{"id":47934,"date":"2013-07-05T09:15:20","date_gmt":"2013-07-05T08:15:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/how-the-pentagon-papers-came-to-be-published-by-the-beacon-press-told-by-daniel-ellsberg-and-others\/47934\/"},"modified":"2013-07-05T09:15:20","modified_gmt":"2013-07-05T08:15:20","slug":"how-the-pentagon-papers-came-to-be-published-by-the-beacon-press-told-by-daniel-ellsberg-and-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/how-the-pentagon-papers-came-to-be-published-by-the-beacon-press-told-by-daniel-ellsberg-and-others\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Pentagon Papers Came to Be Published by the Beacon Press, Told by Daniel Ellsberg and Others"},"content":{"rendered":"

Forty-one years ago, Beacon Press lost a Supreme Court case brought against it by the U.S. government for publishing the first full edition of the Pentagon Papers. It is now well known how The New York Times first published excerpts of the top-secret documents in June 1971, but less well known is how the Beacon Press, a small nonprofit publisher affiliated with the Unitarian Universalist Association, came to publish the complete 7,000 pages that exposed the true history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Their publication led the Beacon press into a spiral of two-and-a-half years of harassment, intimidation, near bankruptcy and the possibility of criminal prosecution. This is a story that has rarely been told in its entirety. In 2007, Amy Goodman moderated an event at the Unitarian Universalist conference in Portland, Oregon, commemorating the publication of the Pentagon Papers and its relevance today. Today, we hear the story from three men at the center of the storm: former Pentagon and RAND<\/span> Corporation analyst, famed whistleblower, Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times; former Alaskan senator and presidential candidate Mike Gravel, who tells the dramatic story of how he entered the Pentagon Papers into the congressional record and got them to the Beacon Press; finally, Robert West, the former president of the Unitarian Universalist Association. We begin with Ellsberg, who Henry Kissinger once described as “the world\u2019s most dangerous man.”<\/p>\n

TRANSCRIPT:<\/strong><\/p>\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> We turn now from Snowden to Daniel Ellsberg. Forty-one years ago, a small, independent press, the Beacon Press, lost a Supreme Court case brought against it by the U.S. government for publishing the first full edition of the Pentagon Papers. It\u2019s now well known how The New York Times<\/em> first published excerpts of the top-secret documents in June of 1971, but less well known is how the Beacon Press, a small nonprofit publisher affiliated with the Unitarian Universalist Association, came to publish the complete 7,000 pages that exposed the true history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Their publication led the Beacon Press into a spiral of two-and-a-half years of harassment, intimidation, near bankruptcy and the possibility of criminal prosecution. This is a story that\u2019s rarely been told in its entirety.<\/p>\n

In 2007, I moderated an event at the Unitarian Universalist conference in Portland, Oregon, commemorating the publication of the Pentagon Papers and its relevance today. Thousands of people were in the audience. Today, we hear the story from the three men on the stage at the center of the storm: former Pentagon and RAND<\/span> Corporation analyst, famed whistleblower, Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked the Pentagon Papers to The New York Times<\/em>; we also hear from former Alaskan senator and former presidential candidate Mike Gravel\u2013he\u2019ll tell the dramatic story of how he entered the Pentagon Papers into the congressional record and got them to the Beacon Press; finally, Robert West, the former president of the Unitarian Universalist Association.<\/p>\n

We begin with famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, who Henry Kissinger once called “the world\u2019s most dangerous man.”<\/p>\n

\n

DANIEL<\/span> ELLSBERG<\/span>:<\/strong> There were 7,000 pages of top-secret documents that demonstrated unconstitutional behavior by a succession of presidents, the violation of their oath and the violation of the oath of every one of their subordinates\u2013I, for one\u2013who had participated in that terrible, indecent fraud over the years in Vietnam, lying us into a hopeless war, which has, of course\u2013and a wrongful war\u2013which has, of course, been reproduced and is being reproduced right now and may occur again in Iran. So the history of that, I thought, might help us get out of that particular war.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Let me skip over the intervening 22 months then, really, which passed after I first copied the Pentagon Papers, when I was trying to get them out, and the senators and others who were not up to the task of putting them out, people who were otherwise very admirable and very credible in their antiwar activities: Senator Fulbright, Senator McGovern, Gaylord Nelson, Senator Gaylord Nelson, various others. Except for Nelson, Fulbright, McGovern and Senator Mathias, some of the best people in the Senate, had, in fact, contrary to the way it\u2019s often reported, not refused to bring out these papers when I discussed them with them. Each one agreed to bring them out and then thought better of it over a period of time, said they just couldn\u2019t do it, take the risk\u2013in effect, in other words, “You take the risk, but I\u2019ve got an important position here, and I can\u2019t ruffle the waters here.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

I read in\u2013I did give them to The New York Times<\/em> \u2013 sorry, to Neil Sheehan, but with no assurance that they would come out in the Times<\/em>, and for reasons not clear to me still, Neil, who, again, acted very admirably and credibly, as did the Times<\/em>, which took a great risk in deciding to publish the papers, did not tell me they were bringing them out. I\u2019m not clear to this day quite why that was. But so I continued up\u2013while they were working to get the papers ready for publication in the spring of 1971, I was still worrying and trying to see where I could get them out. I approached Pete McCloskey, who, again, agreed to do it, but took efforts to get them officially from the Defense Department before he did that. He was very supportive of me during my trial later.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

And I also thought then\u2013I read in the paper about a Senator Gravel, whom I really didn\u2019t know much about, from Alaska, who was conducting a filibuster against the draft, which was exactly what should have been done. By the way, I had raised as a litmus test\u2013I probably never told Mike this\u2013I had raised the idea of a filibuster with a number of senators as a litmus test to see whether they were the kind of person who might go one step beyond that and maybe put out these papers. And in every case I got serious answers\u2013they weren\u2019t frivolous\u2013but the point was, as Senator Goodell put it to me, “Dan, in my business, you can\u2019t afford to look ridiculous. You cannot afford to be laughed at.” And he said, “If I could find other people who would join me, I would do it.” I heard that, by the way\u2013I\u2019ll mention\u2013each name I\u2019m mentioning here is very\u2013the top people in the Senate. Senator\u2013oh, darn, at my age I forget some of these names\u2013but anyway, other senators said much the same: “If I could find somebody else to go with me, I would do it, but I can\u2019t do it by myself. I would look foolish. I can\u2019t afford that.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So here was a senator who was not afraid to look foolish, basically, and that\u2019s the fear that keeps people in line all there lives. Don\u2019t get out of line. It\u2019s the kind of thing you learn at your mother\u2019s knee to get along, go along\u2013your father\u2019s knee. And don\u2019t stick out, don\u2019t make yourself look, you know\u2013don\u2019t raise your head, sort of this thing, and look ridiculous. But he wasn\u2019t afraid to do that on a transcendent issue like the draft in the middle of this war. So I thought, “OK, maybe this is the guy.” I hadn\u2019t met\u2013I had met the other ones before, I knew them. So I didn\u2019t know him. I said, “OK, he\u2019s doing a filibuster.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So at some point\u2013and we were just discussing this. It\u2019s not even clear in my mind when I had a discussion I\u2019ll mention in a moment, but I do remember very clearly that not knowing that the Pentagon Papers were about to be published by The New York Times<\/em> on June 13th\u2013the night of June 12th, they came out, I was in Boston at the time\u2013and nobody had told me that this was happening, so I had them in my apartment for the first time ever. I had never allowed them to be in our apartment, lest the FBI<\/span> swoop down and get them. That was my nightmare. I had a number of copies stashed with different people, so I could say, even from jail, you know, “OK, get that one out or get this out,” with my 10-cent call that I was allowed, that they couldn\u2019t stop it. But I never allowed it to be in my apartment. For once, I had it there because\u2013and Mike did not even know this\u2013because I intended to communicate with his office on Monday to go to Washington, not knowing they were coming out in the Times<\/em>, and offer this thing to this man who was conducting the filibuster.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So I was quite shocked to learn from a friend in the Times<\/em> that the building was locked down. They were worried about an FBI<\/span> raid and an injunction, because they were copying this seven\u2013they were putting out this big study, which I hadn\u2019t been told. So I go, “Well, that\u2019s very interesting.” And meanwhile, I had these papers in my apartment. The FBI<\/span> might come any minute, and I had already had a scheduled meeting with Howard Zinn that night, with our families\u2013his wife and my wife\u2013to go to see Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid<\/em>. And so, I called Howard, didn\u2019t say it over the phone, but I said, “I\u2019ll come to your apartment. We\u2019ll go from your place,” and I went there with the papers, and asked him if I could dump them in his apartment for that night, which he said, you know, “Fine.” I had already shown him. He was one of two people I\u2019d shown\u2013Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn, both\u2013some of these papers earlier.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So, the papers came out that night, and we got them at midnight in Harvard Square. There wasn\u2019t a lot of attention on Sunday to them, which everybody was surprised at in The New York Times<\/em>. The TV didn\u2019t pick it up, and so forth. But on Monday they had got attention, and the key thing was that John Mitchell, the Attorney General, then asked a request of The New York Times<\/em> that they cease publication of this criminal act, stop this. Remember, they had lost their law firm already, Lord & Day, on the grounds that their lawyers had told them this was treason and a criminal act, and they wouldn\u2019t represent them. And Mitchell was confirming that and telling them that they must stop.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Well, they went ahead; they did not obey the request. So the next day, Tuesday, they enjoined The New York Times<\/em> for the first time in our history. We know from the tapes now that Nixon had asked Mitchell on the tape\u2013I\u2019ve heard this\u2013the day before, on Monday, Mitchell wanted to put the Times<\/em> on notice. And, of course, Nixon says, “Have we ever done this before?” And Mitchell says, “Oh, yes, many times.” Terrific legal advice from the bond lawyer. It had never been done in our history and, of course, led to a constitutional battle, which Nixon lost and the attorney general lost. But they did enjoin it, and so the question was what to do next.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

I hadn\u2019t been identified yet, but I decided, on the base of one other person who suggested it to me, that I give it to The Washington Post<\/em>. And meanwhile, I had called up Gravel\u2019s office\u2013I was still able to use a phone, not my home phone, but I went out to a pay phone\u2013and said to the person there, “Is your boss interested in putting out the Pentagon”\u2013I didn\u2019t say the “Pentagon Papers”\u2013”Is your boss intending to keep up this filibuster? Is he going to stay there?” They said, “Oh, absolutely.” I said, “Well, I\u2019ve got some material that could keep him reading till the end of the year, if he\u2019s interested in it, you know.” And that being the number one story at the moment, he sort of guessed what it was. And I think Mike will go on from there. He went on and informed Mike of this possibility. But the question then was how to get them to him. I could no longer travel, as I\u2019d planned to do.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So I\u2019ll end with this story, which will tie in with\u2013Mike can take up the story from there. The question was how to get it to him. I was not in a position to travel at this point. So I did arrange with a former colleague from RAND<\/span>, Ben Bagdikian, an editor of The Washington Post<\/em> who had spent a year or two at RAND<\/span> as a consultant\u2013mic\u2019s down? Can you hear me? OK\u2013Ben Bagdikian, I said, I knew. So I called him up and arranged to have him come to Boston\u2013yeah, it was a colorful story, which I think is told in the thing you have there. He came to Boston, Cambridge. We took a room at the Treadway Inn near Harvard Square, and my wife and I brought these boxes of ill-assorted papers, tremendous stuff we hadn\u2019t collated ideally, to him, and we spent the night with him collating and putting them in an order that he could take back with him. And in the morning he had this big box. He didn\u2019t have\u2013he needed a cord for the box and asked the Treadway, and the motel owner said, “Well, somebody\u2019s been tethering a dog outside. I can give you the dog cord.” So we tied up the box, and he went off and put it on.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

My wife and I looked at the television before we went home. We had been all night on this now. This was about 7:00, 8:00, 7:30 in the morning, and there was our home being\u2013with some FBI<\/span> agents knocking on the door on live television. And they were knocking on the door, so we thought, “Hmm, maybe this isn\u2019t the best time, you know, to go back home, actually.” And what had happened was that Sid Zion, who was mad at the Times<\/em> for having fired him, had rather quickly found out who their source was, and to get back at them, he had revealed it on a radio show, the Barry Graves show, the night before. So the FBI<\/span> was at my door, and having seen it on television, I was now in a position to not be caught and to put out the other copies.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Well, the reason\u2013so we didn\u2019t go home. We went underground in Cambridge. For the next 13 days, the FBI<\/span> conducted what the papers said was the biggest manhunt since the Lindbergh kidnapping, and they were\u2013we were in Cambridge\u2013they were all over the world, in the south of France, in [inaudible] in California. I had a feeling there was a good deal of junketing going on, actually, by the FBI<\/span> looking for us, but meanwhile we were putting it out to these other newspapers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

And I will mention, as one last point here, it\u2019s always the Times<\/em> and the Post<\/em> who are mentioned, of course, as having had the courage to go along with this, as we spent the 13 days putting it out. That\u2019s why I was evading the FBI<\/span>. I had other copies, and I was putting them out. Actually, there were four injunctions, also The Boston Globe<\/em> and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch<\/em>, before they gave up on injunctions, or there would have been more. Altogether 17 other newspapers published those papers. And oddly, they don\u2019t seem to mention it much in their own histories. They don\u2019t commemorate this, as we\u2019re commemorating the Beacon Press right now, but they should. That was a wave of civil disobedience across the country by publishers who were being told that they were violating the Espionage Act, they were committing treason, they were hurting national security. They read the documents we gave them and decided they didn\u2019t agree with that as Americans and patriots, and they published them. So it was institutional civil disobedience of a type\u2013I don\u2019t really know of any country or any other journalists, and that\u2019s a kind of freedom and courage we need to celebrate and we need to continue. So, thank you very much.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Pentagon whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg. Coming up, presidential candidate Mike Gravel picks up the story from there. But first, our break, sung by Barbra Streisand for Daniel Ellsberg.<\/p>\n

[break]<\/p>\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Barbra Streisand singing “I\u2019ll Get By,” a live recording at a 1973 fundraiser for Daniel Ellsberg. Yoko Ono, The Beatles\u2019 John Lennon, Ringo Starr and George Harrison also attended.<\/p>\n

We turn now to Senator Mike Gravel from Alaska, yes, the Democratic presidential candidate today. In 1971, he received the Pentagon Papers from Washington Post<\/em> journalist Ben Bagdikian, who in turn had gotten them from Daniel Ellsberg.<\/p>\n

