{"id":38903,"date":"2013-06-04T13:56:10","date_gmt":"2013-06-04T12:56:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/china-hacking-vs-pentagon-whacking-an-arms-race-in-cyber-space\/38903\/"},"modified":"2013-06-04T13:56:10","modified_gmt":"2013-06-04T12:56:10","slug":"china-hacking-vs-pentagon-whacking-an-arms-race-in-cyber-space","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/china-hacking-vs-pentagon-whacking-an-arms-race-in-cyber-space\/","title":{"rendered":"China hacking Vs. Pentagon whacking: An arms race in cyber-space?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t\t<!–Nile Bowie<\/a>–><\/p>\n

Nile Bowie is a political analyst and photographer currently residing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Fresh allegations of hacking and cyber-theft between China and the United States as well as resources channeled into cyber-warfare and digital troops by both superpowers show uncertain diplomatic terrain ahead.<\/p>\n

\n As the Obama administration imposes gouging cuts on fundamental
\n social spending, the White House is allocating $13 billion for
\n the US Cyber Command, tasked with waging \u2018offensive cyber
\n strikes\u2019<\/i> to defend the homeland. In ‘Pentagonese’<\/i> that
\n translates to building malicious computer viruses designed to
\n subvert disable, and destroy targets and their
\n computer-controlled infrastructure.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n Gen. Keith Alexander, who leads both the Cyber Command and the
\n NSA, even claimed that 13 of the 40 existing cyber battalions are
\n tasked specifically with waging pre-emptive attacks<\/a> against other countries.\n<\/p>\n

\n In keeping with the logic of American exceptionalism, which
\n supposes that the US maintain unrivalled supremacy in every
\n tactical or military field, the Pentagon is now working in
\n earnest to extend its dominance to cyberspace.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n It\u2019s no secret that China has made the modernization of its armed
\n forces a top priority. As Beijing develops new types of hardware,
\n including aircraft carriers, strategic missile submarines and
\n advanced aircraft, white papers issued<\/a> by the People’s
\n Liberation Army (PLA) highlight the desire to digitalize the
\n nation\u2019s military by utilizing modern information
\n technology.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n Washington is no stranger to scare tactics, and as establishment
\n figures routinely warn of America\u2019s power grids and financial
\n systems being overtaken by e-terrorists, the US is positioning
\n itself to enact that same scenario onto others under the guise of
\n national defense.\n<\/p>\n

\n While the US gives itself the space to pre-emptively cyber-strike
\n others with impunity, the Pentagon says that any computer-based
\n attacks and hacking from foreign countries can be considered acts of war<\/a>, which could merit a \u2019use of
\n force\u2019 retaliation.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n The US Cyber Command is part of a worldwide offensive cyber
\n warfare system that includes all branches of the US military, in
\n addition to our friends in NATO \u2014 its chief, Anders Fogh
\n Rasmussen, even went as far as saying that he wants to \u201cextend
\n the definition of attacks which trigger activation of the
\n alliance to include cyber attacks.\u201d<\/i> While the US devises ways
\n to warmonger through programming code, President Obama provocatively phoned<\/a> Chinese President Xi
\n Jinping immediately after his inauguration in March to demand
\n that Beijing stop hacking, a charge China vehemently denies.
\n Obama\u2019s national security adviser, Thomas Donilon, also called
\n out China by name during a speech, lamenting how \u201cthe
\n international community cannot tolerate such activity from any
\n country.\u201d<\/i> (Except the United States, obviously.)\n<\/p>\n

\n Crying foul over China
\n<\/h2>\n

\n The Obama administration accuses Chinese hackers of waging
\n cyber-attacks on a number of US entities, including
\n billion-dollar corporations and governmental departments, and
\n Beijing has recently been charged with stealing blueprints for
\n combat aircraft as such the F\/A-18 fighter jet and the F-35 Joint
\n Strike Fighter, in addition to specs on naval vessels and missile
\n defense systems.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n \"Three<\/p>\n

\n The Chinese Defense Ministry dismissed the accusations<\/a> as ridiculous, saying that
\n the US underestimates the intelligence of the Chinese people and
\n their capacity to develop tactically competitive military technology<\/a>.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n US security experts also previously claimed that a 12-story
\n office building on the outskirts of Shanghai was the headquarters
\n of an elusive squadron of the PLA operating under the name Unit
\n 61398, tasked with attacking international computer networks and
\n engaging in espionage.\n<\/p>\n

\n Beijing claims<\/a> that findings lack technical
\n proof, because the report relied solely on suspicious IP
\n addresses that originate in China, which the Defense Ministry
\n suggests can be easily usurped by hackers outside of China. In
\n truth, there is a glaring absence of any cyber-smoking gun that
\n definitively corroborates US claims. However, it remains highly
\n plausible that Beijing would have an interest in obtaining the
\n intimate tech-specs of Washington\u2019s military hardware to reverse
\n engineer it and build more reliable defensive mechanisms for
\n itself. After all, China is being encircled by a pivoting
\n military power that has waged aggressive wars outside of
\n international law \u2014 any Beijing-backed espionage seen through
\n this perspective becomes understandable. Ironically enough, the
\n Chinese embassy in Washington claims it is a victim of computer
\n hacking that originates in the United States.\n<\/p>\n

