{"id":266439,"date":"2016-09-09T02:40:19","date_gmt":"2016-09-09T02:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=266439"},"modified":"2016-09-10T12:38:42","modified_gmt":"2016-09-10T12:38:42","slug":"huffington-posts-coverage-donald-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/huffington-posts-coverage-donald-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Huffington Post&#8217;s Coverage of Donald Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s3\">Eric Zuesse <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s3\">After NBC\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/storyline\/commander-in-chief-forum\"><span class=\"s4\">\u201cCommander-in-Chief Forum\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0on September 7th,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20160908212234\/http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/\"><span class=\"s4\">Huffington Post\u2019s top of homepage the next day<\/span><\/a>\u00a0was:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s2\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-iraq-war-lie_us_57d1b17de4b00642712c5c29\"><b><i>LIAR-IN-CHIEF: TRUMP REPEATS WHOPPER ABOUT IRAQ WAR \u2014 AGAIN!<\/i><\/b><b><i><\/i><\/b><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s2\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20160908173148\/http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-veterans_us_57d16e09e4b03d2d4598a87f\"><b><i>Don Previews His Nightmare Presidency<\/i><\/b><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s3\"><b><i> &#8230; <\/i><\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-veterans_us_57d16e09e4b03d2d4598a87f\"><span class=\"s4\"><b><i>Suggests He\u2019d Fire Generals<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a><b><i> &#8230; <\/i><\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/trump-putin_us_57d0be2ae4b06a74c9f29508\"><span class=\"s4\"><b><i>Gushes Over Putin<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a><b><i> &#8230; <\/i><\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-veterans_us_57d16e09e4b03d2d4598a87f\"><span class=\"s4\"><b><i>Discusses Classified Intelligence Briefings<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a><b><i> &#8230; <\/i><\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-veterans_us_57d16e09e4b03d2d4598a87f\"><span class=\"s4\"><b><i>Blames Victims Of Military Sexual Assault<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a><b><i> &#8230; <\/i><\/b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-veterans_us_57d16e09e4b03d2d4598a87f\"><span class=\"s4\"><b><i>Boasts About Disrupting An Ally Government<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/a><b><i> &#8230;<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Most of those headlines linked to the report\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-veterans_us_57d16e09e4b03d2d4598a87f\"><span class=\"s5\">&#8220;Donald Trump Keeps Saying Things That Would Destroy Any Other Presidential Candidate\u201d<\/span><\/a>,\u00a0where Sam Stein and Amanda Terkel listed and discussed 6 \u201coutlandish\u201d things that Trump had said the prior evening at that Forum. The first of these six criticisms was the one given the main focus:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>1. Threatening To Fire Generals<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>Trump called for firing most, if not all, of the current military brass, and actively ridiculed their experience and judgement.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>\u201cI think under the leadership Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the generals have been reduced to rubble. They have been reduced to a point where it\u2019s embarrassing for our country,\u201d he said, adding that when he\u2019s in office,\u00a0\u201cthey\u2019ll probably be different generals, to be honest with you. I mean, I\u2019m looking at the generals.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>Generals are not political appointees. They have defined terms and typically are not removed simply because an official wants to clean house. But beyond the factual issues with what Trump said, there is the political context.\u00a0Imagine, for a second, John Kerry making a similar comment during the 2004 presidential campaign and consider the filleting that he would have endured from President George W. Bush\u2019s re-election campaign.