{"id":51159,"date":"2013-07-18T00:09:40","date_gmt":"2013-07-17T23:09:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/google-experimenting-with-anti-nsa-encryption-report\/51159\/"},"modified":"2013-07-18T00:09:40","modified_gmt":"2013-07-17T23:09:40","slug":"google-experimenting-with-anti-nsa-encryption-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/google-experimenting-with-anti-nsa-encryption-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Google experimenting with anti-NSA encryption &#8211; report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Google is considering encrypting users\u2019 data generated on its Google Drive as a protection from the US government&#8217;s invasive meta data collection policies revealed just over a month ago, according to a new report.<\/p>\n<p>\n  The privacy protection initiative remains in the experimental<br \/>\n  phase, but could comfort customers shaken by the revelation that<br \/>\n  the National Security Agency has a policy of indiscriminately<br \/>\n  pulling millions of communication records. Google, according to<br \/>\n  the CNET report that first revealed the testing, already encrypts<br \/>\n  a small percentage of Google Drive files.<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  The current testing is reportedly examining whether it would be<br \/>\n  possible to encrypt data stored in the Google cloud service as<br \/>\n  well as Google Drive.<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201c<i>There are lots of things this could mean: if Google encrypts<br \/>\n  the files but retains the keys, it would mean that any government<br \/>\n  spying would be more visible within the company, since it would<br \/>\n  require the government requesting access to the keys before it<br \/>\n  could snoop on users<\/i>,\u201d wrote technology journalist Cory<br \/>\n  Doctorow.<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201c<i>On the other hand, it might mean that Google would encrypt<br \/>\n  its files in a way that even it can&#8217;t encrypt it &#8211; called<br \/>\n  &#8216;zero-knowledge encryption&#8217; &#8211; which would be much more robust<br \/>\n  against spying<\/i>.\u201d<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  The company, like others in Silicon Valley, has come under harsh<br \/>\n  public scrutiny for the perception that it not only participated<br \/>\n  in the secret government surveillance program PRISM, but profited<br \/>\n  off it as well.<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  An earlier report indicated that Verizon and AT&amp;T each charge<br \/>\n  the NSA hundreds of dollars to install a single wiretap and,<br \/>\n  while Google\u2019s fees were not disclosed, documents obtained by the<br \/>\n  American Civil Liberties Union showed that complete email<br \/>\n  transcripts were often sold for as little as $25.<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorizes the<br \/>\n  disclosures in decisions that are shielded from public oversight.<br \/>\n  Companies are forced to provide that data unless its encrypted.<br \/>\n  While Google has attempted to protect customers\u2019 privacy in the<br \/>\n  past &#8211; including a longstanding battle against government<br \/>\n  National Security Letters &#8211; it may be possible for the NSA to<br \/>\n  step in and demand the search giant intercept encrypted messages.<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201c<i>This is an unanswered legal question<\/i>,\u201d Jennifer Granick,<br \/>\n  the director of civil liberties at Stanford University\u2019s Center<br \/>\n  for Internet and Society, told CNET. \u201c<i>I think the answer would<br \/>\n  depend in part on whether decryption could be called a current<br \/>\n  capability of the provider &#8211; or requires a re-engineering of the<br \/>\n  service<\/i>.\u201d<br \/>\n  <\/p>\n<p>Republished with permission from: <a href=\"http:\/\/rt.com\/usa\/google-experimenting-nsa-encryption-report-230\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Google experimenting with anti-NSA encryption - report\">RT<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Google is considering encrypting users\u2019 data generated on its Google Drive as a protection from the US government&#8217;s invasive meta data collection policies revealed just over a month ago, according to a new report. The privacy protection initiative remains in the experimental phase, but could comfort customers shaken by the revelation that the National Security [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-51159","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51159","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51159"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51159\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51159"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51159"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51159"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}