Privacy activists are flooding Congress with messages of opposition to the cyber surveillance bill due to be considered by the Senate, using faxes rather than emails in order to poke fun at lawmakers\u2019 antiquated understanding of technology and privacy.<\/p>\n
Fight for the Future, a nonprofit fighting for privacy and against government surveillance, has\u00a0set up a page<\/a> dubbed \u201cOperation: Fax Big Brother,\u201d which lets anyone generate and customize a fax protesting the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA). Each fax is then sent to all 100 Senators. The group has not said how many faxes have been sent so far.<\/p>\n CISA\u00a0sailed through<\/a> the Senate Intelligence Committee in March, with Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden being the sole dissenter. Senate is expected to take up a vote on the bill before the August 7 recess. A similar proposal, known as CISPA, was approved by the House of Representatives in 2013 but died in the Senate after public opposition compelled President Barack Obama to threaten a veto.<\/p>\n \u201cGroups like Fight for the Future have sent millions of emails, and they still don\u2019t seem to get it,\u201d<\/em> Evan Greer, the group\u2019s campaign manager, told the Guardian<\/a>. \u201cMaybe they don\u2019t get it because they\u2019re stuck in 1984, and we figured we\u2019d use some 80s technology to try to get our point across.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n According to the group, since 2012 civil liberties activists have sent hundreds of thousands of calls and tweets and over 2.6 million emails to Congress opposing overreaching cybersecurity laws. However, the fax stunt does not just have publicity value. Lawmakers often use analog technology like faxes and pagers in order to hide their digital tracks from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) inquiries, claims a Senate staffer who spoke to the Guardian.<\/p>\n Sponsored by Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, CISA seeks to enlist the support of corporations in collecting user data in the name of cybersecurity, providing them with liability protection if they share the data with federal agencies such as the NSA. Once they have the data, federal agencies would be able to share it freely with each other. What\u2019s more, information shared with the government by the companies will be specifically exempt from FOIA disclosures.<\/p>\n Gabe Rottman, a legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union, described the bill as a \u201cnew and vast surveillance authority that might as well be called Patriot Act 2.0 given how much personal information it would funnel to the NSA.”<\/em><\/p>\n The US Chamber of Commerce and a number of\u00a0major corporations<\/a> are backing the bill. In addition to Facebook and Google, Comcast and AT&T also favor CISA, as do Bank of America and Blue Cross Blue Shield Association.<\/p>\n Proponents of CISA have cited a spree of data breaches over the past year, from corporations such as Sony and healthcare provider Anthem to government agencies including the Department of State and Office of Personnel Management (OPM), as a reason to beef up cybersecurity. Critics have countered that CISA is not doing anything to protect networks from threats, and everything to vacuum up Americans\u2019 data.<\/p>\n \u201cWith all these breaches, there\u2019s a lot of fearmongering going on in DC,\u201d<\/em> says Fight for the Future\u2019s Greer. \u201cThey just say: \u2018This is a problem \u2014 we\u2019ve got to do something!\u2019 And this is the something they\u2019re going to do. It\u2019s not just that this won\u2019t fix things \u2014 it\u2019ll make them worse. And it\u2019ll give sweeping legal immunity to some of the largest companies in the world and open us all up to new forms of surveillance.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Via RT<\/a>.\u00a0This piece was reprinted by RINF Alternative News<\/a> with permission or license.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Privacy activists are flooding Congress with messages of opposition to the cyber surveillance bill due to be considered by the Senate, using faxes rather than emails in order to poke fun at lawmakers\u2019 antiquated understanding of technology and privacy. Fight for the Future, a nonprofit fighting for privacy and against government surveillance, has\u00a0set up a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-168912","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=168912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/168912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=168912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=168912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=168912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}