\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">MY COMMENT: How can it be that the U.S. President, who is elected every four years, doesn\u2019t possess the power to select his generals? Then it cannot be a\u00a0democracy, if the nation\u2019s leader cannot choose his most important team, his military leaders. The President&#8217;s <i>first<\/i> power is that of Commander-in-Chief. To say that he cannot appoint a new team in his most important capacity (Commander-in-Chief), but only a new team in his <i>Cabinet<\/i>, would be ridiculous. How could he then execute his international strategy and his national defense, if he is forced to retain generals who might have very different military priorities than the new President does \u2014 priorities from the previous President, which priorities might not be quite the same as the new President\u2019s (such as eradicating jihadists)? Is this the type of country America actually is \u2014 a country which blocks its new President from having generals whose military priorities are consistent with those of the new President, not necessarily of the old President? A country which places all its military responsibility upon the President\u2019s desk but which denies him (or her) the power to choose whom to appoint to carry out that responsibility? Really?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">No, of course, it\u2019s not.\u00a0The President does have the power to \u2018fire&#8217; (remove from his existing function) any general, but not to place that person on unemployment. Stein and Terkel are either uninformed, or else intentionally deceiving readers, here. Moreover, see this: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/...\/explainer\/2010\/06\/fire_at_will.html\"><span class=\"s6\">http:\/\/www.slate.com\/&#8230;\/explainer\/2010\/06\/fire_at_will.html<\/span><\/a>. In other words: the U.S. President doesn\u2019t outright <i>fire<\/i> generals, but <i>re-assigns<\/i> them, and generals who get reassigned to lower positions, typically choose to retire, instead of to endure the embarrassment in decreased rank.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">ALSO: <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stanley_A._McChrystal\"><span class=\"s6\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Stanley_A._McChrystal<\/span><\/a>. That\u2019s just <i>one<\/i> recent example of a general who got reassigned and who then quickly retired.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Stein and Terkel were here criticizing Trump on fallacious grounds. However, they were not alone in doing so: Politico headlined on September 7th,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2016\/09\/trump-suggests-fire-the-generals-227862\"><span class=\"s6\">\u201c&#8217;Embarrassing to our country&#8217;: Trump suggests he\u2019ll fire top generals\u201d<\/span><\/a>,\u00a0and reporter Jeremy Herb opened: &#8220;Donald Trump trod into uncharted territory Wednesday night when he suggested that if elected he might fire some of the top generals now running the military.\u201d It\u2019s anything but \u201cuncharted territory\u201d; and, furthermore, a replacement of some of Obama\u2019s generals would be essential if the new President is going to be pursuing a different military strategy \u2014 and not <i>merely<\/i> different military <i>tactics<\/i> \u2014 going forward. Trump says that he wants to do this. He criticizes Obama\u2019s foreign policy (the invasions of Libya, Syria, etc.) and proposes very different foreign policy priorities, more focused on reducing or ending Islamic terrorism \u2014 jihadism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Furthermore: Seymour Hersh \u2014 one of the giants of investigative journalism regarding foreign affairs \u2014 headlined in the <i>London Review of Books<\/i>, on 7 January 2016, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lrb.co.uk\/v38\/n01\/seymour-m-hersh\/military-to-military\"><span class=\"s7\">\u201cMilitary to Military\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and he opened:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>Barack Obama\u2019s repeated insistence that Bashar al-Assad must leave office \u2014 and that there are \u2018moderate\u2019 rebel groups in Syria capable of defeating him \u2014 has in recent years provoked quiet dissent, and even\u00a0overt opposition, among some of the most senior officers on the Pentagon\u2019s Joint Staff. Their criticism has focused on what they see as the administration\u2019s fixation on <\/i>[defeating] <i>Assad\u2019s primary ally, Vladimir Putin. In their\u00a0view, Obama is captive to Cold War thinking about Russia and China, and hasn\u2019t adjusted his stance on Syria to the fact both countries <\/i>[U.S. and Russia] <i>share Washington\u2019s anxiety about the spread of terrorism in and beyond\u00a0Syria; like Washington, they <\/i>[Russia] <i>believe that Islamic State must be stopped.\u00a0The military\u2019s resistance <\/i>[to a joint U.S.-Russian effort to end jihadism] <i>dates back to the summer of 2013, when a highly classified assessment, put together by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, then led by General Martin\u00a0Dempsey, forecast that the fall of the Assad regime would lead to chaos and, potentially, to Syria\u2019s takeover by jihadi extremists, much as was then happening in Libya.