{"id":83905,"date":"2013-07-09T07:42:00","date_gmt":"2013-07-09T06:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?guid=3d40b5ff5e648112e13ebd337f030151"},"modified":"2013-07-09T07:42:00","modified_gmt":"2013-07-09T06:42:00","slug":"propaganda-and-puppets-the-gm-sector-and-the-battle-for-the-future-of-humanity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/propaganda-and-puppets-the-gm-sector-and-the-battle-for-the-future-of-humanity\/","title":{"rendered":"Propaganda And Puppets: The GM Sector And The Battle For The Future Of Humanity"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n

Global Research and Countercurrents 9\/7\/2013<\/span>

<\/span>Last year, the then British Agriculture Minister Jim Paice told the Cereals 2012 conference that the public is softening its views towards GM crops (1). He said more work needed to be done to communicate the \u2018full facts\u2019 about GM crops. He stated:<\/span><\/div>\n

\u201cGM is not the panacea and it isn\u2019t going to produce all the food on its own, but it has a role to play as long as it is applied safely and all the tests on its application are properly carried out\u2026 But yes\u2026 I do believe that the famous tanker is beginning to turn.\u201d<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Reality check for Jim Paice: the public is not \u2018softening\u2019 its views, no matter how hard the GM sector tries to soften us up. Moreover, just whose version of the \u2018full facts\u2019 are we to be subjected to? Those of the GM sector?<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
As if Paice\u2019s words were not worrying enough, even more alarming were the comments last year from <\/span>the British Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson. He called concerns over the use of GM foods \u201ccomplete nonsense\u201d in an attack on public concerns about GMOs (2):<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
\n

\u201cEmphatically we should be looking at GM \u2026 I\u2019m very clear it would be a good thing\u2026 The trouble is all this stuff about Frankenstein foods and putting poisons in foods. There are real benefits, and what you\u2019ve got to do is sell the real environmental benefits. Those benefits include a reduction in the use of pesticides because some GM crops are pest-resistant.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city> also said that consumers were already unwittingly eating GM food on a regular basis, so concerns about human health are misplaced:<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
\n

