{"id":111775,"date":"2014-04-03T20:37:29","date_gmt":"2014-04-03T20:37:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theorganicprepper.ca\/?p=3473"},"modified":"2014-04-03T20:37:29","modified_gmt":"2014-04-03T20:37:29","slug":"the-epa-furthers-the-carbon-tax-agenda-with-deadly-human-experiments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/the-epa-furthers-the-carbon-tax-agenda-with-deadly-human-experiments\/","title":{"rendered":"The EPA Furthers the Carbon Tax Agenda with Deadly Human Experiments"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Environmental<\/a><\/h3>\n

Originally Published at Nutritional Anarchy<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/h3>\n

Our friends and protectors at the Environmental Deception<\/del> Protection Agency are so adamant about protecting us from air pollution that they are conducting dangerous experiments on human beings, some of them children.<\/p>\n

Just to emphasize the importance of your soon-to-be-due carbon taxes, the EPA exposed vulnerable members of our population to deadly pollutants: the elderly, people with chronic health problems, and children. \u00a0What’s more – they never warned those participating in the study that the toxins they would be exposed to\u00a0carried with them the risk of cancer and death.<\/p>\n

Victims<\/del> Participants were exposed to diesel exhaust particulates. \u00a0One study was called\u00a0”Asthma in Susceptible Children”. \u00a0Here are some pictures that show the process of the experiment.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The website JunkScience.com first called out the EPA for their unethical experiments back in February of last year, when the EPA scrubbed their site of information regarding the unethical particulate experiment on children. (You can read their report HERE<\/a>.) This week, JunkScience went even further with their exposure of the twisted experiments:<\/p>\n

\n

Let\u2019s see if we can summarize the human experiments scandal.<\/p>\n

I have an ongoing effort, along with many others to do battle with the EPA on air pollution research that violates scientific rules on how to prove causation.<\/p>\n

Milloy and I found out the EPA was doing human experiments under the radar exposing subjects to what EPA said was lethal and toxic, even carcinogenic air pollution.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s where we are in 2014:<\/p>\n

Either the EPA is sponsoring horrific human experiments, or they are lying to the Congress about the toxicity of air pollution. (source<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Their article on this topic is absolutely a must-read – find it HERE<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Let’s revisit the last line of that excerpt:<\/p>\n

\n

Either the EPA is sponsoring horrific human experiments, or they are lying to the Congress about the toxicity of air pollution.<\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n

According to a report \u00a0by\u00a0the agency’s Inspector General, the EPA got consent forms from 81 people for 5 experiments over the course of 2010-2011.<\/p>\n

The participants had an assortment of conditions, from asthma to heart problems. Some were children, and some were elderly. \u00a0These people were exposed to particulate toxins that were up to 50 times greater than the agency had previously established was a danger to human health.<\/p>\n

It may be no surprise that the volunteers were not informed of the extent of the extreme levels of toxicity that they were being exposed to. \u00a0The EPA did not provide them with the extent of the long-term risks involved with inhaling the diesel particulates.<\/p>\n

The Daily Caller reported on the IG’s findings about the shady human experiments:<\/p>\n

\n

The IG\u2019s report found that the EPA did get consent forms from 81 people in five studies. But the IG also found that \u201cexposure risks were not always consistently represented.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cFurther, the EPA did not include information on long-term cancer risks in its diesel exhaust studies\u2019 consent forms,\u201d the IG\u2019s report noted. \u201cAn EPA manager considered these long-term risks minimal for short-term study exposures\u201d but \u201chuman subjects were not informed of this risk in the consent form.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to the IG\u2019s report, \u201conly one of five studies\u2019 consent forms provided the subject with\u00a0information on the upper range of the pollutant\u201d they would be exposed to, but even more alarming is that only \u201ctwo of five alerted study subjects to the risk of death for older individuals\u00a0with cardiovascular disease.\u201d<\/p>\n

