Progressivo
Activism dos meios
Carregamento…
| Registo | Senha perdida? | Boletim de notícias
Uma senha ser-lhe-á enviada. Início de uma sessão | Senha perdida?
Um email ser-lhe-á emitido. Início de uma sessão | Registo
Traduza:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Ferramentas: Notícia | Comentário do borne | Versão da impressora | Email ao amigo

Terça-feira, junho 12o, 2007

Académico: CCTV conduz ao desigualdade em casos legais

Compartilhe deste artigo:

Estes ícones ligam aos locais bookmarking sociais onde os leitores podem compartilhar e descobrir de Web pages novos.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Por Mick Meaney
Notícia da alternativa de RINF

A universidade de Cambridge académico, Ross Anderson, um professor da engenharia da segurança na universidade e na cadeira da fundação para a pesquisa da política de informação, Parliament hoje advertido dos desigualdades produziram por dados eletrônicos, including retratos de CCTV.

A growing number of academics, police and politicians are becoming ever more concerned about the Big Brother state juggernaut that is quickly eroding our civil liberties, removing our personal freedoms and destroying our privacy, due to Tony Blair’s Labour government since the horrific events of 9/11.

Professor Anderson will give evidence to the Commons home affairs committee’s inquiry into the “surveillance society” and follows on from last week, when Nick Eland, legal services manager of Tesco, and Martin Briggs, corporate affairs director of LMG, the firm that created the privacy invading Nectar cards, also presented evidence to the committee.

Professor Anderson said: “Surveillance creates an inequality of arms in both civil and criminal cases. The police can easily get CCTV or ANPR [automatic number plate recognition] data to show you committed a crime, but you have great difficulty getting this data to establish an alibi.

“A bank can get CCTV data to prove you made a disputed ATM transaction, but you can’t get this data to prove that you didn’t.”

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Academic: CCTV Leads To inequality In Legal Cases' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Growing use of CCTV in classrooms
  • CCTV runs risk of data protection breach
  • 8 - 10 CCTV Cameras per Irish Bus
  • Watchdog says most UK CCTV cameras are illegal
  • Do we trust government on ID cards?

  • This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 12th, 2007 at 12:18 pm and is filed under Surveillance, Mick Meaney . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 659 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 681 Total Comments

    Breaking News