9/11 Research Reflects Badly On Cambridge University 9 / 11研究，反映了不良影响剑桥大学
No Detectable Respect For Science: False Claims Regarding 9/11 Research Reflect Badly On University Of Cambridge 没有探测尊重科学：虚假声称关于 9 / 11的研究是源于大学，剑桥大学
On September 11, 2007, the BBC published对2007年9月11日，英国广播公司出版 an article describing an unpublished paper 一篇文章，描述一个未发表的文件 by Dr. Keith Seffen of the University of Cambridge.博士基思seffen的大学，剑桥大学。
Dr. Seffen, the BBC said, had constructed a mathematical model of the World Trade Center collapses which showed that “once the collapse of the twin towers began, it was destined to be rapid and total.”博士seffen ，英国广播公司说，已修建了一个数学模型，世界贸易中心倒塌，这表明“一旦崩溃，双塔开始，这是注定要迅速和彻底” 。
According to the BBC, Dr. Seffen proceeded from this mathematical model to describe the destruction of the twin towers as a “very ordinary thing to happen”.据英国广播公司，博士seffen接着从这个数学模型来描述销毁双塔作为一个“很普通的事发生” 。
The BBC also reported that Dr. Seffen’s findings “are published” in the Journal of Engineering Mechanics (JEM), a publication of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).英国广播公司还报道说，博士seffen的调查结果“发表”在Journal of工程力学（日本实验舱） ，出版的美国社会土木工程师（ asce ） 。
But this claim — which the BBC apparently never checked — was false.但这种说法-英国广播公司显然从未检查-是虚假的。
The BBC’s article was based on BBC的文章是基于 a press release from the University of Cambridge 一份新闻稿，从大学，剑桥大学 which begins as follows:开始如下：
A new mathematical analysis of the collapse of the World Trade Centre has been published by a Cambridge University academic, with results that challenge conspiracy theories surrounding the September 11th attacks. 一种新的数学分析的崩溃，世界贸易中心已出版剑桥大学的学术，结果这一挑战，阴谋论，围绕9月11日的袭击。
Unfortunately, Dr. Seffen’s paper had not been published at the time of the press release, and it has not been published to this day.不幸的是，博士seffen的文件尚未公布，在时间的新闻发布，它尚未发布到这一天。 (Earlier this month, the ASCE announced that （本月初， asce宣布 Dr. Seffen’s paper is scheduled to be published 博士seffen的文件是预定要发表 in the February 2008 issue of the JEM.)在2008年2月的问题，正义与平等运动） 。
Professor Alison Richard 教授艾莉森理查德 is the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge.是副校长的大学，剑桥大学。
According to her web page,根据她的网页，
The Vice-Chancellor is the principal academic and administrative officer of the University, and Professor Richard is the first woman to hold the position full-time.副校长是主要的学术和行政人员的大学，和理查德教授是第一位女举行的立场，全面的时间。
The University of Cambridge is among the world’s foremost universities […]大学，剑桥大学是世界上的首要大学[ … … ]
The University’s academic staff of some 1,700 are globally recognized for the excellence of their teaching and research.该大学的学术人员的一些一七○○顷全球公认的为卓越的教学和研究。
It is most unlikely that the University’s reputation for academic excellence will have been enhanced by this incident.这是最不可能说，大学的声誉为卓越学科，将得到加强，由这件事。
The author of the paper, Dr. Keith Seffen, is a senior lecturer in the Structures Group of Cambridge’s Engineering Department.作者的文件，博士基思seffen ，是一个高级讲师，在结构组剑桥大学的工程部。 The head of the Structures Group is首长的结构组 Dr. Chris Burgoyne ChrisHentschel博士burgoyne . 。
According to the page describing the people of the据该网页介绍了人民的 Structures Group 结构组 , ， 
Chris Burgoyne is Head of the Structures Group and a Reader in Concrete Structures.克里斯burgoyne是头部的结构组和一个读者在混凝土结构。 His interests are prestressed concrete, advanced composites, MRI imaging of concrete and structural properties of bone.他的利益，是预应力混凝土，先进复合材料，磁共振成像混凝土和结构性能的骨。 He is a fellow of Emmanuel College.他是一位研究员伊曼纽尔学院。
