{"id":381877,"date":"2018-10-21T14:00:45","date_gmt":"2018-10-21T13:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=381877"},"modified":"2018-10-21T14:00:45","modified_gmt":"2018-10-21T13:00:45","slug":"the-earthquake-in-international-alliances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/the-earthquake-in-international-alliances\/","title":{"rendered":"The Earthquake in International Alliances"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

(UPDATE<\/b> about the Khashoggi case, posted at end.)<\/span><\/p>\n

America\u2019s international alliances are transforming in fundamental ways. The likelihood of World War III is increasing, and has been increasing ever since 2012 when the U.S. first slapped Russia with the Magnitsky Act sanctions. In fact, one matter driving these changing alliances now toward unprecedented realignments is that some nations\u2019 leaders want to do whatever they can to prevent<\/i> WW III.<\/span><\/p>\n

On October 17th, America\u2019s Military Times<\/i> bannered “Why today\u2019s troops fear a new war is coming soon\u201d<\/span><\/a> and reported, \u201cAbout 46 percent of troops who responded to the anonymous survey of currently serving Military Times<\/i> readers said they believe the U.S. will be drawn into a new war within the next year. That\u2019s a jarring increase from only about 5 percent who said the same thing in a similar poll conducted in September 2017.\u201d Their special fear is of war against Russia and\/or China: \u201cAbout 71 percent of troops said Russia was a significant threat, up 18 points from last year\u2019s survey. And 69 percent of troops said China poses a significant threat, up 24 points from last year.\u201d The U.S. spends around half of the entire world\u2019s military budget<\/span><\/a>; and, after 9\/11, has invaded Afghanistan, Iraq<\/span><\/a>, Libya, Syria, and Yemen, and perpetrated a bloody coup turning Ukraine into a rabidly anti-Russian government on Russia\u2019s very doorstep and even an applicant for NATO membership<\/span><\/a> though, in 2009, before Obama\u2019s coup overthrew Ukraine\u2019s democratically elected Government, even U.S. media reported that \u201cbarely 25 percent of Ukrainians favor joining NATO.\u201d<\/span><\/a> After 1991 when Russia\u2019s anti-American Warsaw Pact military alliance ended, America\u2019s anti-Russian NATO military alliance expanded right up to Russia\u2019s very borders. Nonetheless, these troops aren\u2019t afraid that the U.S. is posing a threat to Russia and maybe to China, but that Russia and China are both posing threats against America; they trust their Government; it\u2019s what they\u2019re taught to believe. But the reality is very different. And it involves all of the \u201cgreat power\u201d relationships \u2014 not only<\/i> U.S., Russia, and China.<\/span><\/p>\n

The precipitating event for the breakup that\u2019s now occurring in international alliances, happened on October 2nd, when Jamal Khashoggi, a critic of the leader of Saudi Arabia, went into the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul Turkey, and disappeared.<\/span><\/p>\n

Allegedly, <\/span>the dictator of Saudi Arabia, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud, had Khashoggi murdered and chopped-up inside that Consulate, within no more than two hours of his entrance there. Russia announced exactly a week later, on October 9th, that Salman had just bought<\/span><\/a> Russia\u2019s world-leading S-400 anti-missile system, for $2 billion. U.S. President Donald Trump and the U.S. Congress will thus now need to determine whether to slap sanctions against Saudi Arabia for that purchase of Russian weaponry, just like the U.S. has already been threatening to do to fellow-NATO-member Turkey after its leader, President Tayyip Erdogan, likewise, recently purchased S-400s. (Trump and Congress also threatened India\u2019s Modi this way, for its purchase of several S-400s<\/span><\/a>.) But even without this Saudi S-400 purchase, some in Washington have been proposing cancellation of Saudi Arabia\u2019s $404 billion purchase of U.S.-made weaponry<\/span><\/a>, the largest armaments-sale in history, which Trump had negotiated with Salman in 2017 and which is the likeliest cause of today\u2019s booming U.S. stock market. The news-media call it a $110 billion sale, but only the first-year of the ten-year commitment is $110 billion; the total deal is a 10-year commitment, at around $400 billion<\/span><\/a>. (Though initially it had been 10 years at $350 billion, CNBC headlined nine months later, \u201cTrump wants Saudi Arabia to buy more American-made weapons\u201d<\/span><\/a> and reported: \u201cIn the past nine months alone, the U.S. has secured $54 billion in foreign military sales to Saudi Arabia.\u201d So, without seeing the actual signed deal, to confirm with certainty, one can assume that the total now is $404 billion.) Low-balling the amount is done in order to hide the national embarrassment of the military-industrial-complex\u2019s now being the actual basis of America\u2019s booming stock market.<\/span><\/p>\n

Salman\u2019s purchase of that $2 billion Russian S-400 could place the vastly larger $404 billion U.S. arms-sale to Saudi Arabia (and America\u2019s consequent stock-boom and full employment) even more in jeopardy than it already is. America\u2019s two most-core Middle Eastern allies, Saudi Arabia and Turkey (and Israel is only a distant third, and has no other option than to do whatever the U.S. Government requires it to do), could soon become no longer U.S. allies. America\u2019s most important international alliances have never before been in such jeopardy. Turkey is likelier to re-align with Russia than Saudi Arabia is, but even if Turkey becomes the only one to switch, that would be an earthquake in international relations. If both Turkey and Saudi Arabia go, it would be an earthquake, not just in international relations, but in world history. It could happen; and, if it does, then the reality that we know today will be gone and will become replaced by arrangements that virtually no one today is even thinking about, at all.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jamal Khashoggi, a member and champion of<\/span><\/a> the Muslim Brotherhood (as is Tayyip Erdogan \u2014 which is another reason why Erdogan would be especially unlikely to relent on this matter), was a nephew of the recently deceased billionaire international-arms merchant Adnan Khashoggi; press adviser to the billionaire Saudi chief of intelligence and Ambassador to the United States Prince Turki al-Faisal al-Saud; and, more recently, a prot\u00e9g\u00e9 of billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud (who also is a Muslim Brotherhood member<\/span><\/a>). Of course, he was also a columnist for the Washington Post<\/i>, which makes impossible his case being ignored in the U.S. <\/span><\/p>\n

On 4 November 2017, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud, and many other Princes and billionaires, were seized by the forces of the billionaire Prince Salman, the heir-apparent to the thone of his father, King Salman al-Saud, who is the world\u2019s only trillionaire<\/span><\/a>. What\u2019s essential to understand is that in order for any Saud Prince (such as this Crown Prince, Salman) to become King Saud (and thus to inherit his father\u2019s trillion-dollar-plus fortune), he must first win the approval of the nation\u2019s Wahhab clergy or \u201cUlema\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and so Saudi Arabia is both a monarchy and a theocracy. There has long been a global competition between two fundamentalist-Sunni groups: the Saud-funded Al Qaeda versus the Thani-funded Muslim Brotherhood. Ever since the Saud family and the Wahhab clergy agreed in 1744 to take control of all Arabs and to convert or kill all Shia, the Sauds have been (and are) anti-Shia and insist upon fundamentalist Sunni rule<\/span><\/a>. Al Qaeda represents the Wahhabist and Saud view, which advocates elimination of Shiites and accepts hereditary monarchy as the power to impose Sunni Islamic law and rejects democracy; the Muslim Brotherhood represents instead the more tolerant Thani view, which accepts Shia and also accepts imposition of Islamic law by means of democracy, and not only by means of dynasty. Both Prince and King Salman hate the Shia-accepting Muslim Brotherhood, whose top funder is the competing Thani family, who own Qatar; the Thanis don\u2019t hate democracy and Shiites and Iran enough to suit the Sauds and especially the Salmans. They\u2019re not sufficiently anti-Iran and anti-Shiite and anti-democracy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Khashoggi had explained why<\/span><\/a> he shared the Muslim Brotherhood\u2019s ideals: \u201cWe were hoping to establish an Islamic state anywhere. We believed that the first one would lead to another, and that would have a domino effect which could reverse the history of mankind.\u201d He was out to save the world by making it a fundamentalist Sunni world, somehow without using terrorism to do it. Like him, the Thanis and Erdogan don\u2019t share such extreme extremism as the Sauds demand.<\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore, On October 16th, Gabriel Sherman at Vanity Fair<\/i> bannered \u201cHOW JAMAL KHASHOGGI FELL OUT WITH BIN SALMAN\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and he wrote that Khashoggi had told him, back in March, that the reason he had turned against Prince Salman, and why the Washington Post<\/i> had hired him, was what had happened on 4 November 2017: \u201c\u2018When the arrests started happening, I flipped. I decided it was time to speak,\u2019 he told me. Khashoggi subsequently landed a column in The Washington Post<\/i>.\u201d Furthermore, Khashoggi told Sherman, \u201cThe people M.B.S. arrested were not radicals. The majority were reformers for women\u2019s rights and open society. He arrested them to spread fear. He is replacing religious intolerance with political closure.\u201d This was the difference between Al Qaeda versus the Muslim Brotherhood.<\/span><\/p>\n

