World News | Forum | UK News | USA News | Global News | Political News | Sci-Tech News | War & Terrorism News | Sports News | Multimedia | Set Homepage
Forum
Latest News
RINF Forum
Translate: Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE

Monday, July 7th, 2008

It wasn’t only the Twin Towers that collapsed on September 11. A third World Trade Center tower that wasn’t hit by the planes also fell. As a report into Tower 7 prepares to publish its findings, Mike Rudin considers how this conspiracy theory got to be so big.

9/11 is the conspiracy theory of the internet age.

Put “9/11 conspiracy” into Google and you get 7.9 million hits. Put in “9/11 truth” and you get more than 22 million.

Opinion polls in the US have picked up widespread doubts among the American people.

A New York Times/CBS News poll in 2006 found that 53% of those questioned thought the Bush administration was hiding something. Another US poll found a third of those questioned thought government officials either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or allowed them to happen.

In the UK a survey by the BBC’s The Conspiracy Files, carried out by GfkNOP in 2006, found that 16% of those questioned thought there was a “wider conspiracy that included the American government”.

This summer will be a key moment for those who question the official explanation of what happened on 9/11, the self-styled “9/11 truth movement”.

Nearly seven years after the terrible events of that September day, the US authorities are due to publish the final report on a third tower that also collapsed on 9/11. Unlike the Twin Towers, this 47-storey, 610-foot skyscraper was not hit by a plane.

And Tower 7 has become a key issue for “truthers” like Dylan Avery, the director of the internet film about 9/11 called Loose Change.

“The truth movement is heavily centred on Building 7 and for very good reason a lot of people are very suspicious about what went down that day,” he says.

Avery points out that Tower 7 housed some unusual tenants: the CIA, the Secret Service, the Pentagon and the very agency meant to deal with disasters or terrorist attacks in New York - the Office of Emergency Management. And some people think Tower 7 was the place where a 9/11 conspiracy was hatched.

The official explanation is that ordinary fires were the main reason for the collapse of Tower 7. That makes this the first and only tall skyscraper in the world to have collapsed because of fire. Yet despite that all the thousands of tonnes of steel from the building were carted away and melted down.

The way official bodies have investigated Tower 7 at the World Trade Center has made some people think they’re hiding something. Its destruction was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.

An inquiry by the Federal Emergency Management Agency said the building collapsed because intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of diesel stored in the building for emergency generators. But its report said this had “only a low probability of occurrence” and more work was needed. That was in May 2002.

The task has now fallen to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based at a sprawling campus near Washington DC. For more than two-and-a-half years, scientists there have been studying Tower 7.

Inevitably the officials have been criticised for being slow and even of being frightened to publish.

But the lead investigator at NIST, who heads up their World Trade Center inquiry, Dr Shyam Sunder, says that two-and-a-half years is typically how long an aeroplane crash investigation takes. He added that only in the last few years did they begin to hear criticism from the “truth” movement.

“It’s only at the very end in 2005 that this group became more vocal and we found them coming to some of our meetings. But for a long time they were not even present. It wasn’t the delay that really caused them, they just woke up one morning and decided to take this on as an issue.”

Soul searching

In April 2005, the first thousand DVDs of Dylan Avery’s Loose Change movie were pressed. It cost just $2,000 to make. It was a critical moment for the development of the movement. The makers of Loose Change claim it has now been viewed by more than a hundred million people.

Steven Jones, a former physics professor at Brigham Young University, who has become the leading academic voice in the movement, first watched a video of the collapse of Tower 7 in the spring of 2005. But when he did, he said he was taken aback as a physicist.

Rubble of the World Trade Center

Will the theories ever be laid to rest?

The American architect Richard Gage’s conversion came in 2006 when driving along he heard an independent radio station interviewing the theologian David Ray Griffin.

“I had to do some real soul searching and some research. And the more I discovered the more disturbed I became and realized I was looking for… the architects and the engineers.”

Finding that they hadn’t really entered the fray by then, Gage decided he had to act.

“It just came to me, I had to start an organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.”

The fifth anniversary of 9/11 was a huge moment for “truthers”. Under the media spotlight protests intensified, websites were spawned and internet films proliferated.

With the publicity also came the “debunkers”, challenging the “truthers” at every stage.

After Loose Change came a website called Screw Loose Change. And internet film 9/11 Mysteries was followed by Screw 9/11 Mysteries.

Conspiracy splits

And the “truthers” have fought back. When the US technology magazine Popular Mechanics launched a book called Debunking 9/11 Myths, it was countered with a book by David Ray Griffin called Debunking 9/11 Debunking.