Tel: 01223 332698电话：零一二二三三三二六九八
Email: cjb@eng.cam.ac.uk电子邮件： cjb@eng.cam.ac.uk
Drs.决议草案。 Chris Burgoyne, Alison Richard and Keith Seffen will soon receive the following email:克里斯burgoyne ，艾莉森理查德和Keith seffen将很快收到以下的电子邮件：
TO: Dr.到： 博士 Chris Burgoyne 克里斯burgoyne
Head of the Structures Group头的结构组
Department of Engineering部工程
University of Cambridge大学剑桥大学
cjb@eng.cam.ac.uk cjb@eng.cam.ac.ukCC: Dr.抄送： 博士 Alison Richard 艾莉森理查德
Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge副校长的大学，剑桥
vc.office.online@admin.cam.ac.uk vc.office.online @ admin.cam.ac.ukCC: Dr.抄送： 博士 Keith Seffen 祁俊文seffen
Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering高级讲师，在结构工程
University of Cambridge大学剑桥大学
kas14@cam.ac.uk kas14@cam.ac.ukDear Dr. Burgoyne , 亲爱的博士burgoyne ，
More than two months ago, the University of Cambridge published a press release whose opening sentence falsely claims that an unpublished research paper written by Dr. Keith Seffen of the Engineering Department’s Structures Group “has been published”. 2个多月前，大学剑桥大学发表了一份新闻稿，其开头一句附有虚假产地来源标签声称未公布的研究论文撰写的博士基思seffen的工程部门的结构小组“已出版” 。 [1] [ 1 ]
The subject of the paper was a controversial one, and the press release was echoed by the BBC and several other news providers.主题文件是一个有争议的一，新闻发布的赞同英国广播公司和其他几个新闻供应商。 [2, 3, 4, 6] [ 2 ， 3 ， 4 ， 6 ]
The false claim in the opening sentence was pointed out shortly after the BBC article was published [5], and the BBC changed its online report within a few hours.假索赔中的开头一句是指出后不久， BBC的文章发表[ 5 ] ，和英国广播公司改变了它的在线报告了数小时。 [6] [ 6 ]
Today, more than two months later, Dr. Seffen’s paper remains unpublished.今天，超过两个月后，博士seffen的文件仍然未公布。 [7] Yet the press release is still online, with the original wording intact. [ 7 ] ，但新闻发布的仍然是在线，与原来的措辞不变。 [1] [ 1 ]
Curiously, the press release contradicts itself in its eighth paragraph, saying Dr. Seffen’s paper “will be published”.奇怪的是，新闻发布的矛盾，本身在其第八段，说博士seffen的文件“将出版” 。 The conflict between this statement and the assertion in the opening paragraph has never been explained, satisfactorily or otherwise.之间的冲突，这一声明和断言，在开幕式段从未解释过，好或以其他方式。
Dr. Seffen has declined to answer any questions submitted to him by email.博士seffen拒绝回答任何问题提交给他的电子邮件。 [8] [ 8 ]
As you well know, one does not normally expect to see the conclusions of an unpublished paper discussed in the major media, especially when the topic is controversial.正如你所知，一个通常不期望看到的结论一未发表的文件，讨论在各大媒体，尤其是当话题是有争议的。
Much less does one expect to see an article representing an unpublished paper as having been published.少得多一不期望看到的一篇文章，代表了一个未公布的文件当作已出版。
If this had been an honest mistake, a prompt and apologetic clarification could have been granted a long time ago.如果这已是一个诚实的错误，及时澄清和道歉可能被授予在很久以前。
The lack of any such clarification, along with Dr. Seffen’s subsequent failure to answer any questions, embodies no detectable respect for science nor any hint of a quest for truth.缺乏任何这种澄清，随着博士seffen随后的不回答任何问题，体现了没有探测尊重科学，也没有任何暗示的追求真理。
Quite independent of the merits of Dr. Seffen’s paper, this incident reflects badly not only on Dr. Seffen and the Structures Group but on the entire University of Cambridge as well.相当独立的优点，博士seffen的文件，这一事件反映了严重，不仅对博士seffen和结构组，但对整个大学，剑桥大学，以及。
It would be a shame if such conduct were to become the norm for Dr. Seffen and his colleagues.这将是一个耻辱，如果这种行为被成为规范为博士seffen和他的同事们。
Therefore it seems quite reasonable to ask:因此，似乎相当合理的要求：
