Μόλυβδος κλήσεων υποκλοπής τηλεφωνικών συνδιαλέξεων στο συνταγματικό κλείσιμο

Από Ryan Singel

Τα DEM θέλουν να ξέρουν περισσότερους για μυστικά warrantless να κρυφακούσουν του NSA σε Αμερικανούς. Ρίχνουν μια κλήση στο γενικό εισαγγελέα Alberto Gonzales και Πρόεδρος Bush. Και η δύο αξίωση τα έγγραφα προστατεύεται από το εκτελεστικό προνόμιο ή ταξινομείται επίσης. Αυτό είναι ένα πολύ πιθανό μελλοντικό σενάριο και πιθανώς το ένα του που η διοίκηση προσπαθεί να διευθύνει μακριά με την κλήση της χθες γιατί το συνέδριο ρητά το πρόγραμμα.

Αλλά τι συμβαίνει έπειτα; Αυτός είναι τι Jeffrey Rosen (συντάκτης Το ανεπιθύμητο βλέμμα: Η καταστροφή της μυστικότητας στην Αμερική) asks over the New Republic today (reg. req.) The surprising and not so-surprising conclusion: well, someone could end up in the little known jail inside Congress and the government mired in a Constitutional battle.

Restraint, however, may not be enough to prevent a constitutional confrontation that could make Monicagate look tame. That’s because any conflict could escalate quickly when the White House, invoking its radical theory of unilateral executive authority, refuses to cooperate with Democratic investigations. Congress may then hold the White House officials in contempt, setting up legal battles that could make their way to the Supreme Court while paralyzing the government in the process. […]

The Judiciary Committee, followed by the full House, votes to hold Gonzales in contempt of Congress–a federal crime with a punishment of up to a year in prison. After Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, certifies the contempt citation, she then forwards it along to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, demanding that he haul Gonzales before a grand jury. […]

Regardless of how the Supreme Court ruled in Conyers v. Gonzales (ed. note: the hypothetical case where Rep. John Conyers issued the subpoena), there would be subsidiary legal battles raging for months as the contempt case made its way up to the Supreme Court. Democrats and Republicans would fight about whether to force Gonzales to testify by granting him the necessary immunity–immunity grants require a two-thirds vote by the relevant committee–and the scope of his immunity might provoke lawsuits of its own. All these fires would be raging from a single investigation into the NSA scandal. At the same time, a series of related battles and lawsuits might be erupting from parallel investigations into Iraq war intelligence, Halliburton cronyism, and the misuse of presidential signing statements.

The more I think about it the more I think Rosen might be right. The question then becomes how far will the new Democratic leadership go to hold back investigations, because despite the election results, I don’t believe the administration is going to change its stance on secrecy and executive power.

All I know is that I need to get my typing fingers in shape real soon to keep up.

Comment on 'Wiretapping Subpoenas Lead to Constitutional Shutdown' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: