RINF.COM: АЛТЕРНАТИВА ПОСЛЕДНИЕ НОВОСТИ
Воскресенье 26-ое июль 2008
RINF.COM: АЛТЕРНАТИВА ПОСЛЕДНИЕ НОВОСТИ
|
|
ПОСЛЕДНИЕ НОВОСТИ |
ОТЧЕТ О БАШНИ 7 ПРЕДПОЛОГАЕМЫЙ, ЧТО ОБВИНИТЬ ПОЖАР ДЛЯ СБРОСА ДАВЛЕНИЯ
Вторник 7-ое июля 2008 Обсудите этот рапорт в форумах RINF > Это было not only твиновскими башнями обрушились 11-ого сентября. Башня центра торговлей третия мир не была ударена плоскостями также упала. По мере того как рапорт в башню 7 подготовляет опубликовать свои заключения, Майк Rudin рассматривает как получили, что была эта теория конспирацияа настолько большой. 9/11 будет теорией конспирацияа времени интернета. Положено «9/11 конспирацияам» в Google и вам получите 7.9 миллиона удары. Положено в «9/11 правды» и вас получите больше чем 22 миллиона. Опросы общественного мнения в США выбирали вверх widespread сомнения среди американских людей. Список избирателей новостей нью-йорка Times/CBS в 2006 нашел что 53% из той спрошенной мысли администрация кустика прятало что-то. Другой список избирателей США считал треть тех спрошенные государственные чиновники мысли или после того как он помогать в нападениях 9/11 или после того как он позволен их случиться. В Великобритании обзор архивами конспирацияа BBC, унесенными GfkNOP в 2006, найдено что 16% из той спрошенной мысли там было «более широким конспирацияом которое включило американское правительство». Этим летом будет ключевой момент для тех спрашивают официальное объяснение случилось на 9/11, self-styled «9/11 движений правды». Почти через 7 лет после ужасных случаев того дня в сентябре, авторитеты США из-за опубликовывают окончательное отчет о третья башня которая также обрушилась на 9/11. Не похоже на твиновским башням, этот 47 storey, небоскреб в 610 ног не был ударен плоскостью. И башня 7 стала ключевым вопросом для «truthers» как Дилан Avery, директор пленки интернета о вызванном 9/11 Свободн Изменять. «Центризуют движение правды тяжело на здании 7 а для очень хорошего множества причины людей будьте очень подозрительно о пошли вниз с того дня,» ем говорит. Avery point out что башня 7 расквартировала некоторых необыкновенных нанимателей: C I A, секретная служба, пентагон и очень агенство намеревались общаться с бедствиями или нападениями в нью-йорке - офисом террориста управления аварийной ситуации. И некоторые людей думают башня 7 было местом где конспирацияо 9/11 было насижено. Официальное объяснение что обычными пожарами было главная причина для сброса давления башни 7. That makes this the first and only tall skyscraper in the world to have collapsed because of fire. Yet despite that all the thousands of tonnes of steel from the building were carted away and melted down. The way official bodies have investigated Tower 7 at the World Trade Center has made some people think they’re hiding something. Its destruction was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. An inquiry by the Federal Emergency Management Agency said the building collapsed because intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of diesel stored in the building for emergency generators. But its report said this had “only a low probability of occurrence” and more work was needed. That was in May 2002. The task has now fallen to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based at a sprawling campus near Washington DC. For more than two-and-a-half years, scientists there have been studying Tower 7. Inevitably the officials have been criticised for being slow and even of being frightened to publish. But the lead investigator at NIST, who heads up their World Trade Center inquiry, Dr Shyam Sunder, says that two-and-a-half years is typically how long an aeroplane crash investigation takes. He added that only in the last few years did they begin to hear criticism from the “truth” movement. “It’s only at the very end in 2005 that this group became more vocal and we found them coming to some of our meetings. But for a long time they were not even present. It wasn’t the delay that really caused them, they just woke up one morning and decided to take this on as an issue.” Soul searching In April 2005, the first thousand DVDs of Dylan Avery’s Loose Change movie were pressed. It cost just $2,000 to make. It was a critical moment for the development of the movement. The makers of Loose Change claim it has now been viewed by more than a hundred million people. Steven Jones, a former physics professor at Brigham Young University, who has become the leading academic voice in the movement, first watched a video of the collapse of Tower 7 in the spring of 2005. But when he did, he said he was taken aback as a physicist.
The American architect Richard Gage’s conversion came in 2006 when driving along he heard an independent radio station interviewing the theologian David Ray Griffin. “I had to do some real soul searching and some research. And the more I discovered the more disturbed I became and realized I was looking for… the architects and the engineers.” Finding that they hadn’t really entered the fray by then, Gage decided he had to act. “It just came to me, I had to start an organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.” The fifth anniversary of 9/11 was a huge moment for “truthers”. Under the media spotlight protests intensified, websites were spawned and internet films proliferated. With the publicity also came the “debunkers”, challenging the “truthers” at every stage. After Loose Change came a website called Screw Loose Change. And internet film 9/11 Mysteries was followed by Screw 9/11 Mysteries. Conspiracy splits And the “truthers” have fought back. When the US technology magazine Popular Mechanics launched a book called Debunking 9/11 Myths, it was countered with a book by David Ray Griffin called Debunking 9/11 Debunking. Over time the scale of the alleged conspiracy has grown and grown, encompassing not just sections of the Bush administration, intelligence, but also the fire service, the police, first responders, official investigators, experts, the building’s owner, and the media, and, oh yes, even the BBC.
And over time schisms have opened up in the 9/11 “truth” movement. So-called “no-planers” believe that commercial aeroplanes did not actually crash into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania. Some have suggested lasers from outer space were used. “Planers” believe aeroplanes were used but argue that only controlled demolitions can explain the collapses of the World Trade Center towers. Then there are the LIHOPs and MIHOPs. Most “truthers” are MIHOPs - they think the government Made It Happen On Purpose, planning and orchestrating the 9/11 attacks. But LIHOPs believe the government just Let It Happen On Purpose, to allow them to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and a clampdown on civil liberties. Into this febrile atmosphere comes the final official report on 9/11. This summer we will find out whether NIST’s report has answered the many questions that have been raised, or whether it will suffer the same fate as the Warren Commission on the assassination of President John F Kennedy and merely add fuel to the conspiracy theories.  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7488159.stm Discuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE 6 Responses to “TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
So why were there pockets of molten steel in the basement? We would like to study the steel from those buildings. Why did the government remove all of the steel from the scene and send it overseas? Our government would have us believe that we can safely fire all of the demolitions experts because we found a new way of making buildings collapse into their own footprint. Do you believe it?