에 의하여 솔직한 JORDANS

연합국. 인권 전문가는 포로 수용소는 국제적인 공정 규격에 맞히고 있지 않다는 것을 그가 Guantanamo 만에 최근 방문에 찾아낸 수요일을 말했다.

마틴 Scheinin, 공포정치에 대하여 전투에 있는 인권에 연합국의 독립적인 조사자는 부시 행정부의 제지 연습, 군사 법원 및 심문 기술에 대하여, 운동하고 있다.

그는 Guantanamo에 그의 방문이 지난 주 피억류자를 거기 수행하는 이용된 법률 기초에 관하여 더 제기했다고 말했다.

"청각 격원한 군사 기지에 공정한 예심 제공에 있는 실제적인 어려움의 도표 삽화를,"는 제공했다 Scheinin를 말했다 핀란드 법학 교수.

대략 305명의 피억류자는 Guantanamo 의 책임 없는 거의 모두에서 붙든다. The men suspected of links to terrorism are held as “enemy combatants” without the same rights as traditional prisoners of war.

U.S. officials said Wednesday they were disappointed by the report.

Scheinin’s finding on the legal process at Guantanamo was “in part misleading about the facts of the process, and revisits well-worn, ill-informed criticisms of military commissions hearings,” said Melanie J. Khanna, a U.S. legal adviser. “The unfortunate fact is that a large part of the report again repeats unfair and oversimplified criticisms of the United States.”

Scheinin was presenting his observations on Guantanamo to the 47-member U.N. Human Rights Council as part of a wider review of U.S. practices in the fight against terrorism.

He recalled attending hearings for Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a former driver for al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden who is charged under the 2006 Military Commissions Act with conspiracy and providing material support for terrorism.

He said it seemed impossible for defense lawyers to provide evidence because they were unable to call witnesses from abroad or the detention facility.

Scheinin told The Associated Press that the recent visit confirmed his findings.

In particular, he expressed concern that the Military Commissions Act — which addresses the legal rights of detainees held outside U.S. territory — was being applied to people who had been seized before the law was created.

“Doing this many years after they have originally been detained on other grounds unavoidably results in something which international law categorizes as arbitrary detention,” Scheinin said.

He also described as “very problematic” the question of the independence of the military tribunals and the use of evidence obtained by coercion.

Of the hearing he observed, Scheinin said “the military judge really did his best in difficult circumstances to strive for a fair trial, but within impossible conditions.”

In addition to observing the legal hearings, U.S. officials had invited Scheinin to visit the actual detention facilities. Scheinin said he declined that offer because he was not guaranteed unmonitored access to the detainees.

“They wanted me also to go to the detention facility but unfortunately their policy of not allowing for full access did not make it possible for me this time,” he told the AP. “I hope there will be another chance.”

Comment on 'UN expert: Guantanamo hearings unfair' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: