{"id":305393,"date":"2017-04-26T22:59:30","date_gmt":"2017-04-26T21:59:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=305393"},"modified":"2017-04-28T11:11:12","modified_gmt":"2017-04-28T10:11:12","slug":"poll-americans-support-military-industrial-complex-else","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/poll-americans-support-military-industrial-complex-else\/","title":{"rendered":"POLL: Americans Support Military-Industrial Complex Above All Else"},"content":{"rendered":"
Eric Zuesse<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
A new Morning Consult\/POLITICO survey<\/a>, published on 26 April, indicates that most American voters support the military-industrial complex more than they support any other recipient of U.S. federal government spending. The military-industrial complex includes almost all federal contractors, the top ten of which, in the ranking of the \u201cTop 100 Contractors of the U.S. federal government\u201d<\/a>, are all military suppliers: 1: Lockheed Martin. 2: Boeing. 3: General Dynamics. 4: Raytheon. 5: Northrop Grumman. 6: McKesson. 7: United Technologies. 8: L-3. 9: Bechtel. 10: BAE. Those ten firms would be the likeliest main beneficiaries from today\u2019s America\u2019s extremely pro-military-industrial-complex public, which is clearly revealed in this poll.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
2,032 American voters were asked in the poll a list of objectives that might be so important as to justify \u201cthe government must shut down.\u201d Only one single objective was close to being supported by an absolute majority of the respondents, so that the government\u2019s going to shut-down would, in those respondents\u2019 view, be justified for Congress to do in order to achieve that given objective, which was stated as: \u201cIncrease funding for defense and homeland security.\u201d<\/b> 47% of respondents (just shy of an absolute majority, which is 50+%) chose that goal as being so drastically important; 39% chose instead the answer, \u201cNOT important enough to prompt a shutdown.\u201d 14% chose \u201cDon\u2019t Know \/ No Opinion.\u201d In other words: 47% were in support of any member of Congress who refused to vote to fund the government unless<\/i><\/b> the proposed legislation to keep the government going would \u201cIncrease funding for defense and homeland security\u201d (increase funding that\u2019s going mainly to those ten firms). Increased spending on the military-industrial complex (which is incontestably the most corrupt portion of the U.S. federal government<\/a>) is so extremely important to 47% of America\u2019s voters, according to this poll. Those 47% are like a huge cheering section for those ten corporate stocks: they\u2019re willing to shut down the federal govenment if the taxpayer-money going to those ten firms isn\u2019t increased.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The second-highest-supported listed objective, \u201cContinue to make cost-sharing payments to health insurance companies,\u201d<\/b> was supported by only 42% of respondents. Exactly the same percentage, 42%, chose \u201cNOT important enough to prompt a shutdown.\u201d So: only<\/i> \u201cIncrease funding for defense and homeland security\u201d was supported, in this poll, by more people than opposed it \u2014 and it was supported by 47% and opposed by only 39%; so, it was supported by 47\/39, or 1.21 times as many<\/i> respondents, as the number of respondents who opposed it. The proponents of increasing the military-industrial-complex don\u2019t merely dominate; they clearly<\/i> dominate.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The third-highest-supported objective, at 35%, was \u201cProvide health care benefits to retired coal miners.\u201d<\/b> 44% said that that goal isn\u2019t worth shutting down the government in order for it to be attained. I.e.: more think that those miners should be left to die than think that continuing to provide for their black-lung treatments (etc.) is essential.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The lowest support of all, at only 27%, was \u201cFund a wall along the Mexican border.\u201d<\/b> Donald Trump\u2019s alleged support for that is shared by far fewer Americans than oppose it. 61% of respondents on that say it\u2019s \u201cNOT important enough to prompt a shutdown.\u201d<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In between was the 32% who wanted to shut down the government unless it would \u201cDecrease funding for domestic programs.\u201d<\/b> By contrast, 48% said that that goal was \u201cNOT important enough to prompt a shutdown.\u201d In other words: congressmen who would vote to shut down the federal government unless the proposed budget reduces \u201cfunding for domestic programs\u201d would be opposed by a very large majority (48% to 32%) of America\u2019s voters: 50% more Americans oppose than support it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Americans, according to this poll, very strongly, by a 47% to 39% margin, absolutely demand \u201cIncrease funding for defense and homeland security,\u201d but by an even stronger<\/i> 48% to 32% margin, they do NOT absolutely demand \u201cDecrease funding for domestic programs.\u201d (This poll did not inquire regarding whether there is more support for increasing domestic programs than for decreasing those programs.)<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Retired U.S. Army Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, who, as the Chief of Staff to U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell had been deceived into believing the military-industrial-complex\u2019s hired allegations in 2002 about Saddam Hussein and \u201cWMD,\u201d became afterward an opponent of that very same operation which had deceived him, has since said (at 11:06- on the video here<\/a>) about that operation which had deceived him:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It is a corporate complex that is growing and it surrounds everything else, including what I call fateful decision-making. \u2026 You are serving the ulterior purposes of the leadership of the country. \u2026 You are serving corporate and commercial interests, you are serving the interests of people who bureaucratically are seeking power within the structure, and you are serving the interests of what is basically an incompetent governing process.<\/i><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
This latest poll makes very clear that the majority of the U.S. public are satisfied with that situation, or else don\u2019t know that it\u2019s even the case. Of course, if they don\u2019t know the reality about this matter, then they\u2019ve been deceived by the newsmedia they\u2019re being exposed to, and\/or by whatever other sources have influenced them regarding it; but, otherwise, they really do love the military-industrial-complex, and they authentically demand that more and more of their tax-dollars go toward paying for it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/a>,<\/i> and of \u00a0<\/i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/a>.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse A new Morning Consult\/POLITICO survey, published on 26 April, indicates that most American voters support the military-industrial complex more than they support any other recipient of U.S. federal government spending. The military-industrial complex includes almost all federal contractors, the top ten of which, in the ranking of the \u201cTop 100 Contractors of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":304173,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461],"tags":[59,1023,804,524,49,76,40],"class_list":{"0":"post-305393","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"tag-military","9":"tag-nuclear","10":"tag-politics-2","11":"tag-russia","12":"tag-usa-news","13":"tag-warfare","14":"tag-white-house"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305393\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/304173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}