Watchdog ruling - Iraq dossier was sexed up看门狗执政党-伊拉克和谐社会是添油加醋
By Chris Ames |由Chris埃姆斯|
The government is attacked as “dodgy” after a ruling that criticises the way in which author of the September 2002 Iraq dossier has effectively been allowed anonymity.政府是攻击为“ dodgy ”后裁决，批评以何种方式的作者2002年9月的伊拉克档案，有效地被允许不愿透露姓名的。
The Information Tribunal has today criticised the government for the absence of any audit trail showing the true authorship of its September 2002 dossier on “Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction”.信息法庭今天批评政府没有任何的审计线索，显示真正的作者，其2002年9月的档案，对“伊拉克的大规模杀伤性武器” 。 In a new ruling, the tribunal has accepted the Cabinet Office’s position that it has no record of which officials or spin doctors made “substantial changes” to the dossier’s executive summary.在一个新的裁决，该法庭已接受了内阁办公室的立场，认为它没有任何的纪录，官员或自旋医生作出了“很大的变化， ”到和谐社会的内容提要。 The Liberal Democrats have already condemned this position as “dodgy”.自由民主党已经谴责了这一立场“ dodgy ” 。
The case represents another blow to the government’s claim that the dossier was the work of the intelligence services, following the publication in February of the first draft, written by Foreign Office spin doctor John Williams.这一案件是另一个打击政府的索赔，该档案是工作的情报服务，出版之后在2月的第一稿，写的外事办公室自旋医生约翰威廉斯。 The existence of the Williams draft was first revealed in the New Statesman in November 2006.所存在的威廉斯草案首次透露，在新的政治家，在2006年11月。
In this latest freedom of information act case, I asked the Cabinet Office to state who re-wrote the dossier’s executive summary between the drafts of 10 and 16 September 2002.在这方面的最新资讯自由法的情况，我要求内阁办公室向国家谁重新写了和谐社会的内容提要之间的草稿， 10日和2002年9月16 。 It initially claimed that evidence to the Hutton Inquiry by Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) chairman John Scarlett covered this, but the Tribunal rejected that claim.它最初声称的证据，向赫顿调查由联合情报委员会（ JIC为）主席John斯嘉丽所涵盖的这一点，但法庭拒绝了这一要求。 Scarlett had told Hutton that he and his team of JIC assessments staff had been responsible for compiling the dossier but did not state that they had done all the drafting.斯佳丽曾告诉赫顿说，他和他的团队的JIC为评估的工作人员一直负责编制卷宗，但没有说明他们做了所有的起草工作。
The Tribunal stated that it is clear “that substantial changes were made” between the two drafts and suggested that it was common ground that officials outside the JIC “may have gone as far as proposing particular forms of words”.法庭指出，这是明确的“很大的变化，提出了”两国之间的草稿，并建议，这是共同点，官员以外的JIC为“可能已经就建议，尤其是形式的话” 。 These officials included Williams and other spin doctors such as Alastair Campbell, the government’s former director of communications.这些官员包括威廉斯和其他自旋医生如坎贝尔，政府的前主任通讯。
The dossier’s executive summary included “judgements”, which Tony Blair presented to Parliament as having been “made by the JIC alone”.案卷的内容提要，包括“判决” ，其中托尼布莱尔向议会提交过“所提出的JIC为单” 。 The judgements in the 10 September draft were themselves revealed to have originated in John Williams’ document.判决，在9月10日，草案本身显示，有起源于约翰威廉斯的文件。 But the next version included a number of new ones.但在下一个版本包括了一些新的定居点。 The government’s inability to account for these changes raises the possibility that none of the judgements in the published dossier originated from within the JIC machinery.政府的无力帐户，这些变化引起的可能性没有判决在已公布的卷宗源自内部JIC为机器。