- Why has the University not yet posted a correction nor issued an apology?为什么有大学尚未发布更正，也没有发出道歉？
- When does the University intend to do these things?时，是否大学打算做这些事情呢？
- Is this the sort of conduct the University expects from the Professors who represent it?这是排序的进行，预计从大学教授的代表呢？
- And if not, how and when does the University intend to make its wishes known?如果没有的话，如何及何时请问大学打算作出的意愿，其已知的吗？
Your attention to this not inconsiderable matter is most appreciated.请你注意，这不是微不足道的事，是最赞赏的。
Sincerely真诚
[ … ] [ … … ]
Notes: 注释：
[1] University of Cambridge: [ 1 ]大学剑桥大学： 9/11 “conspiracy” theories challenged by Cambridge research 9 / 11 “阴谋”理论的挑战，剑桥研究中心
[2] Cambridge Evening News: [ 2 ]剑桥晚间新闻报道： Lecturer dismisses twin towers blast theory 讲师解雇双塔爆炸理论
[3] Business Weekly: [ 3 ]商业周刊： Zero Grounds for Ground Zero conspiracy theory 零理由地面零阴谋论
[4] Winter Patriot: [ 4 ]冬季爱国者： Seffen’s Folly: Attempted 9/11 Hoax By Cambridge And The BBC Was A Failure seffen的蠢事：企图9 / 11虚报由剑桥大学和英国广播公司是一个失败
[5] Winter Patriot: [ 5 ]冬季爱国者： UK Engineer: WTC ‘Collapses’ Were ‘A Very Ordinary Thing’ 英国工程师：世台会'坍塌'人'一个很普通的事'
[6] BBC: [ 6 ]英国广播公司： 9/11 demolition theory challenged 9 / 11拆卸理论的挑战
[7] Winter Patriot: [ 7 ]冬季爱国者： WTC ‘Collapse’ Research Cited In September Is Scheduled To Be Published In February 世台会'崩溃 ' 的研究中提到的9月定将刊登在二月[8] Winter Patriot: [ 8 ]冬季爱国者： Where’s The Paper? 那里的文件？ Did The BBC And A Cambridge Don Commit Fraud To Cover Up Mass Murder? 当时英国广播公司和剑桥唐欺诈来掩饰大规模谋杀？
I have no doubt that Drs.我毫不怀疑，决议草案。 Burgoyne, Richard and Seffen will enjoy hearing from me on this matter. burgoyne ， Richard和seffen将享有听证会由我就这件事。
They will probably enjoy hearing from you, too.他们可能会得到您的回音，太。
And if you如果你 click here 点击这里 , you can send email to all three of them at the same time — just like I did! ，您可以发送电子邮件给所有他们三人在同一时间， -就像我！
See More: 看到更多的： False Flag 虚假国旗Have Your Say: 9/11 Research Reflects Badly On Cambridge University 你说： 9 / 11研究，反映了不良影响剑桥大学
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。
ALSO: Try out our new forum (currently in BETA testing) 还：试试我们的新论坛（目前处于测试阶段）
This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 21st, 2007 at 1:53 pm and is filed under 此项目被张贴在周三， 2007年11月21日在下午1时53分，并提交下 9/11 Truth 9 / 11真相 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。
Free Newsletter 免费通讯 
Related News 相关新闻
- Cambridge University Twin Towers Theory Debunked剑桥大学的双塔理论debunked
- More BBC Deceit: The 9/11 Hoax That Didn’t Quite Work更多的英国广播公司欺骗： 9 / 11恶作剧，没有相当的工作
- 9/11: Irresponsible Science - POP MEC & Dr Seffen 9 / 11 ：不负责任的科学-流行迈克＆博士s effen
- 9/11 Theory Destroyed By Unsung Internet Heroes 9 / 11理论摧毁了互联网的幕后英雄
- Academic: CCTV Leads To inequality In Legal Cases学术：中央电视台，导致不平等的法律案件
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
- Brown admits mistake in abolishing 10p rate布朗承认错误，取消10便士率
- Police reject tougher action on cannabis警方拒绝更强硬的行动对大麻
- 151 Congressmen Profit From War 151国会议员的利润从战争
- Bush official forced to resign布什官员被迫辞职
- Rice: Hamas Iran’s proxy warrior赖斯：哈马斯伊朗的代理勇士
- Government accused of “pimping”政府指责“拉皮条”
- Osama bin Laden’s driver walks out on Guantanamo trial拉登的司机走出对关塔那摩审判
- Fourth Briton accuses MI5 of torture四分之一的英国人指责的MI5的酷刑
- Zimbabwe: Army behind new wave of human rights abuses津巴布韦：军队的背后，新一轮的侵犯人权行为
- Labour revolt over ID cards劳工起义以上的身份证
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻
Archive 存档