in basic necessities and in particular, the gutting of state support for health care.

The proposed austerity measures will devastate regional governments. Beyond gutting federal expenditures on health care, education and utilities, responsibility for providing these services will be increasingly offloaded onto the local administrations.

Unable to support these outlays in the face of an increasingly difficult economic situation, experts anticipate that regional authorities in Russia will simply gut social programs. A July 4 article in the online business news agency Finmarket.ru warned of the prospect of unrest in Russia’s provinces as a result.

While imposing austerity on the population, the Putin regime plans to refocus government spending on the military and infrastructure construction, undertaken wherever possible through so-called “public-private partnerships.” The latter, presented as a “growth-oriented” strategy, will be a boondoggle for corporate interests and the corrupt officials overseeing the deals. They will be the biggest beneficiaries of the slated 450-billion-ruble ($13.6 billion) plan.

The Kremlin also remains committed to dramatically increasing military spending, with outlays on defense scheduled to rise by 63 percent from 2013 to 2016. There will also be significant growth in expenditures on national security and law enforcement, which will swell by 9 percent in the same period.

Sections of the liberal opposition, namely former Minister of Finance Alexei Kudrin, have vocally criticized Putin for sticking to his plan for a multi-trillion-ruble expansion of military spending. Kudrin is a well-known advocate of social cuts, including increasing the pension age.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Railway CEO attempts to shift blame onto local firefighters

0

 

As death toll mounts in deadliest Canadian rail accident in decades,

By
Jeff Lusanne

10 July 2013

Quebec Provincial Police announced yesterday afternoon that the remains of fifteen people have now been recovered from the multi-block “red-zone” in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec that was destroyed by last Saturday’s train derailment, explosion, and fire. The true death toll, however, is almost certainly four dozen or more, since 35 people remain missing.

The victims that have been found are so severely burned officials are asking family members for DNA evidence to help establish their identities. Finding and identifying the remains of the dead is expected to be a painstaking, months-long process. Such was the intensity of the inferno triggered by the derailment, authorities warn they may never find identifiable remains of some of the missing.

Yesterday, the majority of the 2,000 Lac-Mégantic residents ordered evacuated last Saturday were allowed to return home. But 800 people, or close to one-sixth of the 6,000 people who call this Eastern Townships’ town their home, are still having to bunk-up with friends or relatives in makeshift shelters.

The Lac-Mégantic derailment is in all likelihood Canada’s deadliest train disaster in more than a century. In 1942, 39 people were killed when two trains collided in Alimonte, Ontario. In the worst U.S. train disaster in recent decades, a Miami-bound Amtrak train derailed while crossing a bridge in Alabama in 1993, killing 47.

While the investigation into the causes of the Lac-Mégantic tragedy is still in its early stages, the information that has come to light suggests that reckless and likely criminally negligent practices by the Montreal, Maine, & Atlantic railroad (MMA) were a pivotal factor.

The railroad has not put out a press release since Sunday, although new details about the events surrounding the accident are emerging every day. Instead, Ed Burkhardt–the CEO of MMA and the president of its parent company, Rail World Inc.–has used television interviews to blame a local fire department for triggering the chain of events that led to the derailment.

Significantly, Canada’s Transportation Safety Board publicly rebutted some of Burkhardt’s key claims Tuesday morning. The Quebec Provincial Police have, for their part, launched a criminal probe into the derailment.

The train that derailed in Lac-Mégantic consisted of 72 cars of crude oil from the Bakken oil field in North Dakota. Canadian Pacific Railroad hauled it to Montreal, where it was handed over to MMA to continue on to a refinery in St. John, New Brunswick. In the process, MMA placed its own locomotives in charge.

At 11PM last Friday night, the train stopped in Nantes, Quebec for a crew change. The next crew was not immediately available, so procedure demanded that the train be safely secured in place. Trains have three braking systems: air brakes connected through the entire train and operated from the locomotive, individual brakes on each locomotive, and individual “manual” brakes on each railcar. All three are required to be applied to a train that will be unoccupied.

In the case of the MMA train, it was left on a significant railroad grade that headed downward 6.8 miles (11 km) into Lac-Mégantic, requiring extra caution to secure it. The engineer left one of the five locomotives running, which is necessary to maintain the functionality of the train’s airbrakes. After the engineer left, a local resident reported a fire on one of the locomotives and firefighters from the town of Nantes responded.

Before dousing the fire, the firefighters followed standard procedure and shut down the locomotive to prevent fuel from the fuel tank feeding the fire. CEO Burkhardt claimed Monday that the firefighters, “Went out there by themselves, shut the engine off, doused the fire” and didn’t notify the engineer. Burkhardt claims the shutoff of the engine released the airbrakes causing the train to roll towards Lac-Mégantic.

Yet in an interview with the Globe and Mail a member of MMA’s board of directors, Yves Bourdon, contradicted the claim that firefighters acted without contacting MMA. He stated that firefighters called a MMA dispatcher and alerted him of the fire when it broke out, and the dispatcher got a track-repair worker to the scene.

The track-worker was not qualified to operate locomotives, but updated the dispatcher and left the scene. Nantes Fire Chief Patrick Lambert told the media, “The people from MMA told us, ‘That’s great―the train is secure, there’s no more fire, there’s nothing anymore, there’s no more danger,” upon which the firefighters left.

At a press briefing yesterday morning, a spokesman for Canada’s Transportation Safety Board corroborated much of Fire Chief Lambert’s account, asserting that contrary to the claims of MMA CEO Burkhardt, a company employee was present when firefighters doused the locomotive fire.

Shortly after that fire was put out and everyone had left the scene, the train began to roll and within 20 minutes it derailed, while traveling in excess of 60 mph, ending in a massive pileup in the center of Lac-Mégantic, causing explosions that left only rubble for a several block radius.

Only four or five of the 72 tanker cars actually caught fire, indicating the potential for a much larger and even more horrific catastrophe.

In its statements, MMA has failed to state clearly that it was using a one-person crew to operate the oil train, although its explanations implicitly point to that. Across the US and Canada the standard is a two-person crew, consisting of an engineer that operates the train from the cab of the locomotive and a conductor that persons on-the-ground work equipment.

As head of Rail World Inc.–a “railway management, consulting and investment corporation specializing in privatizations and restructurings”– Burkhardt has pioneered one-man “crews.” Such operations call for the engineer to do on-the-ground work like switching out railcars, while using a remote-control pack to operate the engine.

Railway workers and others have long claimed that the “one-man crews” deliver corporations huge cost savings at the expense of worker fatigue and public safety.

Investigation will show to what extent relying on a single crew member at the end of a long-shift to park a loaded train on a grade late at night imperiled public safety. To have properly secured the train, the engineer would have had to walk to several, if not dozens, of individual cars and apply a hand-brake on each one.

The engineer of the MMA train is reportedly devastated over the event. The Toronto Star writes that, “like many others, he accused Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway of not keeping its infrastructure up to date and for not caring about its employees.”

“They haven’t even called us since the accident,” said a colleague.

Other employees have noted that MMA track in places is increasingly substandard. Prior to last Saturday’s tragedy, Lac-Mégantic town officials and residents had also raised concerns about the state of MMA’s infrastructure.

Yet the train’s cargo of crude oil is a booming business for U.S. and Canadian railroads. The sharp rise in oil production in the Western Canadian provinces and the Bakken region of North Dakota has not been matched with pipelines to ship it. This is partly because of environmental concerns, but also because shippers are able to increase their options for routing with railroads and don’t risk the long-term investment of a pipeline on deposits exploited through fracking, which have a much shorter lifespan.

Shipments of crude by rail in the U.S. have skyrocketed from 9,500 carloads in 2008 to 233,811 carloads in 2012. Each railcar carries roughly 740 barrels. In Canada, both major railways, Canadian National and Canadian Pacific, have seen similar exponential growth, with 16.6 million barrels of Canada crude shipped by rail in 2012. This is estimated to grow to as much as 110 million barrels in 2014.

A notoriously unsafe tank car, the DOT-111, carries much of this traffic–including the MMA train that derailed last Saturday. The U.S. National Safety Transportation board describes the DOT-111 as “inadequate to resist the shock of a derailment,” because it is easily punctured on the ends and sides. The DOT-111 is also used to carry ethanol and has been implicated in several deadly explosions and fires in the U.S. over the last decade. The Canadian government requires that when companies buy new tanker cars they are of a newer, higher standard, but with a service life of 40-50 years, the railroads and transporters plan to use DOT-111s to carry inflammable commodities for decades to come.

With the profit interests of railroads, and energy and finance companies large and small at stake, there is no doubt that fierce opposition will emerge to any effort to regulate and otherwise improve safety in this booming business.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Obama nominee to head FBI defends NSA spying in Senate testimony

0

 

By
Eric London

10 July 2013

The deputy attorney general under George W. Bush, James Comey, provided an unqualified endorsement of massive and illegal National Security Agency (NSA) spying operations in an appearance Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Comey, nominated by President Obama to succeed outgoing Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Robert Mueller, testified at his confirmation hearing before a friendly bipartisan panel that likewise evinced support for the unconstitutional spying and avoided any serious questioning of his role in sanctioning torture and illegal surveillance under Bush.

In stating his support for the NSA spying, Comey repeated the official lies about congressional and judicial oversight and a carefully targeted surveillance effort. In fact, the NSA has been caught out–as a result of the revelations of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden–seizing the telephone records and monitoring the Internet and other communications of virtually every person in the United States and hundreds of millions of people around the world.

In the course of the hearing, Comey defended the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) court that rubber-stamps NSA and FBI spying operations and has emerged as a shadow court, beyond the reach of any of the traditional branches of government. He refused to condemn the force-feeding of detainees at the US prison camp at Guantanamo.

Obama’s nomination of Comey and the bipartisan support for his confirmation underscore the seamless transition from the Bush administration and its anti-democratic policies to the Obama administration, which has continued and expanded the police state measures begun under Bush.

During his tenure in the Bush administration, Comey played a major role in erecting a pseudo-legal framework for unconstitutional torture and surveillance programs. Since leaving the Bush administration in 2005, he has been rewarded with a lucrative career in defense contracting and hedge fund managing, as well as in academia, serving as general counsel for both Lockheed Martin and Bridgewater Associates, and holding the post of senior research fellow at Columbia Law School.

In the course of the hearing, senators of both parties as well as Comey engaged in the cynical pretense of questioning the proper “balance” between democratic and privacy rights and the requirements of “national security.” Behind this bogus discussion is the reality of a broad consensus within the political establishment to scrap the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, under the cover of the phony “war on terrorism.” The preparations for dictatorial forms of rule are directed not against foreign terrorists, however, but against the American working class.

Citing “the metastasizing terrorist threats,” Comey attempted to downplay the seriousness of the US government’s massive international and domestic surveillance campaign. “I do know as a general matter that the collection of metadata and analysis of metadata is a valuable tool in counterterrorism,” Comey said.

“I’m a private citizen at this point,” he later declared. “I don’t know the details of the programs involving metadata, for example, that are going on now. I have watched testimony from this table by [outgoing FBI] Director Mueller about, for example, the safeguards around metadata collection: the oversight of Congress, the involvement of FISA court, the inspector general’s involvement. All of those sounded reasonable to me from this distance, but I don’t know enough to say at this point.”

Comey was echoed by the senators, who feigned concern over the expansiveness of the surveillance programs in order to present the hearing as a “dialogue.” This was a stage-managed means for allowing Comey to make the case for shredding basic democratic rights.

In his opening remarks, the chairman of the committee, Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont, encouraged Comey to work with the Senate “to enact some common sense improvements to our surveillance laws.” Comey readily agreed.

The second-ranking Republican on the committee, Orrin Hatch of Utah, declared in his opening statement, “I would be surprised if this wasn’t the third time you were unanimously approved by the Senate, I hope that is the case.”

Senator Mazie Hirono (Democrat of Hawaii), striking a critical pose, in fact justified the mass collection of personal information. She said, “You don’t know where that important connecting dot is going to come from, whether from the collection of millions of this kind of information or not. And if that’s the answer, and you start thinking about what the parameters may be, it seems as if there wouldn’t be any parameters, because how could you define when that particular dot–that critical dot of information–when that would arise?”

Comey, tacitly responding to recent leaks regarding the secret body of unconstitutional law established by the FISA court, shrugged-off concerns about the authoritarian nature of the parallel court system. (See: “The FISA court in operation: Secret laws, secret government”)

He said: “People hear ‘secret court,’ they hear ‘rubber stamp.’ It is anything but a rubber stamp. Anyone who knows federal judges and has appeared before federal judges knows that calling them a rubber stamp shows you don’t have experience before them.”

He added that the “combination of judicial involvement, congressional involvement, inspector general oversight, results in a very effective regime.”

He continued: “I don’t know of a case where a wiretap application has been rejected by a federal judge. … The reason for that is we work like crazy to make sure that doesn’t happen.”

Comey’s testimony included additional indications of his authoritarian bent. On the issue of force-feeding Guantanamo hunger strikers, he merely said, “I wouldn’t want [it] done to me. But I don’t know the circumstances well enough to offer you an opinion.”

Much noise has been made in the press and in Democratic Party circles about Comey’s 2004 decision to oppose then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales’ attempt to get Attorney General John Ashcroft to sign an order from his hospital bed continuing Bush’s secret warrantless surveillance program. At Tuesday’s hearing, Democratic Senator Charles Schumer of New York called Comey’s act a “profile in courage.”

In fact, Comey repeatedly approved Bush-era surveillance and torture operations, including waterboarding. The surveillance program he refused to sign off on was continued in a slightly different form under Bush and expanded under Obama.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Federal Judge appeals to Obama to halt force-feeding at Guantánamo

0

 

By
Matthew MacEgan

10 July 2013

[headline]Federal Judge appeals to Obama to halt force-feeding at Guantánamo [ /headline]

On Monday, US District Judge Gladys Kessler made an appeal to President Barack Obama, urging him to do something about the force-feeding of Guantánamo prisoners who are on hunger strike. The plea came in a four-page opinion denying a request by one of more than 100 hunger strikers at the US prison camp that she issue an injunction barring the military from forcing him to eat through a gastric tube that is inserted into his nose.

Judge Kessler noted that the force-feeding of detainees had been denounced as a violation of medical ethics and human rights by many organizations, including the American Medical Association and the United Nations. ‘It is perfectly clear,” she wrote, that “force-feeding is a painful, humiliating and degrading process.”

She added that the details provided by Dhiab demonstrated that force-feeding prisoners violates Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which prohibits torture or cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment.

In her ruling, Judge Kessler cited a statement by Jeremy Lazarus of the American Medical Association concerning the unethical nature of force-feeding prisoners. In his statement, submitted to the secretary of defense, Lazarus endorsed a World Medical Association Declaration that is very clear on this point: “Where a prisoner refuses nourishment and is considered by the physician as capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment concerning the consequences of such a voluntary refusal of nourishment, he or she shall not be fed artificially.”

Nevertheless, the judge claimed she could not issue an injunction against the procedure because Congress had barred the courts from intervening in questions related to conditions at Guantánamo. President Obama, however, as commander in chief had the authority to address the issue, she wrote.

The Obama administration has defended the brutal practice of force-feeding as consistent with its “compassionate” treatment of detainees at the facility.

Petitioner Jihad Dhiab, a 41-year-old Syrian who has been detained at Guantánamo for more than 11 years, filed an application for a preliminary injunction. Dhiab is of one of 86 of the 166 detainees at the facility who have been cleared by an interagency task force for transfer home or to a third country. However, all of these detainees are being held indefinitely without being charged or tried.

Judge Kessler wrote: “At no time during these 11 years has he had any hearing on the merits of his habeas petition, nor any military commission proceeding to determine the merits of his case.”

In February, several of the prisoners began a hunger strike in response to searches of detainees’ Korans, which military leaders say are used to hide contraband. The hunger strike has spread and become a broader protest of Obama’s failure to close the facility.

Twice a day, selected detainees are brought into a room where their wrists, arms, stomach, legs and head are strapped to a chair before repeated attempts to force a tube down their noses to their stomachs causing the prisoners to gag and wretch, while blood drips from their nostrils. Reportedly, guards do this twice a day to elicit the maximum amount of pain and discomfort, rather than leaving the tubes in. This is meant to discourage others from joining the hunger strike, but has largely failed.

One of the issues brought into Dhiab’s suit was the factor of Ramadan, which began Tuesday evening in North America, during which Muslim adherents are expected to fast during daylight hours. Dhiab contended that being force-fed violated his religious beliefs. The Pentagon has responded by declaring that force-feedings will occur only after sundown and before sunrise.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Egyptian military regime plans sharp attack on working class

0

 

By
Alex Lantier

10 July 2013

The day after carrying out a bloody massacre killing 51 supporters of ousted Muslim Brotherhood (MB) President Mohamed Mursi, the newly-installed Egyptian army junta issued a constitutional decree vesting unlimited powers in the military-backed president. It also named free-market economist Hazem El-Beblawi as prime minister, signaling plans for a sharp attack on the working class.

These events confirm that last Wednesday’s military coup against Mursi’s Muslim Brotherhood (MB) did not represent the aspirations to democracy and social equality that drove masses of workers and youth to protest against Mursi last week. Rather, with the support of liberal and pseudo-left forces that joined the Tamarod (“rebel”) coalition, the coup aimed to forcibly pre-empt rising political opposition in the working class before it turned into a revolutionary struggle against the entire ruling class.

Yesterday’s constitutional declaration gives President Adly Mansour dictatorial powers during a “transitional period” lasting until next year’s presidential elections, at least six months. During this period, the president would have full legislative authority, controlling state policy and the state budget, as well as the power to decree a state of emergency with the approval of a hand-picked Cabinet.

It is the military, however, that will be the final arbiter. A separate National Defense Council headed by the Egyptian president will oversee security, the military budget and any laws relating to the armed forces. Through this mechanism, the army is ensuring for itself an independent and dominant position inside the Egyptian state.

The “transition” period would include the appointment of a panel by the president to make proposed amendments to the constitution implemented under MB rule in 2012. The new constitution would be put forward for an up-or-down vote in a referendum prior to any new elections.

Like last Wednesday’s coup, the new constitutional declaration enjoys Washington’s support. Egypt’s Al Ahram daily cited anonymous US officials who praised the declaration for having “laid out a plan for the path forward.” They added, however, that Washington would “react with some caution” to the plan, as it was issued only one day after the bloody massacre of MB protesters outside the Republican Guard barracks in Cairo.

Mansour’s naming of El-Beblawi as prime minister is a signal to the major international banks and the Persian Gulf oil sheikhdoms that the junta will carry out deep attacks on the working class.

El-Beblawi is founding member of Egypt’s Social-Democratic Party, having done a Ph.D. in economics at the University of Paris and worked as a UN official. He is widely known as an advocate of cuts to state subsidies for grain and fuel prices, on which millions of workers in Egypt depend. He laid these views out in an interview with Daily News Egypt on June 29, the day before protests began against Mursi.

He said, “We must create a clear understanding for the public that the level of subsidies in Egypt is unsustainable, and the situation is critical. Subsidies have exceeded reasonable limits, and take more than 25 percent of the budget … People must understand that they must accept some of the consequences: the cancelling of subsidies requires sacrifices from the public and therefore necessitates their acceptance.”

The New York Times praised El-Beblawi’s nomination as a “signal that the military-led transitional government intends to move forward with economic reforms and restructuring, including reductions in the country’s vast public subsidies.”

Egypt’s EGX30 stock market index jumped 3.3 percent, to 5,295 points, as investors anticipated massive new profits from the junta’s free-market policies.

The army’s constitutional declaration also continues, and even expands, the Islamist legal foundation of the state. According to state-run Egyptian daily Al Ahram, “The declaration states that the Arab Republic of Egypt is a democratic system based on citizenship, Islam is the religion of the state, Arabic is its official language, and the principles of Sharia law derived from established Sunni canons are its main source of legislation.”

The explicit reference to the Sunni branch of Islam is aimed at maintaining the support of far-right Sunni Islamist forces such as the Salafist Al-Nour Party, which backed the coup.

As a result of opposition from the Al-Nour Party, the regime’s first choice for prime minister, Mohamed ElBaradei, the leader of the National Salvation Front, was scrapped. ElBaradei, who played a key role in soliciting US backing for the coup, will serve as vice president of foreign affairs.

The Maspero Youth Union, a Coptic Christian group that also supports the new regime, criticized the declaration, pledging that they would fight for an “equal-opportunity country that safeguards dignity.”

The response of the liberal and pseudo-left forces inside the Tamarod alliance, including the National Salvation Front of Mohamed ElBaradei and the pseudo-left Revolutionary Socialists (RS), shows how thoroughly they are integrated into the Egyptian dictatorship. They issued only mild objections to the constitutional declaration.

On its Twitter account, Tamarod wrote: “It is impossible to accept the C.D. [constitutional declaration], because it founds a new dictatorship. We will hand over to the president an amendment to the C.D.”

In fact, Tamarod and its supporters–the international affiliates of the RS, including the pseudo-left International Socialist Organization (ISO) in the United States and the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) in Britain–continue to back the coup.

Yesterday, the SWP’s Judith Orr penned an article, titled “Egypt–second revolution sweeps out a president,” to praise last Wednesday’s coup as a revolution. She wrote, “The army’s takeover was more than the simple military coup that much of the media are describing it as. It does not signal the ‘end of democracy.’”

While acknowledging that Monday’s massacre of pro-Mursi protesters “has shocked people,” she said, “Some protesters saw the clampdown on the Muslim Brotherhood as welcome.” Orr’s implicit claim that “democracy” existed in Egypt, either under the Mursi regime or now under the junta, brands the SWP and its co-thinkers as propagandists for counter-revolution.

It will not be long before the army turns the methods of mass killing and provocation against opposition in the working class to El-Beblawi’s reactionary social agenda.

Tensions are still running high in Egypt, amid the junta’s continuing crackdown on MB members. Though Monday’s massacre of pro-MB protesters outside the Republican Guard barracks in Cairo was provoked by the army, prosecutors are now preparing charges including murder, thuggery, and undermining general security against 650 pro-MB protesters who survived the massacre.

Mursi supporters are planning to hold a mass rally today in Cairo to protest the coup and commemorate the victims of the massacre.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Defense begins case in trial of Bradley Manning

0

 

By
Thomas Gaist

10 July 2013

Private First Class Bradley Manning’s trial, at Fort Meade, Maryland, is now is in its sixth week. The defense began its case this week, but it has been hamstrung in advance by military judge Colonel Denise Lind’s ruling that Manning’s political motives were irrelevant to case, which effectively denies the defendant any ability to mount a whistleblower defense.

Manning faces a long list of charges, including aiding the enemy under the Espionage Act, computer fraud and stealing government property. Manning has admitted to leaking hundreds of thousands of military intelligence files to WikiLeaks while serving in Iraq during 2009 and 2010, including clear evidence of war crimes. It was the largest such leak of classified documents in US history.

The US government has filed 22 counts against Manning, for a maximum sentence of 149 years in military prison. The most severe charge, “aiding the enemy,” is a potential capital offense, but the government has said that it is not seeking the death penalty.

The whole procedure is a travesty of justice against a political prisoner. The extensive pre-trail hearings and the trail itself have been characterized by high levels of secrecy. Many of the prosecution’s witnesses have testified anonymously, and courtroom access has been severely restricted. According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, Manning’s trial has been “more restrictive than military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay.”

While Manning’s defense team made arguments Monday presenting his decision to leak classified documents as motivated by concern for the well-being of the United States, its military, and the Iraqi people, Lind’s ruling prevents the defense from basing their case on the defendant’s principled opposition to US policies.

On Monday, the defense called Lauren McNamara, a woman who corresponded with Manning during the period when he made the leaks. She testified that he was “concerned with saving the lives of families in foreign countries” and that he “considered human life to be valuable above all.” McNamara quoted from her correspondence with Manning, reading his statement that was “concerned about making sure that everyone, soldiers, marines, contractors, even the local nationals, get home to their families.”

US Army sergeant David Sadtler, who oversaw Manning’s intelligence work, testified that Manning was angered by the jailing of 15 Iraqi civilians, with US approval, for distributing written material criticizing the government. “He was upset at the situation,” Sadtler said. Previously, Manning stated before the court that the Iraqis involved had no ties to the armed resistance against the US occupation, and that their materials contained a “scholarly critique” of the current regime.

Manning’s pre-trial statement shows that he was motivated by a growing consciousness of the criminal character of US foreign policy. In the statement, delivered to the military judge in February, the soldier asserted that his actions were intended to initiate a process of “worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms.”

Referring to politically motivated roundups carried out with full US support by the Iraqi regime, Manning said, “I knew that if I continued to assist the Baghdad Federal Police in identifying the political opponents of Prime Minister al-Maliki, those people would be arrested and in the custody of the Baghdad Federal Police and very likely tortured and not seen again for a very long time, if ever.”

Manning also spoke in the earlier statement about his growing concerns about the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, saying, “The more I became educated on the topic, it seemed that we found ourselves holding an increasing number of individuals indefinitely that we believed or knew to be innocent.”

Referencing the diplomatic cables that he would leak, Manning said, “The more I read, the more I was fascinated by the way that we dealt with other nations and organizations. I also began to think that the documented backdoor deals and seemingly criminal activity didn’t seem characteristic of the de facto leader of the free world.”

Monday’s proceedings featured a viewing of the “Collateral Murder” video leaked by Manning, which shows US helicopter pilots committing war crimes, killing 12 individuals including two Reuters news personnel. While the Pentagon claims the pilots mistook the individuals for “enemy fighters,” the footage shows clearly that the victims were unarmed.

In his pre-trial statement, Manning cited his disgust at the “delightful bloodlust” the pilots in the video appeared to take in the killing, saying that “they dehumanized the individuals they were engaging and seemed to not value human life…. For me, this seems similar to child torturing ants with a magnifying glass.” He continued, “I hoped that the public would be as alarmed as me about the conduct of the aerial weapons team…. I wanted the American public to know that not everyone in Iraq and Afghanistan are targets that needed to be neutralized.”

The defense team filed four motions this week, seeking the dismissal of 7 of the 22 counts against Manning on the basis that they lack evidence. The prosecution has until Thursday to respond, at which point Colonel Lind will rule on the motions.

In support of these motions, the defense called as a witness Colonel Morris Davis, chief prosecutor in the Guantanamo military commissions between 2005 and 2007, who testified that the information on detainees leaked by Manning was already available to the public: “A lot of the information was repetitive of comparable open-source information that was available in print,” Davis said. “You could read the open-source information and sit down and write a substantial version of what was in the DAB [detainee assessment brief].”

“As far as providing sensitive information, it doesn’t do that–it is just background information,” Davis said.

Speaking to the New York Daily News, military justice professor Eugene Fidell of Yale University Law School said that the exposure of National Security Agency surveillance programs by Edward Snowden has significantly raised the stakes involved in the Manning trial. “Anybody looking at this [Manning] case is going to say, “We have to throw the book at this guy, or where does it end?’” Fidell said.

Fidell’s comments underscore that one of the central aims of the Obama administration’s vindictive prosecution of Manning is to set an example and a precedent, which will be used to prosecute all those who publicize information deemed harmful to US imperialism. The prosecution of whistleblowers is one component of a broader campaign by the US ruling elite to criminalize political dissent. The US political and military establishment is deeply fearful of growing popular opposition to its imperialist war policies, which is beginning to find expression even within its own personnel, a process embodied in the cases of Manning and Edward Snowden.

Manning is the target of a deeply reactionary political witch-hunt intended to intimidate opponents of the US foreign policy establishment. While Manning offered to plead guilty to several charges as part of a bargain, the Obama administration rejected any deal and is pushing for the maximum sentence.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Brazil target of massive NSA spying operation

0

 

By
Bill Van Auken

10 July 2013

New documents provided by the former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden have exposed a massive US spying operation targeting millions of Brazilian citizens as well as companies and government institutions. The NSA has also targeted the Brazilian embassy in Washington and the country’s mission to the United Nations in New York.

The scale of the secret espionage was spelled out in an article published July 7 in the Rio de Janeiro daily O Globo, co-written by its own staff and Glen Greenwald, the Guardian journalist who interviewed Snowden and has published a number of articles based on documents provided by the ex-NSA contractor.

The report touched off a wave of official protests and investigations by the Brazilian government headed by President Dilma Rousseff of the Workers Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores–PT). The government demanded explanations from the US State Department and the American ambassador in Brasilia.

At the same time, it announced a criminal investigation by the Federal Police and the National Telecommunications Agency (known by its Portuguese acronym ANATEL) into the spying. One of its objectives will be to determine whether Brazilian companies collaborated with the operations of the US intelligence agency.

According to the documents cited in the O Globo story, access to Brazilian networks was provided by a US telecommunications company that maintains partnerships with companies in Brazil. The newspaper said it was not clear from the documents whether the Brazilian firms were aware of how their ties to the US company were being exploited by the NSA.

The report stressed that Brazil was made a “prime target” by the NSA, on the level of Pakistan, Iran, China and Russia. While US officials have defended the agency’s secret domestic and international spying programs as necessary measures in the “global war on terrorism,” there has never been any suggestion that Brazil is a source of terrorist threats. Rather, the country has likely been given such attention because of its growing economic weight and the challenge it poses to US imperialism’s attempts to exert its hegemony in Latin America and elsewhere.

President Rousseff, while declaring herself “indignant” over the report, added that her government would proceed “without precipitation” or “prejudgment.” She declared, “We have to have dialogue.”

She said her government would promote legislation to secure “first, human rights, the right to privacy of every person and every citizen, and secondly, but not in that order, it is simultaneous, to guarantee the sovereignty of Brazil.”

Brazilian Communications Minister Paulo Bernardo said that the country was faced with “evidence that the Internet is being transformed into a mechanism for global espionage, and that we can fall into a situation of states monitoring the lives of citizens morning, noon and night, and nobody talking about it.” He said that Brazil would pursue discussions on changing the governance of the Internet, which is exclusively in US hands.

Brazilian Foreign Minister Antonio Patriota declared the government’s “deep concern at the report that electronic and telephone communications of Brazilian citizens are being the object of espionage by the organs of American intelligence.” He said that Brasilia would seek action by the United Nations to “impede abuses and protect the privacy” of telephone and Internet communications.

At the same time, Patriota described as “encouraging” the declared willingness of US officials to engage in discussions on the issue.

It is certain that such sentiments are not shared among wide layers of the Brazilian population. The reality is that the US State Department refused to comment in any fashion on the spying program.

The US ambassador to Brazil, Thomas Shannon, insisted that the O Globo story “presented an incorrect image of our program,” but failed to respond to its central thesis, that American intelligence had spied on millions of Brazilians, intercepting billions of their communications. The office of the US Director of National Intelligence likewise refused to comment, claiming the issue would be dealt with through “diplomatic channels” and that “the United States gathers foreign intelligence of the type gathered by all nations.”

The issue is of particular sensitivity in Brazil, which was ruled for two decades by a military dictatorship that came to power in a 1964 CIA-backed coup. Under the military regime, phone-tapping and other forms of domestic surveillance were ubiquitous.

Despite the verbal protests and proposals for legislation, Brazil’s PT government clearly wants no direct confrontation with Washington. Most tellingly, Foreign Minister Patriota made it clear that Brasilia has no intention of reversing its position of summarily rejecting the appeal for asylum by Edward Snowden, the source of the information on the US spying on Brazilians.

Nor, for that matter, was there any threat from Rousseff’s government of terminating US-Brazilian agreements covering intelligence and military collaboration.

A follow-up story published in O Globo Monday revealed that the NSA and the CIA had been allowed to run a surveillance station in Brasilia to collect intelligence from satellites of other countries at least until 2002. The date is significant in that it marked the coming to office for the first time of the PT under then-President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

An NSA document apparently obtained by Snowden named “Primary Fornstat Collection Operations” exposed the existence of the station. There was no indication that the document established the closure of the spy base.

The indications that the PT government has not only continued to collaborate with US intelligence operations in the country, but also to share in the information that they gather, have yet to be probed by the Brazilian media.

It was revealed in the course of the demonstrations that brought millions of people into the streets last month that the Rousseff government had organized a spying operation by the Federal Police on social media as part of an attempt to suppress the mass protest movement.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Australian PM proposes “democratic” changes to Labor’s voting rules

0

 

By
Patrick O’Connor

10 July 2013

Ahead of a federal election due within months, recently reinstalled Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is continuing his campaign to refashion the Australian Labor Party apparatus. After directing Labor’s National Executive to take over the running of the party’s corruption-ridden New South Wales branch, Rudd now proposes to replace the method for selecting Labor’s federal leader, which currently involves only parliamentarians and their factional chiefs, with a combined ballot of parliamentarians and party members.

The change is aimed at promoting a bogus new “democratic” façade to the hollowed-out right-wing bureaucracy that is the Labor Party. At the same time, Rudd is signalling to the corporate elite that he intends to proceed with its demands for austerity and pro-business restructuring, unhindered by the sectional interests of the trade union bureaucracy. He intends to take the proposal to a Labor caucus meeting for ratification later this month.

In announcing his plan, Rudd worked to exploit the continuing public anger over the 2010 Labor Party coup that removed him from office and installed Julia Gillard. The ouster of Rudd, carried out overnight by a small cabal of factional powerbrokers behind the backs of the Australian people, provoked widespread hostility. Neither Gillard nor her supporters anticipated the reaction, and she never recovered from the backlash in the working class.

In 2010, Rudd, no doubt aware of the powerful forces behind Gillard, which included the US embassy and key sections of big business, made no challenge to his removal. Now, however, he is using public hostility to the coup to ensure that any Labor leader, once installed, will be difficult to remove.

Under the new rules, Labor members will be able to vote in a leadership ballot, with their collective votes given a 50 percent weighting, while Labor parliamentarians’ votes will comprise the other 50 percent. Once elected, a Labor leader will only be able to be removed if three-quarters of the parliamentary caucus sign a petition demanding an election, on the narrow grounds that the current leader has brought the party into disrepute.

Rudd declared: “The mechanisms outlined in the proposed rule change prevent anyone from just wandering in [to the prime minister’s office] one day or one night, and saying ‘okay sunshine, it’s over’.”

The prime minister and his backers have absurdly portrayed the new proposals as heralding the dawn of a new era of democracy within the Labor Party. “The reforms will ensure that power will never again rest in the hands of a factional few,” he declared. “I believe it will encourage people to reengage in the political process and to bring back those supporters who have become disillusioned … We’re sending out a very clear message across the entire nation that you, as a valued member of our party, one of the tens of thousands of people across the entire Australian family, you get a say in who becomes the national leader of our party by direct vote.”

This is all an utter fraud. References by Rudd and other government figures to “tens of thousands” of Labor members are aimed at covering over Labor’s collapse as a mass party based in the working class.

Most of Labor’s nominal membership of around 40,000 people comprises inactive “paper” members. An internal party review conducted three years ago for the party’s national executive concluded that the party faced the threat of organisational collapse. Between 2007 and 2010, a quarter of the membership, or more than 13,000 people, quit the party. The review admitted that the combined membership of the Greens and other so-called third parties was “ten times the size of the Labor Party.” In recent elections, the Labor Party has been unable to mobilise enough members and supporters to cover election booths to distribute “how to vote” information–an unprecedented situation for the 120-year-old party, which was created primarily as an electoral machine.

Labor’s membership collapse has nothing to do with how the party leader is elected. Like its labour and social democratic counterparts around the world, the Australian Labor Party has lurched to the right over the last three decades. Under the 1983—1996 Hawke-Keating governments, Labor and the trade unions responded to the emergence of globalised capitalist production methods by junking their previous program of national economic regulation and limited social reform in favour of economic and corporate “restructuring”, privatisations, job slashing and a major assault on social services. As a result, the Labor Party is largely despised throughout the working class.

The proposed change to the party’s rules is not just a response to the current inner-party turmoil, but is aimed at giving its parliamentary leadership a freer hand in imposing unpopular, pro-business economic measures.

The unofficial campaign for the forthcoming election is proceeding at the same time as a deepening economic crisis. Whereas the mining export boom provided a limited buffer for Australian capitalism in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crash, China’s economic slowdown and credit crunch is triggering sharply lower economic growth forecasts and accelerating layoffs. This has added greater urgency to the demands by Australian ruling circles for European-style austerity spending cuts and greater workplace productivity by slashing the wages and conditions of the working class.

Gillard’s factional dependence upon the trade unions had come to be regarded as an obstacle to this agenda. For three decades, the unions have worked hand in hand with big business in suppressing the opposition of workers to the endless drive for greater productivity and “competitiveness.” But powerful sections of corporate Australia now regard the unions as a dispensable overhead expense and, in some instances, an outright obstacle to its restructuring agenda. Earlier this year, Gillard drew the ire of the Murdoch and financial press for lining up behind union campaigns against “foreigners” on 457 guest worker visas, and for thinly-veiled protectionist measures that provided Australian manufacturing companies with greater access to contracts for major mining and infrastructure projects.

Rudd returned to the Labor leadership in the face of continued opposition from key union powerbrokers, who remained behind Gillard. While moving to shore up his own precarious position within the government, the prime minister is, at the same time, signalling to corporate Australia that its demands can now be directly transmitted to the Lodge, without any hindrance from the union bureaucracy.

If the rule change is implemented, Labor leaders will be virtually impossible to remove from office, regardless of how unpopular their policies are. Rudd’s “democratisation” drive foreshadows, in reality, the deeply anti-democratic methods that will be used, by whichever party wins office in the forthcoming election, to implement an accelerated onslaught on the jobs, working conditions and living standards of the working class.



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

A socialist program against war, austerity and the drive to dictatorship

0

 

SEP election meetings

10 July 2013

The Socialist Equality Party is holding an important series of public election meetings to outline its policies in the wake of the enormous political upheavals of recent weeks.

The courageous stand of Edward Snowden in exposing the extent of the Obama administration’s illegal spying activities, and the international manhunt against him; the mass demonstrations of Egyptian workers, following major protests in Turkey and Brazil; and the deepening global slump five years after the financial crisis of 2008– these are just some of the indications of the onset of a new period of revolutionary struggles.

In every country, the ruling elites, representing the interests of the banks and big businesses, are demanding that the working class pay for the crisis of the profit system and preparing authoritarian forms of rule to impose their agenda. At the same time, Washington’s preparations for war against China, in which Australia is intimately involved, are intensifying.

The political turmoil in Australia, including the unprecedented reinstallation of Kevin Rudd as prime minister after he was ousted in a political coup three years ago, is rooted in these global processes. Rudd’s return is a desperate attempt to prevent the collapse of the Labor Party and prop up the two-party system, on which the ruling class has relied for more than a century to defend capitalist rule. These events are a sure sign that major struggles are looming in Australia.

The agenda of the next government, Liberal or Labor, will be deeper attacks on living standards and ongoing preparations for war. The China-driven mining boom has ended and recession is developing. Corporations such as General Motors Holden are demanding savage cuts in wages and conditions, while public education, health, welfare and pensions are under attack by both federal and state governments. The trade unions are collaborating with the employers and the governments in these offensives.

A new, independent political movement of the working class must be developed to meet these challenges, based on an internationalist and socialist perspective. The SEP election campaign is aimed at building such a movement against the capitalist system itself–the root cause of war, austerity and the drive to dictatorship. We urge workers, youth and students to attend our meetings and discuss these vital issues with our candidates.

Details:

Adelaide
Saturday, July 13, 2 p.m.
Room 3, Thebarton Community Centre
60-78 South Road
Torrensville
(car parking off South Road)

Perth
Sunday July 28, 2 p.m.
Kookaburra Meeting Room 2
Herb Graham Centre
38 Ashbury Crescent
Mirrabooka

Geelong
Sunday July 28, 2.30 p.m.
Newcomb Library, upstairs meeting room
Corner Bellarine Hwy and Wilsons Rd
Geelong

Brisbane
Sunday, July 28, 5 p.m.
Jagera Arts Centre Hall
121 Cordelia St
South Brisbane

Wollongong
Saturday, August 3, 2 p.m.
Port Kembla Leagues Club
4 Wentworth St
Port Kembla

Newcastle
Sunday, August 4, 2 p.m.
Joy Cummings Centre
Corner of Scott and Pacific Streets, Newcastle
(One block up Scott Street from Newcastle Station)

Tickets for all meetings: $3 or $2 concession

Authorised by Nick Beams, 113/55 Flemington Rd, North Melbourne VIC 3051



‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
var pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
var position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}

function appendBottomAppeal() {
if (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’)) {
var htmlArray = [
‘

‘
];
var html = htmlArray.join(”);
if ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
} else {
$(‘#content’).append(html);
}
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
$(this).parent().hide();
return false;
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function(){
appendInlineAppeal();
appendBottomAppeal();
});

Republished with permission from: World Socialist Web Site

Congress derails Obama plans to arm Syrian rebels

0

Though the Obama administration has authorized military aid to the rebel opposition currently engaged in a civil war with the government of Bashar Assad, it now appears that the US Congress has essentially blocked that move over terrorism fears.

Members of both the House and Senate intelligence committees have
moved to enact stringent restrictions on funding the Syrian
rebels, a move sufficient to prevent the White House from
delivering on arms shipments according to sources who spoke with
The Hill.

In mid-June, following allegations from the White House that the
Assad government had used chemical weapons against opposition
forces moving to depose him, the Obama administration authorized
arms shipments in a marked escalation of US involvement in the
region.

“This is going to be different
in both scope and scale in terms of what we are
providing,
” said Ben Rhodes, Obama’s deputy national
security adviser at the time.

Now, according to sources familiar with committee activity,
restrictions on that increased aid to Syria’s opposition may have
essentially stopped the administration in its tracks.

According to The Hill, lawmakers moved to block the military aid
out of fears that weapons would fall into the hands of terrorist
groups. US analysts are in particular concerned over the
strengthening of the Syrian al-Qaeda-affiliated group Jabhat
al-Nusra, also known as the al-Nusra Front.

Though the Obama administration had long stated that the use of
chemical weapons by Assad’s government constituted a “red line,” it seems that lawmakers
on the intelligence committees are more worried about the
regional threat posed by Islamist elements now engaged against
Syrian government forces. 

Syrian rebel fighters gather around a former Syrian army tank as rebels prepare to attack positions held by the Syrian army areas in the Salaheddine neighborhood of Aleppo, on July 8, 2013. (AFP Photo / Abo Mhio)

Jabhat al-Nusra is thought to control as many as 10,000
supporters within Syria. Meanwhile, it is also believed that Iran
is currently training Hezbollah fighters within Syria, in growing
tension against the Sunni-backed al-Qaeda affiliates of the
Syrian opposition forces.

“Whatever we do, we have to
make sure we do it right,”
said Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger,
the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Tuesday.

“If we are going to arm, we
have to make sure we have control of what arms are out there and
how people are trained to use those arms so they don’t fall into
the hands of our enemy al-Qaeda,”
added Ruppersberger.

Since the mid-June announcement that the Obama administration
would seek to funnel military aid to Syria’s insurgency, it had
set out to sell that plan to members of Congress. Both Secretary
of State John Kerry and Vice President Joe Biden briefed the
intelligence panels in June.

Despite efforts by the White House to increase momentum for its
new Syria policy, support appeared to be splintered on Tuesday,
even amongst members of Congress who were in favor of arming the
opposition.

“It’s not clear to me that the
administration has a workable policy,”
said Senator Susan
Collins (R-Maine), a member of the Intelligence Committee.

Beyond the key House and Senate intelligence committees, which
hold funding oversight, Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), a ranking
member of the Foreign Relations Committee, accused the Obama
administration of covertly pushing military aid behind the closed
doors of the Intelligence Committee.

“They should come and talk
about this openly,”
Corker told reporters Tuesday.

“It puts the Intelligence
Committee in a very awkward place. All of a sudden, they own
it,”
he added.

According to The Hill, though Obama administration officials
stopped just shy of saying efforts to arm the Syrian opposition
had been thwarted, congressional opposition was not likely to
make it any easier.

The Associated Press had first reported last month that the
congressional intelligence panels had rejected the
administration’s initial plans to arm Syria’s rebels.

Republished with permission from: RT

Texas House passes abortion restrictions despite public outrage

0

Texas legislators provisionally approved controversial abortion restrictions in a House vote Tuesday night after 10 hours of debate. The bill should effectively close nearly every women’s health clinic that provides abortions in the largest US state.

The measure would to ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy
and enact regulations on clinics so invasive, critics say, that
only six of the state’s 42 women’s health clinics will be able to
remain open. Doctors who perform abortions would be required to
have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals and prescribe when
abortion needs need to be taken. Abortions would also only be
allowed to be performed in surgical centers. 

A final, formal vote in the Texas House is scheduled for
Wednesday. Known as House Bill 2 (HB2), the bill is then expected
to pass through the Republican-controlled state Senate later this
week before it is signed into law by Republican Governor Rick
Perry. 

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued
an open letter to Texas lawmakers before the vote was held
Tuesday and warned of the grave health consequences HB2 and its
counterpart in the Senate, SB1, could have. 

“Facts are very important, especially when discussing the
health of women and the American public. And a lot of ‘facts’ are
being asserted in this debate
,” read the letter signed by
ACOG President Jeanne Conry. “Truth be told, the scientific
underpinnings of this legislation are unsound
.” 

“First, there’s the 20-week ban, which is based on the
argument that a fetus can feel pain. Recent and rigorous
scientific reviews have concluded that there is no evidence of
fetal perception of pain until 29 weeks at the earliest (third
trimester is 28-40 weeks)
.” 

Tuesday’s vote comes two weeks after a special session, when
legislators may only debate an issue proposed by the governor,
expired because of an 11-hour filibuster by State Senator Wendy
Davis. Texas senators attempted to nullify Davis’ filibuster by
interrupting her with bogus legal stipulations but, in their
efforts, were chanted into silence by 2,000 pro-choice activists
that filled the state house.  

As the democratic state senator rocketed to national fame,
though, Governor Perry quietly allotted a second special session
for the abortion vote. The debate was no less contentious on
Tuesday, when thousands of pro-life and pro-choice demonstrators
rallied outside the statehouse. 

Abortion rights activists demonstrate outside the floor of the House after the HB2 bill restricting abortion rights passed in Austin, Texas July 9, 2013. (Reuters / Mike Stone)

At least one young woman, 28-year-old Sarah Slamen, was removed
from the building for berating the legislators. 

“Thank you for every
hateful statement degrading women and girls to sex objects, and
brood mares, and bald eagles and leather wallets, like you
eloquent pro-life supporters have done today
,” she said.
“This is a farce. The Texas legislature is a bunch of liars
and it’s a low bar that you hold yourself to that you simply
allowed us to speak
.” 

The bill passed on party lines, with Democratic House members
posing for a picture holding clothes hangers, implying that women
without access to safe abortions would be forced to administer
the procedure on themselves with improvised tools. 

Conservatives frequently used emotional appeals of their own,
inviting women who regretted receiving abortions to tell the
audience of their sorrows. Outside, anti-choice activists held
pictures of aborted fetuses and held signs, one of which read
“The child belongs to God.” 

Through it all, lawmakers asserted that the new law would
ultimately benefit female health in America’s largest state, a
claim the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
reiterated is simply untrue. 

“These proposed requirements, concerning door width and other
irrelevant issues, would only make it extremely difficult or
impossible for most clinics, including clinics that primarily
provide important non-abortion well-woman health care services
such as mammograms and prenatal care to low-income women, to stay
open
,” the ACOG letter went on. 

“Women do not need — or want — any government to make medical
decisions for them. Women must have access to all needed health
care — from mammograms to prenatal visits to reproductive care —
based on scientific facts, not political ideology
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Farmers falling back on chemical pesticides as GMO seeds falter

0

Though biotech companies like Monsanto spent many millions creating and inserting genes that would make corn plants poisonous to the corn rootworm but harmless to other creatures, the pest has begun to develop an immunity.

Though the use of chemical pesticides has always been a source of
contention, the advent of corn hybrid plants by biotech companies
like Monsanto allowed farmers to cut back on their use. These new
hybrids had been specifically designed using genes from a
bacteria called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which provided a
formidable defense against corn rootworm.