\u201cThere\u2019s about 160 million hectares of GM being grown around the world. There isn\u2019t a single piece of meat being served [in a typicalLondon restaurant] where a bullock hasn\u2019t eaten some GM feed. So it\u2019s a complete nonsense. But, the humbug! You know, large amounts of GM products are used across <\/span>Europe<\/span><\/st1:place>.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
So there you have it, straight from the horse\u2019s mouth, or more aptly, from a minister acting as a front for the pro-GM lobby \u2014 GM food is safe simply because people do not know they are eating it, have no say in eating it and have not dropped dead from eating it. Perhaps Patterson would like to consult the mounting research that contradicts his assertions pertaining to the health impacts.<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Such playground logic may wash well in certain quarters, but should we expect such inanity from a senior politician? You do not have to necessarily be a dyed in the wool sceptic to conclude that <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s knowledge of the issues is limited at best and that his words have all the subtlety of a glossy pro-GM brochure.<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In a June 2013 speech, <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city> was still peddling the same line and stated that \u201cseven million children\u201d had gone blind or died over the past 15 years because \u201cevery attempt\u201d to introduce a GM rice fortified with sight-saving vitamin A had \u201cbeen thwarted.\u201d Very emotive and simplistic stuff, which conveniently overlooks wider more complex issues related to food poverty.<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
Surprisingly, however, one of the most damning indictments of <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city>\u2019s recent speech came not from expected anti-GM sources, but from millionaire MP Zac Goldsmith, who is a member of the Conservative Party to which <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city> also belongs. Goldsmith accused his fellow party member of making “nonsensical” claims about the benefits of GM technology, claiming that <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city> is a puppet of the industry and does not understand the dangers genetically modified crops pose to the ecosystem.<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span>Speaking to The Independent newspaper on 3 July, Mr Goldsmith said:<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
“Any half-way decent GM enthusiast with a scientific background would have blushed during much of the speech Owen Paterson made. You have to wonder about the government’s gung-ho attitude to GM\u2026 It undermines his credibility on this issue and makes the government look very silly\u2026 I think he’s falling into a trap over GM and I don’t think he understands the issue. He’s swallowed the industry line hook, line and sinker without talking to anyone with a different view. When designing policy that’s a dangerous thing, and I’m concerned big business is framing the debate for the government\u2026 The story so far suggests that GM is predominantly about the industry getting greater control over the food chain, rather than alleviating poverty or environmental concerns.” (3)<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
Is <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:city> unaware of the issues related to the hijack of food and agriculture by powerful agribusiness, the lax regulations concerning its activities and the seed patenting and monopolies and resultant difficulties faced by farmers in places like <\/span>India<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> (4,5)?<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Is he also unaware of the documented health risks or the actual efficacy or lack of agricultural benefits derived from GMOs (6,7,8,9,10)?<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Or is he content to become part of the problem by kowtowing to the massive well-documented GMO industry pressures and its global PR machine, which receives full and active support from the US State Department (11,12)?  <\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Based on the overwhelming evidence, it is Paterson who is talking complete nonsense. In response to Patterson, Peter Melchett, policy director at the Soil Association, said:<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cGM crops are not cheaper, they use more pesticides in <\/span>America<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> not less, and they haven\u2019t increased yields \u2014 so Mr Paterson has got most of his facts wrong. He talks about embracing new technology, but there are better ways of breeding crops now that do produce bigger yields, are resistant to drought and salinity. They are helping produce high yields in <\/span>Africa<\/span><\/st1:place> right now. The minister\u2019s obsession with GM really is backward-looking.\u201d (13)<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Melchett also says:<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cOwen Patterson is wrong to claim that GM crops are good for the environment.  The UK Government\u2019s own farm scale experiment showed that overall the GM crops were worse for British wildlife. US Government figures show that overall pesticide use has increased since GM crops have been grown there because, as scientists opposed to GM predicted, superweeds and resistant insects have multiplied. The recent British Science Association survey showed public concern has not changed, and the number of people saying that GM food should be encouraged dropped from 46 per cent in 2002 to 27 per cent in 2012. Owen Patterson says that people are eating meat from animals fed of GM feed without realising it. That is because the British Government has consistently opposed moves to label to give consumers accurate information, and he should put that right by immediately introducing compulsory labelling of meat and milk from animals fed on GM feed.\u201d (2)<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Friends of the Earth’s senior food and farming campaigner Clare Oxborrow has said:<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cOwen Paterson\u2019s claims that we need GM crops simply don\u2019t stack up. The industrial farming system, which GM aggravates, has been instrumental in causing the global food crisis we currently face. A fresh approach to agriculture is urgently needed to serve up sustainable diets globally, including reduced meat-consumption in wealthy nations and an end to food crops being used for biofuels.