{"id":57980,"date":"2013-08-11T22:43:33","date_gmt":"2013-08-11T21:43:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=57980"},"modified":"2013-08-13T00:49:08","modified_gmt":"2013-08-12T23:49:08","slug":"27000-innocent-peoples-dna-records-held-on-file","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/latest-news\/27000-innocent-peoples-dna-records-held-on-file\/","title":{"rendered":"27,000 Innocent People&#8217;s DNA Records Held on File"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.rinf.com\" target=\"_blank\">RINF Alternative News<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Essex police who controversially held onto the DNA records of more than\u00a027,000 innocent people have been forced to destroy the records in order to comply with a court ruling.<\/p>\n<p>However, the data contains DNA from\u00a0sex-attack suspects, including rape and other violent crimes. As a result\u00a0some critics have attacked the decision stating the genetic information is too valuable to destroy.<\/p>\n<p>According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thisistotalessex.co.uk\/story-19631019-detail\/story.html?#axzz2bhLpaTaq\" target=\"_blank\">the Essex Chronicle<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Head of the Kent and Essex Serious Crime Directorate, assistant chief constable Gary Beautridge admits it is regrettable that the force can no longer trace crime-scene DNA to that of a previous suspect held on its database.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s devilishly difficult to strike the right balance,&#8221; the 52-year-old told the Chronicle.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;No one wants to live in a tyranny where someone records your details straight from birth, but then again no one wants to live in anarchy either.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The UK has one of the largest DNA databases in the world because the threshold to get someone&#8217;s DNA is quite low.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In other European countries you have to commit more serious crimes before it is retained.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But we&#8217;ve had some very significant cases, such as cold-case investigations, where we have arrested someone for a very minor offence before linking them to the most horrendous acts.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Police swab the inside of people&#8217;s mouths whenever they are arrested, regardless of the offence.<\/p>\n<p>In 2009 Lawrence Button&#8217;s DNA was found in Wivenhoe woodland where he sexually abused a former University of Essex student.<\/p>\n<p>He had been swabbed over a separate issue six months earlier, and the investigating officer Richard McNamara praised the force&#8217;s database as a &#8220;massive investigatory tool&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Yet the protection of human rights is an absolute core of any civilised nation,&#8221; added Mr Beautridge, an officer of 34 years who led the investigation into Vicky Pryce taking penalty points for her husband and former cabinet minister Chris Huhne.<\/p>\n<p>A 2010 Chronicle investigation revealed that three in four innocent people who asked to have DNA deleted was turned down, while Essex police still had the records of 27,285 innocent people.<\/p>\n<p>Yet Mr Beautridge said the force had now deleted all records of innocent people.<\/p>\n<p>Anglia Ruskin University forensics researcher Nathan White believes the new law has been &#8220;forced through&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There was no appeal system to have your DNA removed, and that could be why the regulation is being introduced,&#8221; said the 22-year-old forensics graduate.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It needs a lot of work before they delete it. They need to find out information about the suspects&#8217; profiles and take it into context.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And for those charged but then released, how can they rehabilitate if their DNA is still on the database?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And for those who have even served a prison sentence, how can they rehabilitate if their DNA is still on there?&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Essex police who controversially held onto the DNA records of more than 27,000 innocent people have been forced to destroy the records in order to comply with a court ruling. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":57981,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,1614,18],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-57980","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-surveillance-big-brother","9":"category-latest-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57980","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57980"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57980\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/57981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}