Throughout parts of the midwest, however, farmers are now
discovering rootworms that are immune to the genetically modified
corn. In parts of Illinois, Minnesota and Nebraska, where
rootworm has made a comeback, farmers have now returned to using
chemical pesticides.

According to Dan Steiner, an independent crop consultant in
northeastern Nebraska, the return of the soil insecticides brings
back bad memories.

“We used to get sick [from the
chemicals],”
Steiner tells NPR.

“Because we’d always dig to see
how the corn’s coming along. We didn’t wear the gloves and
everything, and we’d kind of puke in the middle of the day. Well,
I think we were low-dosing poison on ourselves!”

According to the US Department of Agriculture, two thirds
of all corn grown in the US is of a hybrid variety, carrying the
Bt gene that targets the rootworm. The first hybrids were
introduced in 2003 and, as their proliferation now shows, proved
to be very popular.

Though traditional pesticides may help in evening out the odds,
there are other alternatives to combat rootworm despite its
adaptation to the corn hybrid. Steiner, for one, has advocated
“starving” the rootworm
by depriving it of its food source, and advising farmers to
rotate their crops from corn. 

Reuters / John Sommers II

Crop rotation, however, is not likely to prove popular among
farmers who take advantage of some $5 billion in government
subsidies per year, doled out regardless of crop prices or
yields.

Corn is by far the largest recipient of yearly crop subsidies in
the US, a policy which has been sustained in part due to corn
ethanol production, which critics say is not a viable energy
policy, and which has kept the price of corn so low that
manufacturers of processed foods in the US habitually replace
sugar with high fructose corn syrup.

According to University of Nebraska entomologist Lance Meinke,
the increasing use of chemical pesticides may well be nailed down
to the current politics of growing corn, particularly in the face
of alternatives such as crop rotation.

“I think economics are driving
everything,”
Meinke tells NPR.

“Corn prices have been so high
the last three years, everybody is trying to protect every
kernel. People are just really going for it right now, to be as
profitable as they can,”
he adds.

In the meantime, companies such as Syngenta and AMVAC Chemical,
which produce soil insecticides for corn, have reported increases
in sales of 50 to 100 per cent over the past two years.

The situation now developing with the resurgence of the corn
rootworm is not unlike that being experienced by American farmers
who have relied on Monsanto GMO seeds resistant to the company’s
own Roundup Ready herbicide.

Some fifteen years following the introduction of the
herbicide-resistant GMO seed, most of the corn, soybean and
cotton cultivated in the US is now of the Roundup Ready variety.

Some 15 years later, most of the corn, soybeans and cotton
cultivated in the US stems from these Roundup Ready seeds. While
the genetically modified crops were meant to be resistant to
application of the weed-killing Roundup herbicide, farmers are
now increasingly having to deal with Roundup-resistant
“superweeds.”

It is now estimated that in the period from 1996, when the GMO
crops were introduced, to 2011, an additional 404 million pounds
of chemical pesticides were applied to US fields, amounting to a
7 per cent increase overall.

Republished with permission from: RT

The Vaccine-Autism Connection – Here's What They Know…

0

 

The Vaccine-Autism Connection  — Here's What They Know...

Originally published on Vactruth.com and reprinted with permission of the author.

For many years, parents have believed that multiple vaccinations have caused their children to become autistic. Governments from around the world, however, have categorically denied this possibility. They continue to bury their heads in the sand and ignore what is happening. They refuse to carry out relevant studies and will not answer any questions that may uncover the truth about vaccines.

Their actions are clearly demonstrated in a video titled AutismOne & Generation Rescue 2013 Conference Congressional Panel, featuring Congressman Burton (R-IN), Congressman Weldon, MD (R-FL) and Congressman Bill Posey (R-FL), published on May 11, 2013.

The video highlights what has been going on behind closed doors over the years and gives parents the rare opportunity to witness first hand the lies that are being told and the sheer enormity of the vaccine deception. [1]

The video begins in the year 2000.

Representative Dan Burton, chairman of the 2000 House Government Reform Committee on Autism and Childhood Vaccines, opened the conference by stating that autism, once considered a rare disorder, has become a near epidemic. He said that it is a top priority to carry out as much research into the potential connection between vaccines and autism as possible. He finished his introduction to Congress by stating that we must stop burying our heads in the sand and ignoring this possibility.

Turning to Dr. Coleen Boyle, the Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), he asked:

“We have been checking all the financial records of the FDA, the HHS, the CDC, do you believe that anybody who is getting funds from Merck or any of the other pharmaceutical companies should be on advisory panels that are making judgements about pharmaceuticals coming from those companies, or do you believe that is a conflict of interest?”

Now, for many of us, this question would appear to be relatively simple for someone of Dr. Boyle’s standing to answer. However, it was not simple for Dr. Boyle; she appeared to be rendered speechless, before stating:

“I think that is a difficult question to answer.”

Congressman Burton then turned to Dr. Paul Offit and said:

“You talk about collaboration, I guess with the Merck pharmaceutical company?”

To which Offit stuttered:

“Yes, I, um, as I, um, disclosed in my written report, I have been in collaboration with Merck and Company on the development of the Rotavirus vaccine since 1992.”

To which Congressman Burton simply replied:

“They produce the MMR, don’t they?”

Looking back towards Dr. Boyle, Burton asked her why the CDC did not include the possibility that some of these vaccines may have caused the autism increase as one of the potential causes they were investigating, asking her to check out this matter. Despite replying that she would, it appears that once again this relatively simple task was too difficult for Dr. Boyle, because thirteen years later, we are still awaiting her answer.

After speaking to other members of Congress, Congressman Burton turned back to Dr. Doyle and stated very firmly:

“Dr. Boyle, for your information, at a public meeting in Brick Township in January in 1997, and you should know this, with the CDC and others present, several of the audience members asked about the vaccines and the possible autism link and they asked for that to be checked.”

He continued:

“And I submit that maybe, just maybe, it’s because the pharmaceutical company that manufactures it had some influence on the people in that meeting and they said, ‘Hey, we don’t want to get into that,’ and if that’s the case, that is damn near criminal.”

Concluding the 2000 clip, I feel that Dr. Bernard Rimland made the most honest response of the day, when he answered Dan Burton’s question as to whether, after listening to the comments made at the meeting and carrying out his own scientific research, there was any possibility that vaccines were contributing to the increase in autism.

Dr. Rimland answered:

“There is not only the possibility, there is an extremely high likelihood, from all the evidence available.”

Those are strong words, so why has he been ignored?

Moving on to 2002, it appeared as if nothing much had changed. Once again, Congressman Dan Burton can be seen chairing the panel meeting, opening with an extremely poignant and moving piece of film of a child suffering with severe autism to demonstrate what parents cope with on a daily basis.

This piece of film moved the audience to tears and Congressman Burton commented that his grandson, along with thousands of other children across the country, were perfectly normal until they received multiple vaccines and continued by adding this extremely strong statement:

“So, we can’t let the pharmaceutical industries and our government cover this mess up today because it ain’t gonna go away and it’s going to cost the taxpayers trillions more if we wait around on it and for our FDA, the HHS and the health agencies to continue to hide behind this facade that there have been studies that conclusively prove otherwise, is just wrong, too!”

In fact, the whole video from beginning to end clearly shows evidence that this heated debate has carried on for more than a decade. Each year the same issues and the same problems appear to be discussed, and yet the panel comes to the same conclusion that studies are not being carried out to investigate the link between vaccines and autism.

So, why is this happening and why is nothing being done?

In 2012, we see Congressman Bill Posey has taken over the task of trying to question the elusive and now somewhat greying Dr. Boyle from the CDC, about vaccinations and autism.

Congressman Posey asks:

“Dr. Boyle, my predecessor Congressman Welder was a well-respected, competent medical doctor and I glean from him with some certainty he felt thimerosal in vaccinations definitely was a contributory factor to autism and I wonder if the CDC has conducted or facilitated a study comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children yet? Have you done that?”

As expected, instead of answering the question asked of her, Dr. Boyle avoids his question completely and answers by stating:

“We have done a number of studies looking at the relationship between thimerosal vaccines and autism and other developmental disabilities.”

Not to give up on his line of questioning, Congressman Posey rephrased his question in the hope that he may have gotten a direct answer, asking:

“So, clearly, definitely, unequivocally, you have studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated?”

To which she replied:

“We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated.”

Just as she tried to continue with yet more waffle, Congressman Posey stopped her in her tracks, saying:

“Never mind, that was the meaning of my question, you have wasted two minutes of my time.”

He then asked:

“What steps has the CDC undertaken to ensure the integrity of the research that was performed by Dr. Thorsen, who, as you know, has been indicted for misconduct in the misallocation of resources?”

Once again Boyle can be seen avoiding his question. Instead of answering Congressman Posey directly, she tried to palm him off with incorrect data, stating that Dr. Thorsen was a co-investigator in just two of the studies carried out. This was immediately refuted by Posey, who asked if he would be allowed to submit, for the record, information proving that Dr. Thorsen was in fact involved in 21 of the 24 studies undertaken.

At no time in any part of the video did Dr. Boyle answer any question without evading the issue put before her, even when Posey asked:

“Have you gone back to validate the variety of studies he participated in? I mean, you know this guy is a humongous scumbag, one of the most wanted men on earth, and you relied on him for data to determine whether thimerosal had a negative effect?”

Rather than admit to Dr. Thorsen’s failings, Dr. Boyle immediately jumped to Thorsen’s defense, even though this is a man who tops the federal most wanted list for 22 counts of wire fraud and money laundering, facing a total of 260 years in jail for his crimes. [2]

It is obvious from listening to the video that not one person whom Congressman Burton or the panel questioned had any conclusive evidence that vaccines did not cause autism. Instead, leading figures gave false information and avoided all of the questions being asked of them. Many had conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry manufacturing the vaccines and saw no problem with this.

Members of the CDC, the FDA and other organizations sanctioning vaccinations are supposed to be independent. If, like Paul Offit, they hold patents to vaccines or are in collaboration with the companies manufacturing the vaccines, they are not independent and therefore not impartial.

Surely, parents trusting those officials with their children’s lives deserve better than this. It is time for change. For parents to have faith in the vaccine programs, they need to see concrete evidence proving that the vaccines are safe. Instead of bringing out more and more vaccines and trying to mandate vaccinations, governments and their representatives need to answer the questions being asked of them. This video is conclusive evidence that this is not happening.

1. The AutismOne & Generation Rescue 2013 Congressional Panel

2. http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-curious-case-of-poul-thorsen-fraud-and-embezzlement…

– See more at: http://vactruth.com/2013/07/04/vaccination-causes-autism/#sthash.jkBfARND.dpuf

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Republished with permission from: Green Med Info

After 32 years in prison, innocent man suing for malicious prosecution

0

An Illinois man who was freed last year after three decades in prison for a crime he did not commit is now suing authorities who he claims failed to act on DNA evidence proving his innocence.

Andre Davis has filed suit against police and the medical center
in Rantoul, Illinois, south of Chicago, for fabricating evidence
to wrongfully convict him, then ignoring a DNA sample taken from
the crime scene that, if examined, would have exonerated Davis
years before his release. 

He was first convicted in the 1980 kidnapping, rape and murder of
3-year-old Brianna Stickle. Davis, then 19, had spent the day
drinking at a house with at least two occupants, who at one point
departed, leaving Davis alone with Stickle. 

Davis was arrested shortly after the girl was found dead and,
while DNA testing was not possible at the time, blood and semen
were both recovered from the scene. 

The new suit claims that detectives built their case based on the
testimony of Donald Douroux, who found Stickle’s body in her
brother’s home and was later arrested, according to the
complaint. It goes on to assert the investigation’s flawed
beginning and execution prevented police from identifying the
real killer. 

“Despite evidence implicating Brianna’s next door neighbor,
Maurice Tucker, the defendant police officers failed to pursue
Tucker at the time of the crime, and instead coerced, manipulated
and fabricated evidence to create a false case against
[Davis
],” the suit states. 

“Other than a medical report that was fabricated by the
defendant emergency room doctor during his examination of
[Davis], there was no ‘hard’ evidence — fingerprints, serology,
DNA or other physical evidence of any kind — linking [Davis] to
the Brianna Stickle murder. However, the force of the defendants’
misconduct was enough to secure a conviction in two separate
trials
.” 

Davis was sentenced to 80 years in prison without the possibility
of parole, althought prosecutors pushed for execution. He spent
31 years, 10 months and 29 days behind bars, much of that time in
the notorious Tamms supermax facility. Tamms closed six months
after Davis’ release, following years of complaints from human
rights groups. 

The original conviction was reversed in April 1982 due to juror
error, but Davis was again convicted after the defendants — who
he claims lied during the initial trial — testified against him
for the second time. 

The blood and semen found near Stickle’s body were tested for DNA
in 2004, a full eight years before Davis’ release. He spent much
of that time in solitary confinement. 

“The DNA typing revealed that two men, neither of whom is
[Davis], left semen deposits on top of Brianna Stickle’s blood at
the time of the crime. One of these men was identified as Maurice
Tucker and the other is currently unknown
,” the suit alleges.

Using that revelation, Davis filed a petition in 2006 referring
to new evidence. It took a full five years for Champaign County
Circuit Judge Charles Leonhard to deny that petition, saying the
new evidence would not change the result of a new trial. In 2012
the Illinois Appellate Court unanimously overturned Leonhard’s
ruling. 

“Now a 52-year-old man, he must attempt to make a life for
himself outside of prison without the benefit of over three
decades of life experiences which normally equip adults for
building a life
,” Davis’ lawyers wrote, adding that he seeks
damages for malicious prosecution.

“During his incarceration, [Davis] missed out on the ability
to share holidays, births, funerals and other life events with
loved ones, the opportunity to have girlfriends, to fall in love,
to marry, and to pursue a career, and the fundamental freedom to
live one’s life an an autonomous human being
.” 

A judge’s order released Davis from Tamms so quickly that his
family was not notified in time to pick him up. 

“I hadn’t been around people in 14 years, and they were
talking about putting me on a bus
,” he told the Chicago
Tribune. 

He has been spending time with family, many of whom survived the
32 years to see their son released. Judy Royal, of the Center on
Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University, which
represented Davis, told the Associated Press the instant
adjustment from solitary confinement to complete freedom is
almost unimaginable. 

“That is one good thing, that he will have their support,”
she said. “I think it’s difficult for him to know exactly what
to do
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Egypt coalition nixes Mansour decree

0

Egyptâ„¢s National Salvation Front (NSF), the countryâ„¢s main liberal coalition, has rejected a constitutional decree issued by interim President Adli Mansour.

On Tuesday, the NSF published a statement, announcing Å“its rejection of the constitutional decree.”

Late on Monday, Egypt’s interim President Adli Mansour adopted a temporary constitution outlining the president’s powers. The declaration also lays out a timetable for the transition, the period of which is to last around six months until a presidential election is held.

The NSF said it had not been consulted.

The Muslim Brotherhood and the opposition group Tamarod (Arabic for rebellion) – which was behind the recent demonstrations against ousted President Mohamed Morsi in the recent weeks – have also rejected the decree.

In a televised speech late on July 3 night, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that Morsi was no longer in office and declared that the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Adli Mahmoud Mansour, had been appointed as the new interim president of Egypt.

The army also suspended the constitution.

Army officials said ousted President Morsi, who had taken office in June 2012, was being held Å“preventively” by the military and might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

Mansour was sworn in as interim president in a ceremony in Cairo on July 4, where he vowed to Å“preserve the system of the republic, and respect the constitution and law, and guard the peopleâ„¢s interests.”

NT/HJL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Militants kill 2 in Sinai attack

0

Two people have been killed and six injured in a militant attack on a security forces checkpoint in the north of Egyptâ„¢s Sinai Peninsula.

On Tuesday night, militants used rocket-propelled grenades and heavy machine guns to attack the checkpoint in the remote village of Sadr El-Heytan, located in the center of North Sinai province, according to Egyptian security officials.

Hours earlier, militants clashed with security forces in the town of Rafah and attacked a police checkpoint in the same area.

On Sunday, a section of an Egyptian pipeline supplying gas to Israel and Jordan was blown up in the Lehfin area south of the city of al-Arish in the Sinai Peninsula.

The pipeline was attacked several times in 2011 and 2012, but this was the first time the energy link was attacked this year.

Eighty-four people were killed on Monday in clashes between supporters of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and security forces outside the Republican Guard headquarters in Cairo.

Egyptian Medical Syndicate spokesman Ahmed Lotfi said at a press conference in Cairo on Tuesday that there were two doctors among the dead.

He added that 1,000 people, including 7 doctors, were also injured.

Earlier, the Egyptian Ambulance Authority had said at least 51 people were killed and 435 were injured.

On Tuesday, pro-Morsi protesters staged a demonstration outside the Republican Guard headquarters.

Since last week, Egypt has been the scene of rival demonstrations and clashes between thousands of supporters and opponents of the ousted president.

Morsi is reportedly being held Å“preventively” by the military. Senior army officials say he might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

Arrest warrants have been issued for a number of members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

GJH/HGL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

'US, Israel co-wrote Stuxnet against Iran'

0

Fugitive US surveillance whistleblower Edward Snowden says the United States and Israel created the Stuxnet computer virus to sabotage Iranâ„¢s nuclear energy program.

In an interview with the German weekly Der Spiegel published on Monday, Snowden, who has been holed up in a Moscow airport since June, said the US National Security Agency and Israel Å“co-wrote” the malware to infiltrate Iranâ„¢s nuclear facility networks in 2009 and 2010.

The whistleblower said that the virus was used to change the speed of thousands of gas-spinning centrifuges.

Iranian experts detected and neutralized the malware in time, averting any extensive damage to the country’s industrial sites and resources.

In June 2012, The New York Times revealed that US President Barack Obama had secretly ordered the cyber attack with the Stuxnet computer virus.

In addition, a report published by the Washington Post in the same month said that the US and Israel had jointly created the computer virus Flame — a Stuxnet-like espionage malware — to spy on Iran.

The United States, Israel, and some of their allies have repeatedly accused Iran of pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program and have used the unfounded accusation as a pretext to impose illegal sanctions on the Islamic Republic.

Iran rejects the allegations, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

In addition, the IAEA has conducted numerous inspections of Iranâ„¢s nuclear facilities but has never found any evidence showing that Iranâ„¢s civilian nuclear program has been diverted to nuclear weapons production.

MHB/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

‘PM to offer Brotherhood cabinet posts’

0

New Egyptian Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi will offer cabinet posts to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Freedom and Justice Party, a report says.

“Some cabinet posts will be offered to the Freedom and Justice Party,” presidential spokesman Ahmed al-Muslimani was quoted as saying by the official MENA news agency on Tuesday.

Earlier in the day, interim President Adly Mahmoud Mansour appointed 76-year-old former Finance Minister Beblawi as the country’s interim prime minister and 71-year-old opposition politician Mohamed ElBaradei as deputy to the president.

The appointments came six days after the army ousted President Mohamed Morsi, the country’s first democratically elected leader, in a military coup.

In a televised speech late on July 3 night, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that Morsi, a former leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, was no longer in office and declared that the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Mansour, had been appointed as the new interim president of Egypt.

The army also suspended the constitution.

Army officials said ousted President Morsi, who took office in June 2012, was being held Å“preventively” by the military and might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

Mansour was sworn in as interim president in a ceremony in Cairo on July 4.

On Friday, tens of thousands of Muslim Brotherhood activists and their supporters took to the streets across the country to protest against the coup, and clashes broke out between pro-Morsi and opposition protesters and security forces that left 36 people dead and more than 1,000 injured.

In the wee hours of Monday morning, a deadly shooting at the site of a sit-in by Muslim Brotherhood activists and their supporters in Cairo, demanding the reinstatement of Morsi, left at least 55 people, including several children, dead.

GJH/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Slovak soldier killed in S Afghanistan

0

A Slovakian soldier serving with US-led forces has been killed and six others have been wounded in an attack by an Afghan soldier in the south of the country.

On Tuesday, Slovak Defense Minister Martin Glvac said the Afghan soldier opened fire on Slovakian troops in Å“a terrorist attack” in the city of Kandahar.

The shooter was an Afghan national army soldier at the Kandahar airfield, according to the commander of the base, General Abdul Raziq Sherzai.

Sherzai added that the shooter was arrested.

Kandahar provincial government spokesman Javid Faisal stated that the Afghan soldier was taken into custody and questioned.

He added that the preliminary investigation indicates the shooting may have been an accident.

If it is confirmed that the incident was not an accident, the Slovakian soldier would be the ninth NATO-led soldier killed in an insider attack in Afghanistan since the beginning of 2013, according to an Associated Press count.

Initial reports said three Czech nationals had been injured in the attack.

According to the website icasualties.org, 3,348 NATO-led soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan since the US-led war began in 2001.

The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across Afghanistan, despite the presence of over 100,000 US-led troops.

NT/HGL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

The Coming National DNA Database

0

DNA Fragmentation

A national DNA database is coming. Barack Obama has already said that he wants one. A major Supreme Court decision last month paved the way for one. The DNA of those that commit “serious crimes” is already being routinely collected all over the nation. Some states (such as New Jersey) are now passing laws that will require DNA collection from those charged with committing “low level crimes”. And a law that was passed under George W. Bush allows the federal government to screen the DNA of all newborn babies in the United States. So how long will it be before we are all required to give DNA samples to the authorities? How long will it be before DNA collection is routinely done when we take a trip to the DMV? This may sound like science fiction to some people, but “security experts” and law enforcement personnel all over the country are now pushing for a national DNA database to be established. Unfortunately, there is nothing really standing in the way of that. The Supreme Court has already spoken. Justice Scalia understood very clearly what the Supreme Court was doing last month. In his dissent, he made the following statement: “Make no mistake about it: because of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.”

Those that are promoting a national DNA database claim that collecting the DNA of criminals is just like fingerprinting them, and that we should all be willing to submit to a slight intrusion to our privacy in order to make society a safer place.

But is it really just a slight intrusion?

Once they have the DNA of every American, the potential for abuse would be absolutely staggering. It would only be a matter of time before DNA identification replaced Social Security cards and every other form of identification. Eventually, there would be a very real possibility that we would all have to submit to “DNA verification” before we could get on an airplane, get a job, get a driver’s license or get a bank account.

Of course that will not happen immediately, but that is the road that we are going down.

At first, DNA samples were only taken from sex offenders.

Once that precedent was set, they started taking it from all those charged with serious crimes.

Now they are taking it from those charged with low level crimes.

Eventually it will be all of us.

Do you doubt this?

Law enforcement officials are telling us that this is exactly what they want. The following is from a San Francisco Chronicle article from just this week…

Indiana law enforcement officials could find it easier to fight crime if a national database holding DNA profiles of everyone born in the United States is created as the result of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last month, experts say.

The prospect has had investigators and privacy advocates abuzz since the high court’s June 3 decision that police could take a DNA swab from anyone arrested for a serious crime without violating Fourth Amendment limits on search and seizure.

They want the “DNA profiles of everyone born in the United States”. That is their goal.

And they are starting to slowly build this database already. Back in 2008, George W. Bush signed a law that permitted the federal government to “screen the DNA of all newborn babies”…

In April of 2008, President Bush signed into law S.1858 which allows the federal government to screen the DNA of all newborn babies in the U.S. This was to be implemented within 6 months meaning that this collection is now being carried out. Congressman Ron Paul states that this bill is the first step towards the establishment of a national DNA database.

S.1858, known as The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007, is justified as a “national contingency plan” in that it represents preparation for any sort of public health emergency. The bill states that the federal government should “continue to carry out, coordinate, and expand research in newborn screening” and “maintain a central clearinghouse of current information on newborn screening… ensuring that the clearinghouse is available on the Internet and is updated at least quarterly”. Sections of the bill also make it clear that DNA may be used in genetic experiments and tests. Read the full bill: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1858

And according to the New York Times, hundreds of thousands of other DNA samples have already been collected from criminals all over the nation…

New York City has amassed a database with the profiles of 11,000 crime suspects. In Orange County, Calif., the district attorney’s office has 90,000 profiles, many obtained from low-level defendants who give DNA as part of a plea bargain or in return for having the charges against them dropped. In Central Florida, several law enforcement agencies have pooled their DNA databases. A Baltimore database contains DNA from more than 3,000 homicide victims.

