{"id":142605,"date":"2014-12-11T16:04:25","date_gmt":"2014-12-11T16:04:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=142605"},"modified":"2014-12-11T16:04:25","modified_gmt":"2014-12-11T16:04:25","slug":"central-banks-2-plan-impoverish","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/money\/central-banks-2-plan-impoverish\/","title":{"rendered":"Central Banks\u2019 2% Plan to Impoverish You"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i>Reprinted with permission from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonsblog.com\/2014\/12\/central-banks-2-plan-impoverish.html\" target=\"_blank\">Washingtons Blog<\/a><\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>The 2% target is low enough that the household frogs in the kettle of hot water never realize they\u2019re being boiled alive because the increase is so gradual.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>A comment by correspondent David C. suggested the importance of demonstrating the impoverishing consequences of central banks reaching their 2% inflation target.<\/b> David observed: <i>\u201cThat central bankers aren\u2019t all hanging by their necks from lamp posts everywhere is a testament to how scarce are those who grasp exponents and compounding.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>Anyone with basic Excel skills can calculate the cumulative impoverishment caused by central banks\u2019 \u201cmodest\u201d 2% annual inflation.<\/b> Here is my worksheet:<\/p>\n<p>Column 1: year<br \/>\nColumn 2: index starting with 100<br \/>\nColumn 3: annual inflation sum (2% of previous year\u2019s total index)<br \/>\nColumn 4: cumulative total index<\/p>\n<p>1  100.00 2.00 102.00<br \/>\n2  102.00 2.04 104.04<br \/>\n3  104.04 2.08 106.12<br \/>\n4  106.12 2.12 108.24<br \/>\n5  108.24 2.16 110.41<br \/>\n6  110.41 2.21 112.62<br \/>\n7  112.62 2.25 114.87<br \/>\n8  114.87 2.30 117.17<br \/>\n9  117.17 2.34 119.51<br \/>\n10 119.51 2.39 <b>121.90<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Ten years of modest 2% inflation robs households of nearly 20% of their purchasing power. What was $100 in year 1 costs about $122 after 10 years of \u201cmodest\u201d 2% inflation. Put another way, $100 in year one is only worth $81 in year 10.<\/p>\n<p>11 121.90 2.44 124.34<br \/>\n12 124.34 2.49 126.82<br \/>\n13 126.82 2.54 129.36<br \/>\n14 129.36 2.59 131.95<br \/>\n15 131.95 2.64 134.59<br \/>\n16 134.59 2.69 137.28<br \/>\n17 137.28 2.75 140.02<br \/>\n18 140.02 2.80 142.82<br \/>\n19 142.82 2.86 145.68<br \/>\n20 145.68 2.91 <b>148.59<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Two decades of \u201cmodest\u201d 2% inflation robs households of one-third of their purchasing power. What was $100 in year 1 costs about $150 after 20 years of \u201cmodest\u201d 2% inflation. Put another way, $100 in year one is only worth $66 in year 20.<\/p>\n<p><b>Even when central banks fail to reach their 2% annual-thievery target, incomes decline across the entire spectrum.<\/b> The middle class (however you define it) lost roughly 10% as of 2012. In Japan, famous for essentially no inflation, wages have fallen by 9% in real terms since 1997.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.oftwominds.com\/photos2014\/real-household-income2012.gif\" alt=\"\" align=\"center\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n<p><b>While wages go nowhere, costs continue lofting ever higher as central banks print and pump money and credit:<\/b><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.oftwominds.com\/photos2014\/CPI-since-2000a.gif\" alt=\"\" align=\"center\" border=\"0\" \/><br \/>\n<i>source:<\/i> <a title=\"What Inflation Means to You: Inside the Consumer Price Index\" href=\"http:\/\/www.advisorperspectives.com\/dshort\/updates\/CPI-Category-Overview.php\" target=\"resource\">What Inflation Means to You: Inside the Consumer Price Index<\/a> (Doug Short)<\/p>\n<p><b>Imagine central banks overshoot their 2% theft per year target and reach 3% annual inflation.<\/b> If 2% is good, 3% must be even better, right?<\/p>\n<p><b>In one decade of 3% annual inflation, the purchasing power of $100 declines to $73, and after 20 years of central bank inflation, it drops almost in half to $54.<\/b> The central banks\u2019 inflation is a steady transfer of wealth from households to the banking sector and those holding ballooning assets like stocks. This is why central banks cling to their target so vociferously: their reason to exist is to enrich the banking sector at the expense of the rest of us.<\/p>\n<p><b>The 2% target is low enough that the household frogs in the kettle of hot water never realize they\u2019re being boiled alive because the increase is so gradual.<\/b> The central banks assume their 2% plan to impoverish us all escaped our notice. Apparently it has.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><i><b>How to forge a career in a dysfunctional economy:<br \/>\n<a title=\"Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy\" href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/B00JJX2KZM\/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B00JJX2KZM&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=charleshughsm-20\" target=\"resource\">Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy<\/a><\/b>,<br \/>\na mere $9.95 for the Kindle ebook edition and $15.47 for the print edition.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reprinted with permission from Washingtons Blog The 2% target is low enough that the household frogs in the kettle of hot water never realize they\u2019re being boiled alive because the increase is so gradual. A comment by correspondent David C. suggested the importance of demonstrating the impoverishing consequences of central banks reaching their 2% inflation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":47124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487,52],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-142605","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news","8":"category-money"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=142605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/142605\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=142605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=142605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=142605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}