In the video, David Icke examines a speech made by the PM in 2014 at the UN General Assembly in which Cameron said:
The peddling of lies: that 9/11 was a Jewish plot or that the 7/7 London attacks were staged. The idea that Muslims are persecuted all over the world as a deliberate act of Western policy. The concept of an inevitable clash of civilisations.
We must be clear: to defeat the ideology of extremism we need to deal with all forms of extremism – not just violent extremism.
For governments, there are some obvious ways we can do this. We must ban preachers of hate from coming to our countries.
Notice the carefully chosen words and their designed impact on the listener.
I will deconstruct some of the speech and highlight the Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) he used.
‘Peddling of lies’ – this is a damning accusation. So why is Cameron not only determined to remove our freedom to question the glaring holes in the ‘official’ narrative, but to actually label those of us who do as liars? Also, to say we are ‘peddling’ is to imply that there is profit to be made from this work – which in fact most activists, dissidents and researchers who investigate the events of 9/11 do so to their own financial detriment. I speak from experience.
Could this be an obvious indication that the dissemination of facts uncovered by activists, researchers and dissidents is now beginning to gain traction? Or could it be that we, as a society, are approaching the tipping point where the manipulation and control that the elite harness is about to become obsolete?
‘That 9/11 was a Jewish plot’ – the use of the word ‘Jewish’ in this instance is emotive, to imply that those who question the events of that horrific day, are anti-Semitic or in some way aligned with far-right hate groups.
‘Or that the 7/7 London attacks were staged’ – to sneak reference to the London attacks in the same sentence as one alluding to 9/11 researchers being anti-Semitic only serves to place those who question 7/7 under the same banner, effectively labelling both groups of researchers as racist. Smoothly Dave, real smooth.
‘The idea that Muslims are persecuted all over the world as a deliberate act of Western policy’ – can we just let the facts speak for themselves here? As David Icke pointed out in his videocast, we have a long list of countries who are systematically subjected to drone attacks, invasions and civilian torture – all bought and paid for by Western governments.
More than 4 million Muslims have been killed by Western governments since 1990.
In 2015 Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS) released a study that showed the death toll from the ‘War on Terror’ alone was in excess of 1.3 million.
That sounds like persecution to me, Cameron. Let’s call it what it is, genocide.
It’s clear that Cameron has an agenda. He is subtly planting the seed that those of us who speak out against political corruption are aligned with terrorists. That we are dangerous. That we need to be stopped.
And we are dangerous – to the establishment.
As a result of decades long work by researchers, activists and dissidents, the public are now waking up faster than ever before and the criminal psychopaths who lead this nation are losing their grip, losing their control and their dominance over a submissive and docile population.
And that is why we see David Cameron labelling us as racists and terrorists.
Again on the 20th of July, 2015, while speaking at Ninestiles School in Birmingham, he said:
Ideas – like those of the despicable far right – which privilege one identity to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others.
And ideas also based on conspiracy: that Jews exercise malevolent power; or that Western powers, in concert with Israel, are deliberately humiliating Muslims, because they aim to destroy Islam. In this warped worldview, such conclusions are reached – that 9/11 was actually inspired by Mossad to provoke the invasion of Afghanistan; that British security services knew about 7/7, but didn’t do anything about it because they wanted to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash.
His agenda is clear to see.
However, as seen last week, by using David Icke’s name and work as an attempt to psychologically manipulate voters, it could be argued that Cameron was using a little known, yet effective disinformation technique. I will explain.
As you’re no doubt aware, many years ago David Icke experienced a torrent of ridicule in the British mainstream media after appearing on national TV, during a transformational period of his life.
Could it be possible that Cameron was attempting to tap into that ridicule, inferring that David Icke has psychological problems, and therefore by proxy anyone else who supports Brexit, also has psychological problems?
In either case, it’s evident that David Icke is now, very publicly, on the British Governments radar. So what comes next?
Yes. David Icke is an extremist who must be silenced, and because you’re reading RINF, so are you.