État de surveillance : L'oncle SAM est-il le nouveau frère ?

Si vous avez voyagé hors du pays, le gouvernement peut avoir un dossier avec votre nom là-dessus.
    Noms, adresses, l'information de carte de crédit. Itinéraires, numéros de téléphone et adresses d'E-mail. Les voitures que vous avez louées et les noms des hôtels où vous êtes resté. Même les livres que vous avez lus, le peuple vous avez voyagé avec et le type de lit que vous avez demandé dans votre pièce d'hôtel.
    And that’s just some of the information that is gleaned by our government when ordinary citizens come into contact with border agents and transportation safety officials, or give personal information to airlines and companies that make travel reservations. The data is downloaded to the government’s Automated Targeting System, which links electronically to border points and reservation systems.
    Why? Inquiring minds in the Department of Homeland Security want to know. Since 2002, they’ve updated the system by bringing more border checkpoints online, as well as mandating that airlines provide data.
    Security officials claim it’s for our own good, of course. They say they need to know all they can about people who enter our country, including law-abiding Americans, in order to detect patterns and protect us from terrorists.

But privacy advocates and civil liberty activists correctly label it as an unnecessary and dangerous intrusion into the lives of regular people; another step in our evolution toward a surveillance society. The Identity Project, a group of civil liberties advocates, requested their Automated Targeting System files, and were shocked by what they found.
    John Gilmore of San Francisco carried a book about marijuana laws on an overseas trip, a fact that was illegally recorded in his file. And Edward Hasbrouck, a travel consultant, found information about his travel companions, another constitutional no-no. These and other cases are apparent violations of federal privacy laws, which prohibit the government from violating your First Amendment rights by collecting data about the books that you read and the people you choose to associate with.
    It’s just another example of how the eavesdropping Bush administration has used the events of Sept. 11 to wage war on our civil liberties.
    Forget Big Brother. Americans who value privacy and freedom have a bigger concern, one based on fact and not fiction. Uncle Sam is watching.

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_7030637

Comment on 'Surveillance state: Is Uncle Sam the new Big Brother?' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: