NATO Summit Closes By Condemning Russia


Eric Zuesse

The issues that were discussed at this year’s NATO Summit were mainly preparations for a possible war against Russia.

The two-day Summit in Warsaw Poland ended on Saturday July 9th, with a 139-part “Warsaw Summit Communiqué” which used the word “terrorism” 17 times, “jihad” and “jihadist” and “jihadism” 0 (zero) times, and “Russia” 58 times — never favorably, and often with overt hostility. 

It also referred to “Ukraine” 34 times, and “Syria” 10 times. Ukraine, during a February 2014 coup (it has been referred to as having been a “coup” both by the leader of the private CIA firm Stratfor, and by the Establishment writer on international relations John Mearsheimer, among others) switched, immediately after the coup, from having been neutral between NATO and Russia, to being suddenly and consistently intensely hostile to Russia, and immediately applied to join NATO; Syria still remains strongly allied with Russia. 

The Ukrainian government was referred to 100% favorably, and the Syrian government was referred to 100% unfavorably.

In other words: the Communiqué is 100% hostile toward Russia and its ally Syria, and is far more concerned about Russia than it is about terrorism — and not at all concerned about jihadism and jihadists.

The Communiqué is clear about “the crisis in and around Ukraine being, in current circumstances, the first topic on our agenda.” All of its references to that matter are based upon the assumption that this problem is due entirely to Russian “aggression” and that all violations of the Minsk agreements on the Ukrainian conflict are by the pro-Russian separatists, none of the violations are on the Ukrainian government side. The presumption is that the Ukrainian government side never commits aggression, and that the separatist side is never defending itself against Ukrainian aggression. The Communiqué says, regarding the Special Monitoring Mission that is overseeing implementation of the Minsk agreements: “Impediments to the SMM’s work, which continue to occur overwhelmingly in areas under the control of the Russian-backed militants, represent a violation of the Minsk Agreements and seriously hamper the monitoring function of the SMM.” The SMM operates in, and issues daily reports from, the separatist region (Donbass, consisting of two parts: Luhansk and Donetsk), and therefore it’s natural that almost all of those reports concern that region, not Ukraine. However, for example, the report dated 7 July 2016 does note that, “Civilians expressed their anger at continued shelling while other civilians expressed their frustration over water cuts. The SMM facilitated and monitored adherence to the ceasefire to enable repairs to essential infrastructure.” Though this report was, indeed, as NATO phrases the matter, “in areas under the control of the Russian-backed militants” (i.e., of people who live in the region that rejects the coup-imposed Ukrainian government), the “violation of the Minsk agreements” there consisted actually of shelling that was fired from the Ukrainian government forces, into “areas under the control of the Russian-backed militants.”

Similarly, the Communiqué blames the war in Syria upon the Russian-allied side, which in that case happens to be the Syrian government. For example, it says: “We call on the Syrian regime to fully comply with the provisions of all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs), and to immediately take steps for a genuine political transition in accordance with UNSCR 2254  and the 30 June 2012 Geneva Communiqué.” That conflict is between jihadists who are trying to overthrow the Syrian government, and the Syrian government. NATO blames the conflict entirely upon the Syrian government.

The Communiqué describes at some length the sharp increase in soldiers and weapons that NATO is pouring onto and near Russia’s borders, especially in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Romania. The reason that’s given for this surrounding Russia with hostile forces is:

the ongoing illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea, which we do not and will not recognise and which we call on Russia to reverse; the violation of sovereign borders by force; the deliberate destabilisation of eastern Ukraine; large-scale snap exercises contrary to the spirit of the Vienna Document, and provocative military activities near NATO borders, including in the Baltic and Black Sea regions and the Eastern Mediterranean; its irresponsible and aggressive nuclear rhetoric, military concept and underlying posture; and its repeated violations of NATO Allied airspace. In addition, Russia’s military intervention, significant military presence and support for the regime in Syria, and its use of its military presence in the Black Sea to project power into the Eastern Mediterranean have posed further risks and challenges for the security of Allies and others.

No mention is made in the Communiqué of the event that sparked all of this, which was Washington’s Ukrainian coup, which Washington had been preparing starting no later than 1 March 2013 in its Ukrainian Embassy to overthrow the democratically elected President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych.

When NATO demands, regarding Crimea’s return to Russia shortly after the coup, “we do not and will not recognise and … we call on Russia to reverse”; when NATO demands Russia to abandon the 90+% of Crimeans who wanted to rejoin as being part of Russia — when NATO demands Russia to consign these people to the now failed state of Ukraine (which hates them and wants them dead) — NATO is placing itself in the position of a continuing escalation toward nuclear war against Russia, unless NATO itself disbands or else cancels its demand. NATO is now in a position where they will either cancel their demand, or else continue their escalation and surrounding-of-Russia to the point where Russia will have no alternative but to unleash (without warning) all-out nuclear war against NATO countries, and against all nations, such as Ukraine, that hate Russians so much that they are trying to join NATO — the anti-Russia club of nations.

Russia is not going to do what NATO demands. The question now is: which side will start the nuclear war — attack first. In any case, the war (assuming that NATO neither retracts its demand nor disbands, and so war results) will probably be over within less than an hour. There won’t be any winners, but the side that strikes first will be destroyed less than will the side that merely retaliates. And, in that sense, there will be a ‘winner’, even to an all-out nuclear war. Regardless, though, Vladimir Putin’s responsibility is only to the Russian people, no matter how unacceptable the two choices are that NATO has offered him. He has tried many times to discuss the matter with Barack Obama, who always refuses to discuss it with him. Obama’s refusal speaks clearer than any mere words, either from him or from (his agent) NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander, possibly could.


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

  • y3shuA imMANu3l


  • legal eagle

    Not content to be the one who is doing ALL the aggression in the region NATO is now shifting blame for their own actions upon a nation that has done NOTHING wrong. NATO’s regurgitation of the “annexation of Crimea: line of absolute trashy bullshit is demonstrating clearly to all who think rather than just blindly follow that it is a US pushed NATO agenda that is goading for war in order to attempt to salvage the US dollar from utter collapse; collapse that was committed by their own ineptness and incompetence, but true to historical form whenever the US gets itself into financial trouble war has been the traditional method of slithering out from it. And again this time around it will be Europe who will pay the brunt of the costs in lives lost and territory destroyed and yet they are haply retracing this path like mindless lemmings running for the cliff’s edge. Can’t cure stupid.

  • Tim Hadfield

    They should all be hanged as traitors to the human race
    Do we in Europe really want to fight Russia for, and on behalf of, Obama?

  • Pete752

    Look at all the criminals all in one photo. Their day of reckoning is closer than they know.

  • FckYouGodDamCriminalBstrdMod

    Russia is going to completely destroy the USA!
    The entire government are evil treasonous criminals. The day of the next false flag using the nuke they stole in 2007 and blamed on Iran, America will be destroyed by Russia, China and the SCO. This is the war of Armageddon and you can know it is now because of Planet X and the toxic chemtrails that hide it every day. Planet X will end the war when it rips the earth apart again but 90% of Americans will be dead already. All planned by your evil government.

    Fck you, you god dam evil bstrd criminal moderator for deleting my comment thousands of times! You should be hung for treason and accessory to genocide you evil bstrd piece of government sht!

  • Pist-Off

    All European NATO members had best wake up. Should NATO, lead by the USA, (DC), start a war with Russia, the devastation to the European NATO nations will be beyond belief. The USA is across the Atlantic, far from harms way, however, the country could be hit with ICBM’S, but will not see the devastation that European nation will suffer. Now if the European NATO nations chose to continue with the insanity being pushed by DC, they may just find themselves back in the stone age. DC wants a war to prop up the failing dollar, and could care less, for the countries that will suffer, and the countless lives lost.

  • Johnny Canuck

    NATO is pissed that Crimeans Voted unanimously to go back with Russia. What is “illegal” about that? The West is sponsoring out-and-out 100% pure Nazis in Ukraine. Just think of the tens of millions (mostly Russians) that died for nothing. Next time I see a NATO representative placing a Wreath at a Cenotaph for the War Dead, I will turn my back and hope I don’t puke.

    NATO is pissed that Russia has stopped the West from toppling Democratically-elected Assad and have weakened the Western and ISIS-RA-EL created ISIS, the most despicable Creatures on the Planet at the moment, next to Baby Molesters.

    NATO itself is rife with Homosexuality and drunken perversions and hints they may also have many Satanist Psychopaths amongst their midst.

    Nobody supports NATO, the jig is up. Death to NATO!!!! Good riddance to it’s discombobulation!!!

  • Cerberus79

    Why this insane belligerence towards Russia? It’s partially the EU/US attempt to punish Russia for interfering with the West’s re-colonization of the mid East and to discourage any further interference. Russia’s campaign against ISIS, our supposed enemy but actual accomplice, shot Obama’s plan to bring down Assad all to hell and exposed his war mongering for what it was.

  • rollandmiller

    Canadians oppose Nato’s aggression against Russia.

  • Mick McNulty

    They still don’t realize, the next world war won’t just kill us little people it will kill many of them too.