\n

MIKE<\/span> GRAVEL<\/span>:<\/strong> Let me just pick up where he left off, because it really\u2013there\u2019s a lot of little vignettes, and I\u2019ll talk fast, but I want to get all the details out, because I know what you want to know is the inside skinny. You can read the broad lines, but it\u2019s what happened to both our lives at the time that\u2013<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Dan calls my office. He talks to Joe Rothstein, who was my administrative assistant. My administrative assistant\u2013I was down in the Senate gym getting a massage. I was on the table. And, of course, you can\u2019t have staff come into the Senate. This is hallowed ground, so\u2013into the Senate gym. So he\u2019s knocking at the door. He says, “I\u2019ve got to see the senator! It\u2019s an emergency!” And he works his way in to get into the massage stall, and the masseur pulls back a little bit, and he whispers down in my ear. He says, “Somebody wants to give you the Pentagon Papers.” I said, “Man! Where is he?” He says, “He\u2019s going to call us back.” So, man, I get dressed up real quick. We bolt back to the office. And I\u2019m sitting in my office waiting for this call.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Along comes this voice. He says, “Senator, would you read the Pentagon Papers as part of your filibuster?” I says, “Yes. Now please hang up.” The reason for that is I have a background in intelligence. When I was 23 years old, I was a top-secret control officer. I could classify and I could declassify, and I was 23 years old.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So now, here are the papers coming at me. I had a sense of what they were, was a history, a history, and, of course, I had read what the Times<\/em> had published. And so, lo and behold, Dan and I have other conversations. To tell you the truth, our memories are a little vague. He informed me about something that I didn\u2019t know, and occasionally I had done that with him, when he was doing his memoir Secrets<\/em>. We\u2019d spend near a couple days: “Oh, is that what\u2013that\u2019s your interpretation of what you think we did?” “Yes.” “Well, no, that\u2019s my”\u2013”Oh, no. We did it that way.” And what happens, that\u2019s human beings. We all have a different read on some of the details.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

The long and short of it is, he called me in a few days, and he was angry. He was on the phone, and he says, “Why the hell haven\u2019t you used the papers?” And I says, “Why the hell haven\u2019t you got them to me? I don\u2019t have them. I haven\u2019t heard anything.” So he goes back to Ben Bagdikian, and Ben then contacts my office.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Well, quite candidly, I didn\u2019t know who Ben was, but he wanted to get to meet with me. So we meet somewhat secretively on the front steps of the Capitol behind a column in broad daylight during the session. So Ben is standing there. We\u2019re talking about how we\u2019re going to move the papers across, and then out comes Bob Dole, who was one of my enemies, but we\u2019re on the same committee, and he walks up, and Bagdikian is slipping behind a column so he can\u2019t be seen. And so, I get rid of Dole fairly fast, and so we go back.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

And Bagdikian had this plan. We\u2019re going to meet someplace out in the country, you know, Rock Creek Park in a dark\u2013I say, “Wait a second, Ben. I\u2019ve got to tell you. I\u2019ve got a little more experience in this than you have. What we\u2019re going to do, here\u2019s how we\u2019re going to transfer the papers: You\u2019re going to come at 12:00 at night under the marquee of the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C. At 12:00 you park your car there. I will come up with my car. You\u2019ll open your trunk. I\u2019ll open my trunk. And I\u2019ll pop the papers in, and I\u2019ll race off. That\u2019s the way we\u2019ll do it, before God and country, and they won\u2019t even know what happened.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Well, what happens? A group of Alaskan natives walk by, “Oh, there\u2019s our senator,” and they all want to come up and talk with me. And I\u2019m trying to peel them away: “Well, I\u2019ve got to run. I\u2019ve got to run.” And so, I got in my car. We did that. We transferred the papers. I sped away, parked my car, came back in, and Ben and I had a coffee.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

I took the papers home. Where are you going to put them? I brought them home. That\u2019s the first time I told my wife at the time, Rita, I says, “I\u2019ve got the Pentagon Papers right here.” And, of course, the whole world was looking, trying to chase him down and catch him and get the papers. She says, “What are you going to do with them?” “We\u2019re going to put them under the bed, and we\u2019re going to sleep on them. That\u2019s what we\u2019re going to do.” We did.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Next morning\u2013I\u2019m dyslexic, and so I couldn\u2019t read all those papers if it took me a year. And so, what happened, I started calling staff in. And I said, “Look at, you\u2019re going to come in. You bring a toilet kit. Don\u2019t tell your wife what you\u2019re doing. You\u2019re just coming to the senator\u2019s house.” And I met them at the door, and I said, “Look at, I\u2019ve got the Pentagon Papers. You come in, you can\u2019t leave until I leave. But I won\u2019t think ill of you if you don\u2019t come in, because there\u2019s risks that we don\u2019t know anything about.” And so, every one, to the person, said, “Senator, let me have it.” So about four or five people for two days were sleeping on the living room floor, and we would go through the papers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