\u201d (14)<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Eight European countries have banned the production of GM crops: <\/span>Poland<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>Austria<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>France<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>Germany<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>Hungary<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>Luxembourg<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>Greece<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, and <\/span>Bulgaria<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>. In nearly 50 countries around the world, including <\/span>Australia<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>Japan<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, and most of the countries in <\/span>Europe<\/span><\/st1:place>have either banned GM crop production outright, or have put in place extremely tight restrictions on the production and use of GM products.<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Even though GM crops are prevalent in the <\/span>US<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, there was significant concern from scientists at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prior to the FDA allowing GM products into the food chain. The concerns of the scientists were ignored, and by the time the public became aware, the GM products were firmly embedded into the <\/span>US<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> food production chain (15).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
FDA scientists had continually warned regulators that GM crops could create unpredictable and hard to detect side effects, including allergies, toxin production, nutritional problems, and new diseases. They recommended that long-term studies were needed to fully assess the effect of GM foods on other crops, the ecosystem, and animal and human health, but these warnings were ignored.<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
In <\/span>India<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, continued use of GM modified cotton has reduced yields, and the cotton bollworm has developed a resistance to the GM crops which contain the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) toxin (16).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
The claims that the use of GM crops reduce the use of pesticides do not hold up in either. Research by a <\/span>Washington<\/span><\/st1:placename> <\/span>State<\/span><\/st1:placetype> <\/span>University<\/span><\/st1:placetype><\/st1:place> team found that the use of herbicides and insecticides has increased dramatically since GM crops were introduced in the <\/span>US<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> in 1996 (17).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Researchers at the <\/span>University<\/span><\/st1:placetype> of <\/span>Arizona<\/span><\/st1:placename><\/st1:place> found that multi-toxin GM crops (which are the most technologically advanced crops in use) quickly lose their ability to fend off pests, which is likely to lead to a complete failure of the GMO (18).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Moreover, there has been no proper research or monitoring by the companies producing GM crops of the effects on humans consuming products made with GM crops. Scientists like Professor Seralini in <\/span>France<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> who have published studies critical of GM crops and food have suffered a wave of designed to undermine their work by supporters of the technology.<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Minister Patterson\u2019s pro-GM attitudes come as little surprise, though. The cosy relationship between governments and the biotech companies is well known, especially in the US (19), where there has been legislation passed that allows biotech companies to be totally free of any legal ramifications if their products cause harm (20).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
In the UK, Genewatch UK has revealed how Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, and BASF (all biotech companies) under the guise of the \u2018Agricultural Biotechnology Council\u2019 held a meeting in June 2012 with government ministers and academics to formulate a \u2018strategy\u2019 to promote GMO in schools, to \u2018educate\u2019 the public and to \u2018improve\u2019 the regulatory framework favouring GMOs, while encouraging farmers to change their farming methods to fully accommodate the GMO products the companies produce.<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Dr Helen Wallace, Director of GeneWatch <\/span>UK<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> said:<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
\u201cThis dodgy deal shows breath-taking arrogance by Monsanto and its friends, who seem to think that British farming must be destroyed to suit their own commercial interest and British children should be brainwashed to support their business strategies. It is shocking that the Government has done a secret deal to promote GM in <\/span>Britain<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> and abroad when <\/span>US<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> farmers are struggling to tackle superweeds and superpests caused by growing GM crops. Ministers should not prop up this failing industry by pushing Monsanto\u2019s propaganda in British schools at taxpayers\u2019 expense.\u201d (21)<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Despite recent euphoric claims by some quarters that Monsanto has been placed on the back foot, this is far from the truth. The biotech sector continues to try to hijack legislation for its own gain, as evidenced by the 2013 Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India bill 2013 (22), and is determined to continue to push its global agenda (23).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
Maybe politicians such as Owen Paterson are content to be willing servants for the wider military-industrial complex agenda that GMOs (and big dam, oil-dependent chemical agriculture) are tied to. And that agenda encompasses an integrated strategy that involves the (near) monopoly ownership and control of all water, seeds, food and food retail, land and energy, which in turn both fuels and is fuelled by conflict, debt and dependency (24,25,26,27). From <\/span>Syria<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> and <\/span>Pakistan<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, to <\/span>Egypt<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country>, <\/span>India<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:country> and <\/span>Europe<\/span><\/st1:place>, we see this agenda being played out via conflict or war, trade agreements (28) and the molding of political agendas (29).<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
For the big corporations and the families and individuals behind them, profit and ‘full spectrum global dominance’ of resources, nations and people is the ultimate aim.<\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n
 <\/span>Notes<\/span><\/b><\/div>\n
 <\/span>1) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>farmersguardian.com\/home\/<\/wbr>arable\/britain-beginning-to-<\/wbr>accept-gm-technology-%E2%80%<\/wbr>93-paice%C2%A0\/47649.article<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
2) <\/span>http:\/\/www.telegraph.<\/wbr>co.uk\/news\/politics\/9733589\/<\/wbr>Food-minister-Owen-Paterson-<\/wbr>backs-GM-crops.html<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
3) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/<\/wbr>politics\/tory-mp-says-progm-<\/wbr>environment-secretary-owen-<\/wbr>paterson-is-industry-puppet-<\/wbr>8686133.html<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
4) <\/span>http:\/\/www.corpwatch.<\/wbr>org\/article.php?id=573<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
5) <\/span>http:\/\/www.youtube.<\/wbr>com\/watch?v=LJ9vAULNFzc<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
6) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>greenmedinfo.com\/blog\/new-<\/wbr>study-confirms-wheat-autism-<\/wbr>link-0<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
7) <\/span>http:\/\/www.greenmedinfo.<\/wbr>com\/blog\/it-time-acknowledge-<\/wbr>roundup-herbicide-<\/wbr>contraceptive<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
8)<\/span> <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>responsibletechnology.org\/gmo-<\/wbr>dangers<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
9)<\/span> <\/span>http:\/\/vidarbhatimes.<\/wbr>blogspot.co.uk\/2012\/11\/<\/wbr>maharashtra-reports-btcotton-<\/wbr>failure-in.html?m=1<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
10) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/india-genetically-modified-<\/wbr>seeds-agricultural-<\/wbr>productivity-and-political-<\/wbr>fraud\/5328227<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
11) <\/span>http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/<\/wbr>environment\/2013\/may\/15\/<\/wbr>diplomatic-cables-gm-lobbying-<\/wbr>us<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
12) <\/span>http:\/\/documents.<\/wbr>foodandwaterwatch.org\/doc\/<\/wbr>Biotech_Report_US.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
13) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>naturalproductsonline.co.uk\/<\/wbr>melchett-slams-patersons-<\/wbr>backward-looking-patronizing-<\/wbr>obsession-with-gm\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
14) <\/span>http:\/\/www.tbfreeengland.<\/wbr>uk.com\/index.php\/patterson-<\/wbr>says-gm-crops-are-a-good-<\/wbr>thing\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
15)  <\/span>http:\/\/www.nongmoreport.<\/wbr>com\/articles\/october2011\/<\/wbr>FDAignoredscientistswarningsGM<\/wbr>foods.php<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
16) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/harvest-of-hypocrisy-<\/wbr>farmers-being-blamed-for-gmo-<\/wbr>crop-failures\/5322807<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
17) <\/span>http:\/\/www.motherjones.<\/wbr>com\/tom-philpott\/2012\/10\/how-<\/wbr>gmos-ramped-us-pesticide-use<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
18)<\/span>http:\/\/www.naturalnews.com\/<\/wbr>040120_gm_crops_monsanto_<\/wbr>chemical_resistance.html<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
19) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/monsanto-controls-both-the-<\/wbr>white-house-and-the-us-<\/wbr>congress\/5336422<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
20) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/monsanto-protection-act-<\/wbr>signed-by-obama-gmo-bill-<\/wbr>written-by-monsanto-signed-<\/wbr>into-law\/5329388<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
21) <\/span>http:\/\/orderoftruth.<\/wbr>wordpress.com\/2013\/06\/20\/uk-<\/wbr>government-patterson-calls-gm-<\/wbr>food-concerns-complete-<\/wbr>nonsense-and-humbug-we-take-a-<\/wbr>closer-look-at-his-lies-<\/wbr>monsanto-gm\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
22) <\/span>http:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/<\/wbr>india\/en\/Press\/Controversial-<\/wbr>BRAI-Bill-introduced-in-Lok-<\/wbr>Sabha\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
23) <\/span>http:\/\/rt.com\/op-edge\/<\/wbr>monsanto-deception-game-<\/wbr>europe-gmo-261\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
24) <\/span>http:\/\/www.outlookindia.<\/wbr>com\/article.aspx?280234<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
25) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/sowing-the-seeds-of-famine-<\/wbr>in-ethiopia\/366<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
26) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/the-eu-india-free-trade-<\/wbr>agreement-india-up-for-sale-<\/wbr>to-western-corporate-capital\/<\/wbr>5332214<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
27) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/genetic-engineering-and-<\/wbr>the-gmo-industry-corporate-<\/wbr>hijacking-of-food-and-<\/wbr>agriiculture\/5317339<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
28) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/us-eu-free-trade-agreement-<\/wbr>a-corporate-stitch-up-by-any-<\/wbr>other-name\/5339789<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
29) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>countercurrents.org\/<\/wbr>todhunter100213.htm<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n

