{"id":392476,"date":"2019-01-11T19:38:02","date_gmt":"2019-01-11T18:38:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=392476"},"modified":"2019-01-11T19:38:02","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T18:38:02","slug":"the-secret-logistics-of-americas-global-deep-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/the-secret-logistics-of-americas-global-deep-state\/","title":{"rendered":"The Secret Logistics of America’s Global Deep State"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Why is America\u2019s Baghdad Embassy the world\u2019s largest embassy \u2014 and the largest by far?<\/span><\/p>\n

“It’s as if the U.S. Embassy is there not only to protect American interests, but to manage the entire world from the heart of the capital, Baghdad.\u201d<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Iraqi Sheikh Qassim Al Ta\u2019ee, as quoted on 27 December 2011 in Al Iraq News<\/i> and translated by Ibrahim Zaidan from the original Arabic<\/span><\/a> by Nicholas Dagher <\/span><\/p>\n

Zaidan\u2019s article went on to say:<\/span><\/p>\n

The world’s largest embassy is situated in the Green Zone and fortified by three walls, another barrier of concrete slabs, followed by barbed wire fences and a wall of sandbags. It covers an area of 104 acres, six times larger than U.N. headquarters in New York and ten times larger than the new embassy Washington is building in Beijing – which is just 10 acres.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

[Editor’s’ Note: The ten-acre U.S. Embassy in Beijing is the second largest overseas construction project in the history of the Department of State \u2014 and the 104-acre U.S. Embassy in Iraq is the largest.]<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

So, America’s largest diplomatic mission is surrounded by high concrete walls, is painted in black, brown and grey and is completely isolated from its environment. \u2026 The United States announced several months ago that between diplomats and employees, its embassy would include 16,000 people after the pullout of U.S. forces.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

On January 1st, Will Sillitoe headlined at the Helsinki Times<\/i>, “What does the US embassy in Baghdad export to Finland and dozens of other countries?\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 <\/span>and he reported that:<\/span><\/p>\n

More than a million kilograms of cargo were shipped from Baghdad to different parts of the world, reveals US embassies procurement documents.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Mysterious cargo shipments from the US Embassy in Baghdad to other American embassies and consulates around the world have been revealed on a Wikileaks’ database. Procurement orders of US embassies are public documents, but Wikileaks put them in a searchable database making it easier to analyse.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

The database displaying worldwide US embassy orders of goods and services reveals Baghdad as a postal and shipping centre for tonnes of freight.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Though military freight might be expected between the US and Iraq, records show that embassies across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, the Americas and Africa are all receiving deliveries from Baghdad too.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

According to Wikileaks’ database, orders to ship more than 540 tonnes of cargo to the US were made in May 2018. The same document shows other main delivery destinations included 120 tonnes of freight to Europe, and 24 tonnes to South Africa, South America and Central Africa respectively. \u2026<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

On December 29th, Sillitoe had headlined “Guarded warehouse near airport and mysterious cargos from Baghdad; what is the US embassy in Helsinki up to?\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 <\/span>and he opened:<\/span><\/p>\n

Why does the US Embassy in Helsinki need a big warehouse near Malmi Airport and what are the contents of thousands of kilograms of cargo sent to Helsinki from Baghdad?<\/i> <\/span><\/p>\n

A dilapidated warehouse in Malmi is being used by the US Embassy for unknown operations after a Wikileaks release revealed its location.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

The anonymous looking building on Takoraudantie is notable only for the new 427 meter perimeter fence that according to the Wikileaks’ database was ordered by the US Embassy in April 2018.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Situated across the street from the main entrance of Malmi Airport, the warehouse with its 3 meter high security fence appears an unlikely location for official embassy business. Neighbouring companies include a car yard and a tyre warehouse.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Helsinki Times visited the perimeters this weekend. Security personnel, young Finns in uniforms with American flags on their arms, appeared nervous and suspicious when asked to comment on the warehouse. …<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Sillitoe<\/span> closed that article by saying: \u201c<\/span>The searchable Wikileaks database and info about Finland related activities can be found HERE<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

That link leads to a \u201cUS Embassy Shopping List\u201d of 24 separate documents, one of which is “RFP 191Z1018R0002 Mission Iraq Shipping Transportation Services\u201d<\/span><\/a>, dated \u201c5\/17\/18.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Item 2 there is \u201cPacking of unaccompanied air baggage (UAB) – Throughout Iraq – U.S. Embassy Baghdad, Baghdad International Zone, U.S. Consulate General in Basrah, U.S. Consulate General in Erbil, U.S. Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center, U.S. Erbil Diplomatic Support Center (Note: under the specified unit of measure the U.S. Government contemplates \u2018per kilogram\u2019 of gross weight in kilograms)\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The \u201cQuantity Estimated\u201d is \u201c100,000\u201d and the \u201cUnit of Measure\u201d is \u201ckilogram.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Item 7 is \u201cStorage Services – Monthly Storage of containers – Throughout Iraq – U.S. Embassy Baghdad, Baghdad International Zone, U.S. Consulate General in Basrah, U.S. Consulate General in Erbil, U.S. Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center, U.S. Erbil Diplomatic Support Center.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The \u201cQuantity Estimated\u201d is \u201c100\u201d and the \u201cUnit of Measure\u201d is \u201c40\u2019 Container.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Item \u201cSection B.5 Sub-CLIN:84E\u201d is \u201cFrom Republic of Iraq to Western European Countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Malta, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City, Nicosia)\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The \u201cQuantity Estimated\u201d is \u201c5,000\u201d and the \u201cUnit of Measure\u201d is \u201ckilogram.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Item \u201cSection B.5 Sub -CLIN:84 F\u201d is \u201cFrom Republic of Iraq to Eastern European Countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Ukraine, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Kosovo)\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The \u201cQuantity Estimated\u201d is \u201c5,000\u201d and the \u201cUnit of Measure\u201d is \u201ckilogram.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

By far the biggest categories for shipments are to the eastern U.S. states: \u201cFrom Republic of Iraq to the Unites [sp.] States Eastern Time-Zone \u2013 the following States: VT, ME, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC, NY, PA, VA, NC, SC, GA, FL, WV, MI, OH, IN, KY, GA\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n

There are 11 such categories:<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.5 Sub-CLIN:85A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.5 Sub-CLIN:86A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.6 Sub-CLIN:84A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.6 Sub-CLIN:85A”<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.6 Sub-CLIN:86A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.7 Sub-CLIN:84A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.7 Sub-CLIN:85A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.7 Sub-CLIN:86A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.8 Sub-CLIN:84A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.8 Sub-CLIN:85A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

“Section B.8 Sub-CLIN:86A\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Each one of those eleven will receive 30,000 kilograms, under the contract.<\/span><\/p>\n

In each of the eleven, the products will be going \u201cFrom Republic of Iraq to the Unites [sp.] States Eastern Time-Zone \u2013 the following States: VT, ME, NH, MA, RI, CT, NJ, DE, MD, DC, NY, PA, VA, NC, SC, GA, FL, WV, MI, OH, IN, KY, GA\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

That\u2019s a total of 330,000 kilograms. That\u2019s 727,525 pounds, or 364 tons, which are going from the world\u2019s largest Embassy, America\u2019s in Baghdad<\/span><\/a>, to America\u2019s eastern states.<\/span><\/p>\n

In addition, around another 1,091,287 pounds are going from the Baghdad Embassy to other locations throughout the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

The RFP, or Request For Proposal, informs its recipient that \u201cThe Contractor shall provide the services for the base period of the contract,\u201d but \u201cbase period\u201d isn\u2019t defined in the RFP. However, the contract does specify that there shall be \u201ca firm fixed unit price for any contract line item number in the Base Year,\u201d and therefore the obligations under any contract will continue for at least one year, but possibly longer (if renewed). Furthermore, the \u201cType of Solicitation\u201d here is not \u201cSealed Bid (IFB),\u201d but instead \u201cNegotiated (RFP),\u201d which means that the U.S. Government officials who are \u201cSoliciting\u201d these offers will choose whom to request to present an offer; and, if two or more recipients are being approached and make an offer, then the U.S. official will select the winner that he or she prefers, and won\u2019t be required to accept the lowest-priced one, but can instead take some sort of kickback, as long as there is no evidence of having done that. It can easily be arranged. Furthermore, private arrangements bond the two parties, even if the arrangement is just a one-time deal, because neither party will want the private arrangement to be made public, and if ever it does become public, then both parties will be revealed as guilty; it\u2019ll hurt both parties. Moreover, since any contract may be renewed, the offeror of the contract, which is the Embassy employee, holds the power to affect that \u2014 the length of term, and everything that\u2019s associated with it, will be controlled by the Embassy\u2019s side, and not by the contractor\u2019s side. And no matter how brief a contract-term might be, and no matter how many non-Americans might be signing any particular type of contract during any given period of years, none of the private parties will have any motive to make public any kickback. Consequently, there is every motive to keep these arrangements private; and the Embassy employee will always be the more powerful one in any private arrangement that is made with any contractor. <\/span><\/p>\n

Prior RFPs are also online, for example this one from 16 November 2014<\/span><\/a>. The annual amounts seem to be fairly stable.<\/span><\/p>\n

On 10 October 2007, while the U.S. Embassy in Iraq was still building, the Congressional Research Service issued to Congress their report, \u201cU.S. Embassy in Iraq\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and it said:<\/span><\/p>\n

The U.S. Ambassador to Iraq (currently Ambassador Ryan Crocker) has full authority for the American presence in Iraq with two exceptions: 1 \u2014 military and security matters which are under the authority of General Patraeus, the U.S. Commander of the Multinational Force-Iraq (MNF-I), and 2 \u2014 staff working for international organizations. In areas where diplomacy, military, and\/or security activities overlap, the Ambassador and the U.S. Commander cooperate to provide co-equal authority regarding what is best for America and its interests in Iraq.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

By \u201cPatraeus\u201d it meant David Petraeus. He was the person who designed the torture-system that was applied by his assistant James Steele and used in Iraq to extract from prisoners everything they knew about Saddam Hussein\u2019s assistance to the 9\/11 event<\/span><\/a>. Petraeus subsequently became a regular participant in the annual meetings of the private and secretive Bilderberg group<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 <\/span>of representatives of the U.S. and allied nations\u2019 billionaires that constitute The West\u2019s Deep State. Prior to that, Petraeus and Steele had organized and instituted in El Salvador that Government\u2019s death-squads, to eradicate opponents of U.S. control over that country.<\/span><\/p>\n

The most corrupt parts of the U.S. Government are usually in the military, because the entire Defense Department isn\u2019t audited. It is instead financially an enormous dark hole, even to U.S. Senators and Representatives, and even to the U.S. President<\/span><\/a>. Only members of the U.S. Deep State might have an approximate idea of how much money is getting \u2018lost\u2019 in it. After all, the Deep State isn\u2019t, at all, answerable to the public. Since it operates in secret, it can\u2019t be. The consequences of the Deep State, however, can become public, and may contradict what is shown in publicly available documents and public statements, which have been circulated, to the public, by the press. In any nation where a Deep State rules, such contradictions, between public assertions and the actual outcomes, are so commonplace as hardly to be even news at all, if and when they appear, at all.<\/span><\/p>\n