The style that I used in going through it, I was reading my little portion of it, the first part of it, which is the most historic and the most interesting part. But the others would\u2013I said, “Whenever you come across a name, come and show me the name.” I would then read around the context and make a judgment if this should be excised or not. And when we excised, we didn\u2019t just take a pencil, we took scissors and cut it out, so there would be no misunderstandings.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Now, I\u2019ve got to bring the papers from my home to the Capitol, and so I buy two flight bags, you know, those old flight bags without wheels. I buy two of those to honor the papers. And so, I spend the money, pack them up with two bags like that, and so I\u2019m going to take them to the Capitol. But now I\u2019m concerned, so I call the Vietnam Veterans of America, and I say, “Look at, I\u2019ve got a problem. I need somebody to guard my office. And what I want, I want the most disabled veterans you can find.” And lo and behold, I trudge in\u2013and I wouldn\u2019t let my staff touch the papers\u2013so I trudge in with my two big bags, heavy, and, of course, staff is walking with me, and the cops, they\u2019re looking. Why the hell is the senator carrying the bags and the staff is not carrying his bags? So we walk down to the end of the hall, and there are about six, seven soldiers in uniform, you know it, ponytails, badges all over, all in wheelchairs. And they could do wheelies. And all they could do\u2013they didn\u2019t know what I had. All they said: “Go get \u2019em, Senator! Go get \u2019em!” I was just about to cry, with the commitment of these human beings. And they guarded the office. No, but they would have thrown their bodies at anybody that tried to break in.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

I had the papers, so I go to the floor of the Senate. Now, I had made a deal with Alan Cranston. I had to get\u2013I wanted to read in the filibuster. Now, I had a little bit of ego trip going on here: I wanted to break Strom Thurmond\u2019s record in filibustering. And the draft was going to expire at the end of the month, so I wanted to two days, about close to 48 hours, break his record. Now, how are you going to do that? Most people don\u2019t know when Huey Long and those guys used to debate, what they\u2019d do is\u2013they\u2019re drinking a lot of water\u2013they pee right on floor, right on the Senate floor. Make no mistake about it. But I\u2019m a little more cultured than that. So what I do is I rig myself up. I go to the doctor\u2019s office. I tell him what\u2019s going on, tell him I\u2019m going to filibuster. And so, he rigs me up with a colostomy bag with a little hose down to my ankle. And my administrative assistant\u2019s job is going to bleed the colostomy bag.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Then, it gets better than that. We now go to\u2013I\u2019ve got to get somebody to chair, because you can\u2019t control the floor if you don\u2019t control the chair. So I go to Alan Cranston, my closest friend. I say, “Alan, I need help.” “Well, what do you need, Mike?” “I\u2019ve got the Pentagon Papers.” “Oh, my god, Mike! You need more than help. You\u2019ve got problems,” so he says. I said, “Alan, you don\u2019t have to do anything to risk. You don\u2019t have to touch the papers. You just get in the chair by 5:00. We\u2019ll turn around, and you just stay in that chair as long as I\u2019m filibustering.” And that was our plan. And so, I said, “Now go down to the doctor\u2019s office and get a colostomy bag.” He does that. And, of course, I had a rubber mat. It was very interesting to go into the dynamics of that.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So, lo and behold, I come to the floor of the Senate. I\u2019m trudging in with these papers. I put them next to my desk. And I was a freshman, so I was way on the side. And so, Muskie had come up to me for some committee\u2013we were on the same committee. He\u2019s talking to me. He looks down at these two black bags, and he says, “Mike, are those the Pentagon Papers?” And I look up at him with a blank stare. It was just a joke on his part. But I\u2019m looking at him, “My god!” So, lo and behold\u2013here, I\u2019m a nice guy, so what I wanted to do, I know I\u2019m going to be talking for a couple days, so I want to tell the staff of the Senate that, “Hey, you better call your wife, because you\u2019re not getting out here shortly.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

And so, what I do is I lay on a quorum call. Now, if you\u2019re familiar with the procedures in the Senate, a quorum call, they have to now stop\u2013they have to start calling the roll. And there was only one other senator in the chamber. That was Griffin. The Democrats had gone to a banquet. The Republicans had gone home. And so, there\u2019s two senators in the chamber. So I lay on a quorum call. Griffin walks up to me, and he says, “Mike, what are you going to do?” I says, “Well, you know, I\u2019m just continuing my filibuster on the draft.” But I had always done that because Mansfield had set up a two track. Mind you, I filibustered for five months. It could only happen because Mansfield set it up without anybody seeing his velvet hand. And so, I says, “Well, you know.” He says, “But wait, what are you doing at night?” I said, “Well, the draft is about to expire, and I just want to really make a big show.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