The competition between, on the one hand, the pro-Muslim-Brotherhood Thanis and Erdogan, versus the pro-Al-Qaeda Sauds, UAE and Kuwait<\/span><\/a>, on the other; is forcing the U.S. to choose between those two sides, or else even possibly lose both of them and even to go instead with Shia Islam as America\u2019s Muslim partners. The biggest U.S. Middle Eastern military bases in the Middle East<\/span><\/a> are Al Udeid in the Thanis\u2019 Qatar, and Incirlik in Turkey. Both of those are Muslim Brotherhood Sunni territory, not Al Qaeda Sunni territory. The U.S. under Trump has been more pro-Al-Qaeda (pro-Saud) than the U.S. had been under Obama, but doesn\u2019t want to lose those bases. (President Obama had supported the Muslim Brotherhood\u2019s Mohammed Morsi in Egypt. But he also vetoed the congressional bill for investigating whether the Sauds had done 9\/11<\/span><\/a>. He wanted friends on both sides of the Sunni divide. But he killed Al Qaeda\u2019s founding leader, bin Laden. And yet he continued being staunchly pro Al Qaeda against Russia<\/span><\/a>.)<\/span><\/p>\n

Turkey has been a U.S. ally through its membership (since 1952) in the NATO anti-Russia alliance. Saudi Arabia has been a U.S. ally since a major 1938 Rockefeller oil-discovery there<\/span><\/a>, and especially since U.S. President Richard Nixon in the early 1970s switched gold for oil as the physical basis for the dollar\u2019s value<\/span><\/a> in international commerce. But for both of these till-now U.S. allies to be buying the world\u2019s best anti-missile system from the very same country that the U.S. aristocracy has secretly been trying ultimately to conquer even after the U.S.S.R. and its Warsaw Pact military alliance and its communism all ended in 1991<\/span><\/a>, is a shock, and an insult, to America\u2019s aristocracy (the billionaires), coming from two of their most important former allies. <\/span><\/p>\n

What is at stake now is not only the value-basis of the U.S. dollar and the continuance of America\u2019s NATO alliance against Russia, but, more basically than either, is the full realization of the dream by Cecil Rhodes in 1877 and of George Soros today<\/span><\/a>, for a unified and all-inclusive UK-U.S. empire to become ruler over the entire world \u2014 the first-ever all-encompassing global empire. Britain importantly bonded King Saud and his family to its Empire, at the time of World War I, against the Ottoman Empire.<\/span><\/a> That was the Sauds\u2019 alliance against Turkey\u2019s empire. After World War II, U.S. became the leader of this joint UK-U.S. empire, as Rhodes had expected ultimately to happen. Ever since 2000, Erdogan has been scheming to restore Turkey\u2019s role as the world\u2019s primary Islamic empire, and so to squelch the Saud family\u2019s aspirations to achieve dominance over global Islam. Ever since 1744<\/span><\/a>, the Saud family has been trying to achieve that dominance as being the fundamentalist-Sunni champion against the fundamentalist-Shiite leadership since 1979 in Iran. But, now, the Sunni Sauds\u2019 main competitor might no longer be Shiite Iran, but instead turn out to be Sunni Turkey, after all \u2014 which had been the Sauds\u2019 main enemy at the very start of the 20th Century.<\/span><\/p>\n