On 2 July 2017, the great investigative reporter Dilyana Gaytandzhieva<\/span><\/a> headlined “350 Flights Carry Weapons Diplomatic for Terrorists\u201d<\/span><\/a><\/span>, and provided documentation of the U.S. CIA\u2019s intricate global network, which secretly \u201csends $1 billion worth of weapons\u201d through many countries to jihadists in Syria to take down Syria\u2019s Government. Iraq was mentioned 6 times in the original publication of her article, and is mentioned 9 times in the 29 April 2018 updated version<\/span><\/a>. That secret U.S. supply of weapons to jihadist groups to overthrow Bashar al-Assad and his secular, non-sectarian, Baathist Party, is a secret operation, just like the U.S. State Department\u2019s Baghdad Embassy\u2019s operations are, and that Embassy could even be this particular operation\u2019s headquarters. <\/span><\/p>\n

The 200-page, December 2017, study, \u201cWeapons of the Islamic State: A three-year investigation\u201d<\/span><\/a>, by Conflict Armament Research Ltd., states in its Conclusion:<\/span><\/p>\n

IS forces, like most non-state armed groups, acquire significant quantities of weapons and ammunition on the battlefield. \u2026 Evidence presented in this report, however, confirms that many of the group\u2019s weapons \u2014 and notably its ammunition \u2014 are newly manufactured, having been delivered to the region since the start of the Syrian conflict in 2011. These weapons originate in transfers made by external parties, including Saudi Arabia and the United States, to disparate Syrian opposition forces arrayed against the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Here are just a few of the details that this passage in the summary was based upon and summarizing:<\/span><\/p>\n

On pages 36-9, it says:<\/span><\/p>\n

CAR has documented and traced numerous weapon systems in service with IS forces. Many derive from shipments made to the US government, or to entities operating under US government contracts. The United States has acknowledged its support to Syrian opposition forces, orchestrated primarily through resupply from the territories of Jordan and Turkey.26\u00a0 <\/span>All of the shipments originated in EU Member States; in most cases, US retransfers (exports made after purchase by the United States) contravened clauses in end-user certificates (EUCs) issued by the United States to EU supplier governments. The United States signed these certificates prior to transfer, stated that it was the sole end user of the materiel, and committed not to retransfer the materiel without the supplier government\u2019s prior consent. It did not notify the supplier states concerned before<\/i> [violating that, and] retransferring the materiel. \u2026<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

On 21 December 2016, Jaysh al-Nasr, a Syrian armed opposition faction active in the Hama Governorate of Syria, published a set of photographs of its fighters.29\u00a0 <\/span>In one of these, Jaysh al-Nasr fighters are operating a 9M111MB-1 ATGW30 bearing an identical lot number and a serial number (365) close in sequence to the one CAR documented (286) in Iraq, suggesting both were part of the same supply chain. \u2026<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

In May 2015, Syrian YPG forces recovered a PG-7T 40 mm rocket from IS forces near Al Hasakah, Syria, where CAR documented it on 20 May 2015. The Government of Bulgaria confirmed that it exported the item to the US Department of the Army through the US company Kiesler Police Supply. The application for the export licence was accompanied by the original EUC issued by the US Department of the Army (with a non-re-export clause) as well as a delivery verification certificate. The item was exported on 23 June 2014.32 \u2026\u00a0 <\/span>CAR has yet to receive a reply to a trace request sent to the United States regarding these rockets.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Page 54 says:<\/span><\/p>\n

Like the United States, Saudi Arabia has provided support to various factions in the Syrian conflict, including through the supply of weapons. Working with the Bulgarian authorities, CAR has traced numerous items deployed by IS forces to initial exports from Bulgaria to Saudi Arabia. These transfers were uniformly subject to non-retransfer clauses concluded between Saudi Arabia and the Government of Bulgaria prior to export. In this respect, onward retransfers by Saudi Arabia of these weapons contravene its commitments to the Government of Bulgaria not to re-export the materiel in question without Bulgaria\u2019s prior consent.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Just like in the case of the Baghdad Embassy\u2019s agreements with contractors, the powerful party in any contract will be the party whose side is paying (the buyer), and not the party whose side is supplying the service or goods (the seller). Money always rules.<\/span><\/p>\n

