RINF.COM: 最新ニュースの代わり
火曜日、2008年7月29日
最新ニュース | フォーラム | イギリスのニュース | 米国のニュース | ワールド・ニュース | 政治ニュース | Sci技術のニュース | 戦争及びテロリズムのニュース | スポーツのニュース | マルチメディア | ホームページを置きなさい
RINF.COM: 最新ニュースの代わり
|
|
最新ニュース | フォーラム | イギリスのニュース | 米国のニュース | ワールド・ニュース | 政治ニュース | Sci技術のニュース | 戦争及びテロリズムのニュース | スポーツのニュース | マルチメディア | ホームページを置きなさい |
|
最新ニュース |
裁判官はグアンタナモの試験でテロリズムの容疑者に対して証拠を禁止する
火曜日、2008年7月22日 RINFのフォーラムでこのレポートを論議しなさい > によって キャロルJ。 ウィリアムス | 軍の裁判官は`の非常に強制的な」設定でSalim Ahmed Hamdanのオサマ・ビン・ラディンのための運転者によってある声明を、作られた言う。 それは他の場合のための標準を置くことができる。 ワシントン州- 「非常に強制的な環境および条件で」。得られたのでグアンタナモ湾でテロリズムの容疑者に対して最初の戦争犯罪裁判を監督している軍の裁判官はオサマ・ビン・ラディンの前の運転者に対して証拠を禁止するために月曜日を同意した 試験の開会日、海軍大尉。 Keith J。 Allredは防衛米国によって質問の間に作られた他の声明Salim Ahmed Hamdanを除くために懇願を否定した。 グアンタナモ湾、キューバの投獄彼の6年以上の間のと同様、アフガニスタンの代理店」。 裁判官は防衛は政府が日曜日-試験の前の夜まで引っくり返さなかった延滞の記録の600ページを見直す時間があったまで彼がa 2003年5月の質問の判断を差し控えることを言った。 強制されたと考慮された証拠Allredの排除は当然な他の戦争犯罪の場合の許容性のための標準を自称9月のそれを含んで裁判所の前に数か月の内に置くことができる。 11首謀者。 「正義の興味非常に強制的な環境のためにこれらの声明の是認によって機能されないし、米国によって握られている間作られた条件は作られた声明Hamdanの」、はAllred言った。 PanjshirおよびBagramのアフガニスタンの前哨の力。 Bagramの彼の投獄の間に、Hamdanは睡眠の伝えられるところによれば彼が死んだほど打たれ、奪い取られ、そして疑わしい少なくとも1つがひどく打たれた監視および他の囚人によって知らせられた。 強制された証明を抑制するAllredの支配は他の裁判所の裁判官が告白されるに対する9月言い分ののような同じような要求を、無視することを困難にすることができる。 死刑に直面する4他の人および11首謀者Khalid Shaikhモハメッド。 モハメッドはあるために知られているグアンタナモの2人の囚人の1才のwaterboarded間、CIAの管理で外国に。 溺死の感覚を作成する技術は多くの米国によってほとんど等しい無理に曲るために考えられた。 同盟国、法的学者および人権の支持者。 Hamdanのアフガニスタンのビン・ラディンを運転する$200を得た月Yemeniは2001年11月に捕獲された。 He is charged with conspiracy and material support for terrorism, and faces up to life imprisonment if convicted by the jury ― actually, a military commission made up of six senior officers and an alternate. Allred had been asked by Hamdan’s defense team to suppress numerous statements the defendant made under questioning after his capture near Kandahar, including two videotaped interrogations. The judge said he would allow the videos to be played for the commissioners when testimony gets underway later this week. But he agreed to exclude other statements made before Hamdan’s May 2002 transfer from Afghanistan field prisons to the Guantanamo detention center for terrorism suspects. Aside from withholding judgment on the May 2003 interrogation pending the defense review, the judge said interrogation results would be allowed into evidence only if the interrogators who conducted the sessions were available for cross-examination. Much of the evidence the government wanted to introduce was drawn from interrogations in which the notes and records of those involved were destroyed. The tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Army Col. Lawrence Morris, said he hadn’t decided whether to appeal the ruling. “We need to evaluate . . . to what extent it has an impact on our ability to fully portray his criminality in this case, but also what it might set out for future cases,” Morris told the Associated Press. Hamdan’s trial is expected to take about three weeks. He has indicated at times that he may boycott the proceedings, and has made conflicting statements as to what degree he will allow his Navy lawyer, Lt. Cmdr. Brian Mizer, to represent him in his absence. Hamdan testified during pretrial hearings last week that he was subjected to sleep deprivation, solitary confinement and sexual humiliation during interrogations at Guantanamo. Allred largely rejected motions to dismiss statements made during interrogations there, saying the techniques employed by detention officials could be “rationally related to good order and discipline.” Officers of the Joint Task Force that runs the prison and interrogation network at Guantanamo said Hamdan was deprived of “comfort items” such as personal hygiene products as punishment for violating camp rules. Hamdan is the first of nearly 800 men brought to Guantanamo over the last 6 1/2 years to face trial in the first U.S.