These law enforcement agencies are no longer content to rely solely on the highly regulated network of state and federal DNA databases, which have been more than two decades in the making and represent one of the most significant developments in the history of law enforcement in this country.

But authorities are often frustrated because they come across DNA at crime scenes that is not in their databases.

If they had the DNA of everyone, they would instantly be able to identify any DNA left behind at a particular crime scene.

That is one reason why New Jersey recently passed a law that requires law enforcement personnel to collect DNA samples even from people that are convicted of low level crimes…

The state Senate today passed legislation that would require the collection of DNA samples from people convicted of some low-level crimes, including shoplifting and drug possession.

The bill (S436) was approved 36-3 this afternoon. An earlier version remains in committee in the Assembly.

“DNA is one of the most powerful tools we have to identify perpetrators and exonerate those falsely accused of crimes,” state Sen. Nicholas Sacco (D-Hudson) said in a statement. “A more expansive DNA database will enable us to solve investigations with greater speed and accuracy.”

And once your DNA has been collected by one law enforcement agency, it will inevitably be shared with others.

In fact, DNA sharing agreements are becoming quite common. Recently, USA Today reported on a major international DNA sharing agreement between scientific researchers…

An international consortium of genomic researchers across 41 countries potentially moved us a step closer to such a reality when it announced this month a new data-sharing agreement for the expected deluge of human genomes to be sequenced in the near future as the cost falls to levels of an MRI.

So if your DNA is taken even once, you just never know how many agencies and organizations are going to end up getting their hands on it.

Unfortunately, there is not much standing in the way of a national DNA database.  Barack Obama is already on record as saying that this is something that he wants…

“This is where the national registry becomes so important, because what you have is individual states – they may have a database, but if they’re not sharing it with the state next door, you’ve got a guy from Illinois driving over into Indiana, and they’re not talking to each other.”

Well, could we potentially see the American people stand up and object to this?

I wouldn’t count on it. Just look at how little fuss is being made over the NSA snooping scandal.

The American people simply don’t seem to care about privacy as much as they used to.

And things appear to be even worse in Europe. According to one new survey, Europeans are overwhelmingly in favor of using biometric information on identity documents and passports…

According to a new survey conducted by Steria, the majority of European citizens support the use of biometrics for criminal identification and for identity documents and passports, though slightly less than half are supportive of the technology replacing PIN numbers for bank cards.

Steria, a provider of IT-enabled business services, contracted Toluna to perform the survey on citizens in the UK, France , Germany, Denmark, Norway and Sweden, and found that 81 percent of respondents think biometrics for criminal identification is a good thing, and 69 percent agreed that they would support the use of biometrics in identity cards or passports.

Specifically, 81 percent of French citizens favor the application of biometrics for ID documents, compared to 74 percent of Danish respondents and 68 percent of the survey’s British respondents. Across Europe, 69 percent were also in favor of using biometrics as a form of access control for secure areas. In this case, the French respondents proved again to be the most supportive, with 77 percent, followed by the Danes at 75 percent and the Brits at 69 percent.

Sadly, the truth is that western society has become incredibly “dumbed down” and has become accustomed to these types of Big Brother tactics.

One example of this is posted below. In this video, you can actually watch Obama supporters signing a petition to repeal the Bill of Rights…

What in the world is happening to this country?

A Big Brother police state is being constructed all around us, and very few people seem to care.

In his dissent to the Supreme Court decision that essentially legalized a national DNA database, Justice Scalia wrote the following: “It may be wise, as the Court obviously believes, to make the Leviathan all-seeing, so that he may protect us all the better. The proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would not have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection.”

Very wise words.

Hopefully we can get more Americans to wake up and realize the wisdom contained in our founding documents.

If not, I am afraid that a national DNA database will just be the beginning.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

Republished with permission from: The Truth Wins

Texas, North Carolina protesters continue rallies as states move to restrict abortions

0

Activists have been protesting bills throughout the United States that could severely limit abortion access. Thousands of demonstrators picketed the Texas Capitol this week, while hundreds have been arrested in North Carolina in recent months.

North Carolina’s first Republican-led state government in more
than a hundred years has been met with weekly protests opposing
the legislature’s attempts to limit access to women’s health
clinics that provide abortions. Dubbed “Moral Monday,” the
rallies have combined with similar controversy in Texas to raise
the national consciousness on a conservative movement that could
make it almost impossible for women in the states to terminate a
pregnancy safely and legally. 

Last week North Carolina senators passed a bill requiring clinics
to conform to the same safety standards as ambulatory survey
centers, according to The Nation. The law, passed in the Senate
by a 27-14 vote, is scheduled to be voted on in the state House
of Representatives on Wednesday. Republican Governor Pat McCrory
promised during his campaign that he would not sign into law any
restriction on abortion laws but, even if he keeps that pledge,
the bill could pass without his signature. 

According to the Raleigh News Observer, there are currently four
Planned Parenthood clinics in all of North Carolina. The new
safety standards, which Democrats have described as a sham meant
only to cut access, could reduce the number to one because of
expensive licensing fees and doctor requirements. 

Over 2,000 protesters entered the capitol building in Raleigh
Monday, with 64 arrested after they refused to exit the
legislative chamber. Among those taken into police custody was
Janet Colm, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Central
North Carolina. 

“I wish I was in a position to be arrested,” protester
Megan Katsaounis told The Nation. “A lot of us are angry at
the direction our state is going and we’re feeling very helpless
right now. Being hauled away in handcuffs seems like a very
tangible way of taking a stand, and I love how volunteers support
the arrestees, providing meals for everyone upon release. It’s
inspiring
.” 

Some North Carolinians said the proposal could reverse decades of
progress in women’s rights, while others worried the abortion
restrictions would put the state on par with Texas, where
lawmakers have continued to push an anti-choice agenda despite
internationally publicized protests.

The Texas House prepared to debate Tuesday on a bill that would
ban most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy and, like North
Carolina, enact tougher regulations for clinics. Planned
Parenthood announced that the bill would close 36 of 42 the
women’s health clinics that perform in the largest American
state.

Democratic State Senator Wendy Davis previously filibustered for
11 hours to prevent the seemingly inevitable passage of the
legislation, but Governor Rick Perry reinvigorated the debate by
extending the legislative session. 

“It seems to me that they’re trying to pass under cover of
darkness legislation that would not otherwise be passed
,”
Suzanne Buckley, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice North
Carolina, told the News Observer of the political gamesmanship.
“They’re trying to pull a Texas.” 

Protesters hold signs and shout during an anti-abortion rally at the State Capitol in Austin, Texas, July 8, 2013. (Reuters / Mike Stone)

Texas senators attempted to nullify Davis’ filibuster by
interrupting her with legal stipulations that did not apply to
her behavior. In their efforts to shout Davis down, though, the
lawmakers were chanted into silence by 2,000 pro-choice activists
that filled the state house.  

Presumably to prevent poor public relations a second time, Texas
lawmakers have depicted pro-choice activists as rowdy mobs that
could be locked up if they express dissent in a similar method to
the way they did during Davis’ filibuster.

“We have reports and I have my staff taking a look at the
video, the Internet video that we keep, we store, on the
proceedings that evening and if I find examples of the media
waving and trying to inflame the crowd, incite them in the
direction of a riot, I’m going to take action against them
,”
Texas Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst told conservative
website HotAir.com. 

“That’s inciting a riot, that is wrong,” he continued.
“And we have a provision in our rules that if people do not
deport themselves with decorum, they’re not respectful of the
legislative process, one of our rules says we can imprison them
up to 48 hours. Of course that was out of the question with that
many people, but it is… we take a democratic policy
seriously
.”  

Similar threats have come from conservative lawmakers in North
Carolina, despite support for the protesters from pro-choice
politicians. 

“I believe we have a great police force here,” Rep. Larry
Hall, from Durham, North Carolina, told the Asheville
Citizen-Times. “Now, who do they work for? They work
for whoever is in the majority in the House and the Senate, who
are responsible for the messages sent to them from the top
.”

Republished with permission from: RT

Spain PM received slush funds: Report

0

A media report has accused Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy of receiving illicit cash payments when he was a minister in the late 1990s.

On Tuesday, Spainâ„¢s daily El Mundo published excerpts from the ledger entries of a secret slush fund run by the governing Peopleâ„¢s Party (PP), implicating Rajoy and other senior PP members in the corruption scandal.

The document — purportedly handwritten by former PP treasurer and senator Luis Barcenas — showed the names of the Spanish prime minister and the PP members as well as the amounts each had allegedly received.

According to the report, the illegal payments to Rojoy included an amount of 42,000 euros ($53,705) in 1997, and two payments of 12,600 euros ($16,111) in 1998.

The document was sent to the countryâ„¢s High Court on Monday, the Spanish daily said.

Barcenas, who confirmed the authenticity of the ledgers last week, is currently being held in custody in connection with several corruption charges.

In January, similar claims by the El Pais, another Spanish newspaper, ignited protest rallies against the Spanish prime minister and drew calls from the opposition Socialist Party for Rajoyâ„¢s resignation.

However, Rajoy and the PP have repeatedly denied the allegations.

“The Popular Party reiterates that it does not know of the notes or their content, and it does not in any way recognize them as the accounts of this political organization,” the Spanish government said in a statement issued on Tuesday.

MHB/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Egypt’s NSF nixes president's decree

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt’s National Salvation Front (NSF), the country’s main liberal coalition, has rejected a constitutional decree issued by interim President Adly Mansour.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

The Decline Of Breadwinner Jobs Has Resulted In The Longest Bread Lines In American History

0

The_Bread_Line_by_George_Benjamin_Luks,_Dayton_Art_InstituteAs the number of good jobs continues to decline, the number of Americans that cannot take care of themselves without government assistance continues to explode. On Friday, we learned that the U.S. economy added “195,000 jobs” last month. But when you look deeper at the numbers, another story emerges. Last month, the U.S. economy actually lost 240,000 full-time jobs. Overall, the U.S. economy has only added 130,000 full-time jobs in 2013, but it takes about 90,000 full-time jobs a month just to keep up with population growth. So we are losing quite a bit of ground as far as full-time jobs are concerned. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy has added more than 500,000 part-time jobs so far this year. Unfortunately, there are very, very few part-time and temp jobs that can be considered “breadwinner jobs”. Part-time jobs are great for teenagers, university students and elderly people that only want to work a limited number of hours, but what most Americans need are good paying full-time jobs with benefits that will allow them to take care of their families. Unfortunately, those jobs are continually becoming a smaller part of our economy.

As David Stockman has noted, the U.S. economy has only regained 200,000 of the 5.6 million breadwinner jobs that were lost during the last recession…

By September 2012, the S&P 500 was up by 115 percent from its recession lows and had recovered all of its losses from the peak of the second Greenspan bubble. By contrast, only 200,000 of the 5.6 million lost breadwinner jobs had been recovered by that same point in time. To be sure, the Fed’s Wall Street shills breathlessly reported the improved jobs “print” every month, picking and choosing starting and ending points and using continuously revised and seasonally maladjusted data to support that illusion. Yet the fundamentals with respect to breadwinner jobs could not be obfuscated.

This is a big problem. As I wrote about the other day, the quality of jobs in America is falling very fast. Only 47 percent of all adults in the United States have a full-time job at this point, and 53 percent of all American workers make less than $30,000 a year.

Meanwhile, the number of part-time jobs has hit an all-time record high, and the number of temp jobs is absolutely exploding.

Incredibly, the number of temp jobs has increased by more than 50 percent since the end of the recession. Approximately 10 percent of the jobs lost during the last recession were temp jobs, but close to 20 percent of the jobs gained since then have been temp jobs.

We are witnessing a fundamental shift in our economy. Full-time jobs are on the decline. Part-time and temp jobs are on the rise.

In fact, the second largest employer in the United States is now a temp agency. Kelly Services has become the second largest employer in the country after Wal-Mart.

But it is really hard to pay the bills stocking shelves at Wal-Mart or working temp jobs for Kelly Services.

Unfortunately, these days millions of American workers find themselves having to take whatever they can find. We live during a period of chronic unemployment. In fact, according to John Williams of shadowstats.com, unemployment in the United States is now higher than it was at any point during the last recession after you factor in discouraged workers and workers that have taken part-time jobs for economic reasons.

So why don’t more Americans go out and start businesses and create their own jobs?

Unfortunately, thanks to the federal government, state governments and local governments, the environment for small businesses in America today is incredibly toxic. In fact, the percentage of self-employed workers in this country is at an all-time record low.

As a result of everything that I have discussed above, more Americans than ever find that they cannot take care of themselves without government assistance.

I have often written about the fact that the number of Americans on food stamps has skyrocketed in recent years. In the year 2000, there were only 17 million Americans on food stamps. Today, there are more than 47 million Americans on food stamps.

But the number of Americans that are dependent on our “modern day bread lines” is actually far higher than that.

According to a recent CNS News article, a total of 101 million Americans are enrolled in food assistance programs. The following are some of the staggering numbers for some of these programs…

The National School Lunch program provides 32 million students with low-cost or no-cost meals daily; 10.6 million participate in the School Breakfast Program; and 8.9 million receive benefits from the Woman, Infants and Children (WIC) program each month, the latter designed for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and postpartum women, as well as children younger than 5 years old.

In addition, 3.3 million children at day care centers receive snacks through the Child and Adult Care Food Program.

There’s also a Special Milk Program for schools and a Summer Food Service Program, through which 2.3 million children received aid in July 2011 during summer vacation.

At farmer’s markets, 864,000 seniors receive benefits to purchase food and 1.9 million women and children use coupons from the program.

Yes, there is some overlap in some of these programs. So the actual number of Americans receiving food assistance is going to be less than 101 million.

But clearly something has gone horribly wrong. Our economy is not producing enough good jobs, and more Americans than ever cannot take care of themselves as a result.

This is not normal. What we are witnessing is the slow-motion collapse of the middle class. The number of Americans that are dependent on the government for their daily bread is so large that it is difficult to comprehend. The following are a few statistics from my recent article entitled “21 Facts About Rising Government Dependence In America That Will Blow Your Mind“…

-Back in the 1970s, about one out of every 50 Americans was on food stamps. Today, about one out of every 6.5 Americans is on food stamps.

-Today, the number of Americans on food stamps exceeds the entire population of the nation of Spain.

-According to one calculation, the number of Americans on food stamps now exceeds the combined populations of “Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.”

You can read the rest of that article right here.

So what is the solution?

Well, we need a lot more full-time “breadwinner jobs” that will enable men and women to be able to take care of their families.

Unfortunately, we continue to ship millions of good jobs overseas, and our politicians continue to pursue policies which are making the business environment in this country very toxic.

There is not going to be any easy way to fix all of this. We should have seen a nice bounce in the employment numbers during this so-called “recovery”, but that did not happen. And now the next wave of the economic collapse is rapidly approaching, and the employment crisis in this country is going to become a lot more painful.

Republished with permission from: The Economic Collapse

Police station in Sinai shelled: report

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egyptian security officials say militants have attacked a police station in the northern Sinai Peninsula, shelling it with mortar rounds and firing heavy machine guns.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Syria rebels made and used sarin: Russia

0

Scores of people, mostly civilians, were rushed to hospitals in Aleppo following the chemical weapons attack on March 19, 2013.

The Russian ambassador to the United Nations says that firsthand evidence shows that militants, and not the Syrian army, have manufactured sarin nerve gas and used it during an attack near the city of Aleppo in March.

On Tuesday, Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said that Russian experts collected samples at the site of the attack in the region of Khan al-Assal, where over two dozen people, including 16 Syrian troops, died on March 19.

The samples were examined at a laboratory in Russia which is certified by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), and the results of the analysis prove that a missile fired by the militants was filled with sarin, he stated.

Å“The results of the analysis clearly indicate that the ordnance used in Khan al-Assal was not industrially manufactured and was filled with sarin… The projectile involved is not a standard one for chemical use. Hexogen, utilized as an opening charge, is not utilized in standard ammunitions. Therefore, there is every reason to believe that it was armed opposition fighters who used the chemical weapons in Khan al-Assal,” Churkin said.

He went on to say that he had also delivered the evidence to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

Britain, France, and the United States have accused the Syrian government of using chemical weapons. Damascus has denied the charges, saying it was actually the militants who used chemical weapons on several occasions.

On June 13, US Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes claimed in a White House statement that the Syrian government Å“has used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on a small scale” against the foreign-backed militants Å“multiple times in the last year.”

In response, the Syrian Foreign Ministry said, Å“The White House published a statement full of lies about the use of chemical weapons in Syria, based on fabricated information, through which it is trying to hold the Syrian government responsible for such use.”

On June 15, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the materials collected by the Obama administration allegedly proving that Syrian troops used chemical weapons would not meet the requirements of the Hague-based OPCW.

The Syria crisis began in mid-March 2011. Many people, including large numbers of security personnel, have been killed in the violence, and several international human rights organizations say the foreign-sponsored militants have committed war crimes.

The Syrian government says the chaos is being orchestrated from outside the country, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants are foreign nationals.

MAM/HGL

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Saudi, UAE to shower billions on Egypt

0

The body of a supporter of ousted President Mohamed Morsi is seen on the ground after he was shot dead, allegedly by police, during the clashes in Cairo on July 5, 2013.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have pledged a total of $8 billion aid to Egypt, showing their support for the Egyptian army’s coup against President Mohamed Morsi, the country’s first democratically elected leader.

Saudi King Abdullahâ„¢s decision to give Egypt a $5 billion aid was announced on Tuesday, a day after army soldiers shot dead at least 55 pro-Morsi protesters in Cairo.

The Saudi package will include a $2 billion interest-free deposit in the Central Bank of Egypt, a $1 billion donation and $2 billion worth of oil and gas products.

Saudi Finance Minister Ibrahim al-Assaf said that the aid was intended to “support the Egyptian economy faced with the challenges which the country is going through”.

Meanwhile, the UAE also said on Tuesday that it would grant $3 billion in aid to Egypt — $1 billion of donation and a $2 billion interest-free deposit in the central bank.

In a televised speech late on July 3 night, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that Morsi was no longer in office and declared that the head of the Supreme Constitutional Court, Adly Mahmoud Mansour, had been appointed as the new interim president of Egypt.

The army also suspended the constitution.

Army officials said ousted President Morsi, who took office in June 2012, was being held Å“preventively” by the military and might face formal charges over accusations made by his opponents.

Mansour was sworn in as interim president in a ceremony in Cairo on July 4, where he vowed to Å“preserve the system of the republic, and respect the constitution and law, and guard the peopleâ„¢s interests.”

On Friday, tens of thousands of Muslim Brotherhood activists and their supporters took to the streets across the country to protest against the coup, and clashes broke out between pro-Morsi and opposition protesters and security forces that left 36 people dead and more than 1,000 injured.

Earlier on Friday, Muslim Brotherhood supreme leader Mohammed Badie said the military coup against Morsi was illegal and millions would remain on the street until Morsi was reinstated as president.

In the wee hours of Monday morning, a deadly shooting at the site of a sit-in by Muslim Brotherhood activists and their supporters in Cairo, demanding the reinstatement of Morsi, left 84 people, including several children, dead.

Muslim Brotherhood officials said that the victims were offering morning prayers when they were shot dead.

The Egyptians launched the revolution against the pro-Israeli regime on January 25, 2011, which eventually brought an end to the 30-year dictatorship of Hosni Mubarak on February 11, 2011.

GJH/AS

Republished with permission from: Press TV

New Study Shows 1/3 of Jobs Prone to Offshore Outsourcing

0

Bud Meyers
The Economic Populist
July 9, 2013

The change in the skill (educational) level of jobs being moved abroad has led some to wonder whether the offshoring of service, unlike production, activities will result in college graduates facing a dwindling supply of entry-level jobs that have traditionally served as stepping-stones to higher skilled and higher paying positions.

The notion that offshoring depresses job growth in the United States appears to underlie support among some policymakers for measures meant to encourage U.S. firms to expand employment domestically rather than abroad.

While some members of the public policy community also support the adoption by other countries of trade and labor policies intended to level the playing field for U.S. companies and workers in the international marketplace, still others advocate for limited government intervention as the best means of promoting economic growth.


Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 4:41 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Secret Service ordered to release files on Aaron Swartz

0

The federal dossier on Aaron Swartz will be made public due to a United States District judge’s decision last week which compels the Secret Service to disclose the contents of its investigation into the late computer prodigy.

US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled on Friday that the
Secret Service must start sharing the intelligence it collected
on Swartz during the federal probe it wrapped up earlier this
year after the well-known coder and activist committed suicide.
The Secret Service was the main agency pursuing Swartz before he
was indicted on violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in
2011 for unlawfully downloading a trove of academic articles. He
hung himself in a New York City apartment in January while
awaiting trial.

Kevin Poulsen, a journalist for Wired, filed a Freedom of
Information Act shortly after Swartz’s death asking for the tome
of data that investigators accumulated during their pursuit.

But Poulsen wrote that while the criminal case against Swartz was
formally dismissed upon his death, in February the Secret Service
denied the FOIA request by citing an exemption covering sensitive
law enforcement records that remain integral in ongoing
investigations. That prompted Poulsen to file a lawsuit with the
help of Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney David Sobel
against the Secret Service’s parent agency, the US Department of
Homeland Security, which even still neglected to generate a
response – until now.

On Friday, Judge Kollar-Kotelly wrote, “Defendant shall
promptly release to Plaintiff all responsive documents that it
has gathered thus far and shall continue to produce additional
responsive documents that it locates on a rolling basis
.”

With that ruling, the DHS is being told to act fast. That
pressure couldn’t have come at a better time too, added Poulsen,
as just days earlier a Justice Department attorney wrote him to
say they’ve discovered “several thousand additional pages”
on Swartz and would need additional time to review them before
release.

Kollar-Kotelly’s has given the government until August 5 to
answer Poulsen’s lawsuit and provide a timetable detailing the
projected release of documents pertaining to the Swartz probe,
but in the interim the DHS must start sending over documents that
they’ve already processed. Meanwhile, Poulsen wrote that he will
publish documents obtained through his FOIA request on Wired.com
as they become available.

Before Swartz’s death earlier this year at age 27, he worked
alongside Poulsen in the Strongbox project unveiled in May by the
New Yorker. When the project was debuted, Poulsen described it as
an “open-source, anonymous inbox” that would provide “a
slightly safer way for journalists and their anonymous sources to
communicate
” over the Internet. The Strongbox project has
since become all the more relevant since National Security Agency
leaked Edward Snowden exposed massive surveillance programs
operated by the US government only weeks later, which oddly
enough isn’t the only strange coincidence at play: during the
administration of President George W. Bush, Judge Kollar-Kotelly
presided over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and
issued a ruling in 2004 which allows the NSA to collect the
metadata of Americans’ online communications in 2004. Then in
2006, Judge Kollar-Kotelly signed another order in secrecy
approving the bulk collection of phone metadata – Section 215 of
the PATRIOT Act.

Snowden’s revelations about these programs as seen in recent
leaks published in the Guardian, Washington Post and other
outlets have since caused an international scandal that has left
the former NSA contractor seeking asylum to avoid felony charges
in the US.

Republished with permission from: RT

Migrants Pay Up to $20,000 to Cross US-Mexico Border

0

James Bargent
insightcrime.org
July 9, 2013

Heightened border security measures under the Obama administration has reportedly prompted Mexico‘s human smugglers to charge high prices and switch to new tactics.

Human smugglers are devising increasingly sophisticated and expensive methods of moving migrants across the border, as Animal Politico reports.

According to one migrant who has crossed the border several times over the last 20 years, smugglers now offer a range of services priced between $3,000 to $20,000.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 4:18 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Pipeline vs. Rail? Neither, says Campaigners, Just Leave It in the Ground

0

Wagons of the train wreck are seen in Lac Megantic, July 9, 2013. The crude oil freight train that derailed and blew up in the small town of Lac-Megantic early on Saturday morning was traveling far too fast when it went off the rails, investigators told reporters on Tuesday. (Photo: Reuters/Mathieu Belanger)As the deathtoll rises and the search for the missing in Lac-Megantic continues, the oil pipeline industry and its supporters are receiving wide condemnation for exploiting the deadly disaster in Quebec to argue that moving crude oil through pipelines is a “more safe” alternative to moving it by rail.