\n Let\u2019s ask the Iranians
\n<\/h2>\n

\n Its common knowledge that Israel and the United States engineered
\n the Stuxnet virus that sabotaged Iran\u2019s nuclear facility in
\n Natanz, it was even claimed by people close to the matter that it
\n was President Obama\u2019s personal directive<\/a>. Stuxnet remains the most
\n sophisticated malware discovered thus far, the virus targets
\n industrial systems such as nuclear power plants and electrical
\n grids from a Microsoft Windows-based PC. The virus exploits
\n security gaps referred to as zero-day vulnerabilities to attack
\n specific targets; the Pentagon reportedly pays top dollar<\/a> to get its hands on such
\n programming vulnerabilities, which are the essential ingredient
\n in any cyber-weapon.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n \"An<\/p>\n

\n Upon delivery of the Stuxnet payload via USB, the malicious
\n malware manipulated the operating speed of centrifuges spinning
\n nuclear fuel to create distortions that deliberately damaged the
\n machines, while disabling emergency controls. Stuxnet took out
\n nearly 1,000 of the 5,000 centrifuges spinning uranium at the
\n facility, while numerous Iranian nuclear scientists have been
\n assassinated.\u00a0\u00a0
\n <\/p>\n

\n Even after acts of overt hostility and open sabotage, Iran\u2019s
\n response has been completely muted. If the shoe was on the other
\n foot, could the United States ever exercise the same restraint?
\n By the Pentagon\u2019s definition, it would have the legal right to
\n retaliate with force if ever found itself on the receiving end of
\n a Stuxnet-type virus.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n

\n When asked about the Stuxnet worm in a press conference, former
\n White House WMD Coordinator Gary Samore boasted<\/a>, \u201cI\u2019m glad to hear they are having
\n troubles with their centrifuge machines, and the US and its
\n allies are doing everything we can to make it more complicated<\/a>.\u201d<\/i> Never in any of the detailed
\n expos\u00c3\u00a9s published in the New York Times and elsewhere on the
\n Stuxnet episode, is there any moral or legal questioning of
\n Washington and Tel Aviv\u2019s blatantly illegal tactics; mainstream
\n reports on the subject read more like White House press
\n statements than anything that resembles journalism.\n<\/p>\n

\n Who\u2019s hacking who?
\n<\/h2>\n

\n Congress claims that poor internet security has surpassed
\n terrorism to become the single greatest threat to the homeland,
\n and ironically, US tax dollars are flowing to skilled hackers
\n affiliated with criminal groups who supply government agencies
\n with vulnerabilities in existing software programs. Because these
\n vulnerabilities are the main components of cyber-weapons,
\n security holes in widely used software remain unrepaired.
\n Reuters<\/a> has even suggested that Washington is
\n \u201cencouraging hacking and failing to disclose to software
\n companies and customers the vulnerabilities exploited by the
\n purchased hacks.\u201d\u00a0<\/i>\n<\/p>\n

\n Despite the posturing and scare tactics, US Director of National
\n Intelligence James Clapper testified<\/a> before the Senate Intelligence Committee
\n that there was only a \u201cremote chance\u201d<\/i> of a serious
\n cyber-attack on the US. Clapper also spoke about how cyber-theft
\n directly threatened \u201cAmerica\u2019s economic competitiveness and
\n innovation edge,\u201d<\/i> suggesting that the US Cyber Command serves
\n a dual economic purpose.\n<\/p>\n

\n Washington\u2019s Cyber Command takes a two-prong approach: it\u2019s
\n tasked with churning out malicious cyber-weapons like Stuxnet
\n while stringently guarding the intellectual property and data of
\n major US corporations. Claims of China being involved in hacking
\n and cyber-theft should not be dismissed off the bat, but if
\n Beijing is indeed stealing military secrets from the US, it is
\n likely motivated by genuine defensive concerns and its own IT
\n sovereignty. Just as Washington partners itself with questionable
\n figures and organizations to execute its foreign policy
\n objectives, the Pentagon\u2019s warm embrace of hackers is bound to
\n create some form of e-blowback in due time. This much is clear \u2014
\n Cyber-Imperialism is the highest stage of Capitalism \u2014 somebody
\n pass Lenin the memo.
\n <\/p>\n

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

This article originally appeared on: RT<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

<!–Nile Bowie–> Nile Bowie is a political analyst and photographer currently residing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Fresh allegations of hacking and cyber-theft between China and the United States as well as resources channeled into cyber-warfare and digital troops by both superpowers show uncertain diplomatic terrain ahead. As the Obama administration imposes gouging cuts on fundamental […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-38903","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38903"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38903\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}