What will the U.S. do, as the collapse of its aristocracy\u2019s dream of global conquest after the fall of communism, is now gathering force even to bring into question such key former allies of America\u2019s aristocracy, as Turkey, and as the world\u2019s richest family (by far), the Saud family (the owners of Saudi Arabia)<\/span><\/a>?<\/span><\/p>\n

Perhaps the Sauds are making this stunning weapons-purchase from Russia because the prominent critic of the Sauds, Saudi citizen (and nephew of the global arms-merchant Adnan Khashoggi) Jamal Khashoggi, was recorded by loads of hidden cameras and audio recording devices including the watch and cellphone of the victim Jamal Khashoggi himself, as he was being murdered and chopped-up inside the Saudi Embassy in Constantinople-Istanbul when seeking papers that were required in order for him to marry his Turkish fianc\u00e9 \u2014 as the Turkish Government now claims. This is an incident that reverberates hugely against the more-than-a-century-long goal of the UK-U.S. aristocracies for those billionaires to take control over the entire world \u2014 including Russia<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Erdogan got shaken to resist the UK-U.S. alliance, when on 15 July 2016, there was a coup-attempt against Erdogan, which endangered his life. The UK-U.S.\u2019s establishments kept the coup-attempt\u2019s very existence almost hidden in their media for several days, because the attempt had failed and the \u2018news\u2019-media hadn\u2019t received instructions on how to report what had just happened \u2014 the usual CIA-MI6 pipelines \u2018informing\u2019 them were probably silent, because those sources were prepared only for delivering the storyline for a successful coup, and it hadn\u2019t been successful \u2014 it instead failed. <\/span><\/p>\n

So, for example, UK\u2019s Independent<\/i> headlined on July 18th, \u201cTurkey coup attempt: Rebel jets had Erdogan’s plane in their sights but did not fire, officials claim:<\/span><\/a> \u2018Why they didn’t fire is a mystery,\u2019 former military officer says,\u201d and they raised the question in their report, of whether this had actually been a coup-attempt or instead an event that had been planned by the Erdogan regime in order for him then to be enabled to impose martial law so as to eliminate his political opponents: \u201c<\/span>Conspiracy theorists are saying the attempted military coup was faked<\/span><\/a>, comparing it to the Reichstag fire – the 1933 arson attack on the German parliament building used by Hitler as an excuse to suspend civil liberties and order mass arrests of his opponents.\u201d If you then click onto that \u201cattempted military coup was faked\u201d, you will come to this same newspaper\u2019s report, dated July 16th, which was headlined “Turkey coup: Conspiracy theorists claim power grab attempt was faked by Erdogan\u201d<\/span><\/a><\/span>. It\u2019s unusual for an Establishment news-medium to provide any sort of credence to the possibility that a false-flag event has occurred, but if the empire\u2019s intelligence services were providing no information, then even an Establishment \u2018news\u2019-medium can do such a thing \u2014 anything in order to pretend to have news that\u2019s worthy of publishing about an important event.<\/span><\/p>\n

But also on July 18th, yet another Establishment \u2018news\u2019-medium, Newsweek<\/i>, headlined \u201cPUTIN CALLS ERDOGAN TO VOICE SUPPORT FOR ORDER IN TURKEY\u201d<\/span><\/a> and used this event as an opportunity to publicize a statement by an expelled Russian billionaire who had actually been expelled because he had cheated Russia on his tax-returns. Newsweek<\/i> hid that fact. This supposed billionaire-champion of democracy was there approvingly quoted in a passage: \u201cMany in Russia drew parallels between Erdogan and Putin, hinting Putin may fear mutiny in his own ranks. ‘Well done Turkey,’ Putin rival Mikhail Khodorkovsky tweeted as news o<\/span>f the coup broke on Friday.\u201d<\/span> (That\u2019s \u201cPutin rival,\u201d instead of billionaire tax-crook. Brainwashing is done that way.) Every possible anti-Russian angle to this attempted coup was pursued: the angle here was, the failed coup had been attempted for the sake of \u2018democracy\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

On July 21st, Al-Araby headlined “Russia ‘warned Erdogan about coup’ moments before assassination attempt\u201d<\/span><\/a><\/span>, and reported that, <\/span><\/p>\n