The CAR report, which was issued just months after Dilyana Gaytandzhieva\u2019s report, was entirely consistent with, and largely overlapped, hers. The U.S. and Saudi Governments were not only using Al Qaeda as their main proxy in southwestern Syria to lead the jihadist groups to overthrow Syria\u2019s non-sectarian Government, but were also using ISIS in northeastern Syria as their main proxy forces there to overthrow Syria\u2019s Government. After Russia\u2019s entry into the war on 30 September 2015<\/span><\/a> on the side of Syria\u2019s Government, America\u2019s assistance to Al Qaeda in Syria (Al Nusra) continued in order to help replace that Government by one which would be controlled by the Sauds<\/span><\/a>. And America\u2019s assistance to ISIS was almost totally replaced then by its assistance to ethnocentric Syrian Kurds in the northeast as the Syrian Democratic Forces, which were fighting against both the Government and ISIS. Russia, of course, was against both Al Qaeda-led jihadists and against ISIS jihadists. (Turkey was against ethnocentric Kurds, because those people want to take a chunk out of four nations: Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. The CIA edited<\/span><\/a> and written<\/span><\/a> Wikipedia\u2019s article on Kurdistan<\/span><\/a> conveniently doesn\u2019t even make note of that key fact<\/span><\/a>.)\u00a0 <\/span>So: America was using a complex combination in order to take over Syria for the Sauds ultimately to control<\/span><\/a>. But Russia\u2019s entry into Syria\u2019s air-war on 30 September 2015 has overcome that U.S-led and Saudi financed combination against Syria.<\/span><\/p>\n

Would any secret facility, anywhere in the world, be better situated to manage that operation, on America\u2019s side, than America\u2019s Baghdad Embassy?<\/span><\/p>\n

So, the question then arises: who benefits from this enormous Embassy, and from the Deep State of which it is a part? The American public certainly do not.<\/span><\/p>\n

Generally speaking, the people who get paid to promote endless wars, such as sellers of the constantly receding<\/span><\/a> (propagandistic) \u201clight at the end of the tunnel\u201d<\/span><\/a>, support continuing if not intensifying such wars. Typical is the neoconservative (in foreign affairs) and neoliberal (in domestic affairs) David Bradley, who controls and is the Chairman of Atlantic Media, which publishes the neocon-neolib The Atlantic,<\/i> and many other public-affairs magazines and websites. His \u201cDefense One\u201d site posted, on 22 March 2018, from its Executive Editor, “The War in Iraq Isn\u2019t Done. Commanders Explain Why and What\u2019s Next\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and closed with \u201c\u2018We need to be very careful about rushing to the exit, and secure this win,\u2019 said the senior U.S. military official. \u2018This is a significant win.\u2019\u201d The \u201csenior U.S. military official\u201d wasn\u2019t identified, other than to say that he \u201cspoke only on background.\u201d But, of course, George W. Bush had already told the world all about this \u201cwin,\u201d back in 2003. Salespeople just continue their pitches; it\u2019s what they are paid to do, and so they never stop.<\/span><\/p>\n

The annual military costs alone, for the U.S. to keep being, as its propaganda euphemistically puts the matter, \u201cpoliceman for the world\u201d (such as, in the Syrian case, by means of those proxy boots-on-the-ground warriors, the jihadists, and the ethnocentrists among Syria\u2019s Kurds) are actually sufficient, even on their own, to cause America\u2019s soaring federal debt \u2014 and that\u2019s not a benefit, but an extreme harm, to the public. Future generations of Americans will be paying the tab for this. And the costs for being \u201cpoliceman for the world\u201d are enormous. Even just militarily, they\u2019re over a trillion dollars each and every year.<\/span><\/p>\n