Three of the studies exposed people to high levels of PM and two of the studies exposed people to high levels of diesel exhaust and ozone. Diesel exhaust contains 40 toxic air contaminants, including 19 that are known carcinogens and PM. The EPA has publicly warned of the dangers of PM, but seemed to downplay them in their scientific studies on humans.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis lack of warning about PM,\u201d the IG\u2019s report notes, \u201cis also different from the EPA\u2019s public image about PM.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0(source<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Now, if you’re wondering if they really knew how dangerous this substance is, you can take it right from former EPA head kahuna Lisa Jackson’s testimony to Congress back in 2011. Her exact words were:<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cParticulate matter causes premature death. It doesn\u2019t make you sick. It\u2019s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.\u201d<\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Could it be any more clear than that?\u00a0\u00a0Did these scientists\u00a0attend the Josef Mengele School of Scientific Ethics?\u00a0If these participants were cats or bunnies, there would be protests, marches, \u00a0and sit-ins. It would be front page news and disturbing photos would be posted all over Facebook. \u00a0But…it was human beings and they were deceived, and it seems that nobody really cares.<\/p>\n

It’s probably no surprise that several of the participants became seriously ill during the studies.<\/p>\n

\n

No one was killed during the test, but a source close to the issue says that one test subject \u2013 a 58-year-old obese woman with medical problems and a family history of heart disease \u2013 was ordered to go to the hospital by the EPA after being exposed to \u201cambient air pollution particles\u201d in October 2010.<\/p>\n

Other test subjects also experienced health problems during their testing. One subject developed a persistent cough after being exposed to ozone for 15 minutes in April 2011 and two other subjects suffered from \u201ccardiac arrhythmias\u201d during testing in 2010 after being exposed to \u201cclean air.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0(source<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

You may be asking why. \u00a0Why would an agency charged with the responsibility of keeping people safe and healthy go full-out mad scientist with human experiments?<\/p>\n

Because carbon taxes, that’s why.<\/p>\n

The purpose of this study is to demonize the trucking industry and day to day drivers. \u00a0It does nothing to establish a link between lung disease and the enormous factories that bellow out toxic fumes into the air.<\/p>\n

The purpose of the Environmental Protection Agency is not to protect us, the citizens. It is to promote the agenda of the financial elite. \u00a0And that agenda is pure Agenda 21 – ownership of all of the resources through\u00a0climate change scare tactics<\/a>,\u00a0regulations, fees, and fines that make it impossible for everyday people to live and prosper independently.<\/p>\n

\n

One controversy after another can be attributed to the EPA, an agency charged with protecting the air we breathe, the soil in which we grow our food and the water that we drink. At the bottom of each of those controversies can be found ties to the conspiracies of the big businesses that really run the country. Decisions are being auctioned off to industry lobbyists with the most money and influence.<\/p>\n

Environmental protection is only the rule of thumb if it goes along with\u00a0Agenda 21<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 the EPA is all over\u00a0the green agenda<\/a>\u00a0in cases that benefit the redistribution of wealth, but the agency completely ignores blatant crimes against the earth if it involves fracking for the benefit of a natural gas company. (source<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Most recently, the vigilant advocates at the EPA approved even higher levels of deadly glyphosate to be allowed. \u00a0This is great news for their friends in Big Biotech like Dow and Monsanto, but for the rest of us, a potential death sentence. Despite irrefutable evidence of toxicity and death with the previous allowable levels, the corrupt agency came to the conclusion that the allowable levels should actually be raised instead of lowered. We need only to look at the devastating health problems on the Hawaiin island of Molokai to realize that this is a terrible idea. \u00a0With the full approval of the EPA, the island was turned into an experimental petri dish by Monsanto<\/a>, and people died and suffered long-term health indications, not from consuming food tainted by glyphosate, but from the chemical drift from the sprayed fields.<\/p>\n

When you look at incidents like this, the pattern of corruption becomes so clear that even the most die-hard government supporter has to see that the only interests that the EPA looks after are the interests of the highest bidder.<\/p>\n

The EPA is willing to do whatever they must\u00a0in order to forward their agendas, up to and including human sacrifice<\/del> experiments. It is now a matter of record that they tested on children, the elderly, and the ill in order to “prove” something they had already allegedly proven. \u00a0They twist science to make it say what they want it to say, whether that is that…<\/p>\n