He goes back to his desk, and he\u2019s thinking and he\u2019s thinking. Then, of course, I wait 30 minutes to let the staff notify that they\u2019re going to be there a good part of the evening. And, lo and behold, I make a unanimous consent to remove to quorum call. He objects. The minute he did that, I knew I had just been harpooned. And all I could think is, my mind: Good men don\u2019t win. Good men don\u2019t win. I was so angry. He came up to me, and he says, “Well, Mike, what are you doing?” And I started swearing at him, you cannot believe. Well, by that time, he knew something was really afoot. So he went to the Republican cloak room, said, “Stay away from the Senate,” telling all the Republicans. I\u2019m sending my troops to go out there and get the Democrats to come back from the banquet. Well, that goes on for ’til about 9:30, 10:00, and we could not get a quorum. I’m stuck.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Rothstein comes up to me, and he says, “Senator, we\u2019re stuck. There\u2019s nothing we can do here.” So I grabbed\u2013and he says, “But our attorneys think they\u2019ve got a plan B.” So we grab the bags, trudge back to the office again. By this time, the Vietnam vets are out there, they know there\u2019s something really serious afoot, because there\u2019s a lot of media following us. And so, I go in, sit down. “What\u2019s our plan?” “Well, Senator, it\u2019s interesting. There\u2019s not much hope, but we do have one precedent that we could follow.” And that\u2019s the precedent, believe it or not, the House Un-American Activities Committee, for those of you who know what that means.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

He says, “What they were doing is they would go around the country and they would immediately call a hearing so that they could grab somebody, pull him up, swear him in, and get him to talk.” He says, “With that precedent, what you could do”\u2013and now, mind you, I\u2019m a freshman\u2013”you\u2019re chairman of a committee, a subcommittee,”\u2013and, of course, that committee was the Buildings and Grounds Committee. So, lo and behold, they say, “What you could do is you could convene a hearing of this committee, and you would be still within the umbrage of the Senate.” And so, I said, “Fine. Let\u2019s do that.” But what we\u2019ve got to do is we\u2019ve got to have somebody to testify. So we type up the notice that I\u2019m chairman, I\u2019m calling a hearing, slip it under the doors of all these senators who are not there, that I\u2019m notifying them of the hearing, so that that\u2019s covered legally. And then the peace group calls up a Congressman Dowd from Upper New York. He doesn\u2019t know what it\u2019s about. All they tell him on the telephone: “Senator Gravel needs you to come and testify at a very important hearing.” He gets dressed\u2013he was an elderly fellow\u2013gets dressed, comes down, and we convene.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

By this time, we\u2019re upstairs in one of the Senate chambers, committee room, and the whole phalanx of the media. And then Congressman Dowd comes up, and I\u2019m sitting there with my two black bags and my staff assistant. And the congressman\u2013and I gavel the meeting to order. “Congressman, can I help you? Now, I understand you want to testify.” He says, “Yes. I\u2019d like to get a federal building in my district.” And I say, “Congressman, let me interrupt you right there. I know you need a federal building in your district, and I\u2019d love to give you a federal building in your district, but I\u2019ve got to tell you, our government\u2019s broke. We don\u2019t have any money to give you a federal building. And let me tell you why we\u2019re broke: because we\u2019re squandering all this money in Southeast Asia. And let me tell you how we got into Southeast Asia.” And I haul out the papers, put them on the table, and I\u2019m reading.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

It gets better than that. I read for an hour. Now, here again, I\u2019m dyslexic, but there\u2019s no way on God\u2019s green earth I\u2019m going to read\u2013but I\u2019m reading it. Now, keep in mind I hadn\u2019t slept for about three or four days. And so, I\u2019m reading, and I break out sobbing. It\u2019s about 12:00 at night, and I am sobbing, and I can\u2019t get control of myself. Here\u2019s what was going through my head. A journalist on one of the networks the next morning: “Well, this was a bizarre occurrence the night before. You know, Gravel was very bizarre. He cried.” And so, what I was sobbing over\u2013I had been to Walter Reed a month or more before to walk around, and I couldn\u2019t take it. I couldn\u2019t take it emotionally to look at the wounded. And so, I can handle macro-problems, but not micro-, and so, lo and behold, I kept saying to myself, “My god! I love my country. My country is committing immoral acts. We\u2019re killing human beings. There\u2019s no reason for it.” And I\u2019m sobbing, and as I\u2019m dyslexic, I\u2019m reading rote. You know, I couldn\u2019t follow the words in front of me. So Rothstein comes up to me. He says\u2013and the understatement of the year\u2013he says, “Senator, I think you\u2019ve lost it.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

And so\u2013and I keep sobbing, and then he goes back, and I try to get a hold of myself, and I can\u2019t. And so he comes back. He says, “Senator, why don\u2019t you put it in the record.” And then I sobered up immediately and said, “Oh, yes. I got power. I\u2019m the chairman of this committee. So I move and ask unanimous consent to put all these papers that I was going to read into the record, to put them in the record automatically.” Bang! They\u2019re in the record. That\u2019s how it officially got into the record of the United States of America.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

And obviously, the media, by that point, they\u2019re out there going really\u2013so I put the papers back in. We\u2019re trudging back to my office. The media is following us. “We want the papers! We want the papers!” So we cut a deal with them. “Look at, we\u2019ve got a copy of the papers, because we want to hang on to a set. And as we copy them, we\u2019ll turn them to you. We\u2019ll set up a pool, and then you go copy them and distribute them to the world.” That\u2019s what happened all night long. And that\u2019s what made the Supreme Court decision moot, which was at 11:00 or 12:00 that very day. And what they did is they said you could not put on prior restraint, but what you could do is, if you published, you\u2019d be at risk. And that\u2019s what happened. Those that had published took the risks, but they weren\u2019t prepared to take the risks after that.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

