{"id":42411,"date":"2013-06-16T14:57:22","date_gmt":"2013-06-16T13:57:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/police-state-canada-communications-security-establishment-canada-csec-runs-massive-domestic-spying-program\/42411\/"},"modified":"2013-06-16T14:57:22","modified_gmt":"2013-06-16T13:57:22","slug":"police-state-canada-communications-security-establishment-canada-csec-runs-massive-domestic-spying-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/police-state-canada-communications-security-establishment-canada-csec-runs-massive-domestic-spying-program\/","title":{"rendered":"Police State Canada: Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC) Runs Massive Domestic Spying Program"},"content":{"rendered":"

On the basis of secret government directives, Canada\u2019s national security apparatus is conducting mass surveillance of Canadians parallel to, if not directly patterned after, the domestic spying operations of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).<\/em><\/p>\n

Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), the NSA\u2019s Canadian counterpart and longstanding partner, has been scrutinizing the metadata of Canadians\u2019 electronic communications since at least 2005.<\/p>\n

Moreover, the NSA routinely provides Canada\u2019s security agencies with intelligence on Canadians and CSEC reciprocates by providing U.S. intelligence officials with information about people living in the U.S. This arrangement allows both agencies to circumvent legal bans on warrantless surveillance of their own citizenry\u2019s communications.<\/p>\n

It was \u201ccommon\u201d for NSA \u201cto pass on information about Canadians,\u201d Wayne Easter, Canada\u2019s Solicitor-General in 2002-3, told the Toronto Star<\/em> this week. As Solicitor-General, Easter was responsible for overseeing the operations of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).<\/p>\n

The extent and scope of CSEC\u2019s spying and who is being targeted and why are all zealously guarded state secrets. The CSEC functions under secret directives issued by the Minister of Defence\u2013directives whose very existence is unknown to parliamentarians, let alone the public at large.<\/p>\n

The Conservative government has responded to this week\u2019s slight and very partial lifting of the veil on CSEC activities with a campaign of disinformation, dissembling and lies. This campaign has been facilitated by the opposition parties, especially the ostensibly leftwing New Democratic Party, and the corporate media; they have made no more than tepid calls for greater transparency about the CSCE\u2019s spying.<\/p>\n

On Monday, the Globe and Mail<\/em> reported that in November 2011, Defence Minister Peter MacKay signed a secret directive authorizing the CSEC to continue its \u201cmining\u201d of the metadata of Canadians\u2019 telephone and internet communications. The Globe<\/em> said the program had been first authorized by Bill Graham, Defence Minister in Paul Martin\u2019s Liberal government, in 2005, that is six years earlier.<\/p>\n

MacKay, like U.S. President Barack Obama, responded to this revelation of massive state spying by flatly denying that CSEC is \u201ctargeting\u201d Canadians or violating constitutional prohibitions on warrantless surveillance of their communications. This lie is predicated on the drawing of a spurious distinction between the metadata created by any electronic communication and the rest of the communication and on the transparently false claim that such information is innocuous.<\/p>\n

According to the Globe<\/em>, a briefing prepared for MacKay in 2011, presumably by CSEC or lawyers within his department, declared, \u201cMetadata is information associated with a telecommunication \u2026 And not a communication.\u201d<\/p>\n

In fact metadata\u2013which includes such information as the source, destination and duration of a telephone call\u2013is intrinsic to any electronic communication. By systematically gathering and analyzing such metadata, the U.S. and Canadian national-security apparatuses can rapidly build up detailed profiles of targeted individuals and groups, including identifying everything from their associates, to where they work, bank, and shop, and what websites they visit.<\/p>\n

In the course of his efforts to cover-up the scope and purpose of CSEC\u2019s metadata mining, MacKay did make one revealing admission. In response to a question about the mass surveillance of Canadians\u2019 communications, MacKay told Parliament, \u201cI have a heads-up for the member \u2026 This is something that has been happening for years.\u201d<\/p>\n

Government sources, many of them unnamed, sought, meanwhile, to refute the Globe<\/em> \u2019s claim that there had been serious questions within the state apparatus about the constitutionality of the CSEC\u2019s \u201cmetadata\u201d mining of Canadians\u2019 communications. In its Monday report, the Globe<\/em> said that in 2008 the then CSEC Commissioner\u2013that is the head of the government-appointed \u201cwatchdog\u201d charged with ensuring the agency does not go beyond its legal mandate\u2013had cautioned that the program could be violating Canadians constitutional rights and, because of his concerns, the metadata mining program was suspended for more than a year.<\/p>\n

