Review: Notes from the Borderland综述：从边疆

Reviewed by Brian Precious | 审查布赖恩珍贵| SPECTREZINE spectrezine

Is Notes from the Borderland (NFB) a magazine or a series of pamphlets? 是从边疆（非专利巴士） ，一本杂志或一系列的小册子？ One could be forgiven for thinking the latter, since the first issue of this very substantial magazine came out in the Winter of 1997, and the latest issue, issue 8 , only came out last year. 人们可以原谅的思维后者，因为第一个问题的，这十分可观杂志出来，在1997年冬季，而最新一期，第8期，只有来到了去年。 This has been the story all along for NFB readers, who have to wait approximately a year between issues, produced by Larry O’Hara (a regular contributor to Rob Ramsay’s similar, now veteran, magazine 这一直是故事一直为非专利巴士服务读者，他们要等待大约一年之间的问题，所产生的拉里奥哈拉（经常为抢拉姆齐的相似，现在的老将，杂志 Lobster 龙虾 ) and the rest of the ‘NFB Collective’. ）和其余的'非专利巴士集体' 。 To what extent NFB is an offshoot of ‘Lobster’ this reviewer does not know. 到什么程度，非专利巴士，是一个分支的'龙虾'这察员并不知道。 But NFB shares concerns with it’s elder magazine in it’s attempt to scrutinize the activities of the ’security services’, their assets, and how they seek to maintain and project the power and privilege of the ruling class and the establishment,by various methods of subversion, infiltration, and manipulation of the agendas of progressive causes and movements. From the outset, it has been clear that NFB has had no interest whatsoever in pandering to any mainstream aesthetic. 但非专利巴士股份的关注与它的老杂志，它的企图，审议活动的'安全服务' ，但其资产总额，以及他们如何设法维持和项目的权力和特权的统治阶级和建立，由各种方式的颠覆，渗透，并操纵了议事日程，渐进的成因及运动，从一开始，它已明确表示，非专营巴士已没有兴趣在迎合任何主流审美。 NFB looks like it was produced on a shoestring by a bunch of anarchists, which is not a million miles from the truth.The front of NFB can either be a cartoon use of classic art - such as the first issue’s use of Delacroix’s ‘Madame Liberté’ - or more recently we have seen covers sporting a much more radical (not impossible!) version of the satirical covers used by Private Eye. 非专利巴士看起来就像是在制作上两手空空，由一群无政府主义者，这是不是一个320万公里，从truth.the前面的非专利巴士既可以是一个卡通用经典艺术-如第一次发行的使用d elacroix' '夫人自由' -或更近，我们看到涵盖运动更为激进的（不是不可能！ ）版的讽刺，包括所采用的私人眼科。 Given that Larry O’Hara seems to view Private Eye as a source of semi-radicalism and security service disinformation, perhaps this is more than coincidence. 由于拉里奥哈拉似乎要查看私人眼科的一个来源半激进主义和安全事务的假，也许这是多巧合。

So is the annual release of the latest NFB worth the wait?所以是每年发布的最新非专利巴士值得期待吗？ Read on.接着往下看。 The first issue of NFB is as good an introduction as any.第一个问题的非专利巴士一样好介绍，因为没有。 It concentrates on news and investigations of various far-right and racist organisations, such as the International Third Position and those trying to export the Ku Klux Klan to the UK.专注于新闻和查处各种极右派和种族主义团体，如国际化的第三方立场和那些试图出口三K党，以英国。 It should be said from the beginning that NFB maintains that there is much more than meets the eye on the racist far-right,which NFB regards as a hot-bed of not only fascist but security service activity.应该说，从一开始就知道非专利巴士认为，有较符合着眼于种族主义的极右派，其中非专利巴士服务方面，作为一个热门床不仅法西斯，但保安服务活动。 Indeed, subsequently NFB has made a case that this is no surprise, given the usefulness of fascists to the secret state.事实上，后来非专利巴士已经取得了一宗个案，这是毫不奇怪的，鉴于这项工作的效益法西斯的秘密状态。 (More on this below, when we come to the fascinating tale of -he whom NFB call- ‘multi-party animal’ Aidan Rankin, and the state-destabilisation of the UK Independence Party.) （了解更多关于本下面，当我们来到这个迷人的故事-他的人非专利巴士服务呼叫'多党动物'艾丹伦肯，及国务院不稳定的英国独立党） 。