Kevin Grandia, writing for DeSmogBlog, points to a piece by oil industry flack Diana Furchtgott-Roth that appeared in the Globe and Mail on Sunday–just one day after the deadly explosion–and called her attempt to use the tragedy to call for more pipelines “shameful” and a “a new low.” Subsequently, Oil Change International’s Andy Rowell compared the behavior to the Big Oil equivalent of “ambulance-chasing.”

“There is no use talking about the best way to transport a product which climate science tells us shouldn’t even be being produced.” —Stephen Kretzmann, Oil Change International

In her piece, Furchtgott-Roth says that the fire which engulfed the town of Lac-Megantic in the early hours of Saturday morning–leaving 13 confirmed dead and many more still missing–was proof that pipelines were better for moving crude oil from one end of the continent to the other.

“If this oil shipment had been carried through pipelines, instead of rail, families in Lac-Mégantic would not be grieving for lost loved ones today, and oil would not be polluting Lac Mégantic and the Chaudière River,” she wrote.

Grandia’s retort was fierce:

No kidding, Furchgott-Roth wants no more delay in the Keystone XL pipeline, since she has been advocating on behalf of the oil industry in one form or another for more than 25 years, with stints as an economist at the American Petroleum Institute and the oil industry-backed American Enterprise Institute.

Working for oil company front groups is one thing, but using the tragedy still unfolding in Quebec to argue for more oil pipelines is a whole new level of low. 

By late Monday, however, the debate had already taken hold throughout the mainstream press. Headlines appeared in The New York Times, The Montreal Gazette, and Bloomberg (among other places) saying that the Quebec train disaster was, to use Bloomberg’s phrasing, “[Spurring] Rail-Versus-Pipelines Debate on Oil.”

“Pipeline companies will use this to point out the advantages and safety records of pipelines,” Bob Schulz, a professor at the University of Calgary’s Haskayne School of Business, told Bloomberg in an interview. “It gives those companies an additional point to support their argument.”

Environmentalists, however, were quick to call the debate a false dichotomy and a distraction from the larger issues that underly the destructive nature of all fossil fuel extraction, including the unsustainable levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases generated by the industry.

“The answer is there’s no safe way to move this oil around,” argued Eddie Scher of the Sierra Club. “What we need to do is to get the hell off oil.”

Responding to questions about the nature of the debate between rail transport and pipelines, executive director of Oil Change International’s executive director Stephen Kretzmann was dismissive of the comparison’s made by industry-backers on either side.

“Of course, it’s a false dichotomy,” Kretzmann told Common Dreams in an email exchange. “It’s like debating whether or not menthol or regular cigarettes are worse for you. They both kill, and that’s the point.” 

As Keith Stewart of Greenpeace Canada wrote on Monday:

Whether its pipelines or rail, we have a growing safety problem in this country as the Federal government continues to put oil profits ahead of public safety.

The Lac Megantic tragedy shows the dangers of transporting hydrocarbons by rail but we know, all too well, that the answer isn’t more pipelines. The history of pipeline spills from Arkansas and Kalamazoo to Little Buffalo and Zama City shows that pipelines create their own disasters. Alberta averages more than 2 oil spills a day.

The real solution to reducing the risk to the public from oil disasters is in transitioning away from oil; not building new, unneeded infrastructure; and in ensuring that the fossil fuel transportation system we do have is as safe as possible. The federal government is not doing that now, and their inaction is putting all our communities at risk.

Arguing about how we move the stuff, said Kretzmann, betrays the deeper argument that we shouldn’t be digging–or in many cases ‘squeezing’–it out of the ground in the first place.

This is what climate activists have been saying for years, arguing that the only defensible strategy–to borrow a series of popular slogans–is to leave the ‘Coal in the Hole,’ the ‘Oil in the Soil,’ and the ‘Tar Sand in the Land’. (They’re still working on a natural gas slogan, it seems.)

Citing data from the International Energy Agency and climate scientists, Kretzmann points out that the untapped oil reserves held by the industry giants should be left untouched if humanity hopes to prevent the worst impacts of climate change. “Building more pipelines and rail only facilitates the extraction of more oil that we cannot afford to burn, if we want to limit global temp rise to two degrees celsius, which all nations of the world–even Canada and the US–have agreed is our goal.”

And Grist’s John Upton agrees, saying the debate between rail and pipelines obfuscates the real lesson, which is that “oil can’t be moved safely at all.”

Citing the numerous and devastating accidents from both rail and pipelines in recent years, he writes:

It’s clear that letting the energy industry move incendiary bulk fluids around the continent is like tossing a book of matches into the crib to keep little Johnny happy while his folks stare at the television. And that’s without even considering the climate impacts of the fossil-fuel mining binge, or the many hazards of fracking.

The weekend tragedy is a reminder that the energy industry can’t be trusted to do anything safely, let alone transport oil.

As Kretzmann concludes, environmentalists and climate campaigners should not be caught up in the false arguments pushed by industry.

Instead, he suggests, they should remain clear–especially when discussing unconventional fuels like tar sands oil and the “fracked” Bakken crude now contaminating the area around Lac-Megantic in Quebec–that “the product is the problem. Period.”

“There is no use talking about the best way to transport a product which climate science tells us shouldn’t even be being produced,” he said.

_________________________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Obama FBI Nominee Defends NSA’s Dragnet Surveillance

0

Bush’s former deputy attorney no defender of civil liberties, critics warn

President Obama’s nomination for FBI director, James B. Comey, said before his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday that he supports the National Security Agency’s widespread surveillance programs including the monitoring of U.S. citizens’ phone calls and online communications.

Comey said that while he is currently “not familiar with the details of the current programs,” he insisted that he does know “as a general matter” that “the collection and analysis of metadata is a valuable tool in counter-terrorism.”

His comments come amid growing criticisms of the agency’s all-encompassing spying techniques.

Later, while promising to be a “voice for transparency” and a protector of whistleblowers within the Bureau, Comey simultaneously suggested that the so-called “shield law,” which protects journalists from having to reveal their sources, should be subject to exception in national security cases.

“I can only say with confidence that it’s very important for the next director to continue the transformation of the FBI into an intelligence agency,” Comey added during the three-hour hearing, which the Guardian’s Spencer Ackerman said was more “like a coronation” than a confirmation hearing, where Comey enjoyed “very solid support.”

Comey, a former deputy attorney general and federal prosecutor from the George W. Bush administration, also said that he believes the secretive FISA court system provides adequate checks and balances, particularly for the FBI. That same court, however, has come under vast scrutiny for its secretive and far reaching practices following NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden’s recent groundbreaking leaks–with the latest criticisms coming from a former FISA judge who spoke out against the program on Tuesday.

Pointing to Comey’s record in the Bush administration, Laura W. Murphy, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s legislative office in Washington, wrote in the GuardianTuesday that Comey is “hardly a poster-child for civil liberty.”

Murphy writes:

While Comey deserves credit for stopping an illegal spying program in dramatic fashion, he also approved or defended some of the worst abuses of the Bush administration during his time as deputy attorney general. Those included torture, warrantless wiretapping and indefinite detention.

A senior Bush administration official who worked closely with Comey told the New York Times that “he was quite comfortable with a whole bunch” of government surveillance programs and that he had repeatedly signed off on their authorization.

 

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Temp Agency Second Largest Employer in America

0

Ben Bullard
Conservative Musings
July 9, 2013

It’s a great time to be a temporary or part-time employee in America. But it’s a terrible time to have a full-time job or a job that tasks you with making anything – except, maybe, burgers and tacos.

That’s one takeaway from last week’s June jobs report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, which revealed that Kelly Services, an international temporary staffing agency based in Michigan, is the Nation’s second-largest employer behind a company well known for its heavy dependence on part-time employees: Wal-Mart.

Between temp firms like Kelly and volume retail/service companies like Wal-Mart, McDonald’s, Kroger and Target, about 85 percent of the jobs held by Americans are either temporary assignments or low-wage, part-time positions.

Read more

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 4:03 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Corporate Interests Prevail in Transatlantic Trade Talks

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

<img alt="" border="0" class="image-full" src="/sites/commondreams.org/files/imce-images/barack-obama-david-camero-008.jpg" style="width: 540px; height: 324px;" title="Both US President Barack Obama and Prime minister David Cameron are seeking 'dangerous deregulation' in transatlantic trade deal.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

US, Israeli Interests in the Balance as Egypt 'Coup' Label Lingers

0

(Photo: Mariam Soliman/cc/flickr)The strategic interests of the U.S. and Israel are on display as the U.S. continues to dodge calling the Egyptian military ousting of President Mohamed Morsi a coup, and Israeli officials mount pressure on the U.S. to not halt its $1.5 billion in annual aid to Egypt.

The White House has avoided using the word “coup,” because, as Reuters explained, “calling the military intervention a ‘coup’…would trigger legal obstacles to continuing aid payments.”

The New York Times‘ Caucus blog adds that

Egypt has been the second-largest recipient of American aid, behind Israel, since 1979, as a reward and incentive for its peace with the Jewish nation, and the military continues to support that treaty.

On Monday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney repeatedly dodged any confirmation that Morsi’s overthrow was a coup, saying instead the situation in Egypt was “complex and difficult” and that the Obama administration has no immediate plans to halt aid to Egypt.

I think it would not be in the best interest of the United States to immediately change our assistance programs to Egypt. We think — not just I, but we think that it would not be in the best interest of the United States to do that. We are reviewing our obligations under the law and we will be consulting with Congress about the way forward with regards to, specifically, the assistance package that we provide.

The State Department made similar statements on Monday, saying in a press briefing, “Our focus is on returning stability to the region.”

Israel’s interests in the U.S. maintaining its hefty aid to the Egyptian military prompted “marathon phone calls” to U.S. officials this weekend, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported on Tuesday:

Marathon phone calls about the coup took place between Jerusalem and Washington over the weekend. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon spoke with Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, and National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror spoke with his White House counterpart, Susan Rice.

The senior American official said the talks were aimed at coordinating U.S. and Israeli positions on the Egyptian crisis. During those calls, and in follow-up conversations afterward, the Israelis warned that cutting military aid to Egypt would likely impact negatively on Israel’s security, especially given the possibility of further security deterioration in Sinai.

They also warned that halting the aid could undermine Israel’s peace treaty with Egypt.

Foreign policy analyst Jim Lobe noted similar comments from other pro-Israel voices, including the neo-conservative Wall Street Journal. Lobe wrote:

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal’s hard-line neo-conservative editorial board stressed Washington had too much at stake to disassociate itself in any way from the military, insisting that “cutting (military aid) off now would be a mistake. Unpopular as America is in Egypt, 1.3 billion dollars in annual military aid buys access with the generals. U.S. support for Cairo is written into the Camp David peace accords with Israel,” according to its lead editorial Friday.

It added that Egyptians “would be lucky if their new ruling generals turn out to be in the mold of Chile’s Augusto Pinochet…”

The Guardian reports on the continuing developments in Egypt:

Egypt’s military-backed interim presidency moved to implement a speedy transition to civilian rule on Tuesday, appointing economist Hazem el-Beblawi as prime minister and the internationally-known opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei as vice-president.

In a tense atmosphere following the killing of 55 supporters of the deposed president Mohamed Morsi and threats of new mass protests by his supporters, the army also warned against political “manoeuvring” at a time of instability and anxiety — apparently to forestall more squabbling about other cabinet posts.

_____________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Long Term Cholesterol Drug Use Doubles Risk of Breast Cancer

0

Long Term Cholesterol Drug Use Doubles Risk of Breast Cancer

A new study published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention indicates that women who are long-term users of statin drugs have between 83-143% increased risk of breast cancer.[1]

The population-based case-control study utilized data from women in the Seattle-Puget Sound region, which included 916 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 1,068 invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases of 55-74 years of age diagnosed between 2000 and 2008, and a control of 902 women.

Whereas recent publicity on statin drugs has focused on their potential use for cancer prevention or as anti-cancer agents, this study found exactly the opposite with current users of statins for 10 years or longer having a 1.83-fold increased risk of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and a 1.97-fold increased risk of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to never users of statins.

Additionally, among women diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, a condition marked by high levels of lipids and lipoproteins in the blood, current users of statins for 10 years or longer had more than double the risk of both IDC [an average of 104% increased risk] and ILC [an average of 143% increased risk] compared to never users.

Of course, the discovery of a correlation between higher statin drug use and higher breast cancer risk does not necessarily imply causation. For instance, women who are on statins are obviously compliant with conventional blood lipid screening recommendations and therefore are more likely to be complaint with breast screening guidelines as well. Given that recent estimates show that breast screenings have resulted in over 1.3 million US women being misdiagnosed and overtreated for breast cancer in the past 30 years, simply being complaint with breast screening guidelines will result in significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer regardless of whether the diagnosis is accurate or not. [2]

On the other hand, this latest study could indicate a more serious problem, namely, that cholesterol-lowering drugs and statin drugs in particular are carcinogenic. Statin drugs, in fact, have long been suspected to increase the risk of certain cancers, including prostate,[3] colorectal,[4] and kidney;[5] conversely, low cholesterol has been found to increase the risk of cancer at all sites, further implicating these cholesterol-lowering agents as possible carcinogens.[i][6]

At the least, this new study raises doubt as to whether the recent push to identify statin drugs as possible chemopreventive or chemotherapeutic agents can be validated by independent science, especially considering that this class of cholesterol-lowering medications have been linked to over 300 adverse health effects in the published literature.  

This latest finding is all the more reason why natural dietary and nutritional interventions should be considered a first line defense against elevated blood lipids, and why the very question of whether cholesterol is a primary contributing factor in heart disease should be examined more carefully.

Learn more at our Health Guides: Statin Drugs and Heart Health.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Republished with permission from: Green Med Info

American Street Preacher Arrested in London for “Homophobic” Speech

0

An American evangelist preaching on the streets of London was arrested July 1 on a charge of using “homophobic” speech. Tony Miano, a pastor and retired 20-year Los Angeles County deputy sheriff, was arrested by London police in front of the stadium holding the Wimbledon tennis championships, after a woman told police she was offended by Miano’s words concerning homosexual behavior.

The London Telegraph reported that Miano was speaking to passersby from the New Testament book of I Thessalonians (chapter 4), warning of the eternal dangers of sexual immorality, including homosexuality. A woman, who can be seen on a video of the incident on the Telegraph website, complained to police, who took the man into custody, arresting him for using “homophobic” speech. “During the subsequent questioning at Wimbledon police station,” the Telegraph reported, Miano “was asked about his beliefs on what constitutes ‘sin’ and about how he would treat gay people in hypothetical situations.”

Miano recalled that “as the questioning started it became apparent that the interrogation was about more than the incident that took place in the street, but what I believed and how I think.” He added that “I was being interrogated about my thoughts.”

He told reporters that in no way was his speech “homophobic” or hateful. “I began my message by assuring the people that mine was not a message of hate but of love,” he recalled, as quoted by Charisma News Service. “I was simply explaining a passage in the Bible which speaks of sexual immorality and that people should abstain from it. I did not speak solely about homosexuality as a form of sexual immorality, but also about any kind of sex outside of marriage between one man and one woman, as well as lustful thoughts. All of these are considered mainstream Christian positions and have been taught and believed by Christians for thousands of years.” He added that “it was very distressing to be arrested and interrogated for openly expressing my deeply held Christian beliefs.”

The veteran police officer told reporters that he had arrested countless individuals in his 20-year career in law enforcement, but never for a thought or for expressing an opinion. “It surprised me that it is possible for a person to be taken to jail for their thoughts,” he said. “It surprised me that here in the country that produced the Magna Carta that an otherwise law abiding person could loose his freedom because one person was offended by the content of my speech.”

The 49-year-old Miano, who is a U.S. citizen, was provided with an attorney from the U.K. Christian Legal Centre, a conservative legal advocacy group. After spending nearly seven hours in a London jail, Miano was released without charge. Andrea Williams, a spokeswoman for the group, told the Telegraph: “We might joke about there being ‘thought police,’ but this case shows that it has already become a reality. Sadly we are seeing cases like this increasingly often.” She added that “if we continue on the current trajectory, Tony’s arrest will simply be the first of many. It’s clear that there is already a clampdown on freedom of speech where people publicly express mainstream Christian views on sexual ethics.”

Following the incident Miano said that he believed “every human being should have the right to speak their mind. Homosexuals should have the right to free speech, as should atheists, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus. All I’m asking is that we are allowed to be part of the conversation and that society stops treating itself as tolerant when the authorities are intolerant to the Christian point of view.”

He predicted that the same thing he experienced on the streets of London will soon be happening in America. “I believe that’s what our government is going to eventually do here,” he said. “I believe homosexuals or others who are sensitive to their point of view will be visiting churches to listen to what preachers say from the pulpit. And I believe that pastors will be arrested in their pulpits for teaching what the Bible says about homosexuality and other sins.”

Photo of Westminster Palace in London, England

Republished with permission from: The New American

Florida Sheriff Taking Rioting Threats Seriously As Zimmerman Acquittal Appears Likely

2

Miami-area sheriff’s office talking to federal agencies and asking residents not to riot.

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
July 9, 2013

The Broward Sheriff’s Office, whose jurisdiction includes a large portion of the Miami metropolitan area, released a video yesterday urging residents not to riot in response to the Travyon Martin shooting trial which now appears to lean heavily in George Zimmerman’s favor.

“Let’s give violence a rest because we could easily end up arrested,” one of the performers in the video said. “Law enforcement has your back.”

“Let’s back up and choose not to act up and deputies are with us so no need to act tough.”

The video’s web site states that the sheriff’s office Strategic Investigation Division has been communicating to not only to community leaders but also local, state, and federal agencies.

Could potential federal response be similar to the martial law encountered earlier this year in Boston?

Miami is not taking the threats of riots lightly. The city experienced one of the worst race riots in history after the May 1980 acquittal of four police officers in the death of African-American Arthur McDuffie.

Damages from that riot were estimated at $100 million.

The Miami metropolitan area had a population of around 3.2 million then. It’s over 5.5 million now.

Fox News reports that a forensic expert revealed that the trajectory of the bullet and Martin’s gunshot wound indicates Martin was on top of Zimmerman.

“The medical evidence is consistent with his statement,” Dr. Vincent Di Maio told the court regarding Zimmerman’s account of the shooting.

Discoveries found during Martin’s autopsy, such as abrasions on his clenched hands, could also support Zimmerman’s recollection of the shooting, according to USA Today.

The prosecution rested their case on Friday and the defense is expected to rest their case later this week.

As reported by Paul Joseph Watson yesterday, threats of mass rioting and violence in the aftermath of the Zimmerman trial are intensifying as the key terms “riot” and “Zimmerman” continue to bring higher and higher search results on Twitter.

The Miami Herald even reported that the Miami-Dade Community Relations Board reached out to the Miami Heat, asking them to perform a “unity walk” to try and calm unrest.

“There is unrest in the south. I think it’s a powder keg,” Rev. Al Jackson told the Miami Herald. “People are looking for outlets.”

Zimmerman, 29, pleaded not guilty to the charge of second-degree murder, which could mean life in prison if convicted. Under Florida statue, second-degree murder constitutes having a “depraved mind regardless of human life.”

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 3:23 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Long-term statin use is associated with an increased risk of ductal and lobular breast cancer among women 55-74 years of age.

0

Abstract Title:

Long-term statin use and risk of ductal and lobular breast cancer among women 55-74 years of age.

Abstract Source:

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Jul 5. Epub 2013 Jul 5. PMID: 23833125

Abstract Author(s):

Jean A McDougall, Kathleen E Malone, Janet R Daling, Kara L Cushing-Haugen, Peggy L Porter, Christopher I Li

Article Affiliation:

Epidemiology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Abstract:

Background: Mechanistic studies largely support the chemopreventive potential of statins. However, results of epidemiologic studies investigating statin use and breast cancer risk have been inconsistent and lacked the ability to evaluate long-term statin use. Methods: We utilized data from a population-based case-control study of breast cancer conducted in the Seattle-Puget Sound region to investigate the relationship between long-term statin use and breast cancer risk. 916 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 1,068 invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases 55-74 years of age diagnosed between 2000 and 2008 were compared to 902 control women. All participants were interviewed in-person and data on hypercholesterolemia and all episodes of lipid lowering medication use were collected through a structured questionnaire. We assessed the relationship between statin use and IDC and ILC risk using polytomous logistic regression. Results: Current users of statins for 10 years or longer had a 1.83-fold increased risk of IDC [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-2.93] and a 1.97-fold increased risk of ILC (95% CI: 1.25-3.12) compared to never users of statins. Among women diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, current users of statins for 10 years or longer had more than double the risk of both IDC [odds ratio (OR): 2.04, 95% CI: 1.17-3.57] and ILC (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.40-4.21) compared to never users. Conclusion: In this contemporary population-based case-control study long-term use of statins was associated with increased risks of both IDC and ILC. Impact: Additional studies with similarly high frequencies of statin use for various durations are needed to confirm this novel finding.

Article Published Date : Jul 04, 2013

Study Type : Human Study


Republished with permission from: Green Med Info

Taylor Swift Has Man Arrested at Concert for Sign

0

Infowars.com
July 9, 2013

Taylor Swift’s security detail had a man arrested during a concert in Pittsburgh for a sign declaring his love for the popular singer-songwriter. The sign also said “Taylor Swift is with Satan.”

Police claim Joseph Jackson also threatened Swift on Facebook. “Taylor Swift must perish and die,” he allegedly posted.

CBS News in Pittsburgh reported on Monday that Swift’s security officials “are very pro-active regarding any sort of threat against the artist and that they passed that information to police who made the arrest.”

Detectives did not find weapons on Jackson. The only threat appeared to be his signage and a comment he made to police. “Taylor Swift is Satan and that 6,000 years is six days and death comes on the sixth day, so Taylor Swift is in danger.”

Jackson was arrested, handcuffed and taken to jail. He will face a mental evaluation for the comments, according to CBS News.

“[Jackson] will undergo a mental evaluation after police say he made death threats against the singer and held up a sign reading ‘Taylor is with Satan.’ The poster was one of several Joseph Jackson was holding when police nabbed him at Heinz Field” in Pittsburgh, according to Mix 965.

It is not clear how exactly the Facebook messages constitute a threat and why the police were involved in the incident or why they arrested Jackson and detained him for a mental evaluation.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 3:11 pm

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Unapproved GM rice found in US exports to over 30 countries

1

A new report has revealed that the rice supply in at least 30 countries may have already been contaminated with genetically modified strains from US exports, thereby threatening worldwide contamination.

A new report by the GM Contamination Register has disclosed US
Department of Agriculture findings from 2006 and 2007, which show
that the department detected traces of unapproved GM rice in over
30 countries. At the time, all of the Bayer CropScience varieties
discovered had not been approved for cultivation or consumption
abroad, and only one of the three types had been approved for
domestic cultivation.

The USDA believes that the source of the contamination is field
trials which occurred between the mid 1990s and early 2000s.The
genetically modified LLRICE62, LLRice601 and LLRICE604 varieties
are herbicide resistant. The trials were terminated in 2002 and
none of these varieties ever made it onto the US market. But
years later, traces of these strands were found worldwide.

The USDA report said the agency was unable to conclude whether
pollen from the trials escaped and contaminated other fields or
mechanical mixing was to blame.

News of the USDA’s findings comes after Monsanto’s unapproved GM
wheat made its way onto an Oregon field, threatening
US supplies and making other countries weary of importing US
crops. GM wheat has not been approved for cultivation anywhere in
the world. The US is the world’s largest exporter of wheat, and
many of its trading partners are fiercely opposed to the use of
GM wheat supplies. After news of the contaminated Oregon farm
broke out, Japan and South Korea suspended some of its imports of
American wheat, and the European Union urged its member nations
to test for any contamination in its imports.

When experimental crop strains escape into general seed supplies,
it is difficult to keep them contained, prompting some countries
to pull US rice off their shelves.

“Scientific studies confirm that GM contamination is
unavoidable once GM crops are grown in a region,”
Earth Open
Source wrote in a report. “‘Coexistence’ rapidly results in
widespread contamination of non-GM crops… through
cross-pollination, spread of GM seed by farm machinery, and
inadvertent mixing during storage.”