Sources from within the government and CSEC dispute this. They say that the questions raised by Charles Gonthier\u2013a former, now deceased former Supreme Court Justice\u2013concerned only a small part of a much larger program, that only this part of the metadata mining program was ever suspended, and then only very briefly.<\/p>\n

The current CSEC Commissioner has publicly defended the mass surveillance and claimed that his predecessor likewise believed that the CSEC has every right to spy on Canadian\u2019s electronic communications. In an e-mail statement to the Toronto Star<\/em>, Ryan Foreman, a spokesman for CSEC Commissioner Robert Decary, said, \u201cThe commissioner never questioned the legality of CSEC\u2019s metadata activities.\u201d<\/p>\n

MacKay and the government have also sought to shield CSEC\u2019s actions form public scrutiny by insisting that it is solely devoted to gathering foreign intelligence and, as MacKay told Parliament last Monday, \u201cis specifically prohibited from looking at the information of Canadians.\u201d This is an obvious falsehood and not just because warrantless metadata mining is a form of spying.<\/p>\n

CSEC\u2019s government mandate stipulates\u2013as MacKay well knows since he has been the minister responsible for overseeing its work for the past seven years\u2013that it \u201cprovide technical and operational assistance\u201d to CSIS, the RCMP and other domestic security-intelligence and law enforcement agencies \u201cin the performance of their lawful duties.\u201d Furthermore CSEC can seek authorization from the Defence Minister to capture and read the communications of Canadians who are in some way connected to its foreign intelligence targets. As the Toronto Star<\/em> \u2019s Thomas Walkom has observed, \u201cIn 2011-12, the last year for which figures are available, eight such ministerial authorizations\u2013all of unknown size and scope\u2013were in play.\u201d<\/p>\n

While vigorously defending CSEC\u2019s metadata spying, the government has been anxious to put on a record that CSEC does not have access to the NSA\u2019s PRISM Program and has not been using it as a means of monitoring Canadians\u2019 communications. Under PRISM, NSA agents are able to directly access the servers of the most important U.S. based internet companies, including Microsoft, Apple, Google, and Facebook.<\/p>\n

The government\u2019s claims concerning the CSEC and PRISM are not credible. The CSEC has been a close partner of the NSA, sharing intelligence information with it on a daily basis, for more than six decades.<\/p>\n

Britain, which like Canada, is part of the \u201cFive Eyes\u201d\u2013a consortium formed in the late 1940s by the NSA, CSEC, and the signals communications agencies of Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand to jointly monitor global communications\u2013has already said that it obtained intelligence about Britons through PRISM.<\/p>\n

The NSA and CSEC, as the spurious distinction they have made between electronic communications\u2019 metadata and rest of the communications illustrates, can and do create pretexts and mechanisms to illegally circumvent constitutional prohibitions.<\/p>\n

Last but not least, whatever the validity of MacKay\u2019s denial about spying on Canadians though PRISM, it only concerned CSEC. As Easter\u2019s comments cited above demonstrate, Canada\u2019s security agencies have long been the recipients of intelligence on Canadians from the NSA as part of longstanding Canada-U.S. intelligence-sharing agreements and partnerships.<\/p>\n

The CSEC is part of a growing state within the state whose operations are hidden from the public. Till this week most Canadians had never heard of the CSEC and even now they knew very little about its activities. When Defence Minister MacKay renewed by secret ministerial order CSEC\u2019s authorization to spy on Canadians\u2019 electronic communications in November 2011 he issued six other secret ministerial directives to CSEC\u2013none of whose subject let alone contents has been publicly revealed.<\/p>\n

As in the United States, Canada\u2019s elite has used the so-called war on terror to justify Canada\u2019s participation in a series of imperialist wars, massively expand the national-security apparatus, and adopt laws that attack core democratic rights.<\/p>\n

This article originally appeared on: Global Research<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On the basis of secret government directives, Canada\u2019s national security apparatus is conducting mass surveillance of Canadians parallel to, if not directly patterned after, the domestic spying operations of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), the NSA\u2019s Canadian counterpart and longstanding partner, has been scrutinizing the metadata of Canadians\u2019 electronic […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-42411","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42411\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}