µÎ¹øÂ° ¿µ±¹ ÃÑ °ø°Ý ¹Ì±¹ À̶óÅ© Á¤Ã¥
µÎ¹øÂ° À屺Àº ¹Ì±¹¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©' ÀüÈÄ À̶óÅ©·Î ŵµ ¹ÛÀ¸·Î ¸»ÇØ, ÀüÀï¿¡ ¹Ì±¹°ú ¿µ±¹ Àü¸Á »çÀÌ ´Ù¸§À» ³ô°Ô ÇÑ.
¸¶ÀÌÅ© ¼ÒÀå ½ÊÀÚ°¡´Â À̶óÅ© ÀÇ °¢ÇÏ ¸¶ÀÌÅ© Àè½¼ °í¼ÒÇÑ Donald Rumsfeld À屺ÀÇ ³»½À µ¿¾È¿¡ ¿µ±¹ À°±ºÀÇ ¸Ó¸®¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÄÚ¸àÆ®¿¡ ¾îÁ¦ Ãß°¡ÇØ, "ÁöÀûÀÌ ÆÄ»êÇÑ" Á¢±ÙÀÌ ÀüÀï¿¡ ÀÖÀ¸·Î ¹Ì±¹ ÀüÀï °ÇÃà°¡¸¦.
In comments to the Sunday Mirror newspaper, Maj Gen Cross said it was clear before the 2003 invasion that American leaders were certain that the Middle Eastern country would make a swift transition to stability.
¡°The US had already convinced themselves that Iraq would emerge reasonably quickly as a stable democracy,¡± the senior British planner for post-war Iraq was quoted as saying.
¡°Anybody who tried to tell them anything that challenged that idea - they simply shut it out.¡±
Maj Gen Jackson said Mr Rumsfeld ¡°ignored¡± and ¡°dismissed¡± his expressions of concern, adding that ¡°with hindsight¡± he believed the US post-Saddam plan for Iraq was ¡°fatally flawed¡±.
His comments echo those of Gen Jackson, who yesterday told the Telegraph newspaper that the American expectation of a warm welcome for the coalition forces was ¡°an ideological article of faith¡± among planners.
He claimed that it had been assumed that the displacement of the dictator meant that ¡°a model democratic society would inevitably emerge¡±.
Gen Jackson also criticised US foreign policy¡¯s reliance on military force, revealed his doubts about the claims on Saddam Hussein¡¯s weapons of mass destruction and said the work of the US state department had been wasted because of a lack of interest from Mr Bush.
Iraq Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Second UK general attacks US Iraq policy' :
Related News:














¼±Àû¡¦













