{"id":1401,"date":"2007-10-02T23:26:22","date_gmt":"2007-10-02T23:26:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/911-truth\/so-just-how-many-security-systems-failed-on-911-all-of-them%e2%80%8f\/1401\/"},"modified":"2007-10-02T23:26:22","modified_gmt":"2007-10-02T23:26:22","slug":"so-just-how-many-security-systems-failed-on-911-all-of-them%e2%80%8f","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/911-truth\/so-just-how-many-security-systems-failed-on-911-all-of-them%e2%80%8f\/","title":{"rendered":"So, JUST HOW many security systems failed on 911? All of them!!\u00e2\u20ac\u008f"},"content":{"rendered":"

The following list is from Jim Marrs book Inside Job.<\/font><\/p>\n

– A wide variety of standard defense mechanisms designed to prevent such an attack systematically failed on 9\/11. Especially notable are the atypical failures which occurred simultaneously within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Military Command Center (NMCC), and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), all charged with protecting US airspace. <\/font><\/p>\n

– Interceptor jets were not scrambled for more than thirty minutes after it was obvious that four airliners had gone off course and were presumably hijacked. In the case of Flight 77, which reportedly slammed into the Pentagon, an hour and forty-five minutes elapsed with no interception.<\/p>\n

– Missile batteries designed to protect Washington, DC, failed to stop the strike on the Pentagon, one of the world\u2019s most protected structures, and fighter jets on constant alert at Andrews Air Force Base just twelve miles away were never scrambled.<\/p>\n

– By a \u201cbizarre coincidence,\u201d two government homeland defense agencies (NORAD and the NRO) were practicing war games on the morning of 9\/11. The games simulated responses to a scenario in which hijacked planes were crashed into buildings. This fact could explain the government\u2019s lack of rapid response to the real hijackings, yet this plausible alibi has never been brought to public attention. One also wonders: How did the hijackers know the time and date of these war games in order to time their attacks to coincide with them?<\/p>\n

– President Bush proceeded with a photo op at a Florida elementary school even after he and his aides knew that three planes had been hijacked. He lingered in the classroom for nearly twenty minutes after being informed that a second plane had struck the World Trade Center (WTC).<\/p>\n

– Not one steel-framed high-rise building in history has collapsed solely due to fire. The free-fall speed collapse of the Trade Center towers, with attendant melted steel and powdery dust, exhibited all the characteristics of a controlled demolition.<\/p>\n

– Just such a controlled demolition apparently occurred about 5 p.m. that same day when, according to the leaseholder of the WTC complex, the 47-story Building 7 was \u201cpulled,\u201d i.e., intentionally demolished.<\/p>\n

– Vital evidence, including the buildings\u2019 structural steel, was destroyed through rapid removal and destruction by US government officials with no investigation. This is only one of the many reasons why Fire Engineering magazine called the official investigation \u201ca half-baked farce.\u201d<\/p>\n

– An eight-mile-long debris trail indicated that Flight 93 was destroyed in the air rather than in the Pennsylvania crash reportedly caused by an onboard struggle between the hijackers and passengers.<\/p>\n

– More than a dozen countries firmly warned US authorities that an attack on American soil was imminent, some only days before the events.<\/p>\n

– Strong evidence points to complicity in the attacks by senior intelligence operatives from Israel and Pakistan who are closely aligned with American intelligence agencies.<\/p>\n

– A classified Congressional report incriminates senior officials in the Saudi Arabian government, showing that they had close ties to the hijackers. The Saudis enjoy long-term business and social ties to the Bush family and close political ties to the US government.<\/p>\n

– The US government expedited the swift departure of over 100 Saudis from the country, even as the American public had been denied the right to fly. Two dozen members of bin Laden\u2019s own family, presumably potential witnesses, were allowed to leave the country without interrogation.<\/p>\n

– Insiders with foreknowledge of the events to come engaged in massive and highly profitable short-selling of shares in American Airlines and United Airlines, as well as other stocks readily affected by the disaster. The public has still not been presented with the final results of official investigations into these transactions-if there are any.<\/p>\n