<\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Hersh indicated that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dempsey, actually quit over the matter, and that <i>&#8220;Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, director of the DIA between 2012 and 2014, confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of classified warnings to the civilian leadership about the dire consequences of\u00a0toppling Assad. The jihadists, he said, were in control of the opposition<\/i> [to Assad]<i>.\u201d<\/i>\u00a0Flynn was outright fired. (He\u2019s now a top military advisor to Trump. This is how fundamental the strategic gulf is between the existing U.S. strategy and the one that Trump wants.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Stein\u2019s and Terkel\u2019s criticisms #s 2-6 were equally deceptive and distorting, though in different ways. For example, Trump didn\u2019t actually \u201cblame victims of military sexual assault,\u201d nor imply that women who are raped are to blame for anything at all. And his statement that he opposed the invasion of Iraq is supported by an early statement that he had made suggesting that the U.N. inspections of Iraq should be completed before there should be an invasion, but he didn\u2019t want to be publicly opposing Bush\u2019s policy at the time (January 2003: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.apple.com\"><span class=\"s7\">\u201cbecause perhaps shouldn\u2019t be doing it yet and perhaps we should be waiting for the United Nations [WMD inspections to be completed first \u2014 which Hillary at the time strenuously opposed as being any sort of precondition for invading], you know\u201d<\/span><\/a>). But our article here is already long enough; so, we\u2019ll just leave it at that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">(Personal disclosure: I have always voted for only candidates of the two major political Parties, and it has always been only Democratic candidates, because only a fool thinks that a third-Party\u2019s nominee stands any significant chance to win even a single state, which neither Perot nor Nader ever did \u2014 much less a majority of the Electoral College. I supported and voted for Bernie Sanders for President. Hillary Clinton is the only Democratic Party Presidential nominee that I have ever considered horrific. That\u2019s on account of her actions in public office, and not at all on account of her deceptively liberal-sounding public statements, which no intelligent and well-informed person any longer trusts, at all. There is no way to compare that horrific actual policy-record with the public statements by Donald Trump, since Trump has no public record at all, and his public statements also are not trustworthy. This article is, however, not about <i>either<\/i> candidate; it\u2019s instead about the deceptive, stunningly propagandistic, \u2019news\u2019 coverage of Donald Trump. That\u2019s the subject here; the candidates are not.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p5\"><span class=\"s8\">Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic\/dp\/1880026090\/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1339027537&amp;sr=8-9\"><span class=\"s2\"><i>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,<\/i> and of<\/span><span class=\"s9\"> <i>\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B007Q1H4EG\"><span class=\"s6\"><i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eric Zuesse After NBC\u2019s\u00a0\u201cCommander-in-Chief Forum\u201d\u00a0on September 7th,\u00a0Huffington Post\u2019s top of homepage the next day\u00a0was:\u00a0 LIAR-IN-CHIEF: TRUMP REPEATS WHOPPER ABOUT IRAQ WAR \u2014 AGAIN! Don Previews His Nightmare Presidency &#8230; Suggests He\u2019d Fire Generals &#8230; Gushes Over Putin &#8230; Discusses Classified Intelligence Briefings &#8230; Blames Victims Of Military Sexual Assault &#8230; Boasts About Disrupting An Ally [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":266440,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[30,1036,96,1035,535,698,38,907,1009,59,1017,804,543,524,754,92,6257,523,49,76,40,1024],"class_list":{"0":"post-266439","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news","8":"tag-big-brother","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-cover-up","11":"tag-daily-news","12":"tag-global-news","13":"tag-hillary-clinton","14":"tag-iraq","15":"tag-isis","16":"tag-islamic-state","17":"tag-military","18":"tag-news","19":"tag-politics-2","20":"tag-putin","21":"tag-russia","22":"tag-syria","23":"tag-terrorism","24":"tag-trump","25":"tag-ukraine","26":"tag-usa-news","27":"tag-warfare","28":"tag-white-house","29":"tag-ww3"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266439"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266439\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/266440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}