Progresivo
Activismo de los medios
Cargamento…
| Registro | ¿Contraseña perdida? | Boletín de noticias
Una contraseña será enviada a usted. Conexión | ¿Contraseña perdida?
Un email le será enviado. Conexión | Registro
Traduzca:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Herramientas: Noticias | Comentario del poste | Versión de la impresora | Email al amigo

Domingo 5 de agosto de 2007

E-Votación de los límites de California

Comparta este artículo:

Estos iconos se ligan a los sitios bookmarking sociales en donde los lectores pueden compartir y descubrir nuevos Web pages.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Mancha
  • Fark

Prorev 

[Los tiempos juegan abajo de la importación de esta historia, pero la secretaria de California del estado encontró básicamente que estas máquinas, usadas para decidir a quiénes ganaron elecciones recientes, no deben ser confiadas en.]
 
TIEMPOS DE NY - Expresar la preocupación que varias marcas de fábrica de las máquinas de votación electrónicas usadas en California eran vulnerables a tratar de forzar, secretaria del estado Debra Bowen que último viernes pidió nuevas protecciones de la seguridad se agregue y limitó el uso de dos tipos de máquinas que debían para ser utilizadas en las elecciones del año próximo en varios condados meridionales de California. Bowen also withdrew state approval of the InkaVote Plus machines used in Los Angeles County, saying that the machines’ maker, Election Systems and Software, had failed to submit its equipment to her office in time to analyze its vulnerability to hacking. . .
 
Bowen ordered that some machines made by Diebold Election Systems and Sequoia Voting Systems be limited to one per polling place to limit the chances that they could be tampered with. The Sequoia machines are used in Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties.
 
Bowen said the presence of the machines, though limited, would be helpful for disabled voters, though any voter could use the machines. Weir, however, said she was creating a “separate but unequal” voting system.
 
The security requirements Bowen imposed include: reinstalling the software before the Feb. 5. election to ensure it has not already been tampered with; placing special seals at vulnerable parts of the machines to reveal tampering; securing each machines at the close of each day of early voting; assigning a specific election monitor to safeguard each machine; and conducting a complete manual count of all votes cast.

BRAD BLOG -  The  [review] had found that all electronic voting systems certified in California were easily accessible to hacking. A single machine, the testers discovered, could be easily tampered with by an election insider, voting machine company employee, or other individual in such a way that an entire election could be effected without detection. . .

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'California Limits E-Voting' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • E-voting hacks to get Capitol Hill spotlight
  • Most vote machines lose test to hackers
  • Report on Faulty Voting Machines for 2008 Election
  • Ohio voting machines have critical flaws
  • 20 percent of election printouts were unreadable

  • This entry was posted on Sunday, August 5th, 2007 at 3:54 pm and is filed under Sci Tech, Political, General . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 625 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 671 Total Comments

    a-non-lawyer by proxy on Anonymous - Why we fight Scientology

    a-non-lawyer by proxy on Anonymous - Why we fight Scientology

    Breaking News