– A growing number of whistleblowers from within the federal government have pointed to evidence that various agencies were well aware of the possibility of attack, and were prevented by seniors officials from mounting full investigations.<\/p>\n

– Far from being a mere reaction to 9\/11, evidence now proves that the US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq were the culmination of long-standing plans which only awaited a provocation such as 9\/11.<\/p>\n

– The official explanations for the invasion of Iraq, such as the need to capture weapons of mass destruction, and to \u201cbring democracy\u201d to the country, have proven false.<\/p>\n

– Within a few hours, the FBI released names and photos of the suspected hijackers although later many of those named turned up alive in the Middle East.<\/p>\n

– Also within hours of the attacks, FBI agents were scouring the houses, restaurants, and flight schools they frequented. If no one had foreknowledge of the hijackers or their activities, how did they know where to look?<\/p>\n

– Far from ordering a full and objective investigation to determine who was responsible for the 9\/11 tragedies, the Bush administration dragged its feet and actually took actions to impede a swift and truthful probe into the events of that day. It was nearly two years after the events that mounting pressure from the public, led by families of 9\/11 victims, finally forced the creation of an \u201cindependent\u201d investigatory commission.<\/p>\n

– No one in government has been reprimanded or even scolded for what we are told was the greatest intelligence and homeland-defense failure in US history. In fact, the very agencies which failed the nation watched their budgets increase dramatically, and some of the officials ostensibly at fault were actually promoted.<\/p>\n

– No person in government, other than former National Security Council counterterrorism chief Richard A. Clarke, has felt the need to apologize to the American people for the 9\/11 security failure.<\/p>\n

– President Bush himself declined to apologize for the 9\/11 tragedy to either the American public or to victims\u2019 families during an April 2004 press conference, despite being presented with the opportunity to do so at least three times.<\/p>\n

\u00a0What follows now is from <\/em>www.911proof.com<\/font><\/a> (posted here without permission)<\/p>\n\n\n
<\/td>\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

WAR GAMES ON SEPTEMBER 11TH<\/h2>\n

On the very morning of 9\/11\/01, five war games and terror drills were being conducted by several U.S. defense agencies, including one \u201clive fly\u201d exercise using REAL planes. Then-Acting Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force General Richard B. Myers, admitted to 4 of the war games in congressional testimony \u2013 see transcript here<\/font><\/a> or video here (6 minutes and 12 seconds into the video)<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

Norad had run drills for several years of planes being used as weapons against the World Trade Center and other U.S. high-profile buildings<\/font><\/a>, and \u201cnumerous types of civilian and military aircraft were used as mock hijacked aircraft\u201d. In other words, drills using REAL AIRCRAFT simulating terrorist attacks crashing jets into buildings, including the twin towers, were run. See also official military website showing 2000 military drill, using miniatures, involving a plane crashing into the Pentagon<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

Indeed, a former Los Angeles police department investigator, whose newsletter is read by 45 members of congress, both the house and senate intelligence committees, and professors at more than 40 universities around the world, claims that he obtained an on-the-record confirmation from NORAD that ON 9\/11, NORAD and the Joint Chiefs of Staff were conducting a joint, live-fly, hijack exercise which involved government-operated aircraft POSING AS HIJACKED AIRLINERS<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

On September 11th, the government also happened to be running a simulation of a plane crashing into a building.<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

In addition, a December 9, 2001 Toronto Star article<\/font><\/a> (pay-per-view; reprinted here<\/font><\/a>), stated that \u201cOperation Northern Vigilance is called off. Any simulated information, what\u2019s known as an \u2018inject,\u2019 is purged from the screens\u201d. This indicates that there were false radar blips<\/strong> inserted onto air traffic controllers\u2019 screens as part of the war game exercises.<\/h3>\n

Moreover, there are indications that some of the major war games previously scheduled for October 2001 were MOVED UP to September 11th by persons unknown<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

Interestingly, Vice President Cheney was apparently in charge of ALL of the war games and coordinated the government\u2019s \u201cresponse\u201d to the attacks. See this Department of State announcement<\/font><\/a>; this CNN article<\/font><\/a>; and this previously-cited essay<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

And while the government has consistently stated that it did not know where the aircraft were before they struck, this short video clip of the Secretary of Transportation\u2019s testimony before the 9\/11 Commission shows that Cheney monitored flight 77 for many miles as it approached the Pentagon<\/font><\/a>. How could one of the most heavily-defended buildings in the world have been successfully attacked, when the Vice President of the United States, in charge of counter-terrorism on 9\/11, watched it approach from many miles away?<\/h3>\n

Moreover, a former air traffic controller, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew \u201clike the back of my hand\u201d and who handled two actual hijackings says that that planes can be tracked on radar even when their transponders are turned off, and that Donald Rumsfeld and the Pentagon tracked three of the four flights from the point of their hijacking to hitting their targets<\/font><\/a> (also, listen to this interview<\/font><\/a>).<\/h3>\n

Additionally, this diagram shows that the hijacked planes flew over numerous military bases on 9\/11 before crashing<\/font><\/a>. See also this essay regarding the stand down of the military<\/font><\/a>; and see this war game proposal created before 9\/11 revolving around Bin Laden and including \u201clive-fly exercises\u201d involving real planes<\/font><\/a>, later confirmed by this official Department of Defense website<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

Which scenario is more likely from a strictly logistical perspective:<\/h3>\n

(1) An outsider sitting in a cave defeating the air defense system of the sole military superpower; or<\/h3>\n

(2) Someone like Cheney \u2013 who on 9\/11 apparently had full control over all defense, war game and counter-terrorism powers \u2013 rigging and gaming the system?<\/h3>\n

Remember that for the attacks to have succeeded, it was necessary that actions be taken in the middle of the war games and the actual attacks<\/em> which would thwart the normal military response. For example, Cheney watched flight 77 approach the Pentagon from many miles out, but instructed the military to do nothing (as shown in the testimony of the Secretary of Transportation, linked above). Could Bin Laden have done that?<\/h3>\n

Fighter jets were also sent far off-course over the Atlantic Ocean in the middle of the attacks<\/font><\/a> (testimony of Senator Mark Dayton), so as to neutralize their ability to intercept the hijacked airliners. Could Osama Bin Laden and his sent-from-the-cave band of followers have exercised this degree of control over the military? Obviously not.<\/h3>\n

And air traffic controllers claim they were still tracking what they thought were hijacked planes long after<\/em> all 4 of the real planes had crashed. This implies that false radar blips remained on their screens after all 4 planes went down, long after the military claims they purged the phantom war-game-related radar signals. Could Bin Laden have interfered with the full purging of false radar blips inserted as part of the war games? In other words, could Bin Laden have overridden the purging process so that some false blips remained and confused air traffic controllers? The answer is clear.<\/h3>\n

Therefore, it is statistically much more likely that Cheney and\/or other high-level U.S. government and military officials pulled the 9\/11 trigger than that Bin Laden did it. At the very least, they took affirmative steps to guarantee that the hijackers\u2019 attacks succeeded.<\/h3>\n

As discussed previously, a\u00a0former air force colonel and director of the Star Wars program stated \u201cIf our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9\/11, the twin towers would still be standing, and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason\u201d<\/font><\/a>\u00a0<\/h3>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

PRIOR WARNINGS OF PLANES CRASHING INTO BUILDINGS<\/h2>\n

The administration\u2019s claim that terrorists crashing planes into buildings was not foreseeable is contradicted by numerous sources:<\/h3>\n

Initially, the CIA Director had warned congress shortly before 9\/11 \u201cthat there could be an attack, an imminent attack, on the United States of this nature<\/em>. So this is not entirely unexpected\u201d<\/font><\/a> according to a broadcast on National Public Radio<\/h3>\n

And the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee was \u201cnot surprised there was an attack (but) was surprised at the specificity . . . . (he was only) shocked at what actually happened \u2013 the extent of it\u201d<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

