E-Votación de los límites de California
[Los tiempos juegan abajo de la importación de esta historia, pero la secretaria de California del estado encontró básicamente que estas máquinas, usadas para decidir a quiénes ganaron elecciones recientes, no deben ser confiadas en.]
TIEMPOS DE NY
- Expresar la preocupación que varias marcas de fábrica de las máquinas de votación electrónicas usadas en California eran vulnerables a tratar de forzar, secretaria del estado Debra Bowen que último viernes pidió nuevas protecciones de la seguridad se agregue y limitó el uso de dos tipos de máquinas que debían para ser utilizadas en las elecciones del año próximo en varios condados meridionales de California. Bowen also withdrew state approval of the InkaVote Plus machines used in Los Angeles County, saying that the machines’ maker, Election Systems and Software, had failed to submit its equipment to her office in time to analyze its vulnerability to hacking. . .
Bowen ordered that some machines made by Diebold Election Systems and Sequoia Voting Systems be limited to one per polling place to limit the chances that they could be tampered with. The Sequoia machines are used in Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties.
Bowen said the presence of the machines, though limited, would be helpful for disabled voters, though any voter could use the machines. Weir, however, said she was creating a “separate but unequal” voting system.
The security requirements Bowen imposed include: reinstalling the software before the Feb. 5. election to ensure it has not already been tampered with; placing special seals at vulnerable parts of the machines to reveal tampering; securing each machines at the close of each day of early voting; assigning a specific election monitor to safeguard each machine; and conducting a complete manual count of all votes cast.
BRAD BLOG - The [review] had found that all electronic voting systems certified in California were easily accessible to hacking. A single machine, the testers discovered, could be easily tampered with by an election insider, voting machine company employee, or other individual in such a way that an entire election could be effected without detection. . .
Voting Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'California Limits E-Voting' :
Related News:














Cargamento…













