‘Dickensian Britain’: Half a million rely on food banks, charities reveal

500,000 people in the UK are resorting to food banks because of squeezes on benefits, wage cuts and the continuing economic downturn, with numbers trebling over the past year, a report by two leading British charities has warned.

A joint report by Oxfam and Church Action on Poverty has said
that despite Britain’s position as one of the richest nations in
the world an alarmingly high number of people are now forced to
ask for help to feed themselves.

The charities said that reassessment of entitlement to invalidity
benefits, new jobseekers allowance sanctions, and below-inflation
rises in payments are the biggest reason for a surge in demand in
food banks.

“The single biggest reason is delays or sanctions or problems
with people’s benefit payments. And that is tied directly to the
reforms and the cuts that are going on with benefits;
increasingly they are having sanctions where their benefits

are just stopped, which are being used in a very harsh and
arbitrary way,”
Liam Purcell, Communications Officer for
Church Action on Poverty, told RT.

 As well as those on benefits, food uncertainty has been
exacerbated by wage cuts and falling living standards of many
people in employment, with many also having the hours they can
work cut.

“The shocking reality is that hundreds of thousands of people
in the UK are turning to food aid. Cuts to social safety-nets
have gone too far, leading to destitution, hardship and hunger on
a large scale. It is unacceptable this is

happening in the seventh wealthiest nation on earth,”
Mark
Goldring, the Chief Executive of Oxfam, told reporters.

The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the poorest people in
the UK pay more for food than their richer counterparts. A
selection of groceries was 69% more expensive in some of the
poorest parts of the country according to the report, a
reflection of the poor amount of choice in lower end groceries
and supermarkets.

At least 4 million people in the UK do not have access to a
healthy diet, while 13 million live below the poverty line, the
report said. 

A former adviser to the World Health Organization, Tim Lang, told
the Independent earlier this month that Britain was returning to
a “Dickensian” model of welfare. He was referring to
Charles Dickens, an English author from the 19th

century who wrote graphically about poverty in urban Victorian
Britain in novels like Oliver Twist.

The Trussel Trust, which is the biggest organizer of food banks
in Britain, said that last year almost 350,000 people received at
least three days emergency food, a 170 percent increase compared
to just 130,000 in 2011-2012. But because there are other
organizations that also dish out food handouts the Oxfam report
estimates that the number of people reliant on charitable food
donations is well over half a million.

In 2011 and 2012 the Trussel Trust was opening two to three food
banks a week and that in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, a
poor area in East London, the working poor are also starting to
use food banks, explained Denise Bently, the manager of the Tower
Hamlets food bank.

The trust now runs 350 food banks, manned by 30,000 volunteers,
with about 3 new centers opening up each week.

But the government insists that welfare payments are in line with
inflation and that families can afford to feed themselves.

Ed Davey the Energy Secretary told MPs earlier this month that it
was “completely wrong to suggest there is some sort of
statistical link between the benefit system reforms we are making
and the provision of food banks.”

The dependence on food banks is reflective of a widening chasm in
the UK between the rich and the poor, with inequality now higher
than it has been for almost eighty years, Purcell said.

“Inequality in the UK is now the highest it has been since the
1930’s, according to the latest figures it has been growing and
growing under governments of all parties and there is massive
evidence now that inequality is bad for everyone in

society.”



He emphasized that the UK should not be heading in a direction
where charity replaces government responsibility.

“What most people who know about this issue will say is that
food banks should not replace the safety net of the welfare
state, that’s not what they are intended for. They’re meant to be
an emergency short term response, we can’t have a situation where
the government is abnegating its responsibility and leaving
people to depend entirely on charity to be fed,”
Purcell told
RT.

Purcell added that one of the recommendations of the report was
that the government takes action on tax dodging. If the big
corporations and the wealthy paid their fair share of tax, then
there would be much less need for cuts to vital public services
and benefits.

This article originally appeared on: RT