But let\u2019s go back and look at the facts chronologically:<\/h3>\n

Initially, the CIA Director had warned congress shortly before 9\/11 \u201cthat there could be an attack, an imminent attack, on the United States of this nature. So this is not entirely unexpected\u201d<\/font><\/a> according to a broadcast on National Public Radio<\/h3>\n

And the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee was \u201cnot surprised there was an attack . . . .\u201d<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

But let\u2019s go back and look at the facts chronologically:<\/p>\n

According to MSNBC, \u201cThere have been a slew of reports over the past decade of plots to use planes to strike American targets\u201d<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

In 1994, the government received information that international terrorists \u201chad seriously considered the use of airplanes as a means of carrying out terrorist attacks\u201d<\/font><\/a> (see also this article<\/font><\/a>).<\/h3>\n

In 1998, U.S. officials received reports concerning a \u201cBin Laden plot involving aircraft in the New York and Washington, areas.\u201d Officials received reports that al Qaeda was trying to establish an operative cell in the United States and that bin Laden was attempting to recruit a group of five to seven young men from the United States to travel to the Middle East for training in conjunction with his plans to strike U.S. domestic targets<\/font><\/a>. Indeed, the report concluded that \u201ca group of unidentified Arabs planned to fly an explosive-laden plane . . . into the World Trade Center\u201d<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

A 1999 report for the National Intelligence Council warned that fanatics loyal to bin Laden might try to hijack a jetliner and fly it into the Pentagon.<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

Investigators for the Congressional Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

The Pentagon tracked the hijackers before 9\/11<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

And the U.S. received warnings from numerous foreign intelligence services<\/font><\/a> about planned attacks, many of them quite detailed. Indeed, America\u2019s closest ally apparently tracked the hijackers\u2019 every movement prior to the attacks, and may have sent agents to film the attack on the World Trade Centers<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

According to the New York Times, \u201cForeign [intelligence service] agents had infiltrated
\nOsama bin Laden\u2019s network and were carefully tracking its moves\u201d<\/font><\/a>, and \u2013 in January 2001 \u2013 the French intelligence services gave a report to the CIA entitled \u201cPlan to hijack an aircraft by Islamic radicals\u201d<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

There were extraordinarily high terrorist attack threat levels in the summer of 2001, involving threats of attack within the U.S., and the U.S. government knew there were Al-Qaeda cells within the U.S.<\/font><\/a> (or watch the video here)<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

In July 2001, a briefing prepared for senior government officials warned of \u201ca significant terrorist attack against U.S. and\/or Israeli interests in the coming weeks. The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties \u2026 (it) will occur with little or no warning.\u201d<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

FBI agents recommended to FBI headquarters, in July 2001, an urgent nationwide review of flight schools regarding terrorism, and mentioned Bin Laden by name<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

A pre-9\/11 National Intelligence Estimate was entitled \u201cIslamic Extremists Learn to Fly\u201d<\/font><\/a>, and was apparently about Islamic people taking classes at U.S. flight schools.<\/h3>\n

President Bush was told in August 2001 that supporters of Bin Laden planned an attack within the U.S. with explosives and that they wanted to hijack airplanes<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

A month before 9\/11, the CIA sent a message to the Federal Aviation Administration warning of a possible hijacking \u201cor an act of sabotage against a commercial airliner\u201d<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

The August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief was entitled \u201cBin Laden Determined to Strike in<\/em><\/strong> US\u201d<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

U.S. intelligence officials informed President Bush weeks before the Sept. 11 attacks that Bin Laden\u2019s terrorist network might try to hijack American planes, and that information prompted administration officials to issue a private warning to transportation officials and national security agencies<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

It was widely known within the FBI shortly before 9\/11 that an imminent attack was planned on lower Manhattan<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

An employee who worked in the Twin Towers stated \u201cHow could they let this happen? They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we\u2019d been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual. I think they had an inkling something was going on\u201d<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

And a guard who worked in the world trade center stated that \u201cofficials had recently taken steps to secure the towers against aerial attacks\u201d<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

On September 6, 2001, Condoleezza Rice was warned that a terrorist attack inside the United States was imminent<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

