{"id":58452,"date":"2013-08-13T13:16:46","date_gmt":"2013-08-13T12:16:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/critics-question-obamas-vows-to-reform-spying-programs\/58452\/"},"modified":"2013-08-13T14:57:08","modified_gmt":"2013-08-13T13:57:08","slug":"critics-question-obamas-vows-to-reform-spying-programs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/politics\/critics-question-obamas-vows-to-reform-spying-programs\/","title":{"rendered":"Critics Question Obama\u2019s Vows to Reform Spying Programs"},"content":{"rendered":"

President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference in the East Room last week.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

WASHINGTON <\/span>– Civil liberties advocates are expressing doubt that promised reforms to a vast and controversial U.S. surveillance programme will allay concerns that the spying infringes on certain rights.<\/p>\n

On Friday, U.S. President Barack Obama announced that he would oversee reforms to his administration\u2019s surveillance programme. Evidence of this programme, which was initially leaked in May, showed that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) had gained access to the communication records of millions of U.S. citizens, sparking public outrage.<\/p>\n

\u201cIntelligence agencies, by their nature, will always want to collect as much information as possible, and today there are very few technological limits left on what they can collect.” — Prof. David C. Unger<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s good that President Obama has gotten the message that Americans are troubled to learn of the National Security Agency\u2019s overreaching surveillance of their private communications,\u201d David C. Unger, a professor of U.S. foreign policy at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), told IPS.<\/p>\n

\u201cBut more transparency alone won\u2019t be enough, especially if the president intends to keep his proposed review process within the executive branch itself.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rather, Unger says what is needed is a \u201creinvigorated system of checks and balances, with much more vigorous legislative and judicial oversight than we have today.\u201d<\/p>\n

In his remarks, Obama listed four reforms his administration was ready to make. The steps include working with Congress to reform the laws governing surveillance, pursuing measures to increase transparency, and establishing \u201ca high-level group of outside experts\u201d to assess how U.S. intelligence agencies utilise communications technology.<\/p>\n

The reforms, he said, are intended to \u201cstrike the right balance between protecting our security and preserving our freedoms,\u201d as well as \u201cto give the American people additional confidence that there are additional safeguards against abuse.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a sign of sincerity about the reforms, on Monday the president sent a memorandum to the director of national intelligence (DNI), James Clapper, ordering him to establish a Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies.<\/p>\n

The Review Group\u2019s primary assignment is to \u201cassess whether, in light of advancements in communications technologies, the United States employs its technical collection capabilities in a manner that optimally protects our national security and advances our foreign policy while appropriately accounting for other policy considerations, such as the risk of unauthorized disclosure and our need to maintain the public trust.\u201d<\/p>\n

The committee will now have two months to carry out the review, after which it will present its findings to Obama through the DNI.<\/p>\n

Right to ask questions<\/b><\/p>\n

Speaking with reporters at the White House, Obama reminded U.S. citizens about the threat of terrorism the country continues to face. He also lamented the effects that high-profile leaks made by former intelligence analyst Edward Snowden have had on the country\u2019s discourse about the power of its spy agencies.<\/p>\n

\u201cUnfortunately, rather than an orderly and lawful process to debate these issues and come up with appropriate reforms, repeated leaks of classified information have initiated the debate in a very passionate, but not always fully informed, way,\u201d the president said.<\/p>\n

Yet that opinion clashes with the widespread views of critics of the surveillance programme, who are encouraged that an impassioned public outcry has reached presidential ears.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile we\u2019re glad Obama is responding to the public\u2019s concerns, we take [his] promises today with a healthy dose of scepticism,\u201d the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a group which advocates for less government surveillance, said in a statement.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe may be paying lip service to accountability and transparency, but the devil will be in the details when it comes to whether his proposals will be effective.\u201d<\/p>\n

The EFF also remarked that it is \u201cglad\u201d the Obama administration \u201chas been forced to address the matter publicly as a result of the sustained public pressure from concerned voters as well as the ongoing press coverage of this issue.\u201d<\/p>\n

In his remarks on the subject, Obama did note that he had been influenced by a meeting held with civil liberties advocates at the beginning of this month. He also said he understood the concerns being expressed by those who oppose the more invasive spying techniques that his administration has reportedly used.<\/p>\n

\u201c[G]iven the history of abuse by governments, it\u2019s right to ask questions about surveillance,\u201d the president said, \u201cparticularly as technology is reshaping every aspect of our lives.\u201d<\/p>\n

Critics of the extensive spying programme agree the advancement of communication technology has played a part in enabling governments to gather vast amounts of information on private citizens.<\/p>\n

\u201cIntelligence agencies, by their nature, will always want to collect as much information as possible, and today there are very few technological limits left on what they can collect,\u201d says SAIS\u2019s Unger, author of \u201cThe Emergency State: America\u2019s Pursuit of Absolute Security at All Costs.\u201d<\/p>\n

Maintaining principles<\/b><\/p>\n

In his remarks, President Obama also made noteworthy comments on the importance of openness and adherence to the law, even when engaging in controversial surveillance activity. He suggested this was one way in which the United States distinguishes itself from other powers.<\/p>\n

\u201c[W]e show a restraint that many governments around the world don\u2019t even think to do, refuse to show \u2014 and that includes, by the way, some of America\u2019s most vocal critics,\u201d the president stated.<\/p>\n

U.S. leadership, Obama suggested, depends upon \u201cthe example of American democracy and American openness \u2014 because what makes us different from other countries is not simply our ability to secure our nation, it\u2019s the way we do it.\u201d<\/p>\n

While those leery of extensive spying are aware that U.S. practices are often less abusive than some states that have criticised it, many continue to warn against using that fact as justification for the U.S. abandoning its ethical principles.<\/p>\n

\u201cWithout a doubt there are worse actors in the world of espionage than the United States, including some of America\u2019s critics,\u201d SAIS\u2019s Unger told IPS.<\/p>\n

\u201c[However,] none of that should or does absolve the United States from adhering to the principled standards it has historically set for itself and that are in its own long-term best interests.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a9 2013 IPS North America<\/p>\n

Republished from: Common Dreams<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference in the East Room last week.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":58453,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487,17,18,1616],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-58452","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news","8":"category-politics","9":"category-latest-news","10":"category-usa-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58452\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/58453"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}