The number and value of overdue student loans has reached an all-time high in the US as nearly a third of 20- to 24-year-olds are currently unemployed, according to a report by the Department of Education.
With continued concern regarding rising college costs, the
amount of outstanding student loans has now reached $1 trillion,
making that the largest category of consumer debt in the US aside
from home mortgages.
According to the new report, eleven per cent of school loans – one
hundred and ten billion dollars’ worth – are now seriously
delinquent, meaning at least 90 days past due. That is a sharp
increase from the 6 per cent reported in the first quarter of
2003.
The long-term consequences of the school loan repayment burden can
include a graduate’s choice of jobs, as well as the ability to buy
a home.
A tight job market and a continued increase in the cost of higher
education leave many to question the very value of obtaining a
college degree, as opposed to more vocationally oriented
training.
“Today’s economy puts young
graduates in a difficult position,” Jack Buckley,
commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, which
published the report, said in a statement.
“A college diploma no longer
guarantees a direct pathway to the middle class, making it harder
to justify the expense of a degree.”
Still, as Bloomberg reports, the employment rate for college
graduates in the US is 87 per cent, as compared with 64 per cent
for those with only a high school school diploma.
One item which seems to have been eclipsed in recent partisan
wrangling in Congress is a looming rate increase in federal student
loans, which is set to double to 6.8 per cent on July 1 assuming
there is no intervention. That rate increase would impact the more
than 7.4 million students who can currently apply for a 3.4
interest loan.
On Thursday, the House voted along party lines to push forward a
Republican initiative to intervene in the interest rate increase,
though the specifics of the plan is sure to have the student loan
debate take center stage in coming weeks.
The new bill would allow student lending rates to reset every
year, tied to the interest rate of a 10-year US Treasury note, plus
2.5 percentage points for federal Stafford loans. According to the
Congressional Budget Office, that means that the projected rate
increase on those loans would rise to 5 per cent in 2014, and 7.7
per cent in 2023.
“Who’s going to set interest rates, politicians here or the
markets?” asked Representative John Kline, Republican of
Minnesota.
The legislation would cap Stafford loans at 8.5 per cent, with a
higher maximum of 10.5 per cent for graduate loans.
Democrats, who are thus far opposing the Republican plan, prefer
to extend the current Stafford subsidized rate – subsidized meaning
that interest is not accrued while a student is enrolled – at a
cost of $8.3 billion to the federal government, which would in
theory be paid for by closing tax loopholes.
According to The New York Times, some Democrats want to take
things even further. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand has proposed
locking in a 4 per cent rate for all student loans, and allowing
graduates with higher interest rate loans to refinance at that
rate.
President Obama has already put forth his own proposal, which,
like the Republican plan would tie student loan rates to the
Treasury’s borrowing costs, but would then fix that rate for the
life of the loan, rather than resetting each year. The
administration’s plan would also cap loan repayments at 10 per cent
of a student’s income.
Delinquency rates on existing student loan debt suggests that,
whatever solution Congress ultimately selects to follow, it will
have to make loan repayments feasible as higher education costs
continue to increase while wages have stayed roughly the same for
several decades.
In addition to the Republican-sponsored bill HR1911, there are
at least eight other bills aimed at modifying or freezing interest
rates on federal school loans before the July 1 deadline.
The White House on Wednesday threatened to veto the Republican
bill, arguing that it would not guarantee low rates due to its
yearly reset.
Meanwhile, Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of Edvisors.com, says the
fight over subsidized loan rates “is a distraction from the real
problem, which is the amount of debt, not the cost of
debt.”
Kantrowitz may well have a point. According to the San Francisco
Chronicle, a recent study from Fidelity found that “70 per cent of
the class of 2013 is graduating with college-related debt —
averaging $35,200 — including federal, state and private loans, as
well as debt owed to family and accumulated through credit
cards.”
This article originally appeared on: RT