Iraqi Soldiers Monitor A Checkpoint East Of Baghdad On January 6, 2014 (Photo: Agence France Presse)Amid an escalation of fighting in war-torn Iraq, the Obama administration announced Monday it will accelerate the shipment of Hellfire missiles and surveillance drones to the Nuri al-Maliki regime, a move critics charge will only deepen the cycles of violence set in motion by the U.S. invasion.
“The last thing Iraq needs right now is more weapons,” said Phyllis Bennis, senior fellow at Institute for Policy Studies, in an interview with Common Dreams.
White House press secretary Jay Carney announced Monday that the U.S. will send the Iraqi government 48 drones later this week and 10 surveillance drones in upcoming weeks. In addition, a delivery of 100 Hellfire missiles will be expedited to the Iraqi government, said Pentagon spokesman Army Col. Steven Warren in a press statement released Monday.
This is on top of a shipment of 75 Hellfire missiles delivered to Iraq last month.
While Secretary of State John Kerry vowed to do “everything that is possible” to help the government fight Al Qaida in Iraq, short of putting boots on the ground, some hardliners are pushing for direct U.S. military involvement. In a statement released over the weekend, Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) indicated that keeping U.S. troops in Iraq could have avoided the violence.
The announcements of shipments come as a surge in military escalation follows the declaration by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Al-Qaida’s Iraqi-Syrian affiliate, and allied fighters, that they have seized control of Fallujah. The Iraqi government surrounded the city with tanks and artillery on Tuesday amid calls from Fallujah residents for the government to hold off attacks that they say would unleash horrific violence. Further clashes have shaken the surrounding Anbar province, which has seen its worst fighting in years.
Critics charge that the escalating conflict is a direct result of the U.S. war and can not be solved by the same militarized policies.
“The U.S. bears enormous responsibility for the crisis in Iraq,” said Bennis. “This has everything to do with the aftermath of the U.S. invasion and occupation, in which the U.S. created a sectarian-based political system that has never existed in Iraq before and made that institutional, building parties based on sectarian affiliation. This institutionalizing is what led to the consolidation of Shi’a power and discrimination against Sunnis and to a sense of disenfranchisement of much of the population.”
She added, “This is a terrible irony. On the one hand the U.S. is pushing Iran to stop sending arms to the regime in Syria. On the other hand, the U.S. is doing the same thing in Iraq. Not all regimes are the same, but there is an over-arming of all these regimes.”
“This is another unfortunate case where policies of a repressive U.S.-backed regime results in a violent backlash that the U.S. responds to by then sending in more arms, said Middle East scholar Stephen Zunes in an interview with Common Dreams. “It’s a pattern we’ve seen before.”
Critics say the spike in violence highlights failed U.S. policies in Iraq as well as Syria.
“The U.S. government has a lot of responsibility because they have been collaborating with the flow of arms and fire from Sunni countries in the Gulf into Syria,” said Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, in an interview with Common Dreams. “Syria is providing a base for al Qaida in Iraq thanks to U.S. policies in Syria.”
“When you combine the crisis in Syria and the crisis in Iraq, these two phenomena have led to a level of violence in Iraq in which more civilians were killed in 2013 than in the past 5 years,” said Bennis.
“It’s like the war is starting all over again.”
_____________________
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Source: Common Dreams