The USDA report notes that the rice contamination “has had a
major impact on US rice exports,”
prompting Russia and
Bulgaria to ban US rice imports and causing numerous other
countries to conduct strict certification and testing of all rice
imports.

The report also notes that the contamination has affected US
farmers financially, costing them billions of dollars to try to
eradicate the unapproved varieties.

“The contamination episode has also affected seed
producers,”
the report states. “[A]n entire non-GM rice
variety Clearfield 131 was banned by U.S. regulators in early
2007 when it was found to be contaminated, costing producer BASF
billions of dollars in losses.”

Bayer has attempted to acquire approval for its contaminating
rice strands. The USDA approved commercial growing of LL601 in
2006 and approved Canadian import of LL62 in 2006, but none of
the GM rice strands are available on the US market.

Republished with permission from: RT

Officer cleared of threatening Michelle Obama

0

Peter Hermann
The Washington Post
July 9, 2013

A District police officer accused of threatening Michelle Obama has been cleared of administrative charges related to the first lady but was found guilty of posting a derogatory job description on social media and depicting the president as a communist, his attorney said Monday.

Members of a departmental review board ruled that Christopher Picciano, a 17-year veteran who was a member of the elite presidential motorcade detail, should be suspended without pay for 40 days for conduct unbecoming an officer. His attorney, James W. Pressler, said his client is weighing an appeal. The city had sought to have Picciano fired.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 2:58 pm

Tags: , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Radioactive cesium level soars 90-fold at Fukushima in just 3 days

0

RT
July 9, 2013

Geiger counter showing radiation at Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, 4 November 2011 / By osaMu, via Wikimedia Commons

Geiger counter showing radiation at Minamisoma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan / By osaMu, via Wikimedia Commons

Levels of radioactive cesium-134 in a well at Fukushima nuclear power plant are up to 90 times higher than just three days ago, and may spread into the Pacific Ocean. Meanwhile, 10 applications to restart reactors under stricter rules have been received.

TEPCO, the company that operated the plant and is now in charge of the cleanup and decommissioning, said that cesium-134 levels in the well water were at 9,000 becquerels per liter, 150 times the legal level. While cesium-137 measured 18,000 becquerels, 200 times the permitted level.

Cesium-137 has a half-life of 30 years and the readings were some 85 times higher than they had been three days earlier.

These are the highest cesium levels found since the March 2011 disaster.

“It is unclear whether the radioactive water is leaking into the sea. After gathering needed data, we will conduct analyses,” a TEPCO official told the Japanese media.

Although the total levels of cesium collected on July 8 were far higher than those collected just three days earlier on July 5, levels of other radioactive materials, such as strontium, remained the same as three days ago.

“We do not know why only cesium levels have risen,” a TEPCO spokesman said.

The latest findings, just 25 meters from the Pacific Ocean, were made just a month after TEPCO detected cesium in the groundwater flowing from high ground fairly far from the sea into its destroyed plant.

The spike, along with discoveries of other radioactive elements like Tritium and Strontium, suggest that contaminated water is spreading towards the sea from the reactors, which are on higher ground.

It was reported in June that very high levels of strontium 90 were found in groundwater near the stricken plant, but TEPCO officials insisted that it had not leaked into the nearby ocean.

Engineers have been flushing water over the reactors for more than two years to keep them cool, but contaminated water has been building up at the rate of an Olympic sized swimming pool every week and TEPCO is running out of space to store it.

It has applied to channel groundwater, which it says has low levels of radioactive contamination, around the plant and into the sea. Local fishermen have opposed the proposal.

The findings in one of four wells dug by TEPCO at Fukushima since May 24, 2013, come just days after new safety rules came into force designed to avoid a repeat of the disaster and allow Japan to restart it nuclear power stations.

At present only two of Japan’s 50 reactors are connected to the grid, but the government is forging ahead with plans to reopen them, in the face of a skeptical public and rising imported fossil fuel bills to run conventional power stations.

“Some of the units are projected to [restart] one year from now, though I don’t know how many,” Kenzo Oshima a commissioner at Japan’s Nuclear Radiation Authority, told Reuters.

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 2:41 pm

Tags: ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Egypt summons Turkish ambassador

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt has summoned the Turkish ambassador over Ankara’s interference in the country’s internal affairs.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Wounded Marine says the TSA treats him like a terrorist

1

A decorated United States Marine who almost died from injuries suffered during the Iraq War says he’s being treated as a terrorist when he tries to clear security checkpoints in the US.

Retired Marine Cpl. Nathan Kemnitz, 29, has begun to speak
publically after a recent encounter with Transportation Security
Administration agents at California’s Sacramento International
Airport left him with yet another bad taste in his mouth thanks
to TSA screeners.

Kemnitz, a Purple Heart medal-recipient, said a recent stop at
the airport in California’s capital ended with a humiliating
experience that was only made worse when he tried to attend to
attend a ceremony in town honoring him as veteran of the year.

Both recent incidents, he said, has left him feeling like a
terrorist.

When Kemnitz was asked by TSA agents at Sacramento International
to raise his arms up during a security screening, the decorated
vet said he could not comply because a war injury rendered one of
his appendages almost immobile.

“My right arm doesn’t work. It’s a lot of hassle for me to do
that
,” Kemnitz told Military Times.

Then when Kemnitz went to attend the ceremony in his honor at the
California Capitol Building, screeners yet again hassled him at a
security checkpoint. In that instance he was asked to remove his
Marine uniform adorned with numerous awards “because he was
wearing too much metal
.”

“At some places I’m treated like royalty and at some like a
terrorist. There’s got to be something in the middle
,” he
told Military Times.

“He kind of looked around on me and said, ‘Whoa. There’s
a lot of metal on you
,’” he recalled to an ABC
affiliate. 

Kemnitz said it wasn’t an easy task to accomplish given the
roadside explosive injury that has left him partially paralyzed
since 2005, and added, “Even getting into that uniform, somebody
had to help me.”

Patricia Martin, a friend of Kemnitz who accompanied him to the
award ceremony, wrote a letter to Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric
Shinseki asking him to investigate the incidents.

“What does a uniform and heroism represent if our own citizens
– in this case employees of the TSA and security personnel – have
no regard for them?
” she wrote.

“I feel so strongly that you need to know just how shamefully
even a Purple Heart recipient/disabled veteran can be treated by
some TSA and security employees,
” she said.

Ross Feinstein, a federal spokesperson with the TSA, issued a
response on Monday apologizing for the conduct but standing by
his agency’s actions.

“Our intent is to treat all injured service members and
veterans with the dignity they deserve
,” he wrote. “As
always, all passengers with disabilities and medical conditions
are eligible for screening procedures sensitive to their
particular disability, medical condition or other unique medical
circumstance.
”

“Transportation Security Officers have to resolve any anomaly
detected at the checkpoint
,” Feinstein continued. “As is
standard procedure for all passengers, if travelers alarm when
passing through a metal detector or an advanced imaging
technology (AIT) unit, additional screening is required in order
to resolve that anomaly
.”

Mark Hedlund, a spokesperson for the California Capitol Building,
also dismissed the notion that the screening before the award
ceremony was anything out of the ordinary.

“We have the utmost respect for our veterans,” Hedlund
told the ABC station. “But people who come to the Capitol,
just like when you go the courts or get on an airplane, we have
to go through the screening
.”

To Kemnitz, that treatment doesn’t sit well given all he’s done
to defend his nation.

“You could almost say the terrorists won because now we’re
searching our own men and women in uniform
,” he said.

Republished with permission from: RT

GMO Failure Sparks Pesticide Downpour Across Midwest

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

(Photo: Digital JournalPesticide use is skyrocketing across the Midwestern U.S. corn belt, with companies like Syngenta and AMVAC Chemical hiking their pesticide sales 50 to 100 percent over the past two years, NPR reported Tuesday.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Virginia Department of Health Acquires Children’s Medical Records Without Parental Consent

1

Julie Wilson
Infowars.com
July 9, 2013

immunizationA Virginia mom was notified by her child’s private school that her son, whom is set to begin school this fall, needs his immunizations.

The mother of three was confused by the school’s recommendation since she had not yet submitted the health records for her son indicating whether or not he had received his vaccinations.

When the mother contacted the school’s director, even she was confused. The director informed her that the state of Virginia has built a website that allows schools to access children’s health information, including what pediatrician they see and any insurance claims that have been made.

The distraught mom contacted the Virginia Immunization Information System (VIIS) and was informed that the site’s purpose is to provide children’s health information and allow it to be easily accessed by health officials.

According to the Virginia Department of Health’s website the “VIIS is a free statewide registry system that combines immunization history for persons of all ages from both the public and the private sector. Immunization information is accessible to authorized users only.”

The state’s website says VIIS provides many benefits such as:

Consolidating vaccination records from multiple providers into one record.
Providing updated recommendations for immunization scheduling based on the CDC recommendations
Producing an official immunization record for patients that also serves as part of the school entry form (MCH-213 form)
Generates reminder notices for children who are due for vaccines
Serves as a great tool for Vaccines for Children (VFC) providers

The site describes it’s data exchange as a “method of transferring immunization data from an existing electronic system and into the Virginia Immunization Registry System.” VIIS says the parents do not have to provide consent for their children’s records to be added to the database. If your doctor is signed up, the records automatically sync into the electronic database.

According to VIIS, it doesn’t require much to become a provider either. You simply apply, show proof of your credentials, and the program actually travels to you and offers training.

Ester Seisay, a Statistical Analyst at VIIS, said the program began seven years ago during the H1N1 flu epidemic. It’s purpose was to track citizens who had and hadn’t received the flu shot.

Children who hadn’t received the flu shot were flagged so that the providers could encourage the parents to comply with the vaccinations requirements. There are a number of providers who have opted into the electronic system including pharmacies, pediatricians, hospitals and schools.

Ester Seisay also confirmed that the program receives both state and federal funding.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

CDC Study Ordered by Obama Contradicts White House Anti-gun Narrative

0

In January, following the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, President Obama issued a “Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence,” along with 22 other “initiatives.” That study, subcontracted out to the Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, was completed in June and contained some surprises for the president.

Obama had announced at the beginning of the year his push for three major gun control initiatives – universal background checks, a ban on “assault weapons,” and a ban on “high-capacity” magazines – to prevent future mass shootings, no doubt hoping that the CDC study would oblige him by providing evidence that additional gun control measures were justified to reduce gun violence. On the contrary, that study refuted nearly all the standard anti-gun narrative and instead supported many of the positions taken by gun ownership supporters.

For example, the majority of gun-related deaths between 2000 and 2010 were due to suicide and not criminal violence:

Between the years 2000-2010 firearm-related suicides significantly outnumbered homicides for all age groups, annually accounting for 61 percent of the more than 335,600 people who died from firearms related violence in the United States.

In addition, defensive use of guns “is a common occurrence,” according to the study:

Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million per year, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.

Accidental deaths due to firearms has continued to fall as well, with “the number of unintentional deaths due to firearm-related incidents account[ing] for less than 1 percent of all unintentional fatalities in 2010.”

Furthermore, the key finding the president was no doubt seeking – that more laws would result in less crime – was missing. The study said that “interventions,” such as background checks and restrictions on firearms and increased penalties for illegal gun use, showed “mixed” results, while “turn-in” programs “are ineffective” in reducing crime. The study noted that most criminals obtained their guns in the underground economy – from friends, family members, or gang members – well outside any influence from gun controls on legitimate gun owners.

Also, the report noted that mass shootings such as the one in Newtown, Connecticut, have declined and “account for a very small fraction of all firearm-related deaths.”

There was one startling conclusion which, taken at face value, seemed to give the president what he was looking for. The study reported that “the U.S. rate of firearm-related homicide is higher than that of any other industrialized country: 19.5 times higher than the rates in other high-income countries.” However, Zara Matheson of the Martin Prosperity Institute, produced a map that compared gun violence rates in the major metropolitan areas of the country to rates of foreign countries. As Graham Noble of Guardian Express noted, “If one were to exclude figures for Illinois, California, New Jersey and Washington, DC, the homicide rate in the United States would be in line with any other country.” These areas, of course, are noted for the most restrictive gun laws in the country, thus negating any opportunity for the president to celebrate the report’s findings.

The current report from the CDC echoed findings the CDC published back in 2003 that showed that suicides were responsible for 58 percent of all firearms-related deaths in 2000. Also noted is that back in 2003 Americans owned an estimated 192 million firearms, while today that number is estimated to be closer to 300 million, an increase of more than 55 percent.

Said the CDC back in 2003, “Evidence was insufficient to determine the effectiveness of any of these laws” (Emphasis added.):

Bans on specified firearms or ammunition,

Restrictions on firearm acquisition,

Waiting periods for firearm acquisition,

Firearm registration and licensing of owners, and

Zero tolerance for firearms in schools.

If the president was looking to the CDC report for support on how to reduce the threat of firearm-related violence through legislation restricting the rights of American citizens, he was sorely disappointed. Perhaps that’s why so few of the media have publicized the report. In fact, the only establishment media even to mention the report was the Washington Post, which criticized it for not answering questions that it wasn’t asked to answer!

 

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Republished with permission from: The New American

'United Stasi of America': Kim Dotcom 'defaces' US embassy in Berlin

0

The words “United Stasi of America” were projected onto the US embassy in Berlin on Sunday — a comparison made by an artist to draw attention to the extensive spy tactics practiced by the US government.

A light project by German artist Oliver Bienkowski and online
activist Kim Dotcom beamed onto the building of the US mission in
Germany from Sunday night into Monday.
Using a powerful projector, the words lit up the embassy’s walls,
making the comparison visible to all in the vicinity.

“I defaced the US embassy in Berlin with a truth-projection
last night. 0wned!”
Dotcom, whose file-sharing website
Megaupload was shut down by US authorities, wrote in a tweet.

A YouTube video of the project has already garnered more than
45,000 views, sparking a debate on the similarities between
former East Germany’s secret police and the US National Security
Agency.

The artist sought to condemn US government spying on its own
citizens, evoking memories of a divided Germany plagued with
spies and accusing the NSA of taking surveillance to a new level.

“The Stasi would have dreamt of being able to do what the
Americans are doing,”
31-year-old Bienkowski told Reuters.
“The Stasi look like a bunch of boy scouts compared to what
the NSA is doing. It’s the real deal in terms of a secret service
with modern technology at their disposal. It’s far more
dangerous.”

The Stasi secret police employed a network of informants that
served as watchdogs against any forms of government
dissent. Spies reported the actions of friends and
relatives, drilled holes into apartments and hotel rooms to film
citizens with hidden cameras, and infiltrated schools and
universities. In some cases, spouses and family members spied on
each other.

Many Germans retain vivid memories of the Stasi’s extensive
surveillance tactics, and are particularly disturbed by news of
the NSA’s domestic spy programs that were first revealed by
whistleblower Edward Snowden. The Obama administration has
lost
significant support in Germany, where citizens are still
sensitive about government surveillance.

An image grab taken from a video uploaded on YouTube on July 7, 2013 by user@CavemanGermany

“The most upset party in all of this, I think, is the
Germans,”
Michael J. Geary, an assistant professor at
Maastricht University, told the National Journal. “…In a
country where memories of the former East German Stasi are still
quite fresh, the response has been quite critical.”

In June, the German magazine Der Spiegel reported that
the US combs through half a billion German phone calls, emails
and text messages each month, and has classified Germany on the
same target level as China.

Police stopped Bienkowski from beaming the “United Stasi of
America” slogan on the US embassy after a few minutes, but the
YouTube video of the project continues to generate attention and
invoke discussion.

US embassy officials have denied accusations that the NSA
resembles the Stasi, and tried to brush off the stunt.

“Very funny. But anyone making such a comparison knows neither
the Stasi nor the United States,”
an embassy spokesperson
told AFP.

US authorities are seeking to extradite Dotcom from New Zealand
on charges of racketeering, fraud, money laundering and copyright
theft. Charges that German-born Dotcom adamantly denies. The
Internet tycoon collaborated with a team of five people,
including the German artist, to beam the message on the walls of
the US embassy.

An image grab taken from a video uploaded on YouTube on July 7, 2013 by user@CavemanGermany

Republished with permission from: RT

CBO Estimates Late-Term Abortions Save Medicaid Dollars

0

A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) “cost estimate” of a proposed bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy found that preborn babies who have reached that gestational age are presently aborted at a rate of about 11,000 per year – for an overall savings to the federal Medicaid healthcare system. In its estimation of the federal cost to implement the House-passed Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 1797), the CBO explained that based on data from the federal Centers for Disease Control, every year “about 11,000 abortions take place 20 weeks or more after fertilization.”

CSNews.com crunched the CBO numbers and found that in “a 365-day year, 11,000 late-term abortions works out to a little more than 30 per day – counting weekends and holidays…. If it were assumed that those performing late-term abortions only worked 40 hours a week – or 2,080 hours in a 52-week year (without vacations) – that would mean that an average of about 5.3 unborn babies who have made it to at least the 20th week of pregnancy are aborted each work hour in the United States,” or, added the conservative news site, “an average of about 212 per week.”

While the CBO report estimates that “only a relatively small number of abortions would be prohibited” with the passage of the H.R. 1797, CSNews noted that in reality, at 11,000 late-term abortions each year, “American abortionists terminate enough late-term babies in just twelve months to populate Congress [with 435 members] more than 20 times over.”

As for cost, the CBO predicted that most of the women who would have had the late-term abortions banned under H.R. 1797, would opt for earlier procedures, which would cost the federal Medicaid program additional money. “For example,” the report estimated, “if 90 percent of women who would have sought an abortion 20 weeks or more after fertilization instead were to seek earlier abortions, federal spending would rise about $75 million over 10 years.” Since 40 percent of all births in the U.S. are paid for under Medicaid, the report noted, “If only half of those women were to obtain earlier abortions, then federal spending could rise by more than $400 million over 10 years,” since they would presumably carry the babies to term. “CBO estimates that federal spending for Medicaid will rise to the extent that enacting H.R. 1797 results in additional births and deliveries relative to current law.”

In its estimation the CBO made the assumption that “around three-quarters of abortions that would occur 20 weeks or more after fertilization under current law would take place earlier, before the 20th week restriction is triggered, under the act. As a result, we estimate that the increase in federal costs for Medicaid would total $225 million over the 2014-2023 period.”

The bottom line is, the report concluded, preventing the late-term abortions of those estimated 11,000 babies “would result in increased spending for Medicaid. Since a portion of Medicaid is paid for by state governments, CBO estimates that state spending on the program would increase by about $170 million over the 2014-2023 period.”

What the CBO “cost estimate” didn’t factor in, however, noted CNSNews, is “how much wealth and job-creating power U.S. society has lost and will lose in the future because 11,000 late-term unborn babies per year are killed by abortionists and not allowed to live out their lives.”

Sadly, with a pro-abortion Democrat majority presently controlling the U.S. Senate, and with a late-term-abortion champion in the White House with a veto pen at the ready, there is virtually no chance for passage of the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act in the foreseeable future.

Republished with permission from: The New American

Honor Student Inexplicably Beaten by Police “I Awoke Spitting My Teeth Out On the Ground”

0

Yolanda Spivey
yourblackworld.net
July 9, 2013

On June 29th 2013, Gabriella Calhoun’s life changed forever. The night was warm and clear, and after partying with friends, Gabriella and her friends decided to go to their local neighborhood Denny’s to get a late night meal. Gabby is an honor student at Wiley College. She finished high school a year early and went to college a year before the rest of her cohort.

Sitting on the left side of Denny’s so they can have a view of the parking lot, her crew of 17, all high school graduates, witnessed a fight between two girls. As the group of college bound students were ordering their drinks, the cops were called.

When officers arrived on the scene, they entered the Denny’s and approached Gabriella’s table and asked if they had anything to do with the fight. A friend, who shall remain nameless, told the officers that they were not involved with the fight at all at which the cops left and went back outside.

The two girls who were fighting outside were allowed to go into the Denny’s to “clean themselves up.” One girl was previously maced by a police officer in the parking lot for acting unruly. When the two girls saw each other inside of Denny’s, they started to fight again. The cops rushed into the restaurant to break the fight up.

As the cops tried to clear Denny’s, they again approached Gabriella’s table, at which a close friend of hers told the cops they were not involved with the party that was fighting. The cops grabbed the nameless young man, (he wants his name protected out of fear of retaliation), and escorted him out of Denny’s. Gabriella followed them and grabbed his side. As she exited the Denny’s she felt a grip on her neck and arm and says that out of reaction, she tried to pull away.

What happened next was unimaginable. According to her friends, Gabriella was hit in the face with a night stick by a female officer and was knocked unconscious. When Gabriella finally gained consciousness, the Wiley College Student said, “I awoke spitting my teeth out on the ground.”

Read more

Muslim Brotherhood Calls for ‘Uprising’ as Plan for Elections Is Announced

0

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/muslim_brotherhood_calls_for_uprising_as_plan_for_elections_is_announced_20/

Posted on Jul 9, 2013

Republished with permission from: TruthDig

Egyptian Army Massacres Protesters; U.S. Continues Foreign Aid

0

The Egyptian Army massacred scores of pro-Morsi protesters in front of the Cairo National Guard headquarters July 8, where the former elected president is presumed to be under house arrest. However, more than a week after the military coup against Muslim Brotherhood-aligned President Morsi, the U.S. government has yet to call it a “coup” or suspend foreign aid payments to Egypt.

The Washington Post reported: “State-run television said that 51 people were killed and 435 were wounded in the shooting. Mahmoud Zaqzooq, a Muslim Brotherhood spokesman, said 53 were shot dead, including five children.” But the Muslim Brotherhood website, Ikwhanweb, set the total wounded at more than 1,000.

Military government spokesmen blamed the protesters for the violence, according to the Washington Post, quoting military spokesman Ahmed Mohamed Ali as claiming that “Any law in the world allows soldiers to defend Egyptian security when confronted with live fire. We are no longer talking about peaceful protests.” The military spokesman stressed that pictures distributed by the military to the media indicated that the Muslim Brotherhood supporters came into the courtyard prepared for violence: “You saw the video where they have guns, spears, grenades,” The spokesman told the Post,  “When the opponents of Morsi gather, do you have violence? No. When the supporters of Morsi rally, people get killed. They’re the ones who carry guns.”

However, it has become clear the Egyptian military incurred minimal losses in the threat. According to the New York Times, “At least 51 civilians were killed, all or most of them shot, and more than 300 wounded, doctors and health officials said. Security officials said at least one police officer died as well.” The police officer in question may have been hit by friendly fire, according to eyewitness accounts that place him in a car near where protesters had fled from military gunfire. Additionally, the New York Times account suggested that “Some of the blood and bullet holes were hundreds of yards from the walls of the facility’s guard house, suggesting that the soldiers continued firing as the demonstrators fled.”

Despite the violence, President Obama has yet to announce a cut-off in foreign aid payments to the new military junta in charge of Egypt, as required by federal law. Up until the massacre, the Obama administration has refused to call the removal of the elected president a “coup,” admitting in a July 1 press conference that 

They went through an election process that, by all accounts, were [sic] legitimate. And Mr. Morsi was elected. And the U.S. government’s attitude has been we would deal with a democratically elected government. What we’ve also said is that democracy is not just about elections, it’s also about how are you work with an opposition; how do you treat dissenting voices; how do you treat minority groups…. We have some regular assistance that we provide Egypt. We have some dollars that have been held up and have to be approved by Congress. But the way we make decisions about assistance to Egypt is based on are they in fact following rule of law and democratic procedures. And we don’t make those decisions just by counting the number of heads in a protest march, but we do make decisions based on whether or not a government is listening to the opposition, maintaining a free press, maintaining freedom of assembly, not using violence or intimidation, conducting fair and free elections. And those are the kinds of things that we’re examining, and we press the Egyptian government very hard on those issues.

Secretary of State John Kerry said essentially the same thing in a July 6 press statement calling for an end to the already escalating violence in the streets.

Of course, the military coup involved not only the removal of Morsi as president, but also the overturning of the constitution adopted by the nation by a 64-percent popular vote. (The constitution was inferior, however, with an overwhelmingly powerful presidency, weak bill of rights, and massive social welfare commitments.) In essence, Egypt was transformed from a state with an elected president, elected legislature, and a constitution to a government without laws being ruled by military decree.

