3 реакции к «большинству противоречат с реклассификацией cannabis»

1. AlunB3 Вывешено: 19-ое мар. 2009 на 11:24 am

   Хотя классифицирование cannabis не изменяет вероятие кто-нибудь используя cannabis или для боли или как раз не получает высоким и чывство более лучшее - после того как все оно никогда не останавливали домашнюю секретаршю Jacqui Smith леты тому назад - или хозяин бизнесменов и шипучки другого MP начинает… оно некоторо ought внести изменения к каждому что это правительство игнорировало доказательство от своих собственных специалистов и несмотря на их рапорт что cannabis не как опасн как другие снадобья b типа - поднимайте его снова для того чтобы классифицировать b -, incidentally, увеличит максимальные предложения для владения без изменять предложения для культивирования поставкы которые остают на неимоверных 14 летах в тюрьме even when не будут никаких сделанных жертв и явно вреда. Ответ | Quote selected text | Link to this

2. ingo Posted: Mar 19th, 2009 at 12:41 pm

   The stoic decision taken by the UN civil servants in Vienna to carry on fighting the lost war on drugs for another ten years will enrage all those who have wanted to promote more communication and more harm reduction, because we will waste another 100 billion for more inefficiency and more harm in this futile war. Here In Britain scientific bodies are ignored and punitive measures are prefered by political expedient politicians, more worried about their personal morality count than the suffering they cause by their puny and pathetic actions. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

3. Winston Matthews Posted: Mar 19th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

   Could I be paranoid, or understanding media manipulation about cannabis yet again? What with millions of consumers under now more of a punitive threat for taking cannabis in the UK, one of our safest substances, arguably on a par with caffeine, according to Dr Henningfield. It seems that whilst, we the takers of this herb worry about cannabis use, that we might just ignore what the banker or politicians? This is a feeling I get with obviously illogical decisions, from the once taking cannabis consuming Home Sec, especially when nearly an eight of a million pounds lighter, for the ACMD expert advice, just to be ignored. This is about as good as the talk to Frank ads, that seem to benefit, only the advetising industry, and tarnishing the truth, with imaginary gimmickry , whilst ignoring alcohol abuse, or cigarettes as normal, which lets not even talk about classification on those substances? If logic were applied, as cannabis should be legal, at the moment this is being recognised, In the USA,that medicanial useage California, is seriously talking about the way towards making cannabis legal, as a recessional cure. Even though I make proportional arguments about the drugs caffeine, cigarettes and alcohol, cannabis, I may now point out, that I am not in the prohibitionist lobby for these recreational substances, as 13 years of Prohibition in the USA, didn’t work. Cannabis is another taxable commodity, that should be regulated. Why we do ignore this, are the 19 subsidised bars in the commons, giving our politicians wet brain syndrome? Can we not see the logic of legalisation? World wide there are appox 167 million users. The Dutch have tolerated cannabis, for years, also the Netherlands has come top of a Unicef league table for child well-being across 21 industrialised countries in 2007, dare I suggest a correlation between these two facts? Didn’t cannabis soothe Euro 2000 hooligans when Amsterdam’s cannabis selling coffee shops win right to stay open during football tournament after negotiations with the city authority? Don’t talk about reclassification talk about relegalisation, you know it makes more sense! Wake up and smell the coffee please! Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this