Also on September 6th, author Salman Rushdie is banned by US authorities from taking internal US flights; the FAA told his publisher the reason was that it had \u201cintelligence of something about to happen\u201d<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

The former FBI translator who the Department of Justice\u2019s Inspector General, several senators <\/font><\/a>(free subscription required), and a coalition of prominent conservative and liberal groups<\/font><\/a> have claimed is credible says that the government was provided with information about the planned attacks, including the fact that the attacks would be carried out using airplanes, and some information about date ranges and targets. She says that – after 9\/11 – the FBI translators were ordered to \u201ckeep quiet\u201d<\/font><\/a> regarding this information.<\/h3>\n

The National Security Agency<\/font><\/a> and the FBI<\/font><\/a> were both independently listening in on the phone calls between the supposed mastermind of the attacks and the lead hijacker. Indeed, the FBI built its own antenna in Madagascar specifically to listen in on the mastermind\u2019s phone calls. The day before 9\/11, the mastermind told the lead hijacker \u201ctomorrow is zero hour\u201d and gave final approval for the attacks.<\/font><\/a> The NSA intercepted the message that day and the FBI was likely also monitoring the mastermind\u2019s phone calls. (The NSA claims that it did not translate the intercept until September 12th; however, the above-mentioned FBI translator said that she was frequently ordered to falsify dates of translations regarding 9\/11)<\/h3>\n

Shortly before 9\/11, the NSA also intercepted multiple phone calls from Bin Laden\u2019s chief of operations to the United States<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

The CIA and the NSA had been intercepting phone calls by the hijackers<\/font><\/a> for years.<\/h3>\n

Indeed, two days <\/span>before 9\/11, Osama Bin Laden called his stepmother and told her \u201cIn two days<\/span>, you\u2019re going to hear big news and you\u2019re not going to hear from me for a while.\u201d US officials later told CNN that \u201cin recent years they\u2019ve been able to monitor some of bin Laden\u2019s telephone communications with his [step]mother. Bin Laden at the time was using a satellite telephone, and the signals were intercepted and sometimes recorded.\u201d Indeed, before 9\/11, to impress important visitors, NSA analysts would occasionally play audio tapes of bin Laden talking to his stepmother.<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

Newsweek stated \u201cOn Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning<\/span>, apparently because of security concerns\u201d<\/font><\/a> (pay-per-view; cached version of article here<\/font><\/a>) <\/a><\/h3>\n

Indeed, the military had actually drilled <\/span>for aerial attacks with planes:<\/p>\n

The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the military air defense agency responsible for protecting the U.S. mainland, had run drills for several years of planes being used as weapons against the World Trade Center and other U.S. high-profile buildings<\/font><\/a>, and \u201cnumerous types of civilian and military aircraft were used as mock hijacked aircraft\u201d. In other words, drills using REAL AIRCRAFT simulating terrorist attacks crashing jets into buildings, including the twin towers, were run.<\/h3>\n

And the military had conducted numerous drills of planes crashing into the Pentagon. For example, see this official military website showing a military drill conducted in 2000 using miniatures<\/font><\/a>; this article<\/font><\/a> concerning a May 2001 exercise of a plane crashing into the Pentagon (see also this article<\/font><\/a> and this one<\/font><\/a>); and this article<\/font><\/a> about yet another drill of a plane hitting the Pentagon from August 2001.<\/h3>\n

(Indeed, many of the drills appear to have included warning alarms and evacuation of the building<\/font><\/a>.)<\/h3>\n

The military had also run war games involving multiple, simultaneous hijackings (first paragraph), so this aspect of 9\/11 was not as overwhelming as we have been led to believe<\/font><\/a>.<\/h3>\n

There are literally hundreds of other lines of evidence that prove that the government had substantial foreknowledge concerning the attacks (see this website<\/font><\/a>). A former Lieutenant Colonel for the Air Force and former Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute summarized the feeling of many when he stated \u201cOf course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism.\u201d<\/font><\/a><\/h3>\n