Global Research and Countercurrents 9\/7\/2013<\/span>

<\/span>Last year, the then British Agriculture Minister Jim Paice told the Cereals 2012 conference that the public is softening its views towards GM crops (1). He said more work needed to be done to communicate the ‘full facts’ about GM crops. He stated:<\/span><\/div>\n

“GM is not the panacea and it isn’t going to produce all the food on its own, but it has a role to play as long as it is applied safely and all the tests on its application are properly carried out… But yes… I do believe that the famous tanker is beginning to turn.”<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Reality check for Jim Paice: the public is not ‘softening’ its views, no matter how hard the GM sector tries to soften us up. Moreover, just whose version of the ‘full facts’ are we to be subjected to? Those of the GM sector?<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

As if Paice’s words were not worrying enough, even more alarming were the comments last year from <\/span>the British Environment Secretary, Owen Paterson. He called concerns over the use of GM foods “complete nonsense” in an attack on public concerns about GMOs (2):<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

\n

“Emphatically we should be looking at GM … I’m very clear it would be a good thing… The trouble is all this stuff about Frankenstein foods and putting poisons in foods. There are real benefits, and what you’ve got to do is sell the real environmental benefits. Those benefits include a reduction in the use of pesticides because some GM crops are pest-resistant.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city> also said that consumers were already unwittingly eating GM food on a regular basis, so concerns about human health are misplaced:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

\n

“There’s about 160 million hectares of GM being grown around the world. There isn’t a single piece of meat being served [in a typicalLondon restaurant] where a bullock hasn’t eaten some GM feed. So it’s a complete nonsense. But, the humbug! You know, large amounts of GM products are used across <\/span>Europe<\/span><\/place>.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
So there you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth, or more aptly, from a minister acting as a front for the pro-GM lobby – GM food is safe simply because people do not know they are eating it, have no say in eating it and have not dropped dead from eating it. Perhaps Patterson would like to consult the mounting research that contradicts his assertions pertaining to the health impacts.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Such playground logic may wash well in certain quarters, but should we expect such inanity from a senior politician? You do not have to necessarily be a dyed in the wool sceptic to conclude that <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city>’s knowledge of the issues is limited at best and that his words have all the subtlety of a glossy pro-GM brochure.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
In a June 2013 speech, <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city> was still peddling the same line and stated that “seven million children” had gone blind or died over the past 15 years because “every attempt” to introduce a GM rice fortified with sight-saving vitamin A had “been thwarted.” Very emotive and simplistic stuff, which conveniently overlooks wider more complex issues related to food poverty.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n


<\/span><\/div>\n
Surprisingly, however, one of the most damning indictments of <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city>’s recent speech came not from expected anti-GM sources, but from millionaire MP Zac Goldsmith, who is a member of the Conservative Party to which <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city> also belongs. Goldsmith accused his fellow party member of making “nonsensical” claims about the benefits of GM technology, claiming that <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city> is a puppet of the industry and does not understand the dangers genetically modified crops pose to the ecosystem.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n


<\/span>Speaking to The Independent newspaper on 3 July, Mr Goldsmith said:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n


<\/span><\/div>\n
“Any half-way decent GM enthusiast with a scientific background would have blushed during much of the speech Owen Paterson made. You have to wonder about the government’s gung-ho attitude to GM… It undermines his credibility on this issue and makes the government look very silly… I think he’s falling into a trap over GM and I don’t think he understands the issue. He’s swallowed the industry line hook, line and sinker without talking to anyone with a different view. When designing policy that’s a dangerous thing, and I’m concerned big business is framing the debate for the government… The story so far suggests that GM is predominantly about the industry getting greater control over the food chain, rather than alleviating poverty or environmental concerns.” (3)<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n


