{"id":387659,"date":"2018-12-04T01:18:36","date_gmt":"2018-12-04T00:18:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=387659"},"modified":"2018-12-04T01:18:36","modified_gmt":"2018-12-04T00:18:36","slug":"americans-self-contradictory-views-of-socialized-healthcare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/americans-self-contradictory-views-of-socialized-healthcare\/","title":{"rendered":"Americans&#8217; Self-Contradictory Views of Socialized Healthcare"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Majorities want single-payer, but not from the government.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Eric Zuesse<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">On December 3rd, Gallup bannered <a href=\"https:\/\/news.gallup.com\/poll\/245105\/government-favored-ensure-healthcare-not-deliver.aspx\"><span class=\"s2\">\u201cGovernment Favored to Ensure Healthcare, but Not Deliver It\u201d<\/span><\/a> and reported that 57% of Americans say \u201cIt is government&#8217;s responsibility to see that all have healthcare\u201d but only 40% of Americans want a \u201cgovernment-run\u201d healthcare system to be available to everyone who wants it. In other words: many Americans want other Americans to be forced into corporate and non-profit \u2014 privately run \u2014 healthcare. Lots of Americans are irrationally rabid against any sort of socialism, even the democratic types of socialism that exist in many European countries such as Sweden, where the quality of healthcare has been proven in international studies to be superior to America\u2019s, and where the per-person cost of healthcare is around half as high as in America. The healthcare industry and its executives and its lobbies and its paid-off politicians have plenty of libertarian fools in America who, by their political participation, make life worse for all other Americans by effectively blocking socialization of the healthcare function. Gallup\u2019s December 3rd poll also found this mental illness, libertarianism, to be especially common among Republicans: Whereas 65% of Democrats endorse universal availability of a government-run healthcare system, just 13% of Republicans do. So, Republican voters are terrific for the drug companies and the rest of the \u2018health\u2019care (actually sickness) industries.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Gallup has polled Americans on many questions about healthcare policy. One poll they published 16 May 2016, titled\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/191504\/majority-support-idea-fed-funded-healthcare-system.aspx?version=print\"><span class=\"s3\">&#8220;Majority in U.S. Support Idea of Fed-Funded Healthcare System&#8221;<\/span><\/a>, reported that 58% of Americans wanted \u201cReplacing the ACA [Obamacare] with a federally funded healthcare program providing insurance for all Americans.\u201d Only 37% opposed it. A tiny 5% had no opinion. Perhaps that was a high-water mark for the American public\u2019s support of socialization of the healthcare function in America.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">On 20 November 2014, Gallup headlined\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/179501\/majority-say-not-gov-duty-provide-healthcare.aspx?version=print\"><span class=\"s3\">&#8220;Majority Say Not Gov&#8217;t Duty to Provide\u00a0Healthcare for All\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0and reported that, \u201cFor the third consecutive year, a majority of Americans (52%) agree with the position that it is not the federal\u00a0government&#8217;s responsibility to ensure that all Americans have healthcare coverage. Prior to the start of Barack Obama&#8217;s\u00a0presidency in 2009, a majority of Americans consistently took the opposite view\u201d (that it\u2019s <i>not<\/i> government&#8217;s responsibility to see that all have healthcare). But if it\u2019s \u201cnot the federal\u00a0government&#8217;s responsibility to ensure that all Americans have healthcare coverage\u201d (presumably meaning for all basic healthcare, but not for vanity medical services such as \u201ctucks\u201d and other <i>non<\/i>-health-related medical services), then even life-saving medical care, and also essential preventive care (which lowers overall medical costs), will be available only to people who can pay for it; other people will just have to die, unless they can find someone (perhaps a relative) who is willing to pay. Of course, this type of system \u2014 the \u201cGreed is good\u201d system \u2014 will also mean that people die young and that disability-rates, and associated incapacity at work, will be high, and all of this will lower economic productivity. Welcome to the United States! (Of course, it\u2019s lots better than places such as Honduras.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Is it likely that majorities <i>really do<\/i> want single-payer, but <i>not<\/i> from the government? Hardly: a gratuitous addition of stockholders\u2019 profits into the costs for providing essential and economic-productivity-enhancing healthcare services that everyone should have access to if it\u2019s really needed (lawfully prescribed etc.) won\u2019t just distort the incentives to medical-services providers (and so reduce both health and economic productivity), but it will also waste the money of medical consumers (government or otherwise). But what about having \u2018non-profit\u2019 firms provide the single-payer services, instead of the democratically accountable government doing that? Non-profits cut out profits, and so eliminate the distortions that stockholders\u2019 wants introduce into the providing of any services (wants such as stockbrokers have, who pump the investments that pay them the highest commissions, which necessarily harms their investors). However, the top executives even of \u2018non-profit\u2019 firms can pay themselves whatever their friends who sit on their board of trustees will approve; and so a \u2018non-profit\u2019 provider, too, can be, at least to that extent, a scam. (And, of course, in an <i>entirely<\/i> free market, there is no regulation, and therefore scams will be routine; so, only crooks would want that, anyway. But all the propaganda in the U.S. <i>praises<\/i> \u201ca free market.