-administered war crimes cases since World War II. About 265 remain at the sprawling compound of maximum-security prisons, open-air cells and a barracks-like facility for a few dozen of the most cooperative prisoners. Most of the others have been repatriated. War crimes charges have been sworn out against 21 Guantanamo prisoners over the last 18 months. Of those prisoners, 11 have been arraigned. All but two, Hamdan and Canadian Omar Khadr, have indicated they will refuse to attend their trials as a show of contempt for a process they say is inherently stacked against them. Thirteen potential jurors were brought to Guantanamo over the weekend. During questioning, several indicated that they carried emotional scars from the Sept. 11 attacks, which killed or endangered friends and colleagues. The Pentagon was one of the targets. The six jurors and one alternate were sworn in Monday. At least two potential jurors appeared to have been excluded because of their raw feelings associated with Sept. 11. Discuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: Judge Bars Evidence Against Terrorism Suspect at Guantanamo Trial One Response to “Judge Bars Evidence Against Terrorism Suspect at Guantanamo Trial”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
Hypocrisy of the “Repatriate Omar Khadr to Canada” Movement
As soon as the Gitmo interrogation tape of Omar Khadr hit the Internet, the blogosphere was flooded with demands to repatriate him to Canada. This wave is reminiscent of a Soviet campaign to free Luis Corvalán from the “fascist regime” of Augusto Pinochet thirty five years ago. The scenario is strikingly similar. A “victim” held by “fascist regimes” this time run by Bush and Harper, and a public outcry for justice. Except for the fact that Luis Corvalán didn’t kill anyone and didn’t fight for a terrorist group that wants to impose Sharia.
The “repatriate Khadr” crowd describes him as “a child”, “a kid”, “a boy”, and even “a torture victim”, with no facts to substantiate the torture claims notwithstanding. They complain about Khadr being mistreated, again, without anything to back up their claims. Some of them are outraged about “child abuse.” And they all scream for justice.
They want justice? OK, let’s talk about JUSTICE. What about justice for Sgt. First Class Christopher J. Speer, who was (according to an eyewitness) murdered by this “child”? What about justice for Tabitha Speer, who is a widow because of this “kid”? What about justice for Taryn and Tanner Speer, who are left without a father by this “a boy”? And what about all those Afghani civilians and NATO troops who are a little bit safer because this “torture victim” is behind bars? How many of these “repatriate Khadr” hypocrites concern themselves with justice for real victims? In literally hundreds of posts, we couldn’t find a single one.
One would ask, what is the reason for this idiocy? The answer is simple. Ignorance. Complete and utter ignorance. Let’s forget for a second that Omar Khadr killed Christopher Speer. Let’s forget that Khadr’s father was an al Qaeda financier. Let’s forget that Khadr’s family is known for it being al Qaeda sympathizers. Let’s just remember what this “child” was fighting for in Afghanistan.
This is what Taliban-imposed Sharia looks like in real life: http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2000/07/hypocrisy-of-repatriate-omar-khadr-to.html
Why don’t all of you, bleeding heart demagogues go to Afghanistan and spend a day in a Taliban-controlled territory? And let’s talk about Khadr when you get back. If you get back.