{"id":155448,"date":"2015-05-31T11:00:36","date_gmt":"2015-05-31T11:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=155448"},"modified":"2015-05-31T11:00:36","modified_gmt":"2015-05-31T11:00:36","slug":"iran-nuclear-talks-raising-bar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/iran-nuclear-talks-raising-bar\/","title":{"rendered":"Iran Nuclear Talks: Raising the Bar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>by Stephen Lendman<\/p>\n<p>(<a href=\"http:\/\/rinf.com\">RINF<\/a>) &#8211;\u00a0On April 1, P5+1 countries and Iran agreed &#8220;in principle on all key aspects of a deal.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>An article discussing the announcement said hold the cheers. It&#8217;s a long way from preliminary to final agreement &#8211; especially with Washington involved, serving its own and Israeli interests.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s longer still believing America will honor what it agrees to. Its sordid history suggests otherwise &#8211; breaching and\/or reinterpreting one agreement and convention after another to suit its political agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Washington&#8217;s only rules are its own &#8211; made up based on geopolitical considerations and enforced belligerently.<\/p>\n<p>P5+1 nations and Iran agreed on a June 30 deadline to consummate final deal terms.<\/p>\n<p>On Saturday, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif arrived in Geneva for continued talks &#8211; including with John Kerry.<\/p>\n<p>Important disagreements remain. On Wednesday, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araqchi said talks might extend beyond end of June.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;All issues are on the table in this round of talks, and we will work on them concurrently,&#8221; he explained.<\/p>\n<p>Washington raised the bar. It wants access to Iran&#8217;s military sites. Days earlier, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If we don\u2019t get the assurances we need on the access to possible military dimension-related sites or activities, that\u2019s going to be a problem for us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We and Iran have agreed that we will undertake a process to address possible military dimensions (of past nuclear work), and part of that includes access.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Under the Additional Protocol&#8230; which Iran will implement and has said they will implement as part of this deal, the IAEA does get access.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If we cannot agree in the final instance to something that meets our bottom line for what we need in terms of access, we\u2019re not going to sign a final deal. And that\u2019s just something we\u2019ve been very, very clear about.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Her remarks followed Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei saying Iran won&#8217;t allow military site inspections. Preliminary agreement terms make no such demand.<\/p>\n<p>Following new US ones, Ayatollah Khamenei said &#8220;(t)hey are making new comments in the negotiations.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Regarding the inspections, we have said that we will not allow foreigners to carry out inspections of any military sites.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The enemies should know that the Iranian nation and officials will, by no means, give in to excessive demands and bullying.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In early May, Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif said &#8220;Iran will brook no excessive demands.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The agreed parameters are those confirmed by the two sides in Lausanne and these parameters need to be stipulated in a written agreement by Iran and the P5+1.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On Saturday, Deputy Foreign Minister Araqchi said &#8220;(i)nterviews with scientists and inspections of military centers are fully rejected, but talks continue within the framework of the procedures envisaged in the Additional Protocol.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It allows some access to military sites but not unrestricted inspections or interviews with Iranian scientists.<\/p>\n<p>Araqchi explained discussions are continuing on how the Additional Protocol should be implemented. It permits snap nuclear site inspections &#8211; restricted access only to military ones when justified.<\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said &#8220;France will not accept a deal if it is not clear that inspections can be done at all Iranian installations, including military sites.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Was he speaking for his government, Washington and\/or Israel?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yes to an agreement, but not to an agreement that will enable Iran to have the atomic bomb. That is the position of France,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>In Geneva, Zarif said &#8220;(w)e will discuss the latest conditions of the negotiations, and we will decide how to proceed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Last Month, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) head Ali Akbar Salehi said nothing in the Additional Protocol mandates non-nuclear inspections &#8211; only their &#8220;vicinities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Everyone has their own interpretations, he added. Iran so far agreed to much more than it&#8217;s gotten in return.<\/p>\n<p>If Washington keeps raising the bar irresponsibly, perhaps no deal is possible. Iran justifiably won&#8217;t relinquish its legitimate rights &#8211; nor should it.<\/p>\n<p>Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.<\/p>\n<p>His new book as editor and contributor is titled &#8220;Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanIII.html<\/p>\n<p>Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.<\/p>\n<p>Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.<\/p>\n<p>It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Stephen Lendman (RINF) &#8211;\u00a0On April 1, P5+1 countries and Iran agreed &#8220;in principle on all key aspects of a deal.&#8221; An article discussing the announcement said hold the cheers. It&#8217;s a long way from preliminary to final agreement &#8211; especially with Washington involved, serving its own and Israeli interests. It&#8217;s longer still believing America [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":140869,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-155448","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155448\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/140869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}