NASA has published a video of a rocket engine partly manufactured using 3D printing technology. The US space agency looks forward to bringing the price of some expensive parts of rocket engines down by 70 percent in the near term.
NASA experts believe that successful test, which took place at
NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, on
August 22, opens a new era for 3D printing technology in the
A 3D printed injector, designed by NASA and produced by Directed
Manufacturing Inc., of Austin, Texas, has passed a test of
extreme pressures of up to 1,400 pounds per square inch absolute
and temperatures of up to 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit (about 3,300
degrees Celsius) during an engine firing that generated an
awesome 20,000 pounds of thrust.
Though the injector has worked flawlessly, engineers are busy
analyzing the after-effects of extreme operation on the material
the injector is made of, and are scanning its structure for
An injector is a rocket engine part that delivers fuel
components, liquid oxygen and gaseous hydrogen, into a combustion
chamber of an engine. The latest test proved that an engine with
the injector of NASA design produced 10 times more thrust than
any of the previously 3D-printed injectors.
This injector has also become the largest 3D printed rocket
engine component NASA ever tested.
Prior to this test, several smaller 3D-printed injectors were
tested at Marshall Center and at NASA’s Glenn Research Center
facility in Cleveland, Ohio.
“This successful test of a 3D printed rocket injector brings
NASA significantly closer to proving this innovative technology
can be used to reduce the cost of flight hardware,” said
Chris Singer, the director of the Engineering Directorate at the
Marshall Space Flight Center.
Now that 3D printing has proven to be able to produce heavy-duty
parts of sophisticated equipment, NASA specialists plan to
manufacture more rocket engine parts using this revolutionary,
cost-effective technology — which can slash production costs by
up to 70 percent.
The key to major cost savings is reducing the number of parts the
engine consists of. For example, the new injector consists of
only two parts, whereas its predecessor had 115 parts.
“We took the design of an existing injector that we already
tested, and modified the design so the injector could be made
with a 3D printer,” said Brad Bullard, the propulsion
engineer responsible for the design of the injector. “We will
be able to directly compare test data for both the traditionally
assembled injector and the 3D-printed injector to see if there’s
any difference in performance.”
This has become possible due to innovative selective laser
melting technology used in the 3D printer produced by Directed
Manufacturing. The method implies forming a complex part by
building up layers of nickel-chromium alloy powder. Similar
injectors could be used in NASA’s future RS-25 engines for the
Space Launch System rocket planned for deep space manned
missions, such as flights to Mars and possible asteroid mining
“This entire effort helped us learn what it takes to build
larger 3D parts, from design to manufacturing, to testing,”
said Greg Barnett, the lead engineer for the project. “This
technology can be applied to any of SLS’s engines, or to rocket
components being built by private industry.”
The US National Network for Manufacturing Innovation and the
Advanced Manufacturing Initiative, of which NASA is the leading
partner, is looking for ways to reduce space travel costs using
innovative materials and additive manufacturing.
For example, the Marshall Space Flight Center has recently
completed tests of a 3D printer that will print tools for
American astronauts right on board the International Space
Station. The printer has been developed by Made in Space, a
company from Moffett Field, California.
NASA is also funding research into 3D printed food which would
provide astronauts with meals during long space flights.
Although 3D printing technology could make the impossible
possible, such as creating tissue-like material that could revolutionize
medicine (), it has also sparked controversies, such as
3D-printable functional firearms.
Republished from: RT