{"id":227613,"date":"2016-02-28T03:04:29","date_gmt":"2016-02-28T03:04:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=227613"},"modified":"2016-10-18T13:47:41","modified_gmt":"2016-10-18T13:47:41","slug":"how-bernie-sanders-hopes-to-sway-superdelegates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/latest-news\/how-bernie-sanders-hopes-to-sway-superdelegates\/","title":{"rendered":"How Bernie Sanders Hopes to Sway Superdelegates"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Eric Zuesse<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">There will be\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016\"><span class=\"s2\">715 superdelegates at the Democratic Convention<\/span><\/a>\u00a0selecting the Party\u2019s Presidential nominee, and none of them will have been voted there by any of the state primaries. In their capacity as a superdelegate, they don\u2019t actually represent the people of their state; they represent instead the Democratic Party (and the meaning of that will become clear in this article).<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">On February 23rd, CNN\u2019s Political Commentator, Sally Kohn, headlined,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2016\/02\/23\/opinions\/superdelegates-democratic-party-kohn\/\"><span class=\"s2\">\u201cDemocratic Party Superdelegates Are Undemocratic,\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0but that\u2019s a narrow and perhaps overall false characterization of the matter; and here is why:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Hillary Clinton won the South Carolina Democratic primary on February 27th by an enormous 76% to 24% margin over Bernie Sanders, but that\u2019s a state which is certain to be 100% (all of its Electoral College votes) for the Republican nominee in the Electoral College: all of its Electoral College votes will be going to the Republican nominee; so, the relative attractiveness of <i>any<\/i>\u00a0 Democratic candidate in SC is actually meaningless in the ultimate election, which will be the general election in November. That primary, SC, is therefore meaningless to Democrats\u2019 ability to win the White House in November. It\u2019s a throw-away, purely-show, \u2018primary.&#8217;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">By contrast, Sanders won 60% of the votes in New Hampshire\u2019s Democratic primary, and Clinton won only 38% of them, and that primary <i>does<\/i><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>mean something in helping to determine whether the ultimate Democratic nominee will win the White House, because NH is a state that\u2019s <i>not<\/i>\u00a0 a predetermined win for either of the two Parties on Election Day \u2014 it\u2019s a state that will actually be in play, it could go either way. During the 2000 election, it was so close that if Ralph Nader hadn\u2019t drawn more votes from Gore than he did from Bush, NH would have gone (and clearly gone) to Gore in the Electoral College, and,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_presidential_election_in_New_Hampshire,_2000\"><span class=\"s2\">&#8220;Had Gore won in New Hampshire, he would have therefore won the presidency,\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0and there would never even have been any <i>possibility<\/i>\u00a0 of the Supreme Court case, \u201cBush v. Gore.\u201d This year, too, New Hampshire could go either way, Republican or Democratic, in the November Presidential Election. So: that primary (NH) <i>does<\/i><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>really count; it\u2019s not <i>purely<\/i><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>for show. (Likewise, Iowa counts as a real contest, and so does Nevada, and both of those went, though just barely, for Clinton.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Each one of the 715 superdelegates will be focused, above all, on doing whatever he or she can to maximize the probability that the next President will be a Democrat, not a Republican. If the next President is a Republican, then each one of those 715 people will be considerably less powerful during the following four years than if the next President is a Democrat \u2014 <i>any<\/i><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Democrat. Those 715 people are there at the Convention for only one reason: to maximize the probability of the Party\u2019s winning in the Electoral College.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">If CNN\u2019s headline hadn\u2019t been\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2016\/02\/23\/opinions\/superdelegates-democratic-party-kohn\/\"><span class=\"s2\">\u201cDemocratic Party Superdelegates Are Undemocratic,\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0but instead \u201cThe Electoral College Is Undemocratic,\u201d then it would have been correct, not false. But the superdelegates are an intelligent accommodation to that <i>undemocratic feature of the U.S. Constitution:<\/i><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>the Electoral College.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">So: what Sanders is trying to do is to perform better than Clinton does in the states that could go either way in the November general election. He\u2019s virtually ignoring the states that everyone knows will be overwhelmingly likely to be in the Republican column on Election Day, no matter who the two Parties\u2019 nominees are. He knows, for example, that Wyoming will vote for the Republican Presidential nominee, and that Massachussetts will vote for the Democratic Presidential nominee, no matter what, in the general election. So: those states have mainly show-value for him, not real value.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Success, for him, will be beating Clinton in the toss-up states, because those will be the states that will determine which Party will win the White House \u2014 in the Electoral College.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">If he succeeds at that goal, then here is what he\u2019ll be telling each one of those 715 superdelegates: <i>Don\u2019t you want to be powerful not weak during the coming four years? I am the candidate who increases those odds for you; Clinton is the candidate who decreases those odds for you.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Everyone knows that if Clinton beats Sanders in the toss-up states, then she will have earned the Democratic Party\u2019s nomination. But the same is true for Sanders: If he beats Clinton in the toss-up states, then he will have earned the Party\u2019s nomination.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">And the purpose of the 715 superdelegates is simply to maximize the probability that the next President will be a Democrat \u2014 their purpose is to measure each of those two candidates\u2019 relative performances in the toss-up states, and to represent THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY \u2014 <i>not<\/i>\u00a0 any particular one state. Their function is purely a national one, and purely a Party one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Here\u2019s a rational way to think of those superdelegates: they exist for the sole purpose of maximizing the probability of a Democrat winning the White House in November.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Almost all of those superdelegates started out thinking that Clinton would have the strongest likelihood of being able to win in the Electoral College. (So, they are nominally Clinton superdelegates.) Senator Sanders is trying to persuade them that that original belief was wrong, and that he has the higher likelihood of winning the White House for the Party. His basic argument will be: look at the performance by me and by Clinton in the toss-up states, and then make your choice on the basis of your own self-interest during the coming four years. Go with the winner \u2014 <i>of the toss-up states<\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">If Sanders fails to beat Clinton in the toss-up sates, then he won\u2019t have any case to present to those superdelegates \u2014 and he knows it. They\u2019ll then stay with their original choice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s2\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.270towin.com\/maps\/2016-election-toss-up-states\">Here are the toss-up states<\/a><\/span><span class=\"s1\">\u00a0\u2014 the states where the Presidential primaries are for real, not merely for show:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Only those 10 states are holding meaningful Presidential primary elections; all the other 40 state Presidential primaries are for show. And the reason for those 715 superdelegates is to put that truth into practice when they cast their votes at the Democratic National Convention. And, of course, if there is no clear winner of the toss-up states, then the decisions that those superdelegates will be making will be decided by factors other than the main factor (which factor is to increase the likelihood of the Party winning the Presidency), and personal preferences will instead sway, and the likelihood that the superdelegates will have unity as a bloc at the Convention will then diminish proportionately. That could produce a brokered Convention.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">And, so: this is how to keep score with the primaries.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p5\"><span class=\"s3\">Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic\/dp\/1880026090\/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1339027537&amp;sr=8-9\"><span class=\"s4\"><i>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,<\/i> and of <i>\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B007Q1H4EG\"><span class=\"s4\"><i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eric Zuesse There will be\u00a0715 superdelegates at the Democratic Convention\u00a0selecting the Party\u2019s Presidential nominee, and none of them will have been voted there by any of the state primaries. In their capacity as a superdelegate, they don\u2019t actually represent the people of their state; they represent instead the Democratic Party (and the meaning of that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":228184,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487,461,519,18],"tags":[968,951,954,949],"class_list":{"0":"post-227613","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news","8":"category-editorials","9":"category-newswire","10":"category-latest-news","11":"tag-bernie","12":"tag-clinton","13":"tag-hillary","14":"tag-sanders"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227613\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/228184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}