We scoured the country, and this is where the meeting comes in with Beacon. We scoured the country, could not find one major or minor, or anybody, that would touch the Pentagon Papers. We had some inkling that maybe MIT<\/span> Press would, so with my staff, Fishman and one other attorney, we go to Boston. Whoever was handling it\u2013and I don\u2019t recall\u2013at the time, he said, “Senator, I\u2019ve got bad news for you. MIT<\/span> Press won\u2019t touch it with a 10-foot pole.” And then I\u2019m just crestfallen, like we\u2019re going to check how to get back to Washington. He said, “But I\u2019ve got some good news for you: Beacon Press has got the money, and they will publish it. And Gobin Stair and Bob West are downtown in Boston waiting for you, if you want to come down and make the deal with them.” And I said, “Let\u2019s go!” And we had a press conference shortly thereafter. And that\u2019s when we announced that we were going to do it.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

I was a Unitarian even before all this happened in Alaska, but I can\u2019t tell you what I feel for Beacon Press, for the Unitarians and for Dan Ellsberg. Dan quoted and likes to say that when I went in the service, I was going in to be a spy, but I wasn\u2019t getting any action, so I went in to be a combat infantry platoon leader. And on the patch on my shoulder said, “Follow me.” Well, when I saw Dan do what he did, all I could think of: Here\u2019s a guy that\u2019s walking up the hill, taking his life in his own hands, and the least I could do is follow Dan Ellsberg.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Former Alaska senator and Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel, who got the Pentagon Papers into the public record. When we come back, the man who allowed the Beacon Press to take the risk of publishing the top-secret documents. If you want a copy of today\u2019s show, you can go to our website, democracynow.org. Back in a minute.<\/p>\n

[break]<\/p>\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Ringo Starr singing “With a Little Help from My Friends,” sung at the 1973 fundraiser for Dan Ellsberg. This is Democracy Now!<\/em>, democracynow.org. I\u2019m Amy Goodman, as we go now to Robert West, the former president of the Unitarian Universalist Association and Beacon Press. While every other publishing house Senator Gravel had approached and refused to publish the Pentagon Papers, West agreed, despite the considerable political and financial risks involved.<\/p>\n

\n

ROBERT<\/span> WEST<\/span>:<\/strong> My first involvement with the Pentagon Papers was on a midsummer day in 1971, when the director of Beacon Press, Gobin Stair, came into my office. He told me about the 35 publishers who had refused to publish them, and he requested my approval for Beacon Press to do it. I gave my approval that day, and we started down a path that led through two-and-a-half years of government intimidation, harassment and threat of criminal punishment.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Beacon published the Pentagon Papers that October, after having publicly announced its intention in August. In September, Gobin was visited by two intelligence agents from the Defense Department who, in a meeting Gobin described to me as intimidating, tried to dissuade him from publishing the papers. He also received a phone call from President Nixon, who, after saying what a decent fellow Gobin was, pointedly suggested that he was sure Gobin would not want to get into trouble by proceeding to publish them.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

One morning in early November, a vice president of our bank called our UUA<\/span> treasurer to advise us that FBI<\/span> agents had secretly been working at the bank for the last seven days. They were there with a subpoena from the federal grand jury that called for copies of all UUA<\/span> financial records, which meant every check written and every check deposited into UUA<\/span> accounts over a period of four-and-a-half months, amounting to thousands of checks, including those of all individuals who contributed to our denomination.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Senator Gravel immediately brought contempt proceedings against the government and succeeded in halting the FBI<\/span> investigation and examination of our bank records for two months. But agents were authorized to resume their scrutiny on January 10. The next day, the UUA<\/span> filed suit against the FBI<\/span>, the Justice Department and the grand jury, seeking to stop the investigation. We emphasized the grounds of religious freedom and freedom of association, as well as freedom of the press. And we succeeded in halting it on a temporary basis.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

But before all the events had run their course in 1974, we were in federal courts on numerous occasions, including the Supreme Court. FBI<\/span> agents served grand jury subpoenas on Gobin Stair and our UUA<\/span> treasurer, and then withdrew them. The U.S. attorney in Boston filed a memorandum in court that indicated the strong likelihood that Beacon Press officials would be prosecuted for criminal activity. And Gobin Stair was subpoenaed to appear at the Ellsberg trial in California, with me next in line.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Ultimately, the mistrial that was declared in the Ellsberg case meant we did not have to appear at the federal trial in California. The federal court in Boston never allowed the FBI<\/span> investigation of our bank records to continue, and no one associated with Beacon Press or the UUA<\/span> was prosecuted for criminal activity.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

What the government did to us as a continental religious denomination was unprecedented in the history of our nation. The Justice Department investigated our entire denomination\u2019s financial affairs and threatened our association\u2019s staff members because one of our departments, Beacon Press, published one book that was controversial, a text that was already in the public domain.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