The Obama administration’s delay in cutting off U.S. foreign aid payments – currently about $1.6 billion per year – has caused a wave of bipartisan congressional backlash. Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy has posted the relevant sections of foreign aid law on his senatorial website, stating that “our law is clear: U.S. aid is cut off when a democratically elected government is deposed by military coup or decree.” Republican Senator Rand Paul, who offered an amendment on the floor of the Senate to cut off aid to Egypt back on January 31, came out swinging:

Before America supported the Muslim Brotherhood, we supported Morsi’s predecessor, Hosni Mubarak. For decades, we aided the Mubarak regime to the tune of about $60 billion in total…. But what kind of example do we set when we side with the enemies of freedom? How can we have influence in troubled parts of the world when we cuddle up to regimes responsible for much of the trouble?

Senator Paul’s amendment to end aid to military aid to Egypt failed by a vote of 79-19.

In those statements, Senator Rand Paul echoed the views of his father, retired Congressman Ron Paul, who blamed the crisis on decades of U.S. intervention in Egypt’s internal political affairs with its foreign aid money: “The United States has at one point or another supported each side, which means also that at some point the US has also opposed each side. It is the constant meddling in Egyptian affairs that has turned Egyptians against us, as we would resent foreign intervention in our own affairs.”

Senator Paul tweeted just before the violence that: “In Egypt, democratic authoritarianism is replaced with military junta. American neocons say send them more of your money.” But even some of the Republican neoconservatives have voiced new-found opposition to aid to the military government. “It was a coup,” Senator John McCain said on CBS’ Face the Nation July 7, “and, reluctantly, I believe that we have to suspend aid until such time as there is a new constitution and a free and fair election.” McCain had been among the 79 senators who voted to table (kill) the Paul amendment back in January.

The massacre by military forces also forced the Islamist Al Nour Party from the military’s coalition, one that may make the military junta less stable. The Al Nour Party was the only Islamic party to back the coup, but described the July 8 attacks as a “massacre.” It also received the most votes in the 2011-12 parliamentary elections, after the Muslim Brotherhood’s Peace and Freedom Party. The Al Nour Party is salafist in ideology, which the New York Times describes as “ultraconservative Islamists.” Salafists generally support a more rigorous adherence to Islamic Sharia law than the more moderate Muslim Brotherhood. The defection of the salafists means that all of Egypt’s Islamic parties have abandoned the military, and the military – against which the Muslim Brotherhood has called for an “uprising” – can be depicted as anti-Muslim in this majority-Muslim country.

Photo of protesters in Cairo: AP Images

Republished with permission from: The New American

‘84 killed in Monday clashes in Cairo’

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Egypt Medical Syndicate says 84 people were killed in the July 8 clashes between protesters and security forces outside the Republican Guard barracks in the capital Cairo.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

“Devout Catholic” Nancy Pelosi Getting Free Ride from Cowardly Clergy

0

For the past twenty-six years, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif., shown) has been a leading champion of abortion on the national political scene, all the while openly proclaiming to be a “devout Catholic,” a “practicing and respectful Catholic,” and other similar variations on that theme. A former House Minority Whip and Speaker of the House, who represents California’s 12th Congressional district (comprised of the city and county of San Francisco), Pelosi now serves as the Democratic Leader in the Republican-controlled House.

In recent months, Pope Francis has directed the bishops of Argentina, his home country, to deny Holy Communion to politicians who facilitate abortion. And Raymond Cardinal Burke, the Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, the Vatican’s highest court, has restated the Church’s position that bishops and priests have a sacred “duty” to withhold Holy Communion from a Catholic who is “persisting obstinately in grave moral evil.” Prefect Cardinal Burke stated: 

The local Bishop should teach clearly in the matter and also encourage his priests to make sure that the Church’s discipline is observed, in order to avoid the grave sin of sacrilege on the part of the Catholic politician who approaches to receive Holy Communion when he is persisting obstinately in grave moral evil, and to prevent the scandal which is caused when such individuals receive Holy Communion, because their reception of Holy Communion gives the impression that the Church’s teaching on the intrinsic evil of abortion is not firm. 

In June, Rep. Pelosi ratcheted up the abortion rhetoric and heaped more fuel on the growing controversy over the conflict between her position on abortion and that profession of faith, referring to the right to abortion as “sacred ground.” She is clearly in need of reproof and catechetical instruction, apparently suffering from the delusion that abortion has attained the status of a sacrament! Pelosi has two bishops who exercise de jure spiritual authority over her, Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco and Archbishop Donald Cardinal Wuerl of Washington, D.C., but neither prelate has made any public statement concerning Pelosi’s recent, or past, pro-abortion public forays. Spokesmen for the Archbishops were unavailable for comment when The New American contacted them on the matter, and, as of this writing, we have not received a response back from them. Likewise, the media office for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) could provide us with no statement concerning Pelosi’s scandalous words and actions.

At a June 13 press conference, Pelosi responded testily to a question by a reporter from The Weekly Standard asking her to explain the moral difference between what abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell did to babies at 23-25 weeks of pregnancy (for which he was convicted of murder and other crimes) and what happens in clinics where doctors carry out abortions 28 weeks into a pregnancy. Pelosi refused to answer the question and snapped at the journalist and said that she would not discuss the issue with him because he obviously had an agenda to undermine the “sacred ground” of abortion rights. In the same breath she described herself as “a practicing and respectful Catholic.” (See the video below.)

Here is the exchange between Pelosi and The Weekly Standard (TWS): 

TWS: Madam Leader, you mentioned the bill that passed out of the House Judiciary committee. Members who have proposed that bill have done that in the wake of this murder trial in Philadelphia. They argue that there really isn’t much of a moral difference between what someone like Dr. Kermit Gosnell did to infants born at 23, 24, 25 weeks into pregnancy, and what can happen [legally] at a clinic down the road in Maryland where a doctor says that he’ll perform an elective abortions 28 weeks into pregnancy. So the question I have for you is what is the moral difference between what Dr. Gosnell did to a baby born alive at 23 weeks and aborting her moments before birth? 

Pelosi (acidly): You’re probably enjoying that question a lot, I can see you savoring it. Let me just tell you this.

TWS: Could you answer the question?

Pelosi: Let me just tell you this. What was done in Philadelphia was reprehensible and everybody condemned it. For them to decide to disrespect a judgment a woman makes about her reproductive health is reprehensible. Next question.

TWS: So what’s the moral difference? I just asked a simple question. What’s the moral difference then between 26 weeks elective abortion and the killing of that same infant born alive. This is the issue that they’re trying to –

Pelosi: This is not the issue. They are saying that there’s no abortion. It would make it a federal law that there would be no abortion in our country. You’re taking the extreme case. You’re taking the extreme case. And what I’m saying to you is what happened in Philadelphia was reprehensible. And I do not think you –

TWS: You didn’t answer the question.

Pelosi: I’m not going to have this conversation with you because you obviously have an agenda. You’re not interested in having an answer. I’ve responded to you to the extent that I’m going to respond to you. Because I want to tell you something. As the mother of five children, my oldest child was 6 years old the day I brought my 5th child home from the hospital, as a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this. I don’t think it should have anything to do with politics. And that’s where you’re taking it and I’m not going there. 

Besides evading a legitimate question about one of the most important and timely public policy issues before our nation, Rep. Pelosi told a couple of whoppers. First of all, the legislation to which the reporter and Pelosi referred is H.R. 1797, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which passed the House several days after the above exchange. Rep. Pelosi’s claim that “It would make it a federal law that there would be no abortion in our country,” is blatantly false, and she surely knows that. The legislation would merely ban late-term abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy, and even then allows exceptions. But, of course, none of the pro-abortion MSM reporters or commentators called her on this brazen falsehood; they are too firmly allied with her on this issue to let truth get in the way. Contrast this protective covering for Pelosi with their vicious “gotcha” treatment of pro-life Republican Senate candidates Todd Akin (Missouri) and Richard Mourdock (Indiana) in the last election, both of whom made clumsy – but completely defensible – off-the-cuff remarks concerning rape and abortion, that the press then exploited and misrepresented relentlessly, day after day, guaranteeing their defeat.

Secondly, Pelosi’s claim about politics – “I don’t think it should have anything to do with politics; and that’s where you’re taking it and I’m not going there” – is so ludicrous it must surely have caused some muffled guffaws from her own supporters in her media cheering section. Everyone who has followed this issue at all knows that Pelosi has been on the frontline of making “it” have everything to do with politics. She has made abortion one of her top, “sacred” political totems. She is always “going there,” receiving awards from Planned Parenthood and NARAL, voting public monies to promote abortion, declaring that Roe v. Wade must be defended, etc., etc., etc.

Warped, Expedient, Politicized Theology

Nancy Pelosi’s nonsensical claim to eschew politicizing abortion is almost as ridiculous as her lame attempts to co-opt the Bible and the Catholic faith in service of her anti-Christian agenda. One of her most notorious efforts in this regard was her May 6, 2010 speech to a Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill (see video here) in which she claimed to be guided in her actions by the values of Jesus, “the Word.” Rep. Pelosi said: 

They ask me all the time, ‘What is your favorite this? What is your favorite that.’ And one time they asked me, ‘What is your favorite word?’ 

And I said, ‘My favorite word? That is really easy. My favorite word is the Word’ – is the Word. And that is everything. It says it all for us. And you know the biblical reference, you know the Gospel reference of the Word.

And that Word is, we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word. The Word. Isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers everything. The Word. Fill it in with anything you want. But, of course, we know it means: “The Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us.” And that’s the great mystery of our faith. He will come again. He will come again. So, we have to make sure we’re prepared to answer in this life, or otherwise, as to how we have measured up. 

Rep. Pelosi is referring, of course to the Gospel according to St. John, Chapter 1, verse 14, which states: “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, the glory as it were of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.”  

Pelosi has many times similarly invoked the Bible and claimed that it is her Catholic faith that guides her in making moral decisions concerning legislation and public policy, decisions that clearly mutilate and violate the expressed teachings of the Catholic Church. 

Dr. Paul Kengor is a popular author, a professor of political science at Grove City College, and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values. In a recent column, he asked:  “Has anyone in the Church hierarchy spoken to Congresswoman Pelosi about her latest or previous comments on abortion? This has been, and remains, a scandal.”

“A few years back,” Professor Kengor notes, “her priest in San Francisco, Father John Ring, when asked about her radical abortion stance, demurred, saying: ‘She’s a fine woman. She is a good parishioner.’ When asked about Pelosi receiving Holy Communion, Father Ring testily said: ‘Leave it in God’s hands. I’m not going to argue the matter with you.’”

However, as we reported above, Prefect Cardinal Burke has made it clear that priests and bishops are not supposed to “leave it in God’s hands”; God has put it in their hands, as one of their obligatory pastoral duties. This is expressed explicitly in Canon 915 of the Catholic Church’s Code of Canon Law, which states: 

Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to Holy Communion. 

“With regard to Canon 915,” said Prefect Cardinal Burke, “it states that those who obstinately persist in manifest grave sin should not be admitted to receive Holy Communion. There can be no question that the practice of abortion is among the gravest of manifest sins and therefore once a Catholic politician has been admonished that he should not come forward to receive Holy Communion, as long as he continues to support legislation which fosters abortion or other intrinsic evils, then he should be refused Holy Communion.”

Dr. Ed Peters, a noted Catholic canon law expert, has repeatedly cited Pelosi as one of the most egregious examples of “Catholic” politicians to whom priests and bishops should apply Canon 915. Among the numerous other Catholic public officials to whom Canon 915 should be applied are: Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, California Governor Jerry Brown, and many members of the U.S. House and Senate. 

Courageous priest, Catholic lay people take on Pelosi

Even though Pelosi’s pastors and bishops have not marshaled the courage to enforce Canon 915, at least one Catholic priest has publicly taken her to task. Father Frank Pavone, founder and national director of Priests for Life, has called on Pelosi to either truthfully embrace the Catholic faith or renounce it. In a letter to Rep. Pelosi following her press conference debacle, Fr. Pavone charged: 

[Y]ou stated at the press briefing on June 13, “As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this. I don’t think it should have anything to do with politics.”

With this statement, you make a mockery of the Catholic faith and of the tens of millions of Americans who consider themselves “practicing and respectful Catholics” and who find the killing of children – whether inside or outside the womb – reprehensible….

Whatever Catholic faith you claim to respect and practice, it is not the faith that the Catholic Church teaches. And I speak for countless Catholics when I say that it’s time for you to stop speaking as if it were. Abortion is not sacred ground; it is sacrilegious ground. To imagine God giving the slightest approval to an act that dismembers a child he created is offensive to both faith and reason….

Mrs. Pelosi, for decades you have gotten away with betraying and misrepresenting the Catholic faith as well as the responsibilities of public office. We have had enough of it. Either exercise your duties as a public servant and a Catholic, or have the honesty to formally renounce them. 

What was Pelosi’s response to Fr. Pavone’s charitable rebuke? Her typical scorn for authentic Catholic teaching. She called Fr. Pavone and Priests for Life arrogant, medieval, hysterical, and disconnected from the Church.

American Life League (ALL), the largest grassroots Catholic pro-life education organization in the United States, has also not shied away from confronting Pelosi, or from urging the U.S. Catholic bishops to man up to their sacred duty.

Michael Hichborn, ALL’s Director of Media Relations, told The New American that “Nancy Pelosi’s response to the reporter clearly indicates that she cannot deny the fact that there is no moral difference between killing a preborn baby at 28 weeks gestation and a baby that is born at 23 weeks gestation, and so she retreats to the emotional appeal that access to abortion is ‘sacred ground.’”

“Mrs. Pelosi’s grasping and clinging to her identity as a ‘practicing Catholic’ remind me of the way Judas smothered Our Blessed Lord with kisses when he betrayed him for 30 pieces of silver,” says Hichborn. “Since Mrs. Pelosi has received Holy Communion completely unabated while working tirelessly to expand and maintain open access to abortion, she can conclude only one of two things; either Jesus isn’t truly present in the Eucharist, or Jesus is ok with abortion. Until she is openly denied Holy Communion as is required by Canon 915, she will have no reason to change her mind.”

But isn’t that kind of action precisely what the political correctness police would call “hateful” and “judgmental”? Quite the opposite, says Hichborn; in fact, it shows true love for her as well as true love for the Faith. Moreover, he notes, “We must fast and pray for her soul because she is in grave danger of eternal separation from God, the source of all life.”

If Nancy Pelosi’s pastors truly care for her soul, they will rebuke and correct her.  

“Given her scandalous and forceful promotion of abortion in all cases, all forms of birth control, the perversion of the souls of children through pornographic sex education, and her full support for homosexual activity,” notes Hichborn, “if bishops do not courageously and unwaveringly deny her the reception of Holy Communion, by their silence and inaction they will consign her soul to an eternity of Hell while seriously imperiling their own.”

Photo of Rep. Nancy Pelosi: AP Images

Related articles:

Canon Lawyer: Pelosi May Not Receive Communion

Abortionist’s House of Horrors: Gosnell’s Unindicted Media Accomplices

Major Pro-life Bill Passes U.S. House, Faces Pro-abortion Majority in Senate

Republished with permission from: The New American

TSA Harasses And Shames Yet Another Disabled Veteran

0

Medal adorned soldier was wearing “too much metal” for security officers

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
July 9, 2013

A Purple Heart Marine was groped and swabbed by TSA agents recently at a California airport while on his way to a ceremony to honor him as veteran of the year in his district.

Cpl. Nathan Kemnitz sustained severe injuries from a IED detonation while on duty in Fallujah, Iraq in 2004. While traveling to Sacramento, to receive the award, TSA agents at Sacramento International Airport pulled Kemnitz aside for additional screening.

When the screeners ordered him to lift up his arms for a full body scan, the decorated veteran told the TSA goons that because of his injuries, he cannot lift up his right arm.

‘My right arm doesn’t work. It’s a lot of hassle for me to do that,’ Kemnitz told The Military Times.

The screeners the proceeded to probe underneath Kemnitz’s medals, while feeling under the Marine’s waistband and swabbing his shoes for explosives.

Disgusted with his treatment, Kemnitz’s escort Patricia Martin snapped photos of the search and made them public.

“At some places I’m treated like royalty and at some like a terrorist. There’s got to be something in the middle,” Kemnitz told reporters.

In the following video, taken from a 2012 speech, Kemnitz explains how he was injured:

The TSA issued a standard response yesterday denying any wrongdoing:

“As is standard procedure for all passengers, if travelers alarm when passing through a metal detector or an advanced imaging technology (AIT) unit, additional screening is required in order to resolve that anomaly.” said TSA spokesman Ross Feinstein.

To make matters even worse, when Kemnitz arrived for the ceremony at the state capitol building in Sacramento, he received even worse treatment at the hands of security guards.

Unhappy with the fact that Kemnitz was dressed in full uniform, the guards told him that he was wearing “too much metal” and ordered him to remove his dress blue blouse.

Kemnitz refused to do so and an argument broke out, leading Kemnitz to describe the security personnel as “rude and unapologetic”.

California state capitol officials are yet to respond to the incident.

“What does a uniform and heroism represent if our own citizens – in this case employees of the TSA and security personnel – have no regard for them?” wrote Kemnitz’s escort, Patricia Martin, to Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki following the incidents.

“I feel so strongly that you need to know just how shamefully even a Purple Heart recipient/disabled veteran can be treated by some TSA and security employees,” she said.

The TSA has been routinely flagged up for harassing disabled travelers, including veterans.

Back in March, a wounded Marine’s account of mistreatment at the hands of the TSA, led the agency to deny any wrong doing, with agents claiming that the wheelchair bound veteran made his own decision to attempt to get up and walk through a body scanner, and then to take off his prosthetic legs.

Eventually, following involvement from Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., the TSA announced that in response to the incident it had changed its rules to eliminate a requirement that injured troops remove their shoes, jackets or hats. However, in order to qualify for such treatment, the agency says that wounded veterans must forewarn officials before traveling.

–––––––––––––––––––––-

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

British man sentenced to two years in jail after threatening Americans on Facebook

0

A British man has been sentenced to more than two years in prison after he wrote on Facebook that he planned to kill 200 United States citizens earlier this year.

Reece Elliott, a 24-year-old father-of-one, was sentenced this
week five months after he made remarks on the popular social
media site that caused residents of Warren County, Tennessee to
fear for their lives.

Reece Elliott (Image courtesy of Northumbria Police)

Elliott, a self-proclaimed Internet troll, first attracted the
attention of authorities after he used a phony Facebook account
to make posts on the tribute pages created for two teenage
victims of fatal car accidents.

“Fucking fat cunt deserves to die,” he wrote on the page
of a recently passed 17-year-old girl. “Stupid motherfucker
bitch. I hope you rot in hell
,” Elliott admitted to posting
on another.

Those messages caught the attention of a local deputy sheriff,
who according to the UK’s Guardian newspaper then threatened to
have Elliott’s account shut-down. The British man then retaliated
by making a new set of posts on one of those Facebook tribute
pages that left thousands in Tennessee withering in fear.

“My father has three guns. I’m planning on killing him first
and putting his body in the dumpster
,” Elliott wrote. “I’m
gonna kill hopefully at least 200 before I kill myself. So you
want to tell the deputy, I’m on my way
.”

The following day, 2,908 pupils in the Warren County school
district – roughly half of those enrolled – were absent from
class. Although Elliott’s warning was made from across the pond,
it came just weeks after 20-year-old gunman Adam Lanza opened
fire in a Connecticut elementary school and killed more than two
dozen people.

“The residents of Warren County and all the people who have
access to the Facebook page were clearly concerned
,”
prosecutor Gary Buckley told the South Tyneside Magistrates’
Court in February after Elliott surrendered to authorities. He
has been held in custody ever since, and this week he was
sentenced to spen 28 months in jail by Judge James Goss QC, who
said the defendant’s crimes were driven by “no more than
self-indulgent nastiness
.”

“Today’s sentencing marks the end of what has been a complex
investigation
,” added Detective Chief Inspector Ged Noble, a
lead investigator in the case. “Investigating reports of
criminal behavior on social network sites has its challenges, but
we have staff who are trained in navigating these systems and
identifying who the offenders are
.”

In court, Elliott called his conduct “idiotic, childish and
pathetic
.” The Guardian reported he admitted to one count of
making threats to kill and eight Communications Act offenses.

Elliott’s sentencing comes amid a felony court case in the US
that has caused 19-year-old Justin Carter of Texas to have spent
five months so far awaiting the opportunity to fight charges
lobbed at him after he posted a similar threat his family says
was made sarcastically. “I’m going to go shoot up a school
full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts
,” Carter
wrote on Facebook in an argument that stemmed from a dispute
involving a computer game. He faces upwards of 10 years in prison
if convicted of making a terroristic threat.

Republished with permission from: RT

Taliban close political office in Qatar

0

This photo, taken on June 20, 2013, shows the new office of the Afghan Taliban in Doha.

The Afghan militant group, Taliban, has temporarily closed its recently-opened office in the Qatari capital Doha, following a dispute over a flag.

The shuttering of the Doha office follows a diplomatic spat over a white flag at the compound and a sign identifying the movement as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

The Qatari government removed the sign and flag on the request of Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

Meanwhile, a Pakistan-based Taliban official said the militant group has closed its Qatar office to register its protest against broken promises by the US and Afghan governments.

“We have temporarily closed the Qatar office due to broken promises,” the unnamed official said on Tuesday.

The office was opened less than a month ago to facilitate peace talks between the US and Taliban.

President Barack Obama’s administration has supported peace talks with the Taliban after the US-led forces lost ground against the militants in recent months across Afghanistan.

However, the talks stirred tensions between Washington and Kabul. The Afghan government reacted to the move, saying it contradicts the security guarantees the US had given it.

They also said the Taliban can use the office for raising funds for their armed campaign in Afghanistan.

The Kabul government has suspended strategic talks with Washington to discuss the nature of US presence after foreign troops withdraw in 2014.

Meanwhile, Afghanistanâ„¢s High Peace Council stated that none of its members will travel to Qatar to sit at talks with the Taliban.

The council has been making efforts to initiate dialogue with discontented Afghans and militants who have engaged in warfare with the US-led forces and Kabul’s Western-backed government.

The United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan in 2001 as part of Washingtonâ„¢s so-called war on terror. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but after more than 11 years, insecurity remains across the country.

JR/PR

Republished with permission from: Press TV

‘Snowden accepts asylum in Venezuela’

0

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.

US whistleblower Edward Snowden has accepted an offer of political asylum from Venezuela, a top Russian lawmaker confirms.

Å“As was expected, Snowden agreed to (Venezuelan President Nicolas) Maduro’s offer of political asylum,” Alexei Pushkov, the head of the Russian parliament’s foreign affairs committee, said on his Twitter account Tuesday.

Venezuela, Nicaragua and Bolivia had all offered political asylum to Snowden over the weekend.

The former CIA employee has revealed to the news media details of secret surveillance programs under which US spy agencies collect massive amounts of data on peopleâ„¢s communications via telephone and the Internet.

The fugitive leaker added that the NSA has a department called the Foreign Affairs Directorate which coordinates work with other Western spying agencies.

The former NSA contractor has also revealed that the American agency spies on European Union offices in New York, Washington and Brussels, drawing ire from European leaders, especially Germany.

Snowden, 30, has reportedly holed up in the transit area of Moscowâ„¢s Sheremetyevo International Airport since arriving on a flight from Hong Kong on June 23. He is wanted in the US on espionage charges.

GMA/PR

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Florida Outlaws All Computers

3

Infowars.com
July 9, 2013

Photo: Orin Zebest

Photo: Orin Zebest

So hasty were Florida lawmakers, they managed to outlaw all computers in the Sunshine State.

The absurd instance of mindless over reach by government appeared in a Florida Senate bill prohibiting electronic gambling devices and internet cafes.

The legislation was signed into law by Florida’s former Tea Party favorite, Rick Scott. He signed the bill behind closed doors and said the ban the “right thing to do for our state.”

Consuelo Zapata, the owner of Incredible Investments, LLC, a business in Miami-Dade that provides online services for migrant workers who is suing the state in response to the legislation, said the law is so recklessly worded that it outlaws all computers in the state, not simply those at internet cafes.