Campbell later had a further “judgement” added to the summary, after the JIC’s oversight of the document had ended.坎贝尔后来进行了进一步的“判决”添加到概要，后专营的监督，该文件已经结束。 This was the claim that Saddam would use weapons of mass destruction against his own Shia population.这是声称萨达姆会使用大规模杀伤性武器对付自己的什叶派人口。
The Tribunal accepted the Cabinet Office’s case that it had no record either of who had drafted the summary or who had made changes to it.法庭接受了内阁办公室的情况下，它已没有记录无论是谁，已经起草了简易程序或谁作出了更改。 But in doing so, it criticised the absence of a proper audit trail, particularly given the significance of the dossier.但在这样做，它批评缺乏适当的审计线索，尤其是考虑到意义的和谐社会。 In its ruling it observed: “we are not very impressed by the quality of the record keeping… this was on any view an extremely important document and we would have expected, or hoped for, some audit trail revealing who had drafted what.”在其执政的，它指出： “我们不是非常深刻的印象高质量的备存纪录…这是从任何角度来看一个非常重要的文件和我们本来期望，或希望的程度，一些审计线索，揭示了谁起草了什么” 。
The dossier formed the basis of the government’s case to Parliament for invading Iraq.案卷形成的基础上，政府的情况下向议会入侵伊拉克。 It subsequently emerged that Iraq did not have WMD at that time and that the dossier’s claims were expressed with significantly more certainty than the intelligence on which they were said to be based.后来出现了，伊拉克并没有大规模杀伤性武器在那个时间，并认为和谐社会的主张表示了显着更大的确定性，比情报，他们说是基于。
The new judgements included the claim that Iraq could deploy WMD within 45 minutes and another false claim that it was continuing to produce chemical and biological agents.新的判决，包括声称伊拉克大规模杀伤性武器可以部署在45分钟内和另一虚假声称，这是继续生产化学和生物制剂。 Both were opposed by intelligence experts at the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS).都反对由情报专家在国防情报工作人员（ DIS ）的。 The Butler Inquiry later criticised the government’s failure to make the intelligence behind the latter claim available to the DIS: “The fact that it was not shown to them resulted in a stronger assessment in the dossier in relation to Iraqi chemical weapons production than was justified by the available intelligence.”该巴特勒调查后，批评政府的失败，使情报的背后，后者要求提供给存款保险计划： “事实上，这并非表明他们产生了一个强大的评估，在和谐社会在有关伊拉克化学武器生产比理由是现有的情报“ 。
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Ed Davey told the New Statesman: “The absence of any audit trail for the substantial changes to the Iraq dossier is perhaps not surprising.自由民主党外交事务发言人，教育署•达维说，新政治家说： “没有任何的审计线索，为很大的变化，向伊拉克和谐社会是也许并不奇怪。 The government’s spin doctors must have known what they were doing was dodgy and would not be approved by the intelligence experts.政府的自旋医生必须知道什么，他们这样做是dodgy ，并会不获批准，由情报专家。 No wonder they left no fingerprints.”怪不得他们没有留下指纹“ 。
NewStatesman newstatesman source 来源
See More: 看到更多的： Iraq 伊拉克 UK News 英国新闻Have Your Say: Watchdog ruling - Iraq dossier was sexed up 你说：看门狗执政党-伊拉克和谐社会是添油加醋
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的我们的新论坛
2 Responses to “Watchdog ruling - Iraq dossier was sexed up” 2反应“看门狗执政党-伊拉克和谐社会是添油加醋”
steve k 史蒂夫k
Posted: Apr 25th, 2008 at 4:27 am | 发布时间： 2008年4月25日在上午04时27分| Link to this 链接到本steve k 史蒂夫k