<\/span><\/div>\n
Is <\/span>Paterson<\/span><\/place><\/city> unaware of the issues related to the hijack of food and agriculture by powerful agribusiness, the lax regulations concerning its activities and the seed patenting and monopolies and resultant difficulties faced by farmers in places like <\/span>India<\/span><\/place><\/country> (4,5)?<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Is he also unaware of the documented health risks or the actual efficacy or lack of agricultural benefits derived from GMOs (6,7,8,9,10)?<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Or is he content to become part of the problem by kowtowing to the massive well-documented GMO industry pressures and its global PR machine, which receives full and active support from the US State Department (11,12)?  <\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Based on the overwhelming evidence, it is Paterson who is talking complete nonsense. In response to Patterson, Peter Melchett, policy director at the Soil Association, said:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

“GM crops are not cheaper, they use more pesticides in <\/span>America<\/span><\/place><\/country> not less, and they haven’t increased yields – so Mr Paterson has got most of his facts wrong. He talks about embracing new technology, but there are better ways of breeding crops now that do produce bigger yields, are resistant to drought and salinity. They are helping produce high yields in <\/span>Africa<\/span><\/place> right now. The minister’s obsession with GM really is backward-looking.” (13)<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Melchett also says:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

“Owen Patterson is wrong to claim that GM crops are good for the environment.  The UK Government’s own farm scale experiment showed that overall the GM crops were worse for British wildlife. US Government figures show that overall pesticide use has increased since GM crops have been grown there because, as scientists opposed to GM predicted, superweeds and resistant insects have multiplied. The recent British Science Association survey showed public concern has not changed, and the number of people saying that GM food should be encouraged dropped from 46 per cent in 2002 to 27 per cent in 2012. Owen Patterson says that people are eating meat from animals fed of GM feed without realising it. That is because the British Government has consistently opposed moves to label to give consumers accurate information, and he should put that right by immediately introducing compulsory labelling of meat and milk from animals fed on GM feed.” (2)<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Friends of the Earth’s senior food and farming campaigner Clare Oxborrow has said:<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

“Owen Paterson’s claims that we need GM crops simply don’t stack up. The industrial farming system, which GM aggravates, has been instrumental in causing the global food crisis we currently face. A fresh approach to agriculture is urgently needed to serve up sustainable diets globally, including reduced meat-consumption in wealthy nations and an end to food crops being used for biofuels.” (14)<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Eight European countries have banned the production of GM crops: <\/span>Poland<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>Austria<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>France<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>Germany<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>Hungary<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>Luxembourg<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>Greece<\/span><\/place><\/country>, and <\/span>Bulgaria<\/span><\/place><\/country>. In nearly 50 countries around the world, including <\/span>Australia<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>Japan<\/span><\/place><\/country>, and most of the countries in <\/span>Europe<\/span><\/place>have either banned GM crop production outright, or have put in place extremely tight restrictions on the production and use of GM products.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Even though GM crops are prevalent in the <\/span>US<\/span><\/place><\/country>, there was significant concern from scientists at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prior to the FDA allowing GM products into the food chain. The concerns of the scientists were ignored, and by the time the public became aware, the GM products were firmly embedded into the <\/span>US<\/span><\/place><\/country> food production chain (15).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

FDA scientists had continually warned regulators that GM crops could create unpredictable and hard to detect side effects, including allergies, toxin production, nutritional problems, and new diseases. They recommended that long-term studies were needed to fully assess the effect of GM foods on other crops, the ecosystem, and animal and human health, but these warnings were ignored.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

In <\/span>India<\/span><\/place><\/country>, continued use of GM modified cotton has reduced yields, and the cotton bollworm has developed a resistance to the GM crops which contain the Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) toxin (16).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