Russian intelligence warned President Recep Tayyip Erdogan that factions within the army were planning a coup – possibly saving the Turkish leader’s life – Iranian state media has alleged.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Moscow reportedly received “highly sensitive army exchanges and encoded radio messages showing that the Turkish army was readying to stage a coup”, Fars News Agency said, citing Arab sources.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

An unnamed Turkish diplomatic source confirmed that intelligence services “received intel from its Russian counterpart that warned of an impending coup\u201d.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Russian spies … informed Ankara that several military helicopters were dispatched to Erdogan’s hotel to “arrest or kill him”.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

The CIA edits<\/a><\/span>, and on some matters, even writes, Wikipedia articles<\/span><\/a>; and their article on the “2016 Turkish coup d’\u00e9tat<\/i> attempt\u201d<\/span><\/a> says nothing at all about this advance-notice by Putin \u2014 the key fact about the event, if it\u2019s true. They don\u2019t even mention it as something that might<\/i> have happened (and which would explain<\/i> even much that Wikipedia\u2019s article does<\/i> report). Is this absence because the CIA thinks that it\u2019s not true, or because the CIA knows that it is true and perhaps also that the CIA itself was involved in the coup-attempt and so wants to keep this fact out<\/i> of their account and out of the public\u2019s consciousness altogether?<\/span><\/p>\n

Also on July 21st, Alexander Mercouris, who is deeply knowledgeable about international relations, headlined at his The Duran, “Why Reports of the Russian Tip Off to Erdogan May Be True\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and he presented a stunning case, which could more accurately have been headlined \u201cWhy Reports of the Russian Tip Off to Erdogan Are Almost Certainly True.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

I further have documented its extreme likelihood, headlining at Strategic Culture Foundation on August 18th, “What Was Behind the Turkish Coup-Attempt?\u201d<\/span><\/a> But, of course, Wikipedia doesn\u2019t link to sites such as The Duran, or Strategic Culture Foundation, because a controlled news-and-information system-environment is essential to the effective functioning of any dictatorship<\/span><\/a> (and also see this<\/span><\/a> and this<\/span><\/a>, with yet further documentation that the U.S. is no democracy, at all).<\/span><\/p>\n