Posted: Apr 25th, 2008 at 4:41 am | 发布时间： 2008年4月25日在上午04时41分| Link to this 链接到本Reply回复This in my opinion is no accident as the war in iraq is ILLEGAL as a country cannot attack a soverign nation for the purposes of a regime change unless that country has posed a direct and provable threat and even then it needs the full backing of the UN security council for the direct purpose of said regime change and as neither of these happened the government at the time came up with the sexed-up dossier with WMD as an excuse to attack with the express purpose of regime change in iraq .这在我认为是没有发生意外，因为在伊拉克战争是非法的作为一个国家不能攻击一个主权国家为目的，一个政权改变，除非该国已构成了直接威胁，并证明即使如此，它需要的全力支持联合国安理会的直接目的说，制度的变化和作为都没有这些事，政府在时间来与添油加醋的后续和谐社会与大规模杀伤性武器为借口，攻击与表达的目的，改变政权在伊拉克。 Therefore it is no supprise to me that there is no direct paper trail of said dossier or too how and why it went through so many changes!因此，这是没有supprise我认为是没有直接的文件线索的说，和谐社会或过于如何以及为什么它经历了这么多的变化！ . 。 I feel that the full truth of said dossier will never be fully explained !我觉得充分的真相，说，和谐社会绝不会加以充分解释！ . 。
Free Newsletter 免费通讯 
Related News 相关新闻
- UK in Israel WMD cover up英国在以色列的大规模杀伤性武器的掩饰
- More WMD lies exposed更多的大规模杀伤性武器的谎言暴露
- It’s official: Blair’s government set out to deceive us它的官方：布莱尔的政府列出来欺骗我们
- Troops accused of Iraq ‘executions’部队指控伊拉克'处决'
- Ex-MI6 chief: Too much weight on Iraq intelligence前军情6处行政：太多的重量对伊拉克情报
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
- Amnesty urges next US president to ban torture特赦组织敦促下一任美国总统，禁止酷刑
- Ireland accused of failing on flight rendition爱尔兰被告未对航机飞行的移交逃犯
- Brown: To Be More Than an Accessory to War Crimes布朗：要一个多配件的战争罪行
- UK ready to scrap killer cluster bombs英国准备放弃杀手的集束炸弹
- Report: US cluster bombs were faulty报告：美国集束炸弹故障
- Iraq War May Have Increased Energy Costs by $6 Trillion伊拉克战争可能会有所增加的能源成本由六○○○○○○○○○○○○美元
- A Real Inside Job; Anthrax一个真正的内就业;炭疽
- Orwellian Ubiquitous Computing?奥威尔普适计算？
- Appeal from Tony Benn / Stop the War Coalition上诉由托尼本/停止战争联盟
- American Psychological Association Supports Torture美国心理协会支持酷刑
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻
Archive 存档
This is deciet at its very worst it just proves that the UK government cannot be trusted as they knew fair well that too attack irag was ILLEGAL as one government cannot attack any country for the purpose of a regime change unless that country has directly posed a threat too the opposing country , and it needs a full agreement from the UN SECURITY COUNCIL for the direct purpose of a regime change and as neither happened the war in iraq is ILLEGAL .这是deciet在其最糟糕的很，只是证明，英国政府不能信任，因为他们知道，公平，以及过于攻击irag是非法的，作为一个政府不能攻击任何国家为目的的一个政权改变，除非该国已直接构成了威胁太反对的国家，它需要一个全面协议，由联合国安理会的直接目的，一个政权的变化和均发生在伊拉克战争是非法的。 So in my opinion the false sexed up claim of the dossier that SADDAM had WMD gave a ligitimacy to a war that was HIGHLY ILLEGAL and in effect could be classed as A WAR CRIME IN DIRECT BREACH OF THE UN POLICY !因此，我觉得虚假添油加醋的索赔的案卷说，萨达姆大规模杀伤性武器了ligitimacy ，以一场战争，这是高度非法和在作用可被归类为一种战争罪行，直接违反了联合国的政策！ . 。 Thats why in my opinion it is no mistake that there is no direct paper trail as the government in power at the time knew what they were doing and one day would be called too account !这就是为什么在我认为，这是没有错，有没有直接的文件线索，由于政府在权力，在什么时间知道他们正在做的和一天会被要求过于帐户！ . 。