Scott and the Florida Senate passed the law in response to seniors and other state residents using “electronic gambling devices,” including computers.

The bill’s wording can be used to categorize any number of devices as illegal gambling machines, according to the Miami law firm of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, the Huffington Post reported on Monday.

 

Republished with permission from: Infowars

NC 'Has Gone to Hell': 10th Wave of Moral Mondays 'Impossible' to Ignore

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

(Photo: Gerry Broome/ AP)Almost 2,000 demonstrators participated in this week's “Moral Monday” action in North Carolina, a state that's “gone to hell” by challenging the rights of its citizens. This week's NC NAACP coordinated action, originally intended to target key GOP officials, was dominated by concern about an anti-choice law that passed the state Senate last week.

[field_image_caption-raw]

read more

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

More Weather Extremes: Record Rainfall Drenches Toronto

0

A scene from Toronto on Monday when it was hit with record rainfall. (Photo: Steve Hoang/cc/flickr)Toronto was the latest city to be hit by weather extremes on Monday when thunderstorms drenched the area with the most rainfall in a single day in the city’s recorded history.

The amount of rain that fell over two hours was the amount the city normally receives for the entire month of July, The Toronto Star reported.

Nearly five inches (126 mm) of rain was recorded at Toronto’s Pearson International Airport on Monday, breaking the 1954 record when Hurricane Hazel drenched the city. The downtown area got slightly less at about 3.8 inches (97 mm).

The resulting flash flooding in Canada’s largest city wiped out power for around 300,000 area residents and left commuters stranded for hours.

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford said on Tuesday that the city’s power system is “hanging by a thread.”

The Canadian Press has video:

Flickr user Bunton & Peel has more photos:

* * *

_____________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

30,000 California prisoners launch largest hunger-strike in state history

1

Thirty-thousand inmates held in prisons across California have taken the first steps towards engaging in what could become the largest hunger strike in state history.

Prisoners at 11 state facilities began refusing meals early
Monday after months of plotting a demonstration that they hope
will bring change to a number of longstanding grievances held by
inmates against the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, particularly the practice of indefinitely housing
some detainees in total isolation.

In a letter obtained by the Los Angeles Times, protesters
reportedly demand that the state retire its current solitary
confinement policies and let inmates accused of prison gang
involvement spend a maximum of only five years in isolation.
Currently there is no limit to how long inmates thought to be
connected to internal gangs can spend in Segregated Housing
Units, or SHUs, and the Times claim 4,527 inmates at four state
prisons are living like that now, including 1,180 at Pelican Bay
State Prison in northern California where the latest
demonstration was first hatched.

“The principal prisoner representatives from the PBSP SHU
Short Corridor Collective Human Rights Movement do hereby present
public notice that our nonviolent peaceful protest of our
subjection to decades of indefinite state-sanctioned torture, via
long term solitary confinement will resume today
,” reads the
letter as it appears on the Prisoner Hunger Strike Solidarity
website, “consisting of a hunger strike/work stoppage of
indefinite duration until CDCR signs a legally binding agreement
meeting our demands, the heart of which mandates an end to
long-term solitary confinement (as well as additional major
reforms
).”

According to the Times, the inmates are also seeking education
and rehabilitation programs and the right to make monthly phone
calls.

Prisoners in California have held similar protests before,
including a hunger strike in 2011 that also originated at Pelican
Bay and eventually accumulated the support of 6,000 inmates
across the state.

That hunger strike eventually led to a class-action lawsuit to be
filed against the corrections department which has recently
entered a mediation phase. Two years after that action sent a
message to the state, though, prisoners still aren’t satisfied
with the response they’ve received.

“While the CDCR has claimed to have made reforms to its SHU
system – how a prisoner ends up in the solitary units, for how
long, and how they can go about getting released into the general
population – prisoners’ rights advocates and family members point
out that the CDCR has potentially broadened the use of solitary
confinement, and that conditions in the SHUs continue to
constitute grave human rights violations
,” reads their latest
letter.

Officially the state does not recognize a hunger strike until
participants have refused nine consecutive meals. On Monday,
corrections spokeswoman Terry Thornton told the Los Angeles Times
that 30,000 prisoners skipped breakfast and lunch, putting them
on course to launch an actual strike by the middle of the week.

Despite gearing towards what could become the largest hunger
strike in state history, however, Thornton said, “Everything
has been running smoothly
.”

“It was normal. There were no incidents,” she told the
Times of Monday’s protest. But according to the paper’s Paige St.
John, around 2,300 prisoners have taken the protest beyond the
realm of refusing to eat and have also started to skip work and
class.

Ms. Thornton did not immediately respond for comment when
approached by RT about the status of the budding strike early
Tuesday.

According to the inmates, the California prison system currently
holds over 10,000 prisoners in solitary confinement units,
including dozens who have spent more than 20 years each in
isolation. Gabriel Reyes has spent 16 years in the SHU, and in a
letter published this week by Truth-Out, writes, “I understand
I broke the law, and I have lost liberties because of that. But
no one, no matter what they’ve done, should be denied fundamental
human rights, especially when that denial comes in the form of
such torture
.”

Reyes is currently serving a sentence of 25-years-to-life for
burgling an unoccupied swelling. He says that the prison’s
determination of a “gang affiliation” has left him
spending 22.5 hours a day in isolation.

Republished with permission from: RT

Syria militants made sarin gas: Russia

0

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Russian experts have found that Syrian militants fighting against the government of President Bashar al-Assad made sarin nerve gas and used it in a deadly attack outside Aleppo in March.

Republished with permission from: Press TV

"I Love Her But the Sex Has Died": The Brain Chemical That Can Kill Libido in Long-Term Relationships

0

July 9, 2013
 |

Like this article?

Join our email list:

Stay up to date with the latest headlines via email.

Writer Carole Jahme shines the cold light of evolutionary psychology on readers’ problems.

From an anonymous male, aged 40+

I have been in several very loving, amorous, “serious” relationships as an adult, none frivolous and none (at least on a conscious level — who the hell knows what’s going on with me subconsiously) with the intention of being short-term.

Inevitably, however, my sexual attraction for my partner wanes to the point where we become virtually non-sexual. This can happen in less that a year after the relationship started. This condition consistently contributes to the relationship falling apart. My emotional feeling of love stays constant, and the breakup is traumatic for both of us. Add to the mix my undeniable enjoyment of and never-failing satisfaction with masturbation, and it seems to be a recipe for disaster. Is there an evolutionary take on any of this?

Carole replies:
Trying to sustain a long-term relationship that is also sexual presents humans with a chemical catch-22.

Studies on the length of relationships have shown that couples in harmonious, stable and trusting long-term relationships have higher blood levels of oxytocin (a chemical that regulates attachment, promotes cooperation and facilitates sensations of joy and love) than people who are not in compatible relationships. These happy couples also reap other benefits in terms of longer lifespan, lower rates of alcoholism, depression and illness, and more rapid recovery after accidental injury.

But there are conflicting chemicals at work in sexual relationships that sometimes prevent them from ever becoming long-term. Dopamine is a neurotransmitter in the limbic system — the brain’s primitive reward centre. It mediates both the sex drive and addiction to drugs. Brain scans have shown that the rapid rise in dopamine levels during orgasm is similar to that seen in a heroin high. But dopamine falls rapidly following orgasm in both males and females and is replaced with rising levels of a hormone called prolactin.

Both are part of the brain’s “dopaminergic” reward system.

At first, rising prolactin causes sleepy post-orgasm contentment. (Interestingly the amount of prolactin produced is far greater after sex with a partner than after masturbation. Thus there is little prolactin relief for those who masturbate.) But once this sleepy feeling of satiation has passed, prolactin may go on rising and cause problems for couples wanting to sustain a long-term sexual relationship. In both men and women excess levels of prolactin can cause loss of libido, anxiety, headaches, mood swings and depression.

High prolactin is associated with sensations of despair. When the prolactin levels of newly caged wild monkeys were monitored, the hormone was seen to rise once the animals realised they were trapped. Levels of the hormone were much higher in monkeys incarcerated for months compared with wild animals that had only just been caged. Science has yet to determine how long prolactin continues to rise and remain high in humans after orgasm, so this is speculative, but in a relationship with lots of sex it could mean levels are elevated for weeks or even months.

How does all this tie in with your predilection for maturbation? There have been some illuminating studies of this behaviour in non-human primates. It has been found, for example, that male monkeys who masturbate tend to be of low status, whereas high-status male monkeys are likely only to experience ejaculation during sex. It also seems that the frequency of masturbation is higher in captive primates than in wild animals. You can make of this what you will.

The dopaminergic system varies among humans, some people exhibiting more reward-seeking behaviour than others, and this may go some way towards explaining why many relationships are burnt out after a year. In reproductive terms, 12 months is long enough for fertilisation to take place. It is also certainly long enough for prolactin levels to rise. Once your libido flags and anxiety sets in, the short-term reward gained from masturbating may give you a dopamine “high” without risking bringing on that post-orgasmic prolactin “low”.

Republished with permission from: AlterNet

Beblawi appointed Egypt’s interim PM

0

Liberal economist and former Finance Minister Hazem al-Beblawi was named Egyptâ„¢s interim prime minister on July 9, 2013.

Egyptian interim President Adly Mansour has appointed liberal economist Hazem al-Beblawi as the country’s interim prime minister and Mohamed ElBaradei as vice president, state media reports.

Mansour named former Finance Minister Hazem al-Beblawi Egyptâ„¢s new prime minister and former International Atomic Energy Agency chief, Mohamed ElBaradei, new vice president for foreign relations, presidential spokesman Ahmed al-Muslimani said on Tuesday.

The appointments come almost a week after the military deposed President Mohamed Morsi and declared the chief justice of Egyptâ„¢s Supreme Constitutional Court, Adly Mansour, as caretaker president.

ElBaradei was initially tipped to lead the cabinet but his nomination was rejected by the Salafist Nour party.

The Nour party, which quit government talks following deadly clashes in Cairo on Monday, later said it would agree to have the former finance minister, Samir Radwan, as the new prime minister.

Shortly after Beblawi’s appointment, the Egyptian Army warned all parties against disrupting the “difficult and complex” transition in the country.

“The future of the nation is too important and sacred for maneuvers or hindrance, whatever the justifications,” Egypt Armed Forces Chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said in a statement carried by state TV.

The warning comes amid growing opposition against Mansour’s constitutional declaration, which lays out a timetable for presidential election and outlines the president’s powers.

The Muslim Brotherhood, which calls the ouster of Morsi as a military coup, said the plan for constitutional changes and a vote next year Å“brings the country back to square one.”

Egypt’s opposition Tamarod movement also dismissed the interim charter as “dictatorial” and a “setback to the revolution.

MRS/PR

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Israel puts Palestine women on trial

0

Palestinian demonstrators take cover during clashes with Israeli security forces following a protest against the expropriation of Palestinian land by Israel in the village of Kfar Qaddum, near Nablus, in the occupied West Bank, on July 5, 2013.

Two Palestinian female activists have been put on trial in an Israeli court on charges of instigating in a demonstration against Israeli regimeâ„¢s illegal settlement expansion in the West Bank.

On Tuesday, the women known as Nariman Tamimi and Rana Hamadeh went on trial in an Israeli military court over entering a “closed military zone” during a demonstration in Nabi Saleh village on June 28.

Earlier this week, Amnesty International issued a statement saying that Å“They (the two activists) have been denied the basic human right to peacefully protest over land illegally seized by Israeli settlers, and the Israeli judiciary has used spurious legal tools to punish them.”

On June 6, two Palestinian women were wounded in an attack by Israeli regime forces on a group of demonstrators protesting against the illegal settlement expansion near the city of Al-Khalil (Hebron) in the occupied West Bank.

The Tel Aviv regime continues expanding its illegal settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, despite calls from the international community to stop the move.

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since Israelâ„¢s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

Meanwhile, Israeli settlers beat several Palestinian farmers in the town of Huwara in the occupied West Bank on Monday.

The Israeli settlers also stole 300 sheep from the farmers and attempted to bring them back to their illegal settlements.

In recent years, Israeli settlers in the West Bank have often assaulted Palestinians and vandalized their property. However, the Tel Aviv regime rarely detains the assailants.

MAM/PR

Republished with permission from: Press TV

Off-duty police officer shoots family’s ‘big softie’ dog in front of 12-year-old owner

10

Amanda Williams
Mail Online
July 9, 2013

An off duty police officer has shot his neighbour’s dog dead in front of it’s 12-year-old owner, after it allegedly attacked him and his wife.

The Fitzhenry family, from Harris County, Texas, say their beloved boxer dog, Gunner — who they described as a big softie — was shot by the off-duty Houston police officer on Friday along a pathway.

Houston Police Department Officer Mark Condon claims the four-year-old dog charged at him and his wife, after it escaped from the Fitzhenry’s garden by accident.

But according to 12-year-old Dalton Fitzhenry, who family say treated the dog like a brother, the pet had only wanted to play.

Mr Condon, said: ‘The dog charged us and attacked me, my wife and one of our dogs.’

He fired at the dog, striking it in the neck, Khoun.com reports.

He claim details of the injuries he, his wife, and dog suffered, have been recorded by police.

The Fitzhenrys said Gunner was one of the family and losing the animal was like ‘losing an older brother’ for their children. They now plan to lodge a formal complaint with HPD.

Dalton, 12, said the officer had shot the dog at point blank range. The animal died on the way to a vet.

He added: ‘He just pulled it out, like, point-blank range and shot.

‘Gunner didn’t have the chance to run.’

Dalton’s parents said the boy was screaming and crying as he watched the ordeal.

In a statement, Mr Condon said: ‘I have owned dogs and have been an animal lover my entire life.

‘The last thing I would ever want to do is hurt an animal, especially someone’s pet.’

The Fitzhenry family plans to lodge a formal complaint with HPD.

Neighbours on Cascade Bend Lane said their children had happily played with the animal in the past and referred to him as a ‘big softie’.

 

 

Canadian Cop Gives Homeless Woman Lunch Money

0

Infowars.com
July 9, 2013

A Canadian police observer filmed a Toronto officer, not beating a person senseless or violating his rights, but rather committing a courageous act of kindness.

In the video, Toronto Officer Dave Taylor is telling a homeless woman that she needs to leave her current location, but instead of threatening her with arrest, the officer is caught being a genuinely nice guy and giving her money.

The user that sent us the video says the policeman caught on film is actually his father and had this to say:

“I’m sure the person filming was waiting to get a police brutality video to post on YouTube, but instead he got what needs to be seen more. People should not hate the police, there are some good ones. I believe this video should be seen to show exactly that.”

As police officers often get a bad rap for the misdeeds of their more ego maniacal, sexually deviant, profit-driven partners, it is always a breath of fresh air to report on the instances we come across where a cop actually treats a citizen like a fellow human being.

Kudos to Officer Dave Taylor.

See other heartwarming pro-cop articles below:

‘First Amendment Cop’ Becomes Internet Icon

Coolest cop ever playing drums in the woods

NYPD Cop Buys Homeless Man Boots

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 11:41 am

Tags:






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Computer glitch will benefit smokers under Obamacare

0

Older smokers are likely to benefit from Obama’s Affordable Care Act and could save about $4,500 a year on premiums, due to a computer glitch that limits the penalties insurers are allowed to charge.

A June 28 report by the Department of Health and Human Services
discovered the smokers’ glitch, which could take the Obama
administration a year to fix, AP reports. Even though the law
allows insurers to charge smokers up to 50 percent higher
premiums, the system glitch limits these penalties and
particularly benefits older Americans who smoke.

“Because of a system limitation … the system currently
cannot process a premium for a 65-year-old smoker that is …
more than three times the premium of a 21-year-old smoker,”

the industry guidance said. If an insurance company tries to
charge a smoker higher premiums, “the submission of the
(insurer) will be rejected by the system,” 
the guidance
added.

When President Obama’s signature Affordable Care Act is
implemented in 2014, insurance companies will be required to
accept all applicants, regardless of their medical history,
lifestyle or any pre-existing conditions. A 64-year-old
non-smoker would pay about $9,000 a year for a standard “silver”
insurance plan. A 50 percent penalty on premiums would add more
than $4,500 to their annual health insurance costs, bringing the
total to nearly $13,600.

But the glitch prevents insurers from charging older customers
more than three times what they charge the youngest. In order for
the system to approve the insurance plans, a young smoker and an
old smoker would have to be charged the same penalty.

Initially, health insurance experts predicted that companies
would charge young smokers lower penalties and older smokers
higher penalties.

“Generally a 20-year-old who smokes probably doesn’t have much
higher health costs than someone who doesn’t smoke in any given
year,”
said Larry Levitt, an insurance market expert with the
nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. “A 60-year-old is
another story.”

The Obama administration is now suggesting limits on penalties
for smokers of all ages. The Department of Health and Human
Services suggested a 20 percent penalty, which could be
significantly less for older smokers who would have otherwise
been forced to pay 50 percent.

A 64-year-old smoker with a 20 percent insurance penalty would be
paying about $10,900 a year, rather than the $13,600 they would
pay under a 50 percent penalty. Younger smokers, on the other
hand, would most likely be paying more than they normally would.

“It’s going to throw cold water on efforts to get younger
people to sign up,”
Larry Levitt, an insurance market expert,
told AP.

On July 2, the Obama administration unexpectedly announced a
one-year delay of the provision that would mandate larger
employers to provide coverage for their workers or pay hefty
fines. The administration is preparing the launch of the health
insurance marketplace on October 1, but news of
delays and glitches has concerned health industry experts and
consultants. 

In recent weeks, new data and reports have discovered that
Obamacare would increase
healthcare premiums in California by up to 146 percent and
penalize
nearly half a million Native Americans who would no longer be
“Indian enough” for eligibility at federally-funded health
clinics. And with younger smokers set to pay significantly more
and older smokers able to get away paying less, flaws of
Obamacare have once again been highlighted, just a few months
before it goes into effect.

“This was an administration that was telling us everything was
under control,”
health care industry consultant Robert
Laszewski told AP. “Everything was going to be fine. Suddenly
this kind of stuff is cropping up every few days.”

Republished with permission from: RT

VIDEO: Denuncian restrictivas políticas migratorias de Canadá

0

Canadá siempre ha tenido la reputación de ser una tierra de acogida. Sin embargo, los recientes cambios en sus políticas migratorias están cerrando las puertas a mucha gente, entre los que se encuentran miembros de la comunidad de los Rom.

Grupos de defensa de los derechos humanos y la comunidad Rom denuncian las políticas restrictivas en inmigración del gobierno de Canadá.

Estas nuevas medidas están frenando el arribo de los roms en el país.

Canadá estableció una lista de 30 países considerados como seguros. El gobierno canadiense considera que en los llamados “países de origen designados” se respeta los derechos humanos y existe protección del estado.

Según Amnistía Internacional, los roms sufren en los países de la UE una creciente discriminación, violencia de carácter racista, expulsiones forzadas y diversas formas de segregación.

Jorge Zegarra, Montreal.

http://www.hispantv.com
http://www.facebook.com/Hispantv
http://plus.google.com/+hispantv
http://twitter.com/Hispantv
http://hispantv.com/

Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Center of Research on Globalization grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: publications@globalresearch.ca

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the
copyright owner.

For media inquiries: publications@globalresearch.ca

Republished with permission from: Global Research

Blood test that could predict how long you’ll live and how fast you’ll age

0

Emma Innes
Mail Online
July 9, 2013

A revolutionary new blood test could tell you how long you will live, and how quickly you will age.

Scientists have discovered a chemical ‘fingerprint’ in the blood that may provide clues to an infant’s health and rate of aging near the end of life.

The discovery raises the prospect of a simple test at birth that could help doctors stave off the ravages of disease in old age.

Read More

<!–

–>

This article was posted: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 at 11:39 am

Tags: , , , , ,






<!– this is where we need to show the related articles

–>

Republished with permission from: Infowars

Wisconsin Judge Slows Attack on Women with Partial Block of Regressive Law

0

Women’s health advocates get creative with a 2012 protest outside the Wisconsin legislature. (Photo: Light Brigade/ cc/ Flickr)In at least of short term victory for women’s health in Wisconsin, a federal judge Monday evening ordered a temporary suspension on a portion of a controversial abortion rule which Republican Governor Scott Walker covertly attempted to make law over the July 4th holiday weekend.

In a response to a suit filed against the state by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU of Wisconsin, U.S. District Judge William Conley ordered that an admitting-privileges requirement–which bans doctors without access to a hospital within 30 miles of their practice from performing the procedure effectively forcing the closure of two Wisconsin abortion clinics–be suspended for 10 days, until another hearing on the matter can be held.

According to Reuters, Conley wrote in his decision that if this portion of Act 37 (SB 206) were enforced, there would “almost certainly be irreparable harm to those women who will be foreclosed from having an abortion in the next week either because of the undue burden of travel or the late stage of pregnancy, as well as facing increasing health risks caused by delay.”

“This ruling is a step in the right direction for the women of Wisconsin who can now continue to make their own personal, private health care decisions,” said Teri Huyck, President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, in response to news of the suspension. “We are confident that the Court will ultimately recognize if Act 37 is not blocked, it would unconstitutionally restrict the ability of Wisconsin women, including victims of rape and incest and women who are in need of an abortion to preserve their health, to access safe and legal abortions.”

The judge, however, did not block the section of the law which requires an ultrasound to be performed on a pregnant woman at least 24 hours before an abortion.

______________________________

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Fukushima Radioactive Leaks ‘Surge’ 90-Fold in Three Days

0

Fallout worsens again as industry pushes for more nuclear plants

Levels of radioactive substances have surged once again in the groundwater surrounding the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant, the Tokyo Electric Power Co. said on Tuesday.

The rates show that radioactive contamination is quickly spreading in the disaster area despite ongoing efforts to decommission the site, with levels of cesium-134 and cesium-137 as high as 90 times greater than they were just three days prior.

“We still don’t know why the level of radiation surged, but we are continuing efforts to avert further expansion of contamination,” a TEPCO spokesman stated.

TEPCO says that it is now attempting to determine if the substances are seeping into the ocean, a possibility that is very likely, as the Japan Times reports:

The substances, which were released by the meltdowns of reactors at the plant in the aftermath of the huge tsunami of March 2011, were not absorbed by soil and have made their way into groundwater.

Subsoil water usually flows out to sea, meaning these two substances could normally make their way into the ocean, possibly affecting marine life and ultimately impacting humans who eat sea creatures.

The site of the nuclear disaster has been plagued by a series of storage tank leaks among a list of other mishaps this year.

Last month, similar reports had surfaced showing spikes in radioactive substances in the groundwater.

The news arrives as several nuclear reactors in Japan moved closer to restarting this week, with four utility companies applying for safety inspections for 10 idled plants–or what theAssociated Press called “the clearest sign of a return to atomic energy almost two and a half years after the Fukushima disaster.”

Republished with permission from: Common Dreams

Iran-Russia military ties appropriate

0

Tehran-Moscow military relations at appropriate evel: Iran Navy cmdr.

Commander of the Iranian Navy, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari, says military relations between Tehran and Moscow stand at an appropriate level.

In an interview with Russiaâ„¢s state-run news agency RIA Novosti on Tuesday, Sayyari said the two countries have held talks about holding joint military exercises pending the approval of their naviesâ„¢ general staff.

He noted that Iranian authorities attach paramount importance to the development of ties with neighboring states.

Sayyari said Iran places expansion of relations with regional and trans-regional countries high on its agenda.

Iran and Russia conducted their first joint naval maneuvers in the Caspian Sea, involving about 30 vessels, in 2009.

The Iranian Navy recently dispatched two warships, the Joshan (Shield) and the Peykan (Arrow), to the Russian port city of Astrakhan to convey the message of peace and friendship from the Iranian nation to Russia and other littoral states of the Caspian Sea.

On April 21, a group of Russian Navy warships docked at the southern Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas after a long journey from the Pacific Ocean.

The fleet, which comprised Admiral Panteleyev anti-submarine destroyer and the logistic battleships Peresvet and Admiral Nevelskoi vessel with a crew of 712, entered the Iranian naval zone in a bid to further strengthen relations between Tehran and Moscow and promote bilateral naval cooperation to maintain maritime security.

MP/KA

Republished with permission from: Press TV