Watching the unveiling of the next political era in the United States has been satisfying on many levels. It is especially nice to see large numbers of deplorables standing up for their bad selves, and watching the political class recoil and faint.
When it was a “close” race, which is to say, a hackable one, delivering the expected status quo government, it was interesting to watch and assess. A close race (post-Republican primaries) through a mainstream media lens is one where Hillary is the predicted winner, but things close up a bit as we approach election day, and she is still the winner. After all, she has all that government experience. It’s what plants crave, as the common wisdom of our time holds.
But this week, everything changed.
A dark carnival is upon us, and it isn’t the electioneering play of two soulless political parties and their outrageous candidates.
The smartest men in Washington have already decided on a horse, and it’s Trump. A rational person might observe that the neoconservative agenda is not well served by Trump’s outspoken condemnation of their foreign policy, their failed wars, their global interventionism, their kingmaking and regime changing, their insistence on liberal statism at home and reactionary empire abroad. I have seen no militaristic liberal (a kinder and particularly accurate label suggested by a friend) who has ever advocated a real audit of the Pentagon, as Trump has done. Likewise, none have been found guilty of advocating big walls and immigration restrictions in America, as Trump has done.
So why was pernicious propagandising PNAC’er Jim Woolsey allowed under the tent of the Trump national security team?