RINF.COM: HET BREKENDE ALTERNATIEF VAN HET NIEUWS
|
|
BREKEND NIEUWS |
De Programma's van de immunisering onder Nauwkeurig onderzoek
Donderdag, 24 Januari, 2008
Andreas Moritz Voor vele decennia, hebben de belangrijke wetenschappers en de artsen fel het idee bevorderd dat de immunisering van kinderen noodzakelijk is om hen tegen de aanbesteding van dergelijke ziekten te beschermen zoals difterie, polio, cholera, typhoid, of malaria. Maar toch zet op het bewijsmateriaal dat de immunisering niet alleen kan onnodig maar zelfs schadelijk zijn. Het gieten van dodelijke chemische producten in een meer maakt het niet voor verontreinigende stoffen immuun. Eveneens, geeft het inspuiten van de levende vergiften in vaccins in de bloedsomloop van kinderen toekomstige generaties nauwelijks een kans om het echt gezonde leven te leiden. De Amerikaanse kinderen ontvangen vaak zowat 30 inentingen binnen de eerste 6 jaar van hun leven en kinderen in het UK. kan verwachten om worden ingeënt over 25 keer. Binnen de eerste 15 maanden na het leven, worden de inentingen met inbegrip van negen of meer verschillende antigenen gepompt in de onrijpe immune systemen van babys. Ondanks de kolossale inspanningen en de grote sommen geld die aan vaccinonderzoek worden besteed, heeft de geneeskunde nooit een choleravaccin kunnen bedenken dat de werken en de drugs voor malaria niet zo efficiënt zoals één enkel kruid zijn. De difterie wordt nog bestreden met gifstof immunisering programma's alhoewel het bijna helemaal van de aarde is verdwenen. Toen de difterie in Chicago in 1969 uitbrak, waren 11 van de 16 slachtoffers of reeds immuun of waren geïmmuniseerde tegen difterie. In een ander rapport, waren 14 van de 23 slachtoffers volledig immuun. Dit toont dat inenting maakt geen verschil wanneer het over bescherming tegen difterie komt; in tegendeel, kan het de kansen zelfs verhogen om worden besmet. De immunisering tegen de bof is ook hoogst dubieus. Alhoewel het aanvankelijk de waarschijnlijkheid van besmet het worden vermindert, stijgt het risico voor de bofbesmetting nadat de immuniteit zakt. In 1995, toonde een studie die door de Dienst van het U.K.'s Laboratorium van de Volksgezondheid wordt uitgevoerd en die in Lancet wordt gepubliceerd aan dat de kinderen gegeven het mazelen/de bof/rode hondschot drie keer eerder zouden aan uitbarstingen lijden dan die kinderen die het niet ontvingen. De studie vond ook dat het MMR vaccin met vijf keer het aantal kinderen steeg die aan een zeldzame bloedwanorde lijden. Het is interessant om op te merken dat het mortaliteitstarief van mazelen gedaald door 95 percenten vóór mazelen werd het vaccin geïntroduceerds. In het Verenigd Koninkrijk, ondanks wijdverspreide inenting onder toddlers, stegen de gevallen van mazelen onlangs met bijna 25 percenten. The United States has been suffering from a steadily increasing epidemic of measles, although (or because) the measles vaccine has been in effect since 1957. After a few sudden drops and rises, the cases of measles are now suddenly dropping again. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) acknowledged that this could be related to an overall decrease in the occurrence of measles in the Western Hemisphere. In addition to this evidence, many studies show that the measles vaccine isn’t effective. For example, as reported in a 1987 New England Journal of Medicine article, a 1986 outbreak of measles in Corpus Christi, Texas found 99 percent of the victims had been vaccinated. In 1987, 60 percent of the cases of measles occurred in children who had been properly vaccinated at the appropriate age. One year later, this figure rose to 80 percent. Apart from not protecting against measles and possibly even increasing the risk of contracting the disease, the MMR vaccine has been proven to produce numerous adverse effects. Among them are encephalitis, brain complications, convulsions, retardation of mental and physical growth, high fever, pneumonia, meningitis, aseptic meningitis, mumps, atypical measles, blood disorders such as thrombocytopenia, fatal shock, arthritis, SSPE, one-sided paralysis, and death. According to a study published in the Lancet in 1985, if children develop “mild measles” as a result of receiving the vaccine, the accompanying underdeveloped rash may be responsible for causing degenerative diseases such as cancer later in life. In reality, measles is not a dangerous childhood illness at all. The belief that measles can lead to blindness is a myth that finds its roots in an increased sensitivity to light during illness. This problem subsides when the room is dimmed and vanishes completely with recovery. For a long time, measles was believed to increase the risk of a brain infection (encephalitis) which is known to occur only among children who live in poverty and suffer from malnutrition. Among upper class children, only 1 out of 100,000 will become infected. Besides, less than half of children given a measles booster are protected against the disease. In a report issued by German health authorities and published in a 1989 issue of the Lancet, the mumps vaccine was revealed to have caused 27 specific neurological reactions, including meningitis, febrile convulsions, encephalitis, and epilepsy. A Yugoslavian study linked 1 per 1,000 cases of mumps encephalitis directly to the vaccine. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal in the U.S. reported in 1989 that the rate varies from 1 in 405 to 1 in 7,000 shots for mumps. Although mumps is generally a mild illness and the vaccine’s side effects are severe, it is still included in the MMR vaccine. And so is the vaccine for rubella, although it is known to cause arthritis in up to 3 percent of children and in up to 20 percent of the adult women who have received it. In 1994 the Department of Health admitted to doctors that 11 percent of first-time recipients of the rubella vaccine will get arthritis. Symptoms range from mild aches to severe crippling. Other studies show a 30 percent chance of developing arthritis in direct response to the rubella vaccine. Research confirms that the whooping cough vaccine is only effective in 36 percent of children. A report by Professor Gordon Stewart, which was published in 1994 in World Medicine, demonstrated that the risks of the whooping cough vaccine outweighed the benefits. The whooping cough or pertussis vaccine is by far the most dangerous of all the vaccines. DTP, the whooping cough vaccine that was used in the U.S. until 1992, contained the carcinogen formaldehyde, and the highly toxic metals aluminum and mercury. Both this vaccine and its “improved” version DTaP have never been tested for safety, only for efficacy. The new vaccine has proved to be no better than the old one. Both versions cause death, near-death, seizures, developmental delay, and hospitalization. DTaP (formerly DTP) is given to babies as young as six weeks old, although the vaccine has never been tested on this age group. Among the 17 potential health problems caused by the whooping cough vaccine is sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). According to an estimate from the University of California at Los Angeles, 1,000 U.S. infants a year die as a direct result of receiving the vaccine. Immunization programs against polio have no benefits other than economic ones for vaccine producers. The scientist who eliminated polio now suspects that the handful of polio cases which have occurred in the U.S. since the seventies are caused by the live viruses that were used as vaccines. In Finland and Sweden, where the use of live vaccines for polio is prohibited, there has not been a single case of polio in ten years. If live viruses used as a vaccine can cause polio today when hygiene is generally high, it may well be that the polio epidemics 40 to 50 years ago were also caused by immunization against polio while hygiene, sanitation, housing, and nutritional standards were still very low. In the United States, cases of polio increased by 50 percent between 1957 and 1958, and by 80 percent from 1958 to 1959 after the introduction of mass immunization. In five states, cases of polio doubled after the polio vaccine was given to large numbers of the population. As soon as hygiene and sanitation improved, despite the immunization programs, the viral disease quickly disappeared. Whatever may have been the reason for polio outbreaks in the past, it is highly questionable today to immunize an entire population against a disease that does not even exist any more. It raises major questions about the motives behind polio vaccination. Further, the history of some simian virus 40 (SV40) infections in humans is linked to the use of polio vaccines. According to the American Journal of Medicine, many studies have reported the presence of SV40 from the polio vaccine in human brain tumors and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The polio vaccine seems ever more linked to cancers, especially in children. The cancers caused by the use of the polio vaccine in the past still kills 20,000 people a year in the United States. This is quite outrageous given the fact that polio itself hasn’t killed anyone for a long time. - Excerpt from Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation by Andreas Moritz (www.amazon.com) or (www.ener-chi.com) About the authorAndreas Moritz is a medical intuitive; a practitioner of Ayurveda, iridology, shiatsu, and vibrational medicine; a writer; and an artist. He is the author of The Amazing Liver and Gallbladder Flush, Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation, Lifting the Veil of Duality, Cancer Is Not a Disease, It’s Time to Come Alive, Heart Disease No More, Diabetes No More, Simple Steps to Total Health, Diabetes — No More, Ending the AIDS Myth and Heal Yourself with Sunlight. For more information, visit the author’s website (www.ener-chi.com). See More:Health NewsHave Your Say: Immunization Programs Under Scrutiny Please note, only selected comments will be published. Or discuss this report in our our new forums One Response to “Immunization Programs Under Scrutiny”
|
Translations![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
[…] post by Mick Meaney delivered by Medtrials and […]