25th October 2014                                                                                                                                                        
Home / Breaking News / Judge refuses to drop charge of aiding the enemy against Manning
Bradley-Manning

Judge refuses to drop charge of aiding the enemy against Manning

Army Private first class Bradley Manning will continue to be tried for aiding the enemy, a military judge ruled Thursday morning, leaving open the possibility of life in prison for the admitted source of a major intelligence leak.

Despite an attempt from the defense to have the most serious of charges against Pfc. Manning dropped, Col. Denise Lind ruled from a Ft. Meade, Maryland courtroom early Thursday that the former Army intelligence analyst will continue to be tried for aiding the enemy.

Government prosecutors say Manning, 25, indirectly aided al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula by sharing hundreds of thousands of classified documents with the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks in late 2009 and early 2010. Earlier this year, Manning admitted to what’s been called the largest intelligence leak in US history and pleaded guilty to 10 lesser-included offenses in hopes of receiving a lighter sentencing when his military court-martial concludes later this summer.

When the prosecution wrapped up their case earlier this month, defense attorney David Coombs filed motions asking the court to dismiss the charge of aiding the enemy and another allegation against Manning that he violated section 1030 of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act when collaborating with WikiLeaks. With Lind’s Thursday morning rejection, however, Manning will continue to stand trial against both of those counts and around 20 others.

The defense called 10 witnesses last week in only three day before resting their case. Next the government will begin its rebuttal case and soon the sentencing phase of the court-martial will commence. But although Col. Lind has refused to grant the defense’s request to drop the most serious of charges, she may elect later in the trial to find Manning not guilty of aiding the enemy.

Last week, Coombs called Harvard Law professor Yochai Benkler to the stand in order to testify about the role of WikiLeaks in twenty-first century journalism. In the wake of the government portraying WikiLeaks as an organization that facilitates the efforts of terrorist groups, Benkler warned that a guilty conviction of aiding the enemy could have major repercussions in the world of reporting.

Benkler told Lind that “the cost of finding Pfc. Manning guilty of aiding the enemy would impose” too great a burden on the “willingness of people of good conscience but not infinite courage to come forward,” and “would severely undermine the way in which leak-based investigative journalism has worked in the tradition of free press in the United States.”

“[I]f handing materials over to an organization that can be read by anyone with an internet connection, means that you are handing [it] over to the enemy — that essentially means that any leak to a media organization that can be read by any enemy anywhere in the world, becomes automatically aiding the enemy,” Benkler said.

Republished with permission from: RT

  • Franklin

    Col. Denise Lind is AIDING the ENEMY. By suppressing the exposure of American War Crimes, he is AIDING the ENEMY by providing them with more propaganda to recruit more fighters and garner more sympathy and donations.
    Actually the ENTIRE American “effort” is creating FAR more enemies by use of drones, by murdering and rousting People from their homes in the middle of the night.
    FOLLOW the MONEY …. who is PROFITING from the COUNTER-productive “war effort”? OH! That’s right, the Military/Banker/Industrial COmplex. The “career” SLACKERS such as Col. Denise Lind who mignt have to get a REAL JOB, a PRODUCTIVE job ….
    Col. Denise Lind …… you are a POS.

  • Big M

    You know, just once, I’d like to see some whore in the presstitute media demand that schmucks like this judge define their terms. What is “the enemy?” Whose enemy? You know, simple stuff like that.

    They could also do this with “national security.” Has anybody in this clown kingdom ever asked themselves, “What in the hell is national security, anyway?” And how is it that these slimy criminals in DC use it as their get-out-of-jail-free card any time that anybody asks for or demands proof of what they’re claiming? “Uh, sorry. NATIONAL SECURITY. BOOGA BOOGA.” Jesus Christ, a fifth-grader would laugh in these shitheels’ faces. How have they gotten away with this crap for almost 12 years now?

  • robertsgt40

    In a twisted way the judge is correct. Manning is helping the enemy of the state. That would be the citizenry he tried to show what was really going on in their behalf.

Why RINF is different... And why you need to watch this...

RINF not only delivers the info you're not supposed to know, but also provides 100% free solution based videos and articles designed to help you to :

  • Improve your overall health
  • Get more financial independence
  • Stay informed & ahead of the curve
  • Become less dependent on corporations