Many on the left have had long experience, and longer suspicions of, the activities of state infiltrators and agents-provocateurs from demonstrations to picket lines to ordinary meetings of the local TU branch or CND.许多在左侧有长期经验，并不再猜疑的是，活动的国家渗透和代理商-挑衅者由示威纠察线，以普通会议的地方涂科或来电显示。 People who have become involved, for the first time, in such organisations have often had a rude and extremely disturbing awakening as to the kind of beast the British state and broader establishment really is, and the interests it really -and exclusively- serves.人，已成为参与，这是第一次，在这样的团体往往有一种粗暴，极感不安的觉醒，以什么样的野兽，英国国家和更广泛的成立确实是和利益，它真的与独家-服务。 From the Gandalf trial to the experience of middle-England when involved in trying to stop live animal exports, the examples are numerous.从巫师甘道夫审判经验中，当英格兰参与设法阻止活畜出口，这样的例子不胜枚举。

Enter Searchlight magazine.进入探照灯杂志。 Suspicion of this magazine did not begin with NFB.怀疑这种杂志并没有展开与非专利巴士服务。 But it should be pointed out that one of the very first articles to dissect Searchlight appeared more than 15 years ago in ‘Lobster’, written by one Larry O’Hara.但应当指出的是，其中一个很第一条解剖探照灯出现了超过15年前的'龙虾' ，写一个拉里奥哈拉。 NFB regard Searchlight as a ‘honey trap’ ie used to both attract and then spy on the left.非专利巴士服务方面探照灯作为一个'美人计' ，即用两种吸引和间谍，然后就离开。 Evidence for this began in Lobster a good few years ago, when it published the ‘Gable Memorandum’,in which Searchlight editor/founder confesses to years of spying on the left.证据就此开始在龙虾一个好几年前，当它出版了'山墙备忘录' ，其中探照灯总编辑/创始人confesses多年的谍报活动就在左边。

Issue 2 breaks the story of the NFB position on what it calls ‘MI5 shyster’ David Shayler, whose position, they say, does not add up - re his unwillingness to comment on ongoing state acts against dissidents and does he still say nothing on MI6?问题2时段的故事非专利巴士的立场，它所谓的'的MI5讼棍'戴维沙耶尔，其立场，他们说，并不增加了-重，不愿评论正在进行的国家行为对持不同政见者和他是否仍然无话可说，就军情六处？

Issue 3 investigates the strange aspects of soho nail-bomber David Copeland ie that the security services knew more than they let on and effectively did nothing while Copeland gave them the excuse to inflate their budgets.问题3调查，但奇怪的方面苏豪钉轰炸机朱谷轮即安全部门知道了超过他们，让和有效做什么，而谷给了他们借口，夸大其预算。

Issue 4, from 2001-02, is the pièce de résistance for readers of Spectrezine.问题4 ，从2001-02年度，是pièce抵抗，为读者spectrezine 。

In this issue, NFB gives us another lengthy and extremely well-researched article detailing many of the forces ranged against the left and other opponents of the pet-project of the British and European ruling classes: The European Union.在这个问题上，非专利巴士服务，使我们的另一个漫长和极其充分研究的文章，详细说明很多的力量不等，对左和其他对手的聚酯项目的英国和欧洲的统治阶级：欧洲联盟。

This superb article details not only the general way in which the state used it’s assets on the far right to smear and discredit the UK Independence Party (UKIP), leading its founder, LSE academic Alan Sked, to withdraw, disillusioned, from politics, but also gives us a sidelight on how state assets work in the form of an analysis of a one Dr Aidan Rankin.这条高超的细节不仅是一般的方式，其中国家用它的资产，就极右派抹黑和诋毁英国独立党（ ukip ） ，导致其创办人，伦敦经济学者艾伦sked ，撤回，幻灭，从政治，但也给我们提出了侧记就如何对国有资产的工作，在形式的分析，一个博士艾丹伦肯。