Over time the scale of the alleged conspiracy has grown and grown, encompassing not just sections of the Bush administration, intelligence, but also the fire service, the police, first responders, official investigators, experts, the building’s owner, and the media, and, oh yes, even the BBC.

George Bush learns of the attack

George Bush is hiding something, says the 9/11 truth movement

And over time schisms have opened up in the 9/11 “truth” movement.

So-called “no-planers” believe that commercial aeroplanes did not actually crash into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania. Some have suggested lasers from outer space were used.

“Planers” believe aeroplanes were used but argue that only controlled demolitions can explain the collapses of the World Trade Center towers.

Then there are the LIHOPs and MIHOPs. Most “truthers” are MIHOPs - they think the government Made It Happen On Purpose, planning and orchestrating the 9/11 attacks.

But LIHOPs believe the government just Let It Happen On Purpose, to allow them to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and a clampdown on civil liberties.

Into this febrile atmosphere comes the final official report on 9/11.

This summer we will find out whether NIST’s report has answered the many questions that have been raised, or whether it will suffer the same fate as the Warren Commission on the assassination of President John F Kennedy and merely add fuel to the conspiracy theories.

Graphic showing WTC7 and its location on the site

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7488159.stm


Have Your Say: TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.

6 Responses to “TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE”

  1. Bob
    Posted: Jul 7th, 2008 at 4:44 pm

    So why were there pockets of molten steel in the basement? We would like to study the steel from those buildings. Why did the government remove all of the steel from the scene and send it overseas? Our government would have us believe that we can safely fire all of the demolitions experts because we found a new way of making buildings collapse into their own footprint. Do you believe it?

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  2. Ashley
    Posted: Jul 7th, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    No steel framed building, before or since, has collapsed due to fire damage. The fires and impact damage in this building were asymmetrical. Two major news channels predicted the collapse by some 20 minutes due to it being put on the wire that it had collapsed. When it did collapse it completely ignored the 2nd law of thermodynamics, completely ignored the asymmetrical damage, completly ignored the law of conservation of momentum and failed completely and totally at every point around the perimeter within 1/10th of a second and collapsed in to its own footprint at almost freefall speed.

    These ‘normal office fires’ had some pretty remarkable results.

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  3. Liam
    Posted: Jul 7th, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    The buildings fell at a free-fall speed (under 15 seconds), defying law of conservation of momentum, which would have predicted around 45 seconds HAD there have been resistance to the collapse at each floor (which there wasnt). Then Bulding 7 just happened to implode into its own footprint 5 hours later. However, the 9/11 commision made no official report about bulding 7 in their invesigation. Coincidence? Its quite obvious that it was a controlled demolition. There are also major questions about the jet fuel (4/5ths kerasine which is not a hot-burning fuel) and its ability to melt huge steel gurders to collapse the building. Yet where is the evidence of all this mass melted steel? There are some other major questions about 9/11 which are not being answered.

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  4. Searcher
    Posted: Jul 8th, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    As a South African, we have enough of our own problems to be concerned about 9/11. My brother first confronted me with these theories, and at first, I also thought it’s just another bunch of crackpots that has nothing better to do.

    However, the one thing that got me convinced, was building 7. I had a new fresh look at the evidence, and found there is just too many things that doesn’t fit. The reactions of officials when being asked perfectly valid questions, only reinforces suspision. Now, I also discovered that the truth movement was started by first responders, who aren’t getting awnsers to their questions.

    I’m not normally inclined to believe conspiracy theories, however, the 911 truth movement has some very compelling evidence. If someone could awnser their questions, I will be happy to change my position, but for now, I do believe that 911 was an inside job.

    Remember Hitler’s words : “People would much rather believe a big lie than a small one”. I think this is the case with 911. Rather than assuming that these people are crackpots, I would suggest people find out for themselves what they’re talking about. After all, if they are right, shouldn’t Americans know? If you say they are crackpots, then it should be an informed opinion, not an ignorant one.

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  5. Ashley
    Posted: Jul 8th, 2008 at 2:46 pm

    @Searcher

    I don’t think that calling people crackpots can be used to try and discredit the arguments anymore. A poll in the US showed that 1/3 of the American people believe their government to be complicit in 9/11 in some way, that is over 100 million people in the US alone.

    Another poll showed that 60% of people in the US don’t trust their governemnt, that is just shy of 200 million people.

    The anti-truther movement claim we are kooks, conspiraloons, fringe elements etc. With the number of people who think it was an inside job, they will soon have to stop trying to discredit the messenger and look at the evidence empirically (rather than subjectively).

    9/11 was an inside job, forget the no plane theories, Pentagon, WTC1&2, space weapons, pods, holograms, missiles etc. WTC7 is the smoking gun, it was controlled demolition plain and simple.

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

  6. Dem
    Posted: Jul 8th, 2008 at 5:04 pm

    The Neo-Cons desperately wanted a Pearl Harbor. They boldly published their desire for one on the PNAC website. They needed a pretext by which to invade the middle east and suspend our Constitutional rights. They sure got one on 9/11.

    Had the media not become the raging propaganda monopoly that it now is, I might take some stock in this second revisionist expose by the BBC, but no longer. The use of constant lies is now standard operating procedure in mass media and western politics. Remember, Tower 7 was rarely discussed until the Truth Movement came along.

    Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

RSS TrackBack URL


Related News

This entry was posted on Monday, July 7th, 2008 at 8:56 am and is filed under War & Terrorism News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
A Cop's Eye View Of The Drug War Last post by Unregistered @ 10:24 AM

Bush's Parting 'F*CK YOU' to America Last post by Unregistered @ 10:21 AM

O'Reilly: Dangerous 'Far-Left Loons' Nixed Torture Last post by Unregistered @ 10:12 AM

The Feast of the Vampires Last post by Arthur Silber @ 10:08 AM

The Last US Enemy Combatant Last post by Unregistered @ 10:06 AM

Obama-Cola The Great National Temperance Beverage Last post by JMM @ 10:05 AM

Commons raid police 'knew they needed authorities' consent' Last post by Unregistered @ 10:01 AM

New Treaty Bans Weapons Victimising Civilians Last post by Thalif Deen @ 09:57 AM

US mulls unusual tactic as Blackwater charges loom Last post by Unregistered @ 09:55 AM

US Touts International Forces Leaving Iraq as "Progress" Last post by Ditz @ 09:54 AM

Go to Forum | Latest Topics

Forum

Network This Report

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark
  • Netscape
  • Furl

Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines

RINF Advertising Archive
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS
LATEST FORUM TOPICS
Pentagon to deploy 20,000 troops on domestic "anti-terror" mission

Anti-ID Card Protesters Arrested

CCTV Judges Your Behaviour

George W. Bush Belongs in Prison

Kristol Calls On Bush To Pardon Torturers And Wiretappers, Reward Them With Medal Of Freedom

'Historic' UK climate laws ushered in

Taking liberties with information

Venezuelan Elections: The Media Response

BIlly Joe Bob Jumpback commented on:
Pentagon to deploy 20,000 troops on domestic “anti-terror” mission
You are insane. Nuff said
Continue Reading & Reply

Mike commented on:
Lindsey Williams Videos on the Oil/Energy ‘Crisis’
What Lindsey Williams is saying is true! Bottom Line is that the elete, the...
Continue Reading & Reply

shakeel commented on:
ID cards will give ‘false’ data
Dear Sir, or madam; I would like to ask about fingerprint. If someone asylum case in Eu...
Continue Reading & Reply

Dan commented on:
Anti-ID Card Protesters Arrested
WELL DONE
Continue Reading & Reply

Activism & Protest News | Business News | Civil & Human Rights News | Environmental News | Media News | Globalisation News | Web Development News
ADVERTISEMENTS
SITE MAPS
Web Desing & Hosting UK , USA, Europe

WOWEB - Web Design

FAST GATEWAY - Web Hosting

INFOTX - Web Hosting Guides and Resources


ASHLEY GUEST HOUSE - Morecambe Guest House


Skin up marijuana cannabis weed forum
Linux Web Hosting

Never Be Lied To Again!

Subliminal Secrets Exposed

Holographic Creation: Your Own Reality


Masonic Secrets Revealed


What You Aren't Supposed To Know


Conspiracy DVDs Cheap DVDs
Debt Consolidation
7/7 Activism News Afghanistan Alternative-Energy Art Barack Obama BBC Big-Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CCTV Censorship CIA Climate-Change Cover-Up Cults Culture Database-State David-Hicks David-Ray-Griffin Debt Democrats Demos Drugs Education Entertainment Environmental News EU False-Flag FBI Fraud Free-Speech Freemasons G8 Global-News Global-News Globalization Guantanamo Health-News History ID-Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel John McCain Law Marches Media News MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons New World Order NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police-State Political News Propaganda Reviews RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Science & Technology News Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spy Spying Stephen-Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony-Blair Torture TV UK-News UN USA- USA-News Video Voting war War & Terrorism News Warfare Web Development News White-House Wolfowitz World_News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version
About | DVD Store | Opinion | Reviews | Special Guests | Webmasters
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster.
RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum