The Supreme Court of Mississippi is currently considering a case that could lead to charges of manslaughter for women who suffer miscarriages or stillbirths.
Nina Buckhalter was indicted for manslaughter in 2009 after
giving birth to a stillborn baby girl named Hayley 31 weeks into
her pregnancy.
According to a Mother Jones report, those charges were based on
the detection of methamphetamines in Buckhalter’s system, which led
a grand jury in Mississippi to declare that the defendant
“did willfully, unlawfully,
feloniously, kill Hayley Jade Buckhalter, a human being, by
culpable negligence.”
Now the court is set to rule on whether the prosecution can move
forward after hearing oral arguments on the case on April
2.
According to Farah Diaz-Tello, an attorney with National
Advocates for Pregnant Women and part of Buckhalter’s legal
defense, if her case goes forward it could well lead to a spate of
similar prosecutions in Mississippi and other US states.
The fear now is setting a precedent that “unintentional pregnancy loss can be treated
as a form of homicide,” says Farah Diaz-Tello.
Mississippi’s manslaughter laws were never intended to apply in
cases of stillbirths and miscarriages, according to reporting by
Mother Jones. However, Mississippi prosecutors believe that two
state laws allow them to charge Buckhalter. One law defines
manslaughter as the “killing of a human being, by the act,
procurement or culpable negligence of another”, while the
second includes “an unborn child at every stage of gestation
from conception until live birth” as the state’s definition of
human beings.
Mississippi is widely considered one of the most socially
conservative states in the US, and as recently as 2011 a state
ballot measure had sought to grant full rights to fertilized eggs,
effectively making abortion illegal.
Lawmakers are also actively looking to shut down the state’s
sole women’s health clinic that performed abortions.
Diaz-Tello believes that the underlying motivation behind
Buckhalter’s case is an attempt to establish “personhood”
for fetuses, a central issue in the contentious arguments for
banning abortions which rely on a legal definition of an unborn
child’s “viability” or rather the state’s definition of
life.
The definition of “personhood” could, in turn, allow the
introduction of further laws regulating or banning the use of
emergency contraceptives such as Plan B, or be used in further
arguments in restricting access to abortion services.
Robert McDuff, a Mississippi civil rights lawyer also
representing Buckhalter, argued to the state Supreme Court that the
state’s law defining homicide as including the killing of a child
includes an exemption for women seeking a legal abortion.
McDuff argues that, if women in Mississippi can legally
terminate unwanted pregnancies, this should carry over to
unintentionally ending a wanted pregnancy.
At least a dozen medical and public health groups have filed a
friend-of-the-court brief in the Buckhalter case, including the
American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics
and the American College of Obstetricians.
In that brief the group argues that threat of prosecution might
actually lead to more abortions by women dealing with drug or
alcohol addiction, or could raise the risk of miscarriage or
stillbirth by women who fear they may be reported by medical
professionals to the state.
Earlier in the year the state of Alabama set a precedent for
prosecuting pregnant women for drug use when it upheld convictions
against Amanda Kimbrough and Hope Ankrom for “chemical
endangerment” of a child. As Mother Jones notes, that 2006 law
was aimed to punish individuals who expose children rather than
fetuses to illegal drugs, and as in the case of Buckhalter seems to
have further defined “personhood.”
This article originally appeared on: RT