The claims that the use of GM crops reduce the use of pesticides do not hold up in either. Research by a <\/span>Washington<\/span><\/placename> <\/span>State<\/span><\/placetype> <\/span>University<\/span><\/placetype><\/place> team found that the use of herbicides and insecticides has increased dramatically since GM crops were introduced in the <\/span>US<\/span><\/place><\/country> in 1996 (17).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Researchers at the <\/span>University<\/span><\/placetype> of <\/span>Arizona<\/span><\/placename><\/place> found that multi-toxin GM crops (which are the most technologically advanced crops in use) quickly lose their ability to fend off pests, which is likely to lead to a complete failure of the GMO (18).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Moreover, there has been no proper research or monitoring by the companies producing GM crops of the effects on humans consuming products made with GM crops. Scientists like Professor Seralini in <\/span>France<\/span><\/place><\/country> who have published studies critical of GM crops and food have suffered a wave of designed to undermine their work by supporters of the technology.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Minister Patterson’s pro-GM attitudes come as little surprise, though. The cosy relationship between governments and the biotech companies is well known, especially in the US (19), where there has been legislation passed that allows biotech companies to be totally free of any legal ramifications if their products cause harm (20).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

In the UK, Genewatch UK has revealed how Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, and BASF (all biotech companies) under the guise of the ‘Agricultural Biotechnology Council’ held a meeting in June 2012 with government ministers and academics to formulate a ‘strategy’ to promote GMO in schools, to ‘educate’ the public and to ‘improve’ the regulatory framework favouring GMOs, while encouraging farmers to change their farming methods to fully accommodate the GMO products the companies produce.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Dr Helen Wallace, Director of GeneWatch <\/span>UK<\/span><\/place><\/country> said:<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

“This dodgy deal shows breath-taking arrogance by Monsanto and its friends, who seem to think that British farming must be destroyed to suit their own commercial interest and British children should be brainwashed to support their business strategies. It is shocking that the Government has done a secret deal to promote GM in <\/span>Britain<\/span><\/place><\/country> and abroad when <\/span>US<\/span><\/place><\/country> farmers are struggling to tackle superweeds and superpests caused by growing GM crops. Ministers should not prop up this failing industry by pushing Monsanto’s propaganda in British schools at taxpayers’ expense.” (21)<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Despite recent euphoric claims by some quarters that Monsanto has been placed on the back foot, this is far from the truth. The biotech sector continues to try to hijack legislation for its own gain, as evidenced by the 2013 Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India bill 2013 (22), and is determined to continue to push its global agenda (23).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Maybe politicians such as Owen Paterson are content to be willing servants for the wider military-industrial complex agenda that GMOs (and big dam, oil-dependent chemical agriculture) are tied to. And that agenda encompasses an integrated strategy that involves the (near) monopoly ownership and control of all water, seeds, food and food retail, land and energy, which in turn both fuels and is fuelled by conflict, debt and dependency (24,25,26,27). From <\/span>Syria<\/span><\/place><\/country> and <\/span>Pakistan<\/span><\/place><\/country>, to <\/span>Egypt<\/span><\/place><\/country>, <\/span>India<\/span><\/place><\/country> and <\/span>Europe<\/span><\/place>, we see this agenda being played out via conflict or war, trade agreements (28) and the molding of political agendas (29).<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

For the big corporations and the families and individuals behind them, profit and ‘full spectrum global dominance’ of resources, nations and people is the ultimate aim.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

