{"id":246377,"date":"2016-05-28T01:26:49","date_gmt":"2016-05-28T01:26:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=246377"},"modified":"2016-05-28T01:26:49","modified_gmt":"2016-05-28T01:26:49","slug":"sanders-probably-will-campaign-president-till-election-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/sanders-probably-will-campaign-president-till-election-day\/","title":{"rendered":"Sanders Probably Will Campaign For President Till Election Day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Eric Zuesse<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Ever since the start of 2016 \u2014 and this means throughout the entire period while primary elections and caucuses have been held \u2014 only a single person has led both political Parties\u2019 head-to-head hypothetical matchups against all of the given person\u2019s opposite Party candidates: Bernie Sanders. A quick view of the recent head-to-head matchups in both Parties is here:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2016\/president\/2016_presidential_race.html\"><span class=\"s2\">http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2016\/president\/2016_presidential_race.html<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">And here those results are shown ever since the start of the Presidential campaigns:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2016\/president\/us\/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html\">http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2016\/president\/us\/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s4\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2016\/president\/us\/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html\">http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/epolls\/2016\/president\/us\/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s4\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">And here is the same thing shown at HuffPollster:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\"><a href=\"http:\/\/elections.huffingtonpost.com\/pollster\/2016-general-election-trump-vs-sanders\">http:\/\/elections.huffingtonpost.com\/pollster\/2016-general-election-trump-vs-sanders<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s4\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\"><a href=\"http:\/\/elections.huffingtonpost.com\/pollster\/2016-general-election-trump-vs-clinton\">http:\/\/elections.huffingtonpost.com\/pollster\/2016-general-election-trump-vs-clinton<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s4\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">What this means is that among the total electorate \u2014 both Parties, and also including independents \u2014 Sanders has been the consistent leader as the person most preferred to become the next U.S. President.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">There is no mystery as to why this is the case: Sanders has consistently had the highest net favorability rating of all of the Presidential candidates in both Parties. This is not speculation, and it is not debatable; it is the data.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In fact, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are rated more unfavorably than they are rated favorably \u2014 <i>each<\/i> of those two is in net-negative territory on favorability. In other words, with only Clinton and Trump as being realistically possible to become elected President, the U.S. Presidential contest is not between two attractive candidates, but <i>between two unattractive ones<\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">If Bernie Sanders were somehow able to become a realistically possible alternative to the two major Parties\u2019 nominees, and if this were to become generally recognized by voters to be the case by the time November 8th rolls around, then here are some of the questions that would dominate at that time and be considered by each individual voter:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Are more of his prospective voters coming from the pro-Clinton side, or from the pro-Trump side?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Do I care so much about which of those two would win, so that I would be more concerned to vote my conscience than I would be concerned to vote for the person whom I prefer <i>merely between those two<\/i>?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">A choice of a net-positive will seem easy to many people for whom the <i>two<\/i>-person choice is only between two <i>net-negatives<\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Because of the high net-negatives for both Clinton and Trump, plus the billionaires\u2019 backing of both of those candidates, any Clinton-Trump contest would accentuate the opposite candidate\u2019s <i>negatives<\/i>. The negatives won\u2019t be ignored. Furthermore, because of the net-positive favorability rating of Sanders, <i>any<\/i> attack against him from <i>either<\/i> the Democratic side or the Republican side would antagonize so many independents as to be potentially politically suicidal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">How can it NOT be likely that such a person as that will <i>be<\/i> a third candidate by November 8th? Where there is a will, there is often, by some imaginative means, a way; and where there is both a will <i>and<\/i> a way, there is also generally a rush of people who recognize it and who contribute their money to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">I therefore disagree with anyone who says that it\u2019s impossible for Sanders to become the next President.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Furthermore, if Clinton becomes\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonsblog.com\/2016\/04\/3-u-s-criminal-laws-hillary-broke-email.html\"><span class=\"s2\">indicted in the email matter<\/span><\/a>, she might even be out of the picture entirely, by November 8th.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">It\u2019s a wild campaign year. And this could continue until Election Day (or maybe even beyond).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s5\">Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic\/dp\/1880026090\/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1339027537&amp;sr=8-9\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,<\/i> and of<\/span><span class=\"s6\"> <i>\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B007Q1H4EG\"><span class=\"s7\"><i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eric Zuesse Ever since the start of 2016 \u2014 and this means throughout the entire period while primary elections and caucuses have been held \u2014 only a single person has led both political Parties\u2019 head-to-head hypothetical matchups against all of the given person\u2019s opposite Party candidates: Bernie Sanders. A quick view of the recent head-to-head [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":246379,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[968,698,949,49,40],"class_list":{"0":"post-246377","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news","8":"tag-bernie","9":"tag-hillary-clinton","10":"tag-sanders","11":"tag-usa-news","12":"tag-white-house"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246377"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246377\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/246379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}