NFB declare that Rankin’s career is so bizarre it would seem out of place in a Le Carre novel.非专利巴士宣布伦肯的职业生涯是如此奇怪，它似乎是出在乐家乐福小说。 Rankin has been a member of at least six political parties, from left to right: Labour,Tory,Albion Party, Third Way, Conservative Democratic Party and UKIP.伦肯已成员至少有六个政党，从左至右依次为：劳动，保守党，姆维奇党，第三条道路，保守的民主党和ukip 。 Readers may recall an article in the New Statesman a couple of years ago, in which Rankin strongly protested the ‘racism’ of UKIP in order to politically discredit UKIP as much as possible.读者可能还记得一篇文章，在新的政治家，两三年前，其中伦肯强烈抗议'种族主义'的ukip为了在政治上抹黑ukip尽可能多地。 Well, here’s what: Recall Third Way, of which Rankin is a former member.那么，这里的是什么：记得第三条道路，其中伦肯是一名前成员。 Third Way is a post-National Front grouping led by Patrick Harrington (is this the same Harrington who caused a scandal as a student for his fascist views?).第三条道路是专国民阵线为首的分组由Patrick哈灵顿（这是哈林顿，同时引起一场丑闻，作为一名学生，他对法西斯的看法呢？ ） 。 What do you know, while a member of this far-right organisation, Rankin tried to move it’s position from anti-EU to pro-EU, an attempt he has made in many if not all of the organisations of which he has been a member.你怎么知道，而一员，这极右翼组织，伦肯试图将它的位置，从反欧盟亲欧盟的企图，他已经取得了很多，如果不是所有的机构，其中有他一直在成员之一。

So precisely why is Rankin complaining about the alleged racism at UKIP when he himself was previously a member of a far-right organisation?所以正因如此，是伦肯抱怨指称种族主义ukip当他自己以前的成员，一个极右翼组织？ More fundamentally, why has Rankin been all round the political houses, and why does he try to do the same thing in each house?而更根本的，为什么伦肯得到全面的政治招待所，为何他尝试做同样的事情在每家吗？ Why does someone whose views on the EU fit with those of New Europe , then go and join UKIP?为什么有人的看法就欧盟适合那些新的欧洲，然后再加入ukip ？

Issue 5 continues with these themes and much more - including unearthing a secret Searchlight strategy dosument, written by leading Searchlight contributor Nick Lowles, on how to spread propaganda against the anti-EU movement, to ‘influence and educate public opinion’ by the ‘drip flow of information’.问题5继续与这些主题和更多内容-其中包括揭发秘密探照灯战略d osument，写领导探照灯投稿尼克洛莱斯，就如何传播宣传反欧盟运动，以影响和教育公众舆论'受'滴灌流通的信息' 。

The full document is available for a couple of stamps, from the NFB address.全部文件可为一对夫妇的邮票，从非专利巴士地址。

Issues 6,7 and 8 of NFB give us more of the same excellent in-depth coverage, all so exhaustively researched that NFB’s opponents seem to know they are onto a loser if they try to take NFB on.Issue 8, the latest, features ex-MI5 head Eliza Manningham-Buller saying to her successor Jonathan Evans ‘I’m sure you’ll do as well as I did’ , to which Evans replies ‘That’s what I’m afraid of’.问题6,7和8非专利巴士服务给我们更多的同样出色，在深入报道，使所有巨细无遗地研究了非专营巴士的对手们似乎都知道他们是到一个输家，如果他们试图以非专利巴士on.issue 8日，最新，特点当然的MI5主管艾丽莎manningham -布勒说，以她的继任者乔纳森埃文斯'我敢肯定，你们以后做的，以及我' ，而埃文斯回复'这就是我所害怕' 。

Give this unusual, committed magazine a try.这个不寻常的，致力于杂志一试。 It doesn’t come out often, but it’s worth the wait.它不出来，往往，但它值得等待。 All that research must surely take time!所有的研究必然需要时间！

Go To 去 NOTES FROM THE BORDERLAND 从边疆 To Order Your Copy 令您的副本

Comment on 'Review: Notes from the Borderland' : 评论回顾：从边疆' ：

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Related News: 相关新闻：