{"id":90512,"date":"2013-11-11T18:38:07","date_gmt":"2013-11-11T17:38:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/democrats-to-target-tax-loopholesbut-not-for-fossil-fuel-industry\/"},"modified":"2013-11-11T21:30:49","modified_gmt":"2013-11-11T20:30:49","slug":"democrats-to-target-tax-loopholesbut-not-for-fossil-fuel-industry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/latest-news\/democrats-to-target-tax-loopholesbut-not-for-fossil-fuel-industry\/","title":{"rendered":"Democrats to Target Tax &#8216;Loopholes&#8217;&mdash;But Not for Fossil Fuel Industry"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A document obtained by several news agencies last week shows Democrats preparing to target tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations as part of congressional negotiations to meet a Dec. 13 deadline for a budget deal.<\/p>\n<p>Not on the list of Democrats&#8217; targets: tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Hill<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/on-the-money\/budget\/189741-dems-eye-tax-hikes-%E2%80%98here-we-go-again%E2%80%99\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a> that the list<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>contains 12 examples of the types of \u201ctax loopholes\u201d that [Democrats] would like to see closed in a year-end budget deal. Most have been proposed many times before.<\/p>\n<p>Combined, the items on the list would raise $264 billion in revenue over 10 years, more than enough to switch off two years&#8217; worth of the automatic budget cuts known as sequestration.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Bloomberg<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/bangordailynews.com\/2013\/11\/07\/news\/nation\/democrats-target-tax-breaks-for-wealthiest\/\" target=\"_blank\">reported<\/a> that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In addition to closing what Democrats call the \u201cJohn Edwards\/Newt Gingrich loophole,\u201d the party&#8217;s list of options includes carried-interest treatment that allows hedge fund managers and private equity advisers to pay a 20 percent tax rate on their income instead of the nation&#8217;s top income rate of 39.6 percent. Ending that break would save more than $17 billion over a decade, according to the Democrats&#8217; estimates.<\/p>\n<p>Another lets U.S. companies deduct their expenses when they send their plants overseas, which Democrats say encourages offshoring of American jobs. It would raise $200 million. Ending preferences for corporate jets and subsidies for yachts and vacation homes, combined, would bring in another $19 billion.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;The list makes clear that Democrats believe they can win public support by targeting tax breaks that they can portray as subsidies for the rich,&#8221; according to <a href=\"http:\/\/in.reuters.com\/article\/2013\/11\/07\/usa-fiscal-negotiations-idINL2N0IS24920131107\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Reuters<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans have been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/view\/2013\/10\/25\" target=\"_blank\">demanding cuts<\/a> in Social Security and Medicare in exchange for changes to sequestration spending cuts, and that has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/headline\/2013\/10\/21-4\" target=\"_blank\">failed to be met<\/a> by a widespread Democratic pushback.<\/p>\n<p>Progressives like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/newswire\/2013\/07\/26-2\" target=\"_blank\">called<\/a> for and &#8220;End [to] tax breaks and subsidies for oil, gas and coal companies to reduce the deficit by more than $113 billion over the next 10 years&#8221;\u2013a call echoed by the Congressional Progressive Caucus&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/cpc.grijalva.house.gov\/back-to-work-budget\/\" target=\"_blank\">Back to Work Budget,<\/a>&#8221; which calls for an elimination of corporate tax subsidies for oil, gas, and coal companies.<\/p>\n<p>But preserving tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry appears to have widspread bipartisan consensus.<\/p>\n<p>Fossil fuel companies not being on the list of dozen targets may be a result of Democrats&#8217; &#8220;embrace&#8221; of fossil fuels, the <em>Financial Times<\/em> reported.<\/p>\n<p>James Politi <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/intl\/cms\/s\/0\/cc0a881e-48be-11e3-8237-00144feabdc0.html\" target=\"_blank\">reported at the <em>Financial Times<\/em><\/a> that the omission may &#8220;point to an increasing willingness among Democrats to embrace America&#8217;s domestic energy boom as a source of economic strength.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The FT also quotes the American Petroleum Institute as saying there is &#8220;growing bipartisan opposition&#8221; to taxes that target oil and gas industries.<\/p>\n<p>___________________<\/p>\n<p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a title=\"Democrats to Target Tax 'Loopholes'\u2013But Not for Fossil Fuel Industry\" href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/headline\/2013\/11\/11-2\" target=\"_blank\">Common Dreams<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A document obtained by several news agencies last week shows Democrats preparing to target tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations as part of congressional negotiations to meet a Dec. 13 deadline for a budget deal. Not on the list of Democrats&#8217; targets: tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry. The Hill reported that the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1213,"featured_media":90513,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487,52,18],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-90512","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news","8":"category-money","9":"category-latest-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1213"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90512\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90513"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}