The relevance of our experience, those 35 years ago, to secrecy and deception in government today is patently obvious. For example, three of the issues and principles that were involved in our court actions were misuse of power of the Justice Department, invasion of privacy, and misuse of secrecy by the government. All of those clearly apply to what is happening today.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

In his 1972 dissenting opinion in the Gravel case, Supreme Court Justice Douglas said, “The story of the Pentagon Papers is a chronicle of the suppression of vital decisions to protect the reputations and political hides of men who work an amazingly successful scheme of deception on the American people.” And he went on to say in that decision that he had no choice but to hold that it was the government that is lawless, not the press.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

In 1971, Senator Gravel wrote, “The Pentagon Papers show that we have created a new culture, protected from the influence of American life by the shield of secrecy.” In that same year, Beacon Press Editor-in-Chief Arnold Tovell spoke of the Pentagon Papers aiding those who try to unravel exactly how a well-meaning nation could have committed such a colossal blunder in its foreign affairs.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

In closing, I would cite these words from my annual report to the 1973 UUA<\/span> General Assembly, words that could be spoken just as appropriately in this general assembly today: We in this denomination have confidence in a democratic process. We want to make known our determination to resist every government intrusion upon constitutional liberties and to encourage others also to resist. We, as a religious movement, are qualified by our nature, by our heritage, and indeed by our recent experience, to play a significant role at this time in our history to help resist and reverse the ominous trend affecting constitutional liberties. We can, and we will.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Robert West, you also paid a personal price\u2013is this right?\u2013because your brother worked for the FBI<\/span> at the time.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

ROBERT<\/span> WEST<\/span>:<\/strong> Yeah. He was a career\u201330-year career FBI<\/span> agent, and he\u2019s 10 years older than I am. And there was a time when if I was going through Washington International Airport, I would just call him up and say hello. He worked out of the FBI<\/span> agents\u2019 office in Alexandria. And he\u2013one night he told me he would appreciate it if I wouldn\u2019t call him anymore. But I will say this for him: After he retired, we became very close friends, and the man was a liberal. He wound up writing letters against President Bush and against the Iraq War in the newspapers in different parts of Florida. He was a different person. And he was so looking forward to my book coming out, because the longest chapter in it is about the Pentagon Papers, and he kept asking me about it in phone calls. And he died a week before the book was published.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Dan Ellsberg, why don\u2019t you pick it up from there, and that is how what you did then relates to today. In the last few years, you have been calling for people, who like you 35 years ago were inside the system, to step outside and to release an equivalent of the Pentagon Papers. Do you think they exist\u2013the papers and these people who could step forward?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

DANIEL<\/span> ELLSBERG<\/span>:<\/strong> Well, of course, the papers exist. The Pentagon Papers, the equivalent of them, exist in safes in Washington, all over Washington, not only in the Pentagon, but in the CIA<\/span> and the State Department and elsewhere. Are there people who realize what the meaning of those\u2013the full meaning of those papers in their safes? Yes. We know from many leaks and memoirs that have come out that there were people in the White House and the CIA<\/span> and the Pentagon who realized that we were being lied into war. They realized that as early as 2001.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So my message, Amy, over the last two years has been to officials in that position, of whom there are hundreds, not only in 2001 and 2002, hundreds right now who could prevent a war with Iran that is on the tracks right now, that they know, and that they know would be disastrous. They could put that out with the authority of their position, but especially of documents, at the risk\u2013the certainty\u2013of losing their clearances, which would almost certainly\u2013which would mean losing their career with the executive branch, possibly, very likely, subjecting them to prosecution, possibly to conviction, possibly to prison. And by taking that risk, they would have a high chance of averting a catastrophe that would lead to the deaths of tens, hundreds of thousands of people and disastrously reduce our security. They know that. So by taking their own personal risk, like the 5,000 people who went to prison as draft resisters in Vietnam, and by the people here who took risks with their institution and their privacy, by taking that risk they could avert this.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

So my message is to them: Don\u2019t do what I did. Don\u2019t wait ’til the war has started. Don’t wait ’til the bombs have fallen against Iran, or earlier Iraq. Don’t wait \u2019til the engine of this war is unstoppable. Before the war, take the risk. Reveal what you know to be the truth. Reveal the truth under the lies of your own bosses and your superiors. Obey your oath to the Constitution, which every one of those officials took, not to the commander-in-chief, not to superior officers, but to the Constitution of the United States, which they know is being violated.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

AMY<\/span> GOODMAN<\/span>:<\/strong> Pentagon whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg, Unitarian leader Robert West, and Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel.<\/p>\n

Republished with permission from: Truth Out<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Forty-one years ago, Beacon Press lost a Supreme Court case brought against it by the U.S. government for publishing the first full edition of the Pentagon Papers. It is now well known how The New York Times first published excerpts of the top-secret documents in June 1971, but less well known is how the Beacon […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-47934","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47934"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47934\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}