Overview of New 9\/11 Research (from scholarsfor911truth.org)<\/h2>\n
    \n
  1. The impact of the planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand them (as Frank DeMartini, the project manager, has observed), the planes that hit were very similar to those they were designed to withstand, and they continued to stand after those impacts with negligible effects.<\/li>\n
  2. The melting point of steel at 2,800*F is about 1,000*F higher than the maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, so the fires cannot have caused the steel to melt, which means that melting steel did not bring the buildings down.<\/li>\n
  3. UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000*F for three or four hours before it would even significantly weaken, where these fires burned too low and too briefly at an average temperature of around 500*F\u2014about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the North\u2014to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt.<\/li>\n
  4. If the steel had melted or weakened, the affected floors would have displayed completely different behavior, with some asymmetrical sagging and tilting, which would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt, and total demolition that was observed.<\/li>\n
  5. William Rodriguez, the senior custodian in the North Tower and the last man to leave the building, has reported massive explosions in the subbasements that effected extensive destruction, including the demolition of a 50-ton hydraulic press and ripping the skin off a fellow worker, a report corroborated by the testimony of around three dozen other custodians.<\/li>\n
  6. Willie reported that the explosion occurred prior to the airplane\u2019s impact, a claim that has now been substantiated in a new study by Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross, \u201cSeismic Proof: 9\/11 was an Inside Job\u201d, which demonstrates that these explosions actually took place as much as 14 and 17 seconds prior to the airplanes impacts.<\/li>\n
  7. Heavy steel construction buildings like the Twin Towers, built with more than 100,000 tons of steel, are not even capable of \u201cpancake collapse\u201d, which normally only occurs with concrete structures of \u201clift slab\u201d construction and could not occur in \u201credundant\u201d welded-steel buildings, such as the towers, unless every supporting column were removed at the same time, as Charles Pegelow has pointed out to me.<\/li>\n
  8. The destruction of the Twin Towers in approximately 10 seconds apiece is even faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken at least 12 seconds, which, as Judy Wood has emphasized, is an astounding result that would have been impossible without extremely powerful explosives.<\/li>\n
  9. The towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground, where the floors do not move, a phenomenon that Judy Wood has likened to two gigantic trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of the concrete, the official account cannot possibly explain.<\/li>\n
  10. WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 PM\/ET after Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to \u201cpull it\u201d, displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions, including a complete, abrupt, and total collapse into its own footprint, where the floors are all falling at the same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to the official account that it is not even mentioned in THE 9\/11 COMMISSION REPORT.<\/li>\n
  11. The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757!<\/li>\n
  12. The Pentagon\u2019s own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O\u2019Reilly admitted when it was shown on \u201cThe Factor\u201d; but at 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 71-foot Pentagon is high and should have been present and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757!<\/li>\n
  13. Pilots for 9\/11 Truth have analyzed black box data allegedly from the Pentagon plane and discovered that it contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude: it was 300 feet too high to have taken out the lampposts and 100 feet too high to have hit the building itself.<\/li>\n
  14. The aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory\u2014flying at high speed barely above ground level\u2014physically impossible; and if it had come it at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the government has no way out, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757!<\/li>\n
  15. If Flight 93 had come down as advertised, then there would have been a debris field of about a city block in size, but in fact the debris is distributed over an area of about eight square miles, which would be explainable if the plane had been shot down in the air but not if it had crashed as required by the government\u2019s official scenario.There are more, especially about the alleged hijackers, including that they were not competent to fly the planes; their names were not on any passenger manifest; they were not subject to any autopsy; several have turned up alive and well; the cell phone calls appear to have been impossible; on and on. The evidence may be found at 911Scholars.org<\/font><\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    9\/11: moral imperative (spread the word)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The following list is from Jim Marrs book Inside Job. – A wide variety of standard defense mechanisms designed to prevent such an attack systematically failed on 9\/11. Especially notable are the atypical failures which occurred simultaneously within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Military Command Center (NMCC), and the North American Aerospace Defense […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,20,18],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1401","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-911-truth","7":"category-general","8":"category-latest-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1401\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}