So: ever since 15 July 2016, Turkey has been veering away from the U.S. and toward Russia, in its national-security policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the only major prior indication that the Sauds might do likewise was when the Sauds\u2019 intelligence-chief, head of the National Intelligence Council, and former U.S. Ambassador, Prince Bandar bin Sultan al-Saud, secretly met with Putin in Moscow on 31 July 2013<\/span><\/a> in order to try to pry Russia away from protecting the Governments of both Syria and Iran \u2014 Bandar even told Putin “I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics<\/span><\/a> in the city of Sochi on the Black Sea next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the [upcoming Sochi Winter Olympic] games are controlled by us.\u201d Bandar also promised to buy up to $15 billion of Russian-made weapons, if Putin would abandon protection of the sovereignty of the Syrian and Iranian Governments. Putin said no. Bandar was the long-time friend of Israel<\/span><\/a> who had donated heavily to Al Qaeda prior to the 9\/11 attacks<\/span><\/a>, even out of his personal account<\/span><\/a>. He was especially close to both U.S. President Bushes.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Trump arms-deal with Saudi Arabia is enormous \u2014 $404 billion over ten years \u2014 and it very much is at stake now because of the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi. America\u2019s \u2018news\u2019-media hide this reality.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, the 16 October 2018 NPR \u201cMorning Edition\u201d program headlined \u201cTrump Says He Won\u2019t Scrap Arms Deal Over Missing Saudi Journalist\u201d<\/span><\/a> and host Steve Inskeep diminished the importance of Trump\u2019s enormous arms-deal with Saudi Arabia. Inskeep interviewed a supposed expert on international arms-sales. He asked her about Saudi Arabia, whether they are \u201ca really lucrative market for weapons\u201d and she said \u201cArms sales aren\u2019t this lucrative big deal for the United States,\u201d because \u201carms sales are a pretty inefficient employment mechanism,\u201d which wasn\u2019t even relevant to answering the question that had been asked. She went on to say they\u2019re not lucrative because \u201csometimes weapons are given on grant or on favorable credit terms,\u201d but that too was irrelevant but just pointed to the fact that the U.S. taxpayer is often subsidizing<\/i> those extremely lucrative \u2014 for the weapons-firms<\/b> \u2014 transactions. Her answer ignored that Lockheed Martin etc. benefit just the same; only taxpayers lose when it\u2019s subsidized. Inskeep: \u201cYou\u2019re saying that there aren\u2019t actually many jobs at stake?\u201d She answered: \u201cThat\u2019s what we\u2019ve seen in the past.\u201d But she again falsified, because what the econometric studies actually show is that armaments-expenditures produce less economic growth than non-\u2018defense\u2019 spending does. (In fact, in the U.S., military spending actually decreases long-term<\/i> GDP-growth<\/span><\/a>.) Yet still, adding $404 billion to U.S. manufacturing sales in any field (\u2018defense\u2019 or otherwise) is an enormous short-term boost. (Inskeep and his guest never even mentioned the amount, $404 billion in this deal; the program was geared to idiots and to keeping them such. It was geared to deceive.) Both the questioner and the \u2018expert\u2019 were geared toward hiding the basic reality, certainly not to explaining<\/i> it. Trump\u2019s largest boost to U.S. GDP thus far has been that $404 billion arms-sale he made to Prince Salman in 2017. It caused stock-values of those armaments-firms to soar, and will (unless cancelled) produce an enormous number of new jobs in the U.S. making those weapons, once the specific contracts have become finalized. But the boosts to armaments-makers\u2019 stock values are already evident. And yet not once in that segment was it mentioned that the Saudi deal was for $404 billion of U.S.-made weapons over a ten-year period. That sale dwarfs any previous weapons-sale in history. NPR simply lied; they deceived their audience. One might say it\u2019s instead because of incompetence on their part, but those program-hosts and producers and guests are hired and engaged and retained because they possess this kind<\/i> of \u2018incompetence\u2019. It\u2019s no mistake, and it is systematic throughout the mainstream Western \u2018news\u2019-media. It is lying \u2018news\u2019-media. So, as a result, the American public cannot understand U.S.-Saudi relations and other matters that are basic understandings by and for the aristocracy. These are propaganda-media, not<\/i> news-media.<\/span><\/p>\n

In fact, just the day earlier, on October 15th, NPR had even headlined \u201cFact Check: How Much Does Saudi Arabia Spend On Arms Deals With The U.S.?\u201d<\/span><\/a> The sub-head was \u201cPresident Trump says he does not want to endanger what he describes as a $110 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia. But the actual figure is considerably lower.\u201d They reported that, \u201cSince Donald Trump has been president, the United States and Saudi Arabia have concluded less than $4-billion-worth of arms agreements.\u201d No mention was made of the $350 billion figure, much less of the $404 billion one. It\u2019s as if the agreements didn\u2019t exist. (At the time of the signing of the ten-year arms-deal, the video<\/span><\/a>, which starts with Trump signing some documents, shows that the Saud Government stated at 3:03 that the deal was for \u201can investment of more than $480 billion dollars\u201d some of which<\/span><\/a> was non-military<\/span><\/a>, and at 3:15 it says that the deal will \u201cprovide hundreds of thousands of jobs\u201d to the United States. Specific congratulations were given there as contracts were being handed to CEOs and Chairmen of Raytheon, General Electric, Dow Chemical, and other corporations.) Of course, the U.S. Government could have been lying, and the deal could have been different from what the PR says. But that\u2019s not the type of lie which NPR alleged here. Anyone nowadays who trusts what either the U.S. Government or its news-media say, is trusting demonstrably untrustworthy sources \u2014 and this too is not the type of lying (their own<\/i> lying) that NPR says exists. They just lie.<\/span><\/p>\n

Saudi Arabia\u2019s purchase now of Russia\u2019s S-400 does indicate that the U.S. aristocracy might lose their most important foreign ally, the Saud family, and that international relations could transform in transformative ways, not just superficially. It\u2019s only a sign, but what it signals is enormously significant \u2014 and U.S. \u2018news\u2019-media are hiding it.<\/span><\/p>\n

