The political world is swarming over revelations that Hillary Clinton hid her emails during her time as Secretary of State.<\/p>\n
She apparently went so far in shielding her official correspondence from public scrutiny that her team set up the private domain @clintonemail.com, used cover names for family members and reportedly ran a server for the mail client out of her home. Hillary publicly tweeted to dispel concerns about secrecy, dubiously claiming \u2018I want the public to see my email.\u2019<\/em> \u201cThe former Secretary\u2019s tweet does not answer questions about why this was not done when she left office, the integrity of the emails while she controlled them, the scheme to conceal them, or the failure to provide them in logical course,\u201d said committee spokesman Jamal Ware. (source<\/a>)<\/p>\n Perhaps the most serious accusation facing Clinton is that she may have breached one of the fundamental tenets of classified information. J William Leonard, former director of the body that keeps watch over executive branch secrets, the Information Security Oversight Office, told the Guardian that if Clinton had dealt with confidential government matters through her personal email, that would have been problematic. \u201cThere is no such thing as personal copies of classified information. All classified information belongs to the US government and it should never leave the control of the government.\u201d (source<\/a>)<\/p>\n
\n<\/span>
\nBut serious concerns have been raised about her trail of secrecy, and the potential for classified information to have been exposed to foreign entities, spies, hackers and the like:<\/p>\n