\u201d)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">These are reasons why <a href=\"https:\/\/ourworldindata.org\/the-link-between-life-expectancy-and-health-spending-us-focus\"><span class=\"s2\">the countries that have the highest life-expectancies, and therefore the best health-outcomes, are the same as the countries that have socialized basic healthcare services, paid for normally entirely through taxes and provided to all citizens as a basic human right instead of as a privilege that\u2019s available only to individuals who can afford it<\/span><\/a>. (Of course, \u201ctucks\u201d and such get charged extra to the patient.) <b>The United States has by far the costliest health care in terms of not only what Americans pay for it but in terms of healthcare costs as a percentage of GDP, and yet the U.S. has the lowest life-expectancy of all OECD countries; the U.S. has the most-free-market healthcare, and also the worst healthcare, among all of the economically developed countries <\/b>\u2014 all (<i>except<\/i> the U.S.) of which provide guaranteed <i>basic<\/i> healthcare services to <i>all<\/i> citizens: essential services free as a right, not charged as a privilege. America\u2019s combination of the worst healthcare plus the by-far-<i>costliest<\/i> healthcare is no coincidence; and healthcare profits in America are the world\u2019s highest; so, the present American system is terrific for those stockholders (whose firms hire the lobbyists and their politicians who write America\u2019s healthcare-laws). Because basic healthcare in the United States is a privilege instead of a right, <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_countries_with_universal_health_care\"><span class=\"s2\">the U.S. is the only economically developed nation that does not have universal coverage, health insurance for 100% of its citizenry, healthcare as a guaranteed right instead of dependent upon the patient\u2019s ability-to-pay. When Barack Obama entered the White House, the uninsured rate was 14.6%; when he left office it was 10.9%; the insured rate when he started was 85.4%, and it was 89.1% when he left office. His repeated promises of \u201cuniversal coverage\u201d were blatant lies. His plan was in no way designed for \u201cuniversal coverage\u201d; that promise was a lie from the very outset<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In the OECD\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/apps.who.int\/medicinedocs\/documents\/s22177en\/s22177en.pdf\"><span class=\"s2\">\u201cHealth at a Glance 2015\u201d<\/span><\/a> (which covers 44 nations), the United States scored at or near the bottom for almost all indicators of healthcare-quality, including: Life expectancy, Access to care, Quality of care, Doctors per capita, and Hospital beds per capita. We were by far the highest on Pharmaceutical expenditure per capita. Oddly, three nations, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, were exceptionally high in both their heart-disease death-rates and their cancer death-rates; plus their life-expectancies were even lower than America\u2019s, and their most carefully medically calculated measured \u201cQuality of care\u201d rankings were also generally as bad as the United States. However, in the latest calculated year, which is shown there, which was 2013, \u201cHealth expenditure per capita\u201d (p. 165) was U.S. $8,713; Switzerland $6,325; UK $3,235; Czech Republic $2,040, Slovak Republic $2,010; and Hungary $1,719. So, America\u2019s was over four times as high as the healthcare costs of some of the other countries in its class \u2014 i.e. in the overall worst class. Generally the top-performing nations were: Japan, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Italy, and Switzerland. Switzerland was the second-highest in cost-of-care ($6,325), right below the United States. Norway was third-costliest, $5,862. Sweden was fifth-costliest, $4,904. Japan was 14th-costliest, $3,713. Finland was 17th-costliest, $3,442. Italy was twentieth-costliest, $3,077. <b>The average OECD cost for all the 44 nations was $3,453<\/b>, which was <b>less than half<\/b> of America\u2019s obscene $8,713. Whether Obamacare changes any of those U.S. rankings is too early to tell. However, the U.S. is <a href=\"https:\/\/ourworldindata.org\/the-link-between-life-expectancy-and-health-spending-us-focus\"><span class=\"s2\">such an extreme \u201coutlier\u201d so that our healthcare system would need to be replaced root-and-branch in order to be competitive with any other nation\u2019s in terms of delivering value-for-the-money, instead of rip-off (which is its existing outlier status \u2014 unparalleled by any other country\u2019s, for delivering lousy value)<\/span><\/a>. It is so bottom-of-the-barrel, that it is below the barrel. This is by far the world\u2019s most-free-market healthcare system, but our government spends more per-capita on it than do other nations\u2019 governments that pay almost all of their citizens\u2019 healthcare costs. Wow! In fact, as shown in the chart \u201c9.3. Health expenditure as a share of GDP, 2013 (or nearest year)\u201d on page 167 of that OECD report, the U.S. is the <b>only<\/b> country where the private sector pays more of the nation\u2019s healthcare costs than does the public sector, the government. America is a libertarian\u2019s paradise. No other nation comes anywhere close to that degree of non-governmental providing of the healthcare function. Every other nation has socialized the healthcare-function to a vastly higher extent than the U.S. has. That\u2019s how <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/eric-zuesse\/jimmy-carter-is-correct-t_b_7922788.html\"><span class=\"s2\">corrupt<\/span><\/a> America is.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Lots of other countries are more corrupt in the pettier forms of corruption such as bribery, but perhaps few match America\u2019s higher-level, and far more complex, systemic corruption. It benefits only the super-rich, and their lobbyists and other agents.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic\/dp\/1880026090\/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1339027537&amp;sr=8-9\"><span class=\"s5\"><i>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,<\/i> and of<\/span><span class=\"s6\"> <i>\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B007Q1H4EG\"><span class=\"s5\"><i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s4\">.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Majorities want single-payer, but not from the government. Eric Zuesse On December 3rd, Gallup bannered \u201cGovernment Favored to Ensure Healthcare, but Not Deliver It\u201d and reported that 57% of Americans say \u201cIt is government&#8217;s responsibility to see that all have healthcare\u201d but only 40% of Americans want a \u201cgovernment-run\u201d healthcare system to be available to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":387662,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,519],"tags":[29,535,773,853,903,6889,540,755],"class_list":{"0":"post-387659","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-newswire","9":"tag-democrats","10":"tag-global-news","11":"tag-health-2","12":"tag-health-care","13":"tag-libertarianism","14":"tag-medicine","15":"tag-republicans","16":"tag-usa"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=387659"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387659\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387663,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387659\/revisions\/387663"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/387662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=387659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=387659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=387659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}