The General Manager of the Saud family\u2019s Al Arabya international TV channel that was established in order to compete against the Thani family\u2019s Al Jazeera international TV channel, issued stark warnings to the U.S., on Sunday, October 14th. Headlining \u201cUS sanctions on Riyadh would mean Washington is stabbing itself,\u201d<\/span><\/a> he closed: \u201cIf Washington imposes sanctions on Riyadh, it will stab its own economy to death, even though it thinks that it is stabbing only Riyadh!\u201d In between those were: The Kingdom is considering \u201cmore than 30 potential measures to be taken against the imposition of sanctions on Riyadh.\u201d Included among them are: the price of oil \u201cjumping to $100, or $200, or even double that figure.\u201d Also \u201ca Russian military base in Tabuk, northwest of Saudi Arabia.\u201d More realistically, however, he threatened: \u201cAn oil barrel may be priced in a different currency, Chinese yuan, perhaps, instead of the dollar. And oil is the most important commodity traded by the dollar today.\u201d And, he did not miss this one, either:<\/span><\/p>\n

It will not be strange that Riyadh would stop buying weapons from the US. Riyadh is the most important customer of US companies, as Saudi Arabia buys 10 percent of the total weapons that these US companies produce, and buys 85 percent from the US army which means what\u2019s left for the rest of the world is only five percent;<\/i> [and that\u2019s] in addition to the end of Riyadh\u2019s investments in the US government which reaches $800 billion. <\/i> <\/span><\/p>\n

For the very first time publicly, a mouthpiece for the Saud family has now said publicly<\/i> that the U.S. doesn\u2019t control the Saudi Government; the Saudi Government controls the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

If the relationship between the Saud family and the U.S. is the relationship between a dog and its tail, which is which? Perhaps Cecil Rhodes, were he to return, would be so shocked, he\u2019d have a heart-attack and die a second time. <\/span><\/p>\n

UPDATE:<\/b> As this is being written, on October 19th, there has been speculation that the Saudi Government is planning to admit that individual(s) in it had made bad errors, which tragically ended in a botched interrogation of Khashoggi at the Consulate in Istanbul. This response would not be credible in any case, because of the long history, going back decades, of prominent potential opponents of the Saud family being inexplicably disappeared and never heard from (or about) again. For one example, the headline from this past May 30th, six months ago, remains current news, as of even today: \u201cNAWAF AL RASHEED, SON OF PRINCE TALAL BIN ABDULAZIZ AL RASHEED, DISAPPEARED SINCE MAY 12 DEPORTATION TO SAUDI ARABIA\u201d<\/span><\/a>. And, going back to before Crown Prince Salman, to the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing \u2018suspects\u2019, all of them simply disappeared, never to be heard from (or about) again<\/span><\/a> \u2014 no public trial, nothing at all. There are many such cases, of many different kinds<\/span><\/a>. This is normal Saudi practice \u2014 not abnormal at all. What is abnormal is that Jamal Khashoggi had just been hired by perhaps the world\u2019s second-wealthiest person, Jeff Bezos\u2019s Washington Post<\/i>, to write articles against the Crown-Prince son, and future heir, of overwhelmingly the world\u2019s wealthiest person, King Salman<\/span><\/a>. That\u2019s what is different from those such prior instances.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a>,<\/i> and of<\/span> \u00a0<\/i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org (UPDATE about the Khashoggi case, posted at end.) America\u2019s international alliances are transforming in fundamental ways. The likelihood of World War III is increasing, and has been increasing ever since 2012 when the U.S. first slapped Russia with the Magnitsky Act sanctions. In fact, one matter driving these changing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":381878,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,519],"tags":[96,3604,535,67,64462,64983,524,981,20344,874,754,92,1261,11533,523,755,49],"class_list":{"0":"post-381877","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-newswire","9":"tag-cover-up","10":"tag-donald-trump","11":"tag-global-news","12":"tag-israel","13":"tag-khashoggi","14":"tag-rhodes","15":"tag-russia","16":"tag-saudi","17":"tag-sauds","18":"tag-soros","19":"tag-syria","20":"tag-terrorism","21":"tag-turkey","22":"tag-uae","23":"tag-ukraine","24":"tag-usa","25":"tag-usa-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=381877"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381877\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":381879,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/381877\/revisions\/381879"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/381878"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=381877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=381877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=381877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}