 <\/span>Notes<\/span><\/b><\/div>\n
 <\/span>1) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>farmersguardian.com\/home\/<\/wbr>arable\/britain-beginning-to-<\/wbr>accept-gm-technology-%E2%80%<\/wbr>93-paice%C2%A0\/47649.article<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
2) <\/span>http:\/\/www.telegraph.<\/wbr>co.uk\/news\/politics\/9733589\/<\/wbr>Food-minister-Owen-Paterson-<\/wbr>backs-GM-crops.html<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
3) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>independent.co.uk\/news\/uk\/<\/wbr>politics\/tory-mp-says-progm-<\/wbr>environment-secretary-owen-<\/wbr>paterson-is-industry-puppet-<\/wbr>8686133.html<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
4) <\/span>http:\/\/www.corpwatch.<\/wbr>org\/article.php?id=573<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
5) <\/span>http:\/\/www.youtube.<\/wbr>com\/watch?v=LJ9vAULNFzc<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
6) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>greenmedinfo.com\/blog\/new-<\/wbr>study-confirms-wheat-autism-<\/wbr>link-0<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
7) <\/span>http:\/\/www.greenmedinfo.<\/wbr>com\/blog\/it-time-acknowledge-<\/wbr>roundup-herbicide-<\/wbr>contraceptive<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
8)<\/span> <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>responsibletechnology.org\/gmo-<\/wbr>dangers<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
9)<\/span> <\/span>http:\/\/vidarbhatimes.<\/wbr>blogspot.co.uk\/2012\/11\/<\/wbr>maharashtra-reports-btcotton-<\/wbr>failure-in.html?m=1<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
10) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/india-genetically-modified-<\/wbr>seeds-agricultural-<\/wbr>productivity-and-political-<\/wbr>fraud\/5328227<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
11) <\/span>http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/<\/wbr>environment\/2013\/may\/15\/<\/wbr>diplomatic-cables-gm-lobbying-<\/wbr>us<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
12) <\/span>http:\/\/documents.<\/wbr>foodandwaterwatch.org\/doc\/<\/wbr>Biotech_Report_US.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
13) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>naturalproductsonline.co.uk\/<\/wbr>melchett-slams-patersons-<\/wbr>backward-looking-patronizing-<\/wbr>obsession-with-gm\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
14) <\/span>http:\/\/www.tbfreeengland.<\/wbr>uk.com\/index.php\/patterson-<\/wbr>says-gm-crops-are-a-good-<\/wbr>thing\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
15)  <\/span>http:\/\/www.nongmoreport.<\/wbr>com\/articles\/october2011\/<\/wbr>FDAignoredscientistswarningsGM<\/wbr>foods.php<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
16) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/harvest-of-hypocrisy-<\/wbr>farmers-being-blamed-for-gmo-<\/wbr>crop-failures\/5322807<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
17) <\/span>http:\/\/www.motherjones.<\/wbr>com\/tom-philpott\/2012\/10\/how-<\/wbr>gmos-ramped-us-pesticide-use<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
18)<\/span>http:\/\/www.naturalnews.com\/<\/wbr>040120_gm_crops_monsanto_<\/wbr>chemical_resistance.html<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
19) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/monsanto-controls-both-the-<\/wbr>white-house-and-the-us-<\/wbr>congress\/5336422<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
20) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/monsanto-protection-act-<\/wbr>signed-by-obama-gmo-bill-<\/wbr>written-by-monsanto-signed-<\/wbr>into-law\/5329388<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
21) <\/span>http:\/\/orderoftruth.<\/wbr>wordpress.com\/2013\/06\/20\/uk-<\/wbr>government-patterson-calls-gm-<\/wbr>food-concerns-complete-<\/wbr>nonsense-and-humbug-we-take-a-<\/wbr>closer-look-at-his-lies-<\/wbr>monsanto-gm\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
22) <\/span>http:\/\/www.greenpeace.org\/<\/wbr>india\/en\/Press\/Controversial-<\/wbr>BRAI-Bill-introduced-in-Lok-<\/wbr>Sabha\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
23) <\/span>http:\/\/rt.com\/op-edge\/<\/wbr>monsanto-deception-game-<\/wbr>europe-gmo-261\/<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
24) <\/span>http:\/\/www.outlookindia.<\/wbr>com\/article.aspx?280234<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
25) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/sowing-the-seeds-of-famine-<\/wbr>in-ethiopia\/366<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
26) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/the-eu-india-free-trade-<\/wbr>agreement-india-up-for-sale-<\/wbr>to-western-corporate-capital\/<\/wbr>5332214<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
27) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/genetic-engineering-and-<\/wbr>the-gmo-industry-corporate-<\/wbr>hijacking-of-food-and-<\/wbr>agriiculture\/5317339<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
28) <\/span>http:\/\/www.globalresearch.<\/wbr>ca\/us-eu-free-trade-agreement-<\/wbr>a-corporate-stitch-up-by-any-<\/wbr>other-name\/5339789<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
29) <\/span>http:\/\/www.<\/wbr>countercurrents.org\/<\/wbr>todhunter100213.htm<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1214,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487,461],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-83905","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news","7":"category-editorials"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1214"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83905\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}