NYPD labeled mosques terrorist organizations

Muslim women look on as civil rights, legal advocates and residents hold a press conference June 18,2013 in New York (AFP Photo / Timothy Clary)

The New York Police Department has labeled mosques as terrorist organizations, allowing cops to spy on worshipers and imams, use informers and record sermons without any evidence of previous criminal wrongdoing — tactics even the FBI refused to use.

Since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, which rocked the city of New
York, the NYPD has opened at least a dozen terrorism enterprise
investigations (TEIs) as part of an initiative to help police
infiltrate and investigate secret terrorist cells. The explosive
allegations come from documents seen by the Associated Press and
are part of new book, “Enemies within: inside the NYPD’s Secret
Spying Unit and bin Laden’s Final Plot Against America,” by AP
reporters Matt Apuzzo and Adam Goldman, as well as interviews
with current and former NYPD, FBI and CIA officials.

TEIs can go on for years, and anyone who attends a mosque is fair
game and could be the subject of a potential investigation.

Despite the time, effort and resources that have gone into the
TEI scheme, the NYPD has never criminally charged a mosque or an
Islamic organization with terrorism, according to confidential
police documents and interviews.

However, while the NYPD conducted at least dozen such operations,
they were potentially so invasive that the FBI didn’t do even
one, AP reported.

The strategy has allowed the NYPD to investigate countless
innocent Muslims living in New York by sending undercover
officers into mosques and planting informants on their boards and
on at least one prominent Arab-American group in Brooklyn.

But before the NYPD could target mosques for surveillance it had
to persuade a federal judge to rewrite rules governing how police
can spy on citizens, who are protected by the First Amendment.

David Cohen, a former CIA executive who became the NYPD deputy
commissioner for intelligence in 2002, told the judge deciding
the case that mosques could be used “to shield the work of
terrorists from law enforcement scrutiny by taking advantage of
restrictions of the investigation of First Amendment
activity.”

Muslim women look on as civil rights, legal advocates and residents hold a press conference June 18,2013 in New York (AFP Photo / Timothy Clary)

So the NYPD then proposed that officers be allowed to monitor
religious or political speech whenever the “facts or
circumstances reasonably indicate”
that groups of two or more
people were involved in plotting violent crime or terrorism.

The American Civil Liberties Union says that mosque spying
programs are unconstitutional and the revelations come as the
NYPD is already fighting off lawsuits accusing it of racial
profiling in its stop-and-frisk actions while combating street
crime.

But police commissioner Raymond Kelly and Mayor Michael Bloomberg
have denied that TEI is unconstitutional and insist they are
following leads.

“Undercover officers and confidential informants do not enter
a mosque unless they are following up on a lead. We have a
responsibility to protect New Yorkers from violent crime or
another terrorist attack — and we uphold the law in doing
so,”
the news agency cited Kelly as
saying. 

The Al-Ansar center, which opened in Brooklyn several years ago,
attracts young Arabs and South Asians, but NYPD feared it was
breeding ground for terrorists and so immediately decided to put
it under surveillance.

They were particular concerned about Mohammad Elshinawy, a
28-year old Islamic teacher at several New York mosques. He was a
Salafist, a puritanical breed of Islam, and his father was a
co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center attacks, according
to the NYPD.

The FBI were also initially suspicious of Elshinamy and whether
he was recruiting potential agents for jihad. But while the FBI
closed the case after many months, with a former federal law
enforcement official saying, “nobody had any information the
mosque was engaged in terrorism activities,”
the NYPD wasn’t
convinced.

Muslim men pray outside the Islamic Center of New York (Reuters / Shannon Stapleton)

New York police officers believed that because “he is so
highly regarded by so many impressionable individuals”
he
must be a threat. In their investigation no part of his life was
out of bounds including his wedding where everyone present was
under surveillance, according to the investigative report by
authors Goldman and Apuzzo.

But despite a four-year surveillance operation, Elshinamy is now
a plaintiff in an ACLU lawsuit against the NYPD.

“From house of worship to a wedding, there’s no area of New
York Muslim religious or personal life that the NYPD has not
invade through its bias-based surveillance policy,”
AP quoted
Hina Shamsi, an ACLU lawyer, as saying.

As well as bugging mosques, imams and worshipers, the NYPD also
put informants in positions of leadership in mosques and even in
the Arab American Association of New York in Brooklyn, a
completely secular, social-service organization that helps
immigrants adjust to new life in the US, the AP reporters found
out.

Commissioner Kelly was at the time handing out medals to the Arab
American Association soccer team, Brooklyn United. Sarsour, a
Muslim who had met Kelly while he was involved with the
association many times, said she felt betrayed.

“It creates mistrust in our organizations. It makes one wonder
and question who is sitting on the boards of the institutions
where we work and pray,”
the AP reported her as saying.

The Islamic Society of Bay Ridge was one of the mosques targeted
as early as 2003.

59-year old Rimawi, one of the worshipers, who came to the US
from the Palestinian West Bank said, “Ray Kelly, shame on him.
I am American.”

While Zein Rimawi, one of the mosques leaders, went further
saying “I have never felt free in the United States. The
documents tell me I am right.”

Republished from: RT