Though current U.S. Defense Department budgets are around $700 billion annually, the United States is actually spending closer to $1.2 trillion annually on the military when all of the nation\u2019s military spending (such as for military retirements, which are paid by the Treasury Department not by the Defense Department) are factored in<\/span><\/a>. The only people who benefit from being \u201cpoliceman for the world\u201d are the billionaires of the U.S. and (though to only a lesser extent) of its allied countries. And, of course, they pay their lobbyists and propagandists. It\u2019s really being policeman for those billionaires, who own and control all of the international corporations that are headquartered in this alliance. The U.S. public isn\u2019t paying the tab by any cash-and-carry basis; instead, future generations of Americans will be paying the tab, for today\u2019s U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Those billionaires today are the chief beneficiaries. It\u2019s all being done for them and their retinues. That\u2019s why America\u2019s Founders didn\u2019t want there to be any \u201cstanding army\u201d at all. They didn\u2019t want there to be any permanent-war<\/i> government. They wanted military only for national defense \u2014 not for any billionaires\u2019 protection or \u2018insurance policy\u2019, or what might actually be publicly paid and armed thugs in service abroad as if they were the nation\u2019s armed forces \u2014 when, in fact, they are the armed forces for only those billionaires and their servants. America\u2019s Founders wanted no military at all that serves the aristocracy. They wanted no aristocracy, at all. They wanted no \u201cstanding army\u201d whatsoever. They wanted only a military that protects the public, when a real military danger, from abroad, to the domestic public, exists. Of course, that\u2019s possible only in a democracy, but the U.S. is no democracy now<\/span><\/a>, even if it might have been in the past.<\/span><\/p>\n

On 11 December 2017, Montana State University headlined \u201cMSU SCHOLARS FIND $21 TRILLION IN UNAUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT SPENDING; DEFENSE DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT FIRST-EVER AUDIT\u201d<\/span><\/a>, but the Pentagon\u2019s promised audit has failed to materialize. A major accounting firm was hired for the task but soon quit, saying that the Defense Department\u2019s books were too incomplete to proceed further. Three days before that article was published, a colleague of that MSU team headlined at Forbes<\/i>, \u201dHas Our Government Spent $21 Trillion Of Our Money Without Telling Us?\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 <\/span>and said that the answer was yes. All of this \u2018lost\u2019 money was spent merely by the Department of Defense. Just managing the more-than-a-thousand U.S. military bases worldwide<\/span><\/a> requires a lot of money. Any actual war-fighting adds to that U.S. military-base cost \u2014 the war-fighting costs are extra. Those military bases etc. are<\/i> the \u201cstanding army.\u201d Protection of our billionaires\u2019 investments abroad, and of their access to raw materials in underdeveloped countries (such as to manufacture cellphones), is an enormously expensive operation. Basically, the American public are hugely subsidizing America\u2019s billionaires. But only future generations of Americans will be paying that debt \u2014 plus, of course, the accumulated interest on it. <\/span><\/p>\n

The Department of Defense isn\u2019t the only federal Department that has ever been unauditable. On 18 June 2013, Luke Johnson and Ryan Grim at Huffington Post bannered \u201cGAO Cannot Audit Federal Government, Cites Department Of Defense Problems\u201d<\/span><\/a> and opened: \u201cThe Government Accountability Office said Thursday that it could not complete an audit of the federal government, pointing to serious problems with the Department of Defense. Along with the Pentagon, the GAO cited the Department of Homeland Security as having problems so significant that it was impossible for investigators to audit it. The DHS got a qualified audit for fiscal year 2012, and is seeking an unqualified audit for 2013.\u201d However, on 17 November 2014, the Washington Post<\/i> headlined \u201cHomeland Security earns clean audit two years running\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and Jerry Markon reported that, \u201cFor the second straight year, the Department of Homeland Security has achieved a much sought-after clean audit of its financial statements by an independent auditor.\u201d Furthermore: \u201cfor nearly all of its first decade of existence, DHS was unable to achieve a clean audit because it had been created by combining 22 federal agencies and components into one massive department. That led to inherent challenges.\u201d That wasn\u2019t the situation at the Defense Department, which was far different. On 8 December 2017, NPR headlined \u201cPentagon Announces First-Ever Audit Of The Department Of Defense\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and opened: \u201c\u2018The Defense Department is starting the first agency-wide financial audit in its history,\u2019 the Pentagon’s news service says.\u201d However, almost as soon as the auditing team began their work, they quit it, because the Department\u2019s books were garbage. Only<\/i>\u00a0 <\/span>the DOD is like that \u2014 almost entirely corrupt. <\/span><\/p>\n

On 2 October 2018, Project Censored headlined \u201c$21 Trillion in Unaccounted-for Government Spending from 1998 to 2015\u201d<\/span><\/a>. However, it falsified. It opened: \u201cTwo federal government agencies, the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), may have accumulated as much as $21 trillion in undocumented expenses between 1998 and 2015.\u201d None of that was actually HUD, it was 100% DOD. And all of \u201cthe alleged irregularities in DoD and HUD spending\u201d were not merely \u201calleged,\u201d but they were, in fact, carefully checked and repeatedly verified, and were only<\/i> at DOD, despite what Project Censored published. This inaccuracy is important. If people don\u2019t know that DOD is the only<\/i> unaudited federal Department, then they can\u2019t possibly understand why<\/i> that is the case. The reason it is the case, is that almost all of the \u201cwaste, fraud, and abuse\u201d in the U.S. federal government is at<\/i>\u00a0 <\/span>the Defense Department. It has never<\/i> been auditable. How much do America\u2019s \u2018news\u2019-media report this<\/i>\u00a0 <\/span>reality?<\/span><\/p>\n

DOD is consistently, year after year, and decade after decade, the federal Department or federal or local governmental function, that Gallup\u2019s polling has shown to be more respected by the U.S. public than is any other. (It\u2019s identified there as \u201cThe military\u201d<\/span><\/a>. It beats, for examples: \u201cThe Supreme Court,\u201d \u201cCongress,\u201d \u201cThe public schools,\u201d \u201cThe presidency,\u201d \u201cThe police,\u201d and \u201cThe criminal justice system.\u201d) The most corrupt isn\u2019t the most despised; it is the opposite \u2014 it is the most respected<\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Secret government tends to be costly for taxpayers, and also tends to add a lot to the governmental debt. An unauditable governmental department, such as the Defense Department is, cannot function, at all, without an enormous amount of corruption. This<\/i>\u00a0 <\/span>is the reality about America\u2019s military. However, there\u2019s much propaganda contradicting it. The news-media also serve those same billionaires.<\/span><\/p>\n

How likely, then, is it, that <\/span>America\u2019s Baghdad Embassy serves the U.S. public? It certainly does not serve the Iraqi public. But it does serve the people \u2014 whomever they are \u2014 who control the U.S. Government. And that\u2019s the Deep State. That\u2019s the reality, but what\u2019s promoted is fantasyland. And this fantasyland, which is promoted, is called \u201cAmerican democracy\u201d<\/span><\/a>. Just ask Big Brother, and he\u2019ll tell you all about it. He always does.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a>,<\/i> and of<\/span> \u00a0<\/i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org Why is America\u2019s Baghdad Embassy the world\u2019s largest embassy \u2014 and the largest by far? “It’s as if the U.S. Embassy is there not only to protect American interests, but to manage the entire world from the heart of the capital, Baghdad.\u201d \u2014 Iraqi Sheikh Qassim Al Ta\u2019ee, as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":392477,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,519],"tags":[1036,32,96,544,535,38,907,1009,754,92,49],"class_list":{"0":"post-392476","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-newswire","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-cia","11":"tag-cover-up","12":"tag-deep-state","13":"tag-global-news","14":"tag-iraq","15":"tag-isis","16":"tag-islamic-state","17":"tag-syria","18":"tag-terrorism","19":"tag-usa-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=392476"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":392478,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/392476\/revisions\/392478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/392477"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=392476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=392476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=392476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}