تقدّميّة
أوساط فعالية
تحميل…
| سجل | كلمة سرّ ضائعة? | الرسالة الإخباريّة
سيرسل كلمة سرّ كنت إلى أنت. [لوغن] | كلمة سرّ ضائعة?
سيرسل بريد إلكترونيّ كنت إلى أنت. [لوغن] | سجل
ترجمت:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

أدوات: أخبار | موقعة تعليق | طابعة صيغة | بريد إلكترونيّ إلى صديقة

يوم الإثنين, يونيو - حزيران [11ث], 2007

حرية من معلومة عمل يتوقّف

شاركت هذا مادة:

يقترن هذا أيقون إلى اجتماعيّة [بووكمركينغ] موقعات حيث قارئات يستطيع شاركت واكتشفت [وب بج] جديدة.
  • [ديغّ]
  • [سلشدوت]
  • [تشنورتي]
  • [ستثمبليوبون]
  • [دل.يسو.وس]
  • [فيدملينكس]
  • [فورل]
  • [نوسفين]
  • [ردّيت]
  • [يهووموب]
  • [د.ليريو.وس]
  • [بلوغمركس]
  • [سبورل]
  • نمش
  • [فرك]

شارلز [ن.]. ديفيس
[روتلند] معلنة

إجتماع, ظاهريّا محتوى أن يستكشف أعماق جديدة في أيّ وقت في رفض عامّة, على الحافة من يتلقّى وحيد عضوة [دريل] الإصلاح ذو معنى أكثر في سنون من الحرية فيديراليّة من معلومة عمل.

كيف, أنت تسأل, عندما يساند يقهر أغلبية التشريع في على حدّ سواء المنزل ومجلس الشيوخ?

السيطرة سرّيّة, [أف كورس]. في أيّ وقت علم السيطرة سرّيّة? هو جمال - [بمبووزل] بقية حقيقيّة من ال يحشى أقمصة السنة ماضية, [سموك-فيلّد] غرف وسمينة قطات مع [ستوج] [غفّوينغ] على المتأخّرة من ال [تإكسبينغ] [سكهموك]. Think country clubs, secret handshakes and bizarre rituals.

Members of the Society of Professional Journalists, the nation’s largest journalism-advocacy organization, used the power of the blogosphere to find out whose legislative bludgeon was buried in the back of open government. We called every senator, one by one, until at last – when it became clear he could hide no longer – Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ), came blinking and grimacing into the sunlight and admitted that it was he who placed a secret hold … on a bill that addresses secrecy in government.

You can’t make this stuff up.

This is how it works in Washington, kids: Sen. Kyl – this year’s Secrecy Champion — has several as-yet-unstated objections to the Freedom of Information Reform Act, a truly wonderful bill that would significantly improve one of the strongest tools Americans have to supervise the inner workings of government and to hold elected officials accountable.

The bill has plenty of bipartisan support. It is the product of tireless work and advocacy by many open government and press freedom groups and fine legislative craftsmanship by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. The U.S. House of Representatives in March approved a version of the bill with 80 Republicans joining 228 Democrats for a 308-117 vote.

The Senate Judiciary Committee then unanimously sent the measure forward to the full Senate for a vote.

In your civics book, this would be the moment where our senators hold a public debate on the merits and demerits of the legislation at hand, then vote. The votes are then counted, and if the senators who support the bill outnumber those who oppose it, well, you get the idea.

But no, not when senators, using an archaic parliamentarian parlor trick, can stop a bill dead in its tracks merely by telling their party’s Senate leader or secretary that they wish to place a hold on the bill. That’s when Sen. Kyl – who routinely charts a brave course on the immigration debate, and can often be counted on to reason rather than bloviate – slipped in the hold.

The practice of honoring secret holds has no basis in law and has no support in Senate rules. It’s a good-’ol-boy creation and another of the seemingly endless perks of the Senate, where the rules always seem to benefit the representatives far more than the pesky public.

Oh, I know what’s coming: the inevitable blathering about the world’s greatest deliberative body and its need for timeless soul-searching and “candor” and how terribly hard legislating can be. We’ll hear all about collegiality and efficiency and the grand traditions that make the Senate “special.”

Spare me. Tear down the whole argument in favor of secret holds, and it comes down to cowardice: It allows a senator to cower behind anonymity while signaling their dislike for a piece of legislation. More to the point, it takes what would be a single losing vote on the floor of the Senate and converts it, magically, into stoppage of legislation.

That’s awesome power with absolutely no accountability.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who discloses his holds as a matter of practice, introduced an amendment in 2006 to force all senators to identify themselves when placing a hold on a bill. That proposal has gone nowhere fast. Are you surprised?

Charles N. Davis, a member of SPJ’s Freedom of Information Committee, serves as the executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition at the University of Missouri School of Journalism.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Freedom of Information act stalled' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • U.S. Senate passes Bush-backed spy bill
  • First step for trials at Guantanamo
  • President Bush to veto torture Bill
  • Bush threatens to veto surveillance bill
  • US Senate votes to ban waterboarding by CIA

  • This entry was posted on Monday, June 11th, 2007 at 1:32 am and is filed under Political . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 447 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 699 Total Comments

    Gov gags “extraordinary renditions” whistleblower « Dr Nasir Khan on Gov gags “extraordinary renditions” whistleblower

    Reverse Phone Detective Review on New - RINF Alternative Newsletter

    Breaking News