Las derechas agrupan dicen los E.E.U.U. reglas de ensayo injustas
Guardia de los derechos humanos dicha martes considera los E.E.U.U. la comisión militar gobierna para el ensayo de una juventud canadiense para ser grueso injusta.
Las derechas agrupan las reglas ad hoc dichas para el ensayo de Omar Ahmed Khadr, 21, que se ha sostenido en los E.E.U.U. la prisión en la bahía de Guantánamo, Cuba, puesto que él era 15, es injusta y el ensayo del canadiense debe estar en corte federal.
“De nuevo, las comisiones militares están inventando las reglas que son fundamental injustas,” dijeron a Jennifer Daskal, consejo mayor del contador-terrorismo en la guardia de los derechos humanos. “It’s time for the Bush administration to recognize that its legal experiment has failed.”
A military judge is set to rule Thursday on whether Khadr, who is charged with killing a U.S. soldier during an Afghanistan firefight in 2002, qualifies as an “unlawful enemy combatant” who can be tried via military commissions. The judge has barred Khadr from citing international, constitutional or criminal law in challenging the designation.
“The possibility that a judge would try to determine combatant status without any reference to international law is shocking,” said Daskal. “Even the military commissions appeals court recognized the importance of consulting the Geneva Conventions and other international law.”
Guantanamo Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Rights group says U.S